Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Google Fusion Tables

Fusion Tables was a cloud-based developed by for the management, integration, visualization, and collaborative sharing of tabular data sets. Launched experimentally on June 9, 2009, as part of , it enabled users to upload files such as spreadsheets and CSVs, merge disparate tables based on common attributes, and generate interactive displays including maps, charts, and cards without requiring advanced programming skills. The service integrated seamlessly with for geospatial representations, facilitating applications in , , and geographic information systems (GIS) by automating geocoding and rendering large datasets on maps. Fusion Tables supported real-time collaboration among multiple users, allowing simultaneous editing and versioning of , akin to but tailored for structured tables. It provided an for programmatic access, released in December 2009, which extended its utility for developers embedding visualizations into applications. Over its decade-long run, the tool gained adoption for simplifying complex tasks, though it lacked the scalability of enterprise databases and faced limitations in handling very large volumes or advanced querying. In December 2018, Google announced the discontinuation of Fusion Tables and its API, effective December 3, 2019, citing a strategic shift toward other data-focused products like and . Users were encouraged to export data and migrate visualizations, with embedded maps and charts ceasing functionality post-shutdown, marking the end of a service that had democratized basic data visualization for non-experts. No significant controversies surrounded the tool, though its abrupt retirement prompted discussions on alternatives for legacy mapping projects.

Overview

Purpose and Core Functionality

Google Fusion Tables was a cloud-based service designed to enable users to manage, integrate, visualize, and collaborate on structured tabular without requiring advanced database expertise. Launched in 2009 as part of 's efforts to democratize handling, it targeted a wide audience including , journalists, and businesses by providing web-centered tools integrated with the Google ecosystem. The primary purpose was to facilitate the upload and organization of large datasets, surpassing the limitations of traditional spreadsheets, while emphasizing ease of use for non-technical users through automated features like geocoding via the . At its core, the service supported importing data from formats such as , KML, and Spreadsheets, allowing users to merge tables, filter rows, and perform basic queries using a simplified interface. Visualization capabilities formed a central functionality, enabling the creation of interactive maps, charts, line graphs, heat maps, and network diagrams directly from the data, with options to customize styles and embed outputs on websites. Collaboration tools permitted sharing tables with specific permissions, real-time editing, and row-level discussions to foster group analysis and feedback. The platform's design prioritized for datasets up to hundreds of thousands of rows, with built-in support for location-based rendering to highlight spatial patterns in data. By hosting data in the cloud, Fusion Tables ensured accessibility across devices and integrated seamlessly with other services, though it imposed limits on file sizes and query complexity to maintain performance. This combination of features positioned it as a lightweight alternative to full database systems, focusing on and public data dissemination rather than enterprise-level transactions.

Development Origins

Google Fusion Tables emerged from a Google Research initiative to develop cloud-based tools for managing structured data, addressing limitations in traditional database systems that were often inaccessible to non-experts. The project focused on enabling seamless data integration, visualization, and collaboration without requiring users to handle synchronization across files or servers. It was launched experimentally on Google Labs on June 9, 2009, with initial support for uploading tabular data in formats such as CSV, spreadsheets, and KML files, capped at 100 MB per table and 250 MB per user. The development was led by Alon Halevy of Research, who co-announced the tool alongside Rebecca Shapley from the user experience team, leveraging interdisciplinary expertise from 's data management, machine learning, and interface design groups. Additional key contributors included Hector Gonzalez, Christian S. Jensen (on leave from ), Anno Langen, Jayant Madhavan, Warren Shen, and Jonathan Goldberg-Kidon (on leave from M.I.T.), all affiliated with . This team aimed to create a web-centered service that prioritized user-friendly operations over conventional paradigms, such as joining tables on primary keys and embedding discussions directly on data elements. Motivations for the project included the growing need for accessible data handling amid increasing online data volumes, particularly for merging disparate sources and publishing interactive views like maps via or charts through the Google Visualization API. By hosting data in the , Fusion Tables eliminated local storage burdens and facilitated real-time sharing, initially targeting researchers, journalists, and organizations requiring collaborative analysis without . The system's design emphasized empirical and iterative refinement based on early user feedback from participants.

Features

Data Upload and Management

Google Fusion Tables allowed users to upload tabular data directly through its web interface or by integrating with , supporting formats such as (CSV), (TSV), other delimited text files, KML for geospatial data, spreadsheets, and spreadsheets. Uploads were limited to 100 MB per file, with an overall storage quota of 250 MB per user account. Once uploaded, tables supported up to 500,000 rows and 5,000 cells per row, enabling management of moderately large datasets in the cloud without local storage requirements. Users could edit data by modifying individual cells, rows, or columns directly in the interface, with changes tracked through versioning to allow reversion to prior states. Schema evolution was facilitated by adding, removing, or renaming columns post-upload, accommodating evolving data structures. A key management feature was table merging, which performed joins on common keys across disparate tables—even those owned by different users—to integrate data without physical duplication, supporting both inner and outer joins via the "File > Merge" option. This enabled collaborative data enrichment, such as combining attribute data with geospatial layers in KML format. Access controls allowed tables to be set as private, shared with specific collaborators for joint editing and markup, or published publicly.

Visualization Capabilities

Google Fusion Tables enabled users to generate interactive visualizations directly from uploaded tabular data, supporting types such as maps, charts, timelines, motion charts, and network graphs. These tools allowed for quick rendering of data patterns without requiring programming expertise, with options to customize colors, labels, and filters. The service integrated technology for many visualizations, facilitating embedding on web pages or sharing via links. Map visualizations were among the most prominent features, accommodating point-based displays via geocoded addresses, latitude-longitude coordinates, or KML imports, with markers sized or colored by attributes. maps, functioning as heatmaps, overlaid point density or attribute values to highlight geographic concentrations, such as population hotspots or event clusters. Users could toggle between marker and heat views, apply clustering for dense datasets, and embed maps using the API's Fusion Tables Layer for advanced interactivity. Chart options included , , line, and scatter plots, suitable for categorical or numerical comparisons, with support for multiple series and axis configurations. Motion charts animated data over time or categories, similar to Gapminder-style bubbles, requiring , text, and numeric columns for dynamic of trends and correlations. Timelines plotted events chronologically, while network graphs depicted relational data as nodes and edges, useful for or connection analyses. Card views rendered rows as customizable cards, often with images, for gallery-like presentations. All visualizations were responsive to data filters and queries, updating in as users interacted, and supported through shared views. Limitations included reliance on Google-hosted rendering, which capped sizes for complex at around 250,000 rows, and lack of advanced statistical overlays. Despite these, the tools democratized data visualization for non-experts, particularly in and , until the service's in 2019.

