Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Forward Operating Base Chapman

Forward Operating Base Chapman, also known as Camp Chapman, was a installation located approximately two miles east of city in , eastern . Established in late by Combined Joint Task Force-180 engineers and the 3rd Battalion, 505th Parachute Infantry Regiment as part of , the base supported counterinsurgency operations against and forces in southeastern . The outpost housed elements of the U.S. Army, including the , which focused on governance, development, and security initiatives in the volatile region. It also featured a forward operating site dedicated to intelligence collection and targeted operations against high-value terrorist targets. FOB Chapman achieved prominence due to a suicide bombing on December 30, 2009, perpetrated by , a Jordanian and operative posing as a double agent with intelligence on Osama bin Laden's location. The attack, which occurred at the CIA facility within the base, killed seven CIA officers—the agency's heaviest single-incident loss since the 1983 Beirut barracks bombing—and wounded several others, exposing operational security lapses in asset vetting and physical screening protocols. The base continued operations until the broader U.S. drawdown in , after which it was transferred to Afghan forces and eventually abandoned amid the 2021 resurgence.

Geography and Establishment

Location and Terrain

Forward Operating Base Chapman was located in , in southeastern , approximately two miles east of city on an airstrip. The province borders to the east, positioning the base near key cross-border routes utilized by militants. The site lies within the Bowl, a at an average of about 1,180 meters above sea level, surrounded by rugged highlands and mountains. This terrain, characterized by steep escarpments and tribal-dominated areas, offered observational advantages for regional surveillance but also heightened vulnerability to infiltration from adjacent insurgent sanctuaries.

Founding and Early Infrastructure

Forward Operating Base (FOB) Chapman was established in 2002 by U.S. forces as part of , utilizing an existing airstrip in , eastern , to facilitate efforts against and remnants near the border. The base was named in honor of Nathan Ross Chapman, a U.S. Army Special Forces soldier killed on January 4, 2002, near —the first American service member to die from enemy fire in during the conflict. Initial development focused on transforming the former Afghan airfield into a functional forward operating site, emphasizing rapid deployment capabilities for regional patrols and logistics support. Early infrastructure at FOB Chapman included the rehabilitation of the gravel-surfaced airstrip to accommodate and helicopters, alongside the erection of temporary , command posts, and perimeter defenses using , HESCO barriers, and watchtowers. U.S. engineers prioritized basic utilities such as systems, generators for power, and fuel storage depots to sustain small-unit operations in the austere, mountainous terrain. By mid-2002, elements of the and units had established a presence, conducting initial to support ground reconnaissance and supply convoys into surrounding districts. These developments enabled the base to serve as a logistical hub for coalition forces operating in Paktia and Paktika provinces, without permanent structures initially, relying on tented accommodations and modular facilities.

Operational Role

CIA Intelligence Activities

Forward Operating Base Chapman housed a major (CIA) facility that served as a forward station for (HUMINT) operations in southeastern , primarily targeting the , affiliates, and elements operating across the Afghan-Pakistani border. Established in the early amid expanded U.S. efforts following the 2001 invasion, the site enabled CIA officers to conduct close-proximity intelligence collection in , a Haqqani stronghold known for cross-border militant activity into North . This positioning allowed for rapid debriefings of local informants and assets, integrating HUMINT with to identify high-value targets (HVTs) and disrupt insurgent logistics, training camps, and leadership structures. CIA teams at the base focused on recruiting Pashtun tribesmen and other locals as sources to map militant networks, providing granular details on Haqqani safe houses, weapon caches, and operational plans that informed joint raids with forces. Operations emphasized aggressive targeting campaigns, with officers vetting and handling assets to generate leads on figures like , contributing to pre-2009 eliminations and captures in the region through coordinated drone strikes and ground actions. Interrogations of captured suspects were conducted on-site or in adjacent facilities, yielding intelligence that supported broader efforts to sever al-Qaeda's ties with local , though the high-risk environment demanded constant adaptations amid pervasive double-agent threats. The facility's role extended to coordinating with CIA drone programs, funneling HUMINT-derived targeting data for strikes in adjacent Pakistani tribal areas, where Haqqani and leaders frequently relocated. By 2009, this integration had intensified as part of a CIA in forward basing, with dozens of officers rotating through Chapman to sustain pressure on evolving threats, prioritizing actionable over remote analysis to counter militants' adaptability. These activities underscored the agency's shift toward paramilitary-style operations, blending recruitment with kinetic outcomes, though reliant on unverified claims that occasionally exposed vulnerabilities.

