Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Civil Service Retirement System

The Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) is a defined , contributory plan established under the Civil Service Retirement Act, effective August 1, 1920, to provide retirement, , and survivor annuities for eligible federal civilian employees hired before January 1, 1987. Participants contribute 7, 7.5, or 8 percent of their basic pay depending on hire date and position, with employing agencies providing matching funds, while voluntary contributions up to 10 percent of pay can enhance annuities. Annuities are calculated using a formula based on length of creditable service and the employee's high-three average salary, yielding 1.5 percent per year for the first five years, 1.75 percent for the next five, and 2 percent thereafter, capped at 80 percent of high-three pay absent adjustments for unused or reductions. Eligibility for voluntary retirement includes reaching age 62 with five years of service, age 60 with 20 years, or age 55 with 30 years, alongside provisions for special categories like officers and provisions for deferred, discontinued, or annuities. Unlike the (FERS), which succeeded CSRS for new hires to integrate with Social Security, CSRS employees generally do not pay Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI) taxes on federal earnings, though Hospital Insurance taxes apply at 1.45 percent; a tax-deferred is available without agency matching contributions. Survivor benefits typically provide 55 percent of the basic to eligible spouses or dependent children, with corresponding reductions to the retiree's if elected. The system's financing through the Retirement and Disability Fund has encountered long-term actuarial shortfalls, as employee and agency contributions historically cover only a portion of liabilities, necessitating appropriations from general revenues amid debates over sustainability and proposed reforms. As of 2025, ongoing ional efforts to address federal budget constraints have included proposals to adjust calculations or cost-of-living adjustments for CSRS annuitants, reflecting fiscal pressures from unfunded obligations exceeding contributions and investment returns.

History

Establishment and Expansion (1920–1980s)

The Civil Service Retirement Act of 1920 (P.L. 66-215), signed into law on May 22, 1920, and effective August 1, 1920, created the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) as the first comprehensive for civilian federal employees, aimed at promoting workforce stability and retention in the . Initially, coverage extended to most executive branch civilians but excluded members of , active-duty , judicial officers, and certain temporary or part-time workers, with employee contributions set at 5% of salary matched partially by agency funds under a pay-as-you-go structure. The system's design drew from earlier state-level and models but prioritized federal-specific needs, such as addressing high turnover rates observed in pre-World War I data. Subsequent amendments broadened CSRS scope through the mid-20th century. , such as No. 8083 in , extended provisions to additional roles, while the 1942 amendments (P.L. 77-431) introduced disability retirement eligibility for employees with at least five years of service unable to perform duties due to medical conditions, marking a shift toward more protective benefits amid wartime labor demands. Further expansions in the incorporated survivor annuities for eligible dependents and refined rules, covering groups like certain legislative branch staff by 1956, thereby increasing participation and aligning CSRS with evolving demographics post-World War II. By the late , CSRS encompassed roughly 2.7 million active federal civilian employees, paralleling the growth in staffing from under 1 million in 1940 to peaks near 3 million. Annuitant rolls expanded to 1.2 million by , up 20% from early-decade levels, driven by maturing cohorts and liberalized early options. Demographic pressures, including life expectancy rises from 54 years in 1920 to 73.9 years by 1980, extended annuity durations beyond actuarial assumptions embedded in the original funding model, contributing to emerging unfunded liabilities as contributions failed to fully prefund longer post- lifespans under the pay-as-you-go framework.

Replacement by FERS and Legacy Status

The replaced the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) for federal employees entering covered service on or after January 1, 1987, pursuant to the Federal Employees' Retirement System Act of 1986. This shift addressed CSRS's structural deficiencies, including its exclusion of participants from Social Security coverage, which created fiscal imbalances as federal retirement obligations grew without corresponding contributions to the broader Social Security system. CSRS's defined-benefit model imposed escalating long-term costs on the government, projected to strain federal budgets amid demographic pressures like an aging workforce and longer lifespans, rendering the system unsustainable without reform. Employees hired before 1987 generally retained CSRS coverage, though those entering service from January 1, 1984, to December 31, 1986, had the option to elect FERS during an open enrollment period, often under CSRS provisions for hybrid treatment. This preserved CSRS as a for pre-1987 cohorts, ensuring continuity for vested participants while transitioning new hires to FERS's three-tiered structure—an , Social Security, and —to align federal benefits with private-sector norms and distribute costs more equitably. By 2023, CSRS annuitants formed a shrinking but substantial legacy group, with employee annuitants totaling around 1.1 million amid overall retiree numbers exceeding 2.2 million, as FERS enrollment drove growth in post-1987 retirees. CSRS's pure defined-benefit emphasis yields higher average monthly annuities—typically over twice the FERS basic annuity—due to fuller reliance on agency-funded pensions without offsetting Social Security integration, though this legacy status perpetuates higher per-annuitant fiscal burdens compared to FERS's shared-risk model.

