Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

DINK

DINK, an acronym for "dual income, no kids," refers to a household comprising two partners who both generate income while having no dependent children, often enabling higher disposable income for personal consumption and investments.^[1] The term originated in the 1980s amid economic recessions and yuppie culture, characterizing upwardly mobile couples who delayed or opted out of parenthood to prioritize career advancement and financial accumulation.^[2]^[3] Defining Characteristics and Economic Role
DINK households command the highest median incomes among family structures, with U.S. data indicating averages exceeding $130,000 annually, facilitating spending patterns skewed toward travel, luxury goods, and experiences rather than child-rearing costs.^[2] This demographic segment, comprising roughly 5% of the American population, drives targeted markets in leisure and high-end consumer sectors while exhibiting lower financial stress and greater savings rates compared to parent households.^[4]^[5] Societal Implications and Controversies
The proliferation of DINK lifestyles parallels a doubling of childless households since the 1970s, now approaching 43-50% in the U.S., and contributes to fertility rates below replacement levels, straining long-term labor supplies, pension systems, and GDP growth projections by up to 4% in affected cohorts.^[6]^[7] While individual autonomy and economic efficiency underpin the choice, critics highlight causal risks to demographic stability, including accelerated aging populations and reduced innovation pipelines from fewer young workers.^[8]^[6] Empirical trends underscore that high child-rearing expenses and career demands, rather than mere preference, often deter family formation, amplifying these effects in high-cost developed economies.^[9]

Definition and Etymology

Core Meaning and Characteristics

A DINK household consists of two adults, typically in a partnered relationship such as marriage or cohabitation, who each generate independent incomes and bear no responsibility for dependent children, whether biological, adopted, or financial dependents under age 18. The acronym DINK expands to "dual income, no kids" or "double income, no kids," highlighting the combined earning power of the couple without the expenditures associated with child-rearing.^[10]^[11]^[12] This configuration is characterized by voluntary childlessness, distinguishing it from involuntary infertility or temporary phases like pre-parenthood or post-child-launch empty-nesting, where couples may intend or have previously had children. DINKs prioritize personal and joint pursuits such as professional development, travel, hobbies, and wealth-building over family expansion, often leveraging their dual incomes for enhanced financial flexibility and lifestyle choices unencumbered by dependents.^[13]^[14] In contrast to the childfree movement, which broadly describes individuals or households opting out of parenthood regardless of income structure, the DINK label specifically emphasizes the economic duality of two earners, positioning it as a socioeconomic household archetype rather than a mere absence of offspring. Core to DINK identity is the resultant surplus disposable income relative to child-rearing households, facilitating accelerated asset accumulation, career mobility, and discretionary spending in high-cost urban environments where such couples predominate.^[11]^[15]

Historical Coinage

The acronym DINK, denoting "dual income, no kids" or "double income, no kids," first appeared in U.S. media and discourse during the early 1980s, reflecting the growing prevalence of two-income households as women's labor force participation surged from 43% in 1970 to over 50% by 1980.^[16] ^[6] This linguistic innovation emerged amid sociological observations of shifting family structures, where dual earners without dependents were noted for their economic flexibility in an era of stagflation and rising living costs.^[3] The term gained widespread recognition in 1987 through articles in major outlets, including the Los Angeles Times and Washington Post, which portrayed DINKs as a defining feature of baby-boomer couples prioritizing careers over immediate parenthood to offset inflation and childcare expenses, often in a neutral to affirmative light as a pragmatic adaptation.^[3] ^[17] Early economic commentary similarly highlighted DINK households' capacity for higher disposable income, framing childlessness as a rational response to escalating child-rearing costs amid recessions.^[6] Variations like DINKY ("dual income, no kids yet") soon followed, emphasizing temporary deferral of children to pursue consumerist goals such as travel or luxury purchases, underscoring the term's ties to yuppie-era aspirations.^[18]

Historical Context

Emergence in the 1980s

The socioeconomic pressures of the late 1970s and early 1980s in the United States, including stagflation and the 1981–1982 recession, significantly elevated the financial burdens of child-rearing, rendering traditional single-income family models increasingly unsustainable for middle-class households. Housing costs surged amid inflation, with median home prices rising from approximately $47,200 in 1975 to $69,300 by 1980, while educational expenses, including college tuition, began accelerating due to reduced public subsidies and growing enrollment demands. Concurrently, the U.S. Department of Agriculture estimated the total cost of raising a child born in 1980 to age 18 at around $85,000 in constant dollars, encompassing housing, food, transportation, and education— a figure that highlighted the shift toward dual earners as a pragmatic necessity rather than a preference.^[19] These dynamics prompted many couples, particularly in urban and professional sectors, to prioritize combined incomes to maintain living standards, fostering the initial formation of dual-income households without children as a cost-benefit adaptation. Empirical trends underscored this emergence, with U.S. total fertility rates stabilizing at approximately 1.8–1.9 children per woman from the early 1970s through the late 1980s, following a sharp post-baby boom decline, directly correlating with women's labor force participation climbing from 43% in 1970 to over 51% by 1980.^[20] ^[21] This participation surge amplified the opportunity costs of parenting, as women's career investments yielded higher foregone earnings and professional stability when childbearing was deferred or forgone, a pattern evident in census data showing delayed first births among educated cohorts. DINK arrangements thus represented a rational economic calculus: couples deferred family formation to accumulate wealth and security amid volatile job markets and inflation-eroded savings, with surveys from the era indicating that such decisions were driven by financial pragmatism over ideological opposition to parenthood.^[22] Initial evidence suggested limited regret among these early DINK couples, aligning with the low prevalence of explicitly voluntary childlessness—estimated at under 4% for women in national samples—implying that choices were contextually adaptive rather than absolute rejections of family life.^[23] Upwardly mobile pairs, in particular, leveraged dual incomes for lifestyle enhancements like homeownership and leisure, viewing childlessness as a temporary or strategic deferral amid high rearing costs, without widespread reports of dissatisfaction in contemporaneous economic analyses. This period marked DINKs not as a cultural vanguard but as an emergent response to material constraints, where the marginal utility of additional income outweighed immediate reproductive imperatives.^[24]

