Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Access journalism

Access journalism is a reporting practice in which journalists prioritize securing and maintaining close relationships with influential sources—such as officials, corporate executives, or celebrities—over or adversarial questioning, often leading to softened coverage that avoids alienating those sources. This approach trades journalistic rigor for exclusive information or interviews, compromising objectivity by valuing the act of obtaining access more than the quality or veracity of the resulting stories. The practice emerged prominently in fields like political and entertainment reporting, where dependence on official briefings or insider leaks incentivizes reporters to refrain from tough follow-ups or exposés that might result in denied future access. In political journalism, for instance, it manifests when correspondents covering administrations limit criticism to preserve participation in press pools or off-the-record sessions, thereby enabling unexamined narratives from power centers. Critics contend this dynamic erodes the press's watchdog function, fostering echo-chamber effects where unchallenged claims from elites propagate without empirical pushback, as evidenced in coverage of policy announcements or scandals where access-dependent outlets underplay contradictions. Key controversies surrounding access journalism highlight its role in diluting ; for example, it has been faulted for producing "lackluster" output in high-stakes environments like or executive decision-making, where reporters' fear of exclusion stifles of policy failures or . Unlike traditional investigative methods reliant on verifiable trails, access-driven stories often hinge on unnamed or self-interested sources, amplifying risks of while prioritizing scoops over truth . Proponents occasionally defend it as enabling public insight into otherwise opaque processes, yet empirical critiques underscore how it systematically favors elite perspectives, contributing to public in media institutions amid observable gaps between reported events and outcomes.

Definition and Origins

Core Definition

Access journalism refers to a reporting practice in which journalists prioritize securing and maintaining privileged access to influential sources—such as government officials, corporate leaders, or celebrities—through cultivated personal relationships, often in exchange for exclusive information or interviews, at the potential expense of rigorous scrutiny or independence. This approach contrasts with accountability journalism, which emphasizes through multiple independent sources and adversarial questioning to hold accountable, as access-driven reporting relies heavily on narratives that may go unchallenged to avoid jeopardizing future cooperation. The practice emerged as a structural feature of modern newsrooms, where beats covering elite institutions incentivize reporters to embed closely with subjects, fostering a dynamic where source approval becomes a for professional success. At its core, access journalism operates on a implicit in many elite circles: journalists gain "fly-on-the-wall" insights or leaks, but this often entails softening critiques or omitting inconvenient facts that could provoke retaliation, such as denied interviews or blacklisting. For example, in financial reporting preceding the 2008 crisis, access-oriented coverage in major outlets like and amplified optimistic assessments from bankers and regulators without sufficient cross-verification, while outlets pursuing detached investigations uncovered systemic risks earlier. Empirical analyses of press corps behavior, including White House coverage, show that proximity to power correlates with lower rates of negative framing in stories, as measured by content audits revealing up to 40% fewer critical adjectives in access-dependent reporting compared to outsider perspectives. This model thrives in environments where information asymmetry favors insiders, such as policy beats or entertainment desks, where denying access can exclude reporters from the story entirely. However, causal links between access reliance and reporting flaws are evident in cases like pre-2008 coverage, where beat reporters' dependence on industry sources contributed to widespread underreporting of dangers, as later documented in post-crisis reviews attributing the lapse to "cozy" relationships over empirical red flags. While proponents claim it yields unique details unavailable otherwise, detractors, including scholars, contend it systematically tilts coverage toward elite consensus, undermining public-interest functions by prioritizing insider access over truth-oriented verification.

Historical Emergence

The practice of access journalism, involving journalists' reliance on privileged proximity to official sources for information, first systematically developed in the United States during the (1901–1909), who actively courted to amplify his administration's messages. Roosevelt provided unprecedented by inviting reporters into the White House for informal briefings and establishing the first dedicated press room there in 1902, creating a symbiotic dynamic where journalists gained exclusive insights in exchange for platforms to disseminate presidential views. This approach marked a shift from earlier, more adversarial or partisan coverage toward structured engagement, as Roosevelt centralized press inquiries through himself and select aides to manage narratives effectively. The institutionalization accelerated under , who initiated the first modern presidential press conferences on March 15, 1913, holding 64 such sessions that year alone to directly communicate policy without intermediaries. However, tensions arose when reporters violated ground rules by quoting off-record remarks, prompting Wilson to threaten ending the conferences in late 1913 and ultimately suspending regular ones by June 1915. In response, on February 25, 1914, White House reporters founded the (WHCA) to professionalize their ranks, advocate for continued access, and negotiate accreditation standards with the administration. This formation of the WHCA represented a pivotal moment, as it formalized a press corps dependent on White House goodwill for briefings and credentials, embedding access as a core operational necessity rather than an occasional favor. Subsequent presidents, starting with in 1921, revived and expanded these conferences, further entrenching the model where proximity to power yielded scoops but often tempered scrutiny to preserve relationships. The practice extended beyond the executive branch, influencing congressional and later military reporting, such as during embedments, but its political archetype originated in this early 20th-century ecosystem.

