Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Logical machine

A logical machine is a mechanical, electrical, or diagrammatic device engineered to automate the solution of problems in formal logic, such as evaluating syllogisms, class inclusions, or truth-value combinations, thereby performing deductive and inductive reasoning faster and more systematically than manual methods.^[1] The concept of logical machines traces its roots to the late 18th century, with the invention of the Stanhope Demonstrator by Charles Stanhope, third Earl Stanhope, around 1770; this compact wooden device used sliding panels marked with letters to test the validity of syllogisms and basic numerical probabilities by revealing consistent term combinations.^[2] A pivotal advancement occurred in the 1860s when English logician and economist William Stanley Jevons developed the "logical piano," a keyboard-operated mechanical apparatus completed by 1869 and first demonstrated to the Royal Society in 1870; it employed rods, pulleys, and a Boolean-inspired "logical alphabet" to process combinations for up to 4 terms (16 possible combinations) from premises like "All As are Bs," eliminating invalid outcomes and solving complex sorites (chains of syllogisms) in seconds—far surpassing human speed.^[3]^[4] Jevons' machine, influenced by George Boole's symbolic logic, marked the first instance of a device outperforming unaided human reasoning in intricate logical tasks and is preserved at the Museum of the History of Science in Oxford.^[2] Subsequent innovations bridged mechanical and electrical paradigms, notably Allan Marquand's 1881 mechanical machine, which simplified Jevons' design using just 10 keys, rods, levers, and strings to handle propositional logic; Marquand later proposed (but did not build) an electrical relay version in 1885, as detailed in his paper "A New Logical Machine" in the Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.;^[1] however, the proposed electrical version was not built at the time. By the mid-20th century, electrical implementations proliferated, including Benjamin Burack's portable 1936 syllogism tester, which used lamps and switches to verify arguments, and the 1956 Logic Theorist program by Allen Newell and Herbert A. Simon, an early software-based machine that proved mathematical theorems on the JOHNNIAC computer, demonstrating heuristic search in automated reasoning.^[1] These devices not only mechanized Boolean algebra and syllogistic logic but also prefigured modern digital computers by illustrating how logical operations could be encoded and executed systematically, influencing fields from circuit design to artificial intelligence.^[3]

Definition and Fundamentals

Core Concept

A logical machine is a mechanical or electromechanical device designed to perform formal logic operations by manipulating symbols or combinations of terms according to predefined logical rules, often employing principles akin to truth tables to evaluate propositions.^[1] Unlike calculators, which focus on arithmetic computations such as addition or multiplication, logical machines emphasize propositional logic, processing statements about truth values rather than numerical quantities.^[1] This distinction underscores their role in automating deductive processes grounded in Boolean logic, where operations like conjunction and disjunction determine the validity of inferences.^[5] The basic function of a logical machine involves inputting premises through selectors, such as keys or switches, which represent affirmative or negative terms in logical statements.^[5] Mechanical linkages then systematically evaluate all possible combinations of these inputs, eliminating inconsistent ones based on logical laws to identify valid conclusions.^[1] The output typically manifests as a selection of surviving combinations, indicating the conclusions that follow necessarily from the premises.^[5] A key purpose of logical machines is to reduce syllogistic reasoning—such as determining whether "all A is B" and "no B is C" implies "no A is C"—to an exhaustive mechanical check of cases, thereby avoiding human error in complex deductions.^[1] By mechanizing this process, the device ensures precise, error-free inference across multiple propositions.^[5] Historically, such devices were nicknamed "logical abacus" for their bead-like or combinatorial manipulation akin to an abacus for logic, or "logic piano" due to their keyboard-like interface for "playing" propositions.^[1]

Relation to Boolean Logic

Boolean algebra provides the theoretical foundation for logical machines by formalizing logic as an algebraic system where variables represent binary states—true (1) or false (0)—and operations manipulate these states to evaluate propositions. George Boole introduced this framework in his 1847 work The Mathematical Analysis of Logic, where he treated logical statements as equations solvable through algebraic methods, and expanded it in 1854's An Investigation of the Laws of Thought to encompass probabilistic and deductive reasoning.^[6] This binary approach enables logical machines to mechanize inference by reducing complex arguments to combinations of basic operations on true/false values. The core operators in Boolean algebra are conjunction (AND, denoted ∧), disjunction (OR, denoted ∨), and negation (NOT, denoted ¬), each defined by truth tables that specify outputs for all input combinations. For AND, the operation yields true only if both inputs are true:

