Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Directorate-General

A Directorate-General (DG) is a primary administrative unit within the , the executive branch of the , tasked with developing, implementing, and overseeing policies in designated sectors such as , , , and environment. Each DG functions analogously to a national , led by a Director-General who reports to a politically appointed responsible for the corresponding portfolio. As of 2023, the Commission organizes its operations through approximately 33 such DGs and executive agencies, enabling specialized management of EU legislation, funding programs, and regulatory enforcement across member states. These entities form the bureaucratic backbone of EU governance, translating high-level political directives into operational actions, including proposal drafting for new laws, budget allocation, and inter-institutional coordination with the European Parliament and Council. While DGs enhance policy expertise and continuity amid frequent Commissioner turnover, their expansive structure has drawn scrutiny for contributing to the Commission's overall administrative complexity, with over 32,000 staff across directorates handling diverse mandates from internal market regulation to external relations. Notable examples include the , which enforces antitrust rules and state aid controls, and the Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, managing the EU's largest budget expenditure via the .

Definition and Role

A Directorate-General (DG) constitutes the principal administrative and policy unit within the , tasked with developing, implementing, and managing specific domains of EU policy, legislation, and funding programmes. Each DG operates under the political direction of one or more while maintaining operational autonomy in day-to-day administration, focusing on areas such as agriculture, competition enforcement, or digital markets. Headed by a Director-General—an A1-grade senior civil servant appointed by the —these entities employ thousands of officials collectively, drawing from the 's approximately 32,000 staff as of recent organizational data. This structure enables the to fulfill its executive mandate by translating high-level political objectives into concrete actions, including proposal drafting, enforcement monitoring, and inter-institutional coordination. The operational framework of DGs emphasizes specialization and hierarchy, with internal directorates and units handling sub-themes within broader portfolios; for instance, the oversees antitrust cases and state aid assessments through dedicated enforcement branches. Supported by executive agencies for programme execution and service departments for horizontal functions like , DGs ensure cohesive delivery across the EU's 27 member states. This departmental model, akin to ministries in national administrations, promotes efficiency in addressing the Commission's multifaceted responsibilities, from market regulation to external relations, while upholding principles of collegiality and accountability to the College of Commissioners. Legally, the establishment and functioning of Directorates-General derive from the European Commission's internal organizational autonomy as enshrined in the (TEU), particularly Article 17(3), which mandates the Commission to organize itself collegially to exercise its executive powers, and Article 17(6), requiring it to ensure the proper functioning of its services. The specific structure, including the composition of DGs, is formalized in the Commission's Rules of Procedure, which delineate the division into policy-oriented DGs and supporting services, adopted by the Commission and incorporating implementing measures under Council regulations such as Regulation (EU) 2016/300. These rules, grounded in primary law, allow flexibility for periodic reorganization—evidenced by reforms aligning DGs with evolving priorities like the green transition—while subjecting operations to oversight by the European Parliament and Court of Auditors to prevent silos or inefficiencies. This foundation underscores the DGs' role not as independent entities but as integral components of the Commission's supranational executive apparatus, bound by treaty obligations to serve the general interest of the Union.

Primary Functions Across EU Institutions

Directorates-General (DGs) function as specialized administrative departments within the European Union's principal institutions, adapting their operations to each body's distinct competencies under the EU treaties. While sharing common traits such as hierarchical leadership by a Director-General and focus on sectoral expertise, their primary roles vary: policy formulation and execution in the executive-oriented , legislative and administrative support in the , and coordination plus secretarial services in the . This division reflects the EU's institutional balance, with DGs ensuring operational efficiency amid the Union's supranational-intergovernmental hybrid structure. In the , DGs constitute the core policy machinery, developing policies and across assigned domains, implementing them through enforcement and program delivery, and managing related funding allocations from the . For instance, they draft legislative proposals for review, monitor compliance with law via infringement procedures, and oversee expenditure, which totaled €186.7 billion in commitments for 2021 under the current framework. Service-oriented DGs handle cross-cutting administration, such as or IT, while policy DGs align with portfolios, numbering around 30 distinct units as of 2023. These functions position the as the 's independent executive, initiating approximately 80% of per provisions. The European Parliament's DGs, organized under the Secretary-General's Secretariat, primarily provide substantive and logistical support to enable parliamentary oversight, law-making, and democratic functions. They assist Members in drafting amendments, advising on procedural matters, and organizing proceedings in areas like external relations, , or internal policies; for example, the DG for External Policies coordinates interparliamentary delegations and work on . Other DGs manage communications to publicize parliamentary activities, personnel to sustain staff excellence, and institutional affairs to uphold rule-of-law guardianship. With about 7-8 main DGs, their roles emphasize facilitation rather than initiation, supporting the Parliament's 705 Members in scrutinizing proposals and co-deciding laws under the ordinary legislative procedure. In the , DGs within the General —totaling 12 as of recent listings—focus on policy-specific coordination across configurations (e.g., ECOFIN for economic affairs, JAI for justice and home affairs) and service provision to streamline decision-making among member states. Directors-General manage preparatory work for ministerial meetings, deliver procedural and policy advice to the presidency and members, draft legal texts, and track implementation of Council conclusions, ensuring alignment with EU goals like the or common . Support DGs handle translation (processing over 500,000 pages annually), digital services, and communications, while policy clusters facilitate consensus-building in the intergovernmental context. This setup aids the Council's role in adopting laws jointly with and coordinating policies, with the employing around 3,000 staff to service 10 configurations.

Historical Evolution

Origins in Early European Integration (1950s–1960s)

The administrative framework of Directorates-General (DGs) emerged as a key organizational innovation in the nascent during the , enabling specialized policy handling in supranational bodies. The (ECSC), founded via the signed on 18 April 1951 and effective from 23 July 1952, vested executive powers in a High Authority that initially relied on functional departments for oversight of coal and steel sectors. These departments managed production quotas, pricing, and investments across the six founding members—, , , , the , and —but lacked the formalized DG structure until 1960, when they were reorganized into Directorates-General to align with parallel developments in other Communities and enhance administrative coherence. The pivotal establishment of DGs occurred with the (EEC) Commission, instituted by the signed on 25 March 1957 and operational from 1 January 1958. Under President , the Commission's inaugural session on 16 January 1958 at the Château de Val-Duchesse in adopted Rules of Procedure that structured its services into Directorates-General, mirroring national ministerial departments to address EEC priorities like tariff reductions, , and competition rules. Initial DGs included those for Economic and Financial Affairs (DG II), (DG VI), and Internal Market (DG III), each led by a Director-General reporting to Commissioners, facilitating the Commission's role in proposing and enforcing treaty obligations among the founding six states. Throughout the 1960s, this DG model proved adaptable amid expanding integration efforts, including the parallel setup of the European Atomic Energy Community () Commission in 1958, which adopted similar structures for nuclear policy. The ECSC High Authority's 1960 alignment further standardized the approach, with DGs handling technical implementation amid challenges like the 1965 Empty Chair Crisis, which tested institutional resilience. By 1967, the unified the executives of the ECSC, EEC, and Euratom into a single , inheriting and rationalizing the DG framework to support broader economic coordination, though early staffing remained modest—around 300 officials in 1958—prioritizing expertise over bureaucracy.

