Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Mo Ibrahim Foundation

The Foundation is an independent organization established in 2006 by Sudanese-British telecommunications entrepreneur to promote sound and exceptional as essential drivers of progress on the continent. The foundation focuses on empirical assessment of through tools like the annual (IIAG), which quantifies performance across categories such as security, , and economic opportunity using verifiable data from multiple sources. Its flagship initiative, the Ibrahim Prize for Achievement in , recognizes retiring heads of state or government who have delivered outstanding contributions to and development, offering a $5 million prize payable over ten years plus lifelong annual payments, though the award has often been withheld due to rigorous standards—most recently in 2023, marking the third such instance in four years. Additional programs include fellowships hosted by institutions like the , scholarships for postgraduate study in the UK and , and the Ibrahim Governance Weekend, which convenes stakeholders to debate policy challenges grounded in data-driven insights. The foundation's approach emphasizes causal links between accountable institutions, , and human development, while critiquing structural dependencies such as heavy reliance on foreign funding for bodies like the .

Founding and History

Establishment and Initial Goals

The Foundation was founded in 2006 by as an independent, non-grant-making African organization dedicated to strengthening and leadership across the continent. Solely funded by its founder, the organization operates from offices in , , and , , positioning itself to provide data-driven analysis and incentives without direct financial aid to governments or projects. Its inception reflected a recognition of systemic deficits in , particularly the reluctance of leaders to cede power, which perpetuated instability and hindered development. The foundation's initial priorities emphasized incentivizing effective, term-limited leadership to break cycles of authoritarian entrenchment, drawing on the observation that voluntary transitions were rare despite constitutional provisions in many states. In , it introduced its flagship initiative, the Ibrahim Prize for Achievement in Leadership, to reward former heads of state or government who had demonstrated excellence in domains including , , economic management, and democratic processes, while adhering to constitutional term limits and relinquishing office democratically. The prize consists of a $5 million award disbursed over ten years, supplemented by an annual stipend of $200,000 for the same period, aiming to establish and stimulate discourse on accountable governance independent of donor dependencies. This mechanism underscored the foundation's early commitment to measurable outcomes over vague advocacy, prioritizing self-reliance in institutions.

Organizational Development

The Mo Ibrahim Foundation, established in , has grown from a focused initiative on African leadership into a structured with a small supported by external experts from , , and multilateral bodies, while maintaining operational through sole funding from its . This funding model has ensured the foundation remains non-grant-making and free from external donor influences that could compromise its emphasis on empirical assessment. By the early 2010s, it expanded its framework to incorporate programs and analytical panels, enabling broader engagement with governance data without altering its core non-interventionist approach. Operational infrastructure developed with the establishment of offices in at 35 and in , , to enhance coordination between European administrative functions and African fieldwork. These locations facilitate proximity to policy stakeholders and data sources across the . Concurrently, the foundation formed specialized bodies, such as the IIAG Expert Panel comprising academics and practitioners to guide data-driven analysis, reflecting a structural to produce rigorous, verifiable insights amid evolving continental challenges like institutional fragility. In response to events such as the post-2011 democratic reversals following the Arab Spring, the organization prioritized metric-based monitoring over prescriptive advocacy, expanding networks like the Now Generation Network—a for policy input—to sustain and adaptability. Partnerships with entities including the and Afrobarometer have bolstered access to empirical datasets for trend analysis, supporting structural growth without introducing grant dependencies or diluting focus on self-reliant evaluation. This evolution has allowed the foundation to address persistent issues like gaps through enhanced analytical capacity, as evidenced by indexing efforts grounded in quantifiable indicators.

Founder and Leadership

Mo Ibrahim's Background and Motivations

, born in 1946 in and raised partly in , is a Sudanese-British entrepreneur who became a through pioneering mobile in . In 1989, he founded Mobile Systems International (), a cellular consulting and software firm, before launching Celtel International in 1998 as MSI Cellular Investments to provide mobile services in underserved African markets where state-owned infrastructure was inadequate. By 2005, Celtel operated in 14 African countries, demonstrating the viability of private investment in regions plagued by political instability and regulatory hurdles, and was sold to Kuwait-based Mobile Telecommunications Company (MTC, later Zain) for $3.4 billion. This success underscored Ibrahim's approach of leveraging market-driven solutions over reliance on government or foreign aid for infrastructure development. Ibrahim's motivations for establishing the Mo Ibrahim Foundation in 2006 stemmed from direct experiences with governance failures that impeded private enterprise and economic progress across , including , indefinite leader tenures, and bureaucratic inefficiencies he encountered while expanding Celtel. He has critiqued the pattern of African leaders clinging to power beyond constitutional limits, arguing that such practices stifle and deter essential for prosperity. Rather than perpetuating aid dependency, which he views as fostering a mindset of entitlement and undermining , Ibrahim sought to incentivize voluntary retirement after fixed terms and foster institutions prioritizing and . Following the foundation's creation, Ibrahim channeled proceeds from Celtel's sale into ventures like Satya Capital, a targeting African opportunities to bolster and job creation through market mechanisms. This aligns with his conviction that robust precedes and enables sustainable growth, inverting the notion that prosperity alone builds institutions; instead, accountable leadership creates the conditions for private sector-led development to thrive independently of external handouts.

Governing Council and Key Personnel

The Governing Council, chaired by founder , comprises eminent leaders drawn from African and global governments, multilateral organizations, academia, and the to provide unpaid advisory oversight on the foundation's strategic direction and initiatives aimed at bolstering and leadership in . Current members include , Valerie Amos, , , Jin-Yong Cai, Nathalie Delapalme, Moussa Faki Mahamat, Mark Malloch-Brown, and , selected for their specialized expertise in policy, , , and rather than partisan affiliations. This composition fosters epistemic rigor by integrating practical and analytical perspectives to guide the foundation's evidence-based assessments of challenges. Key operational personnel manage the foundation's small secretariat and program execution, while domain-specific expert panels maintain analytical integrity; for instance, the IIAG Expert Panel, including figures like Nic Cheeseman, reviews methodologies to align indicators with evolving empirical on public goods delivery, , and metrics, ensuring from political influence. These panels prioritize verifiable benchmarks over subjective narratives, as evidenced by periodic revisions informed by data landscapes since 2007. In April 2025, the council added former Senegalese President (2012–2024), leveraging his executive experience in regional stability and policy implementation, even amid backlash from over 50 intellectuals who protested the appointment due to perceived deficits in his tenure's transparency and electoral processes, such as the 2024 postponement controversy. This decision highlights the foundation's emphasis on substantive insights from practitioners, prioritizing causal contributions to self-reliance over alignment with prevailing critiques.

