Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

i2hub

i2hub was a peer-to-peer file-sharing application developed by Wayne Chang, a University of Massachusetts Amherst student, in 2003–2004 to enable rapid exchanges of music, movies, and other large files among college students by leveraging the high-bandwidth Internet2 research network connecting over 200 universities.^[1]^[2] The service exploited Internet2's gigabit-speed links, far surpassing consumer broadband, allowing downloads at rates up to 100 times faster than typical P2P networks like Kazaa, which fueled its quick adoption across more than 400 university campuses.^[3]^[4] At its peak, i2hub facilitated widespread sharing of copyrighted materials, drawing intense scrutiny from the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) and motion picture groups, who viewed it as a conduit for piracy and issued subpoenas to universities for user data.^[1]^[5] Chang voluntarily terminated the network on November 14, 2005, citing unsustainable legal threats, marking the end of one of the most efficient student-run file-sharing operations but highlighting tensions between technological innovation and intellectual property enforcement.^[4]^[1] Separately, i2hub's technology integrated with ConnectU, the Winklevoss brothers' social networking site, leading to a partnership under the Winklevoss Chang Group that entangled Chang in later disputes over Facebook settlement proceeds, though courts ultimately rejected his equity claims.^[3]^[6]

Overview

Description and Purpose

i2hub was a peer-to-peer file-sharing application developed primarily for university and college students to exchange music, movies, and other digital files at high speeds.^[2] Created by Wayne Chang, a student at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, the platform emerged around 2003-2004 as an alternative to public P2P services like Kazaa, capitalizing on the superior bandwidth available in academic environments.^[7]^[2] The core purpose of i2hub centered on facilitating efficient file transfers within dorm and campus networks, where traditional P2P traffic often faced throttling or IP-based blocks imposed by network administrators to curb bandwidth consumption.^[1] By routing connections through the Internet2 backbone—a high-capacity research and education network interconnecting over 200 U.S. universities—i2hub enabled users to achieve transfer speeds significantly faster than those on commercial internet, often reaching hundreds of kilobytes per second per connection without traversing congested public infrastructure.^[2]^[3] This design addressed empirical constraints in student file-sharing, such as limited dorm Wi-Fi capacity and institutional restrictions, allowing seamless media distribution among peers at participating institutions.^[8] i2hub's student-centric focus distinguished it from general-purpose networks, prioritizing compatibility with university IT setups and fostering a closed ecosystem limited to verified academic domains to maintain speed and reduce external interference.^[2] At its peak, it connected users across hundreds of campuses, underscoring its role in empirically meeting the demand for unrestricted, high-velocity content sharing in bandwidth-rich but administratively controlled educational settings.^[3]

Founders and Launch Date

Wayne Chang, a student entrepreneur at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, founded i2hub in March 2003.^[9] He developed the peer-to-peer file-sharing platform from his dorm room, driven by the need for efficient file exchange among college students utilizing the high-speed Internet2 backbone.^[10]^[3] The launch capitalized on persistent demand for decentralized file-sharing solutions in the aftermath of Napster's 2001 shutdown and subsequent legal pressures on broader P2P networks. i2hub emerged as a campus-focused innovation, initially self-bootstrapped without venture capital, reflecting individual initiative in early 2000s tech development.^[11]^[4]

Technical Features

Peer-to-Peer Architecture

i2hub utilized a hybrid peer-to-peer architecture featuring centralized directories for file indexing alongside decentralized direct transfers between user nodes. This design relied on hub-like servers or directories to maintain catalogs of available content shared by peers, guiding users to files without central storage of data itself, which distributed bandwidth demands across participating endpoints.^[12]^[13] The system drew inspiration from protocols like DirectConnect, where hubs facilitate discovery but transfers bypass intermediaries to leverage peer resources directly.^[13] By integrating with Internet2's high-capacity backbone—offering up to 10 Gbps links between over 200 research institutions—the architecture enabled efficient inter-campus file exchanges, achieving download speeds of up to 60 Mbps at select sites and reducing effective strain on individual university uplinks through peer distribution.^[14]^[2] Intra-network operations capitalized on campus LANs for local sharing, while the closed "darknet" structure limited participation to authenticated student users, enhancing resilience against external monitoring compared to open P2P networks.^[15]^[16] The setup supported scalability for thousands of concurrent users, evidenced by aggregate network hours exceeding 344,000 in August 2004 across 226 universities, though it inherited vulnerabilities common to hub-based systems, including single points of failure for directories susceptible to shutdown orders.^[2] Legal pressures, including RIAA and MPAA subpoenas targeting hub operators and peers, exposed these weaknesses, culminating in the network's termination on November 14, 2005.^[5]^[17] Despite claims from founder Wayne Chang that no central indexes were maintained by the organization, expert analyses and enforcement actions consistently identified directory components as key to its operation.^[18]^[12]