Expansion and Reorganization (1970s–1990s)

The enlargements of the in 1973, incorporating , , and the , increased membership from six to nine states and prompted administrative expansions within the to manage heightened coordination demands across policy areas. This period saw the proliferation of specialized Directorates-General (DGs) to address emerging sectoral needs, with staff levels rising to accommodate broader implementation responsibilities; for instance, the Commission's total personnel grew from approximately 7,000 in the early to over 12,000 by the mid-1980s, reflecting resource allocation to existing and nascent DGs. A key reorganization occurred with the separation of DG XIV (Fisheries) from DG VI (Agriculture) during the 1970s, driven by the expansion of international fishery agreements and the need for dedicated oversight of maritime resource policies amid growing exclusive economic zones post-1970s UNCLOS negotiations. Concurrently, coordination discussions in the 1970s culminated in the establishment of specialized financial directorates by 1980, enhancing DG II (Economic and Financial Affairs) to handle embryonic mechanisms. Further southern enlargements in 1981 () and 1986 ( and ), raising membership to twelve, intensified pressures on DGs dealing with regional disparities, , and structural funds, necessitating internal reallocations and subunit creations within DGs like Regional Policy to integrate diverse national interests. The of 1986 formalized qualified majority voting and new competencies in areas like environment and research, spurring DG adaptations; this included bolstering research-oriented units that foreshadowed later overhauls. By the early 1990s, preparations for the amplified reorganization efforts, exemplified by the July 1992 restructuring of DG XII (Science, ) and DG XIII (, Information Industries, and ), which streamlined administrative procedures, merged overlapping functions, and aligned structures with emerging technological and single-market imperatives to improve amid fiscal scrutiny. These changes reduced redundancies while expanding DG capacities for policy innovation, setting precedents for subsequent treaty-driven evolutions without fundamentally altering the core departmental framework.

Modern Reforms and Adaptations (2000s–Present)

In the early 2000s, the under President implemented extensive administrative reforms led by Vice-President , following the 1999 resignation crisis over allegations of fraud and mismanagement. These reforms, formalized in a modernization approved on February 29, 2000, emphasized of , improved , and enhanced staff through a new administrative code that empowered middle management and introduced performance-based evaluations. The changes affected Directorates-General (DGs) by streamlining internal operations, reducing hierarchical layers, and integrating activity-based management to align resources with policy priorities, though implementation faced resistance from entrenched bureaucratic interests. Subsequent enlargements in 2004 and 2007 necessitated adaptations in DG structures to handle expanded membership, with reforms under President building on Kinnock's foundation by introducing and programming cycles in 2004 to better coordinate inter-DG activities amid increased workload. The 2009 Lisbon Treaty, entering force on December 1, indirectly reshaped DGs by abolishing the pillar system and creating the (EEAS) in 2011, which absorbed external relations desks from DGs like DG Development and transferred competencies in areas such as trade and enlargement, compelling remaining DGs to refocus on internal implementation. This shift aimed to enhance coherence but strained Commission resources, as evidenced by the relocation of over 1,000 staff to the EEAS. Under President Jean-Claude Juncker's 2014–2019 term, DG reorganizations prioritized a "political Commission" model, merging entities like the former DG Enlargement into the new DG Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations (DG NEAR) to streamline external policy amid stalled accession processes. Portfolio shifts, such as moving health technology assessments from DG Health to DG Internal Market, sought to reduce silos and foster cross-DG task forces, exemplified by the Energy Union initiative that integrated inputs from multiple DGs under vice-presidential oversight. President Ursula von der Leyen's 2019–2024 Commission further adapted DGs to geopolitical priorities, creating specialized units like DG for Defence Industry and Space in 2020 and emphasizing digital and green transitions through reallocated resources in DGs such as DG Climate Action (DG CLIMA). Her second term, starting December 1, 2024, introduced a leaner structure with fewer commissioners but enhanced executive vice-presidents overseeing clustered DGs for competitiveness, defense, and sustainability, reflecting a centralized approach to policy delivery amid external pressures like the Russia-Ukraine war. These evolutions underscore a trend toward flexibility, with DG numbers fluctuating from around 40 in the early 2000s to 33 core DGs by 2024, driven by efficiency mandates rather than treaty-driven overhauls.

Structure in the European Commission

Organizational Framework and Key Directorates-General

The European Commission's organizational framework is built around Directorates-General (DGs), which function as specialized departments handling policy development, implementation, and management across diverse sectors. Each DG operates under the political direction of one or more Commissioners from the College of Commissioners, with a Director-General serving as the administrative head responsible for day-to-day operations, , and coordination with other institutions. DGs are hierarchically structured into directorates—each led by a —and subdivided into units that execute specific tasks such as drafting , conducting analyses, and monitoring . This setup ensures specialized expertise while maintaining alignment with the Commission's overarching priorities, as outlined in the EU treaties and annual work programs. As of the 2024–2029 , the structure includes around 33 policy DGs, service departments, and executive agencies, with periodic reorganizations to adapt to emerging challenges like and geopolitical shifts. The framework emphasizes functional specialization, inter-DG coordination via the Secretariat-General, and accountability through internal audits and reporting to the Commission President. Service-oriented DGs, such as those for budget or , support operational needs, while policy DGs drive substantive work. Staffing totals over 32,000 officials across DGs, with recruitment emphasizing and expertise from member states. This model, rooted in the Commission's role as the EU's , facilitates supranational policymaking but has been critiqued for potential silos that hinder cross-cutting issues. Key Directorates-General exemplify this framework by focusing on high-impact areas:
Directorate-GeneralAbbreviationCore Responsibilities
Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAGRIAdministers the (), supporting farmers, rural development, and sustainable food systems with a 2021–2027 budget exceeding €387 billion.
BudgetBUDGManages the EU's , including revenue collection, expenditure programming, and financial programming for 2021–2027 totaling €1.2 trillion.
Climate ActionCLIMACoordinates EU climate policy, including , renewable energy targets, and implementation of the aiming for by 2050.
COMPEnforces antitrust rules, merger control, and state aid regulations, handling over 400 merger notifications annually and imposing fines totaling billions of euros in recent years.
Economic and Financial AffairsECFINMonitors economic governance, coordinates fiscal surveillance under the , and supports stability mechanisms.
EnvironmentENVDevelops environmental legislation on biodiversity, air and water quality, and initiatives, overseeing protection.
TradeTRADENegotiates and implements trade agreements, managing a covering over 70 countries and handling disputes via the WTO, with EU exports valued at €2.3 trillion in 2023.
These DGs, among others, collectively underpin the Commission's capacity to propose and enforce EU law, with their outputs subject to oversight by the and Council.

