Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

CompuBox

CompuBox is a computerized punch-counting system employed in to deliver real-time statistical data on punches thrown and landed during fights. Invented in 1985 by Bob Canobbio and Logan Hobson, it categorizes punches into jabs and power punches, tracking totals, connect percentages, and round-by-round breakdowns to quantify fighters' offensive output. The system debuted on February 16, 1985, during the HBO-broadcast rematch between and Livingstone Bramble, marking its introduction as a tool for enhancing televised fight commentary and analysis. Operated by CompuBox, , the technology relies on two trained human operators positioned ringside, each assigned to monitor one boxer and input data via keypads with four buttons corresponding to jab thrown, jab landed, power punch thrown, and power punch landed. This setup feeds information into software that generates comprehensive metrics, including accuracy rates, plus-minus differentials (landed minus opponent's landed), and punches thrown per round, which are displayed live for broadcasters and available post-fight for deeper evaluation. Widely regarded as the industry standard, CompuBox data supports production, applications, and fantasy sports, with commercial licensing managed through the company.

Origins and History

Development and Founders

CompuBox originated in the mid- as an adaptation of statistical tracking technology from to , spearheaded by key figures in sports . Jon T. Gibbs, who had developed TenniSTAT—a pioneering computer-generated statistics program for in the early —served as the primary inventor of the underlying software. In , while working at Sports Information and Data Base (SIDB), a sports research firm in , Gibbs collaborated with Robert "Bob" Canobbio to create a similar system tailored for , initially named FightStat. Canobbio, a former researcher at , commissioned the program after being impressed by TenniSTAT's capabilities for real-time data capture. Conceptual work on the adaptation began in , with full development completed by , involving SIDB's resources for funding and initial testing. Logan Hobson, a correspondent and enthusiast, joined the effort alongside Canobbio and Gibbs, contributing to the system's operational framework. Following SIDB's financial difficulties, Hobson and Canobbio rebranded the technology as CompuBox and established CompuBox Inc. to commercialize it. Hobson remained a long-term operator, overseeing implementations until his departure from the company in 2002, while Canobbio focused on software refinements and served as president. Early development faced challenges inherent to the era's technology, particularly the reliance on manual data entry by operators using custom keypads to log punches in . The initial hardware consisted of bulky, 30-pound early personal computers, such as PCs, which two operators shared ringside to track metrics like jabs and power punches—one per . These limitations required precise coordination to minimize errors, with the emphasizing quantitative punch counts over qualitative scoring. Despite these hurdles, the foundational design laid the groundwork for CompuBox's role in analysis.

Debut and Early Evolution

CompuBox made its network television debut on February 16, 1985, during the broadcast of the WBA lightweight title rematch between champion Livingstone Bramble and challenger at the Lawlor Events Center in . The system, initially known as "PunchStat" on , provided real-time punch statistics for the first time on a major broadcast, marking a significant in analysis. Following the debut, CompuBox saw early adoption by after a successful demonstration to Ross Greenburg, leading to its use in subsequent high-profile bouts. It achieved first full integration in a marquee event with the April 15, 1985, title clash between Marvin Hagler and at in , the third fight tracked by the system overall. soon followed suit, establishing long-term partnerships that expanded CompuBox's reach across networks in the mid-1980s. Through the 1990s, CompuBox evolved from a nascent tool operated solely by co-founders Bob Canobbio and Logan Hobson to a more robust operation involving a of statisticians, including former fighters and writers, to handle growing demand. Hobson played a central role as primary operator during this period, overseeing counts for an increasing volume of broadcasts amid the era's boom. The system gained prominence in heavyweight divisions starting with Mike Tyson's fights from 1986 onward, including his 1988 demolition of , which solidified CompuBox as a standard for analyzing major bouts. By the mid-1990s, CompuBox's usage had expanded significantly, with increasing its programming and the partnership with ESPN's Boxing series reaching peak activity levels, transitioning from occasional applications in 1985 to routine coverage of numerous annual events by 2000. This growth reflected broader acceptance in media, as networks leveraged the system's to enhance viewer during an era of rising fight volumes.

