Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Federal Employees Retirement System

The Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) is a retirement plan for federal civilian employees in the executive, judicial, and legislative branches hired on or after January 1, 1984, established by the Federal Employees' Retirement System Act of 1986 to replace the prior for new entrants and promote sustainability through integration with broader mechanisms. Enacted amid fiscal pressures on the older defined-benefit-only model, FERS shifted toward partial pre-funding and employee participation in market-like savings, reflecting first-principles adjustments to demographic realities like longer lifespans and shifting workforce mobility that rendered pure pay-as-you-go systems increasingly burdensome. FERS delivers benefits via three coordinated tiers: a Basic Benefit Plan offering a defined-benefit —typically 1% of an employee's high-three average salary multiplied by years of creditable service (rising to 1.1% for those retiring at age 62 or later with at least 20 years)—to which employees contribute a portion of pay (0.8% for pre-2013 hires, escalating to 4.4% for later ones); mandatory Social Security coverage with full employee and employer payroll taxes; and the (TSP), a defined-contribution account featuring automatic 1% agency contributions, dollar-for-dollar matching up to 3% of salary, and additional matching on the next 2%, enabling substantial compounding for voluntary deferrals up to IRS limits. This structure ensures retirement income draws from predictable , inflation-adjusted Social Security (with a special supplement until age 62 for early retirees), and portable TSP assets invested in low-cost index funds, contrasting with the Civil Service Retirement System's heavier reliance on taxpayer-funded transfers. Key eligibility for an immediate unreduced includes reaching the minimum (ranging from 55 for those born before 1948 to 57 for those born in 1970 or later) with 30 years of service, age 60 with 20 years, or age 62 with 5 years, while deferred and early options accommodate separations with vested benefits. Unlike many -sector plans, FERS annuities accrue interest via securities and are deemed fully funded by combined employee-agency contributions without general taxpayer supplementation, though the broader portfolio faces scrutiny for long-term actuarial shortfalls tied to CSRS overhangs and demographic strains. Recent legislative debates, including 2025 efforts to raise contributions or cap accruals amid trillion-dollar deficits, highlight tensions over whether FERS remains competitively generous relative to norms—where defined-benefit coverage has largely eroded—potentially incentivizing retention but straining finances, with proposals largely moderated in action.

Historical Background

Establishment and Replacement of CSRS

The Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) was established under the Civil Service Retirement Act (P.L. 66-215), signed into law on May 20, 1920, and effective August 1, 1920, as the first comprehensive for U.S. federal civilian employees. Predating the of 1935 by 15 years, CSRS operated without integration with Social Security, requiring employees to contribute 7 to 8 percent of pay solely to the while generally excluding them from Social Security coverage, which created gaps in income portability and overall coverage. CSRS's structure imposed significant limitations on workforce dynamics, as its non-portable benefits—where leaving federal service often resulted in forfeiture of substantial accrued value—fostered a "golden handcuffs" effect, binding employees to long-term government tenure and hindering mobility to private sector roles or between agencies. This rigidity, combined with escalating government costs from unfunded liabilities exceeding hundreds of billions by the 1980s, underscored CSRS's misalignment with evolving private sector norms, where defined contribution plans were gaining prevalence for their flexibility and individual accountability. In response, passed the Employees' Retirement System Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-335) on June 6, 1986, establishing FERS effective January 1, 1987, for most civilian employees newly hired on or after January 1, 1984, while allowing certain earlier hires an election period to transfer. FERS shifted from CSRS's standalone defined benefit model to a hybrid three-tier system—encompassing a reduced basic , mandatory Social Security participation, and an employer-matched —to rectify portability deficits, integrate broader retirement security, curb escalating fiscal pressures through partial defined contribution elements, and facilitate employee mobility akin to incentives. This prioritized long-term by aligning benefits with market-driven portability and cost-sharing, addressing CSRS's causal inefficiencies in talent retention and government expenditure without retroactively altering vested CSRS participants' rights.

Transitional Provisions for Existing Employees

Employees covered by the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) as of June 30, 1987, were offered a one-time opportunity to elect coverage under the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) during an open season from July 1 to December 31, 1987. This provision applied to federal civilian employees and Members of Congress subject to CSRS at that date, excluding temporary or intermittent appointees and certain non-resident aliens. The election was irrevocable once effective, typically the first pay period following the filing of Standard Form 3109, and required no additional employee contributions beyond standard FERS rates. Electing FERS meant prior CSRS service was fully creditable for and computation under the FERS formula—1 percent of the high-three average salary per year of service (or 1.1 percent for employees with 20 or more years retiring at 62 or later)—resulting in a lower basic compared to CSRS's 1.5 to 2 percent accrual rate. In exchange, switchers gained mandatory Social Security coverage for all creditable federal service, enabling full earnings credits toward Social Security benefits, and immediate access to the (TSP) with agency automatic contributions of 1 percent of basic pay plus matching up to 4 percent of employee contributions. Eligible employees also received a refund of any excess CSRS deductions beyond the FERS employee contribution rate of 0.8 percent, though they remained responsible for any required deposits for prior non-deduction service to maximize credits. Fewer than 5 percent of eligible CSRS employees elected to switch to FERS during the 1987 open season, with the vast majority retaining CSRS coverage due to its higher defined-benefit guarantee despite the absence of Social Security . This low election rate highlighted preferences for the security of CSRS's larger lifetime over FERS's diversified structure, particularly among longer-tenured workers averse to market-dependent TSP outcomes or the reduced basic benefit floor. Switchers, however, secured greater portability through TSP assets transferable to private-sector plans and potential for compounded growth via agency matching, which incentivized savings beyond traditional pensions; long-term data indicate FERS retirees often achieve comparable or higher total replacement rates when combining the basic , Social Security, and TSP withdrawals. The transitional design reduced costs per retiree under FERS by shifting risk to defined-contribution elements and employee Social Security participation, contributing to lower unfunded liabilities compared to CSRS's sole reliance on government-funded annuities.

Subsequent Legislative Amendments

The Federal Erroneous Retirement Coverage Corrections Act of 2000 established procedures to remedy situations where federal civilian employees had been incorrectly covered under either the (CSRS) or FERS for at least three continuous years of service, permitting eligible individuals to elect retroactive coverage under the appropriate system and receive adjustments to annuities, refunds, and deposits accordingly. This legislation targeted anomalies arising from administrative errors, particularly during the transition period or for rehired annuitants and special category employees such as those in temporary or intermittent roles, thereby standardizing benefit equity without expanding overall entitlements. The Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 amended FERS contribution requirements to address actuarial funding shortfalls, raising the employee contribution rate for the basic annuity from 0.8% of pay to 3.1% for individuals hired on or after January 1, 2013, with special groups like officers and firefighters facing a rate of 4.4%. These increases applied prospectively to new hires and did not retroactively affect vested benefits or prior service credits, reflecting congressional efforts to enhance the plan's amid rising unfunded liabilities projected by the Office of Personnel Management. The Social Security Fairness Act, enacted in late 2024 and applying to benefits payable after December 2024, repealed the and Government Pension Offset, which previously adjusted Social Security benefits downward for recipients of non-covered pensions such as CSRS annuities. Although FERS participants contribute to Social Security and thus face no direct WEP application to their FERS service, the repeal elevates Social Security payouts for federal retirees with hybrid CSRS-FERS careers or prior non-covered employment, amplifying expenditures in the Social Security system integral to FERS without dedicated revenue offsets, as estimated to add billions to long-term federal outlays. This adjustment indirectly pressures the FERS framework's reliance on Social Security solvency for supplements and coordinated benefits, highlighting ongoing tensions between equity claims and fiscal realism.