Leadership, Staffing, and Internal Operations

Each Directorate-General (DG) in the is led by a Director-General, who serves as the highest-ranking civil servant in that department and reports to the responsible for the policy area. Director-Generals are appointed through internal selection procedures managed by the Commission, often involving evaluation of candidates' expertise, experience, and operational track record, with final approval by the of Commissioners or the . These appointments aim to ensure administrative continuity and policy expertise, though critics have noted variability in transparency and potential influence from national or political considerations in selections. Staffing across the Commission's DGs totals approximately 32,000 permanent and employees as of 2024, comprising policy officers, lawyers, researchers, translators, and administrative personnel drawn from all member states to maintain a multinational composition. Recruitment for permanent posts occurs primarily through competitive examinations organized by the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO), emphasizing merit, linguistic skills, and balanced geographical representation, with temporary agents and contractors filling specialized or short-term roles. Individual DGs vary in size; for instance, DG International Partnerships (INTPA) employs about 3,600 , with roughly 65% in external delegations and 35% in headquarters. are classified into grades such as Administrators (AD), Assistants (AST), and Contract Agents, with Director-Generals at AD15, the pinnacle of the hierarchy. Internally, DGs operate hierarchically, subdivided into directorates led by Directors and further into headed by Heads of Unit, facilitating specialized , drafting, and implementation under the Director-General's oversight. This structure supports day-to-day operations, including inter-service consultations for cross-DG coordination and adherence to the Commission's principles of and in decision-making. Operations emphasize evidence-based policymaking, with handling tasks like legal drafting, consultations, and monitoring, though bureaucratic layers can extend decision timelines, as evidenced by internal reorganization efforts to enhance agility. The Secretariat-General plays a coordinating role across DGs to ensure overall coherence in Commission work.

Directorates-General in Other EU Bodies

European Parliament Directorates-General

The Directorates-General (DGs) of the operate within its , providing administrative, analytical, and logistical support to enable the legislative functions of Members of the European Parliament (MEPs), committees, and plenary sessions. Headed by the Secretary-General, who reports to the Parliament's Bureau, these units ensure coordination of parliamentary business, expert assistance in policy areas, and operational efficiency across the institution's sites in , , and . Unlike the European Commission's DGs, which execute supranational policies, Parliament's DGs prioritize procedural facilitation, multilingual services, and non-partisan research to underpin democratic deliberation and oversight of EU institutions. The Secretariat's DGs are broadly categorized into policy-support units aligned with parliamentary committees and horizontal units handling cross-cutting administrative tasks. Policy DGs draft briefings, organize hearings, and analyze legislative proposals, drawing on specialized expertise to inform decision-making without direct policy formulation authority. Horizontal DGs manage essential services such as budgeting, into 24 official languages, and conference logistics, supporting the Parliament's capacity to process over 10,000 amendments annually in a multilingual environment. Key policy-oriented DGs include: Horizontal DGs encompass:
  • Directorate-General for the Presidency (PRES): Manages administrative services for the , , and Conference of Presidents, including coordination of political priorities and institutional strategy.
  • Directorate-General for Parliamentary Services (EPRS): Delivers independent , impact assessments, and foresight studies to MEPs and committees via specialized units on Members' , library resources, and added value.
  • Directorate-General for (FINS): Prepares and implements the Parliament's , supervises expenditure, and supports discharge reports to the .
  • Directorate-General for Communication (COMM): Handles public information, , campaigns, and visitor services to promote Parliament's activities and democratic role.
  • Directorate-General for and (INLO): Oversees facilities , security, and maintenance across Parliament's workplaces.
  • Directorate-General for and Interpretation for Conferences (): Provides interpretation, conference technology, and event , employing hundreds of interpreters for multilingual proceedings.
These DGs undergo periodic reorganization to adapt to evolving parliamentary needs, such as post-2019 expansions in and support, while maintaining under staff regulations that prohibit activities. The structure reflects the Parliament's growth from 142 staff in 1958 to approximately 8,500 today, enabling effective legislative output amid increasing EU competencies.

Council of the European Union General Secretariat Directorates

The General Secretariat of the (GSC) structures its administrative and policy support through specialized directorates-general, which align with the 's policy configurations and horizontal functions. These directorates-general, each led by a Director-General, facilitate the preparation of meetings, provide expert advice on procedural and substantive matters, and ensure coordination across over 150 preparatory bodies such as committees and working parties. As of October 2025, the GSC comprises 12 such directorates-general, reflecting a division between sector-specific policy support (e.g., for economic affairs or external relations) and enabling services (e.g., legal, translation, and digital). This organization enables the Secretariat to assist both the and the in implementing their agendas, including the 18-month strategic program set by rotating presidencies. The Secretary-General, Thérèse Blanchet, oversees the entire GSC since her appointment on 1 November 2022, with deputy secretaries-general handling operational coordination. Directors-General report to the Secretary-General and are responsible for developing services in their domains, offering policy and procedural guidance to ensure coherent proceedings. Sectoral directorates mirror the 's ten configurations, such as ECOFIN for economic and financial affairs, while horizontal ones handle cross-cutting needs like legal opinions and communication. Staffing across these units totals approximately 3,500 personnel, drawn from member states, with a focus on multilingual expertise and . Key directorates-general include:
Directorate-GeneralDirector-General (as of 2025)Primary Responsibilities
Competitiveness and Trade (COMPET)Isabel RiañoPolicy development for internal market, industry, competitiveness, and trade matters.
Economic and Financial Affairs (ECOFIN)Thomas WestphalSupport for coordination, budgets, taxation, and .
General and Institutional Policy (GIP)Didier SeeuwsInstitutional relations, support, and coordination of agendas.
Justice and Home Affairs (JAI)Christine Roger, , justice, and policies.
Legal Service (JUR)Emer Finnegan, in courts, and interpretation for acts.
Agriculture, Fisheries, Social Affairs and Health (LIFE)David Brozina, fisheries, , and .
External Relations (RELEX)Maryem van den Heuvel, enlargement, and international partnerships.
Transport, Energy, Environment and Education (TREE)Peter Javorčík networks, union, , and / initiatives.
Communication and Information (COMM)Preben Aamann (appointed January 2025)Press relations, public information, and multimedia strategy for activities.
Translation Service (LING)Máire KilloranMultilingual drafting and translation of documents in all 24 EU official languages.
Organisational Development and Services (ORG)Cesare Onestini, , facilities, and administrative efficiency.
Digital Services (SMART)Sven Egyedy, cybersecurity, and of processes.
These directorates operate from the Council's premises in , with some specialized units like the Legal Service maintaining a presence in for Court of Justice proximity. Their work emphasizes neutrality and expertise, drawing on seconded national officials and career civil servants to bridge interests and EU-level . Periodic reorganizations, such as the addition of digital-focused units post-2020, adapt to evolving priorities like cybersecurity and remote deliberation capabilities.

