Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Maximum landing weight

The maximum landing weight (MLW), also known as the maximum structural landing weight, is the highest certified gross weight at which an aircraft may safely touch down during landing, encompassing the combined mass of the airframe, fuel, passengers, crew, cargo, and equipment.^[1] This limit is established by aircraft manufacturers and validated by regulatory authorities to protect the structural integrity of critical components, such as the landing gear and fuselage, against the high-impact forces encountered upon touchdown.^[2] Unlike the maximum takeoff weight (MTOW), which permits heavier loads for departure, the MLW is typically lower—for example, by about 28% for the Boeing 777-300ER—because landing imposes concentrated vertical and horizontal stresses that exceed those of takeoff, with certification standards assuming a sink rate of up to 10 feet per second at this weight.^[3]^[1] Exceeding the MLW constitutes an overweight landing, defined as any touchdown above the aircraft's design limit, which can lead to structural damage, reduced braking efficiency, extended stopping distances, and increased risk of runway excursions.^[4] For instance, in large commercial jets like the Boeing 777-300ER, the MLW stands at 554,000 pounds compared to an MTOW of 775,000 pounds, necessitating careful pre-flight planning to account for fuel burn during flight.^[3] Pilots manage adherence to this limit through strategies such as adjusting flight profiles to consume excess fuel (e.g., via holding patterns or circuitous routing), offloading payload, or, in emergencies, dumping fuel to enable a safe return shortly after takeoff.^[2]^[3] The MLW plays a pivotal role in aviation safety and operational efficiency, influencing go-around performance, tire and brake wear, and overall aircraft longevity.^[1] Regulatory bodies like the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) mandate post-landing inspections for any overweight events to assess potential hidden damage, underscoring the limit's non-negotiable nature even in urgent scenarios like engine failures.^[4] By enforcing this parameter, the aviation industry minimizes risks associated with high-energy landings while optimizing fuel and payload economics across diverse aircraft types, from light general aviation planes—where MLW often equals MTOW—to heavy transports requiring sophisticated weight-and-balance systems.^[2]^[1]

Definition and Importance

Definition

The maximum landing weight (MLW) is the maximum allowable gross weight of an aircraft at the moment of touchdown during landing, certified to ensure the structural integrity of the aircraft and prevent excessive stress on the landing gear, fuselage, and wings.^[5] This limit is established through rigorous certification processes to protect against potential failure under landing impact forces. The MLW is explicitly specified in the aircraft's flight manual and type certificate data sheet (TCDS), with values typically provided in pounds for aircraft certified by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) or in kilograms for those certified by authorities such as the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA).^[6]^[7] It applies strictly to the weight at the instant of landing contact with the runway and does not encompass fuel consumption during post-landing taxi or weight adjustments for subsequent takeoff.^[8]

Operational Importance

The maximum landing weight (MLW) plays a pivotal role in aviation operations by establishing the upper limit for an aircraft's weight upon touchdown, thereby preventing overweight landings that could result in severe structural damage to the airframe and landing gear, tire bursts from excessive loads, or runway overruns due to compromised braking performance.^[5] Landing represents a critical phase of flight where the aircraft's structure endures maximum stress from impact forces, and adhering to MLW ensures that these forces remain within certified design tolerances, safeguarding both the aircraft and occupants.^[5] Exceeding this limit can lead to higher stall speeds and extended landing distances, further elevating the risk of incidents on the runway.^[5] In routine flight planning, MLW significantly influences fuel management strategies, as aircraft frequently depart at weights exceeding MLW to accommodate payload and reserves but must burn sufficient fuel during cruise to arrive at the destination at or below this threshold.^[8] Pilots and dispatchers calculate fuel loads to balance regulatory minimums, economic efficiency, and MLW compliance, often adjusting routes or altitudes to facilitate the necessary weight reduction en route.^[5] This planning is essential for maintaining operational legality and performance margins, particularly on longer flights where fuel burn directly correlates with landing weight.^[8] Exceeding MLW carries serious operational repercussions, including mandatory post-landing inspections to assess potential airframe fatigue or hidden damage, which can ground the aircraft for repairs and disrupt schedules.^[8] Such violations compromise the aircraft's structural integrity, potentially accelerating wear on critical components like the fuselage and wings, and may necessitate costly maintenance interventions to restore certification compliance.^[8] In severe cases, an overweight landing can result in immediate failure of landing gear elements, leading to accidents that endanger safety.^[5] MLW assumes heightened importance in emergency scenarios, such as diversions due to weather or mechanical issues, where crews may need to rapidly reduce weight through fuel dumping to meet the limit and enable a safe landing.^[8] Fuel jettison systems are designed to expel fuel at rates sufficient to achieve MLW quickly, often at least 1% of maximum weight per minute, allowing the aircraft to handle the stresses of an unplanned touchdown without exceeding structural capabilities.^[9] This procedure is a standard regulatory safeguard, ensuring that even in time-critical situations, the aircraft can land within its certified parameters to minimize risks.^[8]

