Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Feasibility study

A feasibility study is a systematic analysis conducted to evaluate the viability of a proposed project, plan, or system by assessing its technical, economic, financial, legal, operational, and scheduling feasibility, ultimately determining whether it can be realistically accomplished within defined constraints.^[1] This evaluation serves as an early-stage decision-making tool in project management, helping stakeholders identify potential risks, opportunities, and challenges before committing significant resources.^[2] The primary purpose of a feasibility study is to provide an objective assessment that informs whether to proceed, modify, or abandon a project, thereby minimizing the risk of failure and optimizing resource allocation.^[3] By examining critical factors such as costs, benefits, market demand, and regulatory compliance, it enables organizations to align initiatives with strategic goals and secure stakeholder buy-in, including from investors or lenders.^[4] In contexts like business development or public infrastructure, these studies are essential for distinguishing viable opportunities from unfeasible ones, often reducing startup failure rates by highlighting economic and operational hurdles early.^[3] Feasibility studies typically encompass several types, each focusing on specific dimensions of viability. Technical feasibility assesses whether the necessary technology, materials, and expertise are available to execute the project.^[1] Economic or financial feasibility evaluates costs against projected returns, including return on investment (ROI) and cash flow projections.^[1] Market feasibility analyzes demand, competition, and market conditions to gauge commercial potential.^[2] Additional types may include legal feasibility, which reviews compliance with laws and regulations, and operational feasibility, which examines integration with existing processes and organizational capacity.^[4] In engineering or environmental projects, social and ecological feasibility further considers community impacts and sustainability.^[2] Key components of a feasibility study generally include an executive summary, detailed analysis of alternatives, financial projections, risk assessment, and recommendations, often compiled into a report that guides subsequent project phases.^[3] The process typically involves stakeholder consultations, data collection, and scenario modeling, with timelines ranging from weeks to months depending on project scale.^[4] Conducted by internal teams or external consultants, these studies ensure informed decisions that enhance project success rates across industries such as construction, technology, and agriculture.

Definition and Overview

Formal Definition

A feasibility study is a systematic and independent assessment designed to evaluate the overall viability of a proposed project or business venture by analyzing its technical, economic, legal, operational, and scheduling dimensions.^[5] This evaluative process determines whether the project can be successfully implemented given available resources, potential risks, and expected benefits, often serving as a foundational step in decision-making for stakeholders.^[1] Key elements of a feasibility study include the identification of internal and external constraints, such as resource limitations or market conditions; exploration of opportunities for innovation or efficiency; and projection of potential outcomes, including success probabilities and alternative scenarios through sensitivity analysis.^[3] These components ensure an objective examination of assumptions related to technology, financing, and operations, providing data-driven insights to mitigate uncertainties before committing significant investments.^[4] A feasibility study differs from related concepts like preliminary analyses, which offer high-level overviews without detailed projections, and business plans, which outline implementation strategies and operational blueprints after viability has been confirmed.^[3] Instead, it functions exclusively as a pre-implementation diagnostic tool to assess practicality and recommend go/no-go decisions, avoiding the tactical planning elements of execution-focused documents.^[6] In project management, standard frameworks such as the TELOS model—encompassing technical feasibility (can it be built?), economic feasibility (is it affordable?), legal feasibility (is it permissible?), operational feasibility (can it be integrated?), and scheduling feasibility (can it be timely?)—provide a structured approach to this analysis.^[7] The Project Management Institute (PMI) incorporates similar feasibility evaluations within its PMBOK Guide framework, particularly during the project initiation phase to validate business cases and organizational capabilities.^[8]

Purpose and Importance

A feasibility study serves as a critical preliminary evaluation to determine the practicality of a proposed project or venture, assessing whether it can be successfully implemented given available resources, constraints, and external factors. Its primary purposes include evaluating the project's viability across key dimensions such as technical capabilities, market demand, and financial implications, thereby enabling organizations to identify potential barriers and opportunities early in the process. By systematically analyzing these elements, the study facilitates efficient resource allocation and informs go/no-go decisions, ensuring that only promising initiatives proceed to full development.^[6]^[1] The importance of conducting a feasibility study lies in its role in mitigating risks and preventing costly failures, particularly in contexts like business development, infrastructure projects, and economic initiatives. For instance, it helps distinguish viable opportunities from unprofitable or risky endeavors, protecting stakeholders from scams or misguided investments, and supports compliance with regulatory requirements in sectors such as tribal economic development or public funding applications. In project management, this assessment aids in gaining stakeholder buy-in by providing objective data that builds confidence among investors, lenders, and decision-makers.^[9]^[1]^[10] Beyond risk reduction, feasibility studies deliver tangible benefits, including significant cost savings through the avoidance of sunk costs in unviable projects and an overall improvement in project success rates. According to the Project Management Institute's recent reports, only 48% of projects are rated as fully successful, with 40% challenged and 12% failed, often due to inadequate upfront evaluation, underscoring the value of feasibility studies. Positioned in the project lifecycle after initial ideation but before detailed planning, these studies ensure informed progression, fostering long-term efficiency and sustainability across diverse applications.^[10]^[6]^[11]

