Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Dominion Voting Systems

Dominion Voting Systems Corporation is a provider of end-to-end technology solutions, specializing in hardware and software for secure tabulation, voter interfaces, and administration, with systems deployed in elections across the and . Headquartered in , , the company offers products such as the ImageCast Precinct optical scanner for polling places and the ImageCast Central for high-volume tabulation, which process paper ballots to enable auditable results through verifiable voter-marked records. These systems, certified by federal standards, have supported voting in over two dozen U.S. states, emphasizing features like and audit trails to maintain integrity. The firm became a focal point of controversy following the 2020 , when claims of software vulnerabilities and vote manipulation surfaced from political figures and allies, prompting to pursue actions; notable outcomes included a $787.5 million with Network in 2023 and ongoing suits against others, without admissions of fault by defendants but highlighting unsubstantiated allegations amid broader scrutiny of security. In October 2025, was acquired by Scott Leiendecker, a former elections director, and rebranded as Vote, a fully American-owned entity prioritizing transparency, independent verification, and public confidence in electoral processes.

History

Founding and Early Development

Dominion Voting Systems was founded in 2003 in Toronto, Ontario, , by , who has served as its president and CEO since inception. The company originated as a private enterprise focused on developing and supplying hardware and software, including interfaces and ballot tabulation systems, with an emphasis on proprietary in-house software creation. Initially headquartered in , Dominion targeted municipal, provincial, and federal elections in that country while building a foundation for North American market entry. In its early years, Dominion prioritized innovation in election technology amid growing demand for automated systems following the transition from mechanical to electronic voting in various jurisdictions. The firm developed core products such as optical scan tabulators and precinct-based voting machines, securing initial certifications for use in Canadian elections and laying groundwork for U.S. expansion through subsidiary incorporations. By the mid-2000s, the company had established operations in the United States, incorporating Dominion Voting Systems, Inc., in , , to facilitate sales and compliance with American election standards, marking a shift toward broader deployment in states seeking verifiable paper-trail-enabled systems. This period of development emphasized secure, auditable voting solutions, though the company's growth was later intertwined with acquisitions of existing voting assets from predecessors like .

Acquisitions and Expansion

In May 2010, Dominion Voting Systems acquired key assets of from (ES&S), including , software, and hardware related to optical scan and direct recording electronic (DRE) voting systems originally developed by Diebold. This transaction, valued at an undisclosed amount, stemmed from a U.S. Department of Justice antitrust settlement requiring ES&S to divest certain Premier assets following its earlier purchase of Diebold's election division in 2009. The acquisition enabled Dominion to integrate Premier's technologies, such as the AccuVote-TSX DRE machines and ballot tabulators, expanding its portfolio beyond Canadian origins into broader U.S. markets previously dominated by Diebold systems. One month later, on June 4, 2010, Dominion completed the acquisition of , a major U.S. provider of equipment used in over 20 states. Sequoia's assets included the AVC Edge DRE systems and Optech optical scanners, which had faced scrutiny for security vulnerabilities but held significant market penetration, particularly in and other jurisdictions. This purchase, also for an undisclosed sum, further consolidated Dominion's position by absorbing Sequoia's customer base and certifying its systems under standards like the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG). These 2010 acquisitions marked a pivotal for , transforming it from a primarily Canadian-focused firm—founded in in 2003—into a dominant U.S. provider. By incorporating legacy technologies from Diebold and , enhanced its offerings with hybrid paper-trail capabilities and scaled deployments to serve jurisdictions in approximately 28 states by the mid-2010s, capitalizing on post-Help Vote (HAVA) upgrades. The moves reduced in the fragmented sector, where fewer than five major vendors controlled most U.S. systems, though they drew antitrust oversight to prevent monopolistic practices. Subsequent growth involved securing contracts in states like (2019) and , alongside international pilots in and the , broadening 's revenue streams beyond hardware sales to include software licensing and maintenance services.

Ownership Changes and Rebranding

Dominion Voting Systems was acquired on July 16, 2018, by a group comprising its existing management team led by CEO and Staple Street Capital, a founded in 2009. This transaction marked a shift from prior ownership by the company's founders, who had established it in in 2003, to control, with Staple Street providing capital for expansion amid growing demand for election technology. Staple Street's investment, reportedly around $38 million initially, yielded substantial returns, including from the $787.5 million defamation settlement with in April 2023 over false 2020 election claims. Staple Street retained majority ownership through the 2024 U.S. election cycle, during which systems were deployed in 27 states. On October 9, 2025, the company was sold to Scott Leiendecker, a former elections director in , , and founder of the voter verification firm Knowink (operating as Liberty Vote). Leiendecker's acquisition integrated 's assets with Liberty Vote's technology, aiming to enhance election infrastructure amid ongoing scrutiny of reliability. election officials confirmed that all prior certifications for systems remained valid post-acquisition, with no immediate operational disruptions. The sale prompted an immediate rebranding of to Liberty Vote, reflecting the new ownership's emphasis on voter access and verification tools. This change followed years of surrounding Dominion's role in the 2020 election, where unsubstantiated rigging allegations had damaged its reputation, though courts and audits repeatedly affirmed system integrity. Leiendecker stated the rebrand sought to distance from past narratives and focus on "secure, transparent elections," aligning with conservative critiques of prior management ties to Democratic donors via Staple Street principals. No further ownership shifts have occurred as of October 2025.

Corporate Structure and Leadership

Key Executives and Officers

John G. Poulos served as co-founder, President, and CEO of from the company's inception in 2003 until its acquisition in October 2025. Poulos, an engineer by training, oversaw the development and deployment of Dominion's voting systems across multiple jurisdictions. On October 9, 2025, was acquired by Liberty Vote, a -based election firm founded by Scott Leiendecker, a former elections director in , . Leiendecker, who previously led elections operations and has advocated for enhanced election measures, assumed principal ownership and control of through the transaction, which integrated it under Liberty Vote's umbrella. Poulos confirmed the sale in a brief statement, noting the acquisition's completion without detailing transitional roles. As of late October 2025, detailed post-acquisition executive rosters for remain undisclosed publicly, with operational leadership reportedly aligning under Leiendecker's direction amid the ongoing rebranding and integration process. Prior to the sale, other senior officers included Michael McGee as Executive Vice President and , responsible for financial strategy and compliance.

Ownership History and Headquarters

Dominion Voting Systems was acquired in July 2018 by its management team, led by chief executive , in partnership with the Staple Street Capital. This followed prior private arrangements since the company's in the early as a Canadian-based provider of election technology. Staple Street's initial investment, estimated at approximately $38 million, generated a reported 1,500% return by April 2023, largely due to Dominion's $787.5 million settlement with over unsubstantiated 2020 election claims broadcast by the network. In October 2025, Staple Street sold Dominion to Liberty Vote, a St. Louis, Missouri-based firm founded by Scott Leiendecker, a former Republican elections director for St. Louis who had previously managed GOP campaigns and voter outreach. The transaction integrates Dominion's voting hardware and software into Liberty Vote's portfolio, which includes ballot verification systems, with plans for rebranding and continued operations across jurisdictions in 27 U.S. states. Leiendecker has stated the acquisition aims to enhance election integrity through American-made technology, amid ongoing scrutiny of voting system vendors. The company's primary U.S. headquarters are in Denver, Colorado, housing operations for its American subsidiary, Dominion Voting Systems Inc., while the parent entity maintains roots and facilities in Toronto, Ontario, . Following the 2025 acquisition, Liberty Vote's base may influence administrative functions, though core manufacturing and certification activities remain tied to existing sites.

Products and Technology

Voting Hardware

Dominion Voting Systems' voting hardware primarily consists of optical scanners and ballot marking devices designed for integration with its Democracy Suite software platform. These devices support paper-based voting systems, emphasizing hand-marked ballots scanned for tabulation. The ImageCast Precinct (ICP) is a precinct optical scan tabulator that scans, validates, and tabulates hand-marked paper at polling locations. It features a high-speed capable of ballots at rates up to 120 per minute and includes options for voters with disabilities. The ImageCast Central (ICC) functions as a central office tabulator for high-volume ballot , handling tasks such as of ballots with errors or ambiguities detected during precinct scanning. It supports of thousands of ballots and integrates with systems for result consolidation. The ImageCast X (ICX) is a ballot marking device (BMD) that allows voters to select choices via an audio-tactile , producing a paper for subsequent scanning. It accommodates needs through features like controls, zoom functions, and audio feedback, without direct tabulation capabilities in BMD mode. The ImageCast Evolution () combines optical scanning with handling in a unit suitable for precinct use, scanning hand-marked or machine-marked ballots while supporting voter-verifiable paper audit trails. It weighs approximately 85 pounds and operates on electrical outlets, designed for mobility within polling sites.

