Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Fang Fang

Fang Fang (: 方方; born Wang Fang, 11 May 1955) is a and whose works often depict the lives of the and marginalized groups in post-reform . Born in to a literary family and raised in after age two, she graduated from and established her literary career through novels, , and essays exploring social inequalities and human resilience. Her international prominence surged with the Wuhan Diary, a series of daily posts from 25 January to 30 March 2020, chronicling the severe lockdown in amid the emerging outbreak, including shortages of medical supplies, deaths from untreated conditions, and frustrations with opaque official communications. These entries highlighted empirical observations of overwhelmed hospitals and delayed responses, drawing millions of readers domestically before facing scrutiny. The diary's English translation, published in 2020, elicited sharp domestic backlash from nationalist voices accusing Fang Fang of exaggerating suffering to discredit abroad and profiting from tragedy, resulting in organized online campaigns labeling her a "traitor" and subsequent censorship of her publications and public engagements by authorities. By 2022, she reported living under effective , with her writings banned in , underscoring tensions between individual testimony and state narrative control during crises.

Early Life and Background

Birth and Family Origins

Wang Fang, who writes under the pen name Fang Fang, was born in , Province, , in 1955. She came from an or literati family native to the region. Her family's ancestral roots trace to Pengze in Province. In 1957, when Fang was approximately two years old, her family relocated from to , Province, where she spent her early years amid the political turbulence of the era. Limited public details exist regarding her members, such as parents' names or professions beyond the scholarly background, reflecting the reticence common in biographical accounts of writers from that period.

Childhood in Nanjing

Wang Fang, who writes under the pen name Fang Fang, was born in , Province, in 1955 to an intellectual family with roots in the local literati tradition. Her family's ancestral origins trace back to Pengze in Province, reflecting a heritage tied to scholarly pursuits. Limited public details exist on her specific experiences during this period, as her time in spanned only her infancy and toddler years. In 1957, at the age of two, Fang Fang's family relocated to , Province, where she would spend the remainder of her childhood and formative years. This early move marked the end of her direct connection to , though the city's cultural environment during her brief residence aligned with her family's educated background amid the post-liberation era in . No verified accounts detail particular events, education, or daily life from her Nanjing infancy, underscoring the brevity of this phase relative to her later development in .

Education and Early Influences

University Studies at Wuhan University

Fang Fang enrolled at in 1978 to study , following a three-year period as a handling cargo at the Port of . This enrollment occurred amid China's post-Cultural Revolution restoration of higher education, where she was recruited directly into a literature program, reflecting her prior self-education and literary inclinations developed during her teenage years. During her undergraduate studies, Fang Fang focused on classical and modern Chinese literary traditions, which laid the groundwork for her subsequent career as a and . She completed a in , typically spanning 1978 to 1982, though some accounts suggest an accelerated path leveraging her practical experience and early poetic compositions from 1975 onward. Her time at the university exposed her to Province's intellectual circles, fostering connections that influenced her early publications shortly after graduation.

Formative Literary Experiences

Fang Fang's immersion in literature began early due to her birth into a literati family in , providing her with foundational exposure to China's scholarly and classical literary traditions amid a cultured household environment. This background, common among families of intellectuals, fostered an innate familiarity with historical texts and narrative forms that emphasized moral and social reflection, setting the stage for her lifelong engagement with writing. Prior to formal , Fang Fang's experiences as a longshorewoman in for four years after the —undertaken to support her family—served as a pivotal literary crucible, bridging theoretical knowledge with empirical observation of working-class life. These years of physical labor honed her commitment to , drawing from personal encounters with urban poverty and , which later manifested in her empathetic portrayals of ordinary residents. Her initial forays into poetry around during this period marked the onset of her creative output, influenced by the era's emphasis on authentic social depiction. Enrolling at in 1978 to pursue a in , Fang Fang systematically studied , classical , and modern developments, including the socialist realist traditions inherited from the of 1919. This academic focus reinforced her stylistic affinity for unvarnished narratives of societal struggles, as evidenced by her subsequent works aligning with May Fourth legacies of vernacular realism and critique of feudal remnants. The university milieu, amid China's post-Mao literary thaw, encouraged her transition from to , solidifying a voice attuned to the complexities of human endurance under systemic pressures.

Literary Career Prior to 2020

Debut and Initial Publications

Fang Fang's literary debut came in 1982 with the Dapengche Shang ("On the Big Truck"), published in the Changjiang Wenyi. This piece, drawing from her recent experiences as a university graduate entering the workforce at Television, depicted themes of youthful transition and rural-urban mobility through a realist lens. Building on this start, Fang Fang continued publishing works centered on personal and social realities. Her 1985 short story Shibazui Xingjinqu ("March of the Eighteen-Year-Olds") examined adolescent aspirations and disillusionment, earning the Second Baihua Prize from Xiaoshuo Yuebao in 1988. The 1987 novella Fengjing ("Landscape" or "Scenery") marked a breakthrough, portraying mundane urban and rural vignettes with stark authenticity and securing the National Outstanding Novella Prize for 1987-1988. Often regarded as an early exemplar of New Realism in Chinese fiction, it highlighted overlooked facets of daily existence amid post-reform societal shifts. These publications positioned her as a proponent of grounded, observational , distinct from more idealistic literary trends of the era.

Major Novels and Essays

Fang Fang's novella Landscape (风景), published in 1987, depicted urban life and youth experiences in post-reform , earning the for its realistic portrayal of social transitions. Her breakthrough long The Chronicle of Wuni Lake (乌泥湖年谱), released in 2002, spans decades of working-class struggles in Wuhan's Wuni Lake district, highlighting poverty, resilience, and among laborers and migrants; the work drew acclaim for its gritty, multi-generational narrative grounded in . In 2008, she published Water Under Time (水在时间之下), a exploring themes of and existential flux amid environmental and personal changes. Subsequent works solidified her reputation for probing historical traumas and societal undercurrents. The 2010 novella Qinduankou (琴断口) won the Fifth Literature Prize in the mid-length category, praised for its examination of interpersonal conflicts and moral ambiguities in contemporary settings. That same year, Ants on the Edge of a Blade (刀锋上的蚂蚁) addressed precarious human conditions under pressure. In 2011, the historical novel Wuchang City (武昌城) reconstructed events around the in , blending factual reconstruction with fictional elements to critique revolutionary legacies. Her 2016 novel Soft Burial (软埋) delved into intergenerational trauma from the late-1940s campaigns, focusing on suppressed memories of violence and dispossession in rural . Fang Fang's essays often complemented her fiction with reflective commentary on regional history and culture. Notable collections include The Vicissitudes of Hankou (汉口的沧桑往事), which chronicles the transformations of Wuhan's district through archival insights and personal observation, emphasizing economic shifts and lost traditions. By the late 2010s, she had authored over 60 novels, novellas, and essay volumes, many anthologized in sets like the five-volume Fang Fang Collection (方方文集), underscoring her prolific output on marginal lives and historical reckonings.

