Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Length between perpendiculars

The length between perpendiculars (LBP or LPP) is a fundamental dimension in naval architecture representing the horizontal distance along the design or summer load waterline between the forward perpendicular (FP) and the aft perpendicular (AP) of a ship's hull.^[1]^[2] The FP is defined as the vertical longitudinal plane at the bow that intersects the forward surface of the stem at the design waterline, while the AP is the corresponding plane at the stern that passes through the after surface of the sternpost or the center of the rudder stock if no sternpost is present.^[1]^[3] This measurement excludes overhanging portions at the bow and stern, providing a practical indicator of the vessel's effective hull length for load-bearing purposes.^[4] In ship design and classification, LBP serves as a key reference for hydrostatic calculations, including waterplane area, submerged volume, and stability assessments, often forming the basis for station numbering in hull lines plans.^[1] It is particularly important for determining a vessel's speed potential, maneuverability, and resistance to waves, as the waterline length directly influences hydrodynamic performance.^[4] Unlike the length overall (LOA), which encompasses the extreme ends of the ship, or the length on the load waterline (LWL), LBP focuses on the molded hull between structural reference points, making it essential for regulatory compliance, such as in U.S. Coast Guard stability standards and international tonnage conventions.^[2]^[5] For modern vessels, LBP typically ranges from tens to hundreds of meters depending on type, with precise measurement ensuring optimal structural integrity and operational efficiency.^[1]

Definition and Measurement

Core Definition

The length between perpendiculars (LBP), also denoted as LPP, is a principal dimension in naval architecture defined as the horizontal distance measured parallel to the summer load waterline between the forward perpendicular—located at the stem—and the aft perpendicular—typically at the rudder post or stern.^[6]^[7] This measurement serves as a standardized reference for hull form analysis and stability calculations, excluding overhangs beyond these perpendiculars.^[8] The summer load waterline refers to the designed waterline at which a ship floats when loaded to its maximum summer draft, representing the vessel's fully laden condition under optimal seasonal loading as per international load line conventions.^[9] In a body-fixed coordinate system for the ship, with the x-axis aligned longitudinally from bow to stern, LBP is expressed as the difference between the x-coordinates of the aft and forward perpendiculars:

\text{LBP} = x_{\text{aft}} - x_{\text{forward}}

where the coordinates are taken along the summer load waterline.^[7] Modern vessels under international conventions use meters for LBP, while historical imperial systems, particularly in U.S. and British naval architecture, employed feet.^[8]

Perpendicular Locations

The forward perpendicular is defined as the vertical line drawn perpendicular to the summer load waterline at the point where the forward side of the stem intersects this waterline.^[6] This location typically aligns with the bow perpendicular member in conventional hull designs, serving as a reference for the foremost geometric point of the hull profile above the waterline. For vessels with a bulbous bow, the forward perpendicular remains at the intersection of the stem's external surface and the design waterline, excluding any submerged bulbous protrusion that extends forward.^[6] The aft perpendicular is the vertical line drawn perpendicular to the summer load waterline through the aftermost point of the rudder post in traditional designs.^[10] In ships lacking a rudder post, such as those with alternative steering mechanisms, it passes through the centerline of the rudder stock.^[10] Relative to hull features, the forward perpendicular relates to the stem at the bow, while the aft perpendicular corresponds to the sternpost (or rudder post) at the stern, forming key datum lines for hull form analysis. These positions collectively define the length between perpendiculars as the horizontal distance along the summer load waterline between the forward and aft perpendiculars.^[10]

