Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

First Austrian Republic

The First Austrian Republic was the parliamentary democracy proclaimed on 12 November 1918 as the Republic of German-Austria following the collapse of the Austro-Hungarian Empire at the end of World War I, lasting until Chancellor Engelbert Dollfuss suspended parliament and established authoritarian rule in 1933–1934. Renamed the Federal State of Austria by the 1919 Treaty of Saint-Germain-en-Laye, which forbade union with Germany and imposed territorial losses, the republic inherited an ethnically diverse but fragmented state with severe economic dislocation from wartime devastation and the sudden loss of imperial markets and resources. The period was defined by acute financial crises, including in the early 1920s and the 1931 collapse of the bank that deepened the Great Depression's impact, fostering mass exceeding 30 percent by 1933 and fueling class-based political antagonism between the socialist Schutzbund and conservative militias. Governments alternated between Social Democratic and Christian Social coalitions, with notable unrest such as the 1927 July Revolt in , where clashes over a judicial escalated into riots killing over 80 and prompting military intervention. Dollfuss's Christian Social administration, facing Nazi agitation and socialist opposition, dissolved the National Council in March 1933 amid budget disputes, suppressed parties and unions, and defeated the Social Democrats in the brief February 1934 civil war, marking the republic's democratic end and transition to a corporatist Ständestaat backed by Mussolini's to counter German expansionism. Despite these turbulences, the republic saw initial social democratic governance in "" implement housing and welfare reforms, though chronic instability prevented sustained achievements and highlighted the fragility of in a post-imperial vacuum predisposed to .

Origins and Foundation

Proclamation and Early Formation

The dissolution of the Austro-Hungarian Empire after its armistice on November 3, 1918, prompted the German-speaking provinces to declare independence. On November 11, 1918, Emperor Charles I issued a proclamation recognizing the right of German-Austria's people to self-determination and relinquishing his role in state affairs, amounting to abdication. On November 12, 1918, the Provisional National Assembly, comprising German delegates from the defunct Reichsrat, convened in Vienna's parliament building and proclaimed the as a indivisibly linked to the German Republic, with aspirations for union. The assembly enacted a provisional vesting legislative and powers in itself and elected Social Democrat as state chancellor of a that included Christian Socialists and Pan-Germans. Facing territorial losses to newly independent states and economic disarray, the provisional regime organized elections on February 16, 1919, under that enfranchised women for the first time; the Social Democratic Workers' Party emerged with the plurality of seats at 108 of 233. The Treaty of Saint-Germain-en-Laye, signed September 10, 1919, delineated Austria's reduced borders, mandated recognition of successor states' sovereignty, renamed the entity the Republic of Austria, and barred union with via Article 88 to preserve the post-war balance. prompted the name change's formal enactment, solidifying the First Austrian Republic's framework amid Allied oversight.

International Recognition and Treaty Constraints

The Treaty of Saint-Germain-en-Laye, signed on September 10, 1919, by representatives of the Allied Powers and , formalized the latter's international recognition as an independent republic following the dissolution of the . This agreement, which entered into force on July 16, 1920, for key signatories including , delineated 's reduced borders—ceding territories such as to , to , and to —and explicitly renamed the state the Republic of , rejecting its initial self-designation as German-Austria with claims to union with . The treaty imposed reparations obligations, though these were limited compared to those on , totaling approximately 2 billion gold crowns but largely suspended due to 's economic distress. Central to the treaty's constraints was Article 88, which stipulated that "the independence of is inalienable otherwise than with the consent of the Council of the League of Nations" and prohibited from entering "any economic, financial or other union with which in any way compromises its independence." This clause, echoed in complementary provisions of the requiring to respect Austrian sovereignty, aimed to prevent and preserve a in amid fears of . Additional military restrictions capped Austria's army at 30,000 volunteers, banned , prohibited an or general staff, and limited armaments, all enforceable under League oversight to ensure neutrality and demilitarization. The United States, having declined to ratify Saint-Germain due to Senate opposition to the League Covenant incorporated therein, extended de jure recognition to Austria through a separate Treaty Establishing Friendly Relations, signed in Vienna on August 24, 1921, and ratified shortly thereafter, thereby resuming full diplomatic ties without assuming League obligations. Austria's admission to the League of Nations on December 15, 1920, further solidified its status, positioning it as a charter-like member under the treaty's guarantees, though this membership hinged on perpetual adherence to independence clauses and exposed Austria to international scrutiny over potential violations. These frameworks collectively constrained Austrian foreign policy, prioritizing sovereignty preservation over irredentist aspirations and economic integration with Germany, despite domestic support for unification evident in early plebiscites in Tyrol and Salzburg.

Constitutional and Political Framework

Federal Constitution of 1920

The Federal Constitutional Law (Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz, B-VG) was adopted by Austria's on October 1, 1920, following the provisional constitution of 1918 and amid postwar economic collapse and territorial losses mandated by the Treaty of Saint-Germain-en-Laye. It entered into force on November 10, 1920, establishing the legal framework for the First Austrian Republic as a democratic federal state, with sovereignty residing in the people and law emanating directly from their representatives. The delineated a with , comprising a bicameral , an led by a responsible to , and an independent judiciary. Article 1 declared a , while Article 2 affirmed its federal structure, comprising nine (states) with enumerated residual powers in areas like local administration, , and municipal affairs; federal authority dominated in , , , and most economic , reflecting centralizing tendencies to manage unification post-empire. Legislative power vested in the (Nationalrat), directly elected every four years via with for men and women over 20, and the Federal (Bundesrat), composed of delegates appointed by state diets to represent interests, ensuring federal balance but with the National Council holding primacy in conflicts. Executive authority centered on the federal president, elected jointly by both parliamentary chambers for a six-year term, who appointed the and but exercised largely ceremonial functions subject to countersignature by the chancellor, underscoring parliamentary supremacy. The document incorporated , including , freedom of expression, , and , alongside protections against arbitrary , though enforcement relied on nascent institutions like the (Verfassungsgerichtshof), established under Article 137 with jurisdiction over federal-state disputes and , influenced by Hans Kelsen's advocacy for judicial oversight of legislative acts. Federalism provisions aimed to accommodate Austria's multi-ethnic legacy by granting legislative initiative in residual matters and rights in the Bundesrat for state-specific bills, yet centralized fiscal and coercive powers at the federal level to prevent fragmentation, a pragmatic response to irredentist pressures and . Amendments required two-thirds majorities in the National Council after Bundesrat consultation, promoting stability but exposing vulnerabilities to coalition gridlock in polarized politics. The 1920 framework endured until suspended in 1933, later amended in 1929 to expand presidential powers amid instability, including and authority to dissolve .

