Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

HOTAS

HOTAS, an for Hands On Throttle And Stick, is a control philosophy primarily used in that integrates switches, buttons, and other essential controls directly onto the lever and flight control stick, enabling pilots to manage and weapons without removing their hands from these primary flight controls. This design minimizes distractions and enhances operational efficiency during dynamic flight conditions, particularly in combat situations where rapid response is critical. The HOTAS concept originated in the early 1960s with its first operational implementation on the British English Electric Lightning interceptor aircraft, marking a significant advancement in cockpit ergonomics for high-performance fighters. By the 1970s and 1980s, HOTAS had evolved into a standard feature in advanced military aircraft, including the U.S. Air Force's F-16 Fighting Falcon and the U.S. Navy's F/A-18 Hornet, where it supports seamless integration with heads-up displays (HUDs), up-front controls (UFCs), and multifunction displays for air-to-air and air-to-ground missions. Beyond its military applications, HOTAS principles have influenced the design of flight simulation systems and consumer gaming controllers, replicating the tactile and functional layout to provide realistic training and immersive experiences for pilots and enthusiasts alike. The system's emphasis on pilot workload reduction and continues to shape modern , with ongoing adaptations in fourth- and fifth-generation fighters incorporating digital interfaces and helmet-mounted cueing systems.

Definition and Principles

Core Concept

HOTAS, an for Hands On Throttle And Stick, refers to a control philosophy and design in which critical functions are integrated directly onto the and control stick. This approach positions switches, buttons, and selectors for essential systems on these primary flight controls, enabling seamless operation without the need to reach for separate panels or instruments. The primary purpose of HOTAS is to minimize pilot distraction and workload by allowing operators to execute key tasks—such as weapon selection, radar mode changes, and communication—while keeping hands on the throttle and stick. By reducing the time pilots spend looking down at auxiliary controls, HOTAS enhances , particularly in high-stress combat environments where rapid decision-making is essential. This integration supports sustained focus on external threats and navigation, contributing to overall mission effectiveness. The term HOTAS emerged in the 1970s during the era of advanced engineering for , marking a shift toward more intuitive human-machine interfaces. In basic operation, the pilot grips the control stick with one hand to manage and roll, while the other hand holds the for power adjustments, using thumbs or fingers to actuate nearby controls without altering hand positions. This flow evolved from earlier aviation designs with dispersed controls, prioritizing efficiency in dynamic flight scenarios.

Design Philosophy

The design philosophy of HOTAS centers on ergonomic principles aimed at reducing pilot workload during high-intensity operations by localizing critical controls to the and stick, thereby minimizing the need for hand repositioning or removal from primary . This approach keeps the pilot's attention primarily outside the , significantly reducing head-down time associated with panel interactions. For instance, in low-level and scenarios, HOTAS enables instinctive access to functions like weapon selection and sensor management without diverting gaze from the external environment, aligning with broader goals of maintaining . Human-machine interface principles in HOTAS design draw on Fitts' Law, which models the time required for targeted movements based on distance and target size, to optimize control accessibility. Switches and buttons are positioned for thumb-operated activation—such as fingersticks or thumbsticks on the and stick—ensuring rapid selection without grip changes, even under dynamic flight conditions. Performance evaluations using Fitts' Law's Shannon formulation demonstrate that while HOTAS devices exhibit lower throughput (approximately 0.7 bits/s) compared to touchscreens (3.7 bits/s), they maintain reasonable accuracy for tasks, with error rates increasing predictably as target sizes decrease. This placement prioritizes dexterity of the thumb over less agile fingers, enhancing overall interface efficiency in constrained spaces. HOTAS integrates closely with modern in glass cockpits, where multi-function displays (MFDs) are controlled directly via HOTAS inputs for seamless interaction with data such as feeds, , and targeting. In systems like the F-16C's 4x4-inch MFDs or the F/A-18C/D's 5x5-inch displays, HOTAS supports software-driven keys and cursor , allowing reconfiguration for mission phases. MFDs occupy 25-30% (up to 40%) of the instrument panel, reducing overall clutter through programmable multifunctionality. This synergy extends to head-up displays (HUDs) and helmet-mounted displays (HMDs), fusing sensor data to further minimize during data entry or mode changes. Safety and efficiency benefits are evidenced by simulator studies showing HOTAS contributions to improved pilot performance, such as a 50% increase in air-to-air exchange ratios when paired with larger 10-inch displays versus 5-inch ones, and a 2:1 advantage in engagements using HMD integration. By enabling head-up operations and rapid function access, HOTAS reduces monitoring demands and enhances response in dynamic scenarios, though challenges like menu complexity require ongoing ergonomic refinements.