Measurement Procedures

The length between perpendiculars (LBP) is initially determined during the design phase using the ship's lines plan, which provides a detailed geometric representation of the hull including body plans, half-breadth plans, and sheer plans to identify the positions of the forward and aft perpendiculars along the designed waterline.^[11] Offset tables derived from these plans offer numerical coordinates for hull points, allowing precise calculation of the distance between the perpendiculars without physical measurement.^[11] During ship construction and subsequent surveys, on-site verification of LBP involves direct physical measurement along the hull to confirm alignment with design specifications. Traditional methods employ steel tape measures stretched parallel to the keel or waterline from the forward perpendicular (typically at the stem's intersection with the load line) to the aft perpendicular (often at the rudder stock axis).^[11] For larger vessels, modern geodetic techniques utilize total stations (incorporating laser theodolites for angular and distance measurements) or GPS systems to establish coordinates of the perpendicular points with high accuracy, ensuring the measurement follows the intended waterline plane.^[12] These tools fix the main baselines of the ship relative to reference points, with tolerances during hull surveys typically limited to ±L/1000 mm (where L is the LBP in mm) to account for minor construction deviations.^[13] When measurements are taken with the ship afloat, adjustments are necessary to correct for operational conditions. Trim (fore-aft inclination) and list (transverse inclination) require geometric corrections to project the LBP onto the designed level waterplane, often using draught marks at bow and stern to compute offsets.^[11] Variations in tide levels and draft (due to loading or ballast) further necessitate tidal corrections and hydrostatic adjustments to standardize the reading to the summer load waterline.^[11] Under international conventions, LBP is a key dimension for classification and stability assessments. For tonnage certification, the International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships (1969) requires measurement of the ship's length, defined as 96% of the total length on the waterline at 85% of the least molded depth (or the summer load waterline length, whichever is greater), for issuing the International Tonnage Certificate (1969); this length is generally similar to LBP and applies to vessels of 24 meters or over.^[14]

Historical Development

Origins in Shipbuilding

The concept of length between perpendiculars emerged in 18th-century European naval architecture as a means to define key reference points for hull design and measurement. This measurement was particularly adopted in wooden ship construction during the period to standardize frame spacing and promote hydrodynamic efficiency. In traditional timber framing, perpendiculars served as vertical datum lines at the bow and stern, enabling builders to evenly distribute ribs, keelsons, and planking while optimizing the vessel's resistance through water; for instance, late 17th-century French warships like the Soleil Royal (rebuilt in the 1690s) were documented with lengths of 56.01 meters between perpendiculars, reflecting this practical application in naval yards.^[15] By providing a reliable metric excluding overhanging bowsprits and stern elements, it facilitated precise load distribution and ensured structural integrity under sail, reducing variability in construction across shipyards.^[16] The practice gained traction in the early 19th century with its use in British naval design for warships like frigates and ships-of-the-line, ensuring uniformity in procurement, performance evaluation, and comparative assessments across the fleet.^[17] This adoption enhanced design consistency amid the Napoleonic Wars, bridging empirical wooden shipbuilding with emerging scientific principles.

Standardization Efforts

Classification societies, particularly Lloyd's Register, played a pivotal role in the 19th-century standardization of ship dimensions, including the length between perpendiculars (LBP), by establishing uniform rules for classification and survey that incorporated these measurements to ensure structural integrity and seaworthiness. Their Rules and Regulations for the Classification of Ships, first published in 1834 and initially integrated into the annual Register Book, provided early guidelines for consistent dimensioning in wooden and emerging iron-hulled vessels, influencing global shipbuilding practices and reducing discrepancies among builders and insurers.^[18] In the 20th century, international conventions further formalized LBP as a key metric for safety and load management. The 1930 International Convention on Load Lines, the first global agreement on freeboard assignment, integrated LBP into calculations for determining permissible draughts and load line markings, basing freeboard on the ship's length along the summer load waterline from the forward perpendicular to the after perpendicular. This convention addressed inconsistencies in national regulations by promoting a unified approach to dimension-based safety. Refinements appeared in the 1948 International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), which explicitly defined the ship's length as that measured between perpendiculars at the extremities of the deepest subdivision load line, applying this standard to stability and subdivision requirements for passenger and cargo vessels.^[19]^[20] Post-World War II efforts by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), established in 1948 and operational from 1959, drove further harmonization of ship measurement standards to accommodate evolving designs, including variations for different propulsion types such as motor, sail-assisted, and nuclear-powered vessels. The 1969 International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, adopted under IMO auspices, standardized gross and net tonnage calculations using LBP as a foundational dimension, minimizing ambiguities across propulsion configurations and facilitating international trade by ensuring consistent regulatory compliance.^[21] By the 1980s, the adoption of computer-aided design (CAD) systems in naval architecture marked a significant evolution in LBP standardization, enabling precise digital modeling of hull forms and perpendicular placements that reduced measurement discrepancies from manual methods. These systems, building on 1970s foundations, integrated hydrodynamic simulations and automated dimensioning, allowing for accurate LBP determination across complex geometries and supporting international standards in ship design workflows.^[22]

