Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Civil Works Administration

The Civil Works Administration (CWA) was a federal employment relief program launched on November 8, 1933, by under the to offer temporary jobs during the Great Depression's harsh winter, focusing on to alleviate widespread . Administered by , it rapidly scaled to employ approximately 4 million workers at its peak, representing a significant portion of the unemployed labor force amid economic collapse. Projects encompassed infrastructure improvements such as constructing or repairing 250,000 miles of s, building or upgrading 40,000 schools, erecting 3,700 playgrounds, and installing 150,000 privies, all executed on public lands with local sponsorship to maximize immediate utility and skill utilization. These efforts, funded initially from allocations at about $200 million per month, delivered tangible outputs like road networks and sanitation facilities that supported community needs without long-term federal ownership. Despite its swift deployment and scale—achieving nationwide coverage in under two months—the CWA faced termination on March 31, 1934, after expending nearly $1 billion, far surpassing initial estimates of $400 million, due to fiscal pressures and apprehensions that sustained might foster dependency rather than . Critics highlighted inefficiencies, including elevated administrative costs from hasty rollout and instances of non-productive assignments, though empirical records show substantial physical completions like levees and water mains that endured beyond the program's lifespan. Transitioning operations to the , the CWA exemplified pragmatism in crisis response but underscored causal limits of deficit-financed work relief in addressing Depression-era structural imbalances, as persisted and required subsequent programs.

Background and Establishment

Economic Context of the Great Depression

The , commencing with the of October 1929, inflicted profound economic contraction on the , marked by a 29 percent decline in from 1929 to 1933. surged to approximately 25 percent of the civilian labor force by 1933, with the estimating 12.8 million individuals out of work amid a labor force exceeding 51 million. Industrial production plummeted by roughly 53 percent from its 1929 peak to the trough in March 1933, reflecting collapsed and output as consumer demand evaporated. Compounding this were widespread bank failures and deflationary spirals that eroded and . Between 1930 and 1933, over 9,000 banks collapsed, representing nearly one-third of all U.S. banking institutions and wiping out billions in deposits, which further stifled and . The fell by nearly 25 percent over the same period, with annual rates exceeding 10 percent in 1932, intensifying debt burdens and discouraging spending as real interest rates soared. Under President , federal responses emphasized indirect measures, such as the established in January to lend to banks and businesses, while rejecting to individuals to avoid undermining and state responsibilities. Local governments and private charities, however, exhausted their capacities by late , with numerous cities facing and unable to sustain relief amid surging welfare rolls that strained budgets already battered by falling tax revenues. This fiscal collapse at state and municipal levels amplified calls for expanded national intervention, as traditional voluntary and localized aid proved inadequate against the crisis's scale. The Civil Works Administration (CWA) was established by President Franklin D. Roosevelt via Executive Order 6420-B, signed on November 9, 1933, under the authority granted by Title II of the National Industrial Recovery Act of June 16, 1933. The order created the Federal Civil Works Administration as an independent agency within the broader Federal Emergency Administration of Public Works, empowering it to finance and construct public works projects aimed at swiftly alleviating unemployment during the deepening Great Depression. This executive action allocated $400 million from the $3.3 billion appropriation designated for public works under the National Industrial Recovery Act and the Fourth Deficiency Act, enabling immediate implementation without awaiting new congressional funding. Harry Hopkins, serving as Administrator of the Federal Emergency Relief Administration, proposed the CWA to Roosevelt in early November 1933 as an urgent winter initiative to hire millions of the unemployed directly through federal payrolls, thereby bypassing the protracted legislative process that had slowed prior relief efforts. Hopkins advocated for this approach to provide work relief on a massive scale within weeks, contrasting with the more deliberate, large-scale infrastructure planning of the Public Works Administration (PWA), which prioritized engineering feasibility and long-term economic multipliers over speed. The CWA's framework emphasized temporary, labor-intensive projects executable by unskilled workers, positioning it as a short-term bridge to sustain families through the harsh 1933-1934 winter until broader recovery measures could take effect.

