Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Guard llama

A guard llama is a domesticated llama (Lama glama), typically a mature gelded male, used as a non-lethal livestock guardian to protect vulnerable animals such as sheep, , , , alpacas, and deer from canid predators including coyotes, , and foxes. These animals leverage their natural instincts, developed in the Andean highlands where llamas serve as alert prey species, to deter threats through behaviors like alarm calling, chasing intruders, standing at attention, and physical confrontation. Introduced to North American farming in the early , guard llamas bond with livestock herds when introduced young—often with livestock accepting them within 10 days in 89% of cases according to a 2000 survey—and require minimal maintenance, with an average initial cost of $532 and annual upkeep of $135 according to that same 2000 survey. Studies demonstrate high effectiveness, with ranchers rating guard llamas as effective or very effective in 89% of operations, 92% of farms, and 100% of ranches according to a 2000 survey, often reducing predation losses to zero in 78% of cases. A field experiment involving 21 sheep flocks showed significantly lower losses in the first lambing season for herds with llamas compared to controls, though efficacy depends on predation pressure reaching a . Economic benefits are substantial, yielding average annual savings of $848 for producers, $2,509 for ranchers, and $1,167 for operations according to a 2000 survey. Optimal selection favors large, mature individuals at least 18–24 months old, as smaller alpacas prove ineffective for guarding.

Overview

Purpose and Definition

A guard llama is an individual (Lama glama) selected for its innate protective behaviors to deter predators, primarily employed to safeguard sheep, , , or other small from canid threats such as coyotes, foxes, , and dingos. The primary purpose of a guard llama is to provide non-lethal predator deterrence via heightened vigilance, vocal alarm signaling, and direct physical confrontation, such as chasing or kicking intruders, thereby acting as a low-maintenance substitute for lethal control measures or other guardian animals like . This approach leverages the llama's natural aggression toward unfamiliar canines while minimizing harm to the livestock under protection. Guard llamas offer several basic advantages, including the absence of required formal , minimal daily care comparable to that of llamas, and the ability to patrol extensive areas in both fenced pastures and open-range environments. Economically, they are cost-effective for small to medium-scale farms, with initial purchase prices typically ranging from $300 to $800 USD for gelded males and annual maintenance costs under $200 USD, primarily for feed and basic veterinary needs. Their adoption in began in the early 1980s as part of integrated predator management strategies.

Historical Development

Llamas (Lama glama) were domesticated from wild guanacos approximately 5,000 years ago in the Andean highlands of present-day and by indigenous cultures, primarily for their , , and utility as pack animals in the challenging high-altitude terrain. While these early societies valued llamas for their social structure and instinctive vigilance within herds—often manifesting as protective behaviors toward group members—there is no evidence of a formalized role as livestock guardians in pre-Columbian or colonial eras. Instead, llamas were integral to Andean economies and rituals, with their herding practices sustaining communities for millennia. The transition to deliberate use as guard animals occurred in the 1970s and in , driven by escalating predation on sheep amid growing llama imports for and purposes. Sheep producers experimenting with co-pasturing llamas observed marked reductions in losses, prompting wider trials as a non-lethal alternative to traditional methods like or lethal control. Key milestones in the development of guard llamas include early experimental trials during the early , with adoption accelerating after a 1990 magazine article highlighted their potential. A pivotal 1993 peer-reviewed study published in the Journal of Range Management, based on surveys of 145 sheep producers by researchers, documented an average predation reduction from 26 to 8 sheep per year per , attributing this to llamas' aggressive responses to canines. By the 1990s, organizations such as the Rocky Mountain Llama and (RMLA) actively promoted guard llamas through educational resources and funding for research, solidifying their role in integrated predator management across North American rangelands. The practice spread globally in the following decades, with farmers adopting guard llamas in the 2000s to deter from sheep and herds, leveraging the animals' established efficacy against canids in open grazing systems. In , uptake began in the 2010s, particularly for protecting sheep from foxes and other predators, as evidenced by increasing sales and trials in countries like the and amid rising interest in sustainable farming.

