Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Crocodile cracking

Crocodile cracking, also known as alligator cracking or fatigue cracking, is a structural distress in asphalt pavements characterized by a series of interconnected, multi-angled cracks forming sharp-edged pieces less than 2 feet (0.6 meters) long, resembling the skin of a crocodile or alligator, typically appearing in wheel paths under repeated traffic loading.^[1]^[2] This fatigue failure initiates at the bottom of the asphalt concrete (AC) layer or stabilized base where tensile stresses are highest, propagating upward to the surface as loads exceed the material's strength.^[1]^[2] The primary causes of crocodile cracking include repeated heavy traffic loads that fatigue the pavement structure, inadequate base or subgrade support, poor drainage leading to saturation, and insufficient asphalt thickness or poor installation quality.^[3]^[4]^[2] Overloading from vehicles beyond design capacity accelerates crack initiation, while moisture infiltration weakens the subbase, exacerbating the issue.^[3]^[4] As crocodile cracking progresses, it develops from fine hairline cracks to a networked pattern with spalling, potentially leading to potholes, loose debris, and further pavement deterioration if untreated.^[1] Severity is classified as low (hairline, non-spalled), medium (networked with light spalling), or high (well-defined, spalled, and rocking pieces posing foreign object debris risks).^[2] It is measured by the area affected in square feet or meters, primarily in loaded areas, and indicates underlying structural failure requiring prompt intervention.^[1]^[5] Prevention strategies emphasize proper pavement design with adequate thickness and base support, effective drainage systems to avoid water accumulation, and limiting overloads through traffic management.^[3]^[4] Regular maintenance, such as crack sealing with rubberized asphalt to block water ingress and thin overlays for reinforcement, can delay onset, while geosynthetics or paving fabrics mitigate reflective cracking in overlays.^[6]^[7] For repair, severely affected areas demand removal of cracked material, base stabilization, and replacement with new asphalt overlays to restore structural integrity.^[3]^[8]

Overview and Characteristics

Definition

Crocodile cracking, also known as alligator cracking, is a form of fatigue cracking in asphalt pavements characterized by a network of interconnected longitudinal and transverse cracks that form a pattern resembling the skin of a crocodile or alligator.^[9] This distress manifests as sharp-angled, many-sided pieces typically appearing in wheel paths under repeated traffic loading.^[10] It is classified as a structural distress originating from bottom-up failure of the hot mix asphalt (HMA) layer, where repeated tensile stresses at the bottom of the layer—due to flexing under traffic—lead to crack initiation and propagation upward.^[9] Traffic loading serves as the primary trigger for this fatigue process in structurally inadequate pavements.^[11] Crocodile cracking is distinct from other crack types, such as transverse cracking caused by thermal contraction or longitudinal cracking resulting from construction joints or shrinkage, as it is specifically fatigue-related rather than environmental or construction-induced.^[12]^[13]

Appearance and Identification

Crocodile cracking, also referred to as alligator cracking, manifests as an interconnected network of cracks forming a series of small, many-sided polygons with sharp angles, resembling the textured skin of an alligator or crocodile. These polygons are typically less than 0.3 meters (1 foot) along their longest edge, creating a distinctive random pattern across the affected surface.^[10]^[14] The cracks begin as narrow hairline fissures, often 3 millimeters wide or less, and progressively widen to 6–19 millimeters or more as the distress advances, with edges that may become ragged or spalled.^[10]^[15] This distress is characteristically located in the wheel paths of asphalt pavements, where it initiates as longitudinal cracks that interconnect over time under repeated loading.^[15]^[14] It can be differentiated from block cracking, which produces larger rectangular or square patterns (1–10 feet across) unrelated to traffic lanes and resulting from thermal shrinkage, and from edge cracking, which appears as crescent-shaped fissures within 0.6 meters of the pavement shoulder due to lateral instability. Unlike these, crocodile cracking displays a non-linear, web-like configuration confined to high-traffic zones.^[15]^[10]^[14] Field identification often notes its occurrence in zones of elevated pavement deflection, frequently accompanied by spalling at crack edges or the development of potholes if moisture infiltrates and the condition worsens untreated.^[10]^[15]