History

Origins in Aviation

In the pre-HOTAS era, traditional aircraft cockpits compelled pilots to remove their hands from the throttle and stick to access panels for essential functions like adjustment and weapon selection, resulting in critical delays during combat. This vulnerability was particularly evident in 1960s operations, where U.S. pilots in the often struggled to maintain and maneuverability while operating complex systems, contributing to higher loss rates against more agile adversaries. The HOTAS concept emerged in the 1950s, with its first operational implementation in the early 1960s on the British English Electric Lightning , where buttons, triggers, and rotary sliders were placed on a separate behind the lever to control , gunsights, and flight systems without removing hands from primary controls. In the early 1970s, U.S. Air Force engineers further developed and formalized HOTAS principles within the Lightweight Fighter (LWF) program, driven by lessons from and simulator evaluations that emphasized the need for seamless integration of flight and mission controls to minimize pilot distraction. This initiative aimed to create a capable of superior agility and pilot workload management, contrasting with the heavier, multi-role F-15 . Initial prototypes incorporating HOTAS principles were tested starting in 1974 with the YF-16 demonstrator, a modified version of the LWF design that featured a side-mounted control stick and equipped with switches for weapons, , and countermeasures. These tests validated the approach on platforms like the T-38 for integration, demonstrating reduced head-down time and improved response in high-threat scenarios. Key motivators for HOTAS development included the escalating speeds of + fighters and the proliferation of advanced missile threats, which demanded instantaneous access to countermeasures and targeting without compromising flight control, thereby enhancing overall mission effectiveness in beyond-visual-range and engagements.

Key Developments and Adoption

While HOTAS originated earlier in designs, it debuted as a standard feature in a U.S. production fighter with the F-16 Fighting Falcon, which entered operational service with the U.S. in 1978, marking the first to integrate controls with HOTAS for enhanced pilot efficiency during high-workload maneuvers. This innovation stemmed from early U.S. experimental programs in the 1970s aimed at reducing pilot distraction in combat. The F/A-18 Hornet followed in the early , with its first flight in 1978 and initial operational capability achieved by 1984, incorporating HOTAS to streamline weapon selection and systems management in environments. By the 1990s, the advanced HOTAS integration during its development phase, with the first prototype flight in 1994, enabling seamless interaction with multifunction displays and voice input systems for multinational operations. Technological advancements in the 1990s further refined HOTAS through the widespread adoption of fully digital systems, which permitted denser integration of switches and sensors on throttle and stick without mechanical constraints, as seen in aircraft like the and entering service around that decade. In the 2000s, voice-activated backups emerged as a redundancy layer, with systems like Direct Voice Input (DVI) in the allowing pilots to issue commands hands-free during critical phases, reducing reliance on physical HOTAS inputs while maintaining core manual control. Global adoption accelerated among U.S., UK, and NATO forces by 1990, with HOTAS becoming a de facto standard in fourth-generation fighters exported across the alliance, enhancing interoperability in joint exercises and operations. Concurrently, Russian designs like the Sukhoi Su-27 series incorporated similar HOTAS principles by the late 1980s, evident in prototypes such as the Su-27M (later Su-35), which featured centralized controls on throttle and stick for radar and weapon management to match Western advancements. As of 2025, modern updates integrate HOTAS with systems (HMDS), such as the F-35's Gen III HMDS, which synchronizes head-tracked cues with and stick inputs for 360-degree without increasing control complexity. Additionally, -assisted controls are emerging to optimize button usage, with tests on the demonstrating guidance for and threat evasion that interfaces directly with HOTAS, potentially reducing the physical switch count by automating routine selections.

System Components

Throttle Controls

The throttle unit in HOTAS systems serves as the primary left-hand interface, positioned on the cockpit's left console and featuring an adjustable lever that pilots manipulate to regulate engine levels from idle to full power. The grip is contoured for a secure, natural palm rest, with integrated switches to facilitate rapid input without hand relocation. Key functions of the encompass engine power management via the main lever, activation by advancing beyond a designated , and speed brake deployment through dedicated switches, alongside integrated communications management system () buttons such as radio transmit controls. Additional capabilities include engagement and cutoff, enabling pilots to maintain focus on flight and tasks while keeping hands on the controls. These elements integrate seamlessly with the right-hand stick, embodying the core HOTAS principle of minimizing head-down time. Variations exist between analog and digital implementations: older aircraft like the F-16 employ mechanical levers with physical detents for tactile feedback, whereas the F-35 features a throttle with fixed and no mechanical detents, relying on electronic interfaces for precise thrust control. Ergonomically, the design prioritizes stability in demanding conditions, incorporating detents—such as one at 80% in some aircraft like the F/A-18—to avert inadvertent engagement during high-G maneuvers, thus enhancing pilot safety and performance.