Rise and Mainstreaming from the 2000s Onward

In the 2000s and 2010s, Millennials and Generation Z increasingly delayed marriage and childbearing amid escalating economic pressures, including student loan burdens averaging over $30,000 per borrower by the mid-2010s and housing affordability crises that pushed median home prices beyond 5 times median household income in many urban areas.^[25]^[26] These factors correlated with later family formation, as studies indicated women with significant debt were up to 42% less likely to have children compared to debt-free peers, reflecting a shift where financial instability trumped traditional timelines.^[25] Technological advancements, such as widespread access to reliable contraception and emerging remote work options, further empowered couples to prioritize career mobility and personal experiences over early parenthood.^[27] By the 2020s, the prevalence of childless households in the United States had risen to 43% in 2022, marking a 7% increase from the prior decade, with married-couple households without children comprising nearly 30% of all households in 2023.^[28]^[29] This trend aligned with a U.S. total fertility rate of 1.62 births per woman in 2023, well below the replacement level of 2.1, as younger adults cited economic barriers alongside voluntary childlessness.^[30] Similar patterns emerged globally, with fertility rates in Europe and Asia falling below replacement—such as 1.5 in the European Union and under 1.3 in countries like South Korea—driven by urbanization, career demands, and cultural emphases on individualism that diminished pronatal norms.^[31] The DINK lifestyle mainstreamed culturally through social media virality, particularly the 2023 TikTok "DINK era" trend, where couples showcased dual-income freedoms via luxury travel, fine dining, and pet-centric indulgences, amassing millions of views and sparking debates on childfree prosperity.^[32] This digital amplification highlighted a causal pivot toward hedonistic pursuits, as remote work and app-based contraception normalized extended childless phases, though empirical data underscores that such choices often stem from intertwined economic realism and preference for autonomy over familial obligations.^[33]^[34]

Demographics and Trends

Global and National Prevalence

In the United States, married couples without children comprised 29.4% of all households in 2023, reflecting a significant share of childless family units.^[29] A 2024 Pew Research Center analysis of adults under age 50 without children found that 47% reported being unlikely to ever have children, indicating a substantial portion aligned with childfree intentions.^[34] This prevalence is elevated in urban centers; San Francisco recorded the lowest proportion of residents under 18 among major U.S. cities at 13.4% in 2025 data, while New York City stood at approximately 21%.^[35]^[36] Globally, DINK-like arrangements are prominent in low-fertility East Asian nations. In South Korea, 28.7% of newlywed couples were dual-income with no children in 2022, rising to over 36% among young couples per 2024 reports.^[37]^[38] Japan shows elevated childlessness, with 28.3% of women born in 1975 remaining without children—the highest rate among developed countries—and projections estimating 42% for those born in 2005.^[39]^[40] In contrast, Israel maintains low childlessness, at 7.8% for women aged 45-59 overall, though urban areas like Tel Aviv report 32% of couples childless.^[41]^[42] Trends among younger cohorts underscore increases; U.S. millennials and Gen Z adults without children number nearly one-quarter planning to remain childfree based on 2024 surveys.^[43] As a related indicator, dog ownership—a proxy for DINKWAD (dual income, no kids with a dog) households—rose 16% from 2018 to 2023 amid broader pet adoption surges.^[44]

Key Drivers of DINK Adoption

Economic pressures significantly contribute to DINK adoption, particularly through the high opportunity costs associated with child-rearing, which disproportionately affect women's career trajectories in modern knowledge-based economies. Studies estimate that the life-cycle career cost of children equates to approximately 35% of a woman's total earnings due to reduced labor force participation and wage penalties following motherhood.^[45] This forgone income arises from time-intensive childcare demands that interrupt skill accumulation and professional advancement, making dual-income childlessness a rational response to prioritize earnings and career stability over family formation.^[46] In sectors emphasizing continuous human capital investment, such as technology and finance, these costs amplify the incentive to forgo children to maintain competitive edges in high-wage roles.^[47] Cultural shifts toward individualism, reinforced by media portrayals and educational emphases on self-fulfillment, further erode traditional family imperatives, while declining religiosity removes normative pressures for procreation. Secularization correlates strongly with lower fertility, as women who view religion as very important in daily life exhibit higher completed fertility rates compared to their less religious counterparts.^[48] This pattern holds across datasets, with religiosity positively associated with total fertility rates independent of economic variables, suggesting that waning religious adherence diminishes the perceived moral or communal duty to reproduce.^[49] Concurrently, pervasive messaging in popular culture and academia normalizes childfree lifestyles as pathways to personal autonomy, framing parenthood as an optional burden rather than a default expectation.^[50] Empirical evidence links DINK choices to structural factors like higher education and urban environments, where surveys reveal career freedom and lifestyle flexibility as dominant self-reported motivations. College-educated individuals are disproportionately represented among the childless, with advanced degrees delaying fertility into later ages and elevating childlessness risks through extended career commitments.^[51] Population density exacerbates this, as a tenfold increase in urban crowding reduces fertility by about 0.35 births per woman via constrained housing and heightened lifestyle trade-offs.^[52] Recent surveys indicate that among adults unlikely to have children, over 60% cite enhanced job success and daily freedoms as key benefits, underscoring how these environmental incentives causally steer dual-income couples away from parenthood.^[53]^[54]

