Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Luminous efficiency function

The luminous efficiency function, also known as the luminosity function, quantifies the average relative sensitivity of the human visual system to at different wavelengths, serving as the foundation for photometry by converting radiometric quantities (such as ) into photometric ones (such as ) that align with human of . It is defined across a spectral range typically from 360 nm to 830 nm, with the standard photopic function V(λ) peaking at 555 nm in the green-yellow spectrum, where the eye is most sensitive under well-lit conditions. Established by the International Commission on Illumination (CIE) in 1924, the photopic V(λ) was derived from averaged experimental data using heterochromatic flicker photometry and other methods on observers with a 2° central visual field, providing a psychophysical analog to radiance for standard daylight-adapted vision. This function, normalized to a maximum value of 1 at 555 nm, underpins the definition of the candela—the SI unit of luminous intensity—and enables the calculation of luminous efficacy, with a maximum spectral value of 683 lm/W at that wavelength. Subsequent refinements, such as Judd's 1951 modifications for shorter wavelengths below 500 nm, improved accuracy without altering the core standard, which was reaffirmed by the CIE in 1983 and incorporated into international standards like those from the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). For dim light conditions, the scotopic luminous efficiency function V'(λ)—adopted by the CIE in 1951—describes rod-dominated vision, peaking at 507 nm and extending sensitivity into the blue-green region, with values tabulated at 10 nm intervals from 380 nm to 780 nm. This distinction reflects the eye's dual adaptation states: photopic for cone-mediated in bright environments and scotopic for achromatic vision in low illumination. In intermediate mesopic conditions, such as twilight, hybrid models interpolate between V(λ) and V'(λ) to account for mixed cone and rod contributions, though standardization remains complex due to variability in visual performance. These functions are integral to fields like , display technology, and optical standards, ensuring measurements reflect human visual response rather than physical energy alone, and they continue to evolve with physiological research on cone fundamentals and spectral sensitivities.

Fundamentals

Definition and Purpose

The luminous efficiency function, also known as the luminosity function, is a standardized curve that describes the average human eye's relative to light across different under defined viewing conditions, such as photopic or . It is inversely proportional to the ratio of the required at a given to produce the same visual sensation as at the peak (where V(λ) = 1), serving as the foundation for photometry by linking physical light measurements to human perception. The primary purpose of the luminous efficiency function is to enable the conversion of radiometric quantities, like spectral radiant power, into photometric quantities, such as , which quantify the perceived brightness of sources. By weighting a source's according to the eye's sensitivity, it allows for objective assessment of visual effectiveness in applications ranging from to display technology. In , corresponding to well-lit conditions, the function V(λ) reaches its peak sensitivity at 555 nm, where monochromatic light has the highest . The (CIE) adopted the original V(λ) function in to standardize measurements of light for and standards, transitioning from subjective evaluations to a unified, objective system. This conversion is mathematically expressed through the luminous flux equation: \Phi_v = 683 \int V(\lambda) P(\lambda) \, d\lambda where \Phi_v is the luminous flux in lumens (lm), V(\lambda) is the spectral luminous efficiency function (dimensionless, normalized to 1 at 555 nm), P(\lambda) is the in watts per nanometer (W/nm), and 683 lm/W is the maximum luminous efficacy of monochromatic radiation at 555 nm under photopic conditions.

