Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Environment and intelligence

Environment and intelligence encompasses the investigation of non-genetic influences on cognitive abilities, primarily measured by intelligence quotient (IQ) scores, which capture general mental processing capacity predictive of educational, occupational, and life outcomes.^[1] Twin, adoption, and molecular genetic studies consistently estimate IQ heritability at 50-80% in adulthood within developed populations, leaving the balance to environmental variance, much of which arises from non-shared experiences unique to individuals rather than shared family or socioeconomic contexts.^[2]^[3] Key environmental modulators include prenatal and early childhood nutrition, exposure to neurotoxins such as lead, maternal health during gestation, and access to quality education, with deficiencies demonstrably depressing IQ by several points in affected cohorts.^[4] Socioeconomic status correlates with IQ differences, yet within-family analyses reveal these effects diminish when controlling for genetics, suggesting indirect mediation through gene-environment correlations where higher-ability individuals seek stimulating milieus.^[5] Physical exercise and parental education also exert modest positive influences, though causal pathways remain partly confounded by selection effects.^[4] The Flynn effect—observed average IQ gains of 3 points per decade across the 20th century in many nations—exemplifies environmental potency, linked to improved nutrition, reduced infectious disease burden, and societal shifts toward abstract problem-solving, though recent reversals in some advanced economies signal saturation or dysgenic pressures.^[6]^[7] Controversies persist over group-level disparities, where environmental explanations often falter against heritability evidence, and interventions like compensatory education programs yield fading benefits beyond initial boosts, underscoring intelligence's partial resistance to broad equalization efforts.^[8]^[9] Despite institutional tendencies to overemphasize nurture amid egalitarian priors, behavioral genetic data affirm causal primacy of polygenic endowments, with environments chiefly amplifying or constraining innate potentials rather than overriding them.^[1]

Conceptual Foundations

Defining Intelligence and Environmental Influences

Intelligence, as studied in psychometrics, refers to general mental ability, quantified as the g factor derived from factor analysis of diverse cognitive tests, which captures the substantial common variance—typically 40% to 50%—underlying performance across mental tasks ranging from reasoning and memory to spatial and verbal skills.^[10]^[11] This g factor, first identified by Charles Spearman in 1904 through the positive manifold of test correlations, reflects a hierarchical structure where specific abilities load onto a superordinate general factor, distinguishing it from narrower talents.^[10] Measures of intelligence, such as IQ tests standardized on population norms with a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15, serve as proxies for g, correlating highly (around 0.8) with it and predicting outcomes like educational attainment and occupational success.^[11] Environmental influences on intelligence encompass non-heritable factors—external to an individual's genome—that shape the development, expression, and measurement of cognitive abilities, including prenatal exposures, nutritional status, toxin avoidance, family rearing practices, and access to stimulating experiences.^[4] These influences operate through gene-environment interactions and correlations, where genotypes may evoke or select environments, but twin and adoption studies consistently estimate intelligence heritability at 50% on average in childhood, rising to 75-85% in adulthood due to additive genetic effects dominating variance as shared environmental impacts fade.^[12]^[13] Non-shared environmental factors, such as unique experiences or measurement error, account for much of the residual variance, while shared environments (e.g., family socioeconomic status) exert diminishing influence post-infancy, explaining less than 20% of differences in high-SES contexts.^[14]^[15] Causal realism in assessing these influences prioritizes interventions with demonstrated effects, such as iodine supplementation preventing IQ deficits of 10-15 points in deficient populations, or lead exposure reductions correlating with population IQ gains of 2-5 points per decade in industrialized nations.^[4] However, broad claims of malleability must reckon with heritability's upward trajectory, indicating that while environments can amplify or suppress potential—particularly in deprived settings—individual differences largely reflect genetic architecture amplified by self-selected niches rather than uniform nurture-driven equality.^[14]^[16] Empirical data from longitudinal cohorts underscore that optimizing environments yields modest, often transient gains (e.g., 3-5 IQ points from enriched early programs), underscoring limits to environmental determinism.^[4]

Heritability Estimates and Gene-Environment Interactions

Heritability estimates for intelligence, as measured by IQ tests, typically range from 40% to 80% across twin and family studies, with meta-analyses of adult samples converging around 50-70% for broad cognitive ability.^[17] These figures derive from comparisons of monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins reared together or apart, where MZ correlations exceed DZ by roughly double, attributing the excess to genetic variance after controlling for shared environments.^[18] Adoption studies reinforce this, showing IQ correlations between biological relatives higher than with adoptive ones, though estimates vary by age and population.^[19] A key developmental pattern is the Wilson effect, wherein heritability rises from about 40% in early childhood to 75-80% by late adolescence and stabilizes into adulthood.^[20] This shift occurs as shared environmental influences decline—often from 30-40% in infancy to near zero in adults—and genetic factors amplify through active gene-environment correlations, where individuals select environments matching their genotypes (e.g., high-ability youth pursuing intellectually stimulating activities).^[20] Genome-wide complex trait analysis (GCTA) yields lower narrow-sense estimates, around 25-30%, reflecting only common SNPs, while twin studies capture broader additive and non-additive effects.^[18] Gene-environment interactions further nuance these estimates, as socioeconomic status (SES) moderates heritability per the Scarr-Rowe hypothesis: lower in low-SES contexts (around 20-40%) due to environmental constraints suppressing genetic variance, and higher in high-SES settings (60-80%) where resources enable fuller genetic expression.^[21] Early twin data from low-SES U.S. samples support this, showing amplified shared environment effects in deprivation.^[22] However, larger recent analyses, including those across racial/ethnic groups, find inconsistent or null evidence for SES moderation in cognitive outcomes, suggesting the interaction may be sample-specific or weaker than initially proposed. Recent GWAS-derived polygenic scores (PGS), predicting 7-10% of IQ variance, reveal similar interactions; for instance, PGS effects strengthen in enriched environments but are buffered in adverse ones, underscoring causal realism where genes do not act in isolation but via probabilistic environmental affinities.^[2]^[23]

Biological Environmental Influences

Prenatal, Perinatal, and Early Health Factors

Prenatal environmental factors, including maternal nutrition and exposure to toxins, have been empirically linked to variations in offspring intelligence. Maternal iodine deficiency during pregnancy is associated with reduced verbal IQ in children, with a meta-analysis of cohort studies indicating a mean deficit of approximately 6.9 to 10.2 IQ points in affected offspring compared to those whose mothers received supplementation.^[24]^[25] This effect persists even in mild-to-moderate deficiency cases, independent of maternal thyroid function, highlighting iodine's role in fetal brain development.^[26] Similarly, prenatal exposure to lead, even at low levels, correlates with lower IQ scores at ages 4 and 8, as evidenced by birth cohort data showing dose-dependent deficits after adjusting for confounders like socioeconomic status.^[27] Maternal smoking during pregnancy is consistently associated with reduced offspring IQ, with unadjusted differences of up to 6.8 points and meta-analyses confirming lower scores (pooled estimate around 3-5 points after adjustments for maternal cognition and birth weight) across multiple cohorts.^[28]^[29] These associations hold after controlling for genetic and familial factors, suggesting a causal pathway via nicotine's impact on fetal brain oxygenation and neurotransmitter systems.^[30] Prenatal maternal stress, including psychological distress, predicts lower cognitive scores in preschoolers, with longitudinal studies linking elevated cortisol to impaired executive function and IQ, though effect sizes are modest (1-3 points) and mediated partly by birth outcomes.^[31]^[32] Perinatal factors, particularly gestational age and birth weight, exhibit strong inverse associations with later intelligence. Very preterm birth (before 32 weeks) or very low birth weight (<1500g) is linked to adult IQ deficits of 7-11 points in individual participant meta-analyses, persisting into early adulthood after adjustments for perinatal complications and family background.^[33] A linear gradient exists between birth weight and IQ, with each standard deviation decrease in birth weight corresponding to roughly 2-3 IQ point losses, as shown in meta-analyses of term and preterm cohorts.^[34]^[35] Perinatal complications, such as hypoxia or neonatal intensive care needs, further predict lower IQ trajectories, with systematic reviews identifying gestational age as the strongest perinatal predictor independent of socioeconomic confounders.^[36] Early postnatal health factors, including infections and continued nutritional deficits, contribute to cognitive outcomes. Maternal infections during pregnancy, especially in the second trimester, are associated with 2-4 point reductions in child verbal and performance IQ, per cohort analyses adjusting for multiple confounders.^[37] In early childhood, unresolved perinatal risks like low birth weight amplify vulnerabilities to developmental delays, with preterm infants showing 10-12 point IQ reductions by school age in meta-analyses, underscoring the need for targeted interventions to mitigate cascading effects.^[38] These biological insults operate through disrupted neurodevelopment, such as altered myelination and synaptic pruning, as inferred from neuroimaging correlates in affected cohorts.^[39]

