Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Nate Silver

Nathaniel Read Silver (born January 13, 1978) is an American statistician, writer, and probabilistic forecaster renowned for developing analytical models in baseball and elections.^[1]^[2] Silver's career began in sports analytics, where he created PECOTA, a system for projecting Major League Baseball player performance based on historical comparisons and statistical regression.^[2]^[3] This tool, licensed to Baseball Prospectus, demonstrated his early aptitude for using data to predict outcomes amid uncertainty.^[2] Gaining prominence during the 2008 U.S. presidential election cycle, Silver accurately forecasted results in 49 of 50 states under the pseudonym "Poblano" on his blog, which evolved into FiveThirtyEight.^[4]^[5] He founded FiveThirtyEight as a platform emphasizing empirical polling aggregation and simulation models to estimate electoral probabilities, distinguishing it from traditional punditry by prioritizing statistical rigor over narrative bias.^[5]^[6] After affiliations with The New York Times and ESPN, Silver departed ABC News in 2023 to launch an independent newsletter, the Silver Bulletin, on Substack, continuing his focus on forecasting amid critiques of overreliance on polls in models like those underestimating Donald Trump's 2016 victory despite assigning it a 29% chance.^[6]^[7] His 2012 book, The Signal and the Noise, elucidates principles of distinguishing predictive signals from random noise, drawing from his experiences in poker, weather modeling, and elections.^[8]

Early Life and Education

Family Background and Childhood

Nathaniel Read Silver was born on January 13, 1978, in East Lansing, Michigan.^[1] His father, Brian Silver, served as a political science professor at Michigan State University, exposing the family to academic discussions on governance and policy.^[9]^[10] His mother, Sally Thrun, worked as a community activist.^[4] Silver's parents divorced during his early years, after which he was raised primarily by his mother.^[11] The family resided in East Lansing, a university town that provided an environment steeped in intellectual pursuits, though specific childhood relocations remain undocumented in primary accounts. During this period, Silver developed foundational interests aligned with probabilistic thinking, later evident in his career, potentially influenced by the analytical household dynamics.^[9] He attended East Lansing High School, graduating as a notably driven student who edited the school newspaper, honing early skills in data interpretation and reporting.^[12]^[13] These formative experiences in a politically engaged academic community foreshadowed his self-directed affinity for statistics, though without formal early training in quantitative hobbies like puzzles or games at the time.^[9]

Academic Training and Influences

Nate Silver earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in economics from the University of Chicago in 2000.^[14] The University of Chicago's economics department, known for its emphasis on mathematical modeling, empirical testing of theories, and the legacy of the Chicago School's focus on market mechanisms and quantification, provided Silver with an early grounding in rigorous, data-oriented analysis over purely theoretical or qualitative approaches.^[15] This environment, influenced by figures like Milton Friedman through the department's enduring methodological traditions, fostered skepticism toward untested assumptions in policy and social sciences, prioritizing observable evidence and probabilistic reasoning. Following his undergraduate studies, Silver obtained a Master of Science degree in economics from the London School of Economics.^[16] LSE's economics program exposed him to advanced econometric techniques, including regression analysis and statistical inference applied to real-world data, reinforcing a commitment to falsifiable models amid the broader social sciences' often narrative-driven tendencies.^[17] This training honed his ability to distinguish signal from noise in complex datasets, a skill he credits with informing his later probabilistic forecasting methods, as evidenced by his adoption of Bayesian updating to refine predictions iteratively based on incoming evidence.^[18] During his academic years, Silver developed an aversion to mainstream interpretive frameworks that lacked empirical backing, a perspective seeded in university-level engagements with economic policy debates where qualitative punditry frequently clashed with quantitative scrutiny.^[19] This shift toward first-principles evaluation of claims through statistical lenses, rather than deference to institutional narratives, laid the groundwork for his subsequent applications in sports analytics and election modeling, emphasizing uncertainty quantification over deterministic outcomes.^[20]

Early Professional Career

Economic Consulting at McKinsey

Following his graduation from the University of Chicago in June 2000 with a Bachelor of Arts in economics, Nate Silver joined the professional services firm KPMG as an economic consultant in Chicago.^[15]^[21] His primary responsibilities centered on transfer pricing analysis, a practice involving the calculation of intercompany transactions to determine taxable income allocation across international borders for multinational corporations seeking to minimize liabilities.^[21] This role exposed Silver to the practical mechanics of corporate strategy, where economic models were adapted to client-specific data under regulatory constraints from bodies like the IRS and OECD.^[21] Silver's projects at KPMG included evaluating the effects of computer integration in Chicago public school classrooms, providing early hands-on experience with empirical data collection in non-corporate settings.^[15] However, he viewed much of the transfer pricing work as repetitive "busywork," characterized by heavy dependence on client-supplied figures that often prioritized tax optimization over unfiltered accuracy.^[15] Such engagements revealed systemic issues in consulting, including the potential for selective data presentation and the challenges of forecasting outcomes amid incomplete or incentivized inputs, which eroded confidence in unchecked assumptions derived from academic theory.^[15] From 2000 to approximately 2004, Silver utilized quantitative techniques, including statistical modeling, to inform risk assessments and strategic recommendations, attempting to ground theoretical economics in verifiable client challenges.^[22]^[23] This period underscored the gap between idealized models and real-world frictions, such as data opacity and incentive misalignment, fostering a preference for rigorous validation over expedited projections in decision-making processes.^[15]

Development of PECOTA in Baseball Analytics

In 2003, Nate Silver developed the Player Empirical Comparison and Optimization Test Algorithm (PECOTA), a projection system designed to forecast Major League Baseball player performance by identifying historical "comparables" based on similarity scores derived from multiple statistical metrics, then applying regression adjustments for factors such as age, playing time, and league strength.^[24]^[25] This methodology emphasized empirical pattern-matching over simplistic extrapolations of recent stats, aiming to mitigate small-sample variability through multivariate analysis. Silver sold PECOTA to Baseball Prospectus that year in exchange for a partnership stake and began contributing articles, including a weekly column titled "Lies, Damned Lies," which integrated the model's outputs into broader sabermetric discussions.^[26] PECOTA's projections, first published in the 2003 Baseball Prospectus annual, rapidly gained traction among analysts for outperforming legacy systems like those relying on weighted averages of past performance alone. From 2003 to 2008, under Silver's management, the model achieved incrementally higher accuracy in predicting player statistics, such as batting average and home runs, by margins including approximately 0.5% superiority over competitors in aggregate forecasting error.^[27] Specific validations showed PECOTA closely aligning with outcomes in divisional standings, with errors like overprojecting the Colorado Rockies by 5-8 games in early years but nearing precision by 2006.^[28] Its edge stemmed from causal adjustments, like regressing extreme performances toward league norms and accounting for career trajectories, which better captured real-world variance than intuition-driven scouting reports. The rollout of PECOTA underscored early conflicts in baseball analytics between quantitative models and the sport's traditional reliance on subjective evaluation. Scouts and front-office personnel, habituated to narrative-based assessments of "tools" and potential, often dismissed algorithmic projections as detached from intangibles like clubhouse fit or "makeup," mirroring broader resistance to sabermetrics that prioritized data over anecdote.^[27] Silver's work with PECOTA thus prefigured recurring tensions where empirical systems, validated through backtesting against historical outcomes, clashed with institutional preferences for unquantified judgment, compelling gradual adoption amid skepticism from MLB insiders.^[29]

Establishment of FiveThirtyEight

Blog Creation and 2008 Election Breakthrough

Nate Silver launched the independent blog FiveThirtyEight.com in March 2008, initially to analyze polling data for the Democratic presidential primaries using a custom aggregation model that adjusted for pollster biases, sample sizes, and historical accuracy rather than simply averaging national surveys.^[30] Motivated by what he saw as media overreliance on flawed or unweighted poll averages—particularly in underestimating state-level variations and overemphasizing recent national snapshots—Silver employed Bayesian updating to incorporate new data while preserving uncertainty from prior distributions.^[31] This approach critiqued the deterministic punditry prevalent in mainstream coverage, which often treated close races as coin flips despite empirical evidence of polling errors and turnout dynamics. As the general election campaign intensified, FiveThirtyEight shifted focus to the Obama-McCain matchup, projecting outcomes at granular state and electoral college levels. On November 4, 2008, Silver's final forecast gave Barack Obama a 349–189 electoral vote margin over John McCain, aligning closely with the actual 365–173 result (after Nebraska's split).^[32] The model estimated McCain's win probability at approximately 9% in its last update, reflecting aggregated polls, economic indicators, and historical swing patterns, but deliberately avoided overconfident binaries to highlight inherent uncertainties like late-deciding voters.^[32] This probabilistic framing contrasted with much polling orthodoxy, which Silver argued inflated national averages without sufficient error correction, leading to media narratives that downplayed Obama's structural advantages in battleground states. The blog's emphasis on empirical aggregation over narrative-driven interpretations propelled rapid audience growth, with unique visitors surging from thousands in spring to over 1.5 million by election week as readers turned to its transparent methodology amid distrust in traditional forecasts.^[33] Silver called the race for Obama at 9:46 p.m. ET on election night—before some networks—based on integrated exit polls and model simulations, demonstrating the value of state-by-state granularity against national-centric punditry.^[34] This 2008 performance established FiveThirtyEight as a counterpoint to overconfident media consensus, validating Silver's insistence on probabilistic realism derived from data rather than unadjusted poll headlines.

