Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Englund Gambit

The Englund Gambit is a provocative for Black in response to 1.d4, beginning with the 1...e5, which aims to undermine , facilitate rapid development of the queenside via ...Nc6, and create tactical opportunities such as excursions and forks. This , while aggressive and surprising at club level, is generally considered unsound, as can secure a lasting material advantage with accurate play, often by defending the or exploiting Black's overextended position. Named after the Swedish chess master Fritz Englund (1871–1933), who popularized it despite its earlier appearances in games, such as those by Polish master Aleksander Flamberg around 1912, the opening gained prominence through Englund's sponsorship of a 1932–1933 Stockholm tournament where all games started with 1.d4 e5 and White received a small incentive for opening with the queen's pawn. The main line, involving 2.dxe5 Nc6 3.Nf3 Qe7, was systematized by Latvian player Kārlis Bētiņš (1867–1943), known for other aggressive defenses like the Latvian Gambit. Though rarely employed at elite levels due to its theoretical inferiority—engines evaluate positions after the main line as favorable for White by at least a pawn—the gambit has seen a resurgence in online and blitz play, boosted by instructional content from influencers like International Master Levy Rozman. Key variations include the sharp main line after 4.Bf4 Qb4+, where Black targets the b2-pawn but risks refutation via 5.Qd5 or 5.c3, leading to White's edge; a quieter alternative with 3...d6 allows White to win the pawn cleanly via 4.exd6 Bxd6 5.Nc3; and the "Stockholm Variation," emphasizing early queen activity to provoke errors. Sub-variations like the Soller Gambit (transposing to related lines) or Zilbermints Gambit (with ...d5 support) attempt to shore up Black's compensation, but none overcome the opening's inherent weaknesses against prepared opponents. Overall, the Englund Gambit exemplifies aggression, rewarding bold play in informal settings while underscoring the importance of solid central control in modern theory.

Background

Defining Moves and Classification

The Englund Gambit arises after the moves 1.d4 e5, in which Black sacrifices the e5-pawn immediately to challenge White's control of and provoke an early capture. This is classified under the () code A40, specifically as the , Englund Gambit variation. The opening is named after the Swedish chess player Fritz Englund, who helped popularize it by organizing a thematic tournament in the early . It is sometimes referred to as the Charlick Gambit, after Henry Charlick who played related lines in the 1890s. In contrast to similar gambits like the Budapest Gambit (1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e5), the Englund Gambit sacrifices the pawn on Black's first move without developing the knight first, resulting in a more premature and riskier commitment to open lines. This early pawn offer aims to unbalance the position quickly but leaves Black's kingside underdeveloped compared to the Budapest's preparatory knight move. The Englund Gambit embodies aggressive play for Black, focusing on rapid piece activity and potential attacks against White's king after the pawn is taken, often leading to tactical skirmishes in the center. However, it is generally evaluated as dubious at higher levels, as White can secure a lasting material advantage—typically a pawn—while consolidating central dominance and avoiding Black's traps with accurate development.

Historical Development

The Englund Gambit, characterized by the moves 1.d4 e5, traces its origins to the mid-19th century, when amateur players experimented with aggressive pawn sacrifices in the Queen's Pawn Opening. Earlier instances include games by Polish master Aleksander Flamberg around 1910. Notable adoption came from Henry Charlick, the second Australian Chess Champion (1845–1916), who popularized the line 1.d4 e5 2.dxe5 d6 in the 1890s as a means to challenge White's center aggressively. The main line continuation, 3.Nf3 Qe7, was later systematized by Latvian player Kārlis Bētiņš (1867–1943) in the early 20th century, building on prior gambit ideas like the to create sharp attacking chances for Black. The gambit gained its name from Swedish player Fritz Englund (1871–1933), not for inventing it but for his role in promoting it through sponsorship of a thematic tournament in from late to early 1933. In this event, all games were required to start with 1.d4 e5 2.dxe5 Nc6 3.Nf3 Qe7 4.Qd5, generating numerous games that highlighted the opening's tactical potential and drew widespread attention in chess circles. The tournament, dubbed the "Englund Gambit Tournament," was won by Gösta Stoltz and significantly boosted the line's awareness, though it remained on the fringes of serious theory due to its dubious reputation. Despite limited adoption by grandmasters—Englund himself did not frequently employ it, and high-level usage has been rare, occasionally appearing in simultaneous exhibitions by players like —the gambit saw a modern revival starting in 2021, fueled by online content from International Master (GothamChess). Rozman's popular video analyzing the gambit's traps and quick wins introduced it to a broad audience of club players, leading to a surge in its play during blitz and rapid games on platforms like and . By 2023, the opening appeared in thousands of online database entries at intermediate levels, reflecting its appeal as a surprise weapon in faster time controls despite theoretical refutations.