Administration and Operations

Leadership and Organizational Structure

The Civil Works Administration was administered by Harry L. Hopkins, who leveraged his prior experience directing the (FERA) to establish and operate the program as a direct federal employment initiative. Appointed by President upon the agency's creation via on November 8, 1933, Hopkins coordinated the distribution of federal funds to hire millions of workers swiftly, focusing on emergency relief during the 1933-1934 winter. Organizationally, the CWA operated under centralized federal authority in but delegated substantial responsibilities to state-level administrators and local Civil Works Divisions for practical execution. These divisions, staffed often by experienced FERA personnel, managed worker eligibility , project approvals, and operational , facilitating coordination with municipal sponsors while adapting to regional needs in the program's brief four-month lifespan. Hiring emphasized skilled and white-collar unemployed individuals over unskilled laborers, incorporating professionals such as engineers, teachers, and clerical workers into roles via specialized components like the Civil Works Service to maximize productive output. Rapid scaling to over employees necessitated innovative mechanisms, with workers placed directly on rolls, alongside eligibility and timekeeping protocols to curb potential and ensure efficient fund allocation.

Employment Policies and Project Implementation

The Civil Works Administration selected workers primarily from local relief rolls, certifying eligibility based on financial need rather than vocational skills or prior experience, to ensure broad access to for the unemployed during the program's brief operation. This approach allowed for rapid onboarding, drawing individuals previously reliant on direct payments into paid labor, though it sometimes resulted in assigning unskilled workers to basic tasks without extensive training. Wage policies established a minimum for common labor, averaging $50 per month, which provided a predictable income stream exceeding typical allotments and, in many localities, surpassing stagnant pay amid the Depression's . Skilled positions commanded higher rates, up to $1.20 per day in some regions, but the structure prioritized volume hiring over competitive compensation to stimulate immediate economic circulation without displacing private jobs. Project implementation relied on decentralized coordination, with local emergency relief administrators—operating under state Federal Emergency Relief Administration offices—submitting proposals aligned with federal guidelines for approval, enabling projects to commence within days to weeks for swift job rollout. This expedited process, directed by Administrator , favored "shovel-ready" initiatives that required minimal upfront planning, subordinating engineering rigor to the imperative of averting winter destitution. Confined to the period from November 9, 1933, to March 31, 1934, the CWA's temporal scope addressed acute seasonal unemployment exacerbated by construction halts and reduced outdoor work in colder months, transitioning participants back to other relief mechanisms as warmer weather revived private opportunities.

Activities and Projects

Types of Public Works Undertaken

The Civil Works Administration (CWA) funded a wide array of public works projects, encompassing both manual labor in infrastructure development and professional services for white-collar workers, reflecting its emergency-driven, decentralized structure that prioritized rapid initiation over long-term planning. Construction efforts predominantly focused on transportation and utilities, including the improvement or building of approximately 250,000 miles of roads and streets nationwide, as well as bridges, airports, and public buildings such as schools and community halls. Other infrastructure initiatives involved sanitation enhancements, sewer and drainage systems, and park developments, often on small scales to facilitate quick local sponsorship and deployment across public lands. In contrast to subsequent programs like the , which emphasized manual labor, the CWA notably incorporated white-collar positions through its Civil Works Service division, employing professionals in tasks such as and topographic surveys, coastline and harbor assessments, and statistical by accountants, clerks, and statisticians. Non-construction projects extended to educational and cultural activities, including library cataloging, art and theater initiatives, modeling and design classes, and services like tuberculin testing in schools. Overall, the program authorized roughly 200,000 separate initiatives, many localized and , to address immediate relief needs while utilizing diverse skill sets.

Scale and Geographic Distribution

The Civil Works Administration rapidly scaled to employ 4,263,644 workers at its peak on January 18, 1934, shortly after its launch on November 9, 1933. This figure encompassed direct hires and those through local administrative divisions, marking a swift nationwide mobilization to combat during the winter months. The program's reach extended across all states and territories, with operations decentralized through state, county, and municipal administrations that sponsored projects on public lands. Employment density was highest in populous industrial regions, such as and , where urban centers faced acute job losses, while rural areas received allocations for adapted like road improvements and land to suit agricultural contexts. Overall, the CWA encompassed roughly 200,000 projects distributed proportionally to local need and sponsorship capacity. Federal funding for the initiative, drawn from reserves, exceeded $800 million by the program's end on March 31, 1934, sustaining monthly expenditures of approximately $200 million at full operation. This allocation supported wages comprising about 80% of outlays, with the balance directed to materials and oversight.

