Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Mosasaurinae

Mosasaurinae is a subfamily of extinct marine squamate reptiles within the family Mosasauridae, representing advanced, fully aquatic mosasaurs that dominated Late Cretaceous oceans from approximately 98 to 66 million years ago. These predators evolved from terrestrial lizard-like ancestors into streamlined swimmers, featuring elongated snouts, robust skulls with conical teeth suited for grasping prey, reduced limbs modified into paddle-like flippers, and a powerful, two-lobed tail fin for efficient propulsion. Ranging in size from under 2 meters in primitive forms like Dallasaurus to over 15 meters in giants such as Mosasaurus, Mosasaurinae taxa exhibited spongious bone structures in their vertebrae and long bones, reflecting adaptations for buoyancy and hydrodynamic efficiency in open marine environments. Taxonomically, Mosasaurinae is one of two primary subfamilies in Mosasauridae (alongside Tylosaurinae), encompassing a monophyletic of genera including , , , , and (often excluding basal taxa like ). Phylogenetic studies using multiple methods, such as implied weighting parsimony and maximum likelihood, consistently recover Mosasaurinae as a derived group within Mosasauroidea, with key synapomorphies like the loss of sacral-pelvic contact (hydropelvic condition) and hyperphalangy in the autopodium (hydropedal condition) evolving once in the lineage. This subfamily's radiation coincided with global marine diversification, filling niches through specialized cranial and dental morphologies, such as the durophagous (shell-crushing) teeth in . Evolutionarily, Mosasaurinae displayed intermediate growth rates compared to other reptiles, evidenced by parallel-fibered in long bones that supported rapid ontogenetic development and body size increases. Their worldwide distribution spanned epicontinental seas and open oceans, with fossils documented from , , , and beyond, underscoring their role in ecosystems until the end-Cretaceous mass extinction.

Description

General Morphology

Mosasaurinae, a subfamily of extinct marine squamate reptiles within Mosasauridae, possessed a robust, elongated body plan adapted for fully aquatic life, characterized by a streamlined, anguilliform form that facilitated efficient swimming through lateral undulations. Adults typically ranged in body length from approximately 3 to 15 meters, with smaller genera like Clidastes reaching around 3–6 meters and larger forms such as Mosasaurus hoffmannii attaining up to 15 meters, reflecting a robust build supported by powerful axial musculature. This size variation underscores their adaptation as apex predators in Late Cretaceous marine environments, with the elongated snout comprising a significant portion of the head (up to 13.8% of total length) and the tail often exceeding 50% of the body for enhanced propulsion. The limbs of Mosasaurinae were modified into paddle-like flippers, featuring shortened, broadened elements with hyperphalangy—up to 10 phalanges per digit in some forelimbs—and covered in rhomboid scales, primarily serving steering functions rather than primary locomotion. The tail was deep and laterally compressed, with neural and haemal spines dilating distally to form a , enabling powerful thrust in water; in derived taxa, the tail could constitute 42–60% of total length. The presacral , consisting of and vertebrae, numbered 31–45, a count generally less than the postsacral series. As advanced squamates, Mosasaurinae retained generalized reptilian features such as a dermal covering of small, keeled, diamond-shaped scales across the body, evidenced by fossil skin impressions that reveal semi-translucent, overlapping structures similar to those in modern . is inferred for Mosasaurinae based on neonatal fossils from pelagic environments, suggesting live birth adapted to fully aquatic lifestyles.