Expansion Under New York Times Ownership

In June 2010, The New York Times announced a three-year licensing partnership with Nate Silver's FiveThirtyEight, under which the blog would relaunch on the Times' website in early August, hosted within its News:Politics section while retaining its independent branding.^[35] This arrangement granted Silver access to the Times' graphic and interactive journalism resources, enabling improved data visualizations and methodological disclosures that enhanced the transparency of his probabilistic models.^[35] The partnership facilitated modest institutionalization, with Silver contributing occasional pieces to the Times' print edition and Sunday Magazine, and the blog broadening its scope to include analyses of economic trends, sports outcomes, and other quantitative domains beyond elections.^[35] However, team growth remained limited, as Silver's push for 20 additional staff to build a dedicated data newsroom was unmet by the Times, highlighting constraints in scaling rigorous empirical work within a traditional media structure.^[36] Tensions surfaced over editorial integration, as Silver's emphasis on uncertainty and first-principles data assessment occasionally conflicted with the Times' preferences for narrative framing, presaging his 2013 departure for ESPN to pursue greater autonomy and resources.^[36] In subsequent reflections, Silver critiqued such environments for fostering groupthink that prioritized access journalism over undiluted statistical realism, an early indicator of challenges in preserving model integrity amid mainstream institutional pressures.^[36]

Transition to ESPN and Internal Conflicts

In July 2013, following the expiration of his contract with The New York Times, Nate Silver announced the relocation of FiveThirtyEight to ESPN, a subsidiary of The Walt Disney Company, where he assumed a multi-faceted role as editor-in-chief of the revamped site.^[37]^[38] This shift enabled deeper integration of Silver's statistical methods with sports analytics, aligning with his background in baseball projections and expanding content beyond politics to include economics and other data-driven disciplines.^[39] The site relaunched on March 17, 2014, under Disney's ownership, with initial support including generous resources and limited editorial oversight, allowing FiveThirtyEight to maintain its probabilistic forecasting approach.^[40] In April 2018, amid ESPN's strategic refocus, FiveThirtyEight transitioned to ABC News, another Disney entity, to emphasize political coverage while retaining some sports elements.^[41] This period saw opportunities for collaboration across Disney's portfolio but also introduced structural challenges, as the site's operations contended with broader corporate priorities favoring established broadcast models over niche data journalism expansion.^[40] Over time, internal tensions arose primarily from business-side constraints rather than direct content interference, including repeated staff reductions—such as a cut exceeding 50% in 2021—that overburdened remaining employees and hindered recruitment amid competition from outlets like The New York Times.^[40] Disney's reluctance to invest in dedicated product or growth strategies for FiveThirtyEight fostered frustrations over risk-averse decision-making and stagnant development, gradually diminishing Silver's operational influence within the organization.^[40]^[42] During the 2016 election cycle, FiveThirtyEight's model assigned Donald Trump a 28.6% chance of victory—higher than many mainstream narratives dismissed as improbable—highlighting occasional disconnects between data-centric outputs and prevailing media emphases on qualitative storytelling, though no documented executive-level clashes within ABC emerged.^[40] These dynamics reflected systemic challenges in aligning independent analytical rigor with corporate media ecosystems prone to institutional biases favoring narrative cohesion over probabilistic nuance.

Election Forecasting Methodology and Performance

Core Probabilistic and Bayesian Approaches

Silver's election forecasting relies on Bayesian updating, beginning with prior probabilities derived from historical data, demographic fundamentals, and economic indicators, which are then revised iteratively as new polling and economic data emerge.^[43]^[44] This approach treats forecasts as dynamic probabilities rather than fixed point estimates, allowing for the incorporation of uncertainty from sparse or noisy inputs like state-level polls.^[45] Central to this framework is poll aggregation, where Silver combines hundreds of national and state polls using weighted averages that account for pollster track records, sample sizes, recency, and house effects, thereby smoothing out individual survey errors and providing a synthesized signal of voter intent.^[30]^[46] Monte Carlo simulations then model electoral outcomes by running thousands of iterations that draw from these aggregated probabilities, simulating vote shares, turnout variations, and correlations between states to generate distributions of possible Electoral College results.^[47] Economic indicators, such as GDP growth and unemployment rates, serve as covariates in these simulations to quantify macroeconomic influences on swing voter behavior and overall uncertainty.^[48] Influenced by his poker background, Silver frames forecasting through expected value calculations, evaluating model outputs as bets where the long-run accuracy of probability assignments—rather than perfect point predictions—determines value, akin to pot odds and bluffing frequencies in Texas Hold'em.^[49]^[50] This probabilistic mindset prioritizes marginal gains in calibration over overconfident deterministic claims, rooting decisions in game-theoretic equilibria that balance risk and reward.^[51] Silver critiques conventional polling models for assuming Gaussian normal distributions, which understate the likelihood of tail risks and black swan events by compressing extreme deviations into improbable outliers.^[52] Instead, he incorporates fat-tailed distributions to better capture non-linear shocks, such as sudden shifts in turnout or exogenous crises, ensuring forecasts reflect higher probabilities for outlier scenarios without abandoning empirical grounding.^[53] Model refinement occurs through post-election autopsies, systematic reviews that dissect prediction errors by comparing simulated distributions against actual results, adjusting priors, poll weights, and structural assumptions—like state correlations or economic sensitivities—for subsequent cycles.^[54]^[48] This empirical feedback loop favors causal mechanisms, such as verifiable voter mobilization effects, over spurious correlations, enhancing long-term predictive validity through transparent, data-driven iterations.^[55]

Track Record Across U.S. Elections (2008–2022)

Silver's forecasting model for the 2008 U.S. presidential election accurately predicted the outcome in 49 of 50 states and Barack Obama's national popular vote margin within 0.9 percentage points.^[56]^[57] In 2012, the model forecasted exactly 332 electoral votes for Obama's reelection against Mitt Romney, matching the final tally, and projected the popular vote margin to within 0.2 percentage points; it correctly identified the winner in all nine swing states.^[58] For the 2016 presidential election, the model assigned Donald Trump a 28.9 percent probability of victory, a figure higher than most major forecasters and reflecting incorporated uncertainties in polling data, such as potential nonresponse bias among Trump supporters.^[59] Although Hillary Clinton won the national popular vote, Trump's electoral college win aligned with the model's simulation of plausible polling errors, which later proved systematic in underestimating Republican performance in Rust Belt states; retrospective evaluations confirmed the forecast's calibration, as rare events occur at rates consistent with assigned probabilities, unlike deterministic predictions from outlets certain of a Clinton win.^[60]^[61] In midterm elections, the model projected Republican House gains of 54 to 55 seats in 2010, closely approximating the actual net gain of 63 seats amid a wave against Democrats.^[62] For 2018, it correctly called the winner in 482 of 506 congressional races (95 percent accuracy) across its Lite and Classic versions, forecasting Democratic House gains of 37 to 43 seats—actual gains totaled 41—while anticipating a net Democratic Senate loss of two seats, which occurred.^[63] The 2022 midterm forecasts predicted Republican control of the House with a narrow majority and a Senate toss-up favoring Republicans by about five seats; outcomes matched this closely, with Republicans securing a slim House majority and underperforming slightly in the Senate due to stronger-than-expected Democratic turnout in swing states, though polling errors again tilted toward underestimating conservative strength in competitive districts.^[64]^[65] Across these cycles, Silver's probabilistic approach yielded well-calibrated predictions, outperforming binary punditry that routinely overstated certainty and ignored turnout dynamics favoring conservatives in off-year and battleground contexts; empirical reviews highlight lower error rates in swing-district projections compared to national aggregates, countering narratives of model unreliability that often stem from media emphasis on improbable outcomes rather than aggregate probabilistic fidelity.^[63]^[66]

2024 Election Model and Post-Election Validation

In anticipation of the 2024 U.S. presidential election, Nate Silver developed an independent forecasting model published through his Silver Bulletin Substack, which assigned Donald Trump a 55 percent probability of victory on the eve of Election Day, November 5, reflecting adjustments for potential polling shortcomings such as non-response bias among Republican-leaning respondents and disparities in voter enthusiasm indicated by rally turnout and registration data.^[67] This contrasted with mainstream aggregates, including those from legacy outlets like The New York Times, which showed Kamala Harris with a slight national lead of approximately 1-2 percentage points and often framed the race as a toss-up or Harris-favored in key battlegrounds, potentially underweighting historical polling errors from 2016 and 2020 that systematically overestimated Democratic support by 3-4 points on average.^[68]^[69] Silver's model incorporated Bayesian updates to raw polls, applying weights for pollster track records, sample quality, and fundamental indicators like economic sentiment and incumbent disadvantages, while explicitly accounting for "herding" effects where pollsters converge on similar results to avoid outlier status, a phenomenon that can amplify shared biases.^[67] It projected Trump winning the Electoral College in scenarios aligning with observed enthusiasm gaps, such as higher Republican early voting surges in swing states, which mainstream narratives often downplayed amid institutional preferences for poll-centric equilibria over contrarian adjustments.^[70] Following Trump's victory, securing 312 Electoral College votes to Harris's 226 and a popular vote margin of about 1.5 percentage points, Silver's forecast demonstrated empirical vindication: the realized Electoral College map matched the most probable outcome in over 80,000 simulations from his model, with Trump's swing-state sweeps (e.g., +5 points in Pennsylvania) falling within predicted distributions despite national polls underestimating his support by roughly 2-3 points after adjustments.^[71]^[72] This accuracy highlighted the value of Silver's independent adjustments over unadjusted aggregates from outlets prone to credentialed consensus, where post-hoc analyses revealed persistent non-response issues among low-propensity Trump voters.^[68] Critiques of the model as exhibiting a "pro-Trump skew," leveled by figures like historian Allan Lichtman—who relied on his non-polling "13 Keys" framework to predict a Harris win—overlooked data-driven evidence of polling herding and failed to engage Silver's probabilistic calibration against historical benchmarks.^[73] Lichtman's approach, while undefeated since 1984 in directional calls, diverges from empirical polling validation by prioritizing qualitative economic and social keys over granular survey data, rendering such dismissals more rhetorical than analytically substantive in a post-election context where Silver's higher Trump odds aligned with the decisive result.^[74]

Reception, Criticisms, and Controversies

Praise for Empirical Accuracy and Innovation

Silver's PECOTA system, introduced in 2003, revolutionized baseball analytics by employing empirical comparison of player statistics against historical databases to generate probabilistic projections of future performance, outperforming traditional scouting methods in accuracy for metrics like batting average and home runs.^[24] This approach democratized advanced statistical tools previously confined to niche sabermetric circles, influencing front offices and fantasy baseball communities by prioritizing data-driven insights over subjective anecdotes.^[75] PECOTA's methodology remains in use today through Baseball Prospectus, demonstrating its enduring empirical validity in projecting individual and team outcomes across MLB seasons.^[76] At FiveThirtyEight, Silver extended this empirical rigor to political forecasting, earning acclaim for models that integrated polling data with economic indicators and historical trends to produce calibrated probability distributions, fostering a shift from deterministic punditry to nuanced probabilistic assessments in public discourse.^[77] Analysts have noted how these innovations elevated quantitative analysis, with Silver's frameworks often aligning closely with efficient betting markets and demonstrating superior calibration—such as correctly assigning win probabilities that matched observed outcomes in large samples like the 2018 midterms—over academic or insider models reliant on narrower assumptions.^[78]^[79] This emphasis on signal extraction from noisy data, as detailed in Silver's writings, encouraged broader adoption of Bayesian updating in media and betting contexts, reducing reliance on binary narratives and highlighting the value of outsider quantitative perspectives.^[80]

