Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Enterprise master patient index

An enterprise master patient index (EMPI) is a centralized database system designed to store and manage consistent, accurate patient demographic and identification data across multiple healthcare facilities, systems, or organizations within a single enterprise, facilitating the unique identification of patients and the linking of their records to prevent duplication and errors.^[1]^[2] By employing advanced matching algorithms—such as probabilistic and deterministic methods—EMPIs resolve potential duplicate entries based on attributes like name, date of birth, address, and medical record numbers, thereby ensuring a single, authoritative view of each patient's identity.^[3]^[4] This technology supports interoperability in health information exchanges (HIEs), integrates with electronic health records (EHRs), and enables record locator services to retrieve comprehensive patient data from distributed sources. The primary benefits of an EMPI include enhanced patient safety through reduced medication errors and misdiagnoses, improved operational efficiency in areas like billing and care coordination, and better compliance with regulatory standards such as HIPAA.^[5] However, challenges in EMPI implementation often involve achieving high data matching accuracy (typically aiming for less than 1% duplicate error rates), addressing data quality issues like incomplete or inconsistent entries, and balancing privacy concerns with cross-system data sharing.^[6]^[7] Emerging trends incorporate artificial intelligence and machine learning to automate identity resolution and adapt to evolving data standards.^[8]

Definition and Purpose

Core Concept

An Enterprise Master Patient Index (EMPI) is a centralized database that assigns a unique identifier to each patient by consolidating and linking records from multiple source systems, such as electronic health records (EHRs), billing systems, and laboratory information systems.^[9] This master index enables healthcare organizations to maintain a unified view of patient identities across disparate data sources, facilitating accurate patient identification without duplicating full clinical records.^[2] Key attributes of an EMPI include its role as a cross-reference repository that primarily stores demographic data—such as name, date of birth, address, and Social Security number—for matching purposes, rather than comprehensive clinical details. Unlike a local Master Patient Index (MPI), which typically serves a single institution and manages records within one facility, an EMPI operates at an enterprise or regional level, integrating and handling millions of records from federated sources across multiple organizations or departments.^[2] The basic workflow of an EMPI involves the ingestion of patient data from various sources, followed by matching processes—either probabilistic, which weighs multiple demographic factors for likely associations, or deterministic, which relies on exact matches of predefined fields—to resolve duplicates and create a single "golden record" representing the authoritative patient profile.^[10]^[11] This matching is typically powered by a match engine that cross-references incoming data against existing entries to ensure ongoing accuracy and completeness.^[12]

Role in Healthcare Systems

The enterprise master patient index (EMPI) plays a pivotal role in fostering patient-centric care within healthcare systems by providing a centralized mechanism for accurate patient identification and record linkage, which minimizes duplicate patient entries that can lead to fragmented care delivery. By consolidating demographic and identifier data from disparate sources, the EMPI ensures that clinical information is reliably associated with the correct individual, thereby supporting seamless care coordination across providers and settings. This function is essential for health information exchanges (HIEs), where the EMPI facilitates secure and standardized data exchange among participating organizations, enabling providers to access a unified view of patient history without compromising privacy.^[6]^[4]^[13] In practical use cases, the EMPI underpins critical processes such as patient registration, where it verifies and assigns unique identifiers to incoming patients, preventing errors during initial encounters. It also enhances clinical decision support by delivering accurate, linked data to electronic health records (EHRs), allowing clinicians to make informed choices based on complete histories rather than incomplete subsets. For population health analytics, the EMPI enables aggregated reporting on patient cohorts across facilities, aiding in trend identification and resource allocation for public health initiatives. Additionally, it supports regulatory compliance, such as HIPAA requirements for unique patient tracking and data protection, by maintaining auditable linkages that ensure traceability in shared environments.^[14]^[15] The EMPI significantly impacts healthcare workflows by streamlining admissions processes through rapid record matching, which reduces administrative delays and allows for quicker treatment initiation. It mitigates risks in medication administration by eliminating confusion from duplicate or mismatched profiles, thereby lowering the incidence of adverse drug events. Furthermore, it promotes longitudinal patient views by linking historical data across episodes of care, enabling providers to track chronic conditions and outcomes over time for more proactive management.^[12]^[16]^[14] At scale, the EMPI operates effectively in enterprise-wide settings, such as hospital networks, where it manages millions of records to support integrated operations across multiple departments and facilities. In cross-organizational contexts, like regional HIEs, it extends this capability to interconnect independent entities, handling diverse data feeds while preserving data integrity for population-level insights and coordinated care.

