Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale

The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), also known as the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, is a clinician-administered developed to quantify the severity of anxiety symptoms in adults, focusing on both psychological and physical manifestations. It consists of 14 items, each rated on a scale from 0 (symptoms not present) to 4 (symptoms very severe or grossly disabling), resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate greater anxiety severity. The scale assesses domains such as anxious mood, tension, fears, , depressed mood, and various somatic symptoms including muscular, sensory, cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and autonomic issues, as well as behavior during the interview. Originally introduced by British psychiatrist Max Hamilton in 1959, the HAM-A was created as a tool for evaluating anxiety states in patients with mixed anxiety and depressive , rather than as a diagnostic instrument. It emerged from Hamilton's earlier work on rating scales, presented at the British Psychological Society's 1957 meeting, and has since become one of the earliest and most established measures for tracking anxiety symptom changes in clinical trials and practice. The scale is typically administered in 10–15 minutes through questions probing the preceding week, making it suitable for both and therapeutic monitoring. Psychometric evaluations have demonstrated the HAM-A's reliability and validity across diverse populations, including adults and adolescents, with sufficient , test-retest reliability, and against other anxiety measures. Scores are interpreted as mild anxiety for totals below 17, mild to moderate for 18–24, and moderate to severe for 25–30 or higher, though cutoffs can vary by context. Widely translated into languages such as , , and , the HAM-A remains a in psychopharmacology studies and assessments, often used alongside scales like the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Its status has facilitated global adoption, though structured interview guides have been developed to enhance .

Development and History

Origins and Creation

Max Hamilton, a prominent psychiatrist and statistician born in 1912 near , , and who emigrated to at age three, developed the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) during his tenure as Senior in the of Psychiatry at the . After earning his medical degree from in 1934 and completing psychiatric training at the in , Hamilton sought to address the subjective nature of anxiety assessments prevalent in mid-20th-century clinical practice. His background in and emphasis on empirical methods drove the creation of a structured instrument to quantify anxiety severity in patients diagnosed with anxiety neurosis, a term then used for what are now recognized as various anxiety disorders. The HAM-A emerged as a clinician-rated tool designed to evaluate observable and patient-reported symptoms through a , prioritizing objective measurement over reliance on self-reports to better differentiate pathological anxiety from normal emotional responses. This approach reflected Hamilton's commitment to psychometric rigor in , building on his earlier work in rating scales for mood disorders. First published in 1959 in the British Journal of Medical Psychology under the title "The assessment of anxiety states by rating," the scale provided a foundational method for tracking symptom intensity in clinical and research settings. The original 1959 version comprised 14 items assessing both (e.g., , fears) and (e.g., respiratory, cardiovascular) manifestations of anxiety, each scored by the on a 0-4 severity scale based on the preceding week. This structure allowed for a total score reflecting overall anxiety burden, facilitating consistent evaluation across patients with diagnosed anxiety . Subsequent adaptations expanded its application, though the core framework remained intact.

Evolution and Revisions

The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, first published in , underwent a notable revision in 1969 that included minor wording adjustments to enhance clarity in assessing both and symptoms. These changes refined the descriptions of items without fundamentally altering the scale's structure or introducing major new elements, ensuring consistency in its clinical application. Further subtle modifications occurred in the 1970s, primarily focused on improving definitional precision, but the scale avoided comprehensive overhauls during this period. The HAM-A's design reflects the diagnostic landscape of its time, aligning with the broader anxiety state categories outlined in ICD-6 (1948) and ICD-8 (1968), which emphasized symptomatic presentations rather than discrete disorders. It predates the DSM-III (1980), which introduced operationalized criteria for specific anxiety conditions like , allowing the scale to retain versatility amid shifting nosological frameworks. From its inception, the HAM-A has held public domain status, enabling unrestricted use in global research and practice without copyright barriers, which has contributed to its longevity and broad dissemination.

