Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Mint mark

A mint mark is a small letter, symbol, or inscription stamped on a coin or medal to indicate the specific mint facility where it was produced. These marks have been used since ancient times to assign responsibility for coin quality, particularly in eras when precious metals were involved, and they play a crucial role in numismatics by helping collectors identify a coin's origin, rarity, and potential value. The practice of mint marking originated in , with the earliest known example appearing on a silver didrachm struck in around 269 BC, though coins prior to that often included city names for similar identification purposes. During the , mint marks proliferated as European monarchies operated multiple mints and employed various moneyers, using symbols or letters to ensure accountability and distinguish strikes from different locations—such as France's 1540 , which assigned alphabetical marks like "A" for the Mint. By the , countries like managed dozens of mints, each with unique identifiers, while coins such as the bore marks like "SF" despite being produced at various global facilities including and . In the United States, mint marks were first introduced in 1838 on gold coins produced at branch mints in (C), Dahlonega (D), and New Orleans (O), following the Coinage Act of 1835 that established these facilities; Philadelphia coins initially bore no mark as the primary mint. The "P" mark for debuted in 1942 on Jefferson nickels due to wartime silver content changes and has since appeared on various denominations, while marks were temporarily omitted from 1965 to 1967 under the to combat counterfeiting amid silver shortages, before being restored in 1968. Today, active U.S. mint marks include "P" (), "D" (), "S" (, primarily for proofs), and "W" (West Point, used sparingly on circulating coins like select in 2019); these distinctions are essential for collectors, as low-mintage examples from specific mints often command premiums based on scarcity and historical context.

Definition and Purpose

Definition

A mint mark is a small , , or design stamped on a coin or indicating the specific mint facility where it was produced. These marks serve as official identifiers applied during the minting process to denote the originating production site, distinguishing them from other features on numismatic items. Common formats of mint marks include , such as "D" for the in the United States, which has been used since to identify coins struck there. Symbols have also been used, particularly in historical contexts, such as stars, crescents, or branches on ancient coinage to signify specific workshops or facilities within larger mint operations. Mint marks differ from die varieties, which arise from unintentional modifications or differences in the die during preparation, such as doubled , and from countermarks, which are supplementary stamps applied post-minting by secondary authorities for purposes like or . Unlike these, mint marks are deliberate and standardized indicators of the production location. They can appear in various styles, including incuse marks that are indented or recessed into the coin's surface for a contrasting effect, versus raised marks that protrude in , as determined by the mint's striking .

Functions

Mint marks serve primarily as a mechanism for quality control and accountability in coin production. By identifying the specific mint facility responsible for striking a coin, these marks enable authorities to trace production issues, such as deviations in weight, composition, or finish, back to their source. For instance, during eras when coins contained precious metals, commissions evaluated samples from each mint to ensure adherence to standards, holding the facility accountable for any substandard output. This system promotes consistency across multiple production sites and facilitates corrective measures if defects arise. In terms of distribution and legal purposes, mint marks assist governments in monitoring coin output to inform , combat counterfeiting, and comply with regulations. They allow central banks and treasuries to track the volume and flow of from individual mints into circulation, supporting decisions on monetary supply. Additionally, by denoting official production origins, mint marks enhance anti-counterfeiting efforts, as authentic marks verify legitimacy and reveal fakes that mismatch historical styles or placements specific to each facility. This traceability also aids in regulatory oversight for cross-border exchanges, ensuring meet jurisdictional standards. Mint marks fulfill an informational role by informing users about a coin's origin, which can highlight regional variations in metal content or design standards, particularly in historical contexts where mints operated under differing local conditions. This knowledge supports practical use in and , as origin details can influence perceived or acceptability in specific markets. In modern coinage, mint marks have evolved to denote editions or commemorative series, helping manage collector demand and distinguish special releases from standard circulation coins. For example, the "W" mint mark on select U.S. indicated West Point production for a limited run, boosting without altering circulating output.