Diagnostic Features

Mosasaurinae is characterized by a suite of cranial and postcranial synapomorphies that distinguish it from other mosasaurid subfamilies, particularly in dental counts, neurocranial foramina, vertebral , and skull roof configuration. One key dental feature is the presence of 14 or more teeth in both the dentary and , reflecting an adaptation for grasping large prey in this advanced mosasaur lineage. This contrasts with more mosasauroids, where tooth counts are typically lower, and exemplifies the subfamily's trend toward robust marginal . Cranially, the position of the foramina for X (vagus), XI (), and (hypoglossal) is diagnostic, with these exiting the lateral wall of the opisthotic through two foramina rather than separate openings. This configuration, observed in genera such as and , indicates a streamlined suited to locomotion and may relate to enhanced sensory integration in marine environments. The hypoglossal (for ), in particular, is positioned posteriorly within this paired exit, contributing to the subfamily's specialized organization. Postcranially, Mosasaurinae exhibits distinctive vertebral , including triangular pygal vertebrae that support the basal region and facilitate fluked . These pygal centra, numbering at least five and often with transverse processes more than twice the length of those on vertebrae, attach via elevated synapophyses located high on the anterior two-thirds of the centrum's lateral surface. This rib attachment pattern enhances thoracic rigidity while allowing flexibility in the caudal series, a hallmark of the subfamily's hydrodynamically efficient . Additionally, haemal arches in Mosasaurinae are notably elongated, often 1.5 times longer than corresponding neural arches, further optimizing function. In the skull roof, variations in the rostral extent of the frontal bones are prominent, with fused frontals forming a triangular plate that narrows anteriorly and telescopes over the anterior edge of the parietal, suppressing mesokinetic movement. This rostral projection, broader in derived forms like Mosasaurus, creates an interorbital septum and bounds the large parietal foramen with posteriorly projecting wings, reinforcing cranial stability under high-speed aquatic stresses. Such features underscore the evolutionary refinement of Mosasaurinae toward a more rigid, streamlined cranium compared to basal relatives.

Taxonomy

History of Classification

The subfamily Mosasaurinae was established by paleontologist François Louis Paul Gervais in as part of the newly defined family Mosasauridae, with the genus serving as the based on characteristic cranial and dental features observed in European fossils. This initial classification grouped several large marine squamates under Mosasaurinae, emphasizing their shared adaptations for aquatic life, such as elongated bodies and specialized , though the boundaries remained fluid due to limited comparative material at the time. During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, taxonomic confusions arose as new North American specimens were described, particularly with genera like , which initially assigned to Mosasaurinae in 1869 owing to superficial similarities in robust jaw structure and tooth morphology. established as a distinct in 1872, but it was Samuel Wendell Williston who, in 1897, formalized the separation by erecting the subfamily Tylosaurinae to accommodate and related forms, distinguishing them from Mosasaurinae based on differences in parietal-frontal sutures, limb proportions, and vertebral counts. These early revisions highlighted the challenges of classifying mosasaurs without comprehensive anatomical comparisons, leading to temporary synonymies and reassignments among genera like Liodon and . A pivotal advancement came in 1967 with Dale A. Russell's systematic revision of mosasaurs, which provided the first rigorous definition of Mosasaurinae using synapomorphies including the overlapping the anterior wings of the frontal to restrict mesokinetic movement, streptostylic quadrates allowing enhanced mobility, fused haemal arches in caudal vertebrae, and more than 31 presacral vertebrae. Russell's work synthesized prior descriptions, incorporated detailed morphological data from numerous specimens, and divided Mosasaurinae into tribes such as Mosasaurini and Globidensini, establishing a framework that emphasized evolutionary relationships over superficial resemblances. In the post-2000 era, cladistic analyses have further refined Mosasaurinae's classification by integrating phylogenetic methods and expanded datasets, confirming its while resolving internal clades. For instance, revisions have solidified the separation of Prognathodontini as a distinct tribe within Mosasaurinae, encompassing and allies, based on shared traits like specialized tooth serrations and quadrate , as evidenced in multiple and Bayesian analyses. These updates, building on Russell's foundation, have incorporated global specimens and refined synapomorphies, such as dual cranial nerve foramina, to better delineate Mosasaurinae from sister subfamilies like Tylosaurinae.