Design and Administration

Item Composition

The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) comprises 14 distinct items, each targeting specific symptoms of anxiety observed through clinician-rated assessment. Developed by Max Hamilton in 1959, the scale evaluates both mental and physical dimensions of anxiety to provide a comprehensive profile of the patient's condition. The items are categorized into two subscales: psychic anxiety (seven items) and somatic anxiety (seven items). The psychic subscale focuses on psychological and cognitive aspects, such as emotional distress and behavioral expressions, while the somatic subscale addresses physiological complaints across various bodily systems. This division allows for differentiation between mental agitation and physical manifestations, reflecting the multifaceted nature of anxiety disorders.
Item NumberItem NameSubscaleBrief Description
1Anxious moodPsychicWorries, anticipation of the worst, fearful anticipation, irritability.
2TensionPsychicFeelings of tension, fatigability, startle response, trembling, restlessness, inability to relax.
3FearsPsychicOf dark, strangers, being left alone, animals, traffic, crowds (including phobias and avoidance behaviors).
4InsomniaPsychicDifficulty falling asleep, broken or unsatisfying sleep, fatigue on waking, nightmares.
5IntellectualPsychicDifficulty in concentration, poor memory.
6Depressed moodPsychicLoss of interest, lack of pleasure in hobbies, early waking, diurnal mood variation.
7Behavior at interviewPsychicFidgeting, restlessness, pacing, hand tremor, furrowed brow, strained face, rapid respiration.
8Somatic (muscular)SomaticPains and aches, twitching, stiffness, myoclonic jerks, grinding of teeth, unsteady voice.
9Somatic (sensory)SomaticTinnitus, blurring of vision, hot and cold flushes, prickling sensation, paresthesia.
10Cardiovascular symptomsSomaticTachycardia, palpitations, pain in chest, throbbing vessels, fainting feelings.
11Respiratory symptomsSomaticPressure or constriction in chest, choking sensations, sighing, dyspnea.
12Gastrointestinal symptomsSomaticDifficulty swallowing, wind, abdominal pain, burning sensations, nausea, vomiting, loose bowels.
13Genitourinary symptomsSomaticFrequency or urgency of micturition or urination, amenorrhea, menorrhagia, loss of libido.
14Autonomic symptomsSomaticDry mouth, flushing, pallor, sweating, giddiness, tension headache.
This structure underscores the scale's rationale of capturing observable signs and patient-reported experiences to distinguish anxiety from overlapping conditions like .

Administration Guidelines

The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) is primarily intended for adults with suspected anxiety disorders, though it has been applied to adolescents and children in clinical contexts. Administration is restricted to trained professionals, such as psychiatrists or psychologists, who possess clinical experience to reduce subjectivity in ratings. The procedure consists of a semi-structured clinical interview that evaluates the 14 specific items through a combination of direct patient questioning, behavioral observation, and, when available, collateral information from family or caregivers. The interview typically lasts 10 to 15 minutes and follows guidelines to probe responses in a neutral manner, avoiding leading questions to elicit accurate symptom reports on aspects like frequency, intensity, and impairment. For enhanced reliability, a structured interview guide (SIGH-A) may be used, providing standardized probe questions and anchor points for severity ratings. In cases involving non-English-speaking populations, validated translations of the HAM-A are available in languages such as , , , , and , but administration must incorporate to account for variations in symptom expression and idiomatic differences. Clinicians are advised to verify the psychometric properties of the specific and adapt probing techniques accordingly to maintain the scale's integrity.

Scoring and Interpretation

Calculation of Scores

The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) employs a standardized 5-point for rating each of the 14 items, where 0 indicates the symptom is not present, 1 denotes mild severity (slight but noticeable), 2 represents moderate severity (definitely present and distressing), 3 signifies severe severity (markedly distressing and interfering with daily activities), and 4 indicates very severe or incapacitating severity (grossly disabling). This ordinal scoring allows clinicians to quantify the intensity of anxiety symptoms based on patient reports and observable behaviors during the interview. The total score is computed by summing the ratings across all 14 items, yielding a range from 0 (indicating no anxiety symptoms) to 56 (reflecting maximum severity). This aggregate provides an overall measure of anxiety severity, with higher scores corresponding to greater . For more nuanced evaluation, optional subscale scores can be derived: the psychic anxiety subscale sums items 1 through 6 (anxious mood, tension, fears, , intellectual , and depressed mood) and item 14 (behavior at interview), while the subscale sums items 7 through 13 (somatic muscular, somatic sensory, cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and autonomic symptoms). These subtotals, each ranging from 0 to 28, facilitate differentiation between psychological and physical manifestations of anxiety. In cases of missing or unrateable items, guidelines recommend basing ratings on all available clinical information from the interview to complete the assessment whenever possible; however, if too many items cannot be reliably scored, the overall scale score may be invalid and should be excluded from analysis based on study protocols.