Election Software

Dominion Voting Systems' core election software offering is the Democracy Suite, a modular election management system (EMS) designed to handle the full election lifecycle, including election setup, ballot production, device configuration, vote tabulation, and results reporting. The system integrates with hardware components such as optical scanners and ballot marking devices to process paper ballots while generating electronic records for auditing and canvassing. Democracy Suite versions, such as 5.19 and 5.20, have undergone federal and state certification testing under standards like the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG), with components including the EMS server, Election Event Designer (EDD), and tabulation modules. The EMS component within Democracy Suite enables election officials to define jurisdictions, precincts, and contests; design ballot layouts in PDF format compatible with tabulators; and program voting devices with encrypted ballot definition files (BDFs). It supports features like voter-activated interfaces for accessible , second-chance review for corrections, and centralized tabulation of precinct results uploaded via secure media. Post-election, the software facilitates risk-limiting audits (RLAs) by exporting cast vote records (CVRs) and images, allowing statistical sampling of paper against electronic tallies. Additional software modules handle data import from systems, precinct-level reporting, and compliance with accessibility standards under the Help America Vote Act (HAVA), including audio ballot navigation for visually impaired voters. The operates on Windows-based servers with role-based permissions to segregate duties among election staff, and it logs all actions for forensic review. As of 2025, certified iterations like Democracy Suite 5.20 incorporate updates for enhanced data encryption and interoperability with diverse hardware configurations across jurisdictions.

Security Features and Certifications

Dominion Voting Systems' Democracy employs a defense-in-depth approach to , incorporating air-gapped networks that isolate voting equipment from the public , thereby minimizing remote access risks. Hardware components, such as the ImageCast Precinct optical scanners, feature tamper-evident seals, physical locks, and no wireless connectivity to prevent unauthorized modifications. data is encrypted during storage and tabulation, with required for administrative functions and continuous vulnerability scanning integrated into the system's operational protocols. The platform emphasizes auditability through paper-based processes, producing voter-verifiable paper audit trails (VVPAT) via accessible ballot-marking devices and optical scanners that tabulate hand-marked or machine-printed ballots. These enable risk-limiting audits, as demonstrated in Colorado's 2018 implementation, where statistical sampling confirmed election outcomes. Post-election, the system's robust auditing module supports independent verification, including logic and accuracy testing, with results exportable in formats compatible with state requirements. Certifications for Dominion systems are conducted by U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC)-accredited laboratories, such as Pro V&V and SLI Compliance, against the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG). Democracy Suite 4.0 achieved EAC certification under VVSG 2005, involving hardware qualification, software testing, and security assessments including source code reviews and penetration testing. Subsequent versions, like 5.5A, received state approvals following EAC-aligned evaluations; certified it on December 5, 2018, after verifying compliance with standards and state-specific protocols. Newer iterations, such as 5.20, undergo ongoing testing to VVSG 2.0 principles, though full recertification requires EAC review of modifications. These processes ensure adherence to requirements but rely on lab attestations without mandatory open-source disclosure.

Deployment and Operations

United States

Dominion Voting Systems entered the market in the mid-2000s, expanding from its Canadian origins by offering electronic voting hardware and software tailored to comply with state-specific election laws and federal standards set by the Election Assistance Commission (EAC). Its initial deployments included optical scanners and ballot marking devices, building on acquisitions of assets from earlier vendors like , which enabled broader adoption in U.S. jurisdictions seeking to modernize post-Help America Vote Act (HAVA) requirements. By 2006, components such as the ImageCast Remote system were in use for absentee and remote voting in select areas. The company's systems have been deployed in thousands of local jurisdictions across at least 24 states as of the elections, with usage expanding to 27 states by 2024, encompassing roughly one in four U.S. voters nationwide. Between 2017 and 2019, Dominion received $118.3 million in contracts from 19 states and 133 local governments for election services, reflecting significant operational footprint in both urban and rural settings. Key states include , , , and , where systems supported high-volume elections, though exact county-level variations depend on local and . In U.S. operations, Dominion's Democracy Suite platform integrates hardware like the ImageCast X touchscreen ballot markers, ImageCast Precinct optical scanners for in-precinct tabulation, and ImageCast Central for post-election aggregation and reporting. These are typically configured for paper ballot production with voter-verifiable trails (VVAT), allowing hand-marked or machine-marked ballots to be scanned at precincts or centrally, with results auditable via risk-limiting s in compliant states. administrators handle setup, voter assistance, and troubleshooting, while provides pre-election logic and accuracy (L&A) testing support, software updates, and 24/7 technical assistance during voting periods. Systems undergo state-by-state , often requiring air-gapped networks and protocols to mitigate operational risks.

Canada

Dominion Voting Systems was established in , , in 2003 by , a engineering graduate, and James Hoover, initially focusing on solutions for Canadian markets. As a Canadian-headquartered firm at the time, it developed hardware and software for ballot tabulation and voting processes, positioning itself as the country's largest provider of such systems by 2016, with deployments in over 1,200 jurisdictions primarily at the municipal level. These included optical scanners and precinct-based systems like the ImageCast series for counting hand-marked paper ballots in local s. The company's technology has been contracted for municipal elections in multiple provinces, such as and , where it supports tabulation of paper ballots without direct use in federal contests, which Elections Canada conducts via manual counting of paper ballots under observation. For instance, in Ontario's municipal elections, Dominion supplied tabulation software, though online voting components—handled separately—experienced server overloads attributed to a third-party Toronto-based service provider rather than Dominion's core systems. Dominion has also provided platforms for internal party processes, including leadership election tabulation for major Canadian political organizations like the . Unlike its U.S. deployments, Canadian implementations have not faced widespread fraud allegations, with operations emphasizing auditable paper trails and no reported systemic failures altering outcomes. In October 2025, was acquired by a U.S.-based firm led by former election official Scott Leiendecker and rebranded as Vote, marking a shift from its Canadian origins while maintaining ongoing contracts in Canadian municipalities. This transaction did not immediately disrupt Canadian deployments, which continue to prioritize verifiable, low-tech integration with paper-based voting to mitigate risks of electronic manipulation. Canadian electoral authorities have consistently verified 's systems through independent testing, aligning with provincial standards that require post- audits and manual recounts where discrepancies arise, as seen in British Columbia's 2024 provincial tabulation processes.

International Deployments

Dominion Voting Systems' voting hardware and software have not been deployed for elections in countries outside North America. The company's operations and client base have historically been confined to jurisdictions within the United States and Canada. The firm maintains a software development office in Belgrade, Serbia, employing local engineers to support the creation and maintenance of its election management systems, including Democracy Suite. This presence, established as part of outsourcing development work, does not extend to the implementation or use of Dominion's voting equipment in Serbian elections or any other foreign polling processes. Allegations of Dominion's involvement in international elections, such as unsubstantiated claims linking its technology to voting irregularities in or through historical acquisitions like , have circulated in partisan discourse but lack verification through official records or independent audits confirming deployment. Dominion's acquisition of Sequoia assets in 2010 involved intellectual property from a vendor with prior Venezuelan contracts, but no evidence indicates Dominion systems were subsequently used abroad.

