Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Eastern elk

The Eastern elk (Cervus canadensis canadensis) was an extinct subspecies of , the second-largest member of the deer family, historically native to the northern and as well as southern . Males typically weighed 600 to 1,000 pounds and sported massive antlers, while females were about 25% smaller; their coat featured tawny or cream-colored fur with a dark brown mane and a distinctive white rump, earning them the Shawnee name "wapiti." Once widely distributed across the region east of the —excluding tundras, deserts, and the Gulf Coast—the Eastern elk thrived in diverse habitats from the Northeast forests to the and , with fossil evidence confirming their presence in states like , , and . European settlers arriving in the encountered abundant herds, but relentless for meat, hides, and sport, combined with widespread for agriculture, led to their rapid decline. By the early 1800s, they had vanished from much of their southern range, including by 1800, and the last confirmed wild individual was killed in in 1877; the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service declared the subspecies extinct by 1880. Although the true Eastern elk cannot be revived, restoration efforts since the late have reintroduced related subspecies, such as the (Cervus canadensis manitobensis), to parts of their former habitat. Notable successes include the 2001 relocation of 52 to in and , where the population has grown to over 200 individuals across Cataloochee and Oconoluftee valleys as of 2022. Similar programs in (home to about 1,300 elk as of 2024), (over 10,000 as of 2024), and other states like , , and have established viable herds, though challenges persist, including risks of , vehicle collisions, and conflicts with agriculture. These initiatives not only restore ecological balance but also support wildlife viewing and limited opportunities, honoring the legacy of the once-vast Eastern elk populations.

Taxonomy and Physical Characteristics

Classification

The Eastern elk is scientifically classified as Cervus canadensis canadensis, the nominate subspecies of the elk (C. canadensis) species complex, native to eastern North America. This subspecies, the nominate form, was established with the species description by Johann Christian Polycarp Erxleben in 1777. Within the broader Cervus canadensis species, which encompasses several North American subspecies adapted to diverse habitats, C. c. canadensis is distinguished as the form historically occupying deciduous and mixed forest ecosystems east of the Great Plains. Historical taxonomic debates have centered on the status of C. c. canadensis, with some early naturalists questioning whether it represents a full separate from western or merely a regional variant within C. canadensis. Formal recognition emerged in the early , notably through Vernon Bailey's 1935 classification based on historical records and , though critics argued for lumping due to potential across ranges. However, mitochondrial analyses of extant and historical samples indicate no genetic distinction between eastern and western populations, suggesting C. c. canadensis may represent a morphological rather than genetically isolated form. More recent phylogenetic studies highlight ongoing uncertainty, as extirpation prevents direct assessment of or fixed genetic markers. Reintroduced in eastern regions today derive from western stock, further complicating taxonomic interpretations without pure C. c. canadensis lineages for comparison.

Morphology and Adaptations

The Eastern elk, classified as the subspecies Cervus canadensis canadensis, exhibited a robust yet relatively streamlined build suited to the dense woodlands of its native range. Adult bulls typically weighed between 300 and 500 kg, stood 1.2 to 1.5 m at the shoulder, and possessed antlers spanning up to 1.2 m with 5 to 7 tines per side, which were shed annually in late winter to conserve energy during periods of scarcity. Cows were notably smaller, averaging 200 to 300 kg, and lacked antlers entirely, allowing for greater agility in forested environments. This in size and ornamentation supported reproductive strategies while facilitating navigation through undergrowth. The species' coat provided essential in eastern forests, featuring a dark brown hue overall with a distinctive lighter rump patch that blended with leaf litter and dappled sunlight. In winter, the fur thickened and darkened further for insulation against cold, while summer molting produced a tawny tone to match emerging foliage; these seasonal patterns enhanced concealment from predators amid varying woodland backdrops. Compared to more open-country subspecies like the , the Eastern elk had a less massive , promoting maneuverability in thick .

