Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Captain Jacobs

Tewea, known by his English name Captain Jacobs (died September 8, 1756), was a chief who allied with French forces during the , leading warriors in raids against British colonial settlements along 's frontiers. His village at Kittanning served as a base for such operations, including the destructive 1756 attack on Fort Granville, where defenders were killed or captured and structures burned after stores ignited. Jacobs earned his epithet through interactions with British traders and officials, reflecting his status as a prominent war leader resisting territorial encroachment by provincial militias and settlers. He met his end during the Kittanning Expedition, a retaliatory raid by approximately 300 provincials under John Armstrong, who destroyed the village, freed captives, and killed Jacobs in fierce cabin-to-cabin fighting that exploded his home's stored . This event temporarily disrupted raiding capacity in the region, though it failed to halt broader allied Indigenous-French offensives, highlighting the raid's tactical success amid strategic limitations against dispersed warrior networks.

Background and Lenape Heritage

Origins and Name

Captain Jacobs, born Tewea, was a chief of the (also known as ) people, an Algonquian-speaking Native American tribe historically centered in the Mid-Atlantic region before significant westward migrations in the . His identity placed him within a matrilineal society where often derived from prowess and ties, though specific details of his early or birthplace remain undocumented in primary historical records. The moniker "Captain Jacobs" originated from interactions with colonial settlers, specifically Pennsylvania landowner Arthur Buchanan, who bestowed the name upon observing Tewea's physical stature and features, likening him to a "burly " from Cumberland County. This anglicized title reflected colonial practices of assigning European-style ranks and surnames to leaders for diplomatic or identificatory purposes, a convention common during frontier negotiations and treaties. Tewea adopted or was persistently referred to by this name in colonial correspondence and military dispatches, distinguishing him from other figures amid escalating conflicts. Prior to his prominence at Kittanning, Tewea had engaged in land transactions near , indicating early ties to areas contested between groups and expanding settlements, though these interactions predated his full alignment with French-allied forces.

Rise to Chieftainship at Kittanning

Captain Jacobs, known by his Lenape name Tewea, emerged as a leader among the () during the westward migration of their bands to the Allegheny Valley in the , a period marked by displacement from eastern lands due to dominance and colonial pressures. Kittanning, meaning "at the great river," was established as a principal village by around 1725 on the east bank of the , approximately 50 miles northeast of , serving as a hub for and subclans seeking autonomy and resources. Jacobs, tied to these groups through and residence, contributed to its organization, transforming it from a scattered into a fortified community resistant to external encroachments. By 1740, Jacobs had attained sufficient stature to represent the Allegheny Delawares at a conference from August 1 to 6, where he, alongside Shikellamy and Sassoonan, addressed grievances over exploitative trader prices, unlicensed rum sales, and overhunting that depleted local game. This diplomatic engagement highlighted his role in advocating for western Delaware interests against both authorities and the , who claimed overlordship. His prior residence near Lewistown, where he sold lands to figures like Colonel Buchanan, suggests an initial phase of accommodation with colonists before tensions escalated. Jacobs' rise to chieftainship at Kittanning crystallized through demonstrated prowess in fare rather than formal hereditary succession, aligning with traditions prioritizing merit in defense and raiding. Following General Edward Braddock's defeat on , , he coordinated war parties from Kittanning, including the October 16 attack on Penn's Creek that killed or captured over 20 settlers, establishing the village as a base for retaliatory operations. Accounts describe him as a recent arrival to the Allegheny country by the mid-1750s, yet his rapid ascent alongside leaders like Shingas and Pisquetomen reflected effective mobilization of warriors amid alliances and frontier vulnerabilities. Some historical records indicate Jacobs succeeded Custaloga as a principal chief, though specifics remain undocumented; his authority peaked in 1755–1756, when Kittanning housed captives from raids like Fort McCord (early 1756) and served as a strategic depot, underscoring his command over an estimated 20–30 warriors in coordinated strikes. This military leadership, rather than diplomatic inheritance, cemented his position, enabling Kittanning's role in the Delaware's brief assertion of independence before colonial reprisals.