Core Components

Basic Annuity

The Basic Annuity constitutes the defined benefit pension core of the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS), delivering monthly lifetime payments to eligible retirees based on creditable years of service and the average of their highest three consecutive years of basic pay, with funding predominantly sourced from agency contributions supported by taxpayer appropriations. Established under the Federal Employees' Retirement System Act of 1986 (effective January 1, 1987), this component guarantees predictable, non-market-dependent income, vesting after five years of creditable civilian federal service, which entitles employees to a deferred payable at the minimum (ranging from 55 to 57 depending on birth year) or age 62. Unlike its predecessor, the (CSRS), the FERS Basic Annuity enhances portability for career mobility, as vested individuals retain eligibility for the deferred upon separation from service, further bolstered by the system's integration of portable earnings and portability. This design reflects congressional intent to align retirement with private-sector norms, where defined plans had diminished, prioritizing flexibility over the larger, less adaptable CSRS that lacked coordination. Employees hired before 2013 contributed only 0.8% of basic pay to the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund for this —beyond payroll taxes—with agencies covering the remainder, approximately 13.7% of payroll in recent actuarial valuations. The Basic Annuity applies to most civilian executive branch employees, including those in agencies, the , and , though certain categories like temporary or intermittent workers may accrue partial credit. Its formula yields a modest base—typically around 1% of high-three salary per service year—deliberately scaled to supplement rather than duplicate Social Security benefits, avoiding over-reliance on any single pillar while ensuring fiscal sustainability through coordinated tiers.

Social Security Integration and FERS Supplement

The Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) mandates participation in the Social Security program for all covered employees, requiring them to contribute 6.2% of their basic pay up to the annual wage base for Old-Age, Survivors, and (OASDI), with agencies matching this contribution at the same rate. This integration replaced the non-Social Security-covered (CSRS), coordinating the FERS defined benefit annuity with Social Security to approximate a total replacement rate of about 60% of pre-retirement income from these sources combined, excluding the . The FERS annuity formula—1.1% (or 1% if under age 62) of the high-three average salary multiplied by years of service—incorporates an implicit offset for Social Security benefits attributable to FERS-covered employment, preventing double compensation for the same earnings period. Prior to 2025, the (WEP) reduced Social Security benefits for FERS retirees with prior non-covered service (e.g., under CSRS), limiting the full integration benefit for those individuals. The Social Security Fairness Act, enacted on January 5, 2025, repealed WEP for benefits payable after January 2024, eliminating this reduction and increasing average monthly Social Security payments by $360 for affected recipients, which raises total retirement income and long-term fiscal costs for dual-system participants. For FERS retirees eligible before age 62—who cannot yet claim Social Security—the system provides a temporary supplement, payable from the retirement date until age 62, to approximate the forgone Social Security portion during that interval. Eligibility applies to immediate annuitants under minimum plus 30 years of service, age 60 plus 20 years, or minimum plus 10 years (with reduction), but excludes deferred or postponed s and those retiring under special provisions like . The supplement is calculated by estimating the Social Security benefit using only FERS creditable service and the retiree's high-three in place of actual earnings, then prorating it based on years from to age 62 and dividing by 40 (reflecting Social Security's 40-year computation framework), excluding any non-covered or non-FERS service. This faces an earnings test akin to Social Security's, where 2025 earnings exceeding $23,400 annually reduce it by $1 for every $2 over the threshold, with no reduction to the underlying . In 2025, the average annual for eligible recipients approximates $18,000, or $1,500 monthly, varying by length and history. The provision highlights FERS's structural dependence on Social Security, positioning the as a short-term bridge that terminates upon Social Security eligibility, after which full coordination resumes without ongoing augmentation.

Thrift Savings Plan

The Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) serves as the defined contribution pillar of the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS), mirroring private-sector 401(k) plans by enabling participants to build retirement savings through personal investments supplemented by employer incentives. Established under the Federal Employees' Retirement System Act of 1986, it emphasizes individual accountability in wealth accumulation via voluntary payroll deductions, tax-deferred growth, and portable accounts that facilitate market-oriented strategies upon job changes. Federal civilian employees under FERS may contribute up to the annual IRS limit—$23,000 in 2024 for those under age 50, with catch-up contributions of $7,500 for ages 50-59 and higher for 60-63—allocated to traditional pre-tax or Roth after-tax accounts. Agencies automatically contribute 1% of an employee's basic pay each pay period, irrespective of personal input, while providing : dollar-for-dollar on the initial 3% of employee contributions and 50 cents per dollar on the subsequent 2%. This yields a maximum 5% total agency input when employees defer at least 5%, structuring rewards to foster disciplined saving habits independent of guaranteed annuities. Participants select from five core individual funds, each tracking broad, low-cost indices to minimize active management risks: the G Fund invests in short-term U.S. Treasury securities specially issued to the TSP, prioritizing principal protection with no credit or inflation risk beyond benchmarks; the F Fund mirrors the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index for fixed-income exposure; the C Fund approximates the S&P 500 for large-cap equities; the S Fund follows the Dow Jones U.S. Completion Total Stock Market Index for small- and mid-cap stocks; and the I Fund tracks the MSCI EAFE Index for developed international markets excluding the U.S. and Canada. Target-date Lifecycle Funds blend these for automated risk adjustment. Expense ratios average 0.036% for equity funds and 0.037% for the G Fund as of December 31, 2024, undercutting 99% of comparable private options and enhancing net returns through frugality. Employee contributions and earnings vest immediately, granting full ownership from inception and underscoring personal control over invested funds. Agency automatic (1%) and matching contributions, however, require a three-year cliff vesting period for most FERS employees—computed from federal civilian or uniformed service—after which participants gain irrevocable rights; exceptions apply for congressional or executive branch roles with two-year vesting. Accounts remain accessible post-separation via in-service withdrawals, loans, or rollovers to IRAs or 401(k)s, promoting continuity in private-market investments without mandatory annuitization. By December 31, 2023, TSP assets surpassed $845 billion across over 7 million accounts, fueled by compounding returns from index tracking and ultra-low overhead; for instance, the C Fund's 2024 year-to-date performance aligned with gains, while the program's simplicity has yielded superior long-term outcomes versus fee-laden private defined contribution plans. This growth trajectory reflects the efficacy of passive, cost-efficient strategies in harnessing market dynamics for retirement security.

