Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Waterline length

Waterline length, commonly abbreviated as LWL, is the horizontal distance along the from the point where the hull intersects the water at the bow to the corresponding point at the , measured when a is floating at its designed load or . This measurement typically excludes overhanging portions of the bow and above the water, making it shorter than the overall length (LOA) of the . In , the waterline length is often specified at the design (DWL), which represents the intended floating position under normal operating conditions, or at the load waterline for regulatory purposes. The waterline length plays a critical role in vessel performance and design, particularly for displacement hulls where it directly influences the theoretical maximum —the speed at which the vessel's wavelength matches the LWL. This can be approximated using the formula v \approx 1.34 \sqrt{LWL}, where v is in knots and LWL is in feet, derived from wave propagation principles in . Longer waterline lengths enable higher s and improved efficiency for yachts and commercial ships, while also affecting by distributing over a greater . In ship , the length is essential for calculating , , and , ensuring the vessel's stability under varying loads. For load line regulations, such as those under the , the length is measured at a specific —typically 85% of the molded depth from the —to determine freeboard requirements and safety margins. Additionally, it informs design by influencing water flow patterns at the , optimizing and reducing in both merchant and .

Fundamentals

Definition

The length of the (LWL), also known as load waterline length, is defined as the horizontal distance along the of a where it intersects the water surface at the designed flotation point under normal loading conditions. This measurement represents the straight-line length from the forwardmost point of the hull's with the waterplane to the aftmost point, typically excluding any overhangs that extend beyond these intersection points either above or below the water surface. In , the LWL is commonly referenced at the summer load or design unless otherwise specified, providing a standardized basis for hull geometry analysis. The LWL is a static measure taken when the vessel is at rest in calm , remaining constant regardless of operational speed, as it reflects the flotation line determined by the vessel's . In contrast, the dynamic waterline length can vary during motion due to factors such as changes, , or wave interactions, which alter the effective wetted surface and influence hydrodynamic performance. This distinction underscores the LWL's role as a fixed rather than a variable operational one. Fundamentally, the LWL is intertwined with the principles of and , as the submerged portion of the defined by this length must displace a of water equal in weight to the vessel's total load to achieve flotation . This relationship ensures and load-bearing , with the LWL contributing to the overall waterplane area that supports vertical buoyant forces without delving into specific hydrodynamic calculations.

Measurement Methods

The measurement of waterline length (LWL) begins with floating the at its load to establish the reference , which represents the loaded floating line where the intersects the surface. The is positioned at rest in calm , ensuring it achieves the intended corresponding to the maximum load (WLref). The is then marked along the using dyes, chalk, or to create a visible at the floating . Finally, the LWL is determined as the straight-line distance, measured parallel to the 's centerline, between vertical planes to the foremost point at the and the aftermost point at the sternpost (or rudderpost) on this marked . For small boats, direct physical measurement is common, employing flexible tape measures stretched taut along the marked waterline while maintaining parallelism to the keel line, often with the aid of a level or plumb bob to ensure accuracy. Laser levels are utilized to project a horizontal reference plane across the hull, facilitating precise marking of the waterline without physical contact, particularly useful for irregular surfaces. In design phases or for verification, computer-aided design (CAD) software analyzes lines plans—two-dimensional hull profiles—to compute LWL geometrically from offset tables derived from the hull model. For large ships, measurements may occur in drydock using offset tables from the hull's construction plans, or in dry dock using the hull's construction plans and offset tables to determine the LWL at the summer load waterline from the vessel's geometry at the design draft without direct afloat measurement. Standards govern these processes to ensure consistency. For small craft up to 24 meters in hull length, ISO 8666 specifies that LWL be measured at the WLref, excluding removable appendages like outboard motors but including fixed structural elements, with the vessel trimmed to for the assessment. The () rules for steel vessels define LWL on the summer load as the distance from the forward side of the to the stock centerline, parallel to the designed , with adjustments for raked keels where the measurement line remains parallel to the baseline; for freeboard purposes, it is taken at 85% of the least molded depth, incorporating minimum lengths of 96% of the total extent. These standards account for by referencing the design load condition and through level floating assumptions, though practical measurements may require corrections for minor deviations. Challenges arise with irregular hull shapes, such as those of canoes or multihulls, where the waterline may exhibit pronounced or , complicating the identification of points for the vertical planes. In canoes, the varying along the waterline can lead to inaccuracies if the measurement deviates from the true path, potentially overstating or understating the effective LWL used in performance assessments. For multihulls, ISO 8666 requires separate measurements for each 's waterline length, but the overall effective LWL for the craft may differ from the geometric sum due to interactions between hulls, necessitating additional hydrostatic modeling to reconcile wave-making characteristics with the measured values.