Historical Range and Ecology

Pre-European Distribution

The Eastern elk (Cervus canadensis canadensis), an extinct subspecies, occupied a broad geographic range across eastern prior to European settlement, extending from southern —including regions of and —southward through the to northern and . This distribution included key areas such as the , the watershed, and portions of the Atlantic coastal plains, where the species utilized diverse forested and open landscapes west to the . Pre-colonial population estimates for the Eastern elk suggest abundance on the order of 2–5 million individuals across this expansive range, forming social herds typically numbering 100–500 animals that facilitated movement through varied terrains. These populations coexisted and overlapped with other , such as (Odocoileus virginianus) and (Bison bison), in mixed grassland-forest ecosystems, where shared habitats supported dynamic trophic interactions. Historical and archaeological accounts document interactions between Eastern elk and , who employed sustainable hunting practices that maintained long-term population stability, including selective harvest methods aligned with seasonal migrations and cultural stewardship traditions. These practices, evidenced in oral histories and site records from the Eastern Woodlands, reflect a balanced coexistence predating intensive exploitation.

Habitat Preferences and Behavior

The Eastern elk (Cervus canadensis canadensis) primarily inhabited and mixed forests, favoring areas with forest edges and open meadows situated in river valleys, where access to diverse and was optimal. These environments provided a balance of browsing opportunities and security from predators, with the elk showing a clear for less dense structures that allowed for easier movement and feeding. In contrast, the tended to avoid dense coniferous forests, which offered limited understory and restricted mobility due to thicker canopy and undergrowth. As browsers and grazers, Eastern elk consumed a varied consisting of twigs, leaves, , and grasses, adapting to seasonal availability to meet nutritional needs. During and summer, they focused on tender grasses and herbaceous plants in open areas, shifting in fall to include nutrient-rich acorns and other from trees, which supplemented their energy reserves ahead of winter. In winter, reliance increased on woody browse like and twigs from shrubs and trees, enabling survival in snow-covered landscapes. This opportunistic strategy supported their large body size and reproductive demands, with morphological adaptations such as broad muzzles aiding in efficient and twig consumption. Socially, Eastern elk organized into matriarchal herds led by dominant cows, which guided group movements and decisions, often comprising dozens to of females and calves for protection and resource sharing. Adult bulls typically formed separate bachelor groups outside the breeding season, maintaining loose affiliations that dissolved during the annual rut from September to October, when males competed aggressively for harems using vocalizations like bugling calls to assert dominance and attract mates. These behaviors fostered social cohesion and , with bugling serving as a key auditory signal across forested habitats. In their native ecosystems, Eastern elk played a vital role as herbivores that influenced vegetation dynamics through selective , which promoted diverse plant regrowth and prevented by certain species. They facilitated by ingesting and excreting viable seeds from forbs, shrubs, and trees, aiding plant colonization in meadows and forest edges. activities, where individuals rolled in soft soil or mud to groom and mark territory, contributed to soil aeration and created microhabitats that benefited invertebrates and smaller plants. Additionally, as primary prey for predators such as wolves (Canis lupus) and cougars (Puma concolor), they sustained carnivore populations and maintained trophic balance in the .

Decline and Extinction

Causes of Decline

The arrival of in the 17th and 18th centuries initiated the rapid decline of the eastern elk (Cervus canadensis canadensis), primarily through direct human pressures that exploited the species' wide-ranging behaviors across its expansive historical range from the Atlantic coast to the . Unregulated emerged as the dominant factor, with settlers pursuing elk for meat, hides, and sport using methods such as dogs, jacklighting, and indiscriminate shooting near settlements. Market hunting intensified this pressure during the 1700s and 1800s, as elk were commercially harvested to supply growing urban populations, leading to localized extirpations in densely settled areas like the by the early 1800s. Habitat destruction compounded the hunting impacts, as widespread for agriculture, timber harvesting, and settlement converted elk-preferred forested and meadow landscapes into farmland and cleared land. In the , forest cover declined by approximately 52% from pre-colonial levels by the late , with over two-thirds of original forests logged or altered at least once by 1920, severely reducing available cover, forage, and migration corridors essential for elk survival. This transformation was particularly acute in key elk habitats like the region, where agricultural expansion and logging eliminated vast tracts of early successional forests and shrublands that provided critical winter range and calving areas. Competition from domesticated further exacerbated the decline, as expanding herds of and other grazers overlapped with remnant elk populations, competing for limited in altered landscapes.