Mission and Principles

Core Objectives in African Governance

The Mo Ibrahim Foundation identifies sound and as essential enablers for Africa's progress, emphasizing the delivery of core public goods including , , participatory rights, economic opportunities, and human development metrics that citizens can reasonably demand from their states. These objectives prioritize empirically verifiable governance elements—such as institutional stability, protection of individual liberties, market-enabling policies, and investments in and —over abstract or redistributive ideals, aiming to establish causal pathways from effective rule to continental prosperity. Central to these aims is the for orderly, voluntary transitions of , which the views as critical to dismantling entrenched kleptocratic patterns and fostering genuine in polities. By highlighting the detrimental effects of leaders' refusals to relinquish office, as seen in repeated extensions across the , the challenges the acceptance of perpetual incumbency that perpetuates and stifles . This principle underscores a first-principles recognition that sustained governance improvements require breaking cycles of personalized rule, enabling fresh leadership to address structural inefficiencies. In pursuit of self-reliant development, the Foundation eschews direct grant-making to governments or institutions, reflecting founder Mo Ibrahim's assessment that heavy dependence on external financing warps incentives and undermines internal reform efforts. This stance critiques scenarios like the African Union's operational budget, where foreign contributions accounted for roughly 70% of its approximately $650 million annual funding as of 2025, illustrating how donor reliance can erode ownership and efficacy in pan-African bodies. Instead, the objectives stress endogenous capacity-building through transparent assessment and exemplary incentives, positioning as a domestically driven imperative rather than an externally subsidized endeavor.

Emphasis on Accountability and Self-Reliance

The Mo Ibrahim Foundation operationalizes in leadership by prioritizing quantifiable metrics over anecdotal or ideological evaluations, using data-driven instruments to assess performance in areas such as economic , protections, and delivery, which incentivize verifiable results like sustained GDP growth and institutional integrity. This approach counters reliance on subjective narratives by grounding evaluations in empirical indicators, as seen in the foundation's for transparent benchmarks that hold leaders responsible for outcomes rather than . Central to the foundation's ethos is a sharp critique of external dependencies that undermine autonomy, exemplified by founder Mo Ibrahim's 2025 description of the African Union's funding model as a "disgrace" and "farce," given that approximately 70% of its $650 million annual budget derives from foreign donors, primarily European governments. This dependency, Ibrahim argued during the June 2025 Ibrahim Governance Weekend, erodes sovereignty, as donor influence shapes priorities and perpetuates a cycle where institutions fail to mobilize domestic resources effectively. The foundation advocates instead for internal revenue generation through formalized economies, , and measures to foster genuine , viewing the end of traditional aid as an opportunity for sustainable, Africa-led development. Underpinning these positions is the foundation's causal attribution of persistent poverty traps to deficiencies in rather than exogenous factors alone, with data from its governance assessments revealing stalled progress in key areas like efficacy and public management, where weak correlates with despite natural resource wealth in many nations. For instance, the 2024 highlighted ongoing vulnerabilities in states with poor , linking these to broader developmental failures and emphasizing that robust, accountable institutions are prerequisites for escaping underdevelopment. This perspective promotes African by urging leaders to prioritize endogenous reforms over paradigms or centralized , positioning as the mechanism for realizing through internal .

Key Initiatives

Ibrahim Prize for Achievement in African Leadership

The Ibrahim Prize for Achievement in Leadership, established by the Mo Ibrahim Foundation in 2007, recognizes former heads of state or government who have voluntarily relinquished power at the end of their constitutionally mandated terms, demonstrating exceptional in fostering democratic , , , , and . Eligibility requires that candidates be democratically elected executives who left office within the preceding three years, adhered strictly to term limits (typically no more than two terms or 10 years), and governed without succumbing to undue pressure or extending their tenure unconstitutionally. The prize aims to incentivize voluntary power transitions by providing financial post-office, thereby countering entrenched incentives for leaders to cling to authority amid Africa's historical patterns of prolonged rule, coups, and democratic . An independent Prize Committee, comprising eminent figures such as former heads of state, Nobel laureates, and international leaders, evaluates nominees against rigorous benchmarks derived from empirical indicators, including measurable improvements in , , and institutional during the recipient's tenure. The committee's deliberations emphasize causal contributions to progress rather than mere incumbency, often resulting in no award when no candidate meets the high threshold—a deliberate design feature that underscores deficits in qualifying across the . For instance, no prizes were conferred in 2009, 2010, 2012, 2013, 2015, 2016, 2018, 2019, 2021, 2022, or 2023, reflecting the rarity of leaders who both deliver substantive outcomes and honor term limits. This selectivity highlights the prize's role in empirically signaling shortcomings, as the foundation has noted that suitable recipients are "exceptional" and not guaranteed annually. The financial award consists of US$5 million disbursed over 10 years, supplemented by US$200,000 annually for life thereafter, structured to render voluntary economically sustainable for leaders forgoing opportunities to entrench power for personal gain. Since inception, six principal laureates have been selected, alongside honorary awards to in 2007 and in 2020, for symbolic recognition of lifetime contributions without strict adherence to recent term-end criteria.
YearLaureateCountryKey Recognition
2007Post-civil war reconciliation and economic stabilization.
2008Sustained democratic stability and anti-corruption measures amid resource management.
2011Transformation into a stable democracy with prosperity gains.
2014Peaceful power transition and poverty reduction efforts.
2017Post-conflict reconstruction and democratic institution-building.
2020Democratic reforms and security advancements despite regional instability.
As of October 2025, no award has been announced for 2024 or 2025, continuing the pattern of intermittent conferrals that empirically reward term-limited efficacy while exposing broader leadership gaps in .

Ibrahim Index of African Governance

The (IIAG) serves as a standardized, -driven tool for evaluating and comparing governance performance across all 54 countries, launched by the Mo Ibrahim Foundation in 2007. It aggregates objective metrics to track progress over a 10-year period, with annual updates providing the most recent available ; the 2024 edition covers 2014–2023 and employs a transparent aggregation method that normalizes and weights indicators equally within categories to produce overall scores. This approach relies on verifiable, quantifiable inputs rather than surveys or perceptual , drawing from 49 independent sources to compile 322 variables into 96 indicators and nearly 500 total measures. The IIAG framework organizes governance into four primary categories: Security & , which assesses absence of violence, accountability of security forces, and ; Participation, Rights & Inclusion, evaluating electoral processes, , and rights protections; Foundations for Economic Opportunity, measuring regulatory quality, , and efficiency; and Human Development, covering services, equity, and access. These categories encompass 16 sub-categories, with indicators such as rates for security, of expression indices for rights, ease of starting a for economic foundations, and rates for human development, ensuring emphasis on empirical outcomes over normative judgments. Annual releases highlight longitudinal trends, including the 2024 findings of halted overall progress in 2022 after prior stagnation, driven by deteriorations in (e.g., rising incidences) and participation (e.g., electoral irregularities and curtailments), affecting two-thirds of countries with declining scores in at least one category. The index demonstrates causal correlations between higher governance scores—particularly in and economic foundations—and sustained growth rates, as evidenced by top performers like maintaining scores above 70/100 through institutional stability, while lower-ranked nations exhibit persistent institutional weaknesses impeding development. By prioritizing hard data from sources like indicators and reports, the IIAG counters reliance on anecdotal or ideologically skewed assessments, offering policymakers evidence-based benchmarks for reform.

