Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Ivanhoe line

The Ivanhoe Line is a proposed railway route in England's , spanning approximately 31 miles (50 km) from Burton-upon-Trent to along a corridor largely disused for passengers since its closure in 1964 amid the Beeching rationalization of services. The route, which traverses the National Forest area and would include new stations at Drakelow, Gresley, , , , Bagworth and Ellistown, Meynell's Gorse, and South (near the King Power Stadium), aims to provide half-hourly services during peak times, integrating with local bus networks and park-and-ride facilities to alleviate road congestion and support economic growth in underserved communities. Originally part of the network, the line facilitated coal transport and local passenger until its passenger services were axed as part of broader cost-cutting measures that prioritized freight over unprofitable routes, leaving only slow-speed aggregate freight operations in place today. The to Reopen the Ivanhoe Line (CRIL), established in , revived interest by commissioning feasibility studies and securing initial government funding under the Restoring Your Railway initiative, which highlighted potential benefits including thousands of new jobs, enhanced , and reduced reliance on between key and hubs. Progress advanced to outline business case stages with Network Rail involvement, but in July 2024, the project was shelved when Chancellor Rachel Reeves cancelled the programme to achieve £85 million in immediate savings amid fiscal pressures, despite prior allocations of over £2.5 million for development. Campaigners, emphasizing the route's strong economic rationale and regional support from businesses, have vowed to pursue alternative funding and reviews, with fresh proposals submitted in early 2025 to integrate it into broader transport strategies. This development underscores ongoing tensions between infrastructure revival ambitions and budgetary constraints in UK rail policy.

Route and infrastructure

Historical alignment and stations

The historical alignment of the Ivanhoe line traced the route of the 's to line, originating as an extension of the Leicester and Swannington Railway (L&SR). The L&SR was constructed from 1830 to 1832 primarily to haul coal from West Leicestershire collieries to via a route spanning approximately 5 miles, incorporating an 800-yard Glenfield Tunnel and initial horse traction supplemented by early . The purchased the L&SR in 1846 and extended it northward through the coalfields, reaching by 1849 with the full passenger and freight line opening on 1 August of that year. Engineered to standard gauge (4 ft 8.5 in), the alignment consisted mainly of single track with passing loops at key junctions to accommodate bidirectional traffic on this secondary route linking major Midland networks. The Victorian-era construction addressed terrain challenges in the hilly, wooded landscapes of what is now the National Forest region, employing embankments up to 30 feet high, shallow cuttings, and minor bridges over streams such as the Anson and Mease rivers, though the line avoided significant viaducts or flood-prone crossings of major waterways like the , terminating south of it at Burton. Intermediate stations and halts numbered over a dozen, serving both passengers and freight:
  • West Bridge (Leicester connection)
  • Swannington
  • Bagworth
  • Coalville Town (with extensive goods yard for colliery traffic)
  • Snibston (coal loading facilities)
  • Moira
  • Ashby-de-la-Zouch (principal intermediate stop with station master's house)
  • Donisthorpe
  • Overseal
  • Castle Gresley
  • Linton
  • Burton upon Trent
These facilities emphasized coal handling, with dedicated sidings and yards at colliery-adjacent points like Snibston and to support output from local mines exceeding 1 million tons annually by mid-century.

Proposed modern upgrades

Network Rail's 2022 survey of the Ivanhoe Line corridor recommended assessing the feasibility of to support modern passenger services, alongside the development of new stations at and potential sites near Measham to serve local communities and regenerate former mining areas. These upgrades would incorporate contemporary standards, including upgraded signaling for safer operations and potential doubling in sections to enable bidirectional freight and passenger flows without capacity constraints. Estimated costs for reinstating the core Burton-on-Trent to segment range from £100 million to £200 million, focusing on track renewal, earthworks stabilization, and bridge reinforcements, while excluding the pricier urban extension into , which Network Rail's 2023 analysis pegged at an additional £271 million due to tunneling, land acquisition, and integration with the . Restoration plans emphasize infrastructure synergies, such as diverting aggregate freight trains from the overburdened and M42 motorways onto the line toward distribution hubs, reducing road congestion and emissions. Compatibility with battery-electric or rolling stock is under consideration to minimize overhead wiring costs in rural stretches, with potential ties to HS2's released capacity on parallel routes for enhanced regional connectivity.