Eligibility, Contributions, and Retirement Pathways

Employee and Agency Contributions

Employees hired into the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) prior to , 2013, contribute 0.8% of their basic pay each pay period toward the basic annuity component. This rate increased for employees first hired on or after , 2013, to 3.1% of basic pay, as enacted under the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 to help offset rising program costs. Further, the raised the rate to 4.4% for those first hired on or after , 2014, reflecting ongoing adjustments to shift more cost burden to newer participants amid concerns over long-term fiscal sustainability. These contributions are deducted post-tax from payroll and fund the defined benefit , with rates tiered by hire date to evolve cost-sharing dynamics without retroactively altering benefits for earlier cohorts. Agencies match employee contributions to the basic annuity by covering the remainder of the actuarially determined normal cost, which typically exceeds the employee share by a multiple; for instance, normal cost percentages for regular FERS employees have ranged from approximately 13% to 18% of in recent valuations, adjusted annually based on demographic and economic factors. This agency portion includes both current and amortization of prior unfunded liabilities, credited with interest at rates, ensuring the Retirement and Disability Fund receives full actuarial contributions despite employee rates remaining below the prior Civil Service Retirement System's 7% level. Critics, including fiscal analysts at the , argue that while employee rates under FERS appear lower, the structure relies on taxpayer-backed general revenues to cover persistent unfunded obligations, effectively subsidizing the system beyond explicit shares. For the (TSP), a defined contribution component, agencies automatically contribute 1% of an employee's basic pay each pay period, irrespective of employee participation, to promote baseline savings discipline. Employee contributions, which are optional and tax-deferred up to annual limits, trigger agency matching: dollar-for-dollar on the first 3% of pay contributed, and 50 cents on the dollar for the next 2%, capping total matching at 4% if the employee contributes at least 5%. This structure incentivizes personal responsibility, as under-contributions forfeit matching funds, with no carryover; for example, an employee contributing less than 5% receives proportionally reduced agency input beyond the automatic 1%. Overall, combined FERS contributions emphasize shared but asymmetric funding, with agency outlays—encompassing annuity normal costs and TSP inputs—substantially exceeding employee deductions to maintain system viability.

Vesting and Eligibility Requirements

Eligibility for a deferred FERS basic requires at least 5 years of creditable civilian service; upon separation from federal service prior to meeting immediate criteria, the vested employee becomes entitled to monthly payments commencing at age 62. Immediate unreduced annuities are available to employees who attain their minimum (MRA)—ranging from 55 for individuals born before 1948 to 57 for those born in 1970 or later, with incremental increases for intervening birth years—and accumulate either 30 years of service or reach age 60 with 20 years of service.
Birth YearMinimum Retirement Age (MRA)
Before 194855
1948–196955 to 56 (increasing by 2 months per year)
1970 and later57
Vesting in agency contributions to the —comprising the automatic 1% of basic pay and up to 4% matching—requires 3 years of creditable federal civilian service for most FERS employees, whereas employee deferral contributions vest immediately upon deposit. retirement benefits under FERS necessitate a minimum of 18 months of creditable service, alongside medical certification of inability to perform useful service due to disease or injury incurred in federal employment. FERS coverage excludes specific categories, including employees of non-appropriated fund instrumentalities (such as certain military exchange or activities) and those appointed to temporary positions limited to one year or less, who generally do not accrue retirement deductions or vesting credits unless converted to permanent status. Special occupational groups, such as officers and firefighters, maintain the standard 5-year vesting threshold for the basic annuity but qualify for enhanced eligibility provisions, including immediate at age 50 with 20 years of or any age with 25 years, to account for physical demands of their roles. These thresholds empirically incentivize retention by linking accrual to sustained duration, without guaranteeing lifetime .

Types of Retirement Options

The Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) provides several types of retirement options, each with distinct eligibility criteria based on age, years of creditable civilian service, and circumstances of separation, designed to balance incentives for continued service against provisions for earlier exits. Immediate voluntary offers an unreduced for employees reaching the minimum (MRA, currently 57 for those born in 1970 or later) with at least 30 years of service, age 60 with 20 years, or age 62 with 5 years. These thresholds encourage longer careers by tying full benefits to substantial tenure, while the MRA+30 provision allows flexibility for mid-career entrants without age penalties. Employees opting for immediate must separate from federal service and apply within specific timelines, forgoing further earnings potential in exchange for stable income. Early or reduced immediate retirement permits separation at the MRA with 10 to 29 years of service, but imposes a 5% reduction per year under age 62, creating a financial disincentive for premature departure that aligns with fiscal goals by preserving agency workforces. This option, often utilized during agency-wide reductions-in-force via discontinued service retirement, extends eligibility to those involuntarily separated at age 50 with 20 years or the MRA with 25 years, providing immediate benefits without voluntary requirements but still subject to age-based reductions if applicable. The trade-off emphasizes retention incentives, as reduced annuities lower lifetime payouts, potentially deterring voluntary early exits absent compelling personal or agency-driven reasons. Deferred retirement applies to vested employees (at least 5 years of service) who separate voluntarily before meeting immediate eligibility, deferring commencement until 62 without reductions, though it forfeits the FERS annuity supplement mimicking Social Security until full retirement . Those with fewer than 5 years receive no deferred benefits, underscoring the threshold's role in ensuring minimal commitment before entitlement. This pathway suits transient careers but trades immediate for delayed, unreduced payments, with no accrual of additional service credits post-separation. Disability retirement accommodates employees unable to perform useful due to , requiring at least 18 months of creditable and certification of inability to continue, available at any to provide income replacement without standard / hurdles. Benefits commence immediately upon approval, but eligibility demands rigorous documentation and excludes conditions arising from willful misconduct, incentivizing genuine claims while protecting against abuse through periodic reviews and recomputations. Alternatives like Voluntary Separation Incentive Payments (VSIP) may supplement or early options during reductions, offering lump-sum payments to encourage voluntary exits over involuntary claims. These provisions prioritize employability preservation, with trade-offs including potential offsets from Social Security benefits to maintain equity across programs.

Benefit Calculations and Adjustments

Annuity Formula and Computation

The basic annuity under the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) is computed using the employee's high-3 average salary, defined as the highest average basic pay earned during any three consecutive years (36 months) of creditable federal service, excluding bonuses, , and other allowances. For most employees retiring under FERS, the unreduced annuity equals 1% of the high-3 average salary multiplied by the total years and months of creditable service, expressed as a (e.g., 5 months equals 0.4167 years). If the employee retires at age 62 or later with at least 20 years of service, the multiplier increases to 1.1% per year of service. Certain occupations qualify for enhanced multipliers under special provisions. For example, air traffic controllers, officers, and firefighters receive 1.7% of the high-3 average salary for the first 20 years of service, plus 1% for each additional year. These rates apply only to service in covered positions and require meeting mandatory retirement ages or other eligibility criteria. The computed may be reduced for early retirement under provisions like voluntary early retirement authority (VERA), where the reduction is 5% per year under age 62 (prorated monthly), or for unpaid service deposits, which deduct 10% of the deposit amount from the unless waived under specific conditions. Among FERS retirees in recent years, the average initial monthly has been approximately $2,126, equating to about $25,500 annually, varying with service length, salary levels, and multipliers applied. Longer service and higher high-3 salaries typically yield larger annuities, with a 25-year often replacing 25% to 27.5% of pre-retirement high-3 pay under the standard formula.

Cost-of-Living Adjustments

Cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) for FERS annuities are calculated annually to account for , using the percentage change in the for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) from the average of the third quarter of the prior year to the average of the third quarter of the current year, as computed by the . These adjustments apply to eligible annuitants and are effective December 1 each year, appearing in payments starting the first business day of January. Under FERS, the formula is more restrained than under the (CSRS) to limit long-term cost growth. If the CPI-W increase is less than 2%, the FERS equals the full increase; if between 2% and 3%, it is capped at 2%; and if greater than 3%, it equals the CPI-W increase minus 1 . In contrast, CSRS provides the full CPI-W increase without caps. This structure reduces growth during moderate , preserving fiscal resources for the retirement trust funds. COLAs under FERS are not available to nondisabled retirees until they reach age 62, after which the capped formula applies; however, annuitants and survivors receive adjustments from the commencement of benefits, subject to the same formula (except during the initial 60% high-3 salary phase for certain ). For 2026, the CSRS COLA is 2.8%, reflecting the full CPI-W rise, while FERS is 2.0% due to the 2%-3% cap; this aligns with the Social Security COLA of 2.8%. Historically, the FERS caps have moderated expenditure growth compared to full indexing, aiding by curbing effects, though federal retiree groups have criticized the "diet COLA" for eroding over time relative to CSRS or private-sector plans.