Causes and Mechanisms

Primary Causes

Crocodile cracking, also known as alligator or fatigue cracking, primarily initiates from repeated traffic loading that generates tensile strains at the bottom of the asphalt concrete (AC) layer, eventually exceeding the material's fatigue life and causing microcracks to form. This bottom-up mechanism occurs under wheel paths where stresses are highest, particularly from heavy vehicles like trucks, leading to crack initiation when cumulative strains surpass the pavement's endurance limit. For instance, tensile strains as high as 173 microstrains (μϵ) have been observed in vulnerable sites, correlating with rapid fatigue failure.^[16]^[2]^[1] Inadequate structural capacity exacerbates this process, often due to thin asphalt overlays placed over weak subgrades or granular bases that cannot distribute loads effectively, resulting in concentrated stresses and accelerated cracking. Pavements with total asphalt thicknesses below 160 mm or base moduli under 24,000 psi are particularly susceptible, as seen in field investigations where thinner layers (e.g., 68.65 mm) on softer supports showed higher crack propensity. Poor layer bonding or delamination at interfaces further reduces load transfer, with debonding observed in over 50% of distressed regions, lowering overall pavement integrity.^[16]^[17]^[18] Material deficiencies, such as the use of low-quality asphalt binders or aggregates, diminish the tensile strength and bending resistance of the AC layer, making it more prone to fatigue under cyclic loading. Low asphalt binder content (e.g., below 4.5%) or high air void levels exceeding 10% in the lower layers compromise durability, as these factors reduce the mixture's ability to withstand repeated bending without fracturing. Aggregates with poor gradation or insufficient film thickness around them similarly contribute by increasing brittleness and oxidation sensitivity.^[16]^[17]^[18] Design flaws, including insufficient asphalt layer thickness or inadequate bonding between layers, lead to stress concentrations that amplify the effects of traffic loads and initiate cracking earlier than anticipated. For example, designs without proper consideration of heavy traffic volumes result in overlays that fail to provide the required structural depth, concentrating tensile forces at critical points. These flaws often manifest in road widenings or reconstructions where interface preparation is overlooked, promoting early fatigue.^[16]^[17]^[18]

Development Process

Crocodile cracking initiates at the asphalt-subbase interface through the formation of micro-cracks under repeated cyclic loading from traffic, leading to fatigue failure in the hot-mix asphalt (HMA) layer.^[19] This process is governed by the fatigue life concept, where the number of load cycles to failure N_f relates to the tensile strain \varepsilon by the equation N_f = k_1 \varepsilon^{-k_2}, with k_1 and k_2 as material-specific constants calibrated from field or lab data.^[20] In typical flexible pavements, these micro-cracks begin as small transverse fissures in wheel paths after accumulating 1.6 to 3.4 million equivalent single-axle loads (ESALs), depending on layer thickness and material properties.^[20] During propagation, the micro-cracks extend upward through the asphalt layer, redistributing stresses and causing branching into an interconnected network that forms the basis of the alligator pattern.^[19] This upward growth occurs due to ongoing tensile strains at the layer bottom, with cracks interconnecting under continued loading to create sharp-angled polygons.^[20] Under heavy traffic conditions, such as on highways with millions of annual ESALs, this phase typically unfolds over 5 to 10 years, progressing from isolated cracks to covering 10% or more of the lane area.^[21] Environmental factors significantly accelerate the propagation of crocodile cracking. Water infiltration into developing cracks promotes stripping, where moisture weakens the asphalt-aggregate bond, reducing effective layer thickness and hastening crack growth.^[22] In regions prone to freeze-thaw cycles, infiltrated water expands upon freezing, exerting additional hydraulic pressures that widen and propagate cracks more rapidly.^[23] Temperature fluctuations induce thermal stresses, causing the asphalt to contract in cooler conditions and further open existing fissures, compounding the fatigue damage.^[23] In the final stage, cracks break through to the pavement surface, manifesting the distinctive interconnected, scale-like pattern characteristic of crocodile cracking, often accompanied by spalling or aggregate loss due to raveled edges and structural weakening.^[19] This surface exposure allows greater moisture entry, leading to pothole formation and complete loss of subgrade support in advanced cases.^[20]

