Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Horizon Europe

Horizon Europe is the European Union's flagship funding programme for research and innovation, spanning 2021 to 2027 with a total budget of €95.5 billion, including €5.4 billion from the NextGenerationEU recovery instrument. Successor to Horizon 2020, it structures its investments across three core pillars—Excellent Science to advance frontier research and talent development, Global Challenges and European Industrial Competitiveness to address societal priorities like health, climate, and digital transformation through collaborative clusters, and Innovative Europe to scale breakthroughs via the European Innovation Council and support for market-creating innovations—supplemented by mission-driven initiatives targeting tangible outcomes in areas such as cancer eradication, ocean sustainability, and climate resilience. The programme aims to strengthen Europe's knowledge base, enhance competitiveness amid global rivalries, and contribute to United Nations Sustainable Development Goals by fostering public-private partnerships, widening participation from underrepresented regions, and enabling strategic international associations, though implementation has faced scrutiny for bureaucratic complexities and tensions between open collaboration and geopolitical safeguards like "open strategic autonomy." Notable characteristics include its emphasis on impact measurement, with early evaluations indicating high leverage effects—up to €11 in economic returns per euro invested—and a push for simplification in future iterations amid calls to resist budget reallocations that could undermine core scientific priorities.

Background and History

Predecessors and Evolution from Horizon 2020

The European Union's Framework Programmes for Research and Technological Development originated in 1984 with the first programme (FP1), spanning 1984–1987 and focusing on collaborative research in areas such as and , with a modest budget of €3.8 billion across subsequent iterations up to FP7 (2007–2013). These early programmes emphasized multi-annual funding for transnational cooperation, evolving from ad hoc initiatives without strong basis to structured instruments supporting the Research Area, with FP7 allocating €50.5 billion to priorities including , , and . Horizon 2020, the immediate predecessor and effectively the eighth framework programme, operated from 2014 to 2020 with a budget of €77 billion (in 2014 prices), streamlining previous structures into three pillars: Excellent Science, Industrial Leadership, and Societal Challenges, while prioritizing job creation, competitiveness, and addressing grand societal issues like and secure societies. Empirical evaluations of Horizon 2020 revealed tangible economic impacts, particularly for participating firms, which experienced an average 20% increase in employment and 30% growth in revenues and total assets relative to non-funded counterparts, based on counterfactual analyses of grant recipients. Overall, the programme contributed to a net employment gain of approximately 220,000 jobs across the EU, alongside advancements in innovation outputs such as patents and collaborations, though success rates for high-quality proposals averaged only 26%, leading to €159 billion in underfunding for rejected projects. Critics, including research universities, highlighted relative underfunding of basic research under the Excellent Science pillar, which received about 30% of the budget despite its role in frontier discoveries, prompting calls for better balance against applied priorities. These outcomes established a performance baseline, demonstrating the programmes' capacity to drive firm-level growth while exposing gaps in funding adequacy and strategic focus. Horizon Europe represents an evolutionary extension rather than a departure, with a €95.5 billion budget for 2021–2027 that builds on Horizon 2020's pillars by enhancing the for investigator-driven research, introducing five targeted missions (e.g., cancer, adaptation) to concentrate efforts on measurable breakthroughs, and formalizing European Partnerships for co-programmed public-private collaboration to boost industrial competitiveness. This shift addresses Horizon 2020's criticisms by allocating more to excellent science (up to 35% indirectly through instruments) and emphasizing , simplification of grant processes, and alignment with EU goals like the Green Deal, while maintaining continuity in transnational cooperation to amplify impacts beyond national efforts. The evolution reflects lessons from interim evaluations, prioritizing higher success rates for top proposals and reduced administrative burdens to sustain momentum in research excellence amid global competition.

Establishment and Launch (2021)

Horizon Europe was formally established through Regulation (EU) 2021/695, adopted by the and on 28 2021, which laid down the framework programme for and from 2021 to 2027, including rules for participation, , and . The regulation applied retroactively from 1 January 2021 to ensure continuity from Horizon 2020, with the programme designed to enhance the EU's global competitiveness in amid intensifying rivalry from the and , where R&D investments significantly outpace Europe's. This causal emphasis stemmed from assessments highlighting Europe's lag in R&D intensity, prompting a strategic focus on breakthrough to address geopolitical and economic pressures. The programme's launch proceeded with the European Research Council issuing its first calls under Horizon Europe in February 2021, including the Starting Grants on 25 February with a €619 million budget and deadline of 8 April, marking an early operational rollout despite the pending full regulation. The main work programme for 2021-2022 was adopted on 16 June 2021, allocating €14.7 billion across priorities like digital transformation and green transition, with broader calls opening on 22 June via the EU Funding and Tenders Portal. This initial setup integrated with the EU's post-COVID recovery strategy under NextGenerationEU, reinforcing research funding to accelerate innovation in recovery-relevant areas, though specific additions like programme top-ups were managed within the overall Multiannual Financial Framework adjustments. Early challenges included delays in third-country associations, notably the United Kingdom's, where Brexit negotiations stalled participation until an agreement in principle in September 2023, effective from January 2024, disrupting potential UK involvement in 2021 calls and highlighting post-Brexit frictions in EU programme governance. These setbacks underscored the programme's reliance on timely international alignments to maximize collaborative impact, with interim UK researchers accessing funds only through transitional guarantees rather than full association.

Objectives and Strategic Framework

Core Objectives

Horizon Europe's core objectives center on enhancing the Union's scientific and technological foundations to address pressing global challenges, including and crises, while promoting industrial competitiveness and sustainable growth. The program seeks to deliver breakthroughs in and innovation by prioritizing excellence-based mechanisms that support frontier research and collaborative efforts across borders. Official documentation emphasizes fostering a unified Research Area to optimize and accelerate , aiming to position the EU as a global leader in science and technology. A key empirical target is to contribute to elevating EU-wide R&D investment to 3% of GDP, building on prior frameworks like Europe 2020, through targeted public funding that leverages private sector involvement and stimulates broader economic activity. By mid-2025, the program had funded over 15,000 projects with more than €43 billion disbursed, demonstrating rapid scale-up in supporting innovative endeavors. Assessments indicate potential economic multipliers, with projections estimating up to €11 in GDP growth per €1 invested over the long term, derived from modeled impacts on , job creation, and technological . The framework underscores a toward integrated, outcome-focused strategies to ensure causal linkages between investments and tangible societal benefits, such as advancements in green technologies and resilient health systems, while strengthening innovation ecosystems through talent attraction and capacity building. This approach prioritizes measurable impacts over fragmented efforts, with evaluations confirming high success rates in areas like grants, where over 80% of funded projects advance cutting-edge .

Alignment with EU Political Priorities

Horizon Europe's framework is explicitly designed to support key supranational agendas, including the for climate neutrality by 2050, the digital transformation outlined in the Digital Decade strategy, and enhanced resilience following the . The program's strategic orientations prioritize research that accelerates the twin green and digital transitions, with investments aimed at restoring industrial competitiveness and in critical sectors like and . Approximately 35% of the overall budget is committed to climate-related objectives over the program's lifetime, reflecting a deliberate policy-driven allocation to underpin the EU's environmental targets, though this figure encompasses indirect contributions across clusters rather than ring-fenced funding. The first strategic plan for 2021-2024 mirrors the EU's political priorities by defining four orientations: fostering a wide range of knowledge to stop and reverse , strengthening the knowledge base for policy-making on societal transformations, creating a favorable for and , and enhancing the impact of EU-funded . This plan emphasizes alignment with recovery efforts post-COVID, ensuring that research outputs inform EU-level decisions on and digitalization. The subsequent plan for 2025-2027 builds on this by setting three orientations focused on the green transition, digital transition, and resilience against global challenges, including commitments to allocate 10% of the budget to actions. These documents direct funding toward policy-relevant areas, such as building evidence for regulatory frameworks, which integrates scientific inquiry with supranational governance needs. While this alignment positions Horizon Europe as a tool for advancing EU-wide objectives, it has prompted critiques regarding the potential subordination of scientific neutrality to political imperatives. priorities skewed toward net-zero pathways and policies may crowd out market-led innovations in non-favored sectors, as evidenced by resistance in Central and Eastern European states where national energy realities conflict with uniform EU climate mandates. Observers note that tying research agendas to predetermined policy goals risks in grant selection, favoring projects that reinforce institutional narratives over disruptive or inquiries, though empirical assessments of output quality remain limited. Such , while efficient for policy implementation, underscores tensions between centralized EU priorities and decentralized scientific pluralism.

