Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Full stop

The full stop (.), also known as the in , is a punctuation mark primarily used to indicate the end of a declarative , signaling a complete thought and a full pause in reading. It also marks the conclusion of indirect questions and separates components in , such as "Dr." or "etc." In numerical contexts, the same symbol functions as the in English-speaking countries. The origins of the full stop date to the 3rd century BCE, when the scholar Aristophanes of Byzantium, a librarian at the , developed an early system for Greek texts to aid oral reading. He introduced three dots placed at varying heights: the highest dot (·), called the periodos or full point, denoted the end of a complete rhythmic unit or thought, distinct from shorter pauses marked by lower dots (resembling modern comma and colon). This innovation stemmed from ancient rhetorical practices emphasizing pauses for breath and emphasis in spoken performance. During the early medieval period, the full stop evolved further; in the 7th century, formalized the high dot as the distinctio finalis to clarify sentence endings and grammatical structure in Latin manuscripts. By the 8th century, under Charlemagne's directive, the scholar of (c. 740–804) advanced in Carolingian scriptoria, promoting consistent use of points to enhance text and reduce scribal errors. The mark simplified to its modern baseline form (.) by the , as revolutionized written language in the . The advent of the movable-type by around 1450 accelerated the full stop's adoption, embedding it in standardized texts like the . Venetian printer (d. 1515) further refined its placement and integration with other in his influential editions of classical works, establishing conventions that persist in modern . In English specifically, the term "full stop" became the preferred British term during the to denote its emphatic termination of a , while "period" continued as the standard in . Today, the full stop remains essential for clarity in formal writing, though its interpretive role in digital messaging—sometimes implying curtness—reflects evolving communicative norms.

Names and terminology

Regional variations in English

In , the mark terminating a declarative is predominantly termed a "full stop" in formal writing and speech, reflecting its role in marking a complete pause. This preference is endorsed by authoritative style guides such as New Hart's Rules: The Oxford Style Guide, which defines the "full point" interchangeably as a "full stop" and notes its distinction from the "." The term underscores the mark's function in fully concluding a thought, aligning with longstanding conventions in English varieties. In contrast, overwhelmingly favors "" for the same punctuation, rendering "full stop" uncommon outside informal or cross-Atlantic contexts. The Chicago Manual of Style, a key reference for U.S. , consistently employs "" throughout its guidelines on endings and . This terminological dominance in American usage extends to educational materials and journalistic standards, where "" is the standard without regional qualifiers. The divergence in nomenclature traces to historical usage where both terms were common in English, with "full stop" appearing by and "" rooted in 16th-century references to rhetorical pauses. Over time, particularly in the , increasingly preferred "full stop" while solidified on "." This evolution is evident in printing manuals and style guides, where British conventions like those of prioritized "full stop" for clarity in formal prose. Style guides exemplify these regional preferences: the guidelines, as in New Hart's Rules, advocate "full stop" for sentence endings in British academic and publishing contexts, whereas the Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition) specifies "period" for identical applications in American texts, including after abbreviations like "U.S." Such distinctions ensure consistency within each variant while facilitating cross-regional adaptation in global English.

Terms in other languages

In , the full stop is typically termed "point," a direct descendant of the Latin punctum, denoting a prick or dot used to mark textual pauses. In , it is known as point, functioning equivalently to the English period or full stop at the end of declarative sentences. In , the term is punto (or punto fermo for emphasis on finality), reflecting the same punctual origin. Spanish employs punto or punto final, with the latter underscoring its role in concluding texts or documents. This shared nomenclature across Romance tongues highlights the enduring influence of Latin scribal practices on . Germanic languages adopt analogous "point"-based terminology, reinforcing the visual of a small mark. refers to it as Punkt, placed after the final word of a sentence without spacing. In , the equivalent is punt, used similarly to denote sentence closure. These terms parallel the etymological roots in Proto-Germanic concepts of pointed notation, adapted from classical influences. Slavic languages favor words evoking "dot" or "point," emphasizing the mark's diminutive form. uses tochka (точка), literally meaning "point" or "dot," to indicate the end of a . calls it kropka, derived from a root implying a small drop or speck, applied at termini. Such designations underscore a conceptual focus on the glyph's simplicity across East and West traditions. In Arabic, the full stop is designated nuqṭah (نقطة), translating to "point," and its application accommodates the script's right-to-left orientation, placing the mark at the end of the sentence, which appears on the left in typesetting. This Semitic variant illustrates how the punctuation's nomenclature adapts to directional writing systems while preserving the universal "point" motif.