Historical Development

Origins in Ancient Coinage

The origins of mint marks trace back to ancient coinage systems, where symbols and inscriptions emerged to identify issuing authorities, ensure , and facilitate trade across decentralized economies. While 5th century BCE Greek city-states incorporated distinctive emblems on their silver coins—such as the owl on Athenian tetradrachms or the sea turtle on Aeginan didrachms—to denote the civic origin and affirm legitimacy among over 1,000 independent poleis, these were primarily civic identifiers rather than facility-specific mint marks. The formalized practice of mint marks, as small symbols or letters indicating the production facility, began with the around 269 BC on a silver didrachm struck in . The refined this tradition starting in the 3rd century BCE, evolving from simple symbols to more explicit identifiers tied to officials and workshops. Early Republican bronze aes grave and later silver denarii occasionally bore control marks like monograms or motifs to indicate the tresviri monetales—the s overseeing coin production—and specific workshops within or provincial facilities. By the mid-2nd century BCE, these marks became more formalized, incorporating abbreviated names, initials, or symbols such as anchors or caducei to denote the responsible , as seen on issues from the 150s BCE onward; this system helped track accountability amid expanding imperial mints in regions like and . Under the , from the 1st century CE, provincial mints extended this practice, using Greek letters or Latin abbreviations to specify locations like or , ensuring traceability in a vast currency network. In parallel, the (206 BCE–220 ) introduced standardized inscriptions on cash coins, marking the rise of imperial mint control in East Asia. The iconic Wu Zhu (five zhu) design, initiated around 118 BCE under Emperor Wu, featured raised characters on the obverse denoting the coin's weight and value, produced at state-run mints in and other imperial centers to unify the economy post-Qin fragmentation. While not typically location-specific like later Roman or European mint marks, these uniform inscriptions—struck in massive quantities estimated in the tens of billions over centuries—signified centralized Han authority, distinguishing official issues from forgeries and supporting taxation and trade along the . Rare variants included additional characters for eras or workshops, foreshadowing later mint-specific notations. Elsewhere, ancient Indian from around 600 BCE featured symbols punched by authorities or guilds to indicate weight and authenticity, serving a similar identificatory role in trade networks across the subcontinent. In early medieval and the following the collapse around 500 , coinage adapted these practices to fragmented polities, using symbols and letters to assert local or caliphal sovereignty through the . Merovingian and Carolingian rulers revived minting at feudal workshops, employing crosses, lions, or initial letters (e.g., PAR for ) on silver deniers to identify regional authorities like those in or , aiding in the decentralization of post-Roman economies. Concurrently, Islamic caliphates under the Umayyads (661–750 ) transitioned from imitative Byzantine and Sasanian designs to reformed dirhams and dinars bearing inscriptions with mint names (e.g., DIM for ) and dates, starting around 696 at facilities across , , and ; these marks, often in script, propagated caliphal unity while accommodating provincial variations. By the Abbasid era (750–1258 ), such notations standardized across an empire spanning from to Persia, with symbols like stars or annulets supplementing textual identifiers for in gold and silver issues.