Ibrahim Governance Weekend

The Ibrahim Governance Weekend is an annual flagship event organized by the Mo Ibrahim Foundation, convening African and international leaders, policymakers, experts, and stakeholders to deliberate on pressing and development challenges facing the . The event emphasizes evidence-based discussions grounded in data from the Foundation's reports, such as the , while prioritizing candid exchanges over prescriptive solutions. It typically spans three days, featuring high-level panels, keynotes, and interactive sessions that foster networking among participants without distributing grants or funding commitments. The 2025 edition, held from June 1 to 3 in Marrakech, , exemplified the event's structure, with Day 2 dedicated to the Ibrahim Forum—a core component focused on thematic deep dives. Discussions built directly on empirical findings from prior analyses, including the 2024 Ibrahim Forum Report on financing gaps, critiquing inefficiencies in traditional aid models and advocating for African-led . Sessions addressed causal factors like financial flows, global tax reforms, and the need to sequence priorities—such as establishing peace and security as prerequisites for —drawing on quantitative data to highlight how instability undermines investment and self-reliance. Recurring themes across IGW iterations underscore a commitment to causal realism in , such as transitioning from dependency on external to domestic through better resource leveraging and institutional reforms. For instance, the 2025 Forum theme, "Leveraging ’s Resources to Close the Finance Gap," examined structural barriers to financing , including carbon markets and financial architecture reforms, informed by data on continental fiscal shortfalls exceeding $400 billion annually. Participants, including heads of state and UN officials, engaged in unfiltered debates that challenge conventional narratives on efficacy, emphasizing over ideological preferences. Outcomes from the Governance Weekend manifest as synthesized policy insights disseminated via reports and public statements, rather than binding agreements, promoting intellectual exchange to influence decision-making. The event's format avoids diluting discourse with funding incentives, ensuring focus on rigorous analysis of metrics and causal drivers, such as how weak erodes economic . This approach has facilitated ongoing dialogues on , with past events yielding recommendations for data-driven reforms that prioritize African priorities over donor agendas.

Leadership Fellowships and Scholarships

The Ibrahim Leadership Fellowships, launched in 2011, provide mid-career African professionals with immersive placements in executive offices of major institutions to cultivate practical governance and leadership expertise. Participants, selected annually through a competitive process emphasizing at least seven years of relevant experience, a master's degree, and demonstrated commitment to public service, undergo a 12-month program at organizations such as the African Development Bank in Abidjan, the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa in Addis Ababa, or the International Trade Centre in Geneva. The initiative prioritizes hands-on exposure to policy formulation and institutional operations, supplemented by direct mentorship from organizational heads, to equip fellows with skills in evidence-based decision-making and institutional effectiveness rather than theoretical or advocacy-oriented training. Fellows receive a $100,000 stipend to cover living expenses, enabling focus on professional development without financial distraction. Complementing the fellowships, the Ibrahim Scholarships target early-career Africans for advanced academic training in disciplines at select UK-based institutions, fostering analytical and capacities through structured postgraduate programs. One scholarship supports the two-year in and at the , covering full tuition, a monthly living allowance, return airfare, and a six-month internship to bridge theory and practice. Another funds a 10-month Fellowship at in , emphasizing projects on affairs and policy . Eligibility restricts awards to nationals, with selections based on academic merit and potential to address challenges, avoiding quotas or demographic balancing in favor of substantive qualifications. Both programs underscore merit-driven selection processes aligned with the Foundation's priorities, producing who apply gained competencies in mechanisms and institutional reform across public sectors. By 2024, the fellowships had supported 37 participants from 24 countries, with annual intakes of three fellows continuing to expand this of practitioners focused on operational efficacy over rhetorical or ideological pursuits. recipients, numbering fewer but similarly vetted, integrate into cohorts that prioritize evidence-informed leadership, contributing to long-term institutional strengthening without reliance on external aid dependencies.

Now Generation Network

The Now Generation Network (NGN) serves as the Foundation's primary platform for engaging young leaders, comprising over 350 members from all 54 countries, including of the Foundation's fellowships and scholarships as well as participants in the annual Now Generation Forum. This invite-only network targets emerging professionals and advocates, typically young and mid-career individuals, to foster collaborative efforts in policy dialogue and thought leadership on challenges. Established to connect enthusiastic leaders, thinkers, and practitioners, the NGN emphasizes equipping participants with skills for sustainable impact through tiered membership that prioritizes thematic expertise. NGN activities center on online platforms such as webinars and debates, alongside in-person events like sessions during the Ibrahim Governance Weekend, where members discuss topics including democratic resilience and development priorities. For instance, in 2020, the network conducted consultations to capture young Africans' perspectives on responses, informing Foundation reports on crisis management. Members produce knowledge outputs like the NGN Insights journal and thought pieces, promoting data-driven discussions on and institutional reforms. These efforts counter prevalent narratives of external dependency by highlighting internal failures, drawing on empirical evidence from member consultations. The network integrates directly with the Foundation's research agenda, with members providing inputs to the (IIAG) through expert consultations on data methodologies and integration. This includes aggregating youth views on expectations, such as demands for and self-reliant policy frameworks, to refine index indicators on and economic . By channeling these empirically grounded critiques, the NGN amplifies calls for reforms that prioritize evidence over aid-centric approaches, distinct from formal training programs.

Research and Publications

Annual Governance Indices and Data

The (IIAG) serves as the Foundation's primary dataset for quantifying performance across 54 countries, drawing on data spanning the most recent 10-year period available. Launched in 2007, the IIAG compiles scores from 96 indicators derived from 322 variables sourced from 49 independent providers, including international organizations and foundation-commissioned collections, yielding over 265,000 data points organized into four overarching categories: & , Participation, Rights & Inclusion, Foundations for Economic Opportunity, and Human Development. These metrics emphasize quantifiable outcomes such as , absence of , public sector integrity, and access to basic , facilitating longitudinal trend analysis that links quality to socioeconomic results like and stability. The IIAG's methodological rigor prioritizes empirical aggregation over subjective assessments, with nearly all indicators (90 of 96) constructed as clusters of multiple variables to mitigate single-source biases and enhance reliability. Updates, such as the 2024 edition covering 2014–2023, reveal continent-wide stagnation in overall scores, with progress halting entirely in 2022 after prior years of minimal advancement, underscoring causal connections between institutional weaknesses and persistent underperformance in areas like and economic opportunity. Specific trends highlight vulnerabilities, including democratic affecting approximately two-thirds of Africa's population in countries experiencing declines in participation and rights metrics, as evidenced by deteriorations in indicators for elections, , and inclusive societies. To support policy analysis, the Foundation provides open-access tools via the IIAG Data Portal, enabling stakeholders to query, visualize, and export granular datasets for custom comparisons across national, regional, and thematic dimensions. Complementary resources include country scorecards and insight briefs that dissect sub-category trends, such as the decade-long decline in and affecting 77.9% of Africans, derived from variables on incidence, rates, and refugee burdens. While primarily national in scope, recent expansions incorporate discussions of sub-national disparities—such as uneven fueling dissatisfaction—to inform targeted reforms, though core data remains aggregated at the country level to maintain comparability. This focus on verifiable, hard data counters narrative-driven excuses for governance failures by enabling evidence-based debunking of claims that external factors alone explain Africa's developmental gaps.