Achievements and Positive Outcomes

Employment and Relief Statistics

The Civil Works Administration (CWA) achieved peak employment of approximately 4 million workers by January 1934, representing a swift mobilization to address winter following its establishment in November 1933. This scale dwarfed prior relief efforts, as pre-CWA baselines under the (FERA) supported millions through direct aid amid rates exceeding 20 percent nationally. The program's emphasis on work relief over handouts enabled a temporary transition for many able-bodied individuals from FERA's caseloads to payrolls, prioritizing employable heads of families to maximize household impact. Demographic targeting focused on unemployed heads of households, with eligibility restricted to those deemed capable of productive labor, excluding the unemployable to conserve resources for verifiable need. Women comprised a smaller share, often in segregated roles such as clerical or projects under the Civil Works division, while minorities received allocations proportional to local rolls, though varied by state administration and faced documented disparities in southern regions. Labor oversight ensured wages approximated local prevailing rates—typically $1.00 to $1.50 daily for common labor—totaling over $700 million in payroll across its four-month span, which bolstered short-term family against pre-program baselines of subsistence-level .
MetricValueTimeframeSource
Peak Employment~4 million workersJanuary 1934National Archives
Total Payroll Expenditure~$700 million (80% of funds)November 1933–March 1934University of Washington analysis of CWA records
Primary EligibilityHeads of employable familiesProgram durationHistorical relief policy documentation

Contributions to Infrastructure and Public Services

The Civil Works Administration (CWA) directed substantial efforts toward constructing and repairing essential infrastructure, including roads, sewers, and public facilities, which addressed immediate needs neglected amid the economic contraction of the Great Depression. Workers improved or built approximately 500,000 miles of roads and streets nationwide, facilitating better connectivity in rural and urban areas where private sector investment had plummeted due to insufficient demand and capital scarcity. Additionally, CWA projects laid 12 million feet of sewer pipe, enhancing sanitation systems in municipalities strained by population growth and deferred maintenance. Public buildings and educational infrastructure saw significant upgrades, with over 40,000 repaired or constructed to restore functionality and accommodate use. Thousands of additional public structures, such as halls and utilities , were erected or rehabilitated, contributing to local delivery in the absence of viable alternatives. Parks and recreational areas were enhanced through , trail building, and pavilion construction, providing enduring public amenities that supported health and leisure without reliance on market-driven development. These outputs, totaling improvements to over 500,000 segments as documented in evaluations, represented a rapid scaling of public assets that private entities were unwilling or unable to undertake during the period's credit freeze and deflationary pressures. Examples include road realignments in to remove rock obstructions and the development of music pavilions in parks, yielding assets still utilized decades later.

Criticisms and Controversies

Fiscal and Economic Critiques

The Civil Works Administration was financed through , with an initial allocation of $400 million from existing funds via 6420-B on November 9, 1933. By its termination in April , total expenditures reached approximately $933 million, exceeding the original appropriation through supplemental funding and rapid project rollout. This outlay, drawn from federal borrowing, contributed to the national debt increasing from $22 billion in 1933 to $33 billion by 1936 amid broader initiatives. Economists have critiqued such programs for potential crowding out of investment, as hiring competed for limited labor and in a depressed economy. Analyses of work relief, encompassing CWA operations, reveal that relief reduced jobs by offering wages closer to market rates, displacing an estimated one position for every 1.5 to 2 relief jobs created. This limited net gains and diverted resources from potentially more efficient ventures, with federal spending correlating to declines in state-level investment during the period. Debates over fiscal multipliers highlight the CWA's limited role in fostering sustained recovery. Empirical estimates for federal expenditures yield state income multipliers of 0.4 to 0.96, indicating that each spent generated less than a in broader economic activity. Recipient wages predominantly funded immediate goods rather than , yielding short-term boosts but insufficient structural stimulus to reverse deflationary pressures or restore lending. Agricultural reports from the era noted related distortions, with farmers facing seasonal labor shortages as rural workers shifted to CWA's higher prevailing wages, straining output in food production.