Theoretical Variations

Main Line

The Englund Gambit arises after the moves 1.d4 e5 2.dxe5, with offering a central for rapid development and initiative. The main line continues 2...Nc6, attacking the e5- and preparing queenside activity, followed by 3.Nf3 Qe7, where 's eyes the b2- while defending the on c6. This sequence aims to provoke into overextending, but it carries risks due to 's exposed . A critical juncture occurs at move 4, where often plays 4.Bf4 to develop the and protect e5 indirectly. responds aggressively with 4...Qb4+, checking the and targeting b2. If interposes 5.Bd2, captures 5...Qxb2, gaining a and threatening 6...Nb4 followed by 7...Nxc2+, ing the and on a1. This can win significant if 's on b1 remains undefended, as illustrated in the position after 6...Nb4: 's on e1, on d1, on a1, and 's poised to exploit the c2 square. In the line 5.Bd2 Qxb2 6.Nc3, Black can attempt 6...Nb4, threatening 7...Nxc2+. However, White refutes this with 7.Nd4 (knight from f3 to d4), which defends c2, attacks the knight on b4, and secures a development advantage, leaving Black's queen overextended. This line underscores the gambit's sharpness but also its vulnerability to precise play. An important subline arises if White develops 4.Nc3 before 4.Bf4, prompting Black to play 4...Qb4, pinning the knight on c3 and renewing the attack on b2. Here, White must avoid passive moves like 5.Bd2 without support, as Black can again capture on b2 and initiate the Nb4 fork, potentially winning the exchange or more. Correct White play, such as reinforcing with 5.Bd2 followed by quick development, maintains the edge. Engine evaluations confirm White's advantage in the main line with accurate play. For instance, 16 assesses positions after 5.Bd2 Qxb2 6.Nc3 Nb4 7.Nd4 as approximately +1.5 in White's favor, reflecting Black's compromised queen position and White's lead in as of 2024 analyses.

Blackburne–Hartlaub Gambit

The Blackburne–Hartlaub Gambit arises in the Englund Gambit after 1.d4 e5 2.dxe5 d6 3.exd6 Bxd6, where Black recaptures on d6 with the dark-squared bishop to accelerate while sacrificing a pawn. This line represents a more positional approach to the gambit compared to sharper queen sorties, prioritizing the activation of Black's kingside pieces over immediate aggression. Named after English chess master Joseph Henry Blackburne and German player Richard Hartlaub, who analyzed the variation in the early , it offers Black open lines along the d-file and the bishop pair as compensation for White's material edge. Following 3...Bxd6, White usually continues with 4.Nf3 or 4.Nc3 to secure the extra pawn and develop harmoniously, prompting Black to play 4...Nf6 and ...0-0 for swift kingside and piece coordination. In these positions, Black seeks active play against White's uncastled king, leveraging the lead in development, though White's pawn advantage provides a solid foundation for counterplay. A critical subline occurs if White opts for 4.Bg5 to exert early pressure on the e7-square; Black can challenge this with 4...f6, aiming to disrupt the pin and open the f-file after 5.Bxf6 gxf6 (or similar recaptures), leading to tactical complexities where Black's active pieces offset the structural weaknesses. Modern engines evaluate the position after 4.Nf3 Nf6 at approximately +0.8 in White's favor, indicating a slight but enduring due to the material imbalance. Despite this, the gambit remains playable for Black in practical over-the-board scenarios, particularly in faster time controls, where its sharpness can unsettle unprepared opponents—as evidenced by database statistics showing White winning about 52% of games, Black 40%, and draws around 8%.

Soller Gambit

The Soller Gambit arises in the Englund Gambit after the moves 1.d4 e5 2.dxe5 f6, where Black immediately challenges White's captured to open lines on the kingside and accelerate development. Following 3.exf6 Nxf6, White typically develops with 4.Nc3 or 4.Nf3, after which Black counters in with ...d5 or ...c6 to support further activity. This line sacrifices for dynamic play, aiming to exploit open files early in the game. Black's strategic objectives center on rapid kingside , often pursuing ...Bc5 to target and ...O-O-O for queenside , accepting a weakened in exchange for piece activity and potential attacks. White, in response, frequently secures central space with , consolidating the material advantage while exploiting Black's exposed king position. A key subline occurs after 4.Bg5 d5 5.e3, where Black's kingside becomes vulnerable to pins and infiltration, turning the initiative toward White. The variation is named after Karl Soller (1908–1979), a correspondence chess player who analyzed and promoted it around the mid-20th century. Database statistics indicate it strongly favors White, with Black winning only about 35% of games overall, reflecting the gambit's unsound nature due to the irreparable damage to Black's pawn shield and lack of compensation for the sacrificed material. In practice, White scores between 50% and 67% in common continuations like 3.exf6, 3.e4, or 3.Nf3.