Ibrahim Forum Reports

The Ibrahim Forum Reports are annual publications issued by the Mo Ibrahim Foundation following the Ibrahim Governance Weekend, synthesizing discussions, empirical data from the (IIAG), and broader economic trends into thematic analyses aimed at informing policy and leadership decisions. These reports emphasize causal links between governance quality, resource mobilization, and , prioritizing domestic agency over perpetual external reliance. For instance, the 2024 report, Financing Africa: Where is the Money?, examined the widening financing gaps exacerbated by debt servicing and illicit financial flows (IFFs), estimating annual IFF losses at $90 billion, which offset potential domestic revenues. The report, Financing the Africa We Want, released in July 2025 after the June 1-3 Governance Weekend in Marrakech, integrates IIAG indicators with global financing data to advocate for African-led ownership and market-driven strategies. It critiques over-dependence on (ODA), noting Africa's declining share from 37.6% of global ODA in 2013 to 26.7% in 2023 ($74 billion total), with projections of a 9-17% further drop in ; such represents less than 10% of most African countries' income and fails to address the $3.3 trillion gap for implementation. Similarly, captured only 2.8% of global ($36 billion out of $212 billion in 2021/22), underscoring inefficiencies in multilateral systems where Africa holds just 6.5% of IMF voting rights despite 19% of . The report highlights domestic resources—totaling $920 billion annually from taxes, sovereign wealth funds ($148.3 billion across 15 countries), pension funds ($217.3 billion across 17 countries), and remittances ($90.8 billion in 2023, projected to $500 billion by 2035)—as underutilized, yet eroded by $940 billion in debt servicing ($102.6 billion in 2024) and IFFs. Empirical evidence in the reports ties governance weaknesses to financing risks, such as only 6% of SDGs on track by 2030 and limited investment-grade ratings (e.g., solely and ), attributing investor deterrence to poor , weak anti-money laundering compliance (5% effective), and absent sovereign ratings in 16 countries. To counter democratic and institutional fragility, the analyses recommend leader through reforms enabling leverage, including $53 billion in 2023 (4% of global total) and (AfCFTA) potential to add $22 billion in trade by 2029. Market-oriented industrialization of critical minerals and infrastructure investments ($130-170 billion annual gap) are presented as causal drivers for , with 75-90% domestic funding targeted for Agenda 2063's $330 billion yearly needs.

Impact and Effectiveness

Achievements and Recognized Outcomes

The Ibrahim Prize for Achievement in African Leadership has awarded $5 million over 10 years plus $200,000 annually for life to six recipients since 2007, recognizing executives who voluntarily transferred power after constitutional terms: (, 2007), (, 2008), (, 2011), (, 2014), (, 2017), and (, 2020). These selections have underscored adherence to term limits as a benchmark for exemplary , influencing continental conversations on democratic norms and peaceful handovers amid frequent incumbency extensions elsewhere in . The (IIAG), tracking 322 variables across 54 countries since 2007, has informed policy by highlighting progress in areas like public goods provision, with three-quarters of Africans living in jurisdictions showing net gains as of 2018 assessments. Its datasets, drawn from 58 sources including African institutions, have been referenced in evaluations and aligned with indicators for benchmarking. High performers like (consistently ranked 1st or 2nd) and (top 5) exhibit correlated advances in security, , and economic management, bolstering evidence for effective institutional incentives. Leadership fellowships have placed dozens of emerging African professionals annually in roles at the , UN Economic Commission for Africa, and since the program's inception, building pipelines for policy expertise and advocacy. This initiative, complemented by scholarships, has amplified youth input into governance dialogues, as seen in the Now Generation Network's contributions to forums on and implementation.

Empirical Assessments and Limitations

The 2024 (IIAG) indicates overall stagnation in continental governance performance, with Africa's average score remaining at 49.3 from 2014 to 2023, followed by a halt in progress in 2022 driven by rising conflicts and coups. This trend underscores limited systemic improvements despite the index's role in benchmarking reforms, particularly in high performers like and , where data has informed policy enhancements in areas such as . However, the infrequency of Prize awards—only five recipients since , including none in multiple years like 2013 and 2017—highlights enduring leadership deficits, as criteria demanding voluntary term limits and sustained governance gains are rarely met. External analyses question the prize's incentive effects, noting insufficient evidence of behavioral shifts among leaders amid entrenched networks that prioritize personal and kin loyalty over institutional . Similarly, while Fellowships have placed in influential roles across institutions and international bodies, isolating their causal contribution to broader outcomes remains challenging due to variables like national economic conditions and political cycles. The Foundation's initiatives have elevated awareness of metrics, as evidenced by IIAG's adoption in dialogues, yet empirical tracking shows no reversal of decade-long declines in and sub-indices. Structural barriers, including the in mineral-rich states—where abundance correlates with weakened institutions via and reduced diversification incentives—constrain the Foundation's tools from yielding transformative continent-wide effects. Cultural norms of further dilute incentive potency, as leaders often retain power beyond terms despite prizes or indices, limiting beyond awareness and elite networking. These limitations suggest the Foundation's contributions, while data-driven and reform-oriented in select contexts, have not empirically offset entrenched causal dynamics like conflict-driven reversals observed in over 77% of African populations per recent IIAG-linked surveys.

Criticisms and Controversies

Issues with Prize Selection and Awards

The Ibrahim Prize for Achievement in African Leadership, established in 2007, has been conferred on only six occasions, to of in 2007, of in 2008, of in 2011, of in 2014, of in 2017, and of via a special prize in 2022. Pronounced gaps in awards—such as none in 2009–2010, 2012–2013, 2015–2016, 2018–2021, and 2023–2024—stem from the independent Prize Committee's rigorous evaluation, which demands that candidates, as former democratically elected executive heads of state or government who departed office within three years, exhibit exceptional performance in areas including democratic institutions, , economic expansion, and voluntary adherence to term limits. These withholdings empirically signal widespread deficits in governance, where few leaders meet the threshold due to patterns of extended tenure via constitutional alterations, suppressed opposition, or manipulated electoral processes that prioritize personal retention of authority over institutional handover. The non-award, in particular, drew commentary framing it as an of the continental pool, as no retiring figure qualified despite reviewing eligible cases, thereby exposing the scarcity of transitions honoring predefined constitutional exits. Such outcomes challenge portrayals in certain international reporting that normalize or minimize authoritarian entrenchment as mere political custom rather than a systemic deviation from democratic norms. Laureates' subsequent trajectories affirm the prize's structure's feasibility, furnishing $5 million disbursed over 10 years followed by $200,000 annually for life, enabling sustained public engagement without office-holding dependency—as evidenced by recipients' advisory roles and post-tenure. Yet the award's sparsity reveals underlying causal impediments, including electoral irregularities and networks that render voluntary politically untenable for most, perpetuating cycles where power consolidation overrides governance . This selectivity, grounded in data-informed assessments by the committee, underscores the prize's role not as routine recognition but as a illuminating entrenched barriers to accountable leadership.