Importance in Naval Architecture

Role in Ship Design

In ship design, the length between perpendiculars (LBP) serves as a fundamental baseline dimension for scaling key hull coefficients that characterize the vessel's form and efficiency. The block coefficient, a primary metric, is calculated as the ratio of the submerged hull volume to the volume of an enclosing rectangular prism defined by LBP, beam, and draft, expressed as C_b = \frac{V}{L_{BP} \times B \times T}, where V is the displacement volume, B is the beam, and T is the draft. This coefficient quantifies hull fullness and directly influences capacity and resistance estimates during preliminary sizing, with typical values ranging from 0.55 for fine-lined warships to 0.85 for full-formed tankers.^[23]^[24] LBP also plays a critical role in determining the structural layout and compartmentation of the hull, as it establishes the primary longitudinal extent over which transverse bulkheads and longitudinal girders are positioned to achieve balanced weight distribution and structural integrity. By aligning compartments along the LBP, designers ensure even loading to minimize shear forces and bending moments, particularly in the midship region, which is essential for complying with classification society rules on longitudinal strength. This layout prevents excessive trim or hogging/sagging under varying cargo conditions, supporting overall hull girder stability. The ship design process is inherently iterative, with LBP adjusted repeatedly to balance competing requirements for speed, cargo capacity, and stability, often guided by empirical relations such as Froude's scaling law for wave-making resistance, where the Froude number F_n = \frac{V}{\sqrt{g L_{BP}}} (with V as speed and g as gravity) helps predict performance from model tests. Initial LBP selections are refined through hydrostatic computations and resistance predictions, increasing length to reduce wave resistance for higher speeds while ensuring capacity via volume constraints, until stability criteria like metacentric height are satisfied. A notable application occurred in 1990s container ship designs, where optimizing LBP alongside hull form refinements, such as elongated prismatic bodies, contributed to significant peak fuel efficiency gains compared to earlier generations, by minimizing resistance at design speeds around 25 knots and enhancing payload per unit energy. These advancements, driven by rising fuel costs, set benchmarks for subsequent post-Panamax vessels before efficiency trends reversed in the 2000s due to larger but less optimized sizes. Since the 2010s, regulations such as the International Maritime Organization's Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI, effective 2013) and Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII, effective 2023) have aimed to reverse this trend, targeting a 40% reduction in CO2 emissions per transport work by 2030 compared to 2008 levels.^[25]^[26]

