Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Log Revolution

The Log Revolution (Balvan revolucija) was an armed insurrection launched by the ethnic Serb minority in Croatia on 17 August 1990, centered in the Knin region and extending to other Serb-populated areas, where local Serbs erected barricades of felled tree logs across key roads to halt Croatian police movements and assert demands for autonomy amid rising tensions over Croatian secession from Yugoslavia. Organized by Serb leaders including Milan Martić, who directed the arming of civilians and the physical blocking of transport routes at the peak of the tourist season, the uprising reflected Serb fears of marginalization following the April 1990 electoral victory of the nationalist Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) and its subsequent constitutional amendments that diminished Serb collective rights by redefining Croatia primarily as a state of the Croatian nation. The blockade inflicted significant economic disruption by severing north-south connections, paving the way for the December 1990 proclamation of the Serbian Autonomous Oblast of Krajina (SAO Krajina) under Milan Babić's political leadership, which evolved into the breakaway Republic of Serbian Krajina (RSK) and ignited full-scale conflict in the Croatian War of Independence. While Serb participants framed the action as defensive against historical precedents of ethnic persecution and immediate discriminatory policies, the event drew support from Belgrade under Slobodan Milošević, who exploited the grievances to extend Serbian influence, amid debates over the degree of external orchestration versus grassroots initiative.

Historical Context

Political Developments in Croatia

The multi-party parliamentary elections held in on April 22–23 and May 6–7, 1990, marked the end of the League of Communists of Croatia's monopoly on power, with the (HDZ) securing a decisive victory and forming the government. The HDZ, founded in 1989 by , campaigned on a platform of Croatian national revival, sovereignty from , and democratic reforms, appealing to widespread dissatisfaction with communist rule and federal dominance from . On May 30, 1990, the newly elected Sabor confirmed Tuđman as president of the presidency, solidifying HDZ's control over executive functions amid rising nationalist sentiments. These developments alarmed the Serb minority, which constituted approximately 12% of Croatia's population and held significant influence in regions like and due to historical settlement patterns. In response, Jovan Rašković established the Serb Democratic Party () on , 1990, to represent Serb interests and counter perceived threats to their cultural and political rights under the incoming HDZ-led government. The SDS platform highlighted grievances rooted in Yugoslavia's 1974 , which had recognized as a constituent alongside , but warned of marginalization as HDZ rhetoric emphasized Croatian statehood over multi-ethnic federalism. Tensions escalated with HDZ-proposed constitutional amendments in July 1990, which declared Croatia's and implicitly shifted emphasis toward Croatian nationhood, prompting SDS leaders to demand territorial for Serb-majority areas to preserve veto rights on key decisions and prevent from . Rašković and delegates walked out of the Sabor in , framing HDZ policies as discriminatory and evocative of interwar and World War II-era Croatian separatism that had targeted . This , fueled by mutual —Croats viewing Serb demands as Belgrade-orchestrated obstructionism and fearing demographic and cultural erasure—set the stage for direct action by Serb communities in August 1990.

Ethnic Tensions and Serb Autonomy Demands

In the late , ethnic constituted approximately 12 percent of Croatia's population, concentrated in regions such as , , and parts of , where they formed local majorities in certain municipalities. These communities had historically enjoyed recognition as a constituent nation under Yugoslavia's 1974 constitution, with rights to cultural autonomy, bilingualism, and in state institutions. However, rising , particularly following the victory of Franjo Tuđman's (HDZ) in the multi-party elections of April-May 1990, heightened Serb anxieties over potential marginalization, evoking memories of discrimination during under the regime. The Serb Democratic Party (SDS), founded on 17 February 1990 by psychiatrist Jovan Rašković, emerged as the primary vehicle for articulating Serb interests, initially demanding cultural autonomy, preservation of Serb constituent status, and safeguards for language, education, and media within a confederated Yugoslavia. Rašković proposed these measures to the Croatian government after the HDZ's electoral success, emphasizing non-territorial solutions to address fears of assimilation amid Tuđman's rhetoric on Croatian statehood, which some Serbs interpreted as exclusionary. Tensions escalated in June 1990 when Croatia's parliament amended the constitution, removing explicit references to Serbs as a co-nation and redefining the republic as the state of the Croatian nation, thereby eroding legal protections that had ensured Serb veto rights on sovereignty issues. By mid-1990, more radical voices within the SDS, including dentist Milan Babić from Knin, advocated for territorial autonomy in Serb-majority areas, outpacing Rašković's preference for cultural arrangements. On 25 July 1990, a Serb assembly in Srb declared sovereignty for Serb territories and affirmed their right to autonomy contingent on Croatia's continued association with Yugoslavia. This culminated in a 19 August 1990 referendum in Krajina and surrounding regions, where over 99 percent of participating Serbs (virtually all ethnic Serbs in the areas) endorsed autonomy within Croatia if it remained in a Yugoslav federation, or self-determination including potential links to Serbia if Croatia seceded. The demands extended to practical measures like separate Serb municipalities for , in official use, and Serb-controlled police forces to prevent perceived , reflecting both genuine fears of —such as sporadic attacks on Serb properties and media portrayals stoking ethnic divides—and strategic responses to Zagreb's push. Croatian authorities rejected territorial concessions, viewing them as threats to unitary statehood, while Serb leaders like Babić framed as essential for survival against Croatian , setting the stage for blockades that began in late August . These positions were not monolithic; Rašković later distanced himself from armed escalation, prioritizing negotiation, but Babić's influence grew amid external encouragements from .