Military Support and Logistics

Forward Operating Base Chapman relied on U.S. units for its foundational and ongoing logistical , enabling CIA operations in southeastern . Construction of the base occurred between August and October 2002 by engineers from Combined Joint Task Force-180, alongside the 3rd Battalion, 505th Infantry Regiment of the , transforming a former Afghan airstrip into a functional forward site near the Pakistan border. Early military presence included soldiers from the and , who contributed to initial security and operational setup. U.S. military elements provided the logistical backbone, including assets for supply transport, , and medical evacuations critical to sustaining personnel in the volatile region. Units such as Task Force Red Dog, a detachment, delivered surveillance, escorts, and rapid response capabilities to support joint operations across the border areas. The base's proximity to , a hub for U.S. forces, facilitated coordinated and reinforced defensive postures through shared resources. Perimeter security was maintained by U.S. troops via checkpoints, patrols, and joint forces, forming a layered defense to protect against incursions in the Taliban-influenced terrain. The Provincial Reconstruction Team, comprising engineers and specialists, operated from Chapman starting in 2004, enhancing logistical resilience through infrastructure projects like roads while collaborating with CIA efforts. These military contributions underscored the interagency partnership, though access protocols revealed inherent challenges in vetting personnel amid high-tempo operations.

The 2009 Suicide Bombing

Background and the Bomber

was a Jordanian of Palestinian descent who became radicalized through online jihadist forums, adopting the pseudonym al-Khorasani to propagate extremist views prior to his recruitment. In early 2009, Jordanian General Intelligence Directorate (GID) agents arrested him on suspicion of militant sympathies and coerced him into serving as a , ostensibly to penetrate networks in and provide intelligence on senior figures, which was then shared with the CIA. Al-Balawi's handlers positioned him as a valuable asset amid the CIA's intensified efforts to disrupt following the August 2009 U.S. drone strike that killed Pakistani Taliban leader , a development that heightened militant resentment toward American operations. Al-Balawi cultivated trust by delivering accurate tips that enabled successful CIA drone strikes against Taliban targets in Pakistan, prompting U.S. intelligence to view him as a potential source for breakthroughs against elusive al-Qaeda leadership. He specifically promised firsthand details on Ayman al-Zawahiri's whereabouts, claiming a recent meeting with al-Qaeda's deputy leader, which generated significant excitement among CIA officers desperate for actionable intelligence after years of stalemated counterterrorism efforts in the region. This intel allure overshadowed his underlying loyalty to al-Qaeda, where he maintained covert ties while feigning cooperation, positioning the impending meeting at Forward Operating Base Chapman as an opportunity to exact revenge for U.S. strikes that had decimated militant ranks. Despite these covert affiliations, multiple indicators of unreliability— including warnings from al-Balawi's GID handler about his potential duplicity and inconsistencies in his communications—were downplayed by CIA personnel, who prioritized the prospect of high-value information over rigorous vetting protocols. Jordanian intermediaries had relayed concerns that al-Balawi might still harbor jihadist intentions, yet these were dismissed amid overconfidence in his proven track record and the operational pressure to secure leads on Zawahiri in late 2009. This eagerness exploited the procedural exceptions granted to promising assets, allowing al-Balawi to approach the base without standard security measures that might have detected his concealed explosives.