Pre-War Relations with British Colonists

Land Interactions and Treaties

In 1754, as British colonial expansion pushed into the Ohio Valley, Captain Jacobs, serving as a prominent war chief at Kittanning, encountered direct overtures from traders seeking land acquisitions near the village. Robert Buchanan, an established Indian trader with prior connections to Jacobs, negotiated the purchase of territory adjacent to Ohesson (likely referring to a locale near present-day Kishacoquillas Valley), leveraging gifts and alcohol to facilitate the deal despite Jacobs' initial reluctance to alienate ancestral lands. This transaction reflected broader wariness toward colonial encroachments, stemming from earlier fraudulent cessions in eastern , such as the 1737 , which had displaced many groups westward without their full consent or compensation. However, the agreement soured rapidly when Buchanan attempted to introduce settlers onto the purchased land, prompting Jacobs to express fury and demand their immediate evacuation, viewing the move as a violation of the terms and an aggressive intrusion into sovereignty. This incident underscored the fragility of pre-war land dealings, where informal sales—often influenced by trade goods rather than equitable negotiation—fueled resentment among Ohio Valley leaders like Jacobs and his ally Shingas, who prioritized defending unceded territories against unchecked settlement. No formal multilateral treaties directly involving Captain Jacobs are recorded from this period; his interactions remained localized and transactional, contrasting with earlier provincial agreements like the 1718 Treaty of Albany, which intermediaries had imposed on lands without tribal ratification. These tensions over land control prefigured the escalation to hostilities as colonial pressures intensified.

Shift to Hostility

Captain Jacobs, originally named for his resemblance to a by Buchanan after selling lands near Lewistown, initially professed strong friendship toward colonists and engaged in amicable interactions, including land transactions in Pennsylvania's frontier regions. In 1753, during George Washington's diplomatic mission to the Ohio Valley, Jacobs hosted Washington at McKees Rocks and invited him to a council at , indicating ongoing neutrality or alignment with interests amid rising Franco- tensions. This posture shifted decisively around as traders and agents intensified efforts to court Delaware leaders against encroaching settlements in the , where colonial expansion—fueled by ventures like the —threatened Native lands and autonomy. Jacobs, among the first Delaware chiefs to be swayed, abandoned professed loyalty to the and aligned with forces, transforming Kittanning into a hub for hostile Delaware war parties. Underlying grievances, including the Delaware's forced westward migration after the 1737 fraudulently ceded vast tracts in eastern , eroded trust in colonial treaties, making promises of support and arms more appealing. By early 1755, ahead of major hostilities, Jacobs' redirection enabled coordinated raids, marking the end of pre-war cordiality and his emergence as a key adversary to settlements. This transition reflected not isolated persuasion but a broader pivot, driven by causal pressures of demographic displacement—British colonists outnumbered French 20-to-1 in by mid-century—and strategic incentives from French alliances offering material aid over British land encroachments.