Critiques of Overreliance on Models and Media Bias

Critics have argued that Silver's probabilistic models exhibit brittleness during non-normal events, such as the 2016 U.S. presidential election, where FiveThirtyEight assigned Hillary Clinton a 71% chance of victory based on polling aggregates and historical correlations, yet Donald Trump prevailed amid polling underestimation of rural turnout and late shifts.^[81] ^[60] This outcome fueled claims of overreliance on quantitative inputs vulnerable to systematic errors, like nonresponse bias in surveys, which models struggle to fully adjust for in outlier scenarios without qualitative overrides.^[82] Despite such episodes, long-term evaluations via metrics like Brier scores—measuring the mean squared difference between predicted probabilities and actual outcomes—demonstrate Silver's approaches maintain superior calibration to unmodeled intuition or pundit consensus across election cycles, as aggregated forecasts align outcomes more reliably over hundreds of races than deterministic calls.^[78] ^[83] For instance, FiveThirtyEight's 2018 midterm projections achieved Brier scores indicating probabilistic accuracy beyond market or expert baselines in competitive districts.^[84] Under ESPN and later ABC News ownership following Disney's 2013 acquisition, FiveThirtyEight reportedly pivoted toward more narrative-oriented and accessible content to boost engagement, diluting the site's original emphasis on rigorous, model-centric analysis in favor of broader topical coverage.^[40] This evolution drew internal critiques for prioritizing audience metrics over empirical depth, as Silver later reflected on the challenges of sustaining "data journalism" amid corporate pressures.^[85] Probabilistic outputs have also sparked debate over misinterpretation, with audiences often conflating calibrated odds—such as a 70% win probability—with implicit endorsements or certainties, amplifying perceptions of model bias when low-probability events materialize and align against prevailing media narratives.^[86] ^[87] This dynamic has contributed to right-leaning skepticism toward data-driven elite consensus, viewing recurrent Democratic-favoring tilts in forecasts as artifacts of pollster and media sampling assumptions rather than neutral empiricism.^[88]

Disputes with Pundits, Polling Experts, and Left-Leaning Critics

Silver has engaged in public disputes with traditional pundits who prioritize qualitative assessments over probabilistic models, notably during the 2012 election cycle when outlets like The New York Times and commentators such as Joe Scarborough dismissed his forecast giving Barack Obama a 74.4% chance of reelection as overly confident, insisting the race remained a "toss-up" despite aggregated polling data.^[89]^[90] Silver's model proved accurate, correctly predicting Obama's popular vote margin within 0.9 percentage points and all but one swing state's outcome, highlighting pundits' tendency to overweight anecdotal narratives amid empirical evidence.^[91] In clashes with polling experts, Silver has accused firms of "herding"—adjusting results to converge on consensus estimates rather than raw data—to avoid outlier predictions, particularly in 2024 when surveys showed a tight Kamala Harris-Donald Trump contest despite evidence of systematic undercounting of Trump support similar to 2016 and 2020.^[92] He labeled such practices as "cheating" by pollsters placing a "finger on the scale" to manufacture competitiveness, which obscured Trump's underlying strength validated by his eventual victory.^[93]^[94] A prominent example is his debate with historian Allan Lichtman, whose "13 Keys to the White House" qualitative framework predicted a Harris win in 2024; Silver critiqued it as "junk science" lacking probabilistic rigor, defending data-driven aggregation against Lichtman's post-election concession of error while questioning Silver's approach.^[73]^[95]^[96] Left-leaning critics intensified attacks on Silver during periods of conservative electoral momentum, such as his 2024 model assigning Trump a 56-64% win probability, prompting accusations of pro-Trump bias and data manipulation from Democratic-aligned voices who favored polls downplaying Trump's viability.^[97]^[98] These disputes echoed tensions with legacy media, including Silver's 2019 critique of The New York Times for underemphasizing Trump risks in polling analysis due to institutional reluctance, and broader post-ABC independence commentary on echo chambers in outlets like ABC News that amplified underestimations of Trump by prioritizing narrative alignment over polling anomalies.^[36] Recent exchanges with journalists like Taylor Lorenz underscored this, as Silver challenged her promotion of insular online communities and COVID-era narratives as reflective of media's detachment from broader voter realities, prompting her counterclaims of personal targeting amid his defenses of empirical scrutiny over ideological curation.^[99]^[100] Such conflicts, empirically borne out by Trump's 2024 win exceeding many polls' implied odds, illustrate institutional pushback against models surfacing data inconvenient to prevailing assumptions.^[101]

Books and Written Works

The Signal and the Noise (2012)

The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail—but Some Don't was published on September 27, 2012, by Penguin Press, coinciding with Silver's accurate forecasting of Barack Obama's victory in 50 out of 50 states during the 2012 U.S. presidential election.^[102]^[103] The book argues that effective prediction requires distinguishing genuine patterns (signal) from random fluctuations (noise), a challenge exacerbated by the explosion of data in the early 21st century. Silver draws on diverse empirical examples to illustrate how forecasters often confuse the two, leading to overconfidence and systemic failures, while advocating for probabilistic methods that incorporate uncertainty rather than seeking illusory certainty.^[104]^[105] Chapters examine forecasting in fields like weather prediction, where ensemble models improved accuracy by averaging multiple simulations to filter noise; poker, where Silver recounts his own success using probabilistic hand assessments to exploit opponents' tendencies; and elections, emphasizing aggregation of polls over single-source reliance.^[106]^[107] A dedicated section critiques the 2008 financial crisis, attributing predictive breakdowns to quantitative models that overfit historical data, ignored tail risks, and fostered complacency among economists who overwhelmingly forecasted continued growth despite warning signs like housing bubbles.^[108]^[109] Silver promotes Bayesian inference as a corrective, urging forecasters to start with prior probabilities and update them iteratively with evidence, in contrast to frequentist approaches prone to overfitting by treating data as exhaustive rather than probabilistic.^[110] This framework, he contends, fosters humility by quantifying uncertainty—such as expressing election odds as probabilities rather than binaries—and avoids the pitfalls of models calibrated too tightly to past noise.^[111] The book achieved commercial success as a New York Times bestseller, praised for its accessible explanations of statistical concepts amid growing interest in "Big Data."^[112] However, it faced pushback from domain experts who argued that Silver undervalued qualitative judgment and domain-specific knowledge, contending that purely probabilistic models overlook causal nuances irreducible to data alone.^[113]^[114] Financial analysts, in particular, defended complex models' role in risk management, suggesting Silver's critique overstated their predictive pretensions while downplaying how noise in human behavior defies even Bayesian updates.^[115]

On the Edge (2023) and Risk Assessment Themes

On the Edge: The Art of Risking Everything, published on August 13, 2024, examines high-stakes domains such as poker, sports betting, and cryptocurrency trading as environments for honing probabilistic decision-making skills.^[116] Silver argues that participants in these fields, whom he terms "Riverians," develop an acute ability to identify and exploit small edges in uncertain situations, contrasting with more risk-averse societal norms.^[117] The book debuted as an instant New York Times bestseller, reaching #5 on the nonfiction list, and a paperback edition with a new preface was released in 2025.^[118]^[119] Central themes revolve around seeking asymmetric opportunities where potential rewards outweigh risks, drawing parallels to venture capital and market predictions rather than pure gambling.^[50] Silver critiques institutions that prioritize consensus and safety over empirical edge-hunting, advocating for a mindset informed by repeated exposure to losses and variance in gambling scenarios.^[120] This approach echoes his forecasting career, emphasizing data-driven calibration over groupthink, as seen in poker players' focus on expected value despite short-term setbacks.^[121] The narrative challenges sanitized perceptions of uncertainty by highlighting how "River" thinkers—analytical risk-takers—drive innovation in politics and finance, often succeeding through disciplined bet-sizing and probabilistic realism.^[122] Silver uses examples from crypto volatility and sports wagering to illustrate how overreliance on heuristics in risk-averse "Villages" leads to misjudged probabilities, underscoring the value of first-hand probabilistic training over theoretical models alone.^[123]

Independent Ventures Post-FiveThirtyEight

Launch of Silver Bulletin Substack

In September 2023, Nate Silver launched Silver Bulletin on Substack as an independent platform for data-driven essays and analysis on elections, sports, media critique, poker, and related probabilistic topics, following his departure from ABC News and FiveThirtyEight.^[124]^[125] The newsletter adopts a subscriber-funded model, with paid subscriptions soft-launched in mid-September 2023 at an initial rate later increased to $20 per month for new monthly subscribers starting September 1, 2024, reflecting demand during the election cycle.^[124]^[126] This structure supports unfiltered, editorially independent content, allowing Silver to prioritize empirical models over institutional pressures.^[127] By late 2024, Silver Bulletin had grown to hundreds of thousands of total subscribers, including tens of thousands of paid ones, establishing it as an influential outlet for real-time Bayesian forecasting without corporate dilution.^[128]^[129] Content from 2024 onward includes detailed NFL-related sports models benchmarked against Vegas odds, March Madness bracket projections for both men's and women's NCAA tournaments (e.g., released March 16, 2025, for the 2025 edition with odds and simulations), and ongoing Trump approval dashboards aggregating daily polling data with emphasis on empirical turnout indicators like voter enthusiasm metrics.^[130]^[131]^[132] These features enable iterative updates based on incoming data, such as post-Harris entry subscriber growth signals tied to campaign dynamics in August 2024.^[133]

Podcasting and Ongoing Predictions (2023–2025)

