The Commer TS3 is a pioneering two-stroke opposed-piston diesel engine, renowned for its innovative three-cylinder, six-piston design that eliminated traditional cylinder heads and valves, delivering compact power for mid-20th-century commercial trucks.[1][2][3]Developed by the Rootes Group's Humber division starting in 1945, the TS3 was led by chief engineer Eric Coy and a small team of just four to seven engineers, who prototyped the concept using a single-cylinder testbed before scaling it to production.[1][3] First introduced in 1954 for Commer and Karrier trucks, it entered full production around 1956 and remained in production until approximately 1968, following Chrysler's acquisition of Rootes in 1964, after which it was gradually phased out in favor of conventional four-stroke engines.[1][3]At its core, the TS3 employed a horizontal layout with opposed pistons in each cylinder—two per cylinder, facing inward and connected via rocker arms and connecting rods to a single central crankshaft—allowing combustion to occur directly between the pistons while ports in the cylinder walls handled intake and exhaust.[2][1] A Roots-type supercharger provided scavenging at about 6 psi boost, enabling a three-phase cycle of power, exhaust, and intake without camshafts or poppet valves, which contributed to its mechanical simplicity and high thermal efficiency.[2][3] The initial 3.25-liter (later 3.5-liter) displacement produced 90–105 horsepower and 270 lb-ft of torque, roughly equivalent to larger four-stroke diesels of the era, while weighing half as much and occupying minimal space for cab-over-engine installations.[1][2][3]Primarily applied in UK and New Zealand Commer trucks like the Q-series and military prototypes, as well as Karrier models, the TS3 excelled in heavy-duty hauling due to its exceptional durability, reliability, and low-end torque suited for load-lugging.[1][3] Later variants included turbocharged versions reaching 140–160 horsepower, though these were prone to reliability issues from higher stresses.[3] Its distinctive "knocking" sound, from the blower and rocker mechanism, earned it the nickname "Commer Knocker" among operators in Australia and New Zealand.[1][3]Though production ended with corporate changes, the TS3's legacy endures as a benchmark of British engineering ingenuity, influencing modern opposed-piston research for efficiency and emissions, and remaining a favorite among vintagetruck restorers for its raw, characterful performance.[2][3]
History and Development
Origins and Design Phase
The development of the Commer TS3 engine commenced in 1945 at the Humber plant in Coventry, part of the Rootes Group, with the primary objective of creating an in-house diesel powerplant for commercial vehicles to eliminate reliance on third-party suppliers such as Perkins and Gardner.[3] A compact team of four engineers, headed by Chief Engineer Eric W. Coy, initiated the project, focusing on an innovative opposed-piston layout to achieve efficiency in a post-war automotive landscape demanding robust, economical engines for heavy transport. The team began with a single-cylinder testbedprototype to validate the opposed-piston concept before developing full-scale units.[1]Design goals emphasized simplicity in construction for low manufacturing costs, alongside delivering high torque at low engine speeds to suit heavy-duty trucking applications, enabling a flat-floor cab design without protruding engine tunnels.[3] These priorities aligned with Rootes' ambitions for their cab-forward QX-series trucks, where the engine's horizontal configuration allowed optimal space utilization for driver comfort and load capacity.[4] Initial prototypes, consisting of two running units, were completed and subjected to rigorous testing in QX chassis by the early 1950s to validate durability and performance under real-world conditions.[3]The project's technical direction drew significant influence from Tilling-Stevens' established expertise in opposed-piston diesel technology, particularly their pre-war designs for commercial applications.[5] Rootes Group's acquisition of Tilling-Stevens in 1950 facilitated the seamless integration of this knowledge, with the Maidstone facility repurposed for TS3 refinement and eventual production starting in 1954.[6]During early road tests around 1952, the engine's characteristic knocking sound—stemming from the two-stroke combustion cycle and the supercharger's undamped whine—prompted the affectionate nickname "Knocker," which gained widespread use among operators in export markets like Australia and New Zealand.[7][1]
Production Timeline
