Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Revaluation

Revaluation is a deliberate upward adjustment to the official exchange rate of a country's currency relative to a foreign currency, gold standard, or other baseline, typically enacted by a central bank or government within a fixed or pegged exchange rate system to reflect economic fundamentals such as persistent trade surpluses or inflationary pressures.^[1]^[2] This policy action increases the domestic currency's value, rendering exports more expensive and imports cheaper, which can help curb domestic inflation but risks eroding export competitiveness and prompting retaliatory measures from trading partners.^[3] Historically, revaluations were prominent under the Bretton Woods system, where surplus countries like West Germany revalued the Deutsche Mark in 1961 and 1969 to address balance-of-payments imbalances without fully floating rates.^[2] In contemporary contexts, such adjustments remain tools for managing global imbalances, though they often spark disputes over currency manipulation, as seen in pressures on undervalued currencies to revalue amid accusations of unfair trade advantages—claims that require scrutiny given incentives for deficit nations to externalize adjustment burdens.^[2] Unlike market-driven appreciations in floating regimes, revaluations underscore central authorities' role in overriding short-term market signals for long-term stability, with empirical evidence showing mixed impacts on growth depending on accompanying fiscal-monetary policies.^[3]

Definition and Mechanisms

Core Definition

Revaluation denotes a deliberate upward adjustment in the official exchange rate of a country's currency relative to a specified standard, such as another currency, gold, or a basket of currencies, typically executed by a government or central bank within a fixed exchange rate regime.^[2]^[4] This policy action increases the domestic currency's value, rendering foreign goods and services relatively cheaper for importers while making exports more expensive for foreign buyers.^[2] In contrast to appreciation, which arises from market forces of supply and demand in floating exchange rate systems, revaluation constitutes an official intervention to realign the pegged rate amid economic pressures like persistent trade surpluses or inflationary differentials.^[5]^[6]

Operational Mechanisms in Fixed Exchange Rates

In fixed exchange rate regimes, revaluation entails a central bank-initiated adjustment to raise the official parity of the domestic currency against its anchor, typically in response to sustained balance of payments surpluses that build foreign reserves and generate inflationary pressures. This mechanism restores equilibrium by appreciating the currency, making exports less competitive and imports cheaper, thereby curbing excess demand.^[7] The operational process commences with a policy decision based on economic indicators, followed by an official announcement of the new rate, such as shifting from 10 domestic units per unit of anchor currency to 8 units, effectively strengthening the domestic currency.^[2] The central bank then enforces this parity through foreign exchange interventions, standing ready to buy or sell currencies to align market rates with the peg; post-revaluation, this often involves selling domestic currency against foreign reserves to counter residual appreciation forces.^[8]^[2] Such interventions directly influence the central bank's balance sheet, revaluing foreign assets upward in domestic terms and potentially expanding the monetary base, which requires sterilization—via open market sales of securities—to prevent unintended liquidity growth.^[2] Monetary policy is subordinated to peg defense, with interest rates or reserve requirements adjusted to support stability, though credibility hinges on adequate reserves and fiscal discipline to avoid speculative attacks.^[7] In stricter fixed variants like currency boards, revaluation flexibility is limited, as the issuer must back liabilities fully at the peg without discretionary lending, often necessitating legislative changes for rate adjustments rather than routine interventions.^[7] Overall, successful implementation demands transparent communication to anchor expectations and mitigate volatility, ensuring the adjusted rate reflects underlying fundamentals rather than temporary pressures.^[8]

Theoretical Underpinnings

Balance of Payments and Elasticities

The elasticities approach to balance of payments adjustment posits that revaluation affects the current account primarily through relative price changes that influence export and import volumes, with outcomes determined by the price elasticities of demand for those trade flows. Under fixed exchange rates, a revaluation strengthens the domestic currency, increasing the foreign-currency price of exports while decreasing that of imports, which theoretically reduces a trade surplus if demand responds sufficiently to these shifts. This partial-equilibrium framework, originating in mid-20th-century trade theory, evaluates adjustment efficacy without incorporating broader macroeconomic feedbacks like income effects.^[9]^[10] The Marshall-Lerner condition provides the critical threshold: a revaluation will contract a trade surplus (stabilizing the balance of payments) if the sum of the absolute price elasticities of export demand and import demand exceeds 1, ensuring volume contractions in exports and expansions in imports outweigh the adverse terms-of-trade effects. If the condition fails—due to inelastic demands, such as for essential commodities—revaluation may initially widen the surplus, as price changes fail to alter quantities adequately, potentially requiring supplementary measures like fiscal tightening. Empirical estimates of these elasticities vary by country and time, often lower in the short run (e.g., due to contracts or habits) than long run, implying delayed or uncertain adjustment.^[11]^[12] In practice, this approach highlights risks in revaluation policy for surplus nations, as low elasticities can lead to perverse outcomes akin to the inverse of the J-curve effect observed in depreciations, where the trade balance deteriorates before improving. Critics note the elasticities model's limitations in ignoring supply responses, capital flows, and monetary dynamics, which later frameworks like the monetary approach address by emphasizing excess money balances over trade volumes. Nonetheless, it remains foundational for assessing whether revaluation restores external equilibrium in inelastic trade environments.^[13]^[14]

Monetary Policy Implications

In fixed exchange rate regimes, currency revaluation compels central banks to subordinate independent monetary policy objectives to the defense of the adjusted parity, as deviations could trigger speculative attacks or imbalances. The appreciation reduces net exports by rendering domestic goods less competitive abroad and imports cheaper, thereby contracting aggregate demand and output. To maintain the higher currency value against ensuing depreciation pressures from the worsened trade balance, the central bank must sell foreign reserves to purchase domestic currency, directly contracting the money supply and tightening liquidity conditions.^[15] This defensive intervention often necessitates higher domestic interest rates to attract capital inflows and bolster reserves, limiting the central bank's capacity for expansionary policy amid the revaluation's inherent contractionary effects on gross national product. Interest rates may initially face downward pressure from reduced money demand due to lower output, but peg maintenance typically overrides this, aligning domestic rates closer to international levels under capital mobility. In standard open-economy models, such as Mundell-Fleming with fixed rates, monetary autonomy remains curtailed post-revaluation, as policy tools cannot sustainably deviate from those required for exchange rate stability without risking reserve depletion.^[16]^[15] Revaluation also addresses monetary distortions from chronic surpluses, where undervaluation fuels reserve accumulation and unsterilized inflows expand the money supply, fostering inflation or asset bubbles. By curbing the surplus, revaluation diminishes the volume of foreign exchange purchases, easing the burden of sterilization—typically domestic bond sales to neutralize liquidity injections—and allowing monetary policy greater focus on inflation control without perpetual offset operations. Failure to revalue in such scenarios can exacerbate these pressures, as evidenced in analyses of pegged systems where surplus-driven liquidity threatens stability.^[17]^[18]

Historical Context

Early 20th Century Examples

In the interwar period following World War I, several European nations sought to restore currency stability by revaluing their depreciated currencies toward pre-war gold parities under fixed exchange rate regimes, often amid efforts to rejoin the gold standard. These adjustments typically involved appreciating the domestic currency relative to recent market rates or dollar/pound benchmarks, driven by political imperatives for national prestige and inflation control, though they frequently imposed deflationary strains due to mismatched internal price levels.^[19] The United Kingdom's return to the gold standard on April 28, 1925, under Chancellor Winston Churchill, fixed the pound sterling at its pre-1914 parity of £1 = US$4.86, marking a revaluation from post-war depreciations that had pushed the rate as low as $3.40 in 1920 and even from the $4.77 level in early 1925.^[20] This policy, endorsed despite cautions from economists including John Maynard Keynes about overvaluation relative to Britain's elevated domestic prices compared to the United States, prioritized restoring London's role as a global financial center but required high interest rates and wage reductions, contributing to industrial slowdown and unemployment in export sectors.^[21] The revaluation proved unsustainable, culminating in Britain's abandonment of gold in September 1931 amid speculative pressures.^[19] Italy's "Quota 90" revaluation in 1927, decreed by Benito Mussolini's fascist regime, pegged the lira at 90 lire per British pound—near its 1914 rate of 92.46—appreciating it sharply from post-war lows exceeding 120 lire per pound.^[22] Intended to curb inflation, symbolize economic vigor, and facilitate gold standard adherence, the policy was enforced through credit restrictions and balanced budgets under Finance Minister Alberto De Stefani's successors, yet it overvalued the lira against Italy's competitive costs, triggering deflation, reduced exports, and industrial contraction that persisted into the early 1930s.^[23] France achieved franc stabilization in June 1928 under Prime Minister Raymond Poincaré, fixing the currency at 25 francs per U.S. dollar (the "Poincaré franc"), which revalued it from the 1926 crisis trough of over 50 francs per dollar while devaluing it to one-fifth of its 1914 gold content.^[24] Backed by fiscal reforms, budget surpluses, and Bank of France interventions, this adjustment restored investor confidence, ended wartime inflationary overhang, and swelled gold reserves from 29 billion francs in 1928 to 82 billion by 1932.^[25] However, the resulting liquidity absorption strained the international gold pool, amplifying deflationary pressures elsewhere and foreshadowing France's own devaluation in 1936.^[24]

Bretton Woods Era Revaluations

The Bretton Woods Agreement of 1944 established an adjustable peg exchange rate regime, permitting revaluations of currencies against the U.S. dollar when fundamental disequilibria threatened balance-of-payments stability, particularly in cases of persistent surpluses that risked imported inflation or speculative pressures.^[26] Revaluations were rare, as most adjustments involved devaluations by deficit countries, but surplus nations like West Germany faced mounting inflows of reserves, prompting interventions to curb domestic overheating without fully relying on monetary tightening.^[27] These adjustments aimed to restore equilibrium by making exports less competitive and imports cheaper, though they often proved insufficient against underlying global imbalances, such as U.S. deficits financing European and Japanese recoveries.^[28] West Germany's Deutsche Mark (DM) underwent the era's most notable revaluations, driven by rapid postwar export growth and labor shortages that fueled wage pressures and reserve accumulation exceeding $2 billion annually by the early 1960s. On March 6, 1961, the DM was revalued upward by 5% against the dollar, from 4.20 to 4.00 DM per USD, following Bundesbank concerns over speculative capital inflows and rising domestic prices that threatened monetary stability.^[29] ^[30] The Netherlands simultaneously revalued its guilder by 5% in solidarity, reflecting coordinated efforts among surplus partners to alleviate pressures on the dollar.^[26] Despite these measures, Germany's current account surplus persisted, with exports growing 10-15% yearly, necessitating further action amid global dollar liquidity strains.^[31] By 1969, renewed speculation—exacerbated by U.S. inflation and Vietnam War spending—drove massive short-term capital inflows to Germany, totaling over DM 20 billion in the preceding months, prompting the Bundesbank to suspend dollar purchases and float the DM briefly from September 30. On October 27, 1969, the DM was revalued by 9.3%, to 3.66 DM per USD, as a compromise to defend the peg while signaling commitment to internal balance over export maximization.^[32] ^[33] This adjustment, larger than the 1961 move, reflected lessons from prior insufficiency but still failed to fully offset undervaluation, as Germany's real effective exchange rate had depreciated amid rising productivity.^[30] Japanese authorities, facing similar yen undervaluation at 360 per USD since 1949, resisted revaluation until external pressures peaked, floating the yen in December 1971 under the Smithsonian Agreement, which raised its value by 16.9% to 308 per USD in a last-ditch effort to salvage the system.^[34] ^[35] These revaluations highlighted the adjustable peg's tensions: while intended to facilitate corrections, political resistance in export-dependent economies like Germany and Japan delayed actions, amplifying speculative attacks and contributing to the system's 1971 collapse when U.S. gold convertibility ended. Empirical analyses indicate revaluations reduced short-term surpluses by 20-30% initially but were undermined by asymmetric adjustments, with deficit countries like the U.S. avoiding discipline.^[27] Sources from central banks, such as Bundesbank reports, provide direct evidence of reserve dynamics and policy rationales, contrasting with academic narratives that sometimes overemphasize U.S. hegemony while underplaying surplus countries' inflationary risks from delayed revaluations.^[29] ^[32]

Post-Bretton Woods Instances

Following the end of the Bretton Woods system in 1973, major currencies largely transitioned to floating exchange rates, yet many economies retained pegged or band systems that required occasional revaluations to address persistent imbalances in trade, inflation differentials, or capital flows.^[36] Regional mechanisms like the European Monetary System (EMS), launched in 1979, exemplified this persistence, operating central rates within fluctuation bands that prompted 62 realignments—including revaluations of stronger currencies—through 1998 to accommodate asymmetric economic shocks.^[37] In the EMS, the Deutsche Mark (DM) underwent multiple upward revaluations relative to weaker partner currencies, reflecting Germany's relatively stronger growth and lower inflation. On September 23, 1979, the DM was revalued by 2% against most EMS currencies and by 5% against the Danish krone, amid efforts to stabilize the nascent system amid dollar volatility.^[38] Further adjustments followed, such as a 5.5% DM revaluation against the French franc and others on October 5, 1981, and a 3% increase in March 1983, which helped preserve competitiveness divergences without full floats.^[39] These realignments, often initiated by collective EMS decisions, mitigated speculative pressures but highlighted the DM's anchor role, with no currency ever revalued against it.^[40] Beyond Europe, pegged regimes in emerging markets also saw revaluations. China, which had fixed the renminbi (RMB) to the US dollar at approximately 8.28 since 1994, revalued it by 2.1% to 8.11 on July 21, 2005, shifting to a managed float referenced against a currency basket; this addressed mounting external surpluses exceeding $600 billion in reserves and US accusations of undervaluation distorting trade.^[41]^[42] The adjustment, though modest, marked a policy pivot amid global pressure, enabling gradual appreciation thereafter without immediate disruptive floats.^[43] The 1985 Plaza Accord, involving G5 nations, facilitated effective revaluations through coordinated interventions in floating markets, depreciating the overvalued dollar by roughly 50% against the yen and DM by 1987, which narrowed US trade deficits via export boosts in Japan and Germany despite initial valuation effects on imports.^[44]^[45] Such interventions underscored post-Bretton Woods hybrid approaches, blending market forces with policy to achieve revaluation-like outcomes absent fixed pegs.^[46]

Precipitating Causes

Domestic Economic Imbalances

Domestic economic imbalances that precipitate currency revaluation in fixed exchange rate systems primarily arise from structural and policy-induced disparities, such as lower domestic inflation relative to trading partners, which erode the real exchange rate and foster persistent trade surpluses. Lower inflation enhances the price competitiveness of domestic goods, increasing export demand and leading to balance of payments surpluses that accumulate foreign reserves at the central bank. This dynamic creates unsustainable upward pressure on the currency, as maintaining the fixed peg requires continuous intervention, eventually necessitating revaluation to restore equilibrium and prevent speculative capital inflows from destabilizing monetary control.^[47]^[30] Productivity growth differentials further amplify these imbalances through mechanisms like the Balassa-Samuelson effect, where advances in tradable sectors raise wages and non-tradable prices without proportional inflation, resulting in real currency appreciation. In such cases, fixed nominal rates become misaligned, undervaluing the currency and channeling resources inefficiently toward exports at the expense of domestic consumption. Historical evidence from West Germany's experience under Bretton Woods illustrates this: postwar productivity surges and wage discipline, coupled with inflation rates below those of key partners like the United States, generated massive current account surpluses exceeding 5% of GDP in the late 1950s and early 1960s. These domestic strengths, rather than external shocks, drove the Deutsche Mark's revaluation by 5% against the U.S. dollar on March 6, 1961, to alleviate reserve pressures and moderate export-led overheating.^[30]^[48] A subsequent revaluation of the mark by approximately 9.3% in October 1969 followed similar patterns, with Germany's inflation averaging under 2% annually in the preceding decade—far below the U.S. rate of over 3%—exacerbating reserve inflows amid robust domestic output growth averaging 4-5% yearly. Tight monetary policies by the Bundesbank, aimed at preserving price stability, reinforced these imbalances by attracting short-term capital and limiting credit expansion, which in turn amplified the need for nominal adjustment to align the peg with underlying economic strength. Failure to address such imbalances promptly risks asset bubbles or sterilization costs for the central bank, as seen in Germany's interventions exceeding billions in marks equivalent by 1961.^[30]^[31]^[48] Fiscal discipline, including budget surpluses, can compound these effects by signaling credibility and drawing investment, but excessive reliance on export competitiveness without revaluation may distort resource allocation, favoring manufacturing over services and suppressing domestic demand. Empirical analyses confirm that such internal factors, independent of global cycles, account for a significant portion of revaluation triggers in surplus nations, with inflation differentials explaining up to 60-70% of real exchange rate movements over medium terms in advanced economies.^[30]^[49]

International Pressures and Speculation

International pressures for currency revaluation typically emerge from trading partners in deficit positions, who argue that a surplus country's undervalued currency distorts global trade by suppressing imports and boosting exports. These demands intensify under fixed exchange rate regimes, where persistent balance-of-payments surpluses accumulate foreign reserves, signaling misalignment. For example, during the Bretton Woods era, the United States repeatedly called on surplus nations like West Germany and Japan to revalue their currencies upward against the dollar to mitigate American trade deficits and support the pegged system.^[50] Such pressures often involve diplomatic negotiations or multilateral forums, as seen in U.S. advocacy for adjustments to prevent deflationary strains on deficit economies.^[51] Speculation amplifies these dynamics by creating self-fulfilling inflows into currencies perceived as undervalued, based on fundamentals like productivity gains or low inflation. Investors purchase the domestic currency or assets, anticipating official revaluation, which forces central banks to defend the peg through sterilization or intervention, often at high cost. In undervaluation scenarios, unlike devaluation attacks, this "upward speculation" builds reserve pressures that policymakers may resolve via revaluation to curb inflows and restore balance-of-payments equilibrium. A monetary model of hot money inflows demonstrates how anticipated revaluations destabilize pegs, as expectations trigger capital surges independent of short-term interest differentials.^[52] Historical instances illustrate this interplay. The 1961 revaluation of the Deutsche Mark by 5% on March 6 stemmed from West Germany's chronic trade surpluses and speculative capital inflows exceeding $1 billion in early 1961, driven by its postwar economic boom and undervaluation relative to inflation differentials since 1950. International urging from the U.S. and others complemented domestic needs to counter imported inflation, marking the first Bretton Woods adjustment.^[31]^[53] Similarly, expectations of revaluation in strong currencies like the mark fueled speculative rushes throughout the 1960s, contributing to multiple adjustments, including the 1969 9.3% hike amid renewed inflows.^[54] In the 1980s, the Plaza Accord of September 22, 1985, exemplified coordinated international pressure, with G5 nations intervening to depreciate the overvalued U.S. dollar, effectively revaluing the yen (from ¥240 to ¥168 per dollar initially) and Deutsche Mark to address U.S. deficits exceeding 3% of GDP. Speculation followed the agreement, accelerating appreciation as markets bet on further policy shifts.^[51] These cases highlight how speculation, while not always the sole trigger, interacts with diplomatic pressures to precipitate revaluations, often validating market assessments of fundamental misalignments over official resistance.^[2]

Economic Consequences

Impacts on Trade and Competitiveness

Currency revaluation, which raises the value of a domestic currency against foreign currencies in a fixed or pegged exchange rate regime, typically erodes the price competitiveness of a country's exports by making them more expensive for international buyers. This effect stems from the direct translation of higher domestic currency values into elevated export prices abroad, assuming pass-through to foreign markets, thereby reducing demand and volumes in export-oriented sectors such as manufacturing and agriculture.^[55] Conversely, imports become cheaper in domestic terms, encouraging higher import penetration and potentially substituting for local production, which can widen trade deficits if the export contraction exceeds any import-driven benefits like lower input costs for import-dependent industries.^[56] Empirical analyses indicate that such appreciations often lead to short-term declines in export growth, with elasticities varying by sector but generally negative for price-sensitive goods; for instance, a 10% appreciation can reduce export volumes by 1-5% in emerging economies, depending on demand elasticities and the Marshall-Lerner condition's applicability in reverse.^[55]^[57] The loss of competitiveness manifests in reduced market shares and profitability for exporters, prompting cost-cutting measures, layoffs, or shifts toward higher-value-added products, though these adjustments are often protracted and incomplete in the face of entrenched global supply chains. Studies on currency overvaluation, a precursor to revaluation pressures, show that sustained appreciations correlate with deteriorating trade balances, as higher export prices deter foreign demand while cheaper imports undermine domestic substitution; for example, overvalued currencies in emerging markets have been linked to export underperformance and balance-of-payments crises.^[58]^[57] In industries with low price elasticities, such as commodities, the impact may be muted initially due to inelastic demand, but diversified economies reliant on manufactured exports face sharper contractions, exacerbating unemployment in trade-exposed regions.^[59] Historical instances underscore these dynamics: the 1985 Plaza Accord-induced appreciation of the Japanese yen contributed to a slowdown in Japan's export-led growth, with manufacturing output stagnating and firms relocating production overseas to mitigate competitiveness losses. Similarly, abrupt appreciations, like the Swiss franc's 2015 surge after the Swiss National Bank's policy reversal, inflicted immediate harm on exporters, with Swiss industry reporting up to 20% profit erosion in affected sectors and a contraction in export orders. These cases highlight that while revaluation may address inflationary pressures or speculative inflows, it often imposes asymmetric costs on trade competitiveness, favoring import-competing sectors at the expense of exporters unless offset by productivity gains or fiscal supports.^[2]^[60]

Effects on Inflation and Purchasing Power

Currency revaluation, which raises the official value of a domestic currency against foreign currencies in a fixed or pegged exchange rate regime, typically exerts downward pressure on domestic inflation rates. This disinflationary effect arises mainly from reduced costs of imported goods and production inputs, which lowers overall price levels and mitigates cost-push inflationary forces.^[61]^[62] In economies with high import dependence, such as those importing energy, raw materials, or consumer products, the pass-through from cheaper imports can significantly dampen headline inflation, as import prices directly influence consumer price indices.^[63] Economic models, including those incorporating exchange rate pass-through, demonstrate that a 10% revaluation can reduce import-driven inflation by 1-4 percentage points in the short term, depending on the elasticity of import demand and domestic competition levels.^[2] The mechanism operates through purchasing power parity dynamics, where a stronger currency aligns relative price levels by making foreign goods relatively less expensive, thereby curbing imported inflation that might otherwise spill over into domestic wages and prices.^[64] Historical applications, such as China's 2.1% renminbi revaluation against the U.S. dollar on July 21, 2005, aimed to counteract inflationary risks from excess foreign exchange reserve accumulation and money supply expansion, though broader domestic factors like credit growth limited the isolated impact.^[41]^[65] Similarly, in cases of sustained currency strength akin to revaluation effects, such as Switzerland's franc appreciation pressures in the early 2010s, the resulting low import costs contributed to inflation rates remaining below 1% annually, underscoring the stabilizing role against price spirals.^[66]^[67] On purchasing power, revaluation bolsters the real value of domestic income and assets in terms of foreign purchasing capability, allowing households to buy more imported consumption goods without equivalent domestic price rises.^[61] This enhances overall welfare for import-reliant consumers, particularly in open economies where foreign goods form a large share of the basket, effectively increasing disposable income's command over international markets.^[2] However, indirect channels can temper these gains: by rendering exports pricier abroad, revaluation may contract export sectors, leading to job losses, reduced output, and slower wage growth, which erode aggregate domestic purchasing power over time.^[62] Empirical evidence from revaluation episodes indicates that while short-term import affordability rises, long-term net effects on purchasing power hinge on the economy's trade structure and policy responses, with export-heavy nations experiencing more pronounced trade-offs.^[61]

Broader Macroeconomic Ramifications

Currency revaluation typically induces contractionary pressures on domestic output by diminishing export competitiveness and net external demand, often resulting in short-term GDP slowdowns. Empirical examinations of large appreciations across countries from 1950 to 2000 reveal that such events are associated with a strong deterioration in the current account balance and negative, albeit temporary, effects on economic growth, with output declining by around 1-2 percentage points in the initial year before recovering.^[68] In specific instances, the 2015 abandonment of the Swiss franc's euro peg led to an abrupt appreciation of approximately 20-30% against the euro, prompting Swiss authorities to forecast reduced GDP growth by 0.5-1 percentage points for 2015 and 2016 due to export sector contraction.^[69] Similarly, Japan's yen revaluation following the 1985 Plaza Accord, which saw the yen strengthen from roughly 240 to 120 per USD by 1987, battered export-oriented industries and contributed to recessionary pressures, necessitating aggressive monetary easing that fueled an asset bubble and prolonged stagnation into the 1990s.^[70] On capital flows, revaluation can redirect investment patterns, often spurring outward foreign direct investment (FDI) as domestic firms seek lower-cost production abroad to offset higher currency values. Post-Plaza Accord, Japan's FDI outflows surged, with annual flows rising from about $7 billion in 1985 to over $50 billion by the early 1990s, as companies relocated manufacturing to mitigate yen appreciation effects.^[71] However, abrupt revaluations may initially trigger capital flight if markets perceive ongoing instability, though credible adjustments can later attract inflows by signaling improved external sustainability. Studies of currency overvaluations in emerging markets further indicate that appreciations correlate with subdued private investment growth, as higher real interest rates and reduced profitability in tradeables sectors dampen capital formation.^[72] Broader ramifications extend to monetary and fiscal policy challenges, where revaluation necessitates compensatory easing to sustain activity, risking financial imbalances. In Switzerland post-2015, the Swiss National Bank introduced negative interest rates and expanded its balance sheet to counteract appreciation's deflationary bite, which stabilized prices but strained banking sector profitability.^[73] Fiscally, diminished trade surpluses erode government revenues from export taxes and related activities, potentially widening deficits unless offset by spending cuts or domestic reallocation. Long-term, while revaluations may curb persistent global imbalances—such as those posed by undervalued currencies in surplus economies like pre-2005 China, where revaluation threats prompted gradual yuan strengthening that modestly reduced the trade surplus from 10% of GDP in 2007 to under 3% by 2019—they risk entrenching reliance on non-tradeable sectors if productivity-enhancing reforms lag, perpetuating slower trend growth as evidenced in overvaluation-growth linkages.^[72]^[74]

Criticisms and Debates

Failures of Interventionist Policies

Interventionist policies aimed at resisting currency revaluation, such as maintaining artificial pegs or conducting large-scale foreign exchange purchases to cap appreciation, have frequently proven unsustainable against persistent market pressures driven by fundamental economic disparities like productivity gains or safe-haven demand. These efforts often involve central banks accumulating vast foreign reserves, which impose fiscal burdens and distort domestic monetary conditions without addressing underlying imbalances, ultimately leading to abrupt policy reversals that amplify exchange rate volatility and economic disruptions. Empirical analyses indicate that sterilized interventions—those not altering the domestic money supply—fail to durably influence rates when fundamentals favor appreciation, as private capital flows overwhelm official actions.^[75] A historical instance occurred in 1961 when West Germany's strong export performance and low inflation generated speculative inflows, pressuring the deutsche mark for revaluation under the Bretton Woods system. The Bundesbank attempted to defend the parity through sterilization of inflows and borrowing abroad, but these measures were undermined by continued capital surges, culminating in a forced 5% revaluation on March 6, 1961. This failure highlighted the inability of intervention to counteract imbalances indefinitely, as the policy delayed adjustment but did not prevent it, contributing to short-term liquidity strains and underscoring the limits of fixed-rate defenses against appreciation.^[30] More recently, the Swiss National Bank's (SNB) three-year defense of a 1.20 Swiss franc per euro peg, introduced in September 2011 amid eurozone crisis safe-haven flows, exemplifies modern intervention pitfalls. The SNB purchased nearly 500 billion euros in reserves by 2014 to maintain the floor, incurring escalating costs and balance sheet risks without resolving deflationary pressures or investor expectations of franc strength. On January 15, 2015, facing intensified strains from the European Central Bank's impending quantitative easing, the SNB abruptly abandoned the peg, triggering a 20-41% franc appreciation against the euro within hours and days. This sudden revaluation caused immediate market turmoil, including a 9% plunge in the Swiss Market Index, bankruptcies among forex brokers, and severe hits to exporters like watchmakers and tourism operators, whose competitiveness eroded overnight. The SNB reported spending an additional 27 billion francs in the final defense days, followed by massive reserve losses estimated in the tens of billions due to the franc's surge.^[76]^[77]^[78] Such failures reveal broader causal pitfalls of interventionism: by propping up undervalued currencies, policymakers foster export dependency and asset bubbles, while the eventual unwind imposes asymmetric shocks—greater than those from market-driven gradual appreciation—disrupting trade, inflating import costs selectively, and eroding central bank credibility. Post-2015 Swiss data showed muted long-term growth dampening and persistent exporter challenges, reinforcing that interventions delay but intensify corrections when fundamentals prevail. Critics argue these episodes validate first-principles insights that exchange rates equilibrate via arbitrage and expectations, rendering sustained official resistance futile without complementary reforms like fiscal tightening or structural adjustments.^[73]^[79]

Currency Manipulation Accusations

In the post-Bretton Woods era of predominantly floating exchange rates, accusations of currency manipulation have centered on countries intervening in foreign exchange markets to suppress the value of their currencies, thereby resisting market-driven revaluations that would align exchange rates with underlying economic fundamentals such as trade surpluses and productivity gains. These interventions, often involving sustained purchases of foreign currencies, are criticized for distorting global trade balances and conferring unfair export advantages, prompting retaliatory measures like tariffs or bilateral negotiations. The United States, as the largest economy facing persistent deficits, has been the primary accuser, formalizing its assessments through semi-annual reports mandated by the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988. Under the 1988 Act, the U.S. Treasury designates a country as a currency manipulator if it meets all three criteria: a significant bilateral goods surplus with the U.S. (generally exceeding $20 billion), a material current account surplus (typically over 2% of GDP), and evidence of persistent, one-sided net foreign exchange purchases exceeding 2% of GDP over a 12-month period.^[80] Between 1988 and 1994, the Treasury labeled China, South Korea, and Taiwan (twice) as manipulators, citing their interventions to maintain undervalued currencies amid rapid export growth.^[80] No designations occurred from 1995 until 2019, though monitoring lists persisted for nations like Japan and emerging Asian economies, reflecting ongoing concerns over sterilized interventions that delayed revaluations.^[81] A prominent pre-formal case involved Japan in the 1980s, where U.S. policymakers accused Tokyo of deliberately undervaluing the yen through massive interventions and capital controls, contributing to America's bilateral trade deficit exceeding $50 billion annually by 1985.^[45] This pressure culminated in the 1985 Plaza Accord, where Japan agreed to coordinated interventions that revalued the yen from approximately 240 per dollar to around 120 by 1987, though critics argue Japan's subsequent asset bubble and stagnation partly stemmed from overcorrection rather than the initial undervaluation.^[44] The 2019 designation of China marked a revival of formal accusations, with Treasury determining on August 5 that Beijing manipulated the renminbi by allowing a 10% depreciation to an 11-year low against the dollar, coinciding with escalated U.S. tariffs, while meeting the criteria through a $345 billion bilateral surplus, 2.8% current account surplus, and net forex purchases.^[82] The label, the first since 1994, was reversed in January 2020 following a phase-one trade deal committing China to refrain from competitive devaluations, though subsequent Treasury reports have highlighted ongoing opacity in China's forex data and lack of market-determined renminbi valuation as persistent issues.^[83] In 2020, Vietnam and Switzerland briefly received the label due to similar patterns of intervention amid surpluses, but were delabeled after negotiations, underscoring how designations often catalyze policy adjustments rather than long-term penalties.^[84] Debates surrounding these accusations emphasize empirical evidence of interventions correlating with undervaluation—such as China's accumulation of over $3 trillion in reserves by 2014 to cap renminbi appreciation—but also question political motivations, with some analyses noting that high domestic savings rates in accused nations could independently drive surpluses without manipulation.^[85] Nonetheless, Treasury assessments prioritize observable interventions over macroeconomic explanations, arguing that deliberate suppression of revaluation harms global adjustment mechanisms, as evidenced by prolonged U.S. deficits averaging 3-5% of GDP since the 1980s.^[86] Accusations have waned in frequency post-2020 amid global disruptions like the COVID-19 pandemic, but remain a tool for addressing imbalances in peg-like or managed float regimes.^[80]

Superiority of Floating Exchange Rates

Floating exchange rates enable currencies to adjust continuously to underlying economic fundamentals, such as differences in inflation, productivity, and trade balances, thereby obviating the need for discrete revaluations that characterize pegged regimes under pressure.^[87] This market-driven mechanism, as argued by economist Milton Friedman in his 1953 essay "The Case for Flexible Exchange Rates," allows exchange rates to serve as shock absorbers, facilitating gradual corrections to imbalances without requiring central bank interventions or reserve depletions.^[88] Under floating systems, persistent over- or undervaluation is less likely to build up, reducing the risk of sudden revaluation crises seen in fixed regimes, where artificial pegs distort relative prices and invite speculative attacks.^[89] A core advantage lies in preserving monetary policy autonomy, as formalized in the "impossible trinity" or Mundell-Fleming trilemma, which posits that nations cannot simultaneously maintain a fixed exchange rate, free capital mobility, and independent monetary control.^[90] With floating rates, central banks can prioritize domestic objectives like inflation targeting or output stabilization, unencumbered by the need to defend a peg through interest rate hikes or foreign exchange sales, which often exacerbate recessions.^[91] Empirical analyses support this: developing economies with floating regimes have demonstrated superior absorption of external shocks, with output growth recovering faster post-shock compared to fixed-rate peers, despite initial higher volatility in trade flows.^[92] For instance, countries like Canada and Australia, maintaining floating currencies since the 1980s and 1990s respectively, avoided the severe balance-of-payments crises that plagued pegged economies during the 1997 Asian financial meltdown, where Thailand's baht peg collapsed amid $20 billion in reserve losses.^[93] Floating regimes also mitigate currency manipulation incentives and accusations, as rates reflect genuine supply-demand dynamics rather than policy-induced distortions. Post-1973, after the Bretton Woods collapse, major economies adopting floats experienced fewer speculative pressures and revaluation episodes, with IMF data indicating that de facto floating arrangements—prevalent in 79 countries by the 2000s—correlated with reduced systemic crises relative to the 48 hard-peg adherents.^[94] Critics note short-term volatility, yet long-run evidence from NBER studies affirms that flexible rates enhance external adjustment without the cumulative misalignments that precipitate forced revaluations, as undervalued pegs like Argentina's pre-2001 convertibility led to export booms followed by abrupt 300% devaluations.^[95]^[93] Thus, floating systems promote causal alignment between exchange rates and economic realities, fostering resilience over the rigidity of pegs.

Contemporary Applications

Surviving Pegged Regimes

Several currency pegged regimes have demonstrated remarkable endurance in the face of speculative attacks, economic shocks, and divergent monetary policies between the anchor and pegged currencies, often through institutional commitment, substantial foreign reserves, and automatic adjustment mechanisms. These "surviving" pegs typically feature hard fixes, such as currency boards or narrow fluctuation bands, which subordinate domestic monetary policy to exchange rate stability, limiting independent interest rate adjustments and requiring fiscal restraint to avoid imbalances.^[7] Examples include the Hong Kong dollar's currency board peg to the US dollar since November 1983 at HK$7.80 per USD, the Saudi riyal's fixed rate to the USD at SAR 3.75 since June 1986, and Denmark's krone's participation in the Exchange Rate Mechanism II (ERM II) peg to the euro since January 1999 at a central rate of DKK 7.46038 per EUR with a ±2.25% fluctuation band.^[96]^[97] The Hong Kong dollar peg has withstood multiple crises, including the 1997-1998 Asian financial crisis—where speculators like George Soros targeted it but failed due to the Hong Kong Monetary Authority's (HKMA) interventions selling HK$118 billion in stocks to defend the rate—and the 2008 global financial crisis, supported by over HK$3 trillion in reserves by 2023, equivalent to seven times the monetary base.^[98] Key survival factors include the currency board's convertibility undertaking, which mandates full backing of the monetary base with US dollars, enforcing automatic liquidity adjustments and preventing over-issuance; high capital account openness that attracts inflows during stress; and explicit policy vows from authorities, as reiterated by Chief Executive John Lee in June 2025, affirming the peg as a "key success factor" for financial stability.^[99] Despite recent strains from US Federal Reserve rate hikes widening interest differentials and capital outflows to mainland China, option-implied probabilities of peg abandonment remained above 90% through mid-2025, bolstered by HKMA's active defense via liquidity operations.^[100] Saudi Arabia's riyal peg, managed by the Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority (SAMA), has endured oil price volatility and global downturns, including the 2014-2016 oil crash that halved revenues, by drawing on sovereign wealth funds and reserves peaking at $737 billion in 2014 and stabilizing around $435 billion by 2025 to intervene in forex markets.^[101] The peg aligns with oil exports predominantly invoiced in USD, minimizing transaction costs and hedging risks for a hydrocarbon-dependent economy where petroleum accounts for 40% of GDP; SAMA's sterilization of inflows via bill issuances prevents inflationary pressures, while fiscal diversification under Vision 2030 reduces vulnerability.^[96] No adjustments have occurred since 1986, even amid 2020's negative oil prices and pandemic-induced deficits, as the fixed rate facilitates petrodollar recycling and investor confidence in a regime with minimal capital controls.^[102] Denmark's krone peg, overseen by Danmarks Nationalbank, has maintained stability through the Eurozone sovereign debt crisis (2009-2012) and the 2015 Swiss franc unpegging spillover, intervening with over DKK 500 billion in sales during the latter to counter appreciation pressures from safe-haven inflows.^[103] Survival hinges on aligning short-term interest rates with the European Central Bank—often below zero since 2014—while building reserves to DKK 1.5 trillion (45% of GDP) by 2023 for asymmetric interventions within the band; this "unilateral euroization lite" benefits from Denmark's open economy and high productivity, avoiding euro adoption's fiscal transfer risks as per the 1992 Edinburgh Agreement opt-out.^[97] Periodic strains, like 2015's band tests, underscore the regime's credibility derived from transparent policy rules and absence of domestic political pressures to deviate, contrasting fragile pegs elsewhere.^[104] Common threads in these regimes include credible institutions prioritizing exchange rate targets over output stabilization, deep forex reserves exceeding short-term liabilities, and economic structures—financial hubs for Hong Kong, commodity exports for Saudi Arabia, export-oriented manufacturing for Denmark—that tolerate induced cycles without breaking the peg.^[105] However, endurance is not guaranteed; divergences in anchor economies' policies, as seen in US-China tensions affecting Hong Kong, can amplify risks, though these cases illustrate how binding rules and market discipline can sustain pegs longer than discretionary floats in small, open economies.^[106]

Recent Pressures and Near-Misses (Post-2000)

In January 2015, the Swiss National Bank (SNB) abandoned its three-year-old policy of capping the Swiss franc at 1.20 per euro, which had been implemented in September 2011 to counter persistent appreciation pressures from safe-haven capital inflows amid the European sovereign debt crisis. The franc appreciated by nearly 30% against the euro immediately following the announcement on January 15, leading to market turmoil including sharp declines in Swiss stocks and exporter profits. This event highlighted the limits of interventionist defenses against revaluation pressures in a floating-rate era, as the SNB had expended billions in foreign reserves to maintain the floor, but ultimately succumbed to unsustainable inflows and low eurozone inflation.^[79]^[107] The Hong Kong dollar's peg to the US dollar at 7.8 has faced recurrent depreciation pressures post-2000, notably during the 2008 global financial crisis when capital outflows tested the Hong Kong Monetary Authority's (HKMA) reserves, requiring interventions to defend the weak-side convertibility undertaking at 7.85. More acutely, in late 2022, aggressive US Federal Reserve rate hikes amid Hong Kong's zero-COVID policy slowdowns drove the currency to the peg's lower band, with market-implied probabilities of peg survival dropping to around 50% based on option prices and asset pricing models. The HKMA responded by draining liquidity through record bill issuance and forex interventions, absorbing over HK$100 billion in local currency to stabilize the band without adjustment. Similar strains reemerged in mid-2025, prompting further interventions totaling HK$9.42 billion in June alone as the exchange rate hit the weak end.^[108]^[109]^[106] Saudi Arabia's riyal, fixed at 3.75 to the US dollar since 1986, endured severe devaluation threats during the 2014-2016 oil price collapse, which halved export revenues and widened fiscal deficits to 15% of GDP by 2015. Speculative pressures manifested in one-year forward points surging to 575 basis points—the highest since 2002—signaling bets on devaluation, while Saudi Arabia's international reserves fell from $737 billion in 2014 to $536 billion by early 2016. Despite calls from analysts to abandon the peg for monetary autonomy, the Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority (SAMA) defended it through $150 billion in drawdowns and spending cuts, averting adjustment but at the cost of economic contraction exceeding 3% in 2016. These episodes underscore the vulnerability of commodity-dependent pegs to external shocks, with ongoing oil volatility posing latent risks despite restored reserves above $400 billion by 2023.^[110]^[111]^[112] Other near-misses include Denmark's krone peg to the euro, which weathered appreciation pressures in 2011-2012 via Danmarks Nationalbank interventions totaling over 100 billion kroner to maintain the 7.46 upper band, avoiding revaluation amid eurozone turmoil. In emerging Asia, Malaysia's ringgit faced revaluation speculation in 2005-2007 due to rapid growth and capital inflows, prompting Bank Negara Malaysia to allow gradual appreciation from 3.80 to 3.40 per dollar while retaining managed float elements to preempt peg-like rigidity. These cases illustrate how central banks in pegged or quasi-pegged regimes have increasingly relied on sterilized interventions and interest rate adjustments—often diverging from anchors—to mitigate pressures, though such measures risk eroding credibility over time.^[113]^[93]

References

[1]
Teacher Guide to Student Interactive: The IMF In Action: How Can ...
... revaluation is an upward change in the currency's value. A key effect of devaluation is that it makes the domestic currency cheaper relative to other currencies ...
[2]
Currency Revaluation Explained: Definition, Effects, and Examples
Sep 11, 2025 · A revaluation is an upward adjustment to a country's official exchange rate relative to a chosen baseline. The baseline can include wage ...What Is a Revaluation? · Effect on Currency Value/Asset... · Causes
[3]
[PDF] Effects of Exchange-Rate Devaluations and Revaluations on ...
in foreign exchange receipts occurs in response to a devaluation or revaluation, corresponds to a value of one for the usual elasticity concept defined in terms ...
[4]
Currency revaluation Definition - Nasdaq
A deliberate upward adjustment in the official exchange rate established, or pegged, by government against a specified standard, such as another currency or ...
[5]
Differentiate between revaluation of currency and appreciation of the ...
Feb 21, 2020 · Revaluation means a rise of domestic currency in relation to foreign currency in a fixed exchange rate whereas appreciation implies an increase in the external ...
[6]
https://www.tutor2u.net/economics/reference/4-1-8-exchange-rates-edexcel
[7]
Exchange Rate Regimes in an Increasingly Integrated World Economy
A currency board is committed to supplying or redeeming its monetary liabilities at a fixed exchange rate, which implies that it must hold foreign reserves ...
[8]
Basics of Exchange Rate Policy | Bank of Botswana
Exchange rate revaluation: in a fixed exchange rate regime, a policy decision to make a discrete increase in the value of the domestic currency. Special Drawing ...
[9]
[PDF] Selected Views of Exchange Rate Determination After a Decade of ...
The approach originated to determine the balance of trade response to an exchange rate devalu- ation or revaluation. However, it is easily altered to.
[10]
The Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on the Prices and Volume of ...
Jan 1, 1977 · Within the tradition of the elasticity approach to the balance of payments, exchange rate adjustment falls into the general category of ...
[11]
[PDF] The Foreign Exchange Market and Trade Elasticities
Thus the first assumption is that the balance of payments is simply sales of the export minus spending on the import. Assumption 2. Assume (through the ...Missing: revaluation | Show results with:revaluation
[12]
Elasticity Approach - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The elasticities approach showed that it is possible for a country to improve its balance of trade through devaluation. Once the exchange rate effects pass ...Missing: revaluation | Show results with:revaluation
[13]
[PDF] The Monetary Approach to the Balance of Payments
By the same reasoning, revaluation or currency appreciation produces a transitory balance-of-payments deficit by lowering domestic prices. The demand for ...
[14]
[PDF] Basic Exchange Rate Theories - EconStor
Feb 7, 2005 · The elasticities approach focuses on the relationship between exchange rates and the current account balance. The absorption approach extends ...
[15]
12.4: Exchange Rate Policy with Fixed Exchange Rates
Jan 30, 2023 · key Takeaways A revaluation in a fixed exchange rate system will cause a decrease in GNP, an increase in the currency value to the new fixed ...
[16]
Chapter 12: Policy Effects with Fixed Exchange Rates
A currency revaluation raises the currency value and causes a decrease in GNP. Unemployment rises, interest rates remain the same, and the trade balance falls.<|control11|><|separator|>
[17]
Policy strategies to deal with revaluation pressures on the renminbi
Under the de facto pegged exchange rate, the surplus in the overall balance of payments results in an increasing money supply, which may create a bubble in the ...<|separator|>
[18]
[PDF] Chapter 17
How a central bank must manage monetary policy so as to fix its currency's value in the foreign exchange market. • The relationship between the central ...<|separator|>
[19]
Britain's Return to the Gold Standard in 1925 Revisited
Jun 17, 2025 · On 28 April 1925, Winston Churchill announced the United Kingdom's return to the gold standard. Few policy decisions in history have provoked as much ...
[20]
Mr Churchill, Mr Keynes and the UK's Re-Entry to and Exit from the ...
In January 1925, the value was $4.77, and hence the rise to $4.86 with the return to the gold standard was rather modest, though in the estimation of Keynes ...
[21]
Winston Churchill's Gold Standard Folly - FEE.org
Jun 1, 2023 · When England went back on the gold standard in April 1925, with the pound valued at $4.86, she had raised the value of the pound about 10 ...
[22]
The 1927 Revaluation of the Lira: A Study in Political Economy - jstor
3 The term Quota Novanta translates literally as the Ninety Rate. It represented the approximate rate of exchange established between the lira and the pound (92 ...
[23]
The economic consequences of Mr. Volpi: An analysis of “quota 90”
The revaluation of the lira against the pound, the so-called “quota 90”, was a major economic policy decision taken by the fascist government in 1926.
[24]
Stabilizing the Franc | Foreign Affairs
Poincaré's measures which made a definite return to the gold standard at an early date essential if this success were not to be jeopardized. As has been noted, ...
[25]
French gold accumulation, 1928–1932 (Chapter 2)
From 1928 to 1932, French gold reserves increased by more than 50 billion francs, from 29 to 82 billion francs. During the same period, Bank of France note ...Missing: revaluation | Show results with:revaluation
[26]
[PDF] The Bretton Woods International Monetary System
France in 1957 and 1958, and minor revaluations by Germany and the Neth- erlands in 1961. The adjustable peg system became less adjustable because, on the ...Missing: instances | Show results with:instances
[27]
[PDF] Devaluation-Bias and the Bretton Woods System
Seven of the reserve-gainers experienced a revaluation-bias by this test (that is, the effective exchange rate changed less than the actual changes in their ...
[28]
[PDF] The Collapse of the Bretton Woods Fixed Exchange Rate System
Finally, reflecting the growing pressure on the system, the deutsche mark was revalued in 1969 and floated in May 1971 prior to the closing of the. U.S. gold ...
[29]
[PDF] Annual report 1961 - Deutsche Bundesbank
At the beginning of March. 1961 moreover the Bundesbank assented to the upward revaluation of the DM, resolved by the. Federal Government, because the fact that ...
[30]
[PDF] THE D-MARK IN THE CONFLICT BETWEEN INTERNAL AND ...
The first such instance was the D-Mark revaluation of 1961, unmistakably signaling the priority of internal monetary stability. It established the principle of ...
[31]
[PDF] WEST GERMANY: THE DEUTSCHEMARK PROBLEM - CIA
The 5 percent revaluation of the Deutschemark in 1961 has frequently been cited as a precedent for a new revaluation in the near future. As the German.Missing: details | Show results with:details
[32]
[PDF] Monthly Report - December 1969 - Deutsche Bundesbank
3 Excluding amount of. DM 4,287 million required by Bundesbank to offset losses in gold and foreign exchange holdings due to D-Mark revaluation. 4 Balance on.
[33]
Chapter 22: Adjustments in Rates for French Franc and Deutsche ...
In arguing for a revaluation of the deutsche mark, they cited the need for measures that affected all of the Federal Republic of Germany's balance of payments, ...
[34]
The Once Feared Strong Yen Is Now in Japan's National Interest
Jan 30, 2024 · The Japanese yen was pegged at 308 to the US dollar, an upward revaluation of 16.88%, the largest increase among participating nations. However, ...<|separator|>
[35]
https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.12987/9780300245578-012/html
[36]
After Bretton Woods - Britannica
Under Bretton Woods, countries had bought when the exchange rate fell and sold when it rose; now national currencies floated, meaning that the exchange rate ...
[37]
Better Than the Euro? The European Monetary System (1979–1998)
Sep 14, 2017 · We will revisit the EMS and show that the 62 de- and revaluations that were conducted among its members between 1979 and 1998 actually helped to minimise ...
[38]
West Germany Revalues the Mark; European Move Tied to Dollar Ills
Sep 24, 1979 · Under the realignment, the value of the West German mark will be increased by 5 percent against the Danish krone and by 2 percent against other ...Missing: Deutsche | Show results with:Deutsche
[39]
III Economic Performance in: EUropean Monetary System
The deutsche mark and the Dutch guilder were revalued by 3 percent and the Belgian and Luxembourg francs by 2 percent against the French franc and the other ...
[40]
[PDF] the european monetary system: credible at last?
These realignments have always taken the form of devaluations, in varying degrees, against the DM: no currency has been revalued against the DM. Only the Dutch ...Missing: Deutsche | Show results with:Deutsche
[41]
A Look at China's New Exchange Rate Regime - San Francisco Fed
Sep 9, 2005 · The revaluation puts the renminbi at 8.11 against the dollar, which amounts to an appreciation of 2.1%.The new renminbi regime · Trade-weighted renminbi...
[42]
Timeline: China's yuan reforms - Reuters
Jun 4, 2010 · In July 2005, China bowed to market and political pressure by revaluing the yuan by 2.1 percent and abandoning its decade-old peg against ...
[43]
Chinese relent and revalue the yuan | Business - The Guardian
Jul 21, 2005 · The immediate impact was a 2.1% appreciation against the dollar. China's leaders have frequently talked of the economic desirability of a more ...
[44]
Plaza Accord: Definition, History, Purpose, and Its Replacement
The Plaza Accord led to the yen and Deutschmark dramatically increasing in value relative to the dollar. An unintended consequence of the Plaza Accord was that ...
[45]
[PDF] The Plaza Accord, 30 years later - Baker Institute
The change had the desired effect, bringing down the dollar and reducing the trade deficit. In recent years concerted foreign exchange intervention, of the sort.
[46]
[PDF] The Plaza Accord 30 Years Later - Harvard University
After two years or so, the elasticities have risen enough that the quantity effects begin to outweigh the valuation effect. The US trade deficit in goods ...
[47]
How Does Inflation Affect the Exchange Rate Between Two Nations?
Oct 28, 2024 · Inflation typically has an inverse relationship with exchange rates: High inflation often leads to a weaker currency, while low inflation ...Inflation, Exchange Rates, and... · Exchange Rate Pass-Through · Other Factors
[48]
[PDF] From the Deutsche Mark to the Euro
Germany revalued its currency relative to the dollar by 5 percent in March 1961. Germany let the mark float upward in September 1969 and then set a peg at a ...
[49]
Measuring the value of currencies: Exchange rates and inflation
Sep 18, 2023 · A large part of these long-run exchange rate movements can indeed be explained by inflation differentials: Inflation is typically low in ...
[50]
Launch of the Bretton Woods System | Federal Reserve History
As explained above, foreign central banks had to monetize these inflows and allow inflation in order to maintain the fixed peg with the dollar (to prevent ...
[51]
Currency Tensions: Four Lessons From History
Dec 9, 2010 · From 1930 to 1938, 20 countries devalued their currencies by more than 10 percent at least once. Some countries—like France, Greece, and Spain— ...The Present Tensions · Change In Real Effective... · Lesson 1: Devaluations Were...<|control11|><|separator|>
[52]
Hot Money Inflows and Renminbi Revaluation Pressure
In this paper we build a monetary model to show how anticipated revaluations lead to the instability of a pegged exchange rate regime. This model assumes ...<|separator|>
[53]
[PDF] The German undervaluation regime under Bretton Woods - EconStor
The figure also illustrates how tiny the German 1961 revaluation was compared to the inflation differentials that had cumulated since 1950. In line with our ...
[54]
From Bretton Woods to Bipolarity: The Evolution of Thought on ...
Jul 20, 2001 · Formally, the two principal achievements of the C-20 negotiations were to endorse the return of the adjustable peg and to declare the SDR the ...Missing: instances | Show results with:instances
[55]
How exports react to exchange rate fluctuations, and what it means ...
Apr 24, 2024 · Conversely, when it appreciates, exports become less competitive and tend to contract. A currency can depreciate for many reasons. For example, ...
[56]
Revaluation - (International Economics) - Fiveable
Revaluation is the process of increasing the value of a country's currency relative to other currencies, often implemented by a government or central bank.
[57]
The Impact of Currency Misalignment on Trade Balance of Emerging ...
Conversely, higher overvaluation makes export less competitive and worsens trade balance; the associated coefficient should be negative. Hence, both ...
[58]
Does exchange rate volatility affect the impact of appreciation and ...
The trade balance declines in the short run because devaluation raises the domestic price of imports while export prices in the seller's currency become ...Missing: revaluation | Show results with:revaluation
[59]
The Valuation Effects of Trade - Federal Reserve Bank of Boston
Abstract. This paper estimates the cash flow and real effects of currency mismatches generated by foreign-priced operations of French manufacturers. The value ...
[60]
Dollars and exports: The effects of currency strength on international ...
Jul 27, 2021 · A strong dollar dampens trade volumes through the financial channel, outweighing any improvement in trade competitiveness.Missing: examples revaluation harming
[61]
Currency Revaluation: How Does It Work? - SmartAsset.com
Aug 7, 2024 · Currency revaluation is a process through which a country adjusts the value of its currency relative to other currencies.
[62]
Impact of Currency Devaluation and Revaluation - Bafageh
Impact of Currency Revaluation ; Exports weaken, Local products become more expensive in foreign markets ; Inflation tends to fall, Import prices can suppress ...
[63]
Revaluation - (Principles of Economics) - Fiveable
Revaluation is the act of increasing the official exchange rate of a currency relative to other currencies. It is a policy tool used by governments or central ...
[64]
Exchange Rate Pass-Through, Domestic Competition, and Inflation
Mar 6, 2012 · This paper quantifies the effect of the government-controlled appreciation of the Chinese renminbi (RMB) vis-à-vis the USD from 2005 to 2008 ...
[65]
[PDF] Why the Yuan Should be Revalued (PDF)
China's foreign exchange reserves have been increasing sharply, reaching $609.9 billion at the end of 2004, a level that places China second in the world behind ...
[66]
The Economic Impact of the Strong Franc on the Swiss Economy
Aug 12, 2024 · The strong franc is a cause of Switzerland's low inflation rate. The inflation-dampening effect of the appreciating currency has a positive impact on export ...Missing: revaluation | Show results with:revaluation
[67]
Franc-ly Speaking, Swiss Currency Is Too Strong - NPR
Aug 11, 2011 · The result is an inflation rate below 1 percent and an unemployment rate of about 3 percent. Government debt, as a share of GDP, is well below ...Missing: revaluation | Show results with:revaluation
[68]
Half a century of large currency appreciations: Did they reduce ...
Mar 2, 2011 · First, the current-account balance typically falls strongly in response to large exchange-rate revaluations. · Second, the effects on output seem ...
[69]
The revaluation of the Swiss franc reduces GDP growth prospects ...
Mar 19, 2015 · The revaluation of the Swiss franc reduces GDP growth prospects for 2015 and 2016. Bern, 19.3. 2015 - Economic forecasts from the Federal ...
[70]
40 years after Plaza Accord, Japan still at mercy of forex swings
Sep 21, 2025 · As Japan had an export-oriented economy, many exporters in the nation were battered by the steep appreciation of the yen. The BOJ cut interest ...
[71]
Plazza Acord and the “Explosion” of the Japanese FDI - ScienceDirect
The present article proposes to analyze the advancement of Japan's FDI, caused by the yen's strong appreciation (after the Plaza Accord-1985).
[72]
[PDF] The Macroeconomic Effects of Large Exchange Rate Appreciations ...
A recent study by Berg and Miao (2010) essentially confirmed. Rodrik's analysis. The authors find empirical evidence that currency overvaluations are negative.
[73]
Ten years after the Swiss franc shock: Lessons on prices ... - CEPR
Jan 28, 2025 · Removing the currency floor triggered a sudden and sharp rise in the Swiss franc – by around 15% against the euro – sending shockwaves through ...Missing: revaluation | Show results with:revaluation
[74]
China reportedly close to an agreement to revalue currency
In 2005, in response to U.S. threats of a tariff on Chinese exports, China revalued its currency by a few percentage points and then allowed it to rise ...
[75]
The Limitations of Foreign-Exchange Intervention: Lessons from ...
Oct 18, 2013 · The Swiss foreign-exchange operations, which by design or by happenstance were sterilized, had failed to prevent the Swiss franc's appreciation.
[76]
Abandoning a Currency Peg | Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
Oct 4, 2016 · By dropping the peg and allowing its currency to appreciate, the SNB “realizes some of these losses when reserves are still low, and [reduces] …
[77]
SNB says spent $27 billion to defend franc before dropping peg
Mar 26, 2015 · The SNB shocked markets in January when it removed the 1.20 per euro cap on the Swiss franc, sending the currency soaring, stocks plunging and ...
[78]
Switzerland's central bank makes a massive loss - The Economist
Aug 1, 2015 · In January, the SNB abruptly abandoned its currency peg as the European Central Bank geared up for its €1.1 trillion quantitative easing ...Missing: costs | Show results with:costs
[79]
Swiss franc soars, stocks tank as euro peg scrapped - CNBC
Jan 15, 2015 · The Swiss National Bank (SNB) stunned markets on Thursday, when it scrapped its three-year-old peg of 1.20 Swiss francs per euro.
[80]
Exchange Rates and Currency Manipulation - Congress.gov
Jan 10, 2025 · Currency manipulation is when governments intentionally interfere with market forces to lower a currency's value to boost exports.
[81]
[PDF] Policy Brief 12-25: Currency Manipulation, the US Economy, and the ...
Dec 25, 2012 · According to the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988, the. US Treasury is required to designate countries as currency manipulators ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
[82]
Treasury Designates China as a Currency Manipulator
Aug 5, 2019 · Secretary Mnuchin, under the auspices of President Trump, has today determined that China is a Currency Manipulator.
[83]
Nothing to See Here: China No Longer 'A Currency Manipulator'
Jan 14, 2020 · A1: The Treasury Department's August announcement designating China a “currency manipulator” charged China with devaluing its currency to “gain ...
[84]
U.S. Treasury labels Switzerland, Vietnam as currency manipulators
Dec 16, 2020 · U.S. Treasury labels Switzerland, Vietnam as currency manipulators ... requirements to warrant a manipulator label. CNBC logo · Subscribe to ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[85]
Currency Manipulation—History Shows That Sanctions Are Needed
Apr 29, 2010 · Growing U.S. trade deficits with China—due, in part, to the Chinese government's manipulation of its currency—caused 2.4 million U.S. jobs ...
[86]
Treasury Releases Report on Macroeconomic and Foreign ...
Jun 5, 2025 · While Treasury has not designated China as a currency manipulator in this report amid RMB depreciation pressure, China stands out among our ...
[87]
[PDF] The Case for Floating Exchange Rates
Recent British experience offers another cautionary tale about the risks involved in pegging one currency to another.Missing: arguments | Show results with:arguments
[88]
The Case for Flexible Exchange Rates in 1953 and 1969: Friedman ...
Apr 15, 2024 · Similarly, Friedman argued that, under a floating regime, exchange rates would be determined by the economic fundamentals, but he also ...Abstract · FRIEDMAN AND JOHNSON · FRIEDMAN (1953) AND...
[89]
[PDF] The balance of payments: free versus fixed exchange rates - FRASER
Friedman argued that balance-of-payments problems would be eliminated by floating exchange rates because there could not be a surplus or a shortage in the sense.
[90]
[PDF] Lessons on the "impossible trinity" - Bank for International Settlements
Floating exchange rates can provide monetary independence by allowing central banks to adjust the policy rate to achieve their inflation target. However, ...
[91]
The impossible trinity - CEPR
Nov 26, 2011 · The impossible trinity doctrine – that it is not possible to have a fixed exchange rate, monetary policy autonomy, and open capital markets ...
[92]
[PDF] Fixed versus flexible exchange rates: Evidence from developing ...
Thus, floating regimes are superior in absorbing the initial external shock. In the following periods output growth recovers under both regimes. However ...<|separator|>
[93]
Fear of floating exchange rates in emerging markets | Brookings
Oct 24, 2024 · Argentina is perhaps the most prominent example and helps illustrate the dangers inherent in currency pegs.
[94]
[PDF] Exchange Rate Regimes: Fix or Float
A country's exchange rate regime governs its exchange rate—that is, how much its own currency is worth in terms of the currencies of other countries. If the ...
[95]
[PDF] Milton Friedman and Exchange Rates in Developing Countries ...
“[W]hile I have long been in favor of a system of floating exchange rates for the major countries, I have never argued that that is necessarily also the best ...
[96]
[PDF] Foreign exchange intervention in Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia has a fixed exchange rate regime, with a dollar peg. The spot USD/SAR exchange rate has remained unchanged at 3.7500 since June 1986, as SAMA.
[97]
Questions regarding fixed exchange rate policy
Denmark pursues a fixed exchange rate policy against the euro. This means that the value of the Danish krone against the euro must be kept stable against the ...
[98]
How Credible Is Hong Kong's Currency Peg? Insights from Financial ...
Sep 25, 2025 · Credibility is driven by factors including interest rate differentials, interbank liquidity, and China's currency renminbi movements.
[99]
Hong Kong's US-dollar peg a key success factor and will stay: John ...
Jun 9, 2025 · Hong Kong will maintain its currency's peg to the US dollar, the city's leader has said, identifying it as a key success factor and rejecting calls to abandon ...<|separator|>
[100]
[PDF] How Credible Is Hong Kong's Currency Peg? Insights from Financial ...
Sep 25, 2025 · Credibility is driven by factors including interest rate differentials, interbank liquidity, and China's currency renminbi movements. Financial ...
[101]
How is Saudi Arabia sustaining dollar dominance? - CurrencyTransfer
Jul 18, 2025 · Since 1986, the Saudi riyal has been fixed at 3.75 to 1 USD. ... Saudi Arabia maintains large USD reserves (around $435bn) to defend the peg.
[102]
Saudi Riyal - USD Trading
May 20, 2025 · Since 1986, the Saudi Riyal has been pegged to the US Dollar at a fixed rate of 3.75 SAR per 1 USD. This means that the Saudi government, ...
[103]
[PDF] The Danish Problem - Danmarks Nationalbank
Yet against all odds, Danmarks Nationalbank has been able to maintain the krone's peg to the euro continuously ever since the euro came into existence in 1999.<|control11|><|separator|>
[104]
Concern in Denmark as Its Currency's Peg to the Euro Is Strained
Feb 12, 2015 · That has led to grave concern here, as speculators bet that Denmark's currency peg to the euro will break, giving them outsize profits on the ...
[105]
[PDF] Pegging and Stabilization Policy in Developing Countries
First, pegging to the currency of another successful monetary authority is believed to. “import” that authority's policies and credibility and thereby lower ...
[106]
How Credible Is Hong Kong's Currency Peg? Insights from Option ...
Aug 13, 2025 · The estimated probability of peg survival (p) dropped to ~50%, coinciding with aggressive US Fed rate hikes, outflows from HKD assets, and a ...Missing: factors | Show results with:factors
[107]
Swiss franc jumps 30 percent after Swiss National Bank dumps euro ...
Jan 15, 2015 · Switzerland's franc soared by almost 30 percent in value against the euro on Thursday after the Swiss National Bank abandoned its three-year old cap.
[108]
[PDF] How Credible is Hong Kong's Currency Peg? Urban Jermann, Bin ...
Sep 4, 2025 · Most notably, in late 2022, the estimated probability of peg survival (p) fell sharply to around 50%, coinciding with aggressive U.S. Federal ...
[109]
Hong Kong Intervenes to Defend FX Peg as Local Currency Drops
Jun 25, 2025 · The Hong Kong Monetary Authority took HK$9.42 billion ($1.2 billion) out of circulation after the exchange rate touched the weak end of its dollar peg.
[110]
https://www.wsj.com/articles/pressure-grows-on-saudi-arabia-to-ditch-dollar-peg-1452015549
[111]
Saudi riyal peg pressure eases, but not gone - Yahoo Finance
Apr 27, 2016 · The world's top oil exporter has pegged the riyal at 3.75 to the dollar since 1986 but oil's price collapse since mid-2014 has raised ...
[112]
Cut Oil Supply or Drop Riyal Peg? Saudis Face 'Critical' Choice
Nov 23, 2015 · One-year forward points for the riyal climbed 120 points to 575 as of 3:53 p.m. in Riyadh, the highest level since December 2002. That reflects ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
[113]
[PDF] Are Pegged and Intermediate Exchange Rate Regimes More Crisis ...
This paper provides evidence on the susceptibility of different types of exchange rate regimes to currency crises during 1990–2001.Missing: revaluations | Show results with:revaluations