Secularization is the process whereby religious beliefs, practices, and institutions progressively lose their social, cultural, and political significance within a society.[1][2]
Originally theorized in the 19th and early 20th centuries by sociologists such as Max Weber and Émile Durkheim, who linked it to processes of modernization, rationalization, industrialization, and the rise of scientific worldviews, the concept posited an inevitable decline in religion's influence as societies advanced.[3][4]
Empirical evidence supports pronounced secularization in Western Europe and North America, where church attendance has fallen sharply—for instance, U.S. weekly attendance dropped from 38% in 2010 to 30% in 2023—and the share of religiously unaffiliated individuals ("nones") has risen to around 30% in the United States by 2019.[5][6]
Globally, however, trends are more varied: while the unaffiliated population grew to 24.2% by 2020, religious affiliation remains dominant at 75.8%, with growth in regions like sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East offsetting declines elsewhere; recent studies indicate a worldwide drop in self-identified religiosity from 68% in 2005 to 56% in 2024, yet religiosity persists or rebounds in developing societies amid demographic transitions.[7][8][9]
The secularization thesis has faced significant controversy, with critics arguing it overgeneralized from European experience, underestimated religion's adaptability—such as through evangelical movements or political Islam—and failed to predict resurgences, prompting revisions like Peter Berger's acknowledgment that pluralism, rather than inevitable decline, better explains modern religious dynamics.[10][11]
Definitions and Conceptual Foundations
Core Definitions
Secularization refers to the process whereby religious institutions, beliefs, practices, and thinking diminish in social, cultural, and political influence within a society.[1][2] This conceptualization, articulated by sociologist Bryan Wilson in 1966, emphasizes the erosion of religion's role in shaping public and private life, as rational, scientific, and bureaucratic structures assume dominance over spheres previously governed by religious authority.[1] Sociologist Peter Berger similarly described it as the removal of sectors of society and culture from the domination of religious institutions and symbols, a process tied to modernization where functional differentiation leads to religion's privatization.The term originates from the Latin saeculum, denoting "this age" or "the world," in contrast to the sacred or eternal; early Christian usage distinguished the temporal, profane realm from ecclesiastical control.[12] In sociological terms, secularization is distinct from mere religious decline, focusing instead on the shrinking scope of religious authority over non-religious domains such as law, education, and economy, without necessarily implying the disappearance of personal faith.[13] Empirical indicators include reduced church attendance, declining institutional power (e.g., state disestablishment of religions), and the cultural normalization of non-religious worldviews, though definitions vary in emphasizing demand-side factors like individual belief erosion or supply-side institutional weakening.[14][15]Variants of the definition highlight causal mechanisms: rationalization, where Enlightenment-derived scientific explanations supplant theological ones; disenchantment, per Max Weber, involving the demystification of the world through bureaucratic and technical means; and existential security, where socioeconomic stability reduces reliance on religion for meaning or security.[16] These core elements underscore secularization as a multidimensional historical shift, observable in metrics like falling affiliation rates in Western Europe (e.g., from 90% Christian identification in the 19th century to under 50% practicing by 2020 in countries like the UK).[3]
Distinctions from Related Terms
Secularization denotes the empirical process through which religious beliefs, institutions, and practices diminish in social, cultural, and political influence over time, often linked to modernization and differentiation of societal spheres.[17] This contrasts with secularism, which constitutes a normative ideology or principle advocating the separation of religious authority from governmental and public institutions to ensure state neutrality toward religion.[18] Secularism functions prescriptively, promoting policies that limit religious involvement in civic life, whereas secularization is descriptive, capturing observable declines in religion's societal dominance without prescribing outcomes.[19]Secularity, by comparison, refers to the resultant state or condition of diminished religious permeation in domains such as law, education, or culture, serving as a neutral descriptor for the "non-religious" rather than a dynamic process.[20] Scholars emphasize that secularity encompasses varied expressions—from privatized faith to outright irreligion—without implying the causal mechanisms or historical trajectories inherent to secularization.[17]Secularization also diverges from individual-level positions like atheism, defined as the absence of belief in deities, and agnosticism, which asserts the unknowability of divine existence; these pertain to personal convictions rather than collective societal shifts.[21] A secularizing society may retain religious adherents whose influence wanes institutionally, without requiring widespread atheism or agnosticism among the population.[10]In specific national contexts, terms like laïcité—France's constitutional framework established in 1905—represent a policy-oriented variant of secularism focused on state protection from religious influence, including bans on conspicuous religious symbols in public schools since 2004. Laïcité prioritizes republican unity over religious accommodation, differing from secularization's broader, non-jurisdictional erosion of religious authority across civil society.[22]
Historical Development
Pre-Modern Religious Dominance
In ancient Near Eastern civilizations like Mesopotamia and Egypt, dating from approximately 3000 BCE, religion was inextricably fused with governance, where kings functioned as intermediaries or embodiments of the divine, legitimizing their rule through priestly sanction and temple economies that managed up to 30-40% of agricultural output in some periods. Egyptian pharaohs, viewed as living gods such as Horus incarnate, oversaw a priesthood that controlled temple lands and labor, enforcing ritual observance as essential to cosmic order (ma'at) and state stability, with deviations risking societal collapse as interpreted through oracles and omens.[23][24]Similarly, in classical Greece (ca. 800-300 BCE) and Rome (ca. 509 BCE-476 CE), state cults integrated religious practices into civic identity, mandating participation in festivals, sacrifices, and oaths to gods like Zeus or Jupiter, under penalty of impiety charges that could lead to exile or execution, as seen in the trial of Socrates in 399 BCE for corrupting youth via unorthodox beliefs. Roman emperors from Augustus onward (27 BCE) were deified posthumously, with imperial cult rituals reinforcing loyalty across provinces, where non-compliance, such as early Christian refusals to sacrifice, triggered sporadic persecutions under emperors like Nero (64 CE) and Diocletian (303-311 CE), underscoring religion's role in suppressing dissent to maintain social cohesion.[25][26]In medieval Europe (ca. 500-1500 CE), the Catholic Church dominated institutional life, holding vast estates—estimated at one-fifth to one-third of arable land in regions like England by the 13th century—and levying tithes equivalent to 10% of annual produce or income from laity, funding clerical hierarchies and cathedrals while embedding ecclesiastical courts in disputes over marriage, inheritance, and morality. Papal authority peaked under figures like Innocent III (1198-1216), who excommunicated kings and declared crusades, intertwining theology with feudal obligations and justifying inquisitions against heretics, such as the Albigensian Crusade (1209-1229) that killed tens of thousands to eradicate Cathar dualism. Education, largely monastic until universities emerged in the 12th century, disseminated scripture-centric worldviews, with literacy rates below 10% among lay populations reinforcing oral transmission of dogma.[27][28]Across Islamic caliphates from the 7th century CE, the ummah under caliphs like those of the Abbasid dynasty (750-1258 CE) applied Sharia as comprehensive law, derived from Quran and hadith, governing commerce, criminal justice, and warfare, with non-Muslims (dhimmis) paying jizya taxes for protection but facing restrictions on proselytizing or public worship, as codified in pacts like the Pact of Umar (ca. 637 CE). In East Asia, Confucian bureaucracies under Chinese emperors (e.g., Han dynasty, 206 BCE-220 CE) invoked the Mandate of Heaven—a divine endorsement revocable by moral failure—while integrating ancestor cults and Daoist rituals into state exams and imperial sacrifices, ensuring elite adherence to hierarchical piety amid peasant reliance on folk religions for agrarian cycles. These structures reflect causal mechanisms where religion provided explanatory frameworks for natural events and authority, absent scientific alternatives, fostering near-universal adherence with atheism or skepticism marginal and often punished as social subversion.[29]