Operational Mechanisms

Policy Development and Implementation

Directorates-General (DGs) within the serve as the primary administrative units responsible for initiating, drafting, and advancing policy proposals across specific sectors, drawing from the political priorities set by the College of Commissioners. Each DG, headed by a Director-General, conducts in-depth analysis, stakeholder consultations, and impact assessments to formulate initiatives that align with treaties and objectives, such as sustainable growth or regional cohesion. For instance, the Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN) contributes to policies promoting fiscal stability and inclusive economic expansion by analyzing macroeconomic data and recommending adjustments to EU-wide frameworks like the . These proposals are then submitted to the Commission for endorsement before transmission to the and for co-decision under the ordinary legislative procedure. In the implementation phase, DGs oversee the execution of EU legislation and funding programs, often in coordination with member states, to translate policies into tangible outcomes. This includes direct management through executive agencies for tasks like research funding under , managed by the Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, which disbursed €95.5 billion from 2021 to 2027 to support innovation-driven growth. For shared management, prevalent in areas like cohesion policy, DGs allocate resources—such as the €392 billion from the 2021-2027 for regional development—and monitor compliance via audits and performance reports, intervening with infringement proceedings if member states deviate from EU law. The Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy, for example, implements these by approving operational programs and evaluating their impact on reducing disparities, with tools like the supporting over 1,000 projects annually as of 2023. DG-led implementation emphasizes evidence-based adjustments through ongoing evaluation cycles, incorporating feedback from expert groups and public consultations to refine policies mid-term. In international dimensions, DGs like International Partnerships ensure policy rollout via partnerships, managing €79.5 billion in external aid from 2021-2027 to align with EU goals. This process, while decentralized to leverage national expertise, relies on DG enforcement powers, with the initiating over 1,000 infringement cases yearly to uphold uniform application across the 27 member states. Challenges arise from varying national capacities, prompting DGs to deploy technical assistance and digital monitoring platforms for real-time oversight.

Coordination and Inter-Institutional Relations

The coordination among the European Commission's Directorates-General (DGs) relies on structured mechanisms to ensure policy coherence and alignment with the Commission's strategic priorities, with the Secretariat-General () serving as the central steering body. The SG oversees the integration of DG inputs to avoid fragmentation, facilitating horizontal coordination across policy areas such as economic , environmental standards, and . This involves monitoring DG compliance with the President's political guidelines and resolving inter-DG disputes through advisory roles rather than hierarchical authority. A key operational tool is the inter-service consultation (ISC) process, formalized under the 's Rules of Procedure adopted on 4 2024, where the lead DG drafts proposals and circulates them to other DGs and services for comments within specified deadlines, typically 8 to 10 weeks. This mandatory consultation incorporates expertise from multiple DGs—such as DG Environment reviewing climate impacts in trade proposals from DG Trade—to refine initiatives before submission to the College of Commissioners, thereby embedding cross-policy considerations like and . In practice, ISCs have processed thousands of documents annually, with the acting as a to enforce deadlines and mediate disagreements, as evidenced by procedural data from Commission working methods. In inter-institutional relations, DGs extend coordination beyond the by providing substantive support during the legislative cycle, particularly under the ordinary legislative procedure outlined in Article 294 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the . Lead DGs prepare detailed impact assessments and explanatory memoranda accompanying proposals, which are then negotiated between the and ; DGs supply technical briefings to parliamentary committees and participate indirectly in trilogues to defend or amend positions based on evidence. For instance, DG Competition has engaged extensively in such processes for merger regulations, responding to over 500 parliamentary queries in 2023 alone. Implementation phases further involve DGs in ongoing inter-institutional oversight via comitology committees, where DG-proposed implementing acts are scrutinized by member state experts before adoption, ensuring delegated powers remain accountable to the and under Regulations (EU) No 182/2011. The SG complements this by guiding DG strategies in inter-institutional forums, such as coordinating responses to Parliament resolutions, to maintain institutional balance while advancing supranational objectives. This framework, while effective for consensus-building, has faced scrutiny for potential delays in ISC timelines averaging 12-15 weeks in complex cases, per procedural analyses.

Criticisms and Controversies

Bureaucratic Expansion and Inefficiency Claims

Critics of the European Commission's structure contend that the of Directorates-General (DGs) exemplifies bureaucratic expansion, enabling supranational institutions to encroach on competencies through specialized policy silos. The Commission currently operates DGs, each handling delineated portfolios under commissioners, a figure that has grown alongside enlargements and new competencies like digital regulation and green transition policies introduced in recent mandates. This organizational fragmentation, while intended to enhance expertise, has been linked by analysts to "supranational ," where bureaucratic growth—measured by and structural —drives policy scope beyond limits, with historical data showing steady increases in administrative units from the onward despite formal staff caps. Claims of inefficiency stem from documented inter-DG rivalries, where competition for budgets and influence results in duplicated efforts and suboptimal decision-making. For instance, overlapping mandates between DGs such as Education and Culture (DG EAC) and Employment and Social Affairs (DG EMPL) foster internal turf battles that prioritize departmental expansion over coordinated outcomes, as evidenced in case studies of policy competition within the Commission. Broader assessments describe the EU's administrative apparatus as a "maze of inefficiency" that imposes excessive procedural layers, stifling business productivity and innovation through regulatory overload, with the Commission's output of directives and regulations exacerbating compliance costs estimated in billions annually for member states and firms. Although official staff figures declined gradually post-2010 to around 32,758 by 2024 after peaking near 2007 amid eastern enlargements, critics argue this masks qualitative expansion via outsourced agencies and delegated tasks, sustaining high operational costs—over €10 billion in administrative expenditure yearly—without proportional efficiency gains.646150_EN.pdf) Such critiques, often from free-market oriented think tanks and academic observers, highlight causal links between bureaucratic scale and reduced agility, positing that DG specialization incentivizes rather than streamlined governance. European state inefficiencies, including those in the , are viewed as symptomatic of over-centralization, where formal structures fail to curb goal divergence among officials, leading to protracted processes and suboptimal resource use. Empirical evaluations, including panel studies on reforms, underscore that EU-level correlates with slower reform implementation in member states, attributing this to layered and points inherent in the DG model. Proponents of restraint, including national governments skeptical of further , cite these dynamics to advocate staff and DG rationalization, though responses emphasize functional necessities tied to obligations.