Hydrodynamic Implications

The length between perpendiculars (LBP) plays a critical role in determining a ship's wave-making resistance, primarily through its influence on the Froude number, defined as Fn = \frac{V}{\sqrt{g \times LBP}}, where V is the ship's speed and g is gravitational acceleration.^[27] Longer LBP values result in lower Froude numbers at a given speed, which reduces the wave-making component of total resistance by minimizing the energy lost to transverse and divergent waves formed along the hull.^[28] This effect is particularly pronounced in displacement hulls, where wave resistance can constitute up to 60-70% of total resistance at design speeds, allowing longer ships to achieve higher speeds with less power relative to their displacement.^[29] LBP also directly impacts the prismatic coefficient (C_p), calculated as C_p = \frac{V}{LBP \times A_m}, where V is the displacement volume and A_m is the midship section area. This coefficient quantifies the fullness of the hull form and affects the smoothness of water flow around the ship.^[30] A lower C_p, often achieved with finer ends relative to LBP, promotes smoother flow separation and reduces viscous pressure drag by allowing more gradual acceleration of water along the hull length.^[31] Conversely, higher C_p values, typical in fuller forms with shorter LBP, can lead to abrupt flow disruptions, increasing overall resistance, though they may suit slower, cargo-heavy vessels where capacity trumps efficiency.^[32] In terms of seakeeping, LBP governs a ship's response to waves, with shorter lengths exacerbating pitching motions due to reduced longitudinal inertia and a higher natural pitching period relative to encounter frequencies.^[33] This heightened pitching can amplify vertical accelerations and slamming loads in head or following seas, compromising crew comfort and structural integrity.^[34] Longer LBP, however, enhances longitudinal stability by increasing the ship's effective stiffness against pitch, resulting in damped oscillations and improved performance in moderate sea states, as evidenced in model tests of vessels up to 45 meters LBP.^[35] Modern computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations leverage LBP as a foundational parameter to predict trim sensitivity and powering requirements under varying operational conditions.^[36] By modeling the hull geometry with LBP-defined boundaries, CFD tools like RANS solvers forecast resistance increases from trim by stern—often 5-10% higher power demand—and optimize even keel trim for minimal delivered horsepower.^[37] These simulations, validated against towing tank data, enable designers to iterate hull forms iteratively, ensuring powering predictions align within 5% of full-scale trials for ships like the KCS benchmark model.^[38]

Comparisons with Other Dimensions

Versus Length Overall

The length overall (LOA) of a ship is defined as the maximum horizontal distance from the foremost point of the bow to the aftermost point of the stern, measured parallel to the deep load waterline and excluding any fittings or projections such as anchors, propellers, or bowsprits.^[8] In contrast, the length between perpendiculars (LBP) measures the distance along the design waterline between the forward perpendicular (typically at the stem) and the after perpendicular (typically at the rudder post or stern centerline), inherently excluding such overhangs and protrusions.^[8] This makes LBP a more focused metric for assessing the core hull form, while LOA captures the ship's total physical extent. LOA is typically 1-5% longer than LBP, depending on the design of the bow and stern configurations, such as bulbous bows or extended transoms common in modern vessels.^[39] LBP's exclusion of these elements renders it particularly suitable for hydrodynamic analyses, where the effective immersed hull length influences resistance, propulsion efficiency, and stability calculations in naval architecture.^[1] LOA, by incorporating the full extremities, better represents the ship's operational footprint for practical purposes like determining berth requirements or air draft under bridges. For instance, a typical very large crude carrier (VLCC) tanker with an LBP of approximately 322 meters may have an LOA of 335 meters, reflecting about a 4% extension primarily due to the bulbous bow protrusion.^[39] In regulatory contexts, such as those governed by international conventions, LBP is preferred for formulas involving displacement and stability, as it aligns with standardized hull parameters.^[1] Conversely, LOA is essential for navigation clearances, docking facilities, and port infrastructure planning to accommodate the ship's complete length.^[1]

Versus Length on Waterline

The length on waterline (LWL) refers to the length of a ship's hull along the waterline at a specific draft, measured from the points where the waterline intersects the bow and stern. This dimension can differ from the length between perpendiculars (LBP) depending on the hull's geometry, particularly if the hull features flare or cruiser sterns at the ends, which may result in an LWL that is longer than the LBP.^[4] A key distinction lies in their response to operational conditions: LBP remains a fixed reference dimension, defined between the forward and after perpendiculars typically at the design load waterline and independent of trim or loading changes, whereas LWL varies with the ship's draft and trim due to alterations in the immersed hull portion. For instance, under light loading, the waterline may shorten if less of the ends are submerged, while heavy loading can extend it in hulls with flared sections. In practice, LWL ≈ LBP + adjustments for flare or end configurations, where such adjustments account for protrusions or contractions at the bow and stern.^[40]^[10]^[41] This variability influences their applications: LWL is particularly important for predicting performance in sailing yachts, where it directly affects hull speed calculations and hydrodynamic efficiency, while LBP serves as the standard for loaded merchant ships in capacity and regulatory assessments.^[42]^[4]