Economic Aspects

Individual-Level Advantages

Dual-income-no-kids (DINK) households benefit from elevated disposable income due to the absence of child-rearing expenses, which enables accelerated wealth accumulation compared to households with children. According to Federal Reserve data analyzed in 2023, the median net worth of DINK couples exceeds that of couples with children by approximately $150,000, reflecting the compounding effects of dual earners directing resources toward assets rather than dependents.^[55] This disparity arises primarily from sustained contributions to retirement accounts and investments, as DINKs face fewer interruptions in earning potential and can allocate a larger share of income—often 20% or more—to long-term savings without the typical drain of family costs.^[55] The financial relief from forgoing parenthood translates to substantial lifetime savings on child-related outlays, estimated at $297,674 per child through age 18 in the United States, encompassing housing, food, childcare, and other necessities.^[56] DINKs redirect these funds toward discretionary spending that bolsters personal finances, such as luxury travel and high-end retail, with surveys indicating that Gen Z and millennial DINKs prioritize vacations and experiential consumption at rates significantly above family households.^[57] This spending power not only enhances immediate quality of life but also supports investment diversification, as excess liquidity facilitates entry into markets like real estate or equities without debt burdens tied to dependents. Career flexibility represents another individual advantage, as DINKs encounter fewer barriers to relocation, job changes, or entrepreneurial ventures, unencumbered by school schedules or family caregiving demands.^[58] Empirical observations link this freedom to higher rates of professional advancement, with childless couples demonstrating greater willingness to pursue high-risk, high-reward opportunities that demand mobility or extended hours.^[59] Such dynamics foster skill development and income growth, further widening the wealth gap over time relative to parent households.

Tax Policies and Fiscal Burdens

In the United States, federal tax policies incorporate credits and deductions explicitly favoring families with dependent children, rendering dual-income no-kids (DINK) households ineligible for these offsets. The Child Tax Credit provides up to $2,200 per qualifying child for tax year 2025, with up to $1,700 refundable, directly lowering parents' income tax liability or providing payments exceeding taxes owed.^[60] DINK couples receive no equivalent relief, forgoing thousands in potential savings annually depending on family size.^[61] The progressive federal income tax structure further burdens many DINKs through the marriage penalty, where dual high earners face higher joint liability upon marriage than if filing singly. For couples in the 37% bracket, combining incomes can elevate marginal rates on portions of earnings, with penalties averaging thousands of dollars; this effect intensifies for childless pairs lacking dependent exemptions or credits to counterbalance it.^[62]^[63] Data from tax simulations reveal that childless adults typically endure higher effective federal income tax rates than parents at comparable income levels due to these exclusions. A childless couple with $100,000 in earnings might incur about $12,000 in taxes, whereas a similar-income family with two children could reduce theirs to roughly $4,200 after the Child Tax Credit, yielding effective rates 20-30% lower for the family.^[64] European Union member states mirror this pattern via targeted family allowances and tax breaks unavailable to childless couples, such as per-child payments and income deductions that reduce parental fiscal loads.^[65] Over a lifetime, European parents contribute approximately 25% fewer net taxes than non-parents, as public transfers and credits offset child-rearing costs not borne by DINK equivalents.^[66] Such frameworks subsidize reproduction to sustain demographic and fiscal equilibria, leaving DINK choices unsubsidized and exposing adherents to undiluted tax burdens. This reveals an inherent free-rider element, as childless households leverage societal benefits—like pensions and infrastructure—underwritten by others' progeny without reciprocal generational investment.^[64]

Broader Economic and Fiscal Impacts

DINK households, characterized by dual incomes without children, contribute disproportionately to short-term economic growth through elevated consumer spending. In 2024, DINKs allocated significantly more to discretionary categories such as dining out—averaging $816 monthly compared to $215 for the average American household—and travel, nearly double the typical amount, thereby amplifying sectors like hospitality and leisure.^[57]^[67] This pattern elevates per capita GDP contributions in the near term, as higher disposable incomes fuel demand without offsetting child-rearing costs, supporting aggregate economic activity.^[68] However, the prevalence of DINK lifestyles correlates with sustained fertility declines, imposing long-term fiscal burdens through reduced population growth and workforce shrinkage. Projections indicate that millennial-driven childlessness could reduce GDP by up to 4% due to an aging population with fewer workers, as noted by HSBC global economist James Pomeroy.^[8] This dynamic manifests in inverted population pyramids, where dependency ratios rise; Japan's experience exemplifies this, with fertility rates below 1.4 since the 2000s contributing to workforce contraction and decades of economic stagnation amid high public debt and entitlement pressures.^[69] Entitlement programs face acute strain from these trends, as voluntary childlessness diminishes the future tax base supporting retirees. In the U.S., rising childlessness exacerbates Social Security and Medicare challenges, with fewer workers per beneficiary projected to drop further by the 2040s, relying on payroll taxes from a shrinking contributor pool.^[70]^[71] Such externalities highlight a tradeoff: short-term consumption gains versus intergenerational fiscal imbalances, where non-reproductive households indirectly burden public finances without replenishing labor supplies.^[72]