Eligibility and Retirement Options

Voluntary Retirement Requirements

Eligibility for voluntary retirement under the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) requires meeting specific age and creditable thresholds to commence an immediate, unreduced . Employees must attain age 55 with at least 30 years of , age 60 with at least 20 years of , or age 62 with at least 5 years of . These criteria ensure sufficient career length to qualify for full benefits without age-based reductions, which apply if retiring earlier under discontinued provisions. An additional prerequisite is that the employee must have been covered under CSRS during at least one of the two years immediately preceding , emphasizing in the retirement system's . This rule excludes breaks in federal civilian service that might otherwise credit toward total years but disqualify immediate commencement. Special occupational categories, such as officers, firefighters, and air traffic controllers, are subject to distinct lower thresholds (e.g., age 50 with 20 years), but voluntary requirements apply to non-specialized positions. Historical patterns indicate that voluntary CSRS retirees typically exceeded the minimum service thresholds, with average service lengths for normal retirements surpassing 30 years by the and an average of approximately 61.5 years, as many deferred eligibility beyond the earliest option. This reflects employees often accumulating longer tenures before opting for , aligning with the system's design for career workers.

Deferred, Disability, and Survivor Benefits

Under the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS), deferred retirement provides a postponed annuity for eligible former employees who separate from federal service before meeting voluntary retirement criteria but accumulate sufficient creditable service. Eligibility requires at least 5 years of creditable federal civilian service, with the annuity commencing unreduced at age 62. Employees apply using OPM Form 1496A, and the benefit is computed under the standard CSRS formula based on high-3 average salary and total creditable service at separation, without early claiming reductions applicable to voluntary retirements. Unlike voluntary options, deferred annuities do not permit earlier commencement, ensuring preservation of full actuarial value for those exiting mid-career. Disability retirement under CSRS safeguards employees unable to perform useful and efficient due to a medical condition expected to last at least one year. To qualify, individuals must have at least 5 years of creditable and become while employed in a CSRS-covered position, with the agency certifying that no or reassignment within the same grade and commuting area is feasible. Applications must be filed before separation or within one year after, using SF 2801 and supporting medical documentation via SF 3112, submitted to the employing agency or directly to OPM if separated. The computation yields the higher of the earned —using the general of 1.5% of high-3 for the first 5 years of plus 1.75% thereafter—or a guaranteed minimum, defined as the lesser of 40% of high-3 or the general applied to projected to age 60. This minimum applies until age 62, after which the recomputes under the standard based on actual age and ; pure CSRS annuitants face no Social Security offset, distinguishing the system from FERS, where benefits incorporate Social Security subtractions. Survivor benefits under CSRS provide annuities to eligible spouses and dependent children upon the of a retiree or eligible employee, emphasizing spousal protection without Social Security integration for those with pure CSRS . Eligible surviving s receive up to 55% of the retiree's unreduced accrued if the maximum election was made at , payable for life unless occurs before age 60. Dependent children qualify if unmarried and under age 18 (or 22 if full-time students, or any age if disabled before 18), receiving supplemental benefits added to the spousal —typically $300 monthly plus $150 per eligible child under 18—or standalone shares if no survives, capped to ensure total payouts align with the 55% maximum. These provisions, absent Social Security offsets, yield higher effective income compared to FERS's 50% spousal maximum post-reduction, reflecting CSRS's standalone design for pre-1984 hires generally excluded from Social Security coverage. Employee deaths before with 18 months of trigger similar spousal and child annuities based on projected to age 60, underscoring the system's emphasis on family continuity absent dual-system coordination.

Benefit Structure and Calculation

Annuity Computation Formula

The Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) annuity is calculated using a defined that applies a tiered to an annuitant's high-3 average based on years of creditable service. The high-3 average represents the highest average annual basic pay over any three consecutive years of creditable service, excluding bonuses, , or other allowances. Under the general , the accrual rate is 1.5% of the high-3 average for each of the first five years of service, 1.75% for each of the next five years, and 2% for each additional year thereafter, with the total capped at 80% of the high-3 average. Creditable service for the computation includes all periods of federal civilian employment covered under CSRS, converted unused added as additional service months, and performed after 1956 only if the annuitant makes a deposit equal to 7% of military basic pay earned plus accrued interest; pre-1957 is fully creditable without deposit. Non-creditable periods, such as time under or certain leaves without pay exceeding specified thresholds, are excluded unless specific waivers apply. For employees in special categories, such as officers, firefighters, or materials couriers, an enhanced applies: 2.5% of the high-3 average salary per year for the first 20 years of qualifying service, followed by 2% for each additional year, provided the service meets rigorous criteria including primary duties involving or . This yields higher accrual rates compared to the general , reflecting statutory recognition of occupational hazards. For illustration, an annuitant with 30 years of creditable service and a high-3 average of $100,000 would receive an unreduced annual of $56,250 under the general : (5 years × 1.5% + 5 years × 1.75% + 20 years × 2%) × $100,000 = 56.25% replacement rate. Reductions may apply for early or unpaid deposits, but the core prioritizes full service credits to determine the basic before any adjustments.