Historical Development

Origins in Healthcare IT

The origins of the Master Patient Index (MPI) trace back to the 1970s and 1980s, when hospital information systems (HIS) began incorporating automated tools for managing patient records within single facilities. Early HIS implementations focused primarily on administrative and financial functions, but as electronic data processing became more feasible, institutions developed local databases to centralize patient identification and link encounters across departments. Standards from organizations like HL7 contributed to early efforts in patient identification. For instance, by the early 1970s, pioneering hospitals like Henry Ford Hospital initiated electronic medical record systems that evolved into rudimentary MPIs by the 1980s, enabling the assignment of unique identifiers to track patient visits and avoid silos in record-keeping.^[17]^[18] A significant milestone occurred in the 1990s with the passage of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) in 1996, which emphasized patient privacy, data security, and accurate identification to prevent unauthorized disclosures. HIPAA's administrative simplification provisions highlighted the need for standardized approaches to patient matching, recognizing the MPI as a foundational concept for unique health identifiers while mandating protections for protected health information. This regulatory push accelerated the adoption of MPIs amid growing IT infrastructure in healthcare, as facilities sought to comply with requirements for reliable data linkage and error reduction.^[19]^[2] The primary drivers for these early MPI developments included the fragmentation of patient data resulting from hospital mergers and the high prevalence of duplicate records, which compromised care continuity and operational efficiency. Prevalent error rates from duplicates were estimated at 8-16% in many organizations, leading to misdirected treatments, billing inaccuracies, and safety risks before widespread MPI implementation. These challenges underscored the necessity for centralized indexing at the facility level, laying the groundwork for later enterprise-scale expansions.^[6]

Evolution to Enterprise Scale

The passage of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act in 2009, part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, provided financial incentives for healthcare providers to adopt electronic health records (EHRs), driving the need for robust patient identification systems to ensure interoperability across disparate systems.^[20] This legislation accelerated the transition from local master patient indexes (MPIs) to enterprise master patient indexes (EMPIs), as organizations required centralized mechanisms to link patient data from multiple EHRs and health information exchanges (HIEs) while minimizing duplication errors.^[6] In the 2010s, EMPI implementations began incorporating cloud-based architectures to enable scalable data storage and access, allowing healthcare enterprises to manage growing volumes of patient information without on-premises hardware limitations. Federated models also emerged during this period, distributing patient matching across networked systems to support collaborative care while preserving data privacy at individual sites.^[21] In the post-2010 era, technological advancements integrated artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) into EMPI frameworks to enhance matching accuracy, particularly for handling big data from sources like wearable devices and telehealth platforms.^[22] These AI/ML approaches analyze probabilistic patterns in demographic and clinical data, improving matching accuracy compared to traditional deterministic methods, and enabling real-time resolution in high-volume environments.^[23] This shift was crucial as healthcare data exploded, with telehealth adoption surging post-2020 and wearables generating continuous streams of patient metrics that demanded adaptive, scalable EMPIs.^[24] The vendor landscape for EMPIs expanded significantly in the 2000s and 2010s, with major players like Epic Systems, Cerner (acquired by Oracle in 2022), and Informatica developing integrated EMPI modules within their EHR and data management platforms to support enterprise-wide deployment.^[25] Open-source alternatives, such as OpenEMPI released in 2008, provided customizable, cost-effective options for organizations seeking flexible patient indexing without proprietary lock-in.^[26] These solutions facilitated broader adoption by offering APIs for seamless integration and tools for probabilistic matching. Global adoption of EMPIs extended beyond the United States in the late 2010s, influenced by regulatory frameworks like the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) enacted in 2018, which mandated secure handling of personal health data and prompted increased implementation of compliant EMPI systems among European healthcare providers.^[27] In Asia, national health systems in countries like Singapore and India incorporated EMPIs into initiatives such as the National Electronic Health Record (NEHR) and Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission, enabling cross-facility data sharing while addressing interoperability in diverse populations.^[28] This international growth underscored EMPIs' role in supporting unified patient views across borders, though challenges like varying data standards persisted.^[29]