Historical Context

Origins and Evolution

The formal practice of feasibility studies originated in early 20th-century engineering and military projects, where systematic assessments of project viability became essential for large-scale infrastructure planning. In the United States, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) played a pivotal role, conducting comprehensive surveys and economic evaluations as early as the 1920s under the 1925 Rivers and Harbors Act, which authorized "308 Reports" for analyzing water resource projects including navigation, flood control, and irrigation feasibility.^[12] By the 1930s, during the Great Depression and New Deal era, USACE expanded these practices to include cost-benefit analyses mandated by the Flood Control Act of 1936, evaluating multipurpose dams and channels like the Fort Peck Dam and Upper Mississippi River Nine-Foot Channel Project to ensure economic and technical viability amid unemployment relief efforts.^[13] These early studies marked a shift from ad hoc planning to structured evaluations integrating engineering, economic, and environmental factors for federal infrastructure initiatives.^[12] Following World War II, feasibility studies evolved significantly with the growth of large-scale industrial projects, heavily influenced by the principles of operations research (OR) developed during the war. OR, which emerged in the U.S. military from 1942 to optimize resource allocation and logistics, transitioned to civilian applications in the late 1940s and 1950s, enabling more rigorous modeling of project risks, costs, and efficiencies in sectors like manufacturing and energy.^[14] This integration allowed feasibility assessments to incorporate quantitative techniques such as linear programming and simulation, supporting the expansion of postwar industrial endeavors including chemical plants and power generation facilities.^[15] By the 1960s, these methods became standard for evaluating the scalability and operational impacts of complex projects, bridging military precision with industrial decision-making.^[16] The 1970s and 1980s saw a pronounced shift in feasibility studies toward advanced economic modeling, driven by global events like the 1973 and 1979 oil crises, which exposed vulnerabilities in energy-dependent projects and necessitated deeper financial risk assessments. These crises, which quadrupled oil prices and triggered recessions, prompted industries to incorporate scenario analysis and sensitivity testing into feasibility frameworks to forecast cost fluctuations and resource availability.^[17] Concurrently, the formalization of project management standards, such as the Project Management Institute's (PMI) PMBOK Guide first published in 1996, embedded economic feasibility as a core component of project initiation, emphasizing net present value calculations and return-on-investment metrics. This era's adaptations reflected a broader recognition of macroeconomic uncertainties in project planning. In the 2000s, feasibility studies underwent modern adaptations through integration with software tools, particularly for digital and IT-driven projects amid the rise of information technology transformations. Tools like UNIDO's COMFAR software, evolving from its 1980s origins, provided automated financial modeling and risk simulations for investment appraisals in digital infrastructure initiatives.^[18] Similarly, project management platforms such as Microsoft Project and Oracle Primavera incorporated feasibility modules for data-driven assessments of software development and e-commerce ventures, enabling real-time scenario testing and stakeholder collaboration. These digital enhancements streamlined the evaluation of technical and economic viability in fast-paced environments, aligning feasibility practices with contemporary applications in agile and virtual project ecosystems.

Key Milestones in Practice

In the 1930s, the Hoover Dam project exemplified an early success in comprehensive feasibility studies, where preliminary assessments in 1924 evaluated the Colorado River Basin's development, including site-specific designs for a concrete dam in Black Canyon, ensuring technical viability, flood control benefits, and economic returns through power generation and irrigation.^[19] These studies, conducted by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, addressed geological challenges and cost projections, leading to the dam's completion ahead of schedule in 1936 at approximately $49 million—under budget—and establishing benchmarks for large-scale infrastructure feasibility that influenced subsequent U.S. water projects.^[20] In contrast, the Sydney Opera House construction in the 1950s–1970s highlighted the consequences of inadequate preliminary studies; initial cost estimates of A$7 million ballooned to A$102 million by 1973 due to insufficient geotechnical investigations, incomplete designs before groundbreaking, and overlooked engineering complexities in the shell structures, resulting in 14 years of delays and underscoring the need for robust feasibility phases in architectural megaprojects.^[21] During the 1960s, the NASA Apollo program integrated feasibility assessments as a core practice for space missions, with Langley Research Center engineers developing simulators in the early decade to evaluate rendezvous and docking maneuvers, confirming the technical feasibility of lunar orbit strategies essential for the 1969 Moon landing.^[22] These studies, part of broader program planning under President Kennedy's 1961 directive, assessed propulsion, life support, and trajectory risks, enabling the successful Apollo 11 mission and advancing feasibility methods in high-stakes aerospace engineering.^[23] The 1980s marked the formalization of feasibility guidelines in international development through the World Bank's project appraisal methods, which emphasized economic, technical, and social evaluations to mitigate risks in lending for infrastructure and poverty alleviation initiatives.^[24] For instance, the 1980 World Development Report outlined appraisal frameworks incorporating cost-benefit analyses and environmental impacts, applied to over 1,000 projects annually and influencing global standards for assessing development viability in regions like sub-Saharan Africa.^[25] Standardization accelerated in the 1990s and 2000s with the Project Management Institute's (PMI) PMBOK Guide editions, where the 1996 first edition and 2000 second edition embedded feasibility studies within the project initiation phase, requiring assessments of scope, resources, and risks to authorize proceeding.^[26] The 2004 third edition further refined this by integrating feasibility into knowledge areas like cost and risk management, adopted by over 1 million PMP-certified professionals worldwide for ensuring project alignment with organizational goals.^[8] Complementing this, ISO 31000's 2009 release provided a global risk management framework that incorporates feasibility evaluations as part of iterative risk identification and treatment processes, applied in project contexts to enhance decision-making on uncertainties. In the 2020s, the European Union's Green Deal has emphasized sustainability within feasibility requirements, mandating environmental impact assessments and carbon-neutral projections for projects accessing €1 trillion in sustainable investments through 2030, as outlined in the 2020 framework to align initiatives with net-zero goals.^[27] This includes tools like the Sustainable Europe Investment Plan, which requires feasibility studies to evaluate green transitions in sectors such as energy and transport, fostering resilient infrastructure amid climate imperatives.^[28]

Core Feasibility Aspects

Technical Feasibility

Technical feasibility evaluates whether a proposed project can be successfully implemented using existing or readily available technology, expertise, and resources, without requiring groundbreaking innovations that exceed current capabilities.^[29] This assessment focuses on the practicality of the technical aspects, determining if the project's requirements align with proven methods and tools to minimize risks of failure during execution.^[30] Key evaluation criteria include the availability of necessary technology, the presence of required skills within the organization or accessible externally, and the adequacy of supporting infrastructure. Technology availability is gauged by its maturity level, such as well-established methods like pavement laying versus emerging ones like superconductors that may introduce uncertainties.^[29] Required skills are assessed through expert consultations, ensuring personnel can handle specialized tasks like software architecture or hardware integration.^[31] Infrastructure needs examine whether existing facilities, such as networks or hardware platforms, can support the project or if upgrades are feasible without disproportionate effort.^[30] Common methods for conducting technical feasibility include prototype testing, simulation modeling, and compatibility analysis. Prototype testing involves creating scale models or mock-ups to validate functionality, as seen in maglev train developments where physical prototypes demonstrate performance under real conditions.^[29] Simulation modeling uses software to predict system behavior, helping identify bottlenecks before full implementation.^[30] Compatibility analysis reviews how new components interact with legacy systems, often through demonstrations or walkthroughs to ensure seamless operation.^[31] Important factors considered are scalability, maintenance requirements, and integration with existing systems. Scalability assesses whether the technology can handle increased demands, such as higher user loads in software applications, often evaluated via feature weighting like passenger capacity in transport projects.^[29] Maintenance requirements evaluate long-term supportability, including ease of updates and availability of vendor support to avoid future disruptions.^[30] Integration focuses on how the new system meshes with current infrastructure, such as using existing rail tracks for tram extensions to reduce redevelopment needs.^[29] For example, in assessing hardware and software for a new mobile app development project, teams might prototype user interfaces on target devices to check compatibility across operating systems like iOS and Android, simulate data processing loads to ensure scalability, and verify integration with cloud services for backend support.^[31] This approach confirms that standard tools like React Native or Firebase meet the technical demands without custom inventions.^[30] A common pitfall in technical feasibility assessments is underestimating technological obsolescence, where reliance on platforms like outdated 32-bit systems leads to compatibility issues and unsupported features shortly after deployment.^[30]