Sequence of Events

On December 30, 2009, , a Jordanian acting as a purported for Jordanian intelligence, approached the perimeter of Forward Operating Base Chapman in , , around 4:30 p.m. local time, transported in a vehicle driven by his Jordanian handler from the General Intelligence Directorate. Standard search procedures at the outer gate, which typically included pat-downs and for visitors, were bypassed because al-Balawi was deemed a high-value, trusted asset based on prior intelligence contributions against , and the handler vouched that preliminary checks had already been conducted. This decision reflected procedural exceptions granted to encourage source cooperation, despite internal CIA concerns about inadequate vetting of foreign-recruited assets. Al-Balawi was then escorted into a secure CIA forward operating annex—a restricted area housing temporary briefing facilities—where multiple CIA officers had assembled without weapons drawn, anticipating a debrief on his claimed access to senior figures, including potential locations for drone strikes. The group clustered closely around him to facilitate the sensitive discussion, forgoing additional security screenings or standoff distances as per relaxed protocols for vetted human sources. Moments after entry, al-Balawi detonated a vest concealed beneath his , containing approximately 25 pounds of high explosives packed with ball bearings for fragmentation effect. The blast occurred in the confined space of the annex, instantly killing eight individuals including seven CIA officers and the accompanying Jordanian handler, while wounding six others. No secondary defensive measures, such as armed sentries or automated barriers, activated effectively in the immediate aftermath, as the setup prioritized intelligence gathering over , underscoring gaps in layered for threats. The propagated shockwaves and debris through the structure, initiating a scramble for amid disrupted communications and limited on-site response capabilities.

Immediate Casualties and Response

The suicide bombing at on December 30, 2009, resulted in the deaths of seven CIA officers, including the base chief Jennifer Matthews, and wounded six others, marking the deadliest single incident for the agency since the 1983 Beirut barracks bombing. Among the killed were CIA officers such as Scott Michael Roberson, Harold E. Brown Jr., and Darren LaBonte, with the explosion occurring in a secure area where personnel had gathered to debrief the bomber. Immediate response involved U.S. Air Force surgeons and teams rushing to stabilize the wounded amid a base-wide and heightened protocols. Efforts focused on and rapid transport of survivors to medical facilities, with confirmation of the suicide nature of the attack prompting swift containment measures to prevent further incursions. The swiftly claimed responsibility for the attack through spokesman , framing it as executed by an member to boost insurgent morale and against U.S. and allied operations. This assertion highlighted the event's value in demonstrating perceived vulnerabilities at forward bases, though subsequent details revealed the bomber's ties.

Investigations and Reforms

CIA Internal Review

Following the December 30, 2009, suicide bombing at Forward Operating Base Chapman, CIA Director commissioned an internal accountability review board comprising senior agency officials to examine the incident. The board's October 2010 report, while finding no individual misconduct warranting disciplinary action, pinpointed systemic lapses in source validation and adherence to protocols, including the decision to waive standard searches for the bomber, , based on his perceived value as a high-level asset providing unconfirmed on al-Qaeda leadership. These failures stemmed from overreliance on the asset's handler—a Jordanian —and insufficient cross-verification of his claims against independent data, which allowed the bomber to enter the CIA facility uninspected. The review critiqued the agency's processes in austere, high-threat environments, highlighting how assumptions about asset reliability had eroded empirical safeguards derived from prior operational data. In response, Panetta directed procedural reforms to prioritize verifiable over expediency, including mandatory physical searches and pat-downs for all visitors to CIA forward sites, irrespective of their asset status or sponsoring agency. Additional measures encompassed enhanced inter-agency vetting protocols requiring multiple corroborative checks before granting access waivers and reduced dependence on single-source, unconfirmed reporting in . These changes aimed to institutionalize stricter , drawing on incident-specific lessons to refine security postures without compromising core intelligence-gathering functions.