System and Methodology

Punch Tracking Mechanics

CompuBox employs two operators positioned at ringside, each responsible for monitoring one using a dedicated connected to a five-button . This setup allows for independent yet synchronized tracking, with the keypad buttons designated for jabs landed, jabs missed, landed, missed, and (to classify landed punches to the body) to capture attempts and outcomes in . The operators press the appropriate buttons based on split-second judgments of whether a connects or misses, ensuring data input reflects the action as it unfolds during the bout. Operators undergo rigorous training to maintain accuracy under pressure, often led by co-founder Bob Canobbio, who has instructed a diverse group including his sons starting at age 12 and former professional fighters. Certified scorers such as , a former world champion, exemplify the emphasis on experienced personnel capable of sustaining focus amid crowd noise, extreme temperatures, and other distractions at venues. This training prioritizes rapid, consistent button presses without influencing official fight scoring, as CompuBox serves solely as a statistical tool. The operational process begins with pre-fight setup, where operators calibrate their equipment and position themselves ringside or, since 2014, remotely using a dedicated jib camera feed for optimal visibility. During each round, data capture occurs continuously as punches are logged, with the software aggregating totals for thrown and landed jabs and power punches in real time. Post-round, the system verifies inputs through operator review and, when available, slow-motion replays to confirm counts, enabling punch totals to display on broadcast screens within seconds of the bell. This flow ensures seamless integration into live telecasts while compiling round-by-round profiles for comprehensive fight analysis.

Data Categories and Outputs

CompuBox classifies punches into two primary types: jabs, which are quick, straight punches typically used for distance control and setup, and power punches, encompassing hooks, uppercuts, and crosses designed for greater impact. Each type is further subdivided based on outcome, distinguishing between those that connect (land on the opponent) and those that miss. The core statistical outputs revolve around totals for punches thrown and landed, aggregated across the entire fight or broken down per round to highlight pacing and shifts. Connect percentage, calculated as (landed punches divided by thrown punches) multiplied by 100, serves as a key accuracy metric; for instance, a fighter landing 45 of 180 total punches yields a rate. These figures are complemented by punches per round averages, which quantify output volume, and differentials, representing the net difference between a fighter's landed punches and those absorbed from the opponent. Over time, CompuBox has refined its metrics into 10 standardized categories to provide deeper : total punches thrown and landed per round, total connect percentage, jab thrown and landed per round, jab connect percentage, power thrown and landed per round, power connect percentage, and . Recent expansions include targeted reports on body versus head shots, allowing for analysis of targeting strategies without altering the core punch-type framework. Data is presented in user-friendly formats, particularly for live broadcasts, via on-screen that display running totals like "Fighter A: 50/200 (25% landed)" for overall stats, with parallel breakdowns for jabs (e.g., 30/100) and power punches (e.g., 20/100). These visuals update dynamically between rounds, emphasizing quantitative trends over qualitative judgment. Notably, CompuBox outputs remain purely quantitative, counting only the incidence of punches without assessing factors such as , inflicted, or strategic effectiveness, thereby prioritizing verifiable tallies over subjective evaluation.