Timeline of Extinction

The eastern elk (Cervus canadensis canadensis) experienced initial population declines in the 1600s along coastal regions of the , driven by European colonial expansion and associated overhunting, which fragmented habitats and reduced numbers in areas like the Mid-Atlantic seaboard. Sightings remained relatively common in inland areas such as Pennsylvania's forests into the mid-1700s, where elk were still reported in sufficient numbers to support local . During the 1700s, the pace of extirpation accelerated, with widespread disappearance from states by the early 1800s; for instance, the last recorded elk in was killed in 1732. In the Mid-Atlantic region, populations were largely gone by 1800, including in and , as settlement pressures intensified. The last confirmed eastern elk in was killed around 1855 in Clarke County, marking the effective end of the subspecies in much of the southern Appalachians. In the early 1800s, remnant populations persisted in more remote areas, including the Appalachian Mountains and around the Great Lakes, where isolated groups evaded total eradication longer. Elk survived in Pennsylvania's northcentral counties until the mid-1860s, with the last documented kill occurring on September 1, 1877. Similarly, small numbers held out in the northern Midwest near the Great Lakes until the late 1890s. The eastern elk was considered extinct by 1880. By the early 1900s, the subspecies was considered fully extirpated across its historical range.

Reintroduction Efforts

Early and Failed Attempts

The Game Commission initiated the first major reintroduction effort for in the between 1913 and 1926, importing 177 primarily from and for release in central and northeastern parts of the state. Initial releases showed promise, with the northcentral populations prospering temporarily, but overall survival was low; by 1936, only 14 remained statewide in Elk and Cameron counties. Key factors contributing to the failure included illegal , often motivated by elk damage to crops, and a legal from 1923 to 1931 that harvested 98 bulls, accelerating the decline. The program was effectively abandoned after the final releases in 1926, with hunting curtailed in 1932 due to dwindling numbers. In the 1950s, additional reintroduction attempts occurred in the , including and , utilizing stock from western populations or local hybrids that proved poorly adapted to eastern ecosystems. These efforts failed to establish viable herds, with populations succumbing to unsuitability—such as insufficient early-successional forests and forage—and elevated predation pressure from species like black bears and wolves. In , for example, a small release in the early 1950s from Michigan stock disappeared within a few years, mirroring earlier failures attributed to and ongoing from . Broader challenges during these early 20th-century initiatives stemmed from the use of , which lacked genetic adaptations to eastern conditions, making them vulnerable to parasites like the meningeal worm (brainworm) prevalent in populations. Poor often placed elk in fragmented landscapes with limited cover and high human activity, while inadequate legal protections allowed to persist despite emerging game laws. These failures underscored critical lessons for future , including the necessity of sourcing disease-free, regionally suitable stock to minimize parasitic vulnerabilities and the importance of prior to support establishment. Enhanced protections against and better monitoring also emerged as priorities, directly informing more rigorous protocols in subsequent programs.

Successful Modern Programs

The elk restoration program, initiated in 1997, marked the first large-scale successful reintroduction of elk to the after more than 150 years of absence. Between December 1997 and April 2002, the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources translocated 1,541 (Cervus canadensis nelsoni) from western states including , , , , , and to the region, utilizing a hard-release method where animals were directly released into suitable following health screenings. This effort, supported by partnerships with the (RMEF), emphasized enhancement through and reclaimed mine to provide and . Elk were fitted with radio collars for post-release monitoring to track survival, dispersal, and reproduction, revealing high initial survival rates and rapid . The program established a sustainable herd, leading to the inaugural limited elk hunting season in 2001, which transitioned to quota hunts by 2008; ongoing in-state translocations, such as in McCreary County in 2022, continue to expand the range. Building on Kentucky's model, the (GSMNP) launched its elk reintroduction in 2001 to restore ecological roles in the southern Appalachians. In 2001, the released 25 elk, followed by 27 in 2002, for a total of 52 elk sourced from the Land Between the Lakes in Kentucky, using a hard-release approach with initial veterinary checks and radio/GPS collars on all individuals to monitor movements and health. These were selected for disease resistance and to promote hybrid vigor when integrated with regional herds. Habitat improvements, including meadow restoration and control in partnership with RMEF, supported early establishment in the Cataloochee Valley. By 2010, the population had grown to approximately 135 elk, demonstrating viability through natural reproduction and low mortality. Pennsylvania's modern elk management program, evolving from early 20th-century reintroductions, focused on augmentation in the late 1990s and 2000s through internal trap-and-transfer efforts to enhance and expand the north-central herd. From 1998 to 2000, the Pennsylvania Game Commission relocated 63 within the state to Clinton County, mitigating from the original 1913–1926 stockings of 177 animals. Hard-release techniques with GPS collars were employed for translocated individuals, allowing biologists to assess habitat use in state forests and game lands enhanced via RMEF collaborations for improved browse and thermal cover. This period saw the herd achieve sustainable levels, enabling consistent limited hunting seasons since 2001. Subsequent programs in neighboring states drew from these successes, sourcing elk from Kentucky and western herds to foster genetic mixing for long-term health. In Virginia, from 2012 to 2014, the Department of Wildlife Resources released 71 adult elk and 4 calves (totaling 75) into Buchanan County, captured from Kentucky's established population and hard-released with monitoring collars after disease testing. RMEF partnerships facilitated habitat enhancements on reclaimed mines, promoting forage diversity. Similarly, West Virginia's Division of Natural Resources initiated reintroduction in 2016 within the Tomblin Wildlife Management Area, releasing initial elk from Kentucky supplemented by western sources like Arizona to enhance hybrid vigor, using hard-release with collars for tracking. By 2018, additional transfers from Kentucky brought the founding stock to 130, supported by habitat restoration efforts; further augmentations continued, including 17 elk in 2024. These initiatives underscored the value of multi-state coordination and to establish self-sustaining eastern elk populations.

