Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Fenestron

A Fenestron is a trademarked shrouded system for helicopters, functioning as a integrated into the of the tail boom to provide antitorque control and counteract the main rotor's torque effect. Invented by engineers Paul Fabre and René Mouille at , it first flew on April 12, 1968, aboard the second prototype of the light helicopter, with certification achieved in 1972. Developed primarily for enhanced , the Fenestron encloses the rotating blades within a protective duct, shielding ground personnel from potential strikes and safeguarding the blades from , which significantly reduces accident risks compared to exposed conventional tail rotors. Its design also offers aerodynamic benefits, including improved thrust efficiency in forward flight, lower power consumption, and reduced noise levels through features like uneven blade spacing in later generations. Over five decades, the technology has evolved through multiple generations: the second-generation all-composite version, introduced in the late 1970s with a 1.10-meter for the series (which has amassed over 1.8 million flight hours with the U.S. Coast Guard as of 2024), the third-generation in 1994 featuring noise-reducing blade modulation on the H135, and the latest iteration on the H160 with a 1.20-meter and 12-degree cant for superior and performance. As of 2025, Fenestron-equipped helicopters from , such as the , (now H155), H130, H135, H145, and H160, are widely used in , , and medical roles for their maneuverability, payload capacity, and operational safety.

Overview and Design

Definition and Purpose

The Fenestron is an enclosed, system developed by —formerly known as , , and Eurocopter—to counteract the torque generated by a helicopter's main rotor. This design integrates the rotor blades within a protective shroud, distinguishing it from traditional exposed s. The primary purpose of the Fenestron is to deliver anti-torque control, maintaining and providing yaw authority during flight, thereby enabling pilots to maneuver the effectively. As an alternative to conventional open tail rotors, it enhances overall by shielding the rotating components and reducing vulnerability to external hazards. In its basic operational concept, the Fenestron employs a multi-bladed rotor enclosed in a cylindrical shroud positioned at the tail boom's end, with variable pitch mechanisms allowing for adjustable thrust and control. Fenestron is a registered trademark of , underscoring its proprietary development and application across their lineup. It was first implemented on the helicopter prototype in 1968.

Key Design Elements

The Fenestron features an enclosed rotor system housed within a cylindrical duct or shroud that is seamlessly integrated into the helicopter's tail boom or vertical fin, forming a protective and aerodynamically efficient structure. This enclosure minimizes exposure risks and reduces tip losses by containing the blades within a short annular passage, often with a rounded inlet lip and divergent diffuser section to optimize airflow entry and exit. Stator vanes positioned downstream of the rotor guide the exiting flow, straightening it to enhance thrust generation and overall system efficiency. Blade configuration in the Fenestron typically involves multiple slender blades—ranging from seven to eighteen in number—arranged in a multi-bladed with straight or subtly curved profiles, such as those based on NACA 63A airfoils. To suppress harmonic noise, later designs incorporate uneven angular spacing that distributes blade passages irregularly, thereby modulating acoustic frequencies and reducing tonal components. These blades are mounted on a central with precision-forged horns for pitch variation, ensuring balanced rotation within the confined duct. Materials for Fenestron components have evolved from early light alloy constructions, such as die-forged aluminum for blades and tie-bars, to advanced composites in contemporary models. Composite blades, often made from thermoset carbon fiber, offer significant weight savings while providing superior fatigue resistance and corrosion protection, particularly in demanding operational environments. Integration of the Fenestron emphasizes robust mechanical linkages, with pitch control managed via a mechanism or servo actuators that engage blade horns through a spider assembly on self-lubricating bearings, allowing collective and cyclic adjustments for torque counteraction. The duct itself may incorporate asymmetric shaping or canting, such as a 12° inclination relative to the tail boom in designs like the H160, to enable inherent and improve low-speed stability without additional control surfaces. Recent optimizations, as seen in the 2025-launched H140, include integration with a T-shaped tail boom for further .