Lifestyle Analysis

Personal Benefits and Freedoms

DINK couples often experience enhanced time autonomy, enabling greater allocation of hours to personal pursuits such as hobbies, fitness, and spontaneous travel, unencumbered by the scheduling demands of child-rearing. Empirical analyses of time-use patterns in dual-earner households reveal that childless adults devote significantly more daily minutes to leisure and discretionary activities compared to parents, who face persistent interruptions from caregiving.^[73] This flexibility supports individualized goal-setting, including career advancement or skill-building, without the trade-offs inherent in family obligations.^[50] The absence of parenting responsibilities allows DINK partners to prioritize their relationship dynamics, channeling energy into mutual support and shared experiences rather than divided attentions. Research consistently documents a decline in marital satisfaction following the arrival of children, attributed to increased conflict, reduced intimacy, and role specialization, effects that childfree couples sidestep.^[74] Consequently, DINKs report elevated relational fulfillment, with surveys indicating 88% satisfaction in romantic partnerships versus lower figures among parents.^[4] Fulfillment in the DINK model frequently manifests through alternative bonds, such as deepened companionship with pets, which provide emotional outlets and routines paralleling parental roles but with adjustable commitments. Happiness metrics from recent polls underscore short-term peaks in life satisfaction for childfree dual earners, linked to this lifestyle's emphasis on autonomy and low-stress interdependence, though self-selection among those choosing no kids influences these outcomes.^[4] Such patterns align with broader time-diary data showing childless adults logging higher discretionary free time, fostering pursuits that enhance subjective well-being.^[75]

Individual Drawbacks and Empirical Risks

Childless adults, including those in dual-income-no-kids (DINK) arrangements, face elevated risks of loneliness in later life compared to parents, with multivariate analyses showing childless individuals report higher loneliness scores, particularly when lacking other social supports like a spouse.^[76] In the UK, over 1 million people aged 65 and older without children are at acute risk of isolation and poor health outcomes due to limited family networks.^[77] This vulnerability extends to caregiving; childless elders are less likely to have family-provided support, increasing reliance on formal systems that may prove insufficient.^[78] Psychologically, childlessness correlates with lower senses of meaning in life relative to parenthood, as multiple studies indicate parents derive greater purpose from child-rearing despite comparable or lower daily happiness levels.^[79]^[80] Hedonic adaptation to material luxuries—common in higher-income DINK lifestyles—can exacerbate this, as experiential gains from consumption diminish over time without the enduring relational depth children provide.^[81] For couples, the absence of children may weaken marital bonds; empirical data reveal divorce rates among childless couples are up to 40% higher than for those with children, as shared parenting often acts as a stabilizing factor absent in economically driven unions.^[82] Biologically, deferring parenthood in DINK arrangements closes fertility windows irreversibly for many women, with monthly conception probabilities dropping to 15% at age 35 and 5% by age 40 for healthy couples, compared to 25% in the 20s.^[83] Cumulative infertility rates exceed 20% for women aged 35-39 attempting natural conception, rising sharply thereafter and complicating later reversals of childfree decisions.^[84] This lack of biological legacy offers no familial buffer against age-related health declines, heightening personal risks without the intergenerational support networks parents typically access.^[85]

Societal and Cultural Dimensions

Contributions to Consumer and Cultural Economies

DINK households, characterized by dual incomes without children, have emerged as significant drivers of growth in discretionary consumer sectors, particularly travel and luxury goods. A 2024 Harris Poll survey found that DINKs allocate nearly twice the average amount to vacations, with an average trip budget of $2,000, compared to typical households.^[68] They also spend four times more on dining out monthly ($816 versus $215 for other Americans), fueling demand for premium experiences and takeout services.^[57] This spending pattern positions DINKs as "super-consumers," reshaping retail and hospitality markets by prioritizing high-end, experiential purchases over family-oriented ones.^[67] In the pet industry, DINKs—often termed DINKWADs (Dual Income, No Kids, With A Dog)—have accelerated expansion through elevated pet-related expenditures. Nationwide's 2024 Spending Report documented a 76% increase in pet spending over the prior five years, attributed in part to childless couples treating pets as surrogate family members.^[86] Survey data indicates DINK couples average $1,906 annually on pets, sometimes incurring debt to prioritize veterinary care, grooming, and premium products, which sustains innovation in pet tech and services.^[87] DINKs further bolster wellness and personal development markets by channeling disposable income into self-care and growth-oriented investments. Eighty-eight percent of DINKs report using their earnings to enhance personal and partner well-being, including fitness, coaching, and leisure pursuits that align with self-actualization goals.^[68] This behavior contributes to the global wellness economy's $6.3 trillion valuation in 2023, with DINK demographics amplifying demand for non-traditional, adult-focused services like boutique gyms and experiential retreats.^[88] Culturally, DINK lifestyles promote narratives of autonomy and fulfillment, influencing media and social platforms since 2023. The #DINK hashtag on TikTok has amassed tens of millions of views, featuring content on travel freedoms and personal achievements that normalize childfree priorities.^[57] This visibility accelerates market innovation in child-independent goods, as brands respond to DINK-driven demand for customized, high-discretion products, evidenced by tailored luxury lines and service apps emerging post-2023.^[6]

Criticisms Regarding Demographic Sustainability

The prevalence of DINK lifestyles contributes to sub-replacement fertility rates, as childless dual-income couples forgo reproduction entirely, amplifying broader trends toward delayed or avoided parenthood. In the United States, the total fertility rate stood at 1.62 births per woman in 2023, well below the 2.1 replacement level required for population stability absent immigration.^[30] ^[89] This pattern, observed globally where DINK choices correlate with socioeconomic prioritization of careers over family, accelerates population aging by reducing the influx of younger cohorts into the workforce.^[90] ^[91] Such dynamics strain societal sustainability through shrinking labor pools and escalating dependency burdens. By 2050, the U.S. worker-to-retiree ratio is projected to decline to approximately 2:1 from the current 3:1, as fewer births fail to offset the retirement of baby boomers and rising life expectancies.^[92] ^[93] This intergenerational inequity arises as non-reproducing adults benefit from welfare systems sustained by prior generations' higher fertility, potentially leading to fiscal insolvency without reforms, as evidenced by projections of intensified pressure on social security and healthcare entitlements.^[94] Empirical evidence underscores the risks, with historical precedents like ancient Rome's low birth rates contributing to demographic contraction and imperial decline, as chronicled by observers such as Polybius for the Hellenistic world.^[95] ^[96] Modern pronatalist policies, including subsidies and parental leave expansions, have shown limited long-term efficacy—often yielding temporary total fertility rate upticks at high cost but failing to reverse declines without deeper cultural reorientation toward family formation over individualism—as seen in cases like Hungary where incentives did not sustain higher births.^[97] ^[98] ^[99]