In May 2024, Nate Silver co-launched the weekly podcast Risky Business with Maria Konnikova, a psychologist and author known for her work on poker and decision-making.^[134] Produced by Pushkin Industries, the show explores probabilistic reasoning and risk evaluation through discussions of high-stakes gambling, political betting markets, and personal strategies for navigating uncertainty.^[135] Episodes feature analyses of real-world bets, such as poker tournament outcomes and policy wagers, while maintaining Silver's emphasis on empirical calibration over deterministic forecasts.^[136] The podcast has addressed 2025-specific topics, including potential cabinet selections under the incoming Trump administration and cryptocurrency trajectories like Bitcoin price movements amid regulatory shifts.^[137] Silver and Konnikova often integrate listener-submitted prop bets, such as odds on economic indicators or geopolitical events, to illustrate variance in outcomes and the pitfalls of overconfident punditry.^[138] This format underscores continuity in Silver's methodology, applying simulation-based modeling to non-election domains while critiquing mainstream sources for underweighting tail risks.^[139] Beyond audio content, Silver has sustained ongoing predictive efforts via Silver Bulletin, focusing on calibrated forecasts for sports and macroeconomic events into 2025.^[127] These include NFL game probabilities updated weekly, incorporating betting line efficiencies and player metrics to achieve historical accuracy rates above 55% for spread predictions.^[127] Economic models track indicators like inflation persistence and GDP growth under new fiscal policies, with Silver stressing adjustment for polling analogs' systematic errors observed in recent cycles.^[137] His post-2024 independence has enabled direct challenges to institutional polling shortcomings, such as under-sampling of non-college-educated voters and media-driven optimism biases that inflated Democratic chances.^[140] Silver attributes these failures to methodological inertia in firms reliant on legacy telephone surveys, contrasting them with his simulation ensembles that better captured ground-level shifts.^[94] This reflective stance reinforces his commitment to transparency in error rates, publishing Brier scores for non-presidential outputs to validate long-term probabilistic rigor.^[127]

Broader Contributions and Personal Methodology

Applications in Poker, Gambling, and Sports Betting

Silver supported himself through online poker from 2004 to 2006, earning a living by exploiting probabilistic edges in high-volume play.^[141] He transitioned to tournament poker, accumulating over $887,000 in live earnings, including cashes in World Series of Poker (WSOP) events such as 87th place in the 2023 Main Event and 265th in the 2025 Main Event, where he won $52,500 from a $10,000 buy-in.^[142] ^[143] Poker honed Silver's ability to compute expected value (EV) under incomplete information, a core skill in assessing bets where outcomes blend skill, luck, and opponent reads.^[50] This mirrors his forecasting methodology, where election models weigh polling noise against structural factors to estimate win probabilities, enabling EV-positive wagers when market odds undervalue model insights—such as betting on underdogs with mispriced chances.^[144] Bluff detection in poker, involving Bayesian updates on opponent tendencies, parallels scrutinizing pundit narratives or biased data sources for overconfident signals amid uncertainty.^[145] In sports betting, Silver extended his PECOTA system—originally for projecting baseball player performance—to team forecasts, identifying inefficiencies where Vegas lines diverged from empirical projections.^[146] PECOTA's comparable-player regressions captured variance in outcomes, outperforming consensus lines in backtested baseball bets by quantifying undervalued edges in player matchups and team dynamics.^[147] Similar extensions applied to NBA and other leagues, as in his analysis of betting scandals revealing persistent market blind spots exploitable via data-driven probabilities.^[148] Silver critiques gambling prohibitions as overly paternalistic, arguing that informed individuals better manage risks through EV maximization than blanket bans, which ignore game-theoretic agency.^[149] His poker profitability—sustained over years—empirically validates this approach, contrasting recreational losses with disciplined, probabilistic play.^[150]

Philosophical Stance on Uncertainty and First-Principles Reasoning

Silver advocates a probabilistic framework for navigating uncertainty, emphasizing the need to quantify ignorance rather than eliminate it. In his 2012 book The Signal and the Noise, he delineates how forecasters succeed by distinguishing predictive signals from random noise, employing Bayesian updating to revise estimates with incoming data rather than clinging to overconfident point predictions.^[112] This approach counters the common pitfall of overfitting models to historical patterns without accounting for variability, as probabilistic models incorporate error margins that reflect real-world stochasticity.^[151] Central to Silver's methodology is a superforecaster-like discipline of continuous belief revision, grounded in empirical falsification over deference to expert orthodoxy. Superforecasters, as characterized in related literature he endorses, outperform conventional analysts by treating predictions as tentative hypotheses subject to rigorous testing against outcomes, eschewing dogmatic priors that resist disconfirmation.^[152] He critiques institutional forecasters in academia and media for frequently disregarding base rates—fundamental historical probabilities—leading to systematic errors, such as in assessments of policy impacts where low baseline incidences are ignored in favor of narrative-driven extrapolations.^[107] For instance, in economic and social forecasting, failing to anchor on established rates of phenomena like recidivism or market cycles distorts risk evaluations, a lapse Silver attributes to priors that prioritize ideological coherence over data fidelity.^[153] Rooted in his economics training, Silver prioritizes causal inference—disentangling mechanisms like incentives and feedback loops—from superficial correlations that dominate big data analyses. He warns that statistical associations, absent scrutiny of underlying dynamics, foster illusory patterns, as evidenced in his examinations of financial models prone to spurious links during volatile periods.^[20] This entails building forecasts from first-order principles of human behavior and system constraints, iteratively validated against out-of-sample evidence, to achieve robustness amid Knightian uncertainty where probabilities themselves are imprecise.^[51]

Personal Life and Political Perspectives

Family, Hobbies, and Lifestyle

Silver maintains a long-term relationship with graphic designer Robert Gauldin, whom he met nearly two decades ago on the Chicago social scene; the couple resides together on the East Coast.^[154] No children are publicly known or mentioned in biographical accounts of his life.^[155] His hobbies prominently include poker, which he pursues both online and in live tournaments, accumulating over $800,000 in lifetime earnings as a recreational player while applying probabilistic analysis to the game.^[156] This interest, alongside following sports like the NBA, reinforces his focus on uncertainty and decision-making under risk, though he treats poker as demanding work rather than casual leisure.^[157] ^[158] Silver's lifestyle remains relatively private and low-drama, centered in New York after early years in Michigan, with periodic extended stays in Las Vegas for poker events—totaling about nine months there over recent years—enabling consistent professional output without notable personal controversies.^[159] ^[160]

Evolving Views on Politics, Media, and Institutional Trust

Silver initially gained prominence through accurate forecasting of Barack Obama's victories in the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections, reflecting an early alignment with Democratic prospects based on empirical polling data.^[161]^[162] His models gave Obama strong odds in 2012, emphasizing structural advantages in the Electoral College despite tight national polls.^[161] Following Donald Trump's 2016 upset, Silver began voicing sharper critiques of Democratic overconfidence and mainstream media tendencies toward echo chambers, attributing polling failures partly to under-sampling of non-college-educated voters and urban-rural divides.^[163] He argued that elite media outlets, often center-left in orientation, amplified narratives dismissing Trump's viability, leading to systemic underestimation of his support.^[164] This skepticism intensified post-2024, where Silver highlighted media reluctance to grapple with repeated polling discrepancies favoring Trump, such as shy voter effects and nonresponse bias in surveys.^[165]^[166] Silver's distrust extended to "polite society" consensus on topics like Trump's electability, preferring outsider indicators like prediction markets over institutional polls, which he viewed as prone to groupthink.^[167] In 2024 modeling, he incorporated betting odds from platforms like Polymarket to adjust for perceived pollster herding, drawing backlash from critics who accused his approach of undue Trump favoritism despite data-driven rationale.^[168]^[98] This reflected a broader pivot toward empirical signals from decentralized sources, contrasting with trust in credentialed institutions often marred by ideological clustering.^[169] On policy, Silver exhibited pro-market leanings, advocating deregulation where evidence showed benefits over regulatory capture by entrenched interests, as seen in his endorsements of prediction markets for aggregating dispersed knowledge more reliably than expert consensus.^[170] He critiqued overreliance on government interventions lacking probabilistic rigor, favoring approaches that incentivize accurate forecasting through skin-in-the-game mechanisms like betting.^[171] This stance underscored his preference for causal mechanisms grounded in incentives rather than institutional authority.^[49]

Recognition and Lasting Impact

Awards and Professional Honors

Silver's empirical forecasting models earned him recognition from Time magazine, which named him one of the World's 100 Most Influential People in 2009 for his PECOTA baseball projection system and early election analysis. Fast Company ranked him number one on its list of the 100 Most Creative People in Business in 2013, citing his data-driven approach to politics and sports at FiveThirtyEight. His books received commercial honors as New York Times bestsellers: The Signal and the Noise debuted at number 12 on the nonfiction list in 2012, praised for dissecting prediction methodologies across domains like weather and economics.^[104] On the Edge: The Art of Risking Everything reached number five in 2024, highlighting risk assessment in gambling and venture capital.^[119] Academic institutions conferred honorary degrees for his contributions to statistical reasoning: a Doctor of Literature from The New School in 2013, where he delivered the commencement address, and a Doctorate of Humane Letters from Amherst College in 2014.^[172] In poker and betting circles, Silver's participation in the 2025 World Series of Poker Main Event resulted in a 265th-place finish out of 9,735 entrants, earning $52,500 and underscoring his practical application of probabilistic calibration in high-stakes environments.