Role in the French and Indian War

Alliance with French Forces

Captain Jacobs, whose Lenape name was Tewea, aligned his warriors with forces amid escalating colonial encroachments on Lenape lands in the Ohio Valley during the mid-1750s. Resentful of surveyors and settlers violating treaties like the 1736 agreement, which had placed Lenape under oversight while limiting expansion, Jacobs turned to traders and commanders at for support. agents supplied gunpowder, muskets, and incentives, fostering a pragmatic based on mutual opposition to dominance rather than ideological affinity. This partnership materialized in coordinated raids following the French victory at Fort Necessity in July 1754, which emboldened war parties. By early 1755, and fellow chief Shingas led Delaware contingents armed with weapons, targeting frontier settlements in and to disrupt British supply lines and exact revenge for land losses. officers, including those under Lienard de Beaujeu, integrated scouts into their strategies, providing Jacobs' group with intelligence and reinforcements for ambushes. A pivotal demonstration of the alliance occurred during the July 9, 1755, , where Jacobs' warriors, numbering among the approximately 300 Indians allied with 600 French and Canadian troops, ambushed General Edward Braddock's 1,300-man force en route to . Concealed in the woods, the allied raiders inflicted over 900 casualties, including Braddock himself, using French-supplied flintlocks and tactics that exploited terrain advantages. This success, attributed partly to Jacobs' leadership in flanking maneuvers, solidified his reputation and intensified French-Lenape collaboration, with captives from the engagement paraded at to demoralize prisoners. Throughout 1755–1756, the alliance enabled Jacobs to launch over a dozen raids from his Kittanning base, often with detachments, capturing scalps and prisoners valued at French bounties of 100–150 livres each. French diplomatic overtures, including gifts of and promises of territorial respect, contrasted with British aggression, sustaining Jacobs' commitment until British reprisals targeted his village. This cooperation, while effective in short-term frontier devastation, reflected agency in leveraging European rivalries to counter demographic pressures from 50,000 British colonists versus fewer settlers.

Leadership in Raids on Settlements

Captain Jacobs emerged as a key war leader following the British defeat at the on July 9, 1755, where contemporary accounts attribute his participation alongside other warriors in ambushing General Edward Braddock's expedition, contributing to heavy colonial casualties exceeding 900 killed or wounded. From his base at Kittanning, Jacobs organized and directed multiple war parties targeting frontier settlements, coordinating with allied and French forces to exploit the post-Braddock vulnerability of isolated outposts and wagon trains. These raids, numbering in the dozens between late 1755 and mid-1756, typically involved 20 to 100 warriors employing , resulting in the deaths of hundreds of settlers and the capture of scores more for ransom, adoption, or labor, while disrupting supply lines and forcing evacuations along the Susquehanna and Juniata valleys. In early 1756, Jacobs personally led a war party that attacked Fort McCord near the Maryland border on April 1, burning the makeshift stockade, killing 12 defenders including Captain Lazarus Lowry, and taking numerous captives amid reports of and to intimidate survivors. Concurrently, on the same date, forces under his command ambushed a provincial supply convoy at , killing over 12 militiamen and capturing survivors in a skirmish that highlighted the effectiveness of Native concealment and rapid assault against poorly defended British movements. Jacobs' strategies emphasized surprise and mobility, often staging from Kittanning as a forward base supplied with French arms and powder, which enabled sustained operations that colonial records describe as causing and economic hardship, with settlers fleeing eastward and provincial authorities offering bounties for Indian scalps in response. These actions positioned as a primary target for British retaliation, with Governor Robert Hunter Morris citing his raids as justification for expeditions aimed at neutralizing Kittanning's role as a hub for such incursions, underscoring the chief's tactical acumen in leveraging terrain and alliances to prosecute against expanding colonial encroachments.

The Fort Granville Raid

Planning and Execution

The raid on Fort Granville, occurring between July 30 and August 1, 1756, was orchestrated by Jacobs, a war chief, in coordination with officer François Coulon de Villiers. Jacobs' forces, comprising approximately 100 warriors, allied with around 50 soldiers, exploited intelligence on the fort's weakened state after Captain Edward Ward departed with 24 men on July 30 to aid settlers in Sherman's Valley, leaving a of about 24 defenders, including civilians. This opportunistic timing followed scouting of the area, as raiders had been observed hovering nearby earlier in July, avoiding direct assault on the fully manned stockade equipped with swivel guns. Execution commenced on July 31, with ' warriors advancing stealthily through a nearby to evade detection, then launching incendiary arrows to ignite the fort's wooden . The fire rapidly created breaches in the defenses, killing Lieutenant Edward Armstrong and wounding others among the defenders, who suffered two fatalities overall. By August 1, with the structure ablaze and supplies destroyed, Sergeant surrendered the fort, leading to the capture of 22 men, three women, and several children. The attackers torched the remaining buildings before withdrawing, taking captives northward to villages like Kittanning or further to posts in the Illinois country for potential ransom, while Turner was bound, tortured with heated gun barrels, and executed on ' orders. This tactical use of terrain, fire, and numerical superiority underscored ' leadership in frontier warfare, resulting in a complete French-Indian victory without losses on their side.

