Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Contact binary

A contact binary is a binary star system in which the two component stars are so close that they fill their respective Roche lobes and share a common convective envelope, allowing for direct interaction between their outer atmospheres.^[1]^[2] These systems represent an extreme stage of binary evolution, where the stars' proximity leads to mass transfer and energy exchange, often resulting in observable photometric and spectroscopic variability.^[3]^[4] Contact binaries are classified as overcontact systems when both stars exceed their Roche lobes, forming a single shared envelope that envelops the pair; this configuration distinguishes them from semi-detached binaries, where only one star overflows its lobe.^[2]^[4] The prototype for this class is the W Ursae Majoris (W UMa) system, a short-period eclipsing variable where the components are late-type main-sequence stars of spectral classes F, G, or K, with orbital periods typically ranging from 0.2 to 1 day.^[5]^[6] Due to their geometry, contact binaries produce continuous light curves with two shallow minima from mutual eclipses, and they often emit X-rays from coronal activity enhanced by magnetic interactions in the shared envelope.^[7]^[5] These systems are common among close binaries, comprising a significant fraction of eclipsing variables detected in surveys, and they play a key role in understanding binary stellar evolution, including pathways to common-envelope phases and potential mergers.^[1]^[3] Observations suggest that contact binaries form through angular momentum loss primarily via magnetic braking, leading to orbital shrinkage until contact is achieved.^[1] Their study provides insights into mass-ratio distributions, with many showing nearly equal masses, and luminosity transfer from the primary to the secondary, maintaining thermal equilibrium.^[1]

Definition and Characteristics

Definition

A contact binary is a binary star system in which both component stars fill their Roche lobes and share a common gaseous envelope, resulting in continuous mass exchange and causing the system to appear as a single, distorted object from a distance.^[8]^[9] The Roche lobe represents the gravitational boundary around each star in a binary system, consisting of an equipotential surface where material is bound primarily to that star; it is shaped like a teardrop and terminates at the inner Lagrange point L1, the saddle point between the stars where their gravitational influences are equal.^[10] Filling the Roche lobe occurs when a star expands such that its photosphere reaches the L1 point, enabling the transfer of material through this point to the companion star.^[8] This configuration distinguishes contact binaries from other binary types: detached binaries maintain separation greater than their combined Roche lobes, preventing direct interaction or mass transfer, while semi-detached binaries involve only one star filling its lobe, leading to unidirectional overflow from the donor to the acceptor.^[11] In contrast, contact binaries feature both stars overfilling their lobes, with the shared envelope facilitating bidirectional energy and mass transfer.^[8] Contact binaries were first recognized in the early 20th century through observations of eclipsing variables, exemplified by the discovery of the short-period light variations in the prototype system W Ursae Majoris by Gustav Müller and Paul Kempf in 1903.^[5] The term "contact binary" was formally introduced by Gerard Kuiper in 1941 to describe such closely interacting systems.^[12]

Physical Characteristics

While the following describes typical low-mass, late-type systems, contact binaries also include higher-mass, early-type examples with hotter primaries and more disparate properties.^[5] Contact binaries feature a shared convective envelope that envelops both stellar components, causing their photospheres to come into direct contact at the inner Lagrange point (L1), and imparting a distinctive peanut-shaped or egg-like morphology to the system as a whole. This common envelope facilitates continuous energy and mass exchange between the two stars, maintaining thermal equilibrium across their surfaces.^[13] Contact binaries typically have mass ratios ranging from about 0.1 to 1.0, with many systems showing values below 0.5; total system masses for late-type examples are between 0.5 and 2.5 solar masses (M_\sun).^[1] Their orbital periods are short, spanning 0.2 to 1 day, while each component has a radius of 1 to 3 solar radii (R_\sun), reflecting their evolved, bloated structures due to the envelope sharing.^[1] In typical late-type contact binaries, the components possess similar effective temperatures between 4000 and 7000 K, corresponding to F- to K-type spectral classifications, resulting in nearly identical surface brightness.^[1] Hot spots often appear at the interface where the envelopes meet, marking regions of enhanced heating from dynamical interactions.^[14] Dynamically, these systems achieve tidal locking, with rotational periods synchronized to the orbital period, minimizing shear in the shared envelope.^[15] Energy dissipation within the convective common envelope drives rapid evolutionary changes, including adjustments in mass ratio and fill-out factor, on timescales comparable to the thermal adjustment of the secondary star.^[1] The condition for contact is defined by both stars filling their Roche lobes, approximated by the volume-equivalent radius formula:

\frac{R_L}{a} \approx \frac{0.49 q^{2/3}}{0.6 q^{2/3} + \ln(1 + q^{1/3})}

where R_L is the Roche lobe radius, a is the semi-major axis, and q is the mass ratio (secondary to primary mass). This relation ensures the photospheres overflow the L1 point, enabling the envelope connection.

