Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Men Only

Men Only is a British men's magazine launched in 1935 by C. Arthur Pearson Limited as a pocket-sized publication aimed exclusively at male readers, eschewing content for women. It initially featured articles on topics of interest to men, such as sports and adventure, but evolved in the 1950s into a standard-sized pin-up magazine displaying photographs of models in revealing attire. In 1971, publisher Paul Raymond acquired the title and relaunched it as a softcore pornographic magazine, incorporating elements from his Escort publication and establishing it as the flagship of Paul Raymond Publications. Under Raymond's direction, Men Only capitalized on the liberalization of obscenity laws, featuring explicit , interviews with film performers, and articles on male sexuality, which helped build Raymond's empire and contributed to his brief status as the Kingdom's wealthiest individual in the through combined and property ventures. The magazine's transformation reflected broader shifts in cultural attitudes toward , positioning it as a key player in the "top-shelf" segment of periodical . Despite criticisms over its of women—a common charge against the genre—Men Only maintained a focus on consensual content and high-production photography, sustaining publication into the amid declining print sales due to digital alternatives.

Publication History

Origins and Pearson Era (1935–1965)

Men Only was established in December by C. Arthur Pearson Ltd. as a monthly pocket-sized aimed exclusively at male readers, measuring 115 by 165 mm with a yapped cover slightly larger than the interior pages. Priced at one per issue, it featured a blend of bright articles on contemporary male interests, , humor, and from its , color illustrations of artistic presented in a risqué yet tasteful manner. The publication's editorial stance emphasized avoiding female readership while steering clear of content that might offend women, positioning it as an unapologetically male-oriented periodical distinct from general-interest . Early issues included contributions from authors such as , who wrote on topics like "Motorists in the Air" starting in November 1936 and continuing through wartime subjects until April 1941. Cover designs evolved modestly, shifting from plain text and logos in 1935 to incorporating small black-and-white sketches of men in 1936 and larger cartoons by 1937. During , the magazine adapted to paper rationing, with shortages noted as early as May 1941, prompting a price increase to one and threepence from January 1941 onward. Content during this period maintained a mix of witty, adult-oriented articles alongside mild pin-up illustrations, influenced by American styles such as those from . In the , under continued Pearson oversight—despite the company's acquisition by Newnes—the magazine underwent significant shifts toward a pin-up emphasis. A May 1954 merger with Opinion introduced more illustrated models and racy covers, coinciding with a relaunch featuring color plates. The November 1956 issue marked the publication's 21st anniversary with a 16-page photo supplement. By 1960, it absorbed Lilliput, retaining its pocket format until July 1963, when it adopted a larger size and reduced frequency to bimonthly amid broader industry consolidations, including Newnes' merger into the International Publishing Corporation. These changes reflected declining general-interest appeal amid competition, steering Men Only further into visual glamour content while still under Pearson-linked publishing structures until its sale to City Magazines Ltd. around 1965.

City Magazines Period (1965–1971)

In 1965, Men Only was acquired by City Magazines Ltd., a Fleet Street-based publisher founded by Leonard Matthews, a former director at Magazines known as the "Napoleon of the " for his in comic publishing. This followed the magazine's earlier tenure under from 1959 to 1965, during which it had already begun emphasizing pin-up content. Under City Magazines, Men Only underwent a format change to a larger size, aligning it with contemporary pin-up publications and enhancing its visual presentation for readers. The magazine's content during this era focused primarily on photographic pin-ups, featuring black-and-white interiors supplemented by a color center spread of a model in provocative poses, reflecting the publisher's expertise in similar titles like , , and . City Magazines, established in the mid-1950s, specialized in weekly comics and men's magazines, and integrated Men Only into this lineup without major editorial overhauls, maintaining its monthly schedule and appeal to a audience interested in amid evolving attitudes toward visual . Issues from this period, such as those in the late 1960s, typically included model features with minimal text, prioritizing imagery over narrative articles seen in earlier decades. This phase represented a stabilization for Men Only as a mid-tier pin-up title, benefiting from City Magazines' distribution networks but facing competitive pressures from emerging adult content amid liberalizing obscenity standards, including the Obscene Publications Act amendments. In 1971, amid financial challenges for City Magazines in the early 1970s, the title was sold to , ending this ownership era.