Nutrition, Toxins, and Physical Health

Nutritional deficiencies during critical periods of childhood development can impair cognitive function and intelligence. Severe protein-energy malnutrition in infancy and early childhood is linked to lasting reductions in IQ, with studies showing deficits of up to 15 points in affected populations compared to well-nourished peers, though partial recovery occurs with sustained refeeding.^[40] Iodine deficiency, prevalent in regions without fortification, causes profound cognitive harm; a meta-analysis of supplementation trials found that children exposed to severe deficiency lose an average of 12.45 IQ points, with iodine intervention recovering about 8.7 points on average.^[41] Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in infants correlates with poorer neurocognitive outcomes, including lower verbal IQ and increased inattention persisting into childhood; longitudinal data indicate that moderate IDA in infancy results in 5-10 point IQ deficits by adolescence.^[42]^[43] In contrast, effects in populations without overt deficiencies are smaller or inconsistent. Multivitamin supplementation and iodine fortification raise IQ by 3-5 points in school-aged children from deficient areas, but show negligible benefits in adequately nourished groups.^[40] Iron supplementation improves attention, memory, and intelligence scores in anemic schoolchildren, with meta-analytic evidence confirming positive effects on cognitive domains underlying IQ.^[44] Broader dietary patterns, such as high intake of ultra-processed foods, are associated with subtle cognitive impairments in youth, though causal links remain under investigation via ongoing reviews.^[45] Toxins like heavy metals pose significant risks to intelligence, with lead exposure showing the strongest evidence. Meta-analyses consistently demonstrate that blood lead levels rising from 10 to 20 μg/dL reduce children's IQ by 2-3 points, with effects persisting even at concentrations below 5 μg/dL and cumulative duration amplifying harm—exposures over 4.5 years linked to 22-point drops.^[46]^[47] Globally, lead accounts for millions of lost IQ points annually, contributing to substantial economic costs through diminished cognitive capital.^[48] Other environmental toxins, such as fluoride at elevated levels, have been associated with lower IQ in some meta-analyses of children in high-exposure areas, though confounding factors like socioeconomic status complicate interpretations and warrant further scrutiny.^[49] Physical health factors, including activity levels, influence cognitive outcomes relevant to intelligence. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of exercise interventions in children and adolescents report small but significant gains in intelligence measures, with pooled effects around 0.2-0.3 standard deviations, particularly in executive function and fluid reasoning components of IQ.^[50]^[51] These benefits arise from enhanced brain plasticity and neurotrophic factors, though gains are modest in non-deprived populations and do not alter baseline genetic potentials substantially. Chronic conditions like obesity or poor sleep, tied to physical health, indirectly impair cognition via inflammation and disrupted neurodevelopment, but direct IQ associations are weaker than for acute deficiencies or toxins.^[52]

Sociocultural and Experiential Influences

Family, Home, and Socioeconomic Environment

Socioeconomic status (SES) correlates positively with intelligence, with meta-analyses estimating associations between SES indicators (such as parental education and income) and cognitive ability in the range of 0.27 to 0.35 across childhood and adolescence.^[53] ^[54] This correlation strengthens over development, as longitudinal data from the Collaborative Perinatal Project indicate that children from low-SES backgrounds score approximately 6 IQ points lower at age 2, with the gap widening to 18 points by age 16 due to divergent growth trajectories favoring higher-SES children.^[55] However, these patterns partly reflect genetic selection, as parental SES proxies for heritable intelligence, which predicts offspring IQ independently of environmental transmission; twin studies show heritability of IQ rising from 41% in childhood to 66% in early adulthood, with shared environmental influences declining over time.^[15] ^[19] Family environment exerts a modest influence on intelligence primarily in early childhood, mediated by factors like cognitive stimulation and material resources, but adoption and twin studies reveal limited long-term causal impact from shared family rearing after accounting for genetics. In a study of 486 adoptive families, the IQ similarity between adoptive parents and children was negligible (correlation near zero), suggesting adoptive family environment contributes minimally to variance in adolescent IQ beyond non-shared factors and heritability.^[56] Longitudinal assessments using the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME) inventory demonstrate that enriched home settings—characterized by learning materials, parental involvement, and responsiveness—predict incremental gains in early cognitive scores, with effect sizes around 0.2 to 0.4 standard deviations in infancy through preschool.^[57] Yet, these effects attenuate by adolescence, as evidenced by behavioral genetic models where shared family environment accounts for less than 10% of IQ variance in older children, overshadowed by genetic factors and unique experiences.^[15] In low-SES contexts, environmental constraints amplify variance attributed to non-genetic factors, with heritability estimates dropping to around 40% compared to 70-80% in high-SES families, implying greater malleability from home interventions like nutritional support or stimulation programs during critical periods.^[58] Late adoptions from deprived settings into higher-SES homes can elevate IQ by 12-15 points if occurring before age 4, but gains diminish for older children, underscoring sensitive periods for family environmental effects.^[59] Critically, apparent SES benefits often confound passive gene-environment correlations, where intelligent parents provide both genes and enriching homes, as dissociated in designs separating biological from rearing parents.^[60] Overall, while family and SES shape developmental trajectories through causal channels like stress reduction and opportunity access, empirical decompositions prioritize genetic endowments in explaining persistent IQ differences.^[61]

Education, Peers, and Cultural Factors

A meta-analysis of 142 effect sizes from 42 data sets, employing quasi-experimental designs such as changes in school entry age and compulsory schooling laws, estimated that each additional year of education causally increases cognitive abilities by approximately 1 to 5 IQ points, with effects persisting into adulthood.^[62] These gains appear robust across diverse populations and methodologies, suggesting education enhances fluid intelligence components like reasoning and problem-solving, beyond mere test familiarity.^[63] However, the magnitude may vary by context, with stronger effects in earlier years and potential ceilings imposed by genetic factors, as evidenced by diminishing returns in high-heritability environments.^[64] Peer influences on general intelligence remain limited, with longitudinal analyses of adolescent cohorts finding no significant socialization effects on intellectual ability after controlling for selection biases like assortative friendships.^[65] While peers facilitate knowledge sharing and collaborative problem-solving in specific domains—such as acquiring social norms or domain knowledge through interaction—these do not translate to broad gains in g, the general factor of intelligence.^[66] Instead, peer effects more prominently shape motivational and behavioral outcomes, like conformity or risk-taking, which indirectly affect academic performance but show weak causal links to core cognitive capacity.^[67] Cultural environments influence the conceptualization and development of intelligence, with Western societies prioritizing analytical and individualistic traits like logical deduction, while East Asian and African cultures emphasize social intelligence, practical wisdom, and harmonious interpersonal skills.^[68] Empirical studies reveal that these implicit theories guide child-rearing practices, such as collectivist emphasis on diligence and conformity in Confucian-influenced societies, which correlate with higher performance on effort-dependent tasks but not necessarily abstract reasoning independent of education.^[69] Cross-cultural comparisons indicate that while cultural transmission via language, values, and institutions can foster domain-specific skills—e.g., spatial navigation in nomadic groups—universal measures of g exhibit persistent differences attributable more to heritable and nutritional factors than purely cultural malleability, underscoring limits to environmental causation.^[70] Academic sources on these topics, often from psychology journals, warrant scrutiny for potential Western-centric biases in test design, yet quasi-experimental data provide causal insights beyond correlational artifacts.^[71]