Classification

W-type Contact Binaries

W-type contact binaries represent the primary subtype of overcontact systems within the W Ursae Majoris (W UMa) class of eclipsing variables, characterized by two main-sequence components of late spectral types ranging from F7 to K or M, both filling their Roche lobes and enveloped in a shared gaseous structure. This classification, introduced by Binnendijk in 1970, distinguishes them from hotter A-type systems based on light curve morphology, where the deeper primary minimum arises from the eclipse of the hotter, smaller secondary by the cooler, larger primary.^[16] These binaries typically exhibit orbital periods between 0.2 and 0.5 days, with a median value of approximately 0.35 days, reflecting their compact configurations driven by angular momentum loss mechanisms.^[16] The components of W-type systems possess shallow convective envelopes, which facilitate stable, conservative mass transfer through the common envelope without significant angular momentum loss, maintaining thermal equilibrium between the stars.^[17] Their total luminosities are comparable to those of single main-sequence stars of equivalent spectral type and mass, owing to the efficient energy redistribution in the shared envelope.^[18] Fill-out factors, measuring the degree of overcontact as the fraction of the common envelope volume occupied by the stars, often exceed 20% in these systems, indicating deep contact and enhanced envelope sharing.^[19] W-type contact binaries are the most prevalent form of overcontact systems, accounting for nearly half of all cataloged W UMa binaries in comprehensive samples, with a relative frequency of about 0.2% among main-sequence FGK stars in the solar neighborhood.^[16]^[18] Their stability stems from comparable component masses, typically yielding mass ratios between 0.3 and 0.7, which prevent the onset of Darwin instability—a tidal disruption mechanism that would otherwise lead to rapid merger—thus enabling these systems to persist for billions of years without immediate coalescence.^[20] Notable examples include W Ursae Majoris itself, a prototypical system with a period of 0.333 days and spectral types around G0 for both components.

A-type Contact Binaries

A-type contact binaries represent a subtype of overcontact systems in which both stellar components fill their Roche lobes and share a common envelope, distinguished by light curves where the deeper primary minimum arises from the occultation of the hotter, more massive primary by the cooler secondary. This classification, originally proposed by Binnendijk based on photometric observations, contrasts with W-type systems where the secondary is hotter. These binaries typically feature components of early spectral types (A to F), with effective temperatures reaching up to approximately 10,000 K for the primary, and luminosities higher than those of their W-type counterparts due to their more massive constituents (total masses often exceeding 1.5 solar masses). Orbital periods for A-type systems generally range from 0.5 to 1 day, longer than the shorter periods (<0.5 day) typical of W-type binaries, reflecting their larger separations and lower densities.^[21] Key structural traits of A-type contact binaries include deeper radiative envelopes compared to the convective envelopes dominant in W-type systems, which facilitates more rapid mass transfer rates between components owing to reduced viscosity in radiative regions. This envelope structure leads to a higher degree of overcontact, with fill-out factors often exceeding 20-30%, though variability in fill-out can occur due to dynamical instabilities. The systems exhibit smaller mass ratios (typically q < 0.5) and more pronounced temperature differences between components, with the primary maintaining higher surface temperatures despite shared envelope heating. These characteristics contribute to asymmetric light variations and potential hot-spot activity from mass transfer streams. Evolutionarily, A-type contact binaries are generally post-main-sequence systems, where at least one component—often the initially less massive secondary—has evolved into a subgiant or giant phase, driving the onset of overcontact through Roche lobe overflow. This evolutionary stage implies prior detached or semi-detached phases, with the secondary's expansion reversing the mass ratio and promoting instability. Such systems are prone to asymmetric mass loss via stellar winds or ejection events, which can alter orbital parameters and lead to rapid evolution toward merger. In dense environments like star clusters, their merger products may manifest as blue stragglers, appearing younger and more luminous than cluster main-sequence stars. A-type contact binaries are less frequent than W-type systems, comprising roughly 20-30% of known overcontact binaries, as their formation requires specific evolutionary paths involving higher initial masses and angular momentum loss mechanisms like magnetic braking. They are preferentially detected in older stellar populations, such as galactic fields or globular clusters, where evolved progenitors are abundant. Detection relies on photometric surveys revealing their distinct light curve symmetries, though variable fill-out factors can occasionally mimic detached phases, complicating identification without spectroscopic confirmation of radial velocities and envelope sharing.^[21]