Felbecker Gambit

The Felbecker Gambit arises in the Englund Gambit after 1.d4 e5 2.dxe5 Nc6 3.Nf3 f6 4.exf6 Nxf6, when White responds with 5.Bc4 and Black counters with 5...Bc5, developing the bishop to target the vulnerable f2-square while accelerating piece activity. This line combines elements of the Soller Gambit structure with early bishop development on c5, creating a hybrid approach that emphasizes rapid mobilization over immediate pawn challenges. Black's strategic ideas revolve around exploiting White's isolated central structure and lack of pawn support, often preparing a kingside fianchetto with ...g6 or reinforcing the center via ...Qe7 to support further advances. By placing the bishop on c5, Black gains pressure against f2 and prepares potential discoveries or tactics along the a1-h8 diagonal, compensating for the material deficit through superior piece coordination. In a key subline, an alternative order 3...f6 4.Bc4 Bc5 allows White to refute the gambit sharply with 5.exf6 d5, though Black secures some compensation via active piece play and open lines. The variation is named after the German player Hans Felbecker and gained attention through his involvement in 1920s correspondence games, where such aggressive lines were explored in postal play. Evaluation favors White with approximately a +1.0 advantage, as modern analysis and database statistics show White prevailing in over 56% of encounters, rendering the Felbecker Gambit a minor and rarely adopted option due to stronger alternatives for Black in the Englund complex.

Zilbermints Gambit

The Zilbermints Gambit arises in the Englund Gambit after the moves 1.d4 e5 2.dxe5 Nc6 3.Nf3 Nge7, where develops the kingside knight flexibly to support future operations without immediately recapturing on e5. This line emphasizes harmonious piece play over , allowing to challenge center indirectly while keeping the queen sidelined to avoid early tactical refutations common in other Englund variations. A key response for White is 4.Bf4, developing the dark-squared with against the on c6. Black counters with 4...Ng6, attacking the and eyeing the e5-; White typically retreats 5.Bg3. From here, Black can solidify the position with ...d6 or ..., bolstering the on g6—which continues to pressure the —and preparing a central counterpush with ...d5 to contest White's extra and open lines for the pieces. This setup avoids exposing the queen prematurely, unlike lines involving an early ...Qe7, and promotes active development without committing to pawn recaptures that might weaken the kingside. An important subvariation occurs after 4.Nc3, to which Black replies 4...Nf5, placing the knight actively to influence and while harmoniously developing toward kingside . This move indirectly pressures White's setup by discouraging advances and supporting potential ...d5 breaks, creating dynamic imbalances where Black regains activity despite the pawn deficit. The gambit is named after American chess player Lev Zilbermints (born 1967), who invented and extensively analyzed the line starting in March 1993, with its first recorded use in his game against J. Saffern on April 18, 1993; prior to this, fewer than ten games featured the 3...Nge7 idea. Zilbermints promoted the variation through practical play and theoretical work, establishing its core concepts in the as a sound alternative within the Englund complex. In evaluation, White retains a moderate edge (approximately +0.9 by engine assessment after 5.Bg3), stemming from the extra pawn and better coordination, though Black's position remains playable with no immediate weaknesses and opportunities for counterplay via central expansion. Database statistics from limited master-level games show White scoring around 50%, with draws common in balanced middlegames, underscoring the line's viability for Black in surprise scenarios.