Casualties and Captives

The attack on Fort Granville on August 2, 1756, resulted in the deaths of Lieutenant Edward Armstrong, the fort's commander, and one enlisted soldier during the initial fighting, after which the reduced garrison surrendered. Three additional soldiers sustained wounds. The raiders, primarily Delaware warriors under Captain Jacobs with French support, captured 22 men, 3 women, and an unspecified number of children who had taken refuge within or near the fort; these prisoners were marched northward toward Indian villages, including Kittanning. Among the captives was Sergeant John Turner, who was later tortured and burned at the stake by his Delaware captors at Kittanning as retribution for the destruction of an earlier Indian raiding party. Most other captives were eventually transported to French-held Fort de Chartres in the Illinois Country, where some were ransomed and returned to British colonial authorities.

Kittanning Expedition and Demise

British Planning and Approach

In response to the destruction of Fort Granville on July 30-31, 1756, by Delaware warriors under (Tewea), which resulted in the death of Edward Armstrong—brother of the expedition's commander—Pennsylvania colonial authorities initiated plans for a retaliatory strike against Kittanning, the primary village serving as a base for raids on settlements. Robert Hunter Morris authorized the expedition, bypassing legislative delays caused by Quaker and factional disputes between proprietary and antiproprietary interests, by invoking royal charter powers to raise volunteer forces. The operation aimed to disrupt enemy operations, kill key warriors including Jacobs, liberate an estimated 100 captives, and restore morale amid ongoing panic from Indian incursions following Braddock's defeat in 1755. Lieutenant Colonel John Armstrong, a surveyor and militia officer from Carlisle, was selected to lead approximately 307 men drawn from the Second Battalion of the Pennsylvania Regiment, primarily volunteers assembled from forts in Cumberland County. Intelligence was gathered from scouts such as traders and John Patten, who provided details on Kittanning's location about 40 miles east of modern , as well as from John Baker, a former English captive who described the village's layout, defenses, and warrior numbers, ultimately serving as guide. Armstrong opted for the challenging Frankstown path over alternatives like Raystown to maintain surprise, emphasizing secrecy through a rapid march of roughly 150 miles along the Kittanning Trail, departing around August 30, 1756, with strict orders to avoid detection by foraging parties or French-allied forces. The strategic approach prioritized a dawn with flanking maneuvers to overwhelm before reinforcements could arrive, focusing on structures, targeting combatants, and securing prisoners rather than prolonged . Provisions were limited to sustain mobility, with detachments left to guard supply lines and camps, reflecting calculations of the risks posed by the deep penetration into hostile without support. This provincial initiative marked the only major offensive by Pennsylvania militia during the early war years, driven by urgent demands despite inadequate provincial funding and coordination with British regulars.

Battle at Kittanning

On the morning of , 1756, Lieutenant Colonel Armstrong's of approximately 300 militiamen launched a dawn on Kittanning, approaching from the east and south to envelop the village along the . The attackers divided into parties to prevent escape, catching most residents off guard as many warriors were absent on hunting or raiding parties; numerous villagers fled into surrounding woods, some carrying white captives. Captain , the leader who had directed raids including the recent destruction of Fort Granville, organized a determined defense with a handful of followers, firing from the shelter of cabins to inflict casualties on the advancing . The fiercest fighting centered on ' own , where he and his family—reportedly including his wife assisting in reloading muskets—resisted surrender demands and continued shooting until the structure was set ablaze by the attackers, igniting stored gunpowder and causing explosions audible miles away. As flames consumed the building, and his family attempted to escape by leaping from an upper story but were shot down and killed, with militiamen scalping ' body as a of the engagement. The battle lasted several hours, with the torching much of despite sustaining heavier losses than the defenders; Armstrong's command reported 17 killed, 13 wounded, and 19 missing (some of whom returned later), while were lower, estimated at 5 to 14 including and his relatives, though exact figures remain uncertain due to the chaos and escapes. During the fighting, at least 11 English captives were rescued from , though four escaped during the subsequent and two were recaptured only to face by pursuing Delawares. Armstrong himself was wounded in the early in the action but directed operations from a ridge, ordering withdrawal as reinforcements from approached.