Technical Architecture

Match Engine Mechanics

The match engine serves as the core software module within an enterprise master patient index (EMPI) system, responsible for processing incoming patient data against existing index records using algorithmic techniques to identify potential matches and detect duplicates. It employs rules-based or probabilistic methods to evaluate similarities across demographic fields such as name, date of birth, address, and medical record numbers (MRNs), enabling the linkage of records from disparate sources while minimizing errors in patient identification.^[30]^[31] EMPI match engines typically incorporate two primary matching types: deterministic and probabilistic. Deterministic matching relies on exact correspondences in predefined key fields, such as a unique MRN or social security number, where all specified criteria must align precisely to confirm a match, offering high certainty but limited flexibility for data variations.^[11] In contrast, probabilistic matching applies statistical models to assign weights to individual data elements based on their agreement or disagreement, computing an overall match score that reflects the likelihood of records belonging to the same patient; for instance, a threshold of 80% confidence may trigger a potential link for further review.^[11]^[32] Central to the match engine's operation are key processes including data normalization, weight assignment, and duplicate detection. Data normalization standardizes input formats—such as converting varied date representations (e.g., MM/DD/YYYY to YYYY-MM-DD) or parsing addresses into components like street, city, and ZIP code—to ensure consistent comparisons across heterogeneous sources.^[32] Weight assignment then evaluates field reliability, assigning higher scores to stable identifiers like date of birth (often weighted at 20-30% of the total score) compared to more variable ones like address (10-15%), using likelihood ratios derived from historical match frequencies to compute composite probabilities.^[11] Duplicate detection scans the index iteratively, flagging records with scores above the threshold for resolution, thereby preventing fragmentation in the patient registry.^[33] Illustrative algorithms within probabilistic match engines include Soundex for phonetic name matching, which encodes surnames into a four-character code based on sound (e.g., "Smith" and "Smythe" both yield S530) to handle spelling inconsistencies, and edit distance metrics like Levenshtein for quantifying variations in strings such as addresses, measuring the minimum operations (insertions, deletions, substitutions) needed to transform one into another (e.g., "123 Main St" to "123 Maine Street" requires two edits).^[32]^[33] These techniques integrate into the engine's workflow to enhance accuracy in linking records, contributing to the broader EMPI architecture by providing scored candidates for subsequent resolution.^[30]

Data Linking and Resolution Processes

Once potential matches are identified by the match engine, the enterprise master patient index (EMPI) proceeds to the linking phase by assigning unique identifiers and cross-references, or pointers, to the corresponding source records across disparate systems. These cross-references enable the EMPI to connect patient data without physically duplicating or moving the underlying records, thereby maintaining data integrity and reducing storage overhead. This process creates a virtual "golden record," which serves as a composite, unified view of the patient's information aggregated from multiple sources, allowing healthcare providers to access a complete patient profile on demand.^[34]^[35] Resolution techniques in EMPI systems handle discrepancies and uncertainties in linking through a combination of automated and manual methods. For matches with low confidence scores, cases are routed to manual review queues where trained personnel evaluate demographic details, such as date of birth or address, to confirm or reject linkages. Automated survivorship rules complement this by defining prioritization logic for conflicting data attributes; for instance, the most recent address or the preferred name from the primary source system is selected to populate the golden record, ensuring consistency without overwriting critical historical information.^[1]^[36] Data stewardship plays a central role in managing the resolution process, with designated administrators responsible for approving merges of duplicate records or initiating splits when erroneous linkages are detected. Stewards also address demographic changes, such as name updates following marriage or address relocations, by updating cross-references and propagating corrections to linked source systems while preserving audit integrity. This oversight ensures ongoing accuracy in patient identity management across the enterprise.^[1]^[37] Error handling in EMPI linking and resolution is supported by comprehensive auditing mechanisms that log all match decisions, merges, splits, and manual interventions, providing a traceable history for compliance and quality assurance. These audit trails facilitate post-resolution reviews to identify patterns in errors, such as overlays from false positives. In mature EMPI implementations, false positive rates—where unrelated records are incorrectly linked—are typically maintained below 1%, achieved through iterative refinement of resolution workflows and stewardship practices.^[38]