Current Populations and Conservation

Population Status by Region

The reintroduced elk populations in the have shown steady growth since the late , with an estimated total of 12,000 to 15,000 individuals across fragmented ranges east of the as of 2025. These herds, primarily established through translocations from western subspecies, occupy restored habitats in forested and mountainous regions, contrasting sharply with the historical continuous range of the extinct eastern elk. In , the largest eastern herd exceeds 10,000 individuals distributed across 16 counties in the eastern portion of the state, reflecting robust annual growth rates of approximately 5-10% driven by natural reproduction and habitat management. This population supports a sustainable , with approximately 500 harvested annually through a permit system that includes 500 drawn hunters for the 2025 season, helping to balance growth and prevent overpopulation. Along the range, populations remain smaller but stable. In the spanning and , approximately 200-300 elk inhabit the park and surrounding areas, sustained by natural reproduction since their 2001-2002 reintroduction, with recent estimates indicating around 270 individuals and ongoing expansion beyond initial release sites. In southwestern , the herd numbers over 250 elk, concentrated in Buchanan, Dickenson, and Wise counties, where monitoring shows consistent recruitment and limited dispersal. Pennsylvania hosts approximately 1,400 elk statewide, primarily in the north-central "Elk Country" region encompassing parts of Cameron, Clinton, Elk, and Potter counties, with gradual range expansion. For the 2025 hunting season, 140 permits were issued via lottery, allowing limited antlered elk harvest to manage herd health and habitat impacts. Emerging populations continue to develop in other areas, including , where over 100 elk have been established since 2015, with the current herd estimated at 140-150 individuals in the southern coalfields following additional translocations in 2024. Potential expansions are under consideration in , though state wildlife officials oppose formal reintroduction due to risks to and safety, while maintains a separate herd of about 1,000 in the northern Lower Peninsula, derived from early 20th-century western stock. Genetically, these reintroduced herds are predominantly of (Cervus canadensis nelsoni) lineage, sourced from western populations like those in Kentucky's original translocations, with no revival of the pure eastern elk due to its confirmed in the . This western ancestry has resulted in lower in some herds, prompting ongoing monitoring to mitigate risks through selective translocations.