Ideological and Methodological Critiques

Critics of the Foundation's approach argue that its emphasis on individual through the $5 million prize risks overemphasizing personal agency at the expense of systemic and structural factors in , akin to a " that attributes outcomes primarily to leaders rather than institutional reforms or historical contexts. Some analyses, such as those questioning the foundation's 2018 assessments, describe this as a potential "misdiagnosis" by prioritizing leader over entrenched economic dependencies or colonial legacies that perpetuate underperformance. Left-leaning perspectives further charge that the foundation's promotion of market-oriented, liberal democratic metrics fosters excessive , sidelining communal traditions in favor of Western that may not align with local social fabrics. In defense, proponents highlight the empirical rigor of the (IIAG), which aggregates 322 variables from 49 independent sources to measure institutional quality across categories like and economic opportunity, demonstrating correlations with prosperity independent of leader-centric narratives. This data-driven methodology validates the foundation's focus on verifiable institutions over anecdotal or historical excuses, aligning with right-leaning endorsements of market to counter dependency traps that stifle , as evidenced by consistent IIAG trends showing improved scores in countries prioritizing domestic . Africanist arguments invoking cultural relativism posit that universal governance standards impose ethnocentric benchmarks ill-suited to diverse traditions, potentially undervaluing context-specific practices. However, cross-country data refute this by revealing strong, consistent positive correlations between governance quality—measured by factors like accountability and security—and economic prosperity across African nations, mirroring global patterns where institutional robustness drives outcomes regardless of cultural variance, thus underscoring the universality of effective governance principles. Regarding the prize's monetary incentives, while some contend large payouts could entrench corrupt elite networks by rewarding tenure over reform, the foundation's infrequent awards—none in several years—mitigate this by enforcing stringent criteria tied to post-tenure democratic transitions.

Recent Governance Decisions and Backlash

In April 2025, the Mo Ibrahim Foundation appointed former Senegalese President , who served from 2012 to 2024, as a new member of its Council and independent Prize Committee for the Ibrahim Prize. This decision drew immediate criticism for perceived inconsistencies with the foundation's core advocacy for democratic transparency and accountability, particularly given Sall's role in postponing Senegal's February 2024 to December 2024 amid political unrest and opposition accusations of power consolidation. More than 50 prominent African intellectuals, including academics and figures, issued a public letter against the appointment, arguing that Sall's record—marked by the delay and associated crackdowns—undermined the foundation's standards for exemplary and risked eroding its credibility as a . A separate signed by 64 individuals echoed this, asserting that elevating Sall contradicted the foundation's mission to reward verifiable democratic excellence rather than political expediency. Critics, including analyst , highlighted this as exposing potential within the foundation's structures, where influential former leaders might prioritize networks over rigorous empirical vetting of metrics. Concurrently, in June 2025 at the Ibrahim Governance Weekend in Marrakech, foundation founder publicly critiqued the African Union's financial dependency, declaring it a "" and "" that approximately 70% of the AU's $650 million annual derives from foreign donors rather than member states, thereby questioning the continental body's autonomy and self-funding capacity. This statement, rooted in data on AU financing shortfalls, intensified debates over external interventionism versus African-led , with some viewing it as a principled call for causal while others questioned its alignment with the foundation's history of engaging donor-funded initiatives. These positions tested the foundation's internal coherence, revealing tensions between promoting data-driven governance ideals and navigating appointments that could invite accusations of selective application.