Significance in Design

Relation to Hull Speed

The waterline length (LWL) serves as the primary determinant of a vessel's , which represents the maximum efficient speed for hulls before escalates dramatically. This limit arises because, as a moves through , it generates a and a stern wave; at , the wavelength of these waves equals the LWL, causing the waves to align in a way that positions the hull amidships in the wave trough, increasing . The core formula for hull speed in displacement vessels is derived from the (Fn), a dimensionless parameter that scales speed relative to wave propagation speed, defined as
Fn = \frac{V}{\sqrt{g L_{WL}}}
where V is the speed, g is (approximately 9.81 m/s² or 32.17 ft/s²), and L_{WL} is the waterline length. Hull speed occurs near Fn \approx 0.4, corresponding to a speed-length of about 1.34, yielding the
V \approx 1.34 \sqrt{L_{WL}}
with V in knots and L_{WL} in feet; this equivalence stems from Froude's 19th-century experiments on wave patterns in towing tanks, where resistance humps appear when bow and stern waves interfere constructively.
For example, a yacht with a 30-foot LWL has a theoretical hull speed of approximately 7.3 knots ($1.34 \times \sqrt{30} \approx 7.3), beyond which powering the vessel requires disproportionately more energy due to climbing its own bow wave. In contrast, planing hulls can exceed this limit by rising onto the surface and reducing wetted area, thereby minimizing wave-making resistance. This formula assumes monohull displacement vessels under typical conditions; for finer hull forms, the coefficient may rise to 1.4, allowing slightly higher speeds before the resistance hump. Adjustments are needed for other units, such as meters with speed in knots, where the constant becomes approximately 2.43 (V \approx 2.43 \sqrt{L_{WL}}); for kilometers per hour and meters, it is approximately 4.50 (V \approx 4.50 \sqrt{L_{WL}}).

Impact on Performance and Stability

The waterline length (LWL) significantly influences a vessel's performance characteristics, particularly in terms of ride quality and motion response. Vessels with longer LWL experience smoother rides in waves due to reduced vertical accelerations and minimized interference between bow and stern waves, leading to less slamming and improved seakeeping. This configuration also diminishes pitching motions, as the increased longitudinal dimension distributes hydrodynamic forces more evenly along the hull, enhancing overall comfort for crew and passengers during displacement-speed operations. In contrast, shorter LWL designs facilitate quicker acceleration from rest or during maneuvers, owing to lower mass moment of inertia, but they are prone to hobby-horsing—excessive fore-aft pitching in head seas—which can compromise handling and increase crew fatigue. These performance traits are optimized relative to hull speed constraints, where LWL sets a baseline for efficient displacement operation. Regarding stability, LWL plays a key role in longitudinal stability through its contribution to the waterplane's moment of inertia. The longitudinal metacentric height, which governs trim and pitching stability, increases with greater LWL because the second moment of area of the waterplane about the transverse axis scales with the cube of the length, providing a restoring moment against angular displacements in the fore-aft plane. Additionally, the prismatic coefficient—a measure of hull fineness along the LWL—affects transverse righting moments by influencing the distribution of buoyancy and form stability; finer entries (lower prismatic coefficients) associated with optimized LWL reduce initial heeling tendencies in waves, while fuller forms enhance form stability at larger angles but may increase drag. These effects ensure that longer LWL vessels maintain better overall dynamic stability in varied sea states. Efficiency gains from longer LWL stem primarily from reduced wetted surface relative to . For a given volume, extending LWL allows for a slimmer hull form (higher length-to-beam ratio), which lowers the wetted surface area to ratio, thereby decreasing frictional and improving at speeds. This results in enhanced fuel economy and extended operational range; for instance, naval frigates with LWL around 408 feet achieve approximately 10.3 horsepower per at service speeds, compared to higher figures for shorter designs, enabling greater without proportional fuel increases. In ships, LWL optimization balances and speed, as seen in carriers where elongated waterlines (often exceeding 200 meters) minimize while accommodating standardized volumes, yielding up to 15% fuel savings through refined hydrodynamics. However, extending LWL introduces notable trade-offs. Construction costs rise due to increased material requirements and structural reinforcements needed to counter higher longitudinal stresses, potentially elevating overall build expenses in commercial vessels. Moreover, longer LWL often necessitates deeper to maintain and , limiting access to shallow ports or increasing grounding risks. Environmental constraints, such as locks, further cap maximum LWL; for example, locks restrict overall length to 289.6 meters, thereby limiting effective waterline to under 280 meters to ensure safe transit and preserve infrastructure integrity.