Major Political Parties and Ideologies

The First Austrian Republic's political system featured a multi-party democracy marked by sharp ideological cleavages, primarily between socialist internationalism, Catholic corporatism, and ethnic German nationalism, which fueled parliamentary gridlock and the rise of paramilitaries. The Social Democratic Workers' Party (SDAP), rooted in Marxist principles and trade unionism, commanded strong urban support, particularly in Vienna, where it implemented extensive social housing and welfare reforms under the "Red Vienna" model from 1919 onward. Led by figures like Otto Bauer after Victor Adler's death in 1918, the SDAP advocated workers' councils, nationalization of key industries, and cultural enlightenment programs, though it pragmatically joined a grand coalition government from November 1918 to June 1920 to stabilize the nascent republic amid postwar chaos. By 1920 elections, it secured 69 seats in the National Council, reflecting its base among industrial laborers, but lost ground after conservatives assumed power. Opposing the SDAP, the Christian Social Party (CS), a conservative Catholic force drawing from rural peasants, artisans, and the middle class, emphasized anti-socialism, clerical influence, and economic corporatism inspired by prewar mayor Karl Lueger's antisemitic populism. Under priests like Ignaz Seipel, who served as chancellor from 1922 to 1929, the CS dominated governments post-1920, enacting concordats with the Vatican in 1933 and promoting agrarian protections while suppressing leftist agitation. It won 82 seats in the 1930 National Council elections, leveraging alliances with paramilitary Heimwehr groups to counter socialist influence, though internal factions debated monarchism and authoritarianism. The party's ideology prioritized social harmony through Catholic ethics over class conflict, viewing socialism as a threat to traditional order. The (GDVP), representing pan-German liberals and nationalists, sought union with Weimar Germany and free-market policies, appealing to Protestant and urban middle-class voters disillusioned with Habsburg legacies. Formed as a successor to earlier German nationalist groups, it held around 20-25 seats in early parliaments but declined to marginal status by amid economic woes and Nazi competition, with leaders like Ignaz Mayr advocating ethnic solidarity over Austrian separatism. Its ideology clashed with both socialist and CS clericalism, exacerbating fragmentation; minor parties like the agrarian allied variably with CS elements but lacked independent dominance. These tensions, unmitigated by proportional representation's multipolar outcomes, eroded democratic norms by the early .

Economic Conditions and Policies

Hyperinflation and Stabilization Efforts

Following the dissolution of the in 1918, Austria inherited a disproportionate share of the empire's war debts and administrative costs while losing access to its industrial and agricultural hinterlands, leading to chronic budget deficits financed by that escalated inflation into by autumn 1921. The money supply of Austrian crowns surged from 831.6 million in early 1921 to 12.1 billion by late that year under Finance Minister Joseph Schumpeter's brief tenure, with annual inflation reaching 205% in 1921 alone. By December 1921, the supply had ballooned to 174.1 billion crowns, and peaked in July–September 1922 as the currency depreciated rapidly amid failed domestic stabilization attempts, rendering savings worthless and fueling social unrest in urban areas dependent on foreign relief. Initial private business-led reconstruction efforts in 1920–1921 proved insufficient against mounting fiscal imbalances, prompting Austria to seek international intervention; by mid-1922, the krone's collapse threatened state solvency, leading to negotiations with the League of Nations. On October 4, 1922, the Geneva Protocols were signed, establishing a League-supervised financial reconstruction plan that conditioned a 650 million gold crown loan from an international consortium on strict reforms, including balanced budgets, expenditure caps, and prohibitions on monetary expansion or territorial revisions like Anschluss with Germany. The protocols effectively ceded partial economic sovereignty to a League-appointed commissioner general, who oversaw implementation until 1926. Key reforms included the creation of an independent , the , via statutes passed on November 28, 1922, and operational from January 1, 1923, tasked with stabilizing the currency through adherence and restricting credit to government needs. These measures, backed by the League's guarantees, halted by early 1923, restoring confidence and enabling a return to production growth, though at the cost of that deepened class divides. The stabilized paved the way for the schilling's introduction in 1924 at a fixed 14,000:1 ratio to the old crown, marking the end of the immediate crisis but leaving vulnerable to later global shocks. ![25 Schilling 1926 Gold Hartig.jpg][center]

Impact of the Great Depression

The onset of the following the Wall Street Crash of October 1929 triggered a severe contraction in Austria's export-oriented economy, which was heavily reliant on with and vulnerable to global demand shocks. Industrial output plummeted by over 40 percent in the hardest-hit countries including , while surged to affect one in five workers by the early . Real GDP declined sharply during the deflationary phase from 1929 to 1933, with a notable drop of 5.47 percent between 1930 and 1931 alone, exacerbating fiscal strains from prior stabilization efforts. The crisis intensified with the insolvency of Creditanstalt, Austria's dominant universal bank holding a significant share of national deposits, announced on May 11, 1931. This failure, rooted in overexposure to faltering industrial loans and foreign assets, sparked a domestic banking run and contributed to a broader European financial contagion, prompting the Austrian government to nationalize the institution and guarantee losses totaling 1,200 million schillings by June 27, 1931. The bailout strained public finances, leading to currency depreciation pressures and reliance on League of Nations loans conditioned on austerity measures, which included wage cuts and public spending reductions. Government responses emphasized deflationary orthodoxy to maintain the gold standard and creditor confidence, mirroring policies under Germany's , such as budget balancing through tax hikes and expenditure slashes. Under Chancellor , who assumed office on May 20, 1932, these measures prioritized fiscal equilibrium over stimulus, resulting in prolonged stagnation and heightened social tensions as eroded amid falling prices. The economic distress, compounded by failed attempts like the proposed 1931 Austro-German customs union vetoed by and , fueled ideological polarization and paramilitary mobilization, undermining democratic stability in the First Republic.