P	Q	P ∧ Q
T	T	T
T	F	F
F	T	F
F	F	F

For OR, the result is true if at least one input is true:

P	Q	P ∨ Q
T	T	T
T	F	T
F	T	T
F	F	F

Negation inverts the input:

P	¬P
T	F
F	T

These truth tables ensure exhaustive coverage of the 2² = 4 possibilities for two variables, forming the basis for evaluating any Boolean expression.^[7] Logical machines operationalize Boolean algebra by encoding premises as binary states and systematically evaluating all 2ⁿ combinations for n variables, thereby automating the derivation of conclusions without human intervention. This exhaustive enumeration mirrors the algebraic manipulation of Boolean expressions, where machines physically or electromechanically implement the operators to resolve logical validity. For instance, in verifying a basic syllogism like modus ponens—expressed as (P \to Q) \land P \vdash Q—the machine reduces the implication P \to Q (equivalent to \neg P \lor Q) and conjunction to a truth table:

P	Q	P → Q	(P → Q) ∧ P	Q
T	T	T	T	T
T	F	F	F	F
F	T	T	F	T
F	F	T	F	F

Here, whenever (P \to Q) \land P is true (only the first row), Q is also true, confirming the inference holds as a tautology across all cases. This derivation exemplifies how Boolean methods enable machines to validate deductive rules algorithmically.^[8]

Historical Development

Early Precursors

The origins of logical machines can be traced to the 13th century through the work of Catalan philosopher Ramon Llull, who devised the ars combinatoria as a combinatorial system for generating logical conclusions from fundamental premises. Llull's method employed mechanical wheels—concentric rotating disks inscribed with symbols representing basic concepts, virtues, and vices—to systematically combine elements and derive philosophical, theological, and scientific insights without relying solely on human intuition. This "paper computer" or quasi-mechanical device was intended to demonstrate the harmony of creation and convert non-believers by exhaustively exploring logical possibilities, marking an early effort to externalize and mechanize deductive reasoning.^[9]^[10] Building on Llull's combinatorial legacy in the 17th century, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz proposed the characteristica universalis, an ambitious vision for a universal formal language that would encode all human knowledge in symbolic characters, enabling disputes to be resolved mechanically through calculation akin to arithmetic. Leibniz envisioned pairing this linguistic system with a universal calculator to perform logical operations automatically, reducing complex syllogisms and metaphysical arguments to verifiable computations and eliminating ambiguity in reasoning. Though Leibniz constructed only rudimentary calculating prototypes for arithmetic, his conceptual framework emphasized the potential for machines to handle symbolic manipulation, profoundly influencing the pursuit of automated logic.^[11] In the 18th century, practical attempts emerged to realize these ideas through rudimentary prototypes, exemplified by Charles Stanhope's "demonstrator," a compact mechanical device using sliding panels marked with propositions to evaluate syllogistic validity by manual alignment. Other efforts, such as those exploring gear-based mechanisms for propositional combinations, produced non-functional models that aimed to automate syllogism resolution but were constrained by imprecise engineering and manual operation. These devices represented transitional tools—semi-mechanical aids for logical demonstration rather than fully autonomous systems—highlighting the era's growing interest in tangible implementations of abstract logic.^[1]^[12] Collectively, these precursors were conceptual or manually operated constructs, devoid of external power sources for sustained automation, yet they established the intellectual groundwork for mechanizing logic and foreshadowed the role of Boolean algebra as a later mathematical enabler.^[13]