References

  1. [1]
    About us | Mo Ibrahim Foundation
    The Foundation was established to define, assess, and enhance sound leadership and governance in Africa as key enablers of the continent's progress, with a ...Contact us · Jobs · Council · IIAG Expert Panel
  2. [2]
    Mo Ibrahim - World Justice Project
    Dr Mo Ibrahim is the Founder and Chair of the Mo Ibrahim Foundation, which he established in 2006 to support good governance and exceptional leadership on the ...
  3. [3]
    Mo Ibrahim Foundation: Home
    The Mo Ibrahim Foundation is an African organisation providing an African voice on current global challenges, grounded in sound leadership and governance.About us · Leadership Fellowships · Ibrahim Scholarships · Contact usMissing: history | Show results with:history
  4. [4]
    Ibrahim Prize for Achievement in African Leadership
    The Prize celebrates excellence in African leadership. It is awarded to a former Executive Head of State or Government by an independent Prize Committee.
  5. [5]
    Mo Ibrahim Foundation announces no winner of the 2023 Ibrahim ...
    Mar 15, 2024 · The independent Prize Committee has announced that there will be no winner of the 2023 Ibrahim Prize for Achievement in African Leadership.
  6. [6]
    2026 Mo Ibrahim Foundation Leadership Fellowship Program
    Sep 22, 2025 · Established in 2006, the Mo Ibrahim Foundation aims to support good governance and great leadership in Africa. The Foundation works to:.
  7. [7]
    Mo Ibrahim Foundation - Devex
    The Mo Ibrahim Foundation (MIF) is an African foundation, established in 2006 with one focus: the critical importance of governance and leadership in Africa. ...Missing: initial | Show results with:initial<|separator|>
  8. [8]
    [PDF] The Mo Ibrahim Prize for Achievement in African Leadership
    It provides both a new definition of governance and a comprehensive set of governance measures. Robert will give you a great deal more detail on exactly how ...
  9. [9]
    The BA Hosts the Inaugural Mo Ibrahim Prize for Achievement in ...
    Oct 31, 2007 · The Mo Ibrahim Prize consists of US$ 5 million over 10 years and US$ 200,000 annually for life thereafter. For more information on the Mo ...
  10. [10]
    Contact us | Mo Ibrahim Foundation
    Get in touch using the details below. London office 35 Portman Square London W1H 6LR United Kingdom email: info@moibrahimfoundation.orgMissing: Dakar | Show results with:Dakar
  11. [11]
    [PDF] C(2025)9010 final - Borrell Ibrahim.pdf - European Commission
    Apr 1, 2025 · 5). The Mo Ibrahim Foundation is a non-profit organisation established in 2006 by Sir. Mohammed Fathi Ahmed Ibrahim, a Sudanese-British ...
  12. [12]
    IIAG Expert Panel - Mo Ibrahim Foundation
    IIAG Expert Panel: Dr Joseph Asunka, Prof Cristina D'Alessandro, Prof Sabina Alkire, Ma Soukha Ba, NGN member, Karen Bett, Dr Nic Cheeseman, Oliver Chinganya.Missing: establishment | Show results with:establishment
  13. [13]
  14. [14]
    Partners | Mo Ibrahim Foundation
    Foundation partners · Affinity Africa · African Development Bank · Africa Europe Foundation · African Leadership Institute · Afrobarometer · African Peer Review ...Missing: offices adaptations
  15. [15]
    Mo Ibrahim Foundation (MIF) - Afrobarometer
    The Mo Ibrahim Foundation (MIF) is an African foundation, established in 2006 with one focus: the critical importance of governance and leadership in Africa.
  16. [16]
    Founder and Chair - Mo Ibrahim Foundation
    Dr Mo Ibrahim is the Founder and Chair of the Mo Ibrahim Foundation, which he established in 2006 to support good governance and exceptional leadership on the ...Missing: headquarters initial goals
  17. [17]
    Dr Mo Ibrahim | Satya Capital
    Dr Ibrahim is the founder of Celtel International, one of Africa's most successful companies. In 1998, Dr Ibrahim founded MSI Cellular Investments.
  18. [18]
    Mohammed Ibrahim - Forbes
    Mohammed "Mo" Ibrahim founded Celtel International in 1998, one of the first mobile phone companies serving Africa and the Middle East. He sold Celtel to ...
  19. [19]
    No bank would fund Mo Ibrahim's telco but then he became ... - CNBC
    Apr 25, 2019 · Mo Ibrahim was born in Sudan and grew up in Egypt; He founded African mobile network Celtel in 1998 and sold it for $3.4 billion in 2005 ...
  20. [20]
    Celtel's Founder on Building a Business on the World's Poorest ...
    Mo Ibrahim , the founder of Celtel, is the chairman of Satya Capital and of the Mo Ibrahim Foundation, which focuses on the governance of African countries.
  21. [21]
    The end of aid is an opportunity for sustainable self-reliance
    Jul 29, 2025 · The mindset of aid dependency has to stop. First, now is the time for leadership from governments, to shake off the yoke of aid dependency and ...
  22. [22]
    Mo Ibrahim - Creating Emerging Markets - Harvard Business School
    In 2006, Ibrahim went on to found the Mo Ibrahim Foundation, as well as a number of other investment funds designed to support entrepreneurship and promote ...<|separator|>
  23. [23]
    Demystifying Africa's dependence on foreign aid
    Aug 7, 2025 · As development aid from historical donor countries is recently declining, the moment to re-examine the weight of Official Development ...
  24. [24]
    Council | Mo Ibrahim Foundation
    Council · Mo Ibrahim. Founder and Chair · Masood Ahmed · Valerie Amos · Zeinab Badawi · Josep Borrell · Jin-Yong Cai · Nathalie Delapalme · Moussa Faki Mahamat.
  25. [25]
    Mo Ibrahim Foundation welcomes new members to its Council and ...
    Apr 8, 2025 · “We are excited to welcome Josep Borrell, Moussa Faki Mahamat, Mark Malloch-Brown and Macky Sall to the Foundation. Each of them brings a wealth ...
  26. [26]
    Ibrahim Index of African Governance (IIAG) - Mo Ibrahim Foundation
    Ibrahim Index of African Governance (IIAG). The IIAG is a tool that measures and monitors governance performance in African countries.Missing: offices adaptations
  27. [27]
    [PDF] 2024 Ibrahim Index of African Governance _
    Following an internal review of the IIAG framework as well as advice from our IIAG Expert Panel, each sub-category now includes one indicator composed of public ...
  28. [28]
    Controversy Surrounds Macky Sall's Appointment to the Mo Ibrahim ...
    Apr 12, 2025 · Macky Sall, who served as president from 2012 to 2024, now joins notable figures such as Lord Mark Malloch-Brown, former president of the Open ...
  29. [29]
    Over 50 Intellectuals Protest Macky Sall's Mo Ibrahim Foundation ...
    Apr 10, 2025 · They pointed to allegations of suppressing political opposition, undermining democratic institutions, and mismanaging Senegal's economy through ...
  30. [30]
    Beyond Term Limits: Restraining Chief Executives in Africa
    Mar 24, 2021 · The Mo Ibrahim Prize aims to help African countries to solve, or at least ease, what Rosalind Dixon and David Landau called “the end game ...Missing: critique | Show results with:critique
  31. [31]
    [PDF] A Critical Analysis of Presidential Term Limits in Africa
    Jul 6, 2018 · 2). Another vocal critic of presidential term limit manipulations is Mo Ibrahim, a Sudanese billionaire who, in 2007, founded the Mo Ibrahim ...
  32. [32]
    Mo Ibrahim Foundation's Indictment of African Presidential Leadership
    Jun 30, 2016 · In 2016, once again, the Mo Ibrahim Foundation has found no retiring African leader qualified for the Ibrahim Prize for Achievement in ...Missing: criticisms controversies
  33. [33]
    Mo Ibrahim, Founder and Chair, Mo Ibrahim Foundation: Interview
    IBRAHIM: There is no silver bullet to Africa's challenges. Neither aid nor trade alone is the solution. Of course, being aid dependent is not desirable and ...<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    The funding of the AU from member states is a 'farce', Mo Ibrahim
