Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

March Days

The March Days, occurring from 30 March to 2 April 1918 in , , consisted of intense urban clashes between Bolshevik-aligned forces—including and Armenian Dashnak militias under the leadership of Stepan Shaumyan—and Azerbaijani Muslim nationalists primarily from the party, alongside other Muslim armed groups, culminating in the near-total expulsion or slaughter of the Muslim population from the city and the imposition of Bolshevik rule via the short-lived . These events unfolded amid the collapse of the and fears of an advancing army, with exploiting ethnic divisions to consolidate power by allying with Dashnaks against perceived Muslim threats to Soviet authority and oil infrastructure control. The violence erupted after provocations such as the disarming of Muslim military units and inflammatory , rapidly escalating into that devastated Muslim neighborhoods, with Dashnak units conducting house-to-house killings and Bolshevik forces providing logistical support. Casualties were disproportionately borne by , with contemporary investigations estimating around 12,000 killed in itself and up to 24,000 in surrounding areas, though Bolshevik reports like Shaumyan's claimed only 3,000 total deaths across sides; hundreds of and Dashnaks also perished. The outcome entrenched the Baku Commune's dictatorship until its fall in July 1918, but the massacres left enduring ethnic scars, later framed by Soviet historiography as a proletarian uprising against bourgeois nationalists while Azerbaijani accounts document it as targeted supported by primary testimonies from an Extraordinary Investigation Commission.

Historical Context

Pre-Revolutionary Baku Society and Demographics

Baku's population underwent rapid expansion in the late imperial period, driven primarily by the burgeoning and its attendant economic opportunities. In 1863, the city counted approximately 14,500 residents, increasing to 111,904 by the and reaching 214,672 by 1913. This growth was accelerated by the relocation of the provincial center from to following the 1859 earthquake, as well as influxes of labor migrants to the oil fields and refineries. Demographically, pre-revolutionary was a hub with substantial ethnic diversity, reflecting its role as an industrial . Turkish-speaking Muslims (chiefly ) formed a core group concentrated in the historic Icherisheher Fortress and western districts, while , , and other migrants predominated in the industrial northern zones and suburbs. By 1909, the population neared 222,000, comprising a mix where and each accounted for about one-third, alongside a significant Turkish-speaking element and smaller minorities such as , , and . This multiethnic composition stemmed from waves of settlers attracted by oil-related employment, overlaying the city's longstanding Muslim substrate. Socially, the oil boom stratified Baku into distinct classes, with the industry dominating economic life and fostering both prosperity and tensions. A nascent of Muslim industrialists, such as Haji Zeynalabdin Tagiev, coexisted with merchants, administrators, and foreign capitalists who controlled much of the extraction and export infrastructure. At the base lay a multinational of oil workers—drawn from local , , , and Dagestanis—who endured harsh conditions, prompting early labor activism including strikes and the negotiation of 's first general labor contract in 1904. By 1901, produced over half the world's oil, underscoring its pivotal role in imperial Russia's economy and amplifying urban-rural divides, as well as ethnic occupational patterns where often dominated commerce and supplied much of the manual labor.

Russian Revolution's Impact on the Caucasus

The of 1917 dismantled Tsarist administrative structures in the , replacing centralized imperial control with the Provisional Government's (Ozakom), which proved ineffective in maintaining order amid rising local initiatives. National political organizations proliferated, including the Georgian Mensheviks, Armenian Dashnaktsutyun, and Azerbaijani Musavat Party, each advocating for ethnic and autonomy as Russian garrisons disintegrated and economic disruptions from the war compounded social strains. The accelerated fragmentation by challenging non-Bolshevik elements, leading to the establishment of the on November 15, 1917, in Tiflis under Menshevik leadership as a bulwark against Bolshevik expansion from Petrograd. This provisional entity, comprising representatives from Georgian, Armenian, and Azerbaijani factions, negotiated independently with the but failed to unify the region, as Bolshevik agitation in industrial hubs like promoted class-based soviets over national assemblies. In , home to over 70% of Russia's production by , the revolution empowered a Bolshevik-Armenian under figures like Stepan Shaumyan, leveraging proletarian Russian and Armenian workers against the Azerbaijani Muslim majority, whose nationalist leanings clashed with internationalist rhetoric. The evacuation of Russian Caucasian Army units created a security vacuum, arming irregular militias and exacerbating pre-existing ethnic frictions rooted in 1905 pogroms, while Bolshevik nationalization efforts threatened Azerbaijani commercial interests in the sector. Broader regional instability from the revolution's fallout, including the ' in March 1918 ceding territories to the Ottomans, emboldened Turkish and intensified territorial disputes over areas like and , pitting Armenian claims against emerging Azerbaijani statehood aspirations. This power void, absent imperial arbitration, transformed ideological divides into armed standoffs, culminating in the short-lived Transcaucasian Democratic Federative Republic's declaration of independence on April 22, 1918, before its rapid dissolution into separate republics amid mutual distrust.