Interventions and Enrichment Programs

Early Childhood and Educational Interventions

Early childhood interventions, such as intensive preschool programs for disadvantaged children, have demonstrated modest initial gains in IQ scores, typically ranging from 4 to 10 points immediately post-intervention, but these effects largely dissipate within 1 to 3 years as control groups catch up through natural development or compensatory experiences.^[72] A meta-analysis of 22 experimental studies confirmed this fadeout pattern, attributing it to the experimental group's loss of relative advantage rather than absolute skill decay, with effect sizes dropping from 0.37 standard deviations at intervention end to near zero after 2 years.^[73] Programs like the Perry Preschool Project (1962–1967), targeting 3- to 4-year-olds from low-income families in Ypsilanti, Michigan, yielded an average IQ increase of 7–10 points at age 5, but by age 10, scores converged with controls; long-term follow-ups to age 40 showed no sustained cognitive differences but benefits in employment (71% vs. 54% high school graduation) and reduced crime.^[74] Similarly, the Abecedarian Project (1972–1977), providing full-day educational care from infancy to age 5 for at-risk infants in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, produced more persistent effects, with treatment group IQ scores averaging 4.4 points higher at age 21 and broader impacts across IQ subtests like verbal ability, though initial gains of 10–15 points still attenuated over time.^[75] Federal programs like Head Start, launched in 1965 to serve low-income preschoolers, have shown inconsistent IQ persistence; short-term evaluations report gains of 5–8 points in cognitive measures by kindergarten entry, but by third grade, these fade to negligible levels in randomized trials, with meta-analyses indicating no reliable long-term IQ elevation despite some enduring effects on achievement tests into adolescence.^[76] Critics note that Head Start's large-scale implementation dilutes intensity compared to smaller, high-quality models like Perry or Abecedarian, and benefits often manifest in non-cognitive domains such as health behaviors rather than intelligence itself.^[77] Nutrition-focused early interventions, such as iodine supplementation in deficient populations, can yield larger IQ boosts (up to 10–13 points), but these address biological deficits rather than experiential enrichment and are not generalizable to non-deficient groups.^[40] Educational interventions beyond early childhood, including extended schooling, exhibit smaller, more consistent but limited effects on intelligence. A meta-analysis of 142 studies estimated that each additional year of education causally raises IQ by 1 to 5 points, with stronger effects on crystallized intelligence (e.g., vocabulary) than fluid reasoning, based on natural experiments like compulsory schooling laws.^[78] However, targeted school-based programs, such as class size reductions or curriculum enhancements, produce effect sizes below 0.2 standard deviations on cognitive tests, often failing to exceed fadeout timelines similar to preschool efforts; for instance, Tennessee's STAR experiment (1985–1989) boosted early reading scores but showed no lasting IQ divergence by adolescence. High heritability estimates (0.5–0.8 for IQ in childhood) constrain environmental malleability, explaining why interventions rarely sustain gains against genetic baselines or peer normalization.^[79] Overall, while early and educational interventions mitigate some environmental deficits, empirical evidence underscores their transient impact on general intelligence, prioritizing non-cognitive outcomes for policy justification.

Domain-Specific Training and Enrichment

Domain-specific training refers to targeted interventions designed to enhance particular cognitive abilities, such as working memory, spatial reasoning, or musical processing, often through repetitive practice or structured programs. These approaches aim to leverage neuroplasticity to improve performance in the trained domain and potentially transfer benefits to broader intelligence measures like fluid intelligence (Gf) or full-scale IQ. However, meta-analyses consistently indicate that while near-transfer effects—improvements on similar untrained tasks within the same domain—are observable, far-transfer to general cognitive ability (GCA) or IQ remains elusive or negligible.^[80]^[81] Working memory (WM) training, one of the most studied domain-specific interventions, involves exercises like n-back tasks to expand capacity for temporarily holding and manipulating information. Early claims of transfer to Gf, such as a 2008 study reporting gains after adaptive training, sparked interest, but subsequent replications and meta-analyses from 2020 onward have failed to substantiate broad effects. A 2024 review of randomized controlled trials found no reliable improvements in fluid intelligence from WM training, with gains confined to trained tasks and no correlation between WM enhancements and IQ changes. Similarly, a 2022 study on adaptive WM training in adults showed no transfer to cognitive or neural measures of intelligence, attributing apparent benefits to expectancy effects or methodological artifacts.^[82]^[83]^[84] Music training exemplifies enrichment through instrumental practice, hypothesized to boost executive functions and verbal IQ via auditory processing and discipline. Longitudinal studies and reviews report modest near-transfer to inhibition and processing speed, particularly in children, but far-transfer to general intelligence is weak. A 2024 meta-analysis of preschool interventions found positive effects on specific executive domains like cognitive flexibility, yet no consistent IQ elevation. Critically, a comprehensive 2024 review concluded that evidence for causal nonmusical benefits, including IQ, is "weak or nonexistent," with correlational links likely reflecting selection bias where higher-IQ individuals pursue training.^[85]^[86]^[87] Spatial skills training, often via mental rotation or visualization exercises, demonstrates malleability within the domain and links to STEM outcomes. Meta-analyses confirm effect sizes of 0.47 to 0.91 for spatial improvements, with transfer to mathematics performance (e.g., geometry) but not to overall IQ. A 2021 analysis of training studies supported enhanced mathematical understanding through spatial interventions, yet gains did not generalize to Gf or verbal domains, underscoring domain-specific limits. Chess instruction similarly yields domain gains in problem-solving and concentration, with some trials showing math score improvements, but meta-analytic evidence for IQ transfer is absent, and expert correlations with cognition reflect preexisting abilities rather than causation.^[88]^[89]^[90] Overall, domain-specific enrichment programs, while enriching experiential environments, exhibit constrained impact on general intelligence due to the g-factor's robustness and limited cross-domain plasticity. Positive findings often stem from non-randomized designs prone to confounding, and rigorous RCTs emphasize practice-specific adaptations over systemic IQ boosts. This aligns with broader critiques of environmental malleability, where genetic constraints predominate for g variance.^[80]^[91]

The Flynn Effect and Its Limits

The Flynn Effect denotes the observed phenomenon of rising average IQ test scores across generations, typically estimated at approximately 3 IQ points per decade during the 20th century in industrialized nations.^[6] This trend, first systematically documented by political scientist James Flynn through analyses of standardized tests like the Raven's Progressive Matrices, has been replicated in over 30 countries, encompassing both fluid intelligence measures (e.g., abstract reasoning) and crystallized intelligence (e.g., vocabulary).^[92] However, these gains primarily manifest on specific subtests rather than uniformly across the general factor of intelligence (g), with meta-analyses indicating weaker increases on highly g-loaded tasks such as backward digit span or culture-reduced visuospatial tests.^[6] ^[93] Evidence for the Effect derives from norming data on IQ batteries, where older test norms yield inflated scores for contemporary populations; for instance, a 2013 meta-analysis of 285 studies confirmed average gains of 2.31 points per decade globally from 1950 onward, though with diminishing rates in developed economies post-1990.^[6] Proposed environmental drivers include enhanced nutrition (e.g., reduced childhood malnutrition), expanded education access, and reduced family sizes, which correlate with higher scores in longitudinal cohorts.^[94] Yet, these improvements appear to reflect shifts in cognitive styles—toward more abstract, scientific thinking—rather than absolute biological intelligence enhancements, as Flynn himself argued that gains do not equate to rising g, supported by stable or declining performance on elementary cognitive tasks like reaction time in some datasets.^[95] ^[93] Limits to the Flynn Effect emerge from saturation of environmental gains and emerging reversals. In high-income nations, IQ increases have plateaued or slowed since the late 20th century, with Scandinavian studies showing zero or negative trends from the 1990s onward, attributed to maximized health and educational inputs.^[96] The reverse Flynn Effect—declines in average scores—has gained empirical traction; a 2023 analysis of U.S. adults from 2006 to 2018 reported drops of up to 0.3 points per year in verbal and quantitative reasoning, sparing only spatial abilities, based on large-scale synthetic aperture MRI-linked cognitive data.^[97] Similarly, UK neuropsychological assessments from 1960 to 2020 in high-security populations revealed worsening cognitive profiles, while Norwegian conscript data from 1975 to 2010 indicated a 7-point decline by 2010, particularly among lower-ability groups.^[98] ^[99] These reversals challenge unbounded environmental malleability, suggesting genetic constraints or dysgenic pressures (e.g., differential fertility by IQ) may cap gains, as polygenic scores for intelligence show no corresponding secular rise.^[100] ^[101]