Enlightenment and Industrial Era Shifts
The Enlightenment, spanning roughly the late 17th to late 18th centuries, marked a pivotal intellectual challenge to religious authority through the elevation of reason, empirical science, and skepticism toward dogmatic theology. Thinkers such as Voltaire, who in works like his Philosophical Dictionary (1764) derided organized religion as a source of fanaticism and superstition, and David Hume, whose Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (1779) questioned the design argument for God's existence, promoted deism or agnosticism over revealed faith.[30][31] This era's emphasis on human autonomy and verifiable knowledge eroded the epistemic monopoly of ecclesiastical institutions, fostering secular alternatives in ethics and governance, as seen in John Locke's advocacy for religious toleration in A Letter Concerning Toleration (1689), which influenced state-church separations.[32]Politically, these ideas manifested in efforts to diminish clerical power, culminating in the French Revolution of 1789, where revolutionaries enacted the Civil Constitution of the Clergy (1790), subordinating the Catholic Church to the state, closing churches, and executing refractory priests amid dechristianization campaigns that symbolized a rupture from sacral monarchy.[33] In Britain, parliamentary acts like the Test and Corporation Acts' gradual repeal (1673–1828) relaxed religious qualifications for office, reflecting Enlightenment pressures for civil liberties unbound by creed.[34] Such reforms, driven by causal links between rational critique and institutional reconfiguration, reduced religion's legal prerogatives without immediately extinguishing belief, though they laid groundwork for viewing faith as private rather than public obligation.The Industrial Revolution, beginning in Britain around 1760 and spreading across Europe by the early 19th century, accelerated secular shifts through urbanization, technological innovation, and socioeconomic upheaval that disrupted rural parish structures. Mass migration to factories eroded communal religious ties, as workers in cities like Manchester faced grueling conditions that prompted some to embrace secular ideologies like socialism—Karl Marx's Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right (1843) famously termed religion the "opium of the people"—over ecclesiastical palliatives.[35][36] The 1851 Religious Census in England and Wales revealed irregular attendance, with only about 40-50% of the population participating on census Sunday, indicating nominal adherence amid rising literacy and scientific literacy that favored material explanations.[34] In France, post-Revolutionary anticlericalism compounded industrial effects, yielding persistently low churchgoing rates by mid-century, as state welfare and education supplanted church roles.[37] Yet, countercurrents like Methodist revivals among laborers highlight that industrialization initially spurred evangelical responses before long-term disaffiliation, underscoring secularization as a gradual, uneven process tied to causal disruptions in traditional authority rather than inevitable decline.[38]
20th-Century Formulations
In the early 20th century, Max Weber advanced a formulation of secularization intertwined with rationalization, describing it as the "disenchantment of the world" (Entzauberung der Welt), where scientific and instrumental rationality progressively displaces traditional religious and magical interpretations of causality. In his 1919 lecture "Science as a Vocation," Weber contended that modern intellectualization implies no belief in ultimate, mysterious forces, but rather a mechanistic view of the world amenable to precise calculation and control, thereby limiting religion's explanatory power to subjective realms of ultimate meaning rather than objective public authority.[10] This process, Weber argued, accompanies the rise of bureaucratic and legal-rational structures that compartmentalize religious influence, reducing its role in economic, political, and scientific domains.[39]Mid-century sociological formulations refined these ideas through empirical and structural lenses. Peter L. Berger, in The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion (1967), defined secularization as the progressive removal of societal sectors from religious governance, driven by modernization's differentiation of institutions and the pluralism that undermines religion's plausibility structures—social mechanisms sustaining belief as objectively real. Berger posited that this leads to religion's retreat into subjective private experience, with pluralism fostering doubt by exposing competing worldviews, though he later acknowledged overgeneralization beyond Western contexts. [40]Concurrently, Bryan R. Wilson in Religion in Secular Society (1966) characterized secularization as the diminishing social significance of religious thought, practices, and institutions across societal, organizational, and individual levels, evidenced by metrics like Britain's church attendance dropping from over 50% weekly in the 1850s to under 10% by the 1960s. Wilson attributed this to rational alternatives in science and welfare systems supplanting religion's functions in explanation, legitimation, and community integration, particularly in industrialized nations where urbanization and education erode traditional adherence.[41][1] These 20th-century articulations framed secularization as a byproduct of modernity's causal dynamics, emphasizing institutional differentiation over mere disbelief, though interpretations varied in scope and inevitability.[42]
Secularization Theory
Classical Proponents and Assumptions
Max Weber, in works such as The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (1905) and his lectures on the "disenchantment of the world" (1917–1919), laid foundational assumptions for secularization theory by positing that modernization through rationalization—encompassing bureaucratic organization, scientific inquiry, and calculative economic action—erodes the magical and religious bases of authority.[43] Weber argued that Protestant asceticism inadvertently fostered capitalism's rational ethos, which in turn marginalized religious explanations in public life, leading to a progressive "disenchantment" where traditional religious worldviews yield to instrumental rationality.[10] This process, he contended, was not merely European but a logical outcome of societal differentiation, with religion retreating from dominance over politics, law, and economy.[44]Peter L. Berger, in his seminal The Sacred Canopy (1967), formalized secularization as an inherent byproduct of modernization, where societal pluralism and structural differentiation compel religion's privatization—confining it to subjective individual experience rather than societal nomos (order).[4] Berger assumed that the Enlightenment's epistemological shift toward empirical verification undermines religious plausibility structures, rendering faith optional amid competing worldviews, with secularization most pronounced in advanced industrial societies. He viewed this as unidirectional and irreversible in the West, driven by urbanization, education, and mass communication that expose individuals to diverse beliefs, fostering doubt in transcendent claims.