Historical operations

Construction and early development

The Ivanhoe line originated as a series of extensions by the Midland Railway to exploit the Leicestershire coalfield, connecting collieries around Coalville and Swannington to broader networks for coal export to industrial users in Burton upon Trent, including breweries and pottery manufacturers. Initial development built on the Leicester and Swannington Railway, opened on July 17, 1832, which featured cable-worked inclines and early steam locomotives to haul coal wagons from pits to Leicester, addressing high canal transport costs and poor road infrastructure. The Midland Railway acquired this line in 1846 and extended it northward toward Burton, with the segment from Burton to Ashby-de-la-Zouch opening in 1849 to facilitate mineral traffic. To complete a direct route bypassing longer circuits via Derby or Nuneaton, colliery proprietors such as William Stenson and John Ellis, alongside the Midland and London & North Western Railways, promoted a connecting link from Moira (near Ashby) to Nuneaton. The Ashby de la Zouch and Nuneaton Junction Railway received parliamentary authorization in 1862, evolving into the joint Ashby and Nuneaton Joint Railway under an 1866 Act ratified by both companies, which formed a joint committee for management. Construction commenced in 1869, involving earthworks through the coalfield and bridges over local waterways, with the line opening for goods traffic on August 1, 1873, from Moira to Nuneaton's Abbey Street station. Early operations emphasized freight, with tank locomotives suited for short-haul coal trains pulling loaded wagons at gradients up to 1:100. The ownership ensured shared capital and maintenance costs, though exact initial outlay figures remain undocumented in primary records; subsequent acts through authorized deviations and branches to enhance . This solidified the full Leicester-Burton corridor by the mid-1870s, prioritizing over needs.

Peak usage and services

The Leicester–Burton upon Trent line, forming the basis of what would later be termed the , attained peak operational intensity from the late through the , with freight constituting the predominant traffic. Coal extraction in west , particularly from collieries around and Snibston, generated substantial rail volumes, as the line's completion in enabled efficient onward shipment to domestic and markets, underscoring its foundational role in regional expansion. Burton-upon-Trent's brewing sector, centered on production, further bolstered freight demand, with rail supplanting canals for bulk distribution to and other centers by the 1870s. Passenger patterns emphasized local connectivity, featuring regular services between , , , and Burton, supplemented by expresses linking to via Derby for broader regional travel. These operations catered to industrial workers and rural communities, though exact frequencies varied; diesel multiple units were introduced in 1958 for the full Leicester-to-Burton run, averaging 66 minutes end-to-end. Freight's dominance persisted, with and related minerals far outpacing passengers in tonnage and economic value prior to rationalization. In , the line contributed to national logistics by facilitating troop movements and mineral hauls, diverting loads from overburdened main arteries like the to sustain wartime production and supply chains. This utility highlighted the infrastructure's strategic resilience amid heightened demand for to fuel industry and ale for morale-boosting rations, though specific tonnage figures for the period remain undocumented in available records.

Decline leading to closure

The Ivanhoe line experienced eroding viability from the onward, exacerbated by the rise of competing with rail for both and freight. Lorry haulage increasingly supplanted rail for local coal traffic from pits around and , as roads offered more direct and flexible delivery options to nearby industries and power stations. Passenger patronage similarly waned, with British Railways recording a roughly 50% drop in overall passenger journeys from 1948 to 1960 amid the growth of bus networks and private car ownership, rendering rural branches like the Ivanhoe line increasingly unprofitable. Nationalization under British Railways in 1948 inherited an aging burdened by wartime wear and deferred maintenance, with financial deficits prioritizing investment in high-volume main lines over peripheral routes. The 's branches and low-density traffic patterns amplified these pressures, as operational costs for signaling, track upkeep, and staffing outstripped revenues from sporadic services. By the early 1960s, these factors had diminished the line's economic case, culminating in the suspension of passenger trains between and on 7 September 1964. Freight operations lingered post-passenger closure, serving residual quarrying and industrial needs, but declining coal demand further strained usage. Certain sidings and uneconomic segments saw complete shutdown by 1966, with track removal in disused portions occurring through the 1970s as British Railways rationalized redundant assets.

Closure and immediate aftermath

Beeching Axe context

The Beeching Axe originated from the March 1963 report The Reshaping of British Railways, commissioned by the Conservative government and authored by , chairman of British Railways, to address annual operating losses exceeding £120 million by concentrating services on high-traffic routes. The document applied criteria such as failure to cover avoidable costs (including track maintenance and train operations), low passenger volumes relative to route length, and service to sparsely populated rural areas with limited revenue potential, factors that marked the Ivanhoe line for elimination alongside thousands of others. Nationwide implementation resulted in the of approximately 2,300 route miles of and 2,128 stations between 1964 and 1970, reducing by about one-third and eliminating services deemed uneconomic under short-term financial metrics. The government's underlying rationale prioritized a modal shift to , promoting private cars for passengers and lorries for freight as more flexible and responsive to , while BR faced deficits partly attributable to underinvestment and competition from subsidized road haulage. This approach overlooked rail's inherent efficiencies in energy use and capacity for bulk freight, favoring roads despite evidence that fuel duties and infrastructure grants disproportionately benefited motoring over rail viability. Empirical evaluations post-closure have highlighted causal drawbacks, including exacerbated congestion from redirected traffic, elevated public costs for expansions and externalities, and foregone opportunities for rail in mitigating and emissions—outcomes that contradicted assumptions of net savings amid rising vehicle dependency. Studies indicate these disinvestments amplified regional disparities and inefficiencies, as rail's fixed could have absorbed demand growth more scalably than ad-hoc builds.