Collaboration and Sharing Tools

Google Fusion Tables facilitated collaboration through sharing mechanisms integrated with Google accounts, allowing owners to grant access to specific users or groups for viewing or data. Permissions distinguished between read-only viewers and editors, with the system tracking contributions to attribute changes to individual collaborators. Edit permissions enabled real-time modifications, such as merging datasets or adding markup, while maintaining a record of who altered specific data elements. A built-in discussion feature supported threaded conversations at the granularity of entire tables, rows, columns, or cells, enabling collaborators to annotate and debate points directly within the . Discussions remained linked to the context, and any edits made by permitted users during active threads appeared inline in the conversation history for all participants, including viewers. This functionality promoted iterative refinement, such as resolving discrepancies in merged datasets or enhancements to public tables. Visibility settings offered three tiers: private (accessible only to the owner), shared with designated collaborators, or public, which made tables discoverable via search engines and embeddable in external sites. Public sharing extended to visualizations, where users could generate and distribute or embeds for maps and charts independent of the raw data, subject to the table's overall permissions. The Fusion Tables API further enabled programmatic and permission management, supporting automated workflows for team-based .

Filtering and Querying Mechanisms

Google Fusion Tables enabled users to filter data subsets through an interactive web interface, where conditions could be applied to specific columns using operators such as equals, contains, greater than, or range-based criteria, effectively narrowing datasets for or without altering the underlying . Multiple filters could be combined logically to refine results, and aggregated summaries—such as counts, averages, or sums grouped by categories—could be computed and displayed alongside raw filtered rows. These filtered views preserved the original data integrity while allowing persistent subsets to be shared or in maps, charts, or timelines, supporting exploratory workflows by isolating relevant portions of large tables exceeding 100,000 rows. Programmatic querying relied on the Fusion Tables , which supported a subset of for and manipulation, including SELECT statements with WHERE clauses for conditional ing on numerical, textual, or geospatial predicates. For instance, queries could filter rows matching 'column = value' or complex conditions like 'column1 > 100 AND column2 CONTAINS "term"', with support for [LIMIT](/page/Limit) to cap results and ORDER BY for sorting. Aggregation functions enabled GROUP BY operations to compute statistics across filtered groups, while JOIN capabilities merged tables on primary keys, facilitating across disparate datasets hosted by different users. The SQL , available until its in January 2013 in favor of a RESTful v1.0 retaining equivalent query functionality, processed requests by decomposing high-level SQL into distributed low-level scans, optimizing for cloud-scale tables but eschewing transactional guarantees in favor of read-heavy analytical use cases. In map-based visualizations, queries dynamically adjusted displayed markers or polygons via the API, enabling real-time data subsetting tied to user interactions.

Technical Specifications and Limitations

Data Handling Constraints

Google Fusion Tables restricted uploads to a maximum of 1 MB per HTTP request, with batch additions limited to cells rather than rows. Individual tables could store up to 500 million cells in total, though practical constraints often arose from query and processing. Users faced an overall quota of 250 MB across all tables. Query results and mapping operations processed only the first 100,000 rows of , excluding larger datasets from full geospatial rendering or outputs. visualizations enforced a 500-feature-per-tile limit, potentially causing incomplete displays for dense geographic . Supported import formats were limited to structured files such as , KML, Excel spreadsheets, and sheets, requiring tabular organization without native handling for unstructured or binary content like images. Column data types were confined to basic categories including text, numbers, dates, booleans, and locations (via geocoding, / pairs, or KML geometries), with automatic during import but no support for complex nested structures or relational foreign keys beyond simple merges. These constraints prioritized lightweight, web-centric over enterprise-scale databases, often necessitating data subsetting or external preprocessing for larger or non-tabular datasets.

Integration with Google Ecosystem

Google Fusion Tables operated as a native component of , enabling users to create, store, and organize tables alongside other Drive files such as documents and spreadsheets, with sharing permissions managed through Drive's collaborative controls. Data importation supported direct uploads from and other Drive-hosted spreadsheets in formats including , KML, and Excel, streamlining workflows by leveraging Drive's file compatibility without requiring external transfers. The platform maintained tight integration with for geospatial applications, automatically rendering table data as interactive map layers, markers, and heatmaps using embedded Maps APIs to visualize location-based attributes. provided programmatic extensibility, allowing scripts to query, insert, update, or synchronize data between Fusion Tables and Sheets, as demonstrated in enterprise automation examples for roadmap . Generated visualizations, such as maps and charts, could be embedded via iframes into or other applications, ensuring dynamic updates tied to the underlying table data for enhanced intra-ecosystem sharing.

API and Extensibility

Google Fusion Tables offered a RESTful that facilitated programmatic interactions with its , querying, and capabilities, allowing developers to , manage, and retrieve tabular data without relying solely on the web interface. The supported core operations including table creation, insertion of rows, SQL-based queries for filtering and aggregation, and export of results in formats such as or . In June 2012, released an enhanced version of the , building on the prior SQL by incorporating management for tables and columns, such as renaming or altering schemas, which expanded options for automated data pipelines and custom applications. This update enabled more robust extensibility, including integration with external scripts for dynamic data merging from multiple sources and generation of visualizations like maps and charts via calls. Extensibility extended to interoperability with other Google services, notably the JavaScript API, where Fusion Tables layers could be overlaid on maps for geospatial rendering, supporting features like styled markers and heatmaps driven by table data. Developers also leveraged (KML) exports from Fusion Tables to integrate data into tools like , enabling extensible geoscience and mapping workflows through XML-based customization. However, the 's discontinuation on December 3, 2019, alongside the service itself, halted all programmatic access, prompting migrations to alternatives like or for similar extensibility needs.

History and Evolution

Launch and Initial Release

Google Fusion Tables was publicly announced on June 9, 2009, through a post on the Research blog by Alon Halevy of Research and Rebecca Shapley of . The service launched as an experimental offering under , aimed at simplifying cloud-based by allowing users to merge multiple data sources, facilitate discussions, perform queries, generate visualizations, and publish results on the . It targeted users handling large tabular datasets, such as spreadsheets, by providing a platform for integration and collaboration without requiring local software installations. At launch, core features included uploading tabular data files with a limit of 100 MB per dataset and 250 MB total per user, supporting formats like and enabling real-time collaborative editing with automatic version syncing. Users could share tables publicly or with specific collaborators, including options to selectively hide sensitive rows or columns, and engage in granular discussions attached to individual rows, columns, or cells. Data fusion capabilities allowed merging tables via joins on primary keys, while visualization tools integrated with for geographic displays and the Google Visualization API for charts, lines, and other graphics; exports were possible in format. Initial constraints encompassed the dataset size limits and basic join functionality, with the announcement noting plans to expand join types and additional features based on user feedback through a dedicated . The service emphasized web-centric accessibility, positioning it as a precursor to broader cloud tools, though it remained in experimental status without immediate support. Early adoption focused on exploratory use by and organizations seeking straightforward handling in the ecosystem.