Applications and Usage

Integration in Broadcasts

CompuBox data has been integrated into live telecasts since its debut in 1985, providing real-time statistical overlays on major networks such as , , and Showtime to enhance viewer during fights. These typically display punch totals, connect percentages, and breakdowns—such as jabs and power es—updated after each round and occasionally mid-round, allowing audiences to track momentum shifts visually. Broadcasters frequently rely on CompuBox statistics in commentary to contextualize the action, with announcers like referencing figures such as connect rates to describe a fighter's , for instance noting when one has landed 60% of their jabs. This integration adds analytical depth, as commentators draw on the data to highlight trends without interrupting the flow of the broadcast. In high-profile events, CompuBox stats have been prominently featured; during the 2015 Mayweather-Pacquiao bout on , on-screen graphics showed Mayweather landing 148 of 435 punches (34%) compared to Pacquiao's 81 of 429 (19%), underscoring Mayweather's defensive edge. Similarly, in the 2024 Usyk-Fury rematch aired on and , real-time displays revealed Usyk landing 179 of 423 total punches (42.3%) against Fury's 144 of 509 (28.3%), emphasizing Usyk's accuracy in power shots. Two CompuBox operators are positioned ringside at these events, each monitoring one fighter via keypad inputs that capture punches in real time, with the data transmitted directly to the production trucks for immediate incorporation into the telecast. Over time, the presentation has evolved from simple round-end totals in the to more dynamic, interactive displays in the , complemented by mobile access through compuboxdata.com for fans to follow stats live.

Post-Fight and Analytical Roles

CompuBox plays a significant role in post-fight breakdowns by providing detailed statistical reports that aid media analysis and highlight key performance metrics from bouts. These reports often include punch counts, accuracy rates, and comparative data between fighters, enabling commentators and journalists to dissect fight outcomes beyond subjective impressions. For instance, following the matchup between and , CompuBox analysis revealed Pacquiao's superior output with 224 total punches landed to De La Hoya's 83, underscoring Pacquiao's dominance through volume and precision. Similarly, in the Pacquiao-David Diaz fight, the stats showed Pacquiao landing 230 of 788 punches (29% accuracy) compared to Diaz's 90 of 463 (19%), illustrating Pacquiao's aggressive style in breaking open a competitive early fight. Such recaps contribute to annual highlights, including CompuBox's recognition of record-setting or exemplary punches, like the high-volume exchanges in historic clashes that set benchmarks for punches thrown. In analytical applications, CompuBox data serves as a tool for trainers and strategists to evaluate and refine techniques, focusing on metrics such as jab accuracy and punches absorbed to inform adjustments. By reviewing post-fight stats, coaches can identify weaknesses, such as low connect percentages on punches, and develop targeted drills to enhance efficiency. For example, data showing a fighter's jab landing rate below 30% might prompt emphasis on footwork and timing in sessions to boost defensive evasion and offensive precision. This retrospective use extends CompuBox's utility from live broadcasts into ongoing performance optimization, including commercial licensing for applications and fantasy sports. CompuBox's Pound-for-Pound rankings further exemplify its analytical depth, aggregating stats across categories like ratios (landed minus absorbed punches) and average punches landed per round to rank elite fighters objectively. As of late 2025, leads with a plus/minus of +20.2, reflecting his defensive prowess and offensive output in recent bouts. These rankings, updated via the official CompuBox platform, incorporate data from multiple fights to highlight trends, such as Roman Gonzalez's league-high 30.1 average total punches landed per round. Introduced post-2020, the system's 10 core categories—including jab thrown per round (led by at 39.1) and opponent power punches absorbed (fewest by at 4.1)—provide a multifaceted view of fighter effectiveness. Recent examples illustrate CompuBox's ongoing post-fight relevance, such as the November 2024 rematch between and , where stats showed Foster landing 172 of 534 punches (32%) compared to Conceição's 153 of 565 (27%), with Foster outlanding in 8 of 12 rounds despite Conceição's higher activity. In a 2025 bout on November 8, Darius Fulghum and David Stevens fought to a draw, with CompuBox data available for immediate review on the beta platform, revealing balanced outputs in a tactical, low-volume affair. The platform's 2025 updates, including round-by-round breakdowns for events like vs. , facilitate rapid analytical insights for media and fans. CompuBox has also retrofitted historical fights for modern analysis, applying its methodology to archival footage from eras like 's to quantify legendary performances. In Ali's 1973 rematch with , CompuBox has applied its methodology to highlight Norton's edge in accuracy during a grueling contest Ali won by . The "Muhammad Ali by the Numbers" analysis covers 47 of Ali's fights, emphasizing his jab-heavy style that averaged high volume in big wins, though exact career totals are not publicly detailed beyond the publication. This historical application, detailed in dedicated analyses, allows contemporary audiences to contextualize past eras through quantifiable trends.