History

Origins in ancient Greek and Latin

The full stop's origins trace back to writing practices, where the need for visual cues in —uninterrupted streams of letters—led to the development of pause indicators around the 3rd century BCE. In this era, a high dot (˙ or elevated ·), known as the teleia or punctus elevatus, was used to mark the end of a or a complete thought unit called the periodos, facilitating pauses during oral of literary and dramatic texts. This mark appears in surviving Hellenistic papyri, such as fragments of plays and philosophical works, demonstrating its role in structuring rhythmic delivery rather than enforcing strict grammar. Aristophanes of Byzantium, a prominent scholar and librarian at (c. 257–185 BCE), is credited with formalizing this early system to aid readers and performers. His involved placing a single dot at varying heights relative to the text line: the high dot for the longest pause (full stop or periodos), the middle dot (·) for an intermediate pause (, or ), and the low dot (.) for the shortest pause (comma, or phrase). Designed primarily for theatrical and rhetorical purposes, this théseis system represented a shift from purely contextual interpretation to explicit notation, influencing how ancient texts were divided into sense units. Evidence of its application is found in papyri from the BCE, including excerpts from and other classical authors, where the high dot consistently signals sentence completion. Greek punctuation practices influenced later Latin scripts, though classical largely relied on and abandoned systematic dots by the 2nd century CE, with figures like emphasizing rhythm over marks. In the 6th–7th centuries, Christian writers revived and adapted the Greek system for Latin. (c. 560–636) formalized it, defining the high dot (·) as the distinctio finalis for sentence ends and the low dot (.) for shorter pauses like commas, aiding grammatical clarity in manuscripts. The Greek middle dot (·) informed the for word separation in archaic texts, while the colon (:), formed by stacking dots, emerged as a marker for stronger divisions, bridging pause hierarchies.

Evolution in medieval and modern English

In early manuscripts from the 6th to 15th centuries, evolved to support oral , with Christian scholars adapting ancient systems. By the , of Seville's distinctio finalis (high dot) clarified endings. In the 8th century, of advanced standardization in Carolingian scriptoria under , promoting points for readability. Later, from the 12th to 15th centuries, the punctus—a simple dot at varying heights—marked pauses: baseline for short (comma-like), mid-line for medium, and headline for ends, evolving into the modern full stop. The punctus elevatus, resembling an inverted , indicated major medial pauses between clauses, serving as a precursor to the , while the virgula suspensiva (forward slash) marked brief hesitations. These conventions, inherited from late antique practices, remained inconsistent and scribe-dependent, primarily aiding liturgical and scholarly reading. The advent of the in the brought greater standardization, particularly through the work of Venetian printer , who standardized placement, including the at , in his influential editions of classical works like the 1501 , using innovative italic typefaces for enhanced legibility. This distinguished the full stop from raised points for other pauses, promoting uniformity across printed Latin and texts as printing spread to via in the 1470s. Manutius's reforms bridged manuscript traditions and early modern , solidifying the dot's role as a sentence terminator. By the , English grammarians formalized these developments amid rising and prescriptive , with Lindley Murray's influential English Grammar (1795) explicitly codifying the full stop as the primary mark for concluding declarative sentences, emphasizing its distinction from commas and colons in a hierarchical pause system. Murray's text, which sold over 20 million copies by the mid-19th century, reflected efforts to regulate English prose for clarity and rhetorical effect. In the , British printing houses, influenced by mechanized typesetting and style guides from firms like , increasingly adopted "full stop" as the preferred terminology over "period," aligning with evolving conventions in and amid divergences. This shift, evident in manuals from the early , underscored the mark's entrenched syntactic function while adapting to new media like telegraphs and typewriters.

