Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Harshad Mehta

Harshad Shantilal Mehta (29 July 1954 – 31 December 2001) was an stockbroker and convicted fraudster whose manipulation of the through the 1992 securities scam diverted approximately ₹4,000 in bank funds into equities via fraudulent ready-forward transactions and bogus bank receipts, artificially inflating market indices before a sharp decline that wiped out investor gains and exposed systemic regulatory failures. Born into a Jain family in , , Mehta moved to in his youth and began his career as a junior clerk at a brokerage firm before establishing his own trading outfit, aggressively leveraging inter-bank lending loopholes to amass wealth and earn the moniker "Big " for driving a perceived in the early . His operations temporarily boosted retail participation in and highlighted equities' growth potential amid India's , yet relied on unreported cash infusions from banks that violated reserve requirements and obscured true market liquidity. The scam unraveled in April 1992 following investigative reporting that prompted probes by the and the Janakiraman Committee, revealing how Mehta and accomplices circulated fake instruments to siphon public deposits into speculative trades, culminating in his arrest, multiple convictions including for cheating and criminal breach of trust, and death from a heart attack while in custody amid ongoing trials. The episode prompted reforms like enhanced SEBI oversight and dematerialized trading to curb similar manipulations, though debates persist over the precise scale of losses attributable to Mehta versus broader market corrections.

Early Life and Education

Childhood and Family Background

Harshad Shantilal Mehta was born on July 29, 1954, in , a village in Gujarat's , into a modest Jain . His father, Shantilal Mehta, operated a small cloth trading , providing for the through traditional activities, while his mother, Rasilaben Mehta, managed the household as a homemaker. The household exemplified lower-middle-class circumstances typical of mid-20th-century trading communities, with limited financial resources shaping a frugal upbringing. Mehta grew up alongside siblings, including his brother Ashwin Mehta, in an environment emphasizing family reliance and basic commerce, though specific details on additional siblings remain sparsely documented in available accounts. His early years involved relocation, with some periods spent in , , before the family settled in Mumbai's area, exposing him to urban transitions amid economic constraints.

Formal Education and Initial Influences

Harshad Mehta attended primary schooling in , , before transferring to Rose Manor Garden School in Santacruz. In 1964, his family relocated from to (then in , now ) to support his father's cloth trading business, exposing Mehta to modest economic conditions in a smaller city during his formative years. Returning to Mumbai around 1973, Mehta enrolled at Lala Lajpatrai College, where he earned a degree in 1976. His commerce studies provided foundational knowledge in accounting and economics, though contemporaries noted his practical acumen often surpassed formal coursework. Post-graduation, Mehta's initial influences emerged through hands-on hustling in low-wage roles, such as a salesperson for Company and informal trading in commodities like plastic scrap and , often personally handling deliveries to cut costs. These experiences, amid India's regulated pre-liberalization economy, cultivated his risk tolerance and market intuition, drawing from a lower-middle-class Jain upbringing that emphasized and . An early affinity for numbers, evident from childhood ventures like selling newspapers, further steered him toward finance, with his college-era exposure to Mumbai's nascent sparking sustained interest.

Professional Ascendancy

Entry into Financial Sector

Harshad Mehta completed his degree in 1976 and subsequently joined Company Limited (NIACL) at its head office in Fort, , where he worked as a clerk or salesman in the hull department, handling claims. Earning an initial salary of approximately Rs. 600 per month, Mehta began exploring the during this tenure, trading small amounts informally. This role, lasting about two years, provided his first exposure to financial operations but highlighted conflicts of interest as his personal trading interests grew. In the late 1970s, Mehta resigned from NIACL to pursue a full-time career in stockbroking, entering the (BSE) as a jobber—a floor trader responsible for market making by matching buy and sell orders in the system. This transition marked his formal entry into the financial sector, where he operated without institutional backing, relying on personal capital and acumen to facilitate trades in equities and other securities. Jobbers like Mehta earned commissions on spreads between bid and ask prices, navigating volatile sessions amid limited regulation and manual trading practices prevalent at the BSE during the era. Mehta's early years as a jobber involved working alongside established brokers, absorbing strategies for spotting trends and managing risks in a largely opaque environment. By 1980, he had gained initial footing on the trading floor, building a network through persistent deal-making and leveraging community ties in Mumbai's financial circles. This phase laid the groundwork for his ascent, as he shifted from subsidiary roles to independent operations, eventually forming a small firm in 1982 to expand his brokerage activities. His rapid adaptation to the BSE's dynamics, characterized by high-volume, low-margin trades, demonstrated an intuitive grasp of provision amid India's nascent markets.

Development of Trading Strategies

Mehta's trading strategies emerged in the late as he transitioned from sub-brokership to independent operations on the , focusing on opportunities in the under-regulated inter-bank market for government securities. Observing discrepancies between high rates and lax verification of , he began facilitating legitimate ready forward (RF) transactions, where banks lent short-term funds against government bonds with a , earning commissions as an intermediary. This initial role allowed him to build relationships with bank officials, identifying their willingness to issue bank receipts (BRs)—promises to pay based on purported securities holdings—without rigorous audits. By 1990, Mehta refined this into a leveraged funding mechanism by requesting BRs from surplus banks in his name, pledging them to cash-short banks for immediate loans, and diverting the proceeds to purchases rather than repurchasing securities. These BRs, often backed by fictitious or double-pledged government papers, created illusory liquidity, enabling him to borrow multiples of initial deposits through chained deals across institutions like and . Unlike standard RFs, which were and unreported to the , Mehta's version involved non-delivery of underlying assets, effectively multiplying funds without capital outlay. This approach scaled rapidly in 1991 amid , which flooded banks with idle funds post-devaluation, allowing Mehta to amass over ₹1,000 in borrowed capital by early for concentrated bets on blue-chip like and . He targeted undervalued firms with strong fundamentals to justify price surges, using the influx to corner supply and engineer upward momentum, a tactic that propelled the from around 1,000 points in 1990 to over 4,500 by April . The relied on opacity in banking oversight, where BRs were treated as equivalents despite lacking , enabling unchecked circulation until regulatory scrutiny in mid-.

Market Influence and Achievements

Harshad Mehta gained prominence in the (BSE) during the late 1980s and early 1990s through aggressive trading that propelled select to extraordinary valuations, earning him the nickname "Big Bull" for his bullish market stance. His activities contributed to a dramatic rally in the , which climbed from around 1,000 points in February 1991 to a peak of approximately 4,500 points by April 1992, reflecting heightened trading volumes and investor enthusiasm. This surge was partly attributed to Mehta's strategy of accumulating large positions in undervalued or niche , creating perceived demand and drawing retail investors into the market. Mehta's trading successes included notable flips of specific equities; for instance, he acquired shares of at around Rs 200 and later sold them at Rs 10,000 amid the 1992 boom, exemplifying his ability to capitalize on momentum-driven price escalations. He focused on scrips with strong fundamentals or turnaround potential, such as those in and textiles, amplifying their visibility and through high-volume trades. These maneuvers not only generated substantial personal gains—reportedly turning modest initial capital into billions—but also influenced , encouraging broader participation from middle-class investors previously wary of equities. Beyond individual trades, Mehta's influence extended to reshaping perceptions of the as a viable wealth-creation avenue, with his public persona and media appearances demystifying trading for the average Indian. This era marked a shift toward retail-driven dynamics on , though sustained by opaque practices later scrutinized. His achievements, viewed pre-exposure, highlighted the untapped potential of leveraged investing in a liberalizing , spurring temporary economic optimism tied to gains.