Operational Feasibility

Operational feasibility assesses the extent to which a proposed project integrates with an organization's existing operations, processes, and human resources, ensuring practical implementation without undue strain on daily activities. This evaluation focuses on alignment with current workflows, employee capabilities, and organizational structure to determine if the project can be realistically adopted and sustained. Key criteria include workflow compatibility, which examines whether the project enhances or disrupts routine processes; user acceptance, gauging employee willingness and readiness to adopt changes; and change management needs, which identify strategies for transitioning to new operational norms.^[32]^[33]^[34] Assessment methods for operational feasibility typically involve stakeholder interviews to collect qualitative insights from end-users and managers on potential impacts; process mapping to visualize and analyze how the project fits into existing operations; and pilot testing to simulate implementation on a small scale, revealing practical issues before full rollout. These approaches help quantify risks and benefits in terms of operational flow, often using tools like flowcharts or surveys to measure compatibility. For instance, interviews can uncover hidden dependencies in workflows, while pilot tests provide empirical data on usability and integration challenges.^[32]^[35]^[34] Critical factors influencing operational feasibility encompass training requirements to equip staff with necessary skills for new processes, minimizing skill gaps; potential disruption to current operations, such as temporary halts in production or service delivery during transition; and the adequacy of support systems, including ongoing technical assistance and resource allocation for maintenance. These elements ensure the project does not overburden existing infrastructure or personnel, promoting long-term viability. In evaluating these, analysts consider how the initiative affects overall productivity and morale.^[1]^[33]^[32] A representative example is the implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software in a manufacturing firm, such as Rolls-Royce's adoption of SAP R/3, where operational feasibility was assessed by mapping legacy workflows against the new system to identify integration points and required process re-engineering. This involved analyzing impacts on shop floor operations, where temporary disruptions occurred during the "go-live" phase due to data transfer issues, but were mitigated through extensive training for over 10,000 employees and pilot testing in waves. The assessment revealed needs for behavioral training to foster user acceptance and addressed workflow incompatibilities by standardizing processes to fit the ERP without heavy customization.^[36] Challenges in operational feasibility often stem from resistance to change among employees accustomed to established routines, which can hinder adoption and lead to suboptimal use of the project; and cultural fit issues, where the initiative clashes with the organization's values or hierarchical structure, potentially causing internal conflicts. Overcoming these requires proactive engagement, such as involving stakeholders early in assessments to build buy-in and tailoring change management to address specific cultural nuances. Failure to manage these can result in prolonged disruptions or project abandonment.^[34]^[33]^[35]

Legal Feasibility

Legal feasibility evaluates whether a proposed project complies with applicable laws, regulations, and ethical standards to ensure its implementation does not violate legal requirements or expose stakeholders to undue risks. This assessment is crucial in project management as it identifies potential barriers that could render the project unviable from a legal standpoint, such as conflicts with statutory obligations or contractual agreements. By examining these elements early, organizations can mitigate issues that might lead to project delays, modifications, or abandonment.^[37]^[32] Key areas of legal feasibility include intellectual property rights, environmental regulations, labor laws, and zoning permits. Intellectual property considerations involve verifying trademarks, patents, copyrights, and trade secrets to avoid infringement, particularly in innovation-driven projects like software development or product launches. Environmental regulations require compliance with laws governing pollution, waste management, and resource use, ensuring the project aligns with standards set by bodies like the Environmental Protection Agency. Labor laws focus on adherence to employment standards, including equal opportunity, working conditions, and necessary permits for workforce engagement. Zoning permits assess local land-use restrictions to confirm the project's location and scope are permissible under municipal ordinances.^[37]^[38]^[39] Methods for conducting a legal feasibility study typically involve legal audits, consultations with experts, and reviews of contracts. Legal audits entail a systematic examination of the project's proposed activities against relevant statutes and regulations to identify compliance gaps. Consultations with legal experts, such as attorneys specializing in the project's domain, provide interpretive guidance and recommendations for adjustments. Contract reviews analyze agreements with suppliers, partners, or employees to ensure terms are enforceable and aligned with governing laws, often involving due diligence on clauses related to liabilities or obligations. These approaches help build a robust legal foundation before proceeding.^[37]^[40] Important factors in legal feasibility include liability issues and data privacy compliance. Liability assessments evaluate potential exposures from product defects, tort claims, or disputes that could arise during or after project execution, informing insurance needs or risk allocation strategies. Data privacy factors ensure adherence to regulations like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) for technology projects handling personal information, requiring safeguards for data collection, storage, and processing to prevent breaches. Non-compliance in these areas can impose operational constraints by necessitating redesigns or additional approvals.^[37]^[39] For example, in a construction project, legal feasibility involves checking building codes for structural safety and zoning laws for land use compatibility, such as verifying that a proposed commercial building on residential-zoned land obtains necessary variances or permits from local authorities. This process confirms the site's suitability and avoids violations that could halt development.^[41]^[38] Risks associated with inadequate legal feasibility include potential litigation, fines, or regulatory penalties from non-compliance, which can escalate costs and damage reputation. In severe cases, unresolved legal barriers may lead to project termination or bankruptcy, underscoring the need for thorough upfront evaluation.^[37]^[32]