Establishment as a Prominent Writer

Fang Fang solidified her position as a prominent figure in contemporary through a series of acclaimed works and major awards spanning from the to the . Her early Scenery (Fengjing), which explored urban and social landscapes, earned the National Outstanding Novella Prize in 1987, marking her initial breakthrough and gaining attention for its vivid realism. This success paved the way for a prolific output, including over 100 published works in novels, essays, and by the early , often focusing on the struggles of and societal shifts. A defining milestone occurred in 2010, when Fang Fang received the fifth Lu Xun Literary Prize—one of China's most esteemed honors—for her mid-length Qin Duan Kou (琴断口), which delved into personal and historical dislocations. The award, selected from over 1,000 entries and recognizing excellence in prose, underscored her mastery in portraying the and everyday resilience, earning praise for unflinching social observation. Subsequent recognitions, such as the 2011 Chinese Media Award for Author of the Year and a 2016 literary prize for Soft Burial (Ruan Mai), a depicting a family's amid 1950s land reforms, further entrenched her reputation for confronting China's traumatic past with causal depth and empirical detail. By the late , Fang Fang's body of work had positioned her as a leading voice in and national literary circles, with translations of select pieces introducing her realist style to international audiences and influencing discussions on modern Chinese identity. Her consistent critical reception highlighted a commitment to truth over ideological conformity, distinguishing her amid state-influenced publishing norms.

The Wuhan Diary

Context of the COVID-19 Outbreak in Wuhan

The earliest known cases of , caused by the virus, surfaced in , Province, , in 2019, with a cluster of pneumonia cases of unknown cause reported to local health authorities on December 29. On December 31, Chinese officials notified the (WHO) of the outbreak involving 44 cases, many linked to the , a site selling live animals including susceptible to coronaviruses. The market was shuttered on January 1, 2020, amid growing concerns, and subsequent environmental sampling detected RNA in animal stalls, supporting a potential zoonotic spillover from raccoon dogs or other intermediate hosts present there. However, not all early cases had direct market exposure, with epidemiological mapping showing some infections centered elsewhere in prior to the market's peak activity. Initial responses involved information suppression, exemplified by the reprimand of ophthalmologist , who on December 30 warned a private group of seven SARS-like cases confirmed via testing, only to be detained and forced to sign a statement accusing him of rumor-mongering.30382-2/fulltext) authorities initially denied of human-to-human , stating on January 14, 2020, that no clear cases existed outside close contacts, despite internal indicating otherwise by early January. This delay coincided with the travel peak, facilitating spread beyond , as retrospective studies estimated the virus had been circulating undetected for weeks, with an effective reproduction number (R0) around 2.5 in the initial phase. By January 23, 2020, with infections surging—over 500 confirmed cases in Province— implemented a stringent , confining 11 million residents, halting , and restricting outbound travel under penalty of fines or detention. The measures, enforced by checkpoints and digital surveillance, marked the first city-scale in modern history, lasting until April 8, 2020, for specifically. Amid these events, the outbreak's origins sparked ongoing debate: while market-linked animal reservoirs bolster zoonotic theories, the Institute of Virology's location approximately 12 kilometers from the market and its pre-2019 on coronaviruses, including gain-of-function experiments funded partly by , has sustained lab-incident hypotheses, with U.S. assessments noting concerns at the facility but no conclusive evidence of origin.

Diary Composition and Online Publication

Fang Fang commenced composing her diary on January 25, 2020, two days after the Chinese central government imposed a strict on on to contain the emerging outbreak. She posted the entries daily on , China's primary microblogging platform, initially to assure friends and family of her safety amid disrupted communications and the city's isolation. Each entry drew from her personal observations in , secondhand accounts from acquaintances in healthcare and affected communities, and limited public reports, capturing the immediacy of shortages, medical strains, and social disruptions without direct fieldwork due to mobility restrictions. The diary consisted of 60 sequential entries, published consecutively without interruption, reflecting the duration of the most acute phase of the . Fang Fang wrote in a straightforward, unadorned style, often concluding entries with appeals for transparency and aid, which amplified their resonance on where they garnered millions of views and interactions from domestic readers seeking unfiltered perspectives. Publication occurred in real-time, with posts appearing shortly after midnight local time to align with daily rhythms, enabling rapid dissemination despite platform pressures that later intensified. Fang Fang concluded the series with her 60th entry on March 25, 2020, shortly after initial announcements of easing restrictions, stating it marked the end of the format though she would persist in posting on . This online serialization preserved raw contemporaneous records, later archived by supporters amid deletion risks, distinguishing it from retrospective accounts by prioritizing temporal proximity to events over polished narrative.

Core Content and Themes

Fang Fang's Wuhan Diary consists of over 60 daily entries posted on from January 25, 2020, shortly after 's began, through early April 2020, capturing the personal and communal impacts of the outbreak in . The entries blend firsthand observations of quarantined life—such as challenges with procurement, reliance on online interactions for family and social connections, and the emotional strain of isolation—with relayed accounts from residents, including stories of medical shortages, overwhelmed hospitals, and deaths that received inadequate official acknowledgment. Fang Fang documents specific incidents, like the struggles of healthcare workers facing exhaustion and resource scarcity, and the quiet heroism of volunteers distributing aid, while noting her own health concerns, including amid supply disruptions. Central themes revolve around the human cost of bureaucratic opacity and delayed responses, with Fang Fang repeatedly urging accountability from local officials for early mismanagement, such as underreporting cases and suppressing whistleblowers like doctor , whose January 2020 warnings were dismissed. She critiques the gap between state portraying orderly control and the ground-level reality of , , and inequity, advocating for to prevent future failures without directly endorsing systemic overthrow. A motif of emerges, as Fang Fang positions her writing as "watching from below" to document citizen experiences overlooked by top-down narratives, fostering solidarity among readers through shared expressions of resilience and mutual support. Personal solace in routine domestic acts, like caring for her or reflecting on , underscores themes of individual endurance amid , while emphasizing the moral imperative to remember victims' stories for societal healing. The diary avoids sensationalism, grounding claims in verifiable local reports and personal networks rather than unconfirmed rumors, though some entries highlight unverified anecdotes of official negligence to illustrate broader patterns of distrust. This humanistic focus—prioritizing ordinary suffering over ideological polemic—drew praise for its restraint, yet also fueled later accusations of selective emphasis on negatives, ignoring eventual containment successes. Overall, the work serves as a chronicle of empathy-driven realism, calling for empirical reckoning with causal failures in crisis response to honor the afflicted.