Cost-of-Living Adjustments and Supplemental Benefits

Cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) for Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) annuities are determined annually based on the percentage increase in the for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W), measured by comparing the average CPI-W for the third quarter of the current year to the third quarter of the prior year. CSRS annuitants receive the full CPI-W increase, rounded down to the nearest 0.1 , without the caps applied to adjustments under the (FERS), where increases exceeding 2% or 3% thresholds are limited or reduced by 1 . This mechanism provides comprehensive inflation protection aligned directly with the CPI-W metric. Adjustments take effect on December 1 each year, with the increased amount reflected in annuity payments beginning on the first business day of ; for those receiving benefits less than a full year, the initial COLA is prorated at one-twelfth of the full amount per month of eligibility. CSRS does not include a special annuity supplement for retirees under age 62, as federal under this system is not covered by Social Security, eliminating the need for a bridge payment approximating Social Security earnings from government employment—a to FERS. Instead, eligible CSRS retirees who meet early criteria, such as age 55 with 30 years of , receive their full computed immediately upon separation, without deferral or supplemental augmentation until Social Security eligibility from non-federal work. Historical COLA applications under CSRS, varying from 0% in low- periods to highs like 14.1% in 1980, have preserved and occasionally enhanced the real value of benefits amid rising life expectancies, with third-quarter CPI-W comparisons ensuring responsiveness to wage-earner trends. Supplemental benefits under CSRS include seamless integration with the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) program, allowing retirees to maintain pre-retirement health coverage if enrolled in FEHB continuously for the five years immediately before or for the full duration of their federal service if shorter. FEHB premiums are withheld directly from payments, with no government contribution required from the retiree beyond what was standard during employment; this continuity supports post-retirement healthcare stability without interruption. Additionally, unused accumulated at is fully credited toward total service length for purposes, with each 8 hours of typically converting to 1 day of additional creditable service under standard leave systems, thereby boosting the overall benefit without further employee cost.

Contributions and Funding Mechanism

Employee and Agency Contributions

Employees under the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) deduct 7 percent of their basic pay as contributions to the Civil Service Retirement and Fund, with this rate applying uniformly to most covered employees hired before 1984. Of this amount, approximately 0.8 percent is allocated to the Employees' Compensation Fund to support survivor benefits, while the remainder funds the basic . These deductions have remained unchanged since their establishment in the 1960s, reflecting the system's original design without subsequent adjustments for or cost increases. Agencies employing CSRS participants contribute an amount equivalent to the employee's 7 percent , serving as a direct match to the payroll withholdings. In addition, agencies pay variable supplemental contributions determined actuarially to address normal costs exceeding the matched rate, though these fall short of fully funding on a pay-as-you-go basis. For fiscal year 2024, agency cost factors for CSRS coverage averaged around 36-38 percent of basic pay, highlighting the gap between fixed contributions and projected obligations. CSRS-covered service excludes participation in Social Security taxes for retirement, survivors, and , as the system operates independently without FICA withholdings on federal basic pay. This non-coverage triggers the (WEP) for individuals with partial Social Security credits from non-federal employment, reducing their Social Security benefits to prevent duplicate full offsets.

Government Supplemental Funding and Fiscal Obligations

The Retirement System (CSRS) depends on annual appropriations from the U.S. 's general fund to address shortfalls in the Civil Service Retirement and Fund (CSRDF), stemming from insufficient employee and contributions to cover normal costs and amortize historical unfunded liabilities under its static funding approach. These supplemental payments, mandated , finance the gap between disbursements—primarily to annuitants—and dedicated inflows, while also covering on unpaid obligations and demographic-driven increases in payouts. In 2023, transfers for CSRS reached approximately $35.5 billion, reflecting the system's ongoing reliance on taxpayer-backed revenues amid a pay-as-you-go structure that does not fully prefund future liabilities. The CSRDF's aggregate balance has trended upward, reaching $1.012 trillion by the end of 2022—equivalent to over 10 times annual outlays—and projected to climb to $1.576 trillion by 2032, buoyed partly by FERS inflows and returns. However, this masks CSRS-specific dynamics, where liabilities exceed dedicated assets due to legacy deficits not targeted for amortization within defined timelines, with recent estimates placing CSRS unfunded liabilities above $830 billion. The Treasury's role extends to paying interest on these static shortfalls for non-Postal Service portions, perpetuating fiscal transfers as annuitant numbers swell relative to active contributors. Disputes over U.S. Postal Service (USPS) contributions highlight funding tensions, with analyses claiming USPS overpayments into CSRS of $50 billion to $75 billion since the 1970s, driven by actuarial assumptions that inflated agency shares and created arguable surpluses now contested amid USPS financial strains. These claims, supported by independent actuarial reviews, underscore how allocation formulas have shifted burdens, yet infusions continue for the broader system, as USPS-specific overfunding does not offset general CSRS deficits. Defined benefit guarantees under CSRS allocate , , and risks to the federal —and ultimately taxpayers—rather than participants, amplifying obligations as the annuitant-to-worker ratio rises from demographic aging and static workforce sizes. Long-term projections in OPM actuarial reports indicate sustained payments, with no statutory mechanism to eliminate reliance on general revenues, thereby embedding intergenerational fiscal drag in the system's design.