[45]Bryan Wilson, building on Weberian themes in Religion in Secular Society (1966), defined secularization empirically as the declining social significance of religious institutions, practices, and beliefs amid rationalization and functional specialization.[2] Wilson assumed that industrialization transfers religion's former roles—such as legitimating authority or providing social cohesion—to secular alternatives like the welfare state and scientific expertise, exemplified by falling church attendance in post-World War II Britain (from 11% weekly in 1950 to under 5% by 1960).[46] He emphasized that a rational worldview, rooted in verifiable cause-effect relations, inherently conflicts with supernatural explanations, predicting religion's marginalization without positing outright disappearance.[4]Collectively, these classical formulations rested on the core assumption of unilinear modernization: that socioeconomic advancement inexorably diminishes religion's public authority through differentiation (separation of spheres), rationalization (replacement of faith by reason), and pluralism (erosion of monolithic belief systems).[47] Proponents drew from European historical trends, such as the French Revolution's laïcité (1790s) and Germany's Kulturkampf (1870s), extrapolating them as universal models, though they acknowledged variations by religious tradition—e.g., Protestantism's compatibility with rationalism versus Catholicism's hierarchical resistance.[48] This framework influenced mid-20th-century sociology, presupposing religion's adaptability limits under empirical scrutiny and institutional autonomy.[10]
Variants and Refinements
One prominent refinement to classical secularization theory emerged from Peter Berger himself, who in the late 1990s acknowledged empirical anomalies such as religious resurgence in the global South and pluralism's role in sustaining faith, revising his earlier view that modernization universally erodes religion's plausibility structure.[40] Berger argued that secularization primarily characterizes European societies with established churches, while desecularization prevails elsewhere due to unmet human needs for meaning, though he maintained that modernization fragments religious authority without eliminating it entirely.[49]Rodney Stark and Roger Finke's supply-side model represents a market-oriented refinement, positing that religious vitality depends not on modernization's inexorable decline but on the competitive supply of religious goods, akin to economic markets.[50] In regulated religious monopolies, such as Europe's state-supported churches, participation stagnates due to complacency and inefficiency, whereas free-market conditions, as in the 19th-century United States, foster innovation and growth—evidenced by Methodist and Baptist expansions from under 10% to over 50% of the population between 1776 and 1850.[51] This approach critiques classical theory's demand-side focus, emphasizing institutional entrepreneurship and consumer choice, with data showing higher U.S. church attendance (around 40% weekly in the 1980s) compared to Europe's 10-20%.[52]Pippa Norris and Ronald Inglehart's existential security hypothesis refines the theory by linking religiosity to human security levels rather than broad modernization, arguing that affluent, stable societies reduce existential anxieties met by religion, as captured in World Values Survey data from 1981-2007 showing inverse correlations between GDP per capita and religious participation (r = -0.7 across nations).[53] Insecure environments, like post-Soviet states or developing regions, sustain higher religiosity—e.g., sub-Saharan Africa's 80-90% belief in God versus Western Europe's 40-60%—but this predicts secularization only where welfare systems and longevity (e.g., life expectancy >75 years) substitute for supernatural assurances.[54] Critics note this overlooks cultural persistence, as Nordic countries maintain low but stable religiosity despite high security.[55]Other variants emphasize differentiation over outright decline, as in José Casanova's framework, where religion privatizes and loses public dominance (e.g., U.S. Supreme Court rulings from 1947-1963 curbing school prayer) but retains societal influence through voluntary associations.[44] Philipp Gorski identifies "neo-secularization" as refining the paradigm to focus on institutional separation, accommodating evidence of religious mobilization in politics, such as Poland's Solidarity movement in the 1980s.[44] These refinements preserve a core thesis of diminishing religious authority in modern spheres while integrating counterexamples through contextual factors like regulation and security.[56]
Empirical Evidence for Secularization
Declines in Institutional Religion
In the United States, church membership dropped below 50% of the adult population for the first time in 2021, marking a decline from 70% in 1999 according to Gallup polling.[57] Weekly religious service attendance has similarly fallen to 30% as of 2024, down from 42% two decades earlier, with declines observed across most religious groups including Protestants, Catholics, and others.[5] By 2024, only 45% of Americans reported belonging to a formal house of worship, the lowest figure since tracking began in 1937.[58]Affiliation with Christianity, the dominant institutional religion, has also contracted: evangelical Protestants comprised 23% of U.S. adults in recent surveys, down from 26% in 2007, while mainline Protestants fell to 11% from 18% over the same period, per Pew Research Center data.[59] These trends reflect reduced participation in organized religious activities, though the pace of decline in overall Christian identification appears to have slowed or stabilized in the early 2020s.[59]In Western Europe, church attendance and institutional affiliation have declined more precipitously, with many countries exhibiting low levels of regular participation for decades. Data from the European Values Study indicate that Europeans increasingly forgo church services, with religiosity diminishing across organized practices.[60] Between 2010 and 2020, the share of the population affiliated with any religion decreased by at least 5 percentage points in numerous European nations, as documented by Pew Research.[61] In countries like those in Northern and Western Europe, weekly attendance often hovers below 10-20%, contrasting with higher but still declining rates in Southern and Central Europe.[62]Cross-national analyses, including those from the World Values Survey, show that from 2007 to 2019, religiosity—including institutional involvement—waned in 43 out of 49 studied countries, predominantly in the West where modernization correlates with reduced public ritual participation as the initial stage of secular transition.[63][9] This pattern underscores a generational shift, with younger cohorts exhibiting markedly lower engagement in institutional religion compared to prior generations.[64]
Shifts in Individual Beliefs and Practices
In the United States, the proportion of adults identifying as Christian declined from 78% in 2007 to 62% in 2024, according to Pew Research Center surveys, with the religiously unaffiliated population rising from 16% to approximately 30% over the same period.[65][59] This shift reflects broader changes in self-reported beliefs, including a drop in those affirming absolute certainty in God's existence from 71% in 2007 to 55% in 2023-24.[59]Religious practices have also diminished, with Gallup polls recording weekly or near-weekly church attendance at 30% in 2024 (21% weekly and 9% almost weekly), down from around 40% in the 1950s and membership rates that exceeded 70% from the 1930s to 1960s but fell below 50% by 2021.[5][57] Rates of daily prayer remained relatively stable in recent years at about 40-45%, yet the overall trajectory aligns with reduced institutional engagement, particularly among younger generations where attendance hovers below 20%.[59][5]In Western Europe, individual religiosity shows steeper declines, with belief in God falling from 75% to 49% in the United Kingdom between 1981 and 2022, placing it among the lowest in a 24-nation study.[66] European Values Study data indicate widespread low church attendance, often below 10% weekly in countries like France and Sweden, alongside reduced personal practices such as prayer, correlating with generational replacement where younger cohorts report minimal religious importance.[60]Cross-national analyses from the World Values Survey reveal a sequential pattern in secularization: public ritual participation erodes first, followed by diminished perceived importance of religion, and eventually waning belief, evident in Western nations over decades of modernization.[9] These trends, while slowing in some contexts post-2020, underscore empirical shifts toward privatized or absent spirituality, with unaffiliated individuals increasingly viewing morality as independent of divine authority.[59][6]
