Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Fractional coordinates

Fractional coordinates, also known as crystal coordinates, constitute a specialized in for specifying the positions of atoms or points within a crystal's as dimensionless fractions of the lattice parameters a, b, and c. These coordinates are expressed as a triplet (x, y, z), where x, y, and z range typically from 0 to 1 (or equivalently -0.5 to 0.5), representing the proportional distances along the respective unit cell edges from the at (0, 0, 0). For instance, the center of the is always at (0.5, 0.5, 0.5), independent of the cell's dimensions or shape. This system leverages the periodic nature of crystal lattices, where adding or subtracting integer values to any coordinate (e.g., (x+1, y, z)) yields an equivalent position in an adjacent due to . Unlike orthogonal Cartesian coordinates, which measure absolute distances in angstroms along perpendicular axes, fractional coordinates align with the non-orthogonal crystallographic axes separated by angles α, β, and γ, making them essential for handling the of real crystals. Conversion between fractional and Cartesian coordinates is achieved via a derived from the unit cell parameters, facilitating calculations such as interatomic distances using the . Fractional coordinates play a pivotal role in , enabling the concise representation of atomic arrangements in crystallographic databases such as the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) and the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) and in computational tools for symmetry operations, Fourier transforms, and molecular modeling. They simplify the description of complex across infinite lattices and are particularly valuable in fields such as and biochemistry for interpreting data and simulating periodic systems.

Crystal Structure Basics

Crystal Lattice

A crystal is defined as an infinite array of discrete points in space, where each point has identical surroundings, generated by integer combinations of three discrete vectors. This arrangement forms the mathematical framework underlying the periodic structure of crystalline solids, allowing the positions of lattice points to be reached by translating the structure along these vectors without rotation or reflection. The concept of the crystal lattice was formalized by Auguste Bravais in his 1850 work, which systematically classified possible lattice arrangements. Bravais lattices represent the 14 unique three-dimensional configurations of such points, categorized into seven crystal systems: triclinic, monoclinic, orthorhombic, tetragonal, trigonal, hexagonal, and cubic. These lattices differ in their and the relationships between their translation vectors, encompassing , body-centered, face-centered, and base-centered variants where applicable, ensuring all possible periodic point arrays are covered without redundancy. The repeating unit of the lattice is defined by three non-coplanar vectors, conventionally denoted as a, b, and c, which serve as the basis for generating all points via linear combinations with integer coefficients. These vectors determine the periodicity and of the , with their lengths and angles specifying the crystal system's parameters. The unit cell, as the smallest volume containing the full symmetry, is constructed from these vectors.

Unit Cell

The unit cell serves as the fundamental repeating unit in a crystal lattice, representing the smallest volume that encapsulates all essential structural information of the ; translating this volume by integer multiples of the vectors generates the entire periodic structure. It forms a bounded by the three vectors \mathbf{a}, \mathbf{b}, and \mathbf{c}. The infinite arises from the translational repetition of these unit cells in three dimensions. The geometry of the unit cell is characterized by six lattice parameters: the edge lengths a = |\mathbf{a}|, b = |\mathbf{b}|, c = |\mathbf{c}|, and the interaxial angles \alpha (between \mathbf{b} and \mathbf{c}), \beta (between \mathbf{a} and \mathbf{c}), and \gamma (between \mathbf{a} and \mathbf{b}). These parameters are constrained by the symmetry of the seven crystal systems, which classify all possible Bravais lattices. In the triclinic system, the lowest symmetry, all lengths and angles are unequal (a \neq b \neq c, \alpha \neq \beta \neq \gamma), allowing maximal asymmetry. Higher-symmetry systems impose equalities, such as the cubic system where a = b = c and \alpha = \beta = \gamma = 90^\circ, resulting in a regular cube. The full set of relations is summarized below:
Crystal SystemEdge LengthsAngles
Triclinica \neq b \neq c\alpha \neq \beta \neq \gamma
Monoclinica \neq b \neq c\alpha = \gamma = 90^\circ, \beta \neq 90^\circ
a \neq b \neq c\alpha = \beta = \gamma = 90^\circ
Tetragonala = b \neq c\alpha = \beta = \gamma = 90^\circ
Trigonal (rhombohedral)a = b = c\alpha = \beta = \gamma \neq 90^\circ
Hexagonala = b \neq c\alpha = \beta = 90^\circ, \gamma = 120^\circ
Cubica = b = c\alpha = \beta = \gamma = 90^\circ
These parameters reflect the inherent symmetry, with lower-symmetry systems like triclinic permitting oblique orientations for minimal volume representation. Unit cells are categorized as primitive or conventional based on their size and lattice point occupancy. A primitive unit cell has the minimal volume compatible with the lattice, containing exactly one lattice point (shared among eight adjacent cells at the corners), and its vectors connect nearest-neighbor lattice points. Conventional unit cells, in contrast, are larger multiples of the primitive cell, selected to highlight the lattice's symmetry even if they enclose multiple lattice points; they are not always the smallest possible but facilitate description in high-symmetry cases. For instance, the face-centered cubic (FCC) lattice uses a conventional cubic unit cell with lattice points at all eight corners and the centers of all six faces, enclosing four lattice points total (each corner point shared by eight cells, each face-center point by two); its primitive counterpart is a smaller rhombohedral cell with one lattice point. The orientation and choice of unit cell prioritize minimal volume for the primitive form while aligning with the crystal's symmetry for conventional descriptions, particularly in asymmetric systems where oblique angles minimize the enclosed space without violating periodicity.