Student-Focused Innovations

i2hub's custom client software was engineered specifically for university environments, enabling rapid file discovery through decentralized search mechanisms that prioritized efficiency on campus networks. This allowed students to locate and initiate downloads of academic resources, music, and videos with minimal latency, capitalizing on the dense user base within dormitories and shared Ethernet infrastructures typical of early 2000s college housing.^[19]^[2] The platform incorporated community-driven seeding and leeching protocols adapted to student lifestyles, where intermittent online presence—such as during study sessions or evenings—facilitated sustained file availability through collective participation across residence halls. In shared housing setups, multiple users per network segment amplified seeding efficiency, reducing dependency on individual upload capacities and mirroring the cooperative dynamics of campus life.^[20]^[19] Basic chat integration within the client supported direct peer communication for negotiating file requests and troubleshooting transfers, fostering informal social interactions tied to sharing without aspiring to broader networking paradigms. This feature, akin to IRC channels but embedded in file operations, enhanced usability for students coordinating swaps in real-time, predating dedicated social platforms while remaining focused on practical exchange.^[19]^[4]

Growth and Operations

User Adoption in Universities

i2hub experienced rapid initial adoption among U.S. college students following its launch in early 2004, leveraging campus networks for peer-to-peer file sharing. By July 2004, tens of thousands of students had signed up, drawn to its accessibility during a period of widespread music and media piracy.^[20] At its peak in 2005, i2hub reportedly had hundreds of thousands of regular users across more than 500 universities, primarily those connected to the high-speed Internet2 research backbone.^[1] Concurrent user metrics from April 2005 indicate around 7,000 active participants at a given time, collectively sharing approximately 99 terabytes of content—equivalent to roughly 99,000 full-length movies.^[15] This volume underscored its traction amid the era's peak in unauthorized file distribution, though adoption remained concentrated in institutions with robust network infrastructure rather than uniform nationwide penetration. Empirical data on monthly sharing volumes highlight sustained engagement, with users exchanging terabytes of files routinely, outpacing slower alternatives like Kazaa in perceived efficiency for campus environments.^[16] Growth was organic, spreading via word-of-mouth among students facing bandwidth constraints on consumer internet, though exact per-university breakdowns are limited in available records.^[2] Despite claims of broad appeal, verifiable traction emphasized quantitative user counts and data throughput over anecdotal popularity, reflecting targeted appeal to tech-savvy undergraduates.^[5]

Competitive Landscape

i2hub, launched in March 2004, primarily competed with general-purpose peer-to-peer (P2P) file-sharing networks such as Kazaa and LimeWire, which dominated broader consumer markets but suffered from slower speeds on congested public internet connections.^[2] In contrast, i2hub optimized for university infrastructures, including high-speed links like Internet2, enabling transfer rates that substantially exceeded those of Kazaa—often by orders of magnitude in campus settings—thus capturing a specialized niche among over 400 connected universities by mid-2005.^[2]^[21] This performance edge stemmed from its closed-network design, which minimized external interference and maximized intra-campus bandwidth utilization. Direct competitors in the student space included DC++-based hubs, which also supported private, high-speed sharing within university intranets via the Advanced Direct Connect protocol, popular for distributing large files like media in controlled environments.^[22] i2hub differentiated itself through enhanced stealth mechanisms to evade detection and simpler integration for novice users, fostering rapid adoption in dormitories where general P2P tools like LimeWire faced throttling or bans due to network policies.^[2] Emerging protocols such as BitTorrent, gaining traction by late 2004 for distributed downloads, posed less immediate threat in real-time campus sharing scenarios, as i2hub's architecture favored quick, symmetric uploads and downloads suited to student workflows.^[23] Indirect rivalry arose from the February 2004 debut of Facebook, initially exclusive to Harvard students, which pivoted online habits toward profile-based social connections over anonymous file exchanges.^[2] This platform's emphasis on interpersonal networking—rather than content distribution—drew comparable demographics, contributing to a market divergence where social features increasingly supplanted pure P2P utilities, though i2hub persisted as file-centric without adopting relational elements.^[22] Such dynamics reflected convergent adaptations to student tech ecosystems, with no evidence of direct conceptual appropriation; platforms evolved parallel solutions to bandwidth abundance and privacy needs in academic networks.^[2]