Survivor and Death Benefits

Under the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS), survivor benefits provide annuities to eligible , former , and children upon the death of a covered employee or retiree, with computations designed to reflect the deceased's accrued service without extending ancillary payments like the FERS beyond the retiree's lifetime. For retirees, a full survivor provides the eligible with 50% of the retiree's unreduced basic upon the retiree's death, but requires a 10% in the retiree's own during their lifetime to fund this provision actuarially. A partial offers 25% of the unreduced to the survivor at a 5% cost to the retiree, while no results in no survivor but preserves the full unreduced for the retiree. These reductions cease upon the retiree's death, ensuring the survivor's aligns with the pre-elected level without ongoing deductions from a non-existent employee . In cases of death in service, a surviving married to the employee for at least nine months receives an automatic full annuity of 50% of the the employee would have been entitled to if they had retired on the date of death, assuming minimum eligibility of 18 months of creditable civilian . Eligible minor children (under 18, or up to 22 if full-time students) may receive additional annuities of up to 10% each of the computed employee , not exceeding a family maximum, if there is no surviving or if the spouse remarries before 55; these child benefits terminate upon reaching qualifying limits or other disqualifying events. Unused sick leave is credited toward the deceased employee's total length for computing these annuities, converting excess days into additional months (with 30 days equaling one month) to enhance the base without cash payout. Death benefits include the FERS Basic Employee Death Benefit (BEDB), payable only upon in-service death after 18 months of service: a one-time lump sum of approximately $15,000 plus the value of the deceased's accrued annual leave, which the surviving spouse may elect to receive as a single payment or in 36 equal monthly installments. If no survivor annuity is payable—due to lack of eligible survivors or election—the estate or designated beneficiaries receive a lump-sum return of the employee's retirement contributions plus interest, or for retirees, any unpaid annuity balance at death. Notably, the FERS annuity supplement, which approximates Social Security benefits for eligible retirees until age 62, does not transfer to survivors of retirees, confining such payments to the employee's own entitlement and thereby limiting post-mortem intergenerational fiscal transfers. Survivor annuities undergo annual cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) tied to the Consumer Price Index, prorated if commencing after December 31 of the prior year, to maintain purchasing power without inflating beyond empirical inflation metrics.

Funding and Fiscal Sustainability

Contribution Mechanics and Trust Funds

Employee and agency contributions to the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) basic annuity are deposited into the (CSRDF), a trust fund managed by the on behalf of both the (CSRS) and FERS. Employees under FERS contribute between 0.8% and 4.4% of their basic pay through mandatory payroll deductions, with the rate varying by hire date: 0.8% for those hired before 2013, 3.1% for 2012-2013 hires under FERS-Revised Annuity Employees (RAE), and 4.4% for 2014 or later hires under FERS-Further Revised Annuity Employees (FRAE). These deductions, along with agency contributions, support current benefit payouts while building reserves invested primarily in special-issue U.S. Treasury securities. Federal agencies cover the balance of the normal cost—totaling approximately 20-30% of for regular FERS employees, higher for special categories like —minus the employee share, plus supplemental amortization payments to address accrued unfunded liabilities over a 30-year schedule. Normal cost percentages are updated annually based on actuarial assumptions regarding mortality, salary growth, and economic factors, with revisions effective , 2023, reflecting refined projections for FERS subcategories. Inflows from these sources, supplemented by earnings on fund investments, currently exceed outflows for payments and administrative costs, maintaining positive as evidenced by the CSRDF's 2023 operations. The Thrift Savings Plan (TSP), FERS's defined contribution component, operates through a distinct funding mechanism without reliance on the CSRDF. Employee elective deferrals up to IRS limits, plus automatic agency contributions of 1% of pay and matching up to 4%, are withheld from payroll and allocated to individual participant accounts invested across TSP funds such as the Government Securities Investment (G) Fund, (F), (C), small cap (S), and international (I) indices. These assets are held in trust by the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board (FRTIB) and invested in marketable securities or indexed trusts, ensuring no commingling with CSRDF resources or general federal revenues. Annual actuarial valuations of the CSRDF, mandated by law and performed by the Office of Personnel Management with Board of Actuaries review, assess funding status using entry-age normal cost methods; the fiscal year 2023 valuation confirmed ongoing positive cash flows from contributions and investment income exceeding disbursements, while highlighting accruing liabilities from future retiree . This separation of and TSP funding streams underscores FERS's structure, with CSRDF inflows directly financing defined obligations through Treasury-managed reserves.

Unfunded Liabilities and Long-Term Projections

The combined unfunded actuarial liability for the (CSRS) and Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS), calculated as the present value of future benefits net of assets and scheduled contributions, stood at $1,161.3 billion as of September 30, 2022, with CSRS comprising the majority at $898.0 billion ($844.9 billion non-postal and $53.1 billion postal) and FERS at $263.3 billion ($221.6 billion non-postal and $41.7 billion postal). By the end of 2023, the FERS portion had risen to $371.4 billion, reflecting actuarial updates including lower rates and revised expectations. These figures, derived from Office of Personnel Management (OPM) valuations using a 4.00% interest rate assumption, underscore the systems' reliance on general revenues to bridge shortfalls beyond employee and agency contributions, which primarily fund normal costs rather than amortizing legacy deficits. Long-term projections reveal escalating pressures on FERS , with the unfunded forecasted to reach $687.4 billion by 2100 under baseline assumptions of 2.40% , 2.65% salary growth, and ongoing mortality improvements that extend life expectancies. In contrast, CSRS unfunded obligations are projected to decline to zero by 2100 due to statutory amortization mechanisms, though without targeted payoff schedules for legacy shortfalls, both systems expose future taxpayers to deficits amid demographic trends like a shrinking active relative to retirees—exacerbated by lower birth rates and higher rates. Actuarial discount rates below historical yields amplify these liabilities by increasing the of distant payouts, a methodological choice in OPM reports that prioritizes but may understate funding adequacy if rates rise. Employee and agency contributions cover roughly 40% of annual benefit costs on average, with the balance drawn from general revenues, perpetuating a pay-as-you-go element inherited from CSRS and straining fiscal resources as retiree numbers grow relative to contributors. Without adjustments to benefits, contributions, or assumptions, these dynamics signal rising taxpayer exposure, as defined structures lock in guarantees insensitive to contraction or economic variability. OPM's Board of Actuaries affirms in the near term but notes that statutory frameworks for FERS aim for 30-year amortization of unfunded amounts, while CSRS lacks equivalent mandates, highlighting structural vulnerabilities in causal chains from past underfunding to future obligations.