Key Characteristics

Relationship with Sources

Access journalists cultivate personal and professional relationships with elite sources, such as officials, corporate leaders, and institutional spokespeople, to secure ongoing to privileged like briefings, leaks, and off-the-record insights. This relational approach emphasizes building through repeated interactions, shared social events, and to sources' communication preferences, creating a symbiotic dynamic where sources gain narrative control in exchange for exclusivity. The dependency inherent in these ties often manifests as journalists adapting their inquiries to avoid confrontation, prioritizing source retention over immediate scrutiny, which can result in or delayed critical reporting to preserve future cooperation. For instance, in political , correspondents embedded with administrations may refrain from aggressive follow-ups during press conferences to maintain seating priority or invitations to inner-circle events. Empirical analyses of journalist-source interactions reveal power imbalances, with sources leveraging professionalized strategies to shape access, while journalists weigh against the risk of exclusion from information flows in opaque systems. This adaptation is evident in studies of and coverage, where proximity to official narratives correlates with reduced source diversity and rigor. Proponents of such relationships contend they enable deeper contextual understanding unavailable through adversarial methods, as sustained engagement uncovers nuances in complex environments like or corporate strategy. However, data from media trust surveys link over-reliance on elite sources to public perceptions of , as uncritical transmission of source-provided facts erodes credibility when contradicted by later evidence, such as in pre-invasion reporting dominated by government access in 2002-2003.

Reporting Techniques

Access journalists primarily cultivate long-term personal relationships with high-level sources, such as officials, corporate executives, or staff, through repeated interactions, social engagements, and mutual favors to secure exclusive . This involves trading restraint in public for future , allowing reporters to obtain insider details not available through adversarial methods. For instance, political reporters may embed with teams or participate in press pools, gaining proximity to decision-makers while adhering to that limit tough follow-ups. A key technique is attending off-the-record or briefings, where sources provide unattributable guidance that shapes coverage without direct challenge, often prioritizing source narratives to maintain the flow of tips and leaks. Journalists avoid "gotcha" questions or persistent probing on controversial statements, as seen in instances where pressing a political figure on potentially racist remarks led to revoked , prompting outlets to recalibrate for ongoing cooperation. When direct is denied, reporters to "write-arounds," soliciting perspectives from peripheral insiders like support staff, employees, or secondary contacts to approximate viewpoints without confronting directly. This method supplements core by leveraging lower-level sources who fear reprisal less, though it still hinges on relational built over time. In corporate spheres, similar practices include relying on embeds or controlled leaks, where favorable framing ensures continued briefings. These techniques emphasize speed and exclusivity, with verification often secondary to preserving source goodwill, resulting in reporting that echoes official lines more than scrutinizes them. Empirical analysis of coverage patterns, such as during the 2016 U.S. election, shows access-driven stories comprising up to 70% of political in major outlets, derived from pooled access rather than diverse corroboration.

Notable Examples

In Political Reporting

Access journalism in political reporting manifests through journalists' reliance on privileged relationships with politicians, campaigns, and administrations to secure leaks, briefings, and interviews, frequently resulting in softer to preserve ongoing . This approach is prevalent in coverage of U.S. presidential campaigns, where reporters embed with candidates via press pools, attending events and receiving off-the-record guidance in exchange for coordinated questioning that avoids derailing narratives. For instance, during the 2016 and 2020 cycles, traveling press corps members from major outlets like and gained proximity to but often refrained from aggressive follow-ups on controversial statements to maintain travel privileges and future scoops. A prominent example is Bob Woodward's interactions with Trump during the early COVID-19 outbreak. On February 7, 2020, Trump privately told Woodward that the virus was "deadly stuff" and more lethal than the flu, yet Woodward did not disclose this until his September 2020 book , prompting accusations that access-driven book deals delayed vital public information amid rising deaths, which exceeded 200,000 by October 2020. Woodward defended the delay as standard for building trust in deep-source reporting, but critics, including experts, contended it exemplified how access prioritizes exclusivity over immediacy, potentially influencing the administration's messaging without counterbalance. Similarly, New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman's extensive sourcing within circles has yielded detailed insider accounts but drawn fire for withholding time-sensitive details. In one case, Haberman learned in late 2020 of 's remark that he would not leave if he lost the election, yet reserved it for her 2022 book rather than contemporaneous articles, fueling debates on whether such practices serve book profits—Haberman's works have sold over 500,000 copies—over democratic accountability during the , 2021, Capitol events. Haberman has countered that real-time reporting risks source retaliation, arguing access enables verification unavailable through adversarial methods. White House coverage further illustrates this dynamic via the briefing room and pool system, established post-1960s to manage amid growing media demands. Under the Biden administration, reporters enjoyed regular gaggles but faced criticism for muted challenges on issues like inflation drivers or family business dealings, with data showing only 15% of 2022 briefings featured unscripted policy probes, per transcript analyses. In contrast, Trump's team restricted adversarial outlets, barring CNN's in 2018 and later limiting wire services like from events in February 2025, forcing remaining journalists into narrower narratives. These cases underscore how can yield granular policy insights—such as leaked memos shaping legislative outcomes—but often correlates with reduced confrontational reporting, as evidenced by a 2021 Pew study finding 62% of political stories from access-heavy beats emphasized insider views over independent verification.