Selection and Preparation

Physical and Temperament Criteria

Guard llamas are selected based on specific physical attributes that enable them to effectively deter predators through size, agility, and presence. Mature individuals, typically at least old, are preferred to ensure they have achieved sufficient physical and maturity for guarding duties. Ideal weight ranges from 280 to 450 pounds (127 to 204 ), providing the necessary for and physical with threats like coyotes. Sound conformation is essential, including strong, straight legs for chasing and kicking, an alert posture, and overall athletic build to navigate varied without injury. Larger stature contributes to their imposing presence, particularly for effective guarding. Regarding gender and reproductive status, gelded males and non-pregnant females are preferred due to their protective aggression, making them suitable for high-predator-pressure scenarios. Intact males are not recommended due to the risk of unwanted with . Geldings are commonly used due to their calmer disposition around handlers. Pregnant or nursing females should be avoided, as their focus shifts to offspring, diminishing their guarding vigilance. Temperament is a critical selection factor, with bold and alert dispositions being paramount for success. Effective guard llamas demonstrate instinctive aggression toward unfamiliar canids, such as , charging, or kicking at introduced at a safe distance during testing, while remaining calm and bonding rapidly with the they protect. Skittish or overly submissive are unsuitable, as they may flee threats rather than confront them, and qualities—such as monitoring the herd and alerting to dangers—correlate strongly with overall effectiveness. Health considerations ensure the can perform without vulnerability to illness or injury. Candidates must be free of internal and external parasites, up-to-date on vaccinations against common diseases like clostridial infections, and halter-trained for routine handling, veterinary care, and relocation if needed. Any signs of chronic conditions, poor mobility, or sensory deficits disqualify the animal, as these compromise their ability to detect and respond to predators.

Sourcing and Initial Handling

Guard llamas are typically sourced by purchasing from reputable breeders specializing in working llamas, often through associations like the Rocky Mountain Llama and Alpaca Association (RMLA) or local farms that provide guarantees and support. Adoption from rescues, such as the Southeast Llama Rescue, offers an alternative if the animals have been temperament-tested for guarding suitability. Pet-quality llamas should be avoided, as they lack the necessary instincts and robustness for livestock protection. The evaluation process begins with visiting the to observe the llama's interactions with dogs and , assessing and non-aggressiveness toward humans. Request complete health records, including and history, and inquire about a trial period or return guarantee, which reputable breeders often provide for 30 days to six months. Budget for transportation—such as trailering—and an initial veterinary examination to confirm overall health and maturity, with recommended after 3 years of age and at least 90 days prior to introduction if not already done. Upon acquisition, initial handling focuses on acclimation through training if the llama is not already lead-trained, using gentle daily sessions of 10 to 15 minutes for one to two weeks to build trust without force. the new arrival in a separate area for 21 to 30 days to monitor for illnesses like meningeal worm disease, providing basic shelter, hay, and mineral supplements during this period. Preference is given to physically individuals, at least old, to ensure readiness for guarding duties. Legal and ethical considerations include verifying compliance with local animal welfare regulations, which vary by but generally require proper housing and humane treatment. Select llamas exhibiting non-aggressive traits toward humans to minimize liability risks, prioritizing those with sound conformation and curiosity over dominance.

Implementation and Management

Introduction to Livestock

The process of integrating a guard llama with livestock begins with careful preparation to minimize stress and facilitate bonding. Producers should select a small initial group of 20 to 50 sheep or goats and confine them in a secure, enclosed area such as a fenced corral spanning 1 to 5 acres, while temporarily removing any existing guardian animals to avoid competition or disruption. Introduction in a confined corral is more effective than in open pastures, leading to lower initial livestock losses. This setup allows the livestock to acclimate without the pressures of a larger herd or open terrain, promoting a calmer environment for initial interactions. Once prepared, the guard llama is introduced to this confined group for 4 to 6 weeks, enabling natural through close proximity, scent recognition, and presence. Llamas typically form attachments within a few hours, with 50% adjusting to the in a few hours and 80% fully within one week, as they begin to view the group as part of their social unit. During this period, monitoring is essential to assess acceptance: signs of successful include the llama ignoring or calmly coexisting with the , whereas chasing or aggression indicates incompatibility and may require adjustment. Temperament-tested llamas, selected for their territorial instincts, bond more readily in this phase. After bonding is established, the group can transition gradually to larger pastures or open areas to integrate with the full herd, ensuring the llama maintains its protective focus. A recommended ratio is one guard llama per 100 to 200 to prevent dilution of attention, with reintroduction to the small group advised if the llama is temporarily removed. Common pitfalls in this integration include introducing multiple llamas, which often leads them to bond preferentially with each other rather than the , reducing overall effectiveness. Additionally, introducing the during periods of livestock stress, such as lambing or , can hinder bonding and increase vulnerability to predators; it is recommended to introduce the 4-6 weeks prior to such periods.