Outbreak of the Insurrection

Initial Blockades in Knin

On August 17, 1990, ethnic in , including rebellious local police officers and armed civilians, established roadblocks around the town to obstruct access and defend against anticipated intervention by Croatian security forces. The barricades, constructed using rocks, earth-filled dump trucks, and uprooted metal barriers, sealed off main highways, leaving only a narrow backroad for limited passage. This action, later termed the "log revolution" due to the use of felled trees in similar blockades, was organized amid rising tensions following the election of Croatia's first non-communist government under and its moves toward sovereignty from . The primary impetus was to protect a scheduled on Serbian in , which the Croatian had declared illegal earlier that day. Approximately 120 police officers, including reserves, refused orders from and instead distributed weapons from the local armory, arming participants with machine guns, assault rifles, and shotguns; civilians also carried homemade grenades. Led by figures such as , president of the Serbian National Council, and , who coordinated the arming of , the blockades reflected fears of suppression by Croatian authorities, exacerbated by recent constitutional amendments that viewed as diminishing their status as a constituent people. Local leaders, including municipal assembly vice president Laza Macura, expressed expectations of multi-directional threats, with one participant stating readiness to fight if "Tuđman’s army" advanced. The blockades persisted into August 18, with Serb forces conducting identity checks on vehicles while preparing for potential nighttime closure. Serbian representatives appealed to Yugoslavia's presidency for protection, citing deployments of heavily armed Croatian police, while Zagreb threatened legal action and sought mediation. These initial actions in , a Serb-majority town in northern , disrupted connections between the coast and inland , foreshadowing broader regional insurrections.

Rapid Spread to Other Regions

Following the establishment of log barricades around Knin on 17 August 1990, the Serb-led insurrection expanded swiftly to nearby municipalities with ethnic Serb majorities in northern Dalmatia, including Benkovac and Obrovac, where similar roadblocks were erected on the same day to sever connections to coastal areas and Zagreb. This immediate extension isolated over 100,000 Serbs in the region and halted traffic on key highways, amplifying economic disruption during the height of the tourist season. By 19-20 August, armed Serb groups reinforced barricades across these districts to block access during Croatia's sovereignty referendum, preventing polling in Serb-controlled zones and asserting de facto territorial control. The momentum carried into , with blockades appearing in Gračac and surrounding villages by late August, as local Serb assemblies coordinated via radio communications and rallies to replicate the model. This proliferation continued into early September, reaching Kordun and Banija regions—such as Glina and Vrginmost—where Serb residents felled trees to obstruct police movements and established checkpoints manned by lightly armed civilians, often supplemented by reservists from the . The rapid coordination, involving an estimated 5,000-10,000 participants across barricades by month's end, reflected pre-existing ethnic networks and fears of marginalization under the new Croatian , though it also drew accusations of by Belgrade-aligned figures.