Integration with ConnectU

Negotiations with Winklevoss Twins

In late 2004, following the launch of ConnectU in May, Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss approached Wayne Chang, the founder of i2hub, to explore integrating i2hub's peer-to-peer file-sharing technology and its established user base among university students into ConnectU's social networking platform.^[24]^[25] The twins, facing delays in their initial HarvardConnection project due to Mark Zuckerberg's failure to deliver promised code—which instead enabled the rapid rise of Facebook—sought to accelerate ConnectU's growth by leveraging i2hub's popularity on campuses, where it had attracted thousands of users since its March 2004 debut.^[6]^[26] Negotiations centered on a potential partnership that would merge i2hub's file-sharing functionalities with ConnectU's social features, aiming to create a more comprehensive student-oriented platform in a competitive early social media landscape.^[27] Discussions included collaborative development efforts, with the parties holding themselves out as partners in advancing both services and related initiatives.^[28] This reflected pragmatic alliances among student entrepreneurs, as ConnectU aimed to differentiate itself by incorporating robust peer-to-peer capabilities to drive user engagement and retention.^[29] The talks, initiated amid ConnectU's efforts to expand beyond Harvard, underscored the twins' strategy to bolster their network's utility and scale against Facebook's momentum, though specific terms of collaboration remained under negotiation at this stage.^[30] These preliminary engagements laid the groundwork for joint operations without immediate asset transfers or formal mergers.^[31]

Asset Transfer and Merger Details

In late 2004, Wayne Chang agreed with Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss to integrate i2hub's peer-to-peer file-sharing software into ConnectU's social networking platform, alongside plans to form a joint holding company referred to as the Winklevoss Chang Group (WCG).^[27] The arrangement contemplated transferring elements of i2hub's technology, user base, and related assets to enhance ConnectU's functionality, in exchange for equity stakes, with Chang positioned to receive an option for 15% ownership in ConnectU upon successful integration completion.^[27] ^[6] Despite initial collaborative efforts, no comprehensive technical merger occurred, as i2hub's P2P codebase was not substantially embedded into ConnectU, leading to minimal utilization of the transferred elements and the persistence of i2hub as a separate operation.^[26] ^[32] Chang maintained oversight of i2hub Organization Inc., retaining control over its assets and revenues independently of ConnectU's development.^[32] ^[27] This incomplete assimilation contributed to subsequent disputes over equity entitlements in the proposed WCG structure, where Chang claimed a 50% interest based on his contributions, contrasting with the documented 15% option tied to integration milestones.^[32] ^[27]

Legal Disputes

The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) intensified efforts against peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing on university campuses starting in 2003, issuing subpoenas and filing lawsuits against individual students for copyright infringement via networks like i2hub, which facilitated high-speed transfers over academic backbones such as Internet2.^[33] By early 2005, the RIAA had targeted users at multiple institutions, including Columbia University where subpoenas were served in March for alleged illegal sharing, and expanded to lawsuits against students at 18 campuses in April for i2hub-specific activity, seeking damages up to $150,000 per infringed work.^[34]^[18] These actions relied on Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) processes, where universities forwarded notices identifying IP addresses involved in P2P traffic, though i2hub's decentralized design and use of campus networks complicated direct attribution to operators.^[13] Universities responded to mounting P2P traffic pressures by implementing bandwidth throttling and monitoring policies rather than outright bans on i2hub, prioritizing network management over legal confrontation with developers; for instance, institutions like UCLA faced RIAA suits against five students in May 2005 for i2hub use but focused on educating users and filtering traffic instead of suing the platform.^[35] This operational friction, including throttled speeds on high-bandwidth Internet2 links, posed greater day-to-day challenges than lawsuits against founder Anthony Chang, who faced no personal early litigation but navigated cease-and-desist demands issued to i2hub as one of seven P2P firms in November 2005.^[1] i2hub sustained operations through mid-2005 by leveraging obfuscation techniques inherent to its "darknet" architecture, which routed traffic via student-hosted supernodes on under-monitored academic lines, evading comprehensive shutdowns that felled earlier networks like Napster.^[15] User loyalty, driven by superior speeds and campus exclusivity, combined with adaptive updates to bypass detection—such as dynamic port usage and encrypted overlays—enabled longevity amid industry-wide RIAA pursuits, with the network peaking at thousands of daily users before voluntary cessation.^[19]^[5]