    Jun 10, 2025 · Ibrahim expressed his dismay about AU's excessive dependence, stating that '70% of the 650 million annual budget of the AU is funded by foreigners is a farce.
  35. [35]
    Accountability | Mo Ibrahim Foundation
    Rule of Law, Transparency & Accountability are key to improving public governance in Africa. Blog. 9 December 2016. Corruption – still a worrying trend. Blog.Missing: self- | Show results with:self-
  36. [36]
    Mo Ibrahim Calls Out Africa's Chronic Dependence at the 2025 ...
    Jun 5, 2025 · Ibrahim's critique goes further than numbers; he targets the mindset. The idea that African nations can outsource their developmental priorities ...
  37. [37]
    Why do foreigners fund the African Union? Mo Ibrahim ... - YouTube
    Jun 6, 2025 · "You call them colonizers but when they give us money, they're partners," Sudanese billionaire Mo Ibrahim says. About 70% of the African ...Missing: criticisms controversies
  38. [38]
    Mo Ibrahim urges African leaders to make countries more self-reliant
    Jun 3, 2025 · Sudanese philanthropist Mo Ibrahim yesterday urged African leaders to “put their house in order” and become more self-reliant, rather than relying on foreign ...
  39. [39]
    The 2024 IIAG is now live and the top-ranked country in Overall ...
    Oct 23, 2024 · These states have consistently demonstrated weak leadership, poor ... The release says the Mo Ibrahim Foundation has released the Ibrahim Index of ...
  40. [40]
    Mo Ibrahim Foundation - Facebook
    Oct 23, 2024 · The 2012 Ibrahim Index of African Governance confirmed overall positive trends in governance ... low, contributing to its poor governance rating.
  41. [41]
    Reflections from Marrakech: 2025 Ibrahim Governance Weekend
    Jun 27, 2025 · Africa needs leadership to truly achieve self determination, sovereignty and prosperity. This requires the continent to prioritise, prepare ...Missing: initial | Show results with:initial
  42. [42]
    [PDF] President Mahamadou Issoufou wins 2020 Ibrahim Prize for ...
    Mar 8, 2021 · The Ibrahim Prize is a US$5 million award paid over ten years. It ... Criteria: • Former African Executive Head of State or Government.
  43. [43]
    Prize Committee | Mo Ibrahim Foundation
    Prize Committee: Festus Mogae Chair, Aïcha Bah Diallo, Josep Borrell Mohamed ElBaradei, Moussa Faki Mahamat, Graça Machel, Mary Robinson Ellen Johnson Sirleaf.<|control11|><|separator|>
  44. [44]
    [PDF] No winner of the 2013 Ibrahim Prize for Achievement in African ...
    The Ibrahim Prize for Achievement in African Leadership is the largest prize in the world, worth an annual US$5 million over 10 years and US$200,000 annually ...
  45. [45]
    Laureates | Mo Ibrahim Foundation
    Ibrahim Prize Laureates: Nelson Mandela 2007 Honorary Laureate, Joaquim Chissano 2007 Laureate, Festus Mogae 2008 Laureate, Pedro Pires 2011 Laureate.
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Ellen Johnson Sirleaf accepts Ibrahim Prize for Achievement in ...
    You can follow the Mo Ibrahim Foundation on: • Website: http://mo.ibrahim.foundation/. • Twitter: @Mo_IbrahimFdn. • Facebook: https://www.facebook.com ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] 2024 Ibrahim Index of African Governance Index Report _
    Oct 18, 2024 · This year marks 14 years since the IIAG was setup by the Mo Ibrahim Foundation. ... I hope that the IIAG Expert Panel will be able to provide a.
  48. [48]
    Methodology - Ibrahim Index of African Governance
    The IIAG governance framework comprises four categories: Security & Rule of Law, Participation, Rights & Inclusion, Foundations for Economic Opportunity and ...
  49. [49]
    2024 Ibrahim Index of African Governance - World - ReliefWeb
    Oct 23, 2024 · London, 23 October – The Mo Ibrahim Foundation today released the 2024 Ibrahim Index of African Governance (IIAG), the latest iteration of the ...
  50. [50]
    Mo Ibrahim Governance Weekend
    2025 Ibrahim Governance ...2023 Ibrahim Governance ...Past IGW eventsIbrahim Governance Weekend2022 Ibrahim Forum
  51. [51]
    Ibrahim Governance Weekend - Mo Ibrahim Foundation
    The 2025 IGW took place from 1-3 June in Marrakech, Morocco. This year's conversations built on the findings of the 2024 Ibrahim Forum Report, Financing ...
  52. [52]
    2025 Ibrahim Forum theme
    Feb 28, 2025 · The 2025 Ibrahim Forum, held on Day 2 of the Ibrahim Governance Weekend, will focus on the theme “Leveraging Africa’s Resources to Close the Finance Gap”.
  53. [53]
    2025 Ibrahim Governance Weekend | Mo Ibrahim Foundation
    The 2025 Forum theme was Financing The Africa We Want. The conversations built on the findings of the 2024 Forum Report Financing Africa: where is the money?, ...
  54. [54]
    Throwback to the Ibrahim Governance Weekend On ... - Facebook
    Oct 18, 2025 · Throwback to the Ibrahim Governance Weekend On stage in Marrakech, Mo Ibrahim's message was clear: peace and security must come first if ...<|separator|>
  55. [55]
    AEF at the Ibrahim Governance Weekend 2025
    Apr 11, 2025 · The Ibrahim Governance Weekend (IGW), the flagship event of the Mo Ibrahim Foundation, will be held in Marrakech, Morocco from 1-3 June 2025.
  56. [56]
    Deputy Secretary-General's remarks at the 2025 Ibrahim ...
    Jun 1, 2025 · Marrakech, Morocco. 01 June 2025. Deputy Secretary-General's remarks at the 2025 Ibrahim Governance Weekend [as delivered]. Amina J. Mohammed ...
  57. [57]
    Financing the Africa we want? Reflections from the 2025 Ibrahim ...
    'Financing The Africa We Want' is a call to action on Africa's leaders and citizens alike to have a mindset shift from rhetoric to reality. If it does not ...
  58. [58]
    Mo Ibrahim Foundation
    The Ibrahim Governance Weekend (IGW) brings together leading voices from across Africa and beyond to discuss issues of critical importance to the continent's ...
  59. [59]
    The Ibrahim Leadership Fellowships
    The Ibrahim Leadership Fellowships were established in 2011 to identify and mentor the future generation of outstanding African leaders.Missing: initial goal transitions
  60. [60]
    Ibrahim Scholarships
    The Ibrahim Scholarships support aspiring African leaders at a number of distinguished academic institutions.
  61. [61]
    Mo Ibrahim Foundation Academy Fellowship | Chatham House
    This fellowship is a joint initiative with the Mo Ibrahim Foundation . It offers candidates at the early-to-mid-stage of their career the opportunity to ...Missing: initial | Show results with:initial<|control11|><|separator|>
  62. [62]
    About the NGN - Mo Ibrahim Foundation
    The Mo Ibrahim Foundation's Now Generation Network (NGN) brings together past and present Ibrahim Fellows and Scholars, and the participants of the annual Now ...
  63. [63]
    Now Generation Network | Mo Ibrahim Foundation
    The Now Generation Network (NGN), an initiative by the Mo Ibrahim Foundation, is a vibrant community of change-makers dedicated to shaping a brighter future ...News / Now Generation NetworkNGN leadershipCOVID-19 in Africa: Now ...
  64. [64]
    Now Generation Network webinar | COVID-19 in Africa - YouTube
    Jul 14, 2020 · The Mo Ibrahim Foundation recently set out to gather the views of young people in Africa and its now generation of leaders – who are part of ...
  65. [65]
    About the NGN - Mo Ibrahim Foundation
    About the NGN. The Mo Ibrahim Foundation's Now Generation Network (NGN) brings together past and present Ibrahim Fellows and Scholars, and the participants of ...
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Network - MediaValet
    The Mo Ibrahim Foundation's Now Generation Network (NGN) is a coalition of young and mid-career African practitioners and advocates committed to moving the ...
  67. [67]
    [PDF] 2024 IIAG: Key findings - Ibrahim Index of African Governance