Death and Village Destruction

During the surprise dawn assault on Kittanning village on September 8, 1756, Lieutenant Colonel John Armstrong's militiamen targeted the residence of , identified as a primary defender due to his role in prior raids. The attackers set fire to ' cabin, which reportedly contained stored gunpowder that caused an explosion, forcing occupants to attempt escape. Jacobs' wife and son emerged first from the burning structure and were shot dead by militiamen as they fled toward nearby cornfields. Captain Jacobs then leaped from the cabin, sustaining multiple gunshot wounds that proved fatal; he was subsequently scalped by Armstrong's forces. His death was confirmed through the recovery of his scalp and effects, marking the elimination of a key leader responsible for attacks like the . Following Jacobs' demise, Armstrong's command systematically destroyed the village, igniting all structures and surrounding crops to deny resources to remaining inhabitants and potential raiders. The raid yielded eleven scalps in total and facilitated the of eleven , though at the cost of seventeen militiamen killed and thirteen wounded. This scorched-earth approach rendered Kittanning uninhabitable, disrupting operations in the region.

Aftermath and Historical Assessment

Immediate Frontier Impact

The destruction of Kittanning on September 8, 1756, and the death of Captain Jacobs, a prominent leader responsible for raids such as the February 1, 1756, attack on Fort Granville, provided an immediate psychological boost to Pennsylvania's settlers, who had endured over a year of relentless Native American incursions following General Edward Braddock's defeat in July 1755. Contemporary accounts described the raid as a rare offensive success that restored confidence among colonists, with John Armstrong hailed as the " of Kittanning" for eliminating a key staging ground for attacks on settlements along the Susquehanna and Juniata rivers. This morale uplift was evidenced by increased volunteer enlistments in provincial forces and public celebrations, countering the widespread fear that had led to abandoned farms and fortified blockhouses. Tactically, the raid disrupted Kittanning's role as a supply hub allied with French forces at , as Armstrong's 307-man force burned the village, its crops, and stores, while rescuing at least 11 captives, including women and children held since prior s. ' death—scalped after he reportedly detonated in defiance—deprived raiders of a skilled tactician, temporarily hampering coordinated strikes from that locus, though many warriors escaped to regroup. The operation's success in destroying without full-scale retaliation in the immediate aftermath pushed surviving militants northward, reducing the village's capacity to launch expeditions for several months amid autumn shortages. However, this frontier respite was fleeting; Indian raids intensified in the ensuing weeks, with reports of fiercer assaults on outlying settlements, suggesting the aggravated rather than quelled hostilities by provoking reprisals without a broader to exploit the disruption. Pennsylvania officials noted that while captives' recovery offered tangible relief to affected families, the lack of follow-up expeditions allowed dispersed groups to sustain pressure, underscoring the 's limited strategic depth despite its immediate tactical gains.