Local economic and social impacts

The closure of passenger services on the Ivanhoe line on 18 January 1965 eliminated direct rail links for communities in , compelling rural residents to shift to buses or private cars for travel to , , and local centers like and . This transition heightened car dependency in an area with limited alternative , contributing to for non-drivers and lower-mobility groups, as documented in analyses of Beeching-era cuts affecting industrial and rural locales. Economically, the line's passenger shutdown led to redundancies among station and maintenance staff, adding to regional strains from contemporaneous coal mine rationalizations, though precise local figures remain sparse amid national railway job reductions exceeding 67,000. Freight operations, including from and Donisthorpe collieries, increasingly relied on road or surviving parallel routes like the Leicester-Burton main line, elevating expenses for extractive industries already confronting falling demand and productivity challenges. District-wide population grew modestly from 65,615 in 1961 to 71,671 in 1971, reflecting broader trends, yet smaller settlements along the route faced constrained development, with reduced access correlating to subdued vitality in towns like , where diminished commuter inflows strained high street commerce. The resultant road freight surge further burdened local infrastructure, fostering higher per capita emissions in car-reliant ex- corridors compared to retained networks.

Reopening campaigns

Initial post-closure efforts

In the years immediately following passenger closure in 1964, the Ivanhoe Line corridor saw limited organized revival attempts amid broader post-Beeching rationalizations, with freight traffic persisting on sections between Leicester and Burton upon Trent. By the late 1980s and early 1990s, local advocacy began coalescing around feasibility assessments for potential passenger restoration, though these faced immediate setbacks; for instance, in June 1990, a proposed study to enhance connectivity along the route stalled after Derbyshire County Council declined funding support, citing resource constraints. Local authorities in explored alternative uses, including potential freight diversions to alleviate road congestion, but these were overshadowed by concurrent motorway improvements like M42 expansions, which prioritized highway capacity over rail enhancements. Early environmental initiatives repurposed disused segments into recreational paths, such as elements of the Way footpath network, fostering green corridors that boosted and leisure access while underscoring the trade-off in foregone transport capacity. These and council-led pushes, often led by enthusiasts and , yielded no tangible reopenings before mid-decade disruptions from privatization, which fragmented funding and momentum for Stage II extensions beyond initial Leicester-area trials.

2008 Ivanhoe Line project launch

In 2008, local authorities advanced proposals for restoring passenger rail services along the route known variously as the National Forest Line or Ivanhoe Line, spanning from to via and . resolved in to welcome development of the line through , emphasizing its alignment with regional transport and economic priorities. This reflected growing collaboration among stakeholders, including district councils and business representatives such as chambers of commerce, which advocated for the project's viability in linking underserved communities and supporting freight alongside potential passenger operations.) The "Ivanhoe Line" branding, evoking the historical railway context, was increasingly adopted in official discourse to distinguish the full passenger restoration initiative from prior freight-only usage. A foundational Phase 1 focused on reinstating connectivity between and primarily for heritage rail and enhanced freight capacity, as a precursor to broader passenger integration, with preliminary estimates placing costs around £10 million. Government policy shifts further catalyzed the project, as the revised Regional Funding Allocation guidelines in July 2008 to explicitly incorporate rail reopening schemes for the first time, signaling interest in initiatives tied to economic regeneration in areas like the . This adjustment, while not yielding immediate funding, represented a pivotal endorsement that elevated the Ivanhoe Line from advocacy to feasible candidacy, distinct from earlier fragmented efforts.

2010s advancements and funding bids

During the mid-2010s, the Line reopening campaign advanced through collaborative efforts involving local authorities, , and preliminary engagements with the (DfT), focusing on refining operational and economic assessments to demonstrate feasibility. Building on prior scheme re-appraisals, project proponents conducted targeted studies evaluating infrastructure upgrades, signaling requirements, and integration with existing freight operations, which affirmed the line's potential for sustainable passenger services without substantial operational subsidies. These efforts emphasized the route's capacity to alleviate road congestion along the A42 corridor and enhance connectivity between and industrial hubs. From 2015 to 2019, campaigners submitted multiple funding applications, including exploratory bids aligned with emerging restoration initiatives, culminating in positioning for the Restoring Your Railway Fund outlined in the 2019 Conservative manifesto. Partnerships with facilitated pilot-level technical reviews, projecting annual passenger volumes of approximately 500,000 upon reopening, driven by demand from commuters, tourists accessing the National Forest, and freight-passenger synergies. These projections were supported by modeling of journey time savings and modal shift from car usage, with economic analyses highlighting benefits to regional growth areas like and . Despite these advancements, setbacks emerged in 2018 as national resources were increasingly allocated to high-profile projects, including HS2 Phase 2b, whose alignment intersected the corridor near , complicating parallel development and diverting engineering and planning expertise. Near-misses on funding, such as unsuccessful early-stage allocations under DfT's strategic rail priorities, underscored the challenges of competing against larger-scale investments amid fiscal constraints.