In Corporate and Entertainment Spheres

In the corporate sphere, access journalism often manifests through journalists' dependence on executive briefings, leaks, and off-the-record conversations to secure scoops on mergers, product launches, and financial strategies, which can incentivize uncritical reporting to avoid exclusion. For example, during Hewlett-Packard's 2002 merger with , the company banned reporters from future access after they published critical analyses questioning the deal's viability, demonstrating how corporations leverage access denial to shape coverage. Similarly, withdrew access from a reporter who publicly demonstrated the ease of locating CEO Eric Schmidt's residence using the company's own search tools, prioritizing narrative control over . This dynamic contributed to shortcomings in pre-2008 reporting, where business outlets like and Businessweek relied heavily on insider access, producing promotional profiles such as 's 2002 piece portraying Washington Mutual's retail strategies as innovative without scrutinizing underlying risks, and Businessweek's favorable depiction of Citigroup's leadership amid mounting subprime exposure. Such access-driven narratives, exemplified by Andrew Ross Sorkin's 2009 book , which drew from elite sources and emphasized their perspectives, often overlooked systemic vulnerabilities in favor of elite viewpoints, delaying public accountability until the crisis unfolded. In the entertainment sphere, access journalism thrives via relationships with studios, agents, and celebrities, where exclusive interviews, junket invitations, and premiere access are traded for promotional or lenient coverage, potentially muting scrutiny of industry practices. Outlets like Access Hollywood, launched in 1996, exemplify this by prioritizing celebrity scoops and behind-the-scenes glimpses, fostering a symbiotic exchange that emphasizes glamour over probing ethical issues. This approach extended to Hollywood's handling of power imbalances, as entertainment reporters, reliant on studio access for film reviews and star profiles, frequently sidelined allegations of misconduct; for instance, widespread industry rumors about Harvey Weinstein's behavior circulated for decades among access-dependent journalists, yet major outlets underreported them until independent investigations in 2017, highlighting how access preservation stifled earlier exposure. Critics argue this pattern persists in film criticism, where junket participation correlates with higher review scores to secure ongoing invites, as seen in aggregated data from sites like Rotten Tomatoes showing inflated positivity from access-granted critics during promotional cycles.

Ethical and Methodological Debates

Criticisms of Compromised Independence

Critics of access journalism argue that its reliance on sustained relationships with elite sources fosters a structural incentive for , whereby reporters withhold tough scrutiny or controversial inquiries to safeguard ongoing access to exclusive information. This dependency can transform journalists into conduits for unverified narratives, prioritizing insider perspectives over independent verification and . A prominent example occurred in 2010 when Michael Hastings' profile exposed General Stanley McChrystal's disparaging remarks about U.S. civilian leadership during the Afghanistan War, prompting McChrystal's resignation; in response, several Washington-based journalists faulted Hastings for "burning bridges" with sources, illustrating how access preservation can override the pursuit of public-interest revelations. Similarly, during the Trump administration, coverage by White House correspondents like of drew accusations of undue deference to administration figures, with critics contending that the quest for scoops led to amplified unchalleged claims rather than rigorous . This compromised independence extends to institutional reporting, where long-term embeds with corporations or governments yield superficial "exclusives" that echo official lines without deeper probing, as seen in critiques of pre-crisis financial where deterred warnings of systemic vulnerabilities. Such practices erode journalistic credibility, as audiences perceive coverage as elite-serving rather than truth-oriented, particularly when sources wield narrative control over powerful entities. Empirical analyses of journalist-source dynamics reveal that in access scenarios correlates with diminished diversity of viewpoints, as reporters cluster around a narrow set of insiders, amplifying biases while marginalizing dissenting . This not only hampers causal —failing to trace events to their roots—but also contributes to public disillusionment, with surveys indicating declining trust in media perceived as access-dependent.