The 1992 Securities Manipulation

Pre-Scam Market Conditions

The Indian stock market in the late 1980s and early 1990s operated under a framework of limited regulation and growing optimism fueled by impending economic reforms. The (BSE), the dominant venue for trading, featured physical share certificates, low liquidity in many counters, and a concentration of activity among a handful of family-controlled companies. Banking sector practices, including ready forward deals—temporary sales of government securities with an agreement to repurchase—provided excess liquidity to brokers by allowing banks to park funds , often without stringent oversight from the (RBI). These mechanisms, intended to manage short-term cash needs amid cash reserve ratio requirements, inadvertently enabled large-scale fund diversion into equities, inflating market participation without robust verification of underlying assets. The index, introduced in 1986 as a of 30 major , reflected a bull market trajectory entering 1991. From a closing value of approximately 778 points at the end of 1989, it rose to 1,048 by year-end 1990 (a 34.63% gain) and surged to 1,909 by December 1991 (an 82.09% increase), driven by anticipation of liberalization measures amid a balance-of-payments crisis. This period saw heightened retail and institutional interest, with trading volumes expanding as economic policies shifted from the restrictive License Raj toward deregulation, including rupee devaluation and tariff reductions announced in July 1991 by Finance Minister . However, systemic vulnerabilities persisted, including the absence of a strong securities regulator—SEBI, established in 1988, lacked enforcement teeth until later—and reliance on informal broker networks for . Banks' statutory obligations pushed them toward high-yield equity-linked investments via laxly documented deals, creating a feedback loop of artificial buoyancy without transparent auditing. This environment, while fostering rapid capitalization growth, sowed seeds for manipulation by amplifying unverified fund flows into select scrips, setting the stage for the exposure.

Mechanics of the Fraud

Harshad Mehta orchestrated the fraud primarily through the manipulation of ready forward (RF) transactions, which were short-term inter-bank loans collateralized by government securities, typically lasting 15 to 90 days. In these deals, a lending would provide funds to a borrowing against securities, with an agreement to reverse the transaction later at a slightly higher , effectively functioning as a . Mehta and his associates inserted brokerage firms, such as Growmore Research and Investment, as intermediaries, routing payments and securities through broker accounts rather than direct -to- transfers. The core deception involved fabricating bank receipts (BRs) to replace actual securities collateral. Smaller cooperative banks, including Bank of Karad and Metropolitan Cooperative Bank, issued these spurious BRs without underlying securities or through , often purporting to represent holdings in government bonds or unit (PSU) scrips. Mehta presented these fake BRs to larger banks, such as the (SBI), to secure RF loans, exploiting lax verification and the trust in inter-bank instruments; for instance, SBI alone advanced approximately Rs 500 based on such receipts. Brokers further abused account-payee cheques—intended for bank payees—by crediting them into their own accounts, converting secured loans into unsecured credit extended to the . These diverted funds, totaling over Rs 3,500 between April 1991 and May 1992, were channeled into aggressive stock purchases on the (BSE), creating artificial demand and price surges. Mehta focused on select stocks, such as Associated Cement Companies (ACC), whose price escalated from Rs 200 to Rs 9,000, and , employing circular trading among associates to inflate volumes and lure retail investors into a perceived bull market that propelled the from around 1,000 to 4,500 points. The scheme relied on continuous rollover of loans using rising stock values as pseudo-collateral, forming a pyramid dependent on perpetual market appreciation rather than genuine economic fundamentals. Bribery of bank officials and negligence in security delivery facilitated the release of funds without proper collateral verification, while the absence of centralized clearing and opaque manual processes enabled repeated misuse of the same fake instruments across multiple banks. This systemic exploitation exposed vulnerabilities in the banking-securities nexus, where RF deals, meant for liquidity management, became conduits for 4,000 in overall , amplifying market distortion until regulatory scrutiny unraveled the facade.

Execution and Artificial Market Surge

Mehta executed the fraud primarily through the manipulation of ready forward (RF) transactions, a mechanism intended for short-term lending backed by government securities but exploited to create unsecured loans via fake bank receipts (BRs). In RF deals, banks would sell securities to brokers with an agreement to repurchase them later, effectively providing loans; however, Mehta's network, including cooperative banks like Bank of Karad and Cooperative Bank, issued spurious BRs—fictitious documents purporting to represent these securities—allowing brokers to pledge them to larger banks such as for fresh funds without actual collateral. This process enabled the diversion of approximately ₹3,500 (equivalent to about $1.2 billion at the time) from the banking system to stockbrokers between April 1991 and May 1992, with Mehta's firm alone handling transactions worth thousands of s through repeated rolling over of these fake instruments. The influx of unbacked liquidity fueled aggressive stock purchases, particularly in select "" stocks such as Associated Cement Companies () and Sterlite Industries, where coordinated buying by Mehta and allied brokers created artificial demand. This manipulation bypassed regulatory oversight, as BRs were not scrutinized for authenticity in inter-bank settlements, allowing brokers to between low-interest formal borrowings (around 18-20%) and deploy funds into equities amid post-liberalization optimism. By mid-1991, Mehta had established dominance on the (BSE), using the borrowed capital to corner shares and drive up prices through circular trading and inflated volumes, often settling deals with other brokers' help to simulate genuine market activity. The resulting artificial surge propelled the from roughly 1,000 points in April 1991 to over 4,500 points by April 1992, a fourfold increase attributed largely to the manipulated inflows rather than fundamentals, with trading volumes spiking and lesser-known stocks experiencing multiples in valuation. This boom masked underlying risks, as banks engaged in window dressing—temporary asset swaps to conceal exposures—further amplifying the illusion of and investor confidence, though the scheme relied on continuous of fake BRs to sustain positions. The execution peaked in early 1992, with Mehta publicly flaunting his influence, but faltered when a failed BR exposed the forgeries, triggering the unwind.

Exposure, Investigation, and Immediate Fallout

Discovery by Media and Regulators

The irregularities in Harshad Mehta's operations first gained public attention on April 23, 1992, when journalist published an exposé in titled "The Bombay Club," revealing how Mehta had exploited loopholes in the banking system's ready forward (repos) transactions to divert over ₹1,000 crore from public sector , including the and , into investments without proper collateral. Dalal's , based on and accounts, detailed the use of or backdated bank receipts (BRs) to create artificial , enabling Mehta to inflate share prices of select companies like Associated Cement and . This reporting disrupted the ongoing , as brokers scrambled to unwind positions amid rising suspicions. Regulators responded swiftly to the media revelations, with the (RBI) launching audits into inter-bank lending practices on April 24, 1992, uncovering discrepancies in BRs issued to brokers that lacked underlying securities deposits. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), though limited in powers at the time, suspended trading in several affected by the surge and coordinated with RBI to trace fund flows, estimating the total siphoned amount at approximately ₹4,000 by early May 1992. These probes confirmed systemic failures, such as lax oversight of broker-bank dealings under the Banking Regulation Act, prompting the to form a (JPC) on April 30, 1992, to investigate broader complicity among financial institutions. While Mehta's advocates later alleged media exaggeration triggered undue panic, official inquiries validated Dalal's core claims, as evidenced by subsequent convictions for and criminal breach of trust against Mehta and accomplices. The dual discovery—media-driven public disclosure followed by regulatory verification—exposed vulnerabilities in India's nascent financial oversight, where pre-scam RBI guidelines inadequately monitored repos.