Production of the Commer TS3 engine commenced in 1954 at the Tilling-Stevens factory in Maidstone, Kent, following the relocation of Rootes Group's diesel engine manufacturing from the Humber facility in Coventry, which had handled initial design work.[8][4] The engine's debut application was in Commer Avenger trucks, marking Rootes' first in-house diesel offering for its commercial vehicle lineup.[9]Throughout the 1950s and 1960s, production ramped up significantly, with power outputs progressively enhanced to meet evolving demands; early versions delivered approximately 90 bhp, increasing to a standard 105 bhp by the late 1950s and reaching 117 bhp with torque of 310 lb-ft by 1964 through refinements in supercharging and fuel delivery.[9][4] The 1960s represented the peak era, as the TS3 powered a wide array of Commer trucks and saw substantial output for both domestic and international markets.[10]Engines were manufactured in batches tailored for export destinations, including Australia and New Zealand, where later series like the 3DB and 3DD variants were specifically adapted for local conditions and fitted with larger SC-9 compressors.[11][12]The 1967 acquisition of the Rootes Group by Chrysler initiated the TS3's phase-out, as the American parent prioritized four-stroke diesel engines from partners like Cummins and Perkins to align with its broader portfolio and avoid competitive overlap.[11][9] Production continued for existing commitments until 1972, after which the opposed-piston two-stroke design was fully discontinued in favor of conventional inline engines.[4]
Design and Operation
Opposed-Piston Layout
The Commer TS3 features a distinctive opposed-piston configuration within a three-cylinder block, incorporating six pistons in total—two per cylinder—arranged horizontally and moving towards and away from each other to form the combustion chamber between their crowns.[13][14] The cylinders are cast as a single compact iron block integral with the crankcase, employing wet cast-iron liners sealed by flexible metallic elements to facilitate efficient heat transfer and durability.[13]Each pair of opposed pistons connects to a single central crankshaft located below the cylinders, with one piston per pair linked directly via a connecting rod and the opposing piston coupled through a rocker arm mechanism, enabling synchronized motion without valves or cylinder heads.[14][15] The crankshaft, featuring six throws and supported by four main bearings, is housed within the iron crankcase for robust load distribution.[13] This setup yields a bore of 83 mm and an effective stroke of 102 mm per piston pair, resulting in a total displacement of 3.261 liters (199 cubic inches).[4][13]A Roots-type supercharger is integrated centrally into the design, positioned to deliver pressurized air for scavenging directly to the cylinders via ports controlled by piston movement.[13][15] The engine's water-cooled system circulates coolant around the wet liners, while an integrated oil system employs a gear-type pump for full-pressure lubrication to the main and big-end bearings, with drilled passages ensuring intermittent supply to the pistons.[13]This opposed-piston layout contributes to a highly compact form factor, with the overall engine length under 1 meter and a near-cubic shape that facilitates under-cab installation in trucks.[13][14] The balanced forces from the opposed pistons and evenly spaced firing order—achieved across the three cylinders—minimize vibration, promoting smooth operation without the need for additional balancing components.[15]
Two-Stroke Cycle and Supercharging
The Commer TS3 operates on a two-stroke diesel cycle, delivering a power stroke in every revolution of the crankshaft, which doubles the power output compared to a four-stroke engine of similar displacement. Intake and exhaust occur through ports in the cylinder walls, uncovered and covered by the movement of the opposed pistons, eliminating the need for valves and simplifying the valvetrain while enabling compact design. This port-controlled system relies on precise piston phasing to manage gas exchange, with the uniflow scavenging arrangement directing fresh air axially through the cylinder for optimal exhaust expulsion.[16]Scavenging in the TS3 is facilitated by a Roots-type supercharger that supplies pressurized air at approximately 6 psi (0.41 bar) boost, forcing fresh charge into the cylinder through inlet ports while displacing residual exhaust gases via dedicated exhaust ports.[13] The uniflow configuration enhances efficiency by minimizing short-circuiting of air and exhaust, achieving effective purging as the pistons move apart post-combustion. Port timing is critical: featuring an exhaust lead of 25° and 1° overlap before the inlet ports are fully covered, ensuring sequential gas exchange for complete scavenging.[13][16]Fuel is introduced via a single injector positioned midway along each cylinder liner, timed to inject late in the compressionstroke for optimal mixing with the compressed air-charge. This setup, combined with the absence of valves, reduces mechanical complexity and friction losses but demands exact porting to prevent charge loss during transfer.[16]As with many two-stroke diesels, the TS3 exhibits higher emissions due to incomplete combustion and residual exhaust mixing, alongside elevated oil consumption from lubricant passage through ports and piston rings. These characteristics, inherent to the cycle's design, necessitated careful tuning for reliability in commercial applications, though they limited adoption amid tightening environmental standards.[16]