Maximum Takeoff Weight

The maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) is defined as the maximum allowable weight of an aircraft at the beginning of the takeoff roll, encompassing the aircraft, passengers, cargo, fuel, and other equipment. This limit is established during the aircraft's certification process and specified in the Type Certificate Data Sheet (TCDS).^[5] MTOW is constrained by the aircraft's structural integrity to prevent damage during takeoff stresses, engine thrust availability to achieve required acceleration, and performance criteria such as minimum climb gradients for obstacle clearance and safe flight path.^[5]^[10]^[11] In contrast to the maximum landing weight (MLW), which sets the post-flight weight limit to protect the structure during touchdown and deceleration, MTOW permits a higher initial mass to include fuel for the entire mission. MTOW typically exceeds MLW by 10-30% or more to account for fuel consumption during flight, varying by aircraft design and intended range; for example, the Boeing 777-300ER has an MTOW of 775,000 pounds (351,535 kilograms) versus an MLW of 554,000 pounds (251,290 kilograms).^[12] This differential ensures the aircraft can carry sufficient fuel for long-haul operations while adhering to landing constraints. During flight planning, MTOW establishes the ceiling for total initial loading, requiring operators to balance payload, fuel uplift, and operating empty weight to avoid exceeding it. Fuel and payload are iteratively adjusted—often by reducing one or both—so that the projected weight at destination, after cruise fuel burn-off, remains at or below MLW, thereby optimizing efficiency and safety across the flight profile.^[13]^[14]

Maximum Zero-Fuel Weight

The maximum zero-fuel weight (MZFW) is the maximum permissible weight of an aircraft excluding usable fuel and disposable oil.^[15] This limit is established to protect the wing structure from excessive bending moments, as the payload concentrated in the fuselage—such as passengers and cargo—increases stress on the wing roots during flight, particularly in turbulence.^[16]^[17] In relation to the maximum landing weight (MLW), the MZFW plus any remaining fuel at touchdown must not exceed the MLW to prevent structural overload of the airframe upon landing.^[5] This constraint ensures that payload decisions during flight planning account for fuel burn, avoiding scenarios where heavy cargo or passengers combined with reserve fuel compromise landing safety.^[5] Typically, the MZFW is close to or slightly below the MLW for many commercial aircraft. For instance, the Boeing 737-800 has an MZFW of 138,300 pounds (62,732 kg) and an MLW of 146,300 pounds (66,361 kg).^[18] In regional jets, such as the Embraer E175, the MZFW often represents about 80% of the maximum takeoff weight (MTOW), illustrating the balance between payload capacity and overall structural limits.^[19]