Initial Domestic Reception

Positive Responses from Intellectuals

Professor He Bing of China University of Political Science and Law praised Fang Fang's on April 16, 2020, stating that residents and the Chinese public should thank her for embodying the traditional intellectual's , sense of responsibility, and home-country sentiment, which evoked national shame leading to self-improvement; he further argued that the and ensuing public would shape China's future prevention strategies. Hubei University Liang Yanping expressed support in a late-March 2020 WeChat post, describing the diary as "truly writing for people," a "pursuit of human conscience," and a "direct confrontation with life's existence," while denouncing its critics as "utterly shameful"; her comments prompted a university investigation into her conduct. Poet and Hainan University professor Wang Xiaoni also voiced public backing for Fang Fang, highlighting the diary's role in voicing collective anguish during the lockdown, though such endorsements drew official scrutiny amid rising nationalist backlash. These responses framed the work as fulfilling intellectuals' duty to document societal hardship and advocate for transparency in crisis.

Early Government and Media Reactions

In the initial weeks following the launch of Fang Fang's Wuhan Diary on January 25, 2020, Chinese state media outlets expressed positive sentiments toward her entries. The China News Service, a official government-affiliated agency, praised the posts for their "vivid descriptions and sincere emotions," portraying them as inspiring accounts of life under lockdown. This coverage aligned with the diary's early domestic popularity, as the entries amassed hundreds of millions of views on Weibo by early April 2020, reflecting broad public engagement without immediate suppression. Government censors permitted the diary's online dissemination during the lockdown's peak, allowing Fang Fang to post daily from , where her established status as a — with tens of millions of followers—facilitated spread. Authorities appeared tolerant of content that highlighted local mismanagement in while implicitly endorsing the central government's intervention, as Fang Fang's narratives focused on grassroots suffering and calls for accountability from provincial officials rather than systemic critique of . This phase of reception contrasted with later escalations, but early official media framing positioned the as a humanized supplement to state narratives on crisis response. By late February and early March 2020, as the entries continued, some intellectual and literary circles amplified praise, yet state tolerance began showing limits with selective removals of critical comments rather than the posts themselves, indicating a monitored but not yet prohibitive stance. Official reactions prioritized narrative control, avoiding outright endorsement while leveraging the diary's emotional appeal to bolster images of communal resilience under central leadership.

International Publication and Backlash

English Translation and Western Release

The English-language edition of Fang Fang's Wuhan Diary, translated by Michael Berry, a of at UCLA, was titled Wuhan Diary: Dispatches from a Quarantined City. Berry completed the translation during the early months of the global , drawing on Fang Fang's original posts from January 25 to March 30, 2020, to provide readers with unfiltered dispatches on the in . The book was acquired and published by HarperVia, an imprint of Publishers, with HarperCollins announcing the project in April 2020 for a late-June release in the United States and other Western markets. The Western release occurred amid heightened global interest in the origins and early handling of the outbreak, positioning the diary as one of the first extended firsthand accounts from ground zero available in English. HarperCollins marketed it as a "powerful first-person account" capturing the human toll, bureaucratic failures, and societal strains in quarantined Wuhan, with initial print and e-book formats distributed through major retailers like Amazon and Barnes & Noble. The publication faced swift opposition from Chinese state media and online nationalists even before its full release, who labeled the translation effort as an act of betrayal, prompting Fang Fang to defend the project publicly while emphasizing its basis in her lived experiences rather than fabrication. Subsequent editions, including a 2022 paperback, extended its availability in Western bookstores and libraries.

Amplification in Global Media

The English translation of Fang Fang's Wuhan Diary, rendered by UCLA professor Michael Berry and published by HarperVia on May 7, 2020, rapidly drew attention from outlets seeking firsthand accounts of the early outbreak. The book compiled her posts from January 25 to March 25, 2020, detailing shortages of medical supplies, overwhelmed hospitals, and public frustration with official responses, which contrasted sharply with state-controlled narratives in . Major publications amplified the diary through reviews and features that emphasized its role in exposing perceived government opacity. The published a review on May 15, 2020, portraying it as an "angry and eerie view from inside ," highlighting entries on , unreported deaths, and calls for accountability. Similarly, aired a segment on May 14, 2020, describing the diary as a significant document capturing the "trivial, tragic and absurd" aspects of Wuhan's 76-day from January 23 to April 8, 2020, and making it accessible to English-speaking audiences for the first time. The Washington Post featured Fang Fang's perspective in a , 2020, , where she discussed and during the crisis, further elevating the diary's profile amid ongoing global scrutiny of China's pandemic handling. BBC coverage extended the amplification, with a May 18, 2020, article framing the as a rare glimpse into Wuhan's isolation and mental toll, read by millions in before international dissemination. A follow-up on January 18, 2021, interviewed Fang Fang about the personal costs of her writings, reinforcing its status as a contentious of . noted on April 10, 2020, how announcements of Western translations fueled domestic backlash, yet this inadvertently boosted global interest by positioning the as evidence of suppressed truths. Such coverage, often in outlets with established -watch desks, contributed to the diary's reach beyond literary circles, influencing discussions on during the pandemic's first wave.