Formation

Initial Formation Mechanisms

Contact binaries originate from primordial binary systems formed during the early stages of star formation, where most stars emerge in multiple configurations through the gravitational fragmentation of dense molecular cloud cores. These cores, embedded within turbulent interstellar medium, collapse under gravity, often splitting into binary or multiple protostellar systems due to angular momentum and thermal support variations. Turbulent fragmentation promotes the formation of such multiples, with simulations indicating that approximately 50% of stars form in binary or higher-order systems.^[22] For contact binaries, the initial orbital separations must be exceptionally small, typically less than 10 solar radii (about 0.05 AU), to allow later envelope contact without invoking post-main-sequence evolution. Close binaries with such tight orbits arise primarily from disk instability in protostellar disks, where gravitational fragmentation produces companion clumps that migrate inward via accretion torques in circumbinary disks. Hydrodynamical simulations demonstrate that turbulent conditions in these disks lead to fragmentation at initial separations of tens of AU, followed by rapid inward migration driven by angular momentum transfer, resulting in final periods short enough (P < 10 days) for ~10-20% of systems to become precursors to contact binaries. Dynamical capture during the pre-main-sequence phase in dense environments can also contribute, though it is less dominant for the closest pairs.^[23]^[24] Environmental factors significantly influence these primordial processes, with dense star-forming clusters favoring closer initial binaries through enhanced three-body interactions and disk instabilities. In regions like the Orion Nebula Cluster, high stellar densities (~10^3-10^4 stars pc^{-3}) promote the survival and tightening of primordial binaries via dynamical friction and migration. Magnetic fields, with strengths typically 10–100 μG in protostellar cores,^[25] play a key role by aligning stellar spins with orbits, suppressing excessive disk expansion, and facilitating fragmentation scales that yield tighter binaries, reducing separations by up to a factor of two compared to non-magnetized cases.^[26]^[22] Observational evidence from young star-forming regions supports these mechanisms, as surveys of Class 0/I protostars in the Orion Nebula reveal a high fraction (~40-60%) of binaries with separations below 100 AU, including tight orbits indicative of disk fragmentation and early migration. Adaptive optics and radio interferometry observations confirm bimodal separation distributions peaking at ~75 AU (close pairs) and ~3000 AU (wider), consistent with simulations of primordial formation without significant dynamical hardening post-formation. These young systems in Orion, aged <1 Myr, serve as direct precursors to evolved contact binaries, highlighting the efficiency of initial close-pair formation in clustered environments.^[22]

Binary Evolution Leading to Contact

Contact binaries typically form through the evolution of initially detached binary systems consisting of low-mass stars, where the components gradually approach each other until their envelopes make contact. As the primary star evolves off the main sequence, its radius expands due to hydrogen shell burning, eventually filling its Roche lobe and initiating mass transfer to the secondary. Concurrently, the orbit shrinks due to angular momentum loss, primarily through magnetic braking in convective envelopes of cool stars, with a minor contribution from gravitational wave emission in tighter systems. This dual process—stellar expansion and orbital decay—bridges the detached phase to overcontact, with the secondary often expanding in response to mass accretion, leading both stars to overfill their Roche lobes and share a common envelope.^[27] The timescales for this evolution vary with initial orbital period and stellar masses but generally span 1 to 10 billion years for low-mass systems (total mass < 2 M⊙). For binaries resembling solar-type stars (masses ~0.8–1.2 M⊙) with initial periods of 2–3 days, contact is reached in approximately 5 Gyr, aligning with the age of the Galactic disk and allowing such systems to form continuously over cosmic time. Magnetic braking dominates the orbital shrinkage in these non-compact systems, acting over gigayear scales, while gravitational waves become relevant only for periods below ~0.2 days but play a negligible role prior to contact.^[28] Mass ratio plays a crucial role in the pathway to contact. In systems with nearly equal masses (q ≈ 1), evolution proceeds symmetrically, with both stars expanding comparably and reaching overcontact simultaneously without a prolonged semi-detached phase. For unequal masses (q << 1), the more massive primary fills its Roche lobe first, leading to a temporary semi-detached configuration before the secondary's response drives full contact; this asymmetry can delay overcontact but accelerates overall evolution due to enhanced angular momentum loss.^[27] Orbital decay due to magnetic braking can be approximated by relating the rate of period change to angular momentum loss, often modeled in terms of an effective mass loss rate carrying specific angular momentum from the envelope. A simplified form for the fractional period change is given by

\frac{\dot{P}}{P} = -6 \frac{M_1 + M_2}{M_{\rm env}} \times \left( \frac{J_{\rm orb}}{J_{\rm total}} \right) \dot{M},

where M_1 and M_2 are the component masses, M_{\rm env} is the envelope mass, J_{\rm orb} and J_{\rm total} are the orbital and total angular momenta, and \dot{M} represents the effective mass loss rate induced by magnetic braking. This formulation highlights how braking preferentially removes orbital angular momentum, shrinking the separation until contact.^[27]