Organization and Support

Formation of SAO Krajina

In June 1990, following the victory of the in the April multi-party elections, local Serb leaders in the area formed the Association of Serbian Municipalities of Northern and , comprising 13 majority-Serb municipalities; , a local dentist and politician, was elected its president. This body sought to coordinate Serb interests amid concerns over reduced minority protections under the new Croatian constitution, which had amended provisions on Serb representation in governance. Tensions escalated in August 1990 with the Log Revolution, as Serb militants erected barricades using felled logs to block roads and railways in , protesting Croatian police actions against Serb self-rule initiatives. By late September, the Serb National Council declared autonomy for Serb-populated areas within . On October 1, 1990, assemblies in Serb-majority regions, including those in , formally proclaimed , citing historical rights and fears of or . The was officially proclaimed on December 21, 1990, by delegates from the Association of Municipalities of Northern and at a session in , establishing a unified encompassing territories in northern , , , and Banija, with a population of approximately 200,000, over 90% Serb. Babić assumed leadership as president of the executive council, while the assembly adopted a platform affirming loyalty to but demanding territorial autonomy within modeled on Vojvodina's status. The declaration emphasized preservation of Serb cultural and political rights, rejecting Croatian sovereignty claims over the region without Serb consent. Initial governance structures included a headquarters for coordination with (JNA) units, which provided logistical support, though the formation was driven by local Serb initiatives rather than direct orchestration at this stage. The SAO's establishment formalized the control exerted since the summer blockades, setting the stage for further integration with other Serb autonomies and eventual secessionist moves in 1991.

Involvement of Yugoslav Authorities and JNA

In August 1990, , a prominent Serb political leader in the area, contacted , the , to report on the alleged mistreatment of Croatian amid rising ethnic tensions. directed to meet , the rotating President of the , on 13 August 1990; assured of political backing from Yugoslav authorities and protection for via the (JNA). The Log Revolution's initial barricades, erected on 17 August 1990 under the organization of Milan Martić's paramilitary police, were rapidly consolidated with JNA support, enabling armed Serb groups to seize control of Knin and adjacent regions. JNA units stationed nearby refrained from disarming Serb militias or dismantling the log blockades, instead providing tacit endorsement that prevented Croatian police intervention and maintained Serb dominance in the area. This involvement extended to the distribution of weapons from JNA depots to local Serb formations, bolstering their capacity to enforce the insurrection and conduct the subsequent on Serb from 19 to 2 September 1990, which recorded 99.7% approval among 567,317 voters in Serb-majority locales. Yugoslav federal authorities, influenced by Milošević's dominance over and key presidency members like Jović, framed such actions as preserving Yugoslavia's unity, though in practice they aligned with Serb separatist aims to partition along ethnic lines.

Immediate Impacts

Economic Disruptions

The road blockades erected by Serb insurgents during the , starting on August 17, , primarily targeted highways connecting Croatia's hinterland to the Dalmatian coast, severing vital transport links around , , and other Serb-majority areas. These obstructions, formed using felled pine trees and bulldozers, isolated coastal regions dependent on inland supply routes for , , and other essentials, leading to immediate shortages and halted commercial traffic. The timing exacerbated the impact, coinciding with the peak of the summer tourist season in , where foreign visitors—primarily from —accounted for a substantial share of Croatia's service-based . Access disruptions north of prompted widespread cancellations, stranding and deterring new arrivals amid reports of armored deployments and escalating tensions, thereby inflicting acute losses on hotels, restaurants, and related industries. Although precise figures for 1990 tourism shortfalls remain undocumented in contemporaneous reports, the blockades' role in undermining confidence contributed to broader economic strain, foreshadowing steeper declines as unrest persisted into 1991. Local economies in both Serb-held enclaves and adjacent Croatian territories faced parallel interruptions, with restricted mobility impeding agricultural , inputs, and daily commuting; Serb protesters justified the measures as defensive against perceived Zagreb-imposed discrimination, but the actions nonetheless paralyzed cross-regional exchange in an already fragile post-communist . Federal Yugoslav interventions temporarily dismantled some barriers by late August, yet recurrent threats sustained uncertainty, amplifying indirect costs through investor hesitancy and heightened operational risks for businesses.

