Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Centralized database

A centralized database is a database management system (DBMS) in which all data is stored, processed, and maintained at a single physical location, typically on a central or , allowing multiple users to access it remotely via terminals or networked clients. This architecture contrasts with distributed databases, where data is spread across multiple sites, and emphasizes unified control over , security, and transactions through a single point of management. In a centralized database, the core components include the DBMS software hosted on the central system, which handles data definition (via or DDL), data manipulation (via or DML), and enforcement of constraints like properties (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) for reliable transactions. The system often employs a client-server model, where lightweight client applications or interfaces connect to the central over local area networks (LANs) or wide area networks (WANs), with all processing occurring at the to minimize resource demands. Security is managed centrally, using protocols like LDAP or for , which simplifies but requires robust protection against breaches at the single site. Centralized databases are particularly suited for organizations with moderate data volumes and a need for tight data consistency, such as in enterprise data warehouses or mainframe environments, offering advantages like reduced , easier procedures, and lower administrative overhead compared to distributed alternatives. However, they face limitations including bottlenecks as user loads increase, vulnerability to single points of failure (e.g., mainframe downtime disrupting all access), and potential network latency issues for remote users. Despite these drawbacks, centralized systems remain foundational in many business applications, evolving with modern networking to support hybrid models.

Fundamentals

Definition

A centralized database is a single, unified repository of stored, managed, and accessed from one central location or , where all occurs on a primary such as a mainframe. This setup ensures that remains in a consolidated form at a single site, enabling centralized administration and control over the entire dataset. At its core, a centralized database operates under a single point of control for storage, retrieval, and updates, allowing the (DBMS) to enforce and across all operations. It typically employs structured data models, such as the using SQL for querying tables composed of records and fields, or hierarchical models organizing data in tree-like structures. Centralized databases can support various data models, including non-relational types such as document or key-value stores in single-instance setups. This contrasts briefly with distributed databases, which fragment data across multiple interconnected nodes for scalability. Examples of centralized databases include IBM's Information Management System (IMS), a hierarchical DBMS designed for high-throughput on mainframes, providing a central access point for IMS data processed by applications. In modern contexts, single-server installations of management systems like serve as centralized repositories, where a single mysqld server instance handles all database operations without clustering.

Key Characteristics

Centralized databases enforce a single or across all data. In relational implementations, this ensures that every , column, and adheres to a unified structure defined in the system . This enforcement, managed by a manager, prevents inconsistencies in data organization and allows for standardized query processing. Uniform rules, such as constraints on keys, , and validation checks, are applied centrally to maintain accuracy and reliability throughout the database. Centralized is a core trait, typically handled by a single (DBA) or small team responsible for tasks like access controls, backups, and , which simplifies oversight compared to distributed environments. All users and applications connect to a single endpoint, usually the central hosting the (DBMS), which facilitates consistent query performance through optimized on one . This unified access point streamlines connection management but can introduce bottlenecks during high concurrent usage, as all requests funnel through the same . Centralized databases inherently support strong ACID properties—Atomicity, , , and —for transactions processed at a single location, enabling reliable concurrent operations without the complexities of cross-site coordination. Atomicity ensures complete commits or rollbacks; consistency enforces rules like those in the schema; isolation prevents interference via mechanisms such as ; and durability guarantees data persistence post-commit through . These properties make centralized systems particularly strong for applications requiring strict transactional integrity. Scalability in centralized databases primarily relies on vertical scaling, where resources like CPU, , or are upgraded on the single to handle increased loads, such as by migrating to more powerful . This approach allows for improvements without architectural changes but is limited by hardware constraints and eventual single points of failure. Such characteristics contribute to the ease of in centralized setups, as updates and configurations apply uniformly across the .