Supranational Authority and Sovereignty Concerns

The Directorates-General (DGs) within the exercise supranational authority as delineated in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), particularly in areas of exclusive EU competence such as , competition rules, and common commercial policy, where member states have ceded direct control. For example, DG Trade conducts negotiations for trade agreements that bind all 27 member states without requiring unanimous national ratification post-Lisbon Treaty, while DG levies fines exceeding €10 billion cumulatively on firms for violations, often superseding national antitrust decisions. DG enforces directives like the network, mandating land-use restrictions across borders that national governments must implement under penalty of infringement proceedings. These powers, delegated voluntarily through treaty ratification, enable DGs to prioritize EU-wide objectives over disparate national priorities, fostering integration but raising questions of causal overreach in non-exclusive domains like and . Sovereignty concerns center on the democratic deficit inherent in DG operations, as the 's 32,000 staff, including DG civil servants, operate without direct election or national parliamentary oversight, yet shape 80% of economic regulations in member states via the ordinary legislative procedure where the Commission holds exclusive initiative. Eurosceptic critiques, echoed in analyses from institutions like the , contend this bureaucratic supranationalism erodes national autonomy by circumventing elected governments, exemplified by the 2024 farmer protests across , , , and other states against DG CLIMA and DG AGRI policies under the Green Deal and (CAP), which impose pesticide reductions and fallow land quotas costing farmers an estimated €1 billion annually in compliance. Protesters, representing groups like the French FNSEA and German DBV, argued these uniform rules ignored local soil and market variances, prompting concessions such as a one-year exemption from 4% fallow requirements on 2024. Such episodes illustrate how DG-driven harmonization can impose economic costs—CAP subsidies totaling €58 billion in 2023 often condition payments on supranational sustainability criteria—fueling perceptions of dilution without proportional national veto mechanisms. Heightened tensions manifest in rule-of-law enforcement, where DGs like JUST and assess compliance and trigger financial sanctions, as in the 2022-2023 withholding of €22 billion in cohesion funds from over judicial reforms deemed to undermine . 's subsequent 2023 Sovereignty Protection Law, empowering investigations into foreign-funded political activities, drew an infringement referral from the to the Court of in October 2024, with DG JUST citing violations of EU Charter rights to free association and data protection. Hungarian Prime Minister characterized this as supranational intrusion into sovereign electoral integrity, arguing it weaponizes DG evaluations—conducted by Brussels-based experts—to impose ideological conformity, a view supported by observations of similar pressures on pre-2023 elections. These disputes underscore broader causal realism critiques: while treaties authorize DG enforcement to uphold mutual trust in the , empirical patterns of fund suspensions (e.g., €6.3 billion frozen from in 2022) reveal potential for politicized application, eroding trust in EU institutions and prompting sovereignty reclamation efforts like 's law, which mirrors measures in non-EU states. Empirical assessments, including German Federal Constitutional Court rulings limiting EU fiscal transfers to preserve budgetary sovereignty, highlight risks of "competence creep" where DG policies expand beyond treaty confines via secondary legislation. In Brexit discourse, UK advocates cited DG influences—such as fisheries quotas under DG MARE reducing British catches by 20% post-1973 accession—as emblematic of accumulated sovereignty loss, with referendums reflecting public preference for repatriation over supranational delegation. Despite these concerns, DG defenders emphasize output legitimacy through measurable integration benefits, though source analyses from Eurosceptic-leaning outlets note systemic biases in pro-integration academia underestimating accountability gaps.

Accountability and Corruption Perceptions

The European Commission's Directorates-General (DGs) operate under the collective responsibility of the College of , with each DG headed by a Director-General accountable to their respective Commissioner for and administrative decisions. Commissioners undergo parliamentary hearings and can face censure motions from the , providing indirect oversight of DG activities, though day-to-day operations rely on internal audits and the Commission's ethical standards framework. The (OLAF), established by the Commission, conducts independent investigations into , , and misconduct within EU institutions, including DGs, with powers to recommend disciplinary actions and recoveries; in 2024, OLAF finalized probes into cases like the Slovak "Dobytkár" stock-breeder , contributing to €4.5 billion recovered over three years from prior investigations. Despite these mechanisms, perceptions of in EU executive functions remain elevated, with surveys indicating that 69% of EU citizens in 2025 viewed as widespread nationally, often extending skepticism to supranational bodies due to their remoteness from voters. Transparency International's 2021 for the EU highlighted concerns over elite influence, ranking business executives and national politicians highly corrupt in public views, with revolving-door transitions from roles to positions cited as eroding trust. Specific cases, such as former President Barroso's 2016 appointment at , have fueled revolving-door criticisms, prompting calls for stricter post-mandate restrictions, though enforcement varies and transparency on individual bans remains limited. Recent analyses point to persistent impunity perceptions, including opaque procurement in vaccine contracts under Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and alleged misuse of €2.6 billion annually on Green Deal advocacy studies, as documented in 2025 investigations, underscoring gaps between formal accountability and public confidence. The Western Europe and EU regional average on Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index fell to 64 in 2024, reflecting stagnant anti-corruption efforts amid scandals, with only 21% of citizens believing officials face adequate penalties. While OLAF's recoveries demonstrate operational efficacy, structural critiques argue that the Commission's delegation of investigative powers to itself limits external scrutiny, contributing to a "hollow" accountability regime as noted in policy analyses.

Empirical Impact and Assessments

Measurable Achievements and Outputs

The Directorates-General of the generate measurable outputs through legislative proposals, enforcement actions, budget execution, and policy implementation, as documented in their Annual Activity Reports (AARs). In 2024, the Commission as a whole managed a budget exceeding €180 billion, with DGs executing commitments and payments across sectors; for example, DG Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs (GROW) committed €420.4 million and paid €222.13 million, supporting integration initiatives. Enforcement outputs included 129 infringement decisions adopted by DG GROW to address non-compliance with EU law, alongside handling 3,339 SOLVIT cases with a 77% resolution rate, facilitating problem-solving for citizens and businesses in cross-border issues. DG Informatics (DIGIT) delivered 43 of 57 planned outputs in 2024, including the launch of the GPT@EC AI platform and expansion of the Hermes-Ares-NomCom to the , while recording 913 reuse cases on the Reusable Solutions Platform against a target of 210. Key performance indicators for included 94% end-user satisfaction with the digital workplace and a residual error rate of 0.5%, below the 2% target, reflecting effective IT governance and cybersecurity implementation under Regulation (EU, ) 2023/2841. Similarly, DG GROW tracked metrics such as a of 0.9% and 57.7% digital intensity among SMEs, indicating progress in regulatory alignment despite ongoing challenges like infringement procedure durations averaging 42.3 months against an 18-month target. Across DGs, outputs contribute to broader goals, such as the adoption of 12 sanctions packages against by December 2023 under DG Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union (FISMA), and advancements in the , including revisions to systems finalized in 2023. These metrics, derived from official AARs and performance reports, provide empirical evidence of operational delivery, though effectiveness varies by policy area and is subject to co-legislator approval and external implementation by member states.