Clashes and Human Costs

The Log Revolution, spanning late August to December 1990, involved primarily non-violent road blockades by Serb insurgents, but isolated armed incidents marked the escalation of tensions. Croatian police attempts to dismantle barricades in areas like and often resulted in standoffs rather than open combat, with the (JNA) frequently intervening to prevent direct confrontations between local Serb militias and Croatian forces. These interventions, including the deployment of tanks to guard blockade sites, maintained a fragile deterrence but heightened fears of broader conflict among both Serb and Croat communities. The first confirmed fatality linked to the insurrection occurred on November 23, , near , when Goran Alavanja, a Croatian Ministry of Interior of Serb ethnicity, was killed by gunshot wounds in an ambush on a police vehicle; two colleagues, Stevan Bukarica and Jovo Graovac, were also targeted, with Bukarica wounded. Alavanja's , amid minor skirmishes involving gunfire on patrols, represented the initial human toll, though interpretations vary: Croatian accounts frame it as an attack by Serb rebels, while some analyses highlight Alavanja's continued service to Croatian authorities despite his background, suggesting intra-community friction. No large-scale battles ensued in , limiting casualties to this and sporadic injuries from exchanges of fire, but the incidents signaled the shift from protest to armed resistance. Human costs during this phase were modest in numerical terms compared to later war phases, with documented deaths numbering at least one and injuries few, yet the psychological and social impacts were profound. Blockades fostered ethnic , prompting voluntary departures of Croats from Serb-majority villages and vice versa, exacerbating community divisions and instilling widespread anxiety over potential JNA escalation. Serb participants faced internal pressures, including reprisals against those perceived as disloyal, as evidenced by Alavanja's case, while Croatian residents endured restricted mobility and economic isolation in affected regions. These early events, though low in lethality, laid the groundwork for polarized narratives, with Serb sources emphasizing defensive measures against perceived and Croatian perspectives viewing them as orchestrated aggression backed by .

Conflicting Perspectives

Croatian Interpretations

In Croatian , the Log Revolution of August 17, 1990, is predominantly viewed as the deliberate onset of an armed insurgency aimed at thwarting Croatia's transition to sovereignty following its first multi-party elections in April-May 1990, which brought and the (HDZ) to power. Historians such as Tin Guštin frame it not as a spontaneous ethnic but as a calculated incited by Slobodan Milošević's regime in and supported by the (JNA), which supplied weapons and logistics to local Serb leaders like and in . This interpretation emphasizes causal links to Belgrade's "" ideology, where the erection of log barricades—blocking key roads from to —served to isolate Serb-majority regions, disrupt economic lifelines, and test Croatian resolve amid fears stoked by Croatian adoption of historical symbols perceived by as revanchist. Empirical accounts highlight the rapid escalation: on , Serb militants seized local police stations, withdrew Territorial (TO) weapons stored there (intended for Croatian reserves), and mobilized crowds to man over 30 roadblocks, halting tourist traffic during peak season and inflicting estimated millions in daily economic losses to Croatia's Adriatic economy reliant on Western visitors. Croatian analysts, including those from the Croatian Defence Academy, attribute the insurgency's organization to JNA Colonel Ratko Mladić's early involvement in arming rebels, viewing the event as a proxy aggression rather than internal dissent, evidenced by Milošević's denial of orchestration during confrontations with Tuđman while covertly funding formation. Tuđman publicly decried as a "" of Serbian expansionism, positioning Croatia's response as a defensive for national survival against federal overreach. Later testimonies reinforce this lens: in 2003, Babić testified at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former (ICTY) that he was manipulated by Martić into endorsing the blockades, with broader Serbian disinformation amplifying fears of Croatian "Ustaša" revival to justify secessionist aims. While acknowledging local Serb anxieties over cultural changes , Croatian interpretations prioritize verifiable JNA logistical support—such as tank deployments and arms caches—as causal drivers, dismissing claims of purely defensive Serb as post-hoc rationalizations amid documented patterns seen in simultaneous Slovenian tensions. This narrative underscores the revolution's role in catalyzing Croatia's armed forces buildup, framing it as the spark for a war of against Yugoslav dissolution tactics.

Serb Justifications

Serbian leaders and participants in the Log Revolution justified the road blockades as a defensive measure against perceived threats to their security and rights under the newly elected (HDZ) government. They cited the Croatian Ministry of the Interior's August 1990 order to replace or disarm reserve policemen of Serbian ethnicity in Serb-majority areas, viewing it as an attempt to weaken local capabilities and impose control amid rising . The blockades, beginning on August 17, 1990, around , were framed as necessary to secure the Serbian community's plebiscite on autonomy held August 18–19, which the Croatian government had banned as illegal. Local Serb leaders, including dentist , argued that the vote expressed the right to for the approximately 200,000 in , who comprised over 50% of the population in those districts and sought to preserve ties to or establish autonomous regions to prevent marginalization in a sovereign . Broader justifications invoked historical fears of Croatian domination, referencing atrocities by the regime against Serbs and interpreting HDZ policies—such as adopting the šahovnica flag and amending the constitution to remove references to socialist —as signals of revived anti-Serb sentiment. Serb representatives claimed these actions discriminated against their cultural rights, including bilingualism and usage, and threatened their status as a constituent people within , prompting the formation of the to safeguard minority protections.