Clinical Thresholds

Thresholds for interpreting Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) total scores vary by context and population; one common classification to categorize anxiety severity, guiding treatment decisions in clinical practice, is as follows: 0-17 indicates mild anxiety, 18-24 mild to moderate anxiety, 25-30 moderate to severe anxiety, and 30 or higher very severe anxiety. These cutoffs are derived from empirical studies and expert consensus on symptom impact, though variations exist across populations, such as lower thresholds (e.g., ≥24 for severe) in cohorts.
Score RangeSeverity Level
0-17Mild anxiety
18-24Mild to moderate anxiety
25-30Moderate to severe anxiety
≥30Very severe anxiety
MCID values reported in for the HAM-A total score range from 2.5 to 5 points, depending on population and context, representing a meaningful improvement perceived by patients. This helps clinicians distinguish true symptom reduction from minor fluctuations, particularly in longitudinal assessments. However, HAM-A thresholds should not be applied in isolation; they must be interpreted alongside the patient's clinical history, comorbid conditions, and cultural factors to ensure accurate and . Cutoffs are approximate and may vary by , such as in older adults or those with comorbidities, where somatic items may inflate scores.

Psychometric Evaluation

Reliability Measures

The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) exhibits high inter-rater reliability, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) often ranging from 0.80 to 0.99 across studies, primarily due to its structured items that provide clear behavioral anchors for symptom severity assessment. This consistency is enhanced when raters receive specific training, though variability increases among less experienced clinicians who may differ in probing subjective symptoms like tension or fears. For instance, in a study comparing the traditional HAM-A to a structured guide version, inter-rater ICC reached 0.98 for the standard form. Test-retest reliability of the HAM-A is robust over short intervals (e.g., 1-7 days) in clinically stable patients, yielding or ICC values of 0.86 to 0.96, which supports its stability for tracking anxiety without significant state changes. These coefficients reflect the scale's ability to produce reproducible scores when patient symptoms remain constant, though longer intervals may introduce more variability due to natural fluctuations in anxiety. Internal consistency of the HAM-A is strong, with typically falling between 0.85 and 0.92 in diverse adult and adolescent samples, indicating good item intercorrelation and unidimensionality in measuring overall anxiety severity. This reliability holds across populations but can be lower (e.g., alpha around 0.77) in settings with heterogeneous symptom presentations. Reliability measures for the HAM-A are influenced by contextual factors, such as rater expertise and cultural applicability; for example, coefficients tend to decrease in diverse ethnic groups without validated, culturally adapted translations, emphasizing the importance of localized versions to maintain psychometric integrity.

Validity Assessments

The construct validity of the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) is supported by factor analytic studies that consistently identify a two-factor structure comprising psychic (psychological) and somatic (physical) anxiety dimensions, which aligns with theoretical models distinguishing cognitive-emotional and physiological aspects of anxiety. This structure has been replicated in clinical samples, including those with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, with the two factors typically explaining 50-60% of the variance in scores. Recent post-2010 investigations, such as those in diverse populations like Korean university students and Arabic-speaking Lebanese adults, have affirmed this bifactor model, demonstrating adequate fit indices (e.g., comparative fit index >0.90) and supporting the scale's alignment with contemporary anxiety constructs. Concurrent validity of the HAM-A is evidenced by strong positive correlations with established self-report anxiety measures, including the (STAI) and (BAI), typically ranging from r=0.51 to 0.71 in clinical and non-clinical samples. For instance, intraclass correlation coefficients between HAM-A total scores and STAI subscales have been reported as 0.70-0.71 in validation studies among adults with anxiety symptoms. Additionally, HAM-A scores show robust associations with DSM-based diagnoses of GAD, indicating its utility in capturing diagnostic-level anxiety severity. The HAM-A demonstrates in anticipating treatment responses, particularly in for anxiety disorders, where baseline scores and early reductions (e.g., within 1-4 weeks) reliably forecast remission rates and overall symptom improvement. This predictive capacity holds across diverse clinical settings, underscoring the scale's role in monitoring therapeutic trajectories. Regarding , the HAM-A exhibits good discriminatory power for detecting clinically significant anxiety, with (ROC) analyses yielding an area under the curve () of approximately 0.80 in screening for anxiety disorders against structured diagnostic interviews. Optimal cutoffs, such as 13-14, achieve sensitivities of 72-86% and specificities of 63-74% for identifying GAD in and psychiatric populations. However, performance is moderate in cases of comorbid , where overlapping items reduce specificity (e.g., 50-65%), leading to potential overestimation of anxiety severity in mixed mood-anxiety presentations.