19th-Century Inventions

In the late 19th century, significant strides in mechanizing logical reasoning culminated in the development of practical devices capable of performing deductive inferences automatically. William Stanley Jevons, a professor of logic at Owens College in Manchester, UK, constructed the first such viable logical machine in 1869, known as the "logic piano." This invention built upon earlier philosophical inspirations, such as Ramon Llull's medieval combinatorial wheels, but marked a transition to functional automation by integrating mechanical elements to handle Boolean-style propositions.^[14]^[2] The logic piano was a keyboard-operated device resembling a small upright piano, approximately three feet high, housed in a wooden case and built by a clockmaker in nearby Salford. It featured a 21-key keyboard, with 16 keys dedicated to the four logical variables (A, B, C, D) and their negations (a, b, c, d), plus additional keys for operations such as the copula (equals sign for "is"), full stop (to exclude combinations), and finis (to reset). Internally, it employed an intricate system of pins, levers, pulleys, rods, and wooden boards arranged on a rack to represent and manipulate the 16 possible truth combinations of the four variables. When premises were input, the mechanism physically eliminated inconsistent combinations, leaving only valid ones visible through slots on the front panel.^[5]^[12]^[14] Functionally, the machine excelled at solving syllogistic problems by reducing them to propositional forms, performing inferences in seconds that would take hours manually. For instance, inputting the premises "All A is B" (by selecting combinations where A implies B) and "Some B is C" (selecting overlapping B and C) would eliminate invalid options, outputting that "Some A is C" as a valid conclusion among the remaining combinations. This capability demonstrated the practical utility of Jevons' equational logic, an extension of George Boole's system, for rapid deduction without full predicate logic support.^[5]^[12] Despite its innovations, the logic piano had notable limitations that confined its use to demonstration rather than widespread application. Its piano-sized bulk made it cumbersome for everyday handling, and the manual reset via the finis key after each operation interrupted workflow. Additionally, the complex mechanical linkages were prone to errors from wear or misalignment, restricting reliability, while its design was inherently limited to propositional logic with at most four variables, precluding more advanced predicate reasoning.^[14]^[12]

Late 19th and Early 20th-Century Advances

Building on William Stanley Jevons's logical piano, late 19th-century logicians pursued more compact and versatile mechanical aids for syllogistic reasoning. Allan Marquand, a lecturer in logic at Princeton University, constructed a simplified version in 1881 during his time there, featuring a portable wooden box approximately one foot high, eight inches wide, and six inches deep—roughly half the size of Jevons's original due to a streamlined rectangular arrangement of components for up to four terms. Instead of Jevons's keyboard, Marquand used rotating pointers to exhibit the 16 possible combinations, enabling efficient manual computation of logical conclusions.^[15]^[1] Parallel to these mechanical refinements, John Venn introduced a diagrammatic approach to visualizing set intersections in his 1880 paper, proposing a mechanical plotter to automate the creation of such diagrams for three or four sets. This device, detailed further in the 1894 edition of his Symbolic Logic, used intersecting elliptical cylinders mounted on a box with pegs and pulleys to adjust compartments, allowing users to shade or remove regions representing impossible classes and thereby illustrate propositional relationships without manual drawing. The plotter's pulley system facilitated scalable representation of up to 16 compartments for four sets, emphasizing visual clarity in logical analysis over purely algebraic methods. In the 1880s, Charles Sanders Peirce collaborated with Marquand to electrify these devices. Peirce's suggestions in correspondence outlined relay circuits to automate syllogisms, building on Marquand's mechanical design by replacing manual toggles with electrical switching for greater speed and potential scalability. In the 1880s, Charles Sanders Peirce corresponded with Marquand, suggesting in 1886 the use of electrical relays to electrify the device, leading to conceptual designs for relay circuits that could implement operations like conjunction and disjunction using solenoids. Marquand prepared a relay circuit diagram around 1885, though it was not published at the time and the electrical machine was not constructed.^[16]^[17]^[15]

Design and Mechanisms

Mechanical Implementations

Mechanical logical machines consist of physical components designed to simulate logical operations through mechanical linkages, without reliance on electrical power. Core components include input mechanisms such as keys or switches that represent logical variables or premises, sliding rods or cams that encode and propagate variable states across the device, and output indicators like visible letters, slots, or markers that reveal conclusions based on the mechanical configuration.^[18] These elements form a tangible system where logical variables are represented by the positions or movements of mechanical parts, allowing the machine to process combinations exhaustively. The operation of such machines proceeds in distinct steps to evaluate logical inferences. First, the user sets input premises by pressing keys or adjusting switches, which activate sliding rods or cams to configure linkages that block invalid logical paths corresponding to false combinations. Next, an exhaustive search is conducted by manually rotating a central cylinder or advancing a lever chain, systematically testing all possible states of the variables. Finally, the output is observed through indicators that align or reveal results only for valid paths that remain unblocked, thereby displaying the logical conclusions.^[18]^[2] A representative example is the logical machine developed by William Stanley Jevons and later refined by Allan Marquand, which handled four logical variables through a 16-position drum representing the $2^4 = 16 possible states. In this design, mechanical AND and OR operations were implemented via intersecting slots on the drum: premises input via keys positioned rods to cover slots for invalid states, while rotation exposed only the slots for valid combinations, mechanically enforcing Boolean operators through physical intersections.^[18] These machines offered advantages such as independence from electricity, enabling operation in any environment, and a hands-on, visual nature that facilitated teaching abstract logical principles.^[19]