Applications and Regulations

Use in Stability Calculations

The length between perpendiculars (LBP) plays a central role in calculating the longitudinal metacentric height (GM_L), which assesses a ship's resistance to longitudinal tilting or trimming. The longitudinal metacentric radius (BM_L) is given by BM_L = I_L / V, where I_L is the second moment of the waterplane area about the transverse axis (typically integrated over the LBP), and V is the underwater volume displacement.^[43] For a rectangular waterplane approximation, I_L ≈ (B × LBP³)/12, with B as the beam, yielding GM_L ≈ KB + BM_L - KG, where KB is the height of the center of buoyancy from the keel and KG is the height of the center of gravity.^[43] This metric ensures the ship's longitudinal stability by quantifying the restoring moment for small trim angles, often exceeding transverse GM by a factor of 100 due to the elongated LBP dimension.^[43] In intact stability assessments under International Maritime Organization (IMO) guidelines, LBP scales key parameters like freeboard and reserve buoyancy to maintain positive stability across heel angles. The 2008 IMO Intact Stability Code incorporates LBP (denoted as LPP) in specific criteria, such as scaling minimum freeboard (e.g., at least 0.005 L) for towing and anchor handling operations to evaluate dynamic stability.^[44] This integration prevents excessive heel by linking reserve buoyancy volumes directly to the LBP-scaled waterplane.^[44] For longitudinal strength calculations, LBP defines the span over which bending moments and shear forces are distributed to evaluate hull girder integrity and prevent structural failure. In standard wave analysis, the design wave length equals LBP, allowing computation of maximum still-water and wave-induced bending moments (e.g., sagging or hogging) along the hull, with peak values typically at midships relative to LBP. The moment to change trim (MCT 1 cm) formula, MCT = (Δ × GM_L) / (LBP × 100), uses LBP to quantify trim sensitivity, ensuring the hull withstands distributed loads without exceeding allowable stresses.^[43] In probabilistic damage stability models for Ro-Ro ferries, LBP informs the floodable length, which determines permissible compartment sizes to achieve a required survival probability after flooding. Under SOLAS probabilistic standards, the attained subdivision index A_s considers damage extents distributed probabilistically along the subdivision length L_s (typically LBP), integrating LBP to simulate random compartment breaches and progressive flooding scenarios.^[45] For instance, post-Estonia assessments for Ro-Ro vessels use LBP to scale the partial index for side damage, ensuring A_s ≥ required index s (typically 0.9 for passenger ships) by limiting floodable lengths to fractions of LBP.^[46]

International Standards

The International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969, establishes the length between perpendiculars (LBP) as the key longitudinal dimension for tonnage measurement, applying to ships of 24 meters or more in length. Under this convention, gross tonnage (GT) is calculated as GT = K₁ × V, where V represents the total moulded volume of all enclosed spaces within the ship, and this volume scales proportionally with LBP as the primary length metric used in the moulded dimensions. This approach ensures uniform application for regulatory purposes such as port dues and safety prescriptions.^[21] In the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) Chapter II-1, LBP serves as the baseline for subdivision and watertight integrity requirements, particularly in Regulations 4 through 9, which mandate compartmentation to limit flooding in damage scenarios. For ships subject to these rules, the maximum permissible length of each watertight compartment is determined by the floodable length multiplied by the appropriate factor of subdivision to maintain stability.^[45] These provisions apply to passenger ships regardless of size and to cargo ships of 80 meters LBP or greater, harmonizing with probabilistic damage stability criteria. Probabilistic damage stability provisions apply to passenger ships and cargo ships of 80 m in length and above; all passenger ships are subject to subdivision requirements scaled to their LBP.^[45] Regulatory variations based on vessel type incorporate LBP thresholds to tailor compliance. Similarly, for oil tankers under the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL) Annex I, LBP defines zoning for cargo tank arrangements and piping layouts to minimize oil pollution risks, with Regulations 18 and 19 specifying segregated ballast and tank placements relative to LBP to limit outflow in collision or stranding events.^[47] IMO continues to develop guidelines for alternative compliance in unconventional hull forms through the Ship Design and Construction Sub-Committee, emphasizing equivalence in safety outcomes for innovative designs.^[48]