Core textual usage

Ending declarative sentences

The full stop, also known as a period, serves as a terminal punctuation mark that signals the completion of a declarative or imperative sentence, thereby indicating a full thought or command has concluded. It distinguishes such sentences from interrogative or exclamatory ones, which use question marks or exclamation points instead, and enhances readability by providing a clear pause for the reader. For instance, in the sentence "The experiment succeeded.", the full stop marks the end of the declarative statement. Major style guides prescribe specific conventions for its placement, particularly regarding spacing. The American Psychological Association (APA) 7th edition and the Modern Language Association (MLA) handbook both require a single space following the full stop at the end of a sentence to maintain consistent formatting in academic writing. Similarly, British style guides, such as the UK Government Digital Service guidelines, recommend one space after a full stop, though in justified typesetting, additional spacing may be adjusted algorithmically without inserting extra manual spaces. Certain exceptions apply to its use in sentence endings. Indirect questions, which report rather than directly pose a query (e.g., "She asked whether the train was ."), conclude with a full stop instead of a to reflect their declarative . In bulleted or numbered , a full stop is typically omitted after items that are not complete , such as phrases or fragments, to promote scannability; however, it is retained if each item forms a full declarative . The historical rationale for the full stop traces back to systems of marking pauses for oral recitation. In the BCE, the scholar of developed a system of —low, middle, and high—to denote pauses of increasing length, with the high dot (ancestral to the full stop) signaling the end of a complete thought unit, or periodos. This evolved through Latin adoption in the Roman era, where it marked rhetorical breaks, and into medieval Christian texts, where Isidore of Seville in the 7th century formalized it as a terminator to aid comprehension. By the and the advent of printing in the , the full stop became standardized to support and enhance textual clarity, shifting from pause indicators to grammatical boundaries that improve modern readability.

In abbreviations and acronyms

In abbreviations and acronyms, the full stop serves to indicate truncation or separation of elements within shortened forms of words or phrases, distinct from its role in marking the end of complete sentences. Initialisms, which are abbreviations pronounced as individual letters (such as U.S.A. for United States of America), traditionally include full stops after each letter to signal the abbreviated nature of each component. In contrast, acronyms, pronounced as single words (such as NASA for National Aeronautics and Space Administration), typically omit full stops to facilitate fluid reading and reflect their word-like pronunciation. Formal abbreviations of titles or degrees, like for , often incorporate full stops to denote the omission of letters, following conventions in styles such as the (), which recommends periods in such cases. However, contractions, which shorten combined words (such as for do not), use apostrophes rather than full stops to indicate the elided letters, as they represent a phonetic merger rather than segmented . , for instance, advises omitting periods in all-caps abbreviations like , treating them consistently with modern practices. Contemporary style guides show a trend toward omitting full stops in abbreviations and acronyms for brevity and visual clarity, particularly in all-caps forms. , updated through the 2020s, mandates periods only in two-letter initialisms like U.S. but omits them in longer acronyms like FBI to avoid clutter, reflecting broader shifts in digital and journalistic writing. Similarly, has evolved to eliminate periods in uppercase initialisms and acronyms, such as USA or DNA, prioritizing streamlined presentation over traditional . Historically, full stops in abbreviations originated in medieval manuscripts and early printing to denote textual omissions, where points or susperscript marks signaled truncated words in Latin and early English texts, aiding scribes in efficient copying of lengthy documents. This practice underscored the full stop's role in compact communication, influencing its persistent but diminishing use in abbreviations today.