Stick Controls

The control stick in HOTAS systems serves as the primary interface for flight control and weapon management, typically positioned for right-hand operation in the . Designs vary by aircraft: in some systems like the F-35, force-sensing technology detects pressure and applied by the pilot's hand to translate inputs into electronic signals for and deflection, with no physical movement of the stick. In contrast, aircraft like the F-16 use displacement-based sensing with limited physical movement (approximately 6 mm) to provide tactile feedback, while traditional sticks rely on greater displacement. Key components include a trigger guard with a firing for activating the aircraft's guns or missiles, switches—such as the coolie for radar operating modes (e.g., air-to-air or air-to-ground scan patterns) and the China for countermeasures or weapon selection—and a thumb-operated mini-stick or for cursor positioning on multifunction displays, facilitating target designation and without removing the hand from the controls. These elements allow pilots to perform essential tasks like primary flight attitude adjustments, weapon release, and sensor mode changes seamlessly during high-intensity operations. Variations in stick configuration reflect aircraft-specific ergonomics and mission requirements. For instance, the F-16 Fighting Falcon uses a mounted on the right armrest, which incorporates approximately 6 mm of displacement to provide tactile cues and mitigate over-sensitivity in inputs, while the also employs a similar setup for enhanced pilot comfort. In contrast, the F-15 Eagle features a conventional center-mounted stick with tactilely distinct buttons and switches for blind operation, and the Gripen utilizes a compact center mini-stick operable by wrist for small adjustments or full arm motion for larger ones. Modern iterations, such as those in the F-16 Block 70, integrate stick-mounted pointers compatible with touchscreen displays for hybrid analog-digital interaction. Ergonomic considerations emphasize durability under extreme conditions, with sticks engineered to withstand 9g maneuvers; the side-stick configuration in designs like the F-16 enables pilots to apply control forces using forearm and shoulder muscles while reclined at a 30-degree seatback angle, reducing arm fatigue and improving sustained g-tolerance. Switches are often illuminated for low-visibility operations, and programmable modes allow customization via onboard software to adapt to mission profiles, ensuring balanced accessibility during prolonged flights.

Applications in Aviation

Military Aircraft

The Hands On Throttle And Stick (HOTAS) system has been a cornerstone of design since its integration into the General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon, which entered operational service with the in 1979 following initial deliveries in 1978. The F-16 was one of the first U.S. fighters to fully implement HOTAS as a standard feature, featuring a controller with approximately 10 switches and a with 8 additional switches, enabling pilots to manage , weapons, and without removing their hands from the primary flight controls. This design philosophy addressed the limitations of earlier cockpits, where pilots had to divert attention to overhead panels during critical maneuvers, thereby enhancing responsiveness in dynamic combat environments. In operations such as the 1991 , F-16 pilots leveraged HOTAS to execute precision strikes and air-to-air intercepts, contributing to the coalition's overwhelming air superiority with minimal losses. The U.S. Navy's F/A-18 Hornet, introduced in the early 1980s, also incorporated HOTAS controls to support similar seamless integration with heads-up displays and multifunction displays for air-to-air and air-to-ground missions. In modern fifth-generation fighters like the , HOTAS has evolved to integrate seamlessly with advanced sensor suites, including the Distributed Aperture System (DAS). The F-35's HOTAS grips, supplied by manufacturers such as Essex Industries, allow pilots to access functions supporting DAS—six infrared sensors providing 360-degree situational awareness—while maintaining control of flight and weapons systems. This integration supports helmet-mounted displays that project DAS imagery directly onto the pilot's visor, enabling threat detection and targeting without head movement disrupting control. Deployed in high-threat operations from the 2010s onward, such as counter-ISIS missions, the F-35's HOTAS-DAS synergy has facilitated rapid beyond-visual-range (BVR) engagements, where pilots can launch missiles and monitor spherical battlespace data hands-free. HOTAS systems enable "hands-free" operations critical for BVR engagements, reducing pilot workload in simulated high-threat scenarios according to Air Force studies on combat automation. This allows sustained focus on threat prioritization and evasion, minimizing errors in environments like the Middle East conflicts from the 1990s Gulf War through 2020s operations, where F-16 and F-35 pilots reported fewer procedural lapses due to streamlined controls. In these theaters, HOTAS contributed to operational success by enabling pilots to maintain aircraft stability while programming radar modes or selecting ordnance, directly supporting the U.S. Air Force's dominance in air-to-air and suppression of enemy air defenses missions. Despite these advantages, HOTAS presents challenges, particularly the risk of functional overload from densely packed switches, which can exceed controls per hand in advanced variants. This complexity necessitates extensive training regimens, with U.S. Air Force pilots undergoing specialized simulator sessions to master multi-function assignments without cognitive overload during sustained combat. In the , upgrades to platforms like the F-35 incorporated links for (UAV) control, adding layers to training requirements. U.S. simulations have quantified HOTAS impacts, with improvements in air-to-air engagement cycles demonstrated in exercises like , where HOTAS-equipped showed superior tactical outcomes compared to legacy systems, underscoring its role in enhancing lethality while preserving pilot .