Schedule Feasibility

Schedule feasibility evaluates whether a proposed project can be completed within the allocated timeframe, considering task durations, interdependencies, and potential delays. This assessment is essential in the overall feasibility study to ensure that timelines align with project objectives and stakeholder expectations, preventing overruns that could jeopardize viability. It involves analyzing the sequence of activities to determine if the schedule is realistic given available constraints.^[42] Key criteria for schedule feasibility include critical path analysis, which identifies the longest sequence of dependent tasks that determines the minimum project duration; resource leveling, which adjusts task schedules to avoid overallocation of personnel or equipment; and milestone planning, which sets major checkpoints to track progress against deadlines. Critical path analysis helps prioritize activities with no slack time, ensuring focus on those that directly impact completion. Resource leveling smooths resource demands over the timeline without extending the overall duration where possible. Milestone planning establishes verifiable points, such as prototype completion or testing phases, to monitor adherence to the schedule.^[43]^[44]^[45] Common methods for conducting schedule feasibility include Gantt charts, which visually represent task timelines, durations, and dependencies in a bar format for straightforward planning and communication, and the Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT), which accounts for uncertainty by using probabilistic time estimates (optimistic, most likely, and pessimistic) to calculate expected durations. Gantt charts facilitate the identification of overlaps and gaps in the schedule, aiding in dependency mapping. PERT is particularly useful for projects with high variability, such as research and development, where it computes the critical path variance to assess completion probability.^[46]^[47] Influencing factors encompass task dependencies, where the start or finish of one activity relies on another (e.g., finish-to-start relationships); buffer times incorporated to accommodate unforeseen delays like supply chain issues; and alignment with external deadlines, such as regulatory approvals or market launch windows. Dependencies dictate the logical flow, potentially creating bottlenecks if not sequenced properly. Buffers, often 10-20% of total duration, provide contingency without inflating the baseline schedule excessively. External deadlines ensure the project synchronizes with broader organizational or market events. Resource allocation impacts may necessitate minor adjustments to maintain schedule integrity, as detailed in resource feasibility assessments.^[48]^[49]^[50] In a software rollout example, schedule feasibility might assess the timeline from requirements gathering through coding, testing, and deployment against a seasonal market window, using PERT to estimate a 6-9 month duration with buffers for integration delays, ensuring launch before peak demand periods.^[51] A primary challenge in schedule feasibility is scope creep, where uncontrolled additions to project requirements extend task durations and disrupt the critical path, often leading to missed deadlines in up to 47% of projects. Effective management involves strict change control processes to evaluate impacts before approval.^[52]^[53]

Economic and Resource Factors

Financial Feasibility

Financial feasibility assessment evaluates the economic viability of a proposed project or venture by analyzing costs, revenues, and potential returns to determine if it can generate sufficient financial benefits to justify the investment. This process involves a detailed examination of financial resources required and expected outcomes, ensuring that the project aligns with budgetary constraints and profitability goals.^[1] It is a critical component of overall feasibility studies, focusing on quantitative financial models to support decision-making.^[54] Key metrics used in financial feasibility include Net Present Value (NPV), Return on Investment (ROI), and payback period. NPV measures the profitability of a project by calculating the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at a specific rate, minus the initial investment; a positive NPV indicates that the project is expected to generate value over its costs. The formula for NPV is:

NPV = \sum_{t=1}^{n} \frac{CF_t}{(1 + r)^t} - C_0

where CF_t represents the net cash flow during period t, r is the discount rate (reflecting the time value of money and risk), t is the time period, and C_0 is the initial investment.^[55] ROI quantifies the efficiency of an investment as the ratio of net profit to the total investment cost, expressed as a percentage: ROI = \frac{Net\ Profit}{Investment\ Cost} \times 100, helping to compare the relative profitability of different projects.^[56] The payback period determines the time required to recover the initial investment from project cash inflows, providing insight into liquidity and risk exposure; shorter periods are generally preferred for quicker capital recovery.^[57] Common methods in financial feasibility analysis encompass budgeting, cash flow forecasting, and sensitivity analysis. Budgeting involves estimating all anticipated expenditures to create a comprehensive financial plan that outlines resource allocation.^[58] Cash flow forecasting projects inflows and outflows over the project's lifecycle to assess liquidity and sustainability, often using historical data and assumptions about market conditions.^[59] Sensitivity analysis tests how variations in key variables—such as sales volume or cost increases—affect financial outcomes, identifying potential vulnerabilities and informing risk mitigation strategies.^[60] Influential factors in this assessment include initial capital requirements, ongoing operational costs, revenue projections, and available funding sources. Initial capital covers upfront expenses like equipment and development, while ongoing costs include maintenance, labor, and utilities that recur throughout the project.^[61] Revenue projections estimate future income based on pricing, sales volume, and market penetration, forming the basis for profitability calculations. Funding sources may include equity investments, bank loans, or government grants, each carrying different terms like interest rates or repayment obligations that impact overall feasibility.^[62] For instance, in evaluating a new product launch, the break-even point calculation determines the sales volume needed to cover all costs, using the formula: Break-even\ Point\ (units) = \frac{Fixed\ Costs}{Selling\ Price\ per\ Unit - Variable\ Cost\ per\ Unit}. If fixed costs are $100,000, the selling price is $50 per unit, and variable costs are $30 per unit, the break-even point is 5,000 units ($100,000 / ($50 - $30)), indicating the minimum production required for the launch to avoid losses.^[63] This metric helps assess whether projected sales can achieve financial viability within a reasonable timeframe.^[54]

Resource Feasibility

Resource feasibility evaluates the availability, adequacy, and suitability of non-financial assets required to execute a project, ensuring that essential elements like personnel, supplies, and infrastructure can support the initiative without undue constraints. This assessment determines whether the organization possesses or can acquire the necessary resources to meet project demands, focusing on tangible and human elements rather than monetary aspects. It is a critical component of overall feasibility studies, as resource shortages can derail even viable projects by limiting execution capacity.^[10] Key categories in resource feasibility include human resources, materials, and facilities. Human resources encompass the skills, expertise, and staffing levels needed, such as evaluating whether current employees possess the required competencies or if additional hiring and training are necessary. Materials involve the supply chain for raw goods, tools, and equipment, assessing procurement options and stock levels to avoid disruptions. Facilities cover physical infrastructure like workspace, machinery, and utilities, ensuring they align with project scale and operational needs. For instance, in a factory expansion, analysts might review staffing requirements, identifying gaps in skilled labor that necessitate training programs to bridge expertise shortfalls.^[10]^[64]^[6] Assessment typically involves inventory audits to catalog existing assets, capacity planning to forecast resource utilization against projected demands, and gap analysis to pinpoint discrepancies between current and required resources. These methods help quantify needs, such as auditing equipment inventories or modeling workforce capacity to handle increased production. Factors influencing the evaluation include sourcing reliability from suppliers, the scalability of resources to accommodate growth, and contingencies for potential shortages, like alternative procurement strategies. Challenges often arise from dependency on external suppliers, which can introduce vulnerabilities such as delays or geopolitical risks affecting material availability. While resource acquisition may incur financial costs, these are analyzed separately in financial feasibility to maintain focus on asset adequacy here.^[65]^[66]^[6]^[67]