Historical Development

Origins and Early Prototypes

The concept of a shrouded , foundational to the Fenestron, was first patented in May 1943 by the Glaswegian engineering firm G. & J. Weir Ltd. in the , with the design attributed to engineer C.G. Pullin. This early described a system intended for torque compensation in , predating widespread development but envisioning enclosed rotors to enhance efficiency and protection. Following , interest in ducted designs waned amid rapid advances in conventional technology, but the concept was revived by in the 1950s and 1960s amid efforts to innovate light helicopters for military and civilian use. Drawing from experience with models like the Sud-Ouest Djinn (a tip-jet powered from 1953) and the Alouette series (turbine-powered light helicopters entering service in the late 1950s), engineers Paul Fabre and René Mouille refined the idea into the Fenestron—a trademarked enclosed multi-blade fan—for improved safety and reduced acoustic signature. The specific Fenestron design was patented in 1966, with initial testing of a scaled model commencing in April 1967 at 's Marignane facility. The first integration of a Fenestron prototype occurred on the second SA 340 demonstrator, leading to its maiden flight on April 12, 1968, piloted by Jean Boulet from , —this marked the inaugural operational test of a Fenestron-equipped . Early static rig tests preceded this, validating basic anti-torque performance. Aerodynamic testing during these prototype phases uncovered challenges, including suboptimal duct due to excessive tip clearance and non-ideal angles, which imposed power penalties in forward flight, and from fan-induced and structural stresses reaching up to 1450 at the root. These issues were iteratively addressed through design refinements in the prototypes, such as optimizing vanes and spacing, informed by comparisons to earlier light variants like the Alouette II for acoustic and handling baselines.

Evolution and Generations

The Fenestron's evolution began with its first generation in the late 1960s and 1970s, featuring metal blades evenly spaced around the hub for basic enclosure and enhanced ground safety on early production models. Introduced on the prototype in 1968 and certified in 1972, this design typically incorporated 13 blades and was integrated into the single-engine by the same year, prioritizing structural simplicity and protection against during operations. The second generation emerged in the late , marking a shift to all-composite materials that allowed for a 20% increase in diameter to 1.10 meters, improving maneuverability and anti-torque efficiency on the updated series. This advancement supported demanding roles such as U.S. missions, accumulating over 1.5 million flight hours while maintaining the core safety benefits of the shrouded design. By the 1980s, these composite blades enabled broader adoption across ' light and medium models, setting the stage for further acoustic optimizations. Entering the third generation in the , the Fenestron incorporated uneven blade spacing to distribute acoustic energy more evenly, reducing tonal noise on models like the EC135 introduced in and subsequent variants such as the EC145 T2 (first flight in 2010). This configuration, often with 10 blades, achieved noise reductions of approximately 5 dB compared to prior even-spaced designs, enhancing suitability for urban and noise-sensitive environments; the EC145 further refined this with optimized positioning and integrated blade-strap construction for improved durability and hover performance. These changes reflected ongoing into and materials, drawing from in-service data to balance efficiency and sound levels. The fourth generation arrived in the with the H160, featuring a 10-blade Fenestron with a 1.20-meter canted at 12 degrees to boost low-speed stability, payload capacity, and overall anti-torque authority. Certified in 2020 with updates through 2025 emphasizing compliance, this design cuts perceived noise by up to 50% relative to conventional tail rotors through advanced duct shaping and blade profiling, aligning with stricter environmental standards.

Technical Aspects

Operation and Mechanics

The Fenestron operates as a ducted that counters the produced by the main through the generation of directed opposite to the torque reaction. This is primarily achieved by collectively adjusting the of the multi-bladed within the duct, which increases the blades' to produce the required anti-torque force. Differential cyclic changes on individual blades further enable precise yaw by varying direction. The rotor's blades, often featuring uneven circumferential spacing to mitigate noise, rotate at high speeds inside the shroud to maintain this balance. Airflow dynamics in the Fenestron are governed by the enclosing duct, which accelerates the intake and exhaust air per theory, thereby enhancing thrust efficiency compared to open s by suppressing tip vortices and reducing energy losses. Fixed vanes positioned downstream of the straighten the swirling exhaust , directing it rearward to augment yaw and improve . This enclosed airflow path minimizes and effects, particularly at low speeds. The systems of the Fenestron integrate seamlessly with the helicopter's overall , where antitorque pedals mechanically link to a change mechanism—often a assembly—that adjusts blade angles in response to pilot inputs for heading maintenance. In modern implementations, actuators within the Fenestron structure connect to the system, enabling automatic yaw stabilization and coordination with and cyclic inputs during powered changes.Family-Draft%20Report%2029%2004%2014%20-%20draft.pdf) During maneuvering, the Fenestron supports stable hovering by providing consistent anti-torque thrust less affected by ground effect, as the duct shields the from recirculating . In forward flight, the directed exhaust contributes to yaw control amid varying aerodynamic loads, while sideward movements benefit from the system's rapid pitch response for precise heading adjustments. This configuration ensures reliable operation across flight regimes without exposing the to external hazards.