Paul Raymond Publications Era (1971–present)

In 1971, Paul Raymond acquired Men Only from City Magazines and relaunched it under as the cornerstone of his expanding portfolio of explicit magazines. The June 1971 issue marked the transition, incorporating content from the short-lived title and shifting the format toward with nude pictorials drawn from Raymond's strip clubs. This relaunch capitalized on post-1960s liberalization in British publishing, positioning Men Only as a "top-shelf" staple amid growing demand for erotic material. Under Raymond's oversight, the magazine emphasized high-production photographic spreads featuring models such as , his longtime associate, whose appearances helped drive sales through provocative covers and interior layouts. Raymond integrated his nightclub ecosystem into the content pipeline, using Men Only to promote performers and test boundaries of laws, including instances where issues faced scrutiny for explicitness. The title's success fueled Raymond's empire-building, leading to acquisitions and launches like in 1972, though Men Only retained its monthly rhythm and focus on without venturing into territory. Following Raymond's death in 2008, sustained Men Only as part of its lineup of softcore titles, adapting to market shifts with digital distribution while preserving the print edition's core format of erotic pictorials and minimal text features. As of 2025, the magazine continues publication, with recent issues such as Volume 88 available via platforms like Zinio, reflecting enduring niche appeal despite competition from online media.

Content and Format

Evolution of Style and Layout

In its inaugural phase under C. Arthur Pearson Ltd. from December 1935, Men Only adopted a compact pocket-sized format measuring approximately 115 mm by 165 mm, bound with staples, which facilitated portability and aligned with the era's constraints on wartime and paper supplies. Early covers featured subdued designs with the magazine's logo and textual elements on plain colored backgrounds, evolving by to incorporate small black-and-white sketches and, from 1937, full-page cartoons, such as the July 1937 issue depicting humorous male-centric vignettes. Interior layout emphasized textual articles on topics like sports and humor alongside color reproductions of artistic nude paintings, presented in a restrained manner to evade stricter standards of the time. By the 1950s, amid shifting cultural norms and mergers—including the absorption of London Opinion in —the magazine transitioned to a standard-sized pin-up orientation, introducing racier photographic covers and interior color plates of models in suggestive poses, though still moderated to comply with contemporary . This era saw layouts expand to accommodate more visual content, with black-and-white text-heavy pages interspersed by centered pin-up spreads, reflecting a gradual pivot from illustrative cartoons to photographic realism on covers. Paper shortages during had previously reduced page counts, but post-1945 recovery enabled fuller spreads, culminating in the 1960 merger with Lilliput, which sustained the pocket format until a larger standard size was advertised in the July 1963 issue. Under City Magazines Ltd. from 1965 to 1971, the publication reverted to monthly issuance with an enlarged format, prioritizing ; interiors shifted predominantly to black-and-white layouts accented by color features, enhancing visual dominance over . Covers adopted bolder photographic imagery of models, as seen in 1965 examples, signaling a commercial emphasis on glamour amid rising competition from international titles. The acquisition by in 1971 marked a decisive stylistic overhaul, repositioning Men Only as a top-shelf explicit through integration with and escalation to soft-core content, achieving monthly sales of 400,000 copies by 1972. Layouts evolved to feature expansive full-color pictorials of nude models, minimal textual barriers, and thematic spreads, with covers standardizing provocative photographs of performers—contrasting earlier cartoonish restraint—and enabling stacked layouts for serialized features. Subsequent decades refined this to glossy, high-production values with digital-era adjustments for thematic issues, though core explicit pictorial focus persisted into the 2000s.