Security Concerns and Vulnerabilities

Technical Flaws and Expert Analyses

Cybersecurity experts have identified multiple technical vulnerabilities in Dominion Voting Systems' equipment, particularly the ImageCast X (ICX) ballot marking devices and associated software. J. Alex Halderman, a of at the specializing in election security, conducted an extensive analysis of Georgia's Dominion ICX systems, revealing flaws such as trivially guessable passwords, exploitable buffer overflows, and inadequate that could enable an attacker with brief physical access to alter vote tallies or install . In a 2023 expert report, Halderman demonstrated these issues by hacking an ICX machine in under two minutes to change votes on ballots, highlighting risks from outdated operating systems like and unpatched third-party software. The U.S. (CISA) issued an advisory in June 2022 detailing vulnerabilities in Dominion's Democracy Suite ImageCast X versions 5.5-A through 5.17-B, including improper access controls (CVE-2022-26809) and cryptographic weaknesses that could allow unauthorized configuration changes or ballot manipulation if exploited. Halderman's ongoing research has uncovered additional software flaws in Dominion systems, prompting the company to develop patches for issues that could facilitate vote tally alterations with physical access, though experts emphasize that such vulnerabilities underscore broader risks in direct-recording electronic (DRE) components even when paper trails exist. A 2024 peer-reviewed paper presented at the Security Symposium identified a ballot randomization flaw in Dominion's precinct-based optical used in 21 states, where insufficient shuffling of ballot order enables attackers to correlate scanned ballots with voter identities, compromising voter anonymity despite paper records. Independent assessments, including a report commissioned in the litigation, confirmed systemic security shortcomings in ICX devices, such as weak and potential for remote code execution via USB ports, recommending enhanced protections like tamper-evident seals and routine reviews. Federal evaluations by the Department of Homeland Security and CISA have acknowledged these software flaws but assessed them as unlikely to impact election outcomes without physical tampering or insider assistance, given mitigations like air-gapped operations and post-election audits; however, experts like Halderman argue that the presence of exploitable code in certified systems indicates insufficient rigorous testing and ongoing risks from evolving threats. These analyses collectively point to Dominion's reliance on legacy code and as contributing factors to vulnerabilities, with recommendations for adopting open-source components and verifiable paper-based to enhance .

Certification Processes and Federal Testing

The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) oversees federal certification of voting systems through its Testing and Certification Program, established under the Help America Vote Act of 2002. Manufacturers submit hardware and software for examination by EAC-accredited Voting System Test Laboratories (VSTLs), which conduct rigorous testing for compliance with the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG), including functional accuracy, accessibility, privacy, and basic security requirements. Upon successful lab validation, the EAC reviews documentation and issues certification, which is voluntary but often serves as a baseline for state approvals; as of 2025, 86 systems from various vendors hold EAC certification. Dominion Voting Systems' Democracy Suite platform has undergone repeated federal testing, with certifications primarily aligned to the older VVSG 1.0 (2005) standards. Key versions include Democracy Suite 5.17 (certified March 16, 2023) and 5.20 (certified February 4, 2025), both tested by Pro V&V, an EAC-accredited VSTL in . Pro V&V's evaluations encompass audits, integrity checks, simulated scenarios, and discrepancy resolution, attesting to adherence to prescribed test plans without endorsing broader product approval. Other labs, such as SLI Compliance (accredited for VVSG 2.0 testing since November 2022), have supported state-level reviews of systems, though federal certification for Dominion remains under VVSG 1.0. Despite these certifications, the processes have faced criticism for relying on outdated VVSG 1.0 guidelines, which predate modern cybersecurity threats like remote exploits or undetectable software alterations. VVSG 2.0, adopted in 2021 with principles for , has seen limited adoptions; as of August 2025, Hart InterCivic's Verity Vanguard achieved the first full VVSG 2.0 , while has not. Independent analyses, such as professor J. Alex Halderman's forensic examination, demonstrated vulnerabilities in 's ImageCast X ballot-marking devices—deployed in states like —where votes could be altered without detection, evading standard checks focused on rather than adversarial . The 2020 Antrim County, Michigan, reporting error, where initial results favored by thousands before correction to by 3,800 votes, highlighted gaps between certification and operational deployment. Attributed to a clerk's to apply a certified software update, the incident involved no evidence of vote flipping but exposed risks in not fully addressed in federal testing protocols. Audits confirmed post-correction accuracy, with gaining a net 12 votes, yet it fueled debates over whether VSTL testing adequately simulates real-world errors or insider threats. States like and have supplemented federal processes with independent oversight, including code reviews by firms like Cyber Castellum, finding no disqualifying issues but recommending enhanced chain-of-custody measures.

Audits and Verification Methods

Dominion Voting Systems' Democracy Suite, including ImageCast optical scanners and precinct ballot marking devices, generates paper ballots as the voter-verifiable record, enabling post-election audits that compare physical ballots against electronic tabulations. These systems produce cast vote records (CVRs) from scanned ballots, which can be statistically sampled for without requiring a full manual recount. Pre-election verification includes logic and accuracy (L&A) testing, where officials program machines, insert test ballots with known outcomes, and confirm tabulation accuracy before deployment; this process is mandated in states like and using equipment. Post-election methods encompass hand recounts of paper ballots in jurisdictions with close races or statutory requirements, as well as ballot image audits that digitally review scanned ballot photos against QR codes or human-readable marks to verify machine interpretations. Risk-limiting audits (RLAs) represent a statistical verification approach supported by systems, involving random sampling of paper ballots until the risk of an incorrect outcome falls below a predefined limit, typically 5-10%; Colorado's 2017 statewide RLA, the first of its kind, utilized 's ImageCast Evolution scanners to audit hand-marked paper ballots, confirming machine tallies. implemented batch-comparison RLAs in 2020 and 2022 on systems, sampling ballots within precinct batches to validate reported results for key races, though critics note this method assumes uniform error rates across batches and relies on secure chain-of-custody for papers. Federal certification under the Election Assistance Commission's Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG) requires accredited labs, such as Pro V&V, to conduct functional configuration audits, reviews, and penetration testing on Dominion systems; for example, Democracy Suite 5.20 achieved EAC certification on February 4, 2025, following tests verifying accuracy, security, and auditability against VVSG 1.0 standards. State-level certifications, like those in and , incorporate additional audits of hardware and software configurations tailored to local paper ballot requirements. exercises simulate adversarial attacks to probe vulnerabilities, as documented in reports on earlier versions, though these focus on potential exploits rather than routine verification.

2020 U.S. Presidential Election

Deployment Scale and Performance

Dominion Voting Systems' equipment was deployed across 28 states in the 2020 U.S. presidential election, including battleground jurisdictions such as , , , and , where it handled tabulation for varying numbers of counties and voters. In , following a statewide awarded in , Dominion's ImageCast systems processed all 5 million ballots cast, enabling both direct recording and optical scan tabulation. Similar deployments occurred in over 1,300 jurisdictions nationwide, though exact voter totals varied by state certification and hybrid use with other vendors. Performance evaluations, including post- audits and recounts, generally aligned with federal standards for accuracy, with machine counts matching hand tallies within expected margins. In , a full hand recount of presidential ballots completed on November 19, 2020, confirmed Joe Biden's margin of victory, showing discrepancies of approximately 0.01%—attributable to unreadable marks, overvotes, and minor tabulation variances rather than systemic flaws. Michigan's statewide similarly validated results, though isolated glitches occurred; in Antrim County, an initial reporting error on November 3, 2020, flipped approximately 6,000 votes due to a clerk's failure to complete a required software update on the , which was corrected the same day without altering certified outcomes. A subsequent independent forensic review affirmed no compromise of the Dominion hardware or software itself. The U.S. (CISA) assessed that, despite identified software vulnerabilities in systems disclosed post-, there was no evidence of exploitation impacting vote tallies in 2020. officials in deploying states reported overall reliable operation under high-volume conditions, with error rates below 1% for ballot rejection and no widespread failures preventing , though procedural lapses highlighted dependencies on local and .