References

[1]
Dual Income, No Kids (DINK): Definition and Types of Households
"Dual income, no kids" (DINK) is a slang phrase for a household in which there are two people earning incomes but no dependent children.
[2]
[PDF] The Rise of DINKs: How Childfree Couples are Reshaping Economies
Dec 7, 2023 · DINKs, which stands for “dual income, no kids,” originated as a term in the. 1980s for upwardly mobile couples foregoing families amid recession ...
[3]
Dinks--Double Income, No Kids--Is Baby-Boomers' Newest Moniker
Feb 8, 1987 · “Just because they're dinks doesn't mean they're better educated or better placed in the work force,” O'Sullivan said. “A dink couple can ...
[4]
[PDF] The Rise of DINKs in America - The Harris Poll
DINKs are people who live with their partner, in a dual income household without children, making up about 5% of the American population.Missing: statistics prevalence
[5]
Dual income households: How kids change the financial picture
Mar 11, 2024 · According to the CPS, DINK households earn an average of $138,000 annually – nearly 7% more than the $129,000 annual average for DIWK households ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
[6]
The Rise of DINKs: How Childfree Couples are Reshaping Economies
Dec 22, 2023 · ... DINK (dual income, no kids) couples using glamping as context. This study examines the variations in closeness among DINK couples based on ...
[7]
Double income, no kids (DINK) couples are a growing share of US ...
Dec 5, 2023 · ... (DINK) couples are a growing share of US households. ⁠ ⁠ According to new Census Bureau data, 43% of US families are childless households, up ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
[8]
Millennials choosing to be DINKs could push GDP down by as much ...
Mar 19, 2025 · Millennials choosing to be DINKs could push GDP down by as much as 4% ; The crude birth rate in the U.S. has dropped by more than half ; This drop ...
[9]
The Rise of DINKs: How Childfree Couples are Reshaping Economies
Dec 25, 2023 · The rise of DINKs intersects with declining fertility rates in many developed nations. High childrearing costs are a key factor driving lower ...
[10]
What are DINKS? | Dual income no kids explained | Fidelity
DINK is an acronym for "dual income, no kids," aka a working couple who aren't parents. The DINK lifestyle is becoming more common. DINKs face different ...
[11]
What are DINKs and Why is DINK Era Trending Right Now? - The Knot
It's an acronym that stands for "dual income, no kids." In other words, DINK couples are two people who each have a stream of income and share no children.
[12]
Dual Income, No Kids: Tax Considerations for DINKs - TaxSlayer
Feb 22, 2024 · DINK stands for dual income, no kids. The phrase describes households where two people earn a living without kids or dependents.
[13]
What is the DINK lifestyle? - Clearblue
May 28, 2024 · DINK is an acronym in the zeitgeist that stands for “double income no kids” or “dual income no kids.” These couples are childfree by choice.
[14]
DINK (Dual Income, No Kids): Financial and Lifestyle Implications
Jun 4, 2024 · Financial Planning for DINK Households. Financial planning for DINKs often focuses on maximizing savings, making savvy investment choices, and ...
[15]
What Is Dual Income, No Kids (DINK)? - SmartAsset.com
May 7, 2023 · Empty nesters, who are couples whose children have grown up and left home, are another variety of DINK. Non-DINKs include single parents, ...Missing: household | Show results with:household
[16]
Dual income, no kids ... and loads of free time: dinks are back
Mar 14, 2024 · Age: The term was coined in the 1980s. Dinks have been around for longer and are, by definition, of working and child-raising age. Bit more ...
[17]
IT'S TIME TO THINK DINK| - The Washington Post
Feb 10, 1987 · IT'S TIME TO THINK DINK|. DOUBLE INCOME, NO KIDS A NEW HOUSEHOLD ACRONYM. February 10, 1987More than 38 years ago. Summary. By Elizabeth Kastor.Missing: economics | Show results with:economics
[18]
Dual Income, No Kids (DINK): Overview and Types - The Motley Fool
Jul 24, 2025 · DINKY (Dual Income, No Kids, Yet): This describes couples who are intentionally delaying having children while maintaining a dual-income ...
[19]
High cost of child rearing -- $85000 each, and going up
Oct 6, 1980 · ... housing, food, transportation, clothing, and education. The cost of having a baby, contained in the total, averages $2 485 for the hospital ...
[20]
Is U.S. fertility at an all-time low? Two of three measures point to yes
May 22, 2019 · For example, in 1980 the total fertility rate was 1.84. This means that girls age 15 in 1980 (and thus at the beginning of their childbearing ...
[21]
A note on the changing relationship between fertility and female ...
Along the cross-sectional dimension, the correlation between TFR and FPR was negative and significant during the 1970's and up to the early 1980's. This seemed ...
[22]
Women's employment and fertility in a global perspective (1960–2015)
Women's wage employment is negatively correlated with total fertility rates and unmet need for family planning and positively correlated with modern ...
[23]
Voluntary childlessness among American men and women in the ...
Overall, the rate of voluntary childlessness was not high. Only 3.5 per cent of the men and 2.8 per cent of the women reported that they were childless and did ...Missing: regret | Show results with:regret
[24]
[PDF] Social and Economic Perspective of Dink Culture and it's Impact on ...
Jun 30, 2025 · DINKs, which stand for “dual income, no kids,” originated as a term in the 1980s for upwardly mobile couples foregoing families amid recession.
[25]
Millennials' Student Loans Keep Them From Having Kids