Counter-Evidence and Religious Persistence
Global Demographic Trends
Despite predictions of inevitable religious decline under secularization theory, global demographic projections reveal sustained growth in religious populations, driven primarily by differential fertility rates and population dynamics in developing regions. According to Pew Research Center analyses, the global share of religiously unaffiliated individuals ("nones") is expected to decrease from 16% in 2015 to 13% by 2060, as slower growth among nones contrasts with expansion in affiliated groups.[67] Absolute numbers of adherents to major religions continue to rise with world population, projected to exceed 9 billion by 2050, with Christianity increasing from 2.1 billion in 2010 to an estimated 2.9 billion and Islam from 1.6 billion to 2.8 billion, achieving near parity between the two.[68]Fertility rates underscore this persistence, with religious groups exhibiting higher total fertility rates (TFR) than the global average, which fell to around 2.3 children per woman by the 2010s. Muslims recorded the highest TFR at 3.1 children per woman during 2010-2015, followed by Christians at approximately 2.7, compared to lower rates among Hindus (2.3), Buddhists (1.6), and unaffiliated individuals (1.6-1.7 in regions with data).[69][70] These disparities fuel disproportionate growth: between 2010 and 2020, the Muslim population expanded by 347 million (from 1.6 billion to 1.9 billion), Christians by 122 million (to 2.3 billion), and Hindus by 99 million (to 1.2 billion), while Buddhists declined slightly by 19 million.[7]Regional hotspots amplify these trends, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa and parts of Asia, where high-TFR religious majorities dominate. By 2060, over 40% of global Christians are projected to reside in sub-Saharan Africa, up from current levels, reflecting TFRs exceeding 4 in many countries alongside limited secularization.[71] In contrast, Europe's low TFR (around 1.5) and aging populations contribute to relative stagnation, but migration from high-religiosity regions offsets local declines, sustaining religious shares in aggregate.[69] Overall, 75.8% of the world's 8 billion people identified with a religion in 2020, marginally above prior decades when adjusted for population growth, challenging notions of universal religious fade.[7]These dynamics highlight demographics as a counterforce to secularization, where higher religiosity correlates with elevated birth rates, perpetuating faith transmission across generations independent of modernization in affluent contexts. Projections indicate no major religion will shrink in absolute terms by mid-century, with Islam's growth trajectory positioning it as the largest by 2070 absent switches or other disruptions.[72] This resilience via "demographic momentum" underscores that global religious persistence arises not from resurgence but from baseline reproductive advantages in populous, less-secularized areas.[71]
Revitalization and Resurgence Phenomena
In the Global South, Pentecostal and charismatic Christianity has experienced rapid expansion, countering expectations of secular decline. From 2010 to 2020, the global Christian population grew by 122 million, with significant increases driven by conversions and high fertility rates in sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America, and Asia.[7] Pentecostal movements, emphasizing spiritual experiences like speaking in tongues and healing, have attracted tens of millions of adherents, particularly former Catholics in Latin America, where the share of Protestants rose from 9% in 1970 to 19% by 2014.[73] This growth is most pronounced in countries like Brazil, Guatemala, Kenya, and the Philippines, where renewalist Christianity constitutes a substantial portion of believers, fueled by grassroots evangelism and adaptation to local social needs rather than institutional decline.[74]Islamic resurgence emerged prominently in the late 20th century, marked by increased piety, stricter adherence to religious norms, and political mobilization across Muslim-majority societies. Triggered by events like the 1979 Iranian Revolution and responses to Western influence, this revival involved urban youth and intellectuals seeking identity amid modernization, leading to higher mosque attendance and veiling practices in nations from Indonesia to Egypt.[75] Demographically, the Muslim population expanded by 327 million from 2010 to 2020, outpacing global averages due to fertility rates averaging 2.9 children per woman compared to 2.6 for non-Muslims, projecting Muslims to comprise 35% of the world population by 2100.[7][76] This trend reflects not mere persistence but active revitalization, as evidenced by the spread of revivalist movements emphasizing return to scriptural fundamentals amid perceived cultural threats.[77]Post-communist Eastern Europe witnessed Orthodox Christian revivals following the 1991 Soviet collapse, with church attendance and identification surging in countries like Russia and Poland. In Russia, Orthodox affiliation rose from suppressed levels under atheism to over 70% self-identification by the early 2000s, supported by state alliances and reconstruction of thousands of churches destroyed during Soviet rule.[78] Poland maintained Catholicism as a national anchor, with 87% identifying as Catholic in 2011 censuses, bolstered by anti-communist solidarity movements that framed faith as resistance.[79] These resurgences, while varying in depth of practice, demonstrate religion's capacity for rebound after repression, often intertwined with national identity reconstruction rather than inevitable erosion.Such phenomena challenge uniform secularization narratives by highlighting context-specific drivers like demographic vitality, conversion dynamics, and reactions to ideological vacuums, with global religious adherents projected to remain a majority through 2050.[76] Empirical patterns indicate resurgence is not anomalous but recurrent, as seen in temporary upswings amid modernization stresses.[80]
Criticisms and Theoretical Challenges
Methodological and Definitional Critiques
Critiques of secularization theory highlight ambiguities in its core definitions, which often conflate distinct processes such as the differentiation of institutional spheres, the privatization of religious expression, and an overall decline in religious vitality. José Casanova argues that the theory's foundational element is differentiation—the emancipation of domains like the state, economy, and science from religious control—rather than inevitable decline, yet proponents frequently interpret differentiation as evidence of religion's weakening influence without sufficient distinction.[81] This equivocation allows selective application, where evidence of institutional separation (e.g., legal secularism in post-Enlightenment Europe) is extrapolated to imply broader religious obsolescence, ignoring cases where differentiation coexists with robust public religiosity, such as resurgent religious movements in Latin America during the 1980s and 1990s.[81]Further definitional issues arise from narrow conceptions of religion that prioritize institutional metrics over broader phenomena like individual spirituality or cultural sacrality, leading critics to contend that secularization theory underestimates religion's adaptability. For instance, the theory's emphasis on organized religion overlooks persistent informal beliefs and practices, such as folk spirituality in modernizing societies, which do not fit tidy decline narratives. Mark Chaves proposes reframing secularization as the declining scope of religious authority—the reduced ability of religious leaders to enforce norms across non-religious domains—rather than a drop in personal religiosity, which aligns better with empirical patterns like stable belief rates amid falling institutional adherence.