Fraud Allegations and Evidence Claims

Allegations of fraud involving Dominion Voting Systems in the U.S. primarily revolved around claims that the company's tabulation equipment and software enabled the systematic flipping of votes from to in battleground states. Attorneys affiliated with the Trump campaign, including and , asserted that Dominion's Democracy Suite software incorporated algorithms capable of altering vote ratios undetectably, with Powell specifically citing purported Venezuelan origins of the technology—linking it to —and a CIA-linked "Hammer and Scorecard" system for mass manipulation via foreign servers. These assertions were supported by references to over 100 affidavits from poll watchers and workers alleging machine malfunctions, such as touchscreen selections spontaneously changing from Trump to Biden, and exclusions of observers during tabulation in Dominion-equipped venues. The , tabulation anomaly on November 4, 2020—where initial results reported Biden leading by approximately 3,000 votes in a heavily before a correction showed winning by 3,778 votes—was frequently cited as direct evidence of programmable fraud. The Allied Security Operations Group (ASOG), a cybersecurity firm, issued a forensic report on December 14, 2020, analyzing Antrim's ImageCast Precinct systems and claiming inherent design flaws, including unsecured calibration files that allowed post-election vote ratio adjustments without audit trails, error rates exceeding 68% in some tests (far above federal 1-in-250,000 standards), and absent or corrupted logs preventing verification. ASOG concluded the system was "intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results," recommending its decertification. In Georgia, fraud proponents highlighted surveillance video from State Farm Arena in Fulton County on November 3-4, 2020, showing election workers retrieving ballot containers—described as "suitcases"—from under tables after observers and a camera feed had been paused, allegedly enabling the scanning of thousands of undocumented ballots on Dominion machines without bipartisan oversight. presented this footage during a , 2020, as a "national crime scene" demonstrating coordinated insertion of fraudulent votes. Additional evidence claims included vulnerabilities from modems in Dominion tabulators, which ASOG and others alleged permitted remote access and internet-based hacks during result transmission, bypassing air-gapped safeguards. Statistical irregularities were also invoked, such as disproportionate Biden margins in Dominion-heavy precincts defying distributions for leading digits in vote tallies and synchronized late-night vote dumps favoring Biden in multiple states, purportedly impossible without algorithmic intervention.

Investigations, Audits, and Court Rulings

Following the 2020 U.S. presidential election, multiple states conducted and recounts of ballots processed by Dominion Voting Systems equipment, with results generally affirming the certified outcomes despite procedural irregularities in isolated cases. In , where Dominion systems tabulated over 5 million votes, a statewide risk-limiting initiated on November 11, 2020, examined a statistical sample of ballots and confirmed President-elect Joe Biden's margin of victory by approximately 11,779 votes, with no discrepancies sufficient to alter the result. A subsequent hand recount of all presidential ballots, completed by December 7, 2020, reduced Biden's lead by 1,319 votes due to overvotes and scanning errors but upheld the original certification. In , an initial reporting error on November 3, 2020, temporarily showed Biden leading by thousands of votes due to a clerical failure in updating results from a Republican-leaning precinct; a hand of 22,000 ballots by December 18, 2020, verified Trump's victory there by 3,800 votes, attributing discrepancies to rather than machine manipulation. Forensic examinations in these jurisdictions identified security vulnerabilities in Dominion systems but found no evidence of intentional exploitation impacting vote tallies. professor J. Alex Halderman's independent forensic audit of Antrim County's Dominion equipment, released in detailed form at the Security Symposium in August 2022, revealed that the systems lacked basic protections like air-gapping from the and used unencrypted cards, allowing hypothetical unauthorized access; however, it concluded that the observed errors stemmed from user mistakes, not , and that paper ballots matched electronic records. The (CISA), in a June 3, 2022, advisory, acknowledged software flaws in Dominion's ImageCast X ballot-marking devices—such as buffer overflows and hardcoded credentials affecting versions up to 5.5-A—but stated there was "no evidence that these vulnerabilities have ever led to exploitation of the systems in elections, including the 2020 elections." A joint November 12, 2020, statement from CISA and election officials across government and industry described the election as "the most secure in American history," with no compromised voting systems altering outcomes. Over 60 lawsuits filed by the campaign, lawmakers, and allies alleging Dominion-related fraud—claiming vote-switching algorithms, foreign interference, or ballot stuffing—were dismissed or withdrawn by January 2021, primarily for lack of standing, procedural failures, or insufficient to warrant relief. Federal and state courts, including the U.S. , rejected appeals citing Dominion irregularities; for instance, in King v. Whitmer ( Eastern District, December 7, 2020), Judge Linda Parker ruled plaintiffs failed to provide "any of or misconduct" in systems beyond speculation. Similar dismissals occurred in (Wood v. Raffensperger, November 20, 2020) and (Donald J. for President v. Boockvar, November 28, 2020), where judges noted allegations relied on affidavits without corroboration or chain-of-custody proof. In contrast, prevailed in suits against media outlets promoting unproven claims: a $787.5 million settlement with in April 2023; a $67 million settlement with in August 2025; and Giuliani's bankruptcy-protected settlement in September 2025, acknowledging no supported assertions against the company. These rulings underscored that while machines exhibited testable weaknesses, empirical audits and judicial scrutiny found no causal link to outcome-determinative irregularities.

Defamation Lawsuits and Financial Outcomes

Following unsubstantiated allegations of vote manipulation in the 2020 U.S. presidential election, Dominion Voting Systems initiated multiple defamation lawsuits against media outlets, commentators, and individuals who claimed the company's machines rigged results in favor of . These suits, filed primarily in 2021, sought damages exceeding $1 billion each in several cases, asserting that defendants knowingly propagated false narratives despite internal awareness of their inaccuracy. Courts largely rejected motions to dismiss, finding plausible claims of under New York Times v. Sullivan standards, as defendants allegedly endorsed baseless theories linking Dominion to foreign interference or algorithmic fraud. The most prominent case was against Network, filed on March 23, 2021, in for $1.6 billion, alleging the network aired over 20 segments promoting theories about Dominion despite private doubts from executives and hosts. On April 18, 2023, hours before trial, Fox settled for $787.5 million—the largest known settlement in U.S. history—without admitting , averting public disclosure of evidence including depositions showing Fox prioritized audience retention over accuracy. The payout strained Fox Corporation's finances but was covered by insurance and did not materially impair operations, per financial analyses. Dominion also sued Rudy Giuliani on January 25, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia for $1.3 billion, citing his repeated public accusations of Dominion flipping votes via Venezuelan software ties. The case advanced past denials, but settled confidentially on September 27, 2025, with terms undisclosed amid Giuliani's proceedings. Similar suits against , filed in 2021 for promoting "kraken" theories of Dominion fraud, resulted in a 2023 settlement for an undisclosed sum below the $1.3 billion sought, including Powell's retraction of claims. Against Mike Lindell of MyPillow, a $1.3 billion suit filed in 2021 remains active as of October 2025, with courts awarding Dominion over $2 million in sanctions against Lindell for discovery violations. Additional settlements included in April 2022 for an undisclosed amount with a public apology, and on August 18, 2025, resolving a 2021 suit without specified financial details. These outcomes provided with substantial liquidity—exceeding $800 million from public settlements alone—bolstering its position before its October 2025 acquisition by Liberty Vote, though exact net financial impact remains opaque due to confidential terms and legal costs. No defendants admitted fraud in the election, and settlements preserved First Amendment debates over media liability for .

Reception and Broader Impact

Achievements in Election Modernization

Dominion Voting Systems advanced election modernization by developing the Democracy Suite election management system, which integrates certified hardware and software for streamlined ballot production, scanning, and reporting, replacing older mechanical and punch-card systems with optical scan technology that enhances tabulation speed and reduces manual errors. The system's ImageCast Precinct tabulators process paper ballots at high volumes, enabling jurisdictions to report results more rapidly than traditional hand-count methods, as evidenced by deployments in over 25 U.S. states where electronic-optical hybrids cut processing times while maintaining verifiable records. A key innovation lies in the ImageCast X ballot marking device, a touchscreen interface that produces voter-verified paper ballots, combining electronic with auditable paper trails to support risk-limiting audits and improve post-election verification over direct-recording electronic systems lacking such features. This hybrid approach, certified under federal Voting System Guidelines, facilitates accessibility for voters with disabilities through audio-tactile feedback and adjustable interfaces, as demonstrated in where participants, including elderly voters, successfully navigated the system with minimal assistance. Dominion's contributions extended to central count operations via ImageCast Central, which automates aggregation and , allowing election officials to handle larger voter turnouts efficiently, as seen in certifications across multiple states that confirm compliance with standards for accuracy and chain-of-custody protocols. By prioritizing paper-based auditability in conjunction with electronic efficiency, these systems addressed longstanding concerns over unverifiable digital votes, enabling jurisdictions like those adopting post-2016 upgrades to transition from aging equipment vulnerable to mechanical failure.