Ongoing Care and Monitoring

Guard llamas require a consistent routine of feeding and basic husbandry to maintain their and guarding efficacy. Daily intake should consist of 1.8–2.0% of the animal's body weight in , primarily from high-quality hay or , supplemented with access to at approximately 4 liters per 100 pounds of body weight and loose salts formulated for camelids. Annual shearing is essential, typically performed in spring using electric shears to prevent heat stress, while vaccinations against clostridial diseases such as types C and D, along with , are administered yearly following initial protocols starting at 3 months of age. occurs quarterly or based on fecal egg count tests to manage internal parasites like gastrointestinal nematodes, aiming for at least 90% reduction in egg counts to monitor resistance. Health monitoring involves regular veterinary examinations, including annual physical assessments for foot care—such as trimming overgrown nails every 3–6 months to prevent lameness—and screening for parasites through fecal flotations four times yearly. Owners should observe for stress indicators, including potentially linked to heightened vigilance or environmental factors, as llamas are and may not show overt illness signs until advanced. With proper management, guard llamas have a lifespan of 15–20 years, enabling extended service in protection. To evaluate performance, monthly observations assess the llama's with and responses to potential threats, such as alerting behaviors or perimeter . across pastures supports overall welfare by promoting exercise and preventing overgrazing, with annual maintenance costs typically ranging from $100–$150 for feed and veterinary care. If the llama proves ineffective after a 6-month , replacement is recommended, and integration with secure —at least 5 feet high to contain the animal—enhances protection without relying solely on the guardian.

Guarding Mechanisms

Behavioral Responses to Threats

Guard llamas detect threats through their heightened senses, utilizing keen eyesight and hearing to spot and unusual sounds from afar, often positioning themselves on elevated for better . Upon identifying a potential intruder, such as a canid, they issue alarm calls—typically a loud, shrill, high-pitched rhythmic call that rises and falls, or braying—to warn the and prompt the group to cluster together for safety. In non-physical deterrence, these llamas intimidate single canids by stomping their feet, , or adopting aggressive postures, such as standing with ears forward. They actively patrol the perimeter of their territory to assert dominance and discourage approaches, frequently inserting themselves between the threat and the to form a protective barrier. Physical confrontations involve charging toward the predator, followed by kicking, pawing, or trampling to repel smaller species like coyotes or foxes; in rare cases, llamas may deliver neck bites capable of injuring or killing the intruder, though the emphasis remains on expulsion rather than lethal engagement. Socially, guard llamas bond closely with , maintaining proximity to keep the group cohesive and them away from danger during threats. They generally tolerate familiar animals, such as herding dogs, after initial wariness but respond aggressively to unfamiliar canids due to an innate aversion. Selection for bold temperaments further strengthens these instinctive responses.

Effectiveness Against Predators

Guard llamas demonstrate high effectiveness against canid predators, particularly s, foxes, and feral dogs, primarily through their behavioral responses such as alarming calls and charging at intruders. Surveys of U.S. sheep producers indicate that guard llamas substantially reduce predation, with losses dropping from 21% to 7% annually after . They are most successful against single or paired intruders, achieving up to 100% deterrence in small groups of foxes or dogs, but efficacy diminishes against packs of three or more s, which can overwhelm the . In secondary applications, guard llamas show moderate success against in grazing systems and dogs elsewhere, often deterring attacks through initial confrontations that lead to predator avoidance. However, they are generally ineffective against larger felids like cougars and bobcats or ursids such as bears, where the size mismatch allows predators to treat llamas as prey rather than threats. Effectiveness is optimized in open fields with moderate fencing, where visibility allows the llama to detect and respond to threats promptly, and is viable in both enclosed pastures and smaller range settings. Success rates decline in dense vegetation, expansive open ranges, or when the llama is distracted by unrelated stimuli or fails to bond properly with the . On U.S. farms, more than 50% of producers report zero losses to predators following guard llama deployment, with over half achieving complete elimination of attacks. In , studies and producer accounts describe avoiding flocks after initial encounters with guard llamas, contributing to sustained deterrence in sheep operations.