Arrests and Initial Probes

Following the media exposure of the securities irregularities in April 1992, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) initiated an inquiry into Harshad Mehta's brokerage activities and barred him from trading in the stock market on May 18, 1992, to prevent further manipulation. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) appointed the Janakiraman Committee to probe the involvement of banks in diverting funds through irregular ready-forward transactions, revealing that public sector entities like the National Housing Bank had advanced over ₹600 crore to brokers including Mehta without adequate collateral. The (CBI) took over the criminal probe in June 1992, registering cases against Mehta for cheating, criminal conspiracy, and forgery under sections of the , focusing on the siphoning of bank funds into equities via fake bank receipts. Initial CBI raids on June 4 uncovered documents linking Mehta to discrepancies in share transactions worth thousands of crores, prompting further scrutiny of inter-bank lending practices. Mehta and his brothers were formally arrested by the on November 9, 1992, on charges of misappropriating more than 2.8 million shares of about 90 companies using forged endorsements and benami accounts. The arrests followed preliminary findings that Mehta had exploited lax oversight in the banking system to inflate stock prices, with probes estimating the fraud's scale at around ₹3,000-5,000 involving multiple . Mehta was remanded to custody, marking the onset of extensive forensic audits into his portfolio, which included high-profile stocks like Associated Cement Companies and .

Market Crash and Economic Damage

The exposure of Harshad Mehta's manipulations in late April 1992 precipitated a rapid and profound collapse in the (BSE), ending the artificial bull market fueled by fraudulent bank funds. The , which had peaked at 4,467.32 on April 22, 1992, dropped sharply to 3,896.90 by April 28 amid panic selling as investors realized the market's valuations were unsupported by genuine liquidity. This initial plunge erased gains accumulated over months, with trading volumes surging as brokers unwound leveraged positions. The downturn intensified on April 29, 1992, when the Sensex fell 570 points—or 12.77%—in a single session, one of the steepest one-day declines in Indian market history up to that point, driven by revelations of systemic involving over ₹4,000 in diverted banking funds. Over the ensuing months, the index declined by more than 40% from its peak, reaching lows around 2,500 by mid-1992, as the scam's scale—estimated at ₹5,000 in manipulated transactions—unraveled interconnected broker networks and exposed forged instruments like bank receipts. Economic repercussions extended beyond equities, inflicting heavy losses on investors who had poured savings into during the hype-driven rally, with billions of rupees in vaporized and many facing total wipeouts. Banks grappled with shortfalls and rising non-performing assets from unrepaid loans to brokers, straining the interbank market and curtailing credit availability to the broader economy. The episode eroded public trust in financial institutions, fostering a multi-year aversion to investments and highlighting causal links between unregulated ready-forward deals and systemic vulnerability to individual operator influence.

Ongoing Trials and Charges

Mehta was charged with 72 criminal offenses and faced over 600 civil suits stemming from the securities manipulations, including allegations of , cheating, forgery, and breaches under the , Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, and banking regulations. These encompassed 76 criminal cases in total, many involving accomplices such as bank officials who facilitated ready forward deals and fund diversions estimated at over ₹4,000 . Trials progressed slowly through special courts established under the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992, with Mehta convicted in four criminal cases before his death, primarily for offenses like criminal breach of trust and using forged documents. One notable conviction involved a fraud case, upheld by the in January 2003 after his passing, affirming sentences that included imprisonment. Acquittals occurred in others, such as a 1999 case where Mehta and co-accused were cleared of certain charges due to insufficient evidence of intent. Dozens of cases remained pending at Mehta's death on December 31, 2001, including appeals before higher courts and probes into asset attachments by the Custodian of securities. Posthumously, proceedings abated in some personal criminal matters but continued against his estate, family, and associates; for instance, six individuals, including bank officials, were convicted by the in 2016 for related fund siphoning, and four former bankers received three-year sentences in 2017 from a court. By 2018, lingering trials highlighted judicial delays, with over 20 years elapsed since the scam's exposure and no comprehensive closure. Civil actions focused on recovering attached assets, with Mehta's family litigating against tax authorities and banks; they successfully reduced demands from billions to minimal amounts in over 1,200 cases by , arguing inflated assessments and procedural irregularities. These disputes underscored ongoing encumbrances on his estate, including properties and shares held by the Custodian, with claims rejected as late as by special courts prioritizing scam restitution over individual ownership assertions.

Imprisonment Conditions

Mehta was arrested by the on November 9, 1992, in connection with the securities scam and remanded to judicial custody, initially spending over three months in prison before securing bail. He faced repeated arrests and periods of incarceration across multiple cases, including in 's Arthur Road Jail for related proceedings, though specific daily conditions such as cell assignments or labor requirements remain sparsely documented in contemporaneous reports. In September 1999, the convicted him in a key case involving fraudulent diversion of ₹380.97 , sentencing him to five years of rigorous —entailing —and a fine of ₹25,000, marking one of four convictions out of 27 charges before his death. Mehta was lodged in Thane Central Jail at the time of his final incarceration, where conditions included standard facilities for and convicted prisoners, but with limited medical resources highlighted by events surrounding his death. On December 30, 2001, at approximately 11:00 p.m., he complained of ; jail medical staff attended but lacked immediate cardiac medications, after which he was transferred to Thane Civil Hospital, where he succumbed to a heart attack around 12:40 a.m. on December 31. Official records classified the death as natural, with no formal inquiry finding culpability beyond routine procedures. Jyoti Mehta, his wife, alleged by jail authorities, claiming the absence of heart attack treatments on-site, reliance on a Sorbitrate tablet from an emergency kit provided at his 54 days prior, and a delay of over three hours in dispatch and transfer, which she argued contributed to his demise. These assertions, detailed on a maintained by the family to contest narratives, have not been independently verified or upheld in , contrasting with and reports attributing the outcome solely to . No broader evidence of systemic mistreatment during his roughly nine years of intermittent custody—marked by bail grants and appeals—has surfaced beyond these familial claims.

Death and Surrounding Controversies

Harshad Mehta died on December 31, 2001, at the age of 47, from a heart attack while in custody at Central Jail. He had complained of around 11 p.m. on December 30, 2001, and was rushed to Civil Hospital, where he succumbed early the next morning despite medical intervention. At the time, Mehta was undergoing trials related to the 1992 securities scam, having been imprisoned since his 1992 arrest, with his health reportedly deteriorating due to prolonged legal battles and jail conditions. The official confirmed the cause as a , with no immediate evidence of foul play reported by authorities. However, controversies emerged primarily from allegations by Mehta's wife, Jyoti Mehta, who in 2022 publicly claimed his death resulted from medical negligence in jail. She asserted that jail doctors examined him during the episode but lacked appropriate medication, such as for , and denied him access to his personal Sorbitrate tablets despite his requests. Jyoti Mehta further detailed on a dedicated that an electrocardiogram confirmed the heart attack, recommending immediate ICU admission, but contended that delays and inadequate care contributed to his demise, framing it as systemic failure rather than natural causes alone. These claims have fueled speculation about the adequacy of medical facilities in jails for high-profile , though no formal inquiry substantiated or theories, and official records attribute the death solely to cardiac failure. Mehta's narrative, presented over two decades later, aligns with broader criticisms of Mehta as a in the investigations, but lacks independent corroboration beyond family accounts. Post-death, ongoing asset seizures and trials involving his estate continued, with no reversal of scam convictions based on these allegations.