Photopic Luminosity Function

The photopic luminosity function, denoted as V(\lambda), represents the spectral luminous efficiency of the human visual system under photopic conditions, such as daylight or bright artificial lighting, as defined by the International Commission on Illumination (CIE) in its 1931 standard observer model. This function describes the relative sensitivity of the eye to monochromatic light at wavelength \lambda (in nanometers), based on averaged experimental data from observers viewing a 2° field. It is normalized such that V(555) = 1, reflecting maximum sensitivity at this green-yellow wavelength. The curve of V(\lambda) is bell-shaped, spanning the visible spectrum from approximately 380 nm to 780 nm, with values approaching zero beyond these limits due to negligible cone photoreceptor response in the ultraviolet and near-infrared regions. Sensitivity is notably higher in the green-yellow band (around 500–600 nm), where the eye perceives light as brighter for equivalent radiant power compared to shorter blue or longer red wavelengths; for instance, at the half-maximum points, V(510) \approx 0.503 and V(610) \approx 0.503. This asymmetry and peaking reflect the combined response of long- (L-) and medium- (M-) wavelength cones dominating photopic vision. Tabulated values of V(\lambda) are provided by the CIE at 1 nm intervals across the spectrum, as detailed in CIE Publication 018:2019 (Table 1), to facilitate precise interpolation for computations; coarser 5 nm or 10 nm tables are also available for general use. These tables ensure consistency in photometric standards, with the full dataset confirming the smooth, unimodal profile without secondary peaks. While Gaussian-like mathematical approximations, such as V(\lambda) \approx \exp\left( -\left( \frac{\lambda - 555}{\sigma} \right)^2 \right) for rough estimation (where \sigma approximates the curve's standard deviation around 50–60 nm), can model the overall shape, they introduce errors exceeding 5% outside the central range and are not suitable for accurate work—official tables or piecewise polynomial fits derived from them must be used instead. In and photometry, V(\lambda) is essential for calculating perceived , such as (\Phi_v = 683 \int V(\lambda) P(\lambda) \, d\lambda lm, where P(\lambda) is power and 683 lm/W is the maximum at 555 nm), enabling optimization of sources for and visual comfort without overemphasizing invisible wavelengths.

Scotopic Luminosity Function

The scotopic luminosity function, denoted V'(λ), represents the average of the human visual system under low-light conditions dominated by rod photoreceptors. Adopted by the (CIE) in 1951, it is based on empirical measurements from dark-adapted young observers and serves as the standard for calculating perceived brightness in , typically at luminances below 0.01 cd/m². Unlike , which relies on cone cells for color perception in brighter environments, is achromatic and more sensitive overall, with a maximum of 1700 lm/W compared to 683 lm/W for photopic. The scotopic Φ_v' is computed as \Phi_v' = K_m' \int_0^\infty V'(\lambda) \, P(\lambda) \, d\lambda, where P(λ) is the of the incident radiation and K_m' = 1700 lm/W is the scotopic maximum . This integral weights the radiant power by the eye's relative sensitivity, emphasizing wavelengths where rods are most responsive. The V'(λ) curve peaks at 507 nm in the blue-green spectrum and is normalized to a maximum value of 1 at this wavelength, reflecting the absorption peak of rhodopsin, the rod photopigment. It is broader than the photopic counterpart and shifted toward shorter wavelengths, resulting in higher relative sensitivity in the blue region (around 400–500 nm) and lower sensitivity beyond 600 nm, where red light becomes nearly invisible. This configuration enhances detection of faint blue-green light sources at night while diminishing perception of warmer tones. The CIE provides tabulated values of V'(λ) at 10 nm intervals from 380 nm to 780 nm, derived primarily from threshold measurements by Wald (1945) using small field sizes and brightness-matching experiments by Crawford (1949) with larger fields to minimize cone intrusion. Representative values illustrate the curve's shape and blue bias:
Wavelength (nm)V'(λ)
4500.455
5000.9817
5071.0000
5550.4048
6000.0633
These data, smoothed for practical use, show V'(λ) dropping to about 40% of peak at the photopic maximum (555 nm) and maintaining over 90% sensitivity near 500 nm, underscoring the leftward shift. Full tables appear in authoritative references like Wyszecki and Stiles (1982). At transitional luminances (0.001–10 cd/m²), vision shifts to mesopic conditions, where both rod and cone contributions are significant, requiring interpolated functions beyond pure scotopic V'(λ).