Legacy in Warfare and Narratives

The death of Captain Jacobs on September 8, 1756, during the Kittanning Expedition marked a shift in colonial responses to Delaware raiding tactics, demonstrating the feasibility of offensive provincial raids deep into Native territories as a counter to . Jacobs' leadership in ambushes and village strikes, such as the July 1756 assault on Fort Granville that killed 24 defenders and captured others, had exemplified the effectiveness of hit-and-run operations, which inflicted over 1,000 colonial casualties in alone from 1755 to 1756 and prompted settler evacuations. The expedition's destruction of Kittanning disrupted operations from that base, freeing 11 captives and eliminating a key staging point for raids, though quantitative assessments show Delaware incursions rising from 78 in the 15 months prior to 88 in the following period, albeit with reduced settler fatalities due to frontier depopulation. This event foreshadowed broader adoption of irregular and scorched-earth methods by colonial forces, including village burnings and targeted leadership strikes, later formalized in British campaigns under Jeffrey Amherst. In narratives of frontier conflict, Jacobs was depicted in colonial accounts as a primary architect of terror, with officials lauding his demise as vengeance for mutilations and abductions during raids, including the Granville attack where bodies were reportedly scalped and dismembered. Contemporary celebrations included a commemorative medal for expedition leader John Armstrong and the naming of Armstrong County after him, framing the raid as a morale-boosting triumph that ended Jacobs' personal campaigns. Historians like James P. Meyers credit it with temporary cessation of threats from Jacobs specifically, while others, including Daniel P. Barr, assess it as a strategic draw that failed to destroy stockpiled munitions or liberate an estimated 100 captives, instead provoking intensified reprisals and highlighting the limits of punitive expeditions absent sustained military presence. Modern reevaluations emphasize its psychological value in rallying provincial defenses over decisive wartime alteration, underscoring causal dynamics where localized victories yielded short-term deterrence but perpetuated cycles of retaliation in irregular frontier warfare.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Pennsylvania's Awakening: the Kittanning Raid of 1756 - Journals
    To Pennsylvanians, killing Captain Jacobs (Tewea) proved one of the outstanding accomplishments of the expedition. So named because of his sup- posed ...
  2. [2]
    Kittanning Expedition Battle Facts and Summary
    Oct 17, 2025 · Although many Indians fled, Captain Jacobs, who orchestrated the attack on Fort Granville, fought until killed. Armstrong's command burned ...
  3. [3]
    Win, Lose, or Draw: The Battle of Kittanning
    Captain Jacobs, a Delaware who led the attack, proclaimed that "he cou'd take any Fort that wou'd Catch Fire." The attackers were able to set the fort's ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Victory at Kittanning? Reevaluating the Impact of Armstrong's Raid ...
    After the death of Captain Jacobs, Armstrong retired to the ridge east of Kittanning to seek medical attention. The hill had become a rallying point for wounded ...<|separator|>
  5. [5]
    Tewea Lenni Lenape (-1756) | WikiTree FREE Family Tree
    Sep 21, 2024 · Tewea, better known by his English name Captain Jacobs, (d. September 8, 1756) was a Lenape chief during the French and Indian War.[1]: 174 ...
  6. [6]
    Captain Jacobs | Military Wiki - Fandom
    Captain Jacobs (died September 8, 1756) was a Delaware (Lenape) chief during the French and Indian War. His real name was Tewea. Jacobs received his English ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] The emergence and decline of the Delaware Indian nation in ...
    Captain Jacobs led a war party out of Kittanning. The party burned a private fort named Fort. McCord, killed twelve, and took many captives.81 In July, a ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] the indian chiefs of pennsylvania
    The early Indian history of Pennsylvania is, in many respects, of more interest and importance in the development of Anglo-.
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Braddock's Defeat and the Martial Liberation of the Western - Journals
    Turtle-Turkey stronghold of Kittanning, Shingas, Pisquetomen, and the principal warriors Captain Jacobs (Tewea), a recent arrival to the. Allegheny Country ...<|separator|>
  10. [10]
    The Walking Purchase - Delaware Tribe of Indians