Recent developments and cancellation

2020s progress and government support

In the early 2020s, the Ivanhoe Line restoration advanced under the Restoring Your Railway Fund, which provided initial development funding and aligned with the government's Levelling Up agenda to enhance regional connectivity and economic growth. This included £500,000 allocated in May 2020 to refine proposals for reinstating passenger services between Leicester and Burton-upon-Trent, with efforts extending into subsequent years through ongoing programme support. Network Rail commissioned a detailed in 2022 to evaluate construction costs, benefits, and operational viability, establishing a provisional target for passenger services to commence by 2026. The study received backing from local business leaders, who highlighted potential economic advantages such as improved access to employment and reduced road congestion. Local regeneration initiatives in integrated the line's revival as a core component, with frameworks designating rail reconnection to Burton-upon-Trent and intermediate stops as essential for and attracting investment. District council plans emphasized how restored services could catalyze , commercial development, and transport integration in the area.

2024 decision to scrap

In July 2024, Chancellor announced the termination of the Restoring Your Railway fund during a fiscal review, requiring £5.5 billion in savings for 2024 and an additional £8.1 billion in 2025 to address inherited overspending, with the Ivanhoe Line reopening classified as non-essential relative to core network priorities. This decision halted all further development on reinstating passenger services along the line from Burton-upon-Trent to , despite prior advancements under the programme. Network Rail, which had endorsed a business case for the project, confirmed the suspension, including abandonment of the proposed Leicester extension, without exploration of alternative funding models such as private investment contributions. The Department for Transport had already expended £2.5 million on preparatory work, comprising the Outline Business Case for Phase 1 and the Strategic Outline Business Case for Phase 2. Inflationary pressures were cited in broader critiques as eroding the viability of such schemes' projected benefit-cost ratios, though no updated appraisal was performed for the Ivanhoe Line prior to cancellation.

Ongoing advocacy as of 2025

The Campaign for the Reopening of the Ivanhoe Line (CRIL) has continued its advocacy efforts into 2025, focusing on petitions and direct lobbying of Members of Parliament to prioritize a phased reopening beginning with freight services along the disused route. In March 2025, CRIL submitted proposals positioning the line as a foundational element of an integrated transport network between Burton-upon-Trent and , urging initial freight operations to demonstrate viability and attract further funding without relying solely on passenger restoration. MP Amanda Hack has reiterated her commitment to these initiatives, collaborating with campaigners to explore alternatives amid government funding constraints. By mid-2025, CRIL linked its campaign to the updated Regeneration Framework, which identifies the Ivanhoe Line project as a key opportunity for economic revitalization in the area, pending confirmation of delivery timelines. Campaigners have advocated for private-sector involvement to circumvent delays associated with state-owned Network Rail's on development, proposing that investor-led freight trials could expedite progress and reduce taxpayer burdens. This approach critiques the inefficiencies of public-sector , which has stalled similar projects post-2024 fiscal reviews. Advocates emphasize rail freight's environmental superiority, noting that it can achieve up to 75% lower per ton-kilometer compared to heavy goods vehicles (HGVs), providing a compelling case against expanding capacity that benefits from substantial subsidies. CRIL argues this efficiency gap underscores the need for private incentives to operationalize the line for freight, potentially integrating with Coalville's regeneration to support local hubs. As of June 2025, despite redirected national funding to other schemes, campaigners remain optimistic about securing private commitments to advance feasibility studies.

Debates and controversies

Economic benefits versus costs

Proponents of reopening the Ivanhoe Line argue that it would deliver economic benefits through enhanced regional connectivity, enabling better access to labor markets and supporting business growth in areas like and . Local enterprises have endorsed the project, citing its potential to complement hubs and reduce reliance on congested roads such as the by facilitating passenger and possible freight services. However, quantitative appraisals have historically shown limited net gains; a 2009 re-appraisal by North West Leicestershire District Council yielded a benefit-cost ratio (BCR) of 0.60 under restricted , concluding the scheme offered poor value for money relative to and operating expenditures. Construction costs represent a primary fiscal challenge, with recent Network Rail assessments estimating £271 million for infrastructure to extend services from Coalville to Leicester South, on top of baseline reinstatement expenses for the Burton-upon-Trent to Ashby section. Campaigners have suggested that around £100 million in public funding could initiate progress, but full realization would impose significant upfront taxpayer liability, compounded by ongoing maintenance and operational demands. Skeptics, including fiscal conservatives, highlight opportunity costs, arguing that funds diverted to could better address bottlenecks with higher immediate returns, given the low BCR from prior studies. Pro-market perspectives emphasize shifting freight burdens to users via tolls or charges rather than subsidies, potentially improving viability without broad public outlay, though no updated BCR incorporating such mechanisms has been publicly detailed post-2009. The absence of robust, recent GDP projections—beyond qualitative claims of regeneration—underscores debates over whether gains justify costs amid competing priorities.