Program Structure

Three Main Pillars

Horizon Europe organizes its funding into three main pillars that form the program's core architecture, each targeting distinct aspects of and to advance the European Union's strategic goals. These pillars allocate resources to foster scientific excellence, tackle pressing global issues, and drive market-oriented , respectively, while integrating cross-cutting priorities such as widening participation across EU regions. Pillar 1: Excellent supports investigator-driven frontier to enhance the EU's competitive edge in basic , emphasizing bottom-up approaches that prioritize and development. It funds mechanisms such as grants for groundbreaking projects, researcher mobility and training, and investments in world-class facilities to sustain Europe's . This pillar received an allocation of €25.8 billion over the 2021-2027 period. Pillar 2: Global Challenges and European Industrial Competitiveness directs resources toward collaborative efforts addressing major societal and industrial priorities through thematic clusters in areas including , , adaptation, and secure societies. It promotes industry-academia partnerships to generate solutions with tangible impacts, incorporating five targeted missions—such as combating cancer, restoring ocean , adapting to , achieving climate neutrality in cities, and supporting healthy soils—to accelerate mission-oriented . The pillar's totals €53.5 billion, reflecting its emphasis on applied, challenge-driven . Pillar 3: Innovative Europe focuses on translating into market-ready innovations, particularly breakthrough technologies, by supporting startups, scale-ups, and innovation ecosystems to bridge the "valley of death" between discovery and commercialization. It enables investments, programs, and knowledge-transfer initiatives to stimulate private-sector involvement and enhance Europe's capacity. Allocated €13.5 billion, this pillar aims to create high-growth ventures and foster a more dynamic entrepreneurial environment.

Missions and Cross-Cutting Activities

Horizon Europe incorporates five EU Missions, launched in July 2021, as a novel mechanism to channel research and innovation towards predefined societal challenges with measurable targets by 2030. These missions—Beat Cancer, Climate-Neutral and Smart Cities, , Restore our Ocean and Waters, and —employ a portfolio approach combining bottom-up investigator-driven projects with top-down strategic guidance to foster systemic transformations. For instance, the Cancer Mission targets a 5% reduction in cancer incidence by 2030 through prevention, early detection, and treatment advancements, while the Climate-Neutral and Smart Cities Mission supports 100 EU cities and 12 associated-country cities in achieving by that deadline. This mission-oriented framework contrasts with traditional bottom-up funding by imposing directional priorities, sparking debate among researchers on whether it enhances societal impact or risks stifling serendipitous discoveries central to scientific progress. Proponents, including EU policymakers, contend that top-down elements address urgent, complex problems requiring coordinated efforts across disciplines and stakeholders, as evidenced by over €230 million allocated in 2025 calls for ocean and adaptation missions alone. Critics, however, warn of potential mission creep, where initial goals expand bureaucratically, diluting focus and echoing inefficiencies in prior top-down initiatives. The 2025 interim evaluation of Horizon Europe notes that while missions have accelerated stakeholder engagement, progress towards 2030 outcomes varies, with quantitative indicators showing mobilization of resources but qualitative assessments highlighting needs for refined monitoring and adaptability. Complementing the missions, cross-cutting activities span the program to promote inclusivity and efficiency. Widening participation and spreading excellence initiatives allocate approximately €2.5 billion over the program's lifespan to bolster research infrastructures in moderate and modest innovators—EU regions with lower R&I performance—through measures like European Innovation Councils for twinning, centers of excellence, and knowledge transfer networks. International cooperation encourages third-country involvement in collaborative projects, subject to reciprocity and strategic alignment, to leverage global expertise without compromising EU priorities. Simplification efforts, including streamlined grant agreements and reduced reporting via digital tools, aim to cut administrative costs by up to 20% compared to Horizon 2020, though evaluations indicate persistent burdens for smaller entities. These elements integrate across pillars and missions to ensure broader program coherence, though their effectiveness hinges on empirical tracking of capacity-building outcomes in underrepresented areas.

Budget and Financial Allocation

Total Budget and Sources

Horizon Europe is allocated a total budget of €95.5 billion for the period 2021–2027, encompassing €90.1 billion from the (MFF) and an additional €5.4 billion from the NextGenerationEU recovery instrument to support post-pandemic economic resilience and innovation priorities. The allocation forms the core funding stream, drawn from member states' contributions based on shares, while NextGenerationEU supplements it through temporary borrowing and grants aimed at and transitions. Budget execution includes annual adjustments for via a fixed 2% deflator applied to MFF expenditure ceilings, though this mechanism has faced scrutiny for undercompensating amid higher-than-expected rates in 2022–2024, potentially eroding real-term for activities. Mid-term revisions to the overall MFF, adopted in 2024, incorporated reallocations totaling €64.6 billion across programs to address emerging needs like geopolitical support, but Horizon Europe's specific envelope saw no net increase beyond initial commitments, with funds redirected internally via work programme updates. The 2025 work programme exemplifies this, allocating €7.3 billion for calls in , , and competitiveness, representing about 8% of the total budget and prioritizing talent attraction and . Compared to its predecessor, Horizon 2020's €80 billion over 2014–2020, Horizon Europe's nominal allocation reflects approximately a 19% increase; however, in constant prices, the effective rise is closer to 6–10% when accounting for differentials, raising questions about whether the expansion sufficiently counters escalating costs in areas like personnel and . Critics, including fiscal analysts, argue that without adaptive deflators tied to actual R&D —often exceeding general CPI—the program's real-value growth may lag behind ambitions for global competitiveness.

Distribution Across Pillars and Instruments

The budget allocation in Horizon Europe emphasizes applied research and societal challenges, with Pillar II "Global Challenges and European Industrial Competitiveness" receiving the largest share at approximately 56% of the total program funds, supporting six thematic clusters addressing health, climate, digital technologies, and other priorities. Pillar I "Excellent Science" accounts for about 27%, funding frontier research and talent development to maintain Europe's basic science leadership. Pillar III "Innovative Europe" is allocated roughly 14%, marking a deliberate increase from prior frameworks to support market-oriented innovation and address the "valley of death" between laboratory discoveries and commercialization through instruments like the European Innovation Council (EIC). Horizontal activities, including widening participation for less research-intensive regions, receive around 3%. Key instruments within these pillars include grants under the (ERC) in Pillar I, with €16.6 billion dedicated to investigator-driven projects for groundbreaking research across all domains. In Pillar III, the EIC provides €10 billion, blending grants, equity investments, and loans via its , , and schemes to scale high-risk technologies toward market viability. Pillar II incorporates co-programmed and co-funded partnerships, with over €8 billion committed to more than 50 European Partnerships involving public-private collaboration on strategic areas like batteries and clean energy, though institutionalised joint undertakings receive targeted allocations such as €1.6 billion for specific undertakings like those in bio-based industries. This distribution reflects a strategic pivot toward translational outcomes, with Pillar III's enhanced funding—up from equivalent programs in Horizon 2020—aiming to boost Europe's innovation ecosystem amid lagging commercialization rates compared to the and , though critics note potential risks of diluting pure scientific inquiry in favor of policy-driven applications.
Pillar/InstrumentApproximate Share/AllocationFocus
Pillar I: Excellent 27%Frontier research, ERC (€16.6B)
Pillar II: Global Challenges56%Thematic clusters, partnerships (>€8B total)
Pillar III: Innovative 14%EIC equity and (€10B)
Horizontal Activities3%Widening participation

Participation and Governance

Eligibility for EU Members and Associated Countries

All 27 Member States are automatically eligible for full participation in Horizon Europe, with legal entities established within their territories able to access funding, lead consortia, and engage in all program activities on equal terms with no additional conditions beyond standard application requirements. This eligibility stems from the program's design as an EU-funded initiative prioritizing internal cohesion in research and innovation, where Member States collectively finance the €95.5 billion budget (2021–2027) through the . Associated countries participate under equivalent conditions to Member States via bilateral or multilateral association agreements, which mandate financial contributions to the EU budget—typically proportional to —and alignment with EU research priorities, rules, and dissemination standards. These agreements enable entities from associated countries to apply for grants, join international consortia (often requiring at least three partners from eligible states), and benefit from the same evaluation criteria, fostering collaborative projects while ensuring reciprocity in funding access. In return, associated countries gain strategic advantages, such as enhanced integration into research networks and leverage of EU-scale , though they must harmonize national policies to avoid discrepancies in eligibility enforcement. As of October 2025, key associated countries include members , , and ; the , which finalized its association agreement in December 2023 and became fully associated effective January 1, 2024, resolving post-Brexit interim restrictions; , re-associated from January 1, 2025 after prior partial access; ; ; and , associated since June 2022 amid its geopolitical context. Additional associations encompass Western Balkan states like , , , and , as well as select non-European partners such as for specific pillars. Entities from these countries have secured funding reflecting their research output, with associated states collectively receiving grants that underscore the program's emphasis on merit-based allocation despite their financial inputs covering only a fraction of the total budget relative to participation levels.