Factors Determining MLW

Structural Factors

The maximum landing weight (MLW) is fundamentally constrained by the structural integrity of the landing gear, which must absorb vertical impact loads during touchdown without failure. Shock absorbers, typically oleo-pneumatic struts, are engineered to dissipate kinetic energy from descent velocities up to 3.05 m/s (10 ft/s) at the design landing weight, limiting peak decelerations to approximately 1.5–2g to prevent strut buckling or bottoming out.^[20] Tires and associated components are rated for these loads, with inflation pressures and materials selected to handle compressive forces equivalent to 1.2 times the aircraft weight under braked roll conditions, ensuring no tire burst or rim damage occurs. These design limits directly establish the MLW, as exceeding it risks gear collapse or permanent deformation. Fuselage and wing structures face significant stress from the dynamic load transfer upon landing gear contact, necessitating MLW restrictions to avoid overload. The fuselage keel beam, a primary load path beneath the cabin floor, experiences high compressive axial forces as it transmits vertical reactions from the gear to the airframe, potentially leading to buckling if loads surpass design margins.^[21] Similarly, wing roots endure increased bending moments during touchdown, where the abrupt cessation of descent shifts lift-dependent shear to ground reaction forces, amplifying root stresses compared to cruise conditions in some configurations.^[22] The MLW ensures these elements remain below yield strength thresholds, preserving overall airframe stability. To validate structural durability against fatigue from repeated landings, aircraft undergo rigorous certification testing focused on material limits at MLW. Drop tests simulate impact at vertical velocities of 3.05 m/s (limit) and 3.66 m/s (ultimate reserve), dropping gear assemblies or full sections to measure energy absorption and stress distribution.^[20] These tests, often conducted on subscale models or isolated components, incorporate strain gauges to monitor high-stress areas like strut pistons and keel attachments, ensuring long-term integrity without compromising safety margins.

Performance Factors

Performance factors play a critical role in establishing the maximum landing weight (MLW) for aircraft, as they directly influence the ability to safely decelerate and stop after touchdown. Higher landing weights increase the inertial forces acting on the aircraft, thereby extending stopping distances and elevating the risk of runway excursions. For instance, a 10% increase in landing weight results in approximately a 10% longer landing distance due to the proportional increase in kinetic energy that must be dissipated.^[23] Braking performance is limited by the friction between tires and the runway surface, with tire speed limits preventing excessive heat buildup that could lead to tire failure or reduced braking efficiency. Aircraft braking systems are designed to achieve deceleration rates that account for these limits, ensuring the aircraft remains within the available runway length while maintaining a safety margin, such as landing within 60% of the runway length on dry surfaces or 115% on wet ones to mitigate excursion risks.^[24]^[23] Flap and spoiler effectiveness further constrain MLW by ensuring controlled lift reduction and enhanced deceleration post-touchdown. Upon landing, spoilers (or speed brakes) are deployed to "dump" lift, transferring the aircraft's weight to the wheels and maximizing tire-road friction for braking. This lift dump must occur without exceeding flap extension speed limits, as improper timing or weight could compromise aerodynamic control or structural integrity during rollout. Reverse thrust from engines supplements wheel braking, providing additional deceleration, but its effectiveness diminishes at higher weights due to the increased momentum, necessitating MLW limits that align with certified deceleration capabilities.^[25]^[23] Runway surface conditions and environmental factors require adjustments to MLW to account for variations in ground effect, rolling resistance, and overall stopping performance. On wet runways, reduced friction can increase the required landing distance by up to 15% compared to dry conditions, as water depth promotes hydroplaning and diminishes tire grip, prompting lower MLW to maintain safe stopping margins. At high altitudes, true airspeed is higher for a given indicated speed, extending ground roll distances due to altered aerodynamic effects and reduced engine thrust, while changes in rolling resistance from surface texture or contamination further influence deceleration. These adjustments ensure controllability and prevent excursions under adverse conditions.^[25]^[23]