Social Divisions and Paramilitary Rise

Class Conflicts and Ideological Polarization

The collapse of the in 1918 left Austria with acute social fragmentation, exacerbated by wartime hardships that radicalized the urban toward while reinforcing conservative loyalties among rural populations and the . The Social Democratic Workers' Party (SDAP), drawing support from industrial laborers in and other cities, advocated and Austro-Marxist reforms, controlling the capital from onward in what became known as "." In contrast, the Christian Social Party (CS), rooted in Catholic agrarian and middle-class constituencies, emphasized anti-Marxist , clerical influence, and opposition to , forming the federal government after the October 1920 elections where it secured 30% of seats compared to the SDAP's 26%. These class alignments fueled ideological antagonism, with urban socialists viewing conservatives as defenders of outdated feudal structures and rural supporters perceiving SDAP policies as gateways to Bolshevik-style upheaval. Early flashpoints included the failed June 1919 leftist putsch in , which resulted in 20 deaths and 80 injuries, highlighting the volatility of worker militancy amid chaos and food shortages. The 1920 dissolution of the wartime SDAP- coalition entrenched , as the CS excluded socialists from power, prompting the SDAP to channel energies into municipal welfare initiatives in —such as and —while fostering a of bourgeois obstructionism. Economic pressures deepened polarization, as from 1921 eroded savings disproportionately among the , while chronic —reaching approximately 10% by the mid-1920s and surging to over 20% after the 1929 crash—intensified proletarian grievances and conservative fears of . Rural provinces, reliant on and harboring pan-German sentiments, resisted Vienna's centralizing socialist influence, manifesting in regional referendums like those in and in 1921 favoring union with . Ideological competition mirrored ecological rivalry among proximate groups, with CS and SDAP contesting overlapping anti-capitalist appeals but clashing over Catholic versus secular visions of social order, as evidenced in Viennese media framing that demonized opponents as existential threats. This divide extended beyond economics to cultural realms, with socialists promoting and workers' culture against CS-backed traditionalism, fostering mutual intolerance that precluded compromise. By the late , linguistic and religious cleavages—13 official languages and Catholic-Protestant tensions—intersected with class lines, rendering the republic's federal structure a battleground for competing worldviews rather than a unifying framework.

Formation of Heimwehr and Schutzbund

The emerged in the immediate as localized self-defense units in rural , initially formed to counter invading Yugoslav forces along the southern borders and to restore order amid postwar chaos. Comprising conservative provincial populations, including demobilized soldiers and farmers, these groups coalesced around 1920 under the auspices of conservative provincial governments, driven by fears of communist uprisings and external revisionist threats from and . By 1921, membership varied regionally, reaching up to 23,000 in , reflecting agrarian and anti-Marxist sentiments that positioned the as a bulwark against socialist influences. In response to the growing Heimwehr presence, the Social Democratic Workers' Party (SDAP) established the Republikanischer Schutzbund in April 1923, reorganizing existing workers' guards into a disciplined paramilitary force to safeguard the republic's democratic institutions and the party's social reform agenda. Originating from the SDAP's People's Guard of 1918, which had suppressed communist elements, the Schutzbund aimed to counter right-wing paramilitaries like the Heimwehr, emphasizing tight organization and loyalty to parliamentary democracy over revolutionary socialism. This formation underscored deepening class and ideological divides, with the Schutzbund drawing urban workers and veterans committed to defending Austro-Marxist policies against perceived fascist or monarchist threats. Both organizations armed themselves amid economic instability and political fragmentation, escalating tensions that foreshadowed violent confrontations, as neither trusted the underfunded federal army to maintain neutrality or order. The Heimwehr's rural, patriotic ethos contrasted with the Schutzbund's proletarian discipline, yet their proliferation highlighted the First Republic's fragility, where paramilitaries filled voids left by weak state authority and polarized ideologies.

Escalating Crises and Violence

Schattendorf Incident and July Revolt

The Schattendorf incident erupted on 30 January 1927 in the village of Schattendorf during a demonstration by the social democratic paramilitary , which clashed with members of the right-wing Frontkämpfervereinigung (Association of Front Fighters), a group linked to nationalist and elements. Shots fired by three Frontkämpfer struck two bystanders—an elderly war invalid and a child—killing them instantly, though the perpetrators claimed amid the confrontation with the larger Schutzbund contingent. The three defendants were tried in but acquitted on 14 July 1927 by a vote of 7-5, falling short of the two-thirds (8-4) required for under the era's judicial rules, a widely viewed as lenient toward right-wing militants given the evident fatalities. This decision ignited immediate fury among social democrats and workers, who perceived it as emblematic of judicial bias favoring conservative and interests amid ongoing ideological strife. Outrage culminated in the July Revolt on 15 July 1927, as tens of thousands of protesters converged on Vienna's Palace of Justice demanding justice; the crowd stormed and set the building ablaze, destroying the records, a major , and the city land registry. Police, authorized by the Christian Social government under Chancellor Ignaz Seipel, responded with live ammunition under a shoot-to-kill order, resulting in 89 deaths—mostly protesters—and over 1,000 injuries, with clashes spilling into across the capital. The mobilized a that halted Vienna's industries and transport for two days, aiming to pressure the government and avert further escalation into full , but it garnered limited nationwide support and collapsed without toppling the regime or securing concessions. The revolt's suppression underscored the state's monopoly on coercive force, eroded trust in parliamentary democracy, and accelerated the growth of the as a counterweight to socialist militancy, setting precedents for authoritarian measures in subsequent crises.

Parliamentary Deadlock and Self-Coup

Following the 1930 parliamentary elections, Austria's National Council experienced prolonged deadlock, as the Christian Social Party under Karl Vörösch held only a of 73 seats amid a fragmented including 72 Social Democratic seats, rising Nazi influence (initially 8 seats but growing to threaten stability), and smaller parties refusing stable coalitions. This gridlock intensified during the , with the (SDAP) employing filibusters and procedural obstructions to block measures and budget approvals needed for economic stabilization, while Nazi agitation and pressures eroded democratic functionality. , appointed on May 20, 1932, led a minority Christian Social-Heimwehr government reliant on President Wilhelm Miklas's repeated dissolutions and reconvenings of parliament, yet no viable majority emerged, exacerbating governance paralysis. The immediate trigger occurred amid a February railway workers' protesting wage cuts decreed under powers to address fiscal deficits. On , , the National Council convened in a raucous session to railway pay reductions, descending into chaos with shouting matches and disputed votes on a motion, including allegations of improper voting by deputies. In a knife-edge procedural vote lacking after SDAP walkouts, all three presiding officers—Sepp Straffner (Christian Social), Rudolf Neustädtl (SDAP), and Richard Schmitz (Christian Social)—resigned simultaneously to influence the outcome, leaving the chamber without leadership as required by parliamentary rules for conducting business. Dollfuss capitalized on this constitutional vacuum, interpreting the resignations as the parliament's "self-elimination" (Selbstausschaltung des Parlaments), which he announced on March 7, 1933, invoking Article 19 of a 1917 wartime law and other emergency provisions to assume decree powers without legislative oversight. Federal troops secured the parliament building against protests, while Miklas, though initially hesitant and unable to dissolve the body under ambiguous constitutional terms, tacitly endorsed the move by not countermanding it, avoiding new elections that polls suggested would bolster Nazis. This self-coup dismantled parliamentary democracy, enabling Dollfuss to govern autocratically, suppress opposition, and later ban parties, framed by supporters as essential to avert Nazi or socialist subversion amid verifiable electoral gains by extremists (Nazis polling up to 25% in some 1932 tests). Critics, including SDAP leaders, decried it as an unconstitutional power grab exploiting a manufactured crisis, though procedural records confirmed the presiding officers' voluntary exits rendered the assembly inoperable.