Systemic Reforms and Enduring Impact

Regulatory Overhauls in Banking and Securities

The Harshad Mehta scam revealed critical loopholes in India's banking system, particularly the misuse of ready forward (RF) deals and bank receipts (BRs) to siphon funds from public sector banks to brokers, prompting the (RBI) to overhaul its oversight mechanisms. In response, the RBI constituted the Janakiraman Committee in 1992 to probe irregularities in securities transactions by banks, which uncovered over ₹4,000 in fraudulent dealings involving brokers like Mehta. The committee's recommendations led to stricter guidelines on banks' securities portfolios, including mandatory marking-to-market valuations, enhanced reporting of inter-bank exposures, and curbs on RF transactions to prevent fund diversion. By 1993, RBI prohibited banks from using BRs as collateral for securities and imposed limits on non-SLR investments, aiming to insulate banking liquidity from stock market volatility. In the securities domain, the scam accelerated the statutory empowerment of the Securities and Exchange Board of (SEBI), which had been established in but lacked enforceable powers. The SEBI Act of 1992 granted it statutory authority to regulate stock exchanges and intermediaries, while the Securities Laws (Amendment) Act of 1995 further expanded its jurisdiction to include depositories, foreign institutional investors, funds, and agencies, enabling investigations, searches, seizures, and penalties for violations like . SEBI introduced mandatory disclosure norms, investor protection funds, and KYC requirements to curb and , alongside promoting dematerialized trading to eliminate physical certificate risks exploited in the scam. A pivotal structural reform was the promotion of the National Stock Exchange (NSE) in 1992, operationalized in 1994 as a technology-driven, screen-based platform to counter the opaque system at the that facilitated Mehta's manipulations. NSE's nationwide reduced regional broker dominance, shortened settlement cycles from 14 days to eventual standards, and enforced clearing corporation guarantees, restoring market integrity and investor confidence eroded by the 1992 crash. These overhauls collectively shifted toward a more transparent, regulated framework, though implementation challenges persisted in early enforcement.

Long-Term Effects on Indian Capital Markets

The Harshad Mehta scam of 1992 exposed critical vulnerabilities in India's banking-securities nexus, particularly the misuse of bank receipts and ready forward transactions, prompting enduring structural reforms that professionalized capital markets. In response, the (SEBI), initially established in 1988 as a non-statutory body, was granted statutory powers through the SEBI Act of 1992, enabling it to enforce regulations on intermediaries, curb manipulative practices, and mandate disclosures. This empowerment addressed the pre-scam regulatory fragmentation, where stock exchanges operated with minimal oversight, reducing the scope for broker-bank collusion that Mehta exploited to divert over ₹4,000 from banks. Key innovations included the phased rollout of dematerialized (demat) trading and electronic platforms, with the National Stock Exchange (NSE) launching screen-based trading in November 1994, which eliminated physical certificate fraud and improved settlement efficiency from T+14 days to by the early 2000s. The simultaneously banned unregulated ready forward deals in government securities by April 1992, introducing transparent reporting and collateralized lending norms to prevent fund siphoning into equities. These measures curtailed systemic risks, as evidenced by the absence of comparable broker-driven meltdowns in subsequent decades, though smaller irregularities persisted due to evolving complexities like . Over the long term, these reforms fostered market depth and investor trust, contributing to the (BSE) Sensex's exceeding 15% from 1993 to 2025, alongside a surge in from ₹3.5 crore in 1992 to over ₹400 crore by 2025. Enhanced mandates, such as mandatory auditing standards and prohibitions under SEBI's 1992-1993 guidelines, mitigated opacity that fueled Mehta's price manipulations, where select stocks like rose over 40-fold artificially. However, critics note that while scale diminished, risks remain, as seen in later cases like the 2001 scam, underscoring the need for ongoing vigilance rather than over-reliance on post-1992 frameworks.

Balanced Assessments of Legacy

Harshad Mehta's legacy remains polarizing, with his 1992 securities scam widely regarded as a catalyst for both immediate financial devastation and long-term regulatory maturation in India's capital markets. The , involving the diversion of approximately ₹4,000 from banking channels through manipulated ready forward transactions, precipitated a sharp market downturn, with the Sensex plummeting over 40% from its peak by mid-1992, inflicting billions in investor losses and undermining public confidence in nascent financial liberalization efforts. This episode exemplified unchecked broker-bank collusion, where Mehta siphoned funds from public sector banks like without adequate collateral verification, highlighting causal vulnerabilities in an under-regulated system rather than mere individual malfeasance. Critics, including investigative journalists and regulators, attribute to Mehta a legacy of ethical erosion and amplification, arguing his aggressive market pumping—via inflated share prices in scrips like and Apollo Tires—fostered speculative bubbles detached from fundamentals, eroding the integrity of securities trading for years. Post-scam probes by the Janakiraman Committee revealed how such practices not only drained liquidity from the banking sector but also exposed retail investors to disproportionate risks, with many small traders facing ruin amid the April 1992 crash. Mehta's defense, that he merely exploited legal ambiguities in bank receipt dealings, has been dismissed by courts as disingenuous, given convictions on charges like criminal breach of trust under the , underscoring a pattern of deliberate over systemic inevitability. Conversely, assessments from financial analysts credit the scandal with precipitating enduring reforms, such as the empowerment of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) through the 1992 amendments, which introduced mandatory dematerialization of shares, tighter broker regulations, and curbs on unregulated inter-bank lending. These changes, empirically evidenced by subsequent market stabilization and growth— with BSE capitalization rising from ₹3.5 crore in 1992 to over ₹100 crore by 2007—professionalized trading and mitigated similar risks, transforming India's markets from opaque broker fiefdoms to more transparent entities. While not absolving Mehta's culpability, this perspective frames the as an inadvertent stress test that accelerated liberalization-aligned , though empirical data shows no direct evidence of Mehta intending such outcomes, prioritizing instead personal enrichment.

Personal Life and Assets

Family Dynamics

Harshad Mehta was born on July 29, 1954, into a modest Jain family in , , to Shantilal Mehta, a small-time , and Rasilaben Mehta; the later relocated to Mumbai's neighborhood during his early childhood. He grew up with three brothers—Ashwin, Hitesh, and Sudhir—in a traditional joint setup that emphasized collective living and support. Mehta married Jyoti Mehta, and they had one son, Aatur Harshad Mehta. The family resided together in a spacious Worli apartment complex purchased in 1990 for Rs 3.90 crore, housing his mother, wife, son, and brothers' families, which underscored the close-knit, interdependent dynamics typical of such households. During his rapid rise in the stock market in the late 1980s and early 1990s, family members benefited from his wealth accumulation but maintained traditional roles, with Jyoti managing home affairs while brothers occasionally collaborated in business ventures. The 1992 securities scam revelations tested but did not fracture family ties; Jyoti remained steadfast in support, later recounting Harshad's meetings with Prime Minister in 1991 as evidence of his role in bolstering markets during . Brothers, especially Ashwin, aided legal defenses and asset recovery efforts, such as reclaiming 1.79 Apollo Tyres shares worth over Rs 2,500 since 2006. After Harshad's death from a heart attack in jail on December 31, 2001—alleged by as resulting from medical —the faced collective punishment through asset attachments totaling losses of Rs 20,677 from illegal custodian sales, prolonged litigation, and demands. Jyoti and sons of brothers pursued over 1,200 successful judicial challenges, while Sudhir witnessed jail conditions and Hitesh endured trials ending in 2018 with time-served sentences; Rasilaben died on April 26, 2020, at age 84 amid unresolved appeals on attached properties. In 2022, Jyoti launched harshadmehta.in to publicize alleged harassment and defend Harshad as a , reflecting enduring loyalty despite financial devastation and restricted banking access for over two decades.