Technical Specifications
Physical Characteristics
The Commer TS3 is a compact opposed-piston diesel engine with a displacement of 3.261 litres (199 cubic inches), achieved through a bore of 83 mm and an effective stroke of 102 mm across three cylinders.[1][17] Later variants increased displacement to 3.5 litres.[18] Its overall design forms a nearly cubic shape, making it shorter in length than comparable conventional petrol engines of the era, which contributed to reduced floor space requirements in vehicle chassis.[13]The engine's dry weight, including auxiliaries such as the starter and dynamo, is approximately 997 lb (452 kg), positioning it below the average for units of similar power output.[13][19] Construction utilizes a single compact cast-iron unit for the cylinder block and crankcase, with cast-iron wet cylinder liners sealed by flexible metallic lips to prevent water leakage.[13] Pistons feature a heat-resisting steel crown paired with a cast-iron body, insulated by a special plate, while the exhaust manifold is made of aluminium alloy.[13][19]Fuel delivery employs direct injection via a CAV pneumatically governed pump, compatible with two-stroke diesel operation.[13] The liquid-cooled system uses water circulation around the injectors and cylinder liners, maintaining stable temperatures around 160°F (71°C) under load and integrating with standard radiator setups.[13][19] A gear-type lubricationpump supports the wet sump oil system.[13]Key accessories include a 24-volt electric starter and dynamo for electrical generation, along with an integral Roots-type supercharger (Wade blower) that delivers 6 psi boost and requires about 14 hp at rated speed.[13][19] No separate turbocharger was standard, though experimental turbo variants appeared in later development.[3]
Performance Data
The standard Commer TS3 engine delivered a power output of 105 bhp (78 kW) at 2,400 rpm, with maximum torque of 270 lbf·ft (366 N·m) at 1,200 rpm.[20][1]Early production models from 1954 offered 90 bhp, which was upgraded to 105 bhp by the late 1950s through refinements in fuel injection and supercharging, enabling better combustionefficiency and power delivery.[21][9] Further evolution in 1964 raised output to 117 bhp (87 kW) and torque to 310 lbf·ft (420 N·m).[4]Operational parameters included an idle speed around 600 rpm and a maximum continuous speed of 2,200 rpm, supporting reliable performance across varying loads. The design emphasized durability, with a targeted service life of 500,000 km under normal commercial conditions, and it enabled laden trucks to achieve top speeds up to 80 km/h.[1][4] The integrated supercharging enhanced these metrics by improving air intake and torque availability at low speeds.[20]
Applications
Truck Models
The Commer TS3 engine debuted in 1954, marking its first application in the Commer QX series of cab-forward trucks designed for payloads of 7 to 10 tons, such as the R7 model, where its high low-end torque of 270 lb-ft at 1,200 rpm proved ideal for urban delivery operations requiring frequent stops and starts.[4][3][22] The compact opposed-piston layout allowed seamless under-cab installation in the QX's forward-control chassis, enhancing maneuverability in tight city environments without compromising load capacity.[4][22]Subsequent integrations expanded to lighter-duty vehicles, including the Karrier Bantam range from the late 1950s through the 1960s, which utilized the TS3 in 2- to 5-ton configurations for short-haul and municipal tasks, benefiting from the engine's simplicity and reliability in smaller chassis.[3][23] For heavier applications, the TS3 powered the Commer QX variants and the 1964-introduced Maxiload series, capable of up to 16-ton payloads for haulage, with export versions like those sent to Australia and New Zealand adapting the engine for local conditions, including modified air compressors for braking systems.[4][3]Adaptations in these truck lines typically paired the TS3 with 5-speed manual gearboxes, such as David Brown units, to optimize power delivery across a broad torque band, while axle ratios were selected to support cruising speeds of 50-60 km/h on highways, balancing fuel efficiency and load-hauling capability.[4][3] By the late 1960s, the TS3-equipped trucks saw widespread adoption, with the engine's production for vehicles continuing until 1972.[4]The TS3's legacy in trucks waned following Chrysler's 1968 acquisition of the Rootes Group, leading to its phase-out in favor of conventional four-stroke Perkins engines like the 6.354 series for improved emissions compliance and serviceability, though some units persisted in secondary markets such as Australia into the 1970s and early 1980s for rugged applications.[3][4][1]