Evolution in the Modern Era

The expansion of colonial empires in the 16th to 18th centuries prompted the establishment of overseas mints, where mint marks served to authenticate local production and distinguish coins from metropolitan issues. led this development, opening the mint in present-day in 1574 to process vast silver deposits from the mountain, marking coins with the letter "P" alongside assayer initials to identify origin and ensure quality control amid widespread counterfeiting concerns. These marks facilitated trade across the and global markets, as Potosí output dominated world silver supply, with similar systems in (mark "Mo") and (mark "L (I)") standardizing identification for multiple facilities. In , emerging national mint networks adopted letter-based standardization; for instance, France's 1540 monetary reform assigned alphabetical marks to over 20 provincial mints, such as "A" for and "AM" for , under royal oversight to regulate debasement and circulation. The 19th century's accelerated minting capacity and prompted formalized branch systems, with mint marks evolving into essential tools for accountability in expanding national economies. , the created the as the sole facility, but rapid gold and silver discoveries necessitated branches established by the Coinage Act of 1835: ("C" mark, first used 1838), Dahlonega ("D", 1838), and New Orleans ("O", 1838), to track production and prevent fraud. Britain, during the (1837–1901), centralized coinage at the Royal Mint (relocated to in 1810) but extended imperial control through overseas branches, introducing marks like "S" for (1855) and "M" for (1872) on gold sovereigns to monitor output from antipodean facilities amid empire-wide gold rushes. These developments reflected broader mechanization, such as steam-powered presses, which enabled consistent mark placement and higher volumes, contrasting earlier hand-struck variability. Post-World War II reconstruction and in the fostered international mint collaborations and diversified symbols, adapting mint marks to global economic demands. The Royal Canadian Mint, operational since 1908, used a "C" mark on sovereigns struck at from 1908 to 1919 to distinguish them from British issues, symbolizing early national autonomy within networks. Economic upheavals influenced practices, as seen in the U.S. of 1933, which recalled coins and suspended their minting for circulation until after 1934 (limited to proofs thereafter), effectively pausing mint mark usage on denominations like the $20 while continuing it on silver issues from facilities such as ("D"). This shift underscored mint marks' role in regulatory compliance during crises, with global mints similarly adjusting outputs to postwar currencies. In the contemporary era, mint mark usage endures despite advances in digital minting technologies, balancing tradition with modern traceability needs. and laser etching have streamlined production, allowing precise mark integration, yet physical symbols remain prominent for historical continuity and numismatic appeal; for instance, euro coins launched in 2002 incorporate national mint marks (e.g., Germany's "A" for , "D" for ) on the national obverse side to identify issuing facilities across the . While serial numbering and blockchain-like digital ledgers enhance anti-counterfeiting in high-security issues, reducing some reliance on visible marks for bulk tracking, their retention on circulation coins preserves collector interest and jurisdictional transparency in an increasingly digitized global economy.

Role in Numismatics

Identification and Authentication

Mint marks are small symbols or letters stamped on to indicate the mint of origin, and their placement varies depending on the coin's , , and historical period. Commonly, they appear on the obverse or reverse fields, along the rims, or positioned below the , with early examples often featuring subtle incused designs while modern ones use more prominent raised lettering for clarity. For instance, on , mint marks were traditionally located on the reverse side until , when they shifted to the obverse for most denominations to facilitate easier during and circulation. Interpreting mint marks requires reference to standardized catalogs that decode their meanings and . In numismatic practice, guides such as (commonly known as the ), published by Whitman, provide detailed explanations of symbols, such as "S" denoting the , "D" for , "P" for , and "W" for West Point, along with variations in style and positioning across eras. These resources enable collectors to a coin's mark against documented production details, ensuring accurate cataloging without ambiguity from similar-looking symbols in different jurisdictions. In authentication, mint marks play a critical role by allowing verification against known mint outputs, helping to identify counterfeits or alterations where the mark's style, size, or placement deviates from official specifications. Genuine marks must align with era-specific designs—such as the distinct styles used by the U.S. in the 19th versus 20th centuries—and integrate seamlessly with other security features like edge lettering or to confirm overall authenticity. Professional services like Numismatic Guaranty Corporation (NGC) examine these elements alongside composition tests to detect fakes, rejecting for coins with mismatched or fabricated marks. Numismatists employ various tools and methods to verify mint marks, starting with magnification devices such as 7x to 10x loupes or digital microscopes, which reveal fine details like strike quality and positioning invisible to the . Databases from grading services, including the PCGS Population Report and NGC , offer searchable records of certified by mint mark, , and , allowing users to compare a specimen against verified populations for consistency. Additionally, historical records from the U.S. Mint's archives provide production logs and annual reports to corroborate mark authenticity against documented mintages and design changes.