[13] This redefinition avoids overgeneralizing from authority losses (e.g., diminished clerical influence in Western education systems since the 19th century) to unsubstantiated claims of religion's societal irrelevance.[13]Methodologically, secularization research suffers from inconsistent operationalization of key variables, particularly in measuring religiosity through proxies like church attendance, which may reflect logistical barriers (e.g., competing leisure activities post-1950s in Europe) rather than disbelief. Studies show discrepancies between attendance declines—dropping to under 20% weekly in countries like France by 2010—and persistent self-reported beliefs in God or the afterlife, exceeding 50% in many surveys, undermining claims of uniform decline.[14] Reliance on aggregate European data from the 19th-20th centuries extrapolates poorly to global contexts, where religiosity rises in developing regions; for example, sub-Saharan Africa's religious participation rates increased alongside GDP growth from 1990 to 2020, challenging unidirectional models.[10]Additional methodological flaws include teleological assumptions that modernization causally drives decline without rigorous testing against alternatives, such as supply-side factors or cultural pluralism fostering religious competition. Retrospective labeling of thinkers like Max Weber as secularization proponents misrepresents their views—Weber described rationalization as demystifying magic, not eradicating religion, while Émile Durkheim viewed religious functions as enduring societal essentials.[10] These issues, compounded by potential survey biases toward underreporting private faith in secular-leaning academic contexts, highlight how definitional looseness and measurement inconsistencies enable confirmation of preconceived narratives over falsifiable hypotheses.[10]
Empirical Disconfirmations and Anomalies
Sociologist Peter L. Berger, an early advocate of the secularization thesis, revised his position in the late 1990s, observing that empirical evidence indicated robust religious vitality outside Europe, with the continent representing an exceptional rather than normative case.[45] In his 1999 edited volume The Desecularization of the World, Berger noted that "the world today... is as furiously religious as it ever was, and in some places more so than ever," attributing this to resurgent public roles for religion in politics and culture across Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East. This contradicted the thesis's expectation of uniform decline amid global modernization, as religious movements like Pentecostalism in Brazil and evangelical growth in South Korea expanded alongside economic development.Rodney Stark, in his 1999 analysis "Secularization, R.I.P.," argued that the thesis lacked empirical support, citing historical patterns where religions grew during periods of societal complexity, such as Christianity's expansion in the Roman Empire despite urbanization and literacy gains. Stark highlighted anomalies like the United States, where high GDP per capita ($70,000+ in 2020 terms), advanced education (tertiary enrollment over 80%), and scientific output coexist with religiosity levels (around 70% affirming belief in God in 2023 surveys) far exceeding those in comparably developed Europe (under 50% in many nations). He proposed a supply-side model, where competitive religious markets in the U.S. foster innovation and participation, unlike state-monopolized religions in Europe that stifled vitality, thus explaining the transatlantic divergence without invoking inevitable secular drift.Global demographic data further disconfirms projections of religious eclipse, as Pew Research Center's 2015 analysis forecasted that the unaffiliated share of world population would shrink from 16.4% in 2010 to 13% by 2050, driven by higher fertility rates (2.6 children per woman for Muslims vs. 1.6 for unaffiliated) and youth bulges in religious-majority regions.[76] Between 2010 and 2020 alone, the global Christian population rose from 2.2 billion to 2.3 billion, and Muslims from 1.6 billion to 1.9 billion, outpacing overall population growth in modernizing areas like sub-Saharan Africa (where Pentecostalism claims over 100 million adherents amid GDP doublings since 2000).[7] These trends persist despite urbanization (Africa's urban share from 35% to 44% in the decade) and technological diffusion, anomalies to the thesis's causal link between such factors and religious fade.[76]Post-communist transitions provide additional anomalies, as countries like Poland saw Catholic identification rebound to 87% by 2019 after 1989 liberalization, with church attendance surging amid market reforms and EU integration—contrary to expectations of accelerated secularization in freed societies.[82] Similarly, Iran's 1979 Islamic Revolution entrenched theocracy despite prior modernization under the Shah, including oil-driven industrialization and literacy jumps from 15% to 50% between 1950 and 1970, illustrating how political mobilization can reverse secular trajectories. These cases underscore the thesis's overgeneralization from Western patterns, where institutional disestablishment preceded decline, to contexts where religion adapts or intensifies via endogenous dynamics.[83]
Causal Mechanisms and First-Principles Analysis
Proposed Drivers of Secularization
Economic development has been proposed as a key driver of secularization, as rising incomes increase the opportunity cost of time spent on religious activities and correlate with the adoption of secular attitudes.[84] This mechanism operates particularly in societies with pre-existing historical wealth and stable democratic institutions, where modernization—measured by GDP growth—associates with reduced religiosity, though exceptions occur in post-communist states or regions with Christian minorities amid rising inequality.[85]Decreased existential insecurity represents another theorized cause, whereby improvements in economic stability, health outcomes, and protection from risks like famine or violence lessen the human reliance on religion for psychological security and meaning.[16] Experimental evidence, including choice-based studies on group affiliation, supports this insecurity-reduction hypothesis over competing rationalization models, showing higher religious selection under induced insecurity conditions (18% vs. 7% in secure scenarios).[16]Higher education levels are frequently cited as promoting secularization by exposing individuals to diverse worldviews and critical thinking, with empirical analyses indicating that gains in educational attainment account for over half of the increase in religious non-affiliation in contexts like Canada from the mid-20th century onward.[86] Cross-national data reinforce this link, though effects may plateau or vary by context, as education fosters attitudes questioning traditional doctrines.[87]Advances in scientific knowledge and rational worldviews have been advanced as drivers by providing mechanistic explanations for natural phenomena, purportedly eroding the explanatory monopoly of religion.[88] Proponents argue this clash between empirical rationalism and supernatural claims accelerates disaffiliation, particularly in industrialized settings, yet direct causal evidence remains contested, with global patterns suggesting science alone does not account for observed declines.[89][88]Societal differentiation and institutional secularism, including the separation of religious and state functions, are posited to diminish religion's public authority by confining it to private spheres amid urbanization and pluralism.[44] These structural shifts, tied to modernization, reduce religion's role in governance and education, though their impact depends on historical legacies like state-enforced atheism in communist regimes, which can paradoxically spur later rebounds.[85]
Evidence Against Inevitability