Numerical and symbolic applications

As decimal and thousands separators

In English-speaking countries such as the and the , the full stop (period) serves as the decimal separator to distinguish the part from the of a number, as in 3.14 for three and one-seventh. This convention contrasts with many countries, where the is instead used as the decimal separator, resulting in notations like 3,14. The full stop has also been employed as a thousands separator in certain numerical styles, particularly in older usage in some continental European countries, such as , where numbers like 1.000.000 denoted one million, though this practice is now rare and has largely been replaced by the or a . In contemporary , the typically functions as the thousands separator (e.g., 1,000,000), aligning more closely with American conventions. The (ISO) addresses these separators in its standard ISO 80000-1 (first published in 2009 and revised in 2022), which permits either the full stop or the as the decimal marker but requires consistent use within a document. For thousands grouping, the standard recommends a (e.g., ) as the preferred separator internationally, while allowing regional variations such as the period in some contexts to accommodate established practices. Historically, the use of points to denote fractions emerged in medieval Islamic mathematics, where scholars like al-Uqlīdisī in the employed decimal signs—often small circles or points—to separate and fractional parts in calculations, building on the Hindu-Arabic numeral system. This practice influenced later European developments, with the modern point appearing in the 1440s in the astronomical tables of Italian mathematician Giovanni Bianchini, predating previous estimates by about 150 years.

As multiplication sign and ordinal indicator

In mathematical notation, the full stop, or period, has served as an alternative to the raised dot (·, known as the interpunct or middot) for denoting multiplication, particularly in historical texts and certain printed or handwritten contexts where typefaces limited access to the centered dot. This usage emerged in the early 17th century, with English mathematician William Oughtred employing the dot in his 1631 work Clavis Mathematicae to indicate multiplication between numbers or variables, such as in expressions like "6.r" for 6 times r. German philosopher and mathematician Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz further promoted the dot as a multiplication symbol in a 1698 letter to Johann Bernoulli, favoring it over the × to avoid confusion with the variable x, as seen in notations like "Z C . L M" for Z × C times L × M. By the 18th century, the dot gained traction in European mathematical writing through figures like Leonhard Euler and James Stirling in Britain, though the full stop itself was often indistinguishable from the dot in low-position print, leading to occasional direct use of the period in algebraic expressions for multiplication, especially before standardization of the middot in modern typography. The full stop also functions as an ordinal indicator in several languages, particularly in Central and Northern Europe, where it follows a numeral to denote sequence or rank rather than cardinality. In German, for instance, ordinal numbers written in digits are followed by a period, as prescribed by the Duden orthographic rules, such as "1." for erste (first) or "15." in dates like "den 15. April" (the 15th of April). This convention extends to other languages like Hungarian, Danish, and several Slavic tongues (e.g., Czech and Polish), where the period signals ordinality without additional suffixes, contrasting with English's use of -st, -nd, -rd, or -th. In dates, this manifests regionally as formats like "1. Januar" in German-speaking areas, emphasizing the day's ordinal position before the month. Typographically, the period's role in multiplication evolved from 16th- and 17th-century mathematical manuscripts, where scribes and early printers adapted the full stop due to limited sets, predating the widespread adoption of the dedicated middot in the via influences like Christian Wolff's texts. For ordinals, the period's use traces to medieval conventions for abbreviating ranks in lists and calendars, solidifying in printed grammars by the , such as in style guides that reserve the full stop to avoid ambiguity with decimal points (noted in the prior section on numerical separators). These applications highlight the full stop's versatility beyond sentence termination, adapting to symbolic needs in and ordering while varying by linguistic tradition.