Controversies and Reform Debates

Comparisons to Private Sector Retirement Plans

The Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) combines a defined annuity, (TSP) with up to 5% employer matching contributions, and Social Security eligibility, typically yielding replacement rates of 65% to 81% of pre-retirement for employees retiring after 20 to 30 years of service, depending on age and contributions. In contrast, plans, dominated by defined contribution arrangements like s covering over 70% of participants without a guaranteed , achieve median replacement rates of approximately 40% to 50% from savings plus Social Security, with many workers falling short due to variable contributions and investment risks. No widespread private sector equivalent exists to FERS's inflation-adjusted defined benefit , which provides a floor of about 1% of high-three average salary per year of service (or 1.1% under enhanced conditions), insulating retirees from market volatility and longevity risk in ways that employer-sponsored s do not. Private defined benefit plans, once more common, now cover only about 14% of workers, and their benefits are often less portable and subject to funding shortfalls or plan terminations. Empirical analyses, including those from the , indicate federal retirement benefits contribute to overall compensation packages where non-wage benefits exceed equivalents by 43% on average, driven by the certainty and scale of FERS components. While the TSP offers portability similar to private 401(k)s, allowing seamless rollover upon job change, the FERS annuity's after five years creates a lock-in effect that can deter compared to purely defined contribution systems, though it ensures lifetime absent in most private plans. Critics argue this structure introduces by guaranteeing benefits regardless of individual or agency performance, potentially reducing productivity incentives that private market competition enforces through and performance-tied compensation. Such guarantees contrast with realities, where defined contribution outcomes depend heavily on employee savings discipline and employer match limits averaging 3% to 4%, often below FERS levels.

Criticisms of Generosity and Efficiency

The FERS annuity's vesting requirement after five years of service perpetuates a "golden handcuffs" effect akin to that under the prior CSRS, incentivizing federal employees to extend their careers primarily to secure deferred benefits rather than based on marginal or optimal role fit, thereby distorting labor mobility and efficient allocation of talent across sectors. Analyses indicate that FERS has not substantially elevated separation rates among early- and mid-career employees as anticipated, fostering prolonged tenures that may entrench bureaucratic inertia and reduce incentives for or high , since benefits accrue independently of output metrics. FERS benefits exhibit greater generosity than comparable private-sector plans, delivering replacement rates for federal annuitants that surpass those in medium and large firms—typically 70-80% of final when integrating the , Social Security, and TSP—without means-testing to restrict payouts to those in genuine need, which undermines fiscal efficiency. This structure relies heavily on taxpayer subsidization, with agencies contributing roughly 23% of an average employee's to the fund versus employees' 0.8-4.4% share, shifting the preponderance of costs to general revenues and amplifying opportunity costs by diverting funds from potentially higher-yield investments. Compounding these issues, the system's efficiency is further eroded by unlinked retiree health benefits under FEHB, where the government covers approximately 72% of premiums on a pay-as-you-go basis, imposing an annual burden estimated at over $50 billion amid rising healthcare expenditures and contributing to overall federal compensation distortions that sustain workforce expansion without proportional productivity enhancements. Critics, including policy analyses from conservative-leaning institutions countering mainstream underemphasis on public-sector overcompensation, argue this framework incentivizes retention over merit and bloats payrolls by diminishing natural attrition.

Recent Proposals and Political Conflicts (2023-2025)

In 2025, House Republicans advanced proposals within the reconciliation process to reform the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS), aiming to curb federal spending amid rising deficits. The House Oversight and Accountability Committee recommended increasing employee contributions to FERS from 0.8% of pay for those hired before 2013 to 4.4%, phased in over two years, which the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated would generate $34.5 billion in additional revenues over the 2025-2034 period. Additional measures included shifting the annuity calculation from the high-three average salary to a high-five average, potentially reducing benefits for new retirees, and eliminating the FERS annuity supplement for most early retirees under age 62, except those in mandatory early retirement occupations. The CBO projected these combined changes, including supplement elimination averaging $18,000 annually per affected annuitant, would yield nearly $51 billion in total savings over a decade. These initiatives sparked partisan divides, with Republicans framing them as essential fiscal conservatism to align FERS more closely with private-sector norms and reduce unfunded liabilities, while Democrats and federal employee unions labeled them as effective pay cuts undermining recruitment and retention. The National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association (NARFE) and American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) mobilized opposition, arguing the contribution hike equated to a 3.6% salary reduction for legacy employees and that supplement elimination would cost early retirees over $105,000 in lifetime benefits for certain professions. AFGE described the package as an "attack on the merit system," urging bipartisan rejection, while NARFE highlighted the proposals' threat to earned benefits promised in exchange for lower private-sector wages. Democrats echoed these concerns, decrying the measures as punitive despite CBO's empirical scoring of deficit impacts over union assertions of undue hardship. Ultimately, most FERS-specific reforms stalled as the stripped key provisions, including the contribution increase and high-five shift, from H.R. 1 prior to its July 2025 passage, following intense from employee groups. While some ancillary restructuring elements persisted in budget negotiations, core retirement cuts were averted, leaving existing mechanisms and supplement intact but exacerbating long-term fiscal pressures amid ongoing 2025 deficit debates. Earlier 2023 efforts, such as blueprints advocating private-sector alignment for $236 billion in savings, similarly faced resistance without legislative traction. This impasse perpetuated FERS liabilities, with no major overhauls enacted by October 2025.