Historical Development

Origins in Traditional Shipbuilding

The concept of waterline length (LWL) emerged intuitively in ancient shipbuilding as builders recognized the influence of hull proportions on stability and performance. Around 2000 BCE, Egyptian vessels, such as the reconstructed from Mersa Gawasis known as the Min of the Desert, featured a main of 20 meters and a of 4.9 meters, proportions that implied deliberate considerations for the submerged to maintain during River and navigation. In subsequent periods, from around 1200 BCE, Phoenician ships adopted greater -to- ratios compared to narrower war galleys, prioritizing for extended Mediterranean trade voyages that demanded reliable load-bearing at the . By the (8th–11th centuries CE), longships exemplified optimization of LWL, with designs extending the effective relative to overall to enhance speed potential—capable of up to 15 knots—while flared amidships provided lateral for raiding and . Early theoretical foundations appeared in , where (c. 287–212 BCE) developed principles of that implicitly relied on waterline displacement, influencing later empirical practices even if the term LWL was not yet formalized. In medieval European shipbuilding from the 15th to 17th centuries, empirical "rules of thumb" formalized these proportions, particularly for galleons used in exploration and trade. Builders maintained length-to-beam ratios of 3:1 to 4:1, approximating LWL to balance cargo capacity, maneuverability, and resistance to rolling in open seas, as seen in and vessels that crossed . These guidelines, passed down through guilds, allowed shipwrights to scale designs without mathematical models, ensuring the waterline supported heavy armament and provisions essential for long-duration voyages. The intellectual foundation for LWL analysis solidified in the 17th and 18th centuries through mathematical treatises that bridged empirical practice and theory. Pierre Bouguer's 1746 Traité du Navire marked a pivotal advancement, establishing principles of hydrostatic that directly incorporated dimensions to predict and . During the Age of Sail, such insights informed warship designs, where LWL was key to estimating for tactical advantages in naval engagements; for example, HMS Victory's configuration, with speeds reaching 8–10 knots, leveraged an extended to outpace opponents at battles like in 1805. Prior to widespread formal drafting, measuring LWL relied on rudimentary techniques suited to yard-based construction. Shipwrights employed eye estimation and stretched ropes or chains to gauge hull contours during building, often adjusting empirically for expected load displacement. Post-launch, lead lines—weighted ropes marked in fathoms—verified draft to define the actual waterline, allowing refinements without detailed plans until lines drawings became standard in the late 18th century.