Specifications and Performance

Fenestron systems typically feature diameters ranging from 0.7 to 1.2 meters, scaled to the size of the host . For instance, the H160 employs a 1.20-meter diameter Fenestron, the largest in production, while smaller models like the EC 135 use a 1.00-meter variant. Blade counts vary between 7 and 13 across implementations, with the utilizing 7 blades and certain configurations incorporating 13 for optimized distribution. Rotational speeds generally fall between 3,000 and 6,000 RPM to achieve sufficient thrust from the smaller blade chords; examples include approximately 3,150 RPM in mid-sized helicopters and up to 5,880 RPM in tested prototypes. Power absorption scales with helicopter gross weight, typically 10-50 kW, representing 1-5% of total engine output; measurements on scaled models show 3-4 kW at low thrust conditions, while full-scale systems on light helicopters absorb around 15-25 kW during hover. Performance metrics highlight the Fenestron's efficiency trade-offs compared to open tail rotors. In cruise flight, the shrouded design yields a thrust-to-power ratio approximately 20% higher than conventional open rotors due to reduced tip losses and profile drag, enabling better antitorque authority at high speeds. However, in hover, it incurs a 5-10% power penalty from duct-induced drag, increasing required input for equivalent thrust. Noise levels in modern iterations range from 75-85 dB(A) at 100 meters during flyover, significantly lower than the 90+ dB(A) of traditional tail rotors, attributed to uneven blade spacing and shroud attenuation that disperses tonal harmonics. Efficiency can be analyzed using actuator disk adapted for ducted fans, where ideal is given by T = 2 \rho A v^2 with \rho as air , A as duct cross-sectional area, and v as induced velocity at the disk. Fenestron-specific modifications account for shroud effects, including enhanced mass flow (boosting by up to 10-15% via lip suction) and added penalties (reducing ideal efficiency by 5-8% in static conditions), as derived from extensions for enclosed rotors. Recent advancements in the H160, which received EASA in 2020, FAA in 2023, and entered service with first deliveries in late 2021; as of 2025, it is in full production, integrate composite materials in the Fenestron shroud and blades, achieving approximately 20% weight reduction over metallic predecessors in equivalent systems while maintaining structural integrity. This contributes to overall efficiency gains, with the canted Fenestron design providing supplementary vertical lift equivalent to 40 kg of payload.

Advantages and Limitations

Benefits

The Fenestron's enclosed design significantly enhances safety by preventing blade strikes and (FOD), as the shroud protects the rotor blades from impacts with ground personnel, obstacles, or during operations. This has demonstrated superior , with no from wood sticks smaller than 15 mm and only minor unbalance from those up to 35 mm, compared to conventional exposed tail rotors that are more vulnerable to such incidents. Fleet data from Fenestron-equipped helicopters, such as the EC135, indicate an accident rate involving anti-torque systems of 0.8 × 10⁻⁶ per flight hour, a substantial reduction from the 7.5 × 10⁻⁶ rate for helicopters with traditional tail rotors, thereby minimizing risks in low-level flights, landings, and complex environments like areas with power lines or . Noise and vibration levels are notably reduced due to the ducted , which muffles sound propagation and harmonics, making the Fenestron suitable for urban and noise-sensitive operations. On the EC135, phase-modulated spacing and reduced tip numbers (from 0.565 to 0.441) achieve a 6.5 decrease in hover noise and 4.5 in forward flight, meeting ICAO standards with margin and distributing acoustic energy to less intrusive frequencies. is minimized to low-amplitude, high-frequency excitations that become negligible in forward flight, contributing to smoother overall handling. Aerodynamically, the Fenestron provides efficiency gains through directed and optimized , with a 2% reduction in power absorption during forward flight relative to conventional tail rotors, alongside up to 35% higher in optimized configurations like those on the and AS.342. The canted shroud (e.g., 12° on the H160) enhances low-speed stability and maneuverability, improving hover performance and enabling additional capacity without increased power demands. This directed also supports better anti-torque control, reducing asymmetric issues and pilot workload, as evidenced in trials with the where it minimized yaw deviations during operations. Maintenance benefits arise from the Fenestron's simplified , featuring fewer exposed components and no or feathering hinges, which lead to higher time between overhaul (TBO) and (MTBF) due to reduced stresses on blades and linkages. This design enhances durability in harsh environments, such as or operations, with U.S. Dauphins accumulating over 1.5 million flight hours while maintaining reliability. Overall, these factors contribute to lower lifecycle operating costs for medium and heavy helicopters through decreased needs and improved component longevity.