Additional Considerations

Market Research

Market research constitutes a pivotal component of a feasibility study, focusing on evaluating the commercial potential of a proposed venture by examining demand patterns, competitive dynamics, and prevailing market conditions. This analysis helps determine whether sufficient customer interest and market opportunities exist to support the project's success, drawing on both primary and secondary data sources to inform strategic decisions.^[68]^[69] Key components of market research in feasibility studies include customer segmentation, which categorizes potential consumers into distinct groups based on demographics, income levels, preferences, and behaviors to tailor offerings effectively; demand forecasting, which employs historical trends, population growth projections, and economic indicators to estimate future sales volumes and market capture rates; and competitor benchmarking, which systematically compares the proposed project's features, pricing, and performance against existing rivals to identify differentiation opportunities and potential market gaps.^[70]^[71]^[68] Common methods for conducting this research encompass primary data collection techniques such as surveys and focus groups, which solicit direct feedback from target audiences to gauge interest and preferences, often involving statistically valid samples for reliability. Analytical tools like SWOT analysis provide a structured framework to assess internal strengths and weaknesses alongside external opportunities and threats, aiding in strategic positioning within the market. Additionally, Porter's Five Forces model evaluates the competitive landscape by analyzing factors such as the threat of new entrants, bargaining power of suppliers and buyers, threat of substitutes, and industry rivalry, offering insights into overall market attractiveness.^[71]^[72]^[73] Essential factors influencing the assessment include market size, quantified through total addressable market estimates derived from population data, economic analyses, and absorption rates to gauge scalability; pricing strategy, which aligns proposed costs with competitor benchmarks and consumer willingness to pay for optimal positioning; and entry barriers, encompassing capital investments, regulatory requirements, and competitive saturation that could limit access to the market.^[70]^[71]^[68] For example, when assessing a new consumer electronics product, surveys targeting segmented user groups—such as tech-savvy millennials—can estimate adoption rates by measuring expressed interest, intended purchase frequency, and barriers to uptake, providing quantifiable data on potential market penetration.^[71] These market research findings serve as inputs for broader financial projections, enabling evaluation of revenue potential and break-even timelines.^[69] Environmental and social feasibility evaluates the potential impacts of a proposed project on the natural environment and affected communities, ensuring that sustainability and ethical principles are integrated into decision-making from the outset. This assessment identifies both positive and negative effects, such as resource depletion or community benefits, to determine if the project can proceed without unacceptable harm. It emphasizes proactive measures to mitigate adverse outcomes and enhance long-term viability, drawing on established methodologies to balance development with ecological and societal well-being.^[74] Environmental aspects focus on the project's effects on ecosystems, resources, and climate, including carbon footprint, waste management, and biodiversity. Carbon footprint analysis quantifies greenhouse gas emissions across project phases, helping to identify high-impact activities like energy use in construction. Waste management strategies assess generation, treatment, and disposal of materials to prevent pollution, such as soil contamination from hazardous byproducts. Biodiversity effects are evaluated for risks to habitats and species, particularly in sensitive areas, where habitat fragmentation or species loss could occur. A core tool is the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), a systematic process that predicts these consequences through screening, scoping, impact prediction, mitigation planning, and reporting, often required for major developments to inform project design.^[75]^[76] Social aspects examine the project's influence on human populations, addressing issues like community displacement, equity in benefit distribution, and cultural preservation. Displacement risks involve involuntary relocation of residents, requiring evaluation of livelihood disruptions and support for resettlement. Equity considerations ensure fair access to opportunities, such as jobs or services, avoiding exacerbation of inequalities among marginalized groups. Cultural preservation assesses impacts on heritage sites or indigenous practices, promoting safeguards like community consultations to maintain social cohesion. Social Impact Assessment (SIA) guides this by analyzing effects on health, education, and human rights, emphasizing inclusive processes to build support and reduce conflicts.^[77]^[78] Key methods include lifecycle analysis, stakeholder engagement, and ESG frameworks to comprehensively address these impacts. Lifecycle analysis, or Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), evaluates environmental effects from raw material extraction through operation to disposal, providing a holistic view of sustainability by quantifying resource use and emissions. Stakeholder engagement involves early consultations with affected parties to gather input on risks and benefits, fostering transparency and incorporating local knowledge into mitigation plans. ESG frameworks integrate environmental, social, and governance criteria to assess overall project sustainability, guiding evaluations of ethical practices and long-term societal value.^[79]^[74]^[80] For instance, in evaluating a mining project, assessments might analyze water usage for processing operations, which could strain local supplies, alongside community benefits like infrastructure improvements, ensuring measures like efficient recycling and job training address both environmental strain and social equity.^[81] In modern practice, environmental and social feasibility increasingly aligns with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), adopted in 2015, to promote projects that advance objectives like responsible consumption (SDG 12), life on land (SDG 15), and reduced inequalities (SDG 10), thereby enhancing global sustainability efforts.^[82]