External Analyses and Criticisms

External observers, including historians and international organizations, have characterized the Log Revolution as a pivotal in ethnic tensions, transitioning from political protest to organized with undertones. The uprising, commencing on , , involved coordinated road blockades using felled logs, rocks, and armed checkpoints, which effectively partitioned Serb-majority regions and challenged Croatia's central authority. Analyses emphasize that while triggered by Croatian constitutional amendments reducing Serb veto powers over , the action relied heavily on logistical and protective support from the (JNA), enabling militants to seize police stations and TO arsenals without immediate resistance. Criticisms from bodies like highlight how the barricades not only disrupted commerce and mobility but also created zones of impunity for groups, fostering sporadic violence against non-Serbs and impeding monitoring of abuses. By late 1990, these blockades had isolated communities, with reports of targeted intimidation against Croatian officials and civilians in Serb areas, contributing to a climate of fear that displaced hundreds and foreshadowed broader conflict. Economic analyses quantify the immediate toll: the shutdown of key highways during peak halted an estimated 20-30% of Croatia's summer revenue in affected regions, exacerbating fiscal strains on the nascent government. Scholars critiquing the event's orchestration point to Belgrade's instrumental role, with Serb Democratic Party (SDS) leaders like Jovan Rašković and employing propaganda to frame the blockades as defensive against alleged Croatian "Ustaša revival," despite scant evidence of systematic threats at that stage. This narrative, disseminated via , mobilized passive Serb populations but is faulted for prioritizing territorial control over negotiation, as evidenced by the rapid formation of self-proclaimed autonomous regions that rejected Croatia's sovereignty claims. International legal retrospectives, such as proceedings on related atrocities, underscore that while no genocidal intent was proven in Serb actions overall, the Log Revolution's coercive tactics laid groundwork for documented war crimes in subsequent fighting, including shelling of civilian areas. Some external commentaries, wary of on both sides, argue the revolution exemplified reactive fueled by mutual distrust rather than inherent ethnic animus, yet criticize its failure to pursue reforms within as a missed opportunity for . Mainstream Western analyses, often influenced by post-1995 narratives of Serb aggression, tend to underemphasize Croatian HDZ policies—such as symbolic changes to flags and holidays perceived as exclusionary by —as causal factors, focusing instead on the blockades' role in derailing democratic transitions.

Long-term Consequences

Escalation to Full-scale War

The establishment of the in late 1990, amid ongoing barricades and refusals to accept n sovereignty, set the stage for armed confrontations as Croatian authorities sought to reassert control over contested areas. Tensions boiled over in early 1991 with the 's formal declaration of separation from on , effectively seeking alignment with and rejecting Zagreb's rule. This move, coupled with JNA maneuvers that disarmed Croatian territorial defense units while arming local Serb militias, fragmented military loyalties and emboldened Serb irregulars. The first major clash erupted at on March 31, 1991—known as "Bloody Easter"—when Croatian special police units attempted to evict forces who had seized the site days earlier. The skirmish resulted in one Croatian policeman and one Serb combatant killed, with JNA troops intervening to halt Croatian advances and secure the area for Serb control. This incident, the initial fatalities of the conflict, underscored the JNA's role in shielding Serb autonomists and marked the transition from civil unrest to organized violence. Escalation intensified in May 1991 with the Borovo Selo ambush on May 2, where 12 Croatian policemen were killed and several captured after entering the Serb-majority village near to investigate missing colleagues; Serb militants, backed by local Territorial Defense stocks, executed the attack. Amid these events, conducted an on , boycotted by Serb communities but approved by over 93% of participants, signaling Zagreb's irreversible path to . Croatia's formal on June 25, 1991—alongside Slovenia's—prompted an immediate JNA response, with federal forces blockading borders, seizing key infrastructure, and launching offensives to enforce Yugoslav unity under Serbian dominance. By July, JNA artillery barrages and ground assaults targeted Croatian-held positions, transforming sporadic clashes into coordinated warfare; major battles, such as the 87-day siege of starting August 25, followed, involving up to 35,000 JNA and Serb troops against outnumbered Croatian defenders. The JNA's alignment with Serb goals, including the covert transfer of heavy weaponry to forces, ensured the Log Revolution's regional defiance evolved into a protracted lasting until 1995.