Applications and Uses

In Clinical Practice

The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) serves as an assessment tool in outpatient by quantifying baseline anxiety severity in patients presenting with disorders such as (GAD) or , enabling clinicians to establish initial symptom profiles for targeted intervention. This clinician-administered tool, typically completed in 10-15 minutes, differentiates psychic anxiety (e.g., tension, fears) from somatic manifestations (e.g., cardiovascular symptoms), facilitating precise evaluation in routine clinical encounters. In treatment monitoring, the HAM-A tracks symptom changes over time, particularly in therapeutic modalities like cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) regimens, where it is often administered weekly or biweekly to assess response and adjust interventions. For instance, in GAD management among older adults, serial HAM-A evaluations during SSRI augmentation with CBT have demonstrated its utility as a gold standard for measuring anxiety reduction, with response defined by significant score declines. Guidelines from the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry endorse its use for monitoring treatment effectiveness in GAD, though real-world application may favor simpler scales in some settings. The HAM-A is frequently integrated with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) in clinical practice to support in cases of mixed anxiety-depression, where overlapping symptoms complicate standalone assessments. This pairing allows clinicians to parse anxiety-specific contributions from depressive features, enhancing diagnostic accuracy in comorbid presentations common in outpatient psychiatry. The HAM-A also holds a key role in clinician education programs, promoting standardized anxiety assessment through training on its 14-item structure and scoring to achieve reliable inter-rater consistency. Such implementation ensures uniform application across therapeutic settings, reducing variability in clinical judgments.

In Research Settings

The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) serves as a primary outcome measure in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of anxiolytic medications and psychotherapies, where pre- and post-treatment scores are analyzed to quantify symptom reduction. For instance, a 2024 meta-analysis of low-intensity cognitive behavioral therapy for generalized anxiety disorder utilized HAM-A total scores as the main endpoint, demonstrating significant effect sizes in anxiety alleviation across multiple trials. Similarly, 2020s systematic reviews of pharmacological interventions, such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, frequently employ HAM-A changes from baseline to endpoint to establish treatment superiority over placebo, with standardized mean differences highlighting its sensitivity to therapeutic effects. In epidemiological research, the HAM-A assesses anxiety and trajectories within population , particularly in longitudinal designs tracking vulnerability factors. Studies on aging populations, such as those examining late-life anxiety in community-dwelling older adults, apply the HAM-A to monitor symptom persistence over time, revealing associations with cognitive decline and comorbidities in followed for years. In trauma-exposed groups, including survivors of events like , the scale evaluates anxiety burden in prospective analyses; a 2025 study of post-COVID sequelae used serial HAM-A assessments to document elevated rates and risk predictors in affected individuals. Cross-culturally, the HAM-A has been translated and validated in numerous languages, facilitating its integration into research protocols for anxiety disorders. Validation efforts in regions like the and confirm its psychometric robustness across diverse populations, enabling comparisons in multinational trials. It has been employed in global collaborative studies, including those aligned with frameworks for surveillance, to standardize anxiety measurement in varied socioeconomic contexts. Recent advancements include the HAM-A's adaptation for digital platforms in remote research settings, particularly post-COVID studies from 2020 to 2025, where tools enable virtual administration to overcome access barriers. Digital interventions targeting pandemic-related anxiety, such as mobile apps delivering , incorporate HAM-A scoring via self-report proxies or clinician-guided video assessments, with outcomes showing feasibility and comparable reliability to in-person methods in low-resource environments.