Drawbacks

The Fenestron introduces a notable weight penalty due to the enclosing duct and associated structural reinforcements, adding approximately 10-20 to the tail assembly in medium to heavy compared to conventional open tail rotors. This increment raises the overall empty weight of the helicopter by 2-5%, depending on the size, which can marginally reduce capacity or necessitate compensatory adjustments in main design. Power consumption represents another engineering limitation, with the Fenestron requiring approximately 4% more power in hover than equivalent open rotors, primarily attributable to duct-induced drag and the higher rotational inertia of the multi-bladed fan. This elevated demand stems from the system's smaller effective disk area, which increases disk loading and efficiency losses at low speeds, though the penalty diminishes somewhat in forward flight where the enclosing fin contributes to anti-torque. Manufacturing the Fenestron involves greater complexity than standard tail rotors, as it demands precision fabrication of the ducted shroud, variable-pitch multi-blade assembly, and integrated gearbox, leading to a 15-25% higher unit cost and reliance on a limited supplier ecosystem dominated by Airbus Helicopters. The custom nature of these components, including specialized materials to handle high rotational speeds, extends production timelines and elevates maintenance requirements over the lifecycle. Aerodynamically, the Fenestron incurs increased during high-speed flight due to the shroud's and fan-induced disruptions, unless mitigated by streamlined fairings and optimized sweep. Modern iterations, such as those on the H160, incorporate advanced fairing designs to partially offset this trade-off, balancing it against the system's inherent stability benefits. As of November 2025, integrating the Fenestron into electric vertical takeoff and landing () platforms presents ongoing challenges, particularly with constraints in battery-electric systems that exacerbate the device's higher hover power draw. These issues have prompted explorations into hybrid propulsion systems.

Applications and Adoption

Airbus Helicopters Models

The Fenestron tail rotor system was first integrated into production models during the late 1960s and early 1970s, marking its debut in light utility and multipurpose platforms. The SA 341 , a single-engine introduced in 1968, became the inaugural model to feature the Fenestron, with its shrouded design providing enhanced safety and reduced noise for roles including reconnaissance, training, and light transport. This adaptation emphasized the system's compact integration within the vertical fin, optimizing the Gazelle's agility for both civil and applications. Following the , later single-engine models such as the H125 and H130 series continued Fenestron use in light utility roles. The twin-engine SA 365 in 1972, a medium designed for naval and utility missions such as and offshore operations. The system's second-generation evolution in the late incorporated all-composite materials, increasing the Fenestron's to 1.10 meters for improved and in the 's multipurpose configurations, including the naval variant. This integration certified the Fenestron for twin-engine setups, contrasting with its single-engine origins in the , and highlighted its versatility in balancing anti-torque needs with aerodynamic stability. By the 1990s, second- and third-generation Fenestrons with composite blades and uneven spacing for further sound reduction appeared in the EC 135 and EC 145 series, now designated H135 and H145. These light twins, certified for , , and corporate transport, benefited from the Fenestron's enhanced ground safety and control authority; as of 2025, over 1,560 H135s are in service across more than 67 countries, while the H145 family exceeds 1,750 units worldwide. Modern adaptations culminated in the H160, certified in 2019 for executive and multipurpose transport, featuring a fourth-generation canted Fenestron with a 1.20-meter —the largest to date—for superior and yaw . This 10-blade design, tilted at 12 degrees, integrates seamlessly with the H160's Blue Edge main to minimize external noise and vibration, enabling quieter operations in urban and offshore settings. Across ' lineup, the Fenestron has equipped thousands of units by 2025, with certifications spanning single-engine models like the and twin-engine families from the onward, amassing millions of flight hours in diverse civil and military roles.