Controversies and Criticisms

Chinese Nationalist Accusations of Treason and Fabrication

Chinese nationalists intensified their criticism of Fang Fang following the 2020 announcement of an English translation deal for her Wuhan Diary, accusing her of for allegedly providing with ammunition to discredit China's response. Online commentators on platforms like labeled her a hanjian (traitor to the nation), claiming her diary betrayed the country by highlighting government shortcomings and civilian hardships at a time when emphasized its epidemic control successes. These treason charges framed Fang Fang's work as an act of national betrayal, with detractors arguing that translating and publishing abroad equated to "handing a sword" to anti-China forces abroad, thereby undermining domestic unity and international perceptions of China. Critics, including martial arts figures and social media influencers, escalated rhetoric by calling for her expulsion or punishment, portraying her appeals for transparency as opportunistic alignment with foreign interests over patriotic loyalty. In parallel, nationalists accused Fang Fang of fabrication, alleging she invented or exaggerated accounts of deaths, shortages, and official mismanagement to sensationalize the crisis for personal gain, such as literary fame or financial profit from Western publishers. Detractors claimed her entries relied on unverified rumors rather than , dismissing descriptions of overwhelmed hospitals and unreported fatalities as deliberate falsehoods designed to "spread China's shame" internationally. Such claims proliferated amid a broader nationalist narrative prioritizing positive portrayals of the outbreak response, with Fang Fang's critics demanding retractions or censorship of her online posts.

Claims of Selective Reporting and Unverified Claims

Critics of Fang Fang's Wuhan Diary have alleged selective reporting, claiming the entries disproportionately highlighted negative experiences in —such as shortages of medical supplies, bureaucratic delays, and personal hardships—while omitting accounts of , nationwide aid efforts, and eventual improvements in measures. For instance, state-affiliated media argued that the diary ignored "the efforts that local people made and the support extended across ," portraying an incomplete picture that amplified criticism of local authorities without balancing it against broader systemic responses. Such accusations positioned the work as a "political tract" favoring a of failure over comprehensive depiction, potentially influenced by the author's established literary themes of social critique. Additional claims focused on unverified assertions within the diary, where Fang Fang relayed second-hand anecdotes from acquaintances, including unconfirmed reports of overwhelmed hospitals and unreported deaths, without corroboration. Detractors, including online commentators and analysts, contended these elements relied on rather than , rendering parts speculative and prone to ; for example, early entries described dire conditions based on informal , which later faced amid official data showing contained outbreaks by March 2020. In response to specific fabrications circulated against her—such as false attributions of photographic —Fang Fang clarified that her posts were text-only, underscoring the 's subjective nature as personal reflection rather than journalistic investigation. These critiques, often amplified by nationalist voices on platforms like , highlighted perceived risks of disseminating unvetted information during a , though proponents viewed the as a raw, firsthand chronicle exempt from standards of .

Western Defenses and Counter-Criticisms

In response to Chinese nationalist accusations of treason and fabrication, Western reviewers emphasized the diary's authenticity as real-time posts composed between January 25 and March 25, 2020, during the height of Wuhan's , which captured contemporaneous events like the death of whistleblower on February 7, 2020, later verified by official investigations into early pandemic mishandling. These entries, initially garnering millions of views and positioning Fang Fang as a "national hero" for voicing public frustrations with and resource shortages, were not retrospective inventions but immediate reflections corroborated by the city's 76-day measures enforced from January 23, 2020. Critics of the diary's alleged selective reporting were countered by arguments that its focus on civilian hardships—such as shortages and supply disruptions—provided an unfiltered to state propaganda, offering "rare " amid suppressed narratives, rather than deliberate omissions driven by foreign agendas. review praised the work as an "important and dignified book" that delivered daily catharsis through details of life, from pet care to mental strain, while exposing governmental fumbling without descending into . Similarly, the , initiated by UCLA Michael Berry in 2020 as posts appeared, refuted claims of post-hoc manipulation or Western orchestration, underscoring the diary's organic emergence from Fang Fang's 3.8 million-follower platform. Defenses against treason charges highlighted the diary's alignment with internal rather than , with Fang Fang asserting in a interview that her aimed to aid China's improvement, creating "no tension between me and the country." Academic analyses positioned it as a moderate societal , balancing with Fang's ties, such as her membership in official writers' associations, against hyperbolic nationalist portrayals of her as an "enemy within." Supporters like Wuhan resident Yue Zhongyi argued that backlash misrepresented patriotism, ignoring widespread local agreement with her calls for accountability during the crisis that infected over 50,000 in province by March 2020. These counterarguments framed the diary's publication as a legitimate exercise in , not , amid China's opacity that delayed global alerts until January 20, 2020.

Awards and Recognition

Pre-Diary Literary Awards

Prior to the Wuhan Diary entries beginning in January 2020, Fang Fang (pen name of Wang Fang) had built a distinguished literary career spanning decades, with awards recognizing her novels, novellas, and depictions of social realities in . In 2010, she received the Literary Prize, a triennial award established in 1995 and regarded as one of 's highest honors for literary excellence, named after the influential early-20th-century writer . The following year, in 2011, Fang Fang was designated Author of the Year by the Chinese Media in for her historical Wuchang: A City , which recounts the 1926 battle in Wuchang during the . In 2016, her Soft Burial—exploring the human toll of the early 1950s Campaign through a family's tragic response—earned the Lu Yao , conferred for its historical and narrative depth.

Post-Diary Honors and Disputes

Following the English publication of Wuhan Diary on May 12, 2020, Fang Fang experienced limited formal honors directly tied to the work, amid a landscape dominated by domestic disputes. The diary's edition, narrated by , received the AudioFile Earphones Award in recognition of its effective delivery of the text's emotional depth and historical immediacy. Internationally, the book was praised by outlets such as for providing an unfiltered eyewitness account of the lockdown's human toll, contributing to Fang Fang's profile as a voice on and transparency. However, no major literary prizes were conferred post-publication, reflecting the government's shift from tolerance of her online posts to suppression. The primary disputes arose from Chinese nationalists and state-aligned media, who condemned the authorization of the English translation as tantamount to treason. Upon announcement of the deal in early April 2020, online campaigns accused Fang Fang of fabricating events to "smear" and supplying "ammunition" for Western narratives critical of the Communist Party's early response. Figures like , editor of the , warned that the diary would be weaponized by foreign forces, labeling supporters as "spiritual Americans." This backlash intensified after state media pivoted, censoring her account and portraying her as out of touch with national unity efforts. Fang Fang defended the translation as a factual record intended for global understanding, not political attack, emphasizing in a January 2021 interview that her intent was to document suffering without exaggeration. Defenders, including some intellectuals, argued the outrage revealed deeper societal issues with narrative control, but these voices faced similar . The episode highlighted tensions between individual testimony and state-sanctioned , with Fang Fang reporting personal threats and professional isolation persisting into 2021. Subsequent works by her, such as novels translated in 2025, encountered similar scrutiny, including blacklisting despite initial awards for unrelated .