Neurological and Developmental Mechanisms

Brain Development, Plasticity, and Environmental Modulation

The developing brain exhibits high levels of plasticity, characterized by experience-dependent changes in neural structure and function that enable adaptation to environmental inputs. During prenatal and early postnatal stages, critical periods emerge when specific sensory and social experiences are essential for normal circuit formation, such as visual acuity development requiring patterned light exposure or auditory processing shaped by linguistic input.^[102] Disruption during these windows, as seen in sensory deprivation experiments, leads to persistent deficits in cortical organization and associated cognitive functions.^[103] Environmental modulation influences key processes like synaptogenesis, where exuberant synapse formation peaks in infancy and is refined through activity-dependent pruning, and myelination, which accelerates conduction in white matter tracts under enriched stimulation. Cognitive enrichment, including complex social interactions and novel stimuli, promotes dendritic arborization and hippocampal neurogenesis in animal models, correlating with enhanced learning capacities.^[104] Conversely, chronic stress elevates glucocorticoids, impairing prefrontal cortex maturation and reducing synaptic density, which manifests in diminished executive function and working memory—precursors to fluid intelligence components.^[105] Human neuroimaging studies confirm that early adversity, such as institutional neglect, results in smaller cortical volumes and altered connectivity in regions like the amygdala and default mode network, linked to lower IQ scores averaging 10-15 points below non-deprived peers.^[106]^[107] Neuroplasticity extends beyond critical periods into sensitive phases, where environmental factors exert subtler but cumulative effects on intelligence-related traits. Individuals with higher IQ demonstrate an extended sensitivity to environmental influences on cognitive scores into adolescence, suggesting prolonged windows for experience-driven optimization of neural efficiency.^[108] Principles of experience-dependent plasticity, including specificity (task-relevant changes) and salience (motivationally driven remodeling), underpin gains in domain-general abilities like problem-solving when environments provide intensive, repetitive challenges.^[109] However, plasticity wanes with age due to reduced NMDA receptor signaling and perineuronal net formation, limiting environmental remediation of early deficits, as evidenced by modest IQ gains (3-5 points) from late interventions compared to 10+ points in infancy.^[110]^[104] Empirical data from longitudinal cohorts indicate that optimal environmental modulation—balancing stimulation without overload—fosters thicker gray matter in association cortices, correlating with g-factor loadings in intelligence tests.^[111] Negative modulators, including toxin exposure (e.g., lead levels above 10 μg/dL associating with 4-7 IQ point losses via disrupted glutamatergic signaling), epigenetically alter gene expression in plasticity-related pathways like BDNF, perpetuating intergenerational cognitive disparities.^[106] These mechanisms underscore causal pathways from environment to intelligence, though individual genetic baselines constrain plasticity magnitude, with heritability estimates rising from 20% in infancy to 80% in adulthood.^[112]

Neurological Theories Linking Environment to Cognition

Neurological theories emphasize neuroplasticity as the primary mechanism through which environmental factors shape cognitive abilities, including intelligence, by inducing structural and functional adaptations in the brain. Plasticity encompasses experience-dependent changes such as synaptic strengthening via long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD), which refine neural circuits in response to sensory and cognitive stimuli.^[113] In animal models, enriched environments increase dendritic spine density and synaptic numbers in the cortex and hippocampus, correlating with enhanced learning and memory, foundational to higher cognition.^[113] Human studies demonstrate similar effects, with interventions like musical training leading to expanded cortical representations and gray matter increases after 15 months, supporting improved executive functions linked to IQ.^[113] The Exploration–Selection–Refinement (ESR) model provides a theoretical framework for environmentally driven plasticity across the lifespan, positing three phases: initial exploration of neural microcircuits through broad synaptogenesis, selection of effective pathways via reinforcement learning, and refinement through pruning of inefficient connections.^[114] Environmental demands exceeding current neural capacity trigger these processes, as evidenced by MRI-detected gray matter volume increases following cognitive training, such as juggling or video game play, which modestly enhance working memory—a key component of fluid intelligence.^[114] However, transfer to broad intelligence gains remains limited, with effect sizes around 0.36 in older adults, indicating constraints on plasticity's scope for g-factor enhancement.^[114] Environmental influences modulate the pace of brain maturation, with positive experiences like high socioeconomic status (SES) prolonging structural development and functional network segregation, fostering efficient adult cortical networks associated with superior cognitive performance.^[104] Conversely, chronic stress accelerates maturation, reducing plasticity windows and impairing hippocampal development, which correlates with deficits in working memory and IQ declines observed in adverse conditions such as poverty or toxin exposure like lead.^[115]^[116] Sensitive periods amplify these effects early in life, where nutritional factors (e.g., breastfeeding) and enrichment enhance prefrontal and temporal lobe volumes, directly predicting higher childhood IQ scores.^[116] Gene-environment interactions underpin these theories, with environmental stimuli regulating neurotrophic factors like BDNF to modulate synaptic plasticity and neurogenesis, thereby influencing intelligence-related traits.^[115] For instance, iodine sufficiency prevents thyroid-related deficits in myelination and neuronal migration, averting cognitive impairments, while cardiovascular fitness from active environments bolsters hippocampal integrity into adulthood.^[116] These mechanisms highlight causal pathways from environment to cognition but are bounded by genetic predispositions, as evidenced by varying plasticity responses across individuals.^[104]

Controversies and Empirical Critiques

Debates on Environmental Malleability vs. Genetic Constraints

Heritability estimates for intelligence, derived from twin and adoption studies, typically range from 50% to 80% in adulthood, indicating substantial genetic influence that constrains environmental malleability.^[12]^[117] Monozygotic twins reared apart exhibit IQ correlations of 0.70 to 0.80, with resemblance increasing over time as shared environmental effects diminish and genetic factors dominate stability.^[118]^[119] These findings suggest that while environments can modulate IQ within genetic limits—such as through nutrition or deprivation avoidance—efforts to substantially elevate intelligence beyond an individual's polygenic potential yield limited, often transient results.^[12] Proponents of greater environmental malleability, often drawing from the Flynn effect's generational IQ gains of 3 points per decade in many nations until recent reversals, argue that optimized conditions like enriched education or socioeconomic improvements can unlock untapped potential.^[120] However, meta-analyses of early interventions, such as Head Start or Abecedarian Project, reveal initial IQ boosts of 4-7 points that largely fade out within 2-5 years post-intervention, regressing toward genetic baselines.^[72]^[73] Adoption studies corroborate this, showing transracial or low-to-high SES adoptions produce short-term gains that dissipate by adolescence or adulthood, with adoptees' IQs converging to biological family means rather than adoptive ones.^[56] Critics of expansive malleability claims, including behavioral geneticists like Robert Plomin, emphasize that high within-group heritability does not preclude group-level environmental shifts but imposes ceilings on individual upward mobility, as evidenced by the Scarr-Rowe hypothesis: heritability is lower in impoverished environments, allowing more variance for environmental rescue of genetically disadvantaged individuals, yet overall population distributions remain genetically anchored.^[121] Polygenic scores from genome-wide association studies now explain up to 20% of IQ variance, predicting outcomes independently of family environment and underscoring genetic constraints over malleable factors.^[12] Institutional biases in academia, where environmental determinism has historically dominated despite contradictory data from twin registries, may inflate perceptions of malleability, as longitudinal studies consistently prioritize genetic stability.^[61] Empirical limits are further highlighted by failed large-scale attempts to equalize IQ distributions through policy, such as compensatory education programs in the 1960s-1970s, which produced no sustained narrowing of gaps.^[122] While severe deprivation, like institutional neglect, demonstrably depresses IQ by 10-20 points—reversible to some extent via foster care—these represent floor effects rather than evidence for ceiling breakthroughs via enrichment.^[123] Thus, the debate resolves toward genetic realism: environments exert real but bounded influence, with heritability's rise from 40% in childhood to 80% in adulthood reflecting gene-environment correlations that amplify innate potentials over imposed changes.^[119]^[124]

