Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Mission Accomplished speech

The Mission Accomplished speech was a televised address delivered by on May 1, 2003, from the of the USS Abraham Lincoln off the coast of , announcing the conclusion of major combat operations in the following the rapid that toppled Saddam Hussein's Ba'athist . Bush, who arrived via a tailhook landing in an S-3B Viking jet and donned a for the occasion, praised the U.S. military's efficiency in defeating Iraqi conventional forces in just six weeks, liberating Iraqis from dictatorship, and dismantling weapons of mass destruction programs, while explicitly warning of ongoing dangers from remnants of the regime and potential terrorists in the post-invasion stabilization phase. A large "Mission Accomplished" banner, hung behind the podium at the request of the Lincoln's crew to mark the successful completion of their extended deployment rather than the broader , symbolized the carrier's home after 290 days at sea but later fueled perceptions of premature triumphalism as a persistent erupted, leading to years of , thousands of additional U.S. casualties, and no swift transition to democracy or withdrawal. The speech underscored the distinction between the decisive conventional victory—achieved through superior airpower, precision strikes, and ground maneuvers—and the unforeseen challenges of amid and improvised explosive devices, highlighting causal factors like inadequate pre-war planning for post-Saddam governance and the empowerment of Iranian-backed militias.

Historical Context

Invasion of Iraq and Initial Military Success

Operation Iraqi Freedom commenced on March 20, 2003, with initial airstrikes targeting Iraqi leadership and military infrastructure, followed by a ground invasion from led by U.S. and forces totaling approximately 160,000 troops. The campaign employed "" tactics, combining precision-guided munitions and rapid maneuver warfare to disrupt Iraqi command structures and advance toward . Coalition forces encountered sporadic resistance from Iraqi regular army divisions, Republican Guard units, and Fedayeen paramilitaries, but many Iraqi formations disintegrated or surrendered en masse due to low morale, poor leadership, and overwhelming coalition air superiority. By early April, U.S. Army and Marine units had secured key southern cities like Nasiriyah and Najaf, then pushed northward, encircling Baghdad after battles at the airport and "Thunder Runs" through the city center. On April 9, 2003, Iraqi forces abandoned the capital, marking the fall of Baghdad and the effective collapse of Saddam Hussein's Ba'athist regime, symbolized by the toppling of his statue in Firdos Square. The initial phase concluded with the end of organized Iraqi resistance by late April 2003, as surviving regime elements dispersed into irregular operations, enabling President to declare major combat operations over on . This rapid success—achieved in under —stemmed from U.S. advantages in real-time , satellite-guided weaponry, and integrated joint operations, which neutralized Iraq's conventional forces numbering over 400,000 personnel across multiple divisions without prolonged urban attrition. Coalition casualties remained limited, with U.S. forces suffering 172 deaths (139 hostile) during the through May 1, contrasting sharply with expectations of higher losses in a defended urban campaign. Saddam Hussein evaded capture during the conventional phase but was located and apprehended by U.S. forces on , 2003, in a concealed underground hideout near , confirming the regime's decapitation. This outcome underscored the initial military achievements in dismantling Iraq's centralized command, though it preceded the emergence of decentralized insurgencies.

Strategic Objectives and Pre-Speech Developments


The Bush administration's strategic objectives for Operation Iraqi Freedom centered on neutralizing the threats posed by Saddam Hussein's regime, including its weapons of mass destruction programs, support for terrorism, and defiance of United Nations Security Council resolutions. The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 (H.J.Res. 114), passed by Congress on October 10, 2002, and signed by President George W. Bush on October 16, 2002, explicitly authorized the use of U.S. armed forces to defend national security against Iraq's continuing threat and to enforce relevant UN resolutions. Regime change was identified as a core means to achieve these ends, with major combat operations defined as the decisive defeat of Iraq's conventional forces, such as the Republican Guard and Fedayeen Saddam paramilitaries, rather than the elimination of all armed resistance.
By April 2003, coalition forces had advanced through , capturing on April 9 and —Saddam's hometown—on April 15, signifying the collapse of organized conventional resistance and the completion of Phase III (Dominate) under U.S. joint doctrine, which focused on rapid maneuver and destruction of enemy fielded capabilities. The , deployed since April 2002, played a key role in supporting these operations through its air wing's airstrikes, maritime interdiction, and designation as Force Over-the-Horizon Track Coordinator during the initial phases of OIF. As the carrier returned westward after 290 continuous days at sea—the longest carrier deployment to that point—military planners assessed the transition to Phase IV (Stabilize), involving security and reconstruction amid emerging low-level insurgent activity. Pre-speech deliberations emphasized marking this operational shift to affirm the success of the invasion's core military aims, enhance troop morale after intense , and project strength to deter residual loyalists and foreign fighters, while clarifying that ongoing stability operations would continue. The selection of the for the announcement leveraged its symbolic status as a frontline asset in the , aligning with doctrinal principles of signaling to shape post- dynamics without implying the full end of hostilities.

The Event

Staging and Symbolism of the USS Abraham Lincoln

The USS Abraham Lincoln, a Nimitz-class aircraft carrier, was selected for the May 1, , event due to its pivotal role in supporting U.S. naval operations and to honor its crew following an extended deployment. Positioned at sea approximately 30 miles off the coast of , , the carrier allowed President to address the sailors directly upon their return from combat duties, rather than requiring the crew to travel to a land-based venue. This location underscored the ship's real-world contributions, including sustained air operations in the and Gulf, affirming the event's grounding in genuine military accomplishment over mere spectacle. Bush's arrival amplified the symbolic resonance of the staging, as he flew in aboard a S-3B Viking antisubmarine jet from , executing the first-ever tailhook arrested landing by a sitting U.S. president on an . Dressed in a green emblazoned with his name, Bush emerged to cheers from the crew, evoking the imagery of naval aviators and projecting American military prowess and determination. This method of arrival, involving a co-pilot seat and two preparatory fly-bys, mirrored operational carrier procedures and symbolized continuity with historic U.S. naval triumphs, such as Pacific campaigns where carriers turned the tide against formidable foes. The Abraham Lincoln's operational credentials further reinforced the event's authenticity, having completed a record-setting ten-month deployment—the longest for a U.S. in the post-Cold War era at that time—directly aiding Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom through extensive flight operations. Its air wing delivered initial airstrikes and sustained support, logging thousands of sorties that contributed to the rapid defeat of Iraqi conventional forces. This backdrop highlighted causal links between the carrier's empirical achievements—such as enabling air superiority—and the staging's intent to recognize frontline service amid ongoing global commitments.

Content and Delivery of the Speech

President delivered the speech on May 1, 2003, from the flight deck of the USS Abraham Lincoln, an positioned off the coast of , addressing the ship's officers and sailors as well as a national television audience via live broadcast. The address lasted approximately 21 minutes and was directed to key figures including Admiral Kelly and Captain Card, commencing with thanks to the crew for their service in operations that included strikes against and support for forces in . Bush arrived via a tailhook landing in an S-3B Viking jet earlier that day, marking the first such arrival by a sitting president, before proceeding to the speech amid the carrier's crew. The core message centered on the conclusion of major combat operations in , with declaring verbatim: "Major combat operations in Iraq have ended. In the battle of Iraq, the and our allies have prevailed." He specified that this pertained to the conventional phase of the conflict, crediting forces with toppling Saddam Hussein's in 42 days through rapid advances from to , the liberation of Iraq's cities, and the defeat of divisions, while avoiding claims of total war victory. explicitly acknowledged persistent risks, stating "the continues" and that parts of Iraq remained dangerous due to potential terrorist attacks and regime remnants, emphasizing a shift to and stabilization efforts. Key themes included gratitude to U.S. troops and allies for their precision and resolve, with highlighting empirical outcomes such as the liberation of 25 million from tyranny, the destruction of weapons of mass destruction programs, and the capture or defeat of thousands of enemy combatants. He attributed the swift success of the conventional campaign to advances in and precision-guided munitions, which enabled forces to minimize civilian casualties while achieving operational dominance. Optimism was tempered by realism, as noted "we have difficult work to do ahead" in aiding Iraq's transition to self-government and , committing the to remain until security and reconstruction were achieved, without understating the challenges of .

Immediate Reactions

Domestic Media and Public Response

Public opinion polls immediately following the May 1, 2003, speech reflected strong domestic support for Bush and the military campaign in . A Gallup poll conducted May 2-4, 2003, reported Bush's job approval rating at 79%, buoyed by the rapid defeat of Iraqi conventional forces. Similarly, 86% of respondents in a May 2003 /Washington Post poll approved of the U.S. military's performance in toppling Saddam Hussein's regime, with broad bipartisan backing for the end of major combat operations. U.S. media coverage initially emphasized the speech's themes of success and the shift from to reconstruction, aligning with the administration's framing of concluded major hostilities. Outlets such as and highlighted the carrier's return after 34 months at sea without docking and the precision of operations, portraying the event as a triumphant milestone. While some reports, including in , noted the banner's wording and raised questions about timelines for full stabilization, the predominant tone in early May broadcasts focused on factual achievements like the capture of on April 9, 2003, rather than premature declarations. Support for U.S. troops remained robust, with Gallup data from late to early May 2003 showing 92% of Americans expressing pride in the armed forces' conduct during the invasion phase. This sentiment underscored a public consensus on the operational success against Iraq's army, even as polls indicated 69% awareness of ongoing challenges like looting and governance vacuums. Early skeptical commentary in outlets like centered on logistical hurdles in post-invasion planning but did not dominate coverage, which prioritized the empirical reality of regime collapse within six weeks.

International and Political Commentary

British Prime Minister , a key coalition partner, praised the coalition's military achievements following the speech, describing the liberation from Saddam Hussein's regime as "one huge thing and a momentous and mighty act for the people of " in a May 29, 2003, address to British troops in . Australian Prime Minister similarly endorsed the operation's success, congratulating President on his leadership during a May 2003 meeting and affirming Australia's pride in its contributions to disarming , which aligned with the declaration of ended major combat operations. These responses from allied leaders highlighted recognition of the tactical victory in toppling the Ba'athist regime, with coalition forces having captured on April 9, 2003, and Saddam's government collapsing shortly thereafter. United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan, despite prior reservations about the invasion's lack of explicit Security Council authorization, acknowledged the post-regime reality by emphasizing UN readiness to assist in humanitarian efforts and reconstruction in during April and May 2003. This stance was reflected in UN Security Council Resolution 1483, adopted on May 22, 2003, which recognized the Provisional Authority's authority and called for international support in stabilizing the country after the regime's fall. European leaders and media offered mixed commentary: while outlets like critiqued U.S. , they noted the definitive defeat of Saddam's forces, with some French and German officials expressing wariness toward ongoing occupation but conceding the military phase's conclusion. In U.S. politics, the speech elicited bipartisan acknowledgment of the invasion's initial military objectives, with public approval for the war reaching approximately 80% in early May 2003, including support from many Democrats who had voted for the October 2002 authorization. House Minority Leader expressed caution regarding long-term reconstruction but did not immediately denounce the end of major combat operations, focusing instead on the need for international involvement in stabilization efforts. Figures like Senator highlighted bipartisan consensus on the regime change's success in subsequent months, underscoring a shared recognition of the rapid overthrow of Saddam's government before insurgency challenges intensified.

Origin and Placement of the Banner

The "Mission Accomplished" banner was initiated by the crew of the USS Abraham Lincoln to mark the carrier's return from a nine-month deployment supporting , during which the ship conducted over 4,300 combat sorties and steamed more than 90,000 nautical miles. The phrase reflected the completion of the vessel's specific operational mission, not the overall effort. The advance team, in coordination with the ship's leadership, arranged for the banner to be professionally produced and printed to serve as a to the approximately 5,000 sailors and aboard, ensuring it was large enough for visibility during the May 1, 2003, event. While the crew had planned a similar handmade sign, the administration's involvement facilitated its prominent display without dictating the text or overriding the Navy's intent. Placement of the banner occurred under the direction of the carrier's , Captain , who suggested suspending it from the island behind to honor the 's accomplishments in launching air operations from the . The crew physically installed it on the morning of the speech, positioning it approximately 100 feet wide and 20 feet high for optimal backdrop effect during President Bush's address. This setup was consistent with naval traditions of recognizing unit-level successes upon redeployment. Clarifications from in October 2003, following media inquiries, affirmed that the 's creation stemmed from the Abraham Lincoln's operational achievements, countering attributions of it as an administration-imposed declaration of . No evidence emerged from contemporaneous reviews indicating the requested or imposed the to signify broader strategic success beyond the carrier's role.

Administration Clarifications and Disputes

The White House initially clarified that the "Mission Accomplished" banner referred specifically to the USS Abraham Lincoln's completion of its deployment mission, rather than the overall Iraq War effort. In October 2003, President Bush stated that the sign "was put up by the members of the USS Abraham Lincoln, saying that their mission was accomplished," distinguishing the carrier's operational success—following 290 days at sea and participation in initial combat—from broader conflict objectives. This framing faced disputes from media outlets alleging administration orchestration of premature victory symbolism, prompting questions about hypocrisy given ongoing violence post-speech. responses countered that the speech itself qualified the declaration as the end of "major combat operations," not total mission completion, with stating on May 1, 2003: "Major combat operations in have ended. In the battle of , the and our allies have prevailed." Officials emphasized this causal distinction: conventional phase warfare had concluded with regime collapse by April 2003, shifting to stabilization, while the honored naval personnel's discrete accomplishments amid that transition. By 2008, amid five-year anniversary scrutiny, acknowledged the banner's wording as insufficiently precise, stating it "should have been much more specific and said 'mission accomplished' for these sailors who are on this ship on their mission." President Bush similarly conceded in a November 2008 interview that the banner's presentation was an "optics" error fostering misimpressions of finality, though he defended the underlying accuracy of declaring major combat's cessation, as U.S. forces had toppled Saddam Hussein's government and neutralized organized Iraqi military resistance by early May 2003. These admissions highlighted perceptual challenges without retracting the factual endpoint of the invasion's high-intensity phase.

Subsequent Military and Political Developments

Shift to Insurgency and Reconstruction Challenges

Following the declaration of the end to major combat operations on May 1, 2003, U.S. military fatalities in Iraq remained relatively low in the immediate aftermath, with a total of 139 deaths recorded from the invasion's start on March 20 to that date, primarily from conventional engagements during the rapid advance to Baghdad. This empirical data underscored the success of the initial invasion phase, as coalition forces had dismantled Saddam Hussein's conventional military capabilities within six weeks, capturing key cities and toppling the regime by April 9. However, by summer 2003, a shift to irregular warfare emerged, with insurgent attacks escalating from sporadic incidents in May-June to coordinated ambushes and bombings targeting coalition patrols and Iraqi infrastructure. This transition was exacerbated by () policies enacted shortly after the speech, including Order No. 1 on May 16, 2003, which initiated by purging senior members from public positions, and Order No. 2 on May 23, 2003, which dissolved the Iraqi army and other security entities, leaving hundreds of thousands of former soldiers unemployed and potentially receptive to insurgent recruitment. These measures, aimed at rooting out regime remnants, inadvertently fueled Sunni alienation and provided manpower for groups like , as disaffected officers and ideologues shifted to guerrilla tactics rather than surrendering. U.S. fatalities rose accordingly, from 79 hostile deaths in May 2003 to over 400 for the full year, marking the onset of a protracted phase distinct from the defeated conventional forces. Insurgent violence intensified through 2004-2005, culminating in a peak during 2006-2007, when weekly attacks exceeded 1,000 and sectarian bombings drove civilian deaths to monthly averages over 1,500, straining efforts amid infrastructure sabotage and governance vacuums. challenges compounded the military shift, as , in aid distribution, and insufficient local hindered projects like power grid repairs and oil field stabilization, with U.S. expenditures on stability operations surpassing $50 billion by 2006 without proportional gains in self-sufficiency. In response, the U.S. implemented the 2007 troop surge, deploying approximately 20,000 additional soldiers under General , coupled with tactical shifts emphasizing population protection and alliances with Sunni tribes via the Anbar Awakening. This strategy yielded measurable reductions: by late 2007, Iraqi civilian fatalities dropped over 45% from 2006 peaks, U.S. monthly deaths fell to around 23, and overall attacks declined dramatically, enabling phased withdrawals and embryonic political stabilization. These outcomes affirmed that the post-invasion insurgency represented a separable problem, resolvable through adapted force levels and local partnerships, rather than an extension of the initial combat phase concluded in May 2003.

Impact on U.S. Policy and Troop Commitments

The "Mission Accomplished" speech articulated a policy transition from major combat operations to supporting Iraqi self-governance and reconstruction, emphasizing that the United States would "help you [Iraqis] build a peaceful and representative government" while maintaining forces for security. This framing reinforced executive commitments to nation-building efforts, aligning with pre-existing strategic objectives to stabilize Iraq against potential terrorist havens and regional instability, rather than signaling an imminent withdrawal. In line with this policy continuity, U.S. assistance escalated shortly after the speech; appropriated $18.4 billion in supplemental funding in November 2003 specifically for Iraqi needs, including and support, building on initial post-invasion allocations. Overall, U.S.-led expenditures totaled over $220 billion from 2003 to 2014, with early increases tied to the administration's stated goals of aiding Iraq's to by June 2004. These commitments involved deploying additional civilian advisors and Provincial Reconstruction Teams alongside military units to oversee aid distribution and counter emerging insurgent threats. Troop levels reflected sustained military engagement rather than reduction; following the speech, U.S. forces in averaged around 140,000 through 2004, with no significant drawdown as violence intensified, necessitating a to a peak of 170,300 troops in November 2007 to secure population centers and enable political progress. Drawdowns commenced after the 2008 U.S.- , reducing numbers to 112,000 by January 2010 and 50,000 by August 2010, culminating in combat troop withdrawal by August 2010 and full U.S. military exit by December 2011 under the Obama administration. These shifts were driven by operational assessments of Iraqi capabilities and bilateral agreements, not the speech's , though the address served as an early public affirmation of extended stabilization roles amid rising operational demands.

Interpretations and Legacy

Key Criticisms from Opponents

Opponents, primarily Democrats during the 2004 presidential campaign, charged that the speech prematurely signaled the end of hostilities in , disregarding the onset of and post-invasion instability. In his July 29, 2004, acceptance speech at the , nominee asserted, "proclaiming mission accomplished certainly doesn't make it so," framing the declaration as disconnected from ongoing challenges like inadequate troop planning and rising casualties. Similarly, Senator described the mission as having "failed" relative to and Cheney administration goals, highlighting persistent violence a year later. This critique gained traction through campaign advertising, with Kerry's "No, Mr. President" ad in 2004 contrasting the banner with the absence of a postwar strategy, stating Bush had "no plan to win the peace" despite declaring major combat over. The ad and related rhetoric emphasized empirical realities, such as the escalation in attacks following the speech; U.S. military fatalities totaled approximately 4,270 after May 1, 2003, compared to fewer than 170 during the initial invasion phase, underscoring the shift to prolonged guerrilla warfare and reconstruction difficulties. Media outlets and left-leaning commentators portrayed the event's optics as emblematic of administrative , linking the celebratory staging—including the banner and —to an underestimation of Iraq's sectarian complexities and the limits of conventional success. These arguments held partial empirical validity in the face of sustained , including over 900 U.S. deaths by July 2004 alone, though critics sometimes blurred distinctions between concluding major combat operations and achieving full national stabilization.

Defenses Based on Factual Accuracy

In the speech delivered on May 1, 2003, aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln, President explicitly stated that "major combat operations in have ended," referring to the conclusion of the conventional invasion phase that began on March 20, 2003, and culminated in the fall of on April 9, 2003. This declaration aligned with the military reality at the time, as U.S. and coalition forces had decisively defeated Saddam Hussein's regular army and toppled the regime within six weeks, transitioning from large-scale armored battles to stabilization efforts. The speech itself cautioned against complacency, noting "difficult work to do in " and that "the transition from dictatorship to democracy will take time," directly countering claims that it prematurely announced the war's overall conclusion. The "Mission Accomplished" banner, positioned behind the podium, originated from the carrier's crew to commemorate the ship's successful deployment and return from combat operations, rather than symbolizing the end of the entire campaign. officials, including spokesman , clarified that the phrase pertained specifically to the USS Abraham Lincoln's accomplishments, not broader U.S. objectives in . Critics' portrayal of the event as declaring "mission accomplished" for the war misrepresents the transcript, which avoided such phrasing and instead emphasized ongoing commitments, including that "our coalition will stay until our work is done." Empirical data supports the accuracy of ending major combat declarations: post-invasion attacks, while emerging after collapse, did not constitute organized during the March-May 2003 period, allowing for the rapid dismantling of Ba'athist structures that later facilitated gains, such as the Anbar Awakening in 2006-2007, where local tribes allied with U.S. forces against affiliates. The swift overthrow, achieved with fewer than 150 U.S. combat deaths in the invasion phase, validated the operational success claimed, providing a foundation for subsequent stabilization despite prolonged irregular threats. This factual precision underscores defenses that the speech reflected verifiable military milestones, not overreach, even as challenges persisted.

Long-term Historical Assessments

In 2023 retrospectives marking the 20th anniversary of the speech, historians at the Miller Center assessed it as factually accurate in declaring the end of major combat operations, which corresponded to the completion of Phase III (decisive operations) in the campaign, following the rapid toppling of Saddam Hussein's regime on , 2003. The address explicitly warned of lingering dangers, such as remnants of the Ba'athist network and potential violence in areas like the , reflecting a nuanced that liberation did not equate to full pacification. However, the and overall fostered a public misinterpretation of total victory, eroding long-term credibility when conventional successes gave way to asymmetric by mid-2003. Scholarly analyses emphasize causal distinctions between the invasion's military triumphs—achieved through overwhelming U.S. air and ground superiority in under six weeks—and the subsequent failures in stabilization and , where insufficient troop levels and policies like de-Baathification exacerbated power vacuums, enabling insurgent growth from disparate Sunni, Shia, and foreign elements. The speech's legacy underscores how conflating tactical combat cessation with strategic objectives obscured the need for phased transitions, with post-2003 casualty spikes (e.g., U.S. deaths rising from 139 in May 2003 to over 800 in ) illustrating occupation's distinct demands. Former President later reflected that the presentation, including the banner, was a mistake, though he maintained the underlying assessment of ended major hostilities held, distinguishing optics from operational reality. No significant historiographical shifts have emerged in 2024 or 2025 assessments, with emphasis instead on enduring lessons for interventions: rigorously separating high-intensity combat from protracted and governance phases to avoid underestimating post-victory causal risks like sectarian fragmentation.

References

  1. [1]
    President Bush Announces Major Combat Operations in Iraq Have ...
    May 1, 2003 · For Immediate Release Office of the Press Secretary May 1, 2003. President Bush Announces Major Combat Operations in Iraq Have Ended Remarks ...
  2. [2]
    President Bush proclaims end to major combat operations in Iraq
    May 2, 2003 · "Because of you, the tyrant has fallen and Iraq is free." With a huge red, white and blue banner declaring "Mission Accomplished" hanging in the ...
  3. [3]
    The 'mission accomplished' moment | Miller Center
    My understanding in retrospect was that the banner was intended for the sailors onboard that ship—they had accomplished their mission and they were headed home.
  4. [4]
  5. [5]
    Timeline: The Iraq War - Council on Foreign Relations
    2003. March 20, 2003. War Begins. An explosion rocks one of Iraqi President Saddam Hussein's palaces in Baghdad during air strikes. An explosion rocks one of ...
  6. [6]
    A timeline of the Iraq War | PBS News
    Mar 7, 2023 · A timeline of the Iraq War · March 20, 2003 · April 9, 2003 · May 1, 2003 · May 23, 2003 · June 22, 2003 · August 19, 2003 · December 14, 2003 · January ...
  7. [7]
    Operation Iraqi Freedom - Naval History and Heritage Command
    Mar 14, 2025 · Operation Iraqi Freedom began March 20, 2003, with airstrikes, followed by 67,700 troops and 15,000 Navy personnel. Baghdad fell quickly, but ...
  8. [8]
    The 2003 Battle of Baghdad - Army University Press
    ... April, some Iraqi units began disbanding to pursue guerrilla warfare. Iraqi forces continued to melt away on 8 and 9 April when 1 MARDIV crossed the Diyala ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  9. [9]
    Baghdad falls to U.S. forces | April 9, 2003 - History.com
    Apr 4, 2019 · On April 9, 2003, just three weeks into the invasion of Iraq, US forces pull down a bronze statue of Saddam Hussein in Baghdad's Firdos Square.
  10. [10]
    Iraq War | Summary, Causes, Dates, Combatants, Casualties, & Facts
    Oct 9, 2025 · Iraq War, (2003–11), conflict in Iraq that consisted of two phases. The first of these was a brief, conventionally fought war in March–April 2003.
  11. [11]
    Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) Casualty Summary by Month and ...
    World War I. Principal Wars 1775-1991 · Home > Conflict Casualties > Operation ... MARCH 2003, 17, 1, 39, 0, 0, 57, 4, 1, 2, 1, 0, 8, 21, 2, 41, 1, 0, 65, 77, 8 ...
  12. [12]
    Saddam Hussein captured | December 13, 2003 - History.com
    Jul 21, 2010 · Five months later, on December 13, 2003, U.S. soldiers found Saddam Hussein hiding in a six-to-eight-foot deep hole, nine miles outside his ...
  13. [13]
    “We Got Him!” The Anniversary of the Capture of Saddam Hussein
    It was Dec. 13, 2003, at approximately 8:30 pm local time in Iraq that Saddam was found, huddled in a spider hole near a farmhouse in Ad Dawr, close to his ...
  14. [14]
    H.J.Res.114 - 107th Congress (2001-2002): Authorization for Use of ...
    Authorizes the President to use the U.S. armed forces to: (1) defend U.S. national security against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and (2) enforce all ...Text · Titles (6) · Amendments (3)
  15. [15]
    Statement on Signing the Authorization for Use of Military Force ...
    Oct 16, 2002 · Today I have signed into law HJ Res. 114, a resolution "To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq."
  16. [16]
    President Bush Addresses the Nation
    We have no ambition in Iraq, except to remove a threat and restore control of that country to its own people.Missing: rationale | Show results with:rationale
  17. [17]
    The Iraq War | George W. Bush Library
    On May 1, 2003, President George W. Bush declared the “end of major combat operations,” and the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) was established as the ...
  18. [18]
    Phases of War and the Iraq Experience - War on the Rocks
    Nov 22, 2016 · A perhaps more accurate view is that the U.S. thought it finished Phase III in April 2003 and tried to move into Phase IV operations with the ...
  19. [19]
    Avoid Operational Level Stagnation - Army University Press
    Apr 15, 2016 · The point of stagnation for OIF occurred at the point of transition from Phase III (dominate) to Phase IV (stabilize) operations on 1st May 2003 ...
  20. [20]
    President Bush Announces Combat Operations in Iraq Have Ended
    May 1, 2003 · The USS Lincoln Strike Group was involved in combat in support of three major operations: Operation Southern Watch, Operation Enduring Freedom, and Operation ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Commanding Officer, USS ABRAHAM LINCOLN (CVN 72) To : Chief ...
    May 29, 2004 · During Operation IRAQI FREEDOM, ABRAHAM LINCOLN was designated. Force Over-the-horizon Track Coordinator (FOTC) . ABRAHAM. LINCOLN1s main ...
  22. [22]
    History - Naval Air Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet
    The Lincoln spent the next seven months supporting Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom, as well as maritime security and coalition ...
  23. [23]
    Commander in Chief lands on USS Lincoln - May. 2, 2003 - CNN
    May 2, 2003 · President Bush made a landing aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln Thursday, arriving in the co-pilot's seat of a Navy S-3B Viking after making two fly-bys of the ...
  24. [24]
    USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72) history - U.S. Carriers
    October 9, USS Abraham Lincoln returned to homeport after a six-month deployment. November 14, USS Abraham Lincoln departed Alameda, Calif., for the last time ...
  25. [25]
    President George W. Bush approached the flight deck of the USS ...
    President George W. Bush approached the flight deck of the USS Abraham Lincoln in a S-3B Viking jet Thursday, May 1, 2003. White House photo by Paul Morse.
  26. [26]
    Bush's carrier landing a costly political stunt, say Democrats
    May 9, 2003 · George Bush made a dramatic deck landing on the carrier in a navy Viking jet warplane which he piloted himself part of the way.
  27. [27]
    USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) - Wikipedia
    Abraham Lincoln and the carrier battle group and air wing helped deliver the opening salvos and air strikes in Operation Iraqi Freedom. During the air wing's ...Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike... · Ship history · 1990 to 1999 · 2000s
  28. [28]
    Presidential Approval Ratings -- George W. Bush - Gallup News
    Job approval ratings for President George W. Bush, 2001-2009 trend. High: 90% (2001); low 25% (2008); last 34% (2009).
  29. [29]
    Seventy-Two Percent of Americans Support War Against Iraq
    Mar 24, 2003 · Seventy-two percent of Americans interviewed in a new CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll conducted Saturday and Sunday favor the war against Iraq, while 25% are opposed.
  30. [30]
    Full text: Blair's speech in Iraq - The Guardian
    May 29, 2003 · "The liberation from Saddam is one huge thing and a momentous and mighty act for the people of Iraq which you did and of which you can be proud.
  31. [31]
    Transcript: Bush Thanks Australians for Their Role in Iraq War
    Howard congratulated Bush on "the leadership that you gave to the world, at times under very great criticism." He said the Australians "were very pleased and ...
  32. [32]
    The UN's decline: Timeline | News - Al Jazeera
    Mar 16, 2004 · The resolution granted Kofi Annan more authority to administer the programme and provide humanitarian aid to Iraqi civilians. 18 April 2003: ...<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    Europe's press reacts to Bush's UN speech | Iraq - The Guardian
    Sep 24, 2003 · Press review: "In Britain or the US they call it 'eating humble pie'; German speakers talk of 'setting sights lower'.
  34. [34]
    Opinion in the United States before and after the Iraq War
    Gallup found that from August 2002 through early March 2003 the share of Americans favoring war hovered in a relatively narrow range between a low of 52 percent ...
  35. [35]
    Pelosi: Democrats missed chance to turn Bush away from war - CNN
    Mar 7, 2003 · Pelosi said she remained opposed to using military force against Iraq at this juncture, despite Bush's latest comments. "My position has not ...
  36. [36]
    Invading Iraq: A Bipartisan Tragedy - Humanities in Revolt
    Apr 7, 2023 · Four months into the war, on July 31, 2003, Biden touted bipartisan support for the Iraq War and what he called “enlightened nationalism” ...
  37. [37]
    Carrier Banner Turns into Flap - NPR
    Oct 29, 2003 · Carrier Banner Turns into Flap ... White House press secretary Scott McClellan admits the White House had the "Mission Accomplished" banner made.
  38. [38]
    'Mission Accomplished' Whodunit - CBS News
    Oct 29, 2003 · Bush said, "The 'Mission Accomplished' sign, of course, was put up by the members of the USS Abraham Lincoln, saying that their mission was ...Missing: clarification | Show results with:clarification
  39. [39]
    Verbatim: Nov. 10, 2003 | TIME
    Nov 10, 2003 · “The MISSION ACCOMPLISHED sign, of course, was put up by the members of the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln, saying that their mission was accomplished.
  40. [40]
    White House pressed on 'mission accomplished' sign - CNN
    Oct 29, 2003 · "The banner signified the successful completion of the ship's deployment," he said, noting the Abraham Lincoln was deployed 290 days, longer ...Missing: staging | Show results with:staging
  41. [41]
    White House Clarifies 'Mission Accomplished' Sign - NPR
    May 1, 2008 · President BUSH: The "mission accomplished" sign, of course, was put up by the Marines of the USS Abraham Lincoln, saying that their mission was ...Missing: 2004 investigation
  42. [42]
    Five Years, Two Words, No Letup - The Washington Post
    "President Bush is well aware that the banner should have been much more specific, and said mission accomplished for these sailors who are on this ship on their ...
  43. [43]
    Bush: 'Mission accomplished' a mistake - CNN.com