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis in feasibility studies involves systematically identifying, evaluating, and addressing uncertainties that could undermine a project's viability across technical, operational, legal, schedule, economic, and other dimensions. This process ensures that decision-makers understand potential threats and opportunities, enabling informed adjustments to project plans before significant resources are committed. By quantifying and prioritizing risks, organizations can enhance project resilience and align outcomes with strategic objectives.^[83] The risk analysis process begins with identification, often through brainstorming sessions involving stakeholders to catalog potential issues such as technology failures or regulatory changes. Qualitative assessment follows, categorizing risks by likelihood and impact using descriptive scales like low, medium, and high, while quantitative assessment employs numerical models to estimate probabilities and consequences more precisely. Mitigation strategies are then developed, ranging from avoidance (e.g., altering project scope) to acceptance (e.g., setting aside contingency reserves), tailored to the assessed severity.^[84] Key risk types in feasibility studies include technical risks, such as equipment failure rates that could exceed 10% in unproven systems, leading to delays; market risks, like demand fluctuations due to economic shifts that might reduce projected revenues by 20-30%; and external risks, including geopolitical events that disrupt supply chains or impose sanctions. These categories span all feasibility aspects, ensuring comprehensive coverage without overlap into domain-specific details.^[85] Common methods for risk assessment include Monte Carlo simulation, which runs thousands of iterations of probabilistic models to forecast outcomes like cost overruns, providing a distribution of possible results rather than point estimates. For prioritization, the risk matrix plots risks on a grid of probability versus impact, assigning scores (e.g., 1-5 scale) to highlight high-priority items for immediate action. These tools integrate qualitative insights with data-driven precision to guide resource allocation.^[86]^[87] An illustrative example is scenario planning applied to supply chain disruptions in a global manufacturing project, where multiple future states—such as trade tariffs or natural disasters—are modeled to test resilience, revealing vulnerabilities like a 15% cost increase from rerouting logistics and informing backup supplier strategies.^[88] Risk quantification often uses the Expected Monetary Value (EMV) formula, defined as:

\text{EMV} = P \times I

where P is the probability of occurrence (e.g., 0.3 for a 30% chance) and I is the financial impact (e.g., $100,000 loss). This yields an expected cost, such as $30,000, aiding in reserve planning and decision-making by aggregating multiple risks for overall exposure.^[89]