Historical Development

Origins in Computing

The roots of centralized databases trace back to the pre-1960s era of file-based systems, which relied on punch-card technology for data storage and processing on early mainframes. These systems centralized data handling on a single machine to automate repetitive tasks, marking a shift from manual record-keeping to electronic batch processing. A pivotal example was the IBM 1401 Data Processing System, introduced in 1959, which used punched cards and magnetic tapes to process payroll, inventory, and accounting data efficiently for small and medium-sized businesses, leasing for as little as $2,500 per month and becoming one of the most widely adopted computers with over 10,000 installations by the mid-1960s. In the , centralized databases emerged as dedicated systems to address the limitations of fragmented file processing, enabling integrated on mainframes. Charles Bachman's Integrated Data Store (IDS), developed at in the early 1960s with specifications completed by and a tested in 1963, introduced the first direct-access database management system using a hierarchical model to organize data in tree-like structures on random-access disks. IDS centralized data operations by interposing a metadata-driven layer between applications and storage, facilitating shared access and updates for business processes like manufacturing control, and it operated within the constrained memory of GE mainframes, such as 4,000 words in an 8,000-word system. Key drivers for these early centralized systems included the growing needs of large organizations to handle voluminous for and amid expanding operations. The rise of systems in the 1960s, which allowed multiple users to access a central computer via remote terminals, further propelled this development by enabling efficient, concurrent data retrieval without idle processor time, as seen in implementations by banks, insurers, and retailers. A notable application was NASA's in the 1960s, where ground-based centralized systems on mainframes managed mission , navigation calculations, and real-time control from the Real Time Computer Complex, comprising five interconnected Model 360 Type 75 processors. This included the (IMS), a hierarchical developed between 1966 and 1968 specifically for Apollo, with its first release delivered to in 1968 to support integrated handling for the mission. These foundations laid the groundwork for later evolutions, such as the in the 1970s.

Key Milestones

In 1970, the Data Base Task Group released a report that standardized the network and hierarchical data models, paving the way for centralized implementations of these structures in database management systems. This effort formalized specifications for organizing data in complex, pointer-based networks and tree-like hierarchies, enabling more structured centralized storage and access in early computing environments. That same year, published his seminal paper "A Relational Model of Data for Large Shared Data Banks," introducing the as a foundation for centralized relational database management systems (RDBMS). Codd's model emphasized through tables (relations) with rows and columns, supporting declarative querying that would later underpin SQL, and it shifted centralized databases toward normalized, set-based operations independent of physical storage. Building on Codd's ideas, launched the System R project in 1974, marking the first practical implementation of a relational centralized with an SQL . System R demonstrated the feasibility of relational principles in a production-like environment, incorporating query optimization and integrity constraints, and it validated SQL as a non-procedural for centralized manipulation. The 1980s saw a commercial boom in centralized RDBMS, beginning with Version 2 in 1979, the first commercially available SQL-based . This was followed by IBM's DB2 in 1983, which brought relational technology to mainframe environments and solidified centralized systems in enterprise operations. joined the market with SQL Server 1.0 in 1989, extending centralized relational capabilities to platforms and later Windows, dominating enterprise with robust . From the 1990s into the early 2000s, centralized databases integrated with emerging web technologies, exemplified by MySQL's release in 1995 as an open-source RDBMS optimized for web applications. MySQL's lightweight design and SQL compatibility facilitated centralized for dynamic web sites, contributing to the stack's popularity and broadening centralized RDBMS adoption in internet-era development.

Architecture and Implementation

Core Components

A centralized database system relies on a robust foundation centered around a single or mainframe that serves as the primary processing and storage hub. This setup ensures all data resides in one location, typically supported by high-capacity storage solutions such as arrays for redundancy and , or solid-state drives (SSDs) for enhanced persistence and performance. Mainframes, for instance, act as the central repository linked to user terminals, enabling efficient resource sharing and without distributed replication. The software layers form the core of a centralized database, primarily through a Database Management System (DBMS) that orchestrates handling on the central server. Examples include and , which provide structured environments for storage and retrieval. Key subcomponents encompass the query optimizer, which analyzes SQL statements to generate efficient execution plans by estimating costs and selecting optimal access paths; the transaction manager, responsible for enforcing properties via and logging mechanisms; and index structures such as B-trees, which facilitate rapid lookups by maintaining sorted keys in a balanced format. These elements operate within a unified , ensuring centralized control over all operations. Data structures in a centralized database are enforced uniformly to maintain and , including for storing relational in rows and columns, indexes for accelerating query , views for presenting customized subsets without altering the underlying , and constraints to validate input. Primary keys uniquely identify each row within a , preventing duplicates and enforcing through an associated unique , while foreign keys establish relationships between by referencing primary keys in other , thereby upholding and preventing orphaned records. These structures are managed centrally by the DBMS, ensuring consistent application across the single storage location. Backup and recovery mechanisms in centralized databases are designed for centralized administration, featuring full backups that capture the entire database state and to restore to specific moments. A prominent technique is (WAL), where all changes are recorded in a sequential log file before applying them to the main data files, allowing for crash recovery through redo operations and enabling precise rollbacks using archived logs. This approach minimizes data loss and supports efficient restoration from a single point of control.