Limitations and Criticisms

Methodological Concerns

The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) relies heavily on judgment for rating 14 symptom items, without providing standardized probe questions or guidelines, which introduces significant subjectivity into the process. This lack of contributes to inter-rater variability, particularly for behavioral and observable items such as or respiratory symptoms, where raters may interpret reports or manifestations differently based on their experience. Studies have reported coefficients ranging from 0.89 to 0.97, but these values are achieved primarily among trained clinicians, and variability increases in less controlled settings or with novice raters. A prominent methodological flaw in the HAM-A is its somatic bias, stemming from the scale's heavy weighting toward physical symptoms—seven of the 14 items focus on somatic manifestations like gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and respiratory complaints. This overemphasis can inflate scores in patients with co-occurring medical conditions or somatic side effects from medications, as the subscale for somatic anxiety is prone to confounding with non-anxiety-related physical symptoms, such as those associated with depression or general illness. For instance, items assessing genitourinary symptoms (item 12), including urinary frequency or urgency, often load similarly on both anxiety and depression factors in psychometric analyses, reducing the scale's specificity for pure anxiety constructs. The HAM-A's content, developed in 1959, reflects an outdated conceptualization of anxiety that predates modern diagnostic criteria for (GAD) in the , leading to misalignment with contemporary emphases on cognitive features. Specifically, items like genitourinary symptoms are less relevant to current GAD definitions, which prioritize excessive, uncontrollable as the core symptom, a dimension the HAM-A largely omits in favor of psychic agitation and somatic distress. This omission limits the scale's ability to capture the full spectrum of anxiety phenomenology, particularly cognitive rumination, resulting in incomplete assessments for disorders where is paramount. Administration of the HAM-A requires a 10- to 15-minute interview, which can be time-inefficient in high-volume clinical environments compared to brief self-report measures like the GAD-7. This burden on provider time may hinder routine use in or busy psychiatric settings, where quicker tools allow for more feasible screening and monitoring.

Contemporary Relevance

The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) shows notable gaps in its alignment with and criteria for (GAD), particularly in adequately assessing the core symptom of excessive, uncontrollable occurring for at least several months. Developed in 1959, the HAM-A emphasizes psychic and somatic manifestations of anxiety but underrepresents this diagnostic hallmark, as most of its items focus on symptoms like , fears, and rather than cognitive aspects of central to classifications. Consequently, clinicians often supplement the HAM-A with tools like the Penn State Worry Questionnaire to ensure comprehensive GAD evaluation, enhancing its utility in line with 's requirement for to be pervasive and distressing. similarly defines GAD by persistent, uncontrollable , underscoring these alignment challenges and the need for integrated assessments. In the , the HAM-A continues to inform digital innovations, with studies integrating it into app-based interventions to track anxiety symptom changes in . For instance, a 2024 randomized evaluated a mobile app for young adults with anxiety, using HAM-A scores to demonstrate significant reductions in symptoms ( d=0.94) from baseline to six weeks, highlighting its adaptability to remote monitoring. Such applications address logistical barriers in traditional administration, though they maintain the clinician-rated format to preserve reliability. Emerging research also explores for anxiety by analyzing patterns in symptom reporting. Compared to alternatives, the HAM-A's clinician-administered structure contrasts with patient-centered self-report tools like the GAD-7, which is briefer (7 items, ~2 minutes) and directly targets GAD worry symptoms, offering high (89%) and specificity (82%) at a cutoff of 10 for screening. The GAD-7's brevity and focus on functional impairment make it preferable for routine . Likewise, the PROMIS Anxiety scale employs for precise, unidimensional measurement across severity levels, but superior efficiency in population-based studies due to its calibrated item bank. Ongoing validation research from 2023–2025 emphasizes the need for HAM-A revisions to incorporate and , as current items may overlook anxiety presentations in autistic or trauma-exposed individuals, where somatic symptoms dominate but worry is masked. These directions aim to bridge gaps in applicability for neurodivergent populations, where amplifies anxiety but standard scales lack sensitivity.