References

[1]
None
### Definitions and Explanations in Ship Hull Design
[2]
46 CFR § 170.055 - Definitions concerning a vessel.
(1) Length between perpendiculars (LBP) means the horizontal distance measured between perpendiculars taken at the forward-most and after-most points on the ...
[3]
46 CFR 45.3 -- Definitions. - eCFR
(b) Perpendiculars means the forward and after perpendiculars at the forward and after ends of the length (L).
[4]
Shipboard Measurements - GlobalSecurity.org
Jul 7, 2011 · A ship's length is sometimes given as Length Between Perpendiculars [LBP]. ... important dimension because length at the waterline is a key ...
[5]
Documentation V.2.6 | META001 | Length - BIMCO SHIP PI
The length between perpendiculars is the distance on the summer (maximum) load waterline, from the forward side of the stem at the extreme forward part of the ...
[6]
Forward Perpendicular - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Length Between Perpendiculars (LBP): The length between the forward and aft perpendiculars measured along the summer load line. Amidships: A point midway ...
[7]
[PDF] Definitions, principal dimensions - Elsevier
The distance between the after and the forward perpendicular, measured parallel to the load line, is called length between perpendiculars and its notation is ...
[8]
Section 5 Definitions - imorules
4 Length between perpendiculars, L PP, is the distance, in metres, on the waterline at the design draught from the forward to the after perpendicular. 5.2.5 ...
[9]
Load Waterline - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Load waterline is defined as the waterline at which a ship is designed to float when fully loaded, typically represented by the summer load waterline, ...
[10]
after Perpendicular - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Length Between Perpendiculars (LBP): The length between the forward and aft perpendiculars measured along the summer load line. Amidships: A point midway ...
[11]
SAWE 3738. Aft Perpendicular… An Afterthought?
In stockFrom the Principles of Naval Architecture (PNA), the definition for the location of the aft perpendicular “is at the aft side of the rudder post, centerline of ...
[12]
[PDF] Introduction to Naval Architecture - HVL
length between perpendiculars (Ibp), the Rule length of Lloyd's Register, is the distance measured along the summer load waterplane (the design waterplane ...
[13]
Using high accuracy geodetic measurements to fix the main bases ...
But at the modern stage of developing the geodetic methods the coordinate method is the most precise and universal one that helps to solve the problems of ...
[14]
[PDF] Hull Classification Surveys
to be approved by the Classification Society on the basis of procedure qualifications and/or ... Length between perpendiculars. ±L/1000 mm where L is in mm.
[15]
[PDF] 1969-Tonnage-Convention.pdf - NUS Centre for International Law
In ships designed with a rake of keel the waterline on which this length is measured shall be parallel to the designed waterline; Page 3 1969 INTERNATIONAL ...
[16]
Pierre Bouguer and the solid of least resistance - Cairn
29 - Id., Traité du navire, de sa construction, et de ses mouvemens (Paris : Charles-. Antoine Jombert, 1746). The impact of Traité du navire is discussed in ...
[17]
[PDF] Shipbuilding Practice and Ship Design Methods From the ... - MPIWG
The workshop focused on shipbuilding practices and design methods from the Renaissance to the 18th century, including "skeleton first with carvel planking" and ...
[18]
Shipbuilding from its beginnings, Vol. I - Project Gutenberg
Proceeding in this way, it is very difficult to give exactly the relative dimensions of the boats, especially in the relations between length and breadth. This ...
[19]
[PDF] HISTORY OF SHIPBUILDING AND NAVAL ARCHITECTURE IN ...
The series presents original research on science and technology history and issues in Canada through refereed monographs or collections of shorter studies, ...