Prelude to Conflict

Collapse of Russian Authority and Rise of Local Factions

The of 1917 dismantled centralized Russian authority across the empire's peripheries, including , where the provisional government's (Ozakom) had already proven ineffective in maintaining order following the Tsar's abdication in March 1917 (February by the then in use). The Bolshevik seizure of power in Petrograd led to the rapid disintegration of the Russian military presence in the ; the once-substantial Army, numbering around 320,000 men, dissolved amid mass desertions, with Lenin's November 1917 Decree on Peace accelerating the dispersal of troops and the distribution of their weapons to local groups. In , the Russian garrison—primarily sailors from the and infantry units—totaled several thousand but became paralyzed by internal divisions, ideological agitation, and refusal to intervene in ethnic tensions, effectively ceding control to emerging local entities. This power vacuum intensified after the on March 3, 1918, which mandated Russian withdrawal from the region and exposed Transcaucasia to military pressure, prompting local actors to arm and organize independently. The Baku Soviet, established in the wake of the , gained Bolshevik dominance under Stepan Shaumyan, appointed Extraordinary Commissar for the by Lenin in December 1917; however, the Bolsheviks commanded limited native support, relying on alliances with internationalist socialists like and, crucially, Armenian paramilitary units affiliated with the (Dashnaks), who controlled significant arsenals from redistributed Russian stockpiles—estimated at tens of thousands of rifles. Opposing these forces, Azerbaijani (then termed Muslim) nationalists coalesced around the Party, a secular democratic organization advocating for cultural and political autonomy within a federal , which formed the National Council of Muslims of the South-Eastern Transcaucasia to represent communal interests. and allied groups, including more conservative Muslim factions, raised irregular units numbering in the low thousands, seizing approximately 15,000 rifles from Russian depots in January 1918 amid provincial clashes, to counter perceived threats from militias and Bolshevik disarmament demands. These factional mobilizations, fueled by ethnic demographics—Baku's population roughly balanced between Muslims (about 25,000-30,000), (similar numbers), and /—escalated rivalries over city governance, resource control, and defense against external incursions, setting the stage for direct confrontation.

Formation of the Baku Commune and Allied Forces


The Baku Soviet, established in the aftermath of the February Revolution and increasingly dominated by Bolsheviks after the October Revolution, served as the primary organ of local soviet power in the city. Stepan Shaumyan, appointed by Lenin as Extraordinary Commissar for Caucasus Affairs and arriving in Baku in late 1917, chaired the Soviet and pursued policies aimed at proletarian internationalism while navigating ethnic divisions. By early 1918, with the collapse of Russian imperial authority following the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk on 3 March, the Bolsheviks sought to assert control over Baku's oil resources and administration, facing resistance from Azerbaijani socialist and nationalist groups like Musavat and Hummet, which represented Muslim workers and elites.
To bolster their military weakness, and allied (SRs) entered a tactical coalition with the (Dashnaksutyun), whose paramilitary units—numbering several thousand and battle-hardened from prior engagements—provided critical armed support. This alliance, formalized through joint commissions and mutual agreements in the Soviet, pitted the socialist-Dashnak bloc against Muslim factions amid escalating strikes, protests, and demands in late March. The Dashnaks, prioritizing Armenian security against perceived Turkish and Muslim threats, contributed fighters and logistics, enabling the coalition to mobilize (primarily Russian and workers) alongside irregular Armenian detachments for potential confrontation. The coalition's efforts culminated in the establishment of the Baku Commune on 13 April 1918, shortly after the March Days violence had neutralized much Muslim opposition. Governed by a led by Shaumyan and comprising 26 commissars (mostly with Left SR and Dashnak representation), the Commune declared soviet rule, nationalizing industry and suppressing counter-revolutionary elements. Its allied forces, totaling around 20,000-30,000 including , Dashnak legions, and sailor contingents from the , enforced this authority, though internal frictions over nationality policies foreshadowed instability.

Chronology of Events

Outbreak on 30 March 1918

On 29 March 1918, Bolshevik Red Guards confronted approximately 50 soldiers from the Muslim Savage Division at the Baku docks, firing on them during an attempt to disarm and detain the group, an action linked to the arrival of these troops via the steamship Evelina, which heightened fears among the Bolshevik-led Baku Soviet of an impending Muslim uprising. This incident exacerbated longstanding ethnic tensions in Baku, where the Bolsheviks, under Commissar Stepan Shaumyan, had allied with Armenian Dashnak militias and Red Guards to maintain control amid the collapse of Russian imperial authority, while facing opposition from Azerbaijani nationalist groups like Musavat and local Muslim armed elements seeking greater autonomy. Rumors circulated of Muslim plans to arm for massacres against Armenians and Bolsheviks, fueling preemptive actions by Soviet forces. The outbreak of widespread violence occurred on the evening of 30 March , when sporadic shots echoed across the city, rapidly escalating into coordinated attacks by Bolshevik and Dashnak units on Muslim neighborhoods. By approximately 6 p.m., fighting engulfed central , with armed clashes centering on key streets and quarters inhabited by and other , as Soviet-aligned forces moved to suppress perceived threats from Muslim militias. Initial volleys reportedly originated from Armenian-Bolshevik positions, including possible ship-based fire from the , targeting Azerbaijani areas and prompting disorganized Muslim resistance. The Baku Soviet's disproportionate military advantage, including access to and organized irregulars, allowed rapid dominance in the early hours, though Muslim groups mounted defenses in districts like Sabail and Ichari Shahar. These initial engagements marked the start of the March Days, transforming political rivalries into inter-ethnic , with Bolshevik-Dashnak forces prioritizing the neutralization of Muslim political and military elements to secure oil-rich against separatist challenges. Eyewitness accounts from the period describe chaos spreading from the docks and Armenian-populated zones outward, as formed and began in Muslim commercial areas, setting the stage for intensified over the following days. The Soviet leadership's decision to deploy Dashnak auxiliaries, known for their prowess, reflected a strategic favoring alliance with nationalists over accommodation of Azerbaijani demands, despite mediation attempts by moderate socialists that proved futile.