    Nearly 95% of the 2024 IIAG indicators (90 out of 96) are clustered indicators, which are composed of more than one variable collected from sources. Security &.
  68. [68]
    Launch of the 2024 Ibrahim Index of African Governance (IIAG) Report
    Oct 23, 2024 · The Mo Ibrahim Foundation has released the 2024 Ibrahim Index of African Governance (IIAG), the latest iteration of the biennial dataset ...
  69. [69]
    Ibrahim Index of African Governance (IIAG) Data Portal | Mo Ibrahim ...
    The Ibrahim Index of African Governance (IIAG) is a tool that measures and monitors governance performance in African countries. Explore and compare nearly 500 ...
  70. [70]
    [PDF] Security & Safety in Africa: 2024 IIAG overview
    Over the last decade, the Security & Safety sub-category has consistently declined in 43 of 54 African countries, negatively affecting 77.9% of the continent's ...Missing: vulnerability | Show results with:vulnerability
  71. [71]
    Nathalie Delapalme «Inequalities at the sub-national level can fuel ...
    Dec 20, 2024 · The indicator measuring people's access to energy is one of the ten IIAG indicators that have made the most progress over the 2014-2023 decade.
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Closing data gaps to accelerate Africa's transformation
    The Mo Ibrahim Foundation's NGN is a pan-African coalition of youth committed to moving the continent's development agenda forward. It consists of Ibrahim ...<|separator|>
  73. [73]
    Forum downloads | Mo Ibrahim Foundation
    2025 Forum Report. Financing The Africa We Want ; 2024 Forum Report. Financing Africa: where is the money? · 2024 Forum Report. Key findings. Download file (PDF).
  74. [74]
    [PDF] Financing the Africa We Want - Mo Ibrahim Foundation
    Jul 1, 2025 · The report closes with a synthesis of the main conclusions of the 2025 IGW, highlighting a strong consensus on Africa's path forward and ...
  75. [75]
    16 years of the Ibrahim prize: Has it impacted African governance?
    Apr 4, 2023 · The Ibrahim Prize for Achievement in African Leadership is managed by the Mo Ibrahim Foundation and is regarded as the world's heaviest purse.
  76. [76]
    [PDF] 2018 Ibrahim Index of African Governance Index Report - Tralac
    This 12th Index shows that governance on our continent, on average, is slowly improving. Approximately three out of four African citizens live in a country ...Missing: citations | Show results with:citations<|separator|>
  77. [77]
    [PDF] 2024 Ibrahim Index of African Governance _
    Seventeen criteria are analysed over 137 countries, through the publication of two rankings: the Status Index and the Governance Index. Raw data is freely ...
  78. [78]
    Africa's Governance Trajectory: Are AU Mechanisms Working? - SAIIA
    Jul 17, 2023 · ' and the Mo Ibrahim Foundation's Ibrahim Index of African Governance (IIAG), which is an assessment tool focusing on governance performance in ...
  79. [79]
    Africa's Youth - Mo Ibrahim Foundation
    ... Leadership Fellowships which identifies and mentors the future generation of outstanding African leaders. ... COP29: key outcomes and look ahead for Africa.
  80. [80]
    [PDF] Governance progress in Africa grinds to a halt as security and
    London, 23 October – The Mo Ibrahim Foundation today released the 2024 Ibrahim Index of African Governance. (IIAG), the latest iteration of the biennial ...
  81. [81]
    President Mahamadou Issoufou wins 2020 Ibrahim Prize for ...
    Mar 8, 2021 · The 2020 Ibrahim Prize for Achievement in African Leadership has been awarded to Mahamadou Issoufou, president of Niger.
  82. [82]
    Mo Ibrahim prize: finally a winner | ISS Africa
    Mar 6, 2015 · The Mo Ibrahim Foundation finally announced on Monday that Namibia's outgoing president, Hifikepunye Pohamba, won the US$5 million prize for leadership.
  83. [83]
    Mo Ibrahim does not have all the answers
    Jul 12, 2021 · The Mo Ibrahim Prize rewards African presidents for promoting democracy. But there's no proof the prize has had any effect or that it is needed.
  84. [84]
    Africa's Governance Challenges - jstor
    At the heart of the resource curse are issues of democratic governance. ... Efforts to curb the illegal sale of natural resources to fund the conflict have varied ...
  85. [85]
    Resource Impact: Curse of Blessing? A literature survey
    ... The 'resource-curse' thesis has been used repeatedly to explain why communities that hold rich deposits of mineral resources are likely to be disadvantaged ...
  86. [86]
    [PDF] Unlocking the Power of Reformers to Achieve Better Progress on ...
    Jan 3, 2022 · Because of the particular challenges associated with EI— those qualities that make them particularly prone to rent- seeking, clientelism, ...
  87. [87]
    Over 77% of Africans Face Decline in Security and Democracy (Mo ...
    Oct 24, 2024 · ... 2024 Ibrahim Index of African Governance" released on October 23. This decline is driven by a rise in conflicts, coups, and authoritarian ...
  88. [88]
    Mo Ibrahim Foundation announces no winner of 2016 Ibrahim Prize ...
    Feb 28, 2017 · The Mo Ibrahim Foundation today announced that there is no winner of the 2016 Ibrahim Prize for Achievement in African Leadership.Missing: indictment | Show results with:indictment
  89. [89]
    Yet Again, No Mo Ibrahim Prize Awarded
    Mar 10, 2017 · It awards laureates $5 million over ten years, then $200,000 per year for life. In addition, laureates may apply for an additional $200,000 per ...
  90. [90]
  91. [91]
    Mo Ibrahim Recipients, Governance, and the IIAG - HKS Student ...
    Mar 12, 2015 · The controversy over this issue is whether it is right in nation building for Kagame to remain in office if a successor is ill equipped to lead ...
  92. [92]
    (PDF) Dichotomy of Servant Leadership and Its practicality on the ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · ... Mo Ibrahim Foundation failed to award its annual leadership prize ... great man” theory of leadership. Finally, it is unclear. why ...
  93. [93]
    [PDF] Good Governance and Political Settlements in Africa and Beyond
    Jul 28, 2025 · recently grapples with governance problems (Villalón 2004; Mo Ibrahim Foundation 2022; ... Governance and Growth: History, Ideology, and Methods ...
  94. [94]
    Good Governance - Oxford Public International Law
    11 The Ibrahim Index of African Governance ('Ibrahim Index'), produced by the Mo Ibrahim Foundation, ranks sub-Saharan African nations according to governance ...
  95. [95]
    Good Governance And Economic Growth In Africa - ResearchGate
    Aug 10, 2025 · Therefore, the paper aims to examine the good governance and economic growth for the 50 African countries for the period of 2002 to 2020 using ...Missing: universal | Show results with:universal
  96. [96]
    Governance and economic growth in Africa: evidence from linear ...
    Mar 18, 2025 · In this paper, we study the impact (if any) of governance quality on economic growth in Africa, using a panel dataset of fifty countries during the period 2008 ...Missing: prosperity | Show results with:prosperity
  97. [97]
    [PDF] Economic prosperity and public backing for transparent and ...
    Apr 6, 2024 · This paper analyses how economic factors shape public attitudes toward transparent and accountable governance in Africa, a topic that has ...
  98. [98]
  99. [99]
    It's a disgrace that 70% of the $650 million annual budget of African ...
    Jun 2, 2025 · Appointing Former President Macky Sall to the Board of the Mo Ibrahim Foundation exposes the Founder of the Foundation and #Gold Standard of # ...
  100. [100]
    “It's a disgrace that 70% of the $650 million annual budget of African ...
    Jun 3, 2025 · in todays multipolar world, Mo Ibrahim has a point that African leaders call outsiders “development partners” yet later decry them as “ ...