Historical Development

Early Experiments

The foundational experiments on the luminous efficiency function, which quantifies the human eye's to different wavelengths of light, began in the mid-19th century with efforts to measure . conducted pioneering work in physiological during the mid-19th century, using subjective visual observations to assess the eye's response to across the . His methods involved direct comparison of lights, indicating higher in the green-yellow . These early measurements, however, were limited by the subjectivity of observer judgments and the lack of precise isolation, leading to rough approximations of the luminosity curve. In the 1880s, Arthur König and Eugen Brodhun advanced these efforts through improved photometers, including the 1889 Lummer-Brodhun divided-field design for heterochromatic brightness matching using a reference white. This allowed more reliable comparisons than direct matching. Despite challenges such as observer fatigue from prolonged sessions and variability in individual responses—due to factors like and slight differences—their data provided one of the first systematic curves, showing consistent sensitivity peaks and troughs across multiple trials. This approach improved accuracy over Helmholtz's methods by reducing bias in steady-state judgments. The 1920s saw significant refinements with the work of John Guild and William David Wright, who utilized visual spectrophotometers to measure observer sensitivities under controlled conditions. Guild's experiments at the National Physical Laboratory involved seven observers matching lights via heterochromatic photometry, while Wright's tests at Imperial College engaged ten observers in similar setups, focusing on foveal vision for a 2° field. Techniques included both flicker photometry and direct comparisons, with data averaged to mitigate inter-observer variability, a persistent challenge stemming from physiological differences and measurement inconsistencies like uneven . Their combined results, encompassing over 100,000 individual matches, yielded a robust dataset for the photopic luminosity function V(λ), establishing key features such as maximum efficiency at 555 nm and rapid decline toward and . This averaged data from 10 principal observers formed the empirical basis for the CIE's 1931 adoption of a standardized function. These efforts culminated in the CIE's adoption of an initial photopic V(λ) function in 1924, based on averaged flicker photometry data from earlier experiments such as those by , Forsythe, and Coblentz (1917) and Coblentz and Emerson (1918), providing the first international standard before the 1931 refinement.

CIE 1931 Standard

In 1931, the (CIE) officially adopted the photopic luminous efficiency function, denoted as V(\lambda), as part of its standard observer model for . This function was derived by averaging experimental data from two key studies: William David Wright's measurements with 10 observers and John Guild's with 7 observers, both conducted in the late 1920s using monochromatic stimuli across the . The CIE 1931 V(\lambda) specifically targets foveal cone under photopic conditions, based on a 2° to simulate central . It was tabulated with values at 1 nm intervals from 360 nm to 830 nm, providing a detailed curve normalized to a peak of 1 at 555 nm. These tables formed the foundation for computing in photometry. Early assessments highlighted limitations in the CIE 1931 standard, including its reliance on a small, homogeneous group of observers, which assumed a single "average" human response while overlooking individual variations in . Additionally, the measurements employed early 20th-century visual techniques, such as flicker photometry and direct color matching, that suffered from inconsistencies in stimulus and observer fatigue. The adoption of the CIE 1931 V(\lambda) profoundly influenced photometry by establishing a universal basis for converting radiant power to , weighted by human visual sensitivity. In , it directly informed the Y tristimulus value in the CIE system, enabling standardized color specification and matching across industries.

Updated Standards and Improvements

CIE 1964 Supplementary Function

The CIE 1964 supplementary standard observer addressed key limitations of the preceding 1931 standard, which was derived from color-matching experiments involving only about 10 observers and focused on a narrow 2° that primarily captured foveal . To improve representativeness, the 1964 update incorporated data from a broader set of experiments, including those by Stiles and Burch (49 observers) and Speranskaya (27 observers), with the latter given low weight in the averaging process for enhanced averaging across human photopic responses. This led to a refined luminous efficiency function, denoted as V^*(\lambda) or \bar{y}_{10}(\lambda), which slightly modifies the shape of the original V(\lambda) curve, with notable adjustments in the short-wavelength region (below 500 nm) showing increased relative sensitivity compared to the 1931 version. The 10° used in the underlying experiments better incorporates peripheral contributions, resulting in a function that more accurately models for extended visual scenes while maintaining overall similarity to the predecessor—differences are precise but small, often on the order of a few percent in tabular values. As a supplementary standard, V^*(\lambda) is positioned for complementary use with the 1931 function rather than as a replacement, and it is recommended by the CIE for applications involving visual fields greater than 4°, such as large-area lighting assessments or display evaluations. Despite these advantages, the 1931 standard persists in many established protocols due to its entrenched adoption, though the 1964 version is preferred for new developments requiring fidelity to broader human vision characteristics.