Data Management Processes

In centralized databases, data management processes encompass the core operational workflows that ensure efficient, reliable, and secure handling of from to retrieval and modification. These processes are executed by the database management system (DBMS) on a single central engine, leveraging unified control to maintain consistency and performance across all operations. Query processing begins with the incoming SQL to validate its syntax and semantics, followed by optimization to select the most efficient execution plan from multiple equivalent alternatives. In centralized systems, optimization typically employs cost-based algorithms that estimate the resource costs—such as I/O operations and —of potential plans using statistics on distribution and structures, selecting the plan with the lowest projected cost to minimize execution time. Execution then occurs on the central engine, where the optimizer-generated plan is translated into low-level operations like scans, joins, and sorts, processed sequentially or in parallel within the single to produce the query results. This centralized approach avoids distributed coordination overhead, enabling faster planning for queries on large datasets, though it relies on accurate statistics to prevent suboptimal plans. Transaction handling in centralized databases ensures ACID properties through centralized concurrency control mechanisms, primarily two-phase locking (2PL), which prevents conflicts among concurrent accessing shared data. In the growing phase of 2PL, a transaction acquires all necessary locks (shared for reads, exclusive for writes) before proceeding, while the shrinking phase releases them only after commit or abort, guaranteeing without deadlocks in conservative variants. This protocol maintains , , , and by coordinating all lock requests at a single lock manager, avoiding the inter-node communication required in distributed systems. For recovery, the centralized log records all changes, allowing or redo during failures to restore a consistent state. Maintenance tasks in centralized databases involve periodic operations to sustain and , managed through a unified administrative that applies changes across the entire without in modern implementations. Indexing rebuilds reorganize fragmented structures to restore efficiency in query access paths, often triggered automatically when fragmentation exceeds thresholds, reducing search times significantly on large tables. reclamation processes recover unused by removing obsolete , while statistics updates provide the query optimizer with current on distribution to generate accurate execution plans and prevent performance degradation in update-heavy workloads. alterations, such as adding columns or modifying constraints, are executed atomically via DDL statements, with the central engine validating and propagating changes to and files to ensure ongoing compatibility. Access control in centralized databases is enforced through role-based permissions, where privileges are assigned to predefined roles rather than individual users, simplifying by grouping common access patterns. The central module evaluates requests against these roles, granting or denying operations like SELECT or INSERT based on the user's activated role set, which supports hierarchical for scalable policy management. integrates with external systems like LDAP for centralized user verification, mapping directory attributes to database roles upon successful login to streamline across enterprise environments. This model ensures fine-grained control, with audit logs tracking access decisions at the single point of .

Benefits and Drawbacks

Advantages

Centralized databases offer several key advantages, particularly in environments where simplicity and control are prioritized over scalability across multiple locations. These systems consolidate all data and operations into a single location, enabling streamlined management and reliable performance for many applications. One primary benefit is the ease of administration. With all data residing on a single server, backups, software updates, and security policies can be managed from one point, significantly reducing administrative overhead compared to multi-node distributed setups. This centralized control allows database administrators (DBAs) to enforce access permissions and maintenance tasks efficiently through tools like data dictionaries, which define data structures, relationships, and user rights. Data consistency is another significant advantage, as rules and constraints are applied uniformly across the entire dataset without the delays associated with replication in distributed systems. By storing data once in a unified , redundancy is minimized, and updates propagate immediately, preserving and reducing the risk of inconsistencies from duplicate entries. This setup also supports the immediate enforcement of properties, ensuring atomicity, consistency, isolation, and durability for transactions. For small- to medium-scale operations, centralized databases are often cost-effective due to lower requirements and simpler licensing models, such as a single instance of a database management system (DBMS). Maintenance costs are reduced because physical changes do not necessitate widespread program modifications, and storage needs decrease by eliminating redundant copies across systems. These factors make them particularly suitable for organizations with moderate data volumes, where the investment in a single robust outweighs the expenses of distributed . In terms of performance, centralized databases excel in read-heavy workloads, where fast query execution benefits from unified indexing and caching on a single . This minimizes traffic—queries access data locally without inter-node communication—allowing mainframe-level processing power to handle intensive retrieval operations efficiently. As a result, response times for frequent reads are optimized, supporting applications like reporting and in consolidated environments.