Criticisms from Security Experts and Conservatives

Security researcher J. Alex Halderman, a of at the , conducted a detailed of Dominion's ImageCast X ballot-marking devices used in , identifying multiple severe vulnerabilities in a 96-page report released in June 2023. These included flaws allowing unauthorized access to alter vote tallies, weak authentication mechanisms, and risks from outdated software components, demonstrated through physical demonstrations where Halderman hacked the system in under two minutes during a 2023 federal court proceeding in Curling v. Raffensperger. The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) corroborated several of these issues in a June 2022 advisory, confirming vulnerabilities in Dominion's Democracy Suite ImageCast X versions prior to 5.5-A, such as buffer overflows and hardcoded credentials that could enable remote code execution or ballot manipulation if exploited. While CISA stated no evidence of actual exploitation occurred, including in the 2020 election, the agency emphasized the need for patches and risk mitigation like paper backups. Independent researchers further uncovered ballot randomization flaws in Dominion precinct-based scanners in a 2024 USENIX Security paper, revealing that predictable ordering could link ballots to voters, compromising secret-ballot protections in systems used across 21 states. Conservatives have leveraged these expert findings to criticize Dominion for insufficient safeguards against tampering, arguing that proprietary software and internet-connectable components create undue risks in high-stakes elections. In April 2023, Shasta County, California, Republican supervisors voted 4-1 to terminate their contract, citing repeated glitches, unexplained tabulation errors during testing, and broader reliability doubts amplified by Halderman's disclosures, despite state certification. Figures in conservative media and policy circles, such as those associated with the Election Integrity Network, have called for abandoning systems in favor of hand-counted paper ballots, pointing to the company's foreign elements—like components from —and lack of full open-source code as vectors for undetected interference, though maintains all critical software is U.S.-developed and certified. These critiques persist amid ongoing litigation, with conservatives viewing federal affirmations of flaws as validation for demands of enhanced transparency and decentralized verification over reliance on vendor assurances.

Media Narratives and Fact-Checking Disputes

Following the 2020 U.S. presidential election, mainstream media outlets such as , , and consistently framed allegations against Dominion Voting Systems as baseless conspiracy theories propagated by former President and his allies, emphasizing repeated debunkings by election officials and cybersecurity agencies. Coverage highlighted the absence of evidence for widespread vote manipulation, attributing isolated errors—like the initial misreporting in , on November 6, 2020—to human clerical mistakes in data entry rather than software flaws. These narratives often linked Dominion to the broader "Big Lie" trope, portraying scrutiny of the company's systems as undermining democratic trust without empirical basis. Fact-checking organizations, including FactCheck.org, Reuters, and PolitiFact, rated specific claims—such as Dominion machines "deleting" or "switching" votes— as false, citing forensic audits, hand recounts matching machine tallies, and statements from the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) affirming no exploitation of known vulnerabilities in 2020. For instance, in Antrim County, where initial results showed Joseph Biden leading by thousands before correction to a Trump win, independent analyses by experts like J. Alex Halderman in 2021 and 2022 confirmed the discrepancy stemmed from failure to update precinct data files, with final hand audits aligning with machine outputs and no signs of tampering. CISA's 2022 review acknowledged software flaws in certain Dominion ballot-marking devices but found zero evidence of real-world breaches affecting outcomes. Disputes arose from conservative commentators, security researchers, and Trump-aligned figures who accused fact-checkers of , arguing they dismissed legitimate concerns by conflating lack of proven with inherent , often relying uncritically on Dominion's self-reported or assurances amid acknowledged risks like unpatched vulnerabilities and modem connectivity. Halderman's demonstrations— a Dominion ImageCast X machine in under two minutes during a federal trial—highlighted exploitable weaknesses, such as weak and physical access points, prompting critics to contend that fact-checks underemphasized causal pathways for potential even if unexploited in 2020. Skeptics pointed to over 60 affidavits from poll watchers alleging irregularities, statistical analyses of vote spikes (later attributed to normal batch reporting), and the settlement—where Dominion received $787.5 million without trial admission of inaccuracies—as evidence that narratives prioritized narrative closure over probing transparency issues like Dominion's refusal of full third-party code audits pre-election. These critics, including figures like , maintained that fact-checkers' reliance on post-hoc validations ignored first-mover advantages in error-prone environments, though courts uniformly rejected suits for insufficient evidence.