Assessment and Measurement

Detection Methods

Manual visual inspections remain a foundational method for detecting crocodile cracking, also known as alligator cracking, in asphalt pavements. These inspections typically involve trained personnel conducting Pavement Condition Index (PCI) surveys, where individuals walk or drive along the roadway to identify interconnected crack patterns in wheel paths indicative of fatigue failure. The process follows standardized protocols, such as those outlined in ASTM D6433, which emphasize observing crack density, severity levels (low, moderate, high based on spalling and connectivity), and extent in square meters, using tools like tape measures, rulers, and digital cameras for documentation.^[10] This approach allows for immediate field assessment but relies on inspector expertise to distinguish crocodile cracking from other distresses like transverse cracks. Automated detection methods have increasingly supplemented manual efforts by leveraging vehicle-mounted cameras to capture high-resolution images of pavement surfaces during routine surveys. These systems process images using algorithms such as edge detection and binarization to isolate crack networks, converting grayscale images to highlight linear features resembling alligator patterns while filtering noise from shadows or debris. For instance, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) applied to datasets of thousands of pavement images achieve detection accuracies exceeding 94% for crack presence and 90% for severity classification, enabling efficient scanning at highway speeds.^[24]^[25] Such technologies reduce subjectivity and labor compared to visual methods, though they require post-processing to confirm subsurface involvement. Advanced technologies offer enhanced capabilities for early detection, particularly for subsurface issues. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) employs electromagnetic waves at frequencies like 400-900 MHz to identify concealed cracks in pavement layers before they manifest on the surface, detecting anomalies in dielectric properties caused by voids or fractures through reflected signals analyzed via finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulations. Field applications, such as on expressways, have verified GPR's ability to locate vertical cracks up to 15 cm deep, corroborated by coring, making it valuable for proactive monitoring of fatigue-prone areas.^[26] Complementing this, laser scanning systems provide 3D profiling by projecting laser lines across a 4-meter swath to measure crack depth and geometry with 1 mm resolution at speeds up to 100 km/h, classifying alligator cracking based on width (e.g., low severity <5 mm) and connectivity while accounting for surface irregularities like rutting.^[27] These non-destructive tools yield data suitable for subsequent severity scoring. Assessments for crocodile cracking are recommended annually on high-traffic roads, such as interstates and National Highway System routes, to track progression amid heavy loading, with adjustments for seasonal weather impacts like freeze-thaw cycles that may accelerate surface visibility.^[28] Agencies like the Oklahoma and Pennsylvania Departments of Transportation conduct full-network surveys yearly for these corridors, incorporating quality control through periodic verification sites.^[28]

Quantification and Severity

Quantification of crocodile cracking, also known as alligator cracking, typically involves metrics that assess both the extent and the characteristics of the distress in asphalt pavements. One common metric is the crack length per unit area, expressed as meters of cracking per square meter of pavement surface, which captures the linear density of the interconnected crack network within the wheel path.^[29] Another widely used measure is the Alligator Cracking Index (ACI), defined as the percentage of the wheel path area affected by the cracking, where the wheel path is typically a 1-meter-wide strip along the traffic lane.^[16] These metrics provide engineers with quantifiable data for evaluating structural integrity and prioritizing maintenance. Severity levels for crocodile cracking are standardized in ASTM D6433, which classifies the distress based on crack width, pattern, and associated surface deterioration. Low severity features fine, randomly oriented cracks less than 6 mm wide with no raveling or spalling. Medium severity involves a well-defined chicken-wire pattern of interconnecting cracks 6 to 13 mm wide, with some raveling and minor spalling. High severity is characterized by polygons of interconnected cracks wider than 13 mm, accompanied by significant spalling and loss of aggregate interlock. Density and extent of the cracking pattern (e.g., isolated cracks vs. full coverage) are assessed separately to determine the overall impact on the pavement area.^[30]^[31] To compute the affected area quantitatively, the alligator cracking area A is often estimated using the formula