Feb 23, 2023 · One 2015 study estimates that women with $60,000 in student debt were 42% less likely to have children than their non-indebted peers, after ...
[26]
Student Loan Debt & Homeownership - Education Data Initiative
Jan 7, 2025 · Roughly, 39% of Generation Z say their student loan debt is delaying them from owning a home. 60% of Millennials say their student loan debt ...Missing: formation | Show results with:formation
[27]
The Student Loan Debt Crisis in the United States and the Long ...
Apr 6, 2024 · Demographically, the rise of student debt is already delaying marriage and family formation, which is increasingly becoming an issue of national ...
[28]
The Rise In DINKs, SINKs, DINKWADs, KIPPERs And More - Forbes
Jun 21, 2024 · Half of childless couples in the U.S. don't ever want kids, a survey by MarketWatch found, while 25% said they plan on having children soon ...
[29]
How have American households changed over time? - USAFacts
In 2023, more than half of American households were childless: 29.4% were married households without children, and 29.0% were single households without kids.
[30]
U.S. Fertility Rate (1950-2025) - Macrotrends
U.S. fertility rate for 2023 was 1.62, a 2.41% decline from 2022. U.S. fertility rate for 2022 was 1.66, a 0.45% decline from 2021. Total fertility rate ...
[31]
5 facts about global fertility trends | Pew Research Center
Aug 15, 2025 · Current fertility rates are below the replacement threshold in Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean, Northern America, and Europe. This ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[32]
DINKs Show Off Lavish Child-Free Lifestyles Causing Furious Divide
Dec 7, 2023 · DINKs are vocal about the perks of their child-free lives, and make people very angry in the process. Even Elon Musk weighed in.
[33]
TikTok's latest flex? Double Income, No Kids | The Digital Fairy
TikTok's latest flex? Double Income, No Kids. Amidst a cost of living crisis, DINKs are a new kind of aspirational influencer.
[34]
The Experiences of U.S. Adults Who Don't Have Children
Jul 25, 2024 · 57% of adults under 50 who say they're unlikely to ever have kids say a major reason is they just don't want to; 31% of those ages 50 and older without kids ...
[35]
SF is most childless major city in United States. Here's the data
Sep 15, 2025 · San Francisco has the smallest share of residents under the age of 18 of any major U.S. city. But data shows its share of kids stands out in ...Missing: couples urban
[36]
San Francisco Asks: Where Have All the Children Gone?
Jan 21, 2017 · The share of children in San Francisco fell to 13 percent, low even compared with another expensive city, New York, with 21 percent.Missing: prevalence | Show results with:prevalence
[37]
3 in 10 new couples embrace DINK lifestyle - The Korea Herald
Dec 18, 2023 · Among the 815,357 such couples, 28.7 percent were “dual-income, no kids” couples, or DINKs. It represented more than a 10 percentage point ...Missing: urban | Show results with:urban
[38]
36% of Young Couples Embrace DINK Lifestyle - KBS WORLD Radio
May 12, 2024 · A report finds that more than one third of young Korean couples are "dual income, no kids" couples, or DINKs, amid the country's chronically ...Missing: urban | Show results with:urban
[39]
Japan has highest percentage of 'lifelong childless' women among ...
Jun 22, 2024 · Some 28.3% of women born in 1975 (currently 48 to 49 years old) do not have children in Japan, the highest among developed countries.
[40]
Japan must embrace childlessness as a normal lifestyle choice
Nov 10, 2023 · 42% of Japanese women born in 2005 will never give birth. By comparison, among Japanese women born in 1970, 27% are now childless.
[41]
Demography Connected to Family or Culture? — The Israeli Case
Jul 28, 2024 · Israel has a 7.8 per cent childlessness rate among women aged 45–59. However, when this number is broken down, we find that among Arab women the ...
[42]
The Israeli family: 2.4 children, enjoy eating out - Ynetnews
Jan 30, 2014 · Tel Aviv has the highest proportion of childless couples (32 percent of those in Israel) and the lowest percentage of couples with children ...<|separator|>
[43]
Almost 1 in 4 millennials and Gen Z-ers say they won't have kids due ...
Sep 10, 2024 · Almost a quarter of millennials and Gen Z adults without children say they plan to stay that way. The reason? Money.
[44]
DINKWAD: Unleashing a World of Marketing Opportunities with the ...
Aug 21, 2024 · Dog ownership saw a remarkable 16% increase between 2018 and 2023, highlighting the accelerating trend. DINKWADs often have higher disposable ...
[45]
The career cost of children: career and fertility trade-offs
We evaluate the life-cycle career cost of children to be equivalent to 35 percent of a woman's total earnings.
[46]
Cost of Motherhood on Women's Employment and Earnings
Jun 16, 2020 · Labor force participation plummets when women have children, though earnings partially recover.
[47]
Female education and its impact on fertility - IZA World of Labor
Generally, more female education lowers fertility. Educated women have fewer children, better birth control, and better care, but this relationship is complex.Missing: childlessness | Show results with:childlessness<|separator|>
[48]
Religiosity and Fertility in the United States: The Role of ... - NIH
We show that women who report that religion is “very important” in their everyday life have both higher fertility and higher intended fertility.
[49]
Human fertility in relation to education, economy, religion ...
Feb 22, 2020 · In decreasing order of strength, fertility (TFR) correlates negatively with education, CPR, and GDP per capita, and positively with religiosity.
[50]
DINKs and the American Dream | Institute for Family Studies