Evidence from Twin, Adoption, and Polygenic Studies

Twin studies, which compare monozygotic (identical) twins reared together or apart to dizygotic (fraternal) twins, provide estimates of IQ heritability by partitioning variance into genetic and environmental components. A meta-analysis of over 11,000 twin pairs indicates that IQ heritability rises from approximately 41% in childhood (around age 9) to 55% in early adolescence (age 12) and reaches 66% or higher in adulthood, reflecting increasing genetic influence as individuals age and select environments correlated with their genotypes.^[125] In the Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart, monozygotic twins separated early in life exhibited IQ correlations of about 0.75, comparable to those reared together, underscoring minimal shared environmental effects on adult intelligence after controlling for genetic similarity.^[126] Adoption studies further disentangle genetic from rearing environment influences by examining IQ resemblances between adopted children and their biological versus adoptive parents. In the Colorado Adoption Project, involving hundreds of families, adult adoptees' IQs correlated more strongly with biological parents (r ≈ 0.40) than with adoptive parents (r ≈ 0.15-0.20), with shared family environment accounting for negligible variance in cognitive ability by maturity.^[56] A longitudinal analysis of 486 adoptive families found that socioeconomic status of adoptive homes had no detectable impact on children's general intelligence, as IQ trajectories aligned more closely with genetic expectations than with enriched rearing conditions, though transient gains of 7-12 points were observed in early childhood before regressing toward biological baselines.^[59] These patterns hold across international samples, where early adoption into higher-SES environments yields initial IQ boosts that diminish over time, suggesting limited long-term malleability from postnatal interventions.^[60] Polygenic score analyses, derived from genome-wide association studies (GWAS), quantify cumulative genetic effects on intelligence and validate twin/adoption findings by predicting phenotypic variance independent of family environment. Current polygenic scores, based on millions of genetic variants, explain 10-14% of IQ differences between individuals, with predictive power increasing as GWAS sample sizes grow; within-family designs, such as sibling comparisons, confirm these scores forecast intelligence more accurately than shared rearing factors, isolating causal genetic contributions.^[12] In adoption cohorts, polygenic scores for educational attainment and cognition correlate with adoptees' IQs at levels rivaling biological parent midparent estimates (r ≈ 0.3-0.4), unaffected by adoptive home quality, thus reinforcing that heritable polygenic architecture constrains environmental modulation of intelligence.^[19] Meta-analyses of polygenic prediction across diverse populations affirm this genetic dominance, with scores outperforming environmental proxies in forecasting cognitive outcomes from birth.^[2]

Reverse Flynn Effect and Recent Declines in IQ Scores

The reverse Flynn effect denotes the reversal of the secular rise in IQ scores observed during much of the 20th century, with evidence of declines emerging in multiple developed nations since the late 1970s or early 1990s.^[96] This phenomenon has been documented through standardized IQ testing data, particularly from military conscription assessments and national norming samples, revealing generational drops in cognitive performance.^[127] Unlike the Flynn effect's gains, which averaged 3 IQ points per decade globally, reverse trends show losses of 2-7 points across birth cohorts spanning 20-30 years, varying by country and subtest.^[128] In Norway, a comprehensive analysis of over 730,000 male military conscripts born between 1962 and 1991 found IQ scores peaking for the 1975 birth cohort before declining by approximately 7 points (0.26 points per year) through the 1997 cohort, based on standardized tests adjusted for test version changes.^[96] This within-family comparison isolated environmental influences, as siblings shared genetic backgrounds yet exhibited cohort-specific declines.^[96] Similar patterns appeared in Denmark, where average IQ scores from conscript data fell by about 3 points per decade starting in the 1990s, following earlier gains.^[127] France exhibited a 4-point IQ decline per decade between 1999 and 2008-2009, as measured by the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) in standardization samples, with drops most pronounced in verbal and full-scale IQ.^[129] In Finland, conscript IQ scores dipped by 2 points from 1997 to 2009, despite stable educational inputs.^[130] Broader reviews confirm negative Flynn effects in at least seven countries, including the UK, Australia, and Estonia, with declines linked to post-1980 cohorts and evident across fluid reasoning and spatial subtests.^[127] United States data from large-scale online cognitive assessments of adults born 1975-1985 versus later cohorts indicate drops of up to 2-3 points in areas like verbal and matrix reasoning since the early 2000s, contrasting with isolated gains in vocabulary.^[97] These trends extend to other regions, with prolonged IQ and scholastic aptitude declines reported in parts of Europe (e.g., UK, Netherlands) and East Asia during the 2000s-2010s.^[128] While some critiques attribute artifacts to test revisions or sampling, replicated findings across independent datasets affirm the reality of these generational losses.^[127]