Administrative Inefficiencies and Waste

The Civil Works Administration's rapid expansion from inception in November 1933 to employing approximately 4 million workers by early 1934 necessitated decentralized administration through state and local agencies, which contributed to inefficiencies in oversight and project selection. Congressional records documented complaints of unproductive "" tasks, such as workers raking leaves, shoveling snow in parks, or digging ditches only to refill them, intended as temporary relief but criticized as lacking substantive value and fostering idleness. These practices were debated in proceedings, where opponents argued they exemplified wasteful expenditure without enduring public benefit, exacerbating fiscal strain amid the program's $400 million initial allocation. Investigations into fraud revealed systemic vulnerabilities, including payroll padding where fictitious or ghost employees were listed to inflate disbursements. In February , federal inquiries in led to the dismissal of 14 CWA staff and criminal charges against 12 individuals for such schemes, highlighting lax verification in hiring rushed to meet quotas. Broader critiques from contemporaneous reports cited political favoritism in project approvals and in contract awards, with complaints flooding the at rates of hundreds per day by mid-February , underscoring administrative overload and uneven enforcement across jurisdictions. The absence of rigorous competitive bidding and reliance on scales further amplified costs, as directives prioritized speed over efficiency, resulting in projects that duplicated efforts or employed unnecessary labor. While exact overhead metrics varied, state-level audits exposed discrepancies where administrative and supervisory expenses consumed disproportionate shares of budgets, often exceeding 5-10% in high-complaint regions due to duplicated record-keeping and supervisory bloat. These issues reflected the challenges of scaling a relief apparatus amid economic desperation, where hasty outpaced capacity for .

Political Opposition and Social Impacts

Republicans and conservative Democrats opposed the Civil Works Administration on ideological grounds, decrying it as a form of that expanded federal overreach into private economic spheres. In , conservative critics argued the program cluttered public payrolls with unnecessary hires and directly competed with private industry by drawing workers away from market-driven jobs, thereby distorting labor markets and risking entrenched dependency on support. Business interests and fiscal conservatives further lambasted CWA initiatives as inefficient "make-work" schemes, where projects like ditch digging or minor repairs offered superficial without fostering sustainable skills or stimulating genuine , potentially eroding workers' initiative and incentives. Such critiques echoed broader concerns that short-term expenditures, totaling over $933 million by March 1934, prioritized political over fiscal , with allegations of graft in job allocations amplifying distrust despite limited verified . The program's social effects were mixed, providing immediate wage support that temporarily bolstered family stability and averted deeper destitution for approximately 4 million participants during the 1933–1934 winter, injecting vital income into struggling households. Yet, the prevalence of low-skill, transient tasks prompted warnings of unintended skill stagnation, as laborers accustomed to non-competitive public roles faced challenges reacquiring private-sector competencies upon the program's abrupt end in April 1934, which left thousands demoralized and projects incomplete. Critics, including some within affected sectors, highlighted disruptions like labor shifts from to CWA sites, where federal pay scales outcompeted farm wages and strained rural operations during off-seasons.

Dissolution and Transition

Factors Leading to Termination

The Civil Works Administration was established as a short-term emergency program to provide work relief specifically during the critical winter of 1933–1934, rather than as a sustainable long-term solution. , its administrator, and President regarded indefinite direct employment programs like the CWA as potentially addictive and detrimental to personal motivation, akin to a "" that eroded , necessitating a shift toward more structured alternatives once the immediate seasonal crisis passed. Rapid scaling to employ nearly four million workers by January 1934 drove monthly costs to about $200 million, far exceeding initial projections and straining federal finances already burdened by Depression-era deficits. These expenditures, totaling around $1 billion over five months, amplified internal concerns over fiscal viability, as himself highlighted the program's experimental and transient character to avoid entrenching dependency. Congressional debates further pressured termination, with conservatives insisting on balanced budgets and resisting open-ended amid reports of administrative waste and uneven . Although lawmakers approved supplemental allocations, such as $950 million in February 1934, these did not extend the CWA's direct payroll model indefinitely, prioritizing fiscal restraint over prolonged high-velocity spending. The administration thus enforced a strict cutoff on March 31, 1934, with preparatory measures to phase out operations and mitigate sudden relief disruptions.

Handover to Subsequent Programs

The Civil Works Administration ceased operations on March 31, 1934, with its functions and records transferred to the Emergency Relief Program of the (FERA). Ongoing projects under CWA were integrated into FERA's work relief initiatives, allowing many and efforts to continue under state and federal sponsorship without interruption. Harry Hopkins, who had directed the CWA as part of FERA, maintained oversight during the transition, guiding a policy adjustment toward relief programs that incorporated stricter eligibility assessments for participants, diverging from the CWA's expedited hiring of nearly any able-bodied unemployed individual. Experience gained from CWA administration, including staff reallocation, directly supported the establishment of the in 1935, again under ' leadership.