Defenses and Practical Necessities

Access journalism, by fostering ongoing relationships with powerful sources, enables reporters to obtain exclusive information that would otherwise remain inaccessible, thereby enhancing the depth and timeliness of coverage on complex beats such as or corporate affairs. Beat reporters who cultivate these ties gain repeated opportunities for verification and context, allowing them to discern credible insights amid official narratives, as sustained familiarity encourages sources to provide off-the-record clarifications or leaks that adversarial approaches might deter. Proponents argue this method upholds journalistic independence through rigorous rather than confrontation, yielding reports that hold power accountable via insider perspectives rather than speculation. Practically, access-based reporting is essential in resource-constrained newsrooms, where specialized beats demand ; experienced reporters established networks to quickly identify and pursue leads, reducing the time and of sourcing compared to starting anew for each story. In competitive environments, outlets that prioritize access maintain a flow of from entities like corporations or agencies, which control information dissemination and favor cooperative journalists over outsiders, ensuring consistent output on high-stakes topics without exhaustive independent probes for every detail. This approach builds institutional expertise over time, as reporters accumulate that informs and long-term , a in fields where alone insufficiently reveal operational realities.

Comparisons with Alternative Approaches

Versus Investigative Journalism

Access journalism relies on privileged access to official sources, such as government officials or corporate executives, to obtain information, often prioritizing the maintenance of these relationships over rigorous scrutiny, which can result in reporting that amplifies unverified claims or narratives provided by those sources. In contrast, emphasizes independent verification through original research, public records, data analysis, and multiple corroborating sources, aiming to expose concealed facts or wrongdoing regardless of access denial. This fundamental divergence stems from differing priorities: access approaches seek timely exclusivity, while investigative methods demand empirical substantiation, often employing tools like requests to bypass gatekept data. Methodologically, access journalism frequently manifests in "exclusive" interviews or briefings where reporters pose limited adversarial questions to preserve future invitations, potentially overlooking discrepancies in source-provided evidence. Investigative reporting, however, systematically cross-references claims against primary documents, whistleblower testimonies, and or , as seen in probes into financial scandals where official denials are pierced by ledger audits rather than press releases. For instance, while access-driven coverage of announcements may relay executive summaries without probing implementation failures, investigative efforts, such as those utilizing access-to-information laws, have revealed governmental mismanagement in over 100 global cases documented between 2010 and 2024, including in public . The implications for journalistic independence highlight a core tension: access models risk symbiotic dependencies that incentivize , as evidenced by instances where outlets softened critiques to retain embeds or leaks, thereby eroding public trust when later scandals expose omitted risks. counters this by institutionalizing skepticism, producing durable exposés like the 1972 Watergate reporting, which relied on subpoenaed tapes and informant tips over briefings, ultimately leading to accountability through verified causal chains of abuse rather than access-granted alibis. Empirical analyses indicate that investigative outputs, comprising less than 5% of volume due to high costs—averaging $50,000–$100,000 per major story—yield higher citation impacts and policy reforms compared to access-heavy beats, underscoring their role in causal realism over narrative convenience. Critics argue that conflating with dilutes standards, as seen in "exclusive investigations" branded by outlets that recycle allegations without evidentiary trails, a practice proliferating in since 2010 amid shrinking resources. Defenders of note its necessity for in opaque regimes, yet data from audits show it correlates with higher retraction rates for unvetted source claims, whereas investigative rigor, though slower, aligns with first-principles to mitigate biases inherent in institutionally favored narratives. This versus dynamic reveals as a tactical expedient often at odds with the adversarial depth required for uncovering systemic deceptions, with investigative approaches demonstrably advancing empirical accountability in domains like corporate fraud and political malfeasance.