Third-Country Involvement and Restrictions

Entities from non-associated third countries can participate in most Horizon Europe calls for proposals, either as collaborators in consortia led by EU or associated country participants or through specific open international cooperation opportunities, though they generally do not receive EU funding unless explicitly allowed by the call. Participation requires justification in proposals, particularly for involvement from low- or middle-income countries, and is subject to the same evaluation criteria as EU participants, but access is restricted in areas of Union strategic interest, such as defense-related research or dual-use technologies. These rules build on Horizon 2020 precedents but incorporate post-2021 geopolitical adjustments, limiting full-cost reimbursement for third-country entities to prevent funding outflows without reciprocal benefits. In response to Russia's invasion of , the suspended cooperation with Russian public entities in Horizon Europe effective March , barring them from participation as coordinators or beneficiaries and restricting private entities to exceptional cases approved by the . faces similar exclusions under broader EU sanctions regimes, with entities linked to the Lukashenko regime or supporting military aggression ineligible, reflecting a policy prioritizing security over open collaboration in sensitive domains. These measures, enacted via Council decisions and implementing acts, have reduced participation from these countries to near zero since , contrasting with pre-invasion levels under Horizon where Russian entities secured over €100 million in funding. Prior to recent associations, countries like the and emerged as leading third-country collaborators, with U.S. entities participating in over 1,500 Horizon Europe projects by mid-2024 through open calls, often in and pillars, leveraging bilateral agreements without formal funding eligibility. ranked third among non-EU non-associated participants in Horizon 2020, securing involvement in projects totaling hundreds of millions in EU contributions indirectly via consortia, before its full association in July 2024 which equalized access but required a €30.6 million annual financial contribution. Such partnerships highlight opportunities for knowledge exchange, yet barriers persist, including visa restrictions, asymmetries, and the need for third-country entities to self-fund, which disproportionately affects smaller innovators from non-Western nations. Geopolitical tensions have amplified restrictions and controversies, as seen in debates over Israel's associated status, granted in with a projected €80 million annual contribution, amid ongoing conflicts. In July 2025, the proposed partial suspension of Israel's participation in specific Horizon Europe components, citing violations of clauses in the EU-Israel Association Agreement linked to operations, though EU member states failed to achieve for implementation. Critics, including some EU parliamentarians, argue such associations impose sovereignty costs through mandatory alignment with EU priorities and budget obligations, potentially eroding national control over research agendas, while proponents emphasize mutual benefits in outputs. These cases underscore how third-country involvement navigates imperatives, with exclusions enforced via targeted calls excluding high-risk nations and ongoing reviews of agreements under geopolitical strain.

Governance and Decision-Making Processes

Horizon Europe is managed by the European Commission's Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (DG R&I), which oversees the program's day-to-day implementation, including the development of work programmes and funding decisions. The DG R&I coordinates with other directorates and agencies to align the programme with broader EU policies, such as those on climate and . Decision-making involves the Programme Committee, comprising representatives from member states, which operates under comitology procedures to assist the in implementing the specific programme. This committee approves annual and multiannual work programmes by qualified majority vote, provides strategic input on priorities, and monitors progress, ensuring member state involvement in shaping research agendas without veto power for individual countries. For European Partnerships and missions, a strategic coordinating process—supported by expert groups active from 2021 to —harmonizes governance across co-programmed initiatives, focusing on common indicators and impact frameworks. High-level direction is provided through Commission-led structures, with annual implementation reports submitted to the European Parliament and for oversight and budgetary alignment. The programme's framework regulation, adopted in 2021, empowers the to adapt priorities via delegated acts, subject to by member states. This supranational structure, while enabling EU-wide coordination, has drawn criticism for fostering bureaucratic delays, as multi-level approvals in the Programme Committee and processes can hinder rapid responses to national-specific needs or fast-evolving technological markets. Centralized risks inefficiencies, with reports highlighting administrative overload that prioritizes procedural consensus over agile decision-making, potentially slowing innovation cycles compared to more decentralized national funding models. Proponents of reform, including scientific bodies, advocate extending independent models like that of the to broader Horizon Europe components to mitigate these causal bottlenecks in adaptation.

Implementation Mechanisms

Work Programmes and Calls for Proposals

Horizon Europe's research and innovation activities are directed through multi-annual strategic plans that establish overarching priorities, followed by annual work programmes that operationalize these into actionable funding topics. The initial strategic plan, covering 2021-2024, focused on key orientations such as promoting an open strategic autonomy for the EU in research and innovation, while the subsequent plan for 2025-2027 emphasizes green and digital transitions alongside resilience-building measures. Annual work programmes are developed and published mid-year by the , typically between March and June, to align with the strategic plans and respond to evolving priorities. For example, the 2025 work programme was adopted on May 14, 2025, detailing topics across clusters like health, digital technologies, and civil security. Calls for proposals within these programmes are competitive and topic-specific, inviting consortia to submit applications addressing predefined challenges, such as advancing sustainable solutions or enhancing cybersecurity . The 2025 programme prioritizes simplification to reduce administrative burdens, incorporating wider lump-sum models and two-stage submission processes to improve and focus on high-impact outcomes. By January 2025, these mechanisms had resulted in for over 15,000 projects, reflecting the programme's in mobilizing resources toward EU-wide objectives amid substantial applicant interest evidenced by thousands of submissions per major call.

Application, Evaluation, and Success Rates

The application process for Horizon Europe entails submitting comprehensive proposals through the 's Funding and Tenders Portal, where applicants must detail the project's scientific merit, anticipated societal and economic impacts, resource allocation, and risk management strategies. All proposals require a mandatory self-assessment to evaluate compliance with standards on issues such as human dignity, data privacy under GDPR, dual-use research concerns, and minimization. Proposals undergo a remote peer-review by panels of independent experts selected from a database of over 50,000 specialists, who score submissions on three weighted criteria: excellence (50%, focusing on scientific soundness and ), (30%, assessing alignment with priorities and exploitation potential), and quality and efficiency of implementation (20%, examining work plan feasibility and capabilities). Thresholds of 3/5 apply to each criterion and the overall score, with ethics screening integrated to flag issues for further scrutiny before funding decisions. Successful projects must ensure immediate to peer-reviewed publications and research data where possible, promoting principles. Success rates average 16% across proposals evaluated from 2021 to 2024, reflecting heightened selectivity compared to Horizon 2020's 12%, with roughly 84% of submissions rejected even when demonstrating merit. for single-stage calls typically concludes within 5 months of the submission deadline, though preparatory efforts often span 8-12 months, amplifying the administrative burden of assembling multidisciplinary consortia and aligning with specific work programme topics.

Performance Metrics and Impacts

Scientific and Innovation Outputs

As of early 2025, Horizon Europe had supported 15,148 signed projects, of which 983 were closed, yielding 6,922 peer-reviewed publications excluding those from the (JRC). Including non-peer-reviewed outputs, the total reached 10,222, with 79% available via . These figures reflect direct scientific productivity from completed projects, though the majority of the program's 2021-2027 portfolio remains ongoing, limiting comprehensive output assessment to early indicators rather than full causal impacts on breakthroughs. European Research Council (ERC) grants under Horizon Europe, benefiting 1,662 researchers by 2025, produced 2,181 publications, contributing disproportionately to high-impact . Over 40% of ERC-funded has been cited in patents, with nearly 70% of those citations appearing in frontier-field patents, evidencing translation from to inventive applications. JRC outputs, a benchmark for program-aligned work, included 45.4% of papers in the top 10% most-cited globally and 6.6% in the top 1%, with citations averaging 2.26 times the world norm. In , the European Innovation Council (EIC) supported 706 startups and SMEs through its Horizon Europe portfolio by April 2025, approving €1.7 billion in equity investments to scale deep-tech ventures. This includes selections like 40 startups in June 2025 and 71 in February 2025 under the EIC Accelerator, focusing on market-ready prototypes in areas such as and . Patent filings remain nascent, with only isolated IPR outputs reported from closed projects, underscoring that metrics prioritize scalable over immediate volume. EU Missions generated targeted outputs, including 225 demonstration sites under the for coastal restoration and 25 living labs (encompassing 250 testing sites and 167 partners) under the for health-aligned . One IPR output was validated across Missions, with 33 peer-reviewed publications, indicating early prototyping but requiring longitudinal tracking to confirm causal contributions to systemic advancements like climate-resilient technologies.
Output TypeKey Metrics (as of early 2025)Source
Peer-Reviewed Publications6,922 (total closed projects, excl. JRC); ERC: 2,181
Startups Supported (EIC)706
Mission Demonstrations/LabsOcean: 225 sites; Soil: 25 labs (250 sites)
Patent Citations (ERC-linked)>40% of research cited; 70% in frontier patents

Economic Returns and Value Assessment

The European Commission's interim evaluation of Horizon Europe, conducted in April 2025, projects significant economic returns from the programme's investments. It estimates that every euro of EU contribution could generate up to €11 in (GDP) gains by 2045, primarily through enhanced jobs, firm growth, and spillovers across participating economies. This assessment draws on econometric modeling of prior framework programmes and assumes sustained multiplier effects from public funding in addressing market failures in basic and collaborative research. By early 2025, Horizon Europe had disbursed over €43 billion across more than 15,000 , with preliminary indicators suggesting contributions to and growth in beneficiary sectors, though full realization depends on long-term project outcomes. However, these return estimates face for potential overstatement, as they hinge on optimistic assumptions about additionality—the extent to which public grants enable R&D that would not otherwise occur. Empirical studies on European Framework Programmes, including precursors to Horizon Europe, indicate limited evidence of crowding out R&D for large firms but highlight heterogeneous effects, with smaller projects and research-intensive entities showing stronger co-investment. Critics argue that in competitive sectors, subsidies may substitute rather than supplement spending, reducing net economic value when opportunity costs—such as resources diverted from direct innovation or alternative public investments—are factored in. Moreover, the low grant success rates (often below 15% in competitive calls) impose unquantified costs on unsuccessful applicants, including time and preparatory expenses that could otherwise support -sector alternatives unburdened by bureaucratic hurdles. Despite these projected returns, Horizon Europe's economic value remains tempered by the European Union's enduring innovation performance gap relative to the and . While the programme has allocated substantial funds by mid-implementation, EU metrics in global innovation indices continue to trail leaders in translating public R&D into commercial breakthroughs and high-growth firms, suggesting that structural barriers—like fragmented markets and regulatory delays—may limit the realized beyond modeled forecasts. Independent analyses emphasize that maximizing value requires rigorous counterfactual evaluations to isolate true causal impacts from baseline trends, rather than relying solely on programme-specific attributions.