Electrical and Relay-Based Designs

Electrical and relay-based designs marked a significant evolution in logical machines by incorporating electromagnetic principles to perform Boolean operations more efficiently than purely mechanical systems, which served as their direct predecessors. In 1886, Charles Sanders Peirce proposed to his student Allan Marquand the use of relays—electromagnetic switches—as a means to replace the mechanical linkages in Marquand's earlier logic machine, enabling the construction of modular logic gates that could represent "and" and "or" operations through circuit configurations.^[16] While Marquand outlined an electrical version of his machine around 1887, it was not fully constructed during his lifetime and remained largely conceptual, though it influenced later developments. This innovation allowed for the automation of logical inference by energizing coils with electrical inputs from switches, where the completion or interruption of circuits produced outputs corresponding to logical conclusions.^[20] These designs operated on the principle of electrical current flow controlled by relay contacts: an input signal would activate a solenoid coil, causing an armature to move and close or open associated contacts, thereby routing power to subsequent relays in a chain that evaluated compound propositions. Scalability improved with expanded relay arrays, facilitating the evaluation of complex syllogisms and truth tables without the physical constraints of mechanical rods and levers.^[1] Outputs were typically indicated by lamps or mechanical flags triggered by the final circuit state, providing visual confirmation of logical validity. In the late 1920s and early 1930s, Vannevar Bush and his team at MIT incorporated relays for control logic in analog computing devices, such as precursors to the differential analyzer, alongside experimental use of vacuum tubes for signal amplification. These systems automated intricate computations and demonstrated the application of relay circuits beyond pure mechanical logic, bridging to broader computational paradigms.^[21] However, relays introduced limitations such as mechanical wear on contacts from repeated arcing, electrical noise from contact bounce, and operational delays of several milliseconds per switching cycle, though this was still faster than the seconds required for pure mechanical operations.^[22]

Influence and Legacy

Impact on Computing History

Claude Shannon's 1937 master's thesis, "A Symbolic Analysis of Relay and Switching Circuits," established a foundational link between Boolean algebra and electrical engineering by demonstrating that relay circuits in telephone switching systems could directly implement logical operations such as AND, OR, and NOT.^[23] This work formalized the analogy between logical machines—early mechanical devices for performing deductive inference—and practical hardware, showing how Boolean functions could synthesize complex switching networks without trial-and-error design.^[24] By interpreting relays as truth-value gates, Shannon shifted the application of symbolic logic from abstract philosophy to tangible engineering, enabling the scalable design of computational circuits.^[25] The conceptual influence of logical machines extended to earlier visionary designs, such as Charles Babbage's Analytical Engine from the 1830s, which incorporated mechanisms for mechanized inference through conditional branching and looping operations on punched cards.^[26] Babbage envisioned the Engine not merely as an arithmetic calculator but as a general-purpose device capable of symbolic manipulation, including logical functions that mimicked mental processes like anticipation and decision-making, though he emphasized it as an automaton bound by fixed laws rather than a thinking entity.^[26] These ideas, though unrealized in Babbage's time due to mechanical limitations, prefigured the programmable inference central to later computers.^[26] A pivotal realization of relay-based logical machines occurred in the 1940s with Konrad Zuse's Z3, the first functional programmable digital computer, which employed approximately 2,600 relays to execute binary floating-point arithmetic and conditional operations via punched tape input.^[27] The Z3's architecture descended from early relay proposals, notably Allan Marquand's 1886 electrical logic machine design, refined by Charles Sanders Peirce, who illustrated how relays could perform basic logical connectives like conjunction and disjunction.^[28] Zuse's use of relays for Boolean logic gates marked a direct engineering application of these concepts, allowing automated computation beyond manual calculation.^[29] Overall, logical machines catalyzed a profound transformation in computing history by transitioning deductive logic from a philosophical domain—rooted in Aristotelian syllogisms and Boole's algebraic formalism—into an engineering discipline that underpinned programmable automation.^[24] This shift facilitated the development of general-purpose computers capable of emulating human inference, laying the groundwork for the stored-program paradigm and influencing mid-20th-century relay systems as precursors to electronic digital hardware.^[25]