Bus and Industrial Uses
The Commer TS3 engine found significant application in bus chassis during the 1950s, particularly powering CommerAvenger models in the United Kingdom. Introduced in the Avenger III chassis in 1954, the TS3 provided a compact, low-revving powerplant suited to urban and intercity routes, delivering reliable torque for frequent stops and starts.[24] Double-decker variants, such as those bodied by Plaxton or Duple, utilized the engine's horizontal layout to maintain a low floor height, enhancing passenger accessibility in city operations.[24]Commer Karrier buses also incorporated the TS3 from the mid-1950s onward, benefiting from its smooth power delivery in single- and double-deck configurations for municipal and private operators. The engine's design, with high torque at low engine speeds, proved advantageous for heavy passenger loads on congested routes.[3]Beyond buses, the TS3 was adapted for industrial and marine uses through a partnership between Rootes Group and R.A. Lister, marketing variants as stationary engines for power generation. These Rootes-Lister TS3 units, rated up to approximately 80 kW, powered generators in agricultural and remote installations, valued for their durability and fuel efficiency in continuous operation.[25] In marine applications, Lister Blackstone sold TS3-derived models like the 3DB-215 and 3DD-215 for propulsion in fishing vessels and workboats during the 1960s, with some early 1950s examples remaining in service into the 2010s due to their robust construction.[26]Limited adaptations extended to other specialized vehicles, including fire engines where the TS3 equipped Commer chassis for rapid response duties, leveraging its quick acceleration from low revs. Agricultural uses were minimal, primarily through exported Commer variants in tractor units for light haulage in developing markets.[27]
Variants and Adaptations
Rootes-Lister Version
In 1955, the Rootes Group, parent company of Commer, formed a joint venture with R. A. Lister & Co. known as Rootes-Lister Ltd. to license and produce the TS3 engine for non-automotive markets, rebranding it as the Lister TS for industrial and agricultural applications. This adaptation focused on stationary uses, with modifications enabling horizontal mounting to suit generators and similar equipment.[28]The Lister TS retained the original TS3's displacement and opposed-piston layout but was detuned to around 70-85 bhp to enhance longevity under continuous duty. Key adaptations included improved cooling systems, added power take-off (PTO) drives, and electric starting controls, making it suitable for prolonged operation without the high-stress demands of truck use.[18]These engines found success in the UK and Commonwealth markets, powering farming tasks such as irrigation pumps and stationary power generation until the mid-1970s. Production ceased following Chrysler's acquisition of the Rootes Group, after which Lister transitioned to four-stroke engine lines.[29]
Commer TS4 Prototype
The Commer TS4 was an experimental four-cylinder opposed-piston two-stroke diesel engine developed by Commer, part of the Rootes Group, as an extension of the TS3 design.[30] Initiated around 1960, the project aimed to provide increased power for heavier truck applications while maintaining the core two-stroke cycle, supercharged layout, and opposed-piston configuration of its predecessor.[3] The engine featured a displacement of approximately 4 liters across four cylinders (eight pistons total) and a longer engine block measuring about 1.6 meters in length.[30][3]Prototypes were constructed in the mid-1960s, with road testing occurring in Commer truck chassis, including evaluations in Mexico and Africa. Of the 14 prototypes produced, eight were installed in trucks for road evaluation. Technical challenges and high development costs emerged during evaluation, preventing full production.[3][31][32]The TS4 program was ultimately canceled in 1968 following Chrysler's acquisition of the Rootes Group, as the new owners prioritized conventional four-stroke diesel engines from partners like Cummins and Perkins over the specialized opposed-piston technology. No production versions entered the market, though two prototypes were preserved and donated to the Science Museum Group by Chrysler United Kingdom Ltd. in 1982.[3][30] The engine's development is documented in technical literature on opposed-piston designs, highlighting its innovative but ultimately uncommercialized potential.[33]