Technical and coded contexts

In computing and logic

In computing, the full stop, or period (.), plays a crucial syntactic role as a delimiter and separator in various systems, beginning with its standardization in the American Standard Code for Information Interchange (ASCII). Published in 1963 as ASA X3.4, ASCII assigned the decimal code 46 (hexadecimal 2E) to the period to ensure compatibility with existing telegraphic and typewriter conventions, facilitating its adoption in early digital text processing and data transmission. This encoding choice supported the period's use in programming and data formats, where it denotes boundaries without conflicting with alphanumeric characters. The period's function as a hierarchy separator emerged prominently in file naming conventions during the 1960s. In the PDP-6 Multiprogramming System, delivered by Digital Equipment Corporation in 1964, filenames incorporated a dot to separate the base name from an extension indicating file type, such as "program.exe" for executable files; this design was influenced by earlier time-sharing systems like CTSS (1961) and became a standard in UNIX by the early 1970s for denoting file types (e.g., "document.txt"). Similarly, in domain names under the Domain Name System (DNS) introduced in 1983, the period separates hierarchical labels, as in "example.com," where it delineates subdomains from top-level domains to structure internet addressing. In modern programming languages, the serves as an for attribute access and . In , dot notation accesses object attributes and methods, such as "obj.attr" to retrieve or invoke a , enabling object-oriented and in code. Java employs the period to separate package names in class declarations, like "com.example.package.ClassName," which maps to directory hierarchies and prevents naming conflicts in large-scale applications. In formal logic, the period features in early 20th-century notations for grouping and . introduced dot notation in 1889 in his Arithmetices principia to punctuate logical expressions, replacing parentheses for (e.g., higher dots enclosing lower ones to denote precedence), and by 1905, adapted it for conjunction, writing "p · q" to mean "p and q." This system influenced (1910–1913) by and Russell, where dots dual-serve as punctuation for formula delimitation and as symbols for logical product, though implication uses the dedicated horseshoe ⊃.

In telegraphy and phonetic systems

In Morse code, developed in the 1830s by Samuel Morse and Alfred Vail, the full stop (period) is encoded as the sequence dit-dah-dit-dah-dit-dah, consisting of alternating short and long signals to denote the end of a declarative sentence or to punctuate abbreviations within messages. This distinct pattern differentiates it from other punctuation, such as the comma (dah-dit-dah-dit), ensuring clarity in transmission over telegraph lines where timing—three units between letters and seven between words—further separates elements without relying on the period for word breaks. During the early 20th century, the International Radiotelegraph Convention of 1906, held in , standardized the use of International Morse code for global , including the 's role in signaling the conclusion of sentences or entire telegrams to prevent ambiguity in cross-border communications. In practice, however, telegraph operators frequently substituted the word "STOP" for the period code in transmitted messages, as marks were often counted and charged as full words in billing, equivalent to four-letter terms that incurred no extra fee. This convention not only streamlined transmission but also contributed to cost savings, as telegrams were priced per word, prompting senders to abbreviate extensively and rely on contextual cues like "STOP" to imply sentence breaks without adding billed symbols. In phonetic systems, the full stop holds specific utility for clarity during verbal transmissions. The , standardized in the 1950s for military and use, designates the period as "stop" when spelling out punctuation in radiotelephony, distinguishing it from letter codes like "Papa" for P to avoid confusion in noisy environments. Similarly, in phonetic shorthand systems such as , introduced in 1837, the full stop is represented by a joined cross, kept small to avoid clashing with outlines, facilitating rapid while preserving grammatical structure through minimalistic pauses rather than full textual interruptions. These applications underscore the full stop's adaptation in coded and sound-based communication to balance efficiency with interpretability.

Typographic conventions

Spacing and placement rules

In English , modern professional follows the one-space rule after a full stop at the end of a , particularly since the late with the adoption of proportional fonts. This distinguishes it from the two-space tradition—rooted in earlier printing practices but popularized with typewriters in the late —which persisted into the pre-1980s era due to the limitations of monospaced fonts. The two-space practice aimed to provide clearer separation in uniform-width type, but it became obsolete with the shift to proportional fonts in modern printing. Standard English punctuation rules require no space before the full stop, positioning it directly adjacent to the preceding word without separation. In contrast, French typography conventions include spaces before certain compound punctuation marks, such as guillemets (« ») used for quotations, where a non-breaking space precedes the opening guillemet and follows the closing one to ensure proper visual balance. However, the full stop itself in French follows the same no-space-before rule as in English for simple sentences. In justified text alignment, hanging punctuation techniques position the full stop outside the text margins to preserve a straight, even edge along the right side of the paragraph, preventing the mark from disrupting the flush alignment. This microtypographic adjustment, also known as optical margin alignment, applies particularly to periods, commas, and in body text to enhance and aesthetic uniformity. The rise of digital typography in the 1990s, particularly with and CSS, introduced automatic and justification features that standardized single-spacing after full stops and diminished reliance on manual rules from print traditions. Modern CSS properties, such as hanging-punctuation introduced in the CSS Text Module Level 3 (first drafted in ), aim to automate the placement of periods in justified layouts. As of November 2025, support remains limited, with partial implementation in but lacking in major browsers like and .