Resolution and Krajina's Dissolution

The (RSK) faced military defeat through Croatian offensives in 1995, marking the effective end of the separatist entity born from the Log Revolution's road blockades and subsequent Serb autonomy declarations. , launched on May 1, 1995, recaptured Western Slavonia from RSK control in three days, resulting in approximately 800 Serb military and civilian deaths and the displacement of around 15,000 . This was followed by , initiated at dawn on August 4, 1995, which targeted the core Krajina territories including , the RSK capital; Croatian forces, numbering about 130,000 troops supported by Bosnian Croat units, overran RSK defenses held by roughly 30,000-80,000 Serb fighters within four days, declaring the operation complete by evening on August 7 despite ongoing skirmishes. RSK President ordered a general retreat on August 4, prompting a mass exodus of the Serb population; an estimated 150,000 to 250,000 fled to and Serb-held areas in Bosnia, abandoning homes and infrastructure amid reports of panic and leadership directives to evacuate. Croatian forces documented 174 Serb ant deaths during , with investigators confirming at least 150 extrajudicial executions of Serb civilians and prisoners in the immediate aftermath, unrelated to active , alongside widespread and destruction of Serb property in recaptured villages. These events dissolved the RSK's administrative and military structures, as its leadership fragmented and remaining forces disintegrated, effectively terminating the four-year separatist project that had controlled about one-third of 's territory. The sole remaining Serb-held enclave in Eastern Slavonia, Baranja, and Western Sirmium was addressed through the signed on November 12, 1995, between Croatian authorities and local Serb leaders, establishing the Transitional Administration for Eastern Slavonia (UNTAES) via UN Security Council Resolution 1037 on December 15, 1995. UNTAES, mandated for an initial 12 months and extended to January 15, 1998, oversaw demilitarization, refugee returns, and peaceful reintegration, facilitating the handover of the region to full Croatian sovereignty without further major conflict. This process, combined with Operation Storm's outcomes, restored Croatia's territorial integrity, contributing to the cessation of hostilities in the , though it left legacies of displacement and unresolved war crimes prosecutions.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Milan Babic - Factual Statement
    Serbs organised by Milan Martic also began to arm themselves and erect barricades in Knin in what became known as the "log-revolution." 14. In August 1990, ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Serbian insurgency in Croatia in the 1990s
    The article examines the political violence and insurgency led by the Serbian population in Croatia during the 1990s, which developed under the influence of ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Milan Babic - Initial Indictment
    Serbs, organised by Milan MARTIC, put up barricades and "Martic's Police" distributed weapons to Serbs. This incident became commonly known as the "log- ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Serbia and the Serbian Rebellion in Croatia (1990-1991)
    (Log Revolution) in the Knin Krajina in August 1990. From spring 1991 ... barricades, including logs on roads, to prevent access by Croatian forces.<|control11|><|separator|>
  5. [5]
    Rebel Serbs start the "Log Revolution" - They did not want to live in ...
    Aug 17, 2021 · The barricades were set up at the height of the tourist season and severed transportation on a number of routes between northern and southern ...
  6. [6]
    The 1990s Wars - YU Historija...
    Šarinić also testified that Tuđman had brought attention in Tikveš to the Log Revolution, staged by Croatian Serbs in August 1990, and had protested the fact ...
  7. [7]
    Change in the Offing: The Shifting Political Scene in Croatia
    Dec 14, 1998 · The Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) has dominated Croatian political life since multi-party elections in April 1990 brought an end to ...Missing: victory | Show results with:victory
  8. [8]
    Change in the Offing: The Shifting Political Scene in Croatia | Refworld
    Dec 14, 1998 · The Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) has dominated Croatian political life since multi-party elections in April 1990 brought an end to ...
  9. [9]
    Croatian Democratic Union | political party, Eastern Europe
    In 1989 Tudjman founded the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ), which won Croatia's first free parliamentary elections in 1990. Named president, he pressed for ...
  10. [10]
    Greetings from Minister Grlić Radman on the occasion of the ...