Implementation Considerations

Integration with Existing Systems

Integrating an Enterprise Master Patient Index (EMPI) into existing healthcare IT infrastructures requires careful selection of deployment models to balance control, scalability, and performance. Centralized deployments maintain a single, unified database that aggregates and resolves patient identities from disparate sources, providing a authoritative reference point for the entire organization. ^[3] Federated models, in contrast, enable distributed querying across multiple source systems without replicating data centrally, preserving local autonomy while allowing cross-system access. ^[39] Hybrid approaches combine elements of both, often using a central index for core resolution supplemented by federated access for sensitive or high-volume data. ^[10] Deployment options also include on-premise installations for organizations with legacy systems requiring low latency, or cloud-based solutions like AWS HealthLake, which supports scalable patient entity resolution through managed FHIR storage and integration services. ^[40] Interface methods facilitate seamless data exchange between the EMPI and existing systems, with APIs enabling real-time queries for patient matching during clinical workflows. ^[41] Batch processing is commonly used for initial historical data migration and periodic synchronization, allowing large-scale updates without disrupting ongoing operations. ^[42] Vendor-specific integrations enhance compatibility with major electronic health record (EHR) systems, such as Epic's built-in EMPI tools, which link patient records across modules using standards-based interfaces. ^[42] Similarly, Cerner's Oracle Health Data Intelligence platform incorporates EMPI functionality with RESTful APIs for linking source records to master persons. ^[41] Extract, Transform, Load (ETL) pipelines are essential in these integrations, extracting demographic data from EHRs, transforming it for consistency (e.g., standardizing formats), and loading it into the EMPI to minimize duplicates. ^[43] Migration to an EMPI often involves significant challenges, particularly data cleansing to resolve duplicates and inconsistencies prior to integration. ^[44] Timelines for large enterprises typically span 6-18 months, encompassing assessment, cleansing, testing, and go-live phases to ensure minimal disruption to patient care. ^[45]

Standards and Interoperability

The Enterprise Master Patient Index (EMPI) relies on established healthcare standards to facilitate data exchange and patient identification across disparate systems. HL7 version 2 and version 3 messaging standards enable the transmission of patient demographic data, supporting EMPI functions such as record linking and updates through structured message formats like ADT (admit/discharge/transfer) messages.^[46] Modern implementations increasingly adopt HL7 FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources), which provides RESTful APIs for querying and updating patient information; the FHIR Patient resource specifically standardizes demographics including name, birth date, gender, and identifiers, allowing EMPIs to integrate seamlessly with electronic health records (EHRs).^[34] Complementing these, Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE) profiles such as Patient Identifier Cross-referencing (PIX) and Patient Demographics Query (PDQ) address patient identification challenges; PIX enables cross-referencing of local identifiers to a global enterprise identifier, while PDQ supports querying an EMPI for demographic matches using probabilistic algorithms.^[47]^[48] Regulatory frameworks in the United States further mandate interoperability features that underpin EMPI deployment. While HIPAA does not mandate a unique patient identifier at the national level—due to privacy concerns—EMPIs provide enterprise-level unique IDs to support accurate data handling in compliance with HIPAA's privacy and security rules for protected health information (PHI).^[49] The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) certification criteria for EHRs, under the 21st Century Cures Act, require certified systems to support patient matching and data exchange, including APIs for patient access and standardized demographics—functions typically fulfilled by EMPI capabilities to achieve interoperability and avoid information blocking.^[50]^[51] Internationally, EMPI systems incorporate coding and privacy standards to support cross-border or regional interoperability. SNOMED CT (Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine—Clinical Terms) serves as a comprehensive clinical terminology for encoding patient data in EMPIs, enabling consistent representation of clinical conditions and observations across systems and facilitating semantic interoperability in global health exchanges.^[52] In the European Union, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) governs EMPI operations by requiring explicit consent, data minimization, and robust security measures for processing personal health data, ensuring privacy-by-design in patient identity management implementations.^[53] To verify compliance and accuracy, interoperability testing employs specialized tools that simulate cross-system interactions. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) provides validators and conformance testing suites for HL7 v2 messaging, allowing EMPI developers to assess message parsing and patient matching precision against reference implementations, thereby reducing errors in real-world deployments.^[54] These tools, often integrated with IHE Connectathons, help ensure that EMPI solutions maintain high fidelity in demographic resolution across vendor ecosystems.^[47]