Dollfuss Dictatorship and Civil War

Suspension of Parliament and Ban on Parties

On March 4, 1933, a procedural dispute in the National Council during a debate over railway escalated when the Social Democratic opposition protested alleged voting irregularities, prompting the three presiding officers—one from each major political bloc—to vacate their seats. This action prevented the election of replacements, resulting in the loss of and the body's inability to conduct business, an event Dollfuss later termed the "self-elimination of ." Dollfuss, facing chronic legislative gridlock since the elections, exploited the crisis to suspend parliamentary sessions indefinitely, refusing calls for new elections or reconvening the body. He invoked the 1917 War Economy Enabling Act—originally enacted during —to issue decrees bypassing legislative oversight, effectively initiating rule by emergency powers. The suspension dismantled the constitutional framework of the First Republic, consolidating executive authority under Dollfuss's Christian Social-led government, bolstered by militias and external encouragement from Mussolini's to counter perceived threats from both socialist and Nazi elements. This shift addressed the paralysis caused by opposition filibusters against anti-extremist measures, such as actions targeting pro-Nazi unions, but it marked the onset of authoritarian governance without democratic accountability. In parallel, Dollfuss targeted political organizations deemed subversive, outlawing the (KPÖ)—described as politically marginal—and the (DNSAP) along with its affiliates in 1933. The Nazi ban, enacted on , followed a May-initiated campaign of bombings, protests, and attacks on Jewish businesses and public sites, including a fatal explosion that underscored the party's turn to amid German funding and encouragement. The regime also prohibited the Social Democrats' paramilitary wing, the , though these groups persisted clandestinely. These prohibitions aimed to neutralize ideological and paramilitary violence, prioritizing state stability over pluralistic competition during economic turmoil.

February 1934 Uprising and Suppression

The February 1934 uprising began on 12 February when police and units raided the Social Democratic headquarters in to seize weapons from the , prompting armed resistance from Schutzbund fighters who repelled the initial assault. The conflict rapidly escalated as Schutzbund members in and other industrial centers, including , , and , occupied key buildings and housing projects such as the , while the Social Democratic leadership called a to disrupt transport and utilities. Government Chancellor responded by declaring and deploying the Austrian Federal Army alongside Heimwehr paramilitaries to restore order, with artillery shelling used against fortified socialist positions in Vienna's working-class districts like , , and . Fighting persisted until 15 February, with government forces overpowering the outnumbered and outgunned Schutzbund, whose estimated 80,000 members lacked unified command and sufficient heavy weaponry compared to the state's military resources. Official Austrian government figures reported 118 security forces killed and 486 wounded, alongside 196 Schutzbund fighters killed and 319 wounded in alone, though contemporary estimates by foreign observers like G.E.R. Gedye suggested totals of 1,500–2,000 dead and up to 5,000 wounded across , reflecting underreporting to minimize perceptions of brutality. The suppression dismantled socialist infrastructure, with over 10,000 arrests, the dissolution of trade unions, and subsequent court-martials resulting in 9 executions of Schutzbund leaders and convictions of 140 others. Dollfuss justified as necessary to prevent a Bolshevik-style revolution amid economic instability and threats from both Nazis and communists, withdrawing shortly after while urging clemency for non-leaders to stabilize the regime. The events eliminated the as a political force, paving the way for Dollfuss's consolidation of authoritarian rule under the Ständestaat later that year.

Transition to Ständestaat

Fatherland Front Establishment

The Fatherland Front (Vaterländische Front) was founded on 20 May 1933 by Federal Chancellor , marking the first anniversary of his appointment to the chancellorship, as a supra-partisan organization designed to consolidate conservative, Catholic, and patriotic elements amid escalating political fragmentation and external threats. This initiative responded to the paralysis of parliamentary democracy, where vetoes by President and opposition intransigence had rendered governance ineffective, while paramilitary violence from both the socialist Schutzbund and heightened risks of civil strife or foreign subversion. Dollfuss positioned the Front as a vehicle for transcending traditional party divisions, absorbing the Christian Social Party—his own base—and allying with the agrarian and militias under figures like , to form a unified front prioritizing national cohesion over ideological purity. The Front's foundational program emphasized Austrian sovereignty, Christian social doctrine, and corporatist economic organization inspired by Italian models, explicitly rejecting both Marxist class warfare and Nazi pan-German racialism as existential dangers to the state's independence. It promoted a vision of a "German Austria" rooted in Catholic tradition and federalist structures, aiming to instill patriotism distinct from or aspirations, with symbols like the red-white-red badge signifying voluntary allegiance to these principles. Initial recruitment targeted middle-class professionals, rural voters, and youth organizations, though membership remained modest—estimated at around 200,000 by late 1933—reflecting Dollfuss's strategy of gradual mobilization rather than mass coercion at the outset. This establishment laid the institutional groundwork for the subsequent Ständestaat constitution of May 1934, under which the Front evolved into the regime's sole political apparatus, banning rival parties and mandating participation for public employees to enforce loyalty amid ongoing Nazi infiltration attempts and socialist remnants. Dollfuss's assassination in July 1934 by Nazis did not derail the Front's consolidation under successor , who expanded its propaganda efforts, including folk cultural initiatives, to counter German , though internal tensions between clerical conservatives and more radical elements persisted. The organization's early focus on defensive nationalism proved causally pivotal in delaying pressures until 1938, by channeling anti-extremist sentiment into a state-preserving alternative.

