Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

H-point

The H-point, also known as the hip point, is the theoretical pivot point simulating the junction between the human torso and thigh in automotive engineering, defined as the mechanically hinged hip point of a manikin per SAE Recommended Practice J826.^[1] This reference point is established using specialized devices, such as the H-point machine (HPM) or its computer-aided design equivalent (HPD), to measure and verify seating positions in vehicles.^[2] In vehicle design and development, the H-point serves as a foundational element for occupant packaging, ensuring consistent dimensions for driver and passenger accommodation across passenger cars, trucks, and buses.^[2] It is integral to international standards, including ISO 20176:2020, which specifies the HPM-II for auditing seating layouts and establishing reliable reference points without assessing comfort or temporary seating configurations.^[3] The H-point also plays a critical role in safety regulations, such as the U.S. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS), where it defines the seating reference point (SgRP) for compliance testing in areas like occupant crash protection, head restraints, and seat belt anchorages.^[1] By providing a standardized, reproducible metric, the H-point facilitates ergonomic design, interior space optimization, and enhanced vehicle safety across global automotive manufacturing.^[3]

Definition and Fundamentals

Core Definition

The H-point, also known as the hip point, is defined as the theoretical pivot point between the human torso and the upper leg portions of the femur, simulating the hip joint of a seated occupant.^[1] This reference point serves as a standardized anatomical landmark in ergonomic design, facilitating consistent positioning and analysis of seated postures. It is specifically defined as the mechanically hinged hip point of a manikin per SAE Recommended Practice J826.^[2] The H-point is derived from the anthropometry of a 50th percentile adult male, ensuring uniformity across applications in product development and testing.^[4] This percentile represents average male body dimensions, allowing the point to approximate typical human proportions for broad applicability. In contrast to the actual physical hip joint, which is a complex ball-and-socket structure, the H-point functions as a simulated hinge in side-view profiles, simplifying biomechanical modeling for design purposes.^[5] Within the sagittal plane, its location in 2D coordinates can be determined as the midpoint between key intersection points, given by the equation

H = \frac{x_{\text{torso}} + x_{\text{thigh}}}{2},

where x_{\text{torso}} is the x-coordinate of the torso line's intersection with the vertical reference, and x_{\text{thigh}} is the x-coordinate of the thigh line's intersection in the same plane.^[5] This derivation assumes a hinged model where the H-point bisects the angle formed by the torso and thigh segments, providing a precise yet simplified representation for iterative design processes. The H-point plays a foundational role in vehicle ergonomics by anchoring occupant positioning relative to interior elements.

Ergonomic Role

The H-point serves as a foundational reference in human-centered seating design, facilitating consistent modeling of occupant posture to enhance comfort, visibility, and reach to controls in vehicles. By defining the theoretical pivot between the torso and upper legs, it enables designers to simulate realistic body positions, ensuring that seating configurations support natural movement and interaction with surrounding elements.^[6] This reference point directly influences legroom, torso angle, and overall seating geometry, which are essential for distributing body weight evenly and minimizing pressure on key areas like the hips and lower back. Proper alignment based on the H-point helps prevent fatigue and strain by promoting postures that reduce musculoskeletal stress during extended use, such as long drives.^[7] The height of the H-point plays a key role in user perception, as it modulates the sense of spaciousness within the seating environment and eases transitions like entering or exiting a seat. Higher H-point positions, for instance, can improve forward visibility in vehicles while maintaining accessibility to pedals and steering.^[7]