Influence on Data-Driven Analysis and Public Discourse

Silver's advocacy for ensemble modeling, which aggregates outputs from diverse predictive algorithms to mitigate individual biases and improve accuracy, has shaped modern forecasting practices beyond politics. By demonstrating through repeated applications that such methods outperform singular models or qualitative punditry—evidenced by superior performance in aggregating polls, economic indicators, and historical data—his approach influenced platforms like prediction markets and academic efforts in probabilistic aggregation.^[173]^[174] Firms such as Polymarket, where Silver serves as an adviser since July 2024, have adopted similar data-integration techniques to enhance market-based forecasts, blending statistical ensembles with crowd-sourced betting odds for events like elections.^[175] This extends to broader adoption in superforecasting communities, where ensembles enable calibrated predictions by non-experts trained in probabilistic reasoning, as paralleled in Tetlock-inspired tournaments that prioritize empirical aggregation over ideological priors.^[176] His work has eroded reliance on traditional punditry by quantifying its frequent failures, such as overconfident binary predictions that ignore uncertainty, thereby fostering public skepticism toward interpretive monopolies in media outlets exhibiting systemic left-leaning biases. Silver explicitly deemed punditry "fundamentally useless" for its detachment from verifiable probabilities, a stance validated by post-mortems like the 2016 election where groupthink in liberal-leaning coverage underestimated unconventional outcomes due to echo-chamber effects rather than data.^[177]^[178] This critique empowered Bayesian scrutiny among audiences, promoting iterative belief-updating based on evidence over narrative conformity, as Silver illustrated in analyses distinguishing signal from noise amid biased institutional forecasting.^[164]^[91] In the longer term, Silver's emphasis on causal probabilistic frameworks has contributed to a paradigm shift prioritizing empirical validation over ideological certainty, reducing deference to uncalibrated expert opinion and laying groundwork for AI-augmented predictions that rely on scalable ensembles. His methodologies, rooted in handling uncertainty through diverse data synthesis, align with AI systems' strengths in pattern recognition while cautioning against overfit models, as discussed in his 2025 reflections on AI's role in governance and forecasting amid political dysfunction.^[179]^[170] This legacy manifests in diminished faith in pundit-driven discourse, with metrics like prediction market accuracies—often surpassing polls by incorporating real-stakes incentives—reflecting broader internalization of truth-seeking metrics over partisan heuristics.^[180]