Schuschnigg's Rule and Resistance to Nazism

Kurt Schuschnigg succeeded Engelbert Dollfuss as Chancellor of Austria on July 25, 1934, immediately following Dollfuss's assassination during a Nazi-orchestrated coup attempt known as the July Putsch. In response to the putsch, which involved Austrian Nazis storming the Chancellery and killing Dollfuss, Schuschnigg's government arrested thousands of Nazi sympathizers and collaborators, executing or imprisoning key figures charged with treason. He maintained the ban on the Austrian Nazi Party originally imposed in June 1933 under Dollfuss, enforcing strict surveillance and suppression of Nazi activities to preserve the authoritarian Federal State (Ständestaat) structure. Schuschnigg continued Dollfuss's Austrofascist policies, emphasizing Catholic and the Fatherland Front as a unifying force against both and , while viewing as a distinct "German state" independent from Hitler's . To counter German pressure, he pursued diplomatic alignments with under Mussolini, who initially opposed , and sought assurances from and , though these yielded limited support. On July 11, 1936, Schuschnigg signed the Austro-German Agreement with Hitler at , conceding to the release of imprisoned Austrian Nazis in exchange for Germany's pledge of non-intervention in Austrian affairs, a move intended to stabilize relations but which emboldened underground Nazi networks. Nazi agitation persisted, with bombings, marches, and undermining Schuschnigg's , prompting intensified crackdowns including further arrests and media . Escalating tensions culminated in a second meeting on February 12, 1938, where Hitler, backed by threats of invasion, coerced Schuschnigg into the Berchtesgaden Protocol: granting amnesty to Nazis, appointing as Minister of the Interior (gaining control over the police), and aligning Austrian foreign policy with . In a bid to rally domestic support for , Schuschnigg announced a plebiscite on March 13, 1938, to affirm Austria's sovereignty, anticipating strong approval amid widespread anti-Anschluss sentiment. Facing a and troop mobilizations along the border, Schuschnigg canceled the plebiscite and resigned on March 11, 1938, paving the way for Seyss-Inquart's appointment as , who promptly requested German intervention. forces crossed into Austria unopposed on March 12, completing the annexation by March 13, 1938, despite Schuschnigg's efforts to avert absorption through legalistic resistance and appeals to international norms. His tenure thus prolonged Austrian independence by nearly four years beyond Dollfuss's death, though concessions and internal divisions ultimately proved insufficient against Nazi coercion.

Legacy and Historiographical Debates

Achievements in Stability and Independence

The Dollfuss-Schuschnigg regime achieved political stability by decisively suppressing the February 1934 socialist uprising and subsequent Nazi threats, thereby ending the cycle of paramilitary violence and parliamentary gridlock that had destabilized the democratic First Republic since 1919. This authoritarian consolidation, including the ban on communist and national socialist parties, prevented the kind of revolutionary takeovers or electoral radicalization seen in neighboring states like and during the . Empirical evidence from the period shows no major internal revolts succeeding after 1934, contrasting with the pre-1933 era of frequent street battles between Schutzbund, , and Nazi formations. In military terms, the regime's expansion of armed forces—authorized by Treaty of Saint-Germain signatories in August 1933—provided the means to repel Nazi incursions, fostering a tenuous but effective domestic order until external invasion overwhelmed it. Economically, while the Ständestaat faced persistent exceeding 20% in the mid-1930s, corporatist reforms under the 1934 May Constitution integrated labor and employer guilds to mitigate , avoiding the hyperinflationary collapses of the early 1920s and sustaining basic state functions amid global downturn. On , Dollfuss's policies actively checked pressures by securing Italian diplomatic backing against in April 1933, leveraging Mussolini's rivalry with Hitler to safeguard Austrian sovereignty. The regime promoted a distinct Austro-Catholic via the Fatherland Front, countering pan-German and delaying union with the Third Reich by four years compared to potential earlier absorption under continued democratic fragmentation. The thwarted July 1934 Nazi putsch, which assassinated Dollfuss but failed to install a pro- government, demonstrated the efficacy of these measures in preserving against Berlin-orchestrated . Schuschnigg extended this resistance through 1937-1938 diplomatic initiatives, including bilateral pacts reinforcing non-aggression with Germany, though ultimately undermined by internal Nazi infiltration and the Munich Agreement's fallout. Historiographical assessments, particularly from conservative and revisionist perspectives, credit these authoritarian achievements with averting an earlier fascist or communist domination, providing a buffer of stability that allowed Austria to function as a sovereign entity longer than democratic predecessors might have. Critics from leftist viewpoints, however, argue that such stability came at the cost of without addressing underlying economic grievances, yet indicates the regime's preemptive suppression of extremists empirically forestalled total akin to Spain's 1936-1939 .

Criticisms and Controversies from Left and Right Perspectives

Socialist critics, including leaders of the banned , condemned the Dollfuss regime's authoritarian measures as a fascist overthrow of , particularly the suspension of parliament on March 4, 1933, and the party's prohibition on February 12, 1934, which dismantled municipal in and dissolved the Republican Schutzbund . The ensuing February Uprising, suppressed by bombardment of workers' strongholds like the Karl Marx-Hof, resulted in approximately 1,000 to 1,500 deaths—mostly socialists—and over 16,000 arrests, decried by left-wing accounts as a deliberate massacre to eradicate organized labor. These actions were seen as prioritizing clerical and bourgeois interests over proletarian rights, with Austro-Marxist theorists later critiquing their own leadership's constitutionalism for enabling the regime's consolidation. From conservative and pan-German right-wing perspectives, the early democratic phase of the First Republic was lambasted for systemic instability, with yielding 21 cabinets in 14 years and fostering clashes, such as the 1927 July Revolt, which conservatives attributed to unchecked socialist militancy. Nationalists, including Austrian Nazis, assailed the Ständestaat's corporatist constitution of May 1, 1934, for entrenching independence and Catholic authoritarianism against , viewing Dollfuss's ban on the in June 1933 and the execution of 180 Nazis after the July 25, 1934, putsch attempt as anti-German repression that betrayed ethnic unity. Such policies, enforced amid Habilitation Pacts with Mussolini's , were criticized by far-right elements as subordinating Austrian Germans to foreign influences rather than pursuing Greater German integration.