Comparison to Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS)

Structural and Benefit Differences

The Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) operates as a standalone , providing retirees with an calculated solely from service credits without integration to Social Security benefits for pre-1984 service periods. In contrast, the , established in 1987, structures across three components: a smaller defined , mandatory Social Security coverage, and access to the (TSP) with government matching contributions up to 5% of pay. This tiered FERS design enhances portability, as TSP funds can transfer to private-sector plans, whereas CSRS offers no equivalent defined contribution vehicle with matching. CSRS requires employee contributions of 7% to 8% of basic pay, depending on employment category, with no concurrent Social Security taxes on that portion for most participants. FERS mandates lower contributions—0.8% for pre-2013 hires, 3.1% for 2013-2014 hires, and 4.4% thereafter—supplemented by 6.2% Social Security payroll taxes, resulting in total mandatory deductions below CSRS levels but with broader income streams. formulas reflect this: CSRS uses 1.5% of high-3 average salary for the first five years of service, 1.75% for the next five, and 2% thereafter, enabling replacement rates up to 80% of pre- pay after 41+ years. FERS applies a uniform 1% accrual rate (or 1.1% for at age 62+ with 20+ years), yielding roughly half the basic of an equivalent CSRS tenure absent supplements. Eligibility thresholds differ markedly, with CSRS permitting unreduced retirement at 55 with 30 years of , 60 with 20 years, or 62 with five years. FERS raises the bar, requiring minimum (MRA, ranging from 55 for pre-1948 births to 57 for post-1970 births) with 30 years for unreduced benefits at MRA, or 62 with five years, though early MRA retirements with 10-30 years face 5% annual reductions until 62. CSRS annuities receive full cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) based on the for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W), while FERS COLAs cap at 2% for CPI-W increases of 2-3%, subtract 1% for increases over 3% (floored at 0%), and delay application until 62 for some early retirees. CSRS's exclusion from Social Security coverage for core federal service exposes retirees with non-federal earnings to the (WEP), which reduces Social Security benefits by up to half the CSRS amount, and the Government Pension Offset (GPO), which offsets spousal/survivor Social Security by two-thirds of the . FERS integrates seamlessly with Social Security, avoiding these penalties and providing an interim supplement approximating Social Security until age 62 for eligible early retirees, though the core remains lower to account for these external pillars. Empirical data indicate CSRS annuities average approximately twice FERS basic annuities for comparable service, reflecting the former's higher accrual absent supplemental tiers.

Economic Incentives and Long-Term Outcomes

The Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) incentivizes extended tenure through its defined benefit formula, which back-loads accruals to reward : the equals 1.5% of high-three average for the first five years of , 1.75% for the next five, and 2% thereafter, yielding up to 56.25% replacement of final after 30 years for employees retiring at age 62 or later. This structure, lacking integration with Social Security for post-1983 , imposes a high on mid-career departures, as employees forfeit non-portable accrued benefits without gaining equivalent credits toward private-sector vehicles, thereby reducing labor mobility relative to systems with portable components. Studies of incentives confirm that such defined benefit designs elevate retention by amplifying the financial penalty for early exits, with workers under CSRS exhibiting lower turnover rates than those in hybrid systems like FERS, where portability facilitates transitions. Long-term outcomes for CSRS retirees include elevated payments—averaging $5,447 monthly in 2022, compared to lower base annuities under FERS—enhancing income stability for those completing full careers, though total lifetime wealth comparisons with FERS vary by assumptions on returns, lifespan, and pre-federal . However, the system's guaranteed payouts, independent of fund performance, generate by shifting longevity and market risks entirely to taxpayers, contrasting with FERS's defined contribution element that aligns participant incentives with actual returns. System-wide, CSRS imposes substantial fiscal burdens, with unfunded liabilities reaching $823.5 billion as of 2020, far exceeding the actuarial costs of private defined contribution plans where employer obligations are capped and risks diversified to individuals. This accrual of liabilities stems from historical underfunding and demographic pressures, amplifying taxpayer exposure without corresponding private-sector equivalents that emphasize personal account growth over collective guarantees.