Measurement and Tools

H-point Machine

The H-point machine (HPM), also known as the SAE J826 H-point manikin, is a mechanical fixture designed to simulate the seating posture of a 50th percentile adult male occupant for establishing the H-point in vehicle seats. It consists of adjustable torso and thigh segments that pivot at the simulated hip joint, known as the H-point, allowing for precise replication of anatomical positioning during static evaluations. This device serves as a standardized tool in automotive design and testing to locate the H-point, which represents the theoretical pivot point between the torso and femur in a seated human.^[8]^[4] An updated version, the HPM-II (Human Pelvis and Thigh Model II), provides enhanced biofidelity with improved geometry for the pelvis and thighs, better repeatability, and instrumentation for advanced seating and restraint system evaluations. It complies with SAE J826 for H-point determination and ISO 20176:2020 for road vehicle applications, supporting both static and dynamic testing needs in modern vehicle design.^[9]^[3] The H-point design tool (HPD) is a simplified computer-aided design (CAD) equivalent of the HPM, used for virtual establishment of the H-point in early design phases without physical installation. It follows positioning guidelines in SAE J4004 and can be used in conjunction with the HPM or HPM-II for consistent reference points in digital models.^[10]^[3] Key components of the HPM include a rigid back pan that supports the torso and can be adjusted for seatback angle, a seat pan that accommodates the pelvis with provisions for height and tilt adjustments, and mechanisms for lateral positioning to enable three-dimensional alignment on the seat. The back pan and seat pan are interconnected at the H-point pivot, with additional features such as adjustable leg segments and force indicators to ensure consistent loading and contact with the seat surface. These elements allow the device to mimic the load distribution and geometry of a human occupant while maintaining reproducibility across tests.^[8]^[11] The installation procedure begins with placing the HPM on the vehicle seat, typically covered with a muslin cloth to simulate clothing and ensure even contact, while the seat is adjusted to its rearmost and lowest position along with the seatback at a reference angle. The device is then tilted and rotated to align the torso segment parallel to the seatback and the thigh segments with the seat cushion, applying a specified force to settle it into position and simulating the 50th percentile male's dimensions through segment length and angle adjustments. Once aligned—accounting for foot placement relative to the accelerator pedal or floor pan—the HPM is locked in place to fix the H-point coordinates, which can then be measured relative to vehicle reference points using scales or probes. This process adheres to the protocols outlined in SAE J826 for consistent application in seating accommodation assessments.^[8]^[12] Despite its precision for static measurements, the HPM has inherent limitations, as it is engineered for evaluating a single seat position per installation and cannot simulate dynamic occupant motion or comfort over extended periods. It is primarily suited for driver-side or central seating spaces and requires calibration to tight tolerances to avoid measurement errors, but it does not account for variations in body soft tissue or real-time adjustments.^[8]^[4]

Specific Measurements

The H-point, or seating reference point (SgRP), serves as the foundational reference for several standardized linear and angular measurements in automotive ergonomics, enabling precise quantification of occupant space and accessibility. These measurements are derived using the H-point machine as outlined in SAE J1100 (revised 2009), providing consistent outputs for vehicle design specifications.^[13] H30 denotes the vertical distance from the H-point to the floorboard, specifically the heel reference point—such as the accelerator heel point (AHP) for the driver or floor reference point (FRP) for other positions—which directly influences pedal reach and lower leg accommodation for various occupant percentiles.^[13] H5 measures the vertical distance from the H-point to the pavement or ground level, critical for assessing step-in height and ease of entry, particularly in sedans or SUVs where it integrates chassis and suspension design to ensure ergonomic entry thresholds without compromising ground clearance.^[13] H61 represents the effective headroom, calculated as the distance along a line 8 degrees rearward from vertical extending from the H-point to the roof or headlining, plus a 102 mm adjustment to account for the seated head position of a 95th percentile male occupant. This provides usable vertical clearance, prioritizing prevention of header impacts during recline or acceleration.^[13] H25 quantifies the vertical distance from the H-point to the windowsill or bottom of the side window division line opening (DLO) in the transverse plane at the H-point location, aiding visibility and glare reduction by aligning eye position for outward sightlines. This measurement supports beltline positioning relative to the occupant's torso, balancing aesthetics and functional outward vision.^[13] The angular measure for seat back recline comfort is the seat back angle (A40), defined as the angle of the backrest line from vertical at the H-point, measured using the H-point device's back line reference, ensuring the recline promotes a neutral hip-to-torso posture without excessive forward lean.^[13]