Key Updates and Expansions

In February 2010, enhanced Fusion Tables' mapping functionalities to support the upload and visualization of larger geographic datasets, improving scalability for location-based . This update addressed initial limitations in handling extensive tabular data with spatial components, allowing users to merge tables and generate heat maps or custom overlays more effectively. The Fusion Tables API was introduced on December 14, 2009, enabling developers to query, insert, update, and delete data programmatically, which expanded its utility for custom applications and automated workflows. This API integration facilitated embedding dynamic visualizations that refreshed automatically with data changes, bridging Fusion Tables with external services like . On September 13, 2011, Fusion Tables gained direct integration with , permitting seamless import of spreadsheets and enhanced collaboration features within the ecosystem. This expansion streamlined data management by allowing users to edit and visualize content without exporting files, aligning Fusion Tables more closely with Google's productivity suite. Subsequent developments in 2012 included a redesigned and experimental features such as network graph visualizations, broadening options for non-geospatial data representation. Card-based views were also added, providing snapshot-style displays of individual data rows for quicker insights into structured information like profiles or events. These updates reflected iterative improvements aimed at and diverse analytical needs, though official emphasized ongoing refinements without a formal .

Usage Patterns and Case Studies

Google Fusion Tables was commonly used for rapid creation of interactive visualizations from tabular , particularly geospatial s where users uploaded spreadsheets with information to generate embeddable maps and charts. This pattern facilitated quick and , allowing teams to merge multiple tables, apply filters, and publish results online without advanced programming. Users often employed it for in fields like and , where it enabled non-technical users to visualize trends via heatmaps, lines, or graphs from datasets exceeding limits. In , Fusion Tables supported story development by cataloging and public data sources, such as aggregating socioeconomic indicators for regional reporting. A notable application involved dynamic through aggregated info displays, where reporters combined datasets to illustrate trends on interactive platforms. For , marketers visualized networks to assess performance, creating graphs that highlighted connections and referral patterns from large link datasets. Case studies highlight its practical deployment in ; researchers used Fusion Tables to map drug overdose deaths by integrating mortality data with , enabling flexible filtering by location, time, and demographics to track patterns from 2010 onward. In environmental analysis, it processed National-Scale Air Toxics Assessment (NATA) geospatial data to visualize national variations in exposures, aiding identification of high-risk areas through merged and emission tables. applications included home listings with overlaid property metrics, such as risks or neighborhood stats, to assist users in location-based decision-making as demonstrated in 2011 examples. Educational uses encompassed archiving and collections, like Indiana University's Cushman photographic dataset, where geolocated images were plotted to explore historical urban changes.

Reception and Impact

Adoption Metrics and User Feedback

Google did not publicly release detailed adoption metrics for Fusion Tables, such as total user counts or active table numbers. The service's architecture was engineered to accommodate millions of user tables, reflecting ambitions for broad in . Publicly searchable Fusion Tables numbered in the thousands, enabling users to discover and integrate existing datasets. User feedback emphasized Fusion Tables' strengths in simplifying data upload, , and for non-experts, particularly through integrated and querying features. Reviews on data visualization platforms rated it 8.3 out of 10 across five evaluations, commending ease of use (8/10), features (8.9/10), and capabilities (8.9/10). Early adopters appreciated its collaborative aspects, likening it to "spreadsheets on steroids" for combining tabular analysis with database-like queries. Critiques highlighted performance inconsistencies, such as beta-stage glitches and limitations in advanced compared to specialized tools. Storage caps at 250 MB per user and challenges with large-scale rendering drew complaints from users handling extensive geographic data. The 2019 deprecation announcement elicited user concerns over workflow disruptions, with recommendations to migrate to alternatives like or , underscoring dependency among niche practitioners in research and journalism.

Academic and Professional Applications

In academic settings, Google Fusion Tables supported visualization and collaborative analysis, particularly for geospatial and tabular datasets exceeding the limits of spreadsheets. Researchers utilized it to create interactive maps and charts from or Excel files, enabling seamless integration of latitude/longitude for without advanced programming skills. For example, in , a 2014 study applied Fusion Tables to visualize urban tree benefits, hosting and publishing layers for public access and overlaying metrics like on . In and , it facilitated network graphs linking sources to essays or historical entities, as demonstrated in tutorials for mapping relational in liberal arts curricula. informatics projects, such as those by the , employed it from 2015 to aggregate and visualize species occurrence tables, supporting sharing among scientists. Professionally, Fusion Tables served as a lightweight tool for and reporting, allowing teams to upload, merge, and embed visualizations like heat maps or line charts directly into web applications. In , it enabled rapid creation of interactive maps for topics such as economic trends or public safety, with reporters using it as early as to handle datasets larger than permitted. A 2015 case study in the sector illustrated its application for mapping home claims , where analysts imported geospatial coordinates to generate shareable dashboards for internal decision-making or client presentations. Small organizations leveraged its cloud-based merging of tables—via keys like IDs—for ad-hoc , such as joining with geographic overlays, though limited adoption. Overall, its emphasis on web-centric appealed to non-technical professionals, with reporting in 2010 that users valued the service for quick prototyping over heavy database systems.

Strengths and Achievements

Google Fusion Tables provided a user-friendly for transforming tabular into interactive visualizations, such as maps and charts, with minimal technical expertise required, leveraging for geocoding and display of location-based datasets. Its free, cloud-based model supported seamless uploading of spreadsheets and files, enabling of data views without local software installation. A key strength lay in its data merging capabilities, allowing users to join multiple tables on common keys—similar to operations—facilitating integrated analysis of disparate datasets in a collaborative accessible via Google accounts. This extensibility through further empowered custom applications, such as embedding visualizations in websites or combining with for enhanced interactivity. The platform achieved notable adoption in journalism for data-driven storytelling, exemplified by The Guardian's 2007-2011 mapping of Iraq war casualties using Fusion Tables to plot incident locations and details, which informed public discourse on conflict impacts. In the nonprofit sector, organizations like Atlanta's Drake House employed it to visualize homeless population distributions, aiding targeted service delivery and resource planning. Academic users applied it in interdisciplinary projects, such as overlaying literary references with geographic data to explore spatial themes in texts. Additionally, it supported real-time election result visualizations, as in Turkey's 2011 national elections, where dynamic Fusion Tables interfaces delivered province-level updates to millions via Google.com.tr.

Criticisms and Shortcomings

Performance and Scalability Issues

Google Fusion Tables imposed strict limits on dataset size, capping storage at 250 MB per user and restricting mapping and query results to the first 100,000 rows of data, beyond which additional rows were inaccessible for or geospatial operations. These constraints stemmed from the service's architecture, which relied on for but prioritized ease of use over unbounded growth, rendering it unsuitable for datasets exceeding these thresholds without data partitioning or external workarounds. Performance degraded noticeably with larger tables, particularly during geospatial visualizations; for instance, generating map tiles could violate the 500-feature-per-tile , causing incomplete renders or excessive load times as the system attempted to oversized clusters. Users reported slower marker loading on embedded compared to local JSON files, attributing delays to network-dependent queries against Fusion Tables' remote backend rather than . Query execution speeds were also hampered for tables approaching row , with geocoding requests subject to quotas that could halt operations after high-volume calls, necessitating batching or delays. Scalability efforts included optimizations like SSD integration to extend beyond initial constraints, enabling handling of moderately larger workloads through hybrid storage tiers. However, the service's design as a "database in the " for non-experts inherently favored over scaling, leading to comparisons with more robust platforms like AWS where storage could reach terabyte levels without equivalent row or quota barriers. These limitations often prompted users to fragment data across multiple tables or migrate to alternatives for production-scale applications, underscoring Fusion Tables' positioning as a prototyping tool rather than an enterprise-grade solution.