External Allegations and Controversies

A declassified U.S. from 2010, released in 2016, alleged that a Pakistani (ISI) officer paid $200,000 to members of the and an Afghan border commander to facilitate the December 30, 2009, suicide bombing at Forward Operating Base Chapman, enabling the attacker to gain access without thorough searches. The cable, based on U.S. intelligence reporting, described the payment as split between $100,000 for smuggling al-Balawi across the border and $100,000 for Haqqani facilitators, framing it as part of broader ISI support for Afghan insurgents despite public denials of ties to affiliates. Pakistani officials rejected the claims as baseless, asserting no involvement and highlighting ongoing counterterrorism cooperation with the U.S., while U.S. sources noted the allegations remained unproven in court but aligned with patterns of ISI-Haqqaani interactions documented in other declassified assessments. External critiques have focused on CIA practices, particularly the agency's growing dependence on local assets linked to intelligence, which some analysts argue created vulnerabilities exploited by double agents like al-Balawi, who was fast-tracked after providing purported tips on high-value targets amid escalating U.S. unmanned aerial operations in Pakistan's tribal areas. Al-Balawi, initially vetted through Jordanian intelligence as a sympathizer turned informant, was not subjected to standard body searches due to his claimed ideological alignment and promises of actionable data on , a decision critics from security think tanks described as emblematic of overreach in source handling that prioritized volume over rigorous validation, potentially fueling insurgent blowback from civilian casualties in campaigns. These practices yielded prior successes, such as targeting mid-level facilitators, but the Chapman incident underscored risks when informants with unverified access to sensitive sites were trusted without secondary corroboration, as evidenced by al-Balawi's pre-attack video vowing revenge for s. Debates over the attack have included allegations of undue political haste in intelligence operations following President Obama's December 2009 announcement of a 30,000-troop in , with conservative commentators arguing that demands for rapid counterterrorism results pressured field officers into riskier asset meetings absent adequate bureaucratic safeguards. In contrast, progressive critiques framed the incident within broader objections to prolonged U.S. entanglement, portraying CIA forward basing as symptomatic of that incentivized unvetted recruitments to sustain operational tempo amid escalating insurgency costs exceeding $100 billion annually by 2010. Such viewpoints, drawn from policy analyses, emphasize that while the aimed to reverse gains—evidenced by temporary reductions in attacks per U.S. metrics—the reliance on high-stakes informant meets without fortified protocols reflected systemic trade-offs between urgency and prudence, unsubstantiated by direct directives but inferred from the timing of expanded CIA roles.

Post-Attack Developments

Continued Operations

Following the 2009 suicide bombing, Forward Operating Base Chapman remained operational, serving as a key hub for CIA intelligence fusion and support for targeted operations in , a stronghold of the . In 2011, U.S. military leaders, including Chairman of the Admiral Mike Mullen, visited the base to honor fallen personnel at a , underscoring its ongoing role amid the U.S. surge. Infrastructure enhancements, such as improved in February 2011, were implemented to boost morale and operational efficiency, indicating sustained presence and activities. The base incorporated post-attack reforms, including stricter source vetting protocols, mandatory searches for all visitors, and enhanced biometric screening to mitigate threats, which helped maintain efficacy despite heightened risks. These adaptations supported intelligence gathering for drone strikes and targeting Haqqani and networks, contributing to disruptions in the region during the 2009–2014 surge period. CIA-backed units, such as the , operated from or in coordination with facilities like Chapman, conducting raids and patrols that pressured insurgents in eastern . Fortified perimeters, including reinforced barriers and persistent drone overwatch, were employed to counter mounting insurgent threats, including repeated attempts at infiltration and . While these measures sustained the base's contributions to intelligence-driven strikes—key to degrading Haqqani logistics and leadership—insurgent pressure intensified over the decade, reflecting broader challenges in .