White's Alternatives to Acceptance

White has several sound options to decline Black's gambit pawn offer in the Englund Gambit (1.d4 e5), prioritizing central control and rapid over material gain. These moves exploit the overextension of Black's e-pawn, leading to cramped positions for Black and significant space advantages for . One key decline is 2.d5, advancing the pawn to challenge Black's directly and cramp Black's queenside . Black cannot comfortably recapture on d5 due to the lack of support, and attempts like 2...d6 allow to follow with 3.c4, gaining further space and restricting Black's knight on b8 while preparing e3 or Nc3 for solid . This line favors , as engines assess it as a clear advantage, often exceeding +1.0, with controlling key central squares and Black struggling for counterplay. Another effective choice is 2.c4, bolstering the d4 and preparing a future d5 push, which transposes toward favorable Queen's Gambit-like structures. This move limits Black's options, as 2...exd4 3.cxd4 leaves with a strong , while ignoring the e5 allows to develop harmoniously with Nf3 and g3. Evaluations show holding a comfortable edge here, typically +1.2 or better, emphasizing superior and piece activity. Playing 2.e4 declines the gambit while opening lines for quick kingside development, effectively reversing colors in a akin to the Center Game. Black's 2...exd4 can be met with 3.Nc3 or 3.c3, regaining the with and leading to open positions where White's pieces coordinate better. This option is popular among masters and provides White with a solid, promising advantage, evaluated at around +1.5 by strong engines. Finally, 2.Nf3 ignores the offered pawn entirely, attacking e5 while developing a piece naturally and preparing to . The e5 becomes a target and potential isolani after exchanges, hampering Black's coordination; for instance, 2...d6 3.dxe5 dxe5 4.Qxd8+ Kxd8 leaves Black's exposed. This straightforward approach yields White a better , with evaluations favoring White by +1.0 or more due to superior development and Black's weakened structure. Overall, all these declinations strongly favor , with engine assessments indicating advantages of +1.5 or greater in many continuations, making them reliable for players seeking a safe edge without entering the complications of . Prepared players may opt for 2.dxe5 to pursue sharper lines, but declining is recommended for those prioritizing and avoiding tactical pitfalls.

Strategic Ideas and Evaluation

Black's Objectives and Plans

Black's primary objective in the Englund Gambit (1.d4 e5) is to the e5-pawn in for rapid and lasting initiative, aiming to open lines for the pieces and create threats against White's or central structure. This gambit disrupts White's control of early, allowing Black to activate the queenside and queen aggressively while compensating for the material deficit through superior piece coordination and attacking chances. In lines where White accepts the gambit (2.dxe5), Black typically develops the knight to c6 to challenge the e5-pawn and support further central pressure, followed by Qe7 to target weaknesses on b2 and c2 while preparing breaks like ...d5 to undermine White's pawn center and open the game. Common motifs include knight forks from b4, exploiting overextended White pieces, and pins against the knight on c3 to restrict development; Black may also castle queenside rapidly to launch a direct assault on the enemy king. For instance, greedy play by White such as capturing on b2 with the queen can lead to traps where Black regains material with interest through tactical shots, illustrating the gambit's emphasis on punishing inaccuracies. When White declines the gambit (e.g., 2.d5), Black's plan shifts toward regaining the with ...d6 after preparatory , or countering in the center with ...c5 breaks to equalize and transition into active play without the pawn deficit. Across variations, Black prioritizes piece activity over , using the gambit's unbalanced nature to generate kingside or queenside attacks, often leveraging open files for rooks and bishops to maintain pressure.

White's Counterplay and Refutations

White's primary strategy against the Englund Gambit involves accepting the with 2.dxe5 and then developing pieces to consolidate the material advantage while maintaining central control. Moves such as 3.Nc3, 3.Bf4, or 3.e3 help build a solid in the center, allowing White to develop harmoniously without overextending. This approach exploits Black's compromised and early commitment of , often leading to queenside expansion for White through maneuvers like a3 and b4 to gain space and restrict Black's counterplay. In the main lines following 2...Nc6 3.Nf3 Qe7, White can counter Black's aggressive queen sorties with knight maneuvers such as Nd4 or Nb5, which target the queen and disrupt Black's development. These responses force the black queen to retreat awkwardly, often to b4+ or c5, resulting in loss of tempo and exposure of the a8-rook to potential threats. By prioritizing piece activity over immediate pawn grabs, White maintains initiative and transitions into a favorable middlegame where Black's pieces remain uncoordinated. Positionally, White benefits from the extra and superior , which provide enduring advantages in endgames and allow flexible plans. Advancing followed by d5 can secure additional and Black's , while if Black castles queenside, White may redirect forces for a kingside targeting the weakened e-file and f7-. These elements underscore the gambit's flaws, as Black's early aggression rarely compensates for the structural deficits. Modern engine analysis, including evaluations from , consistently shows holding a clear superiority of +1.0 to +2.0 across principal lines when playing accurately, confirming the gambit's unsoundness and advising its avoidance in high-level play. In the masters database, scores over 60% in accepted lines, highlighting practical dominance. For club-level encounters, should remain alert to Black's tactical traps, such as queen checks or knight forks, but focus on exploiting the gambit's inherent weaknesses, particularly the exposed kingside and delayed development, to convert the advantage into a win.