References

  1. [1]
    Federal Employees' Retirement System Act of 1986 99th Congress ...
    Establishes the Federal Employees' Retirement System for Federal employees, postal employees, and Members of Congress who began service after December 31, 1983.
  2. [2]
    FERS Information - OPM
    FERS is a retirement plan that provides benefits from three different sources: a Basic Benefit Plan, Social Security and the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP).Eligibility · Computation · Types of Retirement · Former Employees
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Federal Employees' Retirement System Act of 1986 - Social Security
    The Act of 1986 establishes FERS for employees hired after 1983, providing a defined benefit plan and a thrift savings plan, coordinated with social security.
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Federal Employees Retirement System - OPM
    This is one of the most important benefits you receive as a Federal employee. FERS is a retirement system that is responsive to the changing times and Federal.
  5. [5]
    Federal Government Plans | Investor.gov
    The Federal Employees' Retirement System (FERS). The FERS Basic Benefit Plan is a defined benefit plan for federal employees hired after December 31, 1983.
  6. [6]
    Computation - OPM
    FERS Basic Annuity Formula. Age · 1 percent of your high-3 average salary for each year of service ; Computation of FERS Component. Age · 1 percent of your high-3 ...
  7. [7]
    Types of Retirement - OPM
    Types of Retirement · Overview · Disability · Early Retirement · Voluntary Retirement · Deferred Retirement · FERS Annuity Supplement.
  8. [8]
    What Is the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) and How ...
    Nov 9, 2024 · FERS is a retirement plan that covers all employees in the executive, judicial, and legislative branches of the federal government.Basic Benefit Plan · Social Security · Thrift Savings Plan · Types of Retirement
  9. [9]
    Federal Employees' Retirement System: Budget and Trust Fund Issues
    Dec 13, 2019 · FERS annuities are fully funded by the sum of employee and employer contributions and interest earned by the Treasury bonds held by the Civil Service ...
  10. [10]
    Senate strips most retirement cuts from reconciliation, but anti-civil ...
    Jun 13, 2025 · Gone from the bill are House-passed provisions that would require all federal workers to contribute 4.4% of their basic pay toward the Federal ...
  11. [11]
    Congress softens the blow: Here's how it affects you
    May 26, 2025 · A series of sweeping proposals targeting the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) and associated benefits could reshape the financial future of millions ...
  12. [12]
    Federal Employees' Retirement System: Summary of Recent Trends
    Dec 12, 2023 · The Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) was established by P.L. 66-215 in 1920, 15 years before Congress created the Social Security system ...
  13. [13]
    Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) | U.S. Customs and Border ...
    Aug 7, 2024 · The Civil Service Retirement Act, which became effective on August 1, 1920, established a retirement system for certain federal employees.
  14. [14]
    Comparing Replacement Rates Under Private and Federal ...
    The Civil Service Retirement System was created in 1920 and was the only retirement plan for most federal civilian employees until 1984. CSRS is a defined ...<|separator|>
  15. [15]
    CSRS Information - OPM
    The Civil Service Retirement Act, which became effective on August 1, 1920, established a retirement system for certain Federal employees.Eligibility · Types of Retirement · Survivors · Former Employees
  16. [16]
    FERS pioneers examine past, present and future of retirement fund
    Dec 12, 2012 · One of the downsides of CSRS, according to analysts, was that it created “golden handcuffs,” forcing people to stay in the government because ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] The effect of government pensions on financial well-being - TIAA
    Like many traditional. DB pensions, the generosity of CSRS coupled with low portability left many feeling that they had “golden handcuffs.” In 1986, Congress ...
  18. [18]
    UNDERSTANDING YOUR PLAN - The Washington Post
    Aug 22, 1997 · The CSRS system is a "golden handcuff" program, designed to provide an excellent annuity -- indexed to inflation -- for people who make a full ...
  19. [19]
    HR 2672 (99 th ): Federal Employees' Retirement System Act of 1986
    This bill was enacted after being signed by the President on June 6, 1986. ... Date, Action. June 5, 1985. Introduced. Bills and resolutions are referred to ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] THE FEDERAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM ACT ... - SOA
    Jan 1, 1988 · The Federal Employees' Retirement System (FERS), enacted into law on. June 6, 1986, covers civilian employees of the U.S. Government who were.
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Chapter 11 - Election of FERS Coverage - OPM
    Jan 1, 1987 · A. Introduction. Employees who are covered by CSRS and certain others who have performed service that is creditable under CSRS may elect ...Missing: transitional existing
  23. [23]
    CRS Explains Congressional Retirement Benefits - Tax Notes
    In 1987, less than 5% of eligible federal employees switched from CSRS to FERS, and in 1998 less than 1% of eligible employees switched.
  24. [24]
    [PDF] T-GGD-98-27 The Federal Employees' Retirement System
    Percentage of CSRS employees. 0. 20. 40. 60. 80. 100. $15,000-$19,999 $30,000-$34,999 $45,000-$49,999 $60,000-$64,999. Selected income levels. Source: Federal ...
  25. [25]
    What is FERCCA? - OPM.gov
    FERCCA is the Federal Erroneous Retirement Coverage Corrections Act. It is a law that addresses the long-term harm to retirement planning.
  26. [26]
    What is the Federal Erroneous Retirement Coverage Corrections Act ...
    The FERCCA addresses the problems created when employees are in the wrong retirement plan for an extended period.
  27. [27]
    S. Rept. 106-178 - FEDERAL ERRONEOUS RETIREMENT ...
    The purpose of S. 1232, the Federal Erroneous Retirement Coverage Corrections Act, is to provide for the correction of certain retirement coverage errors ...
  28. [28]
    Federal Erroneous Retirement Coverage Corrections Act (FERCCA)
    FERCCA was enacted in September 2000 and designed to provide relief to federal civilian employees who were placed in the wrong federal retirement system.
  29. [29]
    [PDF] MIDDLE CLASS TAX RELIEF AND JOB CREATION ACT OF 2012
    and Job Creation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–312), and section. 202 ... INCREASE IN CONTRIBUTIONS TO FEDERAL EMPLOYEES'. RETIREMENT SYSTEM FOR NEW EMPLOYEES.
  30. [30]
    Increase Federal Civilian Employees' Contributions to the Federal ...
    Dec 13, 2018 · First, the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 increased the contribution rate to 3.1 percent for most employees hired ...
  31. [31]
    Summary of The Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012
    Feb 16, 2012 · The employee contribution rate is currently 0.8 percent of pay. Employee contributions and benefits for special occupational groups and Members ...
  32. [32]
    Social Security Fairness Act: Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP ...
    Jul 21, 2025 · The Act ends the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and Government Pension Offset (GPO). These provisions reduced or eliminated the Social Security benefits ...
  33. [33]
    Research: The Social Security Windfall Elimination Provision
    The Act eliminates the reduction of Social Security benefits while entitled to public pensions from work not covered by Social Security. Learn more about the ...
  34. [34]
    The Social Security Fairness Act: What we know so far
    Jan 9, 2025 · The repeal of the WEP and GPO will increase the Social Security benefit entitlements of the government worker or retiree who is receiving a ...
  35. [35]
    5 CFR Part 842 -- Federal Employees Retirement System—Basic ...
    FERS elections are available under limited circumstances to employees not subject to automatic FERS coverage. [59 FR 64282, Dec. 14, 1994]. § 842.102 ...
  36. [36]
    CSRS vs. FERS: Understanding Federal Retirement Systems
    Sep 10, 2025 · CSRS, established in 1920, was the sole retirement system for federal civilian employees for over six decades.
  37. [37]
    FERS vs CSRS differences Explained - FEBRA
    Aug 25, 2025 · Social Security: Paid in addition to your FERS pension, providing extra retirement income and portability if you leave federal service.
  38. [38]
    Social Security Benefits in Federal Employee Retirement Retirement
    Sep 10, 2025 · Under FERS, you'll pay the standard Social Security tax of 6.2% on earnings up to the annual maximum ($176,100 in 2025). This appears on your ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  39. [39]