User Experience Drawbacks

Users reported frequent bugs and glitches in the , such as unexpected rendering errors during creation, which disrupted workflow despite developer acknowledgments via email. Early versions imposed strict row limits of 100 to 250 entries, severely hindering for datasets beyond small scales and rendering large-scale impractical without external preprocessing. tools lacked depth in customization, with minimal interactive features like fixed node positioning in network graphs that prevented manual adjustments, leading to cluttered or suboptimal displays. Mobile responsiveness was inadequate, causing poor display of maps and s on smartphones, which compelled users to rely on workarounds for custom sites rather than native views. The upload process was constrained by a 1 MB limit per Excel file and overall storage caps of 250 MB per , complicating data import for non-technical users and necessitating splits or conversions that increased setup friction. and interfaces, while aimed at non-experts, often felt rudimentary, with challenges in querying and merging s without database knowledge exacerbating usability for broader audiences.

Broader Reliability Concerns with Google Products

Google's frequent discontinuation of products exemplifies a broader pattern of operational unreliability, where services are launched with user adoption but later terminated, often disrupting workflows and . Data compiled by independent trackers indicate that Google has shuttered over 250 products and services as of 2025, accounting for approximately 51.5% of its total offerings since inception, with annual terminations peaking at over 25 in alone. This "fail fast" strategy, while fostering innovation, has led to systemic user dissatisfaction, as evidenced by the abrupt end of tools like in 2013, which forced millions to migrate feeds and integrations elsewhere. Such practices undermine confidence in Google's commitment to longevity, particularly for data-centric applications where users invest significant effort in curation and . Analysts note that products failing to achieve high daily or generate substantial —often undefined thresholds like $1 billion annually—are prime candidates for sunset, regardless of niche utility or institutional reliance. For example, the 2019 deprecation of services like Google+, which amassed 500 million users, highlighted risks of and obsolescence, mirroring challenges in tools. Critics, including technology commentators, argue this churn damages by fostering a of betrayal, making enterprises hesitant to embed products in due to fears of sudden . User forums and retrospectives frequently cite emotional and operational tolls, such as rebuilding custom datasets or retraining teams, which compound over repeated incidents. While attributes shutdowns to resource reallocation toward high-impact areas like and services, the opacity of decision criteria—often limited to internal metrics—exacerbates reliability doubts.

Deprecation

Announcement and Timeline

Google announced the deprecation of Fusion Tables on December 11, 2018, via its official Workspace Updates blog, specifying that the service and its associated would be fully turned down on December 3, 2019. This provided users with approximately one year to migrate their data and visualizations. Following the shutdown, embedded Fusion Tables elements—such as maps, charts, tables, and cards hosted on external websites—ceased to function after December 3, 2019, rendering them inaccessible without prior export. The Fusion Tables Layer in the JavaScript was similarly discontinued on the same date, with support ending in API version 3.38 (version 3.37 being the final supported release). Users retained the ability to export their table data through until March 3, 2020, after which all remaining data was permanently deleted by , eliminating any further recovery options. This timeline aligned with 's broader strategy to consolidate resources toward more advanced data tools, though no extensions were granted despite user feedback in some developer communities.

Official Reasons and Strategic Shifts

announced the shutdown of Fusion Tables on December 11, 2018, stating that the service and its would cease operations on December 3, 2019, while embedded visualizations like maps, charts, tables, and cards would continue to function post-shutdown. The company did not disclose specific internal metrics such as user adoption rates or maintenance costs as factors, focusing instead on the evolution of its tools ecosystem. Officially, Google framed the deprecation as an opportunity to advance user capabilities, noting that it had been "working on new tools to help you do more with your data" following feedback on desired enhancements. Recommended successors included Google Sheets for foundational data management and simple visualizations, Google Data Studio (later rebranded as Looker Studio) for sophisticated reporting and dashboards, Google My Maps for geospatial representations, and Google Cloud's BigQuery for handling large datasets with SQL-based querying and machine learning integrations. This positioning emphasized Fusion Tables' limitations in scalability and feature depth compared to these alternatives, though Google provided no quantitative comparison of performance or user migration success rates. The move aligned with broader strategic shifts at during the late 2010s, including a company-wide effort to rationalize its product portfolio by sunsetting niche or stagnant services in favor of unified platforms that integrated with core offerings like and services. Launched in 2009 as an experimental tool for collaborative data visualization, Fusion Tables had remained a standalone beta-like product without significant updates, contrasting with the rapid iteration seen in enterprise-focused tools like Data Studio, which gained advanced features such as real-time collaboration and third-party connector support by 2018. This consolidation reflected 's prioritization of high-growth areas like cloud analytics over specialized, lower-priority consumer and small-team data tools, enabling resource reallocation to products with stronger monetization potential through subscriptions and API usage.

User Disruptions and Migration Challenges

The discontinuation of Google Fusion Tables on December 3, 2019, led to immediate disruptions for users who had embedded visualizations—such as maps, charts, tables, and cards—on websites, applications, or documents, as these ceased rendering entirely on that date. Developers integrating Fusion Tables via the Maps JavaScript API encountered errors starting in August 2019, prompting early warnings but complicating ongoing projects reliant on real-time data layers. Applications like MIT App Inventor and ODK Collect, which leveraged the Fusion Tables API for data storage and querying, faced compatibility breaks, requiring developers to refactor code or seek workarounds before the API shutdown. Data access persisted briefly post-shutdown, with users able to export tables via downloads or until March 3, 2020, after which all data was permanently deleted from Google's servers. However, failure to export in time risked irrecoverable loss, particularly for users with large datasets or those unaware of the extended window, exacerbating disruptions for academic researchers and small organizations dependent on Fusion Tables for ad-hoc geospatial analysis. The export process supported formats like and KML, but these often stripped specialized Fusion Tables features, such as merged table views and automatic geocoding, necessitating manual reconfiguration in new tools. Migration challenges stemmed from the lack of a direct, user-friendly replacement for Fusion Tables' core strengths in simple and visualization, with Google's recommended alternatives— for warehousing, Data Studio for reporting, SQL for relational storage, and Maps Platform for geospatial rendering—requiring greater technical expertise, SQL proficiency, and potential costs for scaling. Non-technical users reported difficulties in recreating interactive maps and dynamic queries, often facing caching issues with live data updates or limitations in free tiers of alternatives. Third-party guides and webinars emerged to address these gaps, highlighting common pain points like mapping and visualization loss during transfers to tools such as FME or CARTO. Users expressed frustration over the one-year notice period proving insufficient for complex workflows, with some resorting to proprietary solutions like Maptitude or GIS to approximate Fusion Tables' ease of embedding and sharing. Overall, the transition underscored broader reliability concerns with tools, as deprecation left legacy integrations vulnerable without backward compatibility provisions.