Evaluation and Challenges

Scientific Studies and Data

A 1993 survey by and Powell, published in Rangelands (often referenced in Journal of Range Management contexts), involved telephone interviews with 145 sheep producers across the and who used 204 guard llamas to protect sheep from predation. The survey compared predation losses before and after introduction, demonstrating a reduction from 11% to 1% of flocks affected. Broader reviews from the and , including USDA reports, analyzed data from multiple producers and found that over 50% of users experienced complete elimination of predation losses, with an additional 40-45% seeing significant partial reductions. These findings were derived from field observations and producer surveys assessing loss rates before and after llama introduction. Surveys indicate 80-90% success rates when using guard llamas with sheep flocks, though effectiveness can vary with due to differences in dynamics and predator pressures. A 2020 Ohio State University extension analysis highlights the role of guard llamas in integrated predator systems, with 80% of producers reporting similar daily care needs and rating them effective or very effective. While no major meta-analyses have been conducted, and as of 2025 no large-scale new studies have emerged, consistent support from field trials underscores the reliability of these results across regions. Key metrics from these studies include an average protection duration of 2–5 years per llama, after which replacement may be needed to maintain vigilance. Cost-benefit analyses show annual protection costs of $0.50–$1.00 per sheep when using guard llamas, compared to losses exceeding $50 per predation event from coyotes, as reported in USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service data.

Limitations and Alternatives

Guard llamas exhibit several key limitations in their protective capabilities. They are primarily effective against canine predators such as coyotes and domestic dogs due to their instinctive aversion to canids, but prove ineffective against non-canine threats like bears, cougars, or avian predators such as eagles, where their size and behavior offer little deterrence. Additionally, their efficacy diminishes against wolf packs or in scenarios involving heavy predator pressure, as a single llama may be overwhelmed without additional support. In cases of bonding failure, which occurs in approximately 5–10% of instances according to producer surveys, guard llamas may harass or injure livestock, including interference during birthing or aggressive interactions leading to harm. Their performance also declines in very large herds exceeding 300 animals or in dense forest environments with heavy vegetation, where visibility and mobility are restricted, limiting the llama's ability to monitor and respond to threats. Beyond these limitations, using guard llamas carries specific risks and associated costs. Initial bonding failures contribute to ineffectiveness in 5-10% of cases, where the llama may fail to integrate, wander from the herd, or preferentially bond with other llamas if present, necessitating removal or replacement. Furthermore, confrontations with predators can result in injuries to the llama, requiring specialized veterinary care that may be challenging to access due to limited expertise in camelid . Overprotectiveness, reported by about 5% of producers, can complicate handling and, in rare cases, lead to significant losses if the llama becomes aggressive toward young or vulnerable animals. Several alternatives exist to guard llamas, each suited to different management needs. Livestock guardian dogs, such as the Great Pyrenees, offer greater versatility against a broader range of predators including bears and cougars, though they demand higher training costs and ongoing supervision to prevent harm. Donkeys provide a similar deterrent effect to llamas, particularly against canines, but at a lower initial cost (typically $35–$400) and with simpler care, making them preferable for smaller operations. Non-living options like reinforced or electronic deterrents eliminate animal-related risks entirely, while lethal control methods serve as a last resort in severe cases. Choosing alternatives depends on specific environmental and operational factors. In areas with high or activity, guardian are favored for their proactive defense capabilities. Budget constraints may lead to donkeys as a cost-effective substitute with comparable anti-canid efficacy. For optimal results, integrated approaches combining llamas with can enhance rates by leveraging the strengths of each to address diverse threats.