Escalation from 31 March to 2 April

On 31 March 1918, Bolshevik forces under the Soviet initiated escalated violence against Muslim neighborhoods by shelling key sites such as the Tazapir and mosques using artillery from the Red Fleet. Dashnak units, supported by select , launched targeted s on Muslim-held areas, transforming initial clashes into a coordinated . Homes were systematically searched, residents herded into makeshift camps like police stations and cellars, and widespread looting and killings ensued in the and primary Muslim quarters. Stepan Shaumyan, the Bolshevik , later acknowledged exploiting the unrest to mount a "full-frontal" aimed at securing control. The fighting on 31 March resulted in hundreds of deaths among Bolshevik and Dashnak combatants, but the Muslim population, predominantly civilians, suffered far heavier losses estimated at around 12,000 over the course of the events. Eyewitness accounts described the assaults as a campaign of terror against non-combatants, with Dashnak forces bearing primary responsibility for ground-level atrocities. This phase marked a shift from sporadic skirmishes to organized suppression, as Commune-aligned groups leveraged superior and numerical advantages in urban combat. From 1 to 2 , the violence intensified with continued looting, torture, and executions perpetrated by Dashnak and troops, leading to the burning of entire Muslim neighborhoods including the Ismailie district and the Kaspiia publishing house. Muslim defenders, lacking equivalent armament, mounted desperate resistance but were overwhelmed, prompting surrenders among community elites by the morning of 2 . Bolshevik and elements eventually intervened to curb the Dashnak-led excesses, halting the pogrom and consolidating the Baku Commune's authority over the city. The escalation effectively dismantled organized Muslim opposition, paving the way for the Commune's brief dictatorship, though at the cost of approximately 24,000 total deaths across Baku and surrounding areas.

Casualties and Character of Violence

Demographic Impact and Mortality Estimates

The March Days of 1918 in Baku resulted in heavy casualties, predominantly among the Azerbaijani (then referred to as Muslim or Tatar) population, with estimates varying based on sources and methodologies. Historical analyses drawing from eyewitness accounts and contemporary reports indicate approximately 11,000 to 12,000 Azerbaijanis killed in the city over the four days of fighting from 30 March to 2 April. Azerbaijani government and commemorative sources frequently cite higher figures of 20,000 to 30,000 deaths in Baku alone, attributing these to systematic killings by Armenian Dashnak and Bolshevik forces targeting civilian Muslim quarters. These elevated estimates often encompass unrecovered bodies and extend to adjacent regions like Shamakhi, where additional massacres claimed 5,000 to 7,000 lives, contributing to a broader toll exceeding 20,000 across Azerbaijan in March-April 1918. Armenian casualties during the events were comparatively limited, with reports suggesting around 200 to 500 deaths, primarily among and engaged in combat or reprisals. The asymmetry in mortality reflects the one-sided nature of the violence after initial clashes, as Armenian- gained control and conducted house-to-house searches, burnings, and executions in Azerbaijani neighborhoods, while curtailed counter-violence. Demographically, the massacres precipitated a profound shift in Baku's ethnic composition. Prior to 1918, Muslims constituted roughly 25-30% of the city's population of about 267,000 in 1913, concentrated in specific quarters. The killings and subsequent flight of survivors led to the near-depopulation of these areas, with tens of thousands of Azerbaijanis evacuating to rural regions or , reducing the Muslim share significantly by mid-1918. This exodus, compounded by property destruction in the Tatar mahallas, facilitated a temporary Armenian dominance in urban until Ottoman intervention later that year, though long-term recovery occurred under the and Soviet rule. Recovery was partial, as fear and ongoing conflicts deterred full , marking the events as a pivotal ethnic realignment in the oil capital.
Source TypeEstimated Azerbaijani Deaths in Notes
Eyewitness-based historical accounts11,000-12,000Focus on verified bodies and testimonies; excludes missing persons.
Azerbaijani official estimates20,000-30,000Includes broader regional impacts and unaccounted victims.
Extended regional tollOver 20,000Encompasses and other sites in March-April 1918.

Specific Atrocities and Patterns of Killing

The patterns of killing during the March Days in Baku were characterized by targeted assaults on Azerbaijani Muslim civilian populations in specific neighborhoods, including the Old City (Ichari Shahar), Salyan, and Balakhani quarters, where armed detachments, bolstered by Bolshevik , conducted house-to-house raids following the initial military clashes on 30-31 March 1918. These units systematically executed adult males encountered in homes or streets, often using rifles and machine guns for mass shootings, while also killing women and children to eliminate witnesses or as reprisals; eyewitness accounts and subsequent investigations documented instances of families being herded into rooms and shot en masse, with bodies left unburied or dumped into the to conceal the scale. Atrocities extended beyond shootings to include mutilations, such as beheadings and , as well as rapes of women before execution, aimed at terrorizing the population into submission; the Extraordinary Investigating Commission, established post-events, cataloged these acts through survivor testimonies, revealing that perpetrators looted households prior to setting them ablaze, displacing survivors and destroying cultural sites like mosques. In parallel, Bolshevik-Dashnak forces blockaded Muslim areas to prevent escape, enforcing a pattern of that spared few, with estimates from contemporary reports indicating over 12,000 Azerbaijani deaths in alone from such coordinated violence, though figures vary due to incomplete records. The brutality was unrestrained, as noted by Firuz Kazemzadeh, who attributed the Dashnaks' role to opportunistic amid vacuum, resulting in patterns of rather than isolated combat deaths; Tadeusz Swietochowski similarly describes the night of 30-31 March as initiating a where armed groups overwhelmed lightly armed Muslim defenders, shifting to civilian slaughter after military resistance collapsed. These acts contrasted with defensive claims by perpetrators, as from the commission's findings underscores premeditated targeting over spontaneous retaliation.