Coordinate Systems

Cartesian Coordinate System

The Cartesian coordinate system in crystallography is defined by three mutually perpendicular axes, labeled x, y, and z, with equal scaling along each direction, typically expressed in units of angstroms (Å) to represent atomic-scale distances. This orthogonal framework establishes a right-handed reference for positioning points in three-dimensional space, where the coordinates of any point directly correspond to distances from the origin along these axes. In crystallographic applications, the system's simplifies direct metric calculations, making it particularly intuitive for determining physical quantities like interatomic distances and lengths via the formula, without requiring adjustments for non-perpendicular directions. This alignment with standard geometric principles facilitates visualization and analysis in tools such as molecular , where absolute positions are rendered in real space. The origin of the Cartesian system is conventionally placed at a corner of cell, which serves as an arbitrary point, allowing positions to be described relative to this fixed reference within the crystal . For instance, an atom at coordinates (x, y, z) = (4.2, 1.5, 3.0) is located 4.2 from the origin along the x-axis, 1.5 along the y-axis, and 3.0 along the z-axis, providing an absolute spatial description independent of the . While Cartesian coordinates emphasize orthogonal, metric-based positioning, fractional coordinates serve as an alternative for describing locations relative to potentially non-orthogonal vectors.

Fractional Coordinate System

In , fractional coordinates provide a normalized of atomic positions within the , expressed relative to the vectors \mathbf{a}, \mathbf{b}, and \mathbf{c}. These coordinates, often denoted as (u, v, w) or (x, y, z), specify fractions along each vector, such that the position of an is given by \mathbf{r} = u\mathbf{a} + v\mathbf{b} + w\mathbf{c}, where $0 \leq u, v, w < 1. This notation distinguishes fractional coordinates from absolute Cartesian coordinates (X, Y, Z), which measure distances directly in orthogonal space. Special positions in the unit cell, which align with symmetry elements of the , are commonly expressed using fractional coordinates. For instance, points at the corners occupy (0, 0, 0), while in a body-centered cubic structure, an additional atom sits at the special position (0.5, 0.5, 0.5), corresponding to the center of the unit cell. Fractional coordinates offer key advantages for describing periodic structures, including invariance under lattice translations—adding integer values to u, v, or w yields an equivalent position in an adjacent cell due to the modulo-1 periodicity—and a compact form that applies uniformly across diverse crystal systems without needing to specify absolute lengths. For example, an atom at fractional coordinates (0.25, 0.3, 0.1) is positioned at $0.25\mathbf{a} + 0.3\mathbf{b} + 0.1\mathbf{c}, facilitating efficient storage and manipulation of structural data in crystallographic databases.