Lifestyle and Acquired Wealth

Mehta acquired his wealth primarily between 1990 and 1992 by exploiting regulatory loopholes in India's banking and securities systems, diverting approximately ₹4,000 crore in funds from public sector banks through fraudulent ready-forward transactions backed by bogus bank receipts, which he used to artificially inflate stock prices on the Bombay Stock Exchange. This scheme, later exposed as the 1992 securities scam, enabled him to amass an estimated personal net worth of $475 million (equivalent to about ₹3,542 crore at contemporary exchange rates). At his peak, Mehta declared earnings sufficient to pay ₹24 crore in income tax for the financial year 1991-1992, making him one of India's highest individual taxpayers at the time. His lifestyle reflected this ill-gotten prosperity through extravagant acquisitions in Mumbai's prime locales. In , Mehta purchased a sea-facing spanning 15,000 square feet at Madhuli Society, comprising eight interconnected apartments across two floors and featuring a private mini-golf course and . He also acquired two sea-facing apartments, each 1,150 square feet, in Juhu's Vandana Society, along with a full-floor at Maker Chambers V in for his brokerage operations. Mehta maintained a fleet of approximately 20 luxury cars, including India's first imported LS400 sedan and several models such as the W126 series, symbolizing his status as the "Big Bull" of the . These purchases, funded by proceeds, underscored a pattern of that contrasted sharply with his modest origins as a in a brokerage firm. Following his arrest, authorities attached these assets; in 2009, eight flats from the penthouse were auctioned for ₹32.6 to a .

Cultural Depictions

Literary Works

The principal non-fiction account of Harshad Mehta's role in the 1992 securities scam is The Scam: Who Won, Who Lost, Who Got Away, co-authored by financial journalists Debashis Basu and and first published in April 1993. The book chronicles the mechanics of the scam, including Mehta's use of ready-forward transactions with banks to inflate stock prices, drawing on interviews with brokers, bankers, and regulators involved. Subsequent editions, up to the eighth, expanded coverage to include the 2001 scam, the inquiry, and the Global Trust Bank collapse, framing these as symptoms of persistent regulatory lapses. Dalal, who first exposed the scam in a May 1992 Times of India article, positions the narrative around systemic failures enabling Mehta's operations, though Mehta's defenders have contested its portrayal of him as presumptively criminal without full trial evidence. Later works build on this foundation with biographical focus. The Rise and Fall of the Big Bull: The Harshad Mehta Saga, published in 2023, examines Mehta's early career as a , his rapid wealth accumulation through trades in scrips like and Apollo Tires, and the personal fallout from his 1992 arrest on May 31, leading to asset seizures valued at over ₹7,000 crore at the time. Similarly, The Big Bull: The Rise and Fall of Harshad Mehta by Kartik Salopal, a concise 37-page overview released around 2023, traces his trajectory from a clerk at to "Big Bull" status, emphasizing market manipulations that drove the Sensex from 1,000 to over 4,500 points between April 1991 and April 1992. Other accounts include The Money Game: Unveiling the Harshad Mehta Scam by Ali Molla and Labib, published in July 2023, which dissects the scam's financial mechanics, such as the ₹4,000 diversion from banks via fraudulent bank receipts, and its ripple effects on investor confidence. The Story of Harshad Mehta by Aman Redhu, issued in November 2023 as an , summarizes his from birth on July 29, 1954, in , through the scam's exposure and his 2001 death, highlighting unproven allegations of ongoing manipulations post-1992. Hindi-language works like Harshad Mehta Share Scam Ki Inside Story, inspired by true events and published in March 2024, retell the episode with emphasis on investigative details from the . These texts, while fact-based, vary in depth and , with and Dalal's investigative rigor often cited as benchmark despite critiques of narrative bias toward regulatory narratives over Mehta's defense claims of legitimate trading. No prominent novels directly inspired by Mehta's have emerged, distinguishing literary treatments from audiovisual adaptations.

Audiovisual Adaptations

The most prominent audiovisual depiction of Harshad Mehta's life and the 1992 securities scam is the Scam 1992: The Harshad Mehta Story, a 10-episode Hindi-language biographical released on on October 9, 2020. Directed by , it stars in the lead role as Mehta, chronicling his rapid ascent as a , manipulation of bank receipts to inflate stock prices, and subsequent downfall amid market crash and investigations. The series is an adaptation of the 1992 book The Scam: Who Won, Who Lost, Who Got Away by journalists Debashis Basu and , who exposed the , and received critical acclaim for its detailed portrayal of the era's financial mechanisms, earning a 9.2/10 rating on from over 167,000 user votes. Another adaptation is the 2021 film , directed by Kookie Gulati and starring as a fictionalized inspired by Mehta's exploits in siphoning funds via ready forward deals and driving the boom. Released directly on on April 8, 2021, the movie dramatizes the scam's mechanics, regulatory lapses, and personal but alters timelines and character names for narrative purposes, drawing comparisons to while receiving mixed reviews for its less rigorous adherence to factual events. Earlier, the 2006 Hindi film Gafla, directed by Sameer Hanchate, portrays a engaging in manipulations akin to Mehta's bank receipt fraud and market rigging, reflecting the 1992 scam's core tactics without directly naming Mehta. The film highlights systemic vulnerabilities in India's financial oversight at the time but has been less widely viewed compared to later productions.