References

  1. [1]
    The First Republic - History of the building on Ballhausplatz
    The First Republic. Following the collapse of the Monarchy and the end of World War I, the new Republic of German-Austria was proclaimed on 12 November 1918.
  2. [2]
    The First Austrian Republic, 1920–1932 - Oxford Academic
    Oct 20, 2022 · This chapter describes the tumultuous history of the First Republic in Austria, as the state struggled to stabilize its fragile economy after 1920.
  3. [3]
    Austria After World War I: The First Republic - Vienna Unwrapped
    The 12th November 1918 marked the first day of republican Austria. For the first time in more than 650 years, we lived without the Habsburg rule.
  4. [4]
    Emperor Karl I's Abdication Proclamation, 11 November 1918
    Emperor Karl's Abdication Proclamation, 11 November 1918​​ I acknowledge the decision taken by German Austria to form a separate State. The people has by its ...
  5. [5]
    The Proclamation of the Republic in 1918
    In the end, Franz Dinghofer was the politician who on 12 November 1918 proclaimed the new Republic from the ramp of the Parliament building on Vienna's ...
  6. [6]
    12 November 1918 | Der Erste Weltkrieg
    Article 1 German-Austria is a democratic republic. All public powers are put into force by the people. Article 2 German-Austria is a constituent part of the ...
  7. [7]
    19. Austria (1918-1955) - University of Central Arkansas
    Emperor Charles I abdicated on November 11, 1918, and a provisional government was establish on November 12, 1918. Elections for the Constituent Assembly ...<|separator|>
  8. [8]
    Election Day February 16th 1919
    The precise electoral rules were decided on December 18th 1918. The voting age was set at 20 and women and men were able to stand as candidates from age 29 on.
  9. [9]
  10. [10]
    4. Treaty between the Principal Allied and Associated Powers and ...
    Signed at Saint-Germain-en-Laye, September 10, 1919; in force by deposit of ratification for Czechoslovakia, July 16, 1920; for the British Empire, August 16, ...
  11. [11]
    Treaty of St Germain (Treaty of Peace between the Allied ... - dipublico
    Austria waives all claims against the Siamese Government on behalf of herself or her nationals arising out of the liquidation of Austrian property or the ...
  12. [12]
    Section VI.—Austria (Art. 80) - Office of the Historian
    Article 80. Germany acknowledges and will respect strictly the independence of Austria, within the frontiers which may be fixed in a Treaty.
  13. [13]
    Austria - Countries - Office of the Historian
    Emperor Charles I abdicated on November 12, 1918, and an Austrian Republic was proclaimed on November 13, 1918. Since the post-World War II period, the United ...
  14. [14]
    League of Nations Treaty Series
    League of Nations Treaty Series ; Austria. 1920 - 1938. March 18, 1938 ; Brazil. 1920 - 1928. June 13, 1928 ; Chile. 1920 - 1940. June 1, 1940 ; Costa Rica. 1920 - ...
  15. [15]
    100 Year Anniversary of the Austrian Constitution | In Custodia Legis
    Oct 1, 2020 · It was adopted by the Constituent National Assembly on October 1, 1920—100 years ago today—and entered into force on November 10, 1920. It was ...
  16. [16]
    A Parliamentary Democracy — Austria in USA - austria.org
    The Austrian Federal Constitution was passed by the Constituent National Assembly on October 1, 1920. The formulation of the Federal Constitution was the ...<|separator|>
  17. [17]
    ICL > Austria > Constitution
    The Austrian constitution was adopted in 1920, revised in 1929, reinstated in 1945, and last amended on 30 December 2021.
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Austria _FULL_ Constitution - ConstitutionNet
    A. General Provisions Article 1 Austria is a democratic republic. Its law emanates from the people. Article 2 (1) Austria is a Federal State.
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Austria - Gary Marks
    2 The constitution explicitly lists the extensive legislative powers of the central government, as well as the more limited legislative powers of the Länder.
  20. [20]
    [PDF] austria - UPF
    The federal constitution recognizes several leading principles, such as democracy, republicanism, federalism, the rule of law, a separation of powers and human ...
  21. [21]
    (PDF) Austrian Constitution - general aspects - Academia.edu
    2 The Federal President also has the following powers: a. appoints federal civil servants, including officers, as well as other federal officials, and ...
  22. [22]
    Constitution of Austria - University of Minnesota Human Rights Library
    Constitution of Austria. { Adopted in: 1920 } { Revised in: 1929 } { Reinstated in: 1945 }. Chapter I General Provisions Article 1 [Republic, Democracy]Missing: key | Show results with:key
  23. [23]
    The History of the Constitutional Court: An Overview
    After the annexation of Austria to the German Reich, the High Federal Court lost its constitutional powers. The court itself continued to exist, but was ...<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    ICL > Austria > Index - International Constitutional Law > Countries
    The Austrian constitution, adopted on October 1st, 1920 (so called federal constitution Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz' B-VG), has six fundamental principles: ...
  25. [25]
    Austria 1920 (reinst. 1945, rev. 2009) - Constitute Project
    Austria's Constitution of 1920, Reinstated in 1945, with Amendments through 2009.
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Austro-Marxism, Austrofascism, and the First Austrian Republic - DOI
    The Communist Party (KPÖ), founded in November 1918, attracted little support and the Social. Democrats' participation in the grand coalition of 1918-20 ensured ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Review of Social Democracy in the Austrian Provinces, 1918-1934
    It has been a widely held tenet among historians of contemporary European labor movements that the Austrian Social Democratic Party (SDAP) was the first ...Missing: major | Show results with:major
  28. [28]
    History of Austria - First Republic and the Anschluss | Britannica
    On October 21, 1918, the 210 German members of the Reichsrat of Austria formed themselves into the National Assembly for German-Austria, and on October 30 they ...
  29. [29]
    The Christian Social Party | 3 | The Coming of Austrian Fascism | Mart
    Although the ideological origins of the Christian Social Party lie far back in Austrian history, it was Karl Lueger who first created a mass movement, the.
  30. [30]
    Christian Social Party - Jewish Virtual Library
    The Christian Social Party was an Austrian Catholic political party. Founded by Karl Lueger in 1893, along ideological lines elaborated by Karl von Vogelsang.
  31. [31]
    Principles of the German People's Party (1919) - GHDI - Document