Civilian and Training Systems

In advanced programs, HOTAS systems are integral to simulators that replicate high-performance cockpits, enabling pilots to develop precise for throttle and stick management without interrupting flight control. The T-7A Red Hawk trainer, which had its first U.S. flight in and is expected to achieve initial operating capability in 2027, exemplifies this application with its fully digital cockpit featuring HOTAS controls, including a large area display that allows instructors and trainees to handle , targeting, and systems adjustments hands-on during non-combat maneuvers. This configuration supports integrated live-virtual-constructive environments, where simulator sessions link directly to actual flights for enhanced and skill transfer. Civilian aircraft incorporate partial HOTAS designs, particularly in business jets, by embedding essential functions directly onto the and to streamline operations under varying workloads. In the Gulfstream G650, for example, the includes integrated switches for modes, heading select, and tuning, while the throttle quadrant houses power management levers with adjacent controls for speed and settings, minimizing the need to release primary grips during critical phases like approach and landing. These features draw from HOTAS philosophy but prioritize efficiency for commercial profiles, such as transoceanic routes, where seamless integration with advanced reduces . Adaptations of HOTAS for civilian and use emphasize simplified interfaces with reduced switch density to align with lower-risk, non-combat scenarios, often combining them with overrides for sustained hands-on operation during extended flights. By the , FAA certifications for advanced devices (AATDs) mandated configurations that mirror aircraft-specific setups for qualified simulators, to ensure in replicating yoke-throttle interactions. This approach bolsters IFR by permitting uninterrupted procedural practice—such as holding patterns and approaches—fostering instinctive responses that lower incident risks in real-world conditions.

Applications Beyond Aviation

Automotive and Racing

The adaptation of HOTAS principles to automotive and racing contexts began in the late 1980s with the integration of controls directly on the steering wheel in Formula 1 cars, enabling drivers to manage gear shifts and other functions without diverting attention from the road. The 1989 Ferrari 640 marked a pivotal moment as the first F1 vehicle equipped with a semi-automatic transmission featuring paddle shifters positioned behind the steering wheel, which eliminated the need for a traditional gear lever and clutch pedal during shifts. This design drew conceptual parallels to aviation HOTAS by prioritizing hands-on operation to enhance safety and speed, allowing seamless gear changes that contributed to the car's immediate competitive success in the 1989 season. In modern high-performance vehicles, HOTAS-inspired interfaces have evolved to include multifunctional controls for critical operations such as gear selection, power deployment, and adjustments. For instance, the , introduced in 2016, incorporates shift paddles behind the steering wheel for manual gear changes, alongside a central launch control (LC) button that activates maximum acceleration from standstill while optimizing traction. A rotary knob on the wheel further enables rapid switching between driving modes, including settings that adjust engine output and handling parameters to suit track conditions. Similarly, contemporary Formula 1 steering wheels feature dedicated buttons for deploying energy recovery system (ERS) boost, which provides temporary power surges, and rotary dials for fine-tuning and differential settings, all accessible without releasing the wheel. These controls facilitate real-time monitoring via integrated displays, displaying lap times and sector data to inform driver decisions during races. Such systems significantly enhance performance by minimizing distraction and shift times, with paddle shifters alone reducing gear change durations to under 50 milliseconds compared to alternatives, thereby shaving seconds off times in high-stakes . In Formula 1, the shift to these interfaces has enabled drivers to maintain focus on apex speeds and maneuvers, contributing to overall efficiency and consistency. Despite their advantages, implementing HOTAS-like controls in road and racing vehicles faces notable hurdles, including intense s that can compromise electronic reliability and user precision. In Formula 1 environments, where accelerations exceed and engine vibrations reach frequencies up to 3 kHz, components like connectors and electronic control units (s) on interfaces are particularly susceptible to fatigue and signal interference. Space limitations on compact racing wheels, often no larger than 28 in , also restrict button placement and , necessitating advanced haptic feedback and minimalist designs to avoid overwhelming drivers. In applications, these controls extend to quick ECU adjustments for anti-lag systems or power modes via steering-mounted switches, though vibration and dust exposure further challenge durability in off-road conditions.