Criticisms and Limitations

Accuracy and Human Error

CompuBox's punch-tracking system relies on two human operators positioned ringside, each monitoring one fighter and manually pressing buttons to record punches thrown and landed in . This process introduces opportunities for , particularly during rapid exchanges where operators may miss punches or fail to register them accurately due to the speed of combination punching. For instance, in flurries of one-two-three-four sequences delivered in fractions of a second, an operator might count only a subset of the actual blows, leading to underreporting. Operators must also make instantaneous judgments on punch , distinguishing between jabs and power punches based on perceived intent and force, which can result in misclassifications. A punch grazing the opponent might be debated as landed or missed, while borderline cases between jab and power categories add subjectivity. CompuBox president Bob Canobbio has claimed a 2 percent for the system, but independent analyses suggest higher discrepancies, with no automated to cross-check operator inputs. A notable example of such errors occurred in the 2015 vs. fight, where CompuBox statistics heavily favored Mayweather (148 punches landed to Pacquiao's 81), aligning with the judges' decision but contradicting a frame-by-frame video by an group that indicated a closer bout or potential win for Pacquiao. This highlighted the limitations of manual tracking, as even a team reviewing footage post-fight found significant variances from the operators' counts, underscoring the challenges of human perception under pressure. Variability among operators further compounds inaccuracies, as differing interpretations of the same action can lead to inconsistent totals across rounds or fights, with no standardized calibration process beyond basic training. In the 2018 rematch between and , CompuBox recorded Golovkin landing 234 of 879 punches (27% accuracy) compared to Álvarez's 202 of 622 (33%), fueling debates on whether the stats accurately captured the fight's intensity despite the close for Álvarez. Such cases illustrate ongoing concerns with operator subjectivity, particularly in high-stakes bouts where pressures amplify potential flaws.

Broader Interpretive Flaws

CompuBox's punch-tracking system places undue emphasis on the volume of punches thrown and landed, often portraying high-output flurries as superior to more selective, damaging strikes, without penalizing low-effectiveness "" tactics. For example, a fighter landing a low percentage of numerous attempts can accumulate favorable totals, overshadowing an opponent who connects with fewer but more precise shots that cause visible harm. This flaw stems from the system's , where "power punches" simply denote non-jabs rather than assessing actual or , leading to misleading interpretations of dominance. Such metrics create a fundamental disconnect from boxing's official 10-point must scoring system, which evaluates not only clean punching but also ring generalship, effective aggression, and defense—qualitative factors CompuBox entirely omits. The system's aggregate counts fail to account for defensive prowess, such as slips or blocks that neutralize attacks, or the cumulative damage from fewer, well-placed blows that might wobble an opponent. Critics note that this narrow focus contradicts judging criteria, potentially rewarding volume over control, as seen in historical examples where defensive specialists like outmaneuvered aggressive punchers without generating high stats. These interpretive limitations profoundly shape public perception, swaying fan opinions, media commentary, and even betting outcomes by framing fights through incomplete numerical lenses that ignore strategy, resilience, and overall narrative. In the 2017 Manny Pacquiao-Jeff Horn title fight, CompuBox recorded Pacquiao landing 182 punches to Horn's 92, fueling outrage over Horn's upset victory and amplifying claims of a "" among viewers who prioritized stats over subjective judging. This influence extends to commentary, where broadcasters often cite figures to justify biases toward aggressive styles, distorting the sport's emphasis on skill and heart. Boxing experts have long criticized CompuBox for favoring high-volume aggressors while undervaluing technical fighters, with CompuBox co-creator Bob Canobbio admitting the "power punch" label is merely descriptive and not a true gauge of damage. In the 2020s, these debates have escalated, as seen in the November 2024 rematch between and , where CompuBox stats showed Serrano landing more punches (324 to 217) but failed to reflect the perceived quality and damage of shots, and in Chairman Bob Arum's 2024 dismissal of CompuBox data as "a " for misrepresenting punch effectiveness in the Robson Conceição vs. O’Shaquie Foster fight, underscoring ongoing tensions between quantifiable stats and the irreplaceable "eye test".