Sep 24, 2024 · The share of U.S. adults younger than 50 without children who say they are unlikely to ever have them rose 10 percentage points over five years, ...Missing: prevalence | Show results with:prevalence
[51]
Why More Adults Choose to Remain Child-Free | Psychology Today
Sep 7, 2025 · According to a Pew Research Center survey, the majority of child-free adults say they “just didn't want” children. This trend highlights a rise ...
[52]
Does density lower fertility? - Aporia Magazine
Dec 20, 2024 · According to the authors' preferred estimate, a tenfold increase in population density lowers the fertility rate by 0.35 births per woman.
[53]
2. Perceived pros and cons of not having children
Jul 25, 2024 · Smaller but substantial shares say not having children has made it easier for them to be successful in their job or career (44% among those who ...
[54]
Americans Without Kids Don't Want Them, Want to Focus on Careers
Jul 30, 2024 · Four in five Americans under 50 said it's easier for them to have time for their hobbies and interests because they don't have kids, and 61% ...
[55]
DINK (Double Income, No Kid) couples have $150,000 more | Fortune
Oct 27, 2023 · DINKs lavish holidays and designer lifestyle doesn't compare with the financial burden that comes with having children, the Fed's research ...
[56]
It Costs $297,674 to Raise a Child Over 18 Years | LendingTree
Mar 13, 2025 · Raising a child costs $29419 annually, up from $21681 in our 2023 study. Over 18 years, costs add to $297674, up 25.3%.
[57]
America's new 1%: Gen Z and Millennial DINKs spending ... - Fortune
Nov 21, 2024 · America's new 1%: Gen Z and Millennial DINKs spending big on vacations and takeout, survey finds ... Couples who report living the DINK lifestyle— ...
[58]
Encyclopedia of Human Services and Diversity - Dual Income, No Kids
Dual Income, No Kids ... Dual (or Double) Income, No Kids, commonly referred to as DINK, describes couples who both work and have not yet had ...Missing: origin | Show results with:origin<|separator|>
[59]
DINK Lifestyle: 20 Financial Benefits - Under30CEO
Nov 19, 2024 · Couples can focus on personal growth and career advancement without the distractions of parenting. 1. Increased Mobility. One of the biggest ...
[60]
The Child Tax Credit: How It Works and Who Receives It
Aug 14, 2025 · That law also temporarily increased the maximum child tax credit from $2,000 per child to $2,200 per child for tax years 2025-2028. Data from ...Current Law · Maximum Additional Child Tax... · Data on the Child Tax Credit
[61]
Child Tax Credit | Internal Revenue Service
The Child Tax Credit helps families with qualifying children get a tax break. You may be able to claim the credit even if you don't normally file a tax return.
[62]
What are marriage penalties and bonuses? - Tax Policy Center
Married couples with children are more likely to incur marriage penalties than couples without children because one or both spouses could use the head of ...
[63]
Breadwinners, Single Parents, Dual Earners: Who's Overtaxed?
Apr 16, 2024 · Dual-earning couples often pay higher taxes married than they would separately, and they're overtaxed relative to couples where one parent stays at home, too.
[64]
Families With Children Often Pay Less In Taxes Than Their ...
Jul 31, 2024 · Because of the CTC, they could reduce their tax bill by $4,000 dollars ($2,000 per child) , and they would owe about $4,200 in income taxes, for ...
[65]
Tax Relief for Families in Europe, 2021 | Tax Foundation
Jul 27, 2023 · Most countries provide tax relief for families in Europe with children—typically through targeted tax breaks that lower income taxes.Missing: allowances childless
[66]
Despite low fertility, Europe still taxes its own reproduction
Over the working life, parents in Europe contribute on average about one-quarter fewer net taxes than non-parents.Missing: allowances couples
[67]
The Rise of DINKs: Dual-Income Couples Without Kids Redefine ...
Nov 21, 2024 · The Rise of DINKs: Dual-Income Couples Without Kids Redefine Financial Priorities in America · The Harris Poll Survey Reveals How DINK Households ...Missing: prevalence 2000s 2010s 2020s
[68]
The Rise Of DINKs: How Dual-Income Couples Are ... - Forbes
61% of them report household incomes ...Missing: prevalence | Show results with:prevalence
[69]
The Debate over Falling Fertility - International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Declines in fertility rates can stimulate economic growth by spurring expanded labor force participation, increased savings, and more accumulation of physical ...
[70]
Rising Childlessness is Driving the Decline in Birth Rates in the ...
Jul 21, 2024 · ... strain entitlement programs, such as Social Security and Medicare, which rely on taxes paid by current workers to fund benefits for older ...
[71]
AESG Insights: The Economics of Falling Birth Rates
May 2, 2025 · This shift brings important fiscal implications, particularly for funding entitlement programs including Social Security and Medicare. Because ...
[72]
Fiscal Externalities of Becoming a Parent - PMC - PubMed Central
Several researchers have pointed out that the production and rearing of children produces externalities—that is, costs and benefits passed on to society at ...Missing: voluntary | Show results with:voluntary
[73]
An empirical investigation into the time-use and activity patterns of ...
This paper examines the time-use patterns of adults in dual-earner households with and without children as a function of several individual and household ...
[74]
Want to save your marriage? Don't have kids - The Guardian
May 24, 2016 · Researchers have studied how having children affects a marriage, and the results are conclusive: the relationship between spouses suffers once kids come along.
[75]
Parental Involvement and Work Schedules: Time with Children in ...