Determination and Calculation

Certification Process

The certification process for maximum landing weight (MLW) begins during the aircraft type certification phase, where manufacturers and regulatory authorities collaborate to establish limits based on structural integrity and performance under landing conditions. This involves integrating analytical predictions with physical testing to ensure the airframe and landing gear can withstand prescribed loads without failure. Structural and performance factors, such as design descent velocities and load distributions, serve as inputs to define the baseline MLW.^[26] Finite element analysis (FEA) models are employed to simulate landing loads on critical components, predicting stress, deformation, and energy absorption at the proposed MLW. These models incorporate dynamic effects like spin-up, springback, and rebound, and are validated against test data or historical service experience to demonstrate compliance with strength requirements. Ground load tests, including drop tests of the landing gear or full aircraft, verify these analyses by applying limit loads equivalent to the MLW—typically at descent velocities of 10 feet per second for landing—and ultimate loads at 1.5 times those values to confirm reserve strength, allowing yielding but not catastrophic failure. Flight simulations and landing demonstrations further substantiate safe operations at the certified MLW, ensuring controllability and no excessive structural damage.^[27]^[28] The approved MLW is documented in the Aircraft Flight Manual (AFM), which outlines operational limits derived from the certification data. Subsequent modifications, such as landing gear upgrades that could increase MLW, require a supplemental type certificate (STC) to revalidate the design through updated analyses, targeted tests, and regulatory review, ensuring continued airworthiness.^[29]^[30]

Operational Planning

In operational planning, pilots and dispatchers begin with preflight calculations to ensure the projected landing weight does not exceed the aircraft's maximum landing weight (MLW). Using specialized performance software, such as Boeing's Onboard Performance Tool or Jeppesen's OpsData, they estimate the landing weight by subtracting anticipated fuel burn from the takeoff weight, which incorporates maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) and maximum zero-fuel weight (MZFW) limits as baselines.^[31]^[32] If the calculation indicates an exceedance, adjustments are made by reducing payload, such as offloading cargo or limiting passengers, to maintain compliance while meeting fuel and range requirements.^[3] During flight, crews monitor fuel consumption and make real-time adjustments to further reduce weight if needed. Techniques include requesting step climbs to higher altitudes, which increase fuel burn rates due to the additional thrust required, or entering holding patterns to extend flight time and consume more fuel before descent.^[3] Air traffic control may also provide vectors or lower altitudes to facilitate higher fuel burn, ensuring the aircraft arrives at the destination below MLW without compromising safety.^[3] For contingencies, such as emergencies requiring an early return, fuel dumping procedures are employed on equipped aircraft to rapidly reduce weight to MLW. These systems jettison fuel at rates of at least 1% of maximum weight per minute, but only above minimum altitudes—typically 2,000 feet above ground level (AGL) or higher, such as 6,000 feet AGL for evaporation—to minimize environmental impact and ensure fuel dissipates safely.^[9]^[33]

Regulations and Standards

FAA Requirements

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) establishes standards for maximum landing weight (MLW) primarily through Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) Part 25, which governs airworthiness standards for transport category airplanes. Under §25.473, the MLW, also referred to as the design landing weight, is defined as the maximum weight for landing conditions at maximum descent velocity, with the landing gear required to withstand specified loads—such as a limit descent velocity of 10 feet per second—without permanent deformation or failure.^[34] This provision ensures structural integrity during landing impacts, with load factors applied to the gear, fuselage, and wings based on the MLW to simulate real-world scenarios like level landings and tail-down conditions.^[34] Advisory Circular (AC) 120-27F provides operational guidance on aircraft weight and balance control, emphasizing compliance with MLW as part of approved programs for operators under 14 CFR Parts 91K, 121, 125, and 135.^[15] It mandates that weight and balance calculations, including adherence to MLW limits, be incorporated into dispatch releases and load manifests to prevent exceedances during flight planning and execution.^[15] Operators must recalibrate basic empty weight if cumulative changes exceed 0.5% of the MLW, ensuring ongoing accuracy in operational envelopes that account for fuel burn, passenger distribution, and cargo placement.^[15] Enforcement of MLW requirements falls under FAA Order 2150.3C, which classifies overweight landings as a Severity 1 violation (indicating lower enforcement priority) and operations exceeding maximum gross weight (including landings) as potentially leading to certificate actions such as suspensions or revocations.^[35] Following an overweight landing, AC 21-4B requires immediate inspection of the aircraft for structural damage in accordance with manufacturer instructions or approved data, with findings logged and airworthiness confirmed before further flight; if major repairs are needed, FAA Form 337 must document the work.^[36]^[35] Civil penalties for such violations can reach up to $41,417 per violation for individuals and $208,038 for small businesses (adjusted for inflation as of 2025), with potential certificate suspensions of 30 to 90 days depending on the circumstances.^[35]^[37]