Legacy and Alternatives

Influence on Data Visualization Tools

Google Fusion Tables pioneered cloud-based with integrated visualization capabilities, enabling users to upload tabular data from formats like or spreadsheets and automatically generate maps, charts, and network graphs without coding expertise. Launched in June 2009 as a project, it emphasized web-publishing of interactive visualizations, such as geocoded maps via automatic conversion of addresses to latitude-longitude coordinates, which facilitated rapid analysis for journalists and researchers plotting datasets on . These features influenced user expectations for accessible, no-code visualization in subsequent tools, as evidenced by alternatives developed post-deprecation that replicated elements like drag-and-drop mapping and dynamic cloud data handling. For instance, platforms such as Carto and GIS Cloud incorporated similar merge/join functionalities for combining datasets and spatial analysis, directly addressing gaps left by Fusion Tables' shutdown on December 3, 2019. Within Google's ecosystem, its collaborative data sharing model contributed to the evolution toward tools like Looker Studio (formerly Data Studio), which expanded on simple visualization for broader business intelligence needs. The service's emphasis on merging multiple tables and visualizations in web pages set a precedent for hybrid database-spreadsheet tools, though its niche focus on free, lightweight mapping limited broader adoption in like Tableau or Power BI, which prioritized advanced analytics over Fusion Tables' simplicity. Its discontinuation underscored the demand for scalable, collaborative platforms, prompting migrations that highlighted its role in normalizing cloud-first data exploration for non-specialists.

Post-Shutdown Developments

Following the shutdown of Google Fusion Tables on December 3, 2019, users were required to export their data prior to permanent deletion, with Google providing access via the Fusion Tables Archive Tool and Google Takeout service until March 3, 2020. Exports were primarily in CSV format, allowing manual import into other platforms, though embedded visualizations—such as maps and charts—ceased functioning immediately after shutdown, disrupting websites and applications reliant on real-time updates from Fusion Tables. Migration efforts focused on transferring data to Google-recommended successors like for large-scale querying and (formerly Data Studio) for visualization, though these required SQL proficiency and lacked Fusion Tables' simple fusion of heterogeneous data sources. Community-driven solutions emerged, including add-ons for like Mapping Sheets to replicate mapping features by uploading exports and generating interactive layers. For geospatial data, integrations with Engine allowed importing Fusion Tables exports for advanced analysis, preserving some analytical workflows despite the loss of native hosting. Third-party alternatives gained traction post-shutdown, with platforms like GIS Cloud and CARTO offering cloud-based mapping and capabilities compatible with imports from Fusion Tables. No open-source direct successor materialized, but users adapted by combining tools such as Jupyter notebooks for or integrations in platforms like Power BI for sharing public datasets. Data loss occurred for unexported tables after March 2020, highlighting risks of , as noted in archival efforts by groups like , which documented the service's irrecoverable termination. Google recommended for data storage and querying, combined with (previously Google Data Studio) for visualization, as primary paths for users transitioning from Fusion Tables after its shutdown on December 3, 2019. supports uploading and merging tabular data at scale using SQL, handling datasets up to petabyte sizes, while facilitates embedding interactive charts, maps, and reports from or other connectors, replicating Fusion Tables' basic visualization workflows. For geospatial emphasis, CARTO provides a cloud-based platform for importing or KML files, performing spatial joins akin to Fusion Tables' , and generating embeddable maps with heatmaps and choropleths. Similarly, Online enables drag-and-drop uploads of spreadsheets, automated geocoding, and customizable symbology for point, line, and polygon layers, with free tiers for basic use though advanced features incur costs. Business intelligence tools like Tableau Public (free edition) and offer robust alternatives for non-spatial data merging and dashboarding, supporting Fusion Tables-like filtering, aggregation, and export to interactive visuals, but require separate integrations for full mapping via extensions like Tableau's built-in maps or Power BI's plugin. GIS Cloud serves as another option for collaborative mapping, allowing real-time edits and access for embedding, positioned as a direct workflow substitute for smaller teams. No single tool fully replicates Fusion Tables' seamless integration of free storage, fusion, and embedding without trade-offs in cost, scalability, or , prompting many users to combine services like for lightweight editing with specialized visualizers.