Gaming and Simulation

In the gaming and simulation sector, Hands On Throttle And Stick (HOTAS) systems have become essential peripherals for enhancing realism in flight and space simulation titles. Popular setups include the Thrustmaster HOTAS Warthog, originally released in 2011 and remaining a top recommendation in 2025 due to its durable metal construction and high-fidelity controls, featuring 51 programmable action buttons across the joystick and throttle for complex input mapping. Similarly, the Logitech G X56 HOTAS, with over 189 programmable controls including 13 axes, five hat switches, and 31 buttons, offers extensive customization suitable for both novice and advanced users in virtual cockpits. These systems typically range in price from $100 to $600, making them accessible to a broad consumer base and contributing to the growth of the gaming peripherals market at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 10.3% from 2025 to 2034. Software integration has evolved to fully support HOTAS configurations, enabling seamless replication of aircraft controls in major titles. DCS World provides native compatibility for HOTAS devices, allowing precise mapping to simulate military jets like the F-16 with authentic and stick inputs that mirror real-world . includes built-in HOTAS recognition, supporting axis assignments for , , roll, and yaw to facilitate immersive civilian and flights. also integrates HOTAS for space combat and exploration, where users can assign buttons to systems, , and for a hands-on piloting experience. For users, HOTAS setups deliver significant benefits in and skill development, particularly for hobbyists seeking realistic without access to actual . The dual-control design reduces reliance on inputs, fostering for maneuvers and enhancing overall engagement in environments. In esports contexts, such as DCS World tournaments like The E-Sports event, HOTAS enables competitive play with response times and precision that approximate real jet dynamics, giving players an edge in high-stakes leagues focused on tactical flight . Recent trends in the 2020s have emphasized compatibility with (VR) and (AR) technologies, with devices like the X56 explicitly designed for VR integration to provide untethered, cockpit-like immersion in games supporting both HOTAS and headsets. This convergence, alongside declining prices and broader software support, has driven market expansion, with the global sector projected to reach $6.21 billion in 2025, fueled by consumer demand for home-based, high-fidelity experiences.