References

  1. [1]
    Englund Gambit - Chess Openings
    The Englund Gambit is an opening for Black against White's 1.d4. Although similar in appearance to the Budapest Gambit, the Englund is not a sound opening.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  2. [2]
    Englund Gambit - Chess Pathways
    The Englund Gambit is generally considered not to be as viable as some other early pawn sacrifices that black can employ.
  3. [3]
    https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessplayer?pid=12779
  4. [4]
    Englund Gambit Full Guide - 365Chess.com
    The Englund Gambit, beginning with the unexpected moves 1.d4 e5, is a fascinating chess opening that promises a daring and adventurous game.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  5. [5]
    A40: Queen's pawn, Charlick (Englund) gambit - 1. d4 e5 2. dxe5 d5
    The A40 Queen's pawn, Charlick (Englund) gambit starts with 1. d4 e5 2. dxe5 d5. The next move is 3. exd6.
  6. [6]
    Englund Gambit - ChessPub Forum
    Sep 9, 2007 · 1 d4 e5 2 de5 Nc6 3 Nf3 Qe7 is the Englund Gambit proper. Named after Fritz Anton Carl Englund, who held a small thematic tournament with it in ...
  7. [7]
    Englund Gambit: 1.d4 e5 - ChessBase Books
    Englund Gambit: 1.d4 e5. Search. Contents. Contents. 27 Englund-1...e5. Open ... 27 Englund, -, 1...e5. 1.d4 e5 2.dxe5 Nc6 3.Nf3 Qe7 4.Bf4 Qb4+ 5.Bd2! 5.Qd2 ...
  8. [8]
    Matthew Lunn: Dealing with the Englund - ChessBase
    Aug 9, 2016 · The Englund Gambit, 1.d4 e5, is in my opinion the second worst opening in the whole of chess (top position belongs to 1.e4 f5, the glorious Fred).
  9. [9]
    Henry Charlick hones his chess moves in Adelaide from 1860s to ...
    In the early 1890s, Charlick introduced the dubious chess opening 1.d4 e5?! 2.dxe5 d6, sometimes called the Charlick Gambit.. Charlick's idea was to meet 2.dxe5 ...
  10. [10]
    Englund Gambit Guide: Variations, Counters & Traps
    The opening is named after the Swedish player Fritz Englund, who organized a thematic tournament in which all games had an Englund Gambit's starting position.
  11. [11]
    Englund Gambit
    The main line Englund Gambit (2...Nc6, 3...Qe7) was introduced by Kārlis Bētiņš (1867-1943), who also established the Latvian Gambit. The Swedish player Fritz ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  12. [12]
    Englund Gambit | The FAMOUS Stockholm Variation! - Chess.com
    May 14, 2023 · The story goes that Fritz Englund liked this opening so much that he sponsored a themed tournament where all games began with this opening with ...
  13. [13]
    WIN IN 8 MOVES: The Englund Gambit - YouTube
    May 19, 2021 · ... code “GOTHAM” at checkout to save 20% off your order: https ... Is the Englund Gambit a Meme Opening? GMHikaru•306K views · 29:39 · Go ...Missing: ECO | Show results with:ECO
  14. [14]
    Englund Gambit Complex, Hartlaub-Charlick Gambit - Chess Opening
    Englund Gambit Complex, Hartlaub-Charlick Gambit. Opening Colour: Player Wins: 39.89%. Draw: 8.20%. Opponent Wins: 51.91% ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  15. [15]
    Englund Gambit: Soller Gambit - Chess Openings
    Learn the Englund Gambit: Soller Gambit with free tools and analysis from Chess.com. Improve your opening repertoire and crush your opponents!
  16. [16]
    Englund Gambit Complex, Soller Gambit - Chess Opening
    Englund Gambit Complex, Soller Gambit opening. See the moves, success rate, popularity, and recent games.
  17. [17]
    Lev Zilbermintz Analyzes Soller Gambit - Jim West On Chess
    Apr 5, 2013 · The Soller Gambit, introduced by Karl Soller of Germany circa 1950. It is like a Blackmar-Diemer Gambit in reverse.
  18. [18]
    Karl Soller - ChessBase Players
    Images, games, statistics and more of chessplayer Karl Soller.
  19. [19]
    Englund Gambit: Felbecker Gambit - Openings - Chess.com
    Learn the Englund Gambit: Felbecker Gambit with free tools and analysis from Chess.com. Improve your opening repertoire and crush your opponents!