References

  1. [1]
    The use of llamas to protect goats, cattle, and poultry from canid ...
    The use of guard llamas resulted in an average annual savings per ranch of $848 for goat owners, $2,509 for cattle owners, and $1,167 for poultry owners. Fifty- ...
  2. [2]
    Guardian Llamas: Pros and Cons - Mother Earth News
    Mar 30, 2023 · In fact, most llama and alpaca breeders use livestock guard dogs in predator situations. Llamas generally do not provide protection against ...
  3. [3]
    "Efficacy of Guard Llamas (<i>Lama glama</i>) in Reducing Canid ...
    I conducted a field experiment to test the effectiveness of llamas in reducing canid predation on domestic sheep. Twenty-one llamas were placed with Utah sheep ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Use of Livestock Guarding Animals to Reduce Predation on Livestock
    Advantages of donkeys and llamas over guarding dogs include less prone to accidental death, longer-lived, do not require special feeds, stay in the same pasture ...
  5. [5]
    Use of Guard Llamas in an Integrated Predator Control System
    Feb 11, 2020 · Some of the greatest benefits of selecting a llama as a livestock protection animals is the minimal cost associated with implementing this ...
  6. [6]
    Guard Llamas Keep Sheep Safe From Coyotes - RMLA
    Oct 31, 2021 · Llamas were first domesticated more than 5,000 years ago in the Peruvian highlands. Early South American cultures bred them for size and ...
  7. [7]
    Ancient DNA reveals the lost domestication history of South ...
    Llama and alpaca first appeared in the fossil record around 7,000 years before the present (yr BP) as the result of domestication carried out by human ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Guard Llamas: A part of integrated sheep protection
    Do llamas significantly reduce sheep losses caused by predation? • What livestock and llama management practices give the best results? Research on guard llamas ...
  9. [9]
    Guard Llamas - RMLA
    Oct 30, 2021 · More than half of guard llama owners report a 100 percent reduction in predator losses. Llamas are introduced to sheep and pastured with sheep ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Guard Llamas: An Alternative for Effective Predator Management
    Llamas have a very low rate of mortality as guards. The Iowa State University study reported the mortality of only 5% of the. 204 guard llamas in their study.
  11. [11]
    Efficacy of Guard Ilamas to Reduce Canine Predation on Domestic ...
    Causes and economic effects of mortality in livestock guarding dogs. Journal of Range Management 39:293-295. MARKHAM, D., P HILTON, J. TOMPKINS, D ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Guard animals for livestock protection - existing and potential use in ...
    The species of livestock guarding animals (LGAs) used in other countries that need evaluating include various breeds of dog, alpacas, llamas and donkeys.
  13. [13]
    Guard llamas: the ultimate crimefighters? | Animals - The Guardian
    Aug 6, 2012 · We do sell a number of llamas as 'guard llamas' and they do protect livestock, not from human beings but from predators such as dogs and foxes.
  14. [14]
    [PDF] LLAMAS FOR LIVESTOCK PROTECTION – EXPERIENCE AND ...
    We could not find any scientific studies that assessed the efficacy of guard llamas against packs of wolves. Daniela Derron-Hilfiker, Daniel Mettler. AGRIDEA, ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Recommendations for Selection & Placement of Guard Llamas
    Desirable traits: Guard llamas should be conformationally sound and their athletic ability must match specific situation requirements. Larger flocks or open ...Missing: ATTRA | Show results with:ATTRA
  16. [16]
    Llamas and Alpacas on the Farm - ATTRA – Sustainable Agriculture
    Llamas or alpacas can be a good addition to a farm or ranch—alpacas as an alternative livestock enterprise and llamas as guard animals or recreational animals.
  17. [17]
    Guard Llamas - Buck Hollow Llamas, Inc
    Guarding other animals. Llamas have been successfully used to protect animals such as cattle and exotic deer. LLamas have been used to guard alpaca herds.
  18. [18]
    Livestock-Predator Hub | UC Rangelands
    Sep 19, 2024 · Cost of acquisition of livestock guardian animals is highly variable. Dogs, donkeys, and llamas are most commonly used. Dogs appear to be the ...
  19. [19]
    Selecting a Guard Llama - Mother Earth News
    Apr 24, 2014 · Look for a llama 18-24 months old, alert, with leadership and weight. Avoid young, bottle-fed, or isolated llamas. Test handling and response ...Missing: ATTRA criteria
  20. [20]
    Livestock Guardian Animals: Protecting the Flock or Herd
    Selection · Choose the right animal for the terrain, predator pressure, pasture size, proximity to neighbors, budget, and your personal preference. · Only use ...Missing: criteria | Show results with:criteria
  21. [21]
    Southeast Llama Rescue
    Funded by private donations and adoption fees, SELR takes in surrendered animals and provides them with foster care. We then assist new owners ...