ISO and Recent Standards

The (ISO) has played a key role in harmonizing the Commission Internationale de l'Éclairage (CIE) luminous efficiency functions into a global framework for photometry through ISO 23539:2005, titled Photometry — The CIE system of physical photometry. This standard defines the CIE spectral luminous efficiency functions for , V(λ), based on the 1931 CIE 2° standard observer, and for , V'(λ), based on the 1951 CIE standard, establishing them as the basis for quantitative evaluation of optical radiation perceived by the under standard conditions. In 2023, ISO/CIE 23539:2023 revised and expanded the standard to incorporate advancements in visual science, including definitions for the 10° photopic luminous efficiency function, V10(λ), and mesopic vision functions, Vmes(λ), to address intermediate lighting conditions relevant to applications like roadway and pedestrian lighting. This update also added Annex E with the CIE 2015 cone-fundamental-based spectral luminous efficiency functions for both 2° and 10° field sizes, derived from physiological cone sensitivities (LM, MM, SM) to improve accuracy in and photometry, particularly for modern displays and sources with enhanced short-wavelength (blue) content. These cone-based functions, detailed in CIE 170-2:2015, are based on the CIE 2006 cone fundamentals as detailed in CIE 170-1:2006, enhancing consistency across photometric and colorimetric standards. The 2023 revision further includes uncertainty estimates for tabulated values of the luminous efficiency functions, drawn from CIE 018:2019 and BIPM recommendations (2019), to support precise measurements in like LED lighting, where spectral power distributions often deviate from traditional sources and require better short-wavelength sensitivity modeling for calculations. This integration promotes global consistency in photometry, building on the CIE 1964 supplementary 10° functions as a foundational input while extending applicability to digital and systems. In 2024, the CIE published CIE TR 254:2024, a toward basing CIE on cone fundamentals, outlining steps for a new self-consistent system incorporating age and field size variations to further refine photometric standards.

Human Variations

As individuals age, the luminous efficiency function undergoes notable modifications, primarily driven by physiological changes in the ocular media. The most prominent alteration is the brunescence, or yellowing, of the crystalline lens, which increases of short-wavelength , thereby reducing in the region of the . This effect becomes particularly evident after the age of 60, with studies demonstrating a gradual decline in luminous efficiency at wavelengths such as 420 nm and 450 nm, correlated negatively with age. Quantitative assessments indicate that ocular media changes, including yellowing, account for approximately 30-40% of the age-related loss in short-wavelength , as observed in central measurements for short-wavelength pathways. Consequently, the peak of the photopic luminosity function experiences a relative redward shift due to the disproportionate of shorter wavelengths. These changes are captured in models like the CIE 2006 physiological observer framework, which incorporates age-dependent spectral optical density functions for the and macular to derive adjusted luminous efficiency curves. Such age-related variations have practical implications for targeted at seniors, where older eyes perceive equivalent brightness at lower levels without sufficient short-wavelength content, necessitating illuminances up to three times higher than for younger adults to maintain visual performance. Enhanced supplementation in spectra can thus compensate for these deficits, improving perceived brightness and visual comfort in environments for the elderly.

Effects of Color Vision Deficiencies

Color vision deficiencies, also known as , modify the luminous efficiency function by altering the relative contributions of the photoreceptors to perceived . These deficiencies primarily affect the photopic luminosity function V(λ), which in normal trichromats is a weighted sum of long-wavelength-sensitive (L), medium-wavelength-sensitive (M), and short-wavelength-sensitive (S) responses, peaking near 555 nm. In dichromats, the absence of one type shifts the function's shape and peak sensitivity, impacting perception across the spectrum. Approximately 8% of males exhibit some form of color vision deficiency, predominantly red-green types, leading to reduced sensitivity in specific wavelength bands and altered judgments for monochromatic or polychromatic lights. Protan defects (protanopia or protanomaly) involve anomalous or absent L-cones, reducing to long wavelengths (reds), while deutan defects (deuteranopia or deuteranomaly) affect M-cones, impacting medium wavelengths (greens); both are X-linked and comprise the majority of cases. In protanopes, the modified luminosity function V_p(λ) derives from M- and S-cone fundamentals, with reduced weighting of long-wavelength responses, resulting in a peak shifted to shorter wavelengths around 540 and lower efficiency beyond 600 . Deuteranopic V_d(λ), based on L- and S-cone fundamentals, shows a peak near 560 , with diminished in the green region but less overall deviation from the normal V(λ). These average curves, derived from heterochromatic flicker photometry measurements, demonstrate that protanopes require up to 2-3 times more radiant power in the to match perceived compared to normals, affecting tasks like traffic signal recognition. Tritan defects (tritanopia or tritanomaly), rarer and autosomal dominant, involve S-cone anomalies, reducing short-wavelength (blue-violet) sensitivity while preserving L- and M-cone responses. The tritanopic luminosity function V_t(λ) thus closely resembles the standard V(λ), with a peak near nm, but exhibits curtailed efficiency below nm due to minimal S-cone contribution in photopic conditions. Studies by Pokorny and Smith provide average curves for these dichromats, confirming that tritan defects cause steeper drop-offs in short-wave sensitivity, altering perceived brightness for hues without major shifts in the overall . These modifications impact perceived brightness in and visual displays, where color-deficient individuals may underrate intensity. In applications such as display calibration, modified V(λ) functions for protans, deutans, and tritans enable adjustments to ensure equitable mapping for deficient observers, using cone-based transformations in systems. For instance, ICC profiles incorporate protanopic and deuteranopic standards to simulate or compensate for deficiencies, optimizing and in interfaces for affected users. These adaptations, grounded in seminal measurements like those from the 1944 NIST standards and Pokorny-Smith data, improve without altering core for normals.