Legacy and Broader Impact

Influence on Discussions of and

Fang Fang's Wuhan Diary, chronicling the initial weeks of the lockdown in from January 25 to March 30, 2020, directly confronted state-imposed information controls by documenting unfiltered civilian experiences, including shortages of medical supplies and official inaction, which were routinely censored on platforms like . Her entries, often deleted by censors shortly after posting, amassed millions of views before removal, amplifying awareness of how the prioritized narrative control over public disclosure during a crisis. The diary's suppression ignited domestic debates on the limits of expression under authoritarian rule, with supporters framing it as a vital act of bearing witness against opacity, while critics, mobilized via state-aligned campaigns, accused Fang of for allegedly fabricating distress to undermine national unity. This polarization revealed the mechanics of "voluntary propaganda," where online nationalists echoed official lines to discredit dissenting voices, thereby reinforcing as a tool for maintaining regime legitimacy amid verifiable failures in early outbreak management. Internationally, the English translation of the diary, released on June 2, 2020, by Harper Via, contributed to global scrutiny of China's information ecosystem, underscoring how withheld data—such as of early whistleblowers—delayed worldwide and eroded trust in state-reported statistics. It prompted analyses of censorship's role in pandemics, with Fang's appeals for governmental highlighting causal links between suppressed and amplified human suffering, as evidenced by her records of overwhelmed hospitals and unreported deaths. Scholars and outlets noted its function in countering , fostering discourse on citizen journalism's necessity in regimes where official channels prioritize propaganda over empirical reporting. The controversy surrounding the diary's Western publication further exemplified transparency deficits, as Fang faced doxxing and from ultranationalists who viewed her work as ammunition for foreign critics, yet it enduringly modeled how personal narratives can pierce state veils, influencing ongoing calls for archival preservation of censored materials to ensure historical accountability. In 2021 interviews, Fang emphasized the diary's role in documenting "what really happened" despite risks, a stance that continues to inform critiques of China's post-pandemic media controls.

Ongoing Debates in Chinese Society

Fang Fang's Wuhan Diary continues to polarize Chinese society, with debates centering on whether personal critiques of inaction during the outbreak constitute constructive accountability or unpatriotic amplification of national vulnerabilities. Initial acclaim on platforms like , where entries amassed over 380 million views by April 2020, shifted to backlash as nationalists accused her of selective negativity that aided foreign adversaries, dubbing the work a "knife handed to foreigners." This framing persists in , where analyses reveal state-aligned users employing voluntary to portray the diary as biased toward over , thereby reinforcing narratives of unified national strength amid . Such criticisms highlight a broader tension between individual testimony and collective harmony, often amplified by official media cautioning against "exposing the dark side" at the expense of morale. Defenders, including Fang Fang herself, maintain that the diary's unvarnished depictions of delayed aid, medical shortages, and opaque information flows—drawn from daily posts between January 25 and April 1, —serve as vital checks against systemic failures, urging multifaceted recording to prevent historical erasure. In 2025 interviews, she emphasized that suppressing such accounts, as with the blacklisting of her novel Soft Burial for its unflinching portrayal of Land Reform-era traumas, reflects official guilt rather than merit, stifling the diverse perspectives needed for truthful . These views resonate in intellectual discussions on memory preservation, where her oeuvre—from the diary to works like The Running Flame (2025)—challenges societal tendencies toward amnesia, positioning personal narratives as antidotes to state-curated forgetting of events like the land reforms or the lockdowns. As of 2025, these debates underscore unresolved questions about censorship's role in shaping public memory, with Wuhan's post-lockdown reticence—marked by a societal pivot to "pre-" and "post-pandemic" temporal divides—contrasting ongoing literary engagements that probe trauma's long-term societal imprints. While nationalist sentiments dominate online spheres, advocating restraint to safeguard China's global image, proponents of transparency argue that unfiltered documentation fosters resilience, evidenced by Fang Fang's calls for widespread individual chronicling to counter monolithic official accounts. This schism reflects deeper causal dynamics in China's , where empirical critiques risk vilification as disloyalty, yet persist in underscoring the costs of opacity during existential threats like pandemics.