Recurring Features and Themes

The core recurring feature of Men Only has been its pictorial content centered on female and pin-ups, evolving from artistic color paintings in its inaugural December 1935 to photographic spreads by the . Early issues emphasized "" nudes to align with pre-war British sensibilities, while post- editions incorporated model covers, such as the January 1957 featuring , and 16-page photo supplements highlighting celebrities like and in November 1956. By 1965, color pin-up centerfolds became standard, a format intensified under from 1971 onward with more explicit . ![Men Only magazine cover Volume 57 No 9][center] Articles on topics appealing to male readers have supplemented the visuals, including profiles of figures like film director and his partners , , and in the July 1963 issue. These pieces often tied into themes of celebrity romance and lifestyle, reflecting the magazine's initial positioning as a "respectable" men's interest title before its shift to top-shelf status. Humor elements, such as full-cover cartoons from 1937 to 1958, provided satirical commentary on gender dynamics and male fantasies, with selections later reprinted in related publications. Dedicated sections like "Let’s Join the Ladies," introduced after the relaunch, featured illustrated models in the style of artists such as Vargas or Dickens characters, blending whimsy with . Reader interaction via comments pages dates to early issues, allowing feedback on content direction and model preferences, which influenced editorial choices amid evolving standards. Overarching themes privilege visual —depicting women as objects of desire—while incorporating light-hearted or aspirational male-oriented narratives, a formula sustained across eras despite regulatory pressures.

Publishing and Business Aspects

Key Publishers and Ownership Changes

Men Only was launched in November 1935 by C. Arthur Pearson Ltd., a publishing house known for periodicals targeting male readers with a mix of humor, fiction, and illustrations. The magazine remained under Pearson's control until 1965, during which time it maintained a relatively tame pocket-sized format focused on general interest content rather than explicit material. In 1965, ownership transferred to City Magazines Ltd., a Fleet Street publisher managed by Leonard Matthews, formerly of Amalgamated Press. Under City Magazines, Men Only continued publication but faced declining sales amid shifting market dynamics, leading to its sale in 1971 to Paul Raymond, a Soho-based entrepreneur with interests in strip clubs and emerging adult entertainment. Paul Raymond relaunched the title through his newly formed , transforming it into a flagship softcore that incorporated elements from his acquisition of and emphasized pictorial content. Following Raymond's death on March 2, 2008, the company continued operations under family oversight until September 2012, when the portfolio—including Men Only, , and —was acquired by publisher , who integrated it into his broader media holdings.

Circulation, Sales, and Market Dynamics

Under Paul Raymond's ownership starting in 1971, Men Only contributed to the publisher's dominance in the UK top-shelf magazine market, where Paul Raymond Publications generated revenues of approximately £20 million and pre-tax profits of £19 million in 1999. The title's relaunch aligned with a broader expansion in softcore adult periodicals, competing with imports like Playboy and domestic rivals such as Penthouse and Mayfair, amid loosening obscenity laws and rising demand for explicit content. By the mid-2000s, reported group sales of £16.7 million in 2005, with £8 million in profits, reflecting a portfolio including Men Only that still benefited from established print distribution networks despite emerging digital threats. However, sales began eroding as free proliferated; the company cited internet competition for an 8% revenue drop by 2009, pushing it into losses after prior profitability. Market dynamics shifted decisively against print adult titles in the , with Men Only's circulation plummeting due to accessible alternatives, as noted in changes aimed at countering "too tame" relative to online options. The broader magazine sector mirrored this, with consumer print circulations falling 12.4% year-over-year in 2023, driven by and reduced newsstand viability. Top-shelf publishers like Paul Raymond adapted by maintaining niche print runs for collectors while exploring editions via platforms like Zinio, though specific audited figures for Men Only remain limited post-2010, indicating sustained but diminished market presence amid industry contraction.