Management and Challenges

Management of reintroduced Eastern elk populations involves a combination of regulated hunting to maintain sustainable numbers, habitat enhancement projects, and vigilant disease monitoring. In states like Kentucky and Pennsylvania, limited-quota hunting seasons are implemented to control population growth and prevent overbrowsing, with licenses allocated via lotteries to ensure low harvest rates that support herd health. Habitat restoration efforts have focused on creating early successional forests and grasslands essential for elk forage; for instance, the Kentucky elk restoration zone spans over 4.1 million acres, where state agencies have enhanced thousands of acres through prescribed burns, selective logging, and native plantings in collaboration with partners. Disease surveillance programs target chronic wasting disease (CWD) and brucellosis, with state wildlife agencies collecting samples from hunter-harvested elk and conducting periodic testing to detect and mitigate outbreaks early, though CWD prevalence remains low in Eastern herds compared to Western populations. Ongoing challenges include human-wildlife conflicts, such as crop depredation and vehicle collisions, which have increased as herds expand into agricultural areas. In and , elk foraging on corn and hay fields has led to compensation programs for farmers, while highway crossings in restoration zones contribute to dozens of annual collisions, prompting infrastructure improvements like underpasses. incidents persist, with enforcement efforts by conservation officers addressing illegal kills that undermine population goals, and illegal feeding—now prohibited in some states to curb disease spread—exacerbates and conflict. poses additional threats by altering forage availability, with warmer winters and shifting precipitation patterns reducing nutritional quality of browse in habitats, potentially stressing herd nutrition during critical seasons. Conservation initiatives are bolstered by organizations like the (RMEF), which has invested over $2.4 million in Eastern projects since 2020, partnering with state agencies to secure and improve lands for elk and associated species. State-federal collaborations, including funding from the Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration Program, support these efforts by providing resources for land acquisition and management, such as the 44,000 acres of grassland enhanced for Eastern elk. tied to elk viewing generates economic benefits, drawing visitors to areas like Kentucky's elk zone and Pennsylvania's elk country, contributing to local economies through lodging, guiding, and related expenditures estimated in the tens of millions annually across these states. Looking ahead, managers aim for controlled expansion of Eastern elk populations, with goals in states like targeting around 2,800 animals to balance ecological and human tolerance. Discussions on genetic augmentation through additional translocations from diverse source herds address concerns over low in reintroduced groups, though remains unfeasible due to technical limitations and ethical considerations in .