Mesopic Vision Function

The mesopic luminosity function describes the of the human visual system under intermediate levels, ranging from approximately 0.001 to 10 cd/m², where both and photoreceptors contribute significantly to , resulting in a blend between photopic and scotopic responses. Prominent models for this function include the 2008 MOVE model, developed by the European Mesopic Optimization of Visual Efficiency (MOVE) consortium based on extensive visual performance experiments, and the 2010 X-model, recommended by the (CIE) in its standard 191:2010 for performance-based mesopic photometry. Both employ a form given by V_{\text{mes}}(\lambda) = a V(\lambda) + (1 - a) V'(\lambda), where V(\lambda) is the photopic luminosity function, V'(\lambda) is the scotopic luminosity function, and a is a wavelength-independent adaptation factor (ranging from 1 for photopic-dominant to 0 for scotopic-dominant conditions) determined iteratively from the photopic luminance and the scotopic-to-photopic (S/P) ratio of the light source. A key characteristic of the mesopic function is the progressive shift in peak sensitivity from 555 nm under brighter mesopic conditions (closer to photopic) toward 507 nm as decreases and influence strengthens, reflecting the Purkinje shift. CIE 191:2010 provides tabulated values of V_{\text{mes}}(\lambda) for discrete adaptation states (parameterized by a or equivalent m), enabling practical computation of mesopic for various spectral power distributions without full iteration. These functions are applied in standards for and outdoor , where typical night-time luminances of 0.3–5 cd/m² prevail, allowing for optimized design of light sources like LEDs to enhance driver visibility and by accounting for rod-cone interactions absent in traditional photopic photometry.

Functions in Animals

functions in animals describe the of their visual systems, often differing significantly from the photopic V(λ) function, which peaks at approximately 555 nm, due to adaptations to specific ecological niches such as or detection. These functions are typically derived from the combined sensitivities of and cones, weighted by their photoreceptor types and environmental demands, and serve as equivalents to luminous efficiency curves for assessing perceived brightness in those . Measurement of animal luminosity functions commonly employs electroretinography (ERG), which records electrical responses from the to light stimuli, providing curves based on collective photoreceptor activity, or behavioral tests such as discrimination tasks and optomotor responses, where indicate threshold sensitivities through actions like turning toward patterns. ERG is particularly useful for nocturnal species, capturing rod-dominated responses under scotopic conditions, while behavioral methods validate cone contributions in diurnal by observing choices in color or stimuli. In nocturnal mammals like , the luminosity function is rod-dominant, emphasizing scotopic-like with a peak around 501 , reflecting adaptations for low-light where green wavelengths maximize photon capture in dim environments. This contrasts with scotopic (peaking at 507 ) but shares a similar short-wavelength , with contributions appearing under brighter conditions at peaks of 454 (blue-sensitive) and 561 (green-sensitive). Diurnal , such as rhesus monkeys, exhibit luminosity functions closely resembling the photopic curve, with a broad peak near 555-600 driven by medium- and long-wavelength s, though subtle tweaks in L/M ratios can shift slightly for enhanced fruit detection. Birds, possessing tetrachromatic with four types, have luminosity functions incorporating sensitivity, as in chickens where the violet-sensitive peaks near 420 nm, alongside short-wavelength (470 nm), medium-wavelength (~530 nm), and long-wavelength (~570 nm) , enabling detection of UV-reflective and cues invisible to humans. In insects like honeybees, the trichromatic system yields a function peaking at 556 nm in the green-sensitive receptor, supporting efficient and flower detection under daylight, with additional peaks at 344 nm (UV) and 436 nm () contributing to color discrimination. species such as demonstrate dual-peak sensitivities at approximately 455 nm () and 530 nm (), alongside a red peak at 625 nm, adapted for underwater where shorter wavelengths penetrate deeper. These variations highlight evolutionary divergences: nocturnal animals prioritize rod-mediated scotopic functions for survival in low light, while diurnal species like and refine cone-based photopic sensitivity for color-rich environments, often extending into UV or adjusting peaks for habitat-specific signals.