Transformations Between Coordinates

General Conversion Formulas

In , the conversion from fractional coordinates to Cartesian coordinates expresses the position of an atom or point within the unit as a of the basis . The position \mathbf{r} = (x, y, z) in Cartesian coordinates is given by \mathbf{r} = u \mathbf{a} + v \mathbf{b} + w \mathbf{c}, where \mathbf{a}, \mathbf{b}, and \mathbf{c} are the defining the unit edges, and u, v, w are the fractional coordinates ranging from 0 to 1 for positions inside the unit . This forward transformation can be compactly written in matrix-vector notation as \mathbf{r} = A \mathbf{f}, where A is the 3×3 cell matrix whose columns are the lattice vectors \mathbf{a}, \mathbf{b}, and \mathbf{c}, and \mathbf{f} = \begin{pmatrix} u \\ v \\ w \end{pmatrix} is the column vector of fractional coordinates. For the inverse transformation, the fractional coordinates are obtained by \mathbf{f} = A^{-1} \mathbf{r}, which requires inverting the cell matrix A. This inversion is always possible for non-degenerate lattices, as the lattice vectors form a basis spanning three-dimensional space. The derivation of these formulas follows from fundamental linear algebra: any \mathbf{r} in the can be uniquely expanded in the basis \{\mathbf{a}, \mathbf{b}, \mathbf{c}\}, yielding the coefficients u, v, w via solution of the A \mathbf{f} = \mathbf{r}. These relations assume an initial setup with an orthogonal Cartesian basis for defining \mathbf{r}, but they apply generally to non-orthogonal s, where A accounts for the angles between \mathbf{a}, \mathbf{b}, and \mathbf{c}. For orthogonal s, A simplifies to a with entries equal to the lattice parameters, making the conversions scalar multiplications along each .

Matrix-Based Transformations

In matrix-based representations of fractional coordinates, the unit cell is described by a cell matrix \mathbf{A}, whose columns are the basis vectors of the . For a lattice, \mathbf{A} is a 2×2 matrix; for the standard crystallographic case, it is 3×3; and in general, it extends to an n \times n matrix for higher-dimensional structures. The forward transformation from fractional coordinates \mathbf{f} to Cartesian coordinates \mathbf{r} is given by \mathbf{r} = \mathbf{A} \mathbf{f}, while the inverse transformation is \mathbf{f} = \mathbf{A}^{-1} \mathbf{r}, assuming \mathbf{A} is invertible. This matrix formulation generalizes the basic vector equations, providing a compact way to handle basis changes across dimensions. In 2D, such as for planar lattices, the matrix \mathbf{A} facilitates transformations specific to structures like hexagonal lattices, where the basis vectors are \mathbf{a} = (a, 0) and \mathbf{b} = (a/2, a \sqrt{3}/2), yielding \mathbf{A} = \begin{pmatrix} a & a/2 \\ 0 & a \sqrt{3}/2 \end{pmatrix}. The determinant \det(\mathbf{A}) = a^2 \sqrt{3}/2 corresponds to the area of the unit cell parallelogram. For arbitrary dimensions, this approach extends to n-D systems, such as embeddings in simulations or higher-dimensional models, where projections from a higher-dimensional periodic to physical use matrices. If the matrix is non-square, as in certain schemes, the Moore-Penrose pseudoinverse \mathbf{A}^{+} provides a least-squares for the transformation, though standard crystallographic cells remain square and full-rank. Numerical stability is crucial when inverting \mathbf{A} for cells, where small angles lead to near-singular matrices and accumulated floating-point errors. Algorithms for basis reduction, such as the numerically stable Krivy-Gruber method, incorporate tolerances (e.g., \epsilon = 10^{-5} \times V^{1/3}, with V the cell volume) to handle these cases robustly during transformations. As an example, consider a 2D rectangular with parameters a = 5 and b = 4 . The cell matrix is \mathbf{A} = \begin{pmatrix} 5 & 0 \\ 0 & 4 \end{pmatrix}, so for fractional coordinates \mathbf{f} = (0.3, 0.7)^T, the Cartesian position is \mathbf{r} = (1.5, 2.8)^T , and the inverse yields \mathbf{f} = \mathbf{A}^{-1} \mathbf{r}.