Sociologist Peter L. Berger, an early proponent of secularization theory, revised his views in the late 1990s, introducing the concept of desecularization to describe the global resurgence of religious influence in politics and society, countering the notion that modernization inevitably erodes religion.[90] Berger observed that while secularization occurred within specific religious subcultures in the West, the broader global pattern showed religion's vitality, particularly in non-Western modernizing societies.[91]
Rodney Stark, in his 1999 analysis, declared the secularization thesis empirically unfounded, arguing that religion persists because it fulfills fundamental human needs for meaning and community, unaffected by scientific or economic advances.[92] Stark cited historical and contemporary data showing no consistent decline in religious participation with modernization; instead, religious markets thrive under pluralism, as seen in the growth of new denominations.[93]
Global demographic trends further undermine inevitability claims: from 2010 to 2020, the religiously affiliated population rose from 5.9 billion to nearly 6.2 billion, comprising 75.8% of the world, with Muslims experiencing the fastest growth at 34% due to higher fertility rates in religious regions.[7] Christians remained the largest group at 2.3 billion, sustained by expansions in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia, regions undergoing rapid modernization.[7]
Reversals in secularization provide causal evidence against universality: post-communist Eastern Europe saw church attendance surge after 1989, with Poland's Catholic identification exceeding 90% by the 2010s amid economic liberalization.[94] Similarly, Iran's 1979 Islamic Revolution established a theocratic state in a modernizing economy, reversing prior secular policies and sustaining high religiosity.[95]
Even in Western contexts, anomalies persist: U.S. evangelical Protestantism grew from 1970 to the 2000s, comprising 25% of the population by 2014, defying predictions tied to education and urbanization.[96] Recent data indicate youth-led revivals, such as increased church attendance among young men in the U.S. and Europe since 2020, linked to cultural instability rather than inevitable decline.[97] These patterns suggest secularization depends on contingent factors like state policies and cultural responses, not inexorable modernization.[94]
Regional Variations
Europe
Europe has long been regarded as the archetypal region for secularization, characterized by marked declines in religious affiliation, belief, and practice since the mid-20th century, particularly in Western and Northern areas. Between 2010 and 2020, the Christian population in Europe decreased by 9% in absolute terms to 505 million, reflecting broader trends of disaffiliation amid rising numbers of religiously unaffiliated individuals. Church attendance remains low across much of the continent; for instance, in a 2023-2024 survey of 13 European countries, weekly attendance averaged below 20% in most nations, with Poland standing out at approximately 40%. This pattern aligns with data showing that only about a third of European Christians reported attending services monthly or more as of 2012, a figure that has not substantially improved in subsequent years.[98][99]Western Europe exemplifies advanced secularization, with countries like the Czech Republic reporting 91% of 16- to 29-year-olds identifying as non-religious in recent surveys, and Sweden topping lists for infrequent prayer. Cultural Christianity persists nominally—many still self-identify as Christian despite low practice—but active religiosity has waned, contributing to the loss of Christian majorities in nations such as the United Kingdom and France over the 2010-2020 decade. In contrast, Eastern Europe displays greater religious persistence and partial resurgence following the fall of communism in 1989, where suppression had previously curtailed practice; Orthodox and Catholic strongholds like Poland and Lithuania maintain higher affiliation rates, with Christianity continuing to grow regionally as of 2025. This divergence challenges uniform narratives of inevitable decline, as post-communist revival in the East has sustained higher levels of belief and attendance compared to the West.[100][101][102]Immigration has introduced countervailing pressures, as migrants—often from more religious societies, predominantly Muslim—exhibit higher religiosity than native populations, potentially reshaping Europe's religious landscape. Studies from 2002-2018 indicate immigrants maintain elevated levels of religious involvement, with first-generation arrivals praying and attending services more frequently than natives, though this gap narrows across generations. Overall, these inflows have slightly elevated continental religiosity metrics, offsetting native declines; for example, Europe's unaffiliated share, while growing, is moderated by the higher fertility and adherence among immigrant communities. Recent analyses suggest a slowdown in disaffiliation rates across Western Europe since around 2020, with the religiously unaffiliated rising by just 3 percentage points in several countries compared to steeper prior gains, hinting at possible stabilization amid these dynamics.[103][104][105][6]
In the United States, the proportion of adults identifying as Christian declined from 78% in 2007 to 62% in 2024, according to Pew Research Center's Religious Landscape Study, though recent data indicate the decline has slowed and may be stabilizing.[59] The religiously unaffiliated, or "nones," rose to 28% by 2023 but showed signs of plateauing, with Gallup reporting stability at 22% since 2020.[108][109] This shift is most pronounced among younger generations, with only 46% of adults under 30 identifying as Christian compared to 80% of those 65 and older.[110]Canada mirrors the United States in experiencing a marked increase in religious disaffiliation, with the unaffiliated share reaching approximately 30% by 2020 alongside a decline in Christian identification.[111] Statistics Canada reported that 68% of individuals aged 15 and older claimed a religious affiliation in 2021, the first time below 70%, reflecting generational turnover where younger cohorts exhibit lower religiosity.[111]In contrast, Mexico maintains high levels of religious adherence, with over 90% of the population identifying as Christian, predominantly Catholic, as of recent surveys.[112] The country operates under a constitutionally secular framework established in the 19th century and reinforced post-1910 Revolution, yet societal religiosity remains robust, with limited evidence of widespread secularization akin to Anglo-North America.[112] Public education is secular, and anticlerical policies persist, but religious participation, including Catholic rituals, endures across demographics.[112]These patterns in the United States and Canada align with broader secularization observed in affluent, industrialized societies, driven by factors such as education, urbanization, and cultural pluralism, though empirical data suggest the process is not unidirectional, with potential stabilization linked to demographic shifts including immigration from more religious regions.[7] Mexico's relative resistance to secularization underscores regional variations influenced by historical anticlericalism coexisting with deep cultural Catholicism, rather than a linear decline in belief.[112]
Latin America