Evolutionary Processes

In contact binaries, mass transfer primarily occurs via a narrow stream of material originating from the inner Lagrange point (L1), where the more massive primary component overflows its Roche lobe. This stream, deflected by the Coriolis force, circulates within the common envelope, transporting angular momentum and high-entropy material around the less massive secondary component before partially returning to the primary. As a result, the circulation process effectively equalizes the surface temperatures and chemical compositions between the two stars, maintaining thermal and compositional homogeneity across the shared envelope. Typical mass transfer rates in these systems range from approximately $10^{-7} to $10^{-5} solar masses per year, driven by evolutionary expansion of the primary and angular momentum loss mechanisms such as magnetic braking.^[29]^[30] The shared envelope in contact binaries features vigorous convective mixing in the outer layers, which homogenizes the composition and thermal structure, preventing significant gradients between the components. This mixing is facilitated by large-scale circulations induced by baroclinic instabilities from unequal internal heating at the Roche lobe boundaries. At the points of stellar contact—often manifesting as a "peanut-shaped" distortion—frictional heating and impact of the circulating stream generate localized hot spots, typically on the facing hemispheres of both stars, with temperature excesses of several thousand Kelvin. These hot spots contribute to the observed light curve asymmetries and enhanced emission in ultraviolet and X-ray wavelengths.^[29]^[31] Stability in the contact phase is governed by the relative timescales of thermal relaxation and orbital motion, with the thermal relaxation timescale being shorter than the orbital period, enabling the system to achieve a quasi-equilibrium configuration through ongoing adjustments in the envelope structure. This balance inhibits dynamical instabilities, particularly in near-equal-mass systems where the mass ratio prevents excessive donor expansion. In such cases, runaway mass transfer is avoided, as the convective envelope's response to perturbations dissipates energy efficiently without leading to rapid detachment or merger. Seminal analyses, including thermal relaxation oscillation models, underscore how these dynamics sustain the overcontact state over evolutionary timescales.^[29] Observationally, the mass transfer and envelope sharing manifest in synchronized rotation of both components with the orbital period, due to efficient tidal torques within the common envelope. Orbits are highly circular, with eccentricities typically less than 0.01, reflecting rapid tidal circularization and the absence of significant perturbations during the stable contact phase. These signatures are evident in photometric light curves showing continuous variability and in radial velocity curves indicating co-rotation without detectable eccentricity.^[32]

End States and Mergers

Contact binaries reach their end states through a variety of merger scenarios triggered by excessive mass loss, such as via stellar winds or overflow through the outer Lagrange point L2, or by dynamical instabilities like the Darwin instability, which causes orbital decay and inspiral when the orbital angular momentum becomes comparable to the stars' spin angular momentum.^[33]^[34] These processes lead to the eventual coalescence of the components, with the timescale potentially accelerated in the final phases by gravitational wave emission, particularly for systems with short orbital periods. The gravitational wave-driven inspiral timescale for such systems can be approximated as

\tau_{\rm GW} \approx 10^{12} \left( \frac{P}{1\,{\rm day}} \right)^{8/3} \left( \frac{M}{{\rm M}_\odot} \right)^{-5/3} \, {\rm years},

where P is the orbital period and M is the total mass; this provides a prediction for the end-state merger timing, though for typical contact binary parameters (P \sim 0.3–1 day, M \sim 1–20 M_\odot), \tau_{\rm GW} often exceeds the Hubble time except in the closest configurations.^[35] The primary outcomes of these mergers are single stars that appear as rapid rotators, often manifesting as blue stragglers due to the combined mass and rejuvenated appearance on the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram.^[33] Approximately 10–30% of single white dwarfs in the field may originate as merger products, suggesting a notable contribution to the population of apparently single stars from binary interactions, with higher fractions (up to ~30%) estimated for massive main-sequence stars.^[36]^[37] Recent evolutionary models of contact binaries, particularly those using detailed simulations like MESA, indicate that a substantial fraction—over 50% in nuclear-timescale integrations for massive systems—ultimately merge within the Hubble time, driven by non-conservative mass transfer and tidal effects; for primaries in the range 4.8–20.8 M⊙, at least 40% enter contact phases, with 12–19% leading to mergers.^[38]^[33] The remnants exhibit enhanced surface metallicity due to deep mixing during the merger, dredging up helium- and nitrogen-rich material from the cores to the surface, which alters their chemical profiles compared to single-star evolution.^[39] These models predict period-mass ratio distributions consistent with observations, with mergers producing rapidly rotating stars that may display magnetic fields or other anomalies from the violent interaction.^[38]