References

  1. [1]
    Securities Scam Genesis, Mechanics and Impact - ResearchGate
    Aug 6, 2025 · PDF | The term “securities scam” refers to the diversion of funds from the banking system to various stockbrokers in a series Of ...
  2. [2]
    (PDF) Scams That Changed India's Capital Market - ResearchGate
    and Ketan Parekh scam in detail. Harshad Mehta Scam (1992). Harshad Shantilal Mehta (1954-2001) was born in a ...
  3. [3]
    The Rise and Fall of Harshad Mehta: Case Study on Financial Fraud ...
    Jun 12, 2025 · The Harshad Mehta scam in 1992 was a major financial scandal that changed the fate of the Indian stock market and exposed serious loopholes ...Missing: causal | Show results with:causal
  4. [4]
    Janakiraman Reports on Banking Scam - jstor
    The six reports of the Janakiranman committee have painstakingly unravelled the details of the banking-stock market scam involving.
  5. [5]
    Harshad Mehta: 1992 Stock Market Scam, Life, and Financial Impact
    Jun 5, 2025 · The death of Harshad Mehta: Mystery or coincidence? ... Harshad Mehta's death on December 31, 2001, remains a wound for his family—and a puzzle ...Missing: exact primary
  6. [6]
    Harshad Mehta – The Journey – I.I.M.U.N. Blog
    Mar 8, 2021 · Harshad Shantilal Mehta was born on 29th July 1954, at Paneli, Rajkot district, in a Gujarati family. He completed his degree course: B.Com in 1976.
  7. [7]
    Harshad Mehta: House, Family, Net Worth, Properties, Scam
    Harshad Mehta was born in a lower-middle-class family to Mr Shantilal Mehta (a traditional cloth merchant) and his mother, Mrs Rasilaben Mehta. He was born in ...Harshad Mehta Family Details... · What was the Harshad Mehta...
  8. [8]
    Biography of Harshad Mehta: The Visionary Misunderstood A ...
    Jul 19, 2025 · He grew up in a simple lower-middle-class Gujarati family. His father, Shri Shantilal Mehta, sold clothes, and his mother, Smt. Rasilaben Mehta ...
  9. [9]
    Where is Harshad's Mehta brother Ashwin Mehta : A Journey ... - ISFM
    Mar 3, 2025 · Ashwin Mehta was born between 1956 and 1958 in Paneli Moti, a small village in Gujarat's Rajkot district, into a Gujarati Jain family. The son ...
  10. [10]
    Scam 1992 - Harshad Mehta Scam Story - Kuvera
    Sep 27, 2024 · Harshad Mehta was born on 29th July 1954, into a Gujarati family in Mumbai. He spent his early childhood in Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Later, he ...
  11. [11]
    Life Journey of Harshad Mehta Before and After
    Thus, the scam was manufactured by Ms. Sucheta Dalal on 23.04.1992 and delivered to a most telling effect and even the web series is titled “Scam 1992 The ...
  12. [12]
    Harshad Mehta | Motivation - Vocal Media
    From selling papers and earning pocket change as a child, to studying commerce at Lala Lajpatrai College, Harshad always had a sharp eye for numbers and a ...Missing: formal | Show results with:formal<|separator|>
  13. [13]
    Harshad Mehta SCAM: The Full Story - YTScribe
    He started with collecting and selling plastic scrap, and traded even cement. Lots of times, to save money he carried the material himself and delivered it. In ...
  14. [14]
    Scam 1992: The Harshad Mehta Financial Fraud That Shook India's ...
    Feb 25, 2025 · The 1992 Harshad Mehta scam was a massive financial fraud where Mehta exploited loopholes in the banking system to funnel money into the stock ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  15. [15]
    Harshad Mehta: The Big Bull of Dalal Street - The Tribune
    Dec 31, 2024 · Born on July 29, 1954, in a modest Gujarati family in Rajkot ... On December 31, 2001, Harshad Mehta passed away due to a heart attack while in ...<|separator|>
  16. [16]
    How investment climate has changed after Harshad Mehta scam ...
    Oct 10, 2020 · Harshad Mehta was acting as a broker in Ready Forward Deals (RFD) and managed to get money from banks and used it for stock market purchases.Missing: strategy | Show results with:strategy
  17. [17]
    Harshad Mehta scam: Family free of over Rs 2,000cr income tax ...
    Feb 19, 2019 · Mehta used the ready forward (RF) deal to insert money into the market. RF deals were short-term loans from one bank to another. The deals were ...Missing: strategy | Show results with:strategy
  18. [18]
    Story of Harshad Mehta, financial frauds and the lessons that were ...
    Oct 20, 2020 · When the scam was exposed by veteran journalist Sucheta Dalal, it was revealed how Harshad Mehta had exploited banking loopholes to manipulate ...
  19. [19]
    Bull or bear? Who entered the ring of stock markets first?
    Jul 1, 2022 · Harshad Mehta was known to pump up stock prices from near-zero levels to stratospheric highs. In the prime of the 1992 boom, he purchased ...
  20. [20]
    Harshad Mehta Scam 1992: India's Biggest Stock Fraud
    India's most notorious stock market fraud. Learn how ₹5, 000 Cr vanished & how it ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography<|separator|>
  21. [21]
    Scam 1992 Explained: How Harshad Mehta, brokers and banks ...
    Nov 6, 2020 · The securities scandal of 1992, with Harshad Mehta as its main player, is back in collective consciousness nearly three decades after it was perpetrated.
  22. [22]
    The story of Harshad Mehta and five ways it changed Dalal Street
    Oct 21, 2020 · The securities scam of 1992, involving Mehta, led to sweeping stock market reforms and exposed loopholes in the country's banking system.Missing: successful | Show results with:successful
  23. [23]
    45 years of Sensex Returns - Voronoi
    Apr 15, 2025 · Dataset ; 1988, 666.26, 50.68% ; 1989, 778.64, 16.87% ; 1990, 1048.29, 34.63% ; 1991, 1908.85, 82.09%.
  24. [24]
    How Indian stock market benefitted under Manmohan Singh
    Dec 27, 2024 · The liberalisation measures had a direct and long-lasting impact on the Indian stock market. In 1991, the Sensex was trading at around 1,000 ...
  25. [25]
    1991 Reforms | The journey of the Indian stock markets - Moneycontrol
    Jul 22, 2021 · The 1991 reforms liberalised foreign investments and paved the way for private sector banks including IndusInd Bank, Axis Bank, ICICI Bank and HDFC Bank.
  26. [26]
    History of Stock Market Crashes in India - In Depth Learned
    1. The Harshad Mehta Scam (1992) · 2. The Dot-Com Bubble Burst (2000) · 3. The Global Economic Crisis (2008) · 4. The COVID-19 Pandemic Crash (2020) · 5. The ...
  27. [27]
    Scam 1992 vs. Sensex 2025: Lessons From Share Market - Grip Invest
    Jun 8, 2025 · The 1992 scam is unforgettable, it triggered massive panic, wiped out life savings, and shattered trust in stock market investments.
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Decoding-the-Harshad-Mehta-Scam.pdf
    Apr 15, 2025 · Harshad Mehta died on December 31, 2001, while in judicial custody at the Thane Civil. Hospital, reportedly due to cardiac arrest. However, his ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Securities Scam: Genesis, Mechanics and Impact Abstract
    The brokers are being accused by all of downright fraud. The government has chosen the ubiquitous term "systems failure" to describe the reason for the scam.
  30. [30]
    Harshad Mehta Scam: The Biggest White-Collar Crime In India
    Feb 27, 2025 · The scam, worth approximately INR 3500 crore, involved the fraudulent manipulation of securities transactions through fake bank receipts (BRs).
  31. [31]
    The Harshad Mehta Scam: How One Man's Greed Shook India's ...
    Sep 22, 2024 · This blog delves deep into how Mehta rose to prominence, manipulated the stock market, and eventually fell from grace in what became known as the Harshad Mehta ...