Valid Genera and Species

Mosasaurinae encompasses approximately 12 valid genera and over 40 recognized species as of November 2025, based on recent taxonomic revisions that incorporate phylogenetic analyses and reexaminations of type material. This subfamily is characterized by a diverse array of morphologies adapted to marine predation, with genera distributed across Late Cretaceous deposits from the Turonian to Maastrichtian stages. Taxonomic stability has been achieved through the resolution of numerous junior synonyms and nomina dubia, such as certain assignments formerly placed under Platecarpus, which is now regarded as a nomen dubium outside of Mosasaurinae due to insufficient diagnostic features in its type specimens. Recent additions include Jormungandr (2023) and updated species for Carinodens (2025). The following table summarizes the valid genera, approximate species counts, brief etymologies, and details for representative or type species, including information and type localities where available.
GenusApproximate Species CountKey Species Example Details and Type Locality
Carinodens4"Keel " (Greek: carina + odous)C. belgicus (Woodward, 1891)IRScNB R 43 (incomplete dentary); Maastrichtian, Ciply,
Clidastes1"Key thief" (: klidas + kleptes)C. propython (Marsh, 1872)YPM 339 (partial skeleton); , New ,
Globidens5"Globe " (Latin: globus + : odous)G. dakotensis (Landman et al., 2014)SDSM 417 (partial skull and vertebrae); , South Dakota,
Gnathomortis1"Jaws of death" (: gnathos + mortis)G. stadtmani (Fanti et al., 2020)BYUVP 31640 (skull and partial skeleton); , ,
Jormungandr1"Norse serpent of "J. walhallaensis (Zietlow et al., 2023)NDGS F-3461 (partial skull and vertebrae); , North Dakota,
Kourisodon1"Razor " (: kouris + odous)K. puntledgensis (Holmes et al., 2010)RBCM 007 (partial skull and vertebrae); Santonian, ,
Liodon2"Smooth " (: leios + odous)L. anceps (Marsh, 1872)YPM VP 034601 (isolated teeth); , New , ; note: some synonymy with Thalassotitan proposed but retained as valid pending further review
Mosasaurus5"Meuse lizard" (Latin: Mosas + : sauros)M. hoffmannii (Mantell, 1829)IRScNB R1 (partial skull); , ,
Plesiotylosaurus1"Near Tylosaurus" (: plesios + Tylosaurus)P. crassidens (Camp, 1942)LACM 2860 (nearly complete skull); , ,
Plotosaurus1"Swimming lizard" (: plotos + sauros)P. remingtoni (Lindsley, 1940)UCMP 32101 (partial skeleton); , ,
Prognathodon7"Protruding " (: pro + gnathos + odous)P. saturator (Wouters, 1975)IRSNB R54 (partial skeleton); ,
Several genera include junior synonyms resolved through recent studies; for instance, material once assigned to Platecarpus in a mosasaurine context has been reclassified as indeterminate or transferred to other taxa due to non-diagnostic holotypes, such as the fragmentary remains of P. tympaniticus. Type localities predominantly span deposits in and Tethyan margins in and , reflecting the global distribution of Mosasaurinae prior to the K-Pg extinction.

Phylogeny

Cladistic Relationships

Mosasaurinae forms a monophyletic within the Mosasauridae, positioned as the to Tylosaurinae in comprehensive phylogenetic analyses of cranial and postcranial characters. This relationship is supported by shared derived features such as modifications to the suspensorium for aquatic adaptation, distinguishing Mosasaurinae from more basal mosasauroids. Within Mosasaurinae, recent cladistic analyses recover as a basal , situated outside the derived subclades and characterized by primitive traits like a relatively elongated and simpler dental morphology compared to later members. The further divides into three principal tribes—Globidensini, Prognathodontini, and Mosasaurini. Globidensini comprises durophagous forms closely related to , defined as taxa more closely allied to Globidens alabamensis than to Prognathodon solvayi or hoffmanni, with synapomorphies including bulbous, crushing teeth adapted for hard-shelled prey. Prognathodontini includes robust, apex-predatory taxa such as species and Thalassotitan atrox, defined as those closer to Prognathodon solvayi than to Globidens alabamensis or hoffmanni; key synapomorphies encompass massive jaws, large conical teeth with carinae, and a narrow parietal table. Mosasaurini encompasses advanced forms like and allies such as Carinodens and Xenodens, defined as taxa nearer to hoffmanni than to the other two genera, supported by features including shortened rostra and specialized marginal teeth. These tribal divisions highlight the diversification of feeding strategies within Mosasaurinae during the . Mosasaurinae originated in the early during the stage, marked by the appearance of the basal Dallasaurus turneri, a small-bodied (approximately 1 meter in length), lizard-like form with plesiopedal limbs indicative of a nearshore, transitional . This early radiation laid the foundation for the subfamilys adaptive expansion into fully marine environments, with subsequent diversification accelerating through the and Santonian stages, primarily represented by piscivorous genera such as Clidastes. By the and stages, Mosasaurinae reached its peak diversity, encompassing a broad array of ecomorphs across global oceans, driven by ecological opportunities in high-productivity marine settings. Recent discoveries, such as Jormungandr walhallaensis from the of (as of 2023) and a new derived from (as of 2024), further illustrate this diversification and refine basal relationships within the subfamily. A key evolutionary trend within Mosasaurinae was the shift from predominantly piscivorous diets in early forms to more specialized feeding strategies, including durophagy in derived lineages. For instance, the tribe Globidensini evolved robust, globular suited for crushing hard-shelled like ammonites and turtles, reflecting an adaptive response to niche partitioning amid increasing diversity. This dietary innovation, emerging prominently in the , contributed to the subfamilys morphological disparity and ecological dominance as apex predators. Post-Cenomanian evolution saw a marked increase in body size and specialization, adhering to of phyletic size increase, with early taxa like contrasting sharply against giants such as Mosasaurus hoffmannii, which exceeded 12 meters in length. This trend paralleled heightened specialization in cranial and dental features across subclades, enhancing predatory efficiency in open-ocean habitats. Ultimately, despite this , Mosasaurinae suffered total extinction at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary around 66 million years ago, coinciding with the global mass that disrupted marine ecosystems.