References

  1. [1]
    Dominion Voting Systems Corp | U.S. Election Assistance Commission
    Sep 23, 2019 · PO Box 343. Broomfield, Colorado, 80038. Type: Corporation. Technical Representative: Robert Giles, Vice President of Certification and ...
  2. [2]
    Dominion Voting Systems, Inc. Company Profile | Denver, Colorado
    Use our commercial database of more than 120 million business records & industry directory for company research & industry analysis.
  3. [3]
    Voting Equipment Database – Dominion ImageCast Precinct
    Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast Precinct (ICP) is a ballot scanning device used to support polling locations with voters who hand-mark paper ballots.
  4. [4]
    Dominion Voting Systems Inc - Company Profile and News
    Aug 18, 2025 · Dominion Voting Systems, Inc. provides voting machines and tabulators. The Company offers voting systems and scanning devices, as well as resource planning.
  5. [5]
    Fox, Dominion reach $787M settlement over election claims
    Apr 18, 2023 · Fox and Dominion Voting Systems have reached a $787 million settlement in the voting machine company's defamation lawsuit.
  6. [6]
    Dominion Voting Systems reaches settlement in its $1.3 ... - CBS News
    Sep 27, 2025 · Dominion sued Giuliani in 2021 for $1.3 billion in damages after he led President Trump's efforts to cast doubt on the 2020 election ...
  7. [7]
    Dominion Voting Systems sold to company run by ... - ABC News
    Oct 9, 2025 · Dominion Voting Systems, which sued Fox over its reporting on the 2020 election, has been sold to a seemingly new election company run by a ...
  8. [8]
    Liberty Vote
    ### Summary of Dominion Voting Content
  9. [9]
    Dominion: What you need to know about the voting company Trump ...
    Nov 20, 2020 · President Trump and his allies have sought to cast doubt on the results of the 2020 presidential election by challenging everything from ...
  10. [10]
    Dominion Voting Systems: Home
    Intuitive touchscreen voting available in a variety of configurations. PRECINCT BALLOT TABULATORS. imagecast-precinct ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Dominion Voting Systems - GovInfo
    Nov 12, 2020 · Dominion Voting Systems Has A Presence In The U.S. And Canada. Dominion Voting Systems Was Founded In 2003 According To The Company's Website.
  12. [12]
    Dominion Voting Systems | Research Starters - EBSCO
    The company specializes in creating touchscreen voting machines, ballot printers, and ballot scanners, and its products are used to facilitate elections and ...
  13. [13]
    Elections 101: About Dominion Voting Systems
    Founded in 2003, Dominion Voting Systems is a leading industry supplier of election technology across the U.S., Canada and globally. Products. EMS ENGINE.
  14. [14]
    Voting Equipment Database – Sequoia Voting Systems AVC Edge
    Spurred by the testimony of computer scientists at a hearing in Santa Clara County, CA in January 2003, Sequoia Voting Systems was the first major vendor to ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Dominion Voting Systems, Inc. Acquires Premier Election Solutions ...
    May 19, 2010 · As part of the transaction, Dominion also acquired an irrevocable, perpetual license for the AutoMark voting terminals used by voters with ...
  16. [16]
    Justice Department Requires Key Divestiture in Election Systems ...
    Mar 8, 2010 · The Department of Justice announced today that it will require Election Systems & Software (ES&S) to divest voting equipment systems assets it purchased in ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] File No. 111153 - Board of Supervisors |
    Oct 21, 2011 · On June 4, 2010, Sequoia Voting Systems, Inc. was acquired by Dominion Voting Systems, Inc. Fiscal Impact. All of the additional Dominion ...
  18. [18]
    Sequoia Voting Systems AVC Advantage - Verified Voting
    The Sequoia AVC Advantage is a poll worker-activated full-face direct recording electronic voting system with a touch-sensitive matrix of switches that voters ...
  19. [19]
    Sequoia Voting Systems (This company was purchased by Dominion)
    Sep 23, 2019 · 1800 Glenarm Place Suite 500. Denver, 80202. Type: Inactive. Technical Representative: Sandy Green, Director, Certification.
  20. [20]
    Dominion Voting Systems Acquired by its Management Team and ...
    Jul 16, 2018 · Staple Street Capital is a private equity firm that invests in market-leading businesses, where it can provide the strategic oversight, ...
  21. [21]
    Dominion Voting Systems, at centre of false 2020 election claims ...
    Oct 10, 2025 · Voting technology company Dominion Voting Systems (DVS), founded in Toronto and a target of conspiracy theories in the 2020 U.S. ...
  22. [22]
    Fox's $787.5 million settlement is big win for buyout firm Staple Street
    Apr 18, 2023 · Staple Street Capital Group LLC, the small buyout firm that owns Dominion Voting Systems, has scored a $787.5 million windfall after Fox Corp ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] How Dominion's Owner Turned a $38 Million Investment Into a ...
    Apr 20, 2023 · When Staple Street Capital invested in Dominion Voting Systems in 2018, the New York private-equity firm foresaw potential risks if the ...
  24. [24]
    Dominion Voting sold to company run by ex-GOP election official
    Oct 9, 2025 · Dominion is one of the biggest election equipment providers and was used by 27 states during the 2024 election.
  25. [25]
    Dominion Voting Systems acquired by St. Louis-based Liberty Vote
    Oct 9, 2025 · The acquisition brings together two major players providing key infrastructure for voting and voter verification systems across dozens of ...
  26. [26]
    https://seconews.org/article/7764
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Liberty Vote Acquisition of Dominion Voting Systems
    Oct 17, 2025 · All voting systems and components currently certified by the California Secretary of. State remain valid under Liberty Vote ownership. No ...Missing: mergers | Show results with:mergers
  28. [28]
    Former GOP election official buys Dominion Voting Systems, says ...
    Oct 9, 2025 · Dominion Voting Systems, the election vendor that was falsely accused of rigging the 2020 election, is being sold and rebranded as Liberty ...
  29. [29]
    Dominion Voting Systems sold and renamed as Liberty Vote - The Hill
    Oct 9, 2025 · Dominion Voting Systems, the voting technology company that was at the center of controversy and false stolen-election claims after ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  30. [30]
    Dominion, voting firm targeted by false 2020 election claims, sold to ...
    Oct 9, 2025 · Company, which reached $787.5m defamation settlement with Fox News, becomes new entity called Liberty Vote.
  31. [31]
    One Republican Now Controls a Huge Chunk of US Election ...
    Oct 16, 2025 · Former GOP operative Scott Leiendecker just bought Dominion Voting Systems, giving him ownership of voting systems used in 27 states.
  32. [32]
    Dominion CEO Predicts 'Business Ultimately Goes to Zero' | TIME
    May 18, 2023 · A month ago, Dominion Voting Systems seemed like a dragon slayer. The conservative news behemoth Fox News had just agreed to pay Dominion ...
  33. [33]
    Former Republican election official buys Denver-based Dominion ...
    Oct 9, 2025 · Dominion's former CEO confirmed the sale in a single-sentence statement on Thursday: “Liberty Vote has acquired Dominion Voting Systems,” John ...Missing: leadership team
  34. [34]
    Dominion Voting Systems Management Team | Org Chart
    Michael McGee (EVP and Chief Financial Officer) | Christina Reich-Szabo (Vice President of Finance) | Cerv Sheree Noell (Director of National Sales) | View ...Missing: leadership | Show results with:leadership
  35. [35]
    Fox's Dominion payout gives Staple Street Capital 1,500% return
    Apr 19, 2023 · Staple Street Capital scored a 1500% return on its investment in Dominion Voting Systems from Fox News' $787.5 million settlement.
  36. [36]
    What the sale of Dominion Voting Systems to Liberty Vote means
    Oct 17, 2025 · People stand behind a few voting machines. Detroit's Elections Department tests election equipment made by Dominion Voting Systems before a 2022 ...
  37. [37]
    Analyzing Dominion Voting Systems sale to firm run by ex ... - NPR
    Oct 11, 2025 · Dominion Voting Systems has been sold to Liberty Vote. Dominion was at the center of fraudulent vote rigging claims by President Trump and ...
  38. [38]
    Dominion Voting Systems Corp - Company Profile and News
    Dominion Voting Systems Corporation provides election planning processes and voting system services. The Company offers election support services, ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Voting System Examination of Dominion Voting Systems Democracy ...
    Oct 5, 2019 · ImageCast Central (ICC) - A ballot scan tabulator and associated ballot processing application for use in central elections offices. • ImageCast ...
  40. [40]
    Voting Equipment Database – Dominion ImageCast X
    ImageCast X is a touchscreen voting machine. It can be deployed as either a ballot marking device (BMD) without tabulation capabilities, or as a Direct ...
  41. [41]
    Dominion Voting Systems - California Secretary of State
    ICX is an accessible ballot marking device. The ballot marking capabilities allow a voter to vote using the accessible tactile interface (ATI), sip-n-puff, or ...
  42. [42]
    Voting Equipment Database – Dominion ImageCast Evolution
    The ImageCast Evolution (ICE) is a hybrid voting device that combines optical scanning, ballot printing, and vote casting functions in one integrated machine.
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Democracy Suite Use Procedures - CA.gov
    Figure 1-1: ImageCast® Evolution. ImageCast® Evolution Ballot Counter is a precinct-based optical scan ballot tabulator that is used in conjunction with ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Dominion Voting Systems Inc. Democracy Suite 5.19 - CA.gov
    Feb 7, 2025 · ... hardware components to field two complete working versions of the system, including all peripheral devices, one for the Functional Test ...<|separator|>
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Democracy Suite Use Procedures - Verified Voting
    This document describes Dominion Voting Systems' Democracy Suite® 5.10 ... information about the ICX device and software by pressing the “About” button ...