    Nov 12, 2008 · A reflective US President George W. Bush has said he regrets some of his more blunt statements on his so-called war on terrorism over the last eight years.
  44. [44]
    Bush touts accomplishments, admits mistakes - CNN.com
    Jan 12, 2009 · "Clearly, putting a 'Mission Accomplished' [banner] on an aircraft carrier was a mistake," Bush said about how his administration handled the ...
  45. [45]
    Iraq - Empirical Studies of Conflict - Princeton University
    During the period of peak violence in 2006 and 2007, there were over a thousand insurgent attacks per week in Iraq and hundreds of sectarian killings. The ...
  46. [46]
    Iraq After the Surge - Brookings Institution
    Dec 8, 2007 · Rather than trying to destroy the enemy through overwhelming force, which often resulted in large civilian casualties that helped unite the ...
  47. [47]
    Iraq by the numbers: Graphing the decrease in violence
    Dec 17, 2007 · Multinational Forces-Iraq releases data on the drop in violence nationwide. In many cases the violence is down to 2004 levels.
  48. [48]
    The Iraq Data Debate: Civilian Casualties from 2006 to 2007
    First, sectarian cleansing is an important factor in Iraq 's violence, but it is hard to know how important it has been relative to the surge in reducing ...
  49. [49]
    U.S. Achievements Through the Iraq Relief and Reconstruction Fund
    In November 2003, Congress added $18.4 billion to help Iraq with general reconstruction needs. Today, 83% of this $18.4 billion has been obligated to ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] The Reconstruction of Iraq after 2003 - World Bank Document
    Between 2003 and 2014, more than US$220 billion was spent on reconstruction efforts following the United States–led invasion and overthrow of the Saddam Hussein ...
  51. [51]
    Troop Levels in the Afghan and Iraq Wars, FY2001-FY2012
    Jul 2, 2009 · CRS estimates that average troop strength in Iraq will decline to 135,600 in FY2009, 88,300 in FY2010, 42,800 in FY2011, and 4,100 in FY2012.
  52. [52]
    The Iraq war — by the numbers - NBC News
    Mar 20, 2023 · 32,292: The number of U.S. servicemembers wounded in Iraq. Approximately 200,000: The number of Iraqi civilians killed in the war. 170,300: The ...
  53. [53]
    Facts and Figures on Drawdown in Iraq - Obama White House
    Aug 2, 2010 · - By January 2010, there were 112,000 U.S. troops in Iraq. By the end of May 2010, that number had been reduced to 88,000. General Odierno made ...
  54. [54]
    Timeline: Invasion, surge, withdrawal; U.S. forces in Iraq | Reuters
    Dec 14, 2011 · August 31 - Troops levels in Iraq are reduced to 49,700 after a major draw down is completed. April 26, 2011 - U.S. Congressional Budget Office ...
  55. [55]
    Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Democratic ...
    Jul 29, 2004 · Saying we can fight a war on the cheap doesn't make it so. And proclaiming mission accomplished certainly doesn't make it so. As President, I ...Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
  56. [56]
    CNN.com - One year later, Bush defends Iraq speech - Apr 30, 2004
    "Mission accomplished? The mission in Iraq, as laid out by President Bush and Vice President Cheney, has failed," said Sen. Robert Byrd, a fierce critic of ...
  57. [57]
    CNN.com Specials
    CAMPAIGN ADS / JOHN KERRY / AD INFO. No, Mr. President. TRANSCRIPT: On ... The problem is you declared "mission accomplished," but you had no plan to ...
  58. [58]
    Tally of U.S. military deaths in Iraq hits 900 | CBC News
    Jul 21, 2004 · The United States recorded its 900th military casualty in Iraq Wednesday, as a roadside bomb killed a member of the 1st Infantry Division.<|separator|>
  59. [59]
    2003 - Operation Iraqi Freedom - Air Force Historical Support Division
    Major combat operations were declared over on May 1, 2003. However, Iraq remained unstable, with little security and massive looting. The situation ...
  60. [60]
    Bush Never Said "Mission Accomplished" - Foreign Policy Association
    The reason is that the ship's crew, in collusion with White House staff, had strung a large banner bearing the words “mission accomplished” behind the spot ...Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
  61. [61]
    Twenty Years after “Mission Accomplished” in Iraq: A Critical ...
    May 2, 2023 · Bush's now-infamous “Mission Accomplished” declaration on the deck of the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier on May 1, 2003. Widely ...Missing: internal | Show results with:internal
  62. [62]
    [PDF] Shock and Awe Revisited: Legacies of the Iraq War 20 Years Later
    Although President Bush praised this strat- egy in his “Mission Accomplished” speech, it quickly be- came apparent that the United States did not deploy a ...
  63. [63]
    In His First Interview, Bush Admits Mistakes & Defends Decisions
    Nov 9, 2010 · ... Mission Accomplished” and declared that major combat operations in Iraq had ended. “No question it was a mistake,” Bush said of the scene ...Missing: 2023 | Show results with:2023