EASA Requirements

The European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) establishes standards for maximum landing weight (MLW) through Certification Specifications for Large Aeroplanes (CS-25), which ensure the structural integrity of landing gear and airframe under landing loads. In CS 25.473, the landing gear and supporting structure must be designed to withstand ground load conditions, including an impact at a limit descent velocity of 1.52 m/s (5 fps) vertical velocity at the maximum design landing weight with the gear extended, assuming the aeroplane is under control.^[38] This requirement accounts for dynamic response effects and is part of broader ground load assumptions to prevent failure during normal landing operations.^[38] EASA provides guidance on compliance with these strength requirements via Acceptable Means of Compliance (AMC) documents integrated into CS-25. For instance, AMC 25.723 addresses shock absorption tests for landing gear, requiring validation of energy absorption capacity at the design landing weight or takeoff weight—whichever produces the greater impact—through drop tests simulating MLW conditions, such as a 475 mm free drop for design landing weight scenarios.^[38] These AMCs outline methods for demonstrating reserve strength, including analysis or testing to confirm the gear's ability to handle loads beyond nominal limits without catastrophic failure, specifically tailored to large aeroplanes where MLW directly influences structural design margins.^[38] While CS-25 aligns closely with international standards through bilateral aviation safety agreements (BASA) with the FAA, EASA maintains distinct emphases in certification, such as the lower limit descent velocity compared to FAA's 10 fps (3.05 m/s). For example, noise certification under CS-36 requires evaluating MLW impacts on approach noise levels, ensuring that higher landing weights do not exceed cumulative noise margins during operations near airports.^[39]^[40] This harmonized yet differentiated approach, developed via joint working groups, allows reciprocal acceptance of certifications while prioritizing European environmental protections in MLW determinations.^[40]