Closure Following US Withdrawal

As part of the military drawdown in , which reduced troop levels to approximately 2,500 by January 2021 and culminated in a full by August 31, 2021, Forward Operating Base Chapman was transferred to the control of prior to the Taliban's accelerated offensive. Specific details regarding the exact handover date for Chapman, a site with significant CIA involvement, have not been publicly disclosed in official U.S. military records, reflecting the classified nature of operations there. The base's transition occurred amid broader efforts to consolidate U.S. presence at major installations like , which U.S. forces vacated on July 2, 2021, leaving smaller forward operating bases reliant on Afghan partners for sustainment. Evacuation protocols prioritized the of U.S. personnel, sensitive equipment, and mission-critical assets, with minimal left intact to avoid aiding potential adversaries, though exact inventories for Chapman remain unverified publicly. Following the Afghan government's collapse, Taliban forces captured City, the provincial capital near Chapman, on August 15, 2021, effectively ending any residual Afghan control over the site. No subsequent U.S. access or operations at the base have been reported, underscoring the termination of American forward basing in southeastern and the shift to over-the-horizon capabilities.

Strategic Significance and Legacy

Contributions to Counterterrorism

Forward Operating Base Chapman, situated in near the border, functioned as a vital hub for CIA operations targeting , , and affiliated networks operating across the Afghanistan- frontier. CIA personnel at the base cultivated local agent networks that provided granular insights into militant safe houses, supply routes, and leadership movements in the Khost-Gardez corridor, a primary conduit for cross-border insurgent activities. These efforts focused on disrupting the , a potent syndicate responsible for attacks that killed dozens of U.S. and forces, by identifying high-value targets for subsequent neutralization. The base's forward positioning enabled direct debriefings and cross-verification of with partners, accelerating the in ways unattainable from remote facilities. This proximity supported coordinated paramilitary raids and strikes, including expansions into Pakistan's tribal regions and Baluchistan by early 2009, which degraded enemy command structures and operational capabilities along the . On-site operations outperformed distant by incorporating cultural and contextual nuances from human sources, yielding higher-fidelity targeting data that informed joint against mid- and senior-level militants in southeastern . Despite inherent operational hazards, Chapman's agent-handling successes demonstrated the efficacy of embedded postures in penetrating hostile environments, countering assessments that overemphasize technological surveillance at the expense of ground-based networks. Sustained from the contributed to a series of pre-2009 disruptions that hampered and in the region, affirming the causal linkage between persistent forward presence and tangible degradations in adversary effectiveness.

Criticisms and Lessons Learned

The attack at Forward Operating Base Chapman highlighted significant lapses in (HUMINT) vetting protocols, where the suicide bomber, , was granted access without a thorough physical search due to overconfidence in his provided intelligence on high-value targets like . CIA personnel failed to conduct a pat-down, partly because female officers present cited cultural sensitivities regarding searching a Muslim male, allowing al-Balawi to detonate explosives hidden on his person. This incident exposed incentive structures under political pressure for rapid successes, which prioritized source recruitment speed over empirical cross-verification, leading to unchecked in unvetted claims. Critics, including former CIA operatives, argued that the episode reflected deeper operational complacency, where base security routines were relaxed for a purportedly high-yield asset, despite warnings from Jordanian intelligence about potential unreliability that were not adequately disseminated. Broader analyses pointed to in , where initial focused efforts devolved into expansive commitments, diluting resources and exposing forward bases to unnecessary risks from prolonged ground engagements rather than precision strikes. Such distractions, rooted in policy trade-offs favoring indefinite occupations over targeted operations, contributed to vulnerabilities that exploited through infiltrated assets. Enduring lessons emphasized rigorous empirical validation of over narrative-driven haste, prompting post-2009 reforms like mandatory searches, enhanced inter-agency vetting, and a pivot toward (UAV) strikes to minimize human exposure in contested areas. These changes correlated with reduced CIA field casualties in subsequent years, as data from declassified assessments showed fewer successful insider attacks on U.S. facilities after protocol overhauls. The incident underscored the causal pitfalls of politically accelerated timelines, advocating for structural incentives aligned with long-term threat realism rather than short-term operational gains.