Controversies and Reforms

Criticisms of Overgenerosity and Fiscal Burden

Critics argue that the CSRS provides pensions that significantly exceed typical private-sector retirement benefits, where defined-benefit plans cover only about 14 percent of workers as of recent data. In 2022, the monthly CSRS was approximately $5,447, far surpassing the private-sector defined-benefit of $1,570 per month. This disparity contributes to claims of overgenerosity, as CSRS annuities can reach up to 80 percent of an employee's high-three salary after sufficient service, a formula unavailable to the vast majority of private-sector employees who rely on defined-contribution plans with uncertain outcomes. The system's fiscal burden is amplified by its partial pay-as-you-go structure and substantial unfunded liabilities, estimated at around $900 billion for the Retirement and Fund (CSRDF) as of September 2023, with CSRS bearing a significant share due to its closed status and legacy obligations. With approximately 2.2 million CSRS employee annuitants and survivors outnumbering the roughly 44,000 active CSRS-covered employees, current contributions insufficiently cover payouts, shifting costs to future taxpayers and creating intergenerational inequity. An example of misallocation is the U.S. Service's CSRS , overfunded by an estimated $80 to $111 billion under alternative allocation methods, diverting resources from operational needs without proportional benefit enhancements. Defenders contend that CSRS generosity aids talent retention in , yet empirical comparisons show federal total compensation—including benefits—averages 43 percent higher than private-sector equivalents for similar roles, undermining claims of underpayment or necessity for . While arguments persist, reveal no clear of superior public-sector performance outcomes attributable to these costs, suggesting the system's prioritizes annuitant benefits over long-term fiscal .

Recent Proposals and Political Debates (2020–2025)

The Social Security Fairness Act, enacted in late 2024 and signed into law by President Biden on January 5, 2025, repealed the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and Government Pension Offset (GPO), effective retroactively from January 1, 2024. This change directly benefits Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) retirees who qualify for Social Security from non-federal employment, by eliminating reductions in spousal and survivor benefits previously offset against their non-covered CSRS pensions. Average monthly increases are projected at $700 for affected spouses and $1,190 for surviving spouses by December 2025, with expedited retroactive payments issued to compensate for prior offsets. The repeal adds substantial fiscal pressure to the Social Security trust fund, with estimates indicating lifetime benefit increases averaging $7,300 annually per impacted individual, contributing to broader solvency concerns amid concurrent 2025 cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) that further elevate payouts. Parallel to these benefit expansions, Republican-led initiatives in the 119th advanced reforms targeting retirement systems, including CSRS, to address long-term fiscal obligations. House proposals in April-May 2025 sought to shift annuity calculations from the traditional "high-3" average salary to a "high-5" metric, potentially reducing benefit levels for future retirees under legacy systems like CSRS, while also advocating for a 0.5% reduction in CSRS COLAs to align with chained measures used for FERS. These measures, part of broader efforts, were estimated by the to yield nearly $51 billion in savings over a through combined adjustments, though revisions moderated the scope, retaining urgency around unfunded liabilities exceeding $1 trillion for CSRS. Debates surrounding these reforms highlighted tensions between fiscal restraint and retiree protections, with conservative lawmakers emphasizing amid rising , citing potential $30-50 billion in targeted savings from contribution hikes and tweaks applicable to CSRS holdovers. employee unions, including the National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association, opposed the changes as effective pay reductions, arguing they undermine earned guarantees despite CSRS's structure providing inflation-protected, defined-benefit annuities that mitigate market volatility risks absent in private-sector plans. Proponents countered that CSRS's generosity—rooted in pre-1987 designs—exceeds comparable private benchmarks, where participants bear investment downside without taxpayer backstops, justifying trims to prevent intergenerational inequities. No comprehensive CSRS overhaul passed by October 2025, but the proposals underscored partisan divides, with Democrats prioritizing benefit preservation and Republicans invoking actuarial data on escalating costs.