We examine variation in parents' time with children by work schedule in two-parent families, utilizing time use surveys from the United States (2003), ...
[76]
The Association Between Childlessness and Loneliness in Later Life
Sep 13, 2025 · Results: Bivariate and multivariate regression analysis indicated that childless adults were lonelier than adults with one or more living ...
[77]
More than 1m childless people over 65 are 'dangerously unsupported'
Mar 28, 2019 · More than 1 million people aged over 65 without children are “dangerously unsupported”, and at acute risk of isolation, loneliness, poor health, poverty and ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
[78]
[PDF] Population Aging Research Center - University of Pennsylvania
National surveys have reported greater isolation among the childless (Bachrach, 1980), but have found no effects of parental status on levels of happiness, ...
[79]
Parents are not happier but have a greater sense of meaning in life ...
May 26, 2025 · "Our study shows that people who have children are not automatically happier but they are more likely to feel that their own lives are ...
[80]
Parents are happier people - University of California
Jun 4, 2012 · Parents experience greater levels of happiness and meaning in life than people without children, according to research conducted by UC Riverside psychologists.
[81]
[PDF] In Defense of Parenthood: Children Are Associated With More Joy ...
We tested whether parents reported more positive emotional experiences and meaning in daily life than did nonparents. Study 2. Method. Participants. The ...
[82]
Divorce Statistics: Over 115 Studies, Facts and Rates for 2024
Rating 4.9 (24) The divorce rate for couples with children is as much as 40 percent lower than for those without children. 76. Half of all children in the United States will ...
[83]
Does Fertility Decrease After Age 35? | Sharp HealthCare
Apr 27, 2023 · At age 35, there is a 15% chance per month of conception. At age 40, the chance of conception is 5% per month. About 44% of women in their 40s ...
[84]
Having a Baby After Age 35: How Aging Affects Fertility and Pregnancy
For healthy couples in their 20s and early 30s, around 1 in 4 women will get pregnant in any single menstrual cycle. By age 40, around 1 in 10 will get pregnant ...
[85]
Age-Related Fertility Decline - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
Feb 2, 2024 · In a Japanese study, the highest fertility rates were in women aged 24 or younger. Their fertility decreased with age, which correlated to ...
[86]
DINKS and DINKWAPS: the new consumer powerhouses
Jan 13, 2025 · In 2024, Nationwide's Spending Report found that spending on pets had jumped 76 per cent in the past five years. And this is not just a trend ...
[87]
Would you go into debt for your pet? Some couples are. - USA Today
Jul 19, 2025 · DINK couples surveyed spend an average of $1,906 a year on their pets; a fraction of the $23,000 parents spent raising a child last year, ...<|separator|>
[88]
The Global Wellness Economy Reaches a New Peak of $6.3 Trillion
Nov 5, 2024 · The research finds that the wellness market grew from $4.6 trillion in 2020 to $5.8 trillion in 2022, and reached a record $6.3 trillion by the end of 2023 (9% ...
[89]
[PDF] Vital Statistics Rapid Release | CDC
the United States in 2023 was 1,616.5 births per 1,000 women, down 2% from the rate in 2022 (1,656.5); the rate had declined less than 1% from. 2021 to 2022, ...
[90]
The Rise of DINK (Double Income, No Kids) and Its Impact on ...
Sep 2, 2024 · This term describes couples who have opted to remain child-free, focusing instead on their careers, financial stability, and personal freedom.<|control11|><|separator|>
[91]
DINK Trend & Falling Fertility Rates - Mon Amie IVF
Jul 22, 2025 · How is DINK affecting Fertility rates? The rise of the DINK trend is playing a significant role in declining fertility rates in many countries.
[92]
Quick Facts on Social Security
In 1940, there were 42 workers per retiree. Today the ratio is 3-to-1; by 2050 it will be 2-to-1. The burden on each individual worker will increase ...
[93]
Productivity Growth and the Scary Stories About Rising Retiree to ...
May 15, 2024 · It is now down to 2.7. The ratio is projected to fall further to 2.2 by 2050. I doubt that most people feel they have been terribly burdened by ...
[94]
U.S. Demographic Projections: With and Without Immigration
Mar 22, 2024 · The shift of baby-boomer workers into retirement portends a decline in the worker-to-retiree ratio from 3.0 today to 2.0 by 2075. A faster ...<|separator|>
[95]
What Ancient Rome Can Teach China About Demographic Collapse
Aug 7, 2025 · The resulting shortage of women fueled population decline. Social attitudes compounded the problem: many men were unwilling to marry, despite ...
[96]
Population Dynamics Involved in the Decline and Collapse of ...
Aug 6, 2022 · "Writing in The Histories, the Greek historian Polybius largely blamed the decline of the Hellenistic world on low fertility rates. He ...<|separator|>
[97]
Pro-Natal Policies Work, But They Come With a Hefty Price Tag
Mar 5, 2020 · Pro-natal incentives do work: more money does yield more babies. Anybody saying otherwise is mischaracterizing the research. But it takes a lot of money.
[98]
Population policies in advanced societies: pronatalist and migration ...
Pronatalist policies in general are not very effective unless extremely costly and continuous, but they do provide social justice for parents. The solution to ...
[99]
Evaluating pronatalist policies with TFR brings misleading conclusions
Mar 4, 2024 · TFR is distorted by birth timing changes, doesn't measure true fertility, and can send wrong signals about fertility trends, as seen in Hungary.