Immediate Aftermath

Suppression of Muslim Quarters and Commune's Collapse

By 31 March 1918, Bolshevik-led forces, bolstered by Dashnak militias and , shifted from defensive positions to offensive operations targeting Muslim-majority districts in Baku, including the Tatar mahallas around areas like present-day and Azerbaijan Avenue. These assaults involved coordinated raids, summary executions of suspected , and systematic and burning of homes, effectively dismantling Muslim armed groups aligned with the party and the dissolved Muslim Socialist Soviet. Lawyer A. Kluge, in his investigative report on the violence, detailed instances of unarmed Muslim civilians being massacred, with bodies removed from streets in the ensuing days, contributing to an atmosphere of that prompted mass flight from the city. The suppression peaked between 1 and 2 April, as remaining pockets of resistance in quarters along streets such as Nikolayevskaya (now Istiglaliyyat) and Pochtovaya were overrun, leaving ruins and depopulated zones in their wake. Casualty figures for Muslims specifically are contested, with Azerbaijani historical accounts citing 8,000 to 12,000 deaths in Baku alone, based on emergency commission findings and eyewitness testimonies, though some scholarly estimates place the toll lower at several thousand amid mutual ethnic violence. This ethnic purge secured Bolshevik control but exacerbated demographic shifts, reducing the Muslim population in Baku province dramatically and fostering widespread resentment that manifested in regional uprisings. The victory enabled the formal proclamation of the Baku Commune on 13 April 1918, a Bolshevik-dominated with significant representation, which implemented policies prioritizing but effectively sidelining Muslim interests through and exclusion from power structures. However, the Commune's precarious rule—sustained initially by March's coercive gains—unraveled under multiple pressures: acute food shortages from disrupted supply lines, ideological fractures between Bolshevik radicals and moderate socialists, and the relentless advance of the Ottoman-backed toward . By late July 1918, with enemy forces nearing the city and defenses crumbling, internal opposition culminated in a coup on 31 July by Socialist Revolutionaries and , who ousted the Commissars and established the Central Caspian Dictatorship to appeal for military aid against the Ottomans. This overthrow marked the Commune's effective collapse after approximately four months, attributable in causal terms to its failure to reconcile ethnic divisions post-suppression, which isolated Baku from potential Muslim alliances and amplified vulnerabilities to external invasion. The subsequent proved insufficient, leading to the city's fall in , but the Commune's demise underscored how the March suppression, while tactically successful, strategically undermined long-term stability.

Azerbaijani Retreat and Regional Repercussions

Following the suppression of Azerbaijani resistance in by , surviving members of the Muslim population, including leaders of the party and the National Council, evacuated the city en masse, fleeing northward to and other rural strongholds to escape ongoing Armenian-Bolshevik reprisals. This retreat displaced thousands, with estimates from contemporary accounts indicating that up to 10,000-20,000 sought refuge outside , contributing to a sharp demographic decline in the city's Muslim quarters from pre-events levels of around 80,000. The exodus severed Azerbaijani political structures from the capital, forcing the National Council to reconstitute operations in by mid-April, where it coordinated defense and appealed for external support. In , the influx of refugees galvanized Azerbaijani nationalists, culminating in the declaration of the on May 28, 1918, as a asserting over Muslim-majority territories amid the power vacuum left by Russian imperial collapse. This formation marked a direct causal response to the events, shifting the center of Azerbaijani authority away from Bolshevik-dominated urban centers and toward Ottoman-aligned rural bases. Regionally, the retreat and attendant atrocities fueled escalation of the Armenian-Azerbaijani war, with Armenian Dashnak units under Bolshevik auspices advancing into adjacent districts like and Guba, where they conducted further massacres against Muslim communities in April-May 1918, killing several thousand and expelling survivors. These spillover operations, documented in survivor testimonies and diplomatic reports, displaced additional tens of thousands and eroded any remnants of inter-ethnic accommodation in the , paving the way for intervention via the Caucasian Islamic Army, which mobilized from to reclaim lost ground. The pattern of targeted killings and forced migrations thus extended the conflict beyond , weakening the Baku Commune's periphery control and hastening its eventual overthrow in July 1918.

Long-Term Consequences

Emergence of the Azerbaijan Democratic Republic

The March Days massacres in , perpetrated by Bolshevik and Armenian Dashnak forces against the Muslim population, resulted in thousands of civilian deaths and the flight of Azerbaijani leaders from the city, galvanizing national consolidation efforts elsewhere in the Transcaucasus. This violence, which solidified the pro-Bolshevik Baku Commune's control and excluded Muslim representation, underscored the fragility of multi-ethnic governance amid ethnic strife and external Bolshevik influence, prompting Azerbaijani elites to prioritize sovereign statehood over federative arrangements. In the wake of these events, the Azerbaijani National Council—comprising figures from the Musavat Party and other Muslim factions—intensified its organizational activities in Tiflis (modern ), where it had been operating since early 1918. The short-lived , established on April 22, 1918, to unify Georgian, Armenian, and Azerbaijani territories, collapsed on May 26, 1918, due to irreconcilable ethnic divisions, Ottoman advances following the , and the unresolved Baku crisis. The federation's failure, exacerbated by the March Days' demonstration of Armenian-Bolshevik dominance in key oil-rich areas, left Azerbaijani leaders no viable alternative but independence. On May 28, 1918, the Azerbaijani National Council proclaimed the (ADR) in Tiflis, marking the first secular parliamentary in the Muslim world, with Mammad Amin Rasulzade as a leading proponent and appointed as prime minister. Lacking control over , the ADR established its government in , from where it sought alliances, including with the , to reclaim lost territories and secure national survival against ongoing threats from and . This declaration represented a causal response to the March Days' , transforming localized trauma into a structured independence movement rooted in and defense against perceived existential perils.