References

  1. [1]
    Google Fusion Tables: Data Management, Integration, and ...
    Google Fusion Tables is a cloud-based service for data management and integration. Fusion Tables enables users to upload tabular data les (spreadsheets, CSV, ...
  2. [2]
    Google Fusion Tables
    Jun 9, 2009 · Today we're introducing Google Fusion Tables on Labs, an experimental system for data management in the cloud. It draws on the expertise of ...Missing: announcement | Show results with:announcement
  3. [3]
    Mapping your data with Google Fusion Tables
    Feb 24, 2010 · Google Fusion Tables is a place in the cloud for your data tables. Today we're announcing some new features that will let you upload and map large amounts of ...
  4. [4]
    Google Fusion Tables API - The official Google Code blog
    Dec 14, 2009 · Today I'm excited to announce that Google Fusion Tables is releasing its own API. What is Fusion Tables? A product launched recently in ...<|separator|>
  5. [5]
    FAQ: Google Fusion Tables
    Dec 3, 2019 · Google Fusion Tables and the Fusion Tables API have been discontinued. We want to thank all our users these past nine years.
  6. [6]
    Google Fusion Tables to be shut down on December 3, 2019
    Dec 11, 2018 · Google Fusion Tables is being shut down on December 3, 2019, to focus on other areas. Users can download their data and consider migrating to ...
  7. [7]
    Google Fusion Tables: Web-Centered Data Management and ...
    We describe key novel features, such as the support for data acquisition, collaboration, visualization, and web-publishing. Research Areas. Data Management ...
  8. [8]
    Introduction to Data Mapping with Fusion Tables
    In this tutorial, we cover Google Fusion Tables, a database service that can handle significantly larger datasets than Google Spreadsheets.Missing: core | Show results with:core
  9. [9]
    [PDF] fusion tables 1page_01 - Google Earth
    Google Fusion Tables is a service for managing structured data in the cloud. You can upload data from CSV and KML files and spreadsheets, and start visualizing ...
  10. [10]
    4.1. Google Fusion Tables - Uni Bamberg
    Google Fusion Tables supports creating charts, maps, network graphs, and custom layouts in order to visualize the data in a user-friendly manner. All the data ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Google fusion tables: data management, integration and ...
    Jun 10, 2010 · One of the main features of Fusion Tables is that it allows multiple users to merge their tables into one, even if they do not belong to the ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Google fusion tables: web-centered data management and ...
    Jun 6, 2010 · The goal of Fusion Tables is to enable a much larger class of users to manage their data and to do so in a way that is integrated with their ...
  13. [13]
    how to upload bulk data in fusion table - Stack Overflow
    Dec 14, 2012 · Supported formats for upload through the Fusion Tables UI are: comma-separated text (.csv); other text-delimited files (.tsv, etc) ...Google Fusion Tables upload - Stack OverflowHow to batch upload files to Google fusion tables? - Stack OverflowMore results from stackoverflow.com
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Quick and Easy Web Maps with Google Fusion Tables SCO ...
    Fusion Tables accepts data in various formats, including Microsoft Excel files, OpenDocument. Spreadsheets, delimited text files (such as .csv files), and KML ...
  15. [15]
    Google Fusion Tables Offers Data Management In The Cloud
    Jun 11, 2009 · Each user gets 250 Megabytes of storage space on the Google servers and the ability to upload data that cannot exceed 100 Megabytes per data set ...<|separator|>
  16. [16]
    Google Fusion Tables API
    Dec 14, 2009 · What is Fusion Tables? A product launched recently in Google Labs, Fusion Tables is a free service for sharing and visualizing data online.Missing: creators | Show results with:creators
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Google Fusion Tables Tutorial: Working with NATA Geospatial Data
    Type in Fusion Table, and connect to the Fusion Table app. Step 1: Upload Google Earth File. The spatial data that you are using is saved in the form of a ...Missing: methods | Show results with:methods
  18. [18]
    Using Google Fusion Tables to make some maps! - Andrew Wheeler
    Jul 18, 2014 · Basically you can upload your data table and kml in seperate Fusion tables and then merge them to create your own polygons with associated data.<|separator|>
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Google Fusion Tables: Web-Centered Data Management ... - CS598
    Jun 6, 2010 · We describe key novel features, such as the sup- port for data acquisition, collaboration, visualization, and web-publishing. Categories and ...
  20. [20]
    How to: get started using Google Fusion Tables - Journalism.co.uk
    May 19, 2011 · You can visualise your data as a: table; map; intensity map; line, bar pie or scatter graph; motion (must include text, date and number) ...Missing: visualization | Show results with:visualization
  21. [21]
    How to Create, Share and Publish A Heatmap Using Google Fusion ...
    May 7, 2017 · Creating Heatmap. An intensity map or heatmap is a map showing point density on the map. The denser the dots around an area, will have a higher ...
  22. [22]
    Google Fusion Tables: Web-Centered Data Management and ...
    We describe key novel features, such as the support for data acquisition, collaboration, visualization, and web-publishing. Research Areas. Data Management ...
  23. [23]
    Google fusion tables | Proceedings of the 1st ACM symposium on ...
    Jun 10, 2010 · The discussion feature of Fusion Tables allows collaborators to conduct detailed discussions of the data at the level of tables and individual ...<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    Socializing Data with Google Fusion Tables - IEEE Computer Society
    We describe the social features of Google Fusion Tables, a cloud-based data management service whose goal is to facilitate collaboration around data sets.
  25. [25]
    Preparing for the Google Fusion Tables SQL API Deprecation
    Jan 12, 2013 · On January 14, 2013, Google will deprecate the SQL API for their Fusion Tables platform. This post is here to help developers prepare for it ...Missing: documentation | Show results with:documentation<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    What are the technical limitations when using Fusion Tables?
    Aug 14, 2012 · Only the first 100,000 rows of data in a table are mapped or included in query results; Map tiles may exceed the 500 feature-per-tile limit, and ...How to know that Fusion Tables usage is over limit? - Stack Overflowgoogle fusion tables - fusiontables limits - Stack OverflowMore results from stackoverflow.comMissing: constraints | Show results with:constraints
  27. [27]
    Google Fusion Tables - Cloud Mapping - Cartographic Perspectives
    Fusion Tables allows the user to present their data in an appropriate manner and display interactive maps on a website. Although there are limitations to what ...Missing: constraints | Show results with:constraints
  28. [28]
    Using Fusion Tables with Apps Script - G Suite Developers Blog
    Sep 30, 2011 · This application would be a tool used to gather roadmap input from enterprise sales engineering and deployment teams.Missing: integration | Show results with:integration<|separator|>
  29. [29]
    Script to sync a Google SpreadSheet to a Fusion Table - GitHub Gist
    This script can now be combined with other script functions to make the integration between Google spreadsheets and Fusion Tables more powerful.
  30. [30]
    Introducing new Fusion Tables API - Google Research
    Jun 26, 2012 · The new API includes all of the functionality of the existing SQL API, plus the ability to read and modify table and column metadata as well as ...
  31. [31]
    With Google Fusion Tables Being Turned Down In December, what ...
    Jul 9, 2019 · Due to the fact that Fusion Tables are being Turned Down in December 2019, I have been searching for an alternative solution (preferably one created/provided ...
  32. [32]
    Geoscience applications of client/server scripts, Google Fusion ...
    Oct 1, 2012 · Keyhole Markup Language (KML)—a type of extensible markup language (XML)—is the key to the extensibility of Google Earth for geoscience ...