Advantages and Limitations

Primary Benefits

The adoption of an Enterprise Master Patient Index (EMPI) delivers substantial efficiency gains by minimizing duplicate patient records across healthcare systems. Organizations without an EMPI typically experience duplicate rates of 10-18%, which can escalate to 20-40% in merged entities, leading to redundant registrations and administrative burdens.^[55]^[56] Implementing an EMPI can reduce these duplicates by up to 70% within the first year, streamlining patient registration processes and avoiding the creation of erroneous records.^[55] This reduction translates to administrative cost savings, with each avoided duplicate costing approximately $20 to identify and correct, thereby lowering overall operational expenses in healthcare facilities.^[55] Clinically, EMPI enhances care quality by ensuring providers access accurate and comprehensive patient histories, including allergies and medications, which mitigates risks associated with misidentification. Duplicate or overlaid records can lead to errors such as administering incorrect treatments, but EMPI's centralized linking prevents such issues, contributing to improved patient safety and reduced medical errors.^[1] For instance, accurate patient matching supports better care coordination, potentially decreasing adverse events related to medication discrepancies by providing a unified view of clinical data.^[1] EMPI also bolsters analytics capabilities by enabling de-duplicated, high-quality population health data for research, reporting, and strategic decision-making. As a foundational tool for health information exchange, it facilitates reliable aggregation of patient information across systems, supporting initiatives in accountable care organizations and population health management.^[1] This data integrity allows for more precise insights into treatment outcomes and resource allocation. Studies demonstrate strong return on investment from EMPI implementation, often achieving payback within 2 years through cumulative savings from error reduction and efficiency improvements. For example, one healthcare system's analysis projected annual savings of over $500,000 from duplicate elimination, offsetting implementation costs and yielding positive ROI via decreased clinical testing and administrative overhead.^[55]

Common Challenges

One of the primary challenges in deploying an Enterprise Master Patient Index (EMPI) is maintaining data quality, particularly due to inaccurate or incomplete patient demographics such as names, dates of birth, and addresses, which can lead to duplicate records and unresolved matches. Industry surveys indicate that duplicate rates in healthcare facilities typically range from 5% to 10%, with enterprise-level systems potentially facing higher overlapping identifiers exceeding 50% if not properly managed, resulting in fragmented patient information and errors in clinical decision-making.^[57] To address these issues, organizations implement ongoing data cleansing programs, including regular assessments and automated remediation processes, which can reduce duplication to a target below 5% and cost between $15 and $60 per correction. Privacy and security risks pose significant obstacles for EMPI systems, as the centralized storage of patient identifiers across multiple sources makes them attractive targets for cyberattacks and data breaches, potentially exposing sensitive health information to unauthorized access.^[58]^[59] These vulnerabilities are exacerbated by interoperability requirements under regulations like HIPAA, where lapses in access controls can lead to compliance violations and erode patient trust. Mitigation strategies include robust encryption of data at rest and in transit, along with role-based access controls (RBAC) to limit exposure based on user privileges, ensuring that only authorized personnel can query or update records.^[49] Scalability hurdles arise when EMPI systems handle high-volume queries and large datasets from expanding healthcare networks, leading to performance lags, delayed record matching, and system overloads in real-time environments.^[60] For instance, regional EMPIs linking millions of records across distributed facilities require architectures capable of processing batch loads and complex linkages without compromising speed. These challenges are often overcome by adopting distributed computing architectures, such as cloud-based or federated models, which enhance throughput and support seamless scaling for growing data volumes.^[60] Adoption barriers for EMPI implementation include high initial costs and extensive training requirements, which can deter smaller organizations despite the long-term benefits in patient safety and operational efficiency. Estimates for setup, including software, integration, and cleanup, range from hundreds of thousands to several million dollars, compounded by ongoing maintenance expenses like periodic tuning every few years.^[61] Additional concerns involve vendor lock-in, where proprietary systems limit flexibility and increase dependency, alongside the need for staff training on data governance and matching protocols. To facilitate adoption, healthcare leaders prioritize phased rollouts, partnerships with standards bodies like HL7, and ROI analyses highlighting reductions in duplicate-related costs averaging $1.5 million annually per hospital.^[62]^[34]