Impact on Collecting and Valuation

Mint marks play a pivotal role in numismatic valuation by signaling production specifics that often determine rarity and desirability among collectors. Coins from facilities with limited output, such as the 1916-D with a mintage of only 264,200 pieces, exhibit heightened scarcity compared to higher-volume issues from the same year, leading to premiums that can exceed tenfold in auctions for well-preserved specimens. This supply-demand imbalance underscores how mint marks differentiate subtypes, with low-mintage examples routinely achieving values from $1,000 in circulated grades to over $30,000 in uncirculated condition. Collector strategies frequently revolve around assembling comprehensive sets that include all relevant mint marks for a given series, such as pursuing (P), (D), and (S) variants in cents to fulfill date-and-mint-mark objectives. This methodical approach not only heightens the challenge and satisfaction of the hobby but also aligns with grading standards that classify coins by these distinctions, encouraging targeted acquisitions to complete registries or personal portfolios. In auction markets, mint marks amplify premiums through their association with unique varieties and errors, as seen in the 1937-D Three-Legged , where die wear at the facility created a distinctive missing foreleg, propelling values to $105,000 for top-graded examples due to the error's exclusivity to that mint. Broader economic trends, including rising investor participation during periods of market optimism, further escalate these dynamics, with rare mint mark coins often outperforming common issues in sales records. The influence extends to communal aspects of , where mint marks facilitate set-building initiatives within groups like the , promoting and among members seeking diverse variants. Moreover, recognition of scarce mint marks can trigger behaviors among the non-collecting public, which sustains long-term availability for hobbyists by reducing circulation and enhancing future market rarity.

Mint Marks by Jurisdiction

United States

The Mint established its mint mark system in the 19th century to distinguish coins produced at branch facilities from those at the original , which opened in 1792 and initially struck coins without any identifying mark. The served as the primary facility, producing the majority of circulating coinage without a mint mark until the introduction of the "P" symbol on certain issues starting in 1942, with consistent use across most denominations (except cents) beginning in 1980. Branch mints adopted specific letters to denote their output: the , operational since 1854, uses "S"; the , established in 1906, uses "D"; the New Orleans Mint introduced the "O" mark in 1838 upon its opening; and the employed "CC" from 1870 to 1893 for gold and silver coins tied to the silver deposits. Significant historical changes shaped the system, including a suspension of mint marks on most circulating coins from 1965 to 1967 under the , aimed at curbing during a coin shortage by making coins less distinguishable for collectors. Marks resumed in 1968 but were placed on the obverse side for some denominations, and the Philadelphia "P" mark was largely absent from 1968 to 1979 except for limited exceptions like the 1979 . In modern times, the , originally a bullion depository since 1938, began using the "W" mark for select circulating issues, such as 10 million in 2019, marking the first appearance of "W" on general circulation coins; following this, the "W" mark appeared on 2020-W and 2021-W to commemorate the quarter's centennial, and continues on select proof issues as of 2025. Notable coin series highlight the role of mint marks in U.S. , such as the Mercury dimes produced from 1916 to 1945, where "D" and "S" marks identified branch mint output, including low-mintage keys like the 1916-D with just 264,000 pieces struck. The program (1999-2008) incorporated "P", "D", and "S" marks on its designs honoring each state, with over 34 billion total quarters produced across the facilities to facilitate widespread collection. These variations underscore how mint marks aid in tracing production origins and rarity within specific series.