  33. [33]
    Google Fusion Tables celebrates one year of data management
    Jun 9, 2010 · A year ago we launched Google Fusion Tables, an easy way to integrate, visualize and collaborate on data tables in the Google cloud.Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  34. [34]
    This week in Docs: Format painter, Google Fusion Tables, and drag ...
    Sep 13, 2011 · The latest news and updates from the Google Drive team. ... With this week's update, we're also integrating Google Fusion Tables into your ...
  35. [35]
    Google's Fusion Tables gets new features, UI makeover ...
    Mar 29, 2012 · Here's what I've found thus far: Billed as “Faceted filter creation,” there's a streamlined data filtering feature that is Google Refine-esque ...
  36. [36]
    Google Fusion Tables
    Google Fusion Tables. June 9, 2009. Posted by Alon Halevy, Google Research and Rebecca Shapley, User ... We plan to iteratively add new features to the ...
  37. [37]
    Cool Tools: Interactive Mapping with Google Fusion Tables
    May 4, 2016 · The program will take any spreadsheet it is given, look for geolocation information in it, and display the individual items in the sheet on a map.Missing: applications | Show results with:applications
  38. [38]
    Visualize Your Backlinks with Google Fusion Tables - Seer Interactive
    May 7, 2012 · Fusion Tables can also visualize the connections between your data in a simple, interactive map. This new Network Graph feature takes seconds to set up.
  39. [39]
    Google Fusion Tables: A guide for business reporters
    Aug 21, 2012 · However, there are some limitations, he said. “The benefits of (Fusion Tables) are that it's free and has a pretty low learning curve. It also ...Missing: constraints | Show results with:constraints
  40. [40]
    Displaying of aggregate info: Dynamic storytelling with Google ...
    Mar 5, 2014 · Google has created a product called Fusion Tables that make aggregating, combining and displaying data very simple.Missing: creators | Show results with:creators<|separator|>
  41. [41]
    How To Use Google Fusion Tables: A Simple Guide For Marketers ...
    Mar 30, 2015 · In this tutorial, I demonstrate how to analyze your site's backlinks using a network graph powered by a Google Fusion Table.Simple English, Tons Of... · Network Graph Preview · Excel File<|separator|>
  42. [42]
    Surveillance of Drug Overdoses Using Google Fusion Tables - PMC
    Herein, we illustrate the use Google's Fusion Tables software and Google Maps using data on drug-related deaths as well as demonstrate the flexibility of Fusion ...
  43. [43]
    Finding the perfect home with Google Fusion Tables - Maps
    Nov 21, 2011 · Fusion Tables is a data management web application that makes it easy to view tabular data on a Google Map.
  44. [44]
    Using Google Fusion Tables Maps: Home Insurance Case Study
    Jan 22, 2015 · Google Fusion Tables is a free tool to quickly visually show & share data within your teams privately or with the larger world. The ...Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
  45. [45]
    Google Fusion Table Basics with IU's Cushman Collection
    May 25, 2015 · In this tutorial, you'll upload a spreadsheet containing information about the Indiana University's Cushman Collection of photographs.
  46. [46]
    Google Fusion Tables. Interview with Alon Y. Halevy - ODBMS.org
    Aug 9, 2011 · Google Fusion Tables was launched on June 9th, 2009. I wanted to know what happened since then. I have therefore interviewed Dr. Alon Y. Halevy, ...Missing: creators | Show results with:creators
  47. [47]
    Google Fusion Table - the Kopernik Impact Tracker Tech
    Google's light web application Fusion Table allows users to analyze their data in the simplest way possible. Its analysis output comes in the form charts, ...
  48. [48]
    Google Fusion Tables in 2024 - PAT Research
    Rating 8.3/10 (2) Nov 13, 2017 · Fusion Tables allows users to instantly host data as an API and invite developers to use it. It is able to keep users from using outdated data ...
  49. [49]
    More Thoughts on a Content Strategy for Data – Many Eyes and ...
    Feb 29, 2012 · Google Fusion Tables are like spreadsheets on steroids. They combine features of traditional spreadsheets with database like query support and ...Missing: feedback | Show results with:feedback
  50. [50]
    Google Fusion Tables: Failure or Beta Glitches? - Vizworld.com
    I have to say that I'm disappointed by Google's attempts at data visualization in general. If you count maps, they have one decent system that actually works ...Missing: feedback | Show results with:feedback
  51. [51]
    Interactive mapping of urban tree benefits using Google Fusion ...
    Google Fusion Tables is a web-based data management and publishing application that allows users to host, manage, collaborate on, visualize, and publish data ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  52. [52]
    [PDF] PLU DH LAB — HOW-TO GUIDES Network Maps (Google Fusion ...
    Go to drive.google.com and click new → Google Sheets, and create a two column chart by inputting your data. 2. Upload a Microsoft Excel file to your Google ...
  53. [53]
    Google Fusion Tables - GBIF
    Feb 10, 2015 · Google Fusion Tables is a tool within Google Drive to combine data, visualize it, and share it online, including maps and charts. It can also ...
  54. [54]
    A use-case for Google Fusion Tables - A Java geek
    Jul 16, 2017 · Fusion Tables is a no-fluff, just-stuff cloud service that allows to easily display data in various ways. With its ability to join on other tables, it's easy ...Missing: core functionality
  55. [55]
    Mapping tools: Google Fusion Tables - Research Guides
    Nov 18, 2022 · Google Fusion Tables is a cloud-based application that can be used to create a variety of visualizations. It is a free and only requires a Google Account to ...
  56. [56]
    Google Fusion Tables: Data management, integration and ...
    Fusion Tables, launched by Google in June 2009, is a cloud-based platform for data management that includes a number of visualization tools, including a mapping ...Missing: origin | Show results with:origin<|control11|><|separator|>
  57. [57]
    Google Fusion Table Maps And Javascript: The Power | Horn Portfolio
    May 30, 2014 · Google Fusion Tables: The benefits of Fusion Tables is that it is a free service provided by Google. You don't need to pay to use/display maps ...Missing: advantages | Show results with:advantages
  58. [58]
    4.Case studies from Turkey and from other countries
    Jun 25, 2019 · The Guardian has chosen to plot a unique picture of every death in Iraq mapped using Google Fusion tables. Unlike with the Afghanistan war ...
  59. [59]
    Fueling great nonprofits with technology - Google Blog
    Using Google Maps and Fusion Tables to help Atlanta's The Drake House create a map that helps staff better visualize the local homeless population in order ...
  60. [60]
    Google Fusion Tables Presentation - Angie Hoseth Capstone ...
    The project that I chose to demonstrate is a digital humanities project that fuses Literature and Geography by using Google Fusion Tables.Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  61. [61]
    Seçim Sonuçları Google.com.tr/secim2011'den Takip Edildi
    Jun 20, 2011 · ... Fusion Tables kullanılarak geliştirilen bu arayüz, seçim sonuçlarının hızlı ve dinamik bir şekilde görüntülenmesini sağladı, kullanıcılar ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  62. [62]
    loading markers on Google Map from a Google Fusion Table v/s ...
    Sep 10, 2017 · Website performance: loading markers on Google Map from a Google Fusion Table v/s locally stored JSON file · Ask Question. Asked 8 years, 1 ...What are the technical limitations when using Fusion Tables?Some questions about Google Fusion Table and Google MapsMore results from stackoverflow.com
  63. [63]
    Avoiding Google Maps geocode limit? - GIS Stack Exchange
    Sep 27, 2011 · There is a limit to the number of geocode requests a Fusion Table will make, however the limit is quite large. Once you reach the limit, you ...
  64. [64]
    Using SSDs to scale up Google Fusion Tables, a Database-in-the ...
    In this paper, we describe how Google Fusion Tables (GFT) used SSDs and what optimizations were implemented to scale up its in-memory processing, clearly ...
  65. [65]