  32. [32]
    31 Years On, Sucheta Dalal Recounts 1992 Scam - The Quint
    Apr 28, 2023 · Sucheta Dalal, then with the Times of India, broke the story of the Harshad Mehta scam on 23 April 1992. In an interview with The Quint, she ...
  33. [33]
    How Harshad Mehta did it again - Sucheta Dalal
    Flashback to March 1992: Harshad Mehta was the darling of the stock markets -- a superstar whose popularity had begun to rival that of a matinee star. He was ...
  34. [34]
    Harshad Mehta Scam: the 1992 Securities Fraud
    Aug 4, 2025 · Harshad Mehta Scam: the 1992 Securities Fraud · Overview of the Harshad Mehta Scam · Details of the 1992 scam · Key Figures Involved in Scam 1992.Missing: biography facts
  35. [35]
    The Scandal That Transformed And Empowered SEBI - Deciml App
    Nov 29, 2023 · The Harshad Mehta scandal exposed the alarming inadequacies in India's securities market regulation. There was a very clear need for a more ...<|separator|>
  36. [36]
    Allegations/Facts, Harshad Mehta vs Sucheta Dalal
    Harshad Mehta was so anguished by the meltdown of the market due to false media reports on the alleged scam carried out by Ms. Sucheta Dalal that on 17.05.1992 ...Missing: biography key
  37. [37]
    Harshad Mehta scam: 10 key points of the scam that jolted India in ...
    Oct 9, 2020 · On June 4, 1992, the CBI carried out a search on the Mehtas. Subsequently, the tax return filed by Harshad Mehta for the assessment year 1992-93 ...<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    CBI closes in on Harshad Mehta, securities scam likely ... - India Today
    Jan 4, 2013 · CBI closes in on Harshad Mehta, securities scam likely to net bureaucrats and politicians. Even as the CBI closes in on Mehta, the scam is likely to net ...
  39. [39]
    1992: The Harshad Mehta scam - Frontline - The Hindu
    Aug 15, 2022 · The securities scam of 1992, popularly known as the Harshad Mehta scam, introduced a bouquet of historic changes.Missing: execution | Show results with:execution
  40. [40]
    Harshad Mehta Scam - ClearTax
    Jan 15, 2025 · Harshad Mehta, a stockbroker who rose to prominence with his flamboyant success in the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), exploited systemic loopholes ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  41. [41]
    How the markets collapsed - The Economic Times
    Oct 8, 2006 · The scam was uncovered in April 1992 and the Sensex came crashing down from a peak of 4,467.32 on April 22 of that year to 3,896.90 on April 28.
  42. [42]
    Biggest Stock Market Crashes in India: History, Causes and Impact
    May 12, 2025 · 1992 Harshad Mehta Scam: Happened on: April 1992. Sensex Drop: 570 points (12.77%) on April 29. Cause: Harshad Mehta, the “Big Bull,” turned ...
  43. [43]
    Harshad Mehta scam, COVID to Black Monday: Top 5 biggest stock ...
    Apr 7, 2025 · In 2001, the stock market was rocked by another manipulation scandal involving broker Ketan Parekh. When the scam was uncovered, and with the ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  44. [44]
    History of Stock Market Crashes In India - Known And Unknown
    May 20, 2024 · 1992. In 1992, the Harshad Mehta scam led to the crash of the stock markets and the Sensex falling more than 50% over the period of one year.Missing: trough | Show results with:trough
  45. [45]
    5 Biggest Stock Market Crashes In India - Grip Invest
    May 26, 2023 · The Sensex had a 50% decline in just 12 months, from its peak of 20,645 to 9,716 at the end of 2008. 5. Harshad Mehta Scam (1992). Harshad Mehta ...Missing: damage | Show results with:damage
  46. [46]
    Big Bull Harshad Mehta pays dues 9 years after death - India Today
    Mar 17, 2011 · He was later charged with 72 criminal offenses and more than 600 civil action suits were filed against him. In April 1992, press reports ...<|separator|>
  47. [47]
    The Harshad Mehta case: Where time has overtaken justice by a mile
    Jul 5, 2016 · In 1992, when the scam came into light, 76 criminal cases and over 600 civil suits were filed against Harshad Mehta and his family. That ...
  48. [48]
    Harshad Mehta is dead - Times of India
    NEW DELHI: Big Bull Harshad Mehta, who gained notoriety in the wake of multi-crore securities scam 10 years ago, died of a heart attack at the Thane civil ...
  49. [49]
    SC upholds Harshad Mehta's conviction - The - Times of India
    Jan 14, 2003 · ... Court onTuesday upheld the conviction by a Mumbai special court ... Harshad Mehta in the Rs 8,000-crore securities scam of 1992. Mehta ...
  50. [50]
    The Harshad Mehta Scam: Explained - ReadOn
    Oct 6, 2020 · Many cases are still pending against him. Trials are still undergoing in various courts in the country. But he is no longer bothered by them ...
  51. [51]
    Six convicted in case that made Harshad Mehta household name
    Nov 28, 2016 · The Bombay High Court has convicted six persons, including three bank officials, in the 1992 securities scam that made big bull Harshad Mehta a household name.
  52. [52]
    Harshad Mehta scam: 4 former bank officials sentenced to 3 years in ...
    Apr 12, 2017 · A special CBI court in Mumbai convicted four former bank officials in one of the multi-crore securities scam cases and sentenced them to three years ...
  53. [53]
    26 Years Later, the 1992 Scam Trials Linger, Show No Signs of ...
    Aug 3, 2018 · The case for winding up the 1992 scam investigation becomes even more compelling when you compare it with the spate of recent scams and the loot of PSBs by ...
  54. [54]
    Preamble, Harshad Mehta, Jyoti Mehta Breaks her silence after 20 ...
    Unfortunately, even a small portion of her shareholdings in Hero Honda purchased well before the alleged scam of 1991-92 and which had no nexus with any funds ...Allegations/Facts · Life Journey · Videos · Original DocumentsMissing: key | Show results with:key
  55. [55]
    Saga of Harshad S. Mehta | Shares of a person held by 'Custodian ...
    Dec 17, 2021 · The Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transfer of Securities Act, 1992) of AK Menon, J., rejected the claim of late Harshad S. Mehta over the shares ...
  56. [56]
    4 sent to Arthur Road jail for '92 securities scam | Mumbai News
    Oct 8, 2009 · 76-year-old K Margabanthu, the then chairman of UCO bank, and three other bank officials, all accused in the 1992 securities scam.Missing: conditions | Show results with:conditions
  57. [57]
    Harshad Mehta sentenced for five years - Rediff
    Sep 28, 1999 · The Bombay high court today awarded five years rigorous imprisonment to securities scam accused Harshad Mehta and three others in the sensational Rs 380.97 ...
  58. [58]
    PREMATURE END TO BIG BULL RUN - Telegraph India
    Dec 31, 2002 · Harshad complained of chest pain late last night and was taken to Thane civil hospital, where he died of a heart attack around 12.40 am. A ...
  59. [59]
    'Big Bull' Harshad Mehta dead - rediff.com
    Dec 31, 2001 · Police have registred a case of natural death. According to hospital sources, he complained of chest pain last night in the central prison here ...
  60. [60]
    Harshad Mehta scam: Wife Jyoti breaks silence
    Jul 7, 2022 · Nearly 21 years after the scam-accused stock broker Harshad Mehta died of a heart attack in prison, his wife, Jyoti, has claimed he died of medical negligence.
  61. [61]
    Harshad Mehta's wife breaks silence, launches website to defend ...
    Jul 8, 2022 · The jail Doctors saw him but did not have any medicine for a heart attack. Harshad, therefore, requested them to give him Sorbitrate (medicine) ...
  62. [62]