References

  1. [1]
    CSRS Information - OPM
    The Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) is a defined benefit, contributory retirement system. Employees share in the expense of the annuities to which they ...Eligibility · Survivors · Computation · Types of Retirement
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Retirement Facts 1 Civil Service Retirement System - OPM
    The information presented in this pamphlet is an overview of the major provisions of the Civil. Service Retirement System (CSRS) for employ-.
  3. [3]
    Eligibility - OPM
    There are five categories of benefits under the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS). Eligibility is based on your age and the number of years of creditable ...
  4. [4]
    Federal Employees' Retirement System: Budget and Trust Fund Issues
    13 dec 2019 · Pensions for civilian federal employees are provided through two programs, the Civil Service Retirement System ... History, Art & Archives ...
  5. [5]
    Answering common questions about Republicans' proposed federal ...
    May 7, 2025 · But the GOP proposal, if enacted, would move the annuity calculation to be based on the average of an employee's highest five consecutive years ...
  6. [6]
    Senate strips most retirement cuts from reconciliation, but anti-civil ...
    Jun 13, 2025 · "These proposals would slash the take-home pay for newly hired civil servants without any corresponding increase in their retirement benefits, ...Missing: features | Show results with:features
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Benefits and Beneficiaries Under the Civil Service Retirement Act
    13 bills to amend the Civil Service Retirement Act were introduced. Of these, 5 proposed reducing, and in general standardizing, the retirement age. Others ...Missing: 1920-1980 | Show results with:1920-1980
  8. [8]
    Executive Order 8083—Extending the Provisions of the Civil Service ...
    Executive Order No. 3375 of December 24, 1920, extending the provisions of the Civil Service Retirement Act of May 22, 1920, to certain Federal employees, is ...Missing: expansions 1920-1980
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Recent Amendments to the Civil Service Retirement Act - SSA
    A SWEEPING REVISION of the Civil Service Retirement Act was effected on February 28, when the President ap- proved Public Law No. 426 amending the provisions ...
  10. [10]
    Executive Branch Civilian Employment Since 1940 - OPM
    Data comes from agency 113-A monthy submissions and covers total end-of-year civilian employment of full-time permanent, temporary, part-time, and intermittent ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Civil Service Retirement System Annuitants and Social Security
    The number of CSRS primary annuitants in- creased substantially during the 1970's: By 1979, the number of annuitants had reached 1.2 million, 20 percent more ...
  12. [12]
  13. [13]
    Comparing Replacement Rates Under Private and Federal ...
    This article presents a comparison of replacement rates for employees of medium and large private establishments to replacement rates for federal employees.
  14. [14]
    Some Retirees Won't Get a 3.2% Social Security COLA in 2024
    Oct 26, 2023 · The CSRS was replaced by FERS in 1986 due to a series of financial challenges that made the original plan unsustainable in the long term.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Re tire ment Facts 13 - OPM
    An other major category of CSRS Offset employ ees includes people who were hired before January 1, 1984, acquired CSRS interim cover age between 1984 and 1987, ...Missing: retention | Show results with:retention
  16. [16]
    CSRS vs. FERS: Understanding Federal Retirement Systems
    10 sep 2025 · The Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) is a federal pension plan established in 1920 for civilian employees of the U.S. government.<|separator|>
  17. [17]
    Federal Employees' Retirement System: Summary of Recent Trends
    Dec 12, 2023 · This report describes recent trends in the characteristics of annuitants and current employees covered by the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) and the ...Missing: key features controversies
  18. [18]
    Retirement by the numbers: Feds in CSRS are dwindling fast
    Oct 8, 2024 · Federal News Network dug into federal employee retirement data and found the number of retirees in CSRS and FERS to be almost equal.
  19. [19]
    The State of Civil Service Retirement: CSRS and FERS
    Jun 6, 2024 · Here are some numbers from the FY2022 CRS report: 1) Retirement coverage of current civilian federal employees: FERS: 98.4% (2,788,000); CSRS ...
  20. [20]
    Types of Retirement - OPM
    If you are a former Federal employee who was covered by the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS), you may be eligible for a deferred annuity at age 62. Use ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] T-GGD-95-172 Overview of Federal Retirement Programs
    At the end of fiscal year 1994, CSRS and the FERS pension plan, together, were paying annuities to about 1.7 million retirees and about 600,000 survivors of ...Missing: growth | Show results with:growth
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Information About Disability Retirement (CSRS) - OPM
    This pamphlet contains basic information concerning disability retirement benefits under the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS). This is for use by ...
  23. [23]
    Learn more about survivor benefits and retirement - OPM
    If you retire under the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS), the maximum survivor benefit payable is 55 percent of your unreduced annual benefit.
  24. [24]
    Survivors - OPM
    Unmarried children who are dependent upon the employee may receive monthly benefits until they reach age 18, marry, or die.
  25. [25]
    Computation - OPM
    The maximum benefit you can receive from CSRS is 80 percent of your high-3 average salary, plus credit for your sick leave. This limit generally affects only ...
  26. [26]
    What is Military Buy Back? - Defense Finance and Accounting Service
    Jun 10, 2025 · Military Buy Back, also known as a Military Service Deposit, is a benefit of Federal Civil Service that gives you the ability to receive retirement benefits ...
  27. [27]
    Learn more about cost-of-living adjustments (COLA) - OPM