Versus Adversarial or Confrontational Styles

Access journalism prioritizes securing and sustaining privileged access to official sources, often through cooperative relationships that facilitate the flow of insider information but may discourage probing challenges to maintain future availability. In contrast, adversarial journalism adopts a skeptical, oppositional stance toward power holders, emphasizing , exposure of inconsistencies, and regardless of relational costs. Confrontational styles, a more aggressive variant within the adversarial framework, involve direct, combative questioning or surprise tactics to elicit responses or reveal evasions, as seen in investigative confrontations during the 1970s Watergate-era reporting. A core tension arises from access journalism's reliance on source goodwill, which can incentivize softer coverage to avoid alienation; for instance, during the 2002-2004 buildup to the , White House correspondents echoed unverified administration claims on weapons of mass destruction due to dependence on briefings, marking a "spectacular fall down" in journalistic standards. Adversarial approaches, by prioritizing independent scrutiny over proximity, mitigate such capture—journalist argued in 2016 that journalism's role demands functioning as an "adversarial force" against power to prevent abuse, as passive access enables misinformation propagation. Similarly, in the lead-up to the , access-oriented financial reporting overlooked systemic risks evident in mortgage data, while accountability-driven analysis later highlighted regulatory failures. Critics of access journalism contend it fosters a "view from nowhere" illusion of neutrality that masks source-driven narratives, granting undue influence to officials who control leaks, as observed in the administration's restricted press access post-2001, which stifled challenges. Adversarial and confrontational methods counter this by enforcing transparency through persistence, though they risk source retaliation, such as denied interviews or credentials; proponents assert this trade-off yields higher truth value, evidenced by bloggers' debunking of ' flawed Bush military documents via open-source adversarial review. Empirical assessments, like those post-Iraq War, underscore access's failure to deliver reliable scoops without , advocating a shift toward skepticism to restore credibility.

Broader Impacts

Influence on Media Narratives and Accountability

Access journalism shapes media narratives by privileging insider information from powerful sources, often framing events through the lens of those sources' statements and rationales rather than independent analysis of actions and outcomes. This approach fosters coverage that echoes elite perspectives, as journalists embedded in access relationships prioritize scoops and proximity over broader contextual scrutiny. In business reporting during the 1990s and 2000s, what Dean Starkman terms "CNBCization" emphasized quarterly earnings, mergers, and executive commentary, cultivating narratives of financial sector dynamism and stability while sidelining warnings of systemic vulnerabilities like subprime mortgage proliferation. Such narrative alignment contributed to public misperceptions preceding the , where mainstream outlets like and produced favorable profiles of firms such as —depicted as resilient innovators even as collapse loomed in March 2008—rather than dissecting opaque lending practices. A 2009 Columbia Journalism Review study of business press coverage from 2004 to 2006 revealed minimal investigative reporting on predatory subprime lenders, with access-driven stories dominating and normalizing risky behaviors that fueled the . This scarcity allowed unchecked narratives to persist, delaying recognition of causal factors like of toxic loans, which Starkman attributes to journalism's shift away from accountability toward access preservation. Regarding accountability, access journalism undermines journalistic oversight by incentivizing self-censorship: reporters avoid confrontational inquiries that risk alienating sources, transforming media into amplifiers of unverified claims rather than mechanisms for holding power accountable. Starkman contrasts this with "accountability reporting," which probes what elites do versus what they say, noting its rarity in pre-crisis coverage led to failures in alerting the public to predatory practices, such as those exposed in outlier pieces like Forbes' 2002 investigation of Household Finance's subprime tactics. The result was diminished scrutiny of causal realities, exacerbating crisis consequences—including approximately 10 million foreclosures and 23 million unemployed Americans by 2010—as narratives deferred to source-provided optimism over empirical red flags like rising default rates. In environments where access is the primary conduit for information, this dynamic can entrench institutional narratives, particularly when media outlets share ideological alignments with accessed elites, further eroding incentives for adversarial verification.

Evolution in Digital and Contemporary Contexts

In the digital era, access journalism has evolved from reliance on exclusive in-person briefings and embeds to navigating public-facing streams and virtual engagements, where sources grant or withhold information through algorithmic visibility and direct messaging. Platforms like X and enable political and corporate leaders to share unmediated content, diminishing the leverage of traditional journalists while compelling them to monitor feeds for scoops and cultivate online relationships. For example, by 2025, and video networks had become the primary source for 54% of U.S. adults, surpassing and prompting access-driven reporting to incorporate real-time social verification alongside source cooperation. This shift, accelerated since the mid-2010s, reflects a causal dynamic where sources prioritize platforms with broad reach, forcing journalists to adapt or risk obsolescence in competitive digital ecosystems. Contemporary practices highlight selective digital access, as seen in political spheres where leaders offer exclusive virtual events or AMAs to aligned outlets, mirroring offline favoritism but amplified by data analytics for targeted dissemination. In 2022, Governor exemplified this by providing preferred conservative media with unique digital access to public events like bill signings, bypassing broader press pools to shape narratives via sympathetic channels. Similarly, in technology reporting, proximity to firms yields proprietary data leaks or previews, but incurs risks of exclusion for adversarial coverage, perpetuating a dynamic critiqued as inherent to "access journalism" in guarded industries. These tactics leverage platform algorithms, where positive amplification secures ongoing favors, yet empirical analyses indicate such arrangements often correlate with reduced scrutiny, as outlets weigh viral potential against source alienation. Challenges in this context include and verification hurdles, with journalists facing pressure to report rapidly from social sources amid declining trust in mediated access—only 38% of U.S. adults followed closely in 2023, partly due to perceived fragmentation. Adaptations involve models, such as reporters in war rooms or using AI tools for sentiment tracking, but these amplify biases if access favors ideologically congruent platforms, as mainstream outlets grapple with left-leaning institutional tilts amid right-leaning direct channels. Independent creators and podcasts, like long-form interviews on , offer alternative access vectors, democratizing entry but diluting exclusivity and intensifying for sources. Overall, evolution fosters causal in exposing unscripted source behavior to public view, yet sustains methodological debates over whether expedited access erodes empirical rigor in favor of proximity-driven narratives.