Usage in quotations and dialogue

In , the full stop is placed inside the closing , regardless of whether it is part of the original quoted material, as per standard style guides such as those from the (MLA). For example, a sentence like "She said hello." treats the period as integral to the quoted phrase. In contrast, typically positions the full stop outside the quotation marks unless it belongs to the quoted content itself, following conventions outlined in guides like The Oxford Style Manual, resulting in forms such as "She said 'hello'." This difference reflects broader typographic traditions, with American usage prioritizing enclosure for visual consistency. In within novels and , the full stop appears before the closing when the spoken words form a complete declarative , even if followed by a dialogue tag. For instance, the structure "Stop." he said. ensures the terminates the quoted speech appropriately, as recommended in editing resources aligned with principles. This placement maintains the integrity of the character's utterance while integrating it into the narrative flow, avoiding the use of a in such cases unless the tag directly continues the . The , consisting of three dots, often integrates with the full stop in quotations to indicate omissions from the original text, particularly in formal editing. According to (17th edition), when an ellipsis follows a complete within a , the full stop precedes the ellipsis to preserve the sentence's termination, as in "The report concluded that... measures were needed." Here, the ellipsis replaces additional content without substituting the full stop entirely, ensuring clarity in abbreviated excerpts. The evolution of in the , originating from marginal double commas (or "diple") used in printing to highlight passages, influenced modern full stop placement within quotes. Printers like those in around 1580 adapted these double commas into inline marks, gradually standardizing the enclosure of terminal like the full stop inside them for readability in printed texts, as documented in historical typographic analyses. This shift from marginal annotations to embedded helped establish the logical and visual rules still debated in Anglo-American styles today.

Variations in other scripts

In Greek and Armenian

In modern Greek, the full stop is denoted by the low dot (.), called the teleía (τελεία), and it marks the end of a declarative sentence in the same manner as the English period. The raised dot (·), known as the ánō teleía (άνω τελεία), serves as a to separate independent clauses or indicate a stronger pause than a , while also appearing in lists or enumerations. This raised form retains echoes of the ancient Greek pístis or middle dot (·), which of introduced in the BCE to denote sentence boundaries in manuscripts. In polytonic Greek, used until the late for classical and texts, punctuation relied on a system of elevated dots and pauses derived from Byzantine traditions, where a high dot often functioned as a full stop or semicolon-like break, and semicolon-shaped marks indicated intermediate pauses. The shift to monotonic in , enacted by the Greek government to simplify diacritics and enhance , further standardized the low dot as the primary full stop, promoting alignment with international typographic norms and facilitating digital and compatibility. This reform, while primarily targeting accents, integrated into a unified modern system that largely mirrors Latin conventions. The script, created by around 405 CE, employs the verjaket (վերջակետ, ։)—a pair of vertically aligned dots resembling a colon—as its full stop, placed at the end of sentences to denote completion, much like the Latin . This mark has been integral to Armenian writing since the alphabet's invention, appearing in classical manuscripts and persisting in both Eastern and Western Armenian variants today, with its form ensuring clear sentence demarcation in the script's unique letter shapes. In practice, the verjaket functions identically to Western full stops, though it may appear thicker in titles to match the script's bold strokes.