References

[1]
Nate Silver - BR Bullpen - Baseball-Reference.com
Dec 31, 2020 · Nathaniel Read Silver. School University of Chicago; High School East Lansing High School. Born January 13, 1978 in Lansing, MI USA ...<|separator|>
[2]
[PDF] BIO
Founder, FiveThirtyEight.com. Nate Silver began by predicting 2008 primary election results with stunning accuracy – and often in opposition to the better-known ...
[3]
Nate Silver: What I need from statisticians - Stats & Data Science ...
Aug 23, 2013 · With a passion for baseball since his youth, Silver developed PECOTA, a system for forecasting the performance and career development of Major ...
[4]
Nate Silver - Biography - IMDb
He is a statistician and writer, who gained national acclaim when he correctly predicted the winning candidate in 49 out of the 50 states in the 2008 US ...
[5]
Nate Silver Bio - Detroit Regional Chamber
Nate Silver is a leading statistician and founder of FiveThirtyEight.com, an award-winning website focused on statistical analysis of politics, sports and ...
[6]
Nate Silver - MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference Speaker
Nate Silver is the founder and former editor-in-chief (2008-2023) of FiveThirtyEight, which was published by The New York Times, ESPN, and ABC News.
[7]
Statistician; Writer, "Silver Bulletin"; Co-host, "Risky Business" Podcast
Nate Silver is a statistician and writer. His insights and statistical assessments of cultural phenomena appear on the “Silver Bulletin” Substack.Missing: biography | Show results with:biography<|separator|>
[8]
FiveThirtyEight founder to serve as Journalist in Residence
Sep 16, 2022 · Author of “The Signal and the Noise,” Silver takes a unique approach to data-driven, probabilistic thinking that allows him to analyze polling ...
[9]
East Lansing Native Nate Silver Talks Early Years, Risk
Oct 16, 2024 · Perhaps the most recognizable statistician in the US, Nate Silver reflects on growing up in East Lansing.Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
[10]
He called it, and now Nate Silver is a pop-culture star - MassLive.com
Nov 9, 2012 · His father, political science professor Brian Silver, attributes his son's success to a two-pronged drive: "He's driven by a need to get the ...Missing: physics | Show results with:physics
[11]
Interfaith Celebrities: Nate Silver, Another Bond, and Happy Endings
Nov 13, 2012 · Nate Silver, 34, who writes the “FiveThirtyEight: Nate Silver's Political Calculus” blog for the Times. In 2008, he correctly predicted the presidential ...Missing: childhood | Show results with:childhood
[12]
Drunk Nate Silver? Here's a yearbook photo before he could drink
Nov 8, 2012 · Before he was the journalist and stats whiz who predicted the election dead-on, he was just Nate Silver, the high school newspaper editor ...
[13]
Brian Kalt on X: "Nate Silver
Sep 27, 2018 · Nate Silver: the second-most famous graduate of East Lansing High School (first would have to be Google co-founder Larry Page).
[14]
Nate Silver to Deliver Commencement Address | Ripon College
Mar 4, 2013 · He holds a bachelor's degree in economics from the University of Chicago and a master's degree from the London School of Economics.
[15]
Nate Silver - The University of Chicago Magazine
Nate Silver can't hit a fastball, but he's an ace at dissecting baseball stats. And Major League Baseball has taken notice. Nate Silver, age 30, ...
[16]
Nate Silver | Assembly Series | Washington University in St. Louis
For a majority of the pollsters and established pundits, the outcome of the 2012 presidential election was a shock. For statistician, author and blogger Nate ...<|separator|>
[17]
https://www.natesilver.net/p/i-loved-my-time-in-the-uk-but-it
[18]
Is Nate Silver a Statistician? - Amstat News
Oct 1, 2013 · Mr. Silver is a professional statistician by definition (even if he claims he is not) and that his rise to stardom has come during a watershed moment for our ...<|separator|>
[19]
Nate Silver Says We're Bad at Making Predictions - Freakonomics
Oct 27, 2023 · Data scientist Nate Silver gained attention for his election predictions. But even the best prognosticators get it wrong sometimes.Missing: influences | Show results with:influences
[20]
What did Nate Silver just say? Blogging the JSM
Aug 6, 2013 · Silver said the reason he favors the Bayesian philosophy (yes he used the words “philosophy” and “epistemology”) is that people should be ...
[21]
A Conversation with Nate Silver. Thursday, February 28, 2013
Sep 2, 2016 · Best known for his work in political and baseball forecasting, Silver's career didn't start with statistics. After college, Silver joined the ...Missing: McKinsey | Show results with:McKinsey
[22]
He called it, and now Silver's a pop-culture star | MPR News
Nov 10, 2012 · The other night, Nate Silver got a little taste of what things are going to be like for him, post-Election 2012.Missing: puzzles | Show results with:puzzles
[23]
Nate Silver finds the signal, blocks out the noise - Cox BLUE
After finishing college in 2000, Silver worked for three years as a consultant with professional services firm KPMG in Chicago. He soon became burned out ...
[24]
Player Empirical Comparison and Optimization Test Algorithm ...
" It was developed by Nate Silver in 2003, and Silver ran the projections - which were owned by Baseball Prospectus -- from '03-09, before ceding full ...
[25]
Reintroducing PECOTA: What A Long, Strange Trip It Has Been
Sep 27, 2010 · The original PECOTA process, as long-time readers know, was designed by Nate Silver and first offered at Baseball Prospectus when we went to a ...
[26]
An Unfiltered Interview with Nate Silver - The Baseball Analysts
Feb 12, 2007 · A year later, Gary left BP to pursue a series of consulting opportunities both inside and outside baseball and Nate took over as Executive Vice ...Missing: firm | Show results with:firm
[27]
How Nate Silver Went From Forecasting Baseball Games to ...
Oct 9, 2008 · Furthermore, Silver himself invented a system called PECOTA, an algorithm for predicting future performance by baseball players and teams. (It ...
[28]
Lies, Damned Lies: PECOTA Projected Standings, AL and NL West
Mar 29, 2007 · The Verdict: PECOTA overprojected the Rockies by eight games in 2003, five games in 2004, and six games in 2005. It was almost dead-on last year ...
[29]
State of the Prospectus: The Year and the Decade to Come
Jan 4, 2010 · Nate Silver moved on to other work after creating a workable PECOTA system. ... Baseball's rich history is one of the best things about the ...
[30]
Frequently Asked Questions, Last Revised 8/7/08 | FiveThirtyEight
Mar 1, 2008 · 538 is the number of electors in the electoral college. What is the mission of this website? Most broadly, to accumulate and analyze polling and ...
[31]
America's hottest pollster gives his final verdict as US elections ...
Nov 3, 2008 · Nate Silver made his name making uncannily accurate baseball predictions. Now his poll-crunching website is providing possibly the best forecast available of ...
[32]
Today's Polls and Final Election Projection: Obama 349, McCain 189
Nov 4, 2008 · It's Tuesday, November 4th, 2008, Election Day in America. The last polls have straggled in, and show little sign of mercy for John McCain.
[33]
The Shockingly Rapid Success of FiveThirtyEight.com - ADWEEK
Nov 3, 2008 · We're little more then a day away from the end of this endless election and that means political sites are going into hyperdrive.
[34]
Finding Fame With a Prescient Call for Obama - The New York Times
Nov 9, 2008 · Nov. 9, 2008. At 9:46 p.m., blogging on his site FiveThirtyEight.com, Nate Silver called the presidential election for Barack Obama. The ...
[35]
FiveThirtyEight to Partner with New York Times
that is, in very ...
[36]
Behind Nate Silver's war with The New York Times - POLITICO
Aug 15, 2019 · The Times' history with Silver dates to 2010, when it took over FiveThirtyEight under a three-year agreement.Missing: acquisition | Show results with:acquisition
[37]
Nate Silver of FiveThirtyEight Blog Is to Join ESPN Staff
Jul 19, 2013 · The statistician who writes the FiveThirtyEight blog for The New York Times is said to be moving that franchise to ESPN.Missing: acquisition | Show results with:acquisition
[38]
Nate Silver - Renowned Statistician, Author and Founder of ...
Jul 22, 2013 · Nate Silver – Renowned Statistician, Author and Founder of FiveThirtyEight – Joins ESPN in Multi-Faceted Role.Missing: transition | Show results with:transition
[39]
Nate Silver makes move to ESPN
Jul 22, 2013 · The FiveThirtyEight's new incarnation will allow Silver to return to his sports roots while expanding his approach to other disciplines.Missing: transition | Show results with:transition
[40]
A few words about FiveThirtyEight - by Nate Silver
including Trump approval ratings. But the media just lost an extremely ...
[41]
https://www.wsj.com/articles/nate-silvers-fivethirtyeight-is-moving-to-abc-news-1523986333
[42]
Nate Silver Blames Disney Bosses For 538's Demise - Yahoo Finance
Mar 5, 2025 · Nate Silver blamed the higher-ups at Disney for the business failures of the political data analysis site he founded, FiveThirtyEight, ...Missing: ESPN pressures direction
[43]
Nate Silver and the Imperfect Art of Polling and Predictions - NASA
Jun 14, 2019 · This “Bayesian” approach is named for 18th century minister Thomas Bayes who discovered a simple formula for updating probabilities using new ...
[44]
Chapter 16 Statistical models | Introduction to Data Science - rafalab
We will introduce ideas behind the statistical models, also known as probability models, that were used by poll aggregators to improve election forecasts.Missing: methodology | Show results with:methodology
[45]
How Bayesian Theory Helps Us Predict the Future - Shortform Books
May 28, 2023 · According to Silver, Bayesian Theory suggests that we make better predictions when we consider the prior likelihood of an event and update our ...Missing: probabilistic approaches<|separator|>
[46]
[PDF] 1 Origins of Presidential poll aggregation - Math (Princeton)
In 2004 I developed a meta-analysis that reduced polling noise for the Presidential race by reducing all available state polls into a single snapshot in time, ...
[47]
Demonstrating Monte Carlo With The 538 Model
Jan 15, 2020 · Forecasting the Democratic primary This post is inspired by the new FiveThirtyEight primary forecast. It might be tempting to forecast the ...
[48]
[PDF] Why So Many Predictions Fail — but Some Don't - Amazon S3
First published in 2012 by The Penguin Press, a member of Penguin Group (USA) Inc. Copyright © Nate Silver, 2012. All rights reserved. Illustration credits.<|separator|>
[49]
Nate Silver on Life's Mixed Strategies (Ep. 251)
Aug 13, 2025 · In his third appearance on Conversations with Tyler, Nate Silver looks back at past predictions, weighs how academic ideas such as expected ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
[50]
The Power of Thinking Like a Poker Player - The New Yorker
Sep 2, 2024 · His results made it rational to bet on a Trump victory: assuming that Silver's model was accurate, the expected value of the bet was high.
[51]
285 | Nate Silver on Prediction, Risk, and Rationality – Sean Carroll
Aug 12, 2024 · Nate Silver has long thought about probability and prediction, from sports to politics to professional poker. ... The expected value is the value ...
[52]
Pollster Nate Silver: Coronavirus a 'fat tail, black swan' event ...
Mar 13, 2020 · "Coronavirus is what you might call a fat tail kind of black swan type of risk," Silver said. "And we're sitting here and maybe in a month it ...Missing: distributions criticism
[53]
Why you should care about the Nate Silver vs. Nassim Taleb Twitter ...
Dec 17, 2018 · Nassim Taleb, a best-selling author, and quantitative risk expert, publicly announced that FiveThirtyEight does not know how to forecast elections properly!
[54]
Part I: Democrats' risk-aversion helped to re-elect Trump
Dec 3, 2024 · Part 1 of a 3-part autopsy on the Harris campaign. Plus, a GiveDirectly fundraiser!Missing: refinement | Show results with:refinement
[55]
[PDF] Introduction - Bayesian Methodology in Biostatistics (BST 249)
Nate Silver is reknowned for accurate election predictions. Although the details are secret, it appears that Nate Silver uses Bayesian hierarchical regression ...
[56]
How FiveThirtyEight calculates the data of a divided nation - PBS
Nov 4, 2018 · Nate Silver's FiveThirtyEight blog burst onto the political scene in 2008, when he forecasted the popular vote for president within one ...
[57]
Nate Silver on the Pitfalls of Prediction | On the Media - WNYC Studios
Nate Silver is something of an authority on political forecasting. In 2008, his blog FiveThirtyEight correctly predicted the outcome of the presidential ...
[58]
Numbers nerd Nate Silver's forecasts prove all right on election night
Nov 7, 2012 · His final forecast gave Obama a 90.9% chance of victory. Silver also forecast 332 electoral college votes for Obama against 206 for Romney – the ...Missing: Brier | Show results with:Brier
[59]
Why FiveThirtyEight Gave Trump A Better Chance Than Almost ...
Nov 11, 2016 · Based on what most of us would have thought possible a year or two ago, the election of Donald Trump was one of the most shocking events in ...
[60]
Nate Silver says conventional wisdom, not data, killed 2016 election ...
Mar 30, 2017 · On Election Day, nearly every public polling firm predicted that Hillary Clinton would win the presidency. The only real debate was by how large ...Missing: non- period
[61]
How surprising was Trump's victory? Evaluations of the 2016 U.S. ...