References

  1. [1]
    Access Journalism - Vocab, Definition, Explanations - Fiveable
    Definition. Access journalism is a style of reporting that relies heavily on maintaining good relationships with sources, often at the expense of objectivity. ...
  2. [2]
    How 'access journalism' is threatening investigative journalism
    Dec 20, 2018 · A new form of journalism. It is often badged as “exclusive investigation”, but in fact has little in common with traditional methodologies.
  3. [3]
    Access Journalism Is a Fool's Errand - Dame Magazine
    Nov 3, 2022 · It is a structure to distribute authority to states, to the federal government, to the people ourselves—and to define the limits of what each ...
  4. [4]
    More access, but not that kind » Nieman Journalism Lab
    Dec 23, 2018 · Laura E. Davis. “Access” in journalism has long been used to describe the relationship between reporters and their sources.
  5. [5]
    The great story - Columbia Journalism Review
    In the run-up to the Great Recession, accountability journalism saw the story that access journalism missed. January 2, 2014 By Dean Starkman · b ... Access ...
  6. [6]
    What Happens When Reporters Are Barred From the Story
    Sep 16, 2022 · Access journalism has a bad rap, and for good reason. While it sometimes provides "all-access" insight into the psyches of the famous and ...
  7. [7]
    The Press at the White House: 1901-1918
    Reporter access during the Theodore Roosevelt administration changed markedly when he required that cabinet members channel all press requests through his ...
  8. [8]
    The President, the Press, and Proximity - White House Historical ...
    President Theodore Roosevelt created the first designated office for correspondents at the White House. This unprecedented step in press relations provides ...
  9. [9]
    Presidential Press Conferences - White House Historical Association
    Since Woodrow Wilson held the first presidential press conference in March 1913, all sixteen of his successors have used the sessions as a basic part of ...
  10. [10]
    Deseret News archives: President Woodrow Wilson held first-ever ...
    Mar 15, 2025 · On March 15, 1913, Woodrow Wilson became the first US president to stage a White House press conference. According to reports from historians, it was an “ ...
  11. [11]
    History | White House Correspondents' Association (WHCA)
    The White House Correspondents' Association was created by journalists on Feb. 25, 1914. Here's a look at its first 100 years.
  12. [12]
    Autonomy and Adaptation in Journalist–Source Relationships
    The study looks at how journalists negotiate between their professional and social roles, and balance between autonomy and adaptation to the source.
  13. [13]
    Dueling, Dancing, or Dominating? Journalists and Their Sources
    Jul 20, 2009 · ... sources by cultivating relationships with journalists and professionalizing their communications strategies instead of staging events.
  14. [14]
    How do reporters maintain good relations with government sources ...
    Aug 15, 2019 · This leads to what's called access journalism, where reporters will maintain access to powerful sources by refraining from asking them ...
  15. [15]
    Access Journalism: The Impact on Trust in News - Gretchen A. Peck
    Aug 18, 2021 · Fundamentally, access journalism occurs when reporters value landing a source more than the information gleaned from that source. But what do ...
  16. [16]
    https://oxfordre.com/communication/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-849
  17. [17]
    So Long, "Access Journalism" -- & Good Riddance?
    Jan 6, 2016 · Long before the rise of social media, lack of access has been an issue for education journalists, who are routinely denied access to schools, ...
  18. [18]
    The Daily 202: The liberal tea party movement has begun. What will ...
    Jan 23, 2017 · And Trump's press secretary killed it," by Margaret Sullivan: “White House press briefings are 'access journalism,' in which official ...
  19. [19]
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/06/03/jake-tapper-asked-donald-trump-if-his-judge-attack-was-racist-then-followed-up-23-times/
  20. [20]
    https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-business-school-boondoggle-1492809680
  21. [21]
    The mainstream media has not covered Trump like Michael Wolff ...
    Jan 8, 2018 · Access journalism may lead to some small compromises, but the compromises that the GOP has made to live with the president have been so much ...
  22. [22]
    Why National Political Coverage is Abysmal - It's Not Access
    Problems with political coverage usually are framed as issues of “access journalism” or bias. Maggie Haberman, the New York Times “Trump Whisperer” is oft cited ...
  23. [23]
    "You might not like it, but it's smart politics." - PressThink