Standards and Regulations

SAE Standards

The Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) establishes key standards for the H-point in automotive design, primarily through SAE J1100 and SAE J826, which define its role and measurement in vehicle interiors. SAE J1100, titled "Motor Vehicle Dimensions" (revised November 2009), specifies a comprehensive set of measurements for passenger cars, multipurpose passenger vehicles, and light trucks, positioning the H-point as a fundamental reference for interior packaging and occupant accommodation.^[14] The H-point serves as the pivot center between the torso and thigh segments of a seated occupant, enabling consistent evaluation of dimensions such as legroom (e.g., L51 for effective legroom to the accelerator), knee clearance (L48), and seating reference points (SgRP), which are derived from the H-point to standardize vehicle comparisons across manufacturers.^[14] SAE J826, "Devices for Use in Defining and Measuring Vehicle Seating Accommodation" (revised June 2021), outlines the specifications for the H-point machine (HPM), a three-dimensional device used to determine the H-point in seated postures. The procedure involves positioning the HPM on the seat with 95th percentile male leg segments, adjusting for seat back angle (typically 25 degrees from horizontal), and locating the H-point via sight buttons on the machine's centerline, ensuring reproducibility in ergonomic assessments.^[8] Calibration of the HPM includes tolerances for joint angles and segment lengths to maintain accuracy within the device's mechanical limits.^[8] The 2009 revision of SAE J1100 incorporated updates to H-point-related dimensions, including refined definitions for H-point travel paths during seat adjustment, to enhance clarity and alignment with evolving design practices. This revision also promotes global harmonization by aligning certain measurements, such as accelerator heel point distances, with international standards like ISO 6549.^[14] These SAE standards are effectively mandatory for U.S. automotive original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) as they are incorporated by reference in Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS), requiring compliance for ergonomic validation of seating positions and preparation of crash test dummies positioned relative to the H-point.^[15] The SgRP is determined using SAE J826 procedures for FMVSS compliance testing in areas like occupant crash protection, head restraints, and seat belt anchorages.

International and Regulatory Frameworks

The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) has established key procedures for H-point determination through ISO 20176:2020, titled "Road vehicles — H-point machine (HPM-II) — Specifications and procedure for H-point determination." This standard provides the specifications and procedures for using the HPM-II to audit vehicle seating positions, enabling precise vehicle design, specification, and assessment with enhanced three-dimensional accuracy compared to earlier two-dimensional methods.^[3] The procedure involves installing the HPM-II in the seat under specified conditions to verify reference points, supporting global consistency in seating ergonomics.^[3] Under the United Nations Global Technical Regulations (GTRs), the H-point plays a critical role in crash dummy positioning for side-impact tests, as outlined in GTR No. 14 on pole side impact and related amendments. The three-dimensional H-point machine is utilized across multiple UN GTRs and regulations to establish the seat reference point (R-point) and torso angle, ensuring standardized occupant positioning for evaluating injury risks in lateral collisions.^[16] This harmonized approach facilitates international testing protocols, with the H-point serving as the baseline for aligning dummies like the WorldSID to simulate real-world occupant kinematics.^[17] European Union directives incorporate the H-point via United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) Regulation No. 14 (ECE R14) on safety-belt and ISOFIX anchorages, which references the H-point to define anchorage locations relative to seating positions for optimal occupant protection. Specifically, ECE R14 requires that anchorages, including ISOFIX systems, be positioned no less than 120 mm behind the design H-point, determined using ISO procedures, to prevent submarining and ensure restraint effectiveness during crashes.^[18] This integration enhances vehicle safety by linking seating geometry directly to anchorage strength and positioning requirements.^[18] Additionally, UNECE Regulation No. 17 (ECE R17) on seats specifies a ±25 mm tolerance for the determined H-point relative to the design SgRP.^[19] A significant milestone in global standardization occurred in 2008 with SAE's publication of J4002, which provides specifications and calibration procedures for the HPM-II, influencing subsequent ISO harmonization efforts such as ISO 20176:2020 to align three-dimensional H-point measurements for worldwide vehicle export compliance.^[20] Non-compliance with these frameworks, such as deviations in H-point-based measurements, can result in the withdrawal or voiding of type approvals in key markets like Europe and Asia, where UN ECE regulations are adopted, leading to market bans, fines up to millions of euros, and mandatory recalls to mitigate safety risks.^[21]