  22. [22]
    Backcountry Beast: How To Train a Llama - Game & Fish
    May 12, 2025 · Fifteen minutes two or three times a day is all that's needed to assuage their temperament. The key is to build trust and get them used to people.
  23. [23]
    Camelid Herd Health - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
    This article outlines the considerations for routine husbandry, facility and animal maintenance, and infectious disease control
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Guard animals for livestock protection - existing and potential use in ...
    The major difference between dogs and the other species used as livestock guarding animals is that training time for alpacas, llamas and donkeys is much shorter ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] The use of llamas to protect goats, cattle, and poultry from canid ...
    This current study focuses on their use to protect other types of livestock, specifically goats, cattle, and poultry (chickens (Gallus domesticus), turkeys ( ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Review of Methods to Reduce Livestock Depredation: I. Guardian ...
    Their study revealed that 70% used gelded males costing $700–800, with an average of one llama per 284 sheep (range 4–2150).
  28. [28]
    FS917: Llamas and Alpacas (Rutgers NJAES)
    Yearly maintenance costs (including veterinary expenses) are estimated at $300 to $500 per animal. A small yard is sufficient for a llama, but an exercise room ...Missing: ongoing | Show results with:ongoing
  29. [29]
    General Information for the Potential Camelid Owner - OSU Extension
    Both llamas and alpacas are almost odorless, and easy to care for and are easy to train and work with, due to their generally quiet and docile nature.Missing: ongoing | Show results with:ongoing
  30. [30]
    Herd Health of Llamas and Alpacas - Exotic and Laboratory Animals
    More conventional parasite control recommendations include fecal flotations four times a year and fecal reduction egg count tests to identify resistance and ...
  31. [31]
    How to Conduct A Llama Health Check - The Open Sanctuary Project
    Apr 25, 2025 · Our recommendation to conduct routine health checks every six to eight weeks must be done in conjunction with daily observations.
  32. [32]
    Recognizing Hepatic Lipidosis in Llamas and Alpacas
    Jul 28, 2023 · All llamas in the study on average lost over 15% of body weight. Llamas that developed hepatic lipidosis tended to have greater body weight loss ...Missing: guard | Show results with:guard
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Guard Llama - International Lama Registry
    May 4, 2025 · The use of guard llamas has greatly increased since a magazine article in 1990, when national attention was drawn to the potential use of llamas ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Chapter 1 So You Want to be a Goat Rancher - OSU Extension
    • Improves predator and guard animal control. • Decreases incidence of heads being caught in woven wire. • Reduces the possible liability risk of public.
  35. [35]
    Guard Llama or Guard Donkey: Making the Right Decision for Your ...
    Aug 19, 2023 · Guard Llama or Guard Donkey: Making the Right Decision for Your Farm ... trial period should be given to see how they interact together. Most ...
  36. [36]
  37. [37]
    [PDF] The use of guard llamas to protect sheep from coyote predation
    Jan 1, 1993 · The objectives for this research were to determine the 1) management and husbandry practices ranchers used with guard llamas, and 2) descriptive ...
  38. [38]
  39. [39]
    Thinking Beyond the Dog: Guard Llamas - PetMD
    Jul 26, 2013 · Need security for your flock of sheep, goats or alpacas? Have you considered getting a guard llama? Dr. Anna O'Brien tells us why they may ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  40. [40]
  41. [41]
    Using Llamas for Protection - Louis E. Page, Inc.
    Feb 12, 2021 · An open, fenced pasture is preferred, as hilly terrain can result in the llamas being separated from the herd, reducing protection. Llamas like ...
  42. [42]
    (PDF) Guard llamas - Academia.edu
    Guard llamas can significantly reduce sheep predation losses, averaging from 26 sheep to 8 per year. Texas incurred $4.3 million in economic losses due to sheep ...
  43. [43]
    Livestock guardians - Sheep 201
    Females or geldings (castrated males) are generally recommended over intact males. ... Human contact with a guard llama should be avoided. There are many ...Missing: criteria | Show results with:criteria
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Guard Animals - Internet Center for Wildlife Damage Management
    In the Iowa study the initial adjust- ment period usually lasted only a few hours for most llamas, and nearly 80 percent adjust within a week. Many producers ...Missing: quarantine | Show results with:quarantine
  45. [45]
    None
    ### Limitations, Disadvantages, Risks, and Alternatives to Using Llamas as Guard Animals