Remote Operations

HOTAS systems have been adapted for remote operations in unmanned and distant control scenarios, particularly for and , where operators manage vehicles or devices from stations or control centers without direct physical presence. In applications, control stations (GCS) for and commercial UAVs incorporate HOTAS configurations to enable intuitive flight and control. For example, the Certifiable Ground Control Station (CGCS) developed by for remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS), including the MQ-9 Reaper operational since the mid-2000s, features F-35/F-16-inspired HOTAS controls with high-definition touch-screen displays and electronic checklists to reduce operator workload during mission execution. The in these setups allows precise manipulation of camera gimbals for and targeting, keeping hands on controls for seamless transitions between flight maneuvers and adjustments. In robotic applications, HOTAS adaptations support in hazardous environments by providing familiar aviation-style interfaces for and . During the , researchers explored throttle-stick configurations for in planetary exploration simulations, where the managed speed and the stick directed to mimic control despite communication delays. Similar setups have been used in teleoperated systems for space and terrestrial , enhancing operator precision in remote scenarios like or contaminated sites. Advancements in the have integrated haptic feedback into HOTAS for applications such as and remotely operated vehicles (ROVs), where force and tactile cues simulate environmental interactions to mitigate in satellite-linked operations. In , improved HOTAS (iHOTAS) controllers with haptic elements allow surgeons to feel through and stick inputs, improving accuracy in minimally invasive procedures. For ROVs, haptic joysticks within HOTAS layouts provide feedback on currents and , enabling operators to adjust propulsion and manipulators intuitively despite signal delays up to several seconds. These enhancements reduce perceived in control response times, based on experimental evaluations of performance. The primary benefits of HOTAS in remote operations include sustained operator immersion and enhanced , as the hands-on design minimizes during prolonged missions. In military UAV contexts, HOTAS interfaces have demonstrated improved task efficiency, with studies showing faster and reduced error rates compared to keyboard-and-mouse setups due to more natural input mapping for dynamic environments.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] naval aviation new - Naval History and Heritage Command
    HUD, UFC, and HOTAS. HOTAS (the acronym for hands-on-throttle-and-stick) provides the capability to operate the system or change combat modes without the ...
  2. [2]
    Performance, characteristics, and error rates of cursor control ...
    The first operational HOTAS system appeared in the early 1960s in the English Electric Lightning. Buttons, triggers, and rotary sliders were placed on a ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  3. [3]
    [PDF] aetcman11-251.pdf - Air Force
    Sep 10, 2024 · ... ........................................ 169. 9.20. Hands On Throttle and Stick (HOTAS) and Air-to-Air (A/A)/ Air-to-Ground. (A/G) Master Modes ...
  4. [4]
    Marines Make Virtual Training Reality for Naval Aviators > United ...
    It was the perfect spot for the joy stick or HOTAS (hands on throttle-and-stick), which was carefully screwed into place. On the floor lay the rudder pedals ...
  5. [5]
    Release of BlueMax7 Announced - DSIAC
    The operator can control flight by use of a HOTAS (Hands-On-Throttle & Stick), including collective, cyclic, and pedals controls. BlueMax v7.0 release ...
  6. [6]
    Moody A-10 pilots first to field target system downrange
    Mar 13, 2013 · It is also more user-friendly compared to previously fielded models with it being Hands on Throttle-and-Stick (HOTAS) controlled. The HMCS ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Air Superiority Fighter Characteristics. - DTIC
    Jun 5, 1998 · first fighter capable of sustained supersonic speed and originated as a ... (HOTAS) switchology, and (3) the. Head-Up Display (HUD). Each of ...
  8. [8]
    None
    ### Definition and Purpose of HOTAS
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Flight Vehicle Integration Panel Working Group 21 on Glass Cockpit ...
    HOTAS As more flexible MFD's have been added to the cockpit, the ability to control aircraft, sensor and weapon functions through software driven keys has ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Research Archive - University of Hertfordshire
    This paper provides a comparative performance analysis of a hands-on-throttle-and-stick (HOTAS) cursor control device (CCD) with other suitable CCDs for an ...
  11. [11]
  12. [12]
    F-4 Crew Members Speak about Phantom II Issues. And they ...
    F-4 Crew Members Speak about Phantom II Issues. And they Explain why they Loved Flying it despite its Flaws.
  13. [13]
    F-16 Fighting Falcon History | Lockheed Martin
    Oct 1, 2020 · The F-16 was conceived in the early 1970s by a small group of engineers and defense analysts known as the Lightweight Fighter Mafia as an ...Missing: HOTAS | Show results with:HOTAS
  14. [14]
    Legacy of the Lightweight Fighter Competition
    Dec 21, 2016 · The Air Force's Prototype Program Office at Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, launched the Lightweight Fighter (LWF) program in January 1972. The ...Missing: HOTAS | Show results with:HOTAS
  15. [15]
    Pearl Harbor General Dynamics/Lockheed Martin F-16
    Sep 26, 2017 · The F-16 was designed as a pure air superiority fighter. During its development, however, an international need emerged for a multirole fighter ...
  16. [16]
    The F-16 at 50: Why it's still in demand - BBC
    Jan 20, 2024 · The F-16 jet fighter took its first ever flight in 1974, but it is still as important an aircraft now as it was then.
  17. [17]
  18. [18]
    Features | Eurofighter Typhoon
    The Eurofighter Typhoon integrates a Hands on Throttle and Stick (HOTAS) approach with Direct Voice Input (DVI), resulting in the Voice, Throttle and Stick ...
  19. [19]