Observation and Detection

Photometric Observations

Contact binaries are detected primarily through their photometric variability, which arises from their eclipsing nature. Due to the close proximity and shared envelope of the components, these systems exhibit continuous eclipses throughout the orbital cycle, resulting in light curves characterized by two minima of nearly equal depth and lacking flat bottoms, as the total eclipse persists without interruption from the contact configuration.^[40]^[41] This distinct morphology distinguishes contact binaries from detached or semi-detached systems, where minima depths often differ and flat-bottomed eclipses may occur during partial phases. Key features of contact binary light curves include the O'Connell effect, an asymmetry between the two maxima often attributed to starspots on the cooler component, which causes one maximum to be brighter than the other.^[42] Additionally, orbital period changes, typically on the order of ΔP/P ≈ 10^{-6} yr^{-1}, reflect ongoing mass transfer between the components, leading to secular variations observable in long-term monitoring.^[43] Large-scale photometric surveys have significantly expanded the catalog of known contact binaries, with over 70,000 systems identified in surveys such as ASAS-SN as of 2020, and thousands more from missions like TESS and ZTF by 2025.^[44]^[45] Notable contributions come from the All Sky Automated Survey (ASAS), the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment (OGLE), and the Kepler mission, which have detected thousands of these variables through their periodic brightness modulations, alongside more recent efforts from ASAS-SN, TESS, and ZTF.^[46] Photometric colors from these surveys, such as (V - I), provide estimates of effective temperatures, typically ranging from 4000 K to 7000 K for the components, aiding in classification as W-type (cooler) or A-type (hotter) systems.^[47] To derive physical parameters, light curves are modeled using the Wilson-Devinney code, which accounts for geometric effects like Roche lobe overflow and illumination.^[48] This approach fits key quantities such as the fill-out factor (the degree of common envelope filling, often 10–80%) and orbital inclination (nearly edge-on at i ≈ 90° for eclipsing systems), enabling determination of mass ratios and component radii.^[49]^[50]

Spectroscopic and Other Methods

Spectroscopic observations of contact binaries primarily rely on double-lined spectra to derive radial velocity curves, which reveal the orbital speeds of both components, typically on the order of K_1 and K_2 \sim 100 km/s for systems with periods around 0.3–1 day.^[51] These measurements enable the determination of minimum masses through the relations for circular orbits, M_1 \sin^3 i = \frac{P (K_1 + K_2)^2 K_2}{2\pi [G](/page/G)} and M_2 \sin^3 i = \frac{P (K_1 + K_2)^2 K_1}{2\pi [G](/page/G)}, where P is the orbital period, K_1 and K_2 are the radial velocity semi-amplitudes of the primary and secondary, i is the inclination, and G is the gravitational constant.^[52] This approach provides dynamical masses when combined with inclinations from photometry, offering insights into the mass ratio and total mass, which are crucial for understanding the shared envelope dynamics.^[53] Spectral analysis of contact binaries often reveals composite spectra with similar spectral types for both components, reflecting their nearly equal temperatures due to the common envelope.^[51] Rotational broadening of spectral lines, arising from the rapid spin-orbit synchronization in these close systems, complicates line profile fitting but indicates equatorial velocities up to several hundred km/s.^[54] Evidence of chemical anomalies, such as enhanced nitrogen abundances from convective mixing or mass exchange across the envelope, has been detected in some systems, suggesting internal processing that alters surface compositions.^[55] Beyond spectroscopy, interferometry with arrays like CHARA resolves the angular separation of components or the extended envelope in nearby contact binaries, providing direct geometric constraints on sizes and filling factors at sub-milliarcsecond scales.^[56] X-ray observations detect emission from hot spots where stream impacts heat the surface, as seen in flares from accretion-like processes, revealing temperatures exceeding 10^6 K and luminosities up to 10^{30} erg/s.^[57] Astrometric data from Gaia refine distances to contact binaries, enabling absolute parameter calibration with precisions better than 10% out to several kpc, which is essential for evolutionary modeling. A key challenge in spectroscopic studies of contact binaries is the blending of lines from the two rapidly rotating stars, necessitating spectral disentangling algorithms that iteratively separate component spectra using Doppler shifts across multiple epochs.^[54] These methods, such as those implemented in tools like Spectangular, achieve separation accuracies of 1–5% in line strengths, allowing reliable abundance and velocity determinations despite the overlap.^[58]

Notable Examples

W Ursae Majoris

W Ursae Majoris serves as the prototypical example of a W-type contact binary, characterized by two main-sequence stars in an overcontact configuration with nearly equal surface temperatures and short orbital periods. Discovered as a variable star in 1903 by William J. Hussey, who identified its variability and determined an orbital period of approximately 0.334 days along with a mean visual magnitude of 7.8, the system has since become the namesake for this class of binaries.^[59] The binary consists of two low-mass main-sequence components, with masses of approximately 1.14 and 0.99 solar masses for the primary and secondary, respectively, effective temperatures around 4500 K, a Roche lobe fill-out factor of about 70%, and a combined luminosity of approximately 1.5 solar luminosities. These parameters place it firmly within the W-type subclass, where the stars share a common convective envelope while maintaining distinct cores.^[60] A distinctive feature of W Ursae Majoris is its pronounced O'Connell effect, an asymmetry in the light curve maxima often attributed to starspots or circumstellar material, alongside a secular increase in the orbital period that signals active mass transfer from the less massive to the more massive component. Extensively studied since its identification, the system exemplifies the stable overcontact phase typical of W-type binaries, providing key insights into their formation and evolution. Recent Gaia measurements place it at a distance of about 120 pc, facilitating precise absolute parameter determinations.^[60]^[61]