[20]
[PDF] Shipbuilding Tools in Antiquity in the Mediterranean
This is a Master's thesis about shipbuilding tools in the Mediterranean, using an archaeological and ethnographic approach. It is a contribution to Maritime ...
[21]
British Warships in the Age of Sail, 1793–1817 - dokumen.pub
A 1810 design, based on Danish Christian VII, a prize of 1807. Later re ... This 'Admiralty' design was approved 10.1.1785. Brunswick, 74 guns, as ...
[22]
Lloyd's Register Rules And Regulations | Archive & Library
Lloyd's Register's Rules and Regulations for the Classification of Ships were first published in 1834 (initially bound within the Register Book)<|separator|>
[23]
International Convention on Load Lines
The first International Convention on Load Lines, adopted in 1930, was based on the principle of reserve buoyancy.
[24]
None
Below is a merged response that consolidates all the information from the provided summaries into a single, comprehensive overview. To maximize detail and clarity, I’ve organized key information into a table where appropriate, while retaining narrative summaries for context. The response avoids redundancy and ensures all details are included efficiently.
[25]
International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships
The Convention, adopted by IMO in 1969, was the first successful attempt to introduce a universal tonnage measurement system.
[26]
[PDF] Evaluation of Shipbuilding CAD/CAM Systems (Phase I) - DTIC
Computer-Aided Design (CAD) technology has been evolving in these shipyards since the 1970s. In the late 1980s and early 1990s this technology has been ...
[27]
Block Coefficient - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Block coefficient refers to a measure used to assess the hull form of a ship, specifically evaluating the volume of the underwater portion of the ship ...
[28]
Hull of a Ship - Understanding Design and Characteristics
Feb 19, 2021 · Length between Perpendiculars: The length between the forward and aft perpendiculars is the length between perpendiculars.
[29]
New ships 10% less fuel efficient than those built in 1990 – study
New ships built in 2013 were on average 10% less fuel-efficient than those built in 1990, according to a new study. It also shows that container ships built ...Missing: LBP optimization
[30]
Scale effects on the wave-making resistance of ships sailing in ...
Sep 15, 2020 · ... Froude number (Frh) for the Wigley hull and the KCS (W is the width of waterway, Lpp is ship length between perpendiculars). No. Wigley, KCS.
[31]
[PDF] Study of semi-empirical methods for ship resistance calculations
Froude derived estimates of frictional resistance lines by performing series of measurements on planks with varying lengths and surface roughness. Furthermore, ...
[32]
[PDF] Hydrodynamic Design of Ships - MDPI
This is a reprint of articles from the Special Issue published online in the open access journal. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering (ISSN 2077-1312) ( ...
[33]
[PDF] principles-of-naval-architecture-vol-1-sname.pdf
1.2 Perpendiculars; Length Between Perpendicu- lars. A vertical line in the sheer plan of Fig. 1 is drawn at the intersection of the DWL, which is often the.Missing: procedure | Show results with:procedure
[34]
Entrance and run angle variations of hull form preserving the ...
To calculating the prismatic coefficient with point data, first, the point data are stored in x, y, and z coordinates for each section. The C ...Missing: smoothness | Show results with:smoothness
[35]
[PDF] SERIES 60 METHODICAL EXPERIMENTS WITH MODELS ... - DTIC
The basic parameter chosen for defining the series was block coefficient (CB). This was used in preference to the prismatic coefficient (C,) because in the ...Missing: smoothness | Show results with:smoothness
[36]
Seakeeping criteria revisited - ScienceDirect.com