References

  1. [1]
    Remembering the Eastern Elk | The Outside Story
    Jan 14, 2019 · Eastern elk were widely distributed, but were exterminated by settlers. The last eastern elk were gone by 1880, and the last in MA was killed ...
  2. [2]
    Subspecies of Elk - Outdoors International
    The Eastern (Cervus canadensis canadensis) was the first subspecies of elk discovered by white men in North America. ... This elk was defined in simple terms as “ ...
  3. [3]
    Elk | NC Wildlife
    By the year 1800, the Eastern Elk was extirpated from North Carolina, and by the mid-1800s, Eastern Elk had almost disappeared throughout their range entirely.
  4. [4]
    Elk of the Smokies - Environment for the Americas
    Oct 1, 2024 · The eastern elk subspecies (Cervus elaphus canadensis) is extinct. ... In 2001, 52 elk (Cervus elaphus manitobensis) were reintroduced to ...
  5. [5]
    Cervus canadensis - Taxonomy browser Taxonomy Browser () - NIH
    Cervus canadensis canadensis (Eastern wapiti) ; Cervus canadensis manitobensis ; Cervus canadensis nannodes (tule elk) ; Cervus canadensis nelsoni (American elk).
  6. [6]
  7. [7]
    [PDF] The History of Elk (Cervus canadensis) Restoration in Ontario
    Elk (Cervus canadensis) historically inhabited southern Quebec and central Ontario, but, by the early 1900s, the species was extir- pated from this region. ...Missing: 1827 | Show results with:1827
  8. [8]
    Eastern Elk: Are They Really Extinct? by David Stalling
    Some biologists classify tule elk as a separate subspecies because they are visibly different. Others say tules are genetically the same as elk found anywhere ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Genetic Diversity and the Origin of Contemporary Eastern Elk ...
    Due to anthropogenic events in the late 1800s, current distribution ranges and population sizes across all subspecies of elk were reduced to approximately 10% ...Missing: distinctions | Show results with:distinctions
  10. [10]
    Cervus elaphus (elk) | INFORMATION - Animal Diversity Web
    Elk generally have a long head with large ears and widely branching antlers as long as 1.1 to 1.5 m from tip to tip are found on males only. A dark shaggy mane ...
  11. [11]
    Elk | Game Commission | Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
    Elk are much larger and heavier than white-tailed deer. A mature male elk, called a bull, stands 50 to 60 inches at the shoulder and weighs 600 to 1,000 pounds.Missing: size | Show results with:size
  12. [12]
    Cervus elaphus - USDA Forest Service
    Within closed-canopy habitats, elk may select openings for calving [275]. For example, in Montana, elk used small openings in moderately dense forest as calving ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] west virginia elk management plan fy2021-fy2025 - WVDNR
    Eastern Elk (Cervus elaphus canadensis) were once common inhabitants of the eastern United. States prior to European settlement. Elk roamed throughout what ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] challenges and opportunities in the management of reintroduced
    This herbivore is morphologically and behaviorally adapted to open areas, where it coevolved with cursorial predators such as the gray wolf (Canis lupus) ( ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Re-framing deer herbivory as a natural disturbance regime with ...
    Thus, the eastern elk population may have ranged from 2 to 5 million, depending on proportionate density throughout the range (Seton, 1927; Means, 2006).
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Chapter 2: - Large Native Ungulates - USDA Forest Service
    Distributional overlap can occur with mule and white- tailed deer, bison, pronghorn, and bighorn sheep, which apparently partition forage and habitat resources ...
  17. [17]
    Using Archaeology, History, and Indigenous Knowledge to Support ...
    Sep 28, 2025 · We conclude that the archaeological record demonstrates Indigenous peoples have always coexisted with, harvested, and probably stewarded elk in ...
  18. [18]
    Scale‐dependence in elk habitat selection for a reintroduced ...
    Oct 1, 2024 · Elk (Cervus canadensis) ranged widely across diverse ecoregions in North America prior to European settlement and subsequent eastern extirpation ...Missing: pre- | Show results with:pre-
  19. [19]
  20. [20]
    Elk - Missouri Department of Conservation
    Mar 14, 2024 · Food. Elk consume roughly equal amounts of grasses, forbs (herbaceous nongrass plants), and woody browse such as twigs, bark, seedlings, ...Missing: shifts | Show results with:shifts
  21. [21]
    Elk - Yellowstone National Park (U.S. National Park Service)
    Apr 18, 2025 · Yellowstone provides summer range for an estimated 10,000–20,000 elk (Cervus canadensis) from six to seven herds, most of which winter at lower ...<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    Wildlife - Elk Country | US Forest Service
    They have a direct role on vegetation through herbivory and seed dispersal, create wallows, and serve as prey and carrion for many other wildlife species.Missing: aeration | Show results with:aeration
  23. [23]
    Seed dispersal by cattle, elk and deer in northeastern Oregon
    All three species act as seed dispersers for native and exotic plants. Cattle fecal pats had a higher species richness and density of exotic grasses germinating ...
  24. [24]
    History of Elk in PA | Game Commission