References

[1]
Feasibility Study: What It Is, Benefits, and Examples - Investopedia
A feasibility study analyzes all of the critical aspects of a project to determine the probability of completing it successfully.Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
[2]
Feasibility Study - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Feasibility studies are structured ways to assess the technical, social, financial, and environmental viability or practicality of a project.
[3]
[PDF] A Cooperative Feasibility Study Guide - USDA Rural Development
THIS SECTION CLARIFIES what a feasibility study is by providing an extensive definition, explaining why studies are conducted, outlining their limitations, and ...
[4]
[PDF] Feasibility Study Phase - GSA
The Feasibility Study defines project goals, scopes customer need, and assesses alternatives to satisfy both. GSA has standard scopes of work that describe ...
[5]
Techniques to Assess Project Feasibility - PMI
This article describes a project selection technique that helps decision-makers evaluate the profitability of alternative projects.
[6]
2.2.1 Feasibility Studies - Texas Department of Transportation
A feasibility study aims to provide an independent assessment that examines all aspects of a proposed project, including technical, economic, financial, legal, ...
[7]
When to Do and How to Use a Feasibility Study | Ag Decision Maker
A feasibility study investigates a project's viability, assessing if it's worth investment, and is done before committing resources, time, and budget.Missing: PMBOK | Show results with:PMBOK
[8]
How to Do a TELOS Feasibility Study - Testing the Viability of a Project
TELOS is a five-step framework for feasibility studies, covering Technological, Economic, Legal, Organizational, and Scheduling aspects.
[9]
Why Feasibility Studies are Important | Indian Affairs
Feasibility studies examine potential risks to determine whether they're worth taking. A comprehensive feasibility study can distinguish real economic ...
[10]
What is a Feasibility Study: Definition, Steps & Importance
Sep 23, 2025 · A feasibility study is a comprehensive evaluation of a proposed project that evaluates all factors critical to its success to assess its likelihood of success.Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
[11]
Project Management Statistics: Everything You Need to Know (2024)
Nov 8, 2024 · How many projects fail? ... 65% of all projects fail. Source: Upwork. What are the biggest causes of project failure? Statistic. Three ...
[12]
[PDF] The US Army Corps of Engineers: A History - GovInfo
The US Army Corps of Engineers, a permanent institution since 1802, has supported the US Army and Nation, built fortifications, and became a lead flood control ...
[13]
[PDF] the Corps of Engineers and the New Deal, 1929-1941 - GovInfo
The Corps, as the federal agency with a long history in engineering and civil works construction, proved a logical choice to undertake much of the new federal ...
[14]
[PDF] History of Operations Research in the United States Army, Volume 1
Aug 11, 2006 · Operations research (OR) emerged in the US Army during World War II, from 1942 to 1962, to improve weapons and equipment.
[15]
Operations Research - PubsOnLine
This paper examines the Anglo-American experience of Operations Research from the 1940s to 1990s, highlighting both similarities and contrasts in their ...<|separator|>
[16]
[PDF] Operations Research and the United States Army - AUSA
Early during World War II, a new multidisciplinary approach to solving complex military problems was pioneered by the British during the Battle of Britain.
[17]
Oil and the Energy Crisis of the 1970s: A Reanalysis
Jun 25, 2024 · The oil-price rise and the energy crisis of the 1970s was exceptionally destructive, both in its immediate political and inflationary impact and ...Missing: feasibility | Show results with:feasibility
[18]
COMFAR Software | UNIDO
COMFAR complements investment-profiling efforts and offer feasibility analysis support of large infrastructure or Public-Private Partnership (PPP) projects ...Missing: studies digital transformation
[19]
Boulder Canyon Project - Hoover Dam - Bureau of Reclamation
In 1924, a report on the development of the Colorado River Basin included a preliminary design for a concrete dam at the lower Black Canyon site. Prior to this ...
[20]
[PDF] Hoover IK'iiii - NPS History
The uncontestable feasibility and success of Hoover Dam, first of the great multiple-purpose Reclamation dams, gave impetus to the construction of other ...
[21]
Application in the Construction of the Sydney Opera House (SOH)
Aug 2, 2025 · Its construction was marred by poor risk management and suffered huge cost and time overruns. In this essay, we will evaluate the risk ...
[22]
The First Step: Langley's Contributions to Apollo - NASA
Mar 22, 2019 · In the early 1960s, Langley researchers built various simulators to study the feasibility of space rendezvous and orbital docking.Lunar-Orbit Rendezvous (lor)... · Lunar Landing Research... · Lunar Orbiter ProjectMissing: assessments | Show results with:assessments
[23]
[PDF] Apollo: A Retrospective Analysis - NASA
The program to land an American on the Moon and return safely to Earth in the 1960s has been called by some observers a defining event of the twentieth ...
[24]
[PDF] Some Guidelines for the Appraisal of Large Projects
This paper aims to identify modifications to standard techniques of cost-benefit analysis employed by the World Bank in the appraisal of large projects.' It ...
[25]
[PDF] World Development Report, 1980
Published for the World Bank. 1. Underdeveloped areasPeriodicals. 2. Economic development. Periodicals. I. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development ...
[26]
PMBOK Guide Third Edition - Overview of the Changes - PMI
Oct 25, 2004 · ... (PMBOK® Guide), is updated every four to five years. The current version, PMBOK® Guide – 2000 Edition, was published in December 2000. The ...Co-Author: Carol Steuer, Pmp... · Structural Changes · Chapter 4 - Project...
[27]
The European Green Deal
It aims to cut emissions by at least 50% by 2030, rising towards 55%, while legally binding the 2050 neutrality goal through the European Climate Law.Missing: feasibility | Show results with:feasibility
[28]
[PDF] Supporting sustainability transitions under the European Green Deal ...
Transitions become feasible when alternative solutions for a sustainable future are made available. This is why supporting innovation is central in the ...
[29]
2.2 Technical feasibility | OpenLearn - The Open University
For example, the technologies of laying pavements, building stairways and so on is very mature, though new materials will from time to time appear on the market ...Missing: criteria | Show results with:criteria
[30]
Feasibility Study for Information System Projects - UMSL
A feasible project is one where the project could generate adequate amount of cash flow and profits, withstand the risks it will encounter, remain viable in ...Missing: digital transformation
[31]
[PDF] CS 5150 Software Engineering 4. Feasibility Studies - CS@Cornell
Specific Requirements for the Feasibility Report. • Outline plan, showing principal activities and milestones (see the lecture on Project Management).Missing: criteria methods
[32]
How to Conduct a Feasibility Study: Templates and Examples - Asana
May 13, 2025 · By evaluating the viability of a proposed project, a feasibility study helps you identify potential challenges and opportunities, ensuring you ...Types Of Feasibility Studies · Market Feasibility · Legal FeasibilityMissing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative<|control11|><|separator|>
[33]
(PDF) Feasibility Studies and Important Aspect of Project Management
Aug 8, 2025 · This article objective is about to study the impact of project management in obtaining success of project completion.
[34]
What Is a Feasibility Study: Step-by-Step Guide - Technology Advice
Dec 1, 2023 · A feasibility study is an analytical tool used to evaluate the practicality of a proposed project or business idea.Missing: PMBOK | Show results with:PMBOK<|control11|><|separator|>
[35]
None
### Summary of Operational Feasibility from the PDF
[36]
[PDF] A case study of ERP in Rolls-Royce | UMass Dartmouth
This paper examines ERP implementation at Rolls-Royce, using SAP R/3, focusing on business, technical, and cultural issues. ERP integrates functional systems ...
[37]
What is a Legal Feasibility Study?
May 15, 2024 · A legal feasibility study is a key part of a feasibility study. It reviews the legal aspects surrounding the proposed endeavor.
[38]
Project Feasibility Study: Assessment, Analysis, and Report Types
Technical, Economic, Legal, Operational, and Scheduling feasibility — is widely used to evaluate a project's overall ...When is Feasibility Analysis... · What Are the Components... · Financial Feasibility
[39]
Legal Feasibility test - Project Feasibility Study - TrustEd Institute
Legal feasibility examines whether the proposed project conflicts with legal requirements, including zoning laws, data protection act, logistic constraints, ...
[40]
15.1 The Process of Analyzing Legal Feasibility and Conducting ...
The due diligence process should ensure that the project is procured in accordance with current legal requirements, both in domestic and international terms.
[41]
How Construction Feasibility Studies Guide Building Decisions
A feasibility study is the process of researching the location and design of a building before starting a project to determine its success.
[42]
What is a Schedule Feasibility? - PM Study Circle
May 15, 2024 · A schedule feasibility study is part of a feasibility study. In a schedule feasibility study, management analyzes whether the proposed endeavor has any time ...
[43]
Fundamentals of scheduling & resource leveling - PMI
This is a presentation of the fundamentals of CPM scheduling to help the reader fully understand the mechanics of scheduling.