Latin America exhibits limited secularization compared to Europe or North America, maintaining high levels of religious affiliation and practice amid shifts in denominational loyalty. Surveys indicate that approximately 77% of respondents across 17 countries identified as Christian in 2023, with only 18% reporting no religious affiliation, reflecting a modest increase in unaffiliated individuals over prior decades but persistent overall religiosity.[113] Catholic identification has declined significantly, from around 90% in the mid-20th century to 54% by 2024 according to regional polls, driven by conversions to Protestantism, particularly Pentecostalism, rather than widespread abandonment of faith.[114]The rise of evangelical Protestantism, especially Pentecostalism, has offset Catholic losses, with evangelicals comprising 19% of the population by 2024 and growing through active proselytism and appeal to lower socioeconomic groups seeking experiential worship and community support. Pew Research data from 2014 documented tens of millions of conversions from Catholicism to Pentecostalism across the region, attributing growth to factors like dissatisfaction with formal Catholic rituals and the charismatic nature of Pentecostal services.[73] Between 2010 and 2020, the absolute number of religiously unaffiliated individuals in Latin America and the Caribbean increased by 67%, yet this group remains a minority at about 4% of the global unaffiliated population, and many retain spiritual beliefs such as in God or an afterlife.[115][116]Country-level variations highlight uneven secularization: Uruguay and Chile show higher unaffiliated rates (around 20-30%), correlating with advanced urbanization and education, while Brazil and Central American nations sustain stronger religious adherence through evangelical expansion. Despite modernization indicators like economic development, religiosity endures, challenging classical secularization theses that link societal progress to inevitable religious decline; instead, causal factors include religious market competition and cultural resilience of faith in addressing existential needs. Even among nones, belief in life after death exceeds 50% in several countries, indicating latent spirituality rather than atheism.[116] Projections suggest continued denominational flux but no sharp drop in overall religious commitment, as Pentecostal vitality sustains institutional religion's role in social life.[117]
Asia and the Middle East
In East Asia, secularization has progressed significantly, with high rates of religious disaffiliation and low reported importance of religion in daily life. Surveys indicate that 37% of adults in Hong Kong and 35% in South Korea have left the religion of their upbringing, among the highest rates globally, while only 14% in Japan, 7% in South Korea, and smaller shares elsewhere identify as Buddhist or Christian in formal terms.[118]Folk spiritual practices persist, such as ancestor veneration or belief in karma, but organized religion and ritual participation have declined sharply, particularly among younger cohorts, aligning with modernization and urbanization without the Western pattern of total spiritual disengagement.[119][120]China exemplifies state-driven secularization, where Communist Party policies since 1949 have suppressed organized religion, resulting in over 50% of the population identifying as unaffiliated in recent censuses, though underground Christianity and revived folk traditions have grown modestly since the 1980s economic reforms.[121] In contrast, South and Southeast Asia exhibit persistent high religiosity, with 90% or more in Indonesia, India, and Pakistan reporting religion as very important, and minimal declines in affiliation or practice over the past decade.[122][123] These regions' demographic growth sustains religious populations, with Hindus and Muslims comprising vast majorities resistant to secular pressures from globalization.[124]The Middle East displays limited secularization, with religiosity levels remaining elevated and showing signs of stabilization or resurgence post-2010. Arab Barometer surveys from 2018-2022 reveal a decrease in those identifying as "not religious," particularly among youth, alongside increased engagement with religious texts, countering earlier mid-2010s dips possibly linked to Arab Spring disillusionment.[125][126] In countries like Saudi Arabia and Iran, state-enforced Islam correlates with 95%+ Muslim affiliation and daily prayer rates exceeding 70%, while urban secularism in places like Turkey or Lebanon remains marginal and politically contested, as evidenced by electoral support for Islamist governance.[127] Empirical data from Pew indicates Muslim populations in the region grew 24% from 2010-2020, outpacing overall demographics, underscoring religion's enduring role in identity and politics amid modernization.[7][128]
Africa and Sub-Saharan Regions
Sub-Saharan Africa exhibits persistent high levels of religiosity, contradicting expectations of secularization observed in parts of Europe and North America. Surveys indicate that over 90% of respondents in the region consider religion very important in their lives, with minimal decline over decades. For instance, Pew Research Center data from multiple countries show that in nations like Nigeria and Ghana, 95% or more affirm religion's centrality, a figure stable since the early 2000s. This contrasts with global trends where education and urbanization correlate with declining religiosity elsewhere; in Africa, these factors coexist with sustained faith adherence, suggesting cultural and demographic resilience against secular pressures.[129]Christianity and Islam dominate, with traditional African religions diminishing but not yielding to irreligion. Between 2010 and 2020, the Christian population in sub-Saharan Africa grew by 31% to 697 million, while Muslims increased by 34% to 369 million, driven by high fertility rates averaging 4.6 children per woman.[130] Projections estimate Christians will exceed 1.1 billion by 2050, comprising over 38% of the world's total, as the region accounts for the majority of global Christian growth.[129] The religiously unaffiliated remain marginal, at under 3% regionally, with atheism rates below 1% in most countries; even self-identified nones often retain belief in God or spirits, indicating nominal rather than substantive secularization.[131][132]Variations exist, with South Africa showing slightly higher non-religious shares around 15-20%, linked to urban secular influences post-apartheid, yet overall religiosity persists at 80%+ deeming faith important.[133] In contrast, countries like Ethiopia and Uganda report near-universal religious commitment. Economic development and modernization have not eroded faith; instead, Pentecostal and evangelical movements thrive, filling social service gaps amid weak state institutions.[134] Demographic momentum, including youth bulges and low switching to unaffiliation, reinforces this pattern, challenging inevitability theses of secularization tied to industrialization.[116]
Contemporary Trends and Projections
Post-2010 Global Data
From 2010 to 2020, the proportion of the global population formally affiliated with a religion declined from 76.7% to 75.8%, driven primarily by religious switching rather than demographic factors like fertility or mortality.[7] The religiously unaffiliated population grew by 270 million to 1.9 billion, increasing its share by 0.9 percentage points to 24.2%, despite lower fertility rates (1.6 children per woman) and an older median age compared to affiliated groups.[7] This growth was attributed to net gains from switching, with an estimated 11.6 individuals leaving Christianity for every 100 raised Christian in the 18-54 age group, and similar patterns in other traditions.[69]
Data compiled from Pew Research Center estimates covering 201 countries and territories with populations over 100,000.[7]Self-reported religiosity showed a steeper decline in Gallup International surveys, with the share of respondents identifying as "religious" falling from 68% in 2005 to 56% in 2024, while convinced atheists rose from 6% to 10% and the non-religious from 21% to 28%.[8] This trend was most pronounced in high-income countries, where only 36% identified as religious in 2024 compared to 78% in low-income nations, correlating with higher education levels (50% religious among the highly educated vs. 67% among the least educated).[8] World Values Survey data from 2007 to 2020 indicated declining religiosity in 43 of 49 countries analyzed, particularly in measures of belief importance and practice, though aggregate global figures were influenced by persistent high religiosity in regions like sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East.[135]Fertility differentials partially offset disaffiliation in aggregate shares for growing groups like Muslims (2.9 children per woman) and Christians, concentrated in high-fertility areas, while unaffiliated growth relied almost entirely on conversions out of religion rather than natural increase.[7]Migration had minor global effects but contributed to regional shifts, such as Christian declines in Europe offset by inflows elsewhere.[69] These patterns suggest secularization advanced through individual-level exits from religion, counterbalanced demographically in the global total but evident in eroding institutional attachment and self-identification.[7][8]