Evolution in Modern Naval Architecture

The advent of ironclad warships and steam propulsion in the mid-19th century revolutionized ship design, enabling longer, more streamlined hulls that prioritized hydrodynamic efficiency over sail-dependent forms. Steam engines, positioned below the waterline for protection and balance, allowed to optimize and precisely, making waterline length (LWL) a critical parameter for achieving higher speeds without the constraints of masting and . This era's scientific foundation was laid by Russell's wave-line theory, developed in the , which linked performance to wave patterns and formalized LWL within form coefficients. Russell advocated designing the fore-body waterline as a sine curve matching the wave of translation (with length L = 2πV²/g, where V is and g is gravity), and the aft-body as a cycloidal curve at about two-thirds that length, often augmented by a parallel middle body to adjust and . This approach minimized and influenced and early ironclad designs, shifting from empirical to mathematically derived LWL optimization. In the 20th century, and designs for and s further emphasized LWL for hydrodynamic efficiency, with length-to-beam ratios around 7.5 to 9.5 selected to reduce resistance and enhance speed under power. Submarine hulls, for instance, adopted elongated forms to minimize drag during submerged operations, while classes like the U.S. incorporated extended waterlines for improved flow and propulsion autonomy. Post-war, , particularly in the from the 12-Meter era onward, focused on maximizing LWL to boost , with innovations like fin keels and later canting keels allowing effective "stretching" by reducing wetted surface at heel without penalty to rating rules. The computational era from the introduced (CFD) and finite element analysis (FEA) software, enabling precise LWL optimization through simulations of flow, resistance, and structural loads. These tools allowed iterative form adjustments, such as refining prismatic coefficients tied to LWL for minimal wave resistance, far surpassing traditional towing tank tests in accuracy and speed. Concurrently, (IMO) regulations under the incorporated LWL into stability criteria, using it in the probabilistic damage stability index (where the required subdivision index R is a function of ship ) to ensure intact and flooded conditions meet safety thresholds for vessels over 100 meters. Recent trends in vessels and challenge traditional LWL limits by lifting hulls above the water, where effective "waterline" shifts to chord length, decoupling performance from displacement-based constraints. In efforts, longer LWLs are increasingly favored in systems, as extended hulls improve compatibility with auxiliary sails or rotors, potentially reducing fuel consumption by 20-30% in while enhancing overall efficiency.

Comparison to Other Length Measures

Waterline length (LWL) differs from (LOA) primarily because LOA measures the extreme horizontal distance from the forward-most point of the , such as the tip of the bow, to the after-most point, like the end of the overhang, often resulting in LOA being 10-20% longer than LWL due to these protruding elements above and below the . In contrast, LWL is the horizontal distance between the forward-most and after-most points on the specifically at the design , focusing on the immersed portion that interacts directly with water. (LBP), another common measure, is the distance along the design from the forward —typically the of the with the —to the after , typically at the after side of the post; for vessels with raked stems, LBP can be slightly shorter than LWL because the perpendiculars are defined at specific geometric points rather than the full extremities. Each measure serves distinct purposes in and operations. LWL is essential for hydrodynamic calculations, such as estimating via the formula v = 1.34 \sqrt{LWL} (in knots and feet), as it represents the effective length generating wave resistance during mode travel. LOA, however, is used for practical applications like , dockage fees, and regulatory documentation, where the total physical extent of the matters for space allocation; for instance, the U.S. measures registered length as LOA for . LBP finds primary application in structural framing and planning, providing a standardized baseline for bulkhead placement and computations in large commercial or . A representative example illustrates these differences: a typical 40-foot LOA might have a 35-foot LWL, meaning estimates based on LOA would overestimate potential by about 7-8%, as the relies on the shorter immersed to predict the onset of wave-making . In regulatory contexts, such as U.S. documentation, LOA determines and licensing requirements, even if it exceeds the hydrodynamic LWL. Common misconceptions arise when LOA is mistakenly substituted for LWL in performance predictions, leading to inflated expectations; for example, applying the formula to a 40-foot LOA instead of its 35-foot LWL could suggest a maximum of 8.5 knots rather than the accurate 7.9 knots, potentially misleading designers or owners on capabilities. Historically, early 20th-century standards, such as those in H.H.W. Keith's 1912 formulas, shifted emphasis from overall dimensions like LOA to LWL for speed and calculations, reflecting improved understanding of hydrodynamics and influencing modern practices.

