Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Jougs

The jougs is an iron collar used historically as a form of public punishment, primarily in from the through the early , consisting of a hinged metal fastened around the offender's neck and attached by a short to a fixed point such as a door, wall, tree, or . The term derives from the joug, meaning . This device restrained individuals at head height, forcing them to stand exposed to the elements and public scorn for durations typically ranging from one to several hours, serving as a means of rather than severe physical harm. Unlike the or , which immobilized the body or limbs, the jougs focused on neck restraint to emphasize repentance and deter minor offenses like drunkenness, , Sabbath-breaking, or disruptions. With roots in medieval but documented use originating in 16th-century and spreading to parts of and the , the jougs were often administered by authorities as a tool of moral and , particularly in rural parishes where formal prisons were scarce. Records from the 16th and 17th centuries document their use for petty crimes, such as a 1649 case in where a maidservant endured an hour in the jougs for assaulting her mistress. By the post-Reformation era, they symbolized power over community behavior, with variations in design including serrated edges for discomfort or double collars for multiple offenders, though most were simple and functional. Their application declined with the rise of modern legal systems, but they occasionally caused unintended fatalities, as in one instance where a supporting box collapsed, leading to strangulation. Surviving examples, numbering around 31 documented specimens as of 2011, are preserved in Scottish museums and historic sites, highlighting their role in early justice practices. Notable artifacts include 17th-century jougs from Fife's Ladybank parish at the (reference H.MR 43) and a complete set still affixed to the wall of Duddingston Kirk in , a to the .

Definition and Design

Physical Description

The jougs were a restraint device comprising an iron intended to encircle the offender's , with a simple hinged mechanism at the back or side allowing it to open for fitting and front loops or a plate for securing with a . Surviving specimens indicate collars adjustable to fit adult necks while remaining uncomfortably tight. The collar's robust iron construction ensured durability, often forged in a single piece with reinforcements to prevent tampering. A short was riveted or linked to the and anchored to a fixed point such as a , , , or using a staple or ring. This attachment restricted the wearer's range of motion to mere inches, forcing an upright standing position and preventing escape or relief, with the fixed point typically at a of around 1.65 m to accommodate average adult statures. Museum examples of the collar alone weigh up to 1.2 kg (approximately 2.6 pounds), adding to the physical discomfort through constant pressure on the neck and shoulders during extended periods of restraint. Designed primarily for rather than inflicting severe physical harm, the jougs exposed the punished individual to the elements, fatigue, and scorn from onlookers, emphasizing social over violent injury. In function, it paralleled devices like the by immobilizing the offender in a visible location to amplify communal disapproval.

Variations in Construction

Jougs exhibited variations primarily in their completeness and finishing, reflecting practical adaptations for use in different Scottish locations such as churches or public crosses. Complete examples typically included an , a , and an attachment point for securing to a wall or post, allowing for restraint during , while partial versions consisted of just the or the attachment point alone. Some collars were equipped with a for secure fastening around the neck, enhancing their utility as a restraint device. A notable variation was the double joug, designed to restrain two individuals simultaneously, as seen in artefact D21 from the West Kilbride Local History Society Museum. Finishing differences included painted collars, possibly for or visual emphasis in contexts (e.g., artefacts D9–D13, D18, and D21), contrasted with unpainted iron versions that retained a raw, utilitarian appearance (e.g., D1, D2, D4–D8, D14, D22, D25–D27). One outlier, artefact D31, was constructed from rather than forged iron, though it is suspected to be a modern due to its atypical material. These construction differences were observed across surviving examples housed in institutions like the and Kelvingrove Museum, with origins linked to parish churches in locations such as and Dowally. While jougs were predominantly simple iron devices in , similar neck collars were employed as punishment instruments in the , though specific adaptations there remain less documented in archaeological records.