    May 30, 2023 · Then the path to democratic transformation and the realization of a sovereign and independent Croatian state was finally opened. On that ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] JOVAN RASKOVIC THE SILENCED VOICE OF ... - DOI Srpska
    rights of Serbs in Croatia and as a founder of the Serbian Democratic. Party (SDS). Raskovic attempted to secure Serbian (minority) rights in democratic and ...<|separator|>
  12. [12]
    Serbian Nationalism and the Origins of the Yugoslav Crisis
    Apr 1, 1996 · During 1988-89, Serbia's intelligentsia and Slobodan Milosevic's Serbian Communist party clique joined forces to encourage a national revolution ...Missing: Log | Show results with:Log
  13. [13]
    Serbs in Croatia - Minority Rights Group
    The Serb population decreased sharply from 12.2 per cent in the 1991 census, mainly as a direct result of the war. Ethnic Serbs speak Serbian and Croatian, and ...
  14. [14]
    Yugoslavia - Human Rights Watch
    Moreover, Tudjman made little, if any, effort to appease the fears of Serbs in Croatia after his election. ... Ethnic discrimination is also a serious problem in ...
  15. [15]
    None
    ### Summary of Serb Leaders' Demands for Autonomy in Croatia (1990-1991, Pre-War Period)
  16. [16]
    SERBIAN AUTONOMY - The Washington Post
    Aug 18, 1990 · Croatia's government has guaranteed the rights of Serbs, who form roughly 10 percent of Croatia's 4.5 million people, but Serbs demand more ...
  17. [17]
    Serb Minority Seek Role in a Separate Croatia - The New York Times
    Aug 7, 1990 · Such autonomy would allow for the creation of Serb public schools and official use of their Cyrillic alphabet.Missing: demands | Show results with:demands
  18. [18]
    Croatian Serbs began to assert the desire for autonomy within a still ...
    Croatian Serbs began to assert the desire for autonomy within a still-Yugoslav Croatia in 1990. In September 1990, Croatian Serbs proclaimed the Serbian ...
  19. [19]
    Serbs erect barricades to defend referendum in Croatia - UPI Archives
    Aug 17, 1990 · KNIN, Yugoslavia -- Shotgun-toting citizens and rebellious police with machine guns Friday barricaded approaches to the largest Serbian town ...Missing: revolt | Show results with:revolt
  20. [20]
    Serbs maintain blockadess, fear attack - UPI Archives
    Aug 18, 1990 · Armed Serbian police and civilians, one of whom carried homemade grenades, maintained roadblocks for a second day around Knin, 500 miles west of ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] chronology of the homeland war
    ... blockade of traffic with logs was organised throughout Knin, Benkovac and Obrovac (Log Revolution). ... August 1990 armed insurgents blocked the main road ...
  22. [22]
    Armed Serbs Guard Highways in Croatia During Referendum
    Aug 20, 1990 · Bands of armed Serbs blocked roads today in districts of the Croatian republic inhabited largely by ethnic Serbs, trying to prevent Croatian ...
  23. [23]
    Memorial of Croatia | INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
    Mar 1, 2001 · In August 1990 Croatian Serb rebels closed off the region round Knin in southern Croatia. The rebellion gradually spread into other parts of ...
  24. [24]
    The Breakup of Yugoslavia, 1990–1992 - Office of the Historian
    The country broke up under Nazi occupation during World War II with the creation of a Nazi-allied independent Croat state, but was reunified at the end of the ...Missing: Revolution | Show results with:Revolution
  25. [25]
    CROATIA - Human Rights Watch
    In October 1990, rebel Serb leaders declared the creation of the Serbian Autonomous Region of Krajina (Srpska Autonomna Oblast (SAO) Krajina, formerly referred ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  26. [26]
    Croatia's Serbs Declare Their Autonomy - The New York Times
    Oct 2, 1990 · The unrest began after special Croatian police units began confiscating arms and ammunition from police stations in Serbian-dominated areas and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  27. [27]
    060303IT - International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia
    23 proclamation of SAO Krajina? 24 A. It was on the 21st of December. 25 Q. I apologise. 21st of December 1990. We mean 1990, the two of us. Page 1867. 1 A ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] l
    On 27 June 1991, the Assembly of the SAO Krajina appointed Milan MARTIC as. Minister of Interior of the SAO Krajina. 17. The European Community sought to ...<|separator|>
  29. [29]
    030630ED - International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia
    To be specific, in August 1990, the. 20 first barricades were set up in those ... But other weapons from JNA depots were. 8 distributed, on the other ...
  30. [30]
    Roads Sealed as Yugoslav Unrest Mounts - The New York Times