Reception and Cultural Impact

Commercial Success and Industry Influence

Under Paul Raymond's acquisition and relaunch in 1971, Men Only rapidly expanded its readership, with Raymond claiming a circulation of 500,000 copies within a few years, establishing it as a leading title in the UK's emerging softcore magazine market. As the flagship publication of (PRP), it drove substantial revenue alongside sister titles like Mayfair and Club International, contributing to PRP's 2003 turnover of £22.2 million and profits of £12.9 million from magazine sales. By 2005, PRP's overall sales reached £16.7 million with an £8 million profit, underscoring Men Only's role in sustaining a multimillion-pound operation amid peak demand for print adult content. The magazine's success reflected broader post-1960s liberalization, where it capitalized on relaxed laws to blend with serialized fiction, achieving consistent top-shelf dominance until digital alternatives eroded print sales. By the mid-2000s, circulations for Men Only and similar PRP titles had fallen to about one-tenth of their 1970s-1980s peaks, prompting PRP to report losses by as online pornography competed directly with physical distribution. In terms of industry influence, Men Only under pioneered the integration of live promotion with print , cross-pollinating content from his Revuebar clubs to magazine features and thereby modeling a vertically integrated adult entertainment business that competitors like Desmond's later emulated in the 1980s and 1990s. This approach not only standardized softcore formats—emphasizing high-volume, accessible erotic imagery—but also pressured regulators through high-profile challenges, indirectly shaping legal tolerances for explicit content in publishing. Raymond's empire, valued at over £650 million by 2008, demonstrated the viability of niche adult magazines as profit engines, influencing the sector's shift toward bundled offerings before internet disruption fragmented the market.

Public and Critical Responses

Public reception to Men Only under Paul 's ownership was largely positive among its primary male readership, as evidenced by its status as Britain's best-selling men's magazine in the , with circulation figures reflecting strong demand for its blend of and editorial content. The publication's placement on "top shelf" newsagent racks underscored its appeal as accessible adult entertainment, contributing to a broader cultural shift away from post-war prudery toward more open attitudes on sexuality. Supporters, including some obituaries of Raymond, credited the magazine with helping mainstream erotic content and reducing associated for consumers. Critical responses, particularly from moral conservatives, condemned the magazine's explicit imagery as morally corrosive. Campaigners such as and the censorship lobby associated with Lord Longford targeted publications like Men Only for promoting indecency, viewing them as emblematic of declining standards in British media during the 1970s and 1980s. The magazine's editorial stance, often openly hostile to the , drew further ire from feminist critics who argued it exploited sexual liberalization for profit while objectifying women and reinforcing male-centric fantasies. Historian Jean Seton noted that while elevated sex as a legitimate aspect of life, Raymond's titles commercialized it in ways that catered primarily to male gratification, potentially undermining egalitarian goals. Academic analyses of men's magazines, including those akin to Men Only, have highlighted concerns over perpetuation of stereotypes, with content analyzed as prioritizing visual over substantive on or relationships. However, such critiques often emanate from and fields, where systemic biases toward progressive interpretations may influence framing, as evidenced by the predominance of adversarial readings in 30 years of related scholarship. Defenders countered that the magazine provided harmless and a platform for male interests amid evolving social norms, without empirical links to broader harms like .

Legal and Social Controversies

Obscenity Trials and Regulatory Challenges

In the United Kingdom, Men Only operated under the constraints of the Obscene Publications Acts of 1857 and 1959, which criminalized materials tending to deprave and corrupt persons likely to read, see, or hear them, with the 1959 amendment introducing a public good defense based on artistic, literary, or scientific merit. Prosecutions hinged on proving both obscenity and potential harm, often requiring jury trials where publishers could argue the material's value to willing adult audiences. These laws posed recurrent risks to explicit magazines, prompting publishers to balance commercial explicitness with legal safeguards, such as pre-publication reviews to avoid depictions crossing into hardcore territory prosecutable as lacking any merit. A prominent regulatory challenge arose in early 1974, when Paul Raymond Publications defended an edition of Men Only in the High Court after magistrates sought its forfeiture on obscenity grounds. The October issue, printed by Sun Printers of Watford, triggered proceedings under the Act, with a jury tasked to evaluate its content—including nude photography and erotic fiction—for indecency. Raymond, founder of the publishing house, appeared in court alongside associate Fiona Richmond as the publication faced scrutiny over whether it met the deprave-and-corrupt threshold. Such cases exemplified broader efforts by authorities to curb top-shelf erotica amid post-1960s liberalization, though empirical outcomes favored defendants when evidence of societal harm was absent. The 1974 challenge did not result in forfeiture or cessation, aligning with patterns where juries acquitted similar softcore titles, as the strict harm test rarely held against consensual adult consumption. Ongoing regulatory pressures included police raids on distributors and voluntary industry codes restricting sales to adults and opaque shop displays, enforced variably by local councils under indecency bylaws. Raymond's firm invested in compliance measures, averting systemic shutdowns despite conservative campaigns for tighter controls, as seen in parliamentary debates questioning why such "Men Only" fare escaped widespread bans. These dynamics underscored causal tensions: explicit content drove sales without proven causal links to moral decay, per judicial precedents prioritizing evidence over moral panic. By the late , the report on recommended against broadening prohibitions on adult-oriented print media, citing insufficient data on harm and risks to free expression, which indirectly bolstered Men Only's operations. Persistent challenges persisted into the via customs seizures of imports and sporadic local actions, but no landmark convictions dismantled the title, reflecting the Act's high evidentiary bar and publishers' adaptations like emphasizing pictorial rather than textual .