References

[1]
What is an enterprise master patient index (EMPI)? - TechTarget
Aug 8, 2025 · An enterprise master patient index (EMPI) is a database that is used to maintain consistent and accurate information about each patient ...
[2]
Managing Patient Identity Across Data Sources - NCBI - NIH
A master patient index (MPI) facilitates the identification and linkage of patients' clinical information within a particular institution. The term “enterprise ...Introduction · PIM Strategies · Emerging Strategies and... · Summary
[3]
Master Patient Index: Enterprise Healthcare Data Management
Oct 2, 2025 · An enterprise master patient index creates a centralized database that links patient records across multiple systems, ensuring accurate patient ...
[4]
[PDF] The Role of Master Patient Index (MPI) and Record Locator Services ...
• Review the purpose, features, and functionality of: • An enterprise Master Patient Index (eMPI) and potential approaches for Medicaid/SCHIP. • a Record ...
[5]
All About Enterprise Master Patient Index (EMPI) - 314e
Mar 9, 2022 · What are the benefits of EMPI? Accurate patient identification increases patient safety and compliance. Patient data integrity is maintained, ...Missing: challenges | Show results with:challenges
[6]
Why Patient Matching Is a Challenge: Research on Master ... - NIH
Apr 1, 2016 · Patient matching challenges stem from data integrity issues, with middle name and SSN mismatches being most frequent, often due to misspellings ...
[7]
[PDF] A Realistic Approach to Achieving a 1% Duplicate Record Error Rate
AHIMA. “Fundamentals for Building a Master Patient Index/Enterprise Master Patient Index (2010 update).” Journal of AHIMA. (Updated September 2010).
[8]
[PDF] REVIEW ON MASTER PATIENT INDEX - arXiv
A high-level architecture of the Secure Open Enterprise Master Patient Index(SOEMPI) introduced by Toth and Durham (7) of University of Texas at Dallas ...
[9]
[PDF] A HIMSS Guide to Participating in a Health Information Exchange
Enterprise Master Patient Index (EMPI). A database that contains a unique identifier for every patient in the enterprise. EMPI organizes patient. IDs from ...
[10]
[PDF] Enterprise Master Person Index Analysis (eMPI)
Sep 17, 2013 · An eMPI provides a real-time way to locate, identify, match and cleanse information about a person from many sources to create a comprehensive ...
[11]
Deterministic vs. Probabilistic: Best Practices for Patient Matching ...
Jul 10, 2019 · A probabilistic model is more common with the use of an enterprise master patient index (EMPI). Deterministic matching uses business rules ...Missing: definition workflow
[12]
[PDF] Patient Identification and Matching Final Report - HealthIT.gov
Feb 7, 2014 · 63 Reconciling and Managing EMPIs (Updated). Journal of AHIMA 81, no.4 (April 2010): 52-57. 64 Assessing and Improving EHR Data Quality. AHIMA.
[13]
Interoperability in Healthcare - HIMSS National Capital Area Chapter
Entities use identifier standards to uniquely identify patients or providers. Enterprise Master Patient Index (EMPI): A data registry used across a healthcare ...
[14]
[PDF] Information Integrity in the Electronic Health Record American ...
An accurate MPI provides the consistent link and location of a patient's health information across the organization, and potentially across an enterprise or ...
[15]
[PDF] Informatics Toolkit - AHIMA
enterprise master patient index, overseeing or maintaining an electronic ... mote population health/wellness, and to monitor provider habits to help ...
[16]
Design and Implementation of an Application and Associated ... - NIH
Confusion about patients' medication regimens during the hospital admission and discharge process accounts for many preventable and serious medication errors.Missing: administration views
[17]
Historical Highlights: Computers Come to Henry Ford Hospital
Feb 9, 2023 · By the early 1970s, electronic medical records were begun and evolved into a master patient index in the 1980s. In the 1990s, a formal ...
[18]
Hospital Information Systems: The status and approaches in ... - NIH
Initial HISs paid more attention to financial and administrative issues of hospitals. However, in the 1980s, because of changes in the health care system, ...
[19]
White Paper on Unique Health Identifier for Individuals | ASPE
HIPAA recognized the unique identifier for individuals as an ... Several identification system proposals are based on the Master Patient Index concept.
[20]
What is the HITECH Act? 2025 Update - The HIPAA Journal
Apr 3, 2025 · The HITECH Act encouraged healthcare providers to adopt electronic health records and improve privacy and security protections for healthcare data.
[21]
[PDF] Module 2 – Patient Identification and Master Patient (Person) Index