    Janakiraman report makes alarming revelations about modus ...
    Dec 31, 2012 · How major foreign banks broke some rules and regulations, making up others precipitating the securities scam.
  63. [63]
  64. [64]
    NSE was Created as Antidote to BSE. 30 Years Later, That Effort ...
    Mar 30, 2022 · The brokers who ran BSE in the early and mid '90s did not even ban Harshad Mehta from trading in spite of his firm Fairgrowth being indicted for ...
  65. [65]
    Harshad Mehta scam in 1992 ushered regulatory regime in Indian ...
    Though termed as a stock market scam, this estimated Rs 5,0000000000 scam involved bogus debt securities issued by Bank of Karad and Metropolitan Bank in ...
  66. [66]
    THE BOMBAY SECURITIES SCAM OF 1992: THE SYSTEMIC AND ...
    This paper by scrutinising the Bombay securities scam will reveal the structural problems that exist in regard to the government's role in formulating.
  67. [67]
    1992 Indian Stock Market Scam: Harshad Mehta Story | Updated 2025
    Jul 29, 2025 · However, Mehta's success was built on exploiting loopholes within the banking and securities system, culminating in a scam that allegedly ...
  68. [68]
    [PDF] Scams That Changed India's Capital Market - SunText Reviews
    Now let us consider Harshad Mehta scam and Ketan Parekh scam in detail. Harshad Mehta Scam (1992). Harshad Shantilal Mehta (1954-2001) was born in a Gujarati ...
  69. [69]
    Harshad Mehta Properties, Net Worth, Wealth, Family and Scam
    Jul 7, 2025 · Harshad Mehta birth: 1954. Harshad Mehta death: 2001 (at the age of 47). Harshad Mehta Place of death: Thane Civil Hospital. Harshad Mehta ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  70. [70]
    The Harshad Mehta Scam of 1992: Unveiling the Real Mystery
    Nov 19, 2024 · The Harshad Mehta scam of 1992 is a landmark case in the history of Indian financial markets, exposing significant loopholes in the regulatory and banking ...
  71. [71]
    Complete Life Journey of Harshad Mehta: Full Biography I First Time ...
    The article offers a comprehensive view of Harshad Mehta's life, detailing his early years, rise in the stock market, the controversies and legal battles he ...
  72. [72]
    Harshad Mehta House: His House, Family, Net Worth, Other Properties
    Harshad Mehta's birth date. 29 July 1954. Harshad Mehta's place of birth. Gujarat. Harshad Mehta's date of death. 31st december 2001. Harshad Mehta's cause of ...Missing: achievements controversies sources
  73. [73]
    Where is Harshad Mehta's Brother Ashwin Mehta today - StockDaddy
    His family comprises his father, "Shantilal Mehta," his mother, "Rasilaben Mehta," and three siblings, namely, "Sudhir Mehta," "Harshad Mehta," and "Hitesh ...Who is Ashwin Mehta? · Aftermaths of the Scam 1992
  74. [74]
    Scam 1992: Harshad Mehta's wife defends her late husband
    Jul 14, 2022 · Scam 1992: Harshad Mehta's wife defends her late husband. Mrs Mehta said Harshad was called upon to serve the country at a critical juncture ...
  75. [75]
    'Scapegoat' or mastermind of 1992 scam? Harshad Mehta's fall from ...
    Jul 29, 2022 · Harshad Mehta's wife Jyoti has launched a website in her late husband's name, to publicly share the 'harassment' their family is being subjected to.<|separator|>
  76. [76]
    Harshad Mehta's wife defends late Big Bull: 'Suffered losses worth ...
    Jul 12, 2022 · After 20 years of his death, Harshad Mehta's wife Jyoti via her website accuses I-T Dept, banks, custodian of oppressing facts, ...
  77. [77]
    Harshad Mehta's family defends him, makes plea to be allowed to ...
    Jul 7, 2022 · ... Scam 1992 The Harshad Mehta Story'. I am therefore ... scamster while commercially exploiting his name through a completely false story.”.
  78. [78]
    Harshad Mehta Net Worth In Rupees: Inside His Luxurious Houses ...
    Oct 7, 2025 · Inside Harshad Mehta's Lavish Life: From 15,000 Sq Ft Sea-Facing Worli Penthouse With Mini Golf And Pool To 20 Luxury Cars, Rs 3542 Crore ...Missing: spending acquisition 1990-1992
  79. [79]
    Harshad Mehta's flats fetch Rs 32.6 crore - The Economic Times
    Feb 14, 2009 · Eight spacious flats of late 'Big Bull', Harshad Mehta, and his family, were snapped up for Rs 32.6 crore by a Mumbai stock broker.
  80. [80]
    The Scam by Debashis Basu - Goodreads
    Rating 4.0 (750) The book is a gripping account of the 1992 securities, and stock market scams (Harshad Mehta) and the 2001 stock market scam (Ketan Parekh). It spares no detail ...
  81. [81]
    THE SCAM: from Harshad Mehta to Ketan Parekh Also includes JPC ...
    This 8th edition of the scam includes the original Harshad Mehta Scam and the Ketan Parekh Scam, while also delving into the JPC Fiasco and the Global Trust ...
  82. [82]
    [PDF] Excerpts-from-The-Scam-book.pdf - Harshad Mehta
    Jul 1, 2022 · The story was not only false but also very presumptive as she has straight away concluded that. Harshad was engaged in committing a crime (scam) ...
  83. [83]
    The Rise and Fall of the Big Bull: The Harshad Mehta Saga eBook
    "The Rise and Fall of the Big Bull: The Harshad Mehta Saga" is a comprehensive book that explores the life and career of Harshad Mehta, one of India's most ...
  84. [84]
    The Big bull: The Rise and Fall of Harshad Mehta by Kartik Salopal ...
    The big The Rise and fall of Harshad Mehta written by author Kartik Salopal. This book tell about full life of Harshad Mehta. 37 pages, Kindle Edition.
  85. [85]
    The MONEY GAME: Unveiling the Harshad Mehta Scam
    Jul 19, 2023 · In "The Money Game: Unveiling the Harshad Mehta Scam," embark on a gripping journey into one of India's most captivating financial scandals.
  86. [86]
    The Story of Harshad Mehta by Aman Redhu | Audiobook (Digital)
    In stock Free in-store returnsNov 18, 2023 · Overview. Mehta's involvement in the 1992 Indian securities scam made him infamous as a market manipulator. Harshad Shantilal Mehta. Born.
  87. [87]
  88. [88]
    Which is the best book on the Harshad Mehta scam? - Quora
    Mar 10, 2017 · Debashis Basu and Sucheta Dalal's The Scam: Who Won, Who Lost, Who Got Away is one of the best books on stock market scams in India and covers ...The web series “scam 1992” is inspired by which book? - QuoraIs scam 1992 - The Harshad Mehta Story (Webseries) real story?More results from www.quora.com
  89. [89]
    Scam 1992: The Harshad Mehta Story (TV Mini Series 2020) - IMDb
    Rating 9.2/10 (167,752) Scam 1992: The Harshad Mehta Story ... The rise and fall of Harshad Mehta, a stockbroker who single-handedly took the stock market to great heights, is depicted.Missing: adaptations | Show results with:adaptations
  90. [90]
    Scam 1992 - Harshad Mehta vs The Bear Gang - YouTube
    Dec 5, 2020 · ... adapted from journalist Sucheta Dalal and Debashish Basu's 1992 book ... Scam 1992 - The Harshad Mehta Story, streaming now on Sony Liv.
  91. [91]
    The Big Bull (2021) - IMDb
    Rating 5.6/10 (16,998) The Big Bull: Directed by Kookie Gulati. With Abhishek Bachchan, Nikita ... Harshad Mehta and his financial crimes.Ratings · Full cast & crew · Parents guide · Plot
  92. [92]
    The Big Bull vs Scam 1992: How Abhishek Bachchan's 'somewhat ...
    Apr 10, 2021 · While the Hansal Mehta and Jai Mehta-directed series is an official screen adaptation of The Scam: Who Won, Who Lost, Who Got Away by Debashis ...
  93. [93]
    If you loved 'Scam 1992', add these shows & movies to your watchlist
    Oct 14, 2020 · Gafla is a 2006 movie based on the scams done by Harshad Mehta as well. The movie chronicles the details of the scam diligently. The movie is ...<|control11|><|separator|>