In East Asian scripts

In East Asian scripts, the full stop is typically represented by a small known as the ideographic full stop (。), which serves as the sentence terminator in and writing systems. In , this mark is called kuten (句点, "sentence point") or maru (丸, "circle"), and it was standardized as part of modern conventions in the mid-20th century following earlier influences from scripts. In , it is referred to as jùhào (句号, "sentence number"), a full-width small that occupies the space of one character, marking the end of declarative sentences. In , the full stop aligns more closely with conventions using a half-width dot (.) for sentences in pure script, known as machimpyo (마침표, "ending mark"), to denote the conclusion of statements, including in mixed scripts with . In vertical writing, the ideographic full stop (。) is employed, while full-width variants like ． may appear in standardized encodings such as KS X 1001. Historically, classical East Asian texts lacked punctuation, relying on reader interpretation through annotations like jùdòu (句读) in Chinese to indicate pauses, until Western influences prompted adoption in the late 19th century. In Japan, this shift accelerated during the Meiji era starting in 1868, when translations of European works introduced comma and period marks, leading to widespread use by the early 20th century and official standardization in 1946. Similar reforms occurred in China around 1919 with the first printed book using modern punctuation, and in Korea through 20th-century orthographic updates. In vertical writing, common in traditional East Asian typography, the ideographic full stop (。) is positioned at the lower right of the preceding character, contrasting with the baseline placement in horizontal Latin scripts, to maintain visual balance in column-based layouts. This placement ensures the mark does not disrupt the right-to-left column flow while clearly signaling sentence endings.

In Brahmic and related scripts

In , which are systems derived from the ancient and typically written horizontally but with vertical glyph stacking, the full stop equivalent often takes the form of a vertical mark to denote boundaries without disrupting the syllabic flow. These punctuation forms emphasize verticality to align with the scripts' stacked consonant-vowel structures, contrasting with horizontal dots in Latin systems. In , used for languages like , , and , the primary sentence-ending mark is the single (।, U+0964 DEVANAGARI DANDA), a vertical bar resembling a staff or "stick" that signifies the end of a declarative . The double danda (॥, U+0965 DEVANAGARI DOUBLE DANDA) serves for or section endings, a convention rooted in traditional dating to ancient Vedic texts where it delimited phrases and metrical units. This usage persists in classical and religious printing, though modern prose increasingly incorporates the Latin full stop (.) for . The , another Brahmic derivative used for the in , historically employed the kunddaliya (෴, U+0DF4 SINHALA PUNCTUATION KUNDDALIYA), a swirling, comma-like symbol at the baseline to mark the end of verses or sentences in palm-leaf manuscripts. During the 19th-century , Western printing presses introduced , leading to the obsolescence of the kunddaliya in favor of the standard full stop (.), which now dominates modern while retaining the traditional mark in ornamental or classical contexts. In Southeast Asian Brahmic scripts like Thai and Khmer, sentence endings use compact, baseline-placed marks adapted from Indic traditions but simplified for tonal abugidas. Thai traditionally separates sentences with a space (วรรค, wak), using the period (.) for major pauses or abbreviations in modern texts; the fongman (๏, U+0E4F THAI CHARACTER FONGMAN) marks paragraph beginnings or serves as a bullet, while the angkhan kuu (๚, U+0E5A THAI CHARACTER ANGKHANKUU) indicates ends of sections or chapters, with standardization efforts in the 1940s focusing on orthographic consistency. Khmer uses the khan (។, U+17D4 KHMER SIGN KHAN), a small vertical double dot at the baseline, functioning as a full stop for sentences or chapters, with a four-dot variant (៖, U+17D6) for stronger pauses, as outlined in traditional orthographic rules. These marks integrate seamlessly with the scripts' stacked diacritics, avoiding intrusion into vowel positioning. Tibetan script, a Brahmic offshoot with pronounced vertical stacking in its form, utilizes the tsheg (་, U+0F0B MARK INTERSYLLABIC TSHEG), a small dot or wedge at the midline, primarily for separating syllables or words within sentences, while the shad (།, U+0F0D MARK SHAD) acts as the sentence-ending full stop, akin to a vertical or . The tsheg ensures clarity in dense, vowelless consonant clusters, and double shads (།།) denote breaks, a system refined since the 7th-century invention for . Modern digital representation of these vertical forms faces unification challenges in , as variations in shape and baseline alignment across —such as the thicker versus the slender shad—necessitated separate code points to preserve linguistic distinctions, avoiding the pitfalls of that could merge culturally specific marks. This approach, debated in early proposals, supports accurate rendering in vertical text flows but requires advanced font support for proper stacking and .