Broader Societal Debates

The publication of magazines like Men Only, which featured explicit imagery of women from the 1970s onward under Paul Raymond's ownership, has fueled ongoing discussions about 's role in reinforcing gender hierarchies and male entitlement. Radical feminists such as and Catharine MacKinnon argued that such content eroticizes dominance and subordination, potentially normalizing attitudes that contribute to women's subjugation, with MacKinnon contending that traffics in women's by design. These critiques extended to soft-core titles, positing that visual depictions in Men Only—often frontal paired with suggestive narratives—condition male viewers to view women primarily as sexual objects, echoing broader anti- feminist claims of institutionalizing woman-hating. Counterarguments from sex-positive feminists and free-speech advocates emphasize individual agency and the lack of conclusive causal evidence linking consumption of such magazines to real-world harm against women. Empirical reviews, including a 2021 UK government analysis of over 40 studies, found associations between pornography exposure and attitudes accepting of sexual violence or non-consensual acts, but stressed these as correlational rather than causal, with methodological limitations like self-reported data and failure to control for pre-existing traits undermining claims of direct harm. Longitudinal research similarly indicates mixed outcomes: while some men reported heightened body dissatisfaction after viewing idealized images in men's magazines, others experienced no shift in interpersonal aggression, suggesting effects vary by individual psychology rather than content alone. These debates intersect with concerns over magazines' influence on masculine , where titles like Men Only historically promoted a heterosexuality centered on visual fantasy, potentially crowding out relational intimacy but also serving as a private outlet amid cultural shifts toward sexual liberation. Public responses in the era, including letters to the UK's Williams Committee on Obscenity, defended such publications as harmless recreation for "ordinary" men, framing criticisms as disconnected from consumer realities. Critics, however, highlight persistent patterns: content analyses of similar periodicals reveal recurring themes of female passivity and male conquest, which thematic reviews link to subtle normalization of sexist norms, though without robust evidence of societal-level violence escalation attributable to print media alone. Ongoing contention reflects a divide between harm-reduction perspectives, which prioritize empirical caution over ideological bans, and precautionary ones wary of cumulative cultural desensitization.