Distribution and Fossil Record

Temporal Range

The Mosasaurinae, a subfamily of mosasaurs, first appeared during the middle stage of the , approximately 92 million years ago (Ma), marking the onset of their evolutionary history. The earliest records include fragmentary remains allied with turneri, a basal mosasaurine, recovered from marine deposits in , such as the Greenhorn Formation in and . These fossils are biostratigraphically correlated with middle to late ammonite zones, including the Collignoniceras woollgari and Prionocyclus hyatti zones, which provide precise chronological anchoring through associated invertebrate index fossils. The primary phase of diversification for Mosasaurinae occurred from the Santonian to the stages, spanning roughly 86 to 66 Ma, during which multiple genera and species radiated across marine environments. This interval saw the emergence of more derived forms like and , with fossils distributed in strata correlated to ammonite zones such as the Texanites texanus zone in the Santonian and the zone in the . The stratigraphic record indicates a progressive increase in abundance and morphological variety, tied to global sea-level highs that facilitated widespread deposition of fossil-bearing limestones and shales. Mosasaurinae persisted until the latest Maastrichtian, with the youngest occurrences dated to just prior to the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) extinction boundary at approximately 66 Ma. Terminal records, including those of Mosasaurus hoffmannii, come from upper Maastrichtian units like the Pierre Shale in North America, biostratigraphically aligned with the Hoploscaphites nicolleti and Discoscaphites cheyennensis ammonite zones, which span 66.5 to 66.0 Ma. These correlations, based on co-occurring ammonites, confirm the subfamily's abrupt disappearance coincident with the end-Cretaceous mass extinction event.

Geographic Distribution

Mosasaurinae fossils are predominantly known from the , with over 80% of genera documented from deposits in this region, reflecting a strong bias toward Laurasian paleoenvironments during the . The achieved a across epicontinental seas, including the in , the Tethys Sea encompassing and , and the Indo-Pacific region spanning and extending to . In , the yielded the highest abundance of Mosasaurinae remains, particularly from the chalk and shale formations of the . Notable occurrences include those of in , where articulated skeletons and isolated elements have been recovered from the , highlighting the subfamily's dominance in this shallow epicontinental basin. Further north, specimens attributed to and other mosasaurines are reported from the in , , indicating a broad latitudinal range within the seaway. European and North African sites associated with the Tethys Sea preserve significant Mosasaurinae diversity, with the type specimen of hoffmannii originating from the Maastricht Formation near , , underscoring the region's role in early discoveries of the subfamily. Additional records include from Belgian and Dutch chalks, as well as Carinodens from phosphate deposits in , where nearly complete skulls demonstrate specialized durophagous adaptations in Tethyan settings. North African localities, such as those in , contribute further examples, including isolated teeth and vertebrae of Mosasaurus and related taxa from the Ouled Abdoun Basin. The realm features more sporadic but geographically extensive Mosasaurinae occurrences, with fossils reported from Maastrichtian strata containing Mosasaurus hobetsuensis and localities preserving elements of Moanasaurus and other mosasaurines in the . These southern records suggest dispersal via open marine corridors, though sampling intensity remains lower compared to northern sites. Despite the global reach of Mosasauridae, Mosasaurinae exhibits a notable absence in South American records, with no confirmed occurrences amid a generally sparse mosasaurid assemblage potentially attributable to or biogeographic barriers like the widening South Atlantic. This gap contrasts with the subfamily's prevalence elsewhere, emphasizing regional variations in distributions.