A = L \times W \times F

where L is the total length of cracks (in meters), W is the average crack width (in meters), and F is a factor accounting for interconnectedness (typically 0.5 to 1.0, depending on the crack pattern density).^[32] A severity index (SI) can then be derived as a weighted average:

SI = \frac{(A_L \times 1) + (A_M \times 2) + (A_H \times 3)}{A_T}

where A_L, A_M, and A_H are the areas of low-, medium-, and high-severity cracking, respectively, and A_T is the total affected area; this index ranges from 1 (all low severity) to 3 (all high severity).^[33] These quantification methods are integrated into pavement management systems (PMS) to forecast remaining service life, where cracking metrics are combined with structural data from deflection testing, such as falling weight deflectometer (FWD) measurements, to model deterioration rates and optimize rehabilitation timing.^[34] For instance, high ACI values correlated with reduced load-bearing capacity can indicate service life reductions of 20-50% under heavy traffic loads.^[35]

Prevention and Repair

Preventive Strategies

Preventing crocodile cracking, also known as alligator cracking, in asphalt pavements requires proactive measures during design, material selection, construction, and maintenance to mitigate fatigue from repeated traffic loads. Pavement design plays a critical role by ensuring sufficient structural capacity to distribute loads and limit bottom-up tensile stresses. Using mechanistic-empirical methods, such as those outlined in the AASHTO Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG, as updated with 2024 errata), designers calculate layer thicknesses to keep tensile strains at the bottom of the asphalt layer below 50-150 microstrains under expected traffic volumes, thereby avoiding fatigue initiation.^[36]^[37] For heavy traffic conditions, asphalt layers over strong base layers, such as stabilized granular bases, are recommended to enhance load-spreading and reduce strain concentrations.^[38] Material selection further bolsters resistance to fatigue by incorporating high-performance binders and achieving optimal compaction. Polymer-modified asphalt binders, which enhance elasticity and fatigue life compared to unmodified binders, are widely used in high-traffic areas to improve mixture durability and reduce cracking propensity.^[39] During production and placement, compaction to at least 92% of maximum theoretical density minimizes air voids, which otherwise accelerate aging and cracking under load.^[40] Effective construction practices address potential weaknesses that could lead to crack propagation. Implementing robust drainage systems, including permeable bases and edge drains, prevents water infiltration that weakens subgrade support and exacerbates fatigue.^[38] Staged construction in multiple lifts allows for proper cooling and bonding between layers, avoiding weak interfaces that concentrate stresses.^[41] Ongoing maintenance strategies focus on preserving structural integrity before visible distress appears. Regular resurfacing with thin overlays restores surface smoothness and extends fatigue life by redistributing loads, ideally applied when minor surface deterioration is detected but before cracks form.^[42] Imposing temporary load restrictions on sections with marginal subgrade strength avoids overload-induced strains, while periodic structural evaluations using falling weight deflectometer (FWD) tests monitor deflection basins to identify areas nearing fatigue thresholds and guide timely interventions.^[43]