Applications in Calculations

Interatomic Distances

In periodic crystal structures, interatomic distances are calculated using fractional coordinates to account for the periodicity. The Cartesian position of an atom with fractional coordinates \mathbf{f} = (x, y, z) is given by \mathbf{r} = A \mathbf{f} + A \mathbf{m}, where A is the 3×3 matrix whose columns are the lattice vectors \mathbf{a}, \mathbf{b}, \mathbf{c}, and \mathbf{m} is an integer vector representing translations to periodic images. The d between two atoms at \mathbf{f}_i and \mathbf{f}_j is then d = |\mathbf{r}_i - \mathbf{r}_j| = |A (\mathbf{f}_i - \mathbf{f}_j + \mathbf{m})| for the appropriate \mathbf{m} that minimizes d. To efficiently compute this, the squared distance is expressed as d^2 = (\mathbf{f}_i - \mathbf{f}_j + \mathbf{m})^T G (\mathbf{f}_i - \mathbf{f}_j + \mathbf{m}), where G = A^T A is the real-space , a encoding the and angles. This formulation avoids explicit Cartesian conversions for each pair, enabling direct use of fractional coordinates in software. The elements of G are G_{11} = \mathbf{a} \cdot \mathbf{a}, G_{22} = \mathbf{b} \cdot \mathbf{b}, G_{33} = \mathbf{c} \cdot \mathbf{c}, G_{12} = G_{21} = \mathbf{a} \cdot \mathbf{b}, and similarly for other off-diagonals. The minimum image convention ensures the shortest distance by selecting the nearest periodic image, crucial for identifying bonds or close contacts across boundaries. This involves evaluating d over a small set of \mathbf{m} values, typically m_x, m_y, m_z \in \{-1, 0, 1\}, and choosing the minimum, as distances beyond half the cell dimensions are unlikely to be relevant for short-range interactions. In non-orthogonal cells, the search accounts for the to properly weight the fractional differences. For example, in a simple cubic lattice with parameter a, consider atoms at (0,0,0) and (0.5, 0, 0). Here, A = a I (identity matrix scaled by a), so G = a^2 I, and with \mathbf{m} = (0,0,0), d = a/2. If the second atom is at (0.9, 0, 0), the minimum occurs with \mathbf{m} = (-1, 0, 0), yielding \Delta \mathbf{f} + \mathbf{m} = (-0.1, 0, 0) and d = 0.1a, rather than the longer $0.9a without imaging. This approach is fundamental in refining crystal structures and analyzing bonding.

Cell Properties via Metric Tensor

In , the provides a fundamental tool for characterizing the of the unit using fractional coordinates, allowing the computation of intrinsic properties such as volumes and angles without requiring explicit conversion to Cartesian coordinates. Derived from the lattice basis vectors, the encapsulates the dot products between these vectors, enabling efficient calculations in or direct space representations. This approach is particularly valuable in and for analyzing crystal structures where fractional coordinates are the standard input. The \mathbf{G} for the direct is constructed as \mathbf{G} = \mathbf{A}^T \mathbf{A}, where \mathbf{A} is the 3×3 whose columns are the basis vectors \mathbf{a}_1, \mathbf{a}_2, \mathbf{a}_3. Its elements are the scalar products g_{ij} = \mathbf{a}_i \cdot \mathbf{a}_j, forming a symmetric positive-definite that fully describes the metric of the space in the basis defined by these vectors. In terms of traditional parameters a, b, c (lengths) and angles \alpha, \beta, \gamma, the takes the explicit form: \mathbf{G} = \begin{pmatrix} a^2 & ab \cos \gamma & ac \cos \beta \\ ab \cos \gamma & b^2 & bc \cos \alpha \\ ac \cos \beta & bc \cos \alpha & c^2 \end{pmatrix} This formulation links the tensor directly to observable cell parameters, facilitating the quantification of deviations from orthogonality. The unit cell volume V in three dimensions is computed as the absolute value of the of the basis , V = |\det(\mathbf{A})|, which equals \sqrt{\det(\mathbf{G})}. This relation holds because \det(\mathbf{G}) = [\det(\mathbf{A})]^2, ensuring the volume is always positive for physically valid lattices. In two dimensions, the corresponding cell area A simplifies to A = \sqrt{\det(\mathbf{G})}, where \mathbf{G} is now 2×2 with elements based on the two basis vectors. These formulas are under basis changes with determinant ±1, preserving the geometric integrity of the cell. For instance, in an orthorhombic cell with orthogonal axes and parameters a = 5 , b = 6 , c = 7 , \mathbf{G} is diagonal with g_{11} = 25, g_{22} = 36, g_{33} = 49, yielding V = \sqrt{25 \times 36 \times 49} = 210 ų, matching the direct product abc. Such computations highlight how the tensor quantifies cell distortion, including shear (via off-diagonal ratios) and obliqueness (via angle-dependent cosines) in non-cubic systems. Angles between lattice vectors are derived from the elements, providing a direct measure of cell . The cosine of the \alpha between vectors \mathbf{a}_2 and \mathbf{a}_3 is given by \cos \alpha = g_{23} / \sqrt{g_{22} g_{33}}, with analogous expressions for \beta (g_{13} / \sqrt{g_{11} g_{33}}) and \gamma (g_{12} / \sqrt{g_{11} g_{22}}). These relations allow reconstruction of the full set of parameters from \mathbf{G}, essential for comparing experimental refinements to theoretical models. In two-dimensional lattices, the single \gamma quantifies obliqueness, while is assessed through the deviation of off-diagonal elements from zero relative to the diagonal norms; in three dimensions, the interplay of all three angles via \mathbf{G} captures more complex distortions like monoclinic or triclinic symmetries. The tensor's connection to fractional coordinates is evident in its role for general metrics, where the squared between points with fractional differences \mathbf{u} is d^2 = \mathbf{u}^T \mathbf{G} \mathbf{u}, bypassing Cartesian transformations for cell-wide properties. This utility extends briefly to interatomic distances as one application, though the primary focus here is on aggregate cell metrics.