Legacy and Evaluations

Short-Term Economic Effects

The Civil Works Administration (CWA), operating from November 1933 to March 1934, employed up to 4 million workers at its peak in January 1934, providing wages that averaged higher than prior direct relief allowances and injecting roughly $933 million into the economy over five months. This spending generated a short-term boost to local GDP and consumer activity, with empirical estimates indicating an income multiplier of approximately 1.9 for New Deal relief programs including the CWA, meaning each dollar spent raised incomes by about 83 cents through increased retail sales and household expenditures. However, the program's scale—equivalent to about 2.3% of total New Deal grants in its fiscal year—limited the national GDP impact to a transient pulse during the winter unemployment nadir. Despite the wage infusion, CWA relief did not accelerate hiring and instead exhibited crowding-out effects, where each additional public relief job displaced roughly 0.5 positions by competing for low-skilled labor in slack markets. analyses of 1930s urban labor markets confirm that relief surges like the CWA's correlated with reduced employment persistence, as workers preferred stable public payrolls over uncertain opportunities amid persistent and deficient . Localized data from 1929–1939 show no net stimulus to beyond the immediate spending round, with gains (about 44 cents per dollar expended) failing to translate into sustained hiring amid the broader stagnation. The CWA shifted over 4 million individuals from direct dependency to productive payrolls, substantially lowering immediate rolls and associated administrative burdens while fostering short-term economic circulation through earned wages rather than unearned grants. This transition, prioritized by administrators like to prioritize work over charity, averted deepened social distress in regions with acute winter , as evidenced by stabilized local relief caseloads during the program's operation before reversion to doles post-March 1934. In specific locales, such as urban centers with high prior FERA dependency, the payroll shift supported modest recovery in retail and service sectors without inducing long-term fiscal strain beyond the program's $200 million monthly outlay.

Long-Term Policy Influence

The Civil Works Administration (CWA) established key precedents for federal work relief by prioritizing employment on public projects over direct cash assistance, a model that directly informed the established in 1935 under Executive Order 9357. The scaled up the CWA's approach, employing an average of 2.2 million workers annually from 1936 to 1940 on infrastructure and arts initiatives, thereby normalizing direct federal job creation as a mechanism for addressing rather than relying solely on state or private sector responses. This shift embedded work relief norms into U.S. policy, influencing the unemployment insurance provisions of the of August 14, 1935, which drew on relief program data to design contributory systems aimed at preventing recurrent dependency. The CWA's brief operation from November 9, 1933, to April 1, 1934, rapidly expanded federal administrative capacity through decentralized project management under the Federal Emergency Relief Administration, requiring the certification of millions of workers and oversight of diverse local initiatives that built expertise in nationwide coordination. This ad hoc framework transitioned into more institutionalized structures for later programs, demonstrating the government's ability to mobilize resources via deficit-financed borrowing—initially $400 million allocated under the National Industrial Recovery Act—thus challenging pre-Depression fiscal restraint and legitimizing counter-cyclical spending as a policy instrument. By proving the logistical viability of federal intervention, the CWA contributed to a broader precedent for centralized welfare administration, moving beyond emergency grants toward structured public employment. Fiscal conservative histories critique the CWA for entrenching big by accustoming policymakers and the public to expansive roles in labor markets, allegedly fostering long-term bureaucratic growth and reducing incentives for private recovery. Contemporary opponents, including figures like Philadelphia's Mayor Hampton Moore, resisted such programs on grounds of fiscal , viewing them as to sustained deficits and state-level displacement in relief efforts. These perspectives argue that the CWA's success in rapid deployment masked inefficiencies, ultimately normalizing interventionist policies that prioritized as employer of last resort over market-driven solutions.

Modern Assessments and Debates

Empirical analyses of relief programs, including the CWA, reveal positive but localized economic stimuli. A study by Price Fishback and colleagues, using county-level data from 1933 to 1939, estimates that $1 in federal relief and grants increased local retail sales by approximately $1.41, suggesting modest multipliers driven by direct income support and spending. However, these effects were confined to recipient areas and did not substantially alter national output trends, as aggregate hovered above 15% through 1939 despite cumulative expenditures exceeding $10 billion across programs. Macroeconomic evaluations attribute negligible influence of CWA-style interventions on shortening the Depression's duration. Christina Romer's econometric decomposition indicates that fiscal multipliers for 1930s peacetime spending were low, around 0.5 to 1, with recovery accelerating only after 1938 monetary expansions and II's massive mobilization, which boosted GDP by over 50% from 1939 to 1944 through war production rather than civilian relief. Similarly, and Lee Ohanian's general equilibrium model quantifies policies' distortionary effects—via elevated wages and reduced competition—as accounting for half the output shortfall, delaying full recovery until wartime exigencies overrode peacetime rigidities. Ideological debates persist, with progressive economists praising the CWA's innovation in federal direct employment as a bulwark against destitution, enabling 4 million jobs in five months and informing later programs like the . Conservative and Austrian perspectives counter that such interventions induced moral hazards by subsidizing idleness over market adaptation, fostering administrative waste—evidenced by contemporary audits revealing up to 20% unproductive labor—and prolonging maladjustments from prior credit expansions. Recent Austrian-leaning scholarship, such as George Selgin's, reinforces this by highlighting policy-induced uncertainty that stifled private investment until WWII's profit incentives supplanted relief dependency. These critiques prioritize causal chains of distorted incentives over Keynesian demand narratives, noting empirical multipliers' failure to exceed unity in deflated conditions.