Comparative Analysis with Horizon 2020

Horizon Europe, succeeding Horizon 2020 for the period 2021–2027, features a of €95.5 billion, a roughly 20% increase over Horizon 2020's €77 billion allocation, enabling expanded funding for research and innovation activities. This augmentation supports three pillars—Excellent Science, Global Challenges and European Industrial Competitiveness, and Innovative Europe—along with a dedicated widening participation component, aiming to address gaps in Horizon 2020's structure where underrepresentation of less research-intensive regions persisted. Key improvements include elevated application success rates, rising from an average of 12.6% in Horizon 2020 to approximately 15.9–17% in Horizon Europe, attributable in part to the larger budget and refined evaluation processes that prioritize high-impact proposals. Simplified rules, building on Horizon 2020's model, continue with flat-rate reimbursements for and streamlined grant agreements to reduce administrative overhead, while introducing and missions to sharpen focus on tangible outcomes like climate neutrality and cancer eradication. Greater emphasis on breakthrough is evident in the enhanced European Innovation Council (EIC) pillar, which allocates €10 billion for high-risk ventures, contrasting Horizon 2020's more conservative approach to .
MetricHorizon 2020 (2014–2020)Horizon Europe (2021–2027)
Budget€77 billion€95.5 billion
Average Success Rate12.6%15.9–17%
High-Quality Rejections74% of proposals~70% of proposals
Despite these advances, shortcomings mirror Horizon 2020's flaws, including persistent rejection of viable projects—Horizon 2020 funded around 35,000 grants but declined high-quality proposals worth €159 billion, and Horizon Europe still rejects seven out of ten strong applications due to oversubscription. Uneven geographic participation endures, with widening measures failing to fully mitigate disparities; for instance, Eastern and Southern states continue to secure disproportionately low shares relative to , as seen in Horizon 2020's country imbalances. Bureaucratic inefficiencies, such as protracted timelines and compliance demands, remain largely unaddressed, yielding only marginal efficiency gains rather than transformative reform. Overall, while Horizon Europe refines Horizon 2020's framework with incremental enhancements in scale and targeting, core systemic issues like resource and administrative rigidity persist, limiting broader efficacy.

Criticisms and Controversies

Administrative Inefficiencies and Bureaucratic Overload

Horizon Europe has faced substantial criticism for its administrative complexities, including intricate obligations, frequent audits, and extensive documentation requirements that divert significant resources from activities. Beneficiaries report that involves excessive paperwork, with periodic reports requiring detailed justifications for deliverables and financials, often spanning multiple accounting periods of 18 months each. Audits under the single audit principle aim to limit scrutiny to once per project, yet participants note persistent demands for timesheets and cost verifications, particularly burdensome for personnel reimbursements. Proposal preparation alone demands a of 36-45 person-days for coordinators in consortia of up to 14 partners, escalating to 56-65 days for larger groups exceeding 31 partners, with applicants frequently citing cumbersome templates and admissibility checks as key deterrents. The programme's mid-term interim evaluation, published on April 30, 2025, acknowledges simplification initiatives such as lump-sum funding—which reduces reporting by 6-8 person-days per period and eliminates financial audits for eligible projects—and shorter proposal page limits, yet highlights ongoing inefficiencies. Despite these measures, 42% of surveyed applicants described the application process as cumbersome, and 66% of beneficiaries reported administrative effort comparable to or exceeding that of , with 16% noting it as greater. Overall administrative costs are estimated at €4.7-6.5 billion, equivalent to 9-12% of total project expenditures, disproportionately affecting small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and , where up to 11% of universities allocate over 20% of budgets to admin tasks. Persistent complaints from these groups emphasize barriers like platform usability issues and unclear guidelines, hindering participation despite targeted support. Grant processing further exacerbates delays, averaging 273 days from call closure to signing—23 days longer than under —with nearly 60% exceeding the 8-month target due to added requirements such as plans. These inefficiencies stem from the programme's centralized EU-level , which imposes uniform rules across diverse national contexts, fostering rigidities that contrast with more agile national or private funding mechanisms. Large consortia amplify coordination burdens, while fragmented partnerships and mixed funding schemes generate confusion, leading to duplicated efforts and higher compliance costs without proportional gains in oversight effectiveness. The recommends further streamlining, such as clearer lump-sum guidelines and reduced mandates, to mitigate these structural constraints and enhance focus on substantive .

Unequal Funding Distribution and Regional Disparities

In Horizon Europe, funding allocation exhibits significant disparities, with the majority of grants concentrated among a handful of Western and Northern European countries. Data from the program's initial three years (2021–2023) indicate that , , , , and the collectively accounted for over 50% of total EU contributions, reflecting their dominant participation in collaborative projects under Pillars 1 and 2. In contrast, the 15 "widening" countries—defined as those with lower research and innovation performance, including , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and —secured only 14% of funding, an increase from 9% in the program's early phase but still indicative of persistent underrepresentation relative to their population share of approximately 30%. Success rates further highlight regional imbalances, varying widely by country due to differences in institutional readiness and research infrastructure. For instance, , an associated country with advanced ecosystems, achieved a 23% success rate in grant applications as of early 2025, surpassing the EU average of around 16–20%. Widening countries, however, generally lag, with many posting rates below 15%; while five such states (e.g., Czechia, ) approached the EU average by mid-2025, systemic factors like weaker networks and limited prior experience in competitive evaluations contribute to lower proposal quality and fewer approvals. These patterns stem from entrenched advantages in non-widening regions, including denser clusters of high-performing universities, stronger public-private partnerships, and greater administrative expertise in navigating complex application processes—capacities built over decades through prior framework programs like Horizon 2020. Consequently, the uneven distribution perpetuates innovation gaps, as widening regions invest less in R&D relative to GDP and produce fewer breakthroughs, directly countering the EU's cohesion objectives under Article 179 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, which aim to promote harmonious development across member states. Despite targeted widening measures allocating €8.5 billion (9% of the total budget), their ring-fenced nature has not fully offset competitive disadvantages in mainstream pillars, where widening participation remains marginal at under 20% of projects.

Bias in Funding Priorities and Ideological Influences

Horizon Europe's strategic priorities demonstrate a significant allocation toward and environmental objectives, with over 35% of the program's —approximately €35 billion from the €100 billion total for 2021-2027—dedicated to addressing , often through indirect contributions across multiple clusters. This emphasis aligns closely with the , which mandates EU-wide sustainability transformations, integrating research into policy-driven goals like decarbonization and circular economies rather than apportioning funds strictly by scientific merit or market demand. Official evaluations underscore this utilitarian approach, prioritizing projects that support EU-wide transitions and greening, which industry participants have noted as facilitating alignment with regulatory imperatives over disruptive, . The program's funding criteria, which require proposals to demonstrate alignment with strategic objectives—including digital sovereignty through and ethics—further embed these priorities into evaluation processes, potentially marginalizing that deviates from prevailing orthodoxies. For instance, while clusters fund shifts away from dependencies, explicit support for extending technologies remains limited, reflecting broader policies aimed at phasing out such resources in favor of renewables and biofuels. Defense-related is similarly deprioritized, confined largely to ancillary dual-use elements despite recent geopolitical pressures, with core Horizon pillars excluding dedicated applications in contrast to separate instruments like the European Defence Industry Programme. Traditional industries, such as heavy reliant on non- processes, receive subdued attention, as funding streams emphasize retrofitting over preservation or expansion of sectors. Critics argue that this framework introduces ideological influences, as evaluation panels—often drawn from academia and institutions exhibiting systemic progressive biases toward environmentalism and supranational integration—favor proposals reinforcing policy consensus, potentially stifling dissenting inquiries into areas like the economic viability of net-zero timelines or applications unconstrained by precautionary . Such dynamics contrast with first-principles-driven science, where funding should prioritize empirical over predetermined outcomes, and may favor bureaucratic partnerships over agile, private-sector-led ventures. Proponents, including officials, counter that these priorities tackle existential threats like and technological autonomy, positioning Europe competitively against global rivals in sustainable technologies. Empirical assessments of program impacts, however, reveal tensions, with mid-term reviews highlighting the need for balanced ecosystems amid over-reliance on policy-aligned metrics.