Environmental and planning objections

Opponents of the Ivanhoe Line reopening have raised concerns about ecological disruption in the National Forest, an area spanning parts of and through which the proposed passenger route would traverse roughly 27 km of countryside, potentially fragmenting habitats for species such as bats and ground-nesting along the currently disused trackbed that has reverted to semi-natural vegetation. Local planning documents in , including Ashby-de-la-Zouch's neighbourhood plan, emphasize protections akin to designations for surrounding land, with fears that rail reactivation could exacerbate development pressures and alter landscape character in rural settings. These objections extend to not-in-my-backyard sentiments in communities like , where residents have voiced worries over , , and visual intrusion from passing trains, potentially diminishing the tranquility of adjacent residential areas and green spaces. Planning hurdles have included scrutiny from local councils on land-use compatibility, with some advocating for stringent environmental impact assessments to safeguard against habitat loss in a region designated for and enhancement. Proponents counter that electrified operations offer substantially lower lifecycle emissions than road freight alternatives, with rail freight emitting around 76% less CO2 equivalent per tonne-mile compared to heavy goods vehicles, thereby reducing overall regional transport-related carbon outputs if the line diverts traffic from roads. Mitigation strategies, including overpasses and underpasses—proven effective in other rail projects like HS2 and the reopening—can reconnect fragmented habitats and minimize barriers to animal movement, as evidenced by structures designed for such as dormice and badgers. Historical analysis indicates that 1960s rail closures, including precursors to the Ivanhoe Line's passenger suspension, fostered greater and by diminishing options in peripheral areas, leading to dispersed development patterns; restoring lines like Ivanhoe could counteract this by enabling denser, rail-oriented growth and curbing further encroachment on countryside. Despite these arguments, environmental groups such as the National Forest Company have endorsed the project for its potential to promote low-carbon access to woodland trails, underscoring divided stakeholder views on net ecological benefits.