References

[1]
Maximizing Safety with Maximum Landing Weight in Aviation - A-ICE
Maximum Landing Weight (MLW) is the highest weight an aircraft is certified to land safely, ensuring structural integrity and affecting landing performance. ...
[2]
Airplane Weight & Balance Explained - Pilot Institute
Jul 20, 2023 · Maximum Landing Weight is the heaviest weight at which an aircraft can safely land. It's typically less than the Maximum Takeoff Weight, ...
[3]
How Airline Pilots Manage Maximum Landing Weight - Boldmethod
Jun 20, 2022 · The maximum landing weight is 554,000 lbs... A difference of 221,000 lbs! Even with a total burn of roughly 16,500 pounds per hour (both engines) ...
[4]
Overweight Landing | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
An overweight landing is defined as a landing made at a gross weight in excess of the maximum design (ie, structural) landing weight for a particular model.
[5]
[PDF] Chapter 10: Weight and Balance - Federal Aviation Administration
Maximum landing weight—the greatest weight that an aircraft is normally allowed to have at landing. • Maximum ramp weight—the total weight of a loaded.
[6]
Type Certificate Data Sheets (TCDS) - Dynamic Regulatory System
Maximum weight Takeoff 8350 lb. Landing 7940 lb. No. seats 2 (1 at +95, 1 at +148) Maximum baggage 90 lb. (+153) Fuel capacity 170 gal. (2 66-gal. main wing ...
[7]
[PDF] TYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET - EASA
Maximum Ramp Weight. 16280. 17100. Maximum Takeoff Weight. 16220. 17040. Maximum Landing Weight. 14750. 15500. Maximum Zero Fuel Weight. 11750. 11775. 12025*. * ...
[8]
[PDF] Weight & Balance Handbook (FAA-H-8083-1B)
and touchdown. ... A fuel subsystem that allows the fligh crew to dump fuel in an emergency to lower the weight of an aircraft to the maximum landing weight if a ...
[9]
Fuel Dumping: Guidance for Flight Crews | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
Fuel dumping systems must meet several standards. The average rate of fuel jettison must be at least 1 percent of the maximum weight per minute.
[10]
[PDF] AC 20-161 - Aircraft Onboard Weight and Balance Systems
Apr 11, 2008 · (c) Operational Empty Weight Variation – ½ of one percent of the mean aerodynamic chord (MAC) and ½ of one percent of maximum landing weight, as ...
[11]
[PDF] Airplane Flying Handbook (FAA-H-8083-3C) - Chapter 13
Aviation Regulations (CAR) 3. ⦁ 6,000 pounds or less maximum weight and VSO 61 knots or less: the single-engine rate of climb at 5,000.
[12]
[PDF] 777-200LR / -300ER - Boeing
Maximum Design Landing Weight (MLW). Maximum weight for landing as limited by aircraft strength and airworthiness requirements. Maximum Design Zero Fuel Weight ...
[13]
[PDF] 6. economic values related to aircraft performance factors
The combination of maximum payload and maximum fuel weight plus the OEW may exceed the MTOW. In such situations, the operator must balance (reduce) payload, ...
[14]
Takeoff Weight Limits - AOPA
May 12, 2016 · MLW affects MTOW when the flight duration is so short that fuel burn will be less than the difference between MLW and MTOW. Consider a ...
[15]
[PDF] AC 120-27F - Federal Aviation Administration
May 6, 2019 · 15 Maximum Landing Weight. The maximum weight at which the aircraft may normally be landed. A.16 Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW). The maximum ...
[16]
Lear's label - AOPA
Mar 23, 2023 · Lear's label for the zero fuel weight limit is "wing bending" because fuselage weight increases the bending load on the wing.
[17]
How is the Max Zero Fuel Weight used in calculating weight and ...
Apr 9, 2020 · Maximum Zero Fuel Weight is an operating limitation intended to protect the wing spar structure by limiting the concentration of load, ...Why is maximum zero fuel mass used in take off mass calculation?What do we mean by taking the lowest of ZFW; TOW and LW to ...More results from aviation.stackexchange.com
[18]
[PDF] 737 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning - Boeing
737-800 ... Maximum Design Zero Fuel Weight (MZFW). Maximum weight allowed before usable fuel and other specified usable agents must be loaded in defined ...
[19]
American Airlines Embraer ERJ-175LR - oneworld virtual
Specifications ; MLW, 34,100 kg (75,178 lbs) ; MTOW, 40,370 kg (89,001 lbs) ; ZFW, 32,000 kg (70,548 lbs) ; Fuel Capacity, 9,335 kg (20,580 lbs) ; Service Ceiling ...
[20]
14 CFR § 25.723 - Shock absorption tests. - Law.Cornell.Edu
(b) The landing gear may not fail in a test, demonstrating its reserve energy absorption capacity, simulating a descent velocity of 12 f.p.s. at design landing ...
[21]
[PDF] Compression Res ponse of a Sandwich Fuselage Keel Panel With ...