Transition to Digital Systems

The 1940s witnessed a critical evolution in logical machines from electromechanical designs reliant on relays to fully electronic systems using vacuum tubes, enabling faster execution of Boolean logic and binary operations while overcoming the mechanical limitations of speed and reliability. This shift began with the Atanasoff-Berry Computer (ABC), constructed between 1939 and 1942 by John V. Atanasoff and Clifford Berry at Iowa State College, which pioneered the use of vacuum tubes to implement electronic logic gates for binary arithmetic, marking the first instance of a digital electronic computer focused on solving systems of linear equations.^[30] The ABC's design replaced slower relay switches with tube-based circuits, performing additions at 30 per second and demonstrating that electronic components could handle logical operations without the wear and bulk of mechanical parts.^[31] Earlier electromechanical logical machines, such as George Stibitz's 1937 relay-based Complex Number Calculator at Bell Labs, had already validated the practicality of hardware-implemented logic for automated reasoning, alleviating doubts about the engineering challenges of building such devices and proving that logical functions could be reliably executed in physical systems.^[30] By the mid-1940s, this foundation enabled broader adoption of electronics; a landmark achievement was the ENIAC, unveiled in 1945 by John Mauchly and J. Presper Eckert at the University of Pennsylvania's Moore School, which utilized approximately 18,000 vacuum tubes to realize Boolean algebra through electronic switches and accumulators, achieving multiplication rates of approximately 385 per second—far surpassing the capabilities of relay machines that struggled to scale beyond simple operations.^[32] Complementing these hardware advances, John von Neumann's 1945 "First Draft of a Report on the EDVAC" outlined a stored-program architecture that leveraged the modular logic principles from prior machines, integrating a central processing unit, memory for both instructions and data, and input-output mechanisms to support versatile, reprogrammable computation without physical rewiring.^[33] This conceptual leap built directly on the demonstrated modularity of logical machines, transforming them from specialized calculators into blueprints for general-purpose digital systems and profoundly influencing the trajectory of computing history.

Modern Equivalents

Automated Theorem Provers

Automated theorem provers are software systems designed to mechanically check and generate formal proofs of mathematical theorems, serving as modern digital incarnations of logical machines by automating deductive reasoning.^[34] Prominent examples include Coq, initiated in 1984 by Thierry Coquand and Gérard Huet at INRIA as an implementation of the Calculus of Constructions, which relies on dependent type theory to encode and verify proofs.^[35] Similarly, Isabelle, developed by Lawrence C. Paulson in 1986 at the University of Cambridge, employs higher-order logic as its foundational framework for interactive theorem proving.^[36] These tools enable users to formalize mathematical statements and construct proofs that are exhaustively verified by the system, ensuring logical soundness without human oversight in the checking process. In operation, automated theorem provers accept as input a set of axioms, premises, and a goal theorem, then systematically explore potential proof derivations through tactics—predefined or user-defined procedures that manipulate proof states.^[37] This search often involves backtracking over proof trees, where each node represents an intermediate logical state, and branches correspond to applicable inference rules or simplifications.^[37] Upon successful completion, the prover outputs a fully verified proof object, which can be extracted as executable code or inspected for correctness, thereby bridging formal mathematics with computational reliability. A landmark application of these systems is the mechanization of the Four Color Theorem, originally proved in 1976 by Kenneth Appel and Wolfgang Haken using computer enumeration of cases.^[38] In 2005, Georges Gonthier formalized an independent proof of the theorem entirely within Coq, verifying over 60,000 lines of proof script and reducing the reliance on unchecked computational checks from the original effort. This mechanized version not only confirmed the theorem's validity but also demonstrated the feasibility of large-scale formal proofs in proof assistants. Advancements in automated theorem proving have incorporated satisfiability (SAT) solvers to efficiently handle propositional subproblems, transforming undecidable higher-order searches into tractable finite instances.^[37] For instance, integrations like the one between the MiniSat solver and Isabelle/HOL in 2007 allow the prover to offload clause resolution to optimized SAT engines, enabling the processing of formulas with millions of clauses and variables in practical timeframes.^[37]^[34] Such hybrid approaches have significantly expanded the scope of mechanized reasoning, making theorem provers viable for complex, real-world verification tasks while maintaining formal rigor. More recent developments as of 2024 include AI-driven systems like AlphaProof, developed by Google DeepMind, which uses reinforcement learning within the Lean proof assistant to generate and verify proofs for International Mathematical Olympiad problems, achieving silver-medal performance.^[39]