Digital representation

Unicode encoding

The full stop is encoded in Unicode as U+002E FULL STOP (.), a character in the Basic Latin block that serves as the primary punctuation mark for sentence termination in Latin-script languages and as a decimal separator in many locales. This encoding is fully compatible with ASCII, where it occupies position 46 (0x2E in hexadecimal), ensuring seamless integration in legacy systems. Introduced in Unicode version 1.1 in 1993, U+002E inherits its definition from earlier standards and is rendered as a small dot at the baseline, with its use as a decimal point being locale-dependent. Several variant encodings exist for the full stop to accommodate specific typographic or linguistic needs. The middle dot, U+00B7 MIDDLE DOT (·), functions as an in (known as ano teleia) for sentence separation, as a in , and as a Georgian comma; it is distinct from U+002E by its raised position. In East Asian , the fullwidth full stop, U+FF0E FULLWIDTH FULL STOP (．), provides a wider form suitable for proportional fonts in scripts like , , and , maintaining visual balance in vertical or horizontal layouts. The encoding history of the full stop traces back to early international standards for digital text representation. It first appeared in the as part of seven-bit character sets, including the American Standard Code for Information Interchange (ASCII) finalized in and the international ISO/IEC 646 standard ratified in 1972, which defined a 128-character repertoire for data interchange. By the , with the development of and its encoding scheme—proposed in 1992 and standardized in 1993—the full stop retained its ASCII position (byte 0x2E in ), preserving for global adoption across diverse scripts and applications. In bidirectional text environments, the full stop (U+002E) is classified as a neutral character with Common bidirectional category (CS for common separator in some contexts), meaning its visual placement follows the surrounding text direction rather than initiating a new embedding level. This can lead to rendering challenges in right-to-left scripts like Arabic and Hebrew, where the period appears at the logical end of a sentence but visually on the left side, requiring proper algorithm implementation per Unicode Bidirectional Algorithm (UBA) to avoid misalignment with left-to-right insertions such as numbers or Latin terms.

In text messaging and informal digital communication

In informal digital communication, such as , the full stop (period) is frequently omitted at the end of , reflecting a conversational style that prioritizes brevity and flow over traditional grammatical conventions. A linguistic of students' text messages found that only 39% of included sentence-final punctuation, with periods appearing in just 30% of cases, compared to higher rates in (41%). This omission mimics the prosody of spoken dialogue, where pauses are implied by message transmission rather than explicit marks, allowing for a more casual, ongoing exchange. When full stops are used in text messages, they often carry pragmatic implications beyond mere sentence closure, influencing perceptions of and intent. Experimental research has shown that messages ending with a full stop, such as "yup.", are rated as less sincere than unpunctuated equivalents like "yup", an effect unique to formats and absent in handwritten notes. In short messages (one word), full stops can amplify negativity or abruptness, leading recipients to infer irritation or finality, though this perceptual shift diminishes in longer messages (three or more words). However, interpretations vary by context; full stops may signal earnestness, formality, or seriousness in emotionally charged exchanges, rather than consistent hostility, highlighting their semiotic flexibility in informal settings. This evolving role extends to broader digital platforms like comments and chats, where full stops can underscore emphasis or mimic spoken pauses for dramatic effect, such as in "Read. This. Slowly." Such uses adapt the to compensate for the absence of nonverbal cues, though overuse in abrupt replies may still evoke unintended emotional undertones.