Technological Advancements

Historical Upgrades

In the , CompuBox transitioned from its initial setup using bulky 30-pound computers with a shared to more portable systems incorporating individual numeric keypads for the two operators, each responsible for tracking one fighter's jabs and power punches (thrown and landed). This hardware shift improved input speed and reliability during live broadcasts, allowing for real-time data capture without the logistical challenges of heavier equipment. Following co-founder Logan Hobson's departure in 2002, CompuBox introduced new operators. Key milestones in the 2010s included the integration of a dedicated button for tracking body shots in recent years, expanding punch type granularity beyond head and general power categories. Operators increasingly used jib camera angles for better visibility, further streamlining operations. These upgrades collectively boosted system reliability, with CompuBox claiming a as low as 2% in controlled evaluations by the late . As of , the had tracked over 2,400 fight cards, demonstrating enhanced speed and precision in analytics.

Emerging Innovations

Since the 2010s, researchers have proposed embedding sensors in boxing gloves to directly measure punch force, speed, and impact, offering a potential supplement or alternative to manual tracking systems like CompuBox. These wearable technologies, often incorporating inertial measurement units (IMUs) and force sensors, aim to provide real-time biomechanical data during training and bouts, with early prototypes demonstrating accuracy in capturing strike velocity and power output. However, widespread adoption has been limited by high development costs and regulatory requirements for combat sports equipment, preventing integration into professional events as of 2025. In recent years, AI-driven approaches have emerged to automate punch tracking, addressing limitations in human-operated systems. In 2024 and 2025, pilots such as Jabbr's DeepStrike system have utilized with multiple cameras to analyze es in , achieving 98-99% accuracy in impact detection and classification while tested in non-professional bouts and gyms. Complementing this, CompuBox announced a with Combat IQ in January 2025 to incorporate AI-driven insights into its analytics, leveraging 40 years of historical data for enhanced processing and deeper statistical models. These developments represent experimental steps toward fully automated CompuBox enhancements, though full implementation remains in early stages. CompuBox has also expanded digital access through its beta website, beta.compuboxdata.com, which provides public viewing of detailed fight statistics, including round-by-round data for 2025 events like Vergil Ortiz vs. . Launched around 2023, the platform supports broader analytical use by fans and researchers, with features for statistical leaders and historical comparisons, though advanced predictive modeling is not yet prominently featured. Despite these advances, significant challenges persist, including regulatory approvals from commissions for new sensor-based equipment to ensure safety and fairness. concerns with wearable , such as biometric information from gloves or cameras, further complicate adoption, raising issues of and in . As of 2025, these innovations remain largely experimental, focused on refining CompuBox's foundational manual methodology rather than replacing it outright.