Applications in Formal Verification

In formal verification, modern logical machines, often implemented as automated theorem provers and model checkers, play a crucial role in ensuring the correctness of software and hardware systems by exhaustively analyzing their logical properties against specifications.^[40] One prominent application is in software verification, where tools like ACL2 are employed to prove critical properties such as the absence of runtime errors or adherence to safety requirements in complex programs. For instance, NuSMV has been used by Rockwell Collins to formally verify the flight control software for the FCS 5000 system, a family of flight-critical avionics components, demonstrating the tool's ability to certify bug-free operation under DO-178B standards for airborne software.^[41] This approach allows engineers to mathematically prove that software behaviors, such as fault-tolerant responses in navigation algorithms, hold across all possible inputs, far surpassing traditional testing in coverage.^[42] In hardware verification, model checking tools like NuSMV enable the analysis of circuit designs to detect issues such as deadlocks or unintended state transitions in processors. NuSMV models hardware as finite-state machines and verifies temporal logic properties, such as ensuring no deadlock occurs during multi-core synchronization in processor pipelines. For example, it has been applied to verify peripherals like the 16550 UART integrated into processor systems, confirming liveness and safety properties that prevent communication failures.^[43] This exhaustive exploration of state spaces helps identify subtle concurrency bugs that simulation might miss.^[44] A notable historical case illustrating the potential of logical machines is the 1994 Intel Pentium FDIV bug, where a floating-point division error arose from missing entries in a lookup table, leading to incorrect computations in rare cases. Analyses of the incident concluded that formal verification techniques, such as those using automated theorem provers to exhaustively check arithmetic circuit implementations, could have detected and prevented this flaw during design, as they provide complete proof of correctness rather than probabilistic testing.^[45] The benefits of these applications include exhaustive analysis that scales beyond human capacity to explore vast state spaces, reducing the risk of latent defects in safety-critical domains. In aerospace, NASA integrates formal verification into flight software development to enhance reliability, as seen in tools applied to verify properties in mission-critical systems like the Space Shuttle's onboard computers, ensuring fault detection and recovery mechanisms function correctly.^[46] Similarly, in the semiconductor industry, companies like Intel employ formal methods to validate processor designs, achieving higher assurance against functional errors and accelerating time-to-market by minimizing post-silicon fixes.^[47]