    The German People's Party regards the fostering and promotion of the physical and moral health of the people as its earnest duty. It will seek to ensure that ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Agrarian Politics in Interwar Austria - University Digital Conservancy
    With noble influence eclipsed, agrarian politics began to group around the three major political camps of republican Austria: Social Democracy, Christian ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] A (not so brief) history of inflation in Austria
    Hyperinflation was ended through a combination of measures, the first of which was an international rescue pro- gram of the League of Nations. This program ...<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    A short summary of the Austrian hyperinflation after WWI - ECAEF
    Apr 3, 2025 · 205% of inflation in 1921. During Schumpeter's 7 months tenure, the supply of new Austrian Crowns increased from 831.6 million to 12.1 billion.
  35. [35]
    The Great Austrian Inflation - FEE.org
    Apr 1, 2006 · By December 1920 it increased to 30.6 billion; by December 1921, 174.1 billion; by December 1922, 4 trillion; and by the end of 1923, 7.1 ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Hyperinflation as a Catalyst of Transformations
    In July, August and September 1922 Austrian hyperinflation reached its highest levels. Only when the League of Nations finally took up the Austrian question in.
  37. [37]
    Austrian Reconstruction, 1920–1921: A Matter for Private Business ...
    Failure continued until autumn 1922 and, consequently, Austrians experienced two bouts of inflation that attained hyperinflationary proportions, first, during ...
  38. [38]
    1922–1938 - Oesterreichische Nationalbank
    The Geneva Protocol of October 1922 provided a basic framework for an orderly budget. The statutes of the new Austrian central bank were passed as a federal ...
  39. [39]
    Post-war Economies (Austria-Hungary) - 1914-1918 Online
    Apr 16, 2020 · The actual currency catastrophe, hyperinflation from autumn 1921 onwards, brought many entrepreneurs back to reality. Austria was on the verge ...
  40. [40]
    The operation of the “first bailout” the social and Economic impact of ...
    Jun 23, 2025 · The League's scheme meant that, in effect, Austria temporarily lost sovereignty over its economy in return for foreign assistance in restoring ...
  41. [41]
    The Dissolution of the Austro-Hungarian Empire in - IMF eLibrary
    The stabilization of the crown was initiated by the Geneva Protocols of October 4, 1922, which outlined a program of reforms backed by the League of Nations.
  42. [42]
    [PDF] The Great Depression in Europe, 1929-39
    In the worst affected countries – Poland, Germany and Austria – one in five of the population was unemployed, and industrial output fell by over 40 per cent.
  43. [43]
    The Great Depression in Europe: Real GDP Data for 22 nations
    Jul 7, 2013 · From 1930 to 1931 the real GDP loss was 5.47%. (Maddison 2003: 50). During Austria's deflationary depression from 1929 to 1933, real output ...
  44. [44]
    The Collapse of the Creditanstalt Bank - Finaeon
    Jan 5, 2019 · The Austrian government guaranteed all the losses of the Creditanstalt on June 27, 1931 but this meant guaranteeing 1,200 million schillings ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] The Austrian Banking Crisis Of 1931 - LSE Research Online
    1920s they did not perform well, and made the universal banks insolvent. The Credit-Anstalt, which became an 'acquirer of last resort' for weak universal banks ...
  46. [46]
    Austrian Reconstruction and the Collapse of Global Finance, 1921 ...
    “Crisis” explores Austria's hyperinflation in 1921-1922. “Control” provides an authoritative account of the League of Nation's program to stabilize the country ...Missing: effects | Show results with:effects
  47. [47]
    [PDF] The Great Depression in Eastern Europe - OAPEN Library
    The year 2029 will mark the centenary of the beginning of the greatest economic crisis known to the modern world—the Great. Depression.
  48. [48]
    Austerity in Pre-1938 Fascist Austria
    Sep 26, 2018 · “In tackling the economic crisis the Dollfuss-Schuschnigg dictatorship pursued harsh deflationary policies designed to balance the budget and ...
  49. [49]
    Social Democracy in Austria (Chapter 2) - The Cambridge History of ...
    Nov 3, 2022 · Additional socialist misjudgements about Austrian federalism led to a defeat in the elections for the left and enabled the formation of a ...<|separator|>
  50. [50]
    Post-war Societies (Austria) - 1914-1918 Online
    Mar 9, 2023 · This article addresses the short and long-term consequences of the First World War on the young Austrian republic
  51. [51]
    From Red Vienna to the Anschluss: Ideological Competition among ...
    This article proposes that competition among ideologies can be understood and modeled as an ecology of organizations. It presents a theory of ideological ...
  52. [52]
    Heimwehr | Paramilitary, Right-Wing, Fascism - Britannica
    In February 1934 paramilitary formations loyal to the chancellor crushed Austria's Social Democrats in bloody encounters. With a new constitution of May ...
  53. [53]
    Tyrolean Militarism, Catholicism, and the Heimwehr" by Jason Engle
    Dec 11, 2017 · The paramilitary Heimwehr movement that began in 1920 was the creation of Austria's conservative provincial governments.
  54. [54]
    Austria | The Oxford Handbook of Fascism
    In 1921, the Heimwehr numbered from 2,200 men in Vorarlberg to 23,000 in Upper Austria.1 Its membership was drawn from agricultural workers and farmers, the ...
  55. [55]
    Schutzbund | Interwar Period, Social Democratic Party ... - Britannica
    Sep 12, 2025 · Schutzbund, (German: Republican Defense League), paramilitary socialist organization active in Austria between World War I and 1934.
  56. [56]
    Republikanischer Schutzbund and the preparations for Civil War
    With the creation of the Republikanischer Schutzbund in April 1923, the Social Democratic Labor Party of Austria (SDAPÖ) had, at least until 1927, a defense ...Missing: date history
  57. [57]
    The 1927 fire | Der Oberste Gerichtshof | ogh.gv.at
    The police were ordered to shoot the protesters, and 89 people died. This terrible and tragic event is inseparably and tragically associated with the history of ...Missing: Incident | Show results with:Incident
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Kraus and Canetti Responding to the July Revolt of 1927 - DergiPark
    The immediate trigger for the unrest was the controversial acquittal of two right-wing militiamen on July 14, 1927, who had killed two social democrats in a ...<|separator|>
  59. [59]
    AUSTRIA: Riots - Time Magazine
    Estimates placed the dead at between 80 and 150, with injured persons not less than 600. Although the tourist season was at its height in Austria last week, no ...Missing: consequences | Show results with:consequences
  60. [60]
    Austrian Social Democrats general strike to prevent civil war, 1927