  46. [46]
    Democracy Suite 5.17 - U.S. Election Assistance Commission
    Manufacturer · Testing standard · Testing Lab · Certification Date · Certification Status · Testing Application Date · Testing Status · Application Accepted Date.
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Dominion Voting Democracy Suite 5.20 Voting System
    Mar 25, 2025 · On February 10, 2025, Dominion Voting Systems submitted an application for. Washington State Certification of Democracy Suite 5.20.
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Democracy Suite® System Overview - Colorado Secretary of State
    Apr 18, 2023 · The application is installed in the following folder: C:\Program Files. (x86)\Dominion Voting Systems\Election Data Translator Numerous ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Dominion Voting Systems - Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
    2) ImageCast Precinct Scanner (ICP), a precinct optical scan ballot tabulator that scans, validates, and tabulates hand-marked paper ballots and ballots ...<|separator|>
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Test Plan for EAC 2005 VVSG Certification Testing Dominion Voting ...
    Dec 25, 2024 · Dominion Voting Systems Democracy Suite (D-Suite) Version 5.20. Voting System. EAC Project Number: DVS-DemSuite5.20. Version: 05. Date: 11/27 ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] 2.08 - Democracy Suite EMS System Operations Procedures
    Apr 19, 2022 · Dominion Voting is the design authority. 1.5 Patent Status. Certain system concepts, as well as many implementation and construction details, ...
  52. [52]
    [PDF] Dominion Voting Systems D-Suite 5.20 Test Plan-Rev. 02
    Apr 17, 2024 · Pro V&V attests to the following: 1) all testing prescribed by the approved and published test plan or amended test.
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Voting System Examination of Dominion Voting Systems Democracy ...
    Jan 16, 2019 · Dominion strongly recommends that the LAN be air-gapped from public or other private networks. 2.2.1. Observations. The installation of the ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] Written Testimony of Mr. John Poulos, CEO Dominion Voting ...
    Jan 9, 2020 · Dominion Voting Systems before the Committee on House Administration. “2020 Election Security-Perspectives from Voting System Vendors and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Dominion Voting Systems Corp (DVS) Democracy Suite 5.17
    May 19, 2023 · -QVF EMS Export data (contests, proposals, precincts, districts, and candidates) was imported into EDT as part of the database creation using ...
  56. [56]
    Certified Voting System - U.S. Election Assistance Commission
    Dominion Voting Systems Democracy Suite 4.0 There are currently no System Advisory Notices for.
  57. [57]
    Registered Manufacturers - U.S. Election Assistance Commission
    The following voting system manufacturers have registered with the EAC and meet the requirements of Chapter 2 of EAC's Testing and Certification Program Manual.
  58. [58]
    Voting Technology Companies in the U.S. - Their Histories and ...
    Aug 10, 2017 · LONDON, ENGLAND / ACCESSWIRE / August 10, 2017 / Throughout history, the institution of democracy has flourished and changed to maintain ...
  59. [59]
    Voting Equipment Database – Dominion ImageCast Remote
    Dominion's ImageCast Remote is a client-side remote ballot marking system. The system has been used in elections since 2006 and is part of Democracy Suite.
  60. [60]
    Dominion software was not used only in states where Trump is filing ...
    Nov 12, 2020 · ... Dominion Voting is responsible for election fraud. These posts, however, are misleading. Dominion Voting systems were used in at least 24 states
  61. [61]
    Dominion Voting Systems Received $120 Million From 19 States ...
    Dec 8, 2020 · Dominion Voting Systems was paid $118.3 million to provide election services during the past three years, according to public records.
  62. [62]
    What states used voting equipment by Dominion Voting Systems for ...
    Nov 12, 2020 · Twenty-eight states used voting equipment from Dominion Voting Systems in 2020. According to an article entitled Election 2020: Setting the ...
  63. [63]
    Voting Equipment Database – Dominion ImageCast Central
    The Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast Central ballot counter system is a batch-fed central ballot scanner and tabulator using COTS hardware.
  64. [64]
    About Dominion Voting Systems | Sherburne County, MN
    Baseless claims about Dominion Voting Systems and the November 2020 election have been fully debunked by election authorities, subject matter experts, and ...
  65. [65]
    Canada-founded Dominion Voting Systems sold to former ...
    Oct 10, 2025 · The election-technology company launched in Canada by University of Toronto grad John Poulos and James Hoover immediately rebranded as ...
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Dominion Voting Briefing for the Special Committee on Electoral ...
    Oct 14, 2016 · Dominion Voting Systems is a Canadian company, and is Canada's largest provider of election systems. We have over 1,200 jurisdictions across ...
  67. [67]
    Technology and the Voting Process – Elections Canada
    Mar 4, 2020 · By current voting process, we mean that process which the majority of Canadian electors use – voting in person, at the polling station without ...
  68. [68]
    https://x.com/ElectionsCan_E/status/1328449565096366083
  69. [69]
    Online voting in 51 Ontario municipalities marred by election-day ...
    Oct 23, 2018 · A company that provides election tabulation software in Canada and the United States is blaming a Toronto service provider for choking online voting traffic in ...<|separator|>
  70. [70]
    So, the Americans bought Dominion, the Canadian company that ...
    Oct 9, 2025 · Dominion also provides ballot tabulation and voting systems for Canada's major party leadership elections, including those of the Liberal Party ...
  71. [71]
    Voting machines did not delay results in British Columbia election
    Oct 25, 2024 · The Canadian province of British Columbia is recounting some votes in an October 2024 election to confirm which party will form a government ...
  72. [72]
    Dominion Voting Systems - Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
    Dominion Voting Systems is a leading provider of election tabulation hardware and software solutions in the US and Canada.
  73. [73]
    Dominion Voting Systems | IFES
    Dominion Voting Systems Corporation is a North American company that produces and sells electronic voting hardware and software, including voting machines ...
  74. [74]
    One election-system vendor uses developers in Serbia - CSO Online
    Oct 5, 2016 · One major election technology company, Dominion Voting Systems (DVS), develops its systems in the US and Canada but also has an office in Belgrade, Serbia.
  75. [75]
    Dominion Voting Systems, Belgrade (Serbia) - Joberty
    Dominion Voting Systems, Belgrade (Serbia) - Everything you need to know about IT company on one place.<|separator|>
  76. [76]
    Why U.S. election deniers are spreading lies about Brazil's vote - NPR
    Oct 22, 2022 · Baseless claims that voting machines made by Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic are being used to rig voting in Brazil are circulating ...<|separator|>
  77. [77]
    Security Analysis of the Dominion ImageCast X - CITP Blog
    Jun 14, 2023 · A 96-page report that describes numerous security problems affecting Dominion voting equipment used in Georgia and other states.
  78. [78]
    Vulnerabilities Affecting Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast X - CISA
    Jun 3, 2022 · This advisory identifies vulnerabilities affecting versions of the Dominion Voting Systems Democracy Suite ImageCast X, which is an in-person voting system.
  79. [79]
    Four election vulnerabilities uncovered by a Michigan Engineer
    A sign next to two voting machines reads "Vote now!" with a checked. October 23, 2024. October 23, 2024. Four election vulnerabilities uncovered by a ...
  80. [80]
    DVSorder: Ballot Randomization Flaws Threaten Voter Privacy
    These risks are manifested by a vulnerability we discovered in precinct-based ballot scanners made by Dominion Voting Systems, which are used in parts of 21 ...
  81. [81]
    [PDF] Security Analysis of Georgia's ImageCast X Ballot Marking Devices ...
    Dominion Voting Systems Corp., via counsel Susman Godfrey, L.L.P., retained MITRE's. National Election Security Lab (NESL) to provide an independent expert ...
  82. [82]
    Federal review says Dominion software flaws haven't been exploited ...
    May 28, 2022 · Federal review says Dominion software flaws haven't ... This makes it very unlikely that these vulnerabilities could affect an election.”.
  83. [83]
    System Certification Process | U.S. Election Assistance Commission
    The EAC operates a voting system testing and certification program. This program tests and certifies hardware and software, and may also decertify those ...
  84. [84]
    https://www.eac.gov/voting-equipment/voluntary-voting-system-guidelines
  85. [85]
    Certified Voting Systems | U.S. Election Assistance Commission
    EAC accredit voting system test laboratories and certify voting equipment, marking the first time the federal government has offered these services to the ...
  86. [86]
    Democracy Suite 5.20 - U.S. Election Assistance Commission
    Dominion Voting Systems Corp. Testing standard. VVSG 1.0 (2005). Testing Lab. Pro V&V. Certification Date. 02/04/2025. Certification Status. Certified System ...Missing: federal | Show results with:federal
  87. [87]
    Pro V & V
    Founded in 2011, Pro V&V, Inc. is an accredited test laboratory located in Huntsville, AL, with over 100 years of combined testing experience.
  88. [88]
    [PDF] The Antrim County 2020 Election Incident: An Independent Forensic ...
    The major discrepancies in Antrim's results have been fully corrected. The final results match the poll tapes. USENIX Association. 31st USENIX Security ...
  89. [89]
    Expert report affirms accuracy of Antrim County presidential election ...
    Mar 26, 2021 · A report by an elections technology security expert who performed an analysis of the voting equipment used in Antrim County again affirmed ...
  90. [90]
    Antrim County audit shows 12-vote gain for Trump - The Detroit News