Ottoman Intervention and Soviet Reconsolidation

Following the collapse of the Commune in July 1918, the , allied with the newly declared (ADR), launched a military offensive to reclaim from and -aligned forces. The , commanded by Pasha and comprising troops alongside Azerbaijani militias, defeated opposing units near Goychay between June 27 and July 1, 1918, initiating an advance toward the city. This campaign, part of broader efforts to secure the amid , culminated in assaults beginning August 26, 1918, from the direction of the Mud Volcanoes, routing defenders and exploiting internal divisions within the Centro-Caspian Dictatorship that had briefly replaced the Commune. By September 15, 1918, the Islamic Army captured after intense urban fighting, expelling Armenian Dashnak forces and their allies, who had dominated the city since the March Days. Nuri Pasha assumed direct command on September 10, coordinating the final push that integrated Azerbaijani irregulars and restored Muslim administrative control, marking a pivotal reversal of the ethnic power dynamics established two years prior. The intervention, justified by strategic interests in oil resources and pan-Turkic solidarity, enabled the to extend its authority over , though influence waned after the on October 30, 1918, prompting their withdrawal and a brief occupation. Soviet reconsolidation occurred in April 1920, when the invaded the , overthrowing its government amid internal instability and Bolshevik agitation. On April 27-28, 1920, Soviet forces under the 11th Army crossed the border, capturing with minimal resistance after the ADR leadership capitulated to avoid prolonged conflict, establishing the . This operation, driven by Lenin's emphasis on securing 's oil for the Bolshevik economy, integrated into the Soviet framework, suppressing nationalist elements and reversing the brief Ottoman-ADR interlude. By September 30, 1920, a military-economic treaty formalized 's subordination to Soviet , consolidating Bolshevik control over the despite ongoing resistance from Muslim populations affected by the 1918 violence. The invasion, involving approximately 30,000 troops, resulted in the execution or exile of ADR officials and the imposition of communist governance, ending the short-lived independence.

Interpretations and Historical Debates

Azerbaijani Perspective: Genocide by Armenian-Bolshevik Alliance

In the Azerbaijani historical narrative, the March Days of 1918 in Baku constitute a deliberate genocide orchestrated by Armenian Dashnak forces in alliance with Bolshevik revolutionaries against the Azerbaijani (then referred to as Muslim or Tatar) population. This perspective frames the events beginning on March 30, 1918, as a premeditated ethnic extermination campaign, with the peak atrocities on March 31, when armed Armenian units, supported by Bolshevik commissar Stepan Shaumyan's apparatus, launched systematic attacks on Azerbaijani neighborhoods. Azerbaijani accounts emphasize that the Bolsheviks' decision to disband the Azerbaijani Special Transcaucasian Committee (OZAKOM) units and redistribute weapons to Dashnaks provided the pretext and means for the massacres, resulting in the slaughter of civilians, looting of properties, and destruction of Muslim cultural sites. Azerbaijani estimates place the death toll at approximately 12,000 killed over the three-day period from March 30 to April 2, 1918, with some sources citing up to 50,000 victims including those in surrounding areas, representing about one-fifth of Baku's Azerbaijani population at the time. These figures are drawn from eyewitness testimonies, consular reports from , and post-event investigations, highlighting patterns of targeted killings, such as the execution of unarmed men, women, and children in quarters like Balajari and Sabail. Proponents of this view argue the alliance was ideologically driven: Dashnaks pursued territorial expansion toward a "" by eliminating Muslim majorities in disputed regions, while sought to consolidate power amid the Russian Revolution's chaos, prioritizing Armenian militias for their reliability against forces. The Azerbaijani government officially designates as the Day of of , a commemoration established by in 1998 to honor the victims and underscore the event's role in a broader pattern of aggression in the . This interpretation posits causal links to earlier actions in and during and subsequent Soviet-era suppressions, viewing the March Days as a foundational act of that facilitated Bolshevik control until the intervention in September 1918. Azerbaijani scholars and officials contend that Western historiography, influenced by narratives and Soviet propaganda, downplays the claim by framing the violence as mutual or defensive, despite archival evidence of one-sided atrocities against . While these sources, primarily from Azerbaijani state institutions, reflect national memory preservation, they align with contemporary analyses recognizing the disproportionate victimization of the Muslim population in Baku's inter-ethnic strife.

Armenian and Bolshevik Narratives: Defensive Response to Rebellion

The Bolshevik authorities in , led by Stepan Shaumyan, depicted the March Days as a defensive counteraction to a spontaneous Muslim uprising against Soviet rule, initiated by armed elements of the on March 30, 1918 (). They portrayed as a force of feudal khans and bourgeois nationalists seeking to detach the from and align with and , necessitating the suppression to preserve proletarian power and prevent anarchy. In a speech on March 2, 1918, Shaumyan had already condemned for promoting , framing their activities as a direct threat to Bolshevik hegemony amid the power vacuum following the . Bolshevik accounts emphasized that their , numbering 6,000–8,000, responded to initial Muslim gunfire and an alleged , exploiting the clashes to disarm opponents and establish the by April 1918, which they hailed as a triumph of Soviet authority over reactionary rebellion. Armenian Revolutionary Federation (Dashnaktsutyun) leaders, allied with through shared opposition to Muslim nationalism, justified their military involvement—contributing around 4,000 armed fighters—as essential self-defense against an existential threat from Muslim irregulars, including remnants of the "Savage Division" and armed civilians in Muslim quarters. Dashnak narratives invoked historical precedents like the 1905–1906 pogroms and recent advances, claiming the violence erupted from Muslim arming and provocative actions aimed at overthrowing the provisional Soviet order and massacring , with Dashnak units targeting only combatant threats in neighborhoods like Balajary and Fatmay. They maintained that the operations from March 31 to April 2 were reactive measures to neutralize rebellion, not premeditated , and downplayed civilian casualties by attributing deaths primarily to Muslim resistance and crossfire rather than systematic executions. Both narratives converged on minimizing Bolshevik-Dashnak agency in escalating the conflict, insisting the death toll—estimated by them at under 2,000 total, mostly combatants—resulted from the rebels' refusal to surrender and their alleged ties to external pan-Turkic agitators, thereby legitimizing the Commune's campaigns as a bulwark against regional counter-revolution. Shaumyan's post-event reflections underscored this view, describing the as an opportunistic consolidation rather than unprovoked aggression, with the alliance crediting their victory to unified proletarian and resolve against divisive .