Disadvantages

Centralized databases present a significant as a , where the failure of the central can result in complete and unavailability of for all users. For instance, a or hardware malfunction at the central site can halt operations entirely, even for remote users unaffected by the local issue, leading to recovery times that may extend for hours depending on and restoration processes. Scalability in centralized databases is constrained by the need for vertical upgrades, such as adding more powerful to a single , which becomes increasingly costly and limited as volumes grow exponentially. These systems struggle to handle massive expansion without frequent, expensive hardware enhancements, and eventual limits imposed by technological progress, like the slowing pace of , further restrict long-term viability for high-growth applications. Under high concurrency, centralized databases often experience bottlenecks, as multiple simultaneous user requests funnel through the single server, causing queueing delays and degraded response times during peak loads. This centralization of processing leads to , where the system's capacity to manage concurrent transactions diminishes, resulting in slower overall as transaction volumes increase. The of centralized databases amplifies vulnerabilities by concentrating all and through a single , creating a larger susceptible to threats like distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks that can overwhelm the central server. Additionally, this setup heightens risks from threats, as a compromised or internal can potentially or manipulate the entire dataset without distributed safeguards.

Comparisons and Alternatives

Versus Distributed Databases

Centralized databases operate on a single-node architecture, where all data storage, processing, and management occur at one central location, enabling straightforward control and uniform access. In contrast, distributed databases employ a multi-node setup, partitioning data across multiple servers through techniques like sharding—which divides data into subsets (shards) based on keys such as user ID or geography—and replication, which creates copies of data across nodes for redundancy and load distribution. This distributed model introduces complexities in coordination, as nodes must synchronize via network protocols, whereas centralized systems avoid such overhead by relying on local resources. Regarding the , which posits that a distributed system can only guarantee two out of three properties—, , and partition tolerance—centralized databases inherently prioritize and , as there are no network partitions to contend with, allowing immediate and uniform data views without trade-offs. Distributed systems, however, must navigate partition tolerance in networked environments, often sacrificing strict for higher through mechanisms like . Performance in centralized databases benefits from lower for local queries, as data access occurs without traversal, making it efficient for moderate workloads but limited in due to vertical expansion constraints on a single machine. Distributed databases excel in horizontal , distributing load across nodes to handle growing data volumes and traffic, though they incur overhead that can increase for cross-node operations. Centralized databases enforce strong consistency via (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) properties, ensuring all transactions reflect an accurate, up-to-date state without delays. Distributed systems frequently adopt the (Basically Available, Soft state, ) model to balance availability and partition tolerance, accepting temporary inconsistencies for better in large-scale environments. Centralized databases suit organizations with centralized operations, such as banks relying on systems for unified and across branches. Distributed databases are ideal for global applications like platforms, which manage massive, geographically dispersed user data through sharding and replication to support real-time interactions and .

Modern Use Cases

In enterprise applications, centralized SQL databases remain integral to (CRM) and (ERP) systems, providing a unified for operational across departments. For instance, SAP ERP systems leverage a common centralized database to integrate modules for , , and , enabling seamless data sharing and process automation in single-site environments. Oracle Database, the leading choice for SAP deployments, supports these centralized setups in manufacturing firms by offering robust integration for and , ensuring consistent access without distributed overhead. For web and mobile backends, single-server instances of or serve as straightforward centralized databases for small sites and internal tools, where simplicity and low maintenance outweigh the need for across multiple nodes. These relational databases handle transactional workloads like processing and efficiently on a single instance, avoiding the complexity of sharding or replication setups suitable for larger operations. Cloud-hosted centralized databases, such as AWS Relational Database Service () and Azure SQL Database, offer managed single-instance options tailored for startups seeking cost-effective, scalable storage without on-premises infrastructure. AWS provides fully managed relational engines like and in a single DB instance, allowing early-stage companies to focus on application development while automating backups and patching. Similarly, Azure SQL Database's single database deployment model delivers a dedicated, isolated resource for startups, supporting intermittent workloads with serverless compute for optimized pricing and performance. In hybrid scenarios, centralized databases form the core for aggregating from devices, augmented by edge caching to minimize in bandwidth-constrained environments. For example, proactive edge caching frameworks in dense networks store frequently accessed sensor data locally before syncing to a central repository, enabling efficient aggregation for applications like monitoring. This approach addresses challenges by combining edge processing with centralized consistency, as seen in taxonomy-driven use cases where cached content reduces backhaul traffic to the core database. Looking to the future, centralized databases play a pivotal role in and (ML) data pipelines, where a single facilitates controlled access to datasets for model and versioning. Concepts like the ML Model Lake propose centralized frameworks to manage datasets, code, and models organization-wide, streamlining pipelines from to deployment while ensuring . In air quality monitoring pipelines, for instance, centralized warehousing integrates diverse sources to support AI-driven analytics, highlighting the value of unified storage for scalable ML workflows.