References

  1. [1]
    Civil Works Administration (U.S. National Park Service)
    Jun 18, 2020 · The intent of the Civil Works Administration (CWA) was to provide temporary winter construction work. It ended on March 31 of the next year after employing ...
  2. [2]
    Jobs Programs - Digital History
    Far more ambitious was the Civil Works Administration (CWA), established in November 1933. Under the energetic leadership of Harry Hopkins, the CWA put 2.6 ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  3. [3]
    Franklin D. Roosevelt: Domestic Affairs | Miller Center
    Finally, the Civil Works Administration (CWA) spent almost $1 billion on public works projects, including airports and roads. Roosevelt shut the CWA after ...New Deal Critics · The Second New Deal · Reorganizing The Government<|control11|><|separator|>
  4. [4]
    Great Depression Economic Impact: How Bad Was It? | St. Louis Fed
    Real GDP fell 29% from 1929 to 1933. · The unemployment rate reached a peak of 25% in 1933. · Consumer prices fell 25%; wholesale prices plummeted 32%. · Some ...Missing: CPI | Show results with:CPI
  5. [5]
    Chapter 5: Americans in Depression and War By Irving Bernstein
    There were now almost nine and a half million persons out of work, over seventeen percent of the civilian labor force. While the New Deal policies broke the ...
  6. [6]
    An Overview of the Great Depression – EH.net
    The industrial production index of 114 in August 1929 was at 54 in March 1933, or a 52.6 percent decrease. The money supply had fallen 35 percent, prices ...
  7. [7]
    How Bank Failures Contributed to the Great Depression - History.com
    May 13, 2021 · By 1933, dozen eggs cost only 13 cents, down from 50 cents in 1929. Banks failed—between a third and half of all U.S. financial institutions ...
  8. [8]
    The Risk of Deflation - San Francisco Fed
    Mar 27, 2009 · The consumer price index (CPI) plunged by nearly 25%, with the rate of deflation exceeding 10% in 1932.
  9. [9]
    The Great Depression and the First New Deal, 1929-1935
    Between 1929 and 1933, the gross national product, the sum of all the goods and services produced in the country, fell 29 percent. Many cities went broke.Missing: exhaustion | Show results with:exhaustion
  10. [10]
    Executive Order 6420-B—Establishing the Federal Civil Works ...
    (1) I hereby establish a Federal Civil Works Administration, and appoint as Administrator thereof the Federal Emergency Relief Administrator, as an agency to ...Missing: creation | Show results with:creation
  11. [11]
    November 4 - 10, 1933: The Civil Works Administration
    First of all, the CWA was established as a clear, and unbureaucratic, response to an emergency, the fact that the onset of the winter of 1933-34 was likely to ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  12. [12]
    Lessons from FDR: The Hopkins Example - American System Now
    May 20, 2020 · FDR agreed, and authorized Hopkins to set up the Civil Works Administration. That agency opened its doors on Nov. 9, 1933 and within 10 days ...
  13. [13]
    Harry Hopkins (U.S. National Park Service)
    Sep 22, 2020 · His particular contributions to the New Deal included the Federal Emergency Relief Administration (FERA), the Civil Works Administration (CWA), ...
  14. [14]
    Remarks on Signing Executive Order Creating Civil Works ...
    Creation of the new agency constitutes a fundamental change in the Federal program to deal with unemployment aspects of the depression.Missing: 6420B | Show results with:6420B
  15. [15]
    4,000,000 AT WORK ON NEW CWA JOBS; Harry L. Hopkins Tells ...
    ... Civil Works Administration." ... Hopkins paid tribute to the cooperation of the State administrators ... Civil Works Administration. Advertisement. SKIP ...
  16. [16]
    Civil Works Administration (CWA) | Encyclopedia.com
    The program's pioneering "Civil Works Service" program for "white collar ... The Civil Works Administration: The Business of Emergency Employment in the New Deal.
  17. [17]
    12,000 APPLY HERE IN CWA JOB RUSH; Many 'White Collar ...
    About 12,000 white-collar workers seeking jobs under the Civil Works Administration were registered at twenty-eight offices of the National Re-employment ...
  18. [18]
    4,000,000 Idle to Be Hired; Works Plan Bars 'Charity'; President ...
    ... wage rate ... In making his estimate that average wages under the plan would approximate $50 a month ... The Civil Works Administration hopes, however ...
  19. [19]
    Essay: The Civil Works Administration - UW Digital Collections