Evaluations of Effectiveness and Economic Costs

The General Secretariat of the (GSC) operates under Section II of the EU budget, allocated €715.9 million for 2025, representing approximately 0.37% of the total EU commitments budget of €192.8 billion. This funding covers administrative functions for both the and the , with 66.3% (€474.5 million) dedicated to staffing, 15.1% to meetings, interpreting, and travel, 8.4% to buildings and infrastructure, 8.6% to IT and equipment, and 1.6% to other operations. As of February 2024, the GSC employed 3,147 staff members, comprising 2,490 officials, 405 temporary staff, 225 contract agents, and 27 seconded experts. Staffing costs equate to roughly €150,800 per employee annually, encompassing salaries, pensions, and related benefits under the 's staff regulations, which provide competitive, largely tax-exempt averaging €80,000–€120,000 gross for mid-level administrators. These figures contribute to broader critiques of EU administrative expenditure, which totals around €11 billion yearly across institutions, often viewed as elevated compared to equivalent bureaucracies due to supranational overheads like multilingual operations and Brussels-based . Evaluations of the GSC's effectiveness remain limited and predominantly qualitative, with no comprehensive independent performance audits identified from bodies like the , which focuses more on financial regularity than administrative efficiency in Section II. Official assessments emphasize the GSC's role in facilitating decision-making, such as coordinating working parties and ensuring policy consistency, but empirical metrics tying Secretariat inputs to legislative outputs—e.g., via decision timelines or success rates—are scarce. Academic analyses highlight variability in influence, attributing stronger performance in intergovernmental areas (e.g., ) to expertise accumulation, yet inefficiencies arise from frequent priority shifts and fragmented member state inputs, potentially delaying policy cycles. Critics, including policy analysts, argue that the GSC's expansion—staff growth paralleling EU enlargement—has not proportionally enhanced outputs, fostering perceptions of bureaucratic amid high fixed costs, though proponents counter that cost controls, such as zero-nominal growth targets in recent budgets, maintain fiscal . Causal assessments are challenged by confounding factors like geopolitical events influencing agendas, underscoring a need for more rigorous, data-driven benchmarks beyond self-reported efficiencies from EU institutions, which may underplay systemic rigidities due to entrenched interests.