Comparisons with Similar Engines
Sulzer ZG9 Design Parallels
The Commer TS3 and Sulzer ZG9 exhibit notable parallels in their core architecture as two-stroke opposed-piston diesel engines designed for high-efficiency operation in heavy-duty applications. Both engines utilize a single crankshaft connected to opposed pistons via rocker mechanisms, eliminating the need for valve gear and enabling compact, low-profile layouts suitable for vehicle integration. The ZG9, developed by the Swiss Sulzer Brothers in inline configurations of two, three, or four cylinders, incorporates uniflow scavenging—where exhaust ports are positioned at one end of the cylinder and intake ports at the other—to facilitate efficient gas exchange, mirroring the TS3's porting system. Supercharging is employed in both designs via a blower to force air into the cylinders, enhancing scavenging and boosting power output for demanding roles such as marine propulsion and truck powertrains.[34]In terms of specifics, the TS3's three-cylinder inline simplicity aligns with the ZG9's multi-cylinder inline arrangement, yet both deliver exceptional torque density characteristic of opposed-piston layouts. The TS3 achieves approximately 112 Nm/L from its 3.25 L displacement, underscoring their shared emphasis on high mean effective pressure for robust low-speed performance. This design philosophy allows for superior power-to-weight ratios compared to conventional four-stroke diesels of the era.[1]Historical overlap further highlights the connection, as Sulzer's innovations in opposed-piston technology influenced Rootes Group's development of the TS3 during the post-war period. The ZG9, developed in the 1930s, entered production before World War II and served in heavy-duty stationary, marine, and locomotive duties akin to the TS3's truck and bus applications. This influence is evident in the adoption of similar scavenging and supercharging principles to meet the era's demands for reliable, high-torque power sources.[35]Scale differences distinguish their primary uses, with the TS3's 3.25 L capacity tailored for mid-range trucks requiring a flat, low-mounted engine for cab-forward designs, whereas the ZG9's smaller configurations suited stationary generators and smaller marine installations. Despite these variations, the shared opposed-piston principles ensured both engines excelled in torque delivery and fuel efficiency for their respective niches.[34]
Other Opposed-Piston Engines
The Napier Deltic represents a prominent example of a high-power opposed-piston two-stroke diesel engine, featuring an innovative 18-cylinder triangular arrangement with three banks of six cylinders each, developed by D. Napier & Son in the late 1940s and entering production in the 1950s for use in British Rail locomotives and marine propulsion systems through the 1980s.[36] Capable of delivering up to 3,100 bhp at 2,000 rpm in its most powerful variants, the Deltic far exceeded the TS3 in output but required a more intricate design with multiple crankshafts geared together, unlike the TS3's straightforward single-crankshaft inline configuration.[36]Another historical opposed-piston engine is the Junkers Jumo 205, a six-cylinder (12-piston) two-stroke diesel introduced in the 1930s and produced into the early 1940s for aviation applications in German civil and military aircraft such as the Junkers Ju 86 bomber.[37] This engine shared the TS3's uniflow scavenging system for efficient gas exchange but was optimized for high-altitude flight with a displacement of 16.6 liters and outputs around 610 bhp, differing from the TS3 in its aviation-specific tuning rather than ground vehicle durability.[38]In contemporary developments, Achates Power has advanced opposed-piston two-stroke engine technology since around 2010, focusing on light-duty and medium-duty automotive uses with designs that achieve up to 30% better fuel economy than conventional four-stroke diesels while addressing emissions through advanced combustion control.[39] The TS3 stands as an early precursor to these efforts, having provided approximately 30% superior fuel efficiency compared to four-stroke engines of its mid-20th-century era, as evidenced by real-world consumption rates exceeding 20 mpg in testing.[19]Overall, these engines highlight key contrasts with the TS3: while the Deltic emphasized rail and marine power generation and the Jumo 205 targeted aerial performance—often in military contexts—the TS3 prioritized reliability in commercial trucks and buses. All opposed-piston designs benefit from a valveless architecture that reduces mechanical losses and weight, enabling higher power density, yet they commonly encounter challenges with exhaust emissions due to incomplete scavenging in two-stroke operation, a issue modern iterations like Achates' continue to mitigate.[40]