Repair Techniques

Repair techniques for crocodile cracking, also known as alligator or fatigue cracking, address the structural damage in asphalt pavements by restoring integrity and preventing further deterioration. Selection of a method depends on the severity level, with low-severity cases allowing simpler interventions and high-severity requiring more extensive work.^[44] For temporary fixes in low-severity cases, crack sealing using hot-poured rubberized sealants is applied to fill interconnected cracks and prevent water infiltration, which could accelerate base weakening. This method involves cleaning the cracks and applying the sealant at high temperatures (around 350°F) to ensure adhesion and flexibility under traffic loads. It provides short-term protection but is ineffective for advanced patterns where structural failure has occurred.^[45]^[46] Partial repairs suit moderate cases, involving milling or removing the affected surface layer (typically 50-100 mm deep) to reach a stable base, followed by patching with hot-mix asphalt (HMA). The removal extends 300 mm beyond the cracked area to ensure bonding, and the patch is compacted in lifts using HMA with appropriate aggregate size (e.g., 3/8-inch class) and a tack coat for adhesion. This restores local load-bearing capacity without full reconstruction.^[46]^[4] Full rehabilitation for high-severity cracking often employs overlays, such as thicker HMA layers (100-150 mm) or thin whitetopping—a bonded concrete overlay (100-175 mm thick) placed directly on the milled asphalt to enhance durability and reduce reflection cracking. Geosynthetics, like geogrids or geotextiles, are incorporated within the overlay for reinforcement, distributing loads and mitigating crack propagation. These approaches improve structural capacity and extend service life by 10-15 years.^[15]^[47]^[48] Long-term solutions involve complete reconstruction, where the entire distressed section is excavated to the subgrade, stabilized with cement or lime-treated bases for better support, and rebuilt with new asphalt layers. This method addresses underlying issues like poor drainage or subgrade weakness. Costs for such repairs vary with severity, materials, and project scale—lower for sealing and higher for reconstruction.^[4]^[15]