    Where Are They Now: F-8 Digital Fly-By-Wire - NASA
    Jul 17, 2015 · The Digital Fly-By-Wire (DFBW) concept uses an electronic flight-control system coupled with a digital computer to replace conventional ...Missing: HOTAS 1990s
  20. [20]
    Sukhoi Su-35 (Su-27BM) "4++ Generation Flanker" - Aircraft - MILAVIA
    Aug 28, 2008 · Developed in the late 1980s for the Soviet Air Force, the Su-27M ... Su-27, but incorporates the HOTAS principle. Weapons: Longer-range ...
  21. [21]
    F-35 Gen III Helmet Mounted Display System (HMDS)
    The head-up display (HUD), helmet-mounted display, and visor-projected night vision are fully integrated to provide pilots with unprecedented capability in the ...Missing: HOTAS | Show results with:HOTAS
  22. [22]
    Eurofighter Typhoon Fighters Test Integrated AI to Guide Pilots ...
    Jun 20, 2025 · The cockpit integrates voice command systems (DVI/O), HOTAS/VTAS controls, and displays including a HUD, HMD, and a Large Area Display, all ...
  23. [23]
    F-22 Cockpit - GlobalSecurity.org
    Jan 22, 2016 · The throttles are located on the left console. Both the stick and the throttles are high-use controls during air combat. To support pilot ...
  24. [24]
    What is good and bad about the F-35 cockpit: A 'Panther' pilot's ...
    Jan 21, 2021 · It was a bit of a crossover between analogue and digital; it had a good HUD and two MFDs with the classic 20 pushbuttons around the outside. The ...
  25. [25]
    HOTAS – Knowledge and References - Taylor & Francis
    HOTAS (Hands on Throttle and Stick) is an operating philosophy used in modern fighter aircraft that allows the pilot to control all essential mission-related ...
  26. [26]
    Low-Cost Strain-Gauge Force-Sensing Sidestick for 6-DoF Flight ...
    Jul 18, 2025 · Operational experience with the first-generation F-16 sidestick showed that a completely rigid force-sensing design was “too sensitive”, ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] NASA Technical Memorandum 102587
    Each pilot was asked to perform 16 nonflying tasks and then 16 in-flight tasks with each input concept. Table II shows the sequence of input concepts given ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] How F-15s Work
    The pilot steers the plane with a control stick located in the center of ... The controls are designed with the hands-on throttle and stick (HOTAS) system.
  29. [29]
    In the hot seat | News | Flight Global
    Feb 7, 2000 · The HOTAS is configured with weapons selection functions on the stick, while the throttle has two pistol grips. The upper has the sensor ...
  30. [30]
    F-16 Fighting Falcon > Air Force > Fact Sheet Display - AF.mil
    The F-16A, a single-seat model, first flew in December 1976. The first operational F-16A was delivered in January 1979 to the 388th Tactical Fighter Wing at ...Missing: HOTAS | Show results with:HOTAS
  31. [31]
    [PDF] An Overview of Aircraft Integrated Control Technology - DTIC
    F-16 which had ten switches on the sidestick controller and eight more on the throttle, some of which had more than one function"). For these reasons, the ...
  32. [32]
    Vipers of '91: Hill's F-16s at war > 388th Fighter Wing > Article Display
    Jan 15, 2016 · Carrying air-to-air missiles, a heavy bomb load, and equipped with the Low Altitude Navigation and Targeting Infrared for Night (LANTIRN) pods, ...
  33. [33]
    Essex Industries HOTAS Grips on F-35 Joint Strike Fighter
    Nov 27, 2018 · Essex Industries and Lockheed Martin have reached agreement on the next round of HOTAS (Hands-on Throttle and Stick) grip deliveries for the F-35 Joint Strike ...
  34. [34]
    Das Distributed Aperture System - jsf.mil
    The F-35 DAS provides spherical situational awareness. The DAS surrounds the aircraft with a protective sphere of situational awareness. It warns the pilot of ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Human Consequences of Agile Aircraft - DTIC
    ... beyond visual range, or up close, or both. Short- range air-to-air combat ... Hands free controls described in 6.4.3, along with the HOTAS concept ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] USAF Pilot Perceptions of Workload Assessment in a Combat ... - DTIC
    Question 43 was stated as follows: Simulator missions flown in peace time adequately simulate the amount of workload that a pilot will experience in combat.Missing: HOTAS | Show results with:HOTAS
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Alternative Control Technologies: Human Factors Issues - DTIC
    Oct 7, 1998 · capability in 1993 on a Sukhoi Su-27. The control authority of. [8]. thrust vectoring allowing a rearward shot without the missile. Similarly ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] U.S. Army Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap 2010-2035 - DTIC
    Apr 9, 2010 · to control more than one aircraft. Interoperability improvements to the OSRVT will provide level III control that will allow users to ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Full Circle? The Transformation of Dedicated Adversary Air Training ...
    Jun 18, 2001 · During this period, the air-to-air kill ratio for the USAF sank to nearly 1:1. ... 32 Refers to improvements such as HOTAS (hands on throttle and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Armstrong Laboratory - DTIC
    HOTAS Hands On Throttle And Stick. HSI Horizontal Situation Indicator. HUD ... Kill ratio. 97. Page 112. Appendix C. Subjective Workload Assessment ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Gulfstream GVI G650, G650ER - Portal Gov.br
    Jun 2, 2015 · • Use of the yoke mounted 'ON/OFF' switch “clear” mode ... This aircraft utilizes fly-by-wire flight controls. It is important ...
  42. [42]
  43. [43]
    Groundbreaking F1 Gearbox: 1989 Ferrari 640 | ROSSOautomobili
    Jan 20, 2022 · The First Paddle-Shift Gearbox​​ Up until 1988, all Formula 1 cars had manual transmission as well as a clutch pedal in the car. Electro- ...
  44. [44]
    When did Formula One cars switch from stick shifts to paddle shifters?
    Nov 13, 2021 · It was in 1989 when Ferrari introduced the flappy paddles. And they had immediate success with it. In 1990 Williams joined them.What was the very last F1 car without paddle shifters, but with classic ...How did Ferrari's early experiments with paddle shifters in Formula 1 ...More results from www.quora.com