References

  1. [1]
    Centralized Database - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    A centralized database is defined as a system where all data processing is performed on a mainframe, with users accessing the database through terminals or ...Architecture and Components... · Security and Access Control in...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Database System Concepts and Architecture
    Centralized and. Client-Server DBMS Architectures. ▫ Centralized DBMS: ▫ Combines everything into single system including-. DBMS software, hardware ...
  3. [3]
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123747303000012
  4. [4]
    IBM Information Management System (IMS)
    IBM IMS is a secure, high-throughput database and transaction manager on z/OS, designed for fast, reliable data and online transaction processing.
  5. [5]
    https://www.mongodb.com/resources/basics/databases/types
  6. [6]
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/distributed-databases
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Architecture of a Database System - University of California, Berkeley
    A typical RDBMS has five main components, and its architecture includes process models, parallel architecture, storage, transaction, query processor, and ...
  8. [8]
    What Is a Distributed Database? - Oracle
    Jul 3, 2025 · A distributed database is a database that stores data across multiple physical locations to improve the reliability, scalability, and ...
  9. [9]
    https://www.oracle.com/database/distributed-database/what-is-distributed-database/
  10. [10]
    Horizontal Scaling with Oracle Database
    Jul 31, 2021 · Vertical scaling (also called “scale up”) occurs when the existing applications and databases are moved to a larger system. Horizontal scaling ( ...
  11. [11]
    The IBM 1401
    The 1401 addresses a pent-up demand for data processing. The IBM 1401 Data Processing System was introduced on October 5, 1959, via a splashy closed-circuit ...Missing: batch | Show results with:batch
  12. [12]
    How Charles Bachman Invented the DBMS, a Foundation of Our ...
    Jul 1, 2016 · During the late 1960s the ideas Bachman created for IDS were taken up by the Database Task Group of CODASYL, a standards body for the data ...Introduction · What Was IDS For? · Was IDS a Database... · IDS and CODASYL
  13. [13]
    Time-sharing | IBM
    Time-sharing proved popular through the 1960s and '70s as businesses such as banks, insurance companies and retailers installed multiple remote terminals that ...
  14. [14]
    Apollo computers: When IBM engineers gave rockets a brain
    May 31, 2019 · NASA's Apollo program relied heavily on IBM's System/360 mainframe computers for data management and mission control, necessitating a ...Missing: centralized file
  15. [15]
    Hierarchical Model - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Network DBMS The original network model and language were presented in the CODASYL Database Task Group's 1971 report; hence it is also called the DBTO model.
  16. [16]
    A relational model of data for large shared data banks
    A relational model of data for large shared data banks. Author: E. F. Codd ... Published: 01 June 1970 Publication History. 5,614citation66,017Downloads.
  17. [17]
    The relational database | IBM
    In his 1970 paper “A Relational Model of Data for Large Shared Data Banks,” Codd envisioned a software architecture that would enable users to access ...
  18. [18]
    A history and evaluation of System R | Communications of the ACM
    This paper describes the three principal phases of the System R project and discusses some of the lessons learned from System R about the design of relational ...
  19. [19]
    50 years of the relational database - Oracle
    Feb 19, 2024 · ... database management system (DBMS), Oracle Version 2, in 1979. These were historic steps on the path to modern data management. A lot has ...
  20. [20]
    IBM DB2's 25th Anniversary: Birth Of An Accidental Empire
    The launch of DB2 on June 7, 1983, marked the birth of relational database as a cornerstone for the enterprise.
  21. [21]
    New Video: The History of SQL Server - Microsoft
    Feb 15, 2012 · The history of SQL Server dates back to 1989 when the product came about as a result of a partnership between Microsoft, Sybase, and Ashton-Tate.
  22. [22]
    What is MySQL? - MySQL Relational Databases Explained - AWS
    The first version of MySQL Server was released in 1995 by the Swedish company MySQL AB, founded by David Axmark, Allan Larsson, and Michael Widenius. MySQL ...
  23. [23]
    1995: MySQL Debuts and Web Databases Slowly Emerge
    Sep 15, 2021 · By the end of 1995, the foundational pieces of the open source LAMP stack for web development (Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP/Perl/Python) are in ...
  24. [24]