The US presidential election results of 2016 surprised many poll-watchers, suggesting possible biases in estimated support for the major party candidates.
[62]
House Forecast: G.O.P. Plus 54-55 Seats; Significantly Larger or ...
Nov 1, 2010 · Republicans are well-positioned to win control of the House of Representatives in tomorrow's elections, and quite possibly to achieve the ...Missing: accuracy | Show results with:accuracy
[63]
How FiveThirtyEight's 2018 Midterm Forecasts Did - Politics News
Dec 4, 2018 · Nate Silver reviews the FiveThirtyEight Midterm forecasts · The Lite forecast called the winner correctly in 482 of 506 races (95 percent). · The ...
[64]
How Our 2022 Midterm Forecasts Performed | FiveThirtyEight
Feb 2, 2023 · Let's get this out of the way up front: There was a wide gap between the perception of how well polls and data-driven forecasts did in 2022 ...
[65]
The Polls Were Historically Accurate In 2022 | FiveThirtyEight
and yet, the polling ...
[66]
Grading The 2016 Election Forecasts - BuzzFeed News
and right — among high-profile ...
[67]
FINAL Silver Bulletin 2024 presidential election forecast
Nov 4, 2024 · And an archive of the Biden-Trump forecast can be found here. The polls: who's ahead right now? The Silver Bulletin ...Missing: autopsies refinement<|control11|><|separator|>
[68]
How did the polls do in 2024? It's complicated. - Silver Bulletin
where, of course, Trump was ...Missing: validation | Show results with:validation
[69]
Polling Didn't Miss Much in 2024, Says Nate Silver - Newsweek
Nov 19, 2024 · Silver, who published his election prediction model on the Silver Bulletin Substack, said that the final polling averages for the 2024 election ...Missing: post- validation
[70]
Does Trump have momentum? - by Nate Silver
Oct 17, 2024 · And what does “momentum” mean in the context of an election forecast?
[71]
The model exactly predicted the most likely election map
Nov 7, 2024 · The actual map was the most common one in our 80000 simulations! Even so, it contained some revealing surprises.Missing: Brier 2008-2022
[72]
How Accurate Was Nate Silver? - Newsweek
Nov 7, 2024 · Trump swept to victory on Wednesday, winning 295 Electoral College votes to Harris' 226. Exit polls also suggest Trump will win the popular vote ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
[73]
Silver vs Lichtman: Which election prediction models can you trust?
Nov 3, 2024 · Two of the biggest election prognosticators disagree over who will win the 2024 presidential race. Who's model is more accurate?Missing: validation | Show results with:validation<|separator|>
[74]
2024 election predictions from Allan Lichtman, Nate Silver, betting ...
Oct 18, 2024 · Both former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris made Wednesday appearances on FOX News Channel. FOX 5 NY's Robert Moses has ...
[75]
Nate Silver: The Numbers Don't Lie - Chicago Humanities Festival
He soon earned a reputation as a formidable baseball statistical analyst. A disciple of Bill James, Silver's remarkable PECOTA (Player Empirical Comparison and ...Missing: education | Show results with:education
[76]
What is PECOTA, and should you hate it? - ESPN
Feb 7, 2017 · Player Empirical Comparison and Optimization Test Algorithm, or PECOTA, is the projection system created by Nate Silver for Baseball Prospectus ...Missing: enduring | Show results with:enduring
[77]
What's In a Prediction? On Nate Silver and the Science of Probability
But Some Don't, suggests that the true value of forecasting the ...Missing: hobbies | Show results with:hobbies
[78]
How Do We Judge a Probabilistic Model? Or, How Did ...
Nov 25, 2018 · Since FiveThirtyEight predicted 366 elections in the 2018 midterms, all using the same underlying model, we have the requisite sample size ...
[79]
Are Betting Markets Better than Polling in Predicting Political ... - arXiv
Jul 11, 2025 · Overall, findings suggest that Polymarket was superior to polling in predicting the outcome of the 2024 presidential election, particularly in ...
[80]
[PDF] Signal And The Noise Nate Silver
His work, especially in election forecasting, exemplifies this principle through rigorous data analysis, probabilistic modeling, and an understanding of the ...
[81]
Nate Silver's model gives Trump an unusually high chance of ... - Vox
Nov 3, 2016 · Nate Silver's polls-only forecast gave Hillary Clinton an overwhelming 85 percent chance of winning. But as of Thursday morning, her odds have fallen down to ...<|separator|>
[82]
Why (Almost) Everyone Was Wrong | Quanta Magazine
Nov 9, 2016 · There is only one person who correctly forecast the US presidential election of 2016. His name is not Nate Silver or Sam Wang or Nate Cohn. It is Donald Trump.
[83]
Reverse-engineering the problematic tail behavior of the ...
Oct 24, 2020 · We've been writing a bit about some odd tail behavior in the Fivethirtyeight election forecast, for example that it was giving Joe Biden a 3% chance of winning ...
[84]
Polls, Pundits, or Prediction Markets: An assessment of election ...
I compare forecasts of the 2018 U.S. midterm elections based on (i) probabilistic predictions posted on the FiveThirtyEight blog and (ii) prediction market ...
[85]
Why Nate Silver Says ABC Didn't Realize What It Had ... - YouTube
Aug 13, 2024 · Megyn Kelly is joined by Nate Silver, author of "On the Edge," to discuss his exit from ABC's FiveThirtyEight last year, how ABC didn't ...
[86]
Probabilistic Election Forecasts Are Stupid and You Should Not ...
Sep 10, 2024 · ... forecasts, since probabilities are famously open to misinterpretation ... probabilistic election forecasting: Nate Silver. But they were ...Missing: endorsements | Show results with:endorsements
[87]
Americans Don't Understand Election Probabilities
Feb 10, 2018 · Once the private vice of data geeks, just about everyone in the business of handicapping presidential elections used probabilities that year.Missing: misinterpretation endorsements
[88]
Don't Trust the Election Forecasts - POLITICO
Sep 3, 2024 · Even as Joe Biden's presidential candidacy teetered and polls showed him clearly losing to Donald Trump, the election forecasting site 538 ...Missing: Brier | Show results with:Brier
[89]
Nate Silver vs. the Pundits: Examining the Roles of Political Punditry ...
Request PDF | Nate Silver vs. the Pundits: Examining the Roles of Political Punditry, Big Data and Cognitive Dissonance in a 2012 U.S. Presidential Election ...
[90]
Election Polls, Expertise and Empirical Thinking - PSC CUNY
In the closing weeks of the presidential campaign, prominent pundits insisted that the election was a “toss-up.” Analysts who relied on careful statistical ...Missing: disputes | Show results with:disputes<|separator|>
[91]
Election Outcome: In Nate Silver We Trust | Duke Today
Nov 8, 2012 · The votes are in, and one big winner Tuesday night was Bayesian statistics. The day after the national election, statisticians were sharing ...Missing: disputes | Show results with:disputes
[92]
Trump Polls Wrong Again? Why Experts Worry About 'Herding'
Oct 30, 2024 · There are many problems with the Harris-Trump polls, including pollsters 'herding' to disguise potential mistakes.
[93]
Nate Silver: 'Cheating' Pollsters Are Putting 'Finger on the Scale'
Nov 1, 2024 · Polling data expert Nate Silver slammed election forecasts showing a close race between presidential candidates Kamala Harris and Donald ...
[94]
Are pollsters playing favorites? Nate Silver says they're 'misleading ...
Nov 3, 2024 · Nate Silver accused some pollsters of manipulating survey results to show a close race between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris.
[95]
Allan Lichtman takes shot at Nate Silver: 'I admit that I was wrong'
Nov 6, 2024 · Elections forecaster Allan Lichtman took a swipe at fellow prognosticator Nate Silver on Wednesday while admitting he was wrong in ...
[96]
Who Is More Reliable, Nate Silver or the U.S. Polling Nostradamus ...
Oct 3, 2024 · US polling "Nostradamus" Allan Lichtman and FiveThirtyEight founder Nate Silver have been embroiled in a war of words over their predictions for the 2024 ...Missing: Brier | Show results with:Brier
[97]
Nate Silver faces backlash for pro-Trump model skewing - Yahoo
Sep 6, 2024 · Nate Silver, the celebrity statistician who gained notoriety for his FiveThirtyEight election models, is facing backlash over alleged skewing in his new model.
[98]
U.S elections: Has Nate Silver skewed data in favour of Donald ...
Sep 7, 2024 · Some argue that Nate Silver's new election model favors less trustworthy surveys and benefits from his affiliation with a betting organization.Missing: echo chambers
[99]
Why Nate Silver is beefing with Taylor Lorenz over Joe Rogan
Nov 25, 2024 · Lorenz responded by accusing Silver of obsessively targeting her. “I am a 50-year-old woman who you have been posting about all day unprompted,” ...Missing: dispute | Show results with:dispute
[100]
Taylor Lorenz, Nate Silver, and the Toxicity of Social Media
Dec 3, 2024 · It might seem like a silly online feud, but the war of words between two political influencers highlights the kind of sickness in society ...Missing: dispute | Show results with:dispute
[101]
Blaming the media is what got Democrats into this mess
the clearest sign yet of the modern American conservative ...
[102]
The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail—But Some ...
Rating 4.0 (52,154) Sep 27, 2012 · Silver's book, The Signal and the Noise , was published in September 2012. It subsequently reached The New York Times best seller list for ...
[103]
The Signal and the Noise Free Summary by Nate Silver - getAbstract
Rating 9/10 · Review by getAbstractDuring the 2012 American presidential race, predictions varied wildly about who would win. Yet Nate Silver correctly predicted the results in all 50 states.
[104]
The Signal and the Noise by Nate Silver: 9780143125082
In stock Free deliveryNEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • The groundbreaking exploration of probability and uncertainty that explains how to make better predictions in a world drowning ...
[105]
The Signal And The Noise Summary - Four Minute Books
Rating 4.0 (4) Aug 5, 2016 · The Signal And The Noise explains why so many predictions end up being wrong, and how statisticians, politicians and meteorologists fall prey to masses of data.
[106]
Book Brief: The Signal and the Noise | by Russell McGuire
Dec 19, 2023 · Brief Summary ; Title: The Signal and the Noise ; Authors: Nate Silver ; Published: 2012 by Penguin ; What It Teaches: ...
[107]
Some highlights from Nate Silver's "The Signal and the Noise"
Jul 13, 2013 · Chapter 5: Earthquake predictions: The Gutenberg-Richter law predicts the frequency of earthquakes of a given magnitude in a given location. One ...
[108]
Why So Many Predictions Fail But Some Don't | by Andrew Dawson
Nov 27, 2024 · Chapter 1 is about the 2008 housing crisis that sent the global economy spiraling. Silver argues that the 2008 housing crisis can be viewed as a ...
[109]
The Signal and the Noise by Nate Silver Book Summary
In The Signal and the Noise, Nate Silver explores the art and science of prediction, explaining what separates good forecasters from bad ones.
[110]
Book Review: Nate Silver's "The Signal and the Noise: Why So ...
Silver doesn't ...
[111]
Book Review: The Signal and the Noise: The Art and Science of ...
Mar 8, 2013 · In The Signal and the Noise, the New York Times' political forecaster and statistics guru Nate Silver explores the art of prediction.
[112]
The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail-but Some ...
Publication date. February 3, 2015. ISBN-10. 0143125087. ISBN-13. 978 ... “Nate Silver's The Signal and the Noise is The Soul of a New Machine for the ...
[113]
What Nate Silver Gets Wrong | The New Yorker
Jan 25, 2013 · A Bayesian approach is particularly useful when predicting outcome probabilities in cases where one has strong prior knowledge of a situation.Missing: forecasting | Show results with:forecasting
[114]
The Signal and the Noise by Nate Silver – review - The Guardian
Nov 9, 2012 · Silver argues for a sharper recognition of the difference between what we know and what we think we know and recommends a strategy for closing the gap.
[115]
'The Signal and the Noise,' by Nate Silver - The New York Times
Nov 2, 2012 · Applying statistical analysis to the past, Nate Silver evaluates the claims of sports pundits, political handicappers and more.<|separator|>
[116]
On the Edge: The Art of Risking Everything by Nate Silver | Goodreads
Rating 3.7 (4,964) Aug 13, 2024 · It subsequently reached The New York Times best seller list for nonfiction, and was named by Amazon.com as the #1 best nonfiction book of 2012.
[117]
On the Edge: Book Overview & Takeaways (Nate Silver) - Shortform
Jun 28, 2025 · A cornerstone of the mathematical approach that Silver takes to statistics—in both poker and politics—is Bayesian probability. This approach ...<|separator|>
[118]
One year later, is the River winning? - by Nate Silver
Aug 12, 2025 · The paperback edition of On the Edge is out today ... Edge to #5 on the New York Times bestseller list. The downside was ...Missing: ranking | Show results with:ranking
[119]
On the Edge by Nate Silver - Penguin Random House
In stock Free deliveryThe Instant New York Times Bestseller | With a New Preface from Nate Silver for 2025 New York Times Book Review Paperback Row selection “Engaging...
[120]
Book Review: On The Edge, Nate Silver - Matt Glassman | Substack
Aug 2, 2024 · It's a highly +EV decision to roll the die. 83% of the time you will get $0 when you roll 1 through 5. But the expected value of the die roll is ...