    Aug 19, 1990 · Hundreds of Serbs armed with rifles and pistols sealed off towns in the Yugoslav republic of Croatia today, raising fears of ethnic clashes ...<|separator|>
  31. [31]
    "Revolution Truck" - Gazeta Express
    Dec 14, 2022 · In August 1990, the Serbs of Croatia went on a general uprising, blocking roads with logs, stumps and whatnot, especially near Knin. The ...
  32. [32]
    The Death of Goran Alavanja on 23 November 1990 - Hrčak
    Dec 21, 2017 · After the outbreak of Serbian armed rebellion in northern Dalmatia, Alavanja showed no indication of loyalty towards the Croatian authorities ...Missing: balvan revolucija
  33. [33]
    The Death of Goran Alavanja on 23 November 1990 - ResearchGate
    Nov 23, 1990 · Goran Alavanja's personal stance towards the Croatian authorities and the rebellion of the Serbian population is most readily apparent by his ...
  34. [34]
    021002ED - International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia
    Oct 2, 2002 · 3 Belgrade, and on the 17th of August, 1990, the log revolution started. ... Yugoslavia was threatened by Serbian aggression against. 23 ...
  35. [35]
    FORMER YUGOSLAVIA - Human Rights Watch
    50 In August 1990, Serbs in the city of Knin rebelled against the new government, which it considered as nationalistic and anti-Serbian. Serbs in Knin held ...
  36. [36]
    Armed Serbs Close Roads Into Croatia Before Autonomy Vote
    Aug 19, 1990 · Serbs armed with shotguns and hunting rifles sealed roads into southwestern Croatia on Saturday to prevent the republic's police from ...Missing: plebiscite | Show results with:plebiscite
  37. [37]
    SERBS VOTE IN POLL BANNED BY CROATIA - The Washington Post
    Aug 19, 1990 · The two-weekend vote has been declared illegal by Croatia's government, which says it is part of a scenario sponsored by the neighboring ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Republika Srpska Krajina and the right of peoples to self ...
    Jan 15, 1992 · part of Croatia. 35 On 1 July 1990, the Association was formally proclaimed. Its president was Milan Babić, a prominent member of the SDP and ...Missing: Kninska | Show results with:Kninska<|control11|><|separator|>
  39. [39]
    (PDF) Republika Srpska Krajina and the right of peoples to self ...
    In Part I of this article author details the claims to inde- pendent statehood of Croatia and Krajina based upon the right of peoples to self-determination.
  40. [40]
    Human Rights Watch World Report 1993 - The former Yugoslav ...
    Jan 1, 1993 · Road barricades and increasing vigilante violence in Serbian-controlled areas of Croatia also impeded the ability to monitor in those regions.<|separator|>
  41. [41]
    No Genocide Proven In 1990s Serbia-Croatia Conflict, Court Rules
    Feb 3, 2015 · The conflict that followed the breakup of Yugoslavia in the early 1990s included widespread killing, rape and torture, ...
  42. [42]
    (PDF) The Impact of Nationalism in the 1990s Yugoslav Crisis
    Aug 6, 2025 · 1. Introduction. Following the Revolutions of 1989, Eastern Europe underwent rapid political changes that overthrow · 2. A Brief History of ...
  43. [43]
    Serbia 'Used Yugoslav Army for War Goals': Report - Balkan Insight
    Jun 15, 2018 · The Yugoslav People's Army was used to achieve the Serbian leadership's nationalist goals during the 1990s wars in Bosnia and Croatia.
  44. [44]
    Croatia Commemorates Independence War's 'First Casualty'
    Mar 31, 2021 · On Easter Sunday, March 31, 1991, Croatian police entered the Plitvice Lakes national park to expel rebel Serb forces that had occupied the area ...
  45. [45]
    Remembering “Bloody Easter” of 1991, Croatia - Ina Vukic
    Apr 1, 2012 · On 29 March 1991, the Plitvice Lakes management was expelled by rebel Krajina Serb police under the control of Milan Martic (sentenced by ICTY ...
  46. [46]
    Yugoslav Army's Devastating Role in Vukovar Siege Highlighted
    Nov 16, 2018 · The Yugoslav People's Army, JNA used heavy artillery during the siege and capture of Vukovar and deployed about 15,000 troops, including Serb ...
  47. [47]
    Operation Storm — The Battle for Croatia, 1995 - ADST.org
    Nearly a quarter of Croatia's economy was ruined, with an estimated $37 billion in damaged infrastructure, lost output, and refugee-related costs. A total of ...Missing: blockade | Show results with:blockade
  48. [48]
    Croatia - Human Rights Watch
    Many observers believe that a "deal" was struck between Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic and Croatian President Franjo Tudjman to return the Krajina area ...Missing: uprising expansion
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Croatia: Three years since operations Flash and Storm
    Continuing impunity for hundreds of killings by Croatian forces in the 1995 offensives is a disturbing indication of what might be in store for the victims ...