References

  1. [1]
    Khowst PRT Winning the Fight in Afghanistan | Article - Army.mil
    May 30, 2007 · The Khowst Provincial Reconstruction Team, based in Forward Operating Base Chapman near Khowst City, serves as the main effort in rebuilding Khowst province.
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Jordan: Background and U.S. Relations - DTIC
    May 3, 2012 · bomb killing eight people outside CIA Forward Operating Base Chapman in Khost, Afghanistan. His Jordanian handler, Captain Sharif Ali bin ...
  3. [3]
    The remarkable case of the triple agent and the bombing in Khost ...
    a U.S. military base in Khost, Afghanistan — killing seven CIA officers and ...
  4. [4]
    Pentagon Press Secretary John F. Kirby Holds a Press Briefing
    Apr 5, 2021 · And clearly this -- the attack on the on Forward Operating Base Chapman is of concern. And I want to correct my last entry, I said I wasn't ...
  5. [5]
    Camp Chapman: The CIA's Frontline in Afghanistan - Grey Dynamics
    Camp Chapman was a US military base located near Khost in southeastern Afghanistan. It was established in the early 2000s during the US intervention in ...
  6. [6]
    Khost, Afghanistan - Mindat
    Aug 4, 2025 · To the east, Khost Province is bordered by North Waziristan and Kurram in Pakistan. Khost Province used to be part of Paktia Province in the ...<|separator|>
  7. [7]
    Geographical location of Khost Province in Afghanistan and the ...
    Khost Province of Afghanistan lies at a base elevation of about 1,180 m above mean sea level and is located between 33°59 ʹ and 33°46 ʹ North latitudes and 69° ...
  8. [8]
    Khost topographic map, elevation, terrain
    Khost is located in the "Khost Bowl", a valley with lower elevation than the surrounding highlands, because of which it is known for its pleasant weather.Missing: geography | Show results with:geography
  9. [9]
    C.I.A. Takes On Bigger and Riskier Role on Front Lines
    Dec 31, 2009 · The deaths of seven Central Intelligence Agency operatives at a remote base in the mountains of Afghanistan are a pointed example of the civilian spy agency's ...Missing: terrain southeastern
  10. [10]
    Khost Province topographic map, elevation, terrain
    Average elevation: 5574 ft • Khost Province, Afghanistan • Visualization and sharing of free topographic maps.Missing: geography | Show results with:geography
  11. [11]
    CIA chief confirms seven officers killed by Afghan bomb - BBC News
    Dec 31, 2009 · FOB Chapman operates from Khost Airfield 32km from Pakistan border ... Named after Nathan Chapman, first US soldier killed in Afghanistan in 2002.
  12. [12]
    Khost Airfield (KHT) (Airport) - Mapy.com
    ... FOB Chapman) during past conflicts. Recent improvements culminated in a 2021 ... named after: Khost Province. surface: gravel. elevation above sea level ...
  13. [13]
    Photo of Sgt. First Class Nathan Ross Chapman, an Army ... - Reddit
    Apr 23, 2020 · Camp Chapman (aka FOB Chapman) was named in honor of this fallen warrior. Camp Chapman. On December 30, 2009, Camp Chapman, located 2 miles ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Abiding Threat at Camp Chapman - APAN Community
    Jun 1, 2012 · To inform the Army training community of a terrorist suicide bombing at Camp. Chapman, near Khost City, Afghanistan, perpetrated on 26 ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] The United States Army in Afghanistan, 2001-2014, Vol. 1
    ... Forward Operating Base CHAPMAN, a small base constructed by CJTF-180 engineers and 3d Battalion, 505th Infantry, between August and October 2002. Cmd Rpt ...<|separator|>
  16. [16]
    Opinion versus Action in the Radicalization of Abu-Mulal al-Balawi
    Humam Khalil Abu-Mulal al-Balawi, recruited by Jordanian intelligence as a double agent to gather information on high-profile Taliban leaders, blew himself ...
  17. [17]
    CIA base bomber 'was double agent' | News | Al Jazeera