    Dec 17, 2020 · An audit of Antrim County election results Thursday gave President Donald Trump a net gain of 12 votes from the certified results.
  91. [91]
    [PDF] Testing Oversight of Dominion Democracy Suite (D-Suite) 5.16
    outstanding issues with the master test report. NYSTEC's final review, including ... ○ Attachment C - NYS Dominion DS 5.16 Security Jira Issues v5.0 ...Missing: flaws | Show results with:flaws<|separator|>
  92. [92]
    Secretary Raffensperger Announces Completion of Voting Machine ...
    Nov 17, 2020 · Pro V&V conducted an audit of a random sample of Dominion Voting Systems voting machines throughout the state using forensic techniques.<|separator|>
  93. [93]
    Raffensperger Announces Results of Ballot Image Audit, Confirms ...
    Nov 25, 2024 · The audit utilized the Enhanced Audit software from Enhanced Voting to examine the ballot images and provide county election officials with the ...
  94. [94]
    [PDF] Georgia's 2022 Risk-Limiting Audit - The Carter Center
    After the November 2022 election, Georgia conducted a batch-comparison risk-limiting audit. (RLA) of the secretary of state contest and confirmed the ...
  95. [95]
    [PDF] NY Dominion DS 5.16 Master Test Report v5.0
    Date. Version Author. Revision Summary. March 7, 2023. 1.0. M. Santos. Initial Release. March 24, 2023. 2.0. M. Santos. Updates for NYSTEC comments.
  96. [96]
    [PDF] Red Team Testing Report Dominion Democracy Suite 4.14-A and ...
    The scope of the computer and communications security evaluation was to find flaws in software-based controls (e.g. system hardening processes, weak ...
  97. [97]
    Fact Check: Did Dominion Voting Systems Donate to 'Anti-Trump ...
    Dec 1, 2020 · ... 2020 presidential elections. Dominion Voting Systems was used by election officials in 28 states during the 2020 election cycle, including ...
  98. [98]
    State Election Board Invites Dominion Voting Systems to Discuss ...
    Feb 23, 2021 · The meeting also provides an opportunity to address some of the unverified rumors and rampant disinformation that remain regarding the 2020 ...
  99. [99]
    Georgia hand tally of votes is complete, affirms Biden lead | AP News
    A hand tally of ballots cast in Georgia for the presidential race has been completed, and it affirms Democrat Joe Biden's ...
  100. [100]
    Michigan: Failure updating software caused Antrim County vote glitch
    Nov 6, 2020 · A failure to properly update software was the reason for a computer glitch that caused massive errors in unofficial election results reported from Antrim ...
  101. [101]
    U.S. finds no evidence flaws in Dominion voting machines were ever ...
    Jun 3, 2022 · The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency released a bulletin Friday saying it "has no evidence that these vulnerabilities have ...<|separator|>
  102. [102]
    No evidence of exploitation of Dominion voting machine flaws, CISA ...
    May 28, 2022 · The federal government has found no evidence that flaws in Dominion voting machines have ever been exploited, including in the 2020 election.
  103. [103]
    Joint Statement from Elections Infrastructure Government ... - CISA
    Nov 12, 2020 · The members of Election Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council (GCC) Executive Committee – Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security ...
  104. [104]
    How Sidney Powell inaccurately cited Venezuela's elections as ...
    Nov 23, 2020 · Ms. Powell has advanced claims of voluminous voter fraud and a rigged election. She falsely claimed that a supercomputer called Hammer hacked votes.
  105. [105]
    Dominion sues ex-Trump lawyer Sidney Powell—$1.3 ... - CNBC
    Jan 8, 2021 · Dominion Voting Systems said Sidney Powell's false and outlandish claims about fraud in the 2020 election "caused unprecedented harm."
  106. [106]
    [PDF] U.S. Department of Justice Office of Information Policy March 31 ...
    Mar 31, 2023 · The purpose of this forensic audit is to test the integrity of Dominion Voting. System in how it performed in Antrim County, Michigan for the ...Missing: scale | Show results with:scale<|control11|><|separator|>
  107. [107]
    5 Georgia fraud claims from the 2020 election
    Oct 30, 2024 · ... suitcases” of fraudulent ballots from beneath the table and counted them. He called it a “smoking gun” for fraud. The Trump campaign used ...
  108. [108]
    Georgia election officials shows frame-by-frame of State Farm Arena ...
    Dec 5, 2020 · President Trump's lawyers and other supporters call it the smoking gun, proving election fraud in Georgia. The Secretary of State's Office ...
  109. [109]
    No evidence for systematic voter fraud: A guide to statistical claims ...
    After the 2020 US presidential election Donald Trump refused to concede, alleging widespread and unparalleled voter fraud.
  110. [110]
    2020 General Election Risk-Limiting Audit | Georgia Secretary of State
    This is because some voters received two-page ballots, and the second page was considered a blank ballot since it did not have the presidential contest. Audit ...
  111. [111]
    Audit in Michigan County Refutes Dominion Conspiracy Theory
    Dec 18, 2020 · A hand count of paper ballots in Antrim County, Michigan, has verified the election results there, refuting a “forensics report” promoted by President Donald ...
  112. [112]
    Results of Lawsuits Regarding the 2020 Elections
    The various claims of evidence alleging a stolen 2020 election have been exhaustively investigated and litigated. Judges heard claims of illegal voting and ...Missing: Dominion | Show results with:Dominion<|control11|><|separator|>
  113. [113]
    [PDF] in the superior court of the state of delaware
    Mar 22, 2025 · DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS. CORPORATION,. Plaintiffs, v. FOX NEWS NETWORK, LLC,. Defendant. US DOMINION, INC., DOMINION.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  114. [114]
    Dominion Voting Systems settles defamation lawsuit with Newsmax ...
    Aug 18, 2025 · ... alleging fraud in the 2020 election, in which former President Joe Biden defeated Donald Trump. The settlement is set to be paid out in ...
  115. [115]
    Fox News settles Dominion Voting Systems defamation lawsuit - NPR
    Apr 18, 2023 · Fox News and its parent company Fox Corp. have struck a deal averting a trial in the blockbuster defamation suit filed by the election tech company Dominion ...
  116. [116]
    Judge refuses to toss out Dominion defamation suits against Powell ...
    Aug 11, 2021 · A federal judge has rejected bids by three top promoters of President Donald Trump's election fraud claims to throw out defamation lawsuits ...
  117. [117]
    Fox News to Pay $787.5 Million to Settle Defamation Claims Brought ...
    Apr 18, 2023 · Susman Godfrey client, Dominion Voting Systems, and Fox News have reached a $787.5 million settlement to resolve Dominion's massive defamation suit against Fox.
  118. [118]
    Fox's settlement with Dominion unlikely to cost it $787.5M - AP News
    Apr 23, 2023 · Fox Corp.'s $787.5 million settlement with Dominion Voting Systems over defamation charges is eye-popping, but the ultimate cost to the ...
  119. [119]
    Dominion, Rudy Giuliani reach 'confidential settlement' in $1.3B ...
    Sep 27, 2025 · Dominion has settled its $1.3 billion defamation lawsuit against former Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani over false allegations about the 2020 ...
  120. [120]
    Newsmax Announces Settlement with Dominion Voting Systems
    Aug 18, 2025 · ... settlement agreement with Dominion Voting Systems, concluding a defamation lawsuit that Dominion filed in Delaware Superior Court in 2021.Missing: outcomes | Show results with:outcomes
  121. [121]
    [PDF] Usability Study of Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast
    Nov 29, 2011 · Table 1.1: Usability testing dates, locations, and ICE firmware version tested. During the usability tests, 14 participants (mainly older voters ...
  122. [122]
    [PDF] Observations on Voting Equipment Use and Replacement
    Apr 11, 2018 · Local election jurisdictions primarily used optical scan and direct recording electronic (DRE), also known as touch screen, equipment during ...
  123. [123]
    GOP distrust in voting machines persists as Dominion and Fox News ...
    Apr 11, 2023 · The decision by a majority of supervisors in this deeply conservative California County to end a contract with Dominion Voting Systems ...
  124. [124]
    Voting-system firms battle right-wing rage against the machines
    Nov 7, 2022 · Dominion Voting Systems and Election Systems & Software are waging a ground war to beat back threats to their state and local government ...
  125. [125]
    Dominion, Company at Center of False 2020 Voting Conspiracies, Is ...
    Oct 9, 2025 · The election machine manufacturer was bought by a little-known company whose founder is a former Republican election official.
  126. [126]
    Misinformation campaign concerning Antrim County expected to ...
    Dec 8, 2020 · On Sunday, individuals with no apparent technical expertise in election technology were permitted to gather images of Dominion voting ...Missing: disputes | Show results with:disputes
  127. [127]
    Fox, Dominion Voting Systems reach $787 million settlement ... - PBS
    Apr 18, 2023 · Fox, Dominion Voting Systems reach $787 million settlement over false election claims. Politics Updated on Apr 18, 2023 5:11 PM EDT ...<|separator|>
  128. [128]
    Issues: Dominion Voting Systems - FactCheck.org
    Dominion Voting Systems, which was the target of baseless conspiracy theories after the 2020 election, will be used by 27 states in the 2024 election.
  129. [129]
    Dominion did not 'confirm' that machines had an issue affecting vote ...
    Nov 8, 2024 · Dominion Voting Systems did not confirm that their voting machines had a programming issue that affects vote counts, contrary to social ...
  130. [130]
    Expert shows how to tamper with Georgia voting machine in security ...
    Jan 22, 2024 · An expert witness for plaintiffs seeking to bar Georgia's touchscreen voting machines showed a crowded courtroom how he could tamper with ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  131. [131]
    Musk pushes debunked Dominion voting conspiracy theory as he ...
    Oct 17, 2024 · Billionaire Elon Musk promoted debunked conspiracy theories about election fraud Thursday at the first of a series of planned campaign ...