ConnectU-Facebook Lawsuit Context

In December 2004, ConnectU, Inc.—founded by twins Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss along with Divya Narendra—filed suit against Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, alleging breach of an implied contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, and unjust enrichment.^[36] The complaint centered on claims that Zuckerberg, initially approached in November 2003 to develop software for their HarvardConnection social networking site, had instead delayed progress on their project while independently launching TheFacebook.com on February 4, 2004, thereby incorporating elements of their concept, such as connecting Harvard students via profiles and relationships.^[37] ConnectU's assertions extended to purported assets from its integration with i2hub, a peer-to-peer file-sharing network, but these were peripheral, as Facebook's core features emphasized social connectivity over file distribution, with no evidence presented of direct incorporation of i2hub's technology stack.^[38] Timeline evidence underscores independent development rather than outright theft: Zuckerberg's communications with the ConnectU founders stalled by January 2004 amid mutual frustrations, yet he continued coding TheFacebook using his own architecture, drawing from prior social platforms like Friendster (launched March 2002) and MySpace (launched August 2003), which already featured user profiles, friend lists, and networked interactions—concepts predating all parties' efforts.^[39] No forensic analysis or court finding substantiated claims of source code misappropriation; allegations rested on idea similarity and Zuckerberg's evasive emails, such as stringing along ConnectU with vague updates, but ideas themselves lack proprietary protection under U.S. law absent specific implementation details.^[40] Facebook countersued, accusing ConnectU of spamming and intellectual property violations, escalating the dispute through multiple jurisdictions until court-ordered mediation.^[41] The case resolved via settlement on June 13, 2008, with Facebook agreeing to pay ConnectU $20 million in cash and approximately 1.2 million shares of non-voting stock, valued at roughly $45 million at the time for a total of $65 million—terms later appreciated significantly due to Facebook's growth, exceeding $200 million by 2011.^[42] ^[43] The agreement required ConnectU to transfer all its intellectual property and shares to Facebook, with no admission of wrongdoing by either side; subsequent appeals by ConnectU founders challenging the deal's enforceability were rejected by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in 2011, affirming the settlement's validity absent proof of fraud.^[44] This outcome reflects pragmatic resolution over litigated merits, where exaggerated narratives of "stolen" code overlook the absence of direct causal links and the non-novelty of campus social networking, as evidenced by contemporaneous competitors and Zuckerberg's documented solo coding sessions.^[45]