  45. [45]
    The Bugatti Chiron is a velvet rocketship - CNET
    Mar 23, 2017 · Located centrally on the steering wheel, down towards the bottom, is a single, wide button marked simply LC. Find yourself a long road or, ...<|separator|>
  46. [46]
    What it's like to drive a Bugatti Chiron for an hour of your life
    Nov 20, 2017 · A knob on the steering wheel gives drivers quick access to the Chiron's various driving modes. In terms of sheer velocity, the Chiron ...
  47. [47]
    F1 steering wheels: How they work, what the buttons do and more
    Jan 1, 2024 · What are the buttons on an F1 steering wheel? ; Drag Reduction System (DRS). Operates DRS, which opens the rear wing to reduce drag and increase ...
  48. [48]
    Many Functions of Steering Wheels Keep Drivers in Control
    Jul 29, 2024 · A steering wheel provides is lap times. Drivers can scour through real-time data to visually see how they stack up on lap times compared to previous laps.
  49. [49]
    How do Paddle Shifters Work? (and How they Helped Replace ...
    May 11, 2020 · Ferrari introduced paddle shifters in 1990 in their F1 ... In the frame of racing, paddle shifting can shave off seconds to a car's lap time when ...
  50. [50]
    Multi-tasking made simple - understanding the modern Formula One ...
    May 30, 2019 · Then, in 1989, with Ferrari's introduction of the semi-automatic gearbox, paddles for gear shifting were added behind the wheel. Next, hydraulic ...<|separator|>
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Vibrations Measurements of Formula One Car Electronic Devices
    The components which predominantly suffer the vibrations during F1 races are: the connectors, the transducers, the Electronic Control Units (ECU), the voltage ...Missing: challenges | Show results with:challenges
  52. [52]
    (PDF) Usability Assessment of Steering Wheel Control Interfaces in ...
    Feb 25, 2020 · In order to assess the usability of steering wheel control interfaces in motorsport, it is necessary to employ a set of appropriate methods.<|separator|>
  53. [53]
    HOTAS WARTHOG™ - Flying - Thrustmaster
    The throttles feature a total of 17 action buttons, a “Point Of View” hat and a “mouse hat / slew control”. Control Panel with 5 Programmable LEDs. The ...
  54. [54]
    Best PC joysticks in 2025: these are my top picks for everything from ...
    Apr 28, 2025 · Right now, the best PC joystick is the Thrustmaster HOTAS Warthog. It's sturdy and feels good in your hands, and it's also easy to use as a building block for ...
  55. [55]
    Logitech G X56 VR Simulator Compatible HOTAS Joystick
    In stock Rating 3.7 (90) Modern, military-grade simulation for VR and space-flight. Features six degrees of freedom—pitch, roll, yaw, backwards, forwards, up, down, left and right; ...
  56. [56]
    Why 2025 Is the Year to Invest in a Flight Stick - Turtle Beach
    Oct 2, 2025 · The VelocityOne Flightdeck has earned recognition as the best overall HOTAS system for 2025, featuring 139 programmable controls and the ...
  57. [57]
    6 Best HOTAS Flight Stick Options - FLYING Magazine
    Aug 12, 2025 · At-home flight joysticks are the perfect option for personal simulator setups. Check out our top HOTAS flight stick options here.
  58. [58]
    High end hotas - which one and why? - DCS Forums
    May 11, 2023 · Grips and mechanics are all metal, throttle case is plastic, but that's it. Winwing has amazing hat switches, something no other manufacturer ...Missing: military | Show results with:military<|separator|>
  59. [59]
    Flight FAQS - MOZA Racing | Support Center
    As of early April 2025, MOZA Flight products support games including (but not limited to): DCS World, X-Plane 11/12, Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020/2024, Star ...Missing: replication | Show results with:replication
  60. [60]
    Navigating the Top H.O.T.A.S Systems for Flight Simulation ...
    Jan 17, 2024 · The separation of throttle and stick allows for a more realistic and ergonomic flight experience. Imagine having precise control over your ...
  61. [61]
    Bringing Competitive E-Sports to Flight Simulators | DCS - YouTube
    Dec 22, 2020 · This video is a preview of The Winter War E-Sports tournament that aims to bring the high flying world of Flight Simulators and DCS World ...
  62. [62]
    Flight Simulator Market Size, Share & Growth | Forecast [2032]
    The global flight simulator market size was valued at $5.90 billion in 2024 & is projected to grow from $6.21 billion in 2025 to $8.59 billion by 2032.Missing: HOTAS | Show results with:HOTAS
  63. [63]
    Certifiable Ground Control Station (CGCS) - GA-ASI
    The CGCS is a type-certifiable ground station for RPAS, designed for improved situational awareness, and can be retrofitted into existing facilities.Missing: Reaper controls
  64. [64]
    MQ-9 Reaper > Air Force > Fact Sheet Display - AF.mil
    A fully operational system consists of sensor and weapon-equipped aircraft, ground control station, Predator Primary Satellite Link and spare equipment along ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Sim Series 2: Rover Teleoperations to Support EVA Test Report
    • The Rover in VR was connected/driven by NASA simulation framework Trick. • The Rover can be teleoperated by the MCC. Test subject in VR simulation examining ...
  66. [66]
    VR-Haptic and Motor Feedback for Immersive Control in Subsea ...
    Oct 2, 2025 · This paper investigates the integration of haptic feedback and virtual reality (VR) control interfaces to enhance teleoperation and ...
  67. [67]
    Effect of Haptic Feedback on Pilot/Operator Performance During ...
    In this research, we study the effects of incorporating haptic feedback in UAV flight control. We present an experimental evaluation of three flight control ...Missing: HOTAS | Show results with:HOTAS
  68. [68]
    [PDF] INCREASING ACCEPTANCE OF HAPTIC FEEDBACK IN UAV ...
    In tele-operating an UAV, human operators fully rely on cameras to control the vehicle from a distance. To increase operator situation awareness and reduce ...