    Eastern elk once ranged statewide, but colonization and exploitation by European settlers eventually led to the species demise. Prior to the arrival of ...Missing: pre- distribution
  25. [25]
    Elk in Tennessee - TN.gov
    Wt.: males, 700-1000 lbs. (315-450 kgs); females, 500-600 lbs. (225-270 kgs). Beam length of antlers to 64 3/8 in ...Missing: weight | Show results with:weight
  26. [26]
    Reconstruction of Forest and Grassland Cover for the Conterminous ...
    Spatially, more than 80% of the land was originally covered by forests and grasslands, and the loss occurred mainly in the eastern CONUS and Great Plains over ...
  27. [27]
    North American Forests in the Age of Man
    By 1920, more than two-thirds of American forests had been leveled at least once, including the vast majority of eastern forests.
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Elk: Arkansas' Largest Wild Mammal - FSA9099
    The subspecies that most likely occurred in Arkansas prior to the mid. 19th century was the Eastern elk. (now extinct). The elk reintroduced into Arkansas in ...Missing: pre- | Show results with:pre-
  29. [29]
    Elk in Virginia: Return of a Native Species
    However, by the late 1800s, unsustainable hunting and habitat alteration resulted in the extinction of the eastern elk. The last survivor of Virginia's original ...Elk · Elk Hunt Lottery · Elk Hunting · Feeding ElkMissing: causes | Show results with:causes
  30. [30]
    Eastern Elk: Are They Extinct?
    Naturalist Vernon Bailey first split Rocky Mountain elk and eastern elk into separate subspecies in 1935, without having ever seen a single bone, antler or hide ...
  31. [31]
    The History of Elk (<i>Cervus canadensis</i>) Restoration in Ontario
    Apr 1, 2016 · We reviewed historical documents, population census records, and a previous study pertaining to Elk reintroduced to Ontario in the early 1900s ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  32. [32]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  33. [33]
    A Century of Elk Restoration in Eastern North America
    A Century of Elk Restoration in Eastern North America. Figure 1. Historical (light gray) and current (dark gray) elk range in North. America. (acclimation ...
  34. [34]
    About Elk in Michigan
    Michigan's native elk disappeared around 1875. The current herd started in 1918, grew to 1500 in the 1960s, then declined to 200 in 1975, and increased to 850 ...Missing: 1950s | Show results with:1950s
  35. [35]
    Elk Reintroduction | | Wisconsin DNR
    Elk reintroduction in Wisconsin began in 1995 with 25 elk, and later included 150 wild elk from Kentucky, with releases in multiple locations.
  36. [36]
    History of Elk In Kentucky
    Elk translocation to Kentucky occurred from 1997 through 2002, during which time 1541 elk were released into the Kentucky elk restoration zone.Missing: 1997-2003 | Show results with:1997-2003
  37. [37]
    Restoring Elk Country - Eastern Elk Habitat Enhancement | RMEF ...
    Feb 14, 2025 · Restoring elk country is core to RMEF's mission of ensuring the future of elk, other wildlife, their habitat and our hunting heritage.Missing: great lakes atlantic coastal plains
  38. [38]
    Demographics of an Experimentally Released Population of Elk in ...
    Dec 13, 2010 · ABSTRACT We assessed the potential for reestablishing elk (Cervus elaphus) in Great Smoky Mountains National Park (GSMNP), USA, ...
  39. [39]
    Returning Elk to the Southeast: A 20-year Retrospective
    Collectively, “elk range” in the Southeast encompasses more than 12,500 mi2 or just under 8 million acres. Much of this land is incorporated into elk management ...
  40. [40]
    Elk - Great Smoky Mountains - National Park Service
    Elk (Cervus canadensis) are the second largest member of the deer family Cervidae. Renowned for their impressive stature, these animals boast thick, dark brown ...
  41. [41]
    Eastern Elk, Other Wildlife Get $2.4 Million from RMEF, Partners
    Aug 29, 2024 · “Nearly 5,000 acres of wildlife habitat will be enhanced and more than 1,700 acres will be conserved including improved or expanded public ...
  42. [42]
    Environmental Assessment of Long-term Elk Management Released
    Based upon the slow growth in numbers from 52 to about 135, including 25 new calves in 2010, we have concluded that a sustainable elk population over the long ...
  43. [43]
    Elk Hunting | Game Commission - Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
    Archery Elk Shot Placement(opens in a new tab)(video 2:44). To check the status of an Elk License Application: Go to huntfish.pa.gov(opens in a new tab). Log ...
  44. [44]
    RMEF Media Elk Thriving in Virginia
    Sep 30, 2020 · This bull elk is one of the original elk introduced into reclaimed strip mines in Buchanan County, Virginia, from 2012 to 2014. Most of the 75 ...<|separator|>
  45. [45]
    Elk in West Virginia - WVDNR
    Since 2016, the WVDNR has recorded 60 native elk calf births, which indicates that the herd is growing and thriving.Elk · Check Cwd Test Results · BoatingMissing: eastern | Show results with:eastern
  46. [46]
    RMEF-Funded Study Results Mean Good News for West Virginia Elk
    Aug 22, 2025 · Greater genetic mixing between the two elk populations, as noted above, improves long-term viability and health of the population. “Elk ...
  47. [47]
    Elk Population by State 2025 - World Population Review