    For the year 2025, annuitants who retired under CSRS will receive 2.5 percent increase and those who retired under FERS will receive a 2.0 percent increase. The ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Chapter 2: Cost of Living Adjustments - OPM
    B. Cost-Of-Living Adjustment (COLA). The percent increase between the third quarter average of the Consumer Price Index for Urban.
  29. [29]
    How is the Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA) determined? - OPM.gov
    Prorated accounts receive one-twelfth of the increase for each month they received benefits. Cost-of-Living Adjustments were first prorated in April 1982.
  30. [30]
    Cost-Of-Living Adjustments - Social Security
    The COLA for December 1999 was originally determined as 2.4 percent based on CPIs published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Pursuant to Public Law 106-554, ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] CSRS FERS FEHB FEGLI - OPM
    The U.S. Office of Personnel Management's (OPM) Retirement and Insurance Service (RIS) has developed a series of checklists to assist other Federal agencies ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Retirement Facts 8 - OPM
    In general, if your leave system charges 8 hours of sick leave for 1 day's absence, 8 hours of unused sick leave constitutes 1 day of credit. Days are converted ...
  33. [33]
    Sick Leave: How it Works, Accumulates, and Impacts Your Retirement
    Dec 11, 2022 · If you retire under CSRS, or leave a survivor a CSRS annuity, 100% of unused sick leave can be credited toward the income calculation. FERS ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Chapter 33 - CSRS FERS
    (For pre-1987 service, 1.3 percent is the hypothetical FERS deduction rate.) The following table lists employee deduction rates for CSRS and CSRS. Interim ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Chapter 1. Administration and General Provisions - OPM
    Dec 26, 2013 · The employing agency matches the employee's CSRS contributions. D. Voluntary Contributions. Employees may contribute up to 10 percent of ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Chapter 30 of the CSRS and FERS Handbook - OPM
    Apr 24, 1998 · The new agency contribution rates for each category of CSRS employee, ... contributions at the established employee deduction rate based on their.
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Fiscal Year 2024 Federal Employees Benefits Cost Factors ... - OPM
    The FY 2024 cost factors for all categories of CSRS coverage are enclosed. While agency payments under CSRS are not affected by the CSRS normal cost percentages ...
  38. [38]
    Program Explainer: Windfall Elimination Provision - Social Security
    The Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) is a formula used to adjust Social Security worker benefits for people who receive “non-covered pensions.”
  39. [39]
    Windfall Elimination Provision - WEP and Social Security - FEDweek
    The WEP was designed to eliminate the “windfall” that could result if you were to receive a CSRS annuity based on many years of employment not covered by Social ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund Annual Report - OPM
    30-year period, any increases in the static unfunded liability due to salary increases that occurred during the year for non-Postal CSRS employees. In ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Board of Actuaries Statement Fiscal Year 2023 Civil Service ... - OPM
    Jan 8, 2024 · The current statutory contribution requirements do not target paying off these legacy CSRS unfunded liabilities over any specified period.
  42. [42]
    Federal Employees' Retirement System: Summary of Recent Trends
    767,000, an increase of about 39%. ... younger than 45). Ninety-one percent of CSRS employees were aged 60 or older, whereas 15% of FERS employees were in this ...
  43. [43]
    Understanding FERS Contribution - Serving Those Who Serve
    Feb 27, 2024 · So even though CSRS will technically be underfunded by more than $830 billion next year, there will still be money disbursed for those retirees ...
  44. [44]
    Earned Benefits Trust Funds - OPM
    The CSRDF finances two Federal civilian retirement systems: the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) established on May 22, 1920, and the Federal Employees ...
  45. [45]
    Retiree Health Benefits Prefunding and Civil Service Retirement ...
    In 2010, independent analysts found that pension payments to the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) Fund have resulted in overpayments of $50 billion to $75 ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Federal Employees Retirement System FERS Overfunding
    Aug 16, 2010 · It was later determined the Postal Service was overcharged $27 billion for CSRS military service credits. In 2006, these funds were returned to ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Postal Service's Share of CSRS Pension Responsibility - APWU
    Jan 20, 2010 · In 2002 it was determined the Postal Service would overfund CSRS ... The resulting. CSRS surplus can then be transferred into the retiree health ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Federal Employees Retirement System - OPM
    Survivor and disability benefits are available after 18 months of civilian service.<|separator|>
  49. [49]
    CSRS vs FERS: Which Federal Retirement Plan is Best for You?
    Jun 6, 2024 · This guide will delve into the difference between CSRS and FERS, risk tolerance factors, real-life scenarios, and helpful tools to estimate your retirement ...
  50. [50]
    Answers to some of your common questions about CSRS and FERS
    Nov 9, 2023 · The basic FERS retirement benefit would be only about half as much as it would be under CSRS. Under FERS, the computation generally is 1% (or 1 ...
  51. [51]
    Retirement Eligibility & FERS Minimum Retirement Age (MRA)
    Under CSRS/CSRS Offset, and employee may retire at age 62 with five years of service, 60 with 20, or 55 with 30. Under FERS, an employee who meets one of the ...
  52. [52]
    Eligibility - OPM
    Eligibility is determined by your age and number of years of creditable service. In some cases, you must have reached the Minimum Retirement Age (MRA) to ...
  53. [53]
    Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) | U.S. Customs and Border ...
    Aug 7, 2024 · CSRS covered employees contribute 7, 7.5, or 8 percent of pay to CSRS and, while they generally pay no Social Security retirement, survivor and ...
  54. [54]