References

  1. [1]
    Luminosity functions - CVRL
    Luminous efficiency functions are the basis of present photometry. They were introduced by the CIE to provide a psychophysical analog of radiance called ...
  2. [2]
    Realization of the candela | NIST
    It is called the spectral luminous efficiency function for photopic vision, given the symbol V(λ) and is defined in the wavelength domain from 360 nm to 830 nm ...
  3. [3]
    CIE photopic luminous efficiency function
    The spectral luminous efficiency function for photopic vision. It was adopted in 1924 by the International Commission on Illumination (CIE) and in 1970* by the ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] CIE Technical Note 004:2016
    For practical use of photometric units, however, the spectral luminous efficiency function used must be defined and the CIPM (International. Committee of ...
  5. [5]
    Light & Engineering 32 (2) 2024
    Apr 24, 2024 · In 1924, the International Commission on Illumination adopted the function of relative spectral luminous efficiency V(λ), which made it possible ...
  6. [6]
    What is the CIE Luminosity Function? - Admesy
    This photopic sensitivity is based on the midrange of the visual spectrum known as the Vλ or ȳ(λ) luminosity function and the basic principle of the response ...Missing: characteristics table
  7. [7]
    Sensitivity of the human eye
    This standard eye sensitivity is also called standard luminosity function V(λ) and is used, for photopic vision, to define a conversion between the radiated ...
  8. [8]
    CIE spectral luminous efficiency for photopic vision
    Values of spectral luminous efficiency for photopic vision, V(lambda), lambda in standard air, 1 nm wavelength steps, original source: CIE 018:2019, Table 1.Missing: definition characteristics
  9. [9]
    Spectral Luminous Efficiency Function - ScienceDirect.com
    The spectral luminous efficiency function is defined as V(λ), which quantifies the sensitivity of the human visual system to different wavelengths of light ...
  10. [10]
    Scotopic luminosity function - CVRL
    The standard scotopic luminosity function or V'(λ), which was adopted by the CIE in 1951 (CIE, 1951), is based on measurements by Wald (1945) and by Crawford ( ...
  11. [11]
    17-21-035 | CIE
    V · ( ; λ ) function, in 1990 CIE adopted the "CIE 1988 Modified 2° Spectral Luminous Efficiency Function for Photopic Vision", ; V · ( ; λ ), and recommended it for ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  12. [12]
    Luminosity Functions - Ocean Optics Web Book
    May 19, 2021 · The conversion factor for the scotopic luminosity function is K m ′ = 1 7 0 0 l m W − 1 . Thus the rods are more efficient at converting radiant ...Missing: mathematical formula
  13. [13]
    Luminosity Functions – scotopic and photopic vision, spectral ...
    Luminosity functions describe the spectral sensitivity of the human eye in scotopic or photopic vision. They are used in photometry.
  14. [14]
    [PDF] CRSLTD Technical Seminar 1
    In 1931, the CIE transformed the two sets of colour-matching functions obtained from experiments carried out by Wright (1928) and Guild (1931) into a single set.Missing: mathematical approximation formula luminosity<|control11|><|separator|>
  15. [15]
    [PDF] A History of Light and Colour Measurement
    Helmholtz, the first director of the PTR, was renowned for his work in ... 42 Wright W D 1981 'The historical and experimental background to the 1931 CIE.Missing: König | Show results with:König
  16. [16]
    GENERAL V(λ) MISMATCH INDEX - HISTORY, CURRENT STATE ...
    ... luminous efficiency function, V(λ). A short review of its historical development is given to explain the reasons for the current definition and which ...
  17. [17]
    Golden Jubilee of Colour in the CIE - ResearchGate
    Aug 7, 2025 · The system of colorimetry defined by the CIE in 1931 was the culmination of the pioneering determinations of the colour-mixture curves by ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Evaluating the 1931 CIE Color-Matching Functions
    Aug 27, 2002 · In order to evaluate the other sets of functions accurately, a linear transformation was calculated to transform each set into an approximate ...
  19. [19]
    (PDF) How the CIE 1931 color-matching functions were derived from ...
    The CIE 1931 color-matching functions were established based on Wright-Guild experimental data and consensus resolutions. Three primary wavelengths were adopted ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Accurate Color Measurement - AMiner
    functions are given in the Standard as values from 360 nm to 830 nm at. 1 nm intervals with seven significant digits, and they define the CIE 1931 standard.