References

  1. [1]
    Plan to reopen Ivanhoe Line backed by businesses - BBC
    Oct 29, 2022 · The Ivanhoe Line, between Burton-upon-Trent and Leicester, was closed to passenger trains in the 1960s. A campaign to restore the 31-mile (50km) ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  2. [2]
    Ivanhoe Line
    A quick, convenient train connecting Burton-on-Trent to Leicester, opening up opportunities for work, leisure, and exploration.
  3. [3]
    Locations of new train stations to be built along Ivanhoe Line revealed
    Oct 5, 2023 · Among the other towns, villages and cities serviced by the new line will be Derby, Willington, Burton and Coalville. It comes after years of ...
  4. [4]
    Fight to restore Ivanhoe Line not over vow rail campaigners - BBC
    Aug 3, 2024 · The entire Restoring Your Railways scheme was among transport projects pulled to save a projected £85m, including the Ivanhoe Line plan to ...
  5. [5]
    Blog - CRIL - Ivanhoe Line
    Feb 16, 2025 · The Ivanhoe Line is that it is intended for both commercial and leisure use. Along the 30 mile length, there are thousands of businesses that will benefit.<|separator|>
  6. [6]
    Ivanhoe Line reopening halted as railways scheme scrapped - BBC
    Jul 30, 2024 · The restoration of a passenger rail link through the Midlands has been stopped in its tracks. A business case for reopening the Ivanhoe Line ...
  7. [7]
    £43M spent by DfT on Restoring Your Railway projects that hang in ...
    Nov 6, 2024 · The Ivanhoe line in Leicestershire was another project being advanced under Restoring Your Railway. The DfT has spent £2.5M on the Outline ...
  8. [8]
    Rail campaigners submit plans for revived Ivanhoe Line through ...
    Mar 6, 2025 · Plans for a re-opening of the Ivanhoe Line have been revived as a possible catalyst for an integrated transport system along the Burton to ...
  9. [9]
    Fight for Ivanhoe Line revival not over amid major blow to campaign
    Nov 12, 2024 · The fight to reopen a historic rail route will go on despite a major blow, campaigners have vowed.
  10. [10]
    Station Hill - Swannington Heritage Trust
    The Midland Railway bought the Leicester and Swannington Railway in 1846. The new owners immediately set about extending the railway to Ashby de la Zouch and ...
  11. [11]
    Branch Lines - Burton on Trent Local History
    In 1874 the Midland extended its Derby to Melbourne line to Ashby-de-la-Zouch, partly using the route of the former Ticknall Tramway. The junction with the ...<|separator|>
  12. [12]
    Swadlincote Loop - Forgotten Relics
    In 1848 the Leicester and Swannington line was extended by the Midland through South Derbyshire to Burton-on-Trent, whilst at the Leicester end the line was ...
  13. [13]
    Coal & Stone Trains at Moira West Junction - Nigel Tout
    Moira West Junction lay between Ashby de la Zouch and Burton on Trent on the Leicester to Burton 'Ivanhoe Line'. It was a junction between the ex-LNWR line ...
  14. [14]
    Ivanhoe Line reopening moves closer as NR funds survey
    Nov 2, 2022 · A target date of 2026 has been put on the return of passenger services to the Leicester-Burton-on-Trent 'Ivanhoe Line'.
  15. [15]
    Two locations identified for new station as part of abandoned ...
    Jan 6, 2023 · The locations for Coalville's potential future train station would sit on a restored Ivanhoe Line running between Leicester and Burton.
  16. [16]
    Reopening the Ivanhoe Line would have significant business ...
    Oct 28, 2022 · The Campaign for Reopening the Ivanhoe Line (CRIL) has led a movement to restore the 31-mile line, which was sacrificed in the 1960s and 1970s ...<|separator|>
  17. [17]
    Extending the Ivanhoe line restoration to Leicester could cost ...
    Nov 9, 2023 · It will then look into phase two of the Ivanhoe line restoration, which will involve the doubling of the tracks from Bagworth Junction to ...Missing: historical | Show results with:historical
  18. [18]
    Connecting revived Ivanhoe Line from Coalville to Leicester would ...
    Nov 17, 2023 · A revived Ivanhoe Line from Coalville to Leicester would cost an additional £271 million to put in place. Network Rail revealed the eyewatering figure.
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Joint evidence submission from Leicestershire County Council and ...
    The construction of HS2 will also provide additional line capacity for both passenger and freight trains. Currently. Leicester is poorly connected to other ...
  20. [20]
    Leicester & Swannington Railway Line | Desford History
    The Leicester and Swannington Railway was officially opened on the 17th July 1832 to transport coal from the pits in West Leicestershire to Leicester.
  21. [21]
    Ashby De La Zouch Station - National Transport Trust
    This station was built for the Midland Railway in 1849 on its line between Burton and Leicester. Ashby was fashionable in the Regency period as a spa.Missing: construction | Show results with:construction
  22. [22]
    Ashby de la Zouch and Nuneaton Railway - Parliamentary Archives
    Ashby de la Zouch and Nuneaton Railway. « Back. For ... Parliament Office: Lists of Original Acts... ... Junction Railway (1865); HL/PO/PB/3/plan1865/A2 ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] The Battlefield line: a short history of the Ashby to Nuneaton joint ...
    In 1830 construction of the line was started, originally from West Bridge station in Leicester, via the. Glenfield tunnel to the Swanninton area and the project ...
  24. [24]
    Ashby and Nuneaton Joint Railway - Graces Guide