References

  1. [1]
    THE ASSESSMENT OF ANXIETY STATES BY RATING - HAMILTON
    British Journal of Medical Psychology · Volume 32, Issue 1 pp. 50-55 British ... https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1959.tb00467.x. Citations: 8,974.
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A)
    Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A). Reference: Hamilton M.The assessment of anxiety states by rating. Br J Med Psychol 1959;. 32:50–55. Page 2. 82. Below is ...
  3. [3]
    Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) - Oxford Academic
    Sep 11, 2015 · The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A, sometimes termed HARS) [1], dating back to 1959, is one of the first rating scales to measure the severity of ...
  4. [4]
    The Hamilton Anxiety Scale: reliability, validity and ... - PubMed
    The Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) was tested for reliability and validity in two different samples, one sample (n = 97) defined by anxiety disorders.Missing: original | Show results with:original
  5. [5]
    Reliability and validity of the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale in an ...
    Conclusions: These results demonstrate that the HARS is a reliable and valid measure for the assessment of global anxiety in the adolescent population.Missing: review | Show results with:review
  6. [6]
    Reliability and validity of a structured interview guide for the ...
    Jun 13, 2001 · We developed a Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (SIGH-A) and report on a study comparing this version to the traditional form of this ...
  7. [7]
    Max Hamilton • LITFL • Medical Eponym Library
    Dec 2, 2021 · Max Hamilton (1912 – 1988) was a German born British Psychiatrist and statistician Creator of the Hamilton rating scales for anxiety and depression.
  8. [8]
    Max Hamilton | RCP Museum
    Max Hamilton was born near Frankfurt, the son of Henry Himmelschein and his wife Sarah Kleinberg. His family emigrated to England when he was three years old.
  9. [9]
    Hamilton: The Man Behind the Scale | Psychiatric News
    Secondary schooling in London gave him a solid background in mathematics, and he went on to obtain a medical degree in 1934 at University College Hospital. For ...
  10. [10]
    Max Hamilton - Biography - JewAge
    He served from 1939 to 1946 in the Royal Air Force, as a medical officer. Hamilton trained as a psychiatrist at the Maudsley Hospital, London. His ...
  11. [11]
    Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A)
    Max R. Hamilton in 1959. Recognizing the need for a standardized evaluation tool for anxiety, Dr. Hamilton created the HAM-A to measure the severity of anxiety ...
  12. [12]
    SIGH, What's in a Name? An Examination of the Factor Structure ...
    The Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A; Hamilton, 1959) was one of the first rating scales developed to assess anxiety severity among adults, adolescents, and ...Missing: paper | Show results with:paper<|control11|><|separator|>
  13. [13]
    Fifty years with the Hamilton scales for anxiety and depression. A ...
    Apr 28, 2009 · From the moment Max Hamilton started his psychiatric education, he considered psychometrics to be a scientific discipline on a par with ...
  14. [14]
    The assessment of anxiety states by rating. - APA PsycNet
    Citation. Hamilton, M. (1959). The assessment of anxiety states by rating. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 32, 50–55. ... https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044- ...
  15. [15]
    Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale - SpringerLink
    Hamilton, M. (1959). The assessment of anxiety states by rating. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 32, 50–55. ... Kobak, K. A., Reynolds, W. M., & Greist, ...
  16. [16]
    Fifty Years with the Hamilton Scales for Anxiety and Depression
    Apr 28, 2009 · Inspired by Eysenck, Hamilton took the long route around factor analysis in order to qualify his scales for anxiety (HAM-A) and depression (HAM- ...Missing: evolution | Show results with:evolution
  17. [17]
    HAM-A Hamilton Anxiety Scale - Psychiatric Times
    Apr 2, 2013 · Hamilton in 1959, the scale predates, of course, the current definition of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). However, it covers many of ...
  18. [18]
  19. [19]
    Reliability and validity of a structured interview guide for ... - PubMed
    The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, a widely used clinical interview assessment tool, lacks instructions for administration and clear anchor points for the ...
  20. [20]
    Translation, cultural adaptation and evaluation of the psychometric ...
    Jul 19, 2023 · This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the Hamilton Anxiety Scale for the Portuguese population and assess its psychometric properties.
  21. [21]
    Generalized anxiety disorder and the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale ...