Historical Context

Origins and Development

The jougs, an iron collar used for , first appeared as a formalized instrument of punishment in 16th-century Europe, particularly in the and , where similar neck restraints were employed to enforce moral and civil order for minor offenses. Influenced by broader medieval traditions of shaming devices like the , which dated back to the 13th century, the jougs evolved as a targeted tool under ecclesiastical and civil authorities to deter petty crimes without resorting to more severe corporal penalties. Their initial documented applications in church courts occurred in the late 1500s, coinciding with the Protestant Reformation's emphasis on moral discipline. In , kirk sessions—local church governing bodies established following the Reformation Parliament of 1560—routinely sentenced offenders to the jougs for breaches of religious and social norms, such as Sabbath-breaking or slander, often requiring them to stand exposed for one to two hours before congregations. Early records from in 1574 and in 1598 illustrate this integration into ecclesiastical enforcement, marking the device's role in the era's rigorous campaign against immorality. By the mid-16th century, the jougs had spread from —where an instance was recorded in in 1553—and the (including ) to , where they were quickly adopted and standardized in burgh regulations. Scottish towns like (1637) and formalized their use through local statutes, attaching the collars to market crosses, church walls, or tolbooths to maximize public visibility and communal shaming. This dissemination reflected the device's adaptability to both civil and religious jurisdictions, becoming a staple in northern European practices by the 17th century. The jougs began to decline in the amid broader legal reforms that shifted toward and fines over , with usage persisting longest in rural Scottish areas. The last recorded applications occurred around 1810–1820, as Enlightenment-influenced humanitarian sentiments and centralized legal codes rendered such visible punishments obsolete. Surviving examples, such as those at Duddingston near , attest to their phased obsolescence by the early 1800s.

Use in Scotland

Following the of 1560, which established the Presbyterian Church through the First Book of Discipline, jougs emerged as a key instrument in the 's system of moral and ecclesiastical discipline, administered by local kirk sessions comprising ministers and elders. These sessions enforced strict standards of behavior to align communities with Reformed Protestant ideals, using the jougs to publicly humiliate offenders and deter moral lapses. From this period onward, session clerks and elders routinely applied the device for common transgressions, including Sabbath-breaking—such as absenting oneself from services—, and drunkenness, with records showing sentences ranging from one to several hours or Sabbaths of exposure. For instance, in 1651, the Galston kirk session ordered John Persene to stand in the jougs for missing church over multiple weeks, while in 1637, Bessie Black of faced six Sabbaths in the device for . In urban and rural settings alike, jougs were strategically placed for maximum visibility and shame, often secured to walls or posts in , at , or on serving as civic prisons. In prominent burghs such as and , they were affixed near high-traffic ecclesiastical or public sites; for example, records from 1598 describe their use at the market cross for disciplining youth who disrespected elders, while sessions similarly deployed them at church doors or the tolbooth for violators. Rural parishes followed suit, with jougs chained to churchyard trees or walls, as seen in Applegirth, , where they adjoined the prison door to combine religious and civil oversight. This placement ensured that offenders endured taunts from passersby, including during markets or worship times, amplifying the punitive effect. Jougs were frequently integrated with complementary penalties to heighten and communal correction, as detailed in 17th- and 18th-century session minutes across . Offenders might first pay fines to the poor's box, then stand in the jougs while seated on a repentance stool inside the , or face additional humiliations like carting through streets—evident in a 1574 St. Andrews case where David Leyes was carted and jouged for striking his father. In Rothesay in 1661, a woman convicted of repeated drunkenness was warned of jougs alongside public admonition, reflecting the graduated escalation typical of Presbyterian practice. Such combinations underscored the 's holistic approach to discipline, blending financial, physical, and spiritual elements. The social impact of jougs in post-Reformation was profound, as they reinforced a communal by transforming sins into spectacles that stigmatized individuals and educated onlookers on acceptable conduct. In tightly knit parishes, this visible enforcement—often lasting through sermons or market hours—fostered a culture of self-policing and conformity to Calvinist ethics, reducing offenses through fear of exposure and in severe cases. Their use persisted into the but waned with secularization and the rise of civil policing in the , gradually yielding to less corporal forms of justice as influences and legal reforms diminished the kirk's punitive authority.