    Apr 24, 2017 · Opened in 1873 and linking Ashby with Nuneaton via Market Bosworth. Jointly owned by London and North Western Railway and the Midland ...
  25. [25]
    The Leicestershire Collieries - Northern Mine Research Society
    Coal mining in Leicestershire spanned a timescale of eight centuries from about the year 1200 to 1991 when the last colliery, Bagworth, closed.Missing: freight line
  26. [26]
    THE HISTORY OF BREWING IN BURTON UPON TRENT
    Brewing in Burton began in the 11th century at Burton Abbey, becoming a major center by the 1870s, with unique water properties and the Trent Navigation in ...Missing: tonnage | Show results with:tonnage
  27. [27]
    St. Pancras: Built on Beer
    Before the late 1860s, Burton brewers supplied London by sending their beer via the Midland Railway's competitors. However, when the Midland planned its main ...Missing: freight tonnage
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Railway Traffic Expansion and Use of Resources in World War II
    Apr 30, 2008 · In passenger as in freight service an increase in the number of hours equipment is used in trains, as well as the load factors pre- viously ...Missing: Ivanhoe | Show results with:Ivanhoe
  29. [29]
    Beeching - Timmonet
    Aug 8, 2012 · ... British Railways' 7000 stations produced just two percent of the total passenger traffic. 25 percent of traffic started at just 34 stations .
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Leicester and Leicestershire Rail Strategy
    Mar 1, 2017 · The first links the Midland Main. Line at Knighton Junction (approximately 2 miles south of Leicester) with Burton upon Trent via Coalville, and ...
  31. [31]
    The Reshaping of British Railways - Part 1: Report
    The failure of the modernisation plan to stem BR's losses led the author, Dr Beeching, to propose wholesale route closures in an attempt to concentrate ...
  32. [32]
    Beeching: Railway vandal or visionary? - BBC News
    Jun 7, 2013 · When Dr Beeching was brought in by ministers in the early 1960s, Britain's railways were making annual losses of £140m - £2.5bn at today's ...Missing: Ivanhoe line rationale
  33. [33]
    Don't blame Beeching for loss-making railways
    Dr Beeching pointed out that 30 per cent of route miles carried only 1 per cent of passenger-miles and 1 per cent of tonne-miles. He recommended closures.
  34. [34]
    The Beeching Report: A Costly Legacy for British Rail
    Apr 29, 2025 · Among the report's main recommendations: The closure of approximately 5,300 miles of track, (55% of the Rail Network). The closure of 2,363 ...Missing: criteria | Show results with:criteria
  35. [35]
    the beeching report on british railways
    I know that 296 the Report recommends that 130 miles between Inverness and Wick should be closed; but it is to this line above almost anything else that a ...
  36. [36]
    It's time to reverse the Beeching Axe - UnHerd
    Oct 29, 2019 · British Rail was not itself run badly, but for much of the latter half of the century government policy heavily favoured cars. Parking was cheap ...
  37. [37]
    How Beeching got it wrong about Britain's railways - The Guardian
    Mar 2, 2013 · The legacy of 1960s railway cuts has been to hold back revitalisation of the network amid growing demand, writes Robin McKie.Missing: criteria | Show results with:criteria
  38. [38]
    https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/002795016302400104
  39. [39]
    The spatial impacts of a massive rail disinvestment program
    The Beeching-era cuts were part of an ongoing and wider program of network rationalization and cost savings, so the closures taking place in the period we study ...Missing: criteria | Show results with:criteria
  40. [40]
    Lessons from the Beeching cuts in reviving Britain's railways
    Dec 7, 2017 · The main opposition to Beeching's proposals focused on the social impact of the proposed cuts. Opponents argued that Beeching had paid scant ...Missing: Ashby Coalville
  41. [41]
    Revealed: devastating social impact of Beeching railway cuts
    Mar 31, 2021 · Report shows devastating impact on coastal and former industrial towns, which also suffer from poor bus links and low car ownership.Missing: Ashby Coalville
  42. [42]
    Beeching's brutal legacy | Peter Caddick-Adams | The Critic Magazine
    a third of the existing network — with the loss of 67,700 jobs. His ...
  43. [43]
    Coalville (Urban District) through time - Vision of Britain
    1961 Census of England and Wales, Table 3, 'Acreage, Population, Private ... parts of Bardon, Osgathorpe CPs Area: 11 acres. 1971 Census of England and ...
  44. [44]
    Agenda for County Council on Wednesday, 19 March 2008, 2.30 pm
    d) That this Council welcomes any plans to develop the National Forest Line through North West Leicestershire. Minutes: Mr. P. C. Osborne , having declared ...
  45. [45]
    National Forest Line - Hansard - UK Parliament
    Mar 10, 2009 · Hansard record of the item : 'National Forest Line' on Tuesday 10 March 2009.
  46. [46]
    http://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmeastmid/uc104-ii/uc10402.htm
  47. [47]
    North West Leicestershire District Council
    Insufficient relevant content. The provided URL (https://www.nwleics.gov.uk/files/documents/ivanhoe_line_stage_ii_scheme_re_appraisal_april_2009/Ivanhoe%20line%20Stage%20II%20Scheme%20Re-Appraisal%20-%20April%202009.pdf) results in a "Page not found" error, indicating the document is inaccessible. No information about the 2008 Ivanhoe Line project, advisory group, phase 1 proposal for Ashby-Nuneaton, costs, branding, or government response can be extracted.
  48. [48]
    Leicester to Burton Ivanhoe railway line re-opening takes a step ...