Scholarly Assessments and Empirical Challenges to Prevailing Views

Scholars such as Tadeusz Swietochowski have characterized the March Days as a targeted against the Muslim population of , emphasizing the disproportionate violence inflicted on Azerbaijani civilians by Dashnak units allied with Bolshevik forces, rather than a mutual ethnic clash or mere suppression of a uprising. Swietochowski notes that the fighting erupted on the night of March 30, 1918, following demands by Muslim representatives for the Baku Soviet's executive committee to address escalating tensions, including the selective of Muslim national units while forces remained armed, leading to systematic assaults on Muslim quarters. This assessment challenges narratives portraying the events as defensive Bolshevik actions against a spontaneous rebellion, highlighting instead premeditated ethnic targeting evidenced by the rapid escalation into house-to-house killings and looting confined primarily to Azerbaijani neighborhoods. Empirical investigations, including those drawing on the materials compiled by the Extraordinary Investigation Commission established by the in May 1918, reveal patterns of mass civilian slaughter that undermine claims of proportionate military engagement. The commission's documentation, based on eyewitness testimonies, burial records, and forensic examinations, recorded thousands of Azerbaijani victims—predominantly non-combatants, including women and children—killed through methods such as beheadings, burnings, and drownings in the , with estimates of direct fatalities in ranging from 3,000 to 12,000 during the core clashes from March 30 to April 2. These findings contrast sharply with contemporaneous Bolshevik reports, which minimized Muslim casualties and exaggerated their own losses to justify the violence as counter-insurgency, a framing later echoed in Soviet that obscured ethnic motivations under class rhetoric. Critiques of influential works like Ronald Grigor Suny's The Baku Commune, 1917-1918 further illustrate empirical challenges to prevailing interpretations that prioritize over . Suny depicts the March Days as a degeneration of into a "national feud," intertwined with proletarian dynamics in Baku's . However, analysis of primary sources, including diplomatic dispatches and survivor accounts, indicates that paramilitary dominance—bolstered by Bolshevik complicity under figures like Stepan Shaumyan—facilitated one-sided atrocities, with minimal evidence of organized Azerbaijani offensives into areas until defensive retreats. Scholars like Justin McCarthy, in forewords to studies on the period, argue that such events reflect a broader pattern of -nationalist aggression against Muslim populations in the , supported by demographic shifts and archival showing the near-total depopulation of certain Muslim districts post-massacre. These assessments underscore systemic biases in earlier Soviet and some Western academic narratives, which often relied on Bolshevik self-justifications while downplaying the causal role of ethnic animosities and power vacuums following the . Empirical data from the period, including observer reports of unchecked reprisals, reveal that the violence extended beyond combatants, involving the destruction of mosques, newspapers, and cultural sites, consistent with intent to eradicate Azerbaijani political and social presence in . Recent , informed by post-Soviet access to archives, increasingly recognizes the March Days as a foundational ethnic , with total 1918 casualties across exceeding 20,000, challenging sanitized views that equate it with reciprocal pogroms.