    Elk Population by State 2025 ; Kentucky Flag. Kentucky, 13,100 ; California Flag. California, 13,000 ; South Dakota Flag. South Dakota, 7,500 ; Oklahoma Flag.
  48. [48]
    The History of Elk in Virginia | Virginia DWR
    The Department of Wildlife Resources (DWR, formerly DGIF) estimates the elk herd at 250+ in Virginia. © 2025 Virginia Department of Wildlife Resources ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Kentucky Elk Report 2024
    The number of elk permits have fluctuated nearly every year since 2004, with a total of 500 permits available in 2024. Page 4. Kentucky Elk Report 2024.Missing: reintroduction sources
  50. [50]
    Application Strategy 2025: Kentucky elk app insights, draw odds ...
    Apr 21, 2025 · Thanks to dedicated conservation efforts, the elk population has grown to more than 10,000 animals. Since hosting its first modern elk hunt in ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Number of Drawn Hunters by County for 2025 Kentucky Elk Hunt
    KDFWR Bear & Elk Program. Number of Kentucky Residents Drawn: 450. Number of Non-residents Drawn: 50. Total Number of Drawn Hunters: 500.Missing: harvest | Show results with:harvest
  52. [52]
    Magic of the the Great Smoky Mountains | The Saturday Evening Post
    Apr 24, 2025 · Yarkovich, also known as “The Elk Guy,” monitors the Smokies' fledgling elk population, which has grown to nearly 270 ungulates since 52 elk ...<|separator|>
  53. [53]
    Pennsylvania elk hunting license application deadline set for July 13
    Jul 1, 2025 · Pennsylvania offers 140 elk hunting licenses for the 2025-2026 seasons. · The application deadline is July 13, with the drawing on July 26 at the ...
  54. [54]
    Ohio Division of Wildlife opposes elk reintroduction - Outdoor News
    Dec 2, 2024 · The Ohio DNR Division of Wildlife opposes the reintroduction of elk into Ohio because of what it terms as an “unacceptable” risk to motorists, and crop damage ...
  55. [55]
    Genetic Characteristics of Restored Elk Populations in Kentucky
    Jan 5, 2020 · Limited population growth over time has resulted in cases where reintroduced elk exhibit low genetic diversity many years after restoration ( ...
  56. [56]
    Population Genetics of Pennsylvania Elk | ESU
    The genetic analysis of the Pennsylvania elk herd completed in this study has identified the herd as having significantly less genetic diversity.
  57. [57]
    The Complete Guide to Hunting Elk in Eastern States - Outdoor Life
    Oct 21, 2020 · Elk licenses are good only in the Core Elk Management Zone. During open deer seasons outside of the Core Elk Zone, hunters can legally take ...
  58. [58]
    Elk in the East: A View to a Dramatic Conservation Success
    Mar 19, 2025 · A critical piece of Appalachian elk range is the Cumberland Forest, a 253,000-acre Nature Conservancy project.Missing: great lakes atlantic coastal
  59. [59]
    [PDF] SURVEILLANCE OF SELECTED DISEASES IN FREE-RANGING ...
    Biologists collected obex tissues from 566 elk from 1997 to 2009 and found evidence of chronic wasting disease (CWO) in one elk in 2009. No brucellosis was ...
  60. [60]
  61. [61]
    Elk | Virginia DWR
    DWR's Conservation Police Officers have added protecting the elk to their daily (and nightly) routines by monitoring suspicious activity, poaching, spotlighting ...The History Of Elk In... · How To See Elk In Virginia · Elk CamMissing: regulated | Show results with:regulated
  62. [62]
    Don't feed wildlife: new rules in place to protect Washington's wild ...
    May 16, 2025 · WDFW approved a rule proposal that prohibits feeding deer, elk, and moose in Washington, including providing salt blocks to attract wild animals.
  63. [63]
    Biologists study climate change's effects on elk - La Grande Observer
    Sep 6, 2021 · Another climate change factor that may be hurting elk is that much more of the precipitation the region is receiving is now in the form of rain ...
  64. [64]
    Impacts of Climate Changes on Elk Population Dynamics in Rocky ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · Warmer winters and drier summers predicted by the CCC Model couldraise the equilibrium population size of elk by about 50%. Managers of national ...
  65. [65]
    Eastern Elk Herds Thrive with WSFR Funds - Partner with a Payer
    Dec 21, 2022 · Agencies will continue to face emerging challenges in elk management – such as balancing human-wildlife conflicts with local landowners or ...
  66. [66]
    Elk Restoration East of the Big River | Mossy Oak
    May 7, 2020 · “As opposed to western elk herds,” Miller said, “it's real tough to estimate population numbers in the east due to the closed canopy forests.
  67. [67]
    Elk are a big deal in Pennsylvania, with an entire tourism industry ...
    Feb 28, 2025 · A deep-rooted elk culture has woven itself into the local community, significantly impacting the economy and the coveted elk hunting season ...
  68. [68]
    Estimating the Genetic Variation and Population Abundance of ...
    Apr 17, 2021 · Reintroduced elk populations often possess low levels of genetic variation as a consequence of having been established with few individuals and ...
  69. [69]
    [PDF] A proposal to return elk to northeast Minnesota
    A smaller founding population would have less genetic diversity, would be proportionately more susceptible to negative events such as predation, illegal harvest ...Missing: augmentation | Show results with:augmentation