    Jun 27, 2013 · In Lenape history there is the story of the “Walking Purchase” which took place in 1737. William Penn had always dealt fairly with the Lenape, ...Missing: Tewea interactions British<|separator|>
  11. [11]
    Six Nations land cessions - Wikipedia
    The Six Nations land cessions were a series of land cessions by the Haudenosaunee and Lenape to Europeans during the late 17th and 18th centuries.
  12. [12]
    [PDF] History of the early settlement of the Juniata Valley:
    ... Captain Jacobs had always professed great friendship to- ward the Britishcolonists; but he was among the very first won over by the French. He became very ...
  13. [13]
    Battle of Kittanning - Carothers-Carruthers.com
    After a combined force of French and Delaware Indians, led by Captain Jacobs, destroyed Fort Granville in June 1756, taking a number of prisoners back to their ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA HISTORICAL MAGAZINE - Journals
    services rendered the Province and the English cause during the French and Indian War. ... of the Province, Captain Jacobs, the Kittanning Delaware. Chief, ...Missing: background relations
  15. [15]
    Captain Jacobs. Delaware war chief. He assisted in the ... - Facebook
    Captain Jacobs. Delaware war chief. He assisted in the rout of Braddock's army on the Monongahela in 1755. Jacobs led raids against PA and VA settlements...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] The End of the Struggle for the Upper Ohio in the Seven Years' War, 1
    128 Names like Captain Jacobs (Tewea) and Shingas became legendary as the number of ... Bemino, and Tasucamin (a signer of the Walking Purchase). Several others ...<|separator|>
  17. [17]
    Dauphin County and the French and Indian War
    Jan 14, 2022 · King Shinges, as he was called, and Captain Jacobs were supposed to have been the principal instigators of them, and a reward of seven hundred ...Missing: background | Show results with:background
  18. [18]
    In 1756, British forces attacked and burned the Lenape village at ...
    Apr 6, 2022 · [20] Shingas and Captain Jacobs launched dozens of Shawnee and Delaware raids against English settlements,[21] killing and capturing ...
  19. [19]
    The Forbes Expedition - Bridgeville Area Historical Society
    Apr 4, 2020 · The Battle of Sideling Hill, April 1, 1756, was a bloody encounter between Delawares led by Captain Jacobs and Pennsylvania militia led by ...
  20. [20]
    The Fall of Fort Granville - The Pennsylvania Rambler
    May 29, 2019 · Fort Granville was erected by George Croghan in December 1755. The fort was midway between Patterson's Fort in Mexico, Pennsylvania, and Fort Shirley near ...Missing: execution | Show results with:execution
  21. [21]
    Fort Granville, Pennsylvania - Legends of America
    It was named for John Carteret, the Earl of Granville. On July 22, 1756, the French and their Indian allies challenged the fort and demanded its surrender.
  22. [22]
    Fort Granville Battle Facts and Summary | American Battlefield Trust
    Oct 17, 2025 · The victorious Indians tortured Turner before killing him and then took their captives to the Illinois country where the French ransomed them.Missing: Jacobs execution<|separator|>
  23. [23]
    Fort Granville Road | Elizabeth V. and George F. Gardner Library
    Raiding parties hovered in the vicinity during July 1756, biding their time, unwilling to attempt an open attack on a manned fort armed with swivel guns.
  24. [24]
    ff23.html
    The attack upon Fort Granville was made in harvest time of the year 1756. The Fort at this time was commanded by Lieut. Armstrong, a brother of General ...<|separator|>
  25. [25]
    French and Indians Attack and Burn Fort Granville, August 1, 1756
    Aug 1, 2024 · French and Indians Attack and Burn Fort Granville, August 1, 1756 ... The French and Indians captured twenty-two men, three women and a number of ...
  26. [26]
  27. [27]
    Raid On Kittanning - Frontier Partisans
    Jul 17, 2024 · Not Captain Jacobs though. He was trapped in his cabin, from which he delivered gunfire and defiance. The militiamen threatened to set the cabin ...
  28. [28]
    Kittanning Expedition | Military Wiki - Fandom
    The commander's brother, Lieutenant Colonel John Armstrong, immediately organized an expedition against Kittanning in response. Raid.Missing: planning | Show results with:planning<|separator|>
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Unlimited and Irregular Warfare in the Colonial Military Tradition
    Jul 26, 1999 · Amherst in effect sanctioned the colonial Anglo-American way of war. ... Americans designed the Kittanning raid as much to avenge earlier Delaware.