Applications in Yacht and Ship Design

In yacht design, waterline length (LWL) is optimized differently for racing and cruising applications to balance speed, comfort, and regulatory compliance. For racing yachts such as the IMOCA 60 class, designers maximize LWL up to the class rule's 18.28-meter hull length limit to achieve higher hull speeds while incorporating narrow waterline beams—around 5.5 meters overall—to minimize wetted surface area and drag, particularly in light winds. In contrast, cruising yachts prioritize longer LWL relative to displacement to enhance motion comfort and stability, reducing pitching and rolling in ocean conditions, as a longer wave period aligns with the vessel's natural frequency for smoother rides. Rating rules like those from the Offshore Racing Congress (ORC) incorporate an effective LWL—derived from hull measurements in various trim and heel states—into velocity prediction programs to calculate handicaps, ensuring fair competition by adjusting for speed potential across wind conditions. In commercial ship design, LWL plays a critical role in maximizing capacity within dimensional constraints like and . For tankers and ships, engineers extend LWL to increase internal volume and while maintaining a slender form (lower block coefficient of 0.60–0.86), allowing greater —up to 300,000 deadweight tons for very large crude carriers—without proportionally increasing , which optimizes structural efficiency and . Naval vessels emphasize LWL for enhanced and maneuverability; longer, slender waterlines reduce hydrodynamic signatures and cross-sections through smooth, angled integration, while supporting tactical speeds up to 30 knots and turning diameters under five ship lengths in confined waters. Practical applications are evident in case studies from high-profile racing and luxury sectors. Volvo Ocean Race yachts, such as the one-design , employ reverse bows to extend effective LWL beyond traditional limits, piercing waves more efficiently and boosting hull speeds by immersing more length for reduced in heavy seas. Superyachts achieve gains through vertical bow designs that increase static LWL compared to raked stems, combined with that adjust to optimize immersion and during varying loads. Looking ahead, LWL considerations in autonomous and modular ship designs focus on multi-role adaptability and environmental . Autonomous vessels incorporate sensor-driven adjustments to dynamically optimize LWL for in mixed traffic, enhancing maneuverability without human intervention. Modular multi-role ships, like trimaran-configured vessels, use interchangeable sections to tailor LWL for missions ranging from to , maximizing volume within compact lengths for savings. Environmental regulations, such as IMO's Existing Ship , favor longer LWL in slender hulls, which can cut CO2 emissions by 10–25% through lower resistance at operational speeds of 11–16 knots, particularly for tankers and container ships transitioning to fuels. These factors, alongside limits, underscore LWL's role in balancing performance and sustainability.