Applications in Design

Vehicle Seating and Comfort

The H-point serves as a critical reference for adjusting vehicle seats to optimize thigh support and lumbar alignment, thereby minimizing pressure points that lead to occupant discomfort during prolonged driving. By positioning the seat cushion such that its length extends no more than 305 mm forward from the H-point, designers ensure adequate thigh support without inducing excessive pressure on the knees or restricting circulation, as excessive lengths can cause localized indentation and elevated interface pressures exceeding 1-3 N/cm² under the ischial tuberosities. Similarly, lumbar support is ideally placed 96-197 mm above the H-point along the torso line, with a prominence of 30-50 mm, to maintain natural spinal curvature and reduce muscle strain in the lower back; this alignment has been shown to lower peak pressures in the lumbar region to around 2.5 kPa, correlating with decreased subjective reports of aching or numbness.^[22]^[23] In sport utility vehicles (SUVs), an elevated H-point, often corresponding to an H30 measurement (vertical distance from the H-point to the floor) of 300-400 mm, contributes to the desirable "command seating" position that enhances perceived comfort and visibility for drivers. This higher seating reference allows for better thigh elevation relative to the hips, promoting a more upright posture that reduces forward slump and associated fatigue over long distances.^[24]^[25] Seat adjustability mechanisms, such as fore-aft travel and vertical height adjustments, are typically referenced directly to the H-point to accommodate a range of occupant sizes while preserving ergonomic alignment. For instance, fore-aft adjustments enable cushion lengths to vary up to 410 mm for larger occupants, ensuring consistent thigh support without compromising lumbar positioning, while height mechanisms allow H-point elevation by 50-100 mm to suit individual preferences. These features, standardized in practices like SAE J826, facilitate personalized comfort by maintaining optimal angles, such as trunk-to-thigh ratios exceeding 90° on average.^[22]^[26] A key comfort metric for driver ergonomics is the distance from the H-point to the steering wheel center, often evaluated along the SAE-defined Z-axis (vertical dimension) to ensure unobstructed reach and control access without excessive arm extension or shoulder strain. This alignment promotes relaxed wrist and elbow postures that reduce upper-body fatigue.^[27] Misaligned H-point positioning, particularly affecting thigh support, accounts for a substantial share of seating discomfort complaints; for example, analysis of buyer feedback from over 92,000 vehicles revealed that 88% of cushion length-related issues were due to insufficient thigh support, directly tied to H-point referencing errors.^[23]

Safety and Accessibility

The H-point serves a vital function in crash testing by providing a reference for aligning the pelvis of anthropomorphic test dummies, enabling precise prediction of injuries in side impacts where pelvic and lower torso damage is prevalent. In protocols such as those outlined by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), the dummy's H-point is positioned to match the vehicle's seating reference point within a tolerance of 12.7 mm (0.5 inches), simulating realistic occupant posture and ensuring that force measurements accurately reflect potential harm to the pelvis during lateral collisions. This alignment is prioritized in dummy setup procedures to account for variations in seat adjustment, as deviations could skew injury assessments for abdominal and pelvic regions.^[17]^[4]^[28] Integration of the H-point with airbag and seat belt systems further enhances safety by defining occupant positioning for optimal deployment zones. Vehicle designers use the H-point to establish the expected pelvis location, which informs the geometry of side curtain airbags and torso bags to cover the head, chest, and pelvis effectively during impacts. Similarly, seat belt anchors are positioned relative to the H-point to ensure proper pelvic restraint and minimize submarining, where the occupant slides under the belt; this configuration reduces thoracic loading by aligning the belt across the strongest part of the body. Accurate H-point determination prevents mismatches that could lead to ineffective protection, such as airbags deploying outside the intended occupant zone.^[29]^[30]^[28] A key example is the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 214, which incorporates the H-point to evaluate side curtain airbag coverage in dynamic side impact tests. The standard mandates dummy placement such that H-points align within 12.7 mm longitudinally and vertically, allowing assessment of airbag performance in protecting against head ejection and lateral intrusion for both driver and passenger positions. This ensures that side curtains inflate to cover the window area above the seated occupant, reducing risks of traumatic brain injuries and upper body trauma in near-side crashes. Compliance testing under FMVSS 214 has driven advancements in airbag sensing and deployment timing tied to H-point-based occupant models.^[17]^[31]^[32] In terms of accessibility, the H-point influences vehicle entry and exit for elderly and disabled users by determining seat height relative to the ground and sill, with optimized elevations facilitating reduced physical strain in sedans. Studies indicate that H-point heights between 520 mm and 700 mm above the ground minimize bending and lifting efforts, making ingress and egress easier for those with mobility impairments compared to lower positions that require deeper squats. For sedans, where typical H-point heights (H30, from the floor) range from 280 mm to 350 mm, adjustments toward the higher end of this spectrum—such as through seat cushion design—aid users by aligning the pivot point closer to standing height, thereby supporting inclusive design without compromising interior space. NHTSA research on offset crashes shows that such H-point optimizations can reduce compartment intrusion risks, contributing to overall safer and more accessible vehicles for vulnerable populations. In recent developments as of 2025, electric vehicles (EVs) with flat floors have adapted H-point referencing to improve accessibility further, allowing lower step-in heights while maintaining ergonomic seating.^[33]^[34]^[35]^[36]