Other Manufacturers and Variants

Beyond , Fenestron technology has seen limited licensed adaptations and independent implementations by other manufacturers, primarily in Asia. The (AVIC) has incorporated Fenestron-style ducted s in several models derived from licensed designs of the original series. For instance, the AC312 intermediate twin-engine helicopter features a single main rotor with a Fenestron , enabling multi-role operations including and search-and-rescue, and complies with CCAR-29 standards. Similarly, the AC332 civil , which completed its first flight in 2023, employs a four-bladed main rotor paired with a Fenestron , supporting up to 10 passengers at a maximum takeoff weight of approximately 3,850 kg. These adaptations reflect ongoing international interest in the design for enhanced and reduced in and light applications. Experimental variants have also explored Fenestron principles for noise reduction and optimization. In the 1980s, conducted flight tests and analyses on Fenestron-equipped helicopters, such as the SA 349/2 , to correlate aerodynamic data with antitorque efficiency and acoustic signatures, achieving insights into shrouded rotor dynamics that informed broader noise abatement strategies. More recent U.S. Army research through the U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Research Development and Engineering Center (USAAMRDEC) evaluated fan-in-fin antitorque systems, including comparisons of Fenestron configurations on the SA 341 , highlighting potential gains in thrust-to-power ratios despite added weight. In urban air mobility contexts, Fenestron-inspired ducted tail rotors appear in emerging eVTOL prototypes to minimize noise in dense environments. Bell Textron has flight-tested an electrically powered shrouded tail rotor on a modified Model 429, integrating battery-driven actuation for variable pitch control, which reduces mechanical complexity and supports hybrid-electric architectures for future light helicopters. Conceptual designs, such as the Amo ZERO eVTOL, incorporate a Fenestron-type tail unit alongside a three-bladed main rotor to enable precise hovering for single-passenger urban flights. These developments underscore challenges in intellectual property licensing, with non-Airbus adoption remaining niche due to proprietary design constraints and certification hurdles. Looking ahead, Fenestron variants are poised for integration in -electric platforms to meet targets, such as reduced emissions in light utility roles. AVIC's ongoing refinements to the AC332, including potential powertrains, aim to enhance for high-altitude operations in regions like the . Bell's electric technology, scalable for and systems, promises quieter urban operations by eliminating hydraulic dependencies, aligning with global noise regulations for next-generation .