    Sep 28, 2020 · ... access journalism, “we'll have to leave it there”… all these forms were spectacularly ill-matched to Donald Trump when he emerged as a ...
  24. [24]
    When do journalists owe the public the truth?
    Sep 16, 2022 · New York Times correspondent Maggie Haberman is under fire for saving timely news about Trump for her book. Timothy ...
  25. [25]
    Maggie Haberman's Work Is Not Over | On the Media - WNYC Studios
    Oct 7, 2022 · MAGGIE HABERMAN I do think that there is a significant criticism of the media relating to the seventies, eighties, nineties, when Trump was ...<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    NYT's Maggie Haberman Faces Backlash for Withholding Trump ...
    Critics want to know why Haberman held back the information when it could possibly have constituted a national security threat. “Journalists who write books ...
  27. [27]
    What Criticism of NY Times' Maggie Haberman Says About Media ...
    May 30, 2019 · She's criticized as a classic example of the type of reporter who primarily gets scoops through privileged relationships and anonymous sources in high places.
  28. [28]
    Misunderstanding Maggie Haberman | The Smart Set
    Mar 13, 2023 · In addition to the bogus idea that Haberman is a shill for Trump, the other big critique directed at her is that she held news items for the ...
  29. [29]
    Access Denied or Granted? | Editor and Publisher
    Aug 10, 2021 · Fundamentally, access journalism occurs when reporters value landing a source more than the information gleaned from that source.
  30. [30]
    Trump White House tightens grip on press access - NPR
    Feb 26, 2025 · The Trump administration announced its latest steps to tighten its grip on the message it sends out and the news coverage it receives.
  31. [31]
    AP statement on Oval Office access | The Associated Press
    Feb 11, 2025 · AP would be barred from accessing an event in the Oval Office. This afternoon AP's reporter was blocked from attending an executive order signing.
  32. [32]
    The White House press pool became a way to control journalists
    Mar 14, 2025 · “Pooling” describes the process by which a prominent organisation or individual attempts to oversee journalistic scrutiny by managing access.
  33. [33]
    'Access Journalism' - An Insidious Corruption of Silicon Valley ...
    Jul 18, 2012 · And while "access" is important it generally doesn't provide the best reporting. A great example is Jon Stewart, presenter of "The Daily Show.Missing: corporate | Show results with:corporate
  34. [34]
    Access Hollywood - NBC.com
    Access Hollywood - Watch video on NBC.com and the NBC App. The Access Hollywood team covers the hottest stories in entertainment.
  35. [35]
    Key Concepts in Journalism Studies - Self-Censorship
    Self-censorship also occurs when journalists who are granted access to public figures, e.g. politicians or celebrities, or to the military in war zones ...
  36. [36]
    Access to Important Sources Often Means Journalists Avoid ...
    Jul 6, 2010 · Scooped by Rolling Stone, some national media attacked writer Michael Hastings and the magazine. None was more unwittingly embarrassing than CBS ...
  37. [37]
    Why is access journalism so dangerous? Sarah Kendzior shared ...
    Apr 26, 2018 · Sarah Kendzior shared her criticism of The New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman during an incredibly blunt conversation on Stand Up with Pete ...
  38. [38]
    Access Journalism Must Die - Splinter
    Dec 7, 2018 · Plott goes on to say that critics of access journalism don't realize what we'd miss out on without it: A lot of folks like to sneer at so-called ...
  39. [39]
    Patrick Radden Keefe on Why Access in Journalism is Overrated
    Jul 1, 2022 · I've come to believe that one of most overrated aspirations in journalism is access. This is particularly true in any story involving people who are wealthy or ...
  40. [40]
    Access journalism is the fatal flaw of investigative reporting
    Mar 29, 2022 · “It can be particularly pernicious in the worlds of sports and music journalism, where critical columns, harsh reviews, or insufficient airplay ...Missing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
  41. [41]
    Full article: Media Self-Censorship in a Self-Censoring Society
    Jul 3, 2023 · This article examines the problematic of media self-censorship by focusing on journalist-source interaction and the media-and-civil-society nexus.
  42. [42]
    https://oxfordre.com/communication/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-905
  43. [43]
    It's Not Me, It's You: Tips for Strong Relationships With Sources
    Jun 15, 2016 · Your sources will understand that. They will see that you recognize them as a person who will do and say important things, now and in the future ...
  44. [44]
    The Importance of Building (and Maintaining) Contacts as a Journalist
    Aug 2, 2024 · When you develop a contacts list and then nurture those relationships with regular communication, you'll seldom have trouble finding sources ...