    During the Saturday strike, six communist youth were killed, though the circumstances of their deaths are unclear. The Social Democrats Republican Guard may be ...Missing: Schattendorf | Show results with:Schattendorf
  61. [61]
    Austria - Authoritarianism, Dollfuss, Schuschnigg - Britannica
    Dollfuss determined to replace parliamentary government with an authoritarian system. The opportunity to do this came in March 1933.
  62. [62]
    Dollfuss and the Future of Austria - Foreign Affairs
    On March 4, 1933, the Austrian parliament committed suicide. In a squabble ... And he virtually overthrew the Austrian constitution. Passages from the ...
  63. [63]
    Engelbert Dollfuss | Austrian leader, Catholic politician ... - Britannica
    Sep 30, 2025 · Austrian statesman and, from 1932 to 1934, chancellor of Austria who destroyed the Austrian Republic and established an authoritarian regime.
  64. [64]
    AUSTRIANS CALL STRIKE.; Rail Men Will Protest Plan to Cut Wages.
    February 22, 1933 ... —Austrian railway trades unions of all political shades decreed today a two-hour general strike between 9 and 11 A. M. on March ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] ucation in - ERIC
    The time from the self-elimination of the Austrian Parliament on. March 4, 1933, to the bloody days of mid-February 1934, was a period of transition, but ...
  66. [66]
    Austria - The End of Constitutional Rule - Country Studies
    Dollfuss outlawed the Nazi Party, the politically insignificant KPÖ, and the Republikanischer Schutzbund. All, however, continued to exist underground. Seeking ...
  67. [67]
    Nazi Territorial Aggression: The Anschluss - Holocaust Encyclopedia
    In June 1933, in response to a fatal Nazi bombing, the Dollfuss regime banned the Austrian Nazi Party and its affiliates. The Nazi movement became illegal in ...
  68. [68]
    February 1934 - History of Vienna - Stadt Wien
    On 5 March 1933, Dollfuss executed a coup: he took advantage of an irregularity in the voting procedure of the Austrian Parliament to suspend it. From then on, ...
  69. [69]
    Civil War - by Liam Hoare - The Vienna Briefing
    Feb 14, 2024 · How the tumultuous history of the First Republic ended in open warfare between Austria's two main political camps and the death of Austrian ...
  70. [70]
    Historical Documents - Office of the Historian
    Political developments in Austria: Socialist uprising; Nazi activities; murder of Chancellor Dollfuss (Documents 1–59) · Visit of Austrian trade mission to ...Missing: Engelbert response verifiable
  71. [71]
    22 Feb 1934 - AUSTRIAN REVOLUTION - Trove
    OFFICIAL AUSTRIAN CASUALTIES. VIENNA, February 17. The official casualties as a result of the fighting in the city are:— Troops, 102 killed and 319 wounded;
  72. [72]
    Austria's Fatherland Front, 1933-1938 - Eclectic (at Best)
    Aug 18, 2011 · The group, created by Dollfuss in May 1933, was a pale imitation of the fascist organizations of Germany and Italy.
  73. [73]
    The Dollfuss Affair, 1934 - Hitler's Aims - JohnDClare.net
    Dollfuss then used the Schutzbund Uprising as an excuse to set up – with the support of the Catholic Church – a one-party government: the 'First Austrian ...
  74. [74]
    Austria, Left and Right, to 1934 - Macrohistory : World History
    In 1927 in the small town of Schattendorf, on Austria's eastern border ... In the city of Linz, Schutzbund members responded to a police invasion with machine gun ...Missing: shooting | Show results with:shooting
  75. [75]
    'The Second Danger': Austrofascism vs. National Socialism
    Apr 4, 2020 · The Fatherland Front, which came to lead Austria under a single party system, was strongly opposed not only to Marxism but also National ...<|separator|>
  76. [76]
    Paper Party: Propaganda Files from the Austrian Fatherland Front
    Jun 18, 2025 · The Fatherland Front, paper party that it was, struggled to succeed in its mission to lead Austrians to a Christian-based, traditional order within a sovereign ...
  77. [77]
    The Anschluss - Jewish Virtual Library
    On July 11, 1936, Schuschnigg signed a treaty with Germany in which he agreed to the release of Nazis imprisoned in Austria and Germany promised to respect ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  78. [78]
    Triumph of Hitler: Nazis Take Austria - The History Place
    His very first victim was Dr. Kurt von Schuschnigg, Chancellor of Austria, a country being torn apart from within by Nazi agitators and also feeling threatened ...Missing: 1934-1938 | Show results with:1934-1938
  79. [79]
    Anschluss In Nazi Germany: The Goal Of Unification - History
    Hitler threatened to invade Austria unless Schuschnigg gave all important jobs in his government to Nazis. Schuschnigg compromised by appointing the Nazi Seyss- ...
  80. [80]
    [PDF] The Coming of the Dollfuss–Schuschnigg Regime and the Stages of ...
    Austria's traditional political elites were familiar with the principle of government without parliament based on the notorious para- graph 14 of the ...
  81. [81]
    [PDF] Borderland Brothers: Austrofascist Competition and Cooperation ...
    Jun 5, 2024 · From 1936 to 1938, Austrofascists oscillated between cracking down on Nazis ... nomy against Nazi Germany would mean the loyalties of ...
  82. [82]
    Austria between the Two Wars - jstor
    Dollfuss needed considerable armed strength to combat the attacks of the Austrian Nazis, and in August, 1933 the signatories of the St. Germain Treaty permitted ...
  83. [83]
    [PDF] from mises to morgenstern: austrian economics during the ständestaat
    Great Depression, and in 1934 the bottom of the slump had scarcely been overcome. From the point of view of the Austrian liberals the cause of the severity ...
  84. [84]
    DOLLFUSS CHECKS ANSCHLUSS MOVES; He Is Said to Have ...
    DOLLFUSS CHECKS ANSCHLUSS MOVES; He Is Said to Have Received Strong Assurance of Italy's Aid to Combat the Nazis. SOCIALISTS WOULD HELP But Austrian Chancellor ...
  85. [85]
    Ryan O'Connor on Ryan O'Connor (2010) - UC Santa Barbara
    From the moment he came to power, Schuschnigg's overall concern was to preserve Austrian independence. Though they failed this time, he knew that the Austrian ...
  86. [86]
    Austria: 90 years since the 'Austrofascism' war against the working ...
    Feb 21, 2024 · February 12th marked the 90th anniversary of a brief civil war in Austria, when workers attempted to defeat the mounting attacks of the then ...
  87. [87]
    The February Uprising - Tribune
    Feb 12, 2024 · The man is Engelbert Dollfuß, the Austrian chancellor from 1932 to 1934. His political home was the Christian Social Party, the predecessor of ...<|separator|>
  88. [88]
    S.: Collapse of Austro-Marxism in the Vienna Struggle (February 1934)
    Feb 8, 2016 · The leaders of Austro-Marxism chained the proletariat to the anchor of the constitution which dragged it ever deeper into a swamp. They taught ...
  89. [89]