Chang vs. Winklevoss Settlement Claims

In December 2009, Wayne Chang, founder of i2hub, filed a lawsuit in Massachusetts Superior Court against Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, ConnectU Inc., and related parties, alleging breaches of contract and fiduciary duties stemming from the integration of i2hub's peer-to-peer file-sharing technology into ConnectU.^[32] Chang claimed he was entitled to 50% of the proceeds from ConnectU's 2008 settlement with Facebook—valued at $65 million in cash and shares—arguing that this share derived from his purported 50% equity stake in the "Winklevoss Chang Group" (WCG), an entity he asserted jointly managed ConnectU operations and assets, including i2hub's contributions.^[6] He further alleged that the Winklevosses had obstructed distributions to him and his company, The i2hub Organization Inc., despite a memorandum of understanding that entitled him to at least 15% of ConnectU's equity for providing i2hub's software, user base, and operational support.^[46] The Winklevoss brothers countered that Chang's involvement was limited to partial technical contributions, which did not justify a 50% ownership claim, and that he owed them approximately $18,000 in unreimbursed expenses, potentially offset against any equity.^[28] They argued that the WCG was not a formal partnership entitling Chang to settlement proceeds, and that i2hub's integration added negligible value to ConnectU's core social networking features, as evidenced by the platform's modest user growth and operational challenges.^[47] Chang maintained that his assets, including i2hub's codebase and 100,000-plus users, were undervalued and integral to ConnectU's viability, accusing the defendants of bad faith in excluding him from the Facebook payout to maximize their recovery.^[48] In April 2011, Superior Court Judge Peter Lauriat denied the defendants' motion to dismiss, ruling that Chang's allegations of a joint venture and blocked distributions stated plausible claims under Massachusetts law, allowing breach of contract and tortious interference counts to advance.^[47] However, subsequent rulings narrowed the case: equitable claims were dismissed for failure to state a claim, and summary judgment was granted to the Winklevosses on partnership and contract issues, with the court finding insufficient evidence of enforceable 50% equity or direct entitlement to the Facebook settlement, as ConnectU's assets were not sufficiently intertwined with i2hub's to warrant proportional distribution.^[27] The Massachusetts Appeals Court affirmed these dismissals in April 2019, noting Chang's failure to submit a timely claim during the ConnectU-Facebook mediation and the lack of proof that i2hub's contributions generated the settlement value.^[6] The dispute resolved with Chang receiving no significant portion of the $65 million settlement, underscoring the courts' assessment that i2hub's integration provided limited strategic or financial uplift to ConnectU amid its competitive struggles against Facebook.^[49] This outcome highlighted tensions in informal tech alliances, where undocumented equity promises often fail against formal corporate structures, without evidence of systemic bias in judicial handling but reflecting standard evidentiary burdens on plaintiffs.^[25]

Decline and Legacy

Shutdown Circumstances

i2hub's operations ended abruptly on November 14, 2005, when founder Wayne Chang disconnected the network, displaying a shutdown message stating "RIP 11/14/2005. It was a good run. Forced to shut down by the industry."^[4]^[1] The decision stemmed from escalating legal pressures, including cease-and-desist threats from the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) and lawsuits against individual users for copyright infringement via the platform.^[50]^[5] This closure followed the U.S. Supreme Court's June 2005 ruling in MGM Studios Inc. v. Grokster Ltd., which established that peer-to-peer (P2P) networks could be held liable for inducing users to commit copyright violations, intensifying scrutiny on services like i2hub that facilitated unauthorized file sharing of music, movies, and software.^[5]^[17] By late 2005, the RIAA had targeted multiple P2P networks with warnings, contributing to a broader decline in centralized file-sharing viability amid rising litigation risks and user prosecutions.^[51] Although i2hub had integrated assets with ConnectU earlier in 2004–2005, its P2P functionality persisted until the shutdown, after which ConnectU shifted focus away from file sharing toward social networking amid its own legal battles.^[52] No evidence indicates direct involvement by Facebook in precipitating the closure; instead, i2hub's end reflected the unsustainable legal environment for campus-oriented P2P systems, compounded by the emergence of decentralized alternatives like BitTorrent that evaded similar centralized liabilities.^[1] The software was discontinued without subsequent revival efforts, with network remnants fully offline by early 2006 as enforcement actions proliferated.^[53]

Broader Impact and Criticisms

i2hub demonstrated the potential for peer-to-peer networks tailored to restricted academic environments, leveraging high-speed Internet2 connections to enable rapid file distribution among students at over 100 universities.^[15] This approach highlighted early innovations in niche P2P resilience, allowing user-driven sharing that bypassed some public internet limitations and foreshadowed hybrid models combining social connectivity with file exchange, as attempted in its partial integration with platforms like ConnectU.^[29] However, its design inadvertently amplified bandwidth strains on campus networks, prompting administrators to implement monitoring and throttling measures that influenced broader institutional policies on network usage.^[54] Critics, particularly from the recording and motion picture industries, argued that i2hub substantially facilitated unauthorized distribution of copyrighted materials, with users sharing music, films, and software on a scale that evaded initial detection due to its closed-loop architecture.^[55] The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) reported pursuing over 600 infringement cases against i2hub users across dozens of campuses in 2005 alone, underscoring how the platform contributed to a surge in litigation that imposed financial burdens on individual students and escalated tensions between educational institutions and content owners.^[55] Ethically, detractors contended that such systems normalized infringement under the guise of academic freedom, causing measurable revenue losses for creators—estimated in billions annually across P2P networks during the era—without adequate mechanisms for compensation or consent.^[16] In the landscape of 2000s digital innovation, i2hub's legacy remains marginal, serving primarily as a cautionary example of how unchecked P2P proliferation on privileged networks like Internet2 exacerbated legal and infrastructural challenges rather than fostering sustainable models.^[56] While proponents viewed it as empowering decentralized access in bandwidth-constrained settings, the preponderance of evidence points to net negative effects, including heightened enforcement actions that chilled experimental tech development and diverted resources from legal alternatives.^[57] This episode reinforced causal links between unfettered file sharing and economic harms to intellectual property holders, influencing subsequent regulatory scrutiny without yielding transformative advancements in student-centric technologies.^[16]

References

[1]
University file-sharing network shuts down - NBC News
Nov 16, 2005 · Online file-sharing service i2hub, which linked university students and others over the super-fast Internet2 network, has shut down under threat ...
[2]
Supercharged college P2P project expands - CNET
Aug 16, 2004 · I2hub, the supercharged file-swapping network that has run for months on the university Internet2 network, is aiming to solidify its hold on ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[3]
About | Wayne Chang
Chang founded i2hub, a popular file-sharing network connecting over 400 universities via Internet2. With i2hub, he teamed up with the Winklevoss twins to ...
[4]
i2hub Shut Down for Good - Columbia Spectator
Nov 16, 2005 · After several months on life support and without fanfare or warning, the plug was pulled yesterday on a controversial program that was used ...
[5]
https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB113206858308097636
[6]
CHANG v. WINKLEVOSS (2019) - FindLaw Caselaw
Chang's suit arises from the failed business relationship between Chang and his company, The i2hub Organization, Inc. (i2hub), the Winklevoss brothers, Divya ...<|separator|>
[7]
A Twitter Executive's Philosophy on Entrepreneurship
May 10, 2016 · In 2003 and 2004, i2hub, which Wayne hatched in his UMass dorm room, became his chief obsession. Given its breakneck pace of development and its ...
[8]
File-Trading Network i2Hub Shuts Down - Billboard
Nov 15, 2005 · i2Hub was a file trading application that ran on the advanced Internet2 network established on college campuses nationwide. The Internet2 ...
[9]
Wayne Chang - Founder & CEO @ Reasoner - Crunchbase
i2hub Logo. i2hub. Founder, Mar 2003, —. Dropbox Logo. Dropbox. Team Member, —, —. Board ... Start Date: Start date of the Person's Job. End Date: End date of the ...
[10]
Wayne Chang Net Worth
Chang founded Boylston Technology Group in 2007 and co-founded Crashlytics in 2011. He created i2hub in his dorm room at the University of Massachusetts – ...<|separator|>
[11]
i2hub - Crunchbase Company Profile & Funding
i2hub was a peer-to-peer file sharing service and program designed and intended primarily for use by university and college students.
[12]
Hollywood goes after file-sharing “i2hub” students | The Seattle Times
Apr 13, 2005 · The i2hub software, released last year by a University of Massachusetts freshman, enables users to copy files in a fraction of the time required ...
[13]
RIAA Suing i2hub Users - CITP Blog - Princeton University
Apr 13, 2005 · The i2hub website pitches it as a service just “by students, for students”. Some have characterized i2hub as a private filesharing network.Missing: platform | Show results with:platform
[14]
RIAA and MPAA take lawsuits to Internet2
### Technical Details on i2hub's P2P Architecture
[15]
Reducing Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Piracy on University Campuses
UT and other members of the Internet2 consortium are aware of the rogue i2Hub file-sharing system that uses the Internet2 Abilene network for data transport.
[16]
[PDF] THE INTERNET AND THE COLLEGE CAMPUS - GovInfo
Sep 26, 2006 · ... I2Hub, this ''darknet'' system used the networks of numerous universities to facilitate a closed system of internet piracy. I2Hub's ...
[17]
i2Hub P2P Network Shuts Down - BetaNews
Nov 15, 2005 · A peer-to-peer network that took advantage of the super-fast speeds of the Internet2 research network closed it doors late Monday.
[18]
Students Targeted in Piracy Lawsuits - Los Angeles Times
Apr 13, 2005 · But in an e-mail Chang said, “We don't keep an index of files whatsoever.” “The i2hub Organization does not condone activities and actions ...
[19]
File-swapping gets supercharged on student network - CNET
Apr 29, 2004 · Dubbed i2hub, the network has drawn thousands of students from universities around the country to trade files and chat at speeds that far ...
[20]
https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB108915422509256693
[21]
(PDF) Estimating P2P traffic volume at USC - ResearchGate
... i2hub” P2P service, which. connected over 400 universities, is an example of the. popularity of P2P sharing between university stu-. dents [1]. Because the ma ...
[22]
The History of File-Sharing - TorrentFreak
Apr 22, 2012 · DC++ and i2hub were popular methods of sharing files in closed-networks. ... Both were highly used within the university and college scene where ...
[23]
The BitTorrent P2P file-sharing system - The Register
Dec 18, 2004 · In fact, BitTorrent traffic made up 53 per cent of all P2P traffic in June 2004 [12]. As BitTorrent is only a file-download protocol, it relies ...
[24]
Boston Entrepreneur Claims Half Of Winklevoss' $65 Million ...
Jun 28, 2011 · The Winklevoss twins approached him about integrating i2hub with ConnectU, and the terms of their agreement gave him half ownership. The two ...
[25]
Court denies Boston entrepreneur share of $65 million Facebook ...
Apr 24, 2019 · ... 2004 so that ConnectU, then Facebook's competitor, could integrate a peer-to-peer file-sharing software platform Chang had launched called i2hub ...<|separator|>
[26]
Dispute Over Founding of Facebook Resolved Through Mediation
Jun 12, 2019 · In late 2004, Chang and the Winklevosses agreed to incorporate i2hub's software into ConnectU's website, and form a jointly owned holding ...
[27]
WAYNE CHANG & another vs. CAMERON WINKLEVOSS & others.
In this case we examine the dismissal of contract and tort-based claims brought by software developer Wayne Chang against brothers Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss.
[28]
Chang v. Winklevoss - vLex Case Law
The parties agreed to integrate i2hub software into ConnectU's social networking website, and discussed forming a jointly owned holding company, later referred ...
[29]
Fresh legal woes for ConnectU founders - CNET
Jan 4, 2010 · Through this litigation, Chang asserts his ownership interest in The Winklevoss Chang Group and ConnectU, including the settlement proceeds.".Missing: negotiations | Show results with:negotiations
[30]
Winklevoss twins gamble $65m for Facebook fortune - BBC News
Jan 11, 2011 · ConnectU was bought by Facebook as part of the settlement and Mr Chang said that means he is due a share of the deal. Mr Chang said he was "back ...Missing: negotiations | Show results with:negotiations<|separator|>
[31]
[PDF] Software developer's suit against Winklevoss twins may go forward
May 11, 2011 · Chang also claims he and the Winklevosses formed the Winklevoss Chang Group partnership to jointly and operate ConnectU, i2hub and other ...Missing: negotiations | Show results with:negotiations
[32]
WAYNE CHANG THE I2HUB ORGANIZATION INC v. CAMERON ...
This action arises from a failed business relationship between plaintiff Wayne Chang (“Chang”) and defendants Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss (the “Winklevosses”), ...
[33]
RIAA cracks down on Internet2 file swapping - CNET
Apr 12, 2005 · RIAA cracks down on Internet2 file swapping. Students on 18 campuses will be sued for using high-speed i2Hub peer-to-peer network.Missing: sharing 2003-2005<|separator|>
[34]
Subpoena Throws i2hub Security Into Doubt
Mar 29, 2005 · ... RIAA served two other Columbia students with subpoenas for illegal file-sharing. It is estimated that about 60 million Americans illegally.Missing: pressures | Show results with:pressures
[35]
The Download Dilemma - UCLA Newsroom
Apr 1, 2006 · The notification system, installed on residence hall networks in 2004, is designed to deal with alleged file-sharing offenders without shutting ...
[36]
ConnectU LLC v. Zuckerberg et al - PlainSite
ConnectU LLC v. Zuckerberg et al, Case No. 1:04-cv-11923-DPW in the Massachusetts District Court.<|separator|>
[37]
Facebook Suit Settlement Leaked - ABC News
Feb 11, 2009 ·  -- Facebook paid out $65 million in cash and stock options to settle its lawsuit with ConnectU, formerly Harvard Connect, earlier this ...
[38]
Facebook Settlement Triggers New Lawsuit - CBS News
Jan 4, 2010 · The complaint explains that the integration "(provided) ConnectU with i2hub's assets, including thousands of its users, its technology, its ...
[39]
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/04/inside-the-mark-zuckerberg-winklevoss-twins-cage-match
[40]
The Perils of Partnership: Unpacking Facebook, Inc. v. ConnectU, Inc. |
Jun 20, 2025 · Mediation and Settlement: After lawsuits and countersuits, the parties entered court-ordered mediation in 2008. Both sides signed a “Term Sheet ...
[41]
[PDF] FACEBOOK v. CONNECTU, INC. - Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Apr 11, 2011 · They sued Facebook and Zuckerberg (Facebook) in Massa- chusetts. Facebook countersued them and their competing social networking site, ConnectU, ...
[42]
ConnectU's 'Secret' $65 Million Settlement With Facebook
Feb 10, 2009 · A law firm violated confidentiality terms when it bragged about getting a $65 million settlement from Facebook for ConnectU–and the deal ...
[43]
Settlement with ConnectU cost Facebook $65 million
Feb 10, 2009 · Thanks to a slip-up by the law firm that helped ConnectU sue Facebook in 2004, we now know how much the lengthy litigation cost CEO Mark ...<|separator|>
[44]
Ninth Circuit No Friend to Winklevoss Twins: Facebook Settlement
May 8, 2011 · The district court found the settlement agreement enforceable and ordered the Winklevosses to transfer all ConnectU shares to Facebook. The ...
[45]
Winklevoss twins lose Facebook appeal over site idea - BBC News
Apr 12, 2011 · A US appeals court has ruled that twin brothers who say the idea for Facebook was stolen from them by Mark Zuckerberg cannot back out of a settlement deal.
[46]
Software Developer's Suit Against Winklevoss Twins May Proceed ...
Chang's complaint claims his memorandum of understanding with ConnectU entitles him to a 15 percent share of ConnectU for integrating i2hub's peer-to-peer file- ...
[47]
Winklevoss Twins Must Face Suit Over Failed Alliance, Judge Says ...
Superior Court Judge Peter Lauriat in Boston on April 28 denied the Winklevoss twins' motion to dismiss the case, ruling that Chang's prior relationship with ...
[48]
Boston developer wants cut of Winklevoss twins' $65-million ...
May 12, 2011 · Developer Wayne Chang has argued in a lawsuit that he and his former company, i2hub Organization, were blocked from receiving any money in the ...
[49]
Software Developer Loses Claim to $65M Facebook-Winklevoss Deal
Apr 24, 2019 · Software developer accused ConnectU founders of breaking agreement · Business relationship ended before Facebook settlement, court rules.
[50]
File-Trading Network i2Hub Shuts Down - Billboard
Nov 22, 2005 · The i2Hub college-based file-trading network shut down suddenly Nov. 14, apparently the result of ongoing legal challenges by the music and ...
[51]
Supercharged college P2P network closes - ZDNET
Nov 14, 2005 · The i2Hub network emerged in early 2004, taking advantage of the supercharged network that connects college campuses to let students trade ...
[52]
Chang v. Winklevoss - Massachusetts Law
Apr 24, 2019 · Chang's equitable claims were dismissed for failure to state a claim ... Chang does not explain his failure to submit a claim to the settlement ...
[53]
File-Sharing Firm Shuts Down - Los Angeles Times
May 5, 2006 · Since then, the firms behind i2Hub and WinMX have shut down. The Grokster file-sharing service, which was sued by Hollywood film studios and ...<|separator|>
[54]
[PDF] White Paper Potential Liability File Sharing
Nov 8, 2006 · Through the use of a file-sharing application known as “i2hub,” sharing of music and even full-length movies could be accomplished rapidly ...<|separator|>
[55]
University-based Internet file-sharing network i2hub shuts down
Nov 16, 2005 · I2hub was one of seven firms behind file-sharing software whoreceived cease-and-desist letters from the Recording IndustryAssociation of America ...
[56]
http://www.worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/Archive-RandR/2000s/2005/RR-2005-12-23.pdf
[57]
[PDF] Norms and Enforcement: The Case Against Copyright Litigation
Jan 24, 2006 · The aim of the study is to investigate the effect of copyright law enforcement on an- ticopyright norms among file swappers on peer-to-peer ...Missing: dorm | Show results with:dorm