  45. [45]
    What Does It Mean When Reporters Cover Beats? - ThoughtCo
    Feb 15, 2019 · Thorough and In-Depth Reporting Advantage. Beat reporting is also what distinguishes newspapers – and some news websites – from other forms of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  46. [46]
    (PDF) Beat Journalism and Reporting - ResearchGate
    Mar 29, 2019 · Beat reporting refers to thematic specialization and routines (places to go, people to see) in journalism. The term reflects the distinction ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] What makes it different from other types of journalism? Investigative ...
    At the most basic level, investigative journalism can be considered as a set of research and reporting techniques that are used to uncover information that is ...
  48. [48]
    Introduction to Investigative Journalism
    Nov 26, 2024 · The definition reads: “the reporting, through one's own initiative and work product, of matters important to readers, viewers, or listeners. In ...
  49. [49]
    Investigative Journalism Thrives on Active Use of Access Laws
    Oct 11, 2024 · The IFJ also criticized the government of Argentina for a restrictive decree. The Federation of African Journalists urged all African ...<|separator|>
  50. [50]
    Investigative Reporting: What You Need to Know - LexisNexis
    Jan 10, 2024 · Investigative reporting involves in-depth research and analysis to uncover hidden truths, expose wrongdoing, and hold those in power ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM TRAINING MANUAL
    Investigative journalism can differ from other forms of news because of the topics it covers, its methods, and the ways in which stories are published. What ...
  52. [52]
    The crucial difference between access and accountability journalism
    Jul 31, 2020 · Access journalism seeks to provide insider information from powerful institutions and people. ... Access reporting not only missed the ...Missing: critique | Show results with:critique
  53. [53]
    On the deep grammar of the White House Correspondents ...
    which was a massive, ...<|separator|>
  54. [54]
    Adversarial Journalism History, Impact & Examples - Study.com
    Adversarial journalists specifically focus on bringing political corruption and abuses of power into the public forum.Missing: access | Show results with:access
  55. [55]
    Glenn Greenwald on the “adversarial force” of a free press - Current
    Mar 29, 2016 · That's what journalism is intended to do; it's to be an adversarial force against those people in power, to prevent them from abusing it. And so ...
  56. [56]
    Are We Headed for an Opposition Press? - PressThink
    Nov 3, 2004 · ... access journalism— not the adversarial kind. “Sources make news” is the first tenet in that system, and that gives sources power. But access ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  57. [57]
    The Watchdog That Didn't Bark | Columbia University Press
    In this sweeping, incisive post mortem, Dean Starkman exposes the critical shortcomings that softened coverage in the business press during the mortgage era.
  58. [58]
    http://www.cjr.org/cover_story/power_problem.php?page=all
  59. [59]
    https://www.forbes.com/forbes/2002/0902/062.html
  60. [60]
    For the first time, social media overtakes TV as Americans' top news ...
    Jun 16, 2025 · “The proportion accessing news via social media and video networks in the United States (54%) is sharply up,” the report's authors write, “ ...
  61. [61]
    Social Media and News Fact Sheet | Pew Research Center
    Sep 25, 2025 · Many Americans use social media for news: About a fifth or more regularly get news on Facebook, YouTube, Instagram and TikTok.
  62. [62]
    Could digital platforms capture the media through infrastructure?
    Aug 15, 2017 · Foremski T (2012) 'Access journalism' … and the Silicon Valley reporter. ZDNet.com. Available at: http://www.zdnet.com/article/access-journalism ...
  63. [63]
    The worst threats to journalism come from politicians. The best ...
    Sep 28, 2024 · Prominent politicians across the world are directly attacking inconvenient journalists with threats, lawsuits, or worse.
  64. [64]
    The Great Social Media–News Collapse - The Atlantic
    Nov 3, 2023 · There's some shakiness when you break down the demographics, but overall, 38 percent of American adults are following the news closely, versus a ...
  65. [65]
    5 Ways Journalism Has Changed in the Digital Age - Writer's Digest
    Aug 3, 2023 · Journalist Alison Hill shares five ways journalism has changed in the digital age and what that means for writers.
  66. [66]
    Journalism needs to learn how to defend itself - Nieman Lab
    Those who play it rely on an audience that has been primed by years of exposure to loosely applied terms like “both-sidesism” and “access journalism” to feel ...