References

  1. [1]
    Fang Fang - Paper Republic – Chinese Literature in Translation
    Fang Fang is a poet and prolific fiction writer. She was born into a Nanjing literati family in 1955. When she was two, the family moved to Wuhan.
  2. [2]
    Fang Fang | Encyclopedia.com
    FANG FANG. Pseudonym for Wang Fang. Nationality: Chinese. Born: Wang Fang in Nanjing, China, 1955. Education: Wuhan University, beginning 1978, graduated.
  3. [3]
    Fang Fang: The Wuhan writer whose virus diary angered China - BBC
    May 18, 2020 · Fang Fang wrote about everything from the challenges of daily life to the mental impact of isolation.
  4. [4]
    Wuhan Diary - Fang Fang - Harper Academic
    As Fang Fang documents the beginning of the global health crisis in real time, we are able to identify patterns and mistakes that many of the countries dealing ...
  5. [5]
    Chinese writer faces online backlash over Wuhan lockdown diary
    Apr 10, 2020 · For publishing in the western languages, Fang Fang has been accused of helping foreign countries attack China, giving them “a giant sword”.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  6. [6]
    Fang Fang, chronicler of Wuhan lockdowns, now a virtual prisoner
    Dec 17, 2022 · Fang Fang, 67, said she is feeling "somewhat depressed" after facing pressure from Chinese authorities, who have banned her work.Missing: biography | Show results with:biography<|separator|>
  7. [7]
    Fang Fang Books & Biography
    One of contemporary China's most celebrated writers, Fang Fang was born into an intellectual family in Nanjing in 1955, and spent most of her childhood in ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  8. [8]
    Fang Fang - China Unofficial Archives
    Fang Fang (born 1955), is the pen name of Wang Fang, a Wuhan-based author who came to International attention through her portrayal of land reform in the ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  9. [9]
    She Kept a Diary of China's Epidemic. Now She Faces a Political ...
    Apr 17, 2020 · Born in 1955 in Nanjing, Fang Fang moved to the city when she was 2 years old, and has lived there for most of her life. Almost immediately, her ...Missing: childhood | Show results with:childhood
  10. [10]
    Two months into coronavirus lockdown, her online diary is a window ...
    Mar 21, 2020 · Fang Fang is a pen name for Wang Fang, originally from Nanjing but raised in Wuhan from age 2. She lived 30 years south of the Yangtze River ...
  11. [11]
    Fang Fang, periscope on history | MCLC Resource Center - U.OSU
    Oct 4, 2016 · Born as Wu Fang in Nanjing, Jiangsu province, in 1955, she moved with the family to Wuhan, Hubei province, when she was 2, beginning a lifelong ...Missing: Wang | Show results with:Wang
  12. [12]
    Fang Fang: The 'Conscience of Wuhan' Amid Coronavirus Quarantine
    Mar 23, 2020 · Fang Fang is definitely not the most famous living writer in China ... Wuhan University to study literature in her early 20s in the 1970s.
  13. [13]
    [PDF] COVID-19, China and Anatomy of Fang Fang Phenomenon
    May 5, 2020 · Wang Fang, her real name, is an acclained, award-winning writer who has published widely in different genres. Her 60 days diary, called Fang ...
  14. [14]
    Fang Fang - China Digital Space
    Born in 1955, Fang Fang obtained her bachelor's degree in Chinese from Wuhan University. She started writing poetry in the early 1980s. Her breakout novella ...
  15. [15]
  16. [16]
    Fang Fang, the conscience of Wuhan | MCLC Resource Center
    Apr 9, 2020 · ... Wuhan University to study literature in her early 20s in the 1970s. Fang Fang's early works, mostly short stories, concentrated mainly on ...
  17. [17]
    Fang Fang (方方 - chinese-shortstories.com
    Sa première nouvelle est publiée en 1982, dans la revue « Les arts et lettres du Yangzi » (《长江文艺》). Elle s'intitule « Dans le convoi » (《大篷车上》) et ...
  18. [18]
    The Rite of Passage and Digital Mourning in Fang Fang's Wuhan ...
    After attending Wuhan University in 1978 to study Chinese, she began to write poetry in 1982 and launched her first novel Da Peng Che Shang (大篷车上). It ...
  19. [19]
    方方:我不是乖巧的人也不会成为乖巧的作家 - 中国新闻网
    Aug 6, 2013 · 《风景》获全国优秀中篇小说奖;短篇小说《十八岁进行曲》、中篇小说《桃花灿烂》、短篇小说《纸婚年》、中篇小说《埋伏》、《过程》、《在我的开始是 ...
  20. [20]
    遭左派围攻,作家方方谈《软埋》的“软埋” - 纽约时报中文网
    Jun 27, 2017 · 方方,原名汪芳,当代著名作家,1987年发表的中篇小说《风景》被视为新写实主义开山之作,代表作有《祖父在父亲心中》、《乌泥湖年谱》。现为湖北省 ...
  21. [21]
    Fang Fang – Sinoist Books
    Fang Fang was born in Nanjing in 1955, and grew up in the city of Wuhan. She is the author of a number of novels including The Chronicle of Wuni Lake and ...
  22. [22]
    'Wuhan Diary' author Fang Fang has 2 new books translated ... - NPR
    Jan 24, 2025 · Chinese author Fang Fang posted notes online while being quarantined in Wuhan. They became Wuhan Diary. She talks with us about two more of ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins<|separator|>
  23. [23]
    方方车延高获鲁迅文学奖《芳草》刊载的两部作品上榜
    Oct 20, 2010 · 楚天都市报讯(记者范宁)昨晚,第五届鲁迅文学奖30部获奖作品名单揭晓。我省作家方方的中篇小说《琴断口》,诗人车延高的诗集《向往温暖》,以及文学杂志《芳 ...
  24. [24]
    Fang Fang's Wuhan diaries are a personal account of shared memory
    May 18, 2020 · Born in 1955, Fang has a long and respected career as a writer of poems, novels and novellas. She won the prestigious Lu Xun Literary Prize in ...Missing: awards | Show results with:awards
  25. [25]
    COVID-19 pandemic in China: Context, experience and lessons - PMC
    The first cluster of COVID-19 cases was reported in Wuhan, China on December 29th, 2019. Since then, China has experienced a pandemic of COVID-19. Objective ...
  26. [26]
    Archived: WHO Timeline - COVID-19
    Apr 27, 2020 · 31 Dec 2019China reported a cluster of cases of in Wuhan, Hubei Province. A novel coronavirus was eventually identified.1 January 2020WHO ...
  27. [27]
    CDC Museum COVID-19 Timeline
    January 23, 2020. Wuhan, China— a city of 11 million people— is placed under lockdown due to the 2019 Novel Coronavirus outbreak.
  28. [28]
    SARS-CoV-2 infection at the Huanan seafood market - PMC
    Among the 53 early official COVID-19 cases with direct exposure to the Huanan market, 30 were vendors at fixed stalls in the market, 12 were important ...
  29. [29]
    COVID pandemic started in Wuhan market animals after all ... - Nature
    Sep 20, 2024 · Many of the earliest cases of COVID-19 were linked to the city's Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, and so it became a focus in the search for the ...