Application and Punishments

Targeted Offenses

The jougs served primarily as a tool for moral regulation in early modern , targeting offenses that disrupted social and religious order through . Jougs were typically reserved for minor offenses, distinguishing them from harsher punishments for capital crimes like . authorities, particularly Kirk Sessions, employed the jougs for religious infractions to enforce community piety and deter sin. Common offenses included , where offenders faced the collar to atone publicly; , as seen in the 1628 Galston Kirk Session act mandating two Sabbaths in jougs if fines could not be paid, and its 1640 application to a poor for immoral conduct; and non-attendance at church services, such as Sabbath-breaking, with John Persene of Galston threatened with jougs in 1651 if he continued absences after five weeks. In courts, the device addressed civic misdemeanors that undermined communal trust and economy. Magistrates used it for slander, as in the 1637 case of Thomas Meik, who was locked in jougs at the before kneeling at the ; and for scolding or abusive behavior, exemplified by a Wigtown servant in 1649 sentenced to an hour in the jougs for insulting her mistress, or the 1622 case where a was banished for scolding with jougs threatened upon return. While direct records of petty or fraud are less explicit, the jougs were applied to minor breaches of and during markets, such as in Marykirk where offenders were confined amid fairs to maintain order. Gender dynamics influenced applications, with women disproportionately targeted for behaviors deemed disruptive to domestic . Women were frequently punished for scolding or similar offenses. The duration of exposure varied by offense severity, typically ranging from one to six hours to balance humiliation with restraint, such as two hours at market cross in 1574 for filial disobedience.

Enforcement Procedure

The enforcement of jougs as a in historical began with sentencing by a session for offenses or by a for civil infractions, often following an or hearing where the offender was summoned to appear. Once sentenced, the was publicly announced, typically from the church pulpit or at the , to ensure community awareness and amplify the element of shame. The application process involved securing the offender in the iron collar, which was hinged and padlocked around the neck, then chained to a fixed post or wall in a prominent public location such as the church door, , or tron. This was usually carried out by a , messenger-at-arms, or acting as an , with the fitting often timed for high-visibility periods like market days or before services to maximize exposure to passersby and congregants. The device's design forced the offender into an uncomfortable, upright posture, heightening physical discomfort alongside . Durations varied based on the sentence's severity, ranging from one to two hours for minor cases—such as the instance—to multiple Sabbaths for certain offenses, like two consecutive Sundays under the 1628 Galston act for unpaid fines, during which the offender endured exposure to weather and from onlookers. relied on community oversight by elders or local authorities, who monitored compliance without formal guards in most , though resistance occasionally led to additional restraints or escalation to civil . Release occurred upon completion of the prescribed time, verified by the sentencing body, after which the collar was unlocked and removed, sometimes accompanied by a public lecture on or an additional fine to reinforce moral correction. Historical kirk session records note rare instances of escapes or non-compliance, such as offenders during oversight lapses, which prompted re-sentencing or pursuit by bailies.

Surviving Examples

Notable Locations

Approximately 31 documented surviving examples of jougs exist in Scotland, preserved in museums and historic sites. One prominent surviving example of jougs remains attached to the exterior wall of Duddingston Kirk in , , dating to circa the and serving as a reminder of punishments for moral and social offenses. This wrought-iron collar, still chained to the church's gatehouse, is among the few intact examples in its original position, highlighting the device's role in public shaming during church services. At St. Andrew's in , , a set of jougs originally affixed near the church entrance was employed to punish individuals for moral transgressions such as Sabbath-breaking or , in line with Kirk Session records from the . These jougs, now preserved and displayed at the nearby Coastal Communities Museum, exemplify the instrument's use in coastal parish settings for enforcing community standards. The burgh jougs of Lochmaben in , originally mounted outside the Town Hall for restraining minor offenders in public view, are currently held by the local council as a historical artifact. This example underscores the device's application in governance from the post-medieval period onward. Comparative instances appear in churches, where similar neck irons—known locally as "jukken"—were used for public in Reformed congregations during the 17th and 18th centuries, reflecting shared Protestant disciplinary practices across . While specific surviving church-mounted examples in the are less commonly cataloged, their historical presence parallels Scottish jougs in function and placement near places of worship.