References

  1. [1]
    What Is... CompuBox Every Punch Counts - Sports Illustrated Vault
    Oct 6, 2003 · Logan Hobson in 1985, boxing's made-for-TV punch-counting system uses two keypads that feed into a laptop. Each pad has four keys: jab ...
  2. [2]
    The problem with CompuBox: why boxing fans are fooled ... - AS USA
    Jul 2, 2024 · The reality is that, despite the name, CompuBox is just two people sitting at ringside, each watching one boxer and clicking one of four buttons ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  3. [3]
    Compubox
    JAB CONNECT PERCENTAGE. PERCENTAGE ; JESSE RODRIGUEZ. 27.1% ; DAVID BENAVIDEZ. 26.3% ; DEONTAY WILDER. 25.8% ; VERGIL ORTIZ. 25.5%.By the numbers - top... · Current lb for lb fighters where...Missing: system | Show results with:system
  4. [4]
    The Inner Workings Of CompuBox: Boxing's Statistics Generator For ...
    Jun 4, 2015 · There, he met Jon Gibbs who developed TenniSTAT, a statistics program for tennis. Impressed with TenniSTAT, Canobbio commissioned a similar ...
  5. [5]
    Sometimes, Boxing Numbers Don't Add Up - Los Angeles Times
    Oct 3, 2003 · In 1984, Canobbio was working as a researcher for Sports Illustrated and Logan Hobson was a correspondent for United Press International.Missing: development founders interview
  6. [6]
    “Compubox Was Never Designed To Score Fights... But There's No ...
    Jul 3, 2014 · ... Logan Hobson, who co-founded CompuBox before leaving the New York-based company in 2002. “As boxing lovers, Logan and I saw the tennis ...Missing: founders interview
  7. [7]
    From 30-pound computers to keypads: CompuBox turns 40
    Jan 19, 2025 · A little under 40 years ago today, Bob Canobbio and Logan Hobson lugged a mammoth early version of a personal computer to Reno, Nevada and ...Missing: interview | Show results with:interview
  8. [8]
    CompuBox: 25-Years of Punch Stats, and Still Counting
    The CompuBox program – which was dubbed “PunchStat” by HBO – made its network debut on February 16, 1985 when WBA lightweight champion Livingstone Bramble met ...
  9. [9]
    CompuBox Looks Back: Hagler KO's Hearns in Three on 4/15/85
    Hagler-Hearns – held on Tax Day 1985 – was just the third fight in the history of CompuBox, with the first being Livingstone Bramble-Ray Mancini II at the ...
  10. [10]
    How reliable is CompuBox in its portrait of Muhammad Ali and today?
    Sep 18, 2021 · CompuBox was created in 1985 by Bob Cannobio and Logan Hobson. ... This writer first examined CompuBox in the aftermath of the March 13 ...
  11. [11]
    by the numbers - all time great mexican fighters - Compubox
    Fighter's stats compiled in 10 categories. 10 points awarded to fighter who's #1 in each category; 9 points for #2; 8 points for #3, etc.<|control11|><|separator|>
  12. [12]
    The Troubles with CompuBox - Boxing Insider
    Jul 8, 2017 · The four buttons correspond to jabs thrown, jabs landed, power punches thrown and power punches landed.Missing: button | Show results with:button
  13. [13]
    how to use CompuBox punch stats for live boxing bets
    Oct 21, 2025 · CompuBox is the gold standard for punch statistics. It tracks jabs vs. power punches thrown and landed, accuracy percentages, and round-by-round ...
  14. [14]
    CompuBox: Inside The Numbers - The Body Shot Report
    CompuBox looks at their pct of body shots landed to pct. of total punches landed. CompuBox also reports on the top body punchers in the game today.Missing: categories | Show results with:categories
  15. [15]
    The Boxing Judge: What CompuBox can – and can't – tell us about a ...
    Jul 7, 2025 · CompuBox tracks punches thrown and landed – but it doesn't assess the quality of the punches, the damage they cause, or the other nuances of a ...
  16. [16]
    The Troubles with CompuBox - Boxing Philosophy
    Jul 26, 2017 · The four buttons correspond to jabs thrown, jabs landed, power punches thrown and power punches landed.Missing: five- button