  21. [21]
    None
    Nothing is retrieved...<|control11|><|separator|>
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Evaluating the 1931 CIE color matching functions
    Because of the well known limitations of the 1931 CIE standard observer below 460nm, ... A computational analysis was performed to evaluate the 1931 color ...Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
  23. [23]
    A critical review of the development of the CIE1931 RGB color ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · This article describes the development of the CIE1931 chromaticity coordinates and color-matching functions starting from the initial ...Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
  24. [24]
    Colorimetry of Light Sources Gigahertz-Optik
    These color matching functions define the CIE 1931 ... In addition, y (λ) is equal to the CIE spectral luminous efficiency function V(λ) for photopic vision.Missing: luminosity | Show results with:luminosity
  25. [25]
    CIE (1964) 10-deg colour matching functions
    Notes. The CIE 1964 standard observer is based on the mean 10-deg color matching functions of Stiles & Burch (1959) and of Speranskaya (1959).
  26. [26]
  27. [27]
    Colorimetric Observers | CIE
    Colour-matching functions for the CIE 1964 supplementary standard colorimetric observer. This set of colour-matching functions is representative of the ...Missing: 14 | Show results with:14
  28. [28]
    Supplementary Standard Observer / Color-Matching Functions - Part ...
    In 1964, the CIE defined an additional standard observer, this time based upon a 10 field of view; this is referred to as the 10 Supplementary Standard Observer ...Missing: luminous efficiency
  29. [29]
    [PDF] ISO 23539 - iTeh Standards
    Aug 1, 2005 · This Standard defines two spectral luminous efficiency functions for photometric measurements: - The V(O) function, which applies to photopic ...
  30. [30]
    ISO/CIE 23539:2023 - Photometry — The CIE system of physical ...
    This document specifies the characteristics of the system of physical photometry established by the CIE and accepted as the basis for the measurement of light.
  31. [31]
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Principles governing photometry - 2019 - BIPM
    Apr 14, 2019 · It is also known that the spectral luminous efficiency function for photopic vision, V(λ), underestimates the visual response in the blue region ...
  33. [33]
    Spectral luminous efficiency as a function of age
    ### Summary of Age-Related Changes in Spectral Luminous Efficiency V(λ)
  34. [34]
    Luminous Efficiency as a Function of Age and Gender
    I report the results of a study that investigated the combined effects of gender and age on luminous efficiency as measured by heterochromatic flicker.
  35. [35]
    Age-related changes in the central visual field for short-wavelength ...
    Measurements of ocular-media absorption characteristics in each eye revealed that 30–40% of the age-related sensitivity loss could be attributed to reductions ...
  36. [36]
    From CIE 2006 physiological model to improved age-dependent ...
    We hypothesize that the assumption in the CIEPO06 model that the peak optical density of visual pigments does not vary with age is false and is the source of ...
  37. [37]
    Formulae for generating standard and individual human cone ...
    Jul 19, 2023 · The CIE 2006 standard includes formulae and templates that change the shape of the lens pigment optical density spectrum with increasing age ...
  38. [38]
    Luminous Efficiency as a Function of Age and Gender - ResearchGate
    As an example, the photopic luminous efficiency function V(λ) was derived with data from mainly young observers of 33 years on average [18]. However other ...
  39. [39]
    Color vision deficiency | AOA - American Optometric Association
    About 8% of white males are born with some degree of color deficiency. Women are typically just carriers of the color-deficient gene, though approximately 0.5% ...
  40. [40]
    A review of congenital and acquired colour vision deficiencies
    Nov 22, 2016 · The terms 'protan', 'deutan' and 'tritan' represent the colour deficiencies involving the absence or abnormality of a single photo-pigment.
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Standard response functions for protanopic and deuteranopic vision
    The Konig wavelengths have been increased by 3 mJL for protanopes and 4 mJL for deuteranopes to take account of the chromaticity difference between the average ...
  42. [42]
    Luminosity and CFF in Deuteranopes and Protanopes*