    Approximately 250,000 miles of roads and streets were built or improved nationwide. Other projects included sanitation improvements, repair or construction of ...
  20. [20]
    Civil Works Administration (CWA) | Definition & Purpose - Britannica
    CWA programs created or improved 255,000 miles (410,000 km) of road, 2,000 miles (3,200 km) of levees, 1,000 miles (1,600 km) of new water mains, 40,000 schools ...
  21. [21]
    The Civil Works Administration - ArcGIS StoryMaps
    The Civil Works Administration (CWA) was created as part of the New Deal, in the fall of 1933, during a time of mass unemployment and widespread economic ...
  22. [22]
    Records of the Work Projects Administration [WPA] - National Archives
    Microfilmed CWA reports of progress, employment, hours and wages, completed projects, and statistics, 1933-39 (22 rolls). Photographs (1,550 images): CWA ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  23. [23]
    Civil Works Administration - Wikipedia
    Although the CWA provided much employment, there were critics who said there was nothing of permanent value. Roosevelt told his cabinet that this criticism ...
  24. [24]
    Family Experiences and New Deal Relief | National Archives
    Oct 2, 2023 · Another major and innovative—if only fleeting—component of FERA included the Civil Works Administration (CWA), a temporary agency established on ...Missing: $400 | Show results with:$400
  25. [25]
    Essay: The Federal Emergency Relief Administration
    The chief architect of this program was Harry Hopkins, the former president and executive director of the New York State Temporary Emergency Relief ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] The Civil Works Administration, 1933-1934
    took a local dam project and paid heads of families $1.60 plus carfare for an eight-hour day, three days a week, with wages in kind or in grocery orders ...<|separator|>
  27. [27]
    Civil Works Administration (CWA) - Encyclopedia of Arkansas
    The Civil Works Administration (CWA) was one of the first federal relief programs under President Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal to provide employment .
  28. [28]
    [PDF] ANALYSIS OF CIVIL WORKS PROGRAM STATISTICS - FRASER
    officer for the Civil Works Administration and assistant disbursing officers were designated for various counties and cities. Where the specified pay-roll forms.Missing: payroll | Show results with:payroll
  29. [29]
  30. [30]
    Today in labor history: FDR unveils Civil Works Administration
    Nov 8, 2013 · It ended on March 31, 1934, after spending $200 million a month and giving jobs to 4 million people. The Civil Works Administration's workers ...
  31. [31]
    The New Deal (1933-1936) to World War II (1939-1945)
    Dec 28, 2023 · The US debt was $22 billion in 1933 and grew by 50 percent in the three years that followed, reaching $33 billion.
  32. [32]
    [PDF] New Deal Work Relief and Private Wages
    Feb 12, 2004 · Crowding-out in this paper refers to a reduction in private employment caused when competition for labor between work relief projects and ...
  33. [33]
    How Successful Was the New Deal? The Microeconomic Impact of ...
    Most of the. New Deal spending and loan policies broke new ground in the federal government's role in the economy, particularly in the areas of seeking to ...
  34. [34]
    The Multiplier for Federal Spending in the States During the Great ...
    Using panel methods we estimate that an added dollar of federal spending in the state increased state per capita income by between 40 and 96 cents. The point ...
  35. [35]
    (PDF) The Multiplier for Federal Spending in the States During the ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · Federal grants had stronger effects on consumption than on personal income, but they had no positive effect on various measures of private ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] The Dynamics of Relief Spending and the Private Urban Labor ...
    The crowding-out argument suggests that the presence of work relief gave workers an extra outside option that allowed them to search less and to seek higher ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] 2148 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE - Congress.gov
    George White and the State Civil Works administration, and·. Page 4. 1934 ... to get a job raking leaves, trimming trees, or digging ditches. Business ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] congressional record-senate - GovInfo
    Not raking leaves or digging ditches, but productive work which when ... on us for $400,000,000 for the Civil Works Administration. At the outset ...
  39. [39]