  30. [30]
    The Chinese doctor who tried to warn others about coronavirus - BBC
    Feb 6, 2020 · On 30 December he sent a message to fellow doctors in a chat group warning them about the outbreak and advising they wear protective clothing ...
  31. [31]
    The outbreak of COVID-19: An overview - PMC - NIH
    The initial outbreak was reported in the market in December 2019 and involved about 66% of the staff there. The market was shut down on January 1, 2020, after ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  32. [32]
    Timeline: China's COVID-19 outbreak and lockdown of Wuhan
    The Chinese city of Wuhan is looking back on a year since it was placed under a 76-day lockdown beginning Jan. 23, 2020.
  33. [33]
    Fact Sheet: Activity at the Wuhan Institute of Virology - state.gov
    Jan 15, 2021 · The U.S. government does not know exactly where, when, or how the COVID-19 virus—known as SARS-CoV-2—was transmitted initially to humans. We ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Report-on-Potential-Links-Between-the-Wuhan-Institute-of-Virology ...
    Jun 23, 2023 · Variations in IC analytic views on the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic largely stem from differences in how agencies weigh intelligence ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  35. [35]
    'Wuhan Diary' Brings Account Of China's Coronavirus Outbreak To ...
    May 14, 2020 · Fang Fang penned her first entry on January 25, two days after the city was suddenly sealed off from the rest of China, to let friends and ...
  36. [36]
    Wuhan Diary: Dispatches from a Quarantined City - Michael Berry
    On January 25, 2020, after the central government imposed a lockdown in Wuhan, acclaimed Chinese writer Fang Fang began publishing an online diary. In the days ...<|separator|>
  37. [37]
    'Wuhan Diary' Offers an Angry and Eerie View From Inside Quarantine
    May 15, 2020 · In her diary, Fang Fang wrote about quotidian things: food, pets, sleep, friends. She talked about weeping, and about her country's mental ...
  38. [38]
    Review of Fang Fang (2020). Wuhan Diary: Dispatches from a ... - NIH
    Jul 23, 2020 · Another accused Fang of making money off Wuhan's nearly 4000 virus victims, writing: 'How much did you sell the diary for?' (Agence France ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  39. [39]
    First Look as Future Look: The Documentary and the Predictive in ...
    In Wuhan Diary, Fang Fang raged against those officials who suppressed information about the virus early on, public security personnel who muzzled the ...
  40. [40]
    Wuhan Diary Summary of Key Ideas and Review | Fang Fang - Blinkist
    Rating 3.9 (58) Wuhan Diary by Fang Fang is a firsthand account of life in Wuhan during the COVID-19 pandemic. The author writes about her experiences, thoughts, and emotions.
  41. [41]
    Wuhan Diary: Dispatches from a Quarantined City - U.OSU
    Aug 15, 2020 · One major theme in the diary is indeed Fang Fang's persistent appeals for accountability. To those irresponsible and incompetent government ...Missing: core | Show results with:core
  42. [42]
    How Did China Beat Its Covid Crisis? | Ian Johnson
    Nov 5, 2020 · Fang Fang's diary is nuanced, careful, and soft. It is the work of someone not trying to challenge the system but simply trying to express ...Missing: excerpts | Show results with:excerpts
  43. [43]
    Corona crisis chronicle: Fang Fang's Wuhan Diary (2020) as an act ...
    The authors conducted a thematic analysis (TA) of Wuhan Diary, in which we decided to focus on the aspects of sousveillance and solidarity. For the purposes ...
  44. [44]
    方方日记:肺炎疫情下中国人的“国家利益”与个人自由- BBC News 中文
    Apr 16, 2020 · “武汉人民应当感谢她,全国人民也应当感谢她。在她的身上,我们看到传统知识分子的家国情怀与责任担当。她让我们惭愧,并在惭愧中自新,”他在社交媒体 ...Missing: 正面 | Show results with:正面
  45. [45]
    支持武汉作家方方的知识分子持续受到当局压力 - 美国之音
    May 3, 2020 · 梁艳萍据报3月底在微信上发文,称方方的日记是“真正为人的写作”,是“人性良知的追问”,是“直面人生的实存”,同时也批判攻击方方的网友“可耻之极”。文章被方方 ...Missing: 正面 | Show results with:正面
  46. [46]
    教授力挺方方被查“舆论场在退化”
    Apr 27, 2020 · 湖北大学教授梁艳萍因为在社交媒体上发文,力挺方方日记,而被校方专案调查。与此同时,有五毛背景的网络舆论对于方方和梁艳萍仍在追剿。有评论认为,这反映出 ...
  47. [47]
    柴静on X: "摘录:方方家人的隐私被公布,财产被调查。公开支持她的 ...
    Jan 28, 2024 · 摘录:方方家人的隐私被公布,财产被调查。公开支持她的湖北大学梁艳萍教授,海南大学王小妮教授,哈尔滨师范大学于琳琦老师都被翻出过往的“不当言论”, ...
  48. [48]
    Fang Fang: Author vilified for Wuhan Diary speaks out a year on - BBC
    Jan 18, 2021 · Wuhan writer Fang Fang talks about the price she has had to pay for her controversial lockdown diaries.Missing: influences | Show results with:influences
  49. [49]
    'Wuhan Diary': 60 days in a locked-down city – DW – 06/16/2020
    Jun 16, 2020 · A book by Chinese author Fang Fang gains in relevance. She chronicled her life during the Wuhan lockdown, issuing praise for front-line workers and criticism ...Missing: initial domestic
  50. [50]
    China Covid-19: How state media and censorship took on coronavirus
    Dec 28, 2020 · Chinese author Fang Fang received widespread praise earlier in the year for documenting her life in Wuhan, and providing a rare glimpse into ...
  51. [51]
    Fang Fang: Literary Voice of Dissent Amid China's Coronavirus ...
    Mar 31, 2020 · Fang Fang's early works, mostly short stories, concentrated mainly on poor Wuhanese – from urban factory workers to the city's middle-class ...Missing: formative | Show results with:formative
  52. [52]
    Translating Fang Fang's Wuhan Diary amid the Covid-19 Pandemic
    Mar 2, 2021 · He is also an award-winning English translator of several Chinese literary works, including Yu Hua's To Live (2003), Wang Anyi's The Song of ...
  53. [53]
    Fang Fang's Wuhan Diary translations | MCLC Resource Center
    Apr 14, 2020 · It was bad enough that author Fang Fang (方方) has regularly posted her popular Wuhan Diary (武汉日记) on China's social media, offering her ...
  54. [54]
    Wuhan Diary - HarperCollins Publishers
    In stock Free delivery over $35On January 25, 2020, after the central government imposed a lockdown in Wuhan, acclaimed Chinese writer Fang Fang began publishing an online diary.
  55. [55]
    Translation: Backlash to Wuhan Diary "Reveals a Serious Problem ...
    Apr 21, 2020 · This month, it was announced that Fang Fang's diary would be translated into English by Michael Berry and published by Harper Collins. This news ...
  56. [56]
    Wuhan Diary: Dispatches from a Quarantined City - Amazon.com