Historical Development and Trends

Origins and Evolution

The concept of the H-point emerged in the 1950s within the U.S. automotive industry, initially developed by the U.S. Army as part of ergonomic research for vehicle cockpit and cab design, serving as a reference pivot point for the occupant's hip joint to standardize seating positions and packaging.^[37] This foundational idea addressed the need for consistent human body modeling in early vehicle layouts, focusing on the theoretical intersection between the torso and upper leg portions of a seated occupant.^[38] By the early 1960s, the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) formalized the H-point through the adoption of Recommended Practice J826 in November 1962, which standardized a two-dimensional H-point template and a three-dimensional H-point machine for measuring seating accommodation in vehicles.^[37] A key milestone occurred in the 1970s, when the H-point gained prominence in crash research and safety standards following the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966, which led to the establishment of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in 1970 and prompted the development of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS).^[39] The H-point was integrated into FMVSS No. 208 (Occupant Crash Protection), first issued in 1968 with key amendments in the 1970s, to define dummy positioning in crash tests, ensuring reproducible occupant kinematics relative to vehicle structures. This adoption marked a shift from purely ergonomic applications to critical safety evaluations, with SAE J826 serving as the reference for H-point determination in regulatory testing protocols. During the 1980s, SAE-sponsored anthropometric studies, including those led by the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute (UMTRI) under U.S. Department of Transportation contracts, incorporated the H-point into broader analyses of occupant variability for advanced crash test dummy design, such as the Hybrid III family, to better represent U.S. adult populations. These efforts emphasized percentile-based modeling but were limited by reliance on predominantly male-centric data from earlier surveys, which underrepresented female and diverse body types in H-point derivations. The evolution continued into the 1990s with the transition from 2D templates to 3D digital modeling, exemplified by the SAE ASPECT program (initiated in the late 1990s), which developed CAD-based H-point manikins for integrated vehicle design simulations.^[40] Recognizing these limitations, updates in the 2000s enhanced gender inclusivity through initiatives like the SAE-compiled Civilian American and European Surface Anthropometry Resource (CAESAR) database in 2000, which provided more balanced male-female anthropometric data to refine H-point standards, such as in SAE J4002 (first published 2005) for the H-point design tool.^[41] This progression addressed earlier biases, enabling more equitable seating and safety accommodations across diverse user demographics.

Contemporary Trends

In recent years, the application of digital human modeling (DHM) has become a prominent trend in H-point determination, enabling virtual simulations of occupant postures during early vehicle design phases. Statistical regression models integrated into DHM tools, such as IPS IMMA, predict H-point coordinates based on anthropometric factors like stature, sitting height ratio, body mass index (BMI), age, seat height, and steering wheel position, with separate equations for males and females to account for gender-specific variations. For instance, these models have been validated on vehicle geometries like the Volvo S90/V90, demonstrating how limited seat adjustment ranges can shift smaller occupants rearward, informing ergonomic optimizations before physical prototypes are built.^[42] The rise of autonomous vehicles has prompted adaptations in H-point standards to address non-standard seating configurations, such as reclined or rotated positions that prioritize relaxation over driving tasks. Studies using finite element analysis show that seatback angles exceeding 30° rearward shift the H-point closer to side-impact structures like the B-pillar, increasing thorax compression risks by 20-30% in crash scenarios compared to upright postures. This has led to calls for updated safety evaluations beyond traditional forward-facing assumptions, influencing designs that maintain ergonomic comfort while mitigating injury potential.^[43] Electric vehicle architectures, with their flat floorpans from underbody battery placement, facilitate lower H-point heights relative to the floor, typically reducing the distance to enhance legroom and overall posture without compromising headroom. This trend supports lightweight seating solutions and efficient packaging, as seen in designs where H-point-to-floor measurements are optimized for range extension and occupant accessibility. Concurrently, SAE standards have evolved, with the 2024 revision of J4004 providing refined procedures for positioning the H-point design tool to establish seating reference points and track lengths, accommodating these modular interiors.^[44] Machine learning approaches are emerging to enable adaptive H-point adjustments, using point cloud data from laser scanning to train models that optimize driver postures in real-time based on vehicle dynamics and user biometrics. These methods, applied in intelligent seating systems, predict H-point locations to minimize fatigue and improve safety, representing a shift toward personalized ergonomics in connected vehicles.^[45]