    Ham-A is comprised of a psychic and a somatic subscale. The psychic subscale (items 1-6 and 14) addresses the more subjective cognitive and ...
  22. [22]
    Broadening of Generalized Anxiety Disorders Definition Does not ...
    ... HAM-A scale at the 6 month visit (p=0.261) and 59.7% and 67.7 ... A psychic anxiety sub domain (addition of items 1-6 and 14) and a ...
  23. [23]
    Consistency checks to improve measurement with the Hamilton ...
    Mar 15, 2023 · The HAM-A includes 14 items rated on a 5-point scale. The general strategy was to define overly consistent scoring patterns, irregular scoring ...Missing: original | Show results with:original
  24. [24]
    Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Calculator - MDApp
    May 27, 2017 · HAM-A score, Interpretation ; 0 - 17, Mild anxiety ; 18 - 24, Mild to moderate anxiety ; 25 - 30, Moderate to severe anxiety ; 30 - 56, Very severe ...
  25. [25]
    Identifying HAM-A cutoffs for mild, moderate, and severe ... - PubMed
    The optimal HAM-A score ranges were: mild anxiety = 8-14; moderate = 15-23; severe ≥ 24 (scores ≤ 7 were considered to represent no/minimal anxiety).
  26. [26]
    A Validation Study of the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, the Beck ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · Conclusion Our findings suggest that the Korean version of HAM-A was found to be a valid and reliable instrument that can be employed to screen ...
  27. [27]
    Psilocybin therapy for mood dysfunction in Parkinson's disease
    Apr 9, 2025 · Observed MADRS score changes exceed estimates of the MCID (3–6 points [69];). While there is no agreed upon threshold for the HAM-A, a prior ...
  28. [28]
    Limitations of the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale as a Primary ...
    HAM-A is problematic for a second reason: it is clinician administered. HAM-A may be vulnerable to allegiance effects and other related factors that can ...Missing: missing | Show results with:missing
  29. [29]
    Hamilton anxiety rating scale interview guide - ScienceDirect.com
    Interrater reliability coefficients for the HARS have been previously reported. However, differences in the way clinicians assess symptom severity may reduce ...Missing: correlation | Show results with:correlation
  30. [30]
    Development and validation of a computer-administered version of ...
    Developed a computer-administered form of the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAS), designed to provide a high degree of correspondence with the clinician interview ...
  31. [31]
    Translation, cultural adaptation and evaluation of the psychometric ...
    Jul 19, 2023 · The validity and reliability of the instrument are supported. However, the Hamilton Anxiety Scale should be used cautiously in the Portuguese ...
  32. [32]
    Reliability and Validity of the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale in an ...
    The interrater reliability and internal consistency of the HARS were acceptable in this adolescent sample and were comparable to results reported for adults.
  33. [33]
    (PDF) Psychometric Properties and Factor Structure of the Hamilton ...
    Feb 1, 2024 · Conclusion Our findings suggest that the Korean version of HAM-A was found to be a valid and reliable instrument that can be employed to screen ...
  34. [34]
    Validation of the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale and State Trait ...
    It was originally published by Max Hamilton in 1959. For clinical purposes, only severe or inadequate anxiety is attended to.
  35. [35]
    [PDF] An Examination of Factor Structure of the Hamilton Anxiety Rating ...
    Mar 28, 2019 · The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A,. Hamilton (1959) is a 14 items scale designed to assess the individuals level of both psychic and ...
  36. [36]
    Psychometric Properties and Factor Structure of the Hamilton ...
    The 14-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) was developed by Hamilton in 1959 to detect symptoms of anxiety in clinical populations [13]. HAM ...INTRODUCTION · METHODS · RESULTS
  37. [37]
    Measures of Anxiety - PMC - NIH
    The following guidelines are recommended for the interpretation of scores: 0–9, normal or no anxiety; 10–18, mild to moderate anxiety; 19–29, moderate to ...
  38. [38]
    Generalised anxiety disorder - PMC - NIH
    Frequently used rating scales include the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A), Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and Clinical Global Impressions ...
  39. [39]
    Effect of Pharmacotherapy for Anxiety Disorders on Quality of Life
    Pharmacological therapy is effective for improving quality of life in anxiety disorders, and larger symptom reductions are associated with greater improvement ...
  40. [40]
    Early Improvement in One Week Predicts the Treatment Response ...
    We studied whether the therapeutic response at 12 weeks is predictable based on the early improvement with escitalopram at 1 week.
  41. [41]
    Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety: exploring validity with robust ...