    What is a mainframe? It's a style of computing - IBM
    A mainframe is the central data repository, or hub, in a corporation's data processing center, linked to users through less powerful devices such as ...Missing: foundation RAID SSD<|separator|>
  25. [25]
    Storage and RAID Configuration for PostgreSQL - EDB
    Nov 19, 2020 · This blog post discusses the storage and RAID options that can be used with PostgreSQL and EDB Postgres Advanced Server (EPAS).
  26. [26]
    Oracle Database Architecture
    Part II describes the basic structural architecture of the Oracle database, including physical and logical storage structures.
  27. [27]
    Documentation: 18: 28.3. Write-Ahead Logging (WAL) - PostgreSQL
    Write-Ahead Logging (WAL) ensures data integrity by logging changes before writing them to data files, enabling recovery after a crash.Missing: backups | Show results with:backups
  28. [28]
    Primary and foreign key constraints - SQL Server - Microsoft Learn
    Feb 4, 2025 · Primary keys and foreign keys are two types of constraints that can be used to enforce data integrity in SQL Server tables.Missing: centralized structures
  29. [29]
    7 Data Integrity - Oracle Help Center
    The database enforces primary key constraints with an index. Usually, a primary key constraint created for a column implicitly creates a unique index and a ...
  30. [30]
    https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/relational-databases/tables/primary-and-foreign-key-constraints?view=sql-server-ver17
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Query Processing and Optimization
    • Cost Metrics = #block accesses (OR response time in seconds). – focus on I/O cost (in centralized large databases), not. CPU/communication/storage cost. – ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Query Optimization in Database Systems
    Computation Cost: The cost for (or time of) using the central processing unit (CPU). The structure of query optimization al- gorithms is strongly influenced by ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Query Optimization - Stanford InfoLab
    Given a query, there are many plans that a database management system. (DBMS) can follow to process it and produce its answer. All plans are equivalent in terms ...<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Concurrency Control and Recovery - Software Systems Laboratory
    One important technique is two-phase commit, which is a protocol for ensuring that all participants in a distributed transaction agree on the decision to.Missing: compliance | Show results with:compliance
  35. [35]
    Concurrency Control 1: Locking & Degrees of Consistency
    Aug 18, 1998 · Goal: Concurrent execution of transactions, with high throughput/utilization, low response time, and fairness. The ACID test for transaction ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] The transaction - cs.Princeton
    • Two-phase locking with finer-grain locks: – Growing phase when txn acquires locks. – Shrinking phase when txn releases locks (typically commit). – Allows ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] PostgreSQL - Database System Concepts
    Currently, PostgreSQL offers features such as complex queries, foreign keys, triggers, views, transactional integrity, full-text searching, and limited data ...
  38. [38]
    Online reorganization in read optimized MMDBS - ACM Digital Library
    In this paper, we address these problems by presenting an approach for online reorganization in main-memory database systems (MMDBS). Based on a discussion of ...Missing: rebuild | Show results with:rebuild
  39. [39]
    A Systematic Review of Access Control Models - IEEE Xplore
    Jan 29, 2025 · The RBAC (Fig. 10) framework simplifies access man- agement by assigning permissions based on user roles, reducing administrative tasks, and ...
  40. [40]
    Role-based access control on the web - ACM Digital Library
    To demonstrate feasibility, we implement each architecture by integrating and extending well-known technologies such as cookies, X.509, SSL, and LDAP, providing ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] An application of directory service markup language (DSML) for role ...
    In RBAC, access control depends upon the roles of which a user is a member, and permissions are assigned to the roles.
  42. [42]
    [PDF] ADVANTAGES OF CENTRALIZED MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
    (i) Reduced redundancy: Good planning can allow duplicate or similar data stored indifferent files for different applications to be combined and stored only ...
  43. [43]
    Introduction to Databases - UTK-EECS
    Data integrity: By eliminating redundancy, the risk of inconsistent data is reduced. Sharing of data: The corporate data is kept in a centralized repository ...
  44. [44]
    Overview - PolarDB - Alibaba Cloud Documentation Center