  17. [17]
    Floyd Mayweather beats Manny Pacquiao in unanimous decision
    May 3, 2015 · The Mayweather Effect. Manny Pacquiao threw 429 total punches in Saturday's night decision loss to unbeaten Floyd Mayweather, the fewest he's ...
  18. [18]
    Boxing commentator Jim Lampley rips Mayweather-McGregor
    Jun 18, 2017 · “Let me tell you something, CompuBox – which I very much trust and appreciate as an analytical tool – tracked 10 Conor McGregor fights,” Lampley ...
  19. [19]
    Jim Lampley to commentate Berlanga-Sheeraz card in New York
    Jul 10, 2025 · Jim Lampley is back on commentary for Saturday's Ring show in New York ... CompuBox stats: Hamzah Sheeraz TKO5 Edgar Berlanga · Hamzah Sheeraz ...
  20. [20]
    CompuBox: Manny Pacquiao lands just 81 punches against Floyd ...
    May 3, 2015 · Mayweather landed 148 of 435 (34 percent) punches in the fight, while Pacquiao connected on just 19 percent (81 of 429) of his punches against Mayweather.
  21. [21]
    Oleksandr Usyk unanimously defeats Tyson Fury in rematch - ESPN
    Usyk-Fury 2 - CompuBox Punch Stats ; Total landed, 179, 144 ; Total thrown, 423, 509 ; Percent, 42.3%, 28.3% ; Jabs landed, 73, 44.Missing: broadcast integration
  22. [22]
    Big discrepancy in CompuBox figures - Sports Inquirer
    May 14, 2015 · “It would interest everyone to know that there was a big discrepancy between the figures culled from CompuBox and those counted by the group ...Missing: operator | Show results with:operator
  23. [23]
    Canelo Alvarez vs. Golovkin 2 CompuBox stats show how close fight ...
    Sep 16, 2018 · Another boxing fight, another scoring controversy. But as the stats show, this was no clear blowout for either fighter.
  24. [24]
    Please, do not use Compubox to judge fights - Boxe Punch
    Nov 20, 2024 · The margin for error is inevitably high. I recall watching the Errol Spence Jr. vs. Shawn Porter fight with a close friend who, during one ...
  25. [25]
    Is tracking punches by A.I. a better way forward? - Boxing Scene
    Nov 1, 2024 · “The CompuBox people weren't even at the fight,” Arum said of CompuBox figures showing Brazil's Conceicao landed only 11 percent of his 701 ...
  26. [26]
    Inertial Sensors for Performance Analysis in Combat Sports - NIH
    Jan 21, 2019 · The researchers tested their system in a competitive box tag setting and compared it to Compubox, a system used to estimate the number of ...
  27. [27]
    (PDF) Smart Boxing Glove “RD α”: IMU Combined with Force Sensor ...
    Aug 4, 2023 · (PDF) Smart Boxing Glove “RD α”: IMU Combined with Force Sensor for Highly Accurate Technique and Target Recognition Using Machine Learning.
  28. [28]
    Validation of a Unique Boxing Monitoring System - PMC - NIH
    Oct 20, 2021 · This research aimed to develop and validate a comprehensive punch performance sensor system for the measurement and analysis of biomechanical parameters in the ...
  29. [29]
    Can AI cure the corruption and biases that plague boxing?
    Jun 27, 2024 · CompuBox has no comparable depth or accuracy. Although the system is extolled on TV broadcasts, CompuBox only counts punches landed and missed.
  30. [30]
    CompuBox and Combat IQ announce partnership - Boxing Scene
    Jan 24, 2025 · The Boxing data and analytics company CompuBox has agreed a partnership with Combat IQ, a tech organization providing AI-driven insights for combat sports.
  31. [31]
    Medical Wearables Under the Microscope: U.S. Regulatory, Data ...
    Sep 18, 2025 · Here, we clarify the complex and evolving U.S. regulatory framework around medical devices and wearables. We also explore their associated ...
  32. [32]
    Privacy in consumer wearable technologies: a living systematic ...
    Jun 14, 2025 · In this study, we systematically evaluated the privacy policies of 17 leading wearable technology manufacturers using a novel rubric comprising 24 criteria ...