[44]
Resource Leveling in Project Management: A Quick Guide
Aug 5, 2024 · Resource leveling is a resource planning technique that involves balancing available resources and schedules to complete projects on time.
[45]
Critical path method: How to use CPM for project management - Asana
Mar 28, 2025 · The critical path method (CPM) is a technique where you identify tasks that are necessary for project completion and determine scheduling flexibilities.
[46]
A Gantt Chart Guide with Definitions & Examples - ProjectManager
A Gantt chart is a project management chart that allows project managers to create a project schedule. It shows the order in which project tasks will be ...
[47]
https://www.smartsheet.com/content/pert-critical-path
[48]
A Comprehensive Guide for Managing Task Dependencies - ProofHub
Jul 3, 2025 · Task dependencies refer to the relationships between tasks in a project where the start or completion of one task depends on the start or completion of another.
[49]
Scheduling Feasibility: Can Your Project Be Completed on Time?
Sep 18, 2025 · A guide to scheduling feasibility, a critical part of any project plan. Learn how to assess timelines, resources, and dependencies to avoid ...
[50]
Project Dependencies: Types & Dependency Management - Galorath
Apr 15, 2025 · Effective project managers handle external dependencies by building buffer time into the schedule, negotiating realistic deadlines with ...Vendor And Supplier... · Finish To Start (fs) · Design Structure MatrixMissing: feasibility | Show results with:feasibility<|control11|><|separator|>
[51]
Types of Feasibility Study in Software Project Development
Jul 15, 2025 · Operational Feasibility: In Operational Feasibility degree of providing service to requirements is analyzed along with how much easy product ...
[52]
Scope Creep: Causes, Consequences, and Tips on Preventing It
Nov 20, 2024 · Scope creep is bad for a project as it leads to missed delivery dates, exceeding the budget, and poor quality of the final outcome.
[53]
How Does Scope Creep Affect Project Success: Insights Backed by ...
Jan 2, 2025 · Scope creep causes missed deadlines, spiraling budgets, strains relationships, exhausts teams, and reduces ROI, with 47% of projects facing ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[54]
Feasibility analysis for new businesses | Business Queensland
Sep 19, 2025 · Use this type of analysis to determine if your business has adequate economic resources to meet its goals (e.g. funding, capital, profit).How To Analyse The... · Financial Viability · Product And Service...Missing: ongoing projections
[55]
Net Present Value (NPV): What It Means and Steps to Calculate It
To calculate NPV, you need to estimate the timing and amount of future cash flows and pick a discount rate equal to the minimum acceptable rate of return. The ...Disadvantages of Net Present... · Time Value of Money · Microsoft Excel
[56]
How to Calculate ROI to Justify a Project - HBS Online
May 12, 2020 · To calculate the expected return on investment, you would divide the net profit by the cost of the investment, and multiply that number by 100.
[57]
Payback Period: Definition, Formula, and Calculation - Investopedia
The payback period refers to the amount of time it takes to recover the cost of an investment or how long it takes for an investor to hit breakeven.
[58]
Financial Feasibility Study: Meaning, Analysis & Examples
Rating 3.7 (3) Sep 16, 2025 · Financial Feasibility Metrics. NPV (12% discount rate): $311,021; IRR: 35.3%; Payback Period: 2.58 years; Break-even Point: $478,823 annually ...
[59]
2.3 Financial feasibility | OpenLearn - The Open University
Every project has to be financed. Money has to be found to pay for the initial investment in the project and perhaps also to finance subsequent revenue costs ...Missing: ongoing | Show results with:ongoing
[60]
What Is Sensitivity Analysis? - Investopedia
Sensitivity analysis is a financial model that determines how target variables are affected based on changes in input variables.
[61]
Financial Feasibility Analysis Template & Guidance - Iseo Blue
... Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), and the Payback Period to scrutinise the project's prospective financial returns. Again, dealing ...
[62]
How To Prepare A Financial Feasibility Study? - Fortius Consulting
Sep 21, 2023 · It details the investment required to achieve the desired benefit (profit) and considers factors like total cost and expenses simultaneously.
[63]
What Is Break-Even Analysis: Formula and Guide - NetSuite
Mar 25, 2025 · A break-even analysis is a financial calculation that determines the point at which the total costs of a new business, service, or product exactly equal its ...
[64]
[PDF] Lecture 7: the Feasibility Study - Computer Science
To suggest possible alternative solutions. To provide management with enough information to know: Whether the project can be done.
[65]
How to Do a Resource Gap Analysis: A 5-Step Guide | Runn
Jan 20, 2023 · A resource gap analysis helps you identify the gaps between the resources you will need to cover upcoming projects and the resources you currently have.
[66]
A Complete Guide to Resource Capacity Planning - Saviom Software
Oct 29, 2025 · Resource capacity planning is the continuous strategic process of assessing and aligning resource capacity (people, equipment, capital, etc.) ...
[67]
https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/100-day-supply-chain-review-report.pdf
[68]
Feasibility Studies - What Are They? - Penn State Extension
A market analysis, a technical or production analysis, and a financial analysis. Let's take a closer look at each. The market analysis section looks at and ...Missing: components methods
[69]
What is a Feasibility Study? | Ag Decision Maker
1. Preliminary Analysis · 2. Market Assessment · 3. Organizational Structures · 4. Financial Controls · 5. Points of Vulnerability · 6. Results and Conclusions · 7.Missing: components | Show results with:components
[70]
None
### Summary of Market Analysis Components in Feasibility Studies
[71]
Market research and competitive analysis | U.S. Small Business ...
Sep 23, 2025 · Market research helps you find customers for your business. Competitive analysis helps you make your business unique.
[72]
Conducting a SWOT Analysis - Penn State Extension
Jan 3, 2023 · A SWOT analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) is a process that can help get insights into your business.
[73]
How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy
by Michael E. Porter · From the Magazine (March–April 1979). Michael Castaneda ... Subscribe now for unlimited access to every HBR article (and much more).
[74]
[PDF] Feasibility Studies and Project Planning
Provide information ahead of consultations on environmental and social impacts. • Employ good practice in meeting or exceeding ESIA requirements on consultation ...
[75]
Environmental Impact Assessment
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) may be defined as a formal process used to predict the environmental consequences of any development project. EIA thus ...
[76]
[PDF] 2. Overview of the EIA Process
The purpose of the EIA process is to inform decision-makers and the public of the environmental consequences of implementing a proposed project.
[77]
[PDF] Social-Impact-Assessment-Guidance-for-Assessing-and-Managing ...
The purpose of this Guidance Note is to provide advice to various stakeholders about what is expected in good practice social impact assessment (SIA) and ...
[78]
Social impact assessment in the mining sector - ScienceDirect.com
Land use-related impacts and environmental impacts affecting human health and human rights appear to be the most concerning social aspects in the mining sector.
[79]
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) explained - PRé Sustainability
Jul 17, 2022 · Life cycle assessment (LCA) evaluates a product's environmental impacts across its entire life cycle, including raw material extraction, ...
[80]
Sustainability Impact Assessment & Feasibility Analysis
ENGIE Impact uses advanced digital tools to assess the environmental, societal and economic consequences, minimizing risk and optimizing costs.
[81]
[PDF] EIA CASE STUDY: Mining - Colombia
The Gramalote project is an open-pit gold mine in San Roque, Antioquia, Colombia, with a 7.221 km2 ore deposit, aiming to remove 350-450 million ounces of gold ...
[82]
https://sdgs.un.org/goals
[83]
Project risk analysis to support strategic and project management
This paper explains the kinds of cost and schedule risk analyses and the level of detail that would be needed to support both strategic management and project ...
[84]
Quantifying risk - PMI
Risk analysis is broadly split into two areas (i.e., qualitative risk analysis, and quantitative risk analysis).
[85]
Risk Analysis in the Evaluation of Plant Investments - PMI
This paper discusses the application of risk analysis techniques to a feasibility study for a chemical additives production plant in Saudi Arabia.
[86]
Monte Carlo simulation in cost estimating - Risk management - PMI
Monte Carlo simulation is a practical tool used in determining contingency and can facilitate more effective management of cost estimate uncertainties.
[87]
Integrating risk analysis and prioritization - PMI
Using the integrated analysis matrix allows project teams to quickly combine the analysis and prioritization of risk events into a single tool. The matrix ...
[88]
Supply Chain Resilience Roadmaps for Major Disruptions
Oct 15, 2025 · Results: The methodology is introduced to create roadmaps comprises several stages, including supply chain exploration, scenario planning, ...
[89]
Expected Monetary Value Choices Risk Impact | PMI
Multiply the “risk event probability” by the “risk event impact” to calculate “expected monetary value.” For example, you are planning an outdoor fundraising ...