    May 31, 2024 · A centralized database provides a moderate scale of resources, is cost-effective, and is relatively easy to maintain and operate. A distributed ...
  45. [45]
    None
    ### Disadvantages of Centralized Database Systems
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Distributed Database
    Threats on ACID Properties. • While distributed database system has many advantages, it imposes a threat on ACID properties. • Consistency in database (ACID).
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Improving Key-Value Database Scalability with LSD - Sites FCT NOVA
    ... Moore's law dictates that we will, most probably, ... In comparison with the previous prototype with a centralized database, using the best results obtained, 1k ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Security in Centralized Data Store-based Home Automation Platforms
    This paper describes our systematic security evaluation of two popular smart home platforms, Google's Nest platform and Philips Hue, which implement home ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Charting a Security Landscape in the Clouds: Data Protection and ...
    If the security provider is centralized, it is a single point of failure for ... centralized database assumed to be incorruptible—then it is possible ...
  50. [50]
    Difference between Centralized Database and Distributed Database
    Jul 12, 2025 · A centralized database is a type of database that is stored, located as well as maintained at a single location only.
  51. [51]
    What Is a Distributed Database? A Complete Guide - TiDB
    May 29, 2025 · The CAP theorem states that a distributed database can only guarantee two out of three properties: Consistency, Availability, and Partition ...
  52. [52]
    [PDF] Brewer's Conjecture and the Feasibility of
    Seth Gilbert*. Nancy Lynch*. Abstract. When designing distributed web services, there are three properties that are commonly desired: consistency, avail ...
  53. [53]
    What Is the CAP Theorem? | IBM
    The CAP theorem says that a distributed system can deliver only two of three desired characteristics: consistency, availability and partition tolerance.Missing: centralized | Show results with:centralized<|control11|><|separator|>
  54. [54]
    BASE: An Acid Alternative - ACM Queue
    Jul 28, 2008 · DAN PRITCHETT is a Technical Fellow at eBay where he has been a member of the architecture team for the past four years. In this role, he ...
  55. [55]
    The Role of a Core Banking Solution for Central Banks - iGCB
    Aug 6, 2024 · A centralized database is one of the most significant features of Core Banking Solutions. It ensures all information and transaction data is ...
  56. [56]
    What is ERP? The Essential Guide - SAP
    An ERP system consists of integrated module solutions or business applications that share a common database that connects them and lets them talk to each other.
  57. [57]
    Oracle Database for SAP
    The Oracle Database is the #1 database among SAP customers around the globe, with a large customer base that gains long-term cost benefits.Missing: centralized | Show results with:centralized
  58. [58]
    SAP Vs. Oracle ERP System Comparison - Forbes
    Sep 12, 2025 · Both SAP and Oracle offer industry-specific ERP solutions, but SAP is strong in distribution management, while Oracle's strength lies with ...
  59. [59]
    Database Management: Definition, Types and more - Fivetran
    Oct 18, 2023 · A centralized database management System (DBMS) is a type of ... E-commerce: MySQL is used by online shops to maintain their catalogs ...
  60. [60]
    Top 7 Budget-Friendly Relational Databases for Small Enterprises
    Aug 9, 2024 · E-commerce platforms rely heavily on efficient database management. MySQL and PostgreSQL excel in handling large volumes of transactions. These ...
  61. [61]
    Fully Managed Relational Database – Amazon RDS – AWS
    Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS) is an easy-to-manage relational database service optimized for total cost of ownership.Pricing · RDS FAQs · RDS instance type · SQL Server
  62. [62]
    https://risingwave.com/blog/top-7-budget-friendly-relational-databases-for-small-enterprises/
  63. [63]
    Azure SQL Database
    Build and scale apps using automation with Azure SQL Database, a fully managed cloud relational database designed for high performance and reliability.
  64. [64]
    CACHE-IT: A distributed architecture for proactive edge caching in ...
    Apr 1, 2024 · This paper proposes CACHE-IT, a proactive edge caching framework that decouples the caching strategy algorithm from the underlying architecture.
  65. [65]
    (PDF) IoT Edge Caching: Taxonomy, Use Cases and Perspectives
    Aug 9, 2025 · One potential solution is caching data on the edge of the network, thus decreasing the latency of subsequent requests, saving bandwidth, and ...<|separator|>