References

  1. [1]
    Organisation - European Commission
    The Commission is organised into policy departments, known as Directorates-General (DGs), which are responsible for different policy areas. DGs develop, ...College of Commissioners · Commission staff · President Ursula von der Leyen
  2. [2]
    Rules of procedure of the European Commission | EUR-Lex
    The organisational structure is composed of a number of Directorates-General (DGs) and other Commission services. ... Council Regulation (EU) 2016/300 of ...
  3. [3]
    Directors-General - consilium.europa.eu - European Union
    The Directors-General are in charge of management and development of services, or policy areas of the various Council configurations.
  4. [4]
    Directorates-General | The Secretary-General | European Parliament
    The Secretary-General is responsible for the organisation of parliamentary business under the political leadership of the European Parliament President.
  5. [5]
    European Commission – what it does | European Union
    The European Commission is the EU's politically independent executive arm. It is alone responsible for drawing up proposals for new European legislation.Composition · How does the Commission... · The European Commission...
  6. [6]
    DG for External Policies of the Union | The Secretary-General
    The Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union is responsible for organising the work of Parliament's committees and interparliamentary delegations.
  7. [7]
    DG for Communication | The Secretary-General | European Parliament
    The Directorate-General for Communication (DG COMM) communicates the political nature of the institution and the work carried out by its Members.
  8. [8]
    European organisations - CVCE Website
    From 1960, the departments of the High Authority were structured into directorates-general, in the same way as the EEC Commission, whose Rules of Procedure set ...
  9. [9]
    The European Commission 1958-72 - Publications Office of the EU
    May 2, 2014 · The Commission set itself up for business on 1 January 1958 in Brussels with an agenda covering all areas of the economic life of the six founder countries.Missing: structure directorates
  10. [10]
    The European Commission 1973-86 - Publications Office of the EU
    May 6, 2014 · The 13 years which saw the enlargements of the European Communities to include Denmark, Ireland and the United Kingdom on 1 January 1973.
  11. [11]
    The Institutional Terrain of the European Union
    Groups interested in environmental issues would be naturally led to Directorate General XI, the Commission's directorate for the environment. But groups' ...
  12. [12]
    History of the EU - AB Başkanlığı
    1980s: Southern Enlargement of the Community. The Community expanded southwards with the accession of Greece in 1981, followed by Spain and Portugal in 1986.
  13. [13]
    Restructuring of DG XII and DG XIII - CORDIS - European Union
    Nov 17, 2022 · The Commission decided on 15.07.1992 to undertake a major restructuring of Directorates-General XII and XIII and to reform administrative procedures.
  14. [14]
    The Commission approves its Reform Strategy
    Feb 29, 2000 · The European Commission today approved the most far-reaching modernisation strategy in its 40-year history. This detailed design for Reform is ...Missing: present | Show results with:present
  15. [15]
    The administrative reform trajectory of the European Commission in ...
    May 13, 2013 · This contribution aims at explaining how the “unique” politico-administrative context of the European Union affected the trajectory of reform of ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Pragmatism Prevails: Barroso's European Commission
    Nov 22, 2004 · The Strategy adopted by the Barroso Commission becomes feasible only as a consequence of the administrative and institutional reforms pursued.
  17. [17]
    [PDF] EU development cooperation after the Lisbon Treaty - ECDPM
    All country and regional desks of the different Commission directorate generals have been moved to the EEAS. 5 In terms of development cooperation, the split ...
  18. [18]
    The long and winding road towards the EU policy of support to ...
    Sep 30, 2022 · Through the TSI, the Commission provides expertise on how to carry out reforms, which can take the form of strategic or technical advice, ...<|separator|>
  19. [19]
    The impact of Juncker's reorganization of the European Commission ...
    Feb 7, 2018 · The impact of Juncker's reorganization of the European Commission on the internal policy-making process: Evidence from the Energy Union project.
  20. [20]
    The von der Leyen Commission 2.0: Institutional Features, Portfolios ...
    Nov 4, 2024 · von der Leyen's Commission 2.0 consolidates power through a streamlined, centralised structure with six Executive Vice-Presidents, aiming for a more responsive ...
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
    [PDF] EU WHOISWHO OFFICIAL DIRECTORY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
    Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union ... DG ECHO — Directorate-General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid.
  23. [23]
    The European Commission appoints two Director-Generals and two ...
    Today, the European Commission has decided to appoint Mr Gerassimos Thomas as new Director-General in DG Taxation and Customs Union (TAXUD) and Ms Florika Fink ...
  24. [24]
    Ongoing recruitment of Director-General for Enlargement raises ...
    Jan 21, 2022 · The selection procedure for the new Director-General for Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations at the European Commission is ongoing.
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Appointment procedures in the EU institutions - European Parliament
    Feb 28, 2019 · This analytical study focuses on the legal and practical/ethical dimensions of the appointment of senior-level officials in the European Union ( ...
  26. [26]
    Commission staff
    Around 32,000 permanent and contract employees work in the Commission. These include policy officers, researchers, lawyers and translators.
  27. [27]
  28. [28]
    Development Co-operation Profiles: European Union institutions
    Jun 11, 2025 · DG INTPA has 3 600 staff, 1 250 (34.7%) of which are based in Brussels and 2 350 (65.3%) of which are in delegations in non-EU countries. DG ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  29. [29]
    Directorate-general - The Penguin Companion to European Union
    A directorate-general (DG) is the main administrative unit to be found within the principal European Union institutions.
  30. [30]
    internal reorganization approved for more agile operation
    The European Commission has officially approved the internal reorganization that defines the future DG Research and Innovation (DG RTD).<|separator|>
  31. [31]
    Secretariat-General - European Commission
    The Secretariat-General is responsible for the overall coherence of the Commission's work – both in shaping new policies, and in steering them through the other ...Protocol Service · Data protection notices · Mission statement of the...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  32. [32]
    Organisation - The Secretary-General | European Parliament
    It is composed of horizontal units which provide expertise and services to Members, Parliament governing bodies and the whole administration. The Directorate ...
  33. [33]
    Secretariat - European Parliament
    The Secretariat's task is to coordinate legislative work and organise plenary sittings and meetings. It also provides technical and expert assistance.
  34. [34]
    Directorate-General for Cohesion, Agriculture and Social Policies
    The Directorate-General for Cohesion, Agriculture and Social Policies is responsible for supporting the work of parliamentary committees in the fields of ...Missing: roles | Show results with:roles
  35. [35]
    DG for Finance | The Secretary-General | European Parliament
    The main tasks of the Directorate-General for Finance are: drawing up Parliament's budget, supervising its implementation, accompanying the discharge procedure, ...
  36. [36]
    Directorate-General for the Presidency - EU Whoiswho
    Directorate-General for the Presidency. European Union > European Parliament > Secretariat-General of the European Parliament > Directorate-General for the ...
  37. [37]
    DG for Parliamentary Research Services | The Secretary-General
    Directorate-General for Parliamentary Research Services · The DG's four Directorates provide the following services to Members, parliamentary committees and the ...Missing: list | Show results with:list
  38. [38]
    DG for Infrastructure and Logistics | The Secretary-General
    The Directorate-General for Infrastructure and Logistics is responsible for managing infrastructure and logistics in Parliament's various places of work.Missing: structure | Show results with:structure
  39. [39]
    DG for Logistics and Interpretation for Conferences
    The Directorate-General for Logistics and Interpretation for Conferences (DG LINC) is the multilingual conference service hub of the European Parliament.The Following Services Fall... · Directorate For Operational... · Directorate For Conference...Missing: structure | Show results with:structure
  40. [40]
    [PDF] gsc-organisation-chart-en.pdf - consilium.europa.eu
    Oct 16, 2025 · Directorates-General and Services. GSC.DTO. Digital Transformation ... Staffing and Mobility. Gordana MLACAK. ORG.1.F. Legal Advisers to the.<|separator|>
  41. [41]
    The General Secretariat of the Council - consilium.europa.eu
    The General Secretariat of the Council (GSC) is the body of staff responsible for assisting 2 EU institutions: the European Council; the Council of the EU, ...Directors-General · Secretary-General · The GSC's staff and budget · Traineeships
  42. [42]
    New Director-General appointed in the Council's General Secretariat
    Jan 21, 2025 · Today, the Council appointed Preben Aamann as the new Director-General for Communication and Information (COMM).<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    Regional and Urban Policy - European Commission
    The Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy develops and implements the Commission's policies on regions and cities.
  44. [44]
    The role of the European Commission's Directorate General for ...
    Sep 3, 2021 · The department contributes to the development of policies that are geared towards sustainable and inclusive economic growth while preserving ...
  45. [45]
    Policy, law – decision-making process | European Union
    EU policies are typically decided through the ordinary legislative procedure, a process where the three main institutions come to agreement on legislation.
  46. [46]
    About - European Commission
    Policy departments, known as Directorates-General, responsible for different policy areas. They develop, implement and manage EU policy, law, and funding ...Contact · In international relations · In budget and funding · In law