VFTS 352

VFTS 352 is a contact binary system discovered in 2015 through the VLT-FLAMES Tarantula Survey (VFTS) in the 30 Doradus region of the Tarantula Nebula within the Large Magellanic Cloud.^[62] This system represents one of the most massive known contact binaries, with an orbital period of approximately 1.12 days.^[62] The binary consists of two O-type stars with masses of about 28.6 and 28.9 solar masses, both classified as O4.5 V(n)((fc))z and O5.5 V(n)((fc))z, respectively, and effective temperatures exceeding 40,000 K.^[62] It exhibits overcontact configuration, where both components significantly overfill their Roche lobes and share a common envelope with a high fill-out factor of around 1.29.^[62] The stars are rapidly rotating at velocities of approximately 325 km/s, consistent with tidal locking in this tight orbit.^[62] As a young, massive system in a low-metallicity environment like the Large Magellanic Cloud, VFTS 352 shows signs of enhanced internal mixing, potentially indicating chemically homogeneous evolution or an impending merger. Recent studies (as of 2021) continue to explore its mixing processes and role as a progenitor for black hole binaries.^[62]^[63] This configuration challenges existing models of stability in massive binaries and suggests it could serve as a progenitor for systems involving black hole mergers or long-duration gamma-ray bursts.^[62]