Selected International Examples

In , the Royal Canadian Mint, established in in 1908, introduced the "C" mint mark on gold sovereigns produced from 1908 to 1919 to indicate Canadian origin, distinguishing them from those struck at the London branch of the Royal Mint. This mark appears on the reverse above the date, reflecting the mint's role in supporting local gold refining and coinage during the early . Since 1976, the branch has used a "W" mint mark on select issues, such as certain commemorative coins. Coin designs from the Royal Canadian Mint often incorporate bilingual elements in English and French, honoring Canada's two official languages, as seen in commemorative issues that feature dual inscriptions to promote cultural inclusivity. The United Kingdom's has traditionally omitted routine mint marks from circulating coins due to centralized production, first at the and later at since 1968. Instead, historical privy marks—small symbols denoting special strikings—appear on select , such as proof issues from the early , including variations on the 1817 design that revived the modern sovereign format. These privy marks, often subtle engravings like plumes or anchors, helped identify limited-edition or commemorative pieces without altering standard circulation designs. In the , mint marks on introduced in 1999 vary by issuing country to identify production facilities while adhering to unified European standards, with the outer ring featuring 12 stars symbolizing unity. For instance, uses the letter "R" for coins struck at the Mint, positioned near the national design on denominations from 1 to €2. employs a lion's head symbol as its mint mark, reflecting national and appearing on the obverse of coins produced at the Finnish in . Smaller non- states issuing , such as , , and , often rely on external mints but incorporate country-specific motifs; their designs may reference the European map on the common side for €1 and €2 coins, emphasizing continental integration without unique mint symbols in all cases. Australia's minting system features distinct marks across its branch facilities, with the adopting the "P" symbol since its opening in for gold sovereigns sourced from local mines. This mark continued into the decimal era launched in , appearing on select silver and coins to denote production, such as on certain 50-cent pieces and commemoratives. Early decimal issues from other mints, like , typically lacked marks due to the closure of the facility in 1926, but 's "P" provided clear for regional output in the post-1966 series.