References

[1]
Interpretation ID: 24545.drn - NHTSA
"H point" is defined in 571.3 as: the mechanically hinged hip point of a manikin which simulates the actual pivot center of the human torso and thigh.
[2]
https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j826_202011/
[3]
ISO 20176:2020
### Summary of ISO 20176:2020
[4]
H-Point Manikin Seat Positioning Test Device - Humanetics
The H-Point-Manikin (TE-HPM) is an essential tool for the correct measurements and dummy positioning for many test applications. The HPM fulfills the SAE J826 ...
[5]
H-point – Knowledge and References - Taylor & Francis
H-point refers to the position of the mid hip joint, which is simulated as a hinge point in the side view between the torso and the thighs.
[6]
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60825-9_21
[7]
https://doi.org/10.4236/adr.2022.104033
[8]
https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j826_202106/
[9]
https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j4002_202206/
[10]
[PDF] H-Point Manikin, TE-HPM - Technical Product Sheet
Naturally, this device needs to be built and calibrated to the tightest tolerances possible. The Humanetics brand HPM fulfills the SAE J826. (11-2008) as well ...Missing: limitations | Show results with:limitations
[11]
SAE International – Devices for use in Defining and Measuring ...
This document specifies two-dimensional H-Point template and three-dimensional H-Point machine devices for use in defining and measuring vehicle seating ...
[12]
[PDF] SURFACE VEHICLE RECOMMENDED PRACTICE
This SAE Recommended Practice defines a set of measurements and standard procedures for motor vehicle dimensions. The dimensions are primarily intended to ...
[13]
[PDF] Untitled - Deep Blue Repositories - University of Michigan
study, an overall minimum clearance relative to the SAE 95th-percentile headspace contour of 70 mm is a reasonable estimate of the headroom required to ...
[14]
https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j1100_200911/
[15]
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-49/subtitle-B/chapter-V/part-571
[16]
49 CFR Part 571 -- Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards - eCFR
This part contains the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards for motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment established under section 103 of the National ...571.101 – 571.500 · Title 49 · Subpart A —General · 571.3 Definitions.
[17]
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Head Restraints
May 4, 2007 · The SAE J826 manikin has long been incorporated in NHTSA's safety standards for purposes of determining H-point location. See S10.4.2.1 and S10.
[18]
ISO 20186-3:2019
### Summary of ISO 20186-3:2019
[19]
[PDF] United Nations Global Technical Regulation No. 7 - UNECE
3. The three Dimensional (3-D) "H" point machine is used in several UN Regulations and GTRs to verify the Seat Reference Point (SRP, R-point) and Torso Angle of ...Missing: positioning | Show results with:positioning
[20]
49 CFR 571.214 -- Standard No. 214; Side impact protection. - eCFR
(1) Position the pelvis of the dummy such that a lateral line passing through the dummy H-points is perpendicular to the longitudinal center plane of the seat.Missing: Global GTR
[21]
[PDF] Agreement Addendum 13: UN Regulation No. 14 - UNECE
Aug 7, 2023 · The minimum number of safety-belt anchorages for each forward rearward and side-facing seating position shall be those specified in Annex 6.Missing: protection | Show results with:protection
[22]
https://mreed.umtri.umich.edu/mreed/pubs/Reed%20Seating%20Literature%20Review%202000.pdf
[23]
None
Summary of each segment:
[24]
https://www.caranddriver.com/features/a33926390/four-years-testing-seat-height/
[25]
What We've Learned from Four Years Testing Seat Height
Sep 12, 2020 · Among them is the H-point test, which measures how high the driver's hip (the "H") is above the ground. When people talk about a command seating ...Missing: 300- 400mm H30
[26]
[PDF] Exploring Drivers' Seated Position - Chalmers Publication Library
This chapter describes how to elicit information about H-point position and back inclination from the car's computer system and CATIA drawings. It is described.