References

[1]
Mass-ratio distribution of contact binary stars
A contact binary system consists of two stars that have filled their Roche lobes and started sharing a single envelope. The luminosity generated by the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[2]
Contact binary - Oxford Reference
A close binary star in which both components fill their Roche lobes. When both components have just reached the bounding equipotential surface they are ...
[3]
What are binary stars? - Space
Nov 22, 2023 · With a contact binary, both stars have filled their Roche lobes with the more massive star, sending material to its smaller companion but ...Binary star FAQs · Who discovered binary stars? · Different types of binary star...
[4]
Modeling contact binaries - II. Effects of energy transfer
An extreme form of binary interaction happens when the stellar companions enter a contact configuration, where both stars overflow their respective Roche lobes ...
[5]
W Ursae Majoris - aavso
The possibility that the majority of close binary stars of late spectral type, such as the W UMa systems, may be in contact emerged from the analysis of Kopal ( ...
[6]
Algol type (EA) binaries - OGLE Atlas of Variable Star Light Curves
W Ursae Majoris type (EW) binaries. Eclipsing variables of the W Ursae Majoris (W UMa) type are contact binaries, where both stars fill their Roche lobes ...
[7]
W URSAE MAJORIS CONTACT BINARY VARIABLES AS X-RAY ...
A total of 34 W UMa stars have been found associated with X-ray emission. We compute the distances of these W UMa systems and hence their X-ray luminosities.
[8]
None
Below is a merged summary of the information on contact binary stars and related concepts extracted from the provided segments of https://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.11454.pdf. To retain all details in a dense and organized format, I will use a combination of narrative text and a table in CSV format for key information. The narrative will provide an overview and context, while the table will consolidate specific details such as definitions, quotes, distinctions, historical context, and useful URLs across the segments.
[9]
Contact binaries at different evolutionary stages - ADS
Contact binaries consist of two strongly interacting component stars where they are filling their critical Roche lobes and sharing a common envelope.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[10]
https://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/r/Roche-lobe
[11]
[PDF] Binaries and stellar evolution
A detached binary can thus evolve into a semi-detached binary or, if both stars fill their Roche lobes, into a contact binary. Three assumptions are made in ...
[12]
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1941ApJ....93..133K/abstract
[13]
The Structure of Contact Binaries
**Summary of Contact Binaries Structure (Luyten, 1968):**
[14]
[astro-ph/0408049] On the properties of contact binary stars - arXiv
Aug 3, 2004 · Abstract: A catalogue of light curve solutions of contact binary stars has been compiled. It contains the results of 159 light curve ...
[15]
Evidence from CY Ari and IK Lyn - IOPscience
Jul 15, 2025 · Close binary stars; Contact binary stars; Eclipsing binary stars; Stellar evolution ... It should be noted that the components of contact binaries ...
[16]
Statistics of 700 Individually Studied W UMa Stars - IOPscience
Apr 27, 2021 · W UMa stars are late-type contact binaries with short periods (of about 0.35 days) whose components typically have very different masses (with ...Missing: neighborhood | Show results with:neighborhood
[17]
[1301.6035] On the origin of W UMa type Contact binaries - arXiv
Jan 25, 2013 · W UMa type binaries have two defining characteristics. These are (i) the effective temperatures of both components are very similar, and (ii) ...
[18]
Luminosity function of contact binaries based on the All Sky ...
Abstract. The luminosity function for contact binary stars of the W UMa type is evaluated on the basis of the All Sky Automated Survey (ASAS) photometric ...
[19]
[PDF] Contact binaries at different evolutionary stages
Marginal contact binaries are at the beginning of the contact stage, while deep and low-mass ratio contact binary stars are at the final evolutionary stage of ...
[20]
dynamical stability of W Ursae Majoris-type systems - Oxford Academic
It is well known that a contact binary would suffer Darwin's instability and then coalesce into a fast-rotating single star (including FK Com-type stars and ...
[21]
On the properties of contact binary stars - Astronomy & Astrophysics
We also show that different types of contact binaries have well defined locations on the mass ratio – luminosity ratio diagram. Several contact binary systems ...
[22]
The contribution of binary star formation via core fragmentation on ...
The main proposed pathways for binary star formation are disc fragmentation, core fragmentation, and dynamical capture. Disc fragmentation (a ≲ 100 AU) can ...
[23]
Formation of close binaries by disc fragmentation and migration, and ...
Nov 26, 2019 · Success of our toy model suggests that most close binaries and compact triples indeed formed by disc fragmentation followed by accretion-driven inward ...ABSTRACT · INTRODUCTION · TOY MODEL OF BINARY... · RESULTS
[24]
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1706.09894.pdf
[25]
The role of magnetic fields in the formation of multiple massive stars
We observed that the orbital separation is reduced by a factor of two in binaries when magnetic fields are present. Since a(t) is nearly linear, it takes the ...
[26]
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2023/05/aa45845-23/aa45845-23.html
[27]
[1105.2645] Evolution of Cool Close Binaries - Approach to Contact
May 13, 2011 · A set of 27 evolutionary models of cool close binaries was computed under the assumption that their evolution is influenced by the magnetized winds.<|control11|><|separator|>
[28]
Large-scale circulations and energy transport in contact binaries
A common envelope of a contact binary with unequal components cannot achieve hydrostatic equilibrium. Unequal heating from below of the base of the common ...
[29]
The contact binary VW Cephei revisited: surface activity and period ...
mass transfer from the primary (more massive) component to the secondary one and determined a mass transfer rate of ∆M = 1.4 × 10−7 M yr−1. They conclude ...
[30]
[1812.08070] Starspots in contact and semi-detached binary systems
Dec 19, 2018 · From the physical properties of A- and W-type binaries, we infer that mass transfer is a dominant process for forming the hot spots in A-type ...Missing: friction | Show results with:friction
[31]
X-ray emission of contact binary variables within 1 kpc