Geopolitical and Sovereignty Concerns in Associations

Association agreements under Horizon Europe enable over 20 non-EU countries, including , , , , and recently rejoined as of January 2025, to participate on equal footing with EU members, granting access to and collaborative projects. These arrangements, while fostering global talent exchange, have sparked debates over potential erosion of , as non-EU entities co-shape research priorities in areas like dual-use technologies that could affect . Critics argue that funding foreign participants risks undue influence on directions, particularly when associated countries hold divergent geopolitical interests, potentially diluting the program's alignment with European . Russia's exclusion exemplifies acute geopolitical tensions; following its 2022 invasion of , the terminated participation for Russian entities with over 50% public ownership and barred new contracts under Horizon Europe to prevent indirect support for aggression. This measure, part of broader sanctions, prioritized security by curtailing collaboration in sensitive fields, though it isolated some neutral scientists without direct ties to the . Switzerland's association stalled from 2021 to 2024 amid failed broader bilateral talks, treating it as a third country with restricted access and highlighting how Horizon Europe serves as leverage in external negotiations, raising questions for non-members reliant on program funds. Israel's longstanding association faced scrutiny amid the Gaza conflict; in July 2025, the European Commission proposed partial suspension of participation due to concerns over human rights compliance under the EU-Israel Association Agreement, though member states failed to reach consensus, preserving access despite calls for punitive measures. Such episodes underscore risks of geopolitical spillovers, where funding ties could entangle the EU in foreign conflicts or enable technology transfers in security-sensitive domains like cybersecurity and AI, prompting safeguards such as exclusions for high-risk non-EU suppliers in critical projects. Proponents of broad associations emphasize benefits like enhanced from diverse expertise, yet detractors highlight costs, including potential policy capture by influential non- actors and vulnerabilities in sensitive tech where rules require vetting to mitigate or dependency risks. The 's framework balances openness with restrictions, such as barring participation in projects touching "sensitive assets," but ongoing tensions illustrate how associations can amplify leverage dynamics and challenge unified control over strategic research agendas.

Recent Developments and Future Prospects

Mid-Term Evaluations and Adjustments (Up to 2025)

The interim evaluation of Horizon Europe, adopted by the European Commission on 30 April 2025, examined the programme's implementation from 2021 to early 2025, confirming high returns on investment with every euro generating up to €11 in economic and societal value. By January 2025, at the programme's midpoint, over 15,000 projects had received funding totaling more than €43 billion, supporting advancements in key areas like health, digital technologies, and climate resilience. The assessment identified strengths in mobilizing private investment and fostering international collaboration but highlighted persistent challenges, including limited uptake by researchers in widening (lower-performing) member states and overly complex application procedures that deter participation. Adjustments in the 2025 work programme, published on 14 May 2025, responded to these findings by allocating €7.3 billion across clusters, with targeted increases for high-impact priorities such as €1.14 billion for , , and initiatives. The programme emphasized simplification measures, like streamlined evaluation criteria, and enhanced support for widening participation through dedicated capacity-building actions, aiming to address regional disparities without diluting excellence standards. Empirical data showed improved applicant success rates, averaging around 16% overall and rising by over a third compared to , reflecting better alignment of funding with proposal quality in pillars like Global Challenges. Nonetheless, unmet demand persisted, with approximately 71% of high-quality proposals rejected due to budget constraints, underscoring underfunding relative to Europe's research needs and competitive global pressures. These adjustments, while incremental, signal efforts to balance efficiency gains with expanded access amid fixed overall appropriations.

Proposals for the 2028-2034 Successor Programme

In July 2025, the proposed the 10th Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (FP10), succeeding Horizon Europe for the period 2028–2034, with a of €175 billion—roughly double the €95.5 billion allocated to its predecessor over seven years. The proposal positions FP10 as a standalone programme closely integrated with the European Competitiveness Fund, aiming to streamline processes for greater simplicity, faster implementation, and enhanced impact on EU competitiveness. Key reforms include expanded pillars—such as Excellence in Science, Competitiveness and Society, and Global Challenges—to foster deeper integration across research, innovation, and deployment phases, alongside new "moonshot" projects targeting breakthroughs in areas like and clean energy. The seeks to rectify Horizon Europe's administrative burdens by reducing bureaucratic hurdles, such as simplified evaluations and fewer reporting requirements, while prioritizing high-risk, high-reward to address identified gaps in and market uptake. However, feasibility remains contested amid EU fiscal constraints, including the broader () totaling €2 trillion in commitments, which relies on new own resources like plastic packaging taxes and carbon levies to offset rising expenditures. Critics, including representatives in discussions, argue that doubling the budget without proportional efficiency gains could exacerbate funding disparities and centralization, potentially sidelining national priorities in favor of Brussels-directed missions. Stakeholder advocacy highlights pushes for greater national flexibility, such as opt-outs for sensitive technologies and enhanced association rules for non-EU countries like the UK, to mitigate sovereignty concerns amplified in Horizon Europe. While the Commission frames FP10 as a corrective to prior inefficiencies, analyses suggest that without structural decentralization—such as devolving more decision-making to regional hubs—risks persist of perpetuating bureaucratic overload and ideological biases in priority-setting, as evidenced by ongoing Council revisions to proposal articles on partnerships and rules. The legislative process, involving Parliament and Council negotiations through 2027, will determine if these ambitions translate into verifiable improvements in research outputs and economic returns.