[121]
On the Edge by Nate Silver review – the art of risk-taking
Aug 7, 2024 · From card sharps to crypto traders, a statistician asks what we can learn from the people prepared to gamble everything.Missing: probabilistic | Show results with:probabilistic
[122]
On the Edge by Nate Silver | Summary, Quotes, FAQ, Audio - SoBrief
Rating 4.3 (139) Jul 22, 2025 · Riverians apply this probabilistic thinking to gambling, investing, and life decisions, seeking opportunities where the potential payoff ...
[123]
Book Review: On the Edge: The Future - LessWrong
Book Review: On the Edge: The Future. by Zvi. 27th Sep 2024. Don't Worry About the Vase. 58 min read ... Nate Silver definitely thinks AI existential risk ...Missing: themes | Show results with:themes
[124]
Soft launch of paid subscriptions - by Nate Silver
Sep 11, 2023 · Subscribe to Silver Bulletin. Tens of thousands of paid subscribers. Essays and analysis about elections, media, sports, poker, and all the ...
[125]
Silver Bulletin - Bias and Credibility - Media Bias/Fact Check
Silver Bulletin, founded in 2023 by political statistician Nate Silver, is an independent publication on Substack focusing on politics, polling, sports ...<|separator|>
[126]
FYI: Silver Bulletin is raising prices to $20/month starting ... - Reddit
Sep 1, 2024 · The price for Newly-initiated monthly subs will increase to $20/month from September 1 until early November once the election is resolved.
[127]
Silver Bulletin | Nate Silver | Substack
Essays and analysis about elections, media, sports, poker, and all the other things I care about. Click to read Silver Bulletin, a Substack publication with ...Trump Approval Dashboard · Presidential election forecast · Models and Forecasts
[128]
Models & Forecasts | Silver Bulletin | Nate Silver | Substack
Silver Bulletin's models, forecasts, and polling averages. Click to read Silver Bulletin, a Substack publication with hundreds of thousands of subscribers.Missing: growth | Show results with:growth
[129]
Always. Be. Blogging. - by Nate Silver
Nov 22, 2024 · I wanted to share a few tips about my philosophy and take you behind the scenes of the Silver Bulletin writing process.
[130]
SBSQ #11b: On the future of the newsletter — and the sports models
Aug 18, 2024 · We'll take a quick question about the book and then a longer one about the future of the newsletter and the sports models.
[131]
2025 March Madness Predictions - by Nate Silver
Mar 16, 2025 · Silver Bulletin odds and bracket projections for March Madness, the men's NCAA basketball tournament.
[132]
Trump Approval Rating: Latest Polls | Silver Bulletin
See the latest data on President Donald Trump's job approval rating and popularity, updated daily with polling averages, graphs, and commentary from Nate ...Pollster Ratings · How popular is Donald Trump? · How popular is Elon Musk?
[133]
https://x.com/NateSilver538/status/1822077451620474980
[134]
Risky Business Podcast - Nate Silver & Maria Konnikova
He has over $800,000 in lifetime poker tournament winnings and his new book, On the Edge, is about gambling and risk. Risky Business is a co-production of ...
[135]
Risky Business with Nate Silver and Maria Konnikova - Podcast
Risky Business is a weekly podcast about making better decisions. The hosts, Maria Konnikova and Nate Silver, are both journalists who moonlight as high-stakes ...Missing: 2023 | Show results with:2023
[136]
Lessons from the Final Table | Risky Business with Nate Silver and ...
Maria Konnikova, co-host of the Risky Business podcast, is the author, most recently, of The Biggest Bluff, a New York Times bestseller, one of the Times' 100 ...
[137]
113 predictions for Trump's second term - by Nate Silver
Jan 26, 2025 · I'm here to give you some predictions for what Trump's second term will bring. A lot of them, in fact: 113.
[138]
Tariffs, Tariffs, Tariffs - Risky Business with Nate Silver and Maria ...
Listen to this episode from Risky Business with Nate Silver and Maria Konnikova on Spotify. Nate and Maria discuss Trump's latest round of tariffs.
[139]
The Degenerate Gambler's Guide to the Election | Risky Business ...
Nate and Maria give a degenerate gambler's guide to the election, covering everything from Nate's $100k gamble on Florida to listener-inspired prop bets.
[140]
Nate Silver sees 'hidden good news' for Democrats in 2024 results
Nov 12, 2024 · Pollster Nate Silver said he believes there is “hidden good news” for Democrats in the 2024 election results, despite the party wondering ...Missing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
[141]
Nate Silver | Poker Players | PokerNews
He played poker for a living between 2004 and 2006 before moving on to a new career path. In 2008, Silver launched FiveThirtyEight and gained notoriety in the ...
[142]
Nate Silver - Hendon Mob Poker Database
Nate Silver's Results, Stats, Gallery & Pictures. AKA Nathaniel Silver. ... 56th World Series of Poker - WSOP 2025, Las Vegas, 220th, $ 8,357, 130.85, 130.85. 02 ...Missing: career | Show results with:career
[143]
Nate Silver - Poker Tournament Results - Card Player
Nate Silver poker tournament results, including recent cashes, lifetime winnings, WSOP and WPT stats.
[144]
Got Election Anxiety? Nate Silver Can't Save You.
Oct 31, 2024 · I mean, I had a background in poker and forecasting ... If your odds are twice what the consensus is, then that's a high expected value wager.
[145]
Bluffing with Nate Silver | Lemonada Media
Nate Silver is a risk taker. On top of boldly and publicly forecasting elections as part of his website FiveThirtyEight, he's a regular poker player, ...
[146]
Predicting the future - ESPN
Dec 4, 2012 · In ESPN The Magazine, Nate Silver, oracle of sports and politics, tells Peter Keating about the difference between predicting the MLB MVP ...Missing: influence | Show results with:influence
[147]
Silver sheds light on prognosticating in new book - MLB.com
PECOTA was designed to compare baseball prospects to each other and to forecast their future, while FiveThirtyEight strives to make sense of the many political ...<|separator|>
[148]
https://www.natesilver.net/p/the-nba-gambling-scandal-explained
[149]
Nate Silver - X
Jul 1, 2025 · This new amendment to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act would end professional gambling in the US and hurt casual gamblers, too.<|separator|>
[150]
This Year's World Series Of Poker Is Different | Risky Business with ...
Nate and Maria are back in Las Vegas for the World Series of Poker 2025. They discuss a key rule change that will have a major effect on their strategy.Missing: career | Show results with:career
[151]
4 Lessons from The Signal and The Noise | Nate Silver - Jack Yang
Oct 18, 2020 · The book talks about common mistakes that people make, how to make better predictions, as well as some case studies on how the theories can be applied.
[152]
How to become a superforecaster - The Correspondent
May 27, 2020 · Philip Tetlock writes about it in his book, Superforecasting (with Dan Gardner), and data journalist Nate Silver uses it in The Signal and the ...
[153]
The expert class is failing, and so is Biden's presidency - Silver Bulletin
Dec 2, 2024 · Of course, the experts have gotten their comeuppance. Because it was better predicted by polls and because he had already been president, Donald ...
[154]
America's No 1 pollster Nate Silver on his US election bets - The Times
Aug 13, 2024 · He lives there with his partner, Robert Gauldin, a graphic designer whom he met almost 20 years ago on the Chicago gay scene. “He was dating ...
[155]
Nate Silver: "Go to a state school"
Silver is a gay man who does not have children although he is in a committed relationship. But at age 46 I doubt kids are in his future. In other words, he ...
[156]
Risky Business with Nate Silver and Maria Konnikova - Podcast
Nate is the founder and former editor-in-chief of FiveThirtyEight, and one of the country's leading election forecasters. He has over $800,000 in lifetime poker ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[157]
FiveThirtyEight's Nate Silver Takes His Poker Seriously
The problem with playing poker as a hobby is that poker is a lot of work. A day like this, 10 hours since I bought in during Level 1, it's a lot of work.Missing: reading | Show results with:reading
[158]
Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) / Posts / X
Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) - Posts - New Book, On The Edge, #5 NYT Bestseller! | X (formerly Twitter)
[159]
Nate Silver on X: "I go to Kansas City once or twice a year and eat ...
Mar 4, 2018 · I go to Kansas City once or twice a year and eat more BBQ on those trips than in the entirely of the rest of the year in New York, where I live.
[160]
SBSQ #16: Nate's Incomplete Guide to Vegas - Silver Bulletin
Dec 26, 2024 · I've spent about 9 months of my life in Las Vegas, most of that fairly recent, longer than any place I've officially lived. For most of that, I' ...
[161]
Nov. 1: The Simple Case for Saying Obama Is the Favorite
Nov 2, 2012 · If you take the polls at face value, then the popular vote might be a tossup, but the Electoral College favors Mr. Obama. So you have to make ...
[162]
Statistician Nate Silver Scores Big On Election Night - NPR
Nov 7, 2012 · We profile the year's "it" prognosticator, Nate Silver, the baseball guru turned electoral college whiz.
[163]
Twitter, Elon and the Indigo Blob - by Nate Silver
Jul 31, 2023 · The line between expertise and politics has become increasingly blurry. The demise of "Old Twitter" could help to reverse that.Missing: evolving | Show results with:evolving
[164]
SBSQ #23: Does the media really have a liberal bias? - Silver Bulletin
Aug 14, 2025 · Somewhat liberal. Source: Pew Research for audience shares; ChatGPT, Grok, Claude, Google Gemini and Nate's estimates for political orientation.
[165]
It's 2004 all over again - by Nate Silver
Nov 12, 2024 · I wish I could give you a crystal-clear sense of what Democrats felt like in 2004 after George W. Bush was elected to a second term.Missing: early critique
[166]
Do Polls Underestimate Trump's Popularity? - Nate Silver - YouTube
Oct 16, 2024 · Chris and Nate Silver discuss Trump's popularity in the upcoming election. Have we underestimated Trump's popularity in this election ...Missing: skepticism elite
[167]
Polymarket taps election statistician Nate Silver as advisor - The Block
Jul 16, 2024 · The founder of FiveThirtyEight said the investor class will increasingly watch betting markets.
[168]
Opinion | Nate Silver: My Gut Says Trump, but Don't Trust Anyone's ...
Oct 23, 2024 · Since the debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, that is more or less exactly where my model has had it. Yet when I deliver this ...
[169]
Nate Silver on “Blueskyism” - Why Evolution Is True
Sep 10, 2025 · Silver has also criticized “the progressive political class ... Or center-left media institutions like the New York Times, which are ...
[170]
Nate Silver on AI, Politics, and Power - ChinaTalk
Sep 18, 2025 · Nate Silver writes Silver Bulletin and is the author of On the Edge: The Art of Risking Everything, now in paperback with a new foreword.
[171]
We shouldn't rely on markets to tame Trump - Silver Bulletin
Apr 10, 2025 · We shouldn't rely on markets to tame Trump. Why it's premature for the “Trump put” to take a victory lap. Nate Silver's avatar · Nate Silver.Missing: pro- views
[172]
Nate Silver | 2014 Honorees - Amherst College
Nate Silver is a statistician and writer best known for his analysis of baseball and elections. Currently, he is editor-in-chief of ESPN's “FiveThirtyEight” ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
[173]
simple methods and ensemble forecasting of elections - SAS Blogs
Nov 8, 2012 · Examines six types of election forecasting methods, and how they fared in the 2012 US Presidential election between Barack Obama & Mitt ...
[174]
528 Nate Silver - Innovate Tech Hub
Silver's pioneering work in baseball forecasting with PECOTA set a new standard for sports analytics. His innovative approach to player evaluation and ...
[175]
Nate Silver joins prediction market startup Polymarket - Axios
Jul 16, 2024 · Polymarket, a venture-backed predictions market, has hired statistician and journalist Nate Silver as an adviser while it looks to build out more forecasts ...<|separator|>
[176]
Are You a Superforecaster? What Good Decision-makers Have in ...
Mar 7, 2017 · Nate Silver gave some of the most accurate forecasts about whether Donald Trump would win. His estimates were around a 67% chance that Hillary ...
[177]
Nate Silver: 'Punditry is fundamentally useless' - POLITICO
Dec 13, 2012 · It may also overlook the degree to which Silver, though primarily a statistician, also engages in punditry in order to speculate on outcomes.Missing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
[178]
There Really Was A Liberal Media Bubble | FiveThirtyEight
Mar 10, 2017 · Groupthink produced a failure of the “wisdom of crowds” and an underestimate of Trump's chances. By Nate Silver ... bias,” which he wrote in the ...<|separator|>
[179]
It's time to come to grips with AI - by Nate Silver
Jan 27, 2025 · Some of the AI early adopter types I spoke with for my book thought AI would be a significant axis of political conflict in the 2024 election.
[180]
Prediction Markets: How Reliable Are They Really? (Part 1) - Forbes
Oct 23, 2024 · Prediction markets are another finance-theory-inspired innovation, bringing the power of a market mechanism to bear on questions concerning the likelihood of ...