Preservation Efforts

In the 19th century, many surviving jougs were transferred from parish churches and public sites to museums to safeguard them from loss or deterioration, with examples acquired by the , whose collections later formed part of the National Museums Scotland holdings. This included items such as those from churchyard and Clova church, reflecting broader antiquarian efforts to preserve ecclesiastical artifacts amid Scotland's initiatives. Restoration techniques for jougs, primarily involving rust removal through mechanical cleaning and chain repairs using period-appropriate ironwork, have been documented in 20th-century inventories and local conservation projects. For instance, at Kirkcudbright Tolbooth, a local smith undertook restoration in 2024 following concerns over their condition, ensuring structural integrity while maintaining historical authenticity. National Museums Scotland's artefact conservation team applies similar methods, including non-invasive surface treatments, to historical iron objects like jougs in their care. Since the , jougs have played a role in historical reenactments and educational programs, often featured in displays and community events to illustrate punishment practices. At sites like the Coastal Communities , jougs are highlighted in interpretive programs to educate visitors on 's , fostering public engagement with preserved . Preservation of in-situ jougs faces challenges from vandalism and urban development, which threaten exposed examples at churches and tolbooths across . reports ongoing issues with graffiti and structural damage at heritage sites, prompting enhanced security measures to protect such relics from irreparable harm. For example, in 2020, a proposal to relocate jougs from St Anne’s Church in Dowally, , was considered to protect them from corrosion and theft, though opposed by .