Recent Stabilizations and Reversals
In the United States, the long-term decline in Christian affiliation, which fell from 78% of adults in 2007 to 63% by 2019, has shown signs of stabilization since approximately 2019, with subsequent surveys indicating minimal further erosion in religious identification and practice.[59][136] Data from Pew Research Center's Religious Landscape Studies reveal that the share of religiously unaffiliated adults ("nones") plateaued around 28-30% between 2019 and 2024, contrasting with sharper rises in prior decades.[59] This halt correlates with higher religiosity among Generation Z adults born after 1996, who report church attendance and belief in God at rates exceeding those of Millennials, potentially arresting the intergenerational transmission of secularization.[137][138] Measures of weekly worship attendance and daily prayer have also stabilized, with roughly one-third of Americans attending services monthly and nearly half praying daily as of 2024.[139]Across Western Europe, where religiosity had declined markedly since the mid-20th century, recent indicators point to a deceleration or pause in further losses, particularly post-2010. Surveys in 14 Western countries conducted by Pew Research Center found that while Christian identity remains nominal for many, the proportion reporting strengthened faith during the COVID-19 pandemic outnumbered those reporting weakened faith by factors of up to two-to-one, suggesting resilience against ongoing secular pressures.[6] Non-practicing Christians, who constitute the majority in countries like the United Kingdom and Germany, continue to outnumber active adherents, yet affiliation rates have not eroded at the pace observed in the late 20th century, with stable self-identification as Christian hovering around 70% in aggregate Western European samples.[107] In Eastern Europe, post-communist religious revivals have consolidated, with Orthodox Christianity's share rising to nearly 90% adherence in some nations by 2020, reflecting a partial reversal from Soviet-era suppression rather than Western-style secularization.[140]Reversals appear more pronounced in select non-Western contexts, though data on stabilizations dominate recent Western trends. In Poland, for instance, Catholic identification rebounded to over 90% by the 2020s following 1980s solidarity movements, bucking broader European declines through cultural and political reinforcement of religious institutions. Globally, while unaffiliated populations grew modestly from 2010 to 2020 (adding 111 million), this lagged behind gains in Christian (122 million) and Muslim (327 million) adherents, indicating that fertility differentials and migration from high-religiosity regions may counteract secularization in aging Western societies.[7] These patterns challenge linear secularization models, as economic development correlates less rigidly with religiosity erosion in mature post-industrial settings, where baseline levels have bottomed out.[141]
Societal Impacts and Debates
Positive Outcomes and Achievements
Empirical analyses of 20th-century global data indicate that declines in religiosity often preceded economic expansions, with countries experiencing earlier secularization showing stronger subsequent GDP per capita growth rates, potentially due to shifts toward rational economic behaviors and reduced doctrinal constraints on commerce and innovation.[142] This temporal pattern holds across diverse nations, including those in Europe and Asia, where per capita income rose by an average of 2-3% annually following significant drops in religious adherence between 1900 and 2000.[142]Secularization correlates with elevated levels of education and democratic stability, as societies with lower religious influence demonstrate higher literacy rates, tertiary enrollment, and indices of political rights and civil liberties. For instance, cross-national studies from 1850 onward reveal that nations achieving over 50% non-religious populations by mid-century, such as in Scandinavia, attained average PISA scores exceeding 500 in science and math by 2018, alongside robust democratic institutions measured by Freedom House scores above 90/100.[143] These outcomes align with causal mechanisms where secular governance prioritizes evidence-based policies, fostering environments conducive to human capital development and inclusive decision-making.[143]In public health domains, secular frameworks have enabled widespread adoption of vaccination and hygiene practices unhindered by theological objections, contributing to life expectancy gains; for example, Western European countries post-1800 secular reforms saw infant mortality drop from over 200 per 1,000 births in 1850 to under 5 by 2020, paralleling rises in scientific literacy over religious dogma.[142] Achievements include the institutionalization of separation between religious authority and state functions, as in the 1648 Peace of Westphalia, which curtailed intra-Christian wars and laid groundwork for modern international law, reducing large-scale religiously fueled conflicts in Europe from an average of one per decade pre-1500 to near zero post-1800.[142]
Criticisms and Negative Correlations
Critics of secularization argue that its advancement correlates with declining fertility rates, exacerbating demographic challenges in developed nations. Empirical analyses indicate that church membership and religiosity strongly predict higher total fertility rates, with secularization exerting a self-reinforcing negative effect through reduced family formation and couple matching based on shared values.[144][145] For instance, in the United States, weekly religious attendees maintain fertility near or above replacement levels (around 2 children per woman as of 2022), while non-attendees fall below 1.5, widening a gap that sustains population decline in secular subgroups.[146] Globally, secular societies exhibit fertility rates insufficient for replacement, contributing to aging populations and straining social welfare systems, as observed in Europe where rates dropped below 1.5 by the 2010s.[147]Secularization has also been linked to elevated suicide rates, particularly in contexts where religious participation diminishes. Cross-national studies reveal that higher religiosity inversely correlates with suicide risk, with religious service attendance reducing attempts by providing social support and purpose, independent of demographics.[148] In more secularized Catholic countries, suicide rates rise alongside declining religious adherence, contrasting with protective effects in Protestant or observant communities where rates are 27-49% lower.[149][150] Recent U.S. data from 2023-2025 further show higher suicide prevalence in low-religiosity states, attributing this to weakened communal ties and existential voids filled inadequately by secular alternatives.[151]Regarding social cohesion, secularization undermines family structures and community bonds, fostering isolation and relational fragility. Longitudinal analyses demonstrate that secular environments correlate with weaker family ties and higher loneliness, as religious institutions historically enforce norms promoting marriage and intergenerational support.[152] Declining religious affiliation reduces civic participation and mutual aid networks, leading to fragmented societies where individuals report lower trust and higher anomie, per surveys from the 2010s onward.[153]On crime, meta-analyses consistently find religiosity exerts a negative effect on delinquency and violent offenses, suggesting secularization removes moral restraints that deter antisocial behavior.[154] Aggregate data across 162 European regions from 2000-2010 confirm higher religious adherence predicts lower property and violent crime rates, with effects robust to controls for socioeconomic factors.[155][156] In disadvantaged U.S. areas, dense religious congregations buffer against crime spikes, implying secular voids amplify vulnerabilities to disorder.[157] While some cross-national comparisons note lower overall violence in secular nations, these overlook endogeneity where religiosity responds to underlying stability, not vice versa; critics emphasize causal evidence from individual-level studies favoring religion's inhibitory role.[158][159]