References

[1]
Genetic variation, brain, and intelligence differences - Nature
Feb 2, 2021 · Since 2011, the heritability of intelligence has been investigated by direct testing of DNA in large numbers of unrelated individuals [30]. This ...
[2]
DNA and IQ: Big deal or much ado about nothing? – A meta-analysis
Twin and family studies have shown that about half of people's differences in intelligence can be attributed to their genetic differences, with the ...
[3]
Commentary: Why are children in the same family so different? Non ...
In contrast, the point of non-shared environment is that environments are doled out on a child-by-child basis. Note that the phrase 'non-shared environment' is ...
[4]
Effect of environmental factors on intelligence quotient of children
We found that various environmental factors such as place of residence, physical exercise, family income, parents' occupation and education influence the IQ of ...
[5]
Genetic and Environmental Influences on Cognition Across ... - NIH
347) stated, “higher IQ leads one into better environments causing still higher IQ, and so on.” In addition to early cognitive ability, “noncognitive” traits, ...
[6]
The Flynn Effect: A Meta-analysis - PMC - PubMed Central
The “Flynn effect” refers to the observed rise in IQ scores over time, resulting in norms obsolescence.
[7]
What has caused the Flynn effect? Secular increases in the ...
It is proposed that the most probable factor has been improvements in pre-natal and early post-natal nutrition.
[8]
On group differences in the heritability of intelligence
Here we reply to Giangrande and Turkheimer's (2022; G&T) recent critique of a meta-analysis we published in Intelligence regarding the Scarr-Rowe Hypothesis.
[9]
Flynn effect and its reversal are both environmentally caused - PMC
Jun 11, 2018 · A negative intelligence–fertility gradient is hypothesized to have been disguised by a positive environmental Flynn effect, revealing itself in ...
[10]
[PDF] Psychometric g: Definition and Substantiation
The construct known as psychometric g is arguably the most important construct in all of psychology largely because of its ubiquitous presence in.
[11]
The g factor: psychometrics and biology - PubMed
General ability, defined as psychometric g, arises from the empirical fact ... The g factor: psychometrics and biology. Novartis Found Symp. 2000:233:37 ...
[12]
The new genetics of intelligence - PMC - PubMed Central
For intelligence, twin estimates of broad heritability are 50% on average. Adoption studies of first-degree relatives yield similar estimates of narrow ...Missing: peer- | Show results with:peer-
[13]
Reconsidering the Heritability of Intelligence in Adulthood - NIH
Heritability estimates of general intelligence in adulthood generally range from 75 to 85%, with all heritability due to additive genetic influences.Missing: peer- | Show results with:peer-
[14]
Genetics and intelligence differences: five special findings - PMC
Sep 16, 2014 · (i) The heritability of intelligence increases from about 20% in infancy to perhaps 80% in later adulthood. (ii) Intelligence captures genetic ...Missing: peer- | Show results with:peer-
[15]
The heritability of general cognitive ability increases linearly from ...
The heritability of general cognitive ability increases significantly and linearly from 41% in childhood (9 years) to 55% in adolescence (12 years) and to 66% ...Missing: peer- | Show results with:peer-
[16]
The Paradox of Intelligence: Heritability and Malleability Coexist in ...
Estimates of heritability of intelligence increase with age, but do so primarily in environments that are more conducive to cognitive development. 35. Harden ...Missing: peer- | Show results with:peer-
[17]
Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years ...
May 18, 2015 · We report a meta-analysis of twin correlations and reported variance components for 17,804 traits from 2,748 publications including 14,558,903 ...
[18]
Genetics and intelligence differences: five special findings - Nature
Sep 16, 2014 · Similar to other complex traits, GCTA heritability estimates for intelligence are about half the heritability estimates from twin studies.
[19]
Genetic and environmental contributions to IQ in adoptive and ...
We estimated genetic and environmental effects on adulthood IQ in a unique sample of 486 biological and adoptive families.
[20]
The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age
Aug 7, 2013 · The results show that the heritability of IQ reaches an asymptote at about 0.80 at 18–20 years of age and continuing at that level well into ...
[21]
The Scarr-Rowe Interaction in Complete Seven-Year WISC Data ...
Oct 26, 2015 · The Scarr-Rowe hypothesis refers to the possibility that the heritability of cognitive ability is attenuated in relatively poor environments.
[22]
The Scarr-Rowe interaction between measured socioeconomic ...
The Scarr-Rowe interaction between measured socioeconomic status and the heritability ... Socioeconomic status modifies heritability of IQ in young children.
[23]
Polygenic Scores for Cognitive Abilities and Their Association with ...
Intelligence is a highly polygenic trait and genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified thousands of DNA variants contributing with small effects.
[24]
Association of Maternal Iodine Status With Child IQ: A Meta-Analysis ...
This study confirms that low iodine status is associated with a reduction in verbal IQ scores, putting these children at potential risk for poorer academic ...
[25]
Iodine supplementation during pregnancy
This translates into an IQ increase of 6.9-10.2 points for children of iodine-supplemented mothers compared to children whose mothers did not receive ...
[26]
Association of Maternal Iodine Status With Child IQ: A Meta-Analysis ...
Jun 18, 2020 · Therefore, even if maternal thyroid function is not affected by mild-to-moderate iodine deficiency during pregnancy, it is still very well ...
[27]
Effects of low-level prenatal lead exposure on child IQ at 4 and 8 ...
Our aim was to evaluate the association between prenatal lead exposure and child IQ at age 4 and 8 years in an observational birth cohort study. There was no ...
[28]
Maternal smoking during pregnancy and offspring IQ - PubMed
Results: Without adjustment, offspring of mothers who smoked during pregnancy scored 6.8 IQ points lower than offspring of mothers who never smoked, on average.
[29]
Maternal smoking during pregnancy and intelligence quotient in ...
May 15, 2021 · The overall pooled estimate showed that subjects who were exposed to maternal smoking during pregnancy presented lower IQ scores, compared to ...
[30]
Effect of Maternal Smoking During Pregnancy on Offspring's ...
Sep 1, 2006 · Numerous studies have reported that maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy is related to lower IQ scores in the offspring. Confounding is a ...
[31]
The Effect of Maternal Stress during Pregnancy on IQ and ADHD ...
Maternal stress during pregnancy (MSDP) has been linked to a decrease in Intelligence Quotient (IQ) in the general population. The purpose of this study is ...
[32]
Maternal prenatal psychological distress and preschool cognitive ...
In particular, a number of studies have found that distress experienced during pregnancy is linked to reduced cognitive abilities in offspring (Bergman, Sarkar, ...Missing: intelligence | Show results with:intelligence
[33]
Association of Very Preterm Birth or Very Low Birth Weight With ...
May 28, 2021 · Association of very preterm birth or very low birth weight with intelligence in adulthood: an individual participant data meta-analysis.
[34]
A gradient relationship between low birth weight and IQ - Nature
Dec 21, 2017 · Multiple studies have reported that individuals with low birth weights (LBW, <2500 g) have a lower intelligence quotient (IQ) than those with normal birth ...
[35]
A gradient relationship between low birth weight and IQ - PubMed
Dec 21, 2017 · Multiple studies have reported that individuals with low birth weights (LBW, <2500 g) have a lower intelligence quotient (IQ) than those with normal birth ...
[36]
Systematic assessment of perinatal and socio-demographic factors ...
A systematic assessment of perinatal factors revealed significant predictors of IQ trajectory. •. The association between gestational age and IQ was linear ...
[37]
Associations between maternal infections during pregnancy and ...
Mar 12, 2022 · The study aimed to examine maternal infections in each trimester of pregnancy and associations with children's verbal, performance, and total IQ scores.
[38]
Intelligence Quotient (IQ) in school-aged preterm infants - Frontiers
The aim of this systematic review was to summarize available and updated empirical evidence on prematurity as a risk factor for cognitive development in school ...
[39]
Impact of gestational age on child intelligence, attention and ... - NIH
Sep 8, 2019 · This study showed substantially lower intelligence and poorer executive function in children born <34 weeks GA compared with children born at ...
[40]
Raising IQ among school-aged children: Five meta-analyses and a ...
Multivitamin and iodine supplementation, and learning a musical instrument, can raise IQ in school-aged children. Iron and executive function training are ...
[41]
The effects of iodine on intelligence in children: a meta ... - PubMed
The intelligence damage of children exposed to severe ID was profound, demonstrated by 12.45 IQ points loss and they recovered 8.7 IQ points with iodine ...
[42]
Iron Deficiency in Infancy and Neurocognitive and Educational ...
Severity of iron deficiency during infancy was associated with lower verbal IQ and more frequent inattention and SCT symptoms in childhood, and with lower ...
[43]
Iron-deficient infants score worse on cognitive and motor tests as teens