As the compression loads are reduced towards the lightly loaded aft end of the keel quadrant section, the structure transitions to a sandwich construction with ...
[22]
Wing Loads and Structural Layout - AeroToolbox
The maximum wing loads are seen at the wing root where the wing attaches to the fuselage. The two primary contributors to the total stress are the vertical ...Missing: keel | Show results with:keel
[23]
[PDF] Landing Gear Integration in Aircraft Conceptual Design
S is shock absorber stroke, which is the value we are trying to find. Given that the kinetic energy capacity of the shock absorber and tire must be equal to ...Missing: MLW | Show results with:MLW
[24]
[PDF] Advisory Circular 91-79B - Federal Aviation Administration
Aug 28, 2023 · This advisory circular provides ways for pilots and operators to manage landing risks and develop procedures to mitigate runway excursions.
[25]
[PDF] FAA Aircraft Braking Performance Technical Working Group
Disparities in the current model used to predict the maximum friction that aircraft wheel brakes can achieve on a given runway as defined by the type and depth ...
[26]
[PDF] Getting to Grips with Aircraft Performance - SKYbrary
Jan 15, 2002 · The following Table (C4) summarizes the different requirements and aircraft ... • TLO : TakeOff and Landing computation (MTOW, MLW, speeds). • OFP ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[27]
[PDF] AC 25-21 - Advisory Circular - Federal Aviation Administration
Sep 1, 1999 · (c) The method of analysis of airplane and landing gear loads must take into account at least the following elements: (1) Landing gear dynamic ...
[28]
[PDF] AC 25.307-1 - Proof of Structure - Federal Aviation Administration
Oct 7, 2014 · Section 25 .307 requires structural testing to demonstrate compliance with the strength and deformation requirements of subpart C, unless ...
[29]
[PDF] AC 23-19A - Federal Aviation Administration
Apr 30, 2007 · If an airplane was initially certified with maximum landing weight equal to maximum weight, and if an increase in the maximum weight is applied ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[30]
[PDF] FAA Order 8110.4C Chg 7 - Type Certification
Oct 20, 2023 · (a) All new airplane models over 75,000 pounds maximum gross weight and ... Model Takeoff Weight Aircraft Engine. (j) NOTE 10. As part of the ...
[31]
Supplemental Type Certificates - Federal Aviation Administration
Jul 7, 2023 · A supplemental type certificate (STC) is a type certificate (TC) issued when an applicant has received FAA approval to modify an aeronautical product from its ...Installation on the Airplane... · Small Airplanes Guidance · Application to Issuance
[32]
Onboard Performance Tool (OPT) - Boeing Global Services
With Boeing's Onboard Performance Tool, your flight crew and ground personnel can perform real-time weight and balance and takeoff and landing calculations.
[33]
Jeppesen OpsData
It utilizes the world's most comprehensive airport, runway and obstacle databases to calculate takeoff and landing performance data for more than 200 different ...Airport, Runway And Aircraft... · Features And Benefits · Jeppesen Airport Data<|control11|><|separator|>
[34]
Section 4. Fuel Dumping
If an aircraft is dumping fuel in IFR conditions, assign an altitude at least 2,000 feet above the highest obstacle within 5 miles of the route or pattern ...
[35]
14 CFR 25.473 -- Landing load conditions and assumptions. - eCFR
(2) With a limit descent velocity of 10 fps at the design landing weight (the maximum weight for landing conditions at maximum descent velocity); and.
[36]
[PDF] FAA Order 2150.3C with Changes 1-12
Sep 9, 2024 · Who this change affects. The change affects all agency personnel who investigate, report, or process FAA enforcement actions.
[37]
[PDF] AC 21-4B - Special Flight Permits for Operation of Overweight Aircraft
should be helpful to the applicant. a. Application for a special flight permit is made on FAA Form 8130-6. "Application for Airworthiness Certificate." (A ...
[38]
Easy Access Rules for Large Aeroplanes (CS-25) - EASA
Jan 30, 2023 · (b) The landing gear may not fail in a test, demonstrating its reserve energy absorption capacity, simulating a descent velocity of 3.7 m/s (12 ...
[39]
Noise | EASA - European Union
Exposure to aircraft noise impacts the health and wellbeing of millions of people in Europe, with those living in residential communities in the vicinity of ...Missing: MLW | Show results with:MLW
[40]
Harmonization of Airworthiness Standards for Transport Category ...
Jan 5, 2011 · The FAA agrees with the ARAC recommendation to harmonize airworthiness standards for landing gear ... EASA CS-25. Under Amendment 25-108 ...Missing: bilateral FAR- MLW