References

[1]
[PDF] Logic Machines and Diagrams - Monoskop
a mechanical device for the solution of problems in formal logic. The next great step in the history of logic machines took place in. 1869 when William ...
[2]
William Stanley Jevons Constructs the First Logic Machine to Solve ...
In 1866 English mathematician and economist William Stanley Jevons, Offsite Link working at the University of Manchester, constructed his “logical piano,” ...
[3]
Logical Piano Lessons - CHM - Computer History Museum
Feb 1, 2022 · As a box with a keyboard that mechanically spits out solutions to problems input by a user, the Logical Piano readily evokes an embryonic idea of the digital ...
[4]
https://archive.org/stream/philtrans01714956/01714956#page/n0/mode/2up
[5]
I. On the mechanical performance of logical inference - Journals
On the mechanical performance of logical inference. William Stanley Jevons ... DOWNLOAD PDF. Figures; Related; References; Details. Cited by. Moseley R (2015) ...
[6]
George Boole - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Apr 21, 2010 · These results appeared in two major works, The Mathematical Analysis of Logic (1847) and The Laws of Thought (1854). 1. Life and Work; 2. The ...Life and Work · The Context and Background... · The Mathematical Analysis of...
[7]
[PDF] Chapter 2: Boolean Logic - UT Computer Science
Boolean Logic. A Truth Table Definition of the Operator not. Next we'll define not. It is the only example we'll consider of a unary operator (i.e., it acts ...<|separator|>
[8]
[PDF] Chapter 3: Boolean Logic Proofs - UT Computer Science
Look at the next to the last column of the truth table. It's all F's. Recall the definition of the expression p → q. It's true whenever p is false (as well as ...
[9]
Ramon Lull Invents Basic Logical Machines for the Production of ...
Lull became one of the first people to try to make logical deductions in a mechanical, rather than a mental way.Missing: precursor | Show results with:precursor
[10]
[PDF] Thinking Machines. Ramon Llull and the ars combinatoria
Avant la lettre, he invented a quasi-logical machine, a “paper computer,” that could implement combinations of concepts mechanically. Ramon Llull's ...Missing: precursor | Show results with:precursor
[11]
Characteristica universalis, logical calculus, and mathematics | Leibniz
'Characteristica universalis, logical calculus, and mathematics' explains that Leibniz nurtured the dream of developing an alphabet of human thoughts.Missing: machine precursor
[12]
Logic Machines | Encyclopedia.com
In a wider sense, any mechanical device is a logic machine (for example, an eggbeater spins clockwise "if and only if" its crank turns clockwise).Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[13]
Leibniz's Influence on 19th Century Logic
Sep 4, 2009 · Because of its generality, Leibniz's characteristica universalis stands out compared with competing proposals by George Dalgarno (1661) and ...Missing: machine | Show results with:machine
[14]
Jevons and the Logic 'Piano' - The Rutherford Journal
Perhaps the most exciting artefact to be included in the exhibition is Jevons' original logic machine, or 'Logic Piano'. With this device—on loan from the ...
[15]
https://www.jstor.org/stable/20023703
[16]
Charles Sanders Pierce Recognizes that Logical Operations Could ...
Oct 8, 2013 · After receiving Peirce's letter, in 1887 Marquand "outlined a machine to do logic using electric circuits. This necessitated his development of ...Missing: relay solenoids
[17]
https://www.jstor.org/stable/141165
[18]
XXII. On the mechanical performance of logical inference - Journals
It is an interesting subject for reflection that from the earliest times mechanical assistance has been required in mental operations.Missing: components | Show results with:components
[19]
Before Computers Were Logic Diagrams and Machines - EEJournal
Oct 19, 2023 · People started to create mechanical calculators, like Blaise Pascal with his Arithmetic Machine and Gottfried von Leibniz with his Step Reckoner.
[20]
[PDF] Martin Irvine C. S. Peirce and Computation as Automatable Semiosis
Jan 11, 2023 · One of his students, Allan Marquand, designed a working mechanical logic machine. In 1886, Peirce wrote a letter to encourage his student to ...
[21]
[PDF] Vannevar Bush and the Differential Analyzer: The Text and Context ...
The Differential Analyzer was a large mathematical machine, the most important computer in the US at the end of the war, used for calculations and was ...
[22]
Lost Generation: The Relay Computers - Creatures of Thought
May 10, 2017 · We shall see how scientists and engineers developed such relay circuits into the first, lost, generation of digital computers.
[23]
[PDF] A Symbolic Analysis of Relay and Switching Circuits
Claude E. Shannon**. 1. Introduction. In the control and protective ... A Symbolic Analysis of Relay and Switching Circuits. -(n-1). To a-. NUMBERS. Xn.Missing: machines | Show results with:machines
[24]