References

  1. [1]
    Hull of a Ship - Understanding Design and Characteristics
    Feb 19, 2021 · This length plays an important role in the calculation of hydrostatics of the ship, as well as propeller design calculations.
  2. [2]
    Length Water Line Definition and Examples - PredictWind
    Feb 27, 2025 · This measurement is taken from the point where the hull meets the water at the bow to the point where the hull meets the water at the stern.Missing: architecture | Show results with:architecture
  3. [3]
    Determining a Vessel's Load Line Length - dco.uscg.mil
    A vessel's load line length is measured on a particular waterline, determined by its molded hull depth (the vertical dimension from the top of the keel to the ...
  4. [4]
    What is the relationship between the length of a boat and its ...
    the boat's created wave length equals its hull length in feet at the waterline — is a rule of thumb providing an approximate ...Missing: naval architecture
  5. [5]
    Hull Speed - Stanford University
    Dec 12, 2007 · These waves travel at a speed v = (Lg/2π)1/2, where L is the wavelength and g is the local acceleration due to gravity. At sea level, where most ...Missing: formula | Show results with:formula
  6. [6]
    Load Waterline - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The length on the waterline (LWL or LWL) is the length on the waterline, at which the ship happens to be floating between the intersections of the bow and after ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Predicting Yacht Performance in Waves Using a CFD Velocity ...
    Changes in the dynamic waterline length of the yacht, affecting the wave resistance of the yacht. 7. Changes in the wetted surface of the yacht, affecting ...
  8. [8]
    Top 20 Software Used In Naval Architecture - Marine Insight
    Jan 10, 2022 · The main categories of software used by naval architects include: 1. CAD/CAM/CAE software 2. Structural analysis applications 3. Hydrostatics, hydrodynamics, ...
  9. [9]
    Ship Stability - Introduction to Hydrostatics and Stability of Surface ...
    Apr 5, 2021 · Length of Waterline (LWL): The length of the ship's hull intersecting the surface of the water is called Length on Waterline. Length Overall ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Part 3, Hull Construction and Equipment
    Jul 1, 2019 · ... waterline. See 3-1-1/Figure 1. In ships designed with a raked keel, the waterline on which this length is measured is to be parallel to the.
  11. [11]
  12. [12]
    [PDF] THE DESIGN RATIOS | Eric Sponberg
    We can round the decimal fraction above up a hair from 0.39894 to 0.4, and we have equivalence: That is, Fn = 0.4 is equivalent to speed-length ratio of. 1.34.
  13. [13]
    [PDF] WARSHIPS OF THE ANCIENT WORLD - Plaisance Pratique
    The ship would need a greater beam-to-length ratio for stability and to carry more supplies, particularly since Phoenician warships would undertake longer ...Missing: proportions | Show results with:proportions
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Secrets of the Viking Ships - The American-Scandinavian Foundation
    Longer waterlines relative to the length of the hull overall meant that the ships would have faster speed potential. The flared beam amidships added stability.
  15. [15]
    Gokstad Viking Longship - The Model Shipwright
    The characteristic long, narrow, light, graceful design of the longship created a fast vessel, capable of speeds up to 15 knots, although average speeds were ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] The Hull of A Galleon - Preprints.org
    Jun 27, 2022 · increasing of the length-to-beam ratio over 3.0 was not efficient [2]. However later in 17th century, this ratio was increased to 4.0 [2] ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] European Ships of Discovery
    The ships and boats of the 15th and early 16th century European voyages were ... had length to beam ratios between 3 and 4, tonnages between 50 and. 150 ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Historical Roots of the Theory of Hydrostatic Stability of Ships
    The modern theory of hydrostatic stability of ships was founded independently and almost simultaneously by Pierre BOUGUER (“Traité du Navire”, 1746) and.
  19. [19]
    HMS Victory 100-gun First Ship-of-the-Line - Military Factory
    HMS Victory's design allowed speeds up to 8 knots or 10 mph, and being a First Rate ship being maneuverable required her for active service between 1778 and ...
  20. [20]
    Seeking information on determining load waterline - Model Ship World
    Mar 1, 2015 · Take the Length from the inside on the Upper Deck between the Stem and the Sternpost, and the greatest Breadth from Outside to Outside: likewise ...
  21. [21]
    Leadline - National Maritime Historical Society
    Since the 5th century BCE, the leadline has been used to both measure the depth of the water and determine the characteristics of the sea floor. Lead Line ...Missing: eye | Show results with:eye
  22. [22]
    Proving the Power of Iron Over Wood | Naval History Magazine
    Apr 20, 2012 · The CSS Virginia, an ironclad, destroyed wooden ships, proving the power of iron over wood and changing naval warfare.
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Naval Architecture Analysis of the Civil War Ironclad CSS Virginia
    Dec 5, 2016 · The purpose of the analysis was to examine the ship from a naval architectural standpoint pertaining to hydrostatics, stability, weight and ...
  24. [24]
    Contested Waterlines The Wave-Line Theory and Shipbuilding in ...