References

  1. [1]
    Men's Magazines History | Magforum.com - Magforum
    Apr 10, 2024 · In 1935, AC Pearson launched the pocket men's magazine, Men Only (bound, 115x165mm). Its editorial strategy was clearly stated: 'We don't want ...
  2. [2]
    Paul Raymond: Self-styled 'King of Soho' who built a successful
    Mar 5, 2008 · Raymond's biggest coup came in 1971 when he acquired the magazine Men Only. He was now dating the glamour model Fiona Richmond, and promptly ...
  3. [3]
    Men Only - media.info
    Feb 7, 2019 · Men Only is a British soft-core pornographic magazine published by Paul Raymond Publications since 1971. However, the title goes back to ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  4. [4]
    Men's Magazines | Magforum | Mayfair, Men in Vogue, Men Only ...
    Aug 27, 2024 · In 1971, Matthews sold Men Only to Paul Raymond, who ran night-clubs in London's Soho district. He relaunched Men Only (incorporating Escort) as ...
  5. [5]
    MEN ONLY - featuring the writings of W E Johns - creator of Biggles
    ### Summary of Men Only Magazine (1930s-1940s)
  6. [6]
    Men Only-City Magazines - BrazenBooks
    Men Only – City Magazines 1964 – 1971. In 1964, Men Only was sold to City Magazines and adopted a larger format size (A4). City Magazines was already ...Missing: period | Show results with:period
  7. [7]
    Men Only Magazine Back Issues Volume Archive - Wonderclub
    In 1971, Paul Raymond, who ran nightclubs in London's Soho district, acquired Men Only and relaunched it as the start of a top-shelf publishing empire, ...
  8. [8]
    Recent issues of Men Only - Zinio
    Recent issues of Men Only include Volume 88 Number 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 and Volume 87 Number 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.
  9. [9]
    Issue Volume 88 Number 5 - Men Only - Zinio
    With 85 years of history behind it, Men Only represents the ultimate top shelf institution. Crammed full of sexy women, beautifully photographed and eager ...
  10. [10]
    Paul Raymond Publications - AVN
    On October 6th 2012, Paul Chaplin bought Paul Raymond Publications for an undisclosed sum, and reunited it with Loaded and Superbike magazines under the newly ...Missing: Chapin | Show results with:Chapin
  11. [11]
    Top shelf gathers dust | Business - The Guardian
    May 13, 2001 · Paul Raymond Publications' dominance of the market earned it £19m in pre-tax profits from revenues of £2m in 1999, the last year for which ...
  12. [12]
    Paul Raymond heirs to clean up in Soho - The Times
    Mar 9, 2008 · But the launch of Men Only in 1971 was ... Accounts show that in 2005, Paul Raymond Publications turned a profit of £8m on sales of £16.7m.
  13. [13]
    Paul Raymond Publications blames net porn competition as it posts ...
    May 26, 2009 · Pay Raymond Publications, which publishes Men Only and Mayfair, blames online competition for sales decline.
  14. [14]
    Porn editor sacked for choosing too tame photos - Evening Standard
    Apr 12, 2012 · By the time he became editor of Men Only in 2004, its circulation was plummeting because of free porn on the internet, more hardcore porn ...Missing: decline | Show results with:decline
  15. [15]
    Magazine ABCs 2023: Full breakdown shows 12.4% fall in sales
    Feb 21, 2024 · The circulation of UK consumer magazines continued to decline in 2023, falling 12.4% when compared with the same ABC data for 2022.
  16. [16]
    Paul Raymond - The Telegraph
    Mar 3, 2008 · ... Men Only. Filled with photographs of his revue-artistes, it was relaunched, and within a few years Raymond was claiming a circulation of 500,000 ...
  17. [17]
    The Porn King of Soho: The Life and Legacy of Paul Raymond
    Jul 28, 2024 · In 1972, he acquired Club International, further solidifying his position in the adult magazine market. In 1979, Raymond expanded into the ...
  18. [18]
    Porn king Raymond builds his fortune - This is Money
    Nov 1, 2003 · Raymond's magazines, which include titles such as Mayfair and Men Only, made profits of £12.9 million on a turnover of £22.2 million - a ...
  19. [19]
    Members Only: The Life and Times of Paul Raymond by Paul Willetts
    Sep 4, 2010 · By appealing to the lowest common denominator, Raymond built up an empire worth £650m, ranging from magazines such as Men Only to a property ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  20. [20]
    Review Article Sexuality in the Postwar West* - Dagmar Herzog - jstor
    When Paul Raymond took over Men Only, it became the best- selling men's magazine in Britain. Relentlessly hostile to the women's movement. (the first Women's ...Missing: controversy | Show results with:controversy<|separator|>
  21. [21]
    Paul Raymond, 82, Dies; Built an Erotic Empire - The New York Times