[27]
https://cjme.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.3901/CJME.2014.0724.126.pdf
[28]
[PDF] Objective Evaluation Method of Steering Comfort Based on ...
Driver will feel discomfortable if the distance between steering wheel center and H-point exceeds the 'appropriate distance' of himself/herself, such as too ...
[29]
[PDF] Crash Protection Side Impact - Euro NCAP
Dec 9, 2024 · If there are difficulties with positioning of any dummy, the H-point location shall be the priority followed by the pelvic angle and then the ...
[30]
[PDF] H Point The Fundamentals Of Car Design And ... - Tangent Blog
An accurately positioned h point ensures that the seatbelt fits properly and that airbags deploy effectively to protect vital areas. Additionally, the h ...
[31]
[PDF] Inflatable Shoulder Belts and Inboard Upper Anchor ... - ircobi
The inboard seat‐integrated inflatable belt restraint system had the greatest influence, eliminating Hybrid III shoulder‐belt slip out and decreasing excursion ...Missing: zones | Show results with:zones
[32]
[PDF] Ejection Mitigation - NHTSA
Jan 31, 2011 · The same side curtain air bag meeting FMVSS No. 226 can be used to meet the ejection mitigation requirements of FMVSS No. 214 with the ...
[33]
[PDF] Updated Estimates of Fatality Reduction by Curtain and Side Air ...
In addition, recent curtains may cover a larger area and stay inflated longer to protect occupants in crashes with multiple impacts and to help prevent ...
[34]
[PDF] Suitability of Vehicles for Older Drivers
Seat cushion deflection and vehicle suspension movement resulted in the H-point height reducing by between 25 and 40mm, depending on the vehicle. It was found ...
[35]
suitability of vehicles for older drivers: accessibility measurements
Nov 22, 2014 · height (H-point) above ground. Key Dimensions of Tested Vehicles ... elderly persons", ISATA 2000 Conference, Dublin, Ireland. (copy ...
[36]
[PDF] Effects of Anthropometric Variables and Seat Height on ... - HAL
Mar 19, 2018 · Porter and Gyi (1998) observed that preferred seat height was between 283 and 335 mm with an average of 301.1 mm, though the range of seat ...Missing: typical | Show results with:typical<|separator|>
[37]
[PDF] Certification of the H-Pt. and Backset measuring equipment and its ...
For this measurement is a so called Hip-Point-. Manikin, HPM is necessary. This manikin developed in the 50's by the US Army was adopted as US SAE standard SAE.
[38]
Automotive Technology and Human Factors Research: Past ...
Sep 4, 2013 · This paper reviews the history of automotive technology development and human factors research, largely by decade, since the inception of the automobile.
[39]
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Seating Systems
Jul 16, 2024 · They argue that seats that comply with the current standard may yield excessively during a crash, which can lead to spinal cord and brain ...
[40]
ASPECT: The Next-Generation H-Point Machine and Related ...
30-day returnsFeb 28, 1999 · The ASPECT manikin simultaneously measures the H-point location, seat cushion angle, seatback angle, and lumbar support prominence of a seat, ...Missing: 1990s 3D
[41]
Chair Size Design Based on User Height - MDPI
Jan 31, 2023 · In 2000, the Civilian American and European Surface Anthropometry Resource (CAESAR) was compiled by the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE).<|control11|><|separator|>
[42]
Statistical Posture Prediction of Vehicle Occupants in Digital Human Modelling Tools
**Summary of Key Findings on Statistical Models for H-point Prediction in Digital Human Modeling for Automotive Ergonomics**
[43]
Sitting posture influence in autonomous vehicles for the evaluation of occupant safety in side impact
### Summary: Seating Postures in Autonomous Vehicles and Their Effect on H-Point and Ergonomics Evaluation
[44]
[PDF] Seating and electric vehicles - Adient Investor Relations
Aug 5, 2021 · Distance between H-Point and floor, measured in design position can be an important characteristic for EV seating, as it allows better ...
[45]
Machine learning based intelligent posture design of driver - IOPscience
No readable text found in the HTML.<|separator|>