References

  1. [1]
    Mint Marks
    ### Summary of Mint Marks
  2. [2]
    Mintmark - Newman Numismatic Portal
    The first mintmark was placed on a silver didrachm (based on a Greek denomination) struck in Rome in 269 bc. Later some Roman coins bore control marks, ...
  3. [3]
    Coin Collecting FAQs - American Numismatic Association
    Mintmarks are letters that indicate where a coin was made. They have been used for over 2,000 years by various nations and empires as a quality control measure ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  4. [4]
  5. [5]
  6. [6]
    Varieties vs Mint Errors: What's the Difference? - PCGS
    Jul 18, 2024 · Mint errors are mistakes that happen during the manufacturing process. Varieties come from variations in the different dies used to strike the coins.Missing: mark countermark
  7. [7]
    Numismatic Glossary - Coin Photography Studio
    Countermark – A secondary mark added after minting, often for revaluation or validation. Cud – A raised lump on a coin caused by a die break at the edge.
  8. [8]
    What is an Incuse Coin? - APMEX
    Apr 7, 2025 · An incuse coin features design elements recessed into the surface rather than raised above the field. This minting technique is uncommon in modern circulation ...
  9. [9]
    Mintmarks on United States Coins - American Numismatic Association
    Feb 28, 2021 · From the Bureau of the Treasury's perspective, mintmarks are important for quality control because they enable identification and evaluation of ...Missing: accountability | Show results with:accountability
  10. [10]
  11. [11]
    Detecting Mintmark Counterfeits - Numismatic News
    Nov 22, 2023 · Professional authenticators need to know the shapes of the mintmarks used at different times by each Mint, something that any reader can learn ...
  12. [12]
  13. [13]
    Athenian Owls - Numismatics Coins and Coin Collecting
    Archaic Owls were the first Owls, minted c. 510 to 480 BC. That the first Owls were issued c. 510 BC, at about the same time as the establishment of Athenian ...
  14. [14]
    Worth their weight in gold - Blog - Auckland War Memorial Museum
    One of the earliest and busiest Greek mints was on the island of Aegina, a great commercial trade hub off the north-eastern coast of the Peloponnese. By 550 ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Weighing or counting in ancient Greece: the first coins.
    Sep 9, 2024 · 550-525 BCE, four Greek cities started to mint incuse silver coins using a reduced. Corinthian standard, likely creating a closed monetary ...
  16. [16]
    Roman Coins and Roman History pg3 - Lawrence University
    But the tresviri monetales also began adding magistrates' marks, symbols, monograms, abbreviated names, and ultimately, by around 150 B.C., full names, which ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Early coinage of the Roman Republic, 280 to 91 B.C.E.
    third century BCE it was Rome's censors-two senior magistrates elected (notionally) at five year intervals for an eighteen month term- who selected the types ...
  18. [18]
    Expedition Magazine | Like a Bad Penny - Penn Museum
    These coins circulated throughout the Greek world as well as outside ... coins without mint marks are almost always struck in the nation's first capital.
  19. [19]
    Expedition Magazine | China - Penn Museum
    Gold coins unearthed in 1969 and 1970 in fields in Liu-an and Fu-nan in the province of Anhwei. Each coin is inscribed with two characters ying-yûan, “on ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] The Hejia Village Hoard: A Snapshot - History - Yale University
    They mark the first form of coinage in China, dating from circa 500 BCE. Fifteen coins date from the Han period (206 BCE-CE 220), of which eleven are from Wang ...<|separator|>
  21. [21]
    Extension of Import Restrictions Imposed on Certain Archaeological ...
    Jan 14, 2019 · The new Qin coin is inscribed simply with its weight, expressed in two Chinese characters ban liang. These are written in small seal script and ...
  22. [22]
    Dec. 30 – Merovingian Coinage – FLAME
    Some of these can be localized on the basis of mint-marks, such as those of Provence from Marseilles, etc., or those of the Ostrogoths and Burgundians with ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] A Period of Transition: Early Islamic and Umayyad Coinage
    Jan 16, 2014 · An extensive number of coins were minted under the Umayyad caliphs at the Tabariyah location.21. Mu'awiya had begun to successfully adopted, ...
  24. [24]
    Emergency Import Restrictions on Categories of Archaeological and ...
    May 14, 2025 · In the Umayyad period and later, coins typically bore Arabic inscriptions on both sides, and occasionally symbols, animals, or flowers. ...Missing: caliphate | Show results with:caliphate
  25. [25]
    Colonial Silver Mining: Mexico and Peru - Duke University Press
    Nov 1, 1972 · In Peru the Viceroy Toledo established a mint at Potosí in 1572, and in consequence the office in Lima dwindled in importance until 1683, when ...
  26. [26]
    Isotopic Ag–Cu–Pb record of silver circulation through 16th ... - PNAS
    Most European 16th–18th century and Mexican coins plot in a narrow field at δ65Cu ∼ 0.0‰ and ε109Ag ∼ 0.7. The Ag and Cu isotope compositions of Philip III ...
  27. [27]
    History of the U.S. Mint
    ### Summary of Mint Marks and Related History
  28. [28]
    Sovereign Mint Marks | BullionByPost®
    Gold Sovereign mint marks, used to distinguish Sovereign coins depending on the city of origin across the British Empire and the Commonwealth.Missing: era | Show results with:era
  29. [29]
    The Royal Canadian Mint - SCV History In Pictures.