    Mar 8, 2008 · Mr. Raymond became one of Britain's richest men, overseeing an empire of striptease clubs, salacious magazines and real estate holdings.
  22. [22]
    Striptease entrepreneur Paul Raymond dies aged 82 - The Guardian
    Mar 3, 2008 · ... public outrage and private profit which was to make Raymond rich. ... An admirer of Mrs Thatcher who sent 30,000 copies of Men Only to the ...Missing: controversy | Show results with:controversy
  23. [23]
    Members Only by Paul Raymond - The Times
    Aug 29, 2010 · Raymond also had to contend with the Lord Longford/Mary Whitehouse censorship lobby, as well as the Soho Society, which wanted to stop old- ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  24. [24]
    Men and masculinity in men's magazines: A review - Compass Hub
    Jun 11, 2018 · This review article provides a thematic synthesis and overview of 30 years of research into the study of men and masculinity in men's magazines.
  25. [25]
    Dirty magazines, clean consciences: Men and pornography in the ...
    Jan 17, 2024 · ... Men Only, his favourites, did not cleave couples apart, as. some ... and Feminist Critiques', Contemporary British History, 36:2 (2022) ...
  26. [26]
    OBSCENITY AND THE LAW (Hansard, 24 March 1976)
    Mar 24, 1976 · Why is it that much of the pornography that we can buy is in a magazine called "Men Only"? Why are not the women protesting? Why are not ...
  27. [27]
    Liverpool Daily Post (Merseyside ed.) from Liverpool, Merseyside ...
    ... Men Only, Sun Printers of Watford. Paul Raymond Publications were called on to show cause why the October edition should not be forfeited because of obscenity.
  28. [28]
    Paul Raymond seen with Fiona Richmond in London after an edition ...
    $$375.00Aug 11, 2017 · Paul Raymond seen with Fiona Richmond in London after an edition of his 'Men Only' magazine was read by a High Court jury to decide whether or not it was ...<|separator|>
  29. [29]
    Indecent Displays (Control) Bill - Hansard - UK Parliament
    Jan 26, 1979 · It cannot be argued that Men Only is any more than a graduation from certain national newspapers, the pages of which contain photographs which a ...
  30. [30]
    Dirty magazines, clean consciences in: Men and masculinities in ...
    Jan 16, 2024 · ... magazines – Penthouse, Men Only, Mayfair – which usually combined strongly worded text with images of frontal nudity, and occasional ...
  31. [31]
    For men only: the rise and fall of the porn magazine | SBS What's On
    Apr 13, 2017 · In 1964, he launched King, but it failed, ceasing publication after two issues. In 1971, however, he took over the adult title Men Only, and ...Missing: British | Show results with:British
  32. [32]
    Evidence and Harm | Debating Pornography - Oxford Academic
    This chapter examines the evidence for the central contention of anti-pornography feminism, namely, that pornography causes harm to women.
  33. [33]
    [PDF] male heterosexuality in magazines for men
    Soft core pornographic magazines have featured as part of a more general discussion about pornography and its representation of women, though it must be said ...
  34. [34]
    So what do you use pornography for?: In the heated debate about
    Oct 28, 1992 · Pornography is like the equivalent disorder for men.' Everyone agreed that pornography objectifies women (or whoever is in it), and that it ...
  35. [35]
    The relationship between pornography use and harmful sexual ...
    Jan 15, 2021 · There is evidence that use of pornography is associated with greater likelihood of desiring or engaging in sexual acts witnessed in porn, and a ...Executive summary · The pornography landscape... · Assessing the relationship...
  36. [36]
    Steamy Magazines Make Men Feel as Bad As Women | Live Science
    Nov 7, 2008 · Guys who check out the sexy female models in so-called lad magazines such as Maxim have more body-image problems than their pals, a new study finds.
  37. [37]
    Problematic Pornography Use and Physical and Sexual Intimate ...
    Together, these studies provided evidence that watching pornography is associated with increased aggressive behavior. Cognitive scripts theory broadly ...
  38. [38]
    How Magazines Created a New Culture of Manhood - JSTOR Daily
    Apr 5, 2017 · Middle-class American manhood changed in the mid-twentieth century. And the new ideal of masculine consumption was captured by men's magazines.
  39. [39]
    Men's Magazines Are Normalizing Sexist Bigotry, Study Finds
    Oct 14, 2016 · Viewed collectively, these three studies suggest that not only are some publications printing highly prejudiced and derogatory content, but that ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Pornography and Harm to Women: 'No Empirical Evidence?'
    In this Article we employ a different example, pornography, which many people believe is connected to another social ill, female subjugation. Unlike.