    May 24, 2020 · The Government has announced a £500,000 fund, split 10 ways, to look at ways of restoring and re-opening railway lines sacrificed in the 1960s ...Missing: lifted | Show results with:lifted
  49. [49]
    Railway revolution as 34 new train stations could open across UK
    Apr 19, 2022 · Known as the Ivanhoe Line, the STM would aim to reopen stations at Coalville, Ashby, Sinope, the Stephenson Industrial Estate and Moira, as well ...Missing: branding | Show results with:branding<|separator|>
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Appleby Parva to Ashby-de-la-Zouch - GOV.UK
    Oct 2, 2018 · Effects arising from operation. 10.5.1. Users of the Proposed Scheme (i.e. rail passengers) are at all routine times within a controlled ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Restoring Your Railway Fund - Programme Update - GOV.UK
    Two years on, this update provides an overview of all the schemes in the programme, their progress, and the approaches being taken to develop rail schemes and ...
  52. [52]
    Ivanhoe Line to receive Government funding to further develop plans
    May 28, 2020 · Dr Luke Evans, Member of Parliament for Bosworth, has helped to secure a share of £500,000 to develop plans and proposals to reopen the Ivanhoe ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Coalville Regeneration Framework - 2025 Update
    Works are anticipated to start in 2026. Coalville Railway Station / Reopening the Ivanhoe Line (Project 11). Supporting the re-opening of the Ivanhoe Line, ...Missing: Measham | Show results with:Measham
  54. [54]
    Fully revived Ivanhoe Line could 'work wonders ... - Leicester Mercury
    Jul 28, 2024 · A fully revived Ivanhoe Line could “work wonders” on Coalville's revitalisation according to district council boss Councillor Richard Blunt.
  55. [55]
    Burton - Leicester railway line could be 'catalyst' for integrated ...
    Mar 6, 2025 · The Campaign for the Reopening of the Ivanhoe Line has said that the line could be a 'catalyst' for an integrated transport system between Burton and Leicester.
  56. [56]
    Rail campaigners submit plans for revived Ivanhoe Line in Coalville
    Mar 6, 2025 · Plans for a re-opening of the Ivanhoe Line have been revived as a possible catalyst for an integrated transport system along the Burton to Leicester corridor.
  57. [57]
    Ashby MP Hack says reviving the Ivanhoe Line project will be one of ...
    Nov 4, 2024 · ASHBY MP Amanda Hack has told Parliament that she will continue to fight for the re-opening of the Ivanhoe Line. Campaigners confirmed last week ...Missing: petitions lobbying<|separator|>
  58. [58]
    [PDF] The Positive Environmental Effects of Increased Freight by Rail ...
    Abstract. Moving freight by rail instead of truck lowers greenhouse gas emissions by up to 75%, on average. AAR analysis of federal data finds: If 25% of ...
  59. [59]
    Rail campaigners still hopeful of opening line through Ashby | News
    Jun 6, 2025 · Rail campaigners pushing for the re-opening of the Ivanhoe Line through Ashby remain hopeful that the project could still have a future.
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Ivanhoe Line Stage II - North West Leicestershire District Council
    Apr 30, 2009 · The original Ivanhoe concept envisaged a rail service linking Loughborough to Derby via Leicester and Burton on Trent.
  61. [61]
    Ivanhoe Line revival effectively cancelled as Government cuts all ...
    Jul 30, 2024 · Leicestershire's Ivanhoe Line revival has effectively been cancelled after the funding for the project was cut.
  62. [62]
    Opinion: HS2 and the Ivanhoe line - Liberal Democrat Voice
    Apr 6, 2015 · But there is an extra dimension in the form of the Ivanhoe Line, the railway line from Leicester to connect with the Midland main line at Burton ...
  63. [63]
    Amazon and National Forest Company back Ivanhoe line plans
    Oct 12, 2020 · In May, the Government announced a £500,000 fund for feasibility studies on whether 10 routes could be reopened, including the Ivanhoe Line. The ...
  64. [64]
    [PDF] Ashby de la Zouch - Neighbourhood Plan Review
    8.6 This document sets out local considerations for delivering sustainable development across the. Neighbourhood Area. Development proposals should meet the ...Missing: belt | Show results with:belt
  65. [65]
    Ashby MP Hack presents case for Ivanhoe Line to Rail Minister | News
    Nov 21, 2024 · Ashby MP Hack presents case for Ivanhoe Line to Rail Minister - and launches local transport survey. By Ashby Nub News Reporter 21st Nov 2024.
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Rail Environment Policy Statement - GOV.UK
    Jul 14, 2021 · On average, rail freight trains emit around a quarter of the CO2 equivalent (CO2e) emissions of HGVs, per tonne mile travelled.4 In 2019/20, ...
  67. [67]
    Dormouse bridge across railway line could help save endangered ...
    Nov 30, 2021 · The new bridge, which hopes to connect two new dormouse populations in Morecambe Bay, is to be fitted to the side of an existing bridge in summer 2022.Missing: reopening | Show results with:reopening
  68. [68]
    Okehampton – reopening of the Dartmoor Line | Cura Terrae
    Ecus were commissioned by Network Rail to provide ecological services for the reopening of the old Dartmoor Line from Okehampton to Exeter.
  69. [69]
    (PDF) The impacts of rail transit on urban sprawl and mobility of the ...
    Sep 18, 2016 · We analyze the development of the railway networks of these cities and also focus on the urban sprawl, aiming to correlate its spatial form with ...Missing: closures UK