    Jan 6, 2010 · A suicide bomber who killed eight people when he attacked a US base in Afghanistan has been identified as a “double agent” working for Jordanian intelligence.
  18. [18]
    Humam Khalil Abu Mulal al-Balawi Calls C.I.A. Attack Revenge
    Jan 9, 2010 · A Jordanian suicide bomber said that his attack on C.I.A. operatives in Afghanistan last month was revenge for the killing of a Pakistani ...Missing: background | Show results with:background
  19. [19]
    Source: CIA bomber's intel led to successes - NBC News
    Jan 5, 2010 · The suspected double agent who killed eight people on a CIA base in Afghanistan was coerced into helping Jordan's spy agency track down al-Qaida's No. 2 leader ...Missing: background | Show results with:background
  20. [20]
    Bomber Lured CIA to Meet With Intel on Bin Laden's Deputy
    Jan 4, 2010 · The suicide bomber that killed some of the CIA's top al Qaeda hunters lured the agents to the meeting by claiming he had just met with Ayman ...
  21. [21]
    Bomber who killed CIA operatives in Afghanistan was triple agent
    Jan 4, 2010 · Ex-Jordanian militant had agreed to help CIA find al-Qaida chief before turning against US spy agency.Missing: background | Show results with:background
  22. [22]
    Officer Failed to Warn C.I.A. Before Attack - The New York Times
    Oct 19, 2010 · ... C.I.A. officer in Jordan received warnings that the man might be working for Al Qaeda, according to an investigation into the deadly attack.
  23. [23]
  24. [24]
    Bomber who killed seven at CIA base 'was not vetted' - BBC News
    Oct 20, 2010 · A suicide bomber who killed seven CIA agents at a base in Afghanistan in January had not been properly vetted before gaining entry, the CIA ...
  25. [25]
    The frantic effort to save lives after a deadly attack on the CIA
    Dec 30, 2019 · It has been 10 years since he and his military colleagues tried to save lives after an attack on the CIA in Khost, Afghanistan.
  26. [26]
    CIA Faults Lax Security for Afghan Base Attack - VOA
    Oct 19, 2010 · Five CIA officers, two contractors, a Jordanian officer, and an Afghan driver were killed in the attack. The investigation by the CIA's ...Missing: red Chapman
  27. [27]
    The Al-Qaida 'Triple Agent' Who Infiltrated The CIA - NPR
    Jul 19, 2011 · The al-Qaida double agent killed seven CIA operatives when he set off the 30-pound bomb strapped to his body at a fortified base in Afghanistan near the ...Missing: recruitment Chapman
  28. [28]
    Taliban suicide attack kills CIA agents at US outpost in Afghanistan
    Dec 31, 2009 · The CIA yesterday vowed to avenge the deaths of seven of its agents who were killed in a suicide bombing on Wednesday in Afghanistan.
  29. [29]
    CIA Hunts for Answers After Deadly Afghanistan Attack | PBS News
    Dec 31, 2009 · The director of the Central Intelligence Agency reported Thursday that seven CIA employees were killed in an attack on a U.S. military base ...Missing: FOB | Show results with:FOB
  30. [30]
    On December 30, 2009, in Khost, Afghanistan, a suicide bomber ...
    Dec 30, 2022 · On December 30, 2009, in Khost, Afghanistan, a suicide bomber attacked Camp Chapman, killing seven CIA personnel including Jennifer Matthews ...
  31. [31]
    Panetta touts reforms due to Afghanistan attack - POLITICO
    Oct 19, 2010 · Blog: When seven CIA officers were killed in Afghanistan last December in the worst attack in the agency's history, CIA Director Leon ...
  32. [32]
    CIA Releases Report on Deadly Afghanistan Bombing
    Oct 19, 2010 · The attack killed seven CIA employees and contractors and was the most severe strike on the agency since a terrorist bombing in 1983. The report ...
  33. [33]
    Declassified U.S. document suggests Pakistani link to attack on CIA ...
    Apr 14, 2016 · A Pakistani intelligence officer paid $200000 to an extremist network to facilitate a deadly suicide bomb attack on CIA operatives at a base ...