    Google Fusion Tables vs Amazon Web Services: which is better for ...
    Feb 28, 2011 · Fusion Tables is extremely easy to use, just load in some data and you can have a Google Map displaying your data in no time. The back-end doesn ...
  66. [66]
    Go To Hellman: Linked Data vs. Google Fusion Tables
    Jun 12, 2009 · I found two bugs in a half hour of working with Google Fusion Tables, but I got e-mail from the developers acknowledging the problems within an ...Missing: limitations | Show results with:limitations<|separator|>
  67. [67]
    Lessons from a Google Fusion Table Graph - Abby Mullen
    Nov 19, 2012 · The graph itself is clear and easily readable, and it's a relatively simple proposition to remove nodes and see what happens. Fewer options for ...Missing: features | Show results with:features<|separator|>
  68. [68]
    Many Fusion Table duplicates being created - Support - ODK Forum
    Nov 2, 2018 · One reason I have to use the Fusion Tables API for custom websites is because Fusion Tables do not display on smartphones very well. We never ...Missing: complaints | Show results with:complaints
  69. [69]
    Killed by Google: Google Graveyard
    Killed almost 4 years ago, Google Sites (Classic) allowed users to build and edit websites and wiki portals for private and public use. It was almost 14 years ...
  70. [70]
    Killed by Google Study: Google has Killed 51.5% of Its Products
    Jul 3, 2025 · But from 2011-2021, it began killing around 22 products annually. 2019 was an absolute bloodbath, with over 25 offerings getting eliminated.Missing: history concerns
  71. [71]
    Google's constant product shutdowns are damaging its brand
    Apr 2, 2019 · Every time Google shuts down a product, its reputation is harmed. A shutdown makes users feel betrayed, it makes trusting other Google services ...
  72. [72]
    Killed by Google: List of Products and Services Sunsetted by the ...
    Feb 22, 2024 · Google also has a history of killing off beloved services used by millions if it doesn't bring them $1 billion a year in revenue.
  73. [73]
    Why Google Might Kill Flutter: The Uncomfortable Truth About ...
    Jun 16, 2025 · What Makes Google Kill Products? · Low User Engagement: Failing to meet DAU (Daily Active Users) benchmarks · Poor Monetization: Not fitting into ...<|separator|>
  74. [74]
    List of Discontinued Google Products: Google Plus, Glass, Play Music
    Aug 5, 2020 · Glass came with a high price tag, software issues, potential privacy problems, and it generally looked too nerdy. Google ended consumer ...Missing: history reliability concerns
  75. [75]
    10 Canceled Google Products That Were Actually Useful - SlashGear
    Sep 4, 2024 · One of the most frustrating ways Google's monopolies affect everyday users is in its callousness toward the products that aren't core to its ...
  76. [76]
    Desiring to degoogle because of Google constantly killing their best ...
    Oct 6, 2023 · It seems that when I become a fan of something google makes, it gets murdered by them. Bought a few games on Stadia, killed because they prob ...Peter Yang: Why Google abandons so many products after launch ...Google Killing Industry : r/SEO - RedditMore results from www.reddit.com
  77. [77]
    Deprecations - Maps Platform - Google for Developers
    The Fusion Tables Layer in the Maps JavaScript API was turned off on December 3, 2019, and is no longer available as of version 3.38 (3.37 is the last version ...Missing: broader | Show results with:broader
  78. [78]
    Google shutting down Fusion Tables next year, teases new data ...
    Dec 11, 2018 · After a decade, Google Fusion Tables will shutdown on December 3, 2019. Google notes a list of alternatives.
  79. [79]
    WARNING: Google has Deprecated the Fusion Tables Service. It will ...
    Nov 18, 2020 · Fusion tables were a Google product and only Google can help you recover that data. Contact Google. Recovering your data might be impossible.
  80. [80]
    Google Fusion Tables to be shut down on December 3, 2019
    Dec 11, 2018 · We [Google] plan to turn down Fusion Tables and the API on December 3, 2019. Embedded Fusion Tables visualizations—maps, charts, tables and ...
  81. [81]
    Google Fusion Tables Takedown: What It Means for Users
    Dec 26, 2018 · Google recently announced that, on December 3, 2019, their experimental products Google Fusion Tables and the Fusion Tables API will be ...
  82. [82]
  83. [83]
    Migrating google maps api app from fusion tables to datastore + ...
    Dec 24, 2018 · Caching the whole dataset will be difficult for me, because users can add or modify data, which will invalidate the whole cache. But I'm now ...Google Fusion Tables: Several issues (appearance of deleted ...Some questions about Google Fusion Table and Google MapsMore results from stackoverflow.comMissing: difficulties | Show results with:difficulties
  84. [84]
    A "Don't Panic" Guide to Migrating Data out of Google Fusion Tables
    Jan 31, 2019 · Many users are at a loss over how and where they're going to move their data following Google's announcement that Google Fusion Tables is ...Missing: deprecation challenges
  85. [85]
    Google will shut down Fusion Tables - Computerworld
    Dec 11, 2018 · Google announced today that the service will end on Dec. 3, 2019, and “maps using the Fusion Tables Layer in the Maps JavaScript API v3.37 will ...
  86. [86]
    Google Fusion Tables Turndown: An Alternative to Keep Mapping
    Google Fusion Tables and the Fusion Tables API will be turned down on December 3 2019. This means embedded Fusion Tables visualizations (maps charts tables and ...
  87. [87]
    RIP Fusion Tables: Google is killing off the beloved data ...
    Dec 11, 2018 · Google will shut down its hybrid database-spreadsheet product effective next year.
  88. [88]
    GIS Cloud as an Alternative to Google Fusion Tables
    Supported data formats. When using Google fusion tables you often need to convert files from one format to another because they only support csv. and kml.
  89. [89]
    Download your Fusion Tables data and migrate your maps - Medium
    Sep 10, 2019 · To get started, go to the Fusion Tables Archive Tool and select the tables you want to export. You will need to give the tool access to your ...Missing: post | Show results with:post
  90. [90]
    Google's Fusion Table Shuts down 3 December..what to do
    Dec 2, 2019 · Google's Fusion Table will no longer be available after 3 December 2019. If you created an app that uses the tables, the app will no longer work ...
  91. [91]
    What programs are similar to Google Fusion Tables? - Quora
    Jan 23, 2019 · Google suggested Big Query and Data Studio as alternatives to Fusion Tables. These programs are great for working with data, SQL queries and making graphs.Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
  92. [92]
    Google Fusion Tables alternative using Mapping Sheets add-on
    Migrate Fusion Tables data to Google Sheets, then use the Mapping Sheets add-on. Download as CSV, open in Sheets, select headers, and build the map.
  93. [93]
    Google Fusion Table Migration with & within Google Earth Engine
    Jan 28, 2019 · Sine multiple scripts can have repeated names, this script does have a limitation if a single name refers to multiple fusion tables but limits ...
  94. [94]
    Seeking cloud-based alternatives to Google Fusion Tables? [closed]
    Oct 18, 2012 · Fusion Tables are going to be shut down. Alternatives: Google Earth Engine can import and visualize data. Jupyter notebooks can visualize ...What free or open source cloud-based software is recommended by ...How to Start Web Mapping? - GIS Stack ExchangeMore results from gis.stackexchange.comMissing: deprecation | Show results with:deprecation
  95. [95]
    Tools to replace Fusion Tables / Google Maps : r/gis - Reddit
    Aug 14, 2019 · I'm trying to find out what I need to make similar tools. Basically, what tools would you recommend for base level data visualization on a map?
  96. [96]
    Google Fusion Tables - Archiveteam
    Jan 4, 2022 · Google Fusion Tables is no longer be available since December 3rd, 2019. This includes all access to the table data and visualizations for the ...
  97. [97]
    7+ Google fusion tables alternatives - FME by Safe Software
    Dec 17, 2018 · The Google Fusion Tables shutdown means a lot of data now needs to be migrated. Here are popular alternatives and how to easily move your ...