References

[1]
Indiana 2024 IDEA — Alligator Cracking
Alligator (fatigue) cracking appears as a series of interconnecting cracks caused by fatigue failure of the AC surface.
[2]
[PDF] Asphalt Surfaced Airfields: Paver Distress Identification Manual ...
Alligator cracking is considered a major structural distress. Severity Levels. L Fine, longitudinal hairline cracks running parallel to each other with no or ...
[3]
Flexible Pavement Distress Maintenance
Alligator cracking. is a type of distress that is generally caused by inadequate base support or brittle asphalt surface. Since cracks allow surface water to ...
[4]
[PDF] APPENDIX B
Alligator Cracking. Alligator cracking is probably caused by a saturated base or subgrade. Therefore, correction should include removal of the wet material ...
[5]
Chapter 1. Distresses for Pavements With Asphalt Concrete Surfaces
If a pothole occurs within an area of fatigue cracking, the area of fatigue cracking is reduced by the area of the pothole. The minimum area for a pothole is ...
[6]
[PDF] (ts_132) crack sealing - gis.penndot.gov
Sep 5, 2025 · Sealing the cracks with flexible rubberized asphalt that bonds to the crack walls and moves with the pavement will prevent water intrusion. As ...
[7]
[PDF] Installation and Initial Evaluation of Paving Fabric Interlayers for ...
Treatments that are used to reduce or prevent reflective cracking include use of paving fabric as an interlayer, which can be used to reinforce asphalt overlays ...
[8]
[PDF] Best Practices Handbook on Asphalt Pavement Maintenance
Preventive maintenance activities can include conventional treatments such as crack sealing, chip sealing, fog sealing, rut filling, and thin overlays. They can ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[9]
Fatigue Cracking - Pavement Interactive
Fatigue cracking is a series of interconnected cracks caused by repeated traffic loading, forming an alligator-like pattern, and can indicate structural ...
[10]
[PDF] DISTRESS IDENTIFICATION MANUAL
The manual describes pavement distresses like cracks, potholes, rutting, spalling, and other distresses monitored by the LTPP program.Missing: history crocodile
[11]
Alligator (Fatigue) Cracking
Alligator cracking is a series of interconnected cracks caused by fatigue failure of the HMA surface under repeated traffic loading.Missing: up | Show results with:up
[12]
Transverse Cracking – Pavement Interactive
### Definition and Difference from Fatigue Cracking
[13]
Longitudinal Cracking – Pavement Interactive
### Definition and Difference from Fatigue Cracking
[14]
[PDF] Appendix A Pavement Distress Types and Causes
Fatigue (also called alligator) cracking, which is caused by fatigue damage, is the principal structural distress which occurs in asphalt pavements with ...Missing: crocodile | Show results with:crocodile<|separator|>
[15]
Section 2: Visual Pavement Condition Surveys
Alligator cracking consists of interconnected cracks that form small irregularly-shaped blocks (less than 1 ft. on edge) resembling patterns found on an ...Missing: crocodile | Show results with:crocodile
[16]
Pavement Distresses
Description: Cracks parallel to the pavement's centerline or laydown direction. Usually a type of fatigue cracking. Problem: Allows moisture infiltration, ...Fatigue Cracking · Longitudinal Cracking · Block Cracking · Reflection CrackingMissing: engineering | Show results with:engineering
[17]
[PDF] Investigation of Primary Causes of Fatigue Cracking in Asphalt ...
This report presents causes of cracking in asphalt concrete pavement in North Carolina through field investigation and laboratory experiments with field ...
[18]
[PDF] Testing for Fatigue Cracking in the Asphalt Mixture Performance Tester
The cause of these cracks, which are influenced by repeated (i.e., cyclic) loading over time can be tied to weak pavement. The Asphalt Pavement. Technology ...
[19]
[PDF] Common Flexible Pavement Distresses - Caltrans
Location within the lane (wheel path versus non-wheel path) is significant. Longitudinal cracks in the wheel path are normally rated as Alligator 'A' cracking.Missing: crocodile | Show results with:crocodile
[20]
None
### Summary of Fatigue/Alligator Cracking Development in Asphalt Pavements
[21]
[PDF] METHODOLOGY AND CALIBRATION OF FATIGUE TRANSFER ...
Dec 3, 2006 · Asphalt fatigue research has shown that HMA fatigue life is related to the horizontal tensile strain following the relationship of Equation 1.2.
[22]
[PDF] Alligator Cracking Performance and Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of ...
Alligator (fatigue) cracking: Cracks in asphalt that are caused by repeated traffic loadings. The cracks indicate fatigue failure of the asphalt layer. When ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[23]
[PDF] Chemical and Mechanical Processes of Moisture Damage in Hot ...
A dust coating on the aggregate surface promotes stripping by preventing intimate contact between the asphalt and aggregate and by creating channels through ...
[24]
[PDF] Investigation of the Reasons for Alligator Cracks at Side of Flexible ...
Feb 11, 2025 · Fatigue cracking can be influenced by a variety of factors, including loads from traffic, rest intervals, temperature changes, asphalt mixture ...
[25]
[PDF] Pavement Fatigue Crack Detection and Severity Classification ...
Fatigue cracking, also known as alligator cracking, is one of the common distresses of asphalt pavement. It is thus important to detect and monitor the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[26]