    Program Explainer: Windfall Elimination Provision - Social Security
    The Social Security Fairness Act, HR 82, concerning the Windfall Elimination Program and Government Pension Offset, was signed into law on January 5, 2025.
  40. [40]
    Biden signs Social Security Fairness Act into law
    Jan 5, 2025 · CBO also estimated that eliminating WEP will increase monthly Social Security payments of impacted individuals by $360, on average, by December ...<|separator|>
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Chapter 51 - Retiree Annuity Supplement - OPM
    Chapter 51 explains the rules regarding eligibility for and computation of the retiree annuity supplement under FERS. The retiree annuity supplement is a ...
  42. [42]
    A primer on the FERS supplement - Government Executive
    Nov 7, 2024 · For 2024, the exempt amount is $22,320 and for 2025, the annual exempt amount is $23,400. Roger retired Aug.
  43. [43]
    The 'new deal' for federal retirement: What the latest FERS ...
    May 29, 2025 · In fiscal year 2025, the average annual supplement for affected annuitants would be about $18,000/year or $1,500/month, CBO estimates. Those ...
  44. [44]
    About The Thrift Savings Plan (TSP)
    Dec 17, 2024 · The TSP is a retirement savings and investment plan for federal employees and uniformed services members, a defined contribution plan.Missing: GFCSI | Show results with:GFCSI
  45. [45]
    Contribution Types | The Thrift Savings Plan (TSP)
    Dec 20, 2024 · Agency/Service matching contributions​​ The first 3% is matched dollar-for-dollar by your agency or service; the next 2% is matched at 50 cents ...
  46. [46]
    Individual Funds | The Thrift Savings Plan (TSP)
    Apr 21, 2023 · The TSP offers G, F, C, S, and I funds. G is government securities, F is fixed income, C is common stock, S is small cap, and I is ...G Fund · C Fund · S Fund · I Fund
  47. [47]
    G Fund | The Thrift Savings Plan (TSP)
    Feb 27, 2025 · The G Fund is a government-guaranteed fund for TSP, aiming to protect from loss and preserve capital, with no credit risk. It is invested in ...
  48. [48]
    Expenses and fees | The Thrift Savings Plan (TSP)
    Aug 6, 2025 · The TSP's expenses are lower than 99% of investment options. While this cost is only one of several factors you should consider when making ...
  49. [49]
    Thrift Savings Plan Vesting Requirements and the TSP Service ...
    Jul 9, 2015 · For most FERS employees, the TSP vesting requirement is 3 years. However, employees serving in certain positions (see below) only need to ...
  50. [50]
    Federal Thrift Savings Plan Reports Record Match Qualifiers, Total ...
    Feb 1, 2024 · The Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board has reported a record $845 billion in assets under management in the plan at the end of 2023.<|separator|>
  51. [51]
    Rates of Return | The Thrift Savings Plan (TSP)
    Jul 22, 2024 · Fund performance. Rates of return · Share price history · Share price calculation. Use your savings. TSP loans · Taking money from your account ...Missing: low | Show results with:low
  52. [52]
    Understanding FERS Contribution - Serving Those Who Serve
    Feb 27, 2024 · And then employees contribute either 0.8%, 3.1%, or 4.4% depending on the date of hire.
  53. [53]
    Federal Employee Retirement System (FERS)
    Jan 24, 2025 · Congress created the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) in 1986, and it became effective on January 1, 1987.
  54. [54]
    Increase Federal Civilian Employees' Contributions to the Federal ...
    Most people who were hired before 2013 contribute 0.8 percent, most people hired in 2013 contribute 3.1 percent, and most people hired in 2014 or later ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Changes to Agency Contributions for the Federal Employees ... - OPM
    This letter provides notice of the revised normal cost percentages for employees covered by the Federal Employee Retirement System (FERS) Act of 1986.
  56. [56]
    TSP Matching Contribution Example - Serving Those Who Serve
    Mar 5, 2024 · This article discusses the TSP matching contribution. The agency contributes 1% of the employee's base salary no matter what.
  57. [57]
    Eligibility - OPM
    Eligibility is determined by your age and number of years of creditable service. In some cases, you must have reached the Minimum Retirement Age (MRA) to ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Summary of the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) (PDF)
    ... fund window, bear in mind that any or all of the risks explained in the description of the TSP funds may also apply to your chosen mutual funds . In ...Missing: GFCSI | Show results with:GFCSI<|separator|>
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Information About Disability Retirement (FERS) - OPM
    Eligibility Requirements for Disability Retirement​​ 1. You must have completed at least 18 months of Federal civilian service which is creditable under FERS.
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Chapter 10. Coverage 10-1 - OPM
    Dec 31, 2012 · not excluded from FERS term appointments, temporary appointments-PER (TAPER), and ... Government employees are excluded from FERS. (See ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] CC048493 HRM 9316.1A Final Directive: Temporary and Term ...
    Feb 5, 2024 · (a) Temporary employees are not eligible to participate in the FEGLI. Program, FERS, or TSP. However, they may be eligible to continue coverage ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  62. [62]
    [PDF] CSRS FERS Important Notice - OPM
    Apr 20, 1998 · Introduction. Subchapter 46B covers the special retirement provisions that apply to certain groups of FERS employees: law enforcement officers, ...
  63. [63]
    Retirement Eligibility & FERS Minimum Retirement Age (MRA)
    Under FERS, an employee who meets one of the following age and service requirements is entitled to an immediate retirement benefit: age 62 with five years of ...
  64. [64]
    [PDF] Applying for Immediate Retirement Under the Federal Employees ...
    The Minimum Retirement Age depends on your year of birth. To determine your MRA, refer to the following table. If your year of birth is... Your MRA ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Chapter 44 - Discontinued Service Retirement - OPM
    the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS). This subchapter explains how FERS differs from CSRS. It refers readers to the CSRS rule that applies or ...Missing: switch incentives
  66. [66]
    Discontinued Service vs. Deferred Retirement - FEDweek
    Feb 20, 2025 · Discontinued service retirement is for involuntary separation with 25 years/50 at 20, while deferred retirement is for those leaving before ...
  67. [67]
    The unplanned retirement dilemma - Government Executive
    Feb 6, 2025 · If you are at your MRA with 10 years but less than 30 or at age 60 or 61 with at least 10 years or less than 20, you are eligible for a “reduced ...
  68. [68]
    [PDF] Chapter 60 - Disability Retirement - OPM
    minimum service requirement for establishing eligibility to a FERS disability annuity is. 18 months. Example: Robin began employment on March 22, 2018. She ...
  69. [69]
    High-Three Average Salary Calculation for Federal Employees
    Jan 9, 2024 · The high-three average salary is defined as a retiring employee's highest basic pay averaged over any three consecutive years in federal service.
  70. [70]
    [PDF] Information for FERS Annuitants - OPM
    Your Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) component is 2.5% of your “high-3” average salary, multiplied by up to 20 years of law enforcement officer, ...
  71. [71]
    How is a FERS disability retirement special provision rate calculated?
    Sep 26, 2023 · For special groups, the FERS disability rate uses 1.7% for the first 20 years and 1% for additional years. At 62, the annuity is based on high- ...
  72. [72]
    Understanding FERS Calculation - Serving Those Who Serve
    May 11, 2022 · For the 20 years of service, a special provision employee 's basic FERS gross annuity is calculated as 1.7 percent of their high-three average ...
  73. [73]
    ATC Retirement: Mandatory Retirement Age, FERS Rules & Eligibility
    Aug 5, 2025 · Pension = 1.7% × High-3 salary × first 20 years · Plus 1.0% × High-3 salary × remaining years (if any).<|separator|>
  74. [74]
    How Much Income Will Your FERS Pension Replace? - FedSmith.com
    Nov 7, 2023 · A FERS career that lasts 25 years could have 25% to 27.5% of the pre-retirement highest average salary replaced with the pension.
  75. [75]
    How is the Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA) determined? - OPM.gov
    If the CPI increase is more than 3 percent, the adjustment is 1 percent less than the CPI increase. The new amount is rounded down to the next whole dollar. To ...
  76. [76]
    When is the Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA) paid? - OPM.gov