    30-day returnsFrom one of China's most acclaimed and decorated writers comes a powerful first-person account of life in Wuhan during the COVID-19 outbreak.
  57. [57]
    A Wuhan writer, on the ground at the center of the outbreak
    Jul 2, 2020 · Fang Fang describes battling censorship and misinformation about the virus in her Chinese city.Missing: BBC | Show results with:BBC
  58. [58]
    Chinese writer hit by nationalist backlash over diary about Wuhan ...
    Apr 18, 2020 · Award-winning novelist and poet Fang Fang accused of fuelling Western criticisms of China's handling of the Covid-19 outbreak.Missing: literary | Show results with:literary
  59. [59]
    Coronavirus in China: Wuhan's chronicler of daily lies branded a ...
    Apr 12, 2020 · The deal has prompted a torrent of ugly abuse from nationalist Chinese critics, accusing her of treachery and lies at a time when Beijing is ...
  60. [60]
    From “Voice of the People” to “Traitor of China” - What's on Weibo
    May 16, 2020 · Wuhan Diary (武汉日记[1]) is written by the 65-year-old acclaimed Chinese author Wang Fang, better known as Fang Fang (方方). ... 风景, 1987). She ...
  61. [61]
    Coronavirus: Chinese author Fang Fang targeted over Wuhan Diary
    May 18, 2020 · A Chinese author has been labelled a traitor over her diary from within Wuhan which is due to be published in English this month.
  62. [62]
    COVID-19 and the Wuhan Diary –how does the overseas Chinese ...
    Jan 8, 2022 · Fang Fang's identity (insider) and motivation (helping to improve) were more positively perceived at the beginning. A noticeable turning point ...
  63. [63]
    Xu Xiaodong slams tai chi master for threatening Wuhan Diary author
    Apr 21, 2020 · Lei Lei joined in with the criticism, calling Fang a “Chinese traitor”. In the diary, Fang describes the difficulties of life in quarantine, as ...Missing: treason | Show results with:treason
  64. [64]
    Author of 'Wuhan Diary' now finds herself muzzled in China
    Dec 15, 2020 · Fang Fang vividly illustrated her daily activities and feelings about society while the city in central Hubei province was cut off from the ...
  65. [65]
    Killing Memories | Madeleine Thien | The New York Review of Books
    May 15, 2025 · Fang Fang's lockdown diary had initially been read as a product of that tradition, an empathetic and frank chronicle of a shared experience. On ...Missing: influences | Show results with:influences
  66. [66]
    Book Review: China's Most Controversial Writer (And Its Lessons ...
    May 28, 2020 · After all the controversy and accusations of treason, the actual text is extremely underwhelming. ... Fang Fang's Wuhan Diary is thus ...
  67. [67]
    Fang Fang's Diary: An Indefensible Mistake - Taylor & Francis Online
    The diary of the Chinese writer Fang Fang appears as a political tract based on unverified and one-sided materials.Missing: selective | Show results with:selective
  68. [68]
    Fang Fang's Diary: An Indefensible Mistake - ResearchGate
    Against this background, the diary of the Chinese writer Fang Fang appears as a political tract based on unverified and one-sided materials. As the present ...
  69. [69]
    武汉殡仪馆无主手机遍地?假的!-观察者网 - guancha.cn
    Feb 17, 2020 · 2月15日凌晨1:39,作家方方称,“我的封城日记是纯文字记录,从未发过任何照片,也未发过手机图片。”她表示,这是“造谣构陷”,对她本人造成严重伤害 ...
  70. [70]
    Review | Wuhan Diary: Chinese writer Fang Fang's nuanced ...
    Jul 16, 2020 · Chinese writer Fang Fang documents the confusing, conflicting and distressing circumstances of a city under quarantine in real time, ...Missing: domestic reception
  71. [71]
    Blog: Wuhan Diary Author — There Is No Tension Between Me and ...
    Apr 12, 2020 · ... treason is “childish.” “There's no tension between me and the country,” she said. Below is a translation of the interview, edited for length ...Missing: accusations | Show results with:accusations
  72. [72]
    “Soft Burial” banned | MCLC Resource Center - U.OSU
    Jun 16, 2017 · “Soft Burial,” originally published in 2016, won the 2016 Luyao Literature Award, a tribute to its historical realism. Fang Fang explained the ...
  73. [73]
    The Chinese Communist Party's Ultimate Taboo - The Atlantic
    Mar 27, 2025 · Fang Fang's newly translated novel uncovers the brutal, buried history of land reform in China.<|separator|>
  74. [74]
    WUHAN DIARY by Fang Fang Michael Berry Trans
    WUHAN DIARY Dispatches from a Quarantined City. Earphones Award Winner. by Fang Fang, Michael Berry [Trans.] ... A.D.M. Winner of AudioFile Earphones Award ...
  75. [75]
    5 years after Fang Fang recorded Wuhan lockdown, 2 of her books ...
    Jan 24, 2025 · The acclaimed author Fang Fang began jotting down notes from quarantine and posting them online.
  76. [76]
    A diarist in Wuhan faces fury for sharing her story with the West
    Apr 16, 2020 · Supporters hastened to copy and share each new posting before it was deleted by censors. Fans praised the authenticity of Fang Fang's accounts ...Missing: transparency | Show results with:transparency
  77. [77]
    Weibo Criticism of Fang Fang's Wuhan Lockdown Diary as an ...
    Nov 20, 2024 · This paper examines the discourse practices of voluntary propaganda on social media in response to Fang Fang's Wuhan Lockdown Diary during the COVID-19 ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  78. [78]
    Censorship in China Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic | The Daily Nexus
    Jul 19, 2020 · Her Wuhan Diary has become vital reading for millions of Chinese citizens seeking an unbiased account of their untold sufferings during the ...Missing: themes | Show results with:themes
  79. [79]
    [PDF] The Communicative and Affective Labor of Public Pandemic Diaries
    Oct 17, 2022 · This article studies the immaterial labor of Fang Fang's Wuhan diary about the Wuhan. COVID-19 lockdown time period, Jan 23 to Apr 8, ...
  80. [80]
    Chinese writer Fang Fang faces backlash and death threats for ...
    Apr 23, 2020 · An article in the state-run newspaper said that to many Chinese people, the book is “biased and only exposes the dark side in Wuhan”. Publishers ...Missing: Chi defenses
  81. [81]
    [EXCLUSIVE] “As If Present; As If Absent: Fang Fang's Wuhan ... - Cha
    Aug 12, 2025 · As Wuhan became the first city in the world to enter lockdown, Fang Fang began composing and posting a daily record of her thoughts and ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography