Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Intercept method

The intercept method, also known as the Marcq Saint-Hilaire method, is a fundamental technique in celestial navigation for determining an observer's geoposition on Earth by measuring the altitude of a celestial body, such as the sun or a star, and comparing it to the altitude calculated from an assumed dead-reckoning position to derive a line of position.^[1] This method revolutionized maritime and aerial navigation in the late 19th century by simplifying the process of fixing a vessel's location using a single observation, rather than requiring multiple simultaneous sights.^[1] Developed by French naval officer Adolphe-Laurent-Anatole Marcq de Blonde de Saint-Hilaire in 1875, the method builds on Captain Thomas H. Sumner's 1843 concept of the line of position, which recognized that a celestial body's altitude defines a circle of equal altitude rather than a single point.^[1] Marcq Saint-Hilaire, born on July 29, 1832, and who rose to the rank of rear admiral by 1883, published his approach in an article titled Calcul du Point Observé, Méthode des Hauteurs Estimées while serving aboard the French ship Renommée.^[1] By the early 20th century, it had become the standard for sight reduction worldwide, forming the basis for precomputed tables like H.O. 229 (Air Almanac tables) and influencing navigation practices in both the U.S. Navy—adopted at the Naval Academy by 1909—and the U.S. Coast Guard Academy by 1922.^[1]^[2] In practice, the method involves selecting an assumed position near the dead-reckoning estimate, computing the expected altitude (Hc) and azimuth (Zn) of the celestial body using nautical almanac data, spherical trigonometry, and logarithms or haversines.^[2] The observed altitude (Ho), corrected for index error, dip, refraction, and semidiameter, is then subtracted from Hc to yield the intercept—a distance in nautical miles representing how far the true position lies from the assumed position along the azimuth line, with the direction indicated as "toward" or "away" from the body.^[2] This intercept shifts the Sumner line to form the final line of position (LOP), and multiple LOPs from different bodies or times intersect to provide a precise fix.^[1] The technique's efficiency lies in its use of estimated heights, allowing computation at any time without depending on the body's meridian passage, and it remains a cornerstone of traditional celestial navigation despite modern GPS alternatives.^[1]

Introduction

Overview

The intercept method is a graphical technique in celestial navigation for determining a line of position (LOP) by comparing the observed altitude (H_o) of a celestial body, measured via sextant, with the computed altitude (H_c) calculated from an assumed position near the dead reckoning (DR) position. This difference, known as the intercept, indicates the offset from the assumed position along the body's azimuth to plot the LOP.^[3] The method's primary purpose is to establish an accurate position fix for a vessel at sea using observations of celestial bodies such as the sun, stars, or moon, enabling navigation without reliance on electronic aids. It employs an assumed position—a convenient latitude and longitude approximation of the DR position—to streamline the computation of H_c based on the body's declination and hour angle. A principal advantage of the intercept method lies in its simplification of sight reduction, which focuses on altitude differences rather than direct resolution of spherical trigonometry, thereby minimizing computational errors compared to earlier tabular or iterative approaches. Also referred to as the Marcq St. Hilaire method, it facilitates precise positioning with reduced manual effort. In this system, the intercept is expressed in minutes of arc, where 1 minute equates to 1 nautical mile, allowing straightforward conversion for plotting distances on nautical charts.

Historical Development

The intercept method, also known as the Marcq Saint-Hilaire method, was invented in 1875 by French naval officer Adolphe-Laurent-Anatole Marcq de Blonde de Saint-Hilaire as an improvement over the earlier Sumner method published in 1843, which required multiple assumed positions to derive lines of position and often led to cumulative errors in calculations during extended voyages.^[1]^[4] Saint-Hilaire's approach addressed these inaccuracies in earlier intercept-free techniques by employing a single assumed position and treating the zenith distance as a geographical distance to compute an intercept, thereby simplifying the process and enhancing reliability for long-distance navigation.^[1] Saint-Hilaire detailed his method in the seminal paper "Calcul du point observé", published in the French nautical journal Revue Maritime et Coloniale in 1875, where he outlined the use of estimated altitudes to determine position lines more efficiently.^[4]^[5] Following its initial publication in French nautical journals, the method gained gradual adoption among navies worldwide by the early 20th century, as it offered a more streamlined alternative to traditional time sights and chronometer-based fixes.^[1] A key milestone in its standardization occurred in 1918, when the U.S. Hydrographic Office published sight reduction tables specifically designed for the Marcq Saint-Hilaire method, including altitude and azimuth computations for line-of-position work, which facilitated its widespread use in the U.S. Navy.^[6] Over the subsequent decades, the method evolved from reliance on logarithmic and haversine tables to electronic calculators in the 1970s, which streamlined the trigonometric computations, and later to dedicated software programs by the late 20th and early 21st centuries; however, the core graphical principles of intercept calculation and position line plotting remain unchanged as of 2025.^[7]^[8]

Core Principles

Assumed Position

In celestial navigation, the assumed position serves as a foundational reference point for sight reduction calculations within the intercept method. It is defined as a temporary, estimated location derived from the dead reckoning (DR) position, which itself represents the navigator's best estimate of the vessel's location based on course, speed, time, and any known environmental factors such as currents or leeway.^[9] The assumed position is typically selected to lie on or near the DR track at the time of the celestial sight, ensuring it remains a practical approximation without introducing significant errors, often kept within approximately 30 nautical miles of the DR position to maintain accuracy.^[10] Selection of the assumed position prioritizes computational simplicity, with the latitude rounded to the nearest whole degree and the longitude adjusted to align with the DR meridian or to produce a whole-degree local hour angle (LHA) when combined with the Greenwich hour angle (GHA) of the observed celestial body. This adjustment facilitates the use of sight reduction tables, such as Publication No. 229, by avoiding fractional values that could lead to rounding errors in trigonometric functions. For instance, if the DR position at the time of sight is 29°45' N, 45°30' W, the assumed position might be chosen as 30°00' N, 45°00' W, rounding the latitude upward and shifting the longitude westward to simplify LHA calculations.^[9]^[10] The primary role of the assumed position is to act as a fixed vertex in the navigational triangle, alongside the elevated pole and the geographical position of the celestial body, enabling the computation of the calculated altitude (Hc) and azimuth (Zn). By providing this reference, it ensures the intercept—the offset between the observed altitude and Hc—can be determined reliably, forming the basis for plotting the line of position without excessive mathematical complexity. This approach underpins the intercept method by treating the assumed position as the starting point from which any positional correction is measured.^[9]

Zenith Distance and Intercept Calculation

In celestial navigation using the intercept method, the zenith distance represents the angular separation between the observer's zenith—the point directly overhead—and the celestial body, measured along the vertical circle passing through the body.^[11] It is defined as the complement of the altitude, such that the zenith distance z = 90^\circ - h, where h is the altitude of the body above the horizon.^[11] The observed zenith distance z_o is derived from the corrected sextant altitude H_o, so z_o = 90^\circ - H_o, while the computed zenith distance z_c comes from the calculated altitude H_c at an assumed position, given by z_c = 90^\circ - H_c.^[11] This distinction allows navigators to compare the body's apparent position against its expected position, forming the basis for position refinement.^[11] The intercept quantifies the discrepancy between the observed and computed altitudes, calculated as the difference \text{Intercept} = H_o - H_c, expressed in minutes of arc.^[11] A positive intercept occurs when H_o > H_c, indicating that the observed altitude is higher than computed, which means the actual position is closer to the celestial body (toward its geographic position).^[11] Conversely, a negative intercept arises when H_o < H_c, signifying a lower observed altitude and thus a position farther from the body (away from its geographic position).^[11] For practical use, the intercept value in minutes is directly convertible to nautical miles, as 1 minute of arc corresponds to approximately 1 nautical mile on Earth's surface.^[11] The direction of the intercept aligns with the azimuth Z of the celestial body, which is the horizontal angle measured clockwise from true north to the vertical circle through the body.^[11] This azimuth serves as the bearing along which the intercept is applied perpendicular to the resulting line of position, ensuring the offset corrects the assumed position in the appropriate orientation relative to the body's geographic position.^[11] Central to these calculations is the navigational triangle, a spherical triangle formed by the elevated pole, the observer's zenith, and the geographic position of the celestial body.^[11] Its key elements include the declination (dec), the angular distance of the body north or south of the celestial equator; the latitude L, the observer's angular distance north or south of the terrestrial equator; and the local hour angle t (or LHA), the angular distance west from the local meridian to the body's hour circle.^[11] The zenith distance relates to these as one side of the triangle, opposite the pole and influencing the solution for altitude and azimuth.^[11] The computed altitude H_c is derived from the navigational triangle using spherical trigonometry, with the fundamental equation:

\sin H_c = \sin L \sin(\text{dec}) + \cos L \cos(\text{dec}) \cos t

This formula incorporates the assumed position's latitude and the body's declination and local hour angle to predict the altitude, enabling the subsequent intercept determination.^[11]

Step-by-Step Procedure

Taking Celestial Sights

The process of taking celestial sights involves measuring the altitude of a celestial body above the horizon using a marine sextant, which serves as the primary instrument for obtaining the observed altitude (Hs). This double-reflecting sextant, equipped with a micrometer drum, vernier scale, and telescope, allows navigators to align the image of the celestial body with the horizon through mirrored reflections, achieving measurements accurate to within a few tenths of an arc minute under ideal conditions.^[12] Shade glasses are essential for sun or moon observations to protect the eyes, while an accurate chronometer records the Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) of the sight.^[12] The Nautical Almanac provides necessary data for body identification and corrections.^[13] To execute the procedure, the navigator first sets the sextant's index arm to an estimated altitude, then views through the telescope to bring the celestial body—such as the sun's upper limb, a star, or the moon—into coincidence with the sea horizon by adjusting the arm.^[12] The sextant is rocked side-to-side to ensure the body appears to touch the horizon at its highest point, minimizing perpendicularity errors, and the altitude is read from the scale at the moment of tangency.^[12] Simultaneously, the exact UTC is noted using the chronometer, and the body is identified (e.g., sun's upper limb for morning or afternoon sights).^[12] Multiple sights, typically 3 to 5 observations spaced seconds apart, are averaged to account for ship motion and enhance precision, with sun sights being particularly common due to the sun's predictable daily path.^[12] Corrections are applied to the sextant altitude (Hs) to derive the true observed altitude (Ho), starting with index error, which adjusts for any misalignment between the index mirror and horizon glass, determined by setting the sextant to zero and observing the horizon.^[12] Dip correction accounts for the observer's height of eye above sea level, subtracting a value calculated as approximately 0.97 arc minutes times the square root of height in feet.^[12] Atmospheric refraction bends light rays, requiring subtraction of values from standard tables (e.g., about 1 arc minute at 30° altitude, decreasing to zero at the zenith), while semi-diameter adjusts for the sun or moon's disk (adding about 16 arc minutes for the sun's lower limb or subtracting for the upper limb).^[12] Parallax, most significant for the moon (up to 57 arc minutes), corrects for the observer's position relative to Earth's center and is obtained from Nautical Almanac tables.^[13] These corrections use standard tables from the Nautical Almanac or Bowditch.^[12] Environmental factors critically influence sight quality, with optimal conditions occurring during civil twilight for stars and planets, when the horizon is visible but the sky is not fully dark.^[12] Rough seas exacerbate horizon dip and ship roll, necessitating avoidance of excessive motion or use of averaging; calm conditions yield the clearest natural horizon.^[12] Typically, sights of 2 to 3 celestial bodies—such as the sun combined with stars—are taken within a short period to form a position fix, spaced to optimize angular separation and minimize geometric errors in the resulting plot.^[12] Key error sources include personal parallax from improper eye positioning at the telescope, which can introduce up to several arc minutes of bias, and instrument calibration issues like prismatic or graduation errors in the sextant.^[12] Timing inaccuracies from chronometer drift or delayed recording shift the computed position, while unaccounted atmospheric variations (e.g., temperature or pressure deviations from standard 50°F and 1013 mb) affect refraction.^[12] Regular calibration of the sextant and adherence to correction tables mitigate these, ensuring Ho's reliability for subsequent intercept calculations.^[12]

Reducing Sights to Position Lines

Reducing sights to position lines involves processing the observed altitude (Ho) of a celestial body, along with the time of observation and assumed position, to compute the calculated altitude (Hc), azimuth (Z), and intercept distance. This numerical reduction yields the data necessary for plotting a line of position (LOP) on a chart, forming the basis of the intercept method in celestial navigation. The process relies on standard ephemeris data from the Nautical Almanac and sight reduction tables or computational tools.^[14] The initial steps begin with entering the assumed position—typically selected as whole degrees of latitude (L) and longitude near the dead reckoning position—into the Nautical Almanac to obtain the declination (dec) and Greenwich hour angle (GHA) of the celestial body at the universal time of the sight. The GHA is extracted from the almanac's daily pages for the body (e.g., Sun, Moon, planet, or star via sidereal hour angle plus Aries GHA), with increments added for minutes and seconds of time; for the Moon, a correction factor (v) for non-uniform motion is also applied. The local hour angle (t or LHA) is then computed as LHA = GHA ± longitude, adding for west longitude and subtracting for east longitude, ensuring the result falls between 0° and 360°.^[14] Next, these values (L, dec, and LHA) are used with sight reduction tables such as Publication No. 229 (Pub. 229), Sight Reduction Tables for Marine Navigation, published by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA). Pub. 229 provides Hc and Z directly from tabulated entries for selected zones of latitude (in 15° bands across six volumes), using whole-degree values of LHA, L, and dec; interpolation is required for fractional minutes in dec via a declination correction factor (d) and, if needed, a second difference (dsd) for precise entry. For instance, the tabular Hc is adjusted by adding the d correction (tens + units + dsd) to yield the final Hc, while Z is interpolated linearly between whole-degree declination entries. The true azimuth (Zn) is then determined from the corrected Z based on the latitude hemisphere and LHA: For northern latitudes (L > 0°), Zn = 360° - Z if LHA < 180°, Zn = Z if LHA > 180°; for southern latitudes (L < 0°), Zn = 180° - Z if LHA < 180°, Zn = 180° + Z if LHA > 180°. Entry to the tables uses separate sections for declinations of the same or contrary name to the latitude. Alternatively, programmable calculators such as the HP-42S can automate this using pre-loaded routines that implement the spherical trigonometry formulas for Hc and Z, inputting L, dec, LHA, and time directly.^[15]^[16]^[17]^[18] Once Hc and Z are obtained, the intercept distance is derived by subtracting Hc from the index-error- and refraction-corrected Ho: intercept = Ho - Hc, expressed in minutes of arc (1' ≈ 1 nautical mile). A positive intercept (Ho > Hc) indicates the position line lies toward the azimuth direction from the assumed position; a negative value (Ho < Hc) indicates away from it. The true azimuth (Zn) serves as the direction along which the intercept is measured. For verification, the computed Zn can be cross-checked against an observed bearing to the body or using auxiliary amplitude tables from the Nautical Almanac, which provide the body's rising/setting azimuth for compass error assessment, ensuring consistency in the reduction.^[14]^[16] As an illustrative example, consider a sight with Ho = 35°00' and computed values of Hc = 34°50' and Zn = 090°. The intercept is then 10' toward 090°, meaning the line of position is offset 10 nautical miles eastward from the assumed position along the 090° azimuth, perpendicular to form the LOP.^[16] In modern practice as of 2025, software aids such as the Celestial Nav app integrate almanac data and reduction algorithms for direct computation of Hc, Z, and intercepts on mobile devices, often with offline perpetual ephemerides for Sun, Moon, planets, and stars. These tools serve as backups to GPS systems, preserving the intercept method's value for redundancy in electronic-denied environments, such as during solar flares or jamming, while maintaining the core manual procedures for training and verification.^[19]^[14]

Plotting and Fixing Position

Once the intercept value and azimuth have been determined from sight reduction, plotting the line of position (LOP) begins by marking the assumed position (AP) on a nautical chart or universal plotting sheet. From this point, a line is drawn in the direction of the computed azimuth using a protractor or parallel rulers, and the intercept distance—representing the difference between the observed and computed altitudes—is measured along this azimuth line using dividers. The LOP is then constructed perpendicular to the azimuth line at the intercept point, forming a straight line on which the vessel lies under the plane sailing approximation.^[20] This graphical method, rooted in the Marcq St. Hilaire variant of the intercept technique, allows for efficient visualization without recalculating the full celestial triangle.^[20] To obtain a position fix, at least two LOPs from different celestial bodies are plotted and advanced to a common time, typically the moment of the final sight, accounting for the vessel's estimated motion. The intersection of these LOPs yields the fix; with three or more LOPs, a small triangle known as a "cocked hat" may form due to observational discrepancies, and the most probable position is selected at its center. Cocked hat errors are minimized when azimuths are separated by approximately 90° for two LOPs or 120° for three, ensuring the lines cross at optimal angles to reduce the impact of random errors.^[20]^[21] Essential tools for plotting include parallel rulers to transfer angles from the compass rose to the plotting sheet, dividers for measuring intercepts and distances, and a universal plotting sheet that approximates great-circle paths as straight lines for small areas, simplifying the process on Mercator projections.^[20] These instruments enable precise manual construction of LOPs, with modern calculators sometimes used to verify coordinates before plotting. Under ideal conditions with precise sights, a celestial fix using the intercept method typically achieves accuracy within 1-2 nautical miles (NM), though this can degrade to several NM in poor visibility or with horizon errors. LOPs are treated as straight lines in the plane sailing approximation, valid for latitudes below 30° and intercepts under 20 NM, beyond which great-circle corrections may be needed.^[20] For error analysis, the dead reckoning (DR) position is plotted alongside the fix; any offset reveals systematic deviations, such as current set or leeway, allowing adjustments to course and speed. Random errors from sextant readings or timing are assessed by the size of the cocked hat, with fixes from azimuthally spread observations providing higher confidence, as parallel LOPs amplify uncertainties.^[20]

Applications and Variants

Running Fix Technique

The running fix technique in celestial navigation involves advancing a line of position (LOP) derived from an earlier celestial observation to the time of a subsequent observation, using the vessel's dead reckoning (DR) track to account for movement, thereby enabling a position fix through their intersection.^[12] This method is particularly applicable when simultaneous observations of multiple celestial bodies are not feasible, allowing navigators to combine time-separated sights from the same or different bodies.^[12] The procedure begins with plotting the first LOP from a celestial sight, such as a sextant measurement of a body's altitude at time T1.^[12] The vessel's course, speed, and estimated current or leeway are then used to advance this LOP forward along the DR track to the time T2 of the second sight; for instance, a vessel traveling at 10 knots for 30 minutes covers 5 nautical miles, which is plotted as the advancement distance.^[12] The second LOP, obtained from another celestial observation at T2, is plotted on the chart, and its intersection with the advanced first LOP yields the running fix position.^[12] This technique offers advantages in scenarios where only one celestial body is visible at a given time, such as using a sun line at local apparent noon followed by a later observation, thereby providing a more accurate fix than relying solely on DR or a single LOP.^[12] It corrects for uncertainties in current or leeway that might affect contemporaneous fixes and extends positional updates over intervals where observation opportunities are limited.^[12] However, the running fix is susceptible to accumulation of DR errors, including inaccuracies in speed, course, or environmental factors like wind and current, which can propagate and degrade the fix's reliability, particularly over longer intervals.^[12] It is most effective for time separations under one hour to minimize such error buildup, as greater distances traveled amplify discrepancies compared to fixes from simultaneous LOPs.^[12] A representative example is advancing a noon sun sight LOP by 45 minutes along a DR track at 8 knots (covering approximately 6 nautical miles) to intersect with an afternoon star sight LOP, producing a running fix that refines the vessel's position amid limited visibility.^[12]

Integration with Multiple Sights

In celestial navigation using the intercept method, integrating multiple lines of position (LOPs) from different celestial bodies enhances the reliability of the position fix by providing geometric redundancy. The strategy involves selecting bodies that offer a wide azimuth spread, ideally spanning 120° or more, to ensure strong geometric configuration and minimize positioning ambiguity; for example, observing the sun at an azimuth of approximately 180°, Polaris at 000°, and a planet like Venus at 270° allows for optimal distribution across the horizon. Bodies are chosen based on visibility, with preferred altitudes between 10° and 70° to balance accuracy and observational feasibility, prioritizing bright stars or planets during twilight for the best results.^[11] The procedure entails computing and plotting at least three LOPs simultaneously or near-simultaneously using the intercept method for each sight. After measuring sextant altitudes and applying corrections for index error, dip, refraction, and other factors to obtain the observed altitude (Ho), the navigator computes the altitude (Hc) and azimuth (Zn) from an assumed position near the dead reckoning position. The intercept distance, derived as the difference between Ho and Hc in nautical miles, is plotted along the azimuth from the assumed position, with the LOP drawn perpendicular to it; these LOPs are then advanced to a common time using the vessel's course and speed if sights are not exactly simultaneous. For overdetermined sets (more than three LOPs), a least-squares adjustment can refine the fix by minimizing residuals across all lines, yielding the most probable position at their intersection, often forming a small "cocked hat" triangle.^[11]^[12] Special cases include the three-star fix, typically performed at dawn or dusk when multiple stars are visible, involving near-simultaneous sights of three widely separated stars to plot intersecting LOPs for a precise fix. Daytime observations can utilize the moon and sun, leveraging their distinct azimuths to generate two LOPs without requiring twilight conditions. As of 2025, hybrid approaches integrate these celestial fixes with GPS for cross-verification, particularly in GNSS-denied environments, to confirm positions and detect spoofing or jamming.^[11]^[22] This integration reduces errors inherent in single-sight observations, such as instrumental or personal inaccuracies, by distributing risk across multiple measurements, and is particularly preferred in open ocean navigation where it can achieve accuracies on the order of 0.5 to 1 nautical mile under favorable conditions. Key considerations include limiting sight timing to within 15-30 minutes to minimize dead reckoning adjustments for vessel motion, ensuring clear horizon visibility, and applying atmospheric corrections for refraction and temperature/pressure effects to maintain precision.^[11]^[12]

References

[1]
Marq Saint-Hilaire: Father of the New Navigation - U.S. Naval Institute
The Marcq Saint-Hilaire method is the basis of all our modern precomputed navigational tables such as Aquino, H.O. 200, Weems, H.O. 203 and 204, Driesonstok ( ...
[2]
[PDF] Modern navigation by Summer-St. Hilaire methods - Survivor Library
former, lines of position, worked up by the Sum- ner or the (so called) Marcq St. Hilaire methods, are in constant use; while chronometer, or time sights are ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[3]
[PDF] Determining the Position and Motion of a Vessel from Celestial ...
A new celestial navigation method incorporates a moving observer, allowing recovery of a vessel's course and speed, and determining latitude, longitude, course ...
[4]
Admiral Marcq de Blond de St. Hilaire | The Journal of Navigation
Jan 18, 2010 · Marcq de St. Hilaire. (1875). Calcul du point observé: 6 Méthode des hauteurs estimées, Revue Maritime et Coloniale (Paris) 56.Google ...
[5]
[PDF] Dans ce document, le lecteur trouvera les deux articles d'Adolphe ...
- Marcq de Saint Hilaire, Calcul du point observé : Méthode des hauteurs estimées et Point moyen donné par trois observations, Revue Marifime et Coloniale ...
[6]
https://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/book/lookupname?key=United%20States.%20Hydrographic%20Office
[7]
Celestial Navigation by U. S. Civilian Mariners Near the En
... calculator around 1970. It became easier to work the formulae by calculator than to look up the values in a table. Then the programmable calculators came on ...
[8]
Astro Navigation Remembered | The Journal of Navigation
Mar 23, 2012 · The authors give a personal account of the use of astro navigation during the years before GPS became the primary aid for oceanic navigation.<|control11|><|separator|>
[9]
American Practical Navigator - Maritime Safety Information
The 2024 edition of the American Practical Navigator is published in two volumes, which can be downloaded as complete PDF documents by selecting the hyperlinks ...
[10]
[PDF] Contents to Cel Nav Sections of Bowditch
Simply choose any convenient position such as the vessel's DR position as the assumed position. Enter the information required by the spe- cific celestial ...
[11]
[PDF] AMERICAN PRACTICAL NAVIGATOR - dco.uscg.mil
... American Practical Navigator and the book was published in 1802 as a first edition. Bowditch vowed while writing this edition to “put down in the book ...
[12]
[PDF] THE AMERICAN PRACTICAL NAVIGATOR
... American Practical Navigator and the book was published in 1802 as a first edition. Bowditch vowed while writing this edition to “put down in the book ...
[13]
The Nautical Almanac - Astronomical Applications Department
This book is still the standard resource for marine celestial navigation for the US Navy. The history of The Nautical Almanac is found here.
[14]
[PDF] THE AMERICAN PRACTICAL NAVIGATOR - Loc
A system of determining longitude by “lunar distance,” a method which did not require an accurate timepiece, was known, but this product of the minds of ...
[15]
[PDF] SIGHT REDUCTION TABLES MARINE NAVIGATION - dco.uscg.mil
The tables have been designed primarily for use with the Marcq Saint Hilaire or intercept method of sight reduction, utilizing a position assumed or chosen ...Missing: 1918 | Show results with:1918
[16]
[PDF] Use of Pub 229 for sight reduction in the Starpath Cel Nav Book.
In our course we initially focus on Pub 249 for sight reduction using Form 104. That form, however, also provides spaces for using Pub 229 to get the ...
[17]
[PDF] Celestial Navigation - ThomasOkken.com
Since the intercept method ignores the curvatures of the actual position lines, the obtained. FIX is not our exact position but rather an improved position ( ...
[18]
Celestial Nav on the App Store
Sep 12, 2025 · FREE Basic Access*** Advanced marine and land based sight reductions using an offline perpetual almanac. Tool for accurate navigation, ...
[19]
None
Below is a comprehensive merged response summarizing the intercept method in celestial navigation based on the provided segments from *American Practical Navigator* (1995 Edition). Since the content spans multiple segments with varying levels of detail, I’ve consolidated the information into a detailed narrative and supplemented it with a table in CSV format for clarity and density. The narrative focuses on key aspects (plotting LOPs, fixing positions, tools, accuracy, and error analysis), while the table captures specific details, page references, and quotes where available. Note that some segments lacked relevant content, and I’ve prioritized information from segments that explicitly address the intercept method.
[20]
[PDF] CHAPTER 18 SIGHT PLANNING - The Nautical Almanac
A navigator experienced in taking sights with a sextant can, under ideal conditions, take sights accurate to a few tenths of an arc minute. Under typical.
[21]
RMI: Key measures to mitigate impacts of GNSS interference
Oct 7, 2025 · Employ alternative positioning sources in high-threat areas, including Inertial Navigation Systems (INSs), celestial navigation, radar parallel- ...