International Recognition and Commemorative Practices

In the Republic of Azerbaijan, is designated as the Day of of , commemorating the massacres of Azerbaijani civilians during the of , with official observance established by a decree from National Leader in 1998. Annual commemorations include government statements, memorial ceremonies in and other affected regions such as Guba and , and educational initiatives highlighting the estimated 12,000 to 30,000 victims killed by Dashnak forces allied with . These events feature moments of silence, wreath-laying at monuments like the Alley of Martyrs in , and public addresses emphasizing policies aimed at territorial expansion. Azerbaijani institutions, including the and Ministry of Defense, issue annual declarations framing the events as a deliberate against the Muslim population of and surrounding areas. Commemorative practices extend to Azerbaijani diaspora communities and diplomatic missions abroad, where events such as seminars and exhibitions are held to preserve historical memory and counter narratives portraying the violence as mutual ethnic strife. For instance, Azerbaijani embassies in countries like and organize gatherings with minutes of silence and speeches detailing the systematic nature of the killings, including documented atrocities in Muslim quarters of . Allied organizations, such as the , issue solidarity messages acknowledging the massacres as genocide and honoring the victims. International recognition remains limited, with no sovereign states or major global bodies formally classifying the March Days as , despite Azerbaijan's ongoing advocacy through parliamentary declarations and historical research initiatives. Subnational acknowledgment includes a 2013 by the in the United States, which recognizes as the Day of of and references the massacres in alongside other regional pogroms totaling over 100,000 deaths. Efforts for broader endorsement, such as proposed written declarations in the Parliamentary Assembly of the , have not advanced to binding resolutions, reflecting interpretive disputes over intent and casualty attribution in scholarly and diplomatic circles.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Power and Violence in the Russian Revolution - Purdue University
    This article investigates the March Events of 1918: city-wide fighting for control of Baku that involved the Bolshevik party, the Red Guards, and various ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  2. [2]
    Population :: Baku
    In 1913, 214.672 people lived in Baku. The Muslim population lived mainly in the historical centre covering the Icherisheher Fortress and the western part of ...
  3. [3]
  4. [4]
    The Bonds of the Transcaucasian Commissariat - P J Symes
    In July 1917 the coalition government, led by the Menshevik Alexander Karensky, declared the Russian Republic and in October the Bolshevik Revolution launched a ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] BAKU: VIOLENCE, IDENTITY, AND OIL, 1905-1927
    Nov 14, 2017 · ... demographic changes. Examining Baku's census data from 1897, it is evident that a multitude of changes in population had occurred; the city ...
  6. [6]
    The Oil Deal: Nariman Narimanov and the Sovietization of Azerbaijan
    Jul 7, 2017 · Thanks to Baku's oil industry, it had a multi-ethnic industrial base and a radical political tradition that was missing in both Russia's ...
  7. [7]
    The Baku Commune - Jacobin
    Nov 7, 2017 · Muslims disarmed deserting soldiers, and, in a singularly tragic confrontation at Shamkhor in January 1918, they killed a thousand Russians.
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Conflict in the Caucasus -- Analysis of Nagorno-Karabakh's Right to ...
    the Russian revolution introduced a power vacuum as imperial. Russia was no longer able to assert its power in the region.34. Various groups attempted to fill ...Missing: 1917 | Show results with:1917
  9. [9]
    British Policy and the Massacres in Baku of March 1918 - Pat Walsh
    May 6, 2018 · Baku was thrown into flux by a series of events including the collapse of Tsarist authority, the disintegration of the Russian army, the ...
  10. [10]
    The Baku Commune, 1917-1918: Class and Nationality in the ... - jstor
    Roger Suny examines the Revolution in Baku, important provincial capital and oil center of the Russian empire. His study of Baku's national and class conf.
  11. [11]
    Genocide of Azerbaijanis in 1918 - Karabakh.Center
    During the March genocide, around 12 thousand Azerbaijanis and other Muslim civilians were killed by the rampant Dashnak detachments [2].
  12. [12]
    [PDF] 31 March - Day of Genocide of Azerbaijanis
    Mar 31, 2025 · In 1918, leader of the Russian Bolsheviks Vladimir Lenin appointed ethnic Armenian Stephan Shaumyan Extraordinary Commissar of the Caucasus. By ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Realities of Azerbaijan: 1917-1920
    It would be the Baku Azerbaijanis who would pay the price in the 'March days.'141 In January 1918 all political forces but the. Musavat desired to gather ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Tragic events of 1918 ... Impossible to forget!
    ately after the Bolshevik coup in Russia, the Baku Coun- cil, headed by ... On 29 (17) March 1918, Bolsheviks and Dashnaks, provoking an incident with ...
  15. [15]
    Blood memory » AZERBAIJAN » Official web-site of ... - President.az
    As a result of the January tragedy, 131 civilians were killed and 744 more were wounded in Baku and nearby regions. Among those killed were women, children and ...
  16. [16]
    The Battle for Baku (May-September 1918): A Peculiar Episode in ...
    For the. Azerbaijani Muslims March 1918 represents a decisive turning-point. ... Izvestiia (Baku), 9 July 1918, in Suny, The Baku Commune, 1917-1918, p.291 ...
  17. [17]
    The genocide of 1918 :: Baku
    The massacre which committed with particular brutality 100 years ago - in March-April 1918, the Dashnak-Bolshevik armed groups operating under the mandate of ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] THE AZERBAIJAN GENOCIDE- 31ST MARCH
    Abstract: March genocide – is a genocide committed by the Baku Soviet and Armenian armed Dashnak forces between March 30 and April 3 of 1918 in Baku and in ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary<|separator|>
  19. [19]
    [PDF] The March Genocide of 1918 in Baku
    The materials of. Extraordinary Investigation Commission are the unique source for investigating the genocide against Turkish-Muslim population in Azerbaijan.Missing: eyewitness | Show results with:eyewitness<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    Day of Genocide of Azerbaijanis
    Mar 31, 2025 · During these massacres, which were part of a systematic policy of ethnic cleansing and genocide against Azerbaijanis, the killings of innocent ...
  21. [21]
    31 March Genocide of Azerbaijanis - Azerbaijan.az
    Hundreds of settlements were destroyed, and thousands of Azerbaijanis were brutally killed. Skillfully taking advantage of World War I and the February and ...
  22. [22]
    Azerbaijan marks anniversary of 1918 genocide - Anadolu Ajansı
    Mar 31, 2021 · Day of Genocide of Azerbaijanis marks events when Armenian forces, Bolsheviks martyred around 50000 Azerbaijanis - Anadolu Ajansı.
  23. [23]
    THE BLOODY TERROR OF 1918 - Region Plus
    ... massacre of the Muslim population. "On the night of 30-31 March 1918, shooting began in Baku," Tadeusz Swietochowski writes. "Representatives of the Muslim ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Azerbaijan without Azerbaijanis