Paleobiology

Locomotion and Habitat

Mosasaurinae achieved propulsion primarily through powerful lateral movements of their , which featured a broad, laterally compressed structure terminating in a that functioned as a to generate . This -driven allowed for efficient cruising in marine environments, with the reduced limbs—modified into flattened paddles—serving mainly as stabilizers and aids for maneuvering rather than significant propulsors. The fully pelagic lifestyle of Mosasaurinae is inferred from adaptations such as increased vertebral flexibility in the caudal region, enabling sustained undulatory , combined with pronounced limb reduction that minimized drag in open water. These features indicate a shift away from nearshore habits toward a more oceanic existence, distinct from less derived mosasaurs. Members of Mosasaurinae preferred habitats in epicontinental seas, such as the , as well as adjacent open ocean waters, where they could exploit depths exceeding 100 meters based on rare earth element signatures in fossils. Genera like and Platecarpus favored deeper shelf environments within these settings, while Plioplatecarpus occupied somewhat shallower zones. Swimming speeds for Mosasaurinae are estimated through energetic models, suggesting sustained cruising velocities of around 10 km/h, comparable to modern like the in similar predatory roles, though burst speeds may have reached higher for ambushing prey.

Diet and Ecology

Members of Mosasaurinae were predominantly piscivorous, relying on conical, recurved teeth adapted for grasping and piercing soft-bodied prey such as and cephalopods. This , similar to that of modern piscivorous marine mammals like dolphins, facilitated efficient capture of elusive aquatic vertebrates in open marine environments. Stable carbon analyses of from genera like and further support a enriched in marine , with δ¹³C values indicating in nearshore to zones. Within the subfamily, the tribe Globidensini diverged toward durophagy, evolving robust, bulbous teeth for crushing hard-shelled organisms including ammonites, bivalves, and . For instance, specimens exhibit globular dentition that distributed bite forces to process resilient prey, as inferred from biomechanical models of jaw mechanics. Direct evidence comes from articulated fossils preserving stomach contents dominated by fragmented bivalves, such as inoceramids and oysters, which were selectively targeted for their fleshy interiors despite the surrounding matrix lacking similar concentrations. Predation traces on fossils corroborate these feeding strategies, with conical teeth leaving arcuate bite marks on ammonite and shells, indicating targeted attacks on shelled cephalopods by non-durophagous genera. As apex predators, Mosasaurinae genera filled top trophic roles, exhibiting niche partitioning; , for example, preyed on larger vertebrates including , seabirds, and conspecifics, as demonstrated by stomach contents containing multiple mosasaur skulls. Three-dimensional dental microwear texture analysis reveals dietary flexibility with some specialization, such as incorporating softer and alongside , while avoiding overlap with strictly durophagous forms like Carinodens. This partitioning minimized competition in marine ecosystems.