References

  1. [1]
    Bizarre, brutal and absolutely barmy punishments from history - Part IV
    'Jougs' are short chains with a metal collar on the end that petty offenders would be forced to stand in for hours.
  2. [2]
    The grim medieval torture device still on display outside an ...
    Sep 30, 2021 · Step out of line in 12th century Duddingston, and you'd best be prepared to spend a few nights outdoors, locked in the jougs.
  3. [3]
    Appendix Id: Details of Artefacts - Jougs - Internet Archaeology
    May 26, 2011 · Joug point visible on exterior of jougs. Complete jougs ... National Museum of Scotland: H.MR 14, Collar and padlock (unpainted).
  4. [4]
    Scottish History and Archaeology | National Museums Scotland
    ... jougs formerly owned by the parish of Ladybank in Fife, 17th century. Museum reference H.MR 43. A locomotive train on display in the National Museum of Scotland ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] THIS old-time instrument of punishment was - Electric Scotland
    In the Museum of the Society of Antiquaries of. Scotland, Edinburgh, may be seen the jougs of. THE JOUGS AT DUDDINGSTON. the old parish church of Clova ...
  6. [6]
    Jougs - Internet Archaeology
    May 26, 2011 · Best described as an iron collar, the joug is a heavy ring of metal fastened around the neck by a padlock (Fig. 16).Missing: dimensions | Show results with:dimensions<|control11|><|separator|>
  7. [7]
  8. [8]
    Jougs, St Andrew's Kirk - Coastal Communities Museum
    May 31, 2022 · Jougs were metal collars or neck irons formerly used as an instrument of punishment for contravening the rules of the Kirk in Scotland, the Netherlands and ...Missing: dimensions | Show results with:dimensions
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Discipline, Reformation and Community in Perth, 1577-1600
    Following the Reformation Parliament of 1560, Perth's kirk session was established ... jougs [an iron collar] at the market cross, imprisonment in the ...
  10. [10]
  11. [11]
    Jougs Collar of Duddingston Kirk - Atlas Obscura
    Sep 11, 2019 · This medieval device still hangs outside the Duddingston Village church today, and is one of the only remaining jougs collars in Scotland.
  12. [12]
    The First Book of Discipline - Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland
    A book to deliver unto your wisdoms our judgments touching the reformation of religion, which heretofore, in this realm (as in others), has been utterly ...Missing: jougs | Show results with:jougs
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Cultures of Calvinism in Early Modern Scotland - Oxford Handbooks
    Punishments then escalated to the use of physical restraints—serrated 'jougs' and 'branks', fitted round the head and neck, of ten with a suppressor plate or ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  14. [14]
    jougs – The Statistical Accounts of Scotland Blog
    Feb 20, 2019 · But, how exactly did parishes in late 18th – early 19th century Scotland, and even earlier, punish offenders? It wasn't just a matter of ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Criminal Law and Religion in Post-Reformation Scotland
    A. INTRODUCTION. In this article I assess how Scots criminal law was influenced by the. Protestant theology that came to prevail in Scotland during the ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] The Fiend in the Fog: A History of Satan in Early Modern Scotland
    The hallmark of Reformed polity in Scotland, the kirk session was established in ... jougs, an iron neck collar chained to the kirk wall or door, between ...
  17. [17]
    Old Church Life in Scotland
    The most common form of corporal punishment that Church Courts in this country inflicted was confinement for an hour or two in the jougs. These jougs were ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  18. [18]
    Fascinating objects that tell story of Scotland's witch hunts go on show
    Sep 10, 2021 · Jougs, an iron ... A known 3,837 people were accused of witchcraft in Scotland between 1563 to 1736, the vast majority of them women.<|separator|>
  19. [19]
    Scotland, Social and Domestic
    Scotland, Social and Domestic, Memorials of Life and Manners in North Britain by Rev ... The Jagg, Juggs, or Jougs, was a common instrument of punishment.
  20. [20]
  21. [21]
    Edinburgh, Old Church Lane, Duddingston Parish Church - trove.scot
    ... church are two Renaissance mural monuments of the 17th century. JOUGS AND LOUPIN-ON STANE.- Beside the gatehouse hang a pair of wrought-iron jougs, c. 17th ...
  22. [22]
    Who Cares - Lochmaben Community Council
    Lochmaben Town Hall once had Jougs, a metal collar formerly used as an ... The Royal Burgh of Lochmaben: Its History, Its Castles and Its Churches: by ...
  23. [23]
    Jougs and Pirliewinkles, pp.331-333. - - Random Scottish History
    May 16, 2021 · [Scottish National Memorials Contents] The 'Jougs' or Collar for evil-doers is pretty constant in shape, but the specimens exhibited vary in ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] PROCEEDINGS SOCIETY OF ANTIQUARIES OF SCOTLAND.
    judgment, in connexion with the earlier history of Scotland, under the title ... The Jougs, from the Church of Clova, Forfarshire. from the ringing of ...
  25. [25]
    September 2024 - Kirkcudbright History Society
    Sep 19, 2024 · Jougs. Following concern, shown here, about the state of the jougs at the Tolbooth, a local smith has restored them. It is to be hoped they ...
  26. [26]
    Collections Services | National Museums Scotland
    The Paper and Textile conservators provide expert conservation for a diverse range of objects from fashion to tapestry, embroideries to flags, prints to ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Heritage crime fact sheet - Historic Environment Scotland
    Heritage crime carries significantly more severe penalties than vandalism; the maximum fine for damage to a scheduled monument is £50,000 and between six months ...
  28. [28]
    Plan to remove torture items from a Perthshire church - Daily Record
    Nov 29, 2019 · The Parish of Dunkeld has asked PKC for consent to remove three 'jougs'