How Aristotle Created the Computer - cdixon
Feb 20, 2017 · The evolution of computer science from mathematical logic culminated in the 1930s, with two landmark papers: Claude Shannon's “A Symbolic Analysis of Switching ...
[25]
The Modern History of Computing
Dec 18, 2000 · Babbage emphasised the generality of the Analytical Engine, saying 'the conditions which enable a finite machine to make calculations of ...
[26]
[PDF] WAS BABBAGE'S ANALYTICAL ENGINE INTENDED TO BE A ...
Charles Babbage (1791–1871) was the inventor of a number of mechanical devices that were intended to compute mathematical and logical functions.1 The two most ...
[27]
Konrad Zuse: The Invention of the Programmable Computer
Although based on relays, the Z3 was very sophisticated for its time; for example, it utilized the binary number system and could perform floating-point ...Missing: Marquand Peirce influence
[28]
The Church-Turing Thesis - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Jan 8, 1997 · The Church-Turing thesis concerns the concept of an effective or systematic or mechanical method, as used in logic, mathematics and computer science.
[29]
Relay - Konrad Zuse Internet Archive
Electromechanical logic gates can be build with relays. Konrad Zuse's Z3 was an electromechanical machine which employed relays in all of its functional units.Missing: Marquand Peirce
[30]
The Modern History of Computing
Dec 18, 2000 · During the period 1937–1942 Atanasoff developed techniques for using vacuum tubes to perform numerical calculations digitally. In 1939, with ...
[31]
John Vincent Atanasoff - the father of the computer
The logic functions were fully electronic, implemented with vacuum tubes. The family of logic gates ranged from inverters to two and three input gates. The ...
[32]
[PDF] Computer Science History
This was the first time. Boolean logic was translated into a physical format with electronics. 18. This work became the foundation of circuit design and made ...
[33]
[PDF] First draft report on the EDVAC by John von Neumann - MIT
First Draft of a Report on the EDVAC. JOHN VON NEUMANN. Introduction. Normally first drafts are neither intended nor suitable for publication. This report is ...
[34]
[PDF] Satisfiability Solvers - Cornell: Computer Science
Modern SAT solvers provide a “black-box” procedure that can often solve hard structured problems with over a million variables and several million constraints.
[35]
About The Rocq Prover
It started in 1984 from an implementation of the Calculus of Constructions at INRIA-Rocquencourt by Thierry Coquand and Gérard Huet. In 1991, Christine Paulin ...Missing: date | Show results with:date<|separator|>
[36]
Lawrence C Paulson FRS
He introduced the popular Isabelle theorem proving environment in 1986, and made contributions to the verification of cryptographic protocols, the formalisation ...
[37]
Integrating a SAT Solver with an LCF-style Theorem Prover
This paper describes the integration of a leading SAT solver with Isabelle/HOL, a popular interactive theorem prover. The SAT solver generates ...
[38]
Formal Proof—The Four- Color Theorem
The first step in the proof of the Four-Color. Theorem consists precisely in getting rid of the topology, reducing an infinite problem in analysis to a finite ...Missing: mechanized history
[39]
Formal Verification's Usefulness Widens - Semiconductor Engineering
Jan 31, 2024 · “Because of its exhaustive nature, formal verification can prove conclusively that a design is secure, safe, or trustworthy.Missing: NASA | Show results with:NASA
[40]
[PDF] Formal Verification of Flight Critical Software
Aug 18, 2005 · Recent advances in modeling languages have made it feasible to formally specify and analyze the behavior of large system components.
[41]
Industrial hardware and software verification with ACL2 - PMC - NIH
Companies that have used ACL2 regularly include AMD, Centaur Technology, IBM, Intel, Kestrel Institute, Motorola/Freescale, Oracle and Rockwell Collins. This ...Missing: flight | Show results with:flight
[42]
[PDF] Formal Verification of Hardware Peripheral with Security Property ...
Jun 24, 2017 · We use NuSMV and nuXmv to conduct formal Model Checking of hardware peripherals. The hardware peripherals we build models for are the 16550 UART ...
[43]
[PDF] a new symbolic model checker - NUSMV
Abstract. This paper describes a new symbolic model checker, called NUSMV, developed as part of a joint project between. CMU and IRST.
[44]
None
Error: Could not load webpage.<|separator|>
[45]
[PDF] Formal Verification of Critical Aerospace Software - HAL
They have the advantage of being automated and exhaustive. Onera has chosen formal methods for the verification of critical aerospace software. Formal methods.Missing: semiconductors | Show results with:semiconductors
[46]
[PDF] Formal Methods at Intel — An Overview
the infamous FDIV bug: • Error in the floating-point division (FDIV) instruction on some early Intel Pentium processors. • Very rarely encountered, but ...