References

  1. [1]
    Microanatomical and Histological Features in the Long Bones ... - PMC
    Oct 16, 2013 · During their evolution in the Late Cretaceous, mosasauroids attained a worldwide distribution, accompanied by a marked increase in body size ...Missing: taxonomy | Show results with:taxonomy
  2. [2]
    Mosasauroid phylogeny under multiple phylogenetic methods ...
    May 3, 2017 · Within Mosasaurinae (exclusive of Dallsasaurus), all species of Mosasaurus form a clade with Plotosaurus bennisoni and Plesiotylosaurus ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Systematics and morphology of American mosasaurs (Reptilia, Sauria)
    This paper, by Dale A. Russell, published in 1967, covers the systematics and morphology of American mosasaurs (Reptilia, Sauria).
  4. [4]
    Skin of the Cretaceous mosasaur Plotosaurus - PubMed Central - NIH
    The squamation comprises rhomboidal scales that are obliquely arrayed into an alternating pattern where neighbouring scales overlap one another (figure 1 a–c).
  5. [5]
    Live birth in Cretaceous marine lizards (mosasauroids) - PMC - NIH
    Although live-bearing (viviparity) has evolved around 100 times within reptiles, evidence of it is almost never preserved in the fossil record.
  6. [6]
    A large new mosasaur from the Upper Cretaceous of The Netherlands
    Although haemal arches that are 1,5 times longer than neural arches of the same vertebra are considered a synapomorphy in Mosasaurinae. (Bell, 1997), this ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  7. [7]
    Mosasauroid phylogeny under multiple phylogenetic methods ...
    May 3, 2017 · In this study, we present the first mosasauroid phylogenetic analysis performed under different analytical methods, including maximum likelihood, Bayesian ...
  8. [8]
    A Prognathodontin Mosasaur from the Maastrichtian of the Dakhla ...
    Nov 9, 2023 · The Prognathodontini are a subgroup of Mosasaurinae that include Prognathodon and its relatives, sometimes recovered as a distinct clade [24] ...
  9. [9]
    Mosasaurids Bare the Teeth: An Extraordinary Ecological Disparity ...
    The skull length is estimated to be about 75–80 cm, and the total body size to be 5–6 m. Paleoecology—The highly specialized dentition of G. phosphaticus, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  10. [10]
    Jormungandr walhallaensis: A New Mosasaurine (Squamata - BioOne
    Oct 30, 2023 · Its skull and jaws are nearly complete, and the postcranial skeleton preserves seven cervical vertebrae with three hypapophyseal peduncles, 11 ...Missing: plan | Show results with:plan
  11. [11]
    (PDF) The rare mosasaur genus Globidens from north central Texas ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · PDF | On Jan 1, 2005, MJ Polcyn and others published The rare mosasaur genus Globidens from north central Texas (Mosasaurinae: Globidensini) ...Missing: list | Show results with:list<|separator|>
  12. [12]
    (PDF) A new species of Prognathodon (Squamata, Mosasauridae ...
    The taxonomic position of the genus Liodon (=Leiodon Agassiz, 1846) is currently not entirely clear. Some researchers consider it valid (Palci et al., 2014), ...
  13. [13]
    Rediagnosis and redescription of Mosasaurus hoffmannii (Squamata
    May 13, 2016 · While the dorsal surface of the prefrontal is seen to narrow anteriorly, the rostral end is incomplete so the extent of the articulation with ...
  14. [14]
    CRANIAL OSTEOLOGY OF THE GIANT MOSASAUR ...
    Plesiotylosaurus is char- acterized by a protruding rostrum on the snout and mandibles, a wide and virtually unconstricted internarial bar, large and robust ...
  15. [15]
    A new Plotosaurini mosasaur skull from the upper Maastrichtian of ...
    The taxonomy and diversity of its type species, Mosasaurus hoffmannii ... reviewed the validity status of the different species referred to this genus.Missing: paper | Show results with:paper
  16. [16]
  17. [17]
  18. [18]
    Rapid evolution, diversification and distribution of mosasaurs (Reptilia
    Mar 11, 2016 · mosasaurs and their discovery worldwide is provided by Bell (1997). The rise of mosasaurs can be visualized as occurring in three distinct ...
  19. [19]
    evolution of swimming in mosasaurine mosasaurs - GeoScienceWorld
    Mosasaurine mosasaurs appeared in the middle Turonian (ca, 92 Ma) and became extinct at the terminal Cretaceous, recording approximately 27-Myr of evolution in ...
  20. [20]
    (PDF) THE OLDEST NORTH AMERICAN MOSASAURS (SQUAMATA
    Laboratory 20:111–122. Russell, D. A. 1967. Systematics and morphology of. American mosasaurs. Peabody Museum of Natural. History Bulletin 23, 241 pp.
  21. [21]