  34. [34]
    Declassified US Document Suggests Pakistan Link in 2009 CIA ...
    Apr 14, 2016 · It alleges Pakistan intelligence officer paid Haqqani militant network and another man to enable attack, in which seven people were killed.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  35. [35]
    Pakistani Spies May Have Funded 2009 Suicide Bombing Targeting ...
    Apr 13, 2016 · Pakistan's powerful spy agency may have provided the funding for a deadly 2009 suicide attack on a CIA base in Afghanistan that ranks as one of the deadliest ...
  36. [36]
    Pakistan dismisses claims of ties to 2009 suicide bombing targeting ...
    Apr 15, 2016 · Declassified US diplomatic cable says bomber of listening post in Afghanistan was'triple agent' and top Pakistani spy agency paid $200000 to ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  37. [37]
    Pakistan Rejects Allegation of Plotting Raid on CIA's Afghan Base
    Apr 15, 2016 · ... Haqqani network and another man "to enable the attack on Chapman." The plan was for an Afghan border commander to be given $100,000 for his ...
  38. [38]
    What The Khost Bombing Says About The CIA - NPR
    Mar 16, 2010 · Former CIA operative Robert Baer deconstructs the deadliest attack on the CIA in more than a quarter century and the mistakes that led up to it.Missing: FOB | Show results with:FOB
  39. [39]
    CIA runs shadow war with Afghan militia implicated in civilian killings
    Dec 3, 2015 · “When my father opened the gate, they shot him dead,” recalled Khan ... Camp Chapman and were “subjected to ill-treatment.” Two of them ...
  40. [40]
    Improved Internet Connectivity Boosts Morale at Forward Operating ...
    Mar 7, 2025 · ... Forward Operating Base Chapman in Afghanistan's Khost province, Feb. 15, 2011. U.S. Air Force photo by Master Sgt. Matthew Lohr. IMAGE INFO ...
  41. [41]
    Ten years after a CIA operation in Afghanistan went wrong, a slain ...
    Jan 13, 2020 · 30, 2009, at remote Camp Chapman in Khost province along the ... suicide attack by al Qaeda in Khost province in Afghanistan.André ...
  42. [42]
    Armed governance: the case of the CIA-supported Afghan militias
    Jun 18, 2020 · ... Camp Chapman in the northeastern province of Khost.Footnote Significantly, the KPF is an illegal armed group in the sense that its ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] The Haqqani Network - American Security Project
    The Haqqani Network functions as an autonomous branch of the Taliban that carries out operational attacks and serves as a conduit for other terrorist ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] After Action Review on Afghanistan - U.S. Department of State
    The decisions of both President Trump and President Biden to withdraw U.S. military forces from Afghanistan during this period provide the overall context for ...
  45. [45]
    U.S. Leaves Its Last Afghan Base, Effectively Ending Operations
    Jul 4, 2021 · American troops and their Western allies have departed the US military base that coordinated the sprawling war in Afghanistan, officials said on Friday.Missing: Forward | Show results with:Forward
  46. [46]
    The Latest: Taliban appear inside Afghan presidential palace
    An Afghan official and the Taliban say the militants have seized the provincial capital of Khost. The capture Sunday makes the ...<|separator|>
  47. [47]
    [PDF] US Withdrawal from Afghanistan | Biden White House
    Apr 6, 2023 · As part of the deal,. President Trump also pressured the Afghan government to release 5,000 Taliban fighters from prison, including senior war ...Missing: Chapman | Show results with:Chapman<|separator|>
  48. [48]
  49. [49]
    Intelligence failures – DW – 01/11/2010
    Intelligence failures. 01/11/2010 January 11, 2010. US intelligence agencies at ... attack by an al Qaeda double agent in Afghanistan which killed seven CIA ...