MPI or EMPI can be supported in a cloud storage environment and many organizations today will have a “cloud first” strategy. “Cloud storage is a service.
[22]
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10365597/
[23]
Optimizing Patient Record Linkage in a Master Patient Index ... - NIH
Jun 29, 2023 · We aimed to develop and evaluate a machine learning–based software tool, which automatically configures a patient matching algorithm by learning ...
[24]
AI in Rhapsody EMPI Improves Patient Matching | Healthcare IT Today
Mar 4, 2025 · This ability to track data lineage and the consistent accuracy of AI matching reduce the risk of both non-compliance in person data management ...
[25]
AI Meets EMPI: How Rhapsody is Revolutionizing Person Data ...
Rhapsody uses AI to combine EMPI, automating person data matching, increasing accuracy, and improving speed and scalability, while maintaining consistency.
[26]
Informatica Healthcare Data Management for Providers Accelerator
Informatica's Healthcare Data Management for Providers Accelerator enables a 360-degree view of employees, healthcare providers and organizations.Missing: EMPI OpenEMPI 2008
[27]
OpenEMPI | OpenEMPI Web Site
OpenEMPI is an extensible and scalable Master Patient Index that uses algorithms to identify and resolve duplicate patient records.Missing: Epic Informatica 2008
[28]
Enterprise Master Patient Index Software Market Trends Report 2025
Sep 15, 2025 · The EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has led to the deployment of highly secure EMPI systems. Over 68% of healthcare providers in ...
[29]
How Barriers to Cross-Border Data Flows Are Spreading Globally ...
Jul 19, 2021 · Policymakers should create clear rules and frameworks to allow people, firms, universities, and public agencies to share health data. For ...
[30]
[PDF] Identity Resolution and Data Quality Algorithms for Person Indexing
A match engine measures a degree of similarity between any two comparable records, and outputs a matching weight that is computed by comparing all the ...
[31]
[PDF] Master Patient Index Interface (AGMP) - Indian Health Service
MPI software utilizes a variety of probabilistic and other forms of matching algorithm protocols to evaluate and match identities. The mission of the MPI is to ...
[32]
[PDF] The Unique Records Portfolio - Public Health Informatics Institute
The words. “danny” and “dani” would have an edit distance of 3. • Soundex Matching. Soundex comparisons match words (typically names) with different spellings ...
[33]
[PDF] Improving Accuracy of Patient Demographic Matching and Identity ...
An En- terprise Master Patient Index (EMPI) is a patient matching system that performs duplicate detection within individual sources and organizes links between ...
[34]
Enterprise Master Patient Index and Patient Identity Managem
Dec 16, 2021 · An enterprise master patient index (EMPI) is a database for maintaining and retrieving accurate patient demographic data across departments in a healthcare ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[35]
Accurate Patient Matching - LexisNexis Risk Solutions
Within their Enterprise Master Patient Index ... It can even match records when demographic data changes and it assigns a unique identifier to each golden record ...
[36]
MDM Survivorship Rules - Smile CDR Documentation
MDM supports flexible survivorship rules that determine which attributes are replaced and which are preserved in the Golden Record after MDM operations.
[37]
Enterprise Master Patient Index (EMPI) in Healthcare - 4Medica
Enterprise Master Patient Index (EMPI) in Healthcare ... Its skilled staff of data scientists provide data stewardship services foundational for data integrity.
[38]
Accuracy of an Electronic Health Record Patient Linkage Module ...
Nov 4, 2020 · If evaluation had found a significant false positive rate, of even 0.5 to 1%, then ... open enterprise master patient index software toolkit for ...
[39]
[PDF] Master Person Index Services White Paper DRAFT Version D0.2 ...
Jun 2, 2012 · a Master Patient Index/Enterprise Master Patient Index (Updated), Journal of. AHIMA (Updated September 2010). Available online at http ...
[40]
Guidance for Patient Entity Resolution with AWS HealthLake
This Guidance shows how to use AWS Entity Resolution to perform patient entity resolution on healthcare data stored in AWS HealthLake ... (EMPI). How it works.
[41]
Master Person Management API - Oracle Health Data Intelligence
The Health Data Intelligence enterprise master person index (EMPI) solution that enables you to link and obtain the linked medical records for an individual.
[42]
Epic EMPI: Ensuring Accurate Patient Identification Across Health ...