References

  1. [1]
    Fractional Coordinates - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Fractional coordinates refer to a system of specifying the positions of atoms within a unit cell, expressed as fractions of the cell dimensions, such as (0,0,1/ ...
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
    None
    ### Summary: Point Coordinates in Crystals (Fractional Coordinates)
  4. [4]
    Coordinate Systems
    Coordinate systems describe positions within a crystal system, such as Orthogonal Ångstrom, fractional, and reciprocal orthogonal coordinates.<|control11|><|separator|>
  5. [5]
    Crystallography Basics - Chemical Instrumentation Facility
    Lattice is the geometrical basis of all the crystals. A lattice can be considered as a regular and infinite arrangement of points/ atoms where in each point/ ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Bravais Lattice - Gyan Sanchay
    •It is named after Auguste Bravais (1850). •This concept is used to define a crystalline arrangement. According to Bravais, there are no. of ways in which ...
  7. [7]
    Subject 1: The Bravais Lattices - ISSC
    The Bravais lattices represent the 14 unique ways that points can be arranged in three-dimensional space.
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Handout 4 Lattices in 1D, 2D, and 3D Bravais Lattice
    Bravais Lattices in 3D. There are 14 different Bravais lattices in 3D that are classified into 7 different crystal systems (only the unit cells are shown ...Missing: three | Show results with:three
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Crystal basis:
    Choose one point within the primitive unit cell and call it a lattice point. Lattice points: Point in a crystal with specific arrangement of atoms, reproduced ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Lecture-1-Crystal-lattices-notes.pdf - Vishik Lab
    Vocabulary: Lattice: mathematical grid of regularly repeating points. Basis: group of atoms attached to these points.
  11. [11]
    Unit cell - Online Dictionary of Crystallography
    Feb 1, 2018 · The unit cell is the parallelepiped built on the vectors, a, b, c, of a crystallographic basis of the direct lattice.
  12. [12]
    Unit Cells
    The simplest repeating unit in a crystal is called a unit cell. Each unit cell is defined in terms of lattice points.The Simplest Repeating Unit... · Three-Dimensional Graph · NaCl and ZnS
  13. [13]
    None
    ### Seven Crystal Systems and Lattice Parameters
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Bravais Lattice and Primitive Vectors - Simple, Body-Centered, and ...
    The conventional unit cell is generally chosen to be bigger than the primitive cell and to ... face-centered cubic lattice in terms of a cubic unit cell (Figure.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Fundamentals of Crystallography - Plasticity
    Its basis vectors define a right-handed axial setting. Its edges are along symmetry directions of the lattice. It is the smallest cell compatible with the above ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  16. [16]
    Matrices, Mappings and Crystallographic Symmetry
    Definition (D 1.2.1) A coordinate system with three coordinate axes perpendicular to each other and lengths OA = OB = OC = 1 is called a Cartesian coordinate.
  17. [17]
    (IUCr) CIF Definition data__atom_site_Cartn_
    Definition: The atom-site coordinates in angstroms specified according to a set of orthogonal Cartesian axes related to the cell axes as specified by the ...
  18. [18]
    Phil's Notes on Averaging
    Coordinate Spaces. There are three basic crystallographic coordinate systems: Cartesian - an orthogonal X,Y,Z space in Angstroms, usually used for structure ...
  19. [19]
    X-RAY Crystallography - St. Olaf College