    Ship hydrodynamics in the nineteenth century was dominated by John Scott Russell's wave-line theory. Russell, a prominent British shipbuilder and scientist, ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Some Aspects of Submarine Design Part 1. Hydrodynamics (U) - DTIC
    Hydrodynamic aspects are then discussed starting with the shape and reasons why a length-to-beam ratio of about 7.5 gives the minimum resistance. All features ...
  26. [26]
    WW2 American Destroyers - Great war, Interwar and wartime models
    ... length allowed to improve the flow and the hydrodynamic penetration. This hull length also improved the capacity of oil tanks and thus autonomy. The initial ...
  27. [27]
    America's Cup Racing Yachts Evolution of a Design - Titanicology
    The fin shaped keel came down very deep. The boat ... based on ideas proposed by Nat Herreshoff allowing waterline length to be increased without sail
  28. [28]
    [PDF] The Principles of Naval Architecture Series - Rexresearch1.com
    These include finite element analysis, computational fluid dynamics, random process methods, numerical modeling of the hull form and components, with some ...
  29. [29]
    Ship Design and Stability - International Maritime Organization
    The safe design of a ship is primarily regulated in SOLAS chapter II-1, parts A (General) , A-1 (structure of ships) and B (subdivision and stability).Missing: waterline | Show results with:waterline
  30. [30]
    Hydrofoil questions - Boat Design Net
    Jun 4, 2007 · The waterline length of a hydrofoil is the foil chord. At the speed most hydrofoils travel, the Froude number based on chord is so high that the limiting value ...
  31. [31]
    Wind assisted propulsion and port call optimization for sustainable ...
    This study examines the combined potential of wind-assisted ship propulsion (WASP) with PCO strategies to reduce GHG emissions and operational costs in the ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Wind Propulsion Technologies - American Bureau of Shipping (ABS)
    Wind-assisted propulsion is achieved by exploiting the wind encountered by a vessel during sailing so that a force component parallel to the vessel's.
  33. [33]
    46 CFR § 170.055 - Definitions concerning a vessel.
    (2) Length overall (LOA) means the horizontal distance between the forward-most and after-most points on the hull. (3) Length on the waterline (LWL) means the ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] THE DESIGN RATIOS
    Mar 22, 2010 · A primer on some basic principles of naval architecture for small craft. As first published on BoatDesign.net, January – March, 2010. By. Eric W ...
  35. [35]
    Section 5 Definitions - imorules
    4 Length between perpendiculars, L PP, is the distance, in metres, on the waterline at the design draught from the forward to the after perpendicular. 5.2.5 ...
  36. [36]
    IMOCA rules
    These 60-foot boats, which made their debut in the 1986 edition of the BOC Challenge, measure 18.28 metres (60 feet) and were notable for their reasonable size ...<|separator|>
  37. [37]
    Extraordinary Boats: the new 11th Hour Racing IMOCA 60
    Jan 21, 2022 · This means minimising wetted surface area is vital – as a result the static waterline beam is surprisingly narrow. The hull is dramatically ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Motion Comfort Ratio - Eric Sponberg
    An interesting way to look at it, however, is that a light displacement. 50-footer can have the same level of comfort as a heavy displacement 30-footer.<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    [PDF] ORC-Rating-Systems-2024.pdf
    ORC International certificates may be issued for boats which are completely measured in accordance with the IMS and complying with the requirements of the IMS ...
  40. [40]
    Understanding Basic Design of Ship-Ahadsjournal - WordPress.com
    Aug 8, 2020 · Most tankers carry cargo only on one leg of their voyage, and the other leg is usually made on ballast. The ballast waterline of ships is ...
  41. [41]
    Low carbon maritime transport: How speed, size and slenderness ...
    Three responses that reduce energy consumption and CO2 emissions in maritime transport are slower speeds, larger vessels and slender hull designs.Missing: regulations | Show results with:regulations
  42. [42]
    The Stealthiest Ship Ever Built - Navy Matters
    Jan 16, 2023 · All surfaces, hull and superstructure, will be fairly sharply angled and will be completely smooth with no protruding pieces of equipment. The ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Principles of Ship Performance Course Notes - Naval Academy
    The FFG-7 class ship has a waterline length of 408 ft and is powered by two gas turbine engines that produce approximately 41,000 SHP for a published ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  44. [44]
    Innovative features - The Ocean Race
    The reverse bow is designed to maximize the length of the waterline and increase the hull speed, but they can be wet! Water ballasts. The Volvo Ocean 65 has ...Missing: yachts piercing
  45. [45]
    News article: Unveiling the Rise of Vertical Bows in Modern Yachts
    Mar 12, 2024 · Extended Waterline Length: A defining feature of the vertical bow is its increased waterline length compared to a traditional sloped design.
  46. [46]
  47. [47]
    Multi-Role Vessel (MRV) - Modern and Progressive Solution that ...
    The MRV design uses Austal's patented trimaran technology, delivering fuel efficiency with low deadweight and high internal volume within modest ship length.
  48. [48]
    Busting the hull speed myth - Yachting Monthly
    Dec 13, 2021 · Waterline length is not the defining factor in maximum boat speed that we all think it is. Julian Wolfram busts the hull speed myth.