Jan 28, 2025 · Deterministic vs. Probabilistic Matching. Deterministic matching relies on exact data matches, requiring all data points to match precisely.
[43]
How to Integrate Your EHR System with Cerner or Epic Using APIs
Feb 19, 2025 · This guide provides a structured roadmap for developers, IT managers, and digital health system integrators tackling Epic EHR integration with existing ...
[44]
Preserving Data Integrity During Epic Migration: A Tale of ... - e4health
Overlaps must be merged into the enterprise master patient index (EMPI) to ensure system integrity and manage critical patient care implications. In this case ...
[45]
Everything Healthcare Leaders Must Know to Build a Data Migration ...
Your data migration plan must include the time you anticipate it will take to convert your data. While the most common conversion timeline is approximately six ...
[46]
InterSystems EMPI
InterSystems EMPI is a next-generation enterprise master person index with referential matching, delivered in partnership with industry leader LexisNexis.Enterprise Master Person... · Next-Generation Enterprise... · Key Features
[47]
[PDF] IHE Profiles for Health Information Exchange
Feb 8, 2021 · This book is intended to address the needs of developers of EHR, practice management, patient registration, master patient indexing, interfacing ...
[48]
Performing PIX and PDQ Queries Against an EMPI | IHE Use Cases
Describes how to perform probabilistic and deterministic queries against an external EMPI (Enterprise Master Patient Index).
[49]
Managing Patient Identity Across Data Sources - NCBI - NIH
When shared identifiers exist, the main PIM strategy that has emerged is to assign a unique patient identifier (UPI) to each patient. In situations where ...
[50]
21st Century Cures Act: Interoperability, Information Blocking, and ...
May 1, 2020 · This final rule implements certain provisions of the 21st Century Cures Act, including Conditions and Maintenance of Certification requirements for health ...Missing: EMPI | Show results with:EMPI
[51]
Cracking the Patient Identity Code: Precise Patient Matching with an ...
May 26, 2022 · ONC (The Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT) defines patient matching as “the identification and linking of one patient's data ...Missing: criteria | Show results with:criteria
[52]
European Union drives use of standardized terminology in Member ...
Mar 2, 2022 · With over 350,000 concepts, SNOMED CT is not just a coding system of diagnosis. It also covers clinical findings like signs and symptoms and ...
[53]
Master Patient Index (EMPI): Securely Centralize Patient Identities
Aug 15, 2025 · An Enterprise Master Patient Index (EMPI) is a software solution ... A clear audit trail and manual validation for high-risk cases ...
[54]
HL7 v2 Conformance Testing Tools | NIST
Mar 11, 2025 · NIST provides a portfolio of testing tools to conduct conformance testing that implementers and testing bodies can use to determine conformance to an HL7 v2 ...Missing: FHIR EMPI
[55]
Evaluating and Addressing the Need for an Effective EMPI
Dec 15, 2009 · Expectations were that the EMPI would reduce duplicate records by 70% after the first year. This would result in a return-on-investment within ...
[56]
Duplicate Patient Records? Implement MPI in 7 Steps - CapMinds
Sep 22, 2025 · Learn how duplicate patient records impact healthcare and explore 7 key steps to implement a Master Patient Index (MPI) for better data ...Missing: IDX Corporation
[57]
Duplicate Medical Records: A Survey of Twin Cities Healthcare ...
Duplicate medical records occur when a single patient is associated with more than one medical record number. This causes a dangerous and expensive issue ...
[58]
What is EMPI in Healthcare? | Verato
EMPI stands for Enterprise Master Patient (or Person) Index, a core software system used to resolve and link patient identity data in healthcare organizations.
[59]
First Things First: How Getting Patient Identification Right Helps ...
Nov 21, 2022 · Gartner describes EMPIs as “crucial tools for reconciling patient identity and addressing medical record matching challenges needed for high- ...
[60]
[PDF] IHE SUCCESS STORY
An EMPI for a data warehouse requires the scalability necessary to support a distributed architecture and a large volume of data. During the. DFWHC ...
[61]
Understanding The Hidden Costs of MPIs: 3 Things to Know
Jan 22, 2018 · This fine tuning can cost up to $150,000 – $200,000 every 3 years, as well as with every new data source. Conventional MPIs require a lot of ...Missing: range | Show results with:range
[62]
Why EMPI is crucial for current patient identification needs
Aug 23, 2018 · ... Enterprise Master Patient Index (EMPI) systems. This is critically ... While data governance questions still act as a barrier toward its adoption ...