Contact binaries have circular orbits and synchronous co-rotation, which mean that the orbital period of the binary equals to the spin period of each component.<|control11|><|separator|>
[32]
Contact tracing of binary stars: Pathways to stellar mergers
When both stars (over-)fill their Roche lobe it switches to a different solver for the mass-transfer rate suitable for contact binaries. In this scheme, only ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[33]
WISE J185503.7+592234: A particularly low mass ratio contact ...
Feb 7, 2023 · The mechanism that caused binary systems to merge is still under debate. The generally accepted assumption is Darwin's instability theory ( ...
[34]
Gravitational Radiation and the Motion of Two Point Masses
Two techniques, radiation reaction and flux across a large sphere, are used in these calculations and are shown to be in agreement over a time average. In the ...Missing: binary merger
[35]
The merger fraction of ultramassive white dwarfs - Oxford Academic
(2020) estimated that 10–30 per cent of all observable single white dwarfs are formed through binary mergers, where the primary contribution is from the mergers ...
[36]
THE INCIDENCE OF STELLAR MERGERS AND MASS GAINERS ...
30 − 15 + 10 % of massive main-sequence stars are the products of binary interaction. We show that the commonly adopted approach to minimize the effects of ...
[37]
Detailed evolutionary models of massive contact binaries - arXiv
Nov 26, 2020 · We find that models that remain in contact over nuclear timescales evolve towards equal masses, echoing the mass ratios of their observed ...
[38]
Mixing in massive stellar mergers - Oxford Academic
We find that without the effects of microscopic mixing, the temperature and chemical composition profiles in a collision product can become double-valued ...
[39]
The light-curve intrinsic variability in 47 Kepler contact binary stars
Sep 27, 2022 · It therefore follows that the light curves of contact binaries should have primary and secondary minima of nearly equal depth.
[40]
BSN-I: the first in-depth photometric study of seven total-eclipse ...
Feb 5, 2025 · This study used photometric observations of seven W UMa-type contact binaries undergoing total eclipses to provide more accurate orbital and ...
[41]
A Search for the O'Connell Effect in Contact Binaries in the Era of ...
Jan 9, 2025 · Asymmetries between the two maxima of the light curves of contact binaries, known as the O'Connell effect, have been identified using the All ...
[42]
ORBITAL PERIOD CHANGES AND THEIR EVOLUTIONARY ...
Dec 10, 2009 · The observed period modulation is ΔP/P ∼ 10−6. For AO Cam, the cyclic oscillation with a short period of 7.63(±0.07) yr and a low amplitude of 0 ...
[43]
Contact Binaries: The Current State - AIP Publishing
At the currently most common, moderately good accuracy of ~0.5%, in the OGLE surveyc (14 < V <20), the numbers go into a few ×104; in the ASAS surveyd (8 < V < ...
[44]
[PDF] arXiv:1306.6324v2 [astro-ph.GA] 2 Aug 2013
Aug 2, 2013 · Although the three surveys, OGLE, ASAS, and Kepler, observed different. Galactic regions and different stellar populations, we can draw ...
[45]
[PDF] Eclipsing Binary Stars in the OGLE-III Galactic Disk Fields
Jun 20, 2013 · The plotted orbital period distribution is based on 1032 binaries with Kepler magnitudes < 14 mag which were identified in a dataset of ...
[46]
Fifty Years of Eclipsing Binary Analysis with the Wilson–Devinney ...
Jan 19, 2022 · The Wilson–Devinney model (WDM) covers the geometric and physical principles required to analyze binaries. While originally developed for ...
[47]
Photometric light curve analysis of three overcontact binary systems
Aug 4, 2025 · Contact binary systems are classified into two subtypes based on their spectral characteristics and physical properties: the A-subtype and the W ...
[48]
Physical Parameters of Late-type Contact Binaries in the Northern ...
We present the physical parameters of 2335 late-type contact binary (CB) systems extracted from the Catalina Sky Survey (CSS). Our sample was selected from ...
[49]
Photometric and Spectroscopic Analysis of Four Contact Binaries
Apr 9, 2021 · Contact binary stars; Photometry; Spectroscopy; Eclipsing binary stars; Starspots ... physical parameters determined for the four binary systems.
[50]
TESS photometry, radial velocity, and orbital period investigations of ...
We simultaneously analyzed the radial velocity and light curves of four eclipsing contact binaries, ie ASAS J061658+1901.2, NSVS 4919378, V589 Lyr, and V1188 ...
[51]
Physical characterization of late-type contact binary systems ...
Dec 8, 2023 · This paper presents a catalog of approximately 1800 Eclipsing W UMa systems (EWs) using parameters from LAMOST, VSX, ZTF and Gaia.Missing: stability | Show results with:stability
[52]
Spectral disentangling with Spectangular - Astronomy & Astrophysics
It has been shown, e.g. by Gallenne et al. (2016) and Holmgren (2004), that disentangling the spectra helps to improve determining the orbit of binaries.
[53]
The Evolution of Massive Close Binaries - IOP Science
May 23, 2018 · Nitrogen enrichment due to mass accretion appears to be more efficient than that due to rotational mixing, because there exist thermohaline ...
[54]
Visual Orbits of Spectroscopic Binaries with the CHARA Array. IV ...
We present the visual orbits of four spectroscopic binary stars, HD 61859, HD 89822, HD 109510, and HD 191692, using long baseline interferometry with the CHARA ...
[55]
Evidence for a hot spot in the contact binary VW Cephei - NASA ADS
Niarchos: Evidence for a hot spot in the contact binary VW Cephei and produce the overall observed pattern of asymmetry. ... observed X ray flare duration (Choi & ...
[56]
Spectangular: Disentangling variable spectra
1. Introduction. Spectral disentangling is a technique used to separate component spectra of spectroscopic binaries (SB2) and multiples.
[57]
The Astrophysics of Visual Binaries
In 1902 Hussey demonstrated that the period was actually one-half Wroublavsky's value and that the orbit was more eccentric. The most recent determination ...
[58]
W Ursae Majoris: the parameters of a contact binary. - NASA ADS
A theoretical main-sequence contact binary model is constructed which reproduces the observations. I. INTRODUCTION W Ursae Majoris (W UMa) is the prototype of a ...
[59]
Gaia EDR3 Parallax Zero-point Offset Based on W Ursae Majoris ...
We derive a W1-band period–luminosity relation with a distance accuracy of 7.4%, which we use to anchor the Gaia parallax zero-point. The final, global parallax ...
[60]
DISCOVERY OF THE MASSIVE OVERCONTACT BINARY VFTS 352
Oct 13, 2015 · In this study we present the results of the analysis of an 18-month spectroscopic monitoring of VFTS 352 combined with ∼12 years of Optical ...