    Aug 12, 2025 · Therefore, in this study, the psychometric validity of the HRSA was investigated with an elaborate list of measures from both IRT and robust ...
  42. [42]
    A comparison of the Hamilton anxiety rating scale and the DSM-5 ...
    Both the DADSI and HAMA were valid measures of anxiety severity in depressed patients, though the HAMA was more highly confounded with measures of depression ...
  43. [43]
    Antidepressant Medication Augmented With Cognitive-Behavioral ...
    In a case series, we found that the addition of CBT to SSRI treatment increased treatment response and provided long-term relapse prevention after the SSRI was ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Use of Objective Rating Scales for Generalized Anxiety by ...
    Jan 15, 2023 · This review was implemented to evaluate the need for quality improvement initiatives geared toward optimizing identification and management of ...
  45. [45]
    Assessment of Anxiety in Clinical Trials with Depressed Patients ...
    This method was used for imputing missing data. Analysis Plan. The analysis plan involved several steps: 1- descriptive analysis of the above outcome ...Analysis Plan · Hamd Factor Analysis · Discussion
  46. [46]
  47. [47]
    A meta-analysis on the efficacy of low-intensity cognitive ...
    Jan 2, 2024 · This meta-analysis aimed to synthesise effect sizes of three NICE-recommended LICBT for generalised anxiety disorder: non-facilitated self-help, ...
  48. [48]
    Meta-analysis of trials A–E. Hamilton Anxiety Scale total score...
    Meta-analysis of trials A–E. Hamilton Anxiety Scale total score treatment group differences for change between baseline and end of treatment in pre-defined ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
  49. [49]
    Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Generalized Anxiety Disorder ...
    Apr 8, 2009 · Anxiety severity was measured with the Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (SIGH-A). The SIGH-A has adequate psychometric ...<|separator|>
  50. [50]
    Longitudinal Assessment of Mental Health Sequelae in COVID-19 ...
    Aug 26, 2025 · The primary outcome of the study was the change in the anxiety levels (Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) scores) among the COVID-19 ...
  51. [51]
    Digital Health Interventions for Depression and Anxiety in Low - NIH
    ... (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale) and anxiety (Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale) ... Digital tools to ameliorate psychological symptoms associated with COVID ...
  52. [52]
    Psychometric Properties of the Reconstructed Hamilton Depression ...
    Subsequently, Guy (1976) developed a 24-item version of the HRSD, which includes all 21 items from the original HRSD rating form, as well as 3 additional items ...Missing: evolution | Show results with:evolution<|control11|><|separator|>
  53. [53]
    Limitations of the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale as a Primary ...
    The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), a clinician-administered scale that assesses the severity of 14 broad categories of symptoms, presumed to be ...Missing: thresholds | Show results with:thresholds
  54. [54]
    Efficacy of a Mobile App-Based Intervention for Young Adults With ...
    Aug 20, 2024 · The findings of this study suggest that self-guided mobile cognitive behavioral therapy apps can be efficacious in improving anxiety symptoms.
  55. [55]
    Machine learning approaches to anxiety detection - NIH
    Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are integrated now in diagnostic assistance. By integrating behavioral and physiological data from ...
  56. [56]
    A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder
    Convergent validity of the GAD-7 was good, as demonstrated by its correlations with 2 anxiety scales: the Beck Anxiety Inventory (r = 0.72) and the anxiety ...Missing: HAM- concurrent
  57. [57]
    Use of Objective Rating Scales for Generalized Anxiety by ...
    The 2008 guidelines suggest that symptom rating scales, specifically the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A), may be useful to monitor treatment effectiveness in ...
  58. [58]
    Item Response Theory Analysis: PROMIS® Anxiety Form ... - NIH
    Notably, while the PROMIS® Anxiety Short Form 6a is designed to assess anxiety during the past seven days and the GAD-7 is designed to assess anxiety during the ...Methods · Results · Comparison Of Model...
  59. [59]
    Consistency checks to improve measurement with the Hamilton ...
    Consistency checks for ratings of the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) and Clinical Global Impression of Severity of anxiety (CGIS) that are widely used ...Missing: revision trauma- informed 2023-2025
  60. [60]
    Research Impacting and Involving Autistic Adults Should Be Trauma ...
    Mar 31, 2025 · This article calls for widespread integration of trauma-informed strategies into existing research practices focused on autistic adults.Missing: rating scales limitations