References

  1. [1]
    Horizon Europe - Research and innovation - European Commission
    Horizon Europe is the EU's key funding programme for research and innovation. Following the Multiannual Financial Framework Midterm Review (MTR) decision.Funding programmes and... · Funding opportunities · Work programmes · Funding
  2. [2]
    Horizon Europe - Performance - European Commission
    Horizon Europe has a budget of around EUR 95.5 billion. This includes EUR 5.41 billion from NextGenerationEU to boost the economic recovery and make the EU more ...Concrete examples of... · Budget programming and... · Contribution to horizontal...
  3. [3]
    Horizon Europe - consilium.europa.eu
    The first Horizon Europe pillar reinforces the EU's scientific leadership, promoting the development of high-quality knowledge and skills. It supports frontier ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
  4. [4]
    Horizon Europe the EU's funding programme for research and ...
    Horizon Europe is the EU's key funding programme for research and innovation. It tackles climate change, helps to achieve the UN's Sustainable Development ...
  5. [5]
    The EU's ominous emphasis on 'open strategic autonomy' in research
    Apr 3, 2024 · A reboot of the flagship Horizon Europe fund risks prioritizing a mindset geared towards security over open, future-facing research collaboration.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  6. [6]
    Viewpoint: The five challenges to a truly global Horizon programme
    Jan 4, 2024 · The EU research programme could catalyse great science and technology across the globe. But first, Brussels will have to face up to some big challenges.
  7. [7]
    For every euro invested Horizon Europe generates up to €11 in ...
    Apr 29, 2025 · With a total budget of €93.5 billion, Horizon Europe stands at the heart of European competitiveness and innovation strength. Today's ...
  8. [8]
    Horizon Europe is not a lemon, so stop squeezing it
    Oct 16, 2023 · This proves there's no spare money in Horizon Europe and no room for further budget cuts. Also, decommitments, funding which is not used in the ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] EU framework programmes for research and innovation
    Although no Treaty articles provided a clear legal basis for the adoption of these programmes, the first framework programme (FP1) was adopted in 1983.
  10. [10]
    Horizon 2020 - Research and innovation - European Commission
    What was Horizon 2020? Horizon 2020 was the EU's research and innovation funding programme from 2014-2020 with a budget of nearly €80 billion.
  11. [11]
    The Horizon effect: A counterfactual analysis of EU research
    The findings suggest that firms receiving Horizon 2020 grants exhibit an average increase of 20% in employment and about 30% in total assets and revenues, ...
  12. [12]
    report from the commission to the european parliament and the council
    Jan 29, 2024 · Horizon 2020 is also expected to have had a notable impact on job creation, with a net gain in employment levels reaching around 220 000 ...
  13. [13]
    In review: The successes and shortcomings of Horizon 2020 | Science
    Jan 30, 2024 · Plus, the review found Horizon 2020 impact monitoring used weak indicators and was too narrow in scope. This is another shortcoming the ...
  14. [14]
    How Horizon Europe was developed - Research and innovation
    The EU institutions reached a political agreement on Horizon Europe on 11 December 2020 and set the budget for Horizon Europe at €95.5 billion in current ...
  15. [15]
    L_2021170EN.01000101.xml - EUR-Lex - European Union
    REGULATION (EU) 2021/695 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. of 28 April 2021. establishing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research ...<|separator|>
  16. [16]
  17. [17]
    First calls under Horizon Europe to be launched by the ERC
    Feb 21, 2021 · The call will be launched on 25 February, with a budget of €619 million and a deadline of 8 April.
  18. [18]
    Main work programme of Horizon Europe adopted
    Jun 16, 2021 · The Commission has adopted the main work programme of Horizon Europe for the period 2021-2022, which outlines the objectives and specific ...
  19. [19]
    NextGenerationEU - European Commission
    In addition, up to €83.1 billion of NextGenerationEU funds are being used to reinforce several existing EU programmes, such as the Just Transition Fund, ...Use of NextGenerationEU... · Repayment of the borrowingMissing: integration | Show results with:integration
  20. [20]
    U.K. finally rejoins Horizon Europe research funding scheme - Science
    Sep 7, 2023 · The U.K. government announced this morning it will rejoin the European Union's €95 billion research funding program known as Horizon Europe.
  21. [21]
    Access to research funding - Royal Society
    Sep 27, 2023 · The revised association deal was finalised in September 2023 with the UK's formal admission to Horizon Europe as an associated country beginning ...
  22. [22]
    Interim Evaluation of the Horizon Europe Framework Programme for ...
    Apr 30, 2025 · Horizon Europe played a key role in mobilising additional R&I funding and it contributed to the EU's target of investing 3% of GDP in R&D.
  23. [23]
    Horizon Europe 2028 - 2034: twice bigger, simpler, faster and more ...
    Jul 16, 2025 · Horizon Europe 2028-2034 will double to €175 billion, be based on four pillars, and will be twice bigger, simpler, faster and more impactful.
  24. [24]
    Horizon Europe programme analysis - Research and innovation
    The Commission's proposal for Horizon Europe includes a ground breaking approach for capturing and communicating impact - the Key Impact Pathways.
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Horizon Europe - specific programme - European Parliament
    Jul 19, 2025 · The main aims are to strengthen science and technology, to foster industrial competiveness, and to implement the sustainable development goals ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Orientations towards the first Strategic Plan for Horizon Europe
    Gender equality is a core policy objective for all European Union activities and a crucial factor in the achievement of sustainable development and ...
  27. [27]
    Horizon Europe strategic plan 2021-2024
    Mar 19, 2021 · It sets out the research and innovation priorities to support a sustainable recovery and further accelerating the twin green and digital ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] STRATEGIC PLAN 2021 - 2024 - EEAS - European Union
    Horizon Europe investments will help deliver on the different dimensions of the European Green Deal, the European Union's new growth strategy. Furthermore, ...
  29. [29]
    Strategic plan - Research and innovation - European Commission
    The strategic plan raises the ambition of Horizon Europe on biodiversity and commits to a target of 10% of Horizon Europe's total budget 2025-2027 being ...<|separator|>
  30. [30]
    [PDF] THE STRATEGIC PLAN 2021-2024 - FFG
    The strategic plan defines four key strategic orientations. They mirror the political priorities of the. European Union, outline the way research and innovation ...
  31. [31]
    Horizon Europe strategic plan 2025-2027
    Mar 20, 2024 · The second Horizon Europe strategic plan will steer research and innovation funding within and beyond Europe to tackle key global challenges ...
  32. [32]
    Politicization of climate change and Central and Eastern European ...
    The initial resistance to the European Green Deal (EGD) has been noteworthy in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries, especially in Poland and Hungary.
  33. [33]
    Understanding Horizon Europe Developments - Technopolis Group
    Pillar 1: Excellent Science (€ 25.8 billion) Composed of the European Research Council (ERC), mobility programmes and bursaries (the long-standing Marie ...
  34. [34]
    Horizon Europe budget to double, but €68B will remain in ...
    Jul 17, 2025 · The European Commission proposes to almost double Horizon Europe's funding to €175 billion between 2028 and 2034, compared to the current programme.
  35. [35]
    Horizon Europe - Pillar 3 - Innovative Europe - 2021-2027
    ... national and local levels. It also addresses the need to organise European innovation ecosystems. Budget. 13.6 billion euro. Beneficiaries. All beneficiaries ...
  36. [36]
    EU Missions in Horizon Europe - Research and innovation
    Deliver 100 climate-neutral and smart cities by 2030 and ensure that these cities act as experimentation and innovation hubs to enable all European cities to ...
  37. [37]
    EU Mission: Climate-Neutral and Smart Cities
    The Mission is driving Europe's transition to climate neutrality by supporting 100 cities in the EU and 12 cities in countries associated to Horizon Europe in ...
  38. [38]
    'Bottom up' or 'top down': Parsing the EU research debate | Science
    Who decides what researchers should study with EU funding? An odd policy debate highlights a key issue in the EU's €82 billion plan.
  39. [39]
    Horizon Europe EU Missions: over €230 million available under the ...
    May 19, 2025 · A total of €233.65 million in EU funding is available under these calls with deadlines on 24 September 2025.
  40. [40]
    [PDF] TO THE COMMISSIONER RESPONSIBLE FOR RESEARCH AND ...
    Horizon Europe should have a good mix of bottom-up and top- down instruments. The trend in Horizon Europe compared to the past is to move more towards top-down ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  41. [41]
    [PDF] EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 30.4.2025 COM(2025) 189 ...
    Apr 30, 2025 · This communication summarizes the interim evaluation of Horizon Europe, highlighting its strengths, achievements, and areas for improvement, ...Missing: return per
  42. [42]
    Widening participation and spreading excellence
    Widening actions build research capacity for lagging countries, strengthen their participation, and promote networking and access to excellence.Missing: cutting | Show results with:cutting
  43. [43]
    [PDF] EN Horizon Europe Work Programme 2023-2025 11. Widening ...
    Apr 17, 2024 · In addition, particular attention will be paid to cross-cutting objectives set for Horizon ... envisage international cooperation with entities ...
  44. [44]
    International Cooperation - ERA-LEARN
    In Horizon Europe, not only the partnership landscape has been reformed, but the European Union also renewed its strategic orientation towards international ...Missing: simplification | Show results with:simplification
  45. [45]
    A recovery plan for Europe - consilium.europa.eu
    How does Next Generation EU work? · Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF): €672.5 billion · ReactEU: €47.5 billion · Horizon Europe: €5 billion · InvestEU: €5.6 ...
  46. [46]
    2021-2027 long-term EU budget & NextGenerationEU
    The 2021-2027 EU budget (MFF) and NextGenerationEU support Europe's recovery, with new structure, funding, and spending data. It includes spending categories ...Recovery plan for Europe · Multiannual financial · What’s new? · Spending
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Budget and NextGenerationEU - FACTS AND FIGURES
    The EU's 2021-2027 long-term budget is EUR 1.211 trillion, and the combined budget with NextGenerationEU is EUR 1.8 trillion (or EUR 2.0 trillion in current ...
  48. [48]
    Mid-term revision of the EU long-term budget 2021-2027 - Consilium
    The EU's long-term budget is reinforced with an additional €64.6 billion to cover financing for priorities such as support to Ukraine, strategic technologies ...
  49. [49]
    Horizon Europe 2025: €7.3 billion in EU funding to support research ...
    May 21, 2025 · The newly adopted Horizon Europe Work Programme for 2025 allocates €7.3 billion to support research and innovation that delivers on the EU's ambitions.