May 1, 2004 · They scored about six points lower on cognitive tests at age 1-2 years, and 11 points lower at age 15-18 years.<|control11|><|separator|>
[44]
Effects of iron supplementation on cognitive development in school ...
Jun 27, 2023 · Iron supplementation has a significant positive effect on the intelligence, attention and concentration, and the memory of school-age children.
[45]
(PDF) Food for Thought: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis on ...
This systematic review and meta‐analysis synthesized existing research to evaluate the link between UPF consumption and cognitive development in youths.<|separator|>
[46]
Low-level lead exposure and children's IQ: a meta-analysis and ...
An increase in blood lead from 10 to 20 micrograms/dl was associated with a decrease of 2.6 IQ points in the meta-analysis.
[47]
The effect of lead exposure on IQ test scores in children under 12 ...
May 30, 2022 · Lead exposure negatively impacts IQ scores in children. For exposure under 4.5 years, the difference was -3.53, and over 4.5 years, it was -22. ...
[48]
Global health burden and cost of lead exposure in children and adults
Sep 11, 2023 · We aimed to estimate the global burden and cost of intelligence quotient (IQ) loss and cardiovascular disease mortality from lead exposure.
[49]
A meta-analysis on the impact of fluoride levels on children's IQ scores
Jan 29, 2025 · A recent systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that more exposure to fluoride may be linked to lower intelligence scores in children.The Study · Measuring Fluoride Levels In... · 8. Get To Know Iq Scores So...
[50]
Exercise Interventions and Intelligence in Children and Adolescents
Nov 7, 2024 · The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the effect of exercise interventions on intelligence (determined as ...
[51]
Multi-Level Meta-Analysis of Physical Activity Interventions During ...
May 24, 2023 · This multi-level meta-analysis of 92 studies showed that physical activity interventions in childhood could lead to small benefits in cognition ...
[52]
a systematic umbrella review and meta-meta-analysis
These findings provide strong evidence that exercise, even light intensity, benefits general cognition, memory and executive function across all populations.
[53]
A Systematic Overview of Meta-Analyses on Socioeconomic Status ...
Dec 24, 2020 · Meta-analyses show a small to medium positive association between socioeconomic status and cognitive ability/achievement, indicating SES ...
[54]
A meta-analysis of the relationship between socioeconomic status ...
A meta-analysis found a small but significant correlation between SES and EF in children, with the size ranging from small to medium depending on the methods ...
[55]
Socioeconomic status and the growth of intelligence from infancy ...
Higher SES is linked to higher intelligence starting points and greater gains. Low SES children scored 6 IQ points lower at age 2, which tripled by 16.
[56]
Genetic and environmental contributions to IQ in adoptive and ...
While adoption studies have provided key insights into the influence of the familial environment on IQ scores of adolescents and children, few have followed ...
[57]
Home Environment and Early Cognitive Development | ScienceDirect
Home Environment and Early Cognitive Development: Longitudinal Research presents the results of longitudinal studies in Canada and the United States that ...
[58]
(PDF) Socioeconomic Status Modifies Heritability of IQ in Young ...
Aug 7, 2025 · The models suggest that in impoverished families, 60% of the variance in IQ is accounted for by the shared environment, and the contribution of ...<|separator|>
[59]
How can we boost IQs of “dull children”?: A late adoption study | PNAS
Our results show that the adoptive environment for children adopted after 4 years of age is effective in boosting low IQs. Children who had low pre-adoption IQs ...
[60]
Individual and group differences in adoption studies of IQ.
Positive statistical relationships between IQs of biological parents and adopted-away children are indicative of a genetic effect; positive relationships ...
[61]
Family environment and the malleability of cognitive ability - PNAS
Mar 23, 2015 · We demonstrate that adoption into improved socioeconomic circumstances is associated with a significant advantage in IQ at age 18.
[62]
How Much Does Education Improve Intelligence? A Meta-Analysis
We found consistent evidence for beneficial effects of education on cognitive abilities of approximately 1 to 5 IQ points for an additional year of education.
[63]
How much does education improve intelligence? A meta-analysis
We found consistent evidence for beneficial effects of education on cognitive abilities, of approximately 1 to 5 IQ points for an additional year of education.
[64]
How much does education improve intelligence? A meta-analysis
Jun 18, 2018 · Education appears to be the most consistent, robust, and durable method yet to be identified for raising intelligence.
[65]
Could peers influence intelligence during adolescence? An ...
This study does not find evidence supporting a socialization effect of peers on intellectual ability.
[66]
Peer Influences on Cognitive Development - SpringerLink
They acquire new knowledge and skills from talking, sharing, playing, and quarreling together. They learn new ways to approach and solve problems by working ...
[67]
Toward understanding the functions of peer influence: A summary ...
Nov 24, 2021 · The presence of peers activates regions of the brain associated with reward processing, which heightens adolescent sensitivity to the receipt of ...
[68]
Intelligence across cultures - American Psychological Association
Feb 1, 2003 · Researchers in Africa, Asia and elsewhere have found that people in non-Western cultures often have ideas about intelligence that differ fundamentally.
[69]
https://oxfordre.com/psychology/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.001.0001/acrefore-9780190236557-e-585
[70]
how culture shapes what intelligence means, and the implications ...
This paper discusses the relationship between culture and intelligence. The main message of the paper is that intelligence cannot fully or even meaningfully ...
[71]
Cross-cultural differences in visuo-spatial processing and the culture ...
Feb 4, 2022 · Empirical evidence suggests that visuo-spatial intelligence tests can demonstrate substantial cultural bias, and degraded psychometric qualities ...
[72]
The environment in raising early intelligence: A meta-analysis of the ...
We confirm that after an intervention raises intelligence the effects fade away. We further show this is because children in the experimental group lose their ...
[73]
(PDF) The environment in raising early intelligence: A meta-analysis ...
Aug 6, 2025 · We meta-analyze the evidence for the fadeout effect of IQ, determining whether interventions that raise IQ have sustained effects after they end.
[74]
[PDF] The High/Scope Perry Preschool Study Through Age 40
The High/Scope Perry Preschool study is a scientific experiment that has identified both the short- and long-term effects of a high- quality preschool education ...
[75]
The Breadth of Impacts from the Abecedarian Project Early ...
Early life interventions impacting cognitive abilities are most often followed by post-treatment fadeout. Some have hypothesized that persistence is ...
[76]
THE PERSISTENCE OF PRESCHOOL EFFECTS FROM EARLY ...
Preschool attendees consistently performed better on achievement tests from age 5 through early adolescence, but exhibited less optimal psychosocial skills.
[77]
The Effects of Two Influential Early Childhood Interventions on ... - NIH
This paper examines the long-term impacts on health and healthy behaviors of two of the oldest and most widely cited US early childhood interventions.
[78]
How Much Does Education Improve Intelligence? A Meta-Analysis
We found consistent evidence for beneficial effects of education on cognitive abilities of approximately 1 to 5 IQ points for an additional year of education.
[79]
Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Early Education Interventions on ...
A total of 123 comparative studies of early childhood interventions were analyzed. Each study provided a number of contrasts, where a contrast is defined as the ...
[80]
Cognitive Training Does Not Enhance General Cognition
These findings show that practicing cognitive-training programs or intellectually demanding activities do not enhance GCA or any cognitive skill.
[81]
Why Does Cognitive Training Yield Inconsistent Benefits? A Meta ...
Some evidence suggests poor performers benefit the most from cognitive training, showing compensation for their weak abilities.<|control11|><|separator|>
[82]
Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory - PNAS
May 13, 2008 · We present evidence for transfer from training on a demanding working memory task to measures of Gf. This transfer results even though the trained task is ...Missing: review | Show results with:review
[83]
Can we enhance working memory? Bias and effectiveness in ...
Feb 16, 2024 · Fluid intelligence was not found to improve as a result of training, and improvements in WM were not related to changes in fluid intelligence.
[84]
Adaptive working memory training does not produce transfer effects ...
Dec 13, 2022 · In conclusion, WM training produces transfer effects neither at the cognitive level nor in terms of neural structure or function. These results ...
[85]
Effects of music training on executive functions in preschool children ...
Conclusion: Music training has a positive effect on inhibitory control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility in preschool children aged 3–6 years. This ...
[86]
https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-032323-051354
[87]
How musical training affects cognitive development: rhythm, reward ...