  20. [20]
    Englund Gambit Complex: Felbecker Gambit - Openings - Bookmoves
    The Felbecker Gambit is an aggressive chess opening where Black sacrifices a pawn for rapid piece development and attacking chances, but it is a risky choice.
  21. [21]
    Englund Gambit Complex, Felbecker Gambit - Chess Opening
    Englund Gambit Complex, Felbecker Gambit. Opening Colour: Player Wins: 38.46%. Draw: 5.13%. Opponent Wins: 56.41%. add. Enter comment... Submit Cancel.
  22. [22]
    Hans Felbecker player profile - ChessBase Players
    Images, games, statistics and more of chessplayer Hans Felbecker.
  23. [23]
    Englund Gambit: Zilbermints Gambit - Openings - Chess.com
    Learn the Englund Gambit: Zilbermints Gambit with free tools and analysis from Chess.com. Improve your opening repertoire and crush your opponents!
  24. [24]
    Englund Gambit Qe7 and Nge7 lines
    Englund Gambit Qe7 and Nge7 lines. Instead of aiming to blast the ... Bc4 Bc5) 9. Qf3 d6 10. Bxf6 gxf6 11. O-O-O $14 {Sullivan, D (1970)-Linford,C ...
  25. [25]
    Zilbermints Gambit: Englund Gambit Variation Guide
    Main Line: 4. Bf4. The main line of the Zilbermints Gambit is 4. Bf4, which is also the most popular response. With this move, White develops their bishop ...<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    [PDF] table of contents - Unorthodox Openings Newsletter
    The correspondence game Lobo Conchello – R. Gayobart was played, resulting in a win for Black. The game went 1 d4 e5 2 dxe5 Nc6 3 Nf3 Nge7 4 Bg5 h6 5 Bh4 g5 ...
  27. [27]
    Opening • Englund_Gambit_Complex_Zilbermints_Gambit
    Chess openings · Englund Gambit: Zilbermints Gambit · Grob Opening: Zilbermints Gambit · Carr Defense: Zilbermints Gambit · Réti Opening: Zilbermints Gambit · Borg ...Missing: masters database Nge7
  28. [28]
    A40: Queen's pawn, Charlick (Englund) gambit - 1. d4 e5 2. d5
    Stop Analysis. Start Engine Analysis. Stored Analysis: -0.31 Depth 22. Opening Explorer Database: Big Database, Masters Database. Moves List: 1. d4 e5 2. d5.
  29. [29]
    1. d4 e5 2. c4 - Chess Opening explorer - 365Chess.com
    The Opening Explorer is a great tool if you want to study chess openings. Search games · Search position; Opening Explorer. A40 Queen's pawn, Charlick (Englund) ...
  30. [30]
    Why the hell do masters decline the Englund Gambit? - Chess Forums
    Oct 28, 2022 · Ok now I've just realised that only 285 masters have played the Englund Gambit and there are 2000 or so responses to the Englund Gambit? But ...
  31. [31]
    A40: Queen's pawn, Charlick (Englund) gambit - 1. d4 e5 2. Nf3
    Stored Analysis: -0.13 Depth 37. Opening Explorer Database: Big Database, Masters Database. Moves List: 1. d4 e5 2. Nf3.Missing: evaluation | Show results with:evaluation
  32. [32]
    None
    Nothing is retrieved...<|control11|><|separator|>
  33. [33]
    Englund Gambit | Strategy: Attack! - Chess.com
    Mar 10, 2023 · White declined the gambit with (2. e3). The best response for Black ... 2. e3 ... Englund Gambit Declined: Reversed French Variation. 2 ...Missing: options | Show results with:options
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Taming Wild Chess Openings
    Englund Gambit Complex: 1.d4 e5 . ... If the only way to refute an opening is to play a complex tactical variation, we'll recommend that (some gambits ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] California Chess Journal - CalChess
    Jan 1, 2003 · Black's queen often enters early in the Englund Gambit. Huy 1993. White: Eric Denayer. Black: L. Cornet. Englund Gambit ... The correct refutation ...
  36. [36]
    Why don't people play the Englund Gambit? - Chess Stack Exchange
    Oct 8, 2020 · Many people play this gambit. Even some grandmasters. At the highest level white's scoring chances are overwhelming. That says the gambit is unsound.Missing: Budapest | Show results with:Budapest