    Computation - OPM
    Transferred to the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) ; Second 5 years of CSRS service, 1.75% of your high-3 average salary for each year of service ; All ...
  55. [55]
    How average are you and what does it matter?
    Feb 24, 2020 · According to the Congressional Research Service, the average person retiring under CSRS in FY 2108 got an annuity of $4,973 per month compared ...
  56. [56]
    Federal Employees' Retirement System: Benefits and Financing
    Nov 13, 2019 · Congress passed the Civil Service Retirement Act of 1920 (P.L. 66-215) to provide pension benefits for civilian federal employees. In 1935, ...
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Employee Decision Guide - Should be CSRS instead of FERS - OPM
    You were erroneously put in the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS). You should have been put in the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) and then ...Missing: expansion amendments 1940s
  58. [58]
    Financial incentives and retirement: evidence from federal civil ...
    In this paper, we examine the impact of financial incentives on retirement behavior for a unique set of workers, the federal civil service workers in the ...
  59. [59]
    Modifying Federal Civil Service Retirement Incentives - RAND
    Some observers have attributed these problems in large part to the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS), which was thought to create "golden handcuffs" by ...Missing: features controversies
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Separation and Retirement Incentives in the Federal Civil Service
    To address these questions, we first simulate and compare the expected net lifetime wealth under FERS and under CSRS at each leaving age for a "representative" ...
  61. [61]
    Unfunded Liability of Federal Retirement Program Already Peaked
    May 10, 2022 · As of the beginning of FY2020, CSRS had an unfunded liability of $823.5 billion, and FERS had an unfunded liability of $201.5 billion. ... This ...
  62. [62]
    Federal Employees' Retirement System: Benefits and Financing
    At the end of FY2017, the CSRDF had an unfunded liability of $968.1 billion, consisting of a $812.5 billion deficit for CSRS and a $155.6 billion deficit for ...
  63. [63]
    US. New Government Research Finds Strong Private Sector ...
    Sep 29, 2025 · Notably, 70 percent of private sector workers had access to defined contribution plans, and 14 percent had access to defined benefit plans.
  64. [64]
    How Many Retirees Are Under csrs? - Federal Pension Advisors
    Dec 12, 2024 · While average monthly annuities for CSRS and FERS retirees in FY2022 were $5,447 and $2,126, respectively, individual circumstances can lead to ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] PENSIONOMICS 2025 - - National Institute on Retirement Security
    Private sector pension plans covered over 33 million. Americans,14 ... The average private sector pension benefit was $1,570 per month, or $18,840 ...
  66. [66]
    How Federal Pensions Are Paid For - X
    As of September 30, 2023, the CSRDF held net assets of about $1.1 trillion, though it has an unfunded actuarial liability estimated at $900 billion, largely due ...<|separator|>
  67. [67]
    Postal Retirement Funds in Perspective: Historical Evolution and ...
    Jan 8, 2024 · Prior OIG work estimated USPS's CSRS balance would be $80 to $111 billion larger using an alternative allocation methodology. As part of its ...
  68. [68]
    Comparing the Compensation of Federal and Private-Sector ...
    Apr 25, 2024 · In this report, the Congressional Budget Office compares the cost that the federal government incurred in 2022 for the wages and benefits of its civilian ...
  69. [69]
    Federal, Private Sector Benefits Don't Compare Well Directly, Says ...
    Jun 12, 2024 · On average, benefits such as health insurance, retirement income and paid leave are “43 percent higher for federal civilian employees than for ...
  70. [70]
    Biden signs Social Security Fairness Act into law
    Jan 5, 2025 · Eliminating GPO will increase monthly payments by $700 for impacted spouses, and $1,190 for impacted surviving spouses, on average, by December ...
  71. [71]
    The Social Security Fairness Act: Key Points for CSRS Employees
    Nov 4, 2024 · The two provisions the Social Security Fairness Act proposes to repeal are the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and the Government Pension Offset (GPO).Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  72. [72]
    Social Security Announces Expedited Retroactive Payments and ...
    Feb 25, 2025 · Many beneficiaries will be due a retroactive payment because the WEP and GPO offset no longer apply as of January 2024. Most people will receive ...Get Your Social Security... · Statement from Acting... · Why It’s Important to Tell Us...
  73. [73]
    Republicans revise federal benefits cuts in reconciliation bill
    May 19, 2025 · Republicans revise federal benefits cuts in reconciliation bill · Eliminating the FERS annuity supplement · Switching from a “high-3” to a “high-5 ...Missing: 2020-2025 | Show results with:2020-2025
  74. [74]
    [PDF] Threats to Federal Employee and Retiree Earned Benefits - NARFE
    Based on a historical average COLA, this would reduce the value of a typical. (median) CSRS annuity (about $47,000 per year) by more than $179,000 over 30 years ...
  75. [75]
    House Republicans' pension changes will save nearly $51B, CBO ...
    which would reduce appropriated spending by $31.8 billion — ...Missing: 2020-2025 | Show results with:2020-2025
  76. [76]
    GOP lawmakers advance proposals to reduce federal benefits, gut ...
    May 1, 2025 · House Republicans have advanced a series of proposals attempting to cut costs by reducing the value of federal retirement annuities.Missing: 2020-2025 | Show results with:2020-2025
  77. [77]
    House Republicans advance plan to cut federal worker benefits and ...
    Apr 30, 2025 · A series of proposals that would require federal workers to pay more toward their retirement benefits and reduce the value of those benefits.Missing: 2020-2025 | Show results with:2020-2025
  78. [78]
    House Republicans Draft Cuts to Federal Employee Pensions
    Apr 28, 2025 · The proposal would raise federal and postal employees' contribution rates to 4.4%, which the release estimated would raise $30.7 billion for the ...Missing: 2020-2025 | Show results with:2020-2025<|separator|>