Automated pavement distress detection using advanced image ...
The algorithm first finds the initial point of a crack and then determines the crack's classification into transverse, longitudinal and alligator types.
[27]
https://www.pavemetrics.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/LCMS_general_2014.docx.pdf
[28]
[PDF] 3D Laser Road Profiling for the Automated Measurement of Road ...
The LCMS is composed of two high performance 3D laser profilers that are able to measure complete transverse road profiles with 1mm resolution at highway speeds ...
[29]
[PDF] Practical Guide for Quality Management of Pavement Condition ...
Feb 25, 2013 · This guide is about quality management of pavement data collection, which is crucial for reliable pavement management systems. FHWA uses ...
[30]
[PDF] Proposal of Universal Cracking Indicator for Pavements
Intensity, being the length of cracks per unit area expressed, for ... (alligator cracking, block cracking) are measured in units of the area of ...
[31]
D6433 Standard Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement ...
Jan 9, 2023 · This practice covers the determination of roads and parking lots pavement condition through visual surveys using the pavement condition index (PCI) method.
[32]
Severity Levels - FAA PAVEAIR
Medium-severity alligator cracking is defined by a well-defined pattern of interconnecting cracks, where all pieces are securely held in place (good aggregate ...
[33]
Laser Crack Measurement System (LCMS-2) - Pavemetrics
The LCMS-2 is able to automatically geo-tag, measure, detect and quantify all key functional parameters of pavement in a single pass.Cracking · Sealed Cracking · Roughness and IRI · Macrotexture<|control11|><|separator|>
[34]
[PDF] Present Serviceability Rating Computation from Reported Distresses
(Typically, three levels of severity are used: low, medium, and high.) ASTM D6433-16. The definition for and manner of computing the PCI value also vary across ...
[35]
Reformulated Pavement Remaining Service Life Framework
The following distress prediction models are included in the tool: New hot mix asphalt (HMA) and HMA overlay of existing HMA. Alligator cracking. Rutting.
[36]
Estimating Service Life of In Situ Flexible Pavements in Louisiana ...
Mar 29, 2018 · Alligator cracking was the controlling failure mechanism in 48% of the pavement sections. Simple performance models were developed to predict ...
[37]
An Investigation of the Endurance Limit of Hot-Mix Asphalt Concrete
A major controlling factor for bottom-up fatigue cracking is the magnitude of the tensile strain at the bottom of the HMA layer. It is a well-established ...Missing: microstrain | Show results with:microstrain
[38]
[PDF] The Use and Performance of Asphalt Binder Modified with ...
Polymers do quite well in increasing the high temperature properties of a binder. However, polymer modification can also affect the intermediate temperature ...Missing: prevent | Show results with:prevent
[39]
[PDF] FHWA Demonstration Project for Enhanced Durability of Asphalt ...
There are several factors in an asphalt mixture that might affect the compacted density. The two biggest factors are likely gyration level during laboratory ...
[40]
[PDF] Archived - Construction of Pavement Subsurface Drainage Systems ...
Jan 3, 2002 · Alligator cracking is caused by repeated heavy wheel loads on the pavement ... strength should prevent premature cracking in PCC pavements.
[41]
[PDF] CHAPTER 630 – FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT - Topic 631 - Caltrans
May 20, 2022 · Flexible pavement includes Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA), Dense Graded HMA, Rubberized Hot Mix Asphalt (RHMA), and Open Graded Friction Courses (OGFC).
[42]
[PDF] Selecting a Preventive Maintenance Treatment for Flexible Pavements
... falling weight deflectometer, and profilometer/roughness meter). It should be emphasized that the traditional PMS distresses generally indicate failure ...
[43]
Long-Term Pavement Performance Program Falling Weight ...
Falling weight deflectometers are often preferred over destructive methods of testing because they are much faster than destructive tests and do not entail the ...
[44]
[PDF] Asphalt Pavement Distress Repair Guidelines
Crack seal and mastic should be placed during the spring and fall. 2. Crack seal and mastic shall be placed at least 2 months before micro-surfacing is ...
[45]
[PDF] CHAPTER 4 CRACK TREATMENT - Caltrans
Jun 9, 2009 · Longitudinal cracking in the wheel paths is often the first visible sign that alligator cracking is starting to develop. Caltrans refers to.
[46]
[PDF] Chapter 3 Pavement Patching and Repair - wsdot
Sep 1, 2020 · Generally, alligator cracking or more general cracking can be repaired using chip seals. ... the cooling of the asphalt will prevent good adhesion ...
[47]
[PDF] Thin Whitetopping - the Colorado Experience
For specific applications and service life requirements, well-designed and well- constructed bonded whitetoppings appear to provide satisfactory per- formance.
[48]
[PDF] Geosynthetics in Flexible and Rigid Pavement Overlay Systems to ...
This research project aimed to evaluate geotextiles under hot mix asphalt overlays to reduce reflection cracks, using fabrics, grids, and composites.Missing: crocodile | Show results with:crocodile