References

  1. [1]
    Safety innovation #2: The Fenestron - Airbus
    Jul 1, 2022 · Reinforcing safety was the main objective of the Fenestron. The idea behind shrouding the tail rotor was initially developed to provide ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Helicopter Flying Handbook (FAA-H-8083-21B) Chapter 1
    The three most common controls used today are the traditional tail rotor, Fenestron (also called a fantail), and the NOTAR®. All three antitorque designs ...
  3. [3]
    50th anniversary of the trademark Fenestron - Airbus
    Apr 12, 2018 · On the 12 th of April 1968, the first Fenestron, invented by Paul Fabre and René Mouille, took to the skies on the second prototype of the Gazelle.
  4. [4]
    Product safety for helicopters - Airbus
    Fenestron® shrouded tail rotor​​ In addition to shielding ground personnel from hazards posed by a traditional spinning rotor and protecting the rotor blades ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Chapter 4 - Helicopter Components, Sections, and Systems
    Major helicopter components include the airframe, fuselage, landing gear, powerplant, transmission, main rotor system, and tail rotor system.
  6. [6]
    [PDF] the shrouded tail rotor "fenestron"
    The "Fenestron" shrouded rotor consists of a small diameter multi-blade rotor operating inside a shroud integral with the rear structure (fig.4). This ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] bluecopter™ demonstrator: the state-of-the-art in low noise design
    The bluecopter uses an active rudder, Fenestron rotor with advanced blades, evolved stator, and a Fenestron lining concept to reduce noise.
  8. [8]
    Shrieking Gazelles - Aviafora
    Aug 25, 2020 · FENESTRON G & J Weir, of Cathcart, Glasgow patented their design for a shrouded tail rotor concept in May 1943. It was designed by C.G ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] usaamrdl technical report 72-44 fan-infin antitorque concept study
    The. Fenestron was analyzed from the Aerospatiale (Sud Aviation) reports listed in Appendix I. Wind Tunnel Tests. The first wind tunnel tests of the Fenestron ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  10. [10]
    A new and improved Fenestron for the EC145 T2 - Vertical Magazine
    Mar 9, 2011 · This first-ever application of the integrated blade and strap design eliminates blade mount joints on other Fenestrons, removing the opportunity ...Missing: curved ducts
  11. [11]
    [PDF] TYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET - EASA
    Jan 27, 2023 · Fenestron ducted tail rotor, 10 blades ... The H160-B has been demonstrated compliant with Certification Specifications for Airborne.
  12. [12]
    Airbus spotlights latest-generation H160 for Australian aeromedical ...
    Sep 24, 2025 · Its innovative Blue Edge main rotor blades and canted Fenestron tail rotor cut perceived sound by up to 50% compared to conventional designs.
  13. [13]
    [PDF] FAA-H-8083-4, Helicopter Instructor's Handbook
    safe operation of the aircraft. The student must be introduced to and ... A fenestron is a fully enclosed tail rotor. It is essentially a ducted fan ...
  14. [14]
    (PDF) Toward a better understanding of ducted rotor antitorque and ...
    The study indicates that thrust generation in the FANTAIL TM showcases a non-linear relationship with collective pitch, with a ratio of total thrust to fan ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  15. [15]
    Aerodynamic Characteristics of Helicopter with Ducted Fan Tail ...
    Oct 9, 2020 · The helicopter with a ducted fan tail rotor is observed to be much more directionally stable under various crosswind directions, than that with an open-type ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] OF FENESTRON FAN-IN-FIN TAIL ROTOR ON EC 135 11
    The experiments described herein mainly refer to the hover case. A 850mm diameter wide fenestron equipped with 8 advanced oirfoiled blades and o stotorwos ...Missing: count absorption
  17. [17]
    Is there a disadvantage to the "fan in fin" design seen for the tailrotor ...
    Jun 21, 2017 · The fenestron is a lot heavier than a free tail rotor. This is probably the main disadvantage; helicopters are more sensitive to extra mass than aircraft.
  18. [18]
    Distributed Electric Propulsion and Vehicle Integration with Ducted ...
    Jun 8, 2023 · This work demonstrates that electric ducted fans enable improved performance with high levels of distribution, leading to configurations that ...Missing: Fenestron | Show results with:Fenestron<|control11|><|separator|>
  19. [19]
    H135 | Airbus
    An outstanding performer. Fitted with a bearingless main rotor, Airbus' signature Fenestron® shrouded tail rotor, engine software modifications, and a new ...
  20. [20]
    H160 | Airbus
    The H160 is one of the world's most technologically advanced helicopters, designed and built to deliver the highest levels of operational safety.
  21. [21]
    AC312 helicopter - AVIC
    AC312 is an intermediate class (4 ton class) twin engine, multi-purpose helicopter with a single rotor and fenestron. It complies with CCAR29 specifications ...
  22. [22]
    Chinese Twin-Engine Helicopter Completes First Test Flight - AVweb
    Apr 11, 2023 · The twin-engine, four-blade, fenestron-equipped rotorcraft is said to be capable of carrying 10 passengers and has a maximum takeoff weight of ...
  23. [23]
    https://www.airbus.com/en/products-services/helicopters/civil-helicopters/h135
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Correlation of SA349/2 Helicopter Flight Test Data with a ...
    The Fenestron is a shrouded 13-bladed rotor with one control input (collective pitch control). Detailed technical data on the aircraft and rotors are available.
  25. [25]
    Amo ZEROº (concept design) - eVTOL.news
    The ZEROº is a one passenger futuristic electric ultra-light concept design helicopter that has a three-bladed main rotorblade and has a fenestron-type tail ...
  26. [26]
    Airbus Noise Reduction For Helicopters Will Also Guide eVTOL ...
    While the company's Fenestron tail rotor and Blue Edge main rotor blades can reduce a helicopter's overall noise signature, Airbus is continuing to explore ...