    The peak of the protanopes' spectral-sensitivity function (560 nm) is ... The functions for all wavelengths tend to superimpose and show no systematic wavelength ...
  43. [43]
  44. [44]
    Colour vision deficiency transforms using ICC profiles
    ICC profiles can be used to handle a variety of transforms intended to either simulate the appearance of a colour image to an observer with a colour vision ...
  45. [45]
    Modeling spectral sensitivity at low light levels based on mesopic ...
    The spectral sensitivity of the eye at low light levels, ie, mesopic conditions, is determined by the rod and cone photoreceptors of the retina operating ...
  46. [46]
    CIE 191: 2010 RECOMMENDED SYSTEM FOR MESOPIC ...
    Oct 5, 2025 · A unified system of photometry is proposed that is based on human vision and allows the specification of visual stimuli at all light levels.
  47. [47]
    [PDF] RECOMMENDED SYSTEM FOR VISUAL PERFORMANCE BASED ...
    Aug 31, 2009 · Mesopic applications include road and street lighting, marine and air transport, emergency lighting, lighting for security and crime-prevention ...
  48. [48]
    Vision under mesopic and scotopic illumination - Frontiers
    As rods gradually become dominant during dark-adaptation, the peak of visual sensitivity shifts toward shorter wavelengths so that objects predominantly ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  49. [49]
    New Model for Mesopic Photometry and its Application to Road ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · The calculations using the MOVE model show that the adoption of mesopic dimensioning would affect road lighting practice over the whole ...
  50. [50]
    Ultraviolet vision in birds: the importance of transparent eye media
    Birds have UV-sensitive (UVS) visual pigments with sensitivity maxima around 360–373 nm (UVS) or 402–426 nm (violet-sensitive, VS).
  51. [51]
    Spectral Sensitivity Measured with Electroretinogram Using a ... - NIH
    Jan 22, 2016 · In the present study we have successfully used the AC Constant-Response Method to obtain spectral sensitivity curves from rodent species using ...
  52. [52]
    Review: Use of Electrophysiological Techniques to Study Visual ...
    Jan 26, 2022 · This review provides an overview of the milestones of ERG technology, describing how ERG is used to study visual sensitivity.<|separator|>
  53. [53]
    Behavioral measurements of rat spectral sensitivity - ScienceDirect
    Behavioral measurements of visual sensitivity were obtained from hooded rats on a threechoice discrimination task. Increment threshold measurements reveal ...
  54. [54]
    and light-adapted cat retinal ganglion cells | Journal of Neuroscience
    Apr 1, 1993 · In the dark-adapted state the spectral sensitivity of the majority of ganglion cells (92%) was rod mediated (peak sensitivity at 501 nm).Missing: luminous | Show results with:luminous
  55. [55]
    Photopic spectral sensitivity of the cat - PMC - NIH
    On 30 and 300 cd/m2 white backgrounds, the cats were most sensitive to about 454 and 561 nm indicating that these backgrounds are photopic. Sensitivity to ...Missing: efficiency | Show results with:efficiency
  56. [56]
    Photopic Spectral Sensitivity in the Rhesus Monkey*
    Photopic spectral-sensitivity data wvere obtained on two Rhesus monkeys and two human subjects. The data show peaks in the sensitivity functions near 600 nm, ...Missing: diurnal | Show results with:diurnal<|separator|>
  57. [57]
    Colour vision of domestic chicks | Journal of Experimental Biology
    Nov 1, 1999 · The peak sensitivity of the chicken S cone in vivo is near 470 nm and that of the UV cone is near 420 nm (Fig. 1A). To test short-wavelength ...<|separator|>
  58. [58]
    Bird colour vision – from cones to perception - ScienceDirect.com
    Their tetrachromatic colour vision is based on four types of single cones expressing four opsin-based visual pigments and fine-tuned by the carotenoid ...
  59. [59]
    Mechanisms, functions and ecology of colour vision in the honeybee
    The honeybee eye contains three types of photoreceptors which peak in the UV, blue, and green parts of the spectrum: S (short-wavelength sensitive, λ max = 344 ...
  60. [60]
    The Genetic and Evolutionary Drives behind Primate Color Vision
    Primate color vision is based on two to three cone types in the retina, each expressing a different class of visual pigment, making them the only mammals ...
  61. [61]
    Goldfish spectral sensitivity: Identification of the three cone ...
    Chromatic backgrounds were utilized to enhance the sensitivity of one goldfish cone mechanism relative to the other two. Sensitivity peaks were at 455, 530 and ...