    THE EvENTS of MArCH 1918 HAD BEEN oN THE ArMENIAN AgENDA froM. 1917. As it ... The massacres of the Muslim population of Shamakhi continued until July 1918.
  25. [25]
    March 31: 'Bloody massacre' day of Azerbaijanis - Anadolu Ajansı
    Mar 31, 2020 · March 31 marks Day of Genocide of Azerbaijanis when Armenian forces jointly with Bolsheviks martyred around 50000 people - Anadolu Ajansı.
  26. [26]
    Baku, Battle of - 1914-1918 Online
    Oct 15, 2020 · As a result of the 5 August 1918 offensive, nine Ottoman officers were killed and nineteen wounded, in addition to 139 soldiers killed and 444 ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] the (un)making of soviet kirovabad: pogroms and the end of the ...
    “Power and Violence in the Russian Revolution: The March Events and Baku. Commune of 1918.” Russian History 41 (2014): 197-210. Stoler, Ann Laura. Along the ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] The Executive Power of the Sabail District Azerbaijan State ...
    March genocide were resulted in nothing. On March days all groups of Azerbaijani population in Baku were the victims of Armenian violence and plundering. At ...
  29. [29]
    Liberation of Baku :: Azerbaijan Democratic Republic
    The anti-Azerbaijani policy pursued by the Baku Soviet of People's Commissars led to complete discrediting of Bolsheviks and their resignation on July 31, 1918.Missing: garrison | Show results with:garrison
  30. [30]
    The Parliament of the Azerbaijan Democratic Republic (1918-1920)
    Baku was declared the capital of the Azerbaijan Democratic Republic. The Azerbaijan National Council that stopped its work in Ganja on 17 June 1918 resumed it ...
  31. [31]
    Hope from a Century Past: The Azerbaijan Democratic Republic, the ...
    May 8, 2019 · Founded on May 28, 1918, the ADR was the Muslim world's first parliamentary republic. Although it lasted a mere twenty-three months before the ...
  32. [32]
  33. [33]
    [PDF] The Mission of Dunsterforce in Eastern Anatolia, Iran, and the Caucas
    Jan 18, 2023 · March Days of Baku, where numerous Azeri Turks were massacred by Armenian militias with the Baku Soviets' support.85 This event made the ...
  34. [34]
    Democratic Republic of Azerbaijan (1918-20): Origins, Milestones ...
    May 28, 2018 · The emergence of the Democratic Republic of Azerbaijan (ADR) was the by-product of a broad range of processes and dynamics in and around of the Caucasus.
  35. [35]
    The Liberation of Baku: A Retrospective View after a Century
    Sep 24, 2018 · In 28 May 1918, the Azerbaijani National Council declared the formation of the independent Azerbaijani Democratic Republic (ADR).
  36. [36]
    103 years passes since liberation of Baku by Caucasian Islamic Army
    Sep 15, 2021 · On September 10, 1918, Nuru Pasha, an Ottoman general in the Ottoman army, took direct control over the liberation of Baku. By order of Nuru ...
  37. [37]
    Azerbaijan - World War I and Independence - Country Studies
    ... Red Army invaded Azerbaijan in April 1920. Russian leader Vladimir I. Lenin justified the invasion because of the importance of the Baku region's oil to the ...
  38. [38]
    The Supreme Council of the Azerbaijan SSR (1920-1991)
    The Azerbaijan SSR left its military and economic independence under the military-economic alliance treaty with the Soviet Russia on 30 September 1920.Missing: reconsolidation | Show results with:reconsolidation<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    Communism in Azerbaijan | Soviet Occupation | CommunistCrimes
    The Soviet Occupation (1920-1991). Azerbaijan, has a long history of invasions, migration, cultural and political influences. After almost two centuries under ...
  40. [40]
    31 March- Day of Genocide of Azerbaijanis
    Mar 31, 2025 · In order to realize the idea of “greater Armenia” on Azerbaijani lands, Armenians began to falsify their own history and the history of ...
  41. [41]
    The bloody memories of 31st March 1918 - President.az
    Embassy of the Republic of Azerbaijan to the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 29 March 2013. The Day of 31st of March, 1918 is commemorated in the Republic of ...
  42. [42]
  43. [43]
    March 1918 Massacre in Baku - Visions of Azerbaijan Magazine
    Thousands of Azerbaijanis were killed in three days of slaughter at the end of March 1918, when Armenian nationalists went on the rampage in Baku.
  44. [44]
    [PDF] a Day of Genocide a - EOI-Europäisches Ombudsman Institut
    The acts of genocide committed on 31 March, 1918, against the Azerbaijanis ... The massacres committed by the Armenian-Bolshevik forces in Baku gained mass.
  45. [45]
    The Importance Of Establishing An Azerbaijani Genocide Square
    To fully control Baku and its oil, Bolsheviks, led by Armenian Stepan Shahumyan, and Armenian Dashnaks created an alliance against Baku's Azerbaijani Muslim ...Missing: Shaumian | Show results with:Shaumian
  46. [46]
    [PDF] nd political orientations in azerbaijan, 1905-1920 - Wilson Center
    IN AZERBAIJAN, 1905-1920. Tadeusz Swietochowski. Conference on. "NATIONALISM AND SOCIAL CHA~GE IN TRANSCAUCASIA". Co-sponsored by. Kennan Institute for Advanced ...
  47. [47]
    The March massacre in Baku 100 years ago - the Muslim riot against ...
    Apr 4, 2018 · According to various estimates between 3 000 to 12 000 civilians were killed in Baku on that day in 1918. Most of the sources are unanimous in ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] massacre of the azerbaijani turkic population (1918-1920) according ...
    Jan 17, 2018 · The article aims to examine the war between Armenia and. Azerbaijan in 1918-1920, which was accompanied by mass killings and ... bloody events of ...
  49. [49]
    Azerbaijani Ombudsman calls for global recognition of genocide ...
    Mar 31, 2025 · In 1998, by the decree of National Leader Heydar Aliyev, March 31 was declared the Day of Genocide of Azerbaijanis, and research was ...<|separator|>
  50. [50]
    Azerbaijan commemorates memory of victims of 1918 genocide
    Mar 31, 2023 · Azerbaijan honors memory of victims of genocide committed by Armenians and Bolsheviks on March 31, 1918 - Anadolu Ajansı.<|control11|><|separator|>
  51. [51]
    Republic of Azerbaijan Ministry of Foreign Affairs
    March 31 is the Day of Genocide of Azerbaijanis, commemorating the victims of the bloody massacre perpetrated by Armenians against Azerbaijanis in March 1918.
  52. [52]
    Day of Genocide of Azerbaijanis - Azerbaijan Society of America
    March 31, 1918, armed forces of the Armenian revolutionary Federation aided by Russian Bolsheviks massacred tens of thousands of Azerbaijani Muslims and Jews.
  53. [53]
    Azerbaijan marks 107th anniversary of genocide victims on March 31
    Mar 29, 2025 · Jordan Daily – The Embassy of Azerbaijan in Jordan commemorated in a statement March 31 as the Day of Genocide of Azerbaijanis, remembering the ...
  54. [54]
    Day of Genocide of the Azerbaijanis - Organizations of Turkic States
    March 31, which is commemorated in the Republic of Azerbaijan as the Day of Genocide of Azerbaijanis, reflects the memory of the bloody massacre committed ...Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
  55. [55]
    GENOCIDE AGAINST AZERBAIJANIS MUST BE RECOGNIZED ...
    GENOCIDE AGAINST AZERBAIJANIS MUST BE RECOGNIZED INTERNATIONALLY ... A commemoration ceremony on the occasion of the Day of Genocide of Azerbaijanis has taken ...
  56. [56]
    joint resolution recognizing the day of genocide of azerbaijanis
    WHEREAS, a series of large-scale massacres occurred in March 1918 in Baku, Shemakha, Guba, Shusha, Nakhichevan, Irevan, Urmia, Salmas, Maku, Khoy and other ...