    The 3D location of atoms within a unit cell can be listed as their x, y, z Cartesian Coordinates. Space groups describe the symmetry of a unit cell, of ...
  20. [20]
    Geos 306, Fall 2007, Lecture 8, Crystallography I
    We define a certain corner of the unit cell to be the origin. This is the corner that defines the angles a, b, and g. · Atoms are located within the unit cell as ...
  21. [21]
    Coordinate transformations in modern crystallographic computing
    Crystallography deals with objects defined in various coordinate systems, e.g. the fractional coordinate system (used for data or symmetry operators), the ...
  22. [22]
    (IUCr) CIF Definition data__atom_site_fract_
    Definition: Atom-site coordinates as fractions of the _cell_length_ values. Appears in list containing _atom_site_label. Related item: _atom_site_Cartn_ ( ...
  23. [23]
    Geos 306, Lecture 9, Crystallography I
    The unit cell is a parallelpiped with a shape that is characteristic of the crystal and it contains an integral number of chemical formulas. Ideally, the ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Symmetry and Diffraction - Beloit College
    For an atom located at fractional coordinates x,y,z, the phase difference from the origin is thus 2πhx, 2πky, and 2πlz respectively, for a total phase.
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Xiaoping Wang - Oak Ridge National Laboratory
    Oct 1, 2008 · The atomic coordinates of a crystal structure are usually expressed as fractions of the a, b and c unit cell vectors.
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Lattices and Space-Group Theory
    Fractional Coordinates. A fractional coordinate x is given by X/a, where X is that coordinate in absolute measure (A˚ or nm) and a is the unit-cell repeat ...
  27. [27]
    Comparing crystal structures with symmetry and geometry - Nature
    Oct 7, 2021 · All positions are in Cartesian coordinates. By convention, we measure displacements by first deforming {{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}_{2} via a ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Coordinate Transformations in Crystallography
    This allows us to determine α* unambiguously from the real unit cell angles since it must be in the range 0 - 180◦. Of course, equivalent expressions can be.
  29. [29]
    (IUCr) CIF Definition save_atom_sites_fract_transform.matrix
    Definition: Matrix used to transform fractional coordinates in the ATOM_SITE category to Cartesian coordinates. The axial alignments of this transformation ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Numerically stable algorithms for the computation of reduced unit cells
    This paper presents numerically stable algorithms for computing reduced unit cells, including a Niggli-reduction algorithm and a minimum reduction algorithm.Missing: oblique | Show results with:oblique
  31. [31]
    Determination of the experimental equilibrium structure of solid ...
    Mar 2, 2010 · In all calculations, we employed periodic boundary conditions using the minimum-image convention24 and we used a simulation cell comprising ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Introduction to crystallographic calculations
    The determinant of the metric tensor being positive, the volume of the unit cell is real. If one uses a left-handed reference, the determinant of the metric ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] An Overview of Useful Mathematics for Crystallography | Rees Lab
    Oct 12, 2006 · The fractional coordinates are transformed by the relationship: Now, the PDB coordinates have been orthogonalized (designated by capital ...
  34. [34]
    Metric Tensor and Symmetry Operations in Crystallography
    Let us examine, as an example, the cubic lattice: since the unit cell constants are a0 = bo = Co, oe =/3 =3' = 90 °, the metric tensor G is given by: G ...