    CWA DISMISSES 14 IN PAYROLL INQUIRY; 10 of Them, With 2 ...
    De Lamater dismisses 14 employes accused of payroll padding; 10 of them, with 2 City employes, face Fed fraud charges.
  40. [40]
    Graft and the Civil Works Administration - jstor
    with the CWA arrived at the White House on an average of three hundred every day.9 By mid-February headlines such as "CWA Frauds," "CWA. Flop," and "CWA Seen ...
  41. [41]
    The Great Depression and the New Deal - Stanford University
    The Civil Works Administration was a work relief program that gave jobs to many unemployed people. Although this program was criticized as "make work," the ...
  42. [42]
  43. [43]
    Harry Hopkins and Work Relief During the Great Depression
    Feb 26, 2018 · Harry Hopkins had faith in the federal government's ability to assure men and women the opportunity to earn a decent living through useful work.Missing: proposing | Show results with:proposing
  44. [44]
    Harry Hopkins, The First and Final Task of Government
    Apr 30, 2021 · Hopkins supervised the first emergency relief effort, FERA, superseded by the CWA and later, the WPA. Courtesy, Library of Congress. which ...Missing: transition | Show results with:transition
  45. [45]
    The New Deal in New York City, 1933—1943
    It was a natural transition to lead FERA, CWA (Civil Works Administration) and the WPA. He continued as a close advisor to FDR during World War II, in charge of ...Happy Days Are Here Again · The New Deal And The Social... · Section Five
  46. [46]
  47. [47]
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Recovery of 1933 - Federal Reserve Board
    From 1934 to 1935, the CWA had. $1 billion in federal relief expenditures and employed 4 million workers. 3The Works Progress Administration (WPA) also ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] the evolution of policy and programs, 1930-1940 - Social Security
    precedent set by an act of Congress in 1908 which had ... Responsibility was vested in the Federal Civil Works Administration and the State and local civil works ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] THE CIVIL WORKS ADMINISTRATION IN PENNSYLVANIA, 1933 ...
    'Harry Hopkins, Spending to Save (New York, 1936), 115-117, and. Corrington Gill, "The Civil Works Administration," Municipal Year Book,. 1937, 419. "Two such ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] OEEH The New Deal 1 Between 1933 and 1939 the structure of ...
    ... big government. The first is the simple fact that between 1902 and 1922 ... In the winter of. 1933/34, FERA organized the Civil Works Administration, which put 2 ...
  52. [52]
    The Second New Deal and Final Analysis – U.S. History II
    His critics came from both the left and the right, with conservatives deeply concerned over his expansion of government spending and power, and liberals angered ...
  53. [53]
    Works Progress Administration (WPA)
    Hampton Moore (1864-1950), a devout fiscal conservative and apostle of retrenchment, refused any federal assistance monies in Philadelphia. Resisting WPA.
  54. [54]
    On the Fate and Fortunes of Public Goods
    Sep 25, 2015 · Hence the birth of federal agencies: the Farm Security Administration, the Civil Works Administration ... big-government vision in mid century.
  55. [55]
    Did New Deal Grant Programs Stimulate Local Economies? A Study ...
    Mar 15, 2005 · Using data on New Deal grants to each U.S. county from 1933 to 1939, we estimate how relief and public works spending and payments to ...<|separator|>
  56. [56]
    What Ended the Great Depression? | NBER
    Sep 1, 1991 · This paper examines the role of aggregate demand stimulus in ending the Great Depression. A simple calculation indicates that nearly all of ...
  57. [57]
    New Deal Policies and the Persistence of the Great Depression
    New Deal Policies and the Persistence of the Great Depression: A General Equilibrium Analysis. Harold L. Cole and; Lee E. Ohanian.
  58. [58]
    [PDF] The Impact of New Deal Expenditures on Local Economic Activity
    Second, the marginal grant expenditure will have a relatively smaller effect if the spending crowds-out private activity. The AAA explicitly involved a ...
  59. [59]
    The New Deal and Recovery, Part 21: Happy Days - Cato Institute
    Aug 31, 2022 · To judge by this indicator, as tracked in the next chart, recovery made very little progress during the New Deal compared to the tremendous leap ...
  60. [60]
    False Dawn - The University of Chicago Press
    “Selgin challenges the hypothesis that New Deal policies helped stimulate recovery from the Depression…Instead, Selgin points to what he calls 'the Great ...