    Cost-of-Living Adjustments are effective each December first. The adjustment appears in your payment on the first business day of January.
  77. [77]
    Cost-of-Living Adjustments for Federal Civil Service Annuities
    Oct 10, 2024 · All CSRS retirees and survivors receive COLAs. Under FERS, however, nondisabled retirees under the age of 62 do not receive COLAs. Survivors and ...
  78. [78]
    The FERS Cost-of-Living-Adjustment (COLA) and the Equal COLA ...
    Apr 1, 2025 · If inflation is greater than 3.0%, then the COLA for FERS benefits is equal to the change in the CPI-W minus one percentage point. Thus, the ...
  79. [79]
  80. [80]
    2026 CSRS / FERS COLA Announced - My Federal Retirement
    The 2026 federal retiree cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) will be 2.8 percent for those under the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) and 2.0 percent for ...Guide to Federal Retiree COLAs · Federal Retiree COLA History
  81. [81]
    A 'diet COLA' for FERS retirees has compounding effects on ...
    Oct 20, 2023 · That came out to a 7.7% COLA in 2023 and a 4.9% COLA in 2022 for FERS retirees. To address the disparity, some lawmakers have been pushing for a ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  82. [82]
    Survivors - OPM
    Surviving Spouse​​ If an employee dies with at least 18 months of creditable civilian service under FERS, a survivor annuity may be payable if: the surviving ...
  83. [83]
    Learn more about survivor benefits and retirement - OPM
    Under the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS), a full benefit is 50 percent of your unreduced annual basic annuity and a partial benefit is 25 percent ...
  84. [84]
    Survivor Benefits - OPM
    A monthly annuity may be payable to a current spouse, former spouse (if a retiree elects this benefit or if it is awarded by court order), a minor child, ...
  85. [85]
    Fact Sheet: Sick Leave (General Information) - OPM
    Sick Leave Used in the Computation of an Annuity. Unused sick leave will be used in the calculation of an employee's or survivor's annuity based on ...
  86. [86]
    Annuity Payments - OPM
    As a Federal annuitant receiving monthly benefits you can browse the listings below to see how to manage your monthly annuity benefits online.
  87. [87]
    [PDF] Note 13. Federal Employee and Veteran Benefits Payable
    CSRDF monies are generated primarily from employees' contributions, federal entity contributions, payments from the General Fund, and interest on investments in ...
  88. [88]
    [PDF] Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund Annual Report - OPM
    FERS 2023. Total. 2023. Total. 2022. GAS Securities: 2.875% due 2024. $5,272 ... The actuarial valuation of the CSRDF is based on the employee and annuitant.
  89. [89]
    Federal Employees' Retirement System; Normal Cost Percentages
    Apr 14, 2023 · The revised normal cost percentages are effective at the beginning of the first pay period commencing on or after October 1, 2023. Agency ...
  90. [90]
    Home | The Thrift Savings Plan (TSP)
    Jun 27, 2025 · The Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) is a retirement savings and investment plan for Federal employees and members of the uniformed services, ...Contact us · TSP funds · Share Price History · Fund options
  91. [91]
    [PDF] Board of Actuaries Statement Fiscal Year 2023 Civil Service ... - OPM
    Jan 8, 2024 · The actuarial valuation reflected in the CSRDF Annual Report is intended to estimate the full cost of the system and to allocate the cost ...
  92. [92]
    [PDF] BOA Statement FY 2024 CSRDF Report_22Jan2025 - OPM
    Feb 4, 2025 · This report accompanies the CSRDF Annual Report, related to CSRS and FERS, which provide retirement benefits to federal employees. The Board of ...
  93. [93]
    [PDF] Federal and Private Sector Retirement Program Benefits Vary - GAO
    Apr 7, 1997 · Replacement Rates at. Retirement. With a replacement rate of 65 percent, FERS ranks first in a comparison of available benefits for employees ...
  94. [94]
    How Social Security and the Private Retirement System Work Together
    Apr 17, 2025 · At a retirement age of 67, the replacement rates of both DC/IRA assets and Social Security increase by 5–7 percentage points compared with a ...
  95. [95]
    New Report: 40% of Older Americans Rely Solely on Social Security ...
    Jan 13, 2020 · Typically, benefits from Social Security replace approximately 40 percent of pre-retirement income. Most financial planners recommend at least a ...
  96. [96]
    New Government Research Finds Strong Private Sector Retirement ...
    Sep 28, 2025 · Notably, 70 percent of private sector workers had access to defined contribution plans, and 14 percent had access to defined benefit plans.Missing: federal lifetime empirical
  97. [97]
    Comparing the Compensation of Federal and Private-Sector ...
    Apr 25, 2024 · In this report, the Congressional Budget Office compares the cost that the federal government incurred in 2022 for the wages and benefits of its civilian ...
  98. [98]
    Federal, Private Sector Benefits Don't Compare Well Directly, Says ...
    Jun 12, 2024 · On average, benefits such as health insurance, retirement income and paid leave are “43 percent higher for federal civilian employees than for ...
  99. [99]
    Retirement, retention, recruitment: Evidence from a federal pension ...
    Oct 11, 2025 · One potential reason is that private-sector workers, on average, have less generous pensions compared to public-sector workers. Due to this, the ...Missing: retirees | Show results with:retirees
  100. [100]
    Did FERS Actually End the CSRS "Golden Handcuffs" Effect?
    Oct 5, 2022 · Federal employees who stay beyond about age 40 and about 10 years in become lifers whether in FERS or CSRS.Missing: mobility | Show results with:mobility
  101. [101]
    Modifying Federal Civil Service Retirement Incentives - RAND
    However, FERS appears to be less successful at increasing separation rates among those in their early and mid-careers. The lower separation rates observed under ...Missing: studies criticisms
  102. [102]
    Premiums - OPM
    The monthly maximum government contribution (72% of the weighted average) is $703.65 for Self Only, $1,540.87 for Self Plus One and $1,685.73 for Self and ...Missing: burden | Show results with:burden
  103. [103]
    Why It Is Time to Reform Compensation for Federal Employees
    Jul 27, 2016 · Economic studies consistently find that federal employees enjoy both higher pay and substantially higher benefits than comparable private-sector workers.<|separator|>
  104. [104]
    Reconciliation Recommendations of the House Committee on ...
    May 13, 2025 · CBO estimates that the proposed increases in employee contributions would increase revenues by $34.5 billion over the 2025-2034 period. Federal ...
  105. [105]
    House-passed reconciliation bill includes more changes to ...
    May 22, 2025 · A separate provision on increasing the FERS contribution rate to 4.4% across the board was already struck from the legislation earlier this week ...
  106. [106]
    House Republicans' pension changes will save nearly $51B, CBO ...
    which would reduce appropriated spending by $31.8 billion ...
  107. [107]
    Budget Blueprint for Fiscal Year 2023: Policy Proposal
    Bringing federal employee retirement benefits in line with the private sector would reduce accrual-based discretionary spending by $236.542 billion during ...
  108. [108]
    House Committee Advances Cuts to Federal Benefits - NARFE
    May 5, 2025 · Increasing federal employee contributions from payroll towards FERS to 4.4%, phased in over two years. This is essentially a 3.6% pay cut for ...<|separator|>
  109. [109]
    AFGE Fights House Republicans' $50 Billion Cuts to Federal ...
    May 12, 2025 · House Republicans are pursuing at least $50 billion in cuts to Federal Employee Retirement System (FERS) benefits to help pay for a $4.5 trillion package of ...
  110. [110]
    [PDF] Threats to Federal Employee and Retiree Earned Benefits - NARFE
    Threats to Federal Employee and Retiree. Earned Benefits. President Trump and Republican leadership in the House and Senate are planning to advance budget ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  111. [111]
    Rep. Stephen F. Lynch and Ranking Member Steny Hoyer Mobilize ...
    May 14, 2025 · AFGE urges Members on both sides of the aisle to take notice of today's discussion and reject the package of proposed changes to FERS that will ...
  112. [112]
    Federal Workforce Provisions Dropped from H.R. 1 Prior to Senate ...
    Jul 1, 2025 · Increasing federal employee contributions from payroll towards FERS to 4.4%, phased in over two years. This is essentially a 3.6% pay cut for ...
  113. [113]
    In early 2025, federal employees narrowly avoided significant cuts to ...
    Sep 8, 2025 · Eliminate FERS Supplemental Retirement Payments $5 – $13 billion in 10-year savings • This option would eliminate the supplement to FERS ...