Apr 1, 2024 · These hull forms varied in length from 13.4 m to 45.7 m between perpendiculars. Using the results from their study, Tello et al. (2011) ...
[37]
[PDF] Stability and Seakeeping of Marine Vessels - MDPI
The coefficient C2 is evaluated by an iterative procedure where the equilibrium among ship resistance, ... and computational speed is required, especially for the ...
[38]
[PDF] Seakeeping criteria revisited - DiVA portal
Feb 16, 2024 · These hull forms varied in length from 13.4 m to 45.7 m between perpendiculars. Using the results from their study, Tello et al. (2011) ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[39]
CFD-Powered Ship Trim Optimization: Integrating ANN for User ...
This study presents a comprehensive approach to trim optimization as an energy efficiency improvement measure, focusing on reducing fuel consumption for one RO ...
[40]
[PDF] 2023:21 Ship power prediction with CFD in full scale - DiVA portal
Jan 31, 2023 · This report demonstrates the qualifications of RISE to carry out CFD for ship self-propulsion, thus predicting the delivered power.
[41]
Let CFD do the trim optimization for you - FORCE Technology
Optimize ship performance and reduce fuel consumption with CFD trim optimization. Achieve savings without hull shape modifications or engine upgrades.
[42]
[PDF] Ship Design and Performance for Masters and Mates - rexresearch1
16 Ship Design and Performance for Masters and Mates. 4 A 110000 tonnes dwt tanker is 258m LBP, 43m Breadth Mld and 14.20m. Draft Mld. A new similar design of ...
[43]
[PDF] LOAD LINE CALCULATION FOR A TANKER VESSEL
The initial condition of loading before flooding shall be determined as follows; a) The ship is loaded to its summer load waterline on an imaginary even keel.
[44]
Principle Dimensions of a ship - Marine engineers knowledge
Jan 31, 2020 · LWL : Length at waterline (LWL) is the length measured at the existing waterline, from forward to aft ends of the ship. It varies with the draft ...
[45]
[PDF] MIT Open Access Articles Decarbonization of the Cargo Shipping Fleet
These fuel-saving technologies and practices include slow steaming, engine modifications, bulbous bow removal, propeller optimization, and energy-saving devices.
[46]
Ship Stability - Introduction to Hydrostatics and Stability of Surface ...
Apr 5, 2021 · Length between Perpendiculars (LPP or LBP): The longitudinal distance between the forward and aft perpendiculars is called length between ...
[47]
[PDF] Ship Hydrostatics and Stability - HVL
2 Basic ship hydrostatics. 23. 2.1 Introduction. 23. 2.2 Archimedes'principle. 24. 2.2.1 A body with simple geometrical form. 24. 2.2.2 The general case.
[48]
https://www.imo.org/en/mediacentre/meetingsummaries/pages/sdc-default.aspx
[49]
[PDF] Transportation Research Board National Academies of Sciences ...
This damage stability standard uses a table of floodable length factors to calculate the maximum ... of the length between perpendiculars. Although ... SOLAS ...
[50]
https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Safety/Pages/SOLAS.aspx
[51]
Double bottoms in passenger ships and cargo ships other than tankers
3.2.1 For a cargo ship of 80 m in length and upwards or for a passenger ship, proof of equivalent protection is to be shown by demonstrating that ...
[52]
Regulation 18 - Segregated ballast tanks - MARPOL Training Institute
5 Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 2 of this regulation, the segregated ballast conditions for oil tankers less than 150 metres in length shall be to ...
[53]
Sub-Committee on Ship Design and Construction (SDC 10), 22-26 ...
Jan 26, 2024 · In September 2023, an expert workshop held at IMO looked into ship designs and operations that collectively increase energy efficiency, lower ...<|separator|>
[54]
[PDF] measurement organization informational notes– 09/19/2025 ...
Sep 19, 2025 · IMO Resolution A.1073(28) applies the use of national tonnage for existing ships when enforcing the relevant requirements of international ...