    A "C" mintmark distinguished these coins from their British mates. The Ottawa facility, built in classical fortress-like style, passed from British control to ...
  30. [30]
    History of U.S. Circulating Coins
    ### Summary of Mint Marks Evolution in U.S. Circulating Coins (19th and 20th Century)
  31. [31]
    National sides - European Central Bank
    The mint marks appear on either side of the year of issuance. Belgium ... In Italy, the euro coin designs were subject to scrutiny by a national ...
  32. [32]
  33. [33]
  34. [34]
    Guide Book of United States Coins | Red Book - Greysheet
    The world's most popular guide book for US coins. New research, new photographs, updated pricing, the latest US Mint data, new auction records, and more!
  35. [35]
    NGC Counterfeit Detection | Identify Counterfeit Coins
    Like counterfeits, coins with altered dates or mintmarks will not be certified by NGC. Coins with other types of tooling are eligible for NGC Details grading, ...Types Of Counterfeit Coins · Altered Mintmarks · How Ngc Determines...
  36. [36]
    Tools Of A Numismatist - Centerville Coin & Jewelry Connection
    All sorts of magnifiers are available. For grading, 4X-10X magnification is sufficient, with 7X magnification considered by many to be ideal. Collectors of die ...
  37. [37]
    PCGS Population Report
    Search every world coin PCGS has certified listed by date, variety, designation and population by grade.United States Coins · Japan Coins · China Coins · Canada CoinsMissing: mark | Show results with:mark
  38. [38]
    NGC Coin Census Population Report
    The NGC Census is an up-to-date population report showing the latest number of coins, tokens and medals graded by NGC for every type and grade.United States 41406003 graded · Mexico 390407 graded · Canada 927569 gradedMissing: mint marks
  39. [39]
  40. [40]
    1916-D 10C (Regular Strike) Mercury Dime - PCGS CoinFacts
    The 1916-D is rare in mint state and very rare in Gem condition. The strike is usually very sharp and I'd estimated that 80% of more of the mint state survivors ...
  41. [41]
    1916-D Mercury Dime - USA Coin Book
    USA Coin Book Estimated Value of 1916-D Mercury Dime is Worth $1,860 in Average Condition and can be Worth $15,086 to $32,300 or more in Uncirculated ...
  42. [42]
  43. [43]
    5 Key Factors That Influence Coin Values
    Aug 5, 2021 · Each mint produces a different number of coins each year, making some years and mint marks rarer than others.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  44. [44]
    1937-D "3-Legged" Buffalo Nickel : A Collector's Guide - CoinWeek
    The 1937-D "3-Legged" Buffalo nickel is one of interesting U.S. nickels. A missing leg is the key to unlocking the coin's value.
  45. [45]
    All About Mintmarks - Heritage Auctions
    Mintmark: A letter or other mark on a coin denoting the mint that manufactured the coin. US coins are avidly collected by date and mintmark, ...
  46. [46]
    Collecting U.S. Coins - American Numismatic Association
    May 24, 2022 · Collecting by date and mintmark, which dominates the hobby today, started to take off in 1893 with Augustus Heaton's Treatise on Coinage of the ...
  47. [47]
    Non-Collecting Public's Influence on Coin Scarcity - Numismatic News
    Jun 27, 2024 · “If the general public hears or suspects that a particular coin is scarce, it hoards enough of these pieces to preserve them for collectors far ...
  48. [48]
    Historic Coin Production
    ### Summary of Mint Marks and Specific Mints
  49. [49]
  50. [50]
  51. [51]
  52. [52]
  53. [53]
  54. [54]
  55. [55]
    Ottawa Mint | Canada | Information - Chards
    May 26, 2017 · You can identify sovereigns issued by the Ottawa Mint by the letter C on the reverse of the coin in the ground above the date. These sovereigns ...
  56. [56]
    Royal Canadian Mint Celebrates 50 Years of Official Languages Act ...
    Jun 17, 2019 · Bilingual inscriptions highlighting 50 years of the Official Languages Act complete the central design. The progressive nature of this theme is ...
  57. [57]
    British coin mints - A brief history - BullionByPost
    Coin production began with Celtic tribes, established by Romans, and the Royal Mint was founded in 886. The Royal Mint is now the sole official producer, with ...
  58. [58]
    The History of Branch Mint Sovereigns
    Alongside coins struck at The Royal Mint in Tower Hill, between 1855 and 1932, Sovereigns were also struck at branch mints close to where the gold was mined.
  59. [59]
    Royal Mint branch Mints | Information - Chards
    May 26, 2017 · 1914 George V Sovereign - Struck at the Ottawa mint in Canada, the mint mark C is found in the ground above the year date on the reverse. The ...
  60. [60]
    Coins - European Central Bank
    The euro coin series comprises eight different denominations: 1, 2, 5, 10, 20 and 50 cent, €1 and €2. The euro coins have a common side and a national side.€1 · National sides · Lithuania (since 1 January 2015) · 50 centMissing: marks | Show results with:marks
  61. [61]
    €2 commemorative coins - 2025 - European Central Bank
    At the left is the inscription “MICHELANGELO” in semi-circle, the letter R, identifying the Mint of Rome and the year “1475”, and at the right the name of ...
  62. [62]
    The Mint Marks of the Australian Branch Mints | The Royal Mint
    Learn more about The Royal Mint's history down under with our introduction to the mint marks of Australian branch mints.
  63. [63]
    Coin Anatomy - Royal Australian Mint
    Mint Mark. A mint mark is a small letter or symbol that identifies where the coin was made. Not all coins have mint marks, but collectors often look for them.