  47. [47]
    Research and Innovation - European Commission
    The Directorate-General is leading the Commission's work to develop an EU start-up and scale-up strategy that will improve the framework conditions for ...
  48. [48]
    Simplification and Implementation - European Commission
    The Commission works closely with Member States to help them implement EU law and policies, using a wide array of tools ranging from meetings-based tools to ...
  49. [49]
    International Partnerships - European Commission
    Leadership and organisation ; Commissioner. Jozef Síkela ; Director-General. Koen Doens ; Deputy Director-General. Marjeta Jager ; Deputy Director-General. Martin ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Commission Decision (EU) 2024/3080 of 4 December ... - EUR-Lex
    Dec 4, 2024 · The formal interservice consultation procedure shall ... Directorate-General or service responsible for the document within the Commission.
  51. [51]
    [PDF] EN EN - European Commission
    Dec 1, 2024 · The Commissioner for Implementation and Simplification will validate exemptions from impact assessments, stakeholders' consultations 'and the.
  52. [52]
    Full article: Patterns of coordination in the European Commission
    Sep 28, 2021 · The ISC is a formalised procedure in which a Directorate General (DG) that is in charge of developing a given Commission proposal (the 'lead DG') ...
  53. [53]
    Interinstitutional negotiations | Ordinary Legislative Procedure
    Interinstitutional negotiations have become standard practice for the adoption of EU legislation. They enable the co-legislators to reach agreement at any ...
  54. [54]
    Directorate General, DG - EUabc.com
    The EU Commission is composed of 33 Directorate Generals. Each is headed by a Director General under the responsibility of a Commissioner and deals with a ...
  55. [55]
    The Bureaucratic Growth of the European Union - ResearchGate
    Aug 7, 2025 · This article explores supranational activism on the example of bureaucratic growth in the institutions of the EU - operationalised as the number ...Missing: Directorate- | Show results with:Directorate-
  56. [56]
    Education, employment, and bureaucratic competition inside the ...
    Sep 1, 2023 · There is intense competition between different Directorate Generals (DGs) inside the European Commission which all aim to increase their budgets and power.Missing: staff growth
  57. [57]
    Europe's Misguided Obsession with Bureaucracy | - ECIPE
    Nov 21, 2024 · Member States must take the lead. Citizens and businesses across the EU face a maze of inefficiency that stifles productivity and innovation.
  58. [58]
    The European state has become a modern Leviathan - LSE Blogs
    Feb 11, 2019 · The inefficiencies attributed to the EU bureaucracy are but an indicator of the larger problems that befall the modern European state. In many ...
  59. [59]
    Reforming the public administration: The role of crisis and
    This study explores the determinants of efficiency enhancing public administration reforms for a panel of EU countries using a novel reform indicator.
  60. [60]
  61. [61]
    The European Union: A Critical Assessment | Cato Institute
    Jun 22, 2016 · While lacking sovereign power, the EU has its own flag, anthem, currency, president (five of them, actually), and a diplomatic service. Today, ...
  62. [62]
    European farmer protests risk eroding the climate agenda | PIIE
    Mar 11, 2024 · Thousands of tractors are blocking the streets in capital cities across Europe as farmers protest against EU policies on climate change and the influx of ...
  63. [63]
    European farmers step up protests against costs, green rules - Reuters
    Jan 31, 2024 · The Commission also proposed exempting farmers for 2024 from a requirement to keep a minimum share of their land fallow while still ...
  64. [64]
    The limits of EU rule of law financial sanctions: how economic and ...
    The European Union's unprecedented financial sanctions against Hungary in 2022-2023, namely the freezing of 22 billion euros in cohesion funds and 5.8 ...
  65. [65]
    Commission decides to refer HUNGARY to the Court of Justice
    Oct 2, 2024 · On 12 December 2023 the Hungarian National Assembly adopted the Defence of Sovereignty Law empowering a new Office to carry out investigations ...Missing: dispute | Show results with:dispute
  66. [66]
    EU sues Hungary over its national law on defence of sovereignty
    Oct 3, 2024 · The European Commission said on Thursday it was suing Hungary over a law that imposes jail terms for groups that accept foreign funds for ...
  67. [67]
    The anatomy of the EU's farm policy crisis - GIS Reports
    May 1, 2024 · Protesting farmers argue that producers outside Europe do not have to follow strict EU regulations and usually employ much less expensive labor, ...
  68. [68]
    Constitutional complaints challenging the Act Ratifying the EU Own ...
    Dec 6, 2022 · With a judgment pronounced today, the Second Senate of the Federal Constitutional Court rejected two constitutional complaints directed against ...<|separator|>
  69. [69]
    1 Supranational State Building in the European Union
    sovereignty imbues states with the meta-political authority to decide which issues, activities, and practices fall within their authority realm—the ...
  70. [70]
    OLAF home - European Anti-Fraud Office - European Commission
    OLAF investigates fraud against the EU budget, corruption and serious misconduct within the European institutions, and develops anti-fraud policy for the ...Investigations · What we do · About us · Contacts
  71. [71]
    The OLAF report 2024: Home - European Commission
    In 2024, OLAF closed its final investigations into the so-called stock breeder corruption scandal. Read more about our role in uncovering €10 million of bribes ...
  72. [72]
    Citizens' attitudes towards corruption in the EU in 2025
    69% of Europeans believe that corruption is widespread in their country. 51% believe that corruption is widespread among political parties. EU citizens widely ...
  73. [73]
    [PDF] global corruption barometer european union 2021 - citizens' views ...
    Jun 14, 2021 · Business executives and bankers almost tie with national politicians as the most corrupt institutions, and EU residents are concerned about the ...
  74. [74]
    [PDF] Rules on 'revolving doors' in the EU - European Parliament
    Recent cases of revolving doors have stimulated some media attention and sparked reproach. A notable recent case was that of José Manuel Barroso, the former ...
  75. [75]
    'Corrosive': Commission rejects greater revolving doors transparency
    Sep 25, 2024 · The European Commission says it won't immediately publish details of the restrictions placed on Henrik Morch, whose move earlier this year from its antitrust ...
  76. [76]
    How the EU always gets away with it - Politico.eu
    May 28, 2025 · And both of those “have been wracked by impunity and corruption allegations in recent years. ... One of the biggest scandals the Commission ...
  77. [77]
    The European Commission Faces Its Biggest Scandal in 20 Years
    Oct 18, 2025 · Every year, €2.6 billion was spent on questionable studies designed to justify the necessity of the Green Deal. It is hardly surprising that ...
  78. [78]
    CPI 2024 for Western Europe & EU: Leaders' hollow efforts cause…
    Feb 11, 2025 · The Western Europe and European Union (EU) regional average on the Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) has dropped for the second consecutive year to 64 out of ...
  79. [79]
    EU must choose: Strong anti-corruption rules or business as usual -…
    Jun 2, 2025 · According to Transparency International's research, only 21 per cent of people believe that officials face appropriate penalties for corruption ...
  80. [80]
    [PDF] The Illusion of Accountability in the European Union - OAPEN Library
    There are widespread and growing concerns that the political system of the EU does not, in fact, afford citizens appropriate mechanisms of accountability. ( ...
  81. [81]
    The EU has an accountability problem. Doubling down on ethics can ...
    Mar 8, 2024 · The Commission actually names transparency and ethical behaviour as two of its guiding principles. Then there's the European Parliament, whose ...
  82. [82]
    [PDF] Annual Activity Report 2024 - European Commission
    Mar 31, 2025 · In the DG GROW Strategic Plan 2020-2024 three key Performance Indicators (KPIs) were chosen among the result indicators as the most relevant ...
  83. [83]
    [PDF] Annual Activity Report 2024 - European Commission
    Mar 31, 2025 · (4) For the purpose of this report 'Commission departments' refers to Directorates-General (DG) and other organisational entities of the ...Missing: measurable | Show results with:measurable
  84. [84]
    Policy making achievements & milestones 2019-2024 - Finance
    Adoption. 18 December 2023. Sanctions against Russia: 12 package · Political agreement. 13-14 December 2023. Review of the insurance rules · Political agreement.
  85. [85]
    Annual management and performance reports
    Dec 7, 2016 · Every year the Commission produces a report on the results achieved with the EU budget and how the previous year's budget was managed.Missing: measurable outputs
  86. [86]
    The GSC's staff and budget - consilium.europa.eu - European Union
    The General Secretariat employs 3147 staff: officials, temporary and contract staff and seconded national experts: 2490 officials; 405 temporary staff ...
  87. [87]
    Do EU Officials Pay Tax? Salaries, Benefits, and EU Career ...
    Aug 1, 2025 · Senior Officials AD 10–15 €10,000–€16,000+. Even after deductions, that leaves most EU staff with a strong net salary, especially when you ...
  88. [88]
    European Union cost - Guida all'Europrogettazione
    European Union interventions, in member states and around the world, are managed by an administrative structure that “costs” 11 billion a year.
  89. [89]
    European Court of Auditors – Our activities in 2024
    May 5, 2025 · This report provides a thorough overview of our activities and publications in 2024, detailing information about our management, staff, and audit support ...
  90. [90]
    One EU civil service or many? The European Commission and the ...
    Nov 14, 2024 · Presenting analysis based on data from the European Commission and the General Secretariat of the Council – two parts of the EU administration, ...
  91. [91]
    [PDF] "Reforming the EU Institutions - Challenges for the Council"
    According to de Boissieu, Deputy Secretary General of the Council, it is at the basis of inefficiency and ever changing priorities.
  92. [92]
    [PDF] 013300/EU XXVIII. GP - Parlament
    Mar 4, 2025 · The GSC is planning to absorb these significant projects in its normal budget, despite the abovementioned constraints, resulting in zero-growth ...<|separator|>