    Ammonite dating of latest Cretaceous mosasaurid reptiles ...
    The age of the Muwaqqar Chalk Marl Formation is well constrained based on ammonite biostratigraphy. Restricted to a narrow window between 66.5-66.1 Ma (Jagt ...
  22. [22]
    Biostratigraphy of the Mosasauridae (Reptilia) from the Cretaceous ...
    Jan 1, 2006 · Mosasaur biostratigraphy is based on stratigraphic positions, but correlation of stratigraphic sections is necessarily based on other criteria: ...
  23. [23]
    The mosasaur fossil record through the lens of fossil completeness
    Jul 13, 2018 · Stratigraphic ranges​​ Mosasaurs generally occur in marine rocks, and often in close association with zone fossils such as belemnites, ammonites ...Missing: Mosasaurinae | Show results with:Mosasaurinae
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
    A New Species of the Durophagous Mosasaurid Carinodens from ...
    The Maastrichtian Phosphates of Morocco preserve the most diverse known mosasaurid fauna, and perhaps the most diverse known Mesozoic marine reptile fauna.Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
  26. [26]
    Mosasaurs (Reptilia) from the late Maastrichtian (Late Cretaceous ...
    Taxon 1. Mosasauridae Gervais, 1853. Mosasaurinae Williston, 1897. Plotosaurini Russell, 1967 sensu Bell, 1997. Mosasaurus Conybeare, 1822. Mosasaurus sp. aff.Missing: characters | Show results with:characters
  27. [27]
    Soft tissue preservation in a fossil marine lizard with a bilobed tail fin
    Sep 10, 2013 · This specimen provides the first indisputable evidence that derived mosasaurs were propelled by hypocercal tail fins, a hypothesis that was ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Locomotion and skeletal morphology of Late Cretaceous mosasaur ...
    May 8, 2017 · Polcyn, M. J. and G. L. Bell Jr. 2005. Russellosaurus coheni n. gen., n. sp., a 92 million- year-old mosasaur from Texas (USA), ...
  29. [29]
    Climate, competition, and the rise of mosasauroid ecomorphological ...
    Mar 23, 2022 · The later diversification of derived Mosasaurinae and Plioplatecarpinae is associated with a great expansion of morphospace, attributed to the ...
  30. [30]
    Habitat preference of mosasaurs indicated by rare earth element ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · Results indicate that Mosasaurus, Platecarpus and Plioplatecarpus may have preferred more restricted habitats based on water depth whereas ...
  31. [31]
    Arctic mosasaurs (Squamata, Mosasauridae) from the Upper ...
    Mosasaurs ecologically replaced ichthyosaurs, marine crocodyliforms and some plesiosaurs. They were widespread in epicontinental seas, including Antarctica ( ...
  32. [32]
    Swimming speed estimation of extinct marine reptiles - ResearchGate
    Cruising speeds of Mesozoic marine reptiles have been estimated in the past by using a mathematical model of energetic equilibrium during steady swimming.<|control11|><|separator|>
  33. [33]
    Shark-like Tails Sped Ancient Sea Monsters Through Oceans
    Sep 10, 2013 · An amazingly well-preserved find in a Jordanian quarry shows mosasaurs were capable of high-speed swimming, like sharks.
  34. [34]
    Meals of the Mighty Mosasaur - Smithsonian Ocean
    Nov 9, 2018 · The earliest mosasaurs were most likely fish eaters. They almost exclusively had conical teeth, a simple shape common in present-day dolphins.Missing: piscivorous | Show results with:piscivorous
  35. [35]
    The Evolution of Mosasaurid Foraging Behavior Through the Lens of ...
    Plotosaurini is the sister clade to the poorly resolved tribe Globidensini (sensu [47]), which includes the genera Globidens, Prognathodon, Plesiotylosaurus, ...
  36. [36]
    Mosasauridae) from a new species of Globidens from Morocco
    Mar 31, 2019 · consists of a partial frontal, maxilla, and cervical vertebra, as well as numerous small 20! bone fragments. Since then, our knowledge of the ...
  37. [37]
    Stomach contents of Globidens, a shell-crushing mosasaur ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · On the other hand, marine reptiles with globular dentition, such as Globidens have been inferred to have a durophagous diet, feeding on small ...
  38. [38]
    Mosasaur Predation on Upper Cretaceous Nautiloids and ...
    Mar 3, 2017 · Evidence For Mosasaur Origin of Bite Marks. Mosasaur bite marks on ammonites line up in a shallow arc and almost always penetrate the shell ...Missing: coprolites | Show results with:coprolites
  39. [39]
    Three-dimensional dental microwear in type-Maastrichtian ... - Nature
    Nov 9, 2023 · One robust approach to test hypotheses of diet and dietary partitioning in mosasaurs involves dental microwear; the microscopic wear patterns on ...