The reports we review in this section show that musical training also brings about promising far-transfer effects in domains such as verbal intelligence and ...
[88]
[PDF] The Malleability of Spatial Skills: A Meta-Analysis of Training Studies
Having good spatial skills strongly predicts achievement and attainment in science, technology, engi- neering, and mathematics fields (e.g., Shea, Lubinski, ...
[89]
Effects of spatial training on mathematics performance: A meta ...
Our results support prior research and theoretical claims that spatial training is an effective means for enhancing mathematical understanding and performance.
[90]
The Effects of Chess Instruction on Pupils' Cognitive and Academic ...
Chess may be beneficial for mathematical ability and, more widely, academic achievement by enhancing concentration and problem-solving skills. These ...
[91]
The (in)effectiveness of training domain‐general skills to support ...
Aug 3, 2024 · We argue against using isolated domain-general training to enhance math knowledge in early childhood.
[92]
Flynn Effect - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The Flynn effect refers to the puzzling observation of an increase in human intelligence scores over time, as analyzed by Flynn in 1984.
[93]
Inconsistent Flynn effect patterns may be due to a decreasing ...
Our findings provide direct evidence for a decreasing strength of the positive manifold of intelligence as a noticeable driver of the accumulating evidence for ...
[94]
The Flynn Effect – Explaining Increasing IQ Scores
Aug 7, 2023 · This increase is attributed to environmental factors like improved nutrition, education, and reduced exposure to toxins. What is this?Causes · Implications · Is the Flynn Effect Valid?
[95]
The Flynn Effect: What's Behind Rising IQ Scores? - Verywell Mind
Jan 16, 2024 · What Causes the Flynn Effect? · Growing up with fewer siblings: Having fewer siblings was associated with an increase in IQ scores. · Better ...
[96]
Flynn effect and its reversal are both environmentally caused - PNAS
Jun 11, 2018 · The Flynn effect refers to a secular increase in population intelligence quotient (IQ) observed throughout the 20th century (1–4). The changes ...
[97]
Americans' IQ scores are lower in some areas, higher in one
Mar 20, 2023 · A new study from Northwestern University has found evidence of a reverse “Flynn effect” in a large U.S. sample between 2006 and 2018 in ...<|separator|>
[98]
A Reverse Flynn Effect: Trends in Six Decades ... - Palo Alto University
This suggests that contemporary admissions present with more cognitive dysfunction compared to admissions from previous decades… Whatever the potential ...
[99]
The Flynn effect for fluid IQ may not generalize to all ages or ability ...
Sep 10, 2019 · Reverse Flynn Effects at age 18 are consistent with previous data, and those with lower ability levels are exhibiting worsening IQ over time.
[100]
Looking for Flynn effects in a recent online U.S. adult sample
A reverse Flynn effect was found for composite ability scores with large US adult sample from 2006 to 2018 and 2011 to 2018.
[101]
The Reverse Flynn Effect and the Decline of Intelligence - Colligo
Mar 1, 2025 · The Reverse Flynn Effect appears to be real. Two pieces of evidence stand out: Physiological markers—reaction time and color acuity—both ...
[102]
Critical and Sensitive Periods in Brain Development
Jul 16, 2025 · Critical periods are times during which specific environmental experiences are required for the maturation of specific brain regions or functions.
[103]
Brain Plasticity and Behaviour in the Developing Brain - PMC - NIH
To review general principles of brain development, identify basic principles of brain plasticity, and discuss factors that influence brain development and ...
[104]
Environmental influences on the pace of brain development - Nature
Apr 28, 2021 · We consider how experiences, including stress, cognitive enrichment and environmental variability, influence brain maturation and plasticity. We ...
[105]
Positive or negative environmental modulations on human brain ...
In this review, we outline the healthy human brain development in the absence of major issues or diseases. Then, the effects of negative (different stressors) ...
[106]
Negative environmental influences on the developing brain ...
Sep 28, 2023 · Evidence indicates exposures to environmental threats can lead to inappropriate neurological, metabolic, and endocrine functioning often mediated by epigenetic ...
[107]
Environmental contributions to cognitive development: The role of ...
Early environmental experiences influence children's cognitive and neural development. In particular, cognitive stimulation, defined as environmental inputs ...
[108]
The nature and nurture of high IQ: An extended sensitive period for ...
We find that individuals with higher IQ show high environmental influence on IQ into adolescence (resembling younger children),
[109]
Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity - PubMed - NIH
This paper reviews 10 principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity and considerations in applying them to the damaged brain.Missing: intelligence | Show results with:intelligence
[110]
Augmenting NMDA receptor signaling boosts experience ... - PNAS
Experience-dependent neuroplasticity is the capacity of the brain to change in response to environmental input, learning, and use. It is a fundamental property ...
[111]
Critical periods of brain growth and cognitive function in children
There is evidence that IQ tends to be higher in those who were heavier at birth or who grew taller in childhood and adolescence.
[112]
A Systematic Look at Environmental Modulation and Its Impact in ...
Several experimental procedures are currently used to investigate the impact of the environment on brain plasticity under physiological and pathological ...Missing: intelligence | Show results with:intelligence
[113]
Neural plasticity of development and learning - PMC - PubMed Central
Development and learning are powerful agents of change across the lifespan that induce robust structural and functional plasticity in neural systems.
[114]
Brain Plasticity in Human Lifespan Development - Annual Reviews
Dec 15, 2019 · Plasticity can be defined as the brain's capacity to achieve lasting structural changes in response to environmental demands that are not fully ...
[115]
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41583-021-00457-5/
[116]
Neural Mechanisms and Children's Intellectual Development
Oct 28, 2015 · Here, we review the representative environmental factors known to affect human intellectual development during each developmental stage.
[117]
Are Some Destined to Be Smart? | Psychology Today
Oct 2, 2025 · Twin studies reveal strong heritability, showing correlations of .70–.80 in IQ for twins raised apart. That means the environment still ...
[118]
IQ differences of identical twins reared apart are significantly ...
Over the last century, several large studies have been published exploring IQ differences amongst monozygotic (MZ) twins reared apart (TRA).
[119]
Groundbreaking study reveals the impact of genetics on IQ scores ...
Jul 10, 2024 · The longitudinal study, the first of its kind involving young monozygotic twins reared apart, reveals an increase in IQ resemblance as these twins age.
[120]
Heritability Estimates Versus Large Environmental Effects: The IQ ...
It shows that kinship studies hide or 'mask' the potency of environmental influences on IQ. Therefore, they do not really demonstrate the impossibility of ...
[121]
[PDF] Genetic and environmental contributions to IQ in adoptive and ...
Aug 5, 2021 · Today, gene-environment correlation is widely recognized among IQ researchers, with some authors estimating that its effects might account for ...
[122]
Does the raising IQ-raising g distinction explain the fadeout effect?
The raising IQ/raising g distinction is insufficient as an explanation for the fadeout effect, as changes to the environment can improve g and still fade.
[123]
Foster care leads to sustained cognitive gains following severe early ...
Sep 15, 2022 · Despite previous evidence that the effects of interventions aimed to increase cognitive ability often fade out (1, 10), the causal effects of ...
[124]
The genetic and environmental architecture to the stability of IQ
The remainder of the stability and change in IQ was the result of a combination of shared and nonshared environmental influences. Importantly, some substantive ...
[125]
A meta-analysis of 11000 pairs of twins shows that the heritability of...
A meta-analysis of 11000 pairs of twins shows that the heritability of intelligence increases significantly from childhood (age 9) to adolescence (age 12) and ...
[126]
Nature-nurture and intelligence: the twin and adoption studies agree
The biological mother-adopted child correlation is 0.37 whereas the adoptive mother-adopted child and adoptive father-adopted child correlations are only 0.22 ...<|separator|>
[127]
The negative Flynn Effect: A systematic literature review
A negative Flynn effect was reported in 9 studies (comprising 7 countries). Immigration, sex ratio, and dysgenic fertility were discussed as possible causes.
[128]
Ongoing trends of human intelligence - ScienceDirect
Prolonged declines in IQ and PISA test scores across various East Asian regions and parts of Europe, including Norway, Denmark, the UK, the Netherlands ...
[129]
[PDF] A negative Flynn Effect in France, 1999 to 2008–9
In addition, Dutton and Lynn (2013) have observed a decline in IQ scores among Finnish military conscripts from 1997, despite a negligible number of non- ...
[130]
American IQs rose 30 points in the last century. Now, they may be ...
Mar 29, 2023 · One Finnish study found IQ scores had dipped by 2 points between 1997 and 2009. A French study found a 4-point drop from 1999 to 2009.