  50. [50]
    the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation 2021-2027
    Pillar I 'Excellence Science' has a budget allocation of €25.01 billion in current prices, which equals €22.17 billion in constant 2018 prices (26.1% of total ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 16.7.2025 SWD(2025) 570 ...
    Jul 16, 2025 · The purchasing power of the EU budget was diminished in real terms. The MFF expenditure ceilings are adjusted annually by a 2% fixed deflator ...
  52. [52]
    Horizon Europe Programme Budget Breakdown 202 - Catalyze Group
    The preliminary structure of Horizon Europe is divided over 3 pillars and 1 horizontal focus area. There is a total budget of €95.5 billion that will be divided ...
  53. [53]
    Horizon Europe, budget - Publications Office of the EU
    May 4, 2021 · Horizon Europe has a budget of EUR 95.5 billion for the period from 2021-2027. This includes EUR 5.4 billion from the Next Generation EU instrument.
  54. [54]
    [PDF] List of Participating Countries in Horizon Europe
    Jul 11, 2024 · Legal entities from associated countries can participate under equivalent conditions as legal entities from the EU Member States, unless ...
  55. [55]
    Association to Horizon Europe - Research and innovation
    Association to Horizon Europe is the closest form of cooperation with non-EU countries, which allows entities of associated countries to participate in ...Canada · Israel · Albania · New Zealand
  56. [56]
    Horizon Europe – Who should apply
    For most calls for proposals, you must apply as a team of at least 3 partner organisations from 3 different EU or associated countries.
  57. [57]
    United Kingdom - Research and innovation - European Union
    The United Kingdom is associated to Horizon Europe as of 1 January 2024, as announced in the Joint Statement between the European Union and the United Kingdom.
  58. [58]
    [PDF] List of Participating Countries in Horizon Europe
    Dec 20, 2024 · Other third countries​​ Most Horizon Europe calls are also open to participants from non-associated countries and international organisations, ...
  59. [59]
    [PDF] WHY PARTICIPATE IN HORIZON EUROPE - Research and innovation
    Organisations from anywhere in the world can participate, but consortia must include at least one organisation established in an EU Member State and at least ...
  60. [60]
    INFOSHEET - International cooperation in Horizon Euro...
    May 6, 2025 · Overseas countries and territories are linked to one of the European Member States and are therefore eligible to receive funding from Horizon ...
  61. [61]
    International cooperation with Russia in research and innovation
    The Commission has decided to suspend the cooperation with Russian entities in research, science and innovation.Missing: restrictions Belarus
  62. [62]
    EU sanctions against Belarus - Consilium
    The EU has imposed sanctions in response to human rights abuses in Belarus and to Belaru's support for Russia's military aggression against Ukraine.Missing: Horizon | Show results with:Horizon
  63. [63]
    Sanctions against individuals, companies and organisations
    Read about how the EU is sanctioning the individuals, companies, organisations and disinformation actors complicit in Russia's war with Ukraine.
  64. [64]
    Bilateral Cooperation: Science and Technology Agreements with ...
    The EU can fund the participation in Horizon Europe actions of entities established in EU Member States, in Associated countries and in low and middle ...
  65. [65]
    About Horizon Europe
    Oct 1, 2024 · Pillar 1. Excellent science · Pillar 2. Global challenges and European industrial competitiveness · Pillar 3. Innovative Europe.
  66. [66]
    Third Countries: Expert Advice on Participation in Horizon Europe
    Sep 25, 2024 · While most Horizon Europe funding will go to EU Member States and countries associated to the programme, particular Calls for Proposals may ...
  67. [67]
    European Commission wants to suspend Israel from parts of ...
    Jul 28, 2025 · The European Commission has suggested blocking Israel from a grant targeting start-ups, as EU outrage grows at Israel's food blockade of ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  68. [68]
    No EU majority yet for suspending Israel from Horizon programme
    Jul 29, 2025 · EU member states failed to agree on suspending Israel's access to the bloc's Horizon research programme during a meeting on Tuesday ...
  69. [69]
    Decision in case 2711/2025/AGU on how the European Union is ...
    Oct 7, 2025 · Following this assessment, on 28 July 2025, the Commission proposed the partial suspension of Israel's association to Horizon Europe.
  70. [70]
    Research and Innovation - European Commission
    The Directorate-General for Research and Innovation manages and develops EU policy on research, science and innovation.
  71. [71]
    Strategy on research and innovation - European Union
    Horizon Europe will help develop innovations, policies and institutions ... DG Research and Innovation will contribute to all six headline ambitions of ...
  72. [72]
    Programme Committee for the specific ... - Comitology Register
    Programme Committee for the specific programme implementing Horizon Europe - the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation – Strategic configuration: ...
  73. [73]
    [PDF] Horizon-Europe-QA_final-2021.pdf - Central Denmark EU Office
    The Programme Committees (PCs) are the EU Member States' forum for giving input to the. Commission on the content of the Work Programmes. The PCs formally ...<|separator|>
  74. [74]
    European Partnerships in Horizon Europe - Research and innovation
    European Partnerships have been identified as part of the Horizon Europe strategic planning process, ensuring alignment with the programme's priorities. English.Health · Climate, energy and mobility · Digital, industry and space
  75. [75]
    Scientists urged to demand independent governance in Horizon ...
    Oct 9, 2025 · The European Research Council's independent governance model must be applied throughout Horizon Europe, says Manuel Heitor.Missing: structure | Show results with:structure
  76. [76]
    Horizon Europe - 2025 work programme available now
    The Annual Work Programme 2025 for Horizon Europe has just been ... Details. Publication date. 14 May 2025. Author: European Health and Digital Executive ...
  77. [77]
    Horizon Europe work programme 2025: new funding opportunities ...
    May 16, 2025 · In 2025, Horizon Europe will invest €7.3 billion to advance research and innovation across Europe.
  78. [78]
    [PDF] Simplification in Horizon Europe - Science|Business
    This note addresses the simplification measures announced in the publication of the 2025 Horizon Europe Work Programme (WP) and those that are foreseen in the ...
  79. [79]
    Over 3,400 project proposals submitted to five Horizon Europe calls
    Oct 1, 2025 · The 2025 call for Horizon Europe 'Culture, creativity and inclusive society' attracted 1,331 proposals, marking a record-breaking year for ...
  80. [80]
    [PDF] EU Grants How to complete your ethics self-assessment
    Jul 13, 2021 · IMPORTANT NOTICE. This guidance is designed to help applicants and beneficiaries of EU projects make your proposal ethics-compliant.
  81. [81]
    [PDF] EU Grants: HE Programme Guide: V5.1 – 15.09.2025
    Jun 17, 2021 · A new eligibility criterion to get access to Horizon Europe funding: public bodies, research organisations or higher education establishments ( ...
  82. [82]
    [PDF] Horizon Europe Evaluation Form (HE RIA and IA)
    Feb 28, 2025 · For stage 1 proposals, only the criteria Excellence and Impact will be evaluated and within those criteria only the aspects indicated in bold ...
  83. [83]
    [PDF] HORIZON EUROPE PROPOSAL EVALUATION - European Academy
    May 6, 2021 · How to evaluate proposals. • Individual evaluation and scoring. • Evaluating the excellence, impact and quality of the implementation criteria.
  84. [84]
    How to comply with Horizon Europe mandate for publications
    Jun 7, 2022 · All peer-reviewed scientific publications arising from Horizon Europe funding have to be made available in open access.
  85. [85]
    [PDF] Country Participation in the EU R&I Framework Programmes
    The success rate of proposals in Horizon Europe is 16%, a clear increase from 12% in. Horizon 2020. Success rates of applications increased even more, from 14% ...
  86. [86]
    Horizon Europe Success Rate: What You Need to Know - FI Group
    Aug 1, 2025 · The overall success rate for Horizon Europe funding applications currently averages around 16% across all pillars and calls. However, success ...
  87. [87]
    Horizon Europe Journey: A Step-by-Step Overview
    For the single stage submission procedure information on the outcome of the evaluation takes up to 5 months from the date of deadline submission. This is a ...
  88. [88]
    Preparation, submission and assessment of applications
    To optimize your preparation, it is suggested that you commence the development of your proposal 8 to 12 months in advance of the call deadline.
  89. [89]
    Europe must prioritize research and innovation to be competitive
    Jan 17, 2025 · Europe must take urgent action to address the major economic growth gap with the US and China. Here's how research and innovation can help ...
  90. [90]
    EIC Impact Report 2025: EIC on track as leading deep-tech investor ...
    Apr 3, 2025 · Focusing on the Horizon Europe portfolio, the report covers approximately 706 start-ups, 402 advanced research projects, and 183 projects aimed ...
  91. [91]
    40 start-ups secure EIC support in latest round of the EIC Accelerator
    Jun 30, 2025 · The European Innovation Council (EIC) has selected 40 innovative start-ups and SMEs to receive funding following its latest evaluation round.
  92. [92]
    71 companies selected in the most competitive funding round so far
    Feb 17, 2025 · The European Innovation Council (EIC) selected 71 cutting edge companies for funding, combining grants and equity, following the last 2024 EIC Accelerator cut- ...
  93. [93]
    Horizon Europe delivers €11 GDP return for every €1 invested
    May 1, 2025 · ... returning up to €6 in societal value and as much as €11 in GDP growth for every euro invested by 2045. Ekaterina Zaharieva, Commissioner for ...
  94. [94]
    Interim Evaluation of Horizon Europe analyses impact and returns of ...
    Apr 30, 2025 · Under Horizon Europe, only the top 16% of all applications were successful. ... Five Widening Member States now have success rates similar to the ...
  95. [95]
    Do research subsidies crowd out private R&D of large firms ...
    We find no evidence for crowding out and additionally find that small firms, small projects, research-intensive firms and H2020 projects have crowded in private ...
  96. [96]
    [PDF] EU Innovation Policy - ifo Institut
    ''Additionality or crowding-out? An overall evaluation of public R&D subsidy on private R&D expenditure.'' Research Policy 45.9 (2016):. 1715-1730. Mazzucato ...
  97. [97]
    Do research subsidies crowd out private R&D of large firms?
    We evaluate whether public research subsidies are complements or substitutes to the private R&D spending of large firms. Combining data on the EC's three ...
  98. [98]
    [PDF] The impact of R&I policy instruments - Research and innovation
    The paper estimates the causal impact of EU R&D grants, awarded through the SME instrument of Horizon 2020, on a wide set of firm-level innovation outcome ...
  99. [99]
    Do research subsidies crowd out private R&D of large firms ...
    Aug 10, 2025 · We evaluate whether public research subsidies are complements or substitutes to the private R&D spending of large firms.
  100. [100]
    [PDF] The Horizon Europe Programme: A strategic assessment of selected ...
    Horizon Europe is the EU's key funding programme for research and innovation, containing ambitious commitments to scientific progress, climate neutrality ...
  101. [101]
    [PDF] Horizon 2020 in full swing — Three Years On
    Overall, since the start of Horizon 2020, the success rate is of 12.6%. This equates to one out of eight eligible proposals receiving funding, but 74% of high ...
  102. [102]
    Succes rates Horizon Europe rise sharply - PNO Innovation
    May 26, 2025 · The average success rate of a Horizon Europe application has increased by more than a third compared to Horizon 2020.Missing: criteria | Show results with:criteria
  103. [103]
    [PDF] Horizon Europe Condensed - The Legal and Financial Basics - UKRO
    Compared to. Horizon 2020, not much has changed in terms of the eligibility criteria. In short, to be eligible, actual costs must be: Costs are eligible if ...
  104. [104]
    Special Report 28/2018: Simplification measures into Horizon 2020
    With Horizon 2020, simplification became a central aim. The European Commission proposed changes designed to simplify the rules governing EU research and ...
  105. [105]
    [PDF] Looking at the Horizon and Beyond
    Although the initial success rates of Horizon Europe have improved compared to Horizon 2020, they still convincingly demonstrate Europe's enormous appetite ...Missing: comparison shortcomings
  106. [106]
    Processing Horizon Europe grants is taking 23 days longer than ...
    Aug 22, 2024 · For the whole framework programme, it is now taking an average of 273 days between when calls close and grants are signed. That's 23 days longer ...
  107. [107]
    Horizon Dashboard - EU Funding & Tenders Portal
    Find out more about country-specific performance in EU R&I programmes: funding received, participations by region, top beneficiaries, collaboration with other ...
  108. [108]
    Here's what the first two years of Horizon Europe look like in numbers
    Jan 31, 2023 · France's National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) remains the biggest beneficiary of Horizon Europe, thus far having secured €198 million ...Missing: share | Show results with:share
  109. [109]
    Horizon Europe review a missed opportunity to assess Widening ...
    May 28, 2025 · The European Commission's midterm review of Horizon Europe falls short in providing detailed data on Widening performance, according to an informal task force.
  110. [110]
    Widening is working, but it is too soon to celebrate, say observers
    May 14, 2025 · It showed that the share of funding received by the 15 Widening countries increased from 9% to 14% in the first three years of Horizon Europe, ...
  111. [111]
    North vs south: Horizon success rates defy familiar east-west divide
    Mar 4, 2025 · Up in the very north, researchers in Iceland fare best in Horizon Europe, with a whopping 23% success rate.
  112. [112]
    North vs. South: Horizon Europe Success Rates Challenge ...
    Mar 11, 2025 · For example, Iceland leads with a 23% success rate, while Belgium and Moldova also exceed 22%, demonstrating strong performance in the north and ...
  113. [113]
    Interim Evaluation of Horizon Europe analyses impact and returns of ...
    Apr 30, 2025 · Horizon Europe is expected to generate up to six euros in benefits for every euro spent, with 15,000+ projects funded, and 80% of ERC projects ...Missing: per | Show results with:per
  114. [114]
    Widening countries show innovation gain, but gap with other EU ...
    Jul 23, 2025 · Several other Widening countries (Poland, Cyprus, Lithuania, Slovenia, Malta, Czechia and Hungary) posted gains of over 15 points. In comparison ...
  115. [115]
    Widening countries in Horizon Europe - Zaz Ventures
    Horizon Europe widening countries received only 7% of the funding allocated to startups in the EIC Accelerator program in 2022. How can we improve this?
  116. [116]
    Research and innovation for the European Green Deal
    Over 35% of Horizon Europe spending is allocated to address climate change. Green partnerships. Horizon Europe includes a new wave of research and innovation ...Missing: budget percentage
  117. [117]
    Facts about Horizon Europe
    The pillar Innovative Europe aims to bring Europe at the forefront of market-creating innovation and SME growth through the European Innovation Council (EIC).
  118. [118]
    [PDF] Horizon Europe support for the European Green Deal
    The European Green Deal, aimed at making the EU climate-neutral by 2050, outlines a comprehensive approach to sustainability,.Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
  119. [119]
    Diversity of options to eliminate fossil fuels and reach carbon ...
    Jun 8, 2022 · Many technical options exist to achieve carbon neutrality across all energy sectors and to completely eliminate fossil fuel imports in Europe.
  120. [120]
    Dual-use and defence in Horizon Europe: this is not the way to go
    Apr 24, 2025 · It proposes redirecting parts of its budget to dual-use and defence related activities. This fait accompli approach is unacceptable for the League of European ...
  121. [121]
  122. [122]
    Viewpoint: Europe's research priorities must catch up with reality
    Jun 5, 2025 · Europe's research priorities have revolved around a simple formula: technological innovation equals economic growth, equals social progress.Missing: bias | Show results with:bias
  123. [123]
    Evaluation support study on Horizon Europe's contribution to a ...
    Aug 16, 2024 · This publication is the final report of the evaluation support study on Horizon Europe's contribution to a Resilient Europe.
  124. [124]
    Horizon Europe Eligible Countries 2025 | Full Access Guide
    Jun 18, 2025 · List of Associated Countries (2025). As of 2025, 23 countries have association agreements with Horizon Europe. These include both European ...
  125. [125]
    Associated countries set out Horizon Europe concerns | Science
    Mar 27, 2025 · During Horizon Europe, which started in 2021, distant countries like New Zealand, Canada and South Korea have also been allowed to associate.<|separator|>
  126. [126]
    Strategic Autonomy and European Economic and Research Security
    Learn about how the EU safeguards its interest while being open to non-EU countries for research and innovation funding.
  127. [127]
    The European Union and the Russian Federation | EEAS
    Following Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine, the European Union has terminated the participation of Russian legal entities with over 50 % public ...
  128. [128]
    The EU boycott of Russian scientists and the right to science in the ...
    Feb 6, 2023 · The only ground that may justify suspending Russian scientists from Horizon Europe or Horizon 2020 is evidence that funds are indeed misdirected ...
  129. [129]
    Switzerland and EU insist on the benefits of Horizon Europe ...
    Sep 4, 2025 · More recently, Switzerland was excluded from Horizon Europe from 2021 to 2024 because of broader disagreements with the EU. This situation was ...Missing: stalled | Show results with:stalled
  130. [130]
  131. [131]
    EU proposes partial suspension of Israel from Horizon Europe ...
    Jul 30, 2025 · The European Commission has proposed partially suspending Israel's participation in the Horizon Europe research programme.Missing: geopolitical conflicts
  132. [132]
    Commission proposes partial suspension of Israel's association to ...
    Jul 29, 2025 · On 28 July 2025, the European Commission proposed to partially suspend Israel's participation in Horizon Europe. The suspension specifically ...Missing: geopolitical conflicts
  133. [133]
    EU fails to agree Israeli suspension from research fund over Gaza
    Jul 30, 2025 · EU member states could not rally the support necessary to suspend Israel from the Horizon Europe fund in response to the war in Gaza.Missing: geopolitical | Show results with:geopolitical
  134. [134]
    [PDF] EU Grants How to handle security-sensitive projects
    Jul 1, 2021 · This guidance is designed to help applicants and beneficiaries of EU projects get an overview of the additional procedures you need to follow if ...Missing: risks | Show results with:risks
  135. [135]
    Brussels stands firm on plan to limit foreign access to 'sensitive' R&D ...
    May 24, 2021 · Revised plan maintains exclusions for non-EU countries in projects that touch on “sensitive Union assets”. By Éanna Kelly.<|control11|><|separator|>
  136. [136]
    EU-Israel Relations under Threat? - Horizon Europe, a Strategic ...
    Aug 10, 2025 · What the EU has to gain from Israeli participation in Horizon Europe: A Strategic Imperative · Proven Performance & Tremendous Returns.Missing: geopolitical concerns
  137. [137]
    [PDF] EN Horizon Europe Work Programme 2025 6. Civil Security for Society
    May 14, 2025 · Cluster 3 addresses cybercrime and the developing security threats in a digital age, such as criminal use of AI, to protect people, institutions ...
  138. [138]
    Commission publishes Horizon Europe Work Programme 2025
    May 14, 2025 · With an investment of over €7.3 billion, the programme intends to support cutting-edge science, accelerate the EU's green and digital ...
  139. [139]
    [PDF] EN Horizon Europe Work Programme 2025 1. General Introduction
    May 14, 2025 · -. The 'main' Work Programme 2025 will feature 29 topics using two-stage evaluation. These will allow applicants to submit a shorter summary ...Missing: progress | Show results with:progress
  140. [140]
    [PDF] Evolution and/or disruption? - European Parliament
    The resulting underfunding is tangible—for instance, Horizon Europe's failure to fund approximately 71% of high-quality research proposals due to budget ...
  141. [141]
    Horizon Europe - European Commission
    Jul 17, 2025 · Proposal for a Council Decision on establishing the Specific Programme implementing Horizon Europe
  142. [142]
    EC presents proposal for next Framework Programme
    It will be tightly connected to the European Competitiveness Fund. The Commission is proposing to double the budget of the Framework Programme to €175 billion.
  143. [143]
    Legislative Proposal for FP10 published by the European Commission
    Jul 17, 2025 · The proposal for FP10, Horizon Europe (2028-2034), was published on July 17, 2025, and includes changes to European Partnerships, discontinuing ...
  144. [144]
    New Horizon Europe 2028-2034: budget and key pillars
    Jul 29, 2025 · Discover the €175 billion budget and the pillars of the new Horizon Europe 2028-2034. Science, innovation and opportunities for businesses.
  145. [145]
    Emerging Council plans could shake up FP10 - Science|Business
    Sep 10, 2025 · In the document, the Council has bracketed articles 19 and 25 in the Commission's FP10 proposal. Article 19 lays out the scope and updated rules ...
  146. [146]
  147. [147]
    EU budget 2028-2034 - European Commission
    On 3 September 2025, the Commission adopted a second package of sectoral proposals, completing the framework for the next long-term EU budget for 2028-2034.
  148. [148]
    [PDF] On the European Commission's draft proposal for FP10 - connects-uk
    Sep 24, 2025 · CONNECTS-UK welcomes FP10's ambition and expanded budget, but stresses the need to strengthen the UK's association further to reflect its ...<|separator|>
  149. [149]
    Advocacy on FP10 - Science Europe
    The year 2025 is crucial for advocacy towards the EU institutions on the conditions, requirements, and policies for the next Framework Programme: decisions ...
  150. [150]
    Horizon Europe 2028–2034: What do we know so far?
    Sep